{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":359,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":359,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"6aa78d8d6ad3","filters":{"topic":"Psychology of Social Influence"}},"results":[{"id":"W2114116188","doi":"10.1177/1745691610369469","title":"Renovating the Pyramid of Needs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Pyramid (geometry); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1409476230298466,"gpt":0.5268710894059402,"spread":0.3859234663760935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006323478,0.000372441,0.0009955545,0.0004289123,0.00194105,0.0001617217,0.004481002,0.0006829302,0.000343176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005224423,0.0002206797,0.0004357685,0.005974372,0.02558896,0.0002362608,0.0001945328,0.001964206,0.0001836486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003022326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004675523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002338291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955097,0.0005650431,0.0006326862,0.001127012,0.001284316,0.0008811985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962759,0.001241728,0.0008057411,0.001052079,0.000397224,0.0002273007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006467253,0.0002174832,0.000007608603,0.00004364856,0.00001261735,0.000002646555,0.01420586,1.274181e-7,0.00001626289,0.2494112,0.000275659,0.7358004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007036432,0.0002058374,0.0002464686,0.0007458181,0.00004439249,0.000006963191,0.01444868,1.63916e-7,7.496635e-7,0.004806129,0.979098,0.0003264938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000743705,0.7240251,0.00001340976,0.001283512,0.001666896,0.0008054781,0.00001173791,0.0001168005,0.2713334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005918373,0.9921058,0.0004303784,0.0003272798,0.0005497839,0.00007235194,6.61316e-7,0.00001827131,0.0005770324],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105527445","doi":"10.1086/432230","title":"The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":540,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Social influence; Social psychology; Marketing; Business; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1561962654053124,"gpt":0.4944339712623292,"spread":0.3382377058570168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01146949,0.00007663536,0.0002606018,0.0002320916,0.0008111292,0.0000787637,0.001225271,0.0001558552,0.00008631697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005367661,0.00005901635,0.000102595,0.0008623686,0.004386301,0.0005285137,0.00009067178,0.001129361,0.00003959165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001980943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00118089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001401052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006524381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954074,0.001654952,0.0006635769,0.0001290826,0.001565435,0.000579551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953338,0.002350135,0.0003837798,0.0001607385,0.001635638,0.0001359146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001545735,0.0005973027,0.2240697,0.00004511029,0.0002596514,0.0001471026,0.2133094,0.0001102621,0.008045296,0.06998199,0.03811016,0.4437782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001455395,0.0001832048,0.198094,0.00024492,0.00001417803,0.00001875865,0.03747957,0.000009217829,0.0004233431,0.007935289,0.7539545,0.0001876041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9664892,0.00290551,0.000001640069,0.02411458,0.00009139077,0.0002008354,0.000001693491,0.000004459763,0.006190684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971988,0.001620119,0.0000735818,0.0001354043,0.0002163192,0.000007493198,3.263331e-8,0.000006416609,0.0007418336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7158443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098343396","doi":"10.1086/674137","title":"The Nature of Slacktivism: How the Social Observability of an Initial Act of Token Support Affects Subsequent Prosocial Action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":450,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Observability; Security token; Action (physics); White (mutation); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2148304279486311,"gpt":0.5155401545271938,"spread":0.3007097265785627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01162243,0.0001094023,0.0003834744,0.0001163381,0.0009756121,0.00009668055,0.001154145,0.0003841839,0.0001139563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003039096,0.00006909169,0.000237028,0.0005984546,0.005604377,0.0007486306,0.00009779913,0.001591371,0.000003874565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001836894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00178028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001167625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001106015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934031,0.003373999,0.0005184828,0.0001509857,0.002064136,0.0004893271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939379,0.001858745,0.0009253856,0.0002450539,0.002899038,0.0001338876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004063672,0.002547137,0.312483,0.0004613452,0.001563745,0.00004821075,0.1812937,0.000003423423,0.1997179,0.02426999,0.0773816,0.1961663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001207252,0.00100705,0.9024414,0.00008005332,0.00006821386,0.000011206,0.04079498,0.000004164816,0.02668343,0.01652286,0.01099589,0.0001835356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798938,0.0002197974,0.000001757027,0.01632698,0.0004749293,0.0006431743,0.00001083132,0.000005194095,0.002423523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990608,0.0002045504,0.0000447366,0.00004849853,0.0004866819,0.00001567212,7.249421e-7,0.000009938278,0.0001283822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5899583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786306177","doi":"10.1509/jmr.16.0118","title":"(I'm) Happy to Help (You): The Impact of Personal Pronoun Use in Customer–Firm Interactions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Alberta; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Pronoun; Personal pronoun; Business; Marketing; Perception; Customer satisfaction; Customer delight; Agency (philosophy); Customer intelligence; Empathy; Psychology; Customer to customer; Service (business); Customer retention; Advertising; Social psychology; Service quality; Linguistics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1842514197034432,"gpt":0.5350645923652754,"spread":0.3508131726618322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034718,0.0000765326,0.0001920055,0.0004871632,0.0006176888,0.0001236929,0.0006986389,0.00008322384,0.0006097596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02326756,0.00005384359,0.0001494663,0.0011583,0.001352535,0.0004535149,0.0001094592,0.00104714,0.00005893853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006328718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009102893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005912947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002437167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947561,0.00304771,0.000420297,0.0001415952,0.001046862,0.00058743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931174,0.004761405,0.0002503259,0.0001427075,0.00154266,0.0001854951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003972454,0.0004899732,0.7516631,0.00001714247,0.0001587813,0.0000424848,0.1123688,0.00002928514,0.008344647,0.000212189,0.1039399,0.01876116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002552161,0.0003737642,0.951846,0.0003415516,0.000004582374,0.00001952539,0.02321851,0.00003516456,0.0000453043,0.0002638186,0.02351179,0.00008474818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781215,0.00005584633,0.000006270334,0.006386643,0.0002559267,0.0002230441,0.000003211572,0.000004638736,0.01494291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975778,0.00006681326,0.0002197441,0.00006605659,0.0007825127,0.000005288881,7.02837e-8,0.00000869291,0.001272966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2001829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120213669","doi":"10.1509/jppm.22.2.170.17641","title":"When Profit Equals Price: Consumer Confusion about Donation Amounts in Cause-Related Marketing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Donation; Profit (economics); Marketing; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0488471938288251,"gpt":0.376052246628841,"spread":0.3272050528000159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04657924,0.0002144258,0.000438914,0.0009149671,0.0006406339,0.0002800814,0.0005700776,0.0003965152,0.0008750196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06458571,0.0002200963,0.000150458,0.001280233,0.0005400275,0.001248976,0.00006588401,0.0008307574,0.00002560019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009487913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001969121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001009031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003315369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897433,0.006545727,0.001395587,0.0002973007,0.001017668,0.001000407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944987,0.002308455,0.00176019,0.0001801382,0.0008909956,0.0003614686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002398529,0.000256894,0.847655,0.00009033264,0.0002619241,0.0001148581,0.02857638,0.00001326679,0.003807414,0.05110527,0.01222184,0.05565698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003252175,0.00006364495,0.8184446,0.0009453572,0.00005378969,0.0001221695,0.01146177,0.00004782883,0.0000580509,0.01217469,0.1526727,0.0007032435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8462952,0.0008220351,0.00002572763,0.013698,0.0006224913,0.0003063825,0.000002959302,0.00004167184,0.1381855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960322,0.0005368531,0.00072247,0.0008700581,0.0003932082,0.000008290653,0.000001051918,0.00002693399,0.001408969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1497369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9817473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121304593","doi":"10.1177/0956797613496823","title":"Helping Fellow Beings","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Compliance (psychology); Psychology; Government (linguistics); Feeling; Social psychology; Public relations","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05793520405073095,"gpt":0.4309959298381622,"spread":0.3730607257874313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002033916,0.0001261895,0.0001538163,0.0001041438,0.001829411,0.0003223359,0.001594295,0.0001657463,0.002662512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00122042,0.0001073672,0.00006618975,0.001595367,0.007176633,0.001069743,0.0001139639,0.0002755015,0.003698669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001372618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007139397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001398728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004251732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99718,0.0001352103,0.0002242536,0.0006844485,0.0007799599,0.0009961337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987476,0.0001525145,0.00009433815,0.0003173016,0.0002255361,0.000462719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002348884,0.0008723912,0.1100983,0.000006824687,0.00001652063,0.00003949468,0.02781091,0.000008165633,0.1273369,0.4161448,0.04580441,0.2718377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003616864,0.0001766334,0.7748222,0.00002852739,0.000005439638,0.000008689868,0.005500071,0.00002562763,0.0003690148,0.150363,0.06771672,0.0006223671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6322601,0.00003522203,0.0001770433,0.01084865,0.000689748,0.0002446004,3.481997e-7,0.0002027751,0.3555416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989019,0.0000539486,0.002630886,0.006742717,0.0002437314,0.00005059613,1.83365e-7,0.000005180049,0.001253716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6647239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739543172","doi":"10.1037/apl0000249","title":"When fellow customers behave badly: Witness reactions to employee mistreatment by customers.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Vignette; PsycINFO; Empathy; Social psychology; Anger; Witness; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; MEDLINE","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03992718467852883,"gpt":0.3962445234422191,"spread":0.3563173387636902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001262756,0.0002367564,0.0004987881,0.0002166192,0.001438731,0.0001349724,0.001406685,0.0004013201,0.0003506006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001469678,0.000236836,0.0001866133,0.000152575,0.00153855,0.0002868246,0.00006026167,0.0005728888,0.0003671322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003140077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001804751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005933241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001555966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976357,0.0001280503,0.0006793522,0.000402645,0.0005173298,0.0006368895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973246,0.0001192778,0.001114301,0.00065209,0.000248031,0.0005417392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002149838,0.00170198,0.04271192,0.0000192982,0.0009996396,0.0003384783,0.07027368,0.0000547222,0.04726414,0.01234484,0.7464224,0.07571905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002219615,0.0004418881,0.03186775,0.00004306545,0.0001514662,0.00006166337,0.005367134,1.724924e-7,0.0005827355,0.008587069,0.9501957,0.0004817896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6144111,0.0000958369,0.0001543561,0.02224136,0.002926996,0.0004069347,0.00001856572,0.0000475578,0.3596973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916447,0.0002455775,0.001229712,0.003181966,0.0006806292,0.00003252301,0.000002014428,0.00003065818,0.002952188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3772337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172106562","doi":"10.1177/0146167214538672","title":"Political Conservatives’ Affinity for Obedience to Authority Is Loyal, Not Blind","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Obedience; Ideology; Social psychology; Politics; Test (biology); Milgram experiment; Law; Psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1360156930775148,"gpt":0.4466781994701922,"spread":0.3106625063926773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003497005,0.0002183155,0.0004412881,0.00006531207,0.002187122,0.00008134406,0.0004592347,0.0005966905,0.0005484316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001701408,0.0002542882,0.000156561,0.00021075,0.00304297,0.00007413825,0.00007176302,0.0004240493,0.0001919055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008218275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001081358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001456794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966555,0.0009143447,0.0003404022,0.0007603285,0.0003459038,0.0009834996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979873,0.000998758,0.0001250599,0.0001837897,0.0002829595,0.0004221062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005406241,0.000239635,0.009810555,0.00002695831,0.00004591951,0.000001441713,0.04393007,4.33412e-8,0.0001334394,0.871931,0.07118692,0.002153452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001264605,0.0002096073,0.1969468,0.0000107953,0.00003044009,0.000001901379,0.005354109,0.000002119115,0.0000232419,0.0520731,0.7436959,0.0003874424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5165017,0.00002135339,0.001042036,0.4447185,0.0005457504,0.0004271817,0.0000939833,0.00008718445,0.03656229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8876684,0.000009871836,0.002021077,0.1080789,0.001150388,0.00008587362,0.000004800165,0.00001411273,0.000966576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8198578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326007307","doi":"10.1080/13691180802270386","title":"EXPOSURE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Communication & Society","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scrutiny; Argument (complex analysis); Construct (python library); Subject (documents); Frame (networking); Empirical research; Epistemology; Revelation; Politics; Sociology; Centrality; Political science; Positive economics; Public relations; Computer science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02657434893438892,"gpt":0.3481237663168362,"spread":0.3215494173824472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009449966,0.00006524302,0.00007786199,0.00002239723,0.001148501,0.0001221884,0.0005912221,0.0001607313,0.0001416864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001522452,0.00007464029,0.00009601095,0.000302927,0.0003205967,0.002246817,0.00002863988,0.0002088286,0.0003354178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001386466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001018437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001605983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003091794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990787,0.0001383237,0.0002680839,0.00005439481,0.0002759599,0.0001845184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989991,0.00008952773,0.0001820215,0.000405945,0.0002527618,0.00007059739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007900101,0.00006835703,0.001209234,0.000003819589,0.0000209527,4.91319e-8,0.3970844,0.00003918862,0.00005608262,0.3372926,0.1577895,0.106428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003110827,0.00002297915,0.04248221,0.00001319407,0.000005354632,4.875258e-7,0.03189699,0.00005404272,0.00001967414,0.01867561,0.9063645,0.0001538478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06546436,0.0005264098,0.002809887,0.06497524,0.0002167753,0.0004693952,0.000007823415,0.000676383,0.8648537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789492,0.001081445,0.005803866,0.01382738,0.00005409932,0.00001225285,0.00003047296,0.000002015957,0.0002392462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.883346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102506293","doi":"10.1177/0956797610388815","title":"When Giving Feels Good","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05359454211113598,"gpt":0.4366721436219017,"spread":0.3830776015107658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004109476,0.0001361814,0.0001618421,0.0001043978,0.001976439,0.0002538316,0.002169819,0.0002579012,0.003029119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002393591,0.0001168385,0.00007221474,0.001116059,0.009002519,0.0007164882,0.0001392519,0.0006659512,0.0008938353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006364351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001216899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003908036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004660294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970123,0.000128398,0.0002288478,0.0007695091,0.0008803507,0.0009806331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985262,0.0002300119,0.0001085476,0.000459635,0.0001735823,0.0005019876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001891878,0.0004966405,0.08156751,0.000002385557,0.000006025886,0.000030176,0.01330442,9.51661e-7,0.1807877,0.627128,0.006781971,0.08987527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002650673,0.00009965662,0.5445108,0.000008490865,0.000004010502,0.00001258726,0.0009784895,0.000004867519,0.000394481,0.1291362,0.324182,0.0004032812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5801605,0.00001297652,0.0001324569,0.008006097,0.001869588,0.0001405972,0.000001447325,0.000197004,0.4094793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883599,0.0000178772,0.006053465,0.002889878,0.0004816939,0.00001939723,1.836863e-7,0.000005866013,0.002171743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4979918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077110920","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.015","title":"“Why didn’t you just ask?” Underestimating the discomfort of help-seeking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Embarrassment; Psychology; Ask price; Social psychology; Seekers; Feeling; Egocentrism; Helping behavior; Position (finance)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07645188989575512,"gpt":0.4593044240786768,"spread":0.3828525341829217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001694656,0.0001789583,0.0004266829,0.0001104961,0.001141819,0.00005546382,0.001001764,0.0003512086,0.0005028477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002554038,0.0001462055,0.0003064772,0.0003278321,0.002916422,0.0003755941,0.00008655158,0.000938506,0.000008604466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001008165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001511446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005542392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003203879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975457,0.0003898468,0.000782225,0.000213145,0.0005853394,0.0004837308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981834,0.000240283,0.001106843,0.0001961641,0.0001280415,0.0001452301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003355,0.001415984,0.02264839,0.00001006667,0.0002748753,0.00004638094,0.1099883,0.000003834079,0.7642946,0.05986661,0.03343723,0.007678188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008782738,0.002745774,0.2492981,0.0002305792,0.0003551205,0.0004975396,0.3999051,0.00003300599,0.01982919,0.0560389,0.260335,0.001948985],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9384502,0.0003870819,0.0003708878,0.01418242,0.004478936,0.0001990834,0.000004589494,0.00002355723,0.04190329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929857,0.00002644325,0.001358631,0.003544108,0.00194371,0.000006462942,7.097532e-7,0.00002169326,0.0001125113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7444655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605344818","doi":"10.1177/1049732317707726","title":"Experience of Touch in Health Care: A Meta-Ethnography Across the Health Care Professions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Arnold P. Gold Foundation","keywords":"Ethnography; Health care; Psychology; Nursing; Health professions; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9101552512111865,"gpt":0.8082098033231057,"spread":0.1019454478880808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05159489,0.0005596718,0.004452832,0.0007422762,0.0108063,0.0001619386,0.003703786,0.0006561464,0.00005883525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006365912,0.0003930574,0.0009250061,0.003626204,0.01053774,0.0003453195,0.0005499526,0.004279318,0.00004585953],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003365948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03082956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1881482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09867329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9061199,0.08212627,0.003110633,0.001450624,0.003393264,0.003799337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983842,0.008809842,0.003076229,0.001731545,0.001582712,0.0009577299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001412443,0.00006642884,0.00001044276,0.01257577,0.0001089109,0.000001970834,0.6782338,3.271777e-8,5.253778e-9,0.006184991,0.002937182,0.2998663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001099947,0.0002776924,0.00003446952,0.004497685,0.000009800558,3.290839e-7,0.4768105,1.281703e-8,2.926506e-8,0.0004002391,0.5177171,0.0001422316],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007270171,0.951932,0.000008187835,0.03704643,0.0005481081,0.007494946,0.0006779658,0.00004886368,0.002170783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008649733,0.9927992,0.0004687664,0.001439347,0.0002104038,0.003631331,0.00005764908,0.00006016743,0.0004681621],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5147799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978738802","doi":"10.1086/508524","title":"The Moderating Effect of Relationship Norm Salience on Consumers' Loss Aversion: Figure 1","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Endowment effect; Moderation; Social psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Status quo bias; Psychology; Economics; Norm (philosophy); Salient; Status quo; Microeconomics; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07471195074891311,"gpt":0.4557823533246602,"spread":0.3810704025757471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01105988,0.00008891207,0.0002175056,0.0001851157,0.001976833,0.0001062435,0.000654686,0.0001539097,0.0000615416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004309287,0.00006173061,0.000121772,0.0004871718,0.002790712,0.0002587307,0.00004265797,0.001043871,0.00007182937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001656771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004775743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008405492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000328458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952786,0.002095575,0.0004729095,0.0001333815,0.001573979,0.0004455552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883357,0.01020506,0.0003612112,0.0001941895,0.0007929378,0.0001108433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001260216,0.0001907962,0.8560486,0.000050926,0.0001264508,0.0001526601,0.006145229,0.0001883959,0.002656659,0.0707625,0.04667487,0.0157427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007975555,0.003913834,0.572,0.001857845,0.0001932496,0.0001523329,0.01670032,0.0001894408,0.02834177,0.08570989,0.2819081,0.001057611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560783,0.001123046,0.00002075419,0.005353592,0.0003090418,0.0002262477,0.00000237198,0.000007941696,0.03687874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998352,0.0002178855,0.00008080323,0.00003772511,0.000165749,0.000004260728,2.694711e-7,0.000006936775,0.001134354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2840486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907732843","doi":"10.1177/0956797618814145","title":"People Are Slow to Adapt to the Warm Glow of Giving","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Booth School of Business, University of Chicago","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06808747420876224,"gpt":0.4440200491098174,"spread":0.3759325749010551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003577645,0.0001260309,0.0002058776,0.0001020951,0.001622975,0.0001025867,0.002679599,0.0001142696,0.0005187223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004043638,0.00008597642,0.00006554861,0.003608355,0.004109184,0.0002377117,0.0002647133,0.0001795468,0.001007127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001044055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007953797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008553774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002886887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970966,0.0001828345,0.0002583117,0.0006868187,0.0009563744,0.0008190531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982217,0.0002639443,0.0001305891,0.0005309997,0.0003889099,0.0004638734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003472253,0.001327476,0.1719701,0.0000131303,0.00002881855,0.00002162446,0.2599959,0.0001024744,0.08415139,0.1022184,0.2236453,0.1561782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001123763,0.0004073367,0.8336834,0.00003177918,0.000003557314,0.000002466383,0.005621084,0.000007788949,0.0005305065,0.003782576,0.1555914,0.0002256705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8428806,0.00002246989,0.001159658,0.06237429,0.001371366,0.000421885,0.000005930962,0.00008825394,0.09167554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871345,0.00000981696,0.002617541,0.0090134,0.0004807003,0.0000306256,6.275395e-8,0.000004785781,0.0007085666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6617134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090748035","doi":"10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70680-4","title":"Complexity Management Theory: Motivation for Ideological Rigidity and Social Conflict","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cortex","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; The Wilson Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Ideology; Simple (philosophy); Rigidity (electromagnetism); Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Politics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2362525889326839,"gpt":0.3808708270735425,"spread":0.1446182381408586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006046979,0.00007220609,0.0001235036,0.00002456789,0.000912626,0.00003594011,0.0001591028,0.0001173587,0.0003543795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001256535,0.00007355053,0.00004277596,0.00008593099,0.001361689,0.0001065586,0.00003485546,0.00007720629,0.00003473849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004757526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005156528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007517023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008355804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991266,0.0001544831,0.0001180799,0.0002201107,0.000141554,0.0002391831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995518,0.00020577,0.00007048379,0.00006908046,0.00005349121,0.00004936635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002105029,0.000061086,0.008453246,0.000008259613,0.00002334464,0.000002082505,0.005610357,8.186612e-8,0.00003967716,0.9634097,0.009730656,0.01264045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004635496,0.00003866822,0.6712557,0.000003738623,0.00001919923,4.240671e-7,0.001758447,0.00002757025,0.000003347909,0.2001463,0.1261502,0.0001328279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8601767,0.0001110339,0.002762414,0.007663445,0.0003882163,0.0007445179,0.00001932621,0.0001721413,0.1279622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959496,0.00005264461,0.0005030013,0.001441267,0.0002095342,0.00003412834,0.000004131227,0.000004410164,0.001801276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7632634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7019274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973632348","doi":"10.1037/a0021880","title":"Service without a smile: Comparing the consequences of neutral and positive display rules.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Respondent; Social psychology; Intrapersonal communication; Interpersonal communication; Task (project management); Mood; Interpersonal relationship; Quality (philosophy); Applied psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03019636587274372,"gpt":0.3729842758072091,"spread":0.3427879099344654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001392095,0.0001131255,0.0003473389,0.00008053857,0.0003211442,0.00003062822,0.0005866929,0.0002089165,0.00004264437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005527319,0.00008332233,0.000057686,0.0002147434,0.003072903,0.0001220392,0.00003452524,0.0007506807,0.000009550697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001427209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001314227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004666633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00160484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987867,0.0001391622,0.0004276714,0.0001619554,0.0002097051,0.0002748215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998541,0.0003104967,0.0006422457,0.0001568883,0.0002229528,0.000126418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001693263,0.0004250038,0.1107054,0.00002623232,0.0004402524,0.00004965697,0.1104496,0.00002692641,0.287426,0.4752366,0.003384092,0.01013707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002761739,0.0002876275,0.855671,0.00007464711,0.0001642966,0.0004374442,0.01390332,0.000009582858,0.002282158,0.1093182,0.01470279,0.0003871224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9349375,0.0000915028,0.00003603408,0.0107056,0.0008072606,0.0001483614,0.00000485387,0.000008698529,0.05326018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99498,0.00009420076,0.001290351,0.003346049,0.0002622072,0.000003486563,3.835361e-7,0.00000740723,0.00001585959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7449657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586030185","doi":"10.1177/001979390605900306","title":"Further Evidence on the “Monday Effect” in Workers' Compensation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Labor Relations Review","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Workers' compensation; Earnings; Moral hazard; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Health insurance; Hazard; Medicine; Occupational safety and health; Order (exchange); Exploit; Health care; Demography; Business; Psychology; Economics; Incentive; Computer security; Social psychology; Finance; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08530028514079634,"gpt":0.3683084449323608,"spread":0.2830081597915645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002054161,0.00007994001,0.0001623788,0.00003848206,0.0003632072,0.00003828101,0.0001404046,0.0001532373,0.0005564743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001567187,0.00005563572,0.00003606279,0.0007372333,0.0003025256,0.0001691102,0.00001224678,0.0003311442,0.0002007063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007021824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008732967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006679168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982886,0.0009652072,0.0002416882,0.0001553763,0.0001950223,0.0001540685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982434,0.001443334,0.00010998,0.0001264564,0.00004472584,0.00003209435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005445357,0.00009344831,0.6519824,0.0000567869,0.00002292879,0.000007214955,0.003789851,0.0000424141,0.00002925643,0.1595668,0.1117032,0.07265121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006098317,0.00008771347,0.3113571,0.008147491,0.00006837377,7.061294e-7,0.0003690986,0.000004490033,0.000007564023,0.00765879,0.671435,0.0002538748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.714087,0.04872308,0.000004358309,0.1955318,0.0004836978,0.001856564,0.000006288836,0.00005856285,0.03924863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990582,0.005135462,0.00001464923,0.00176635,0.0003557566,0.00008213507,0.00000237175,0.000005527677,0.002055737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5597318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6093004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132311998","doi":"10.1086/649028","title":"Context Effects from Bodily Sensations: Examining Bodily Sensations Induced by Flooring and the Moderating Role of Product Viewing Distance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Product placement; Psychology; Advertising; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Art; History; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09907022352010161,"gpt":0.4152737567873018,"spread":0.3162035332672002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006409287,0.0001057209,0.0003480772,0.0001424185,0.001190779,0.0001813251,0.0003348876,0.00009164499,0.00001058805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005698876,0.00008501393,0.0000605195,0.0003739865,0.001052447,0.0005164056,0.00003855908,0.0008222683,0.000003326365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001020579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003286785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001506529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002257307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996131,0.001796406,0.0005461891,0.0002024633,0.0009462853,0.0003776339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951217,0.0033176,0.0004065555,0.0001876183,0.0008334869,0.0001330654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006065465,0.0002758724,0.03438121,0.00004896988,0.0004266503,0.00003573233,0.2298893,0.00006179438,0.4869792,0.01281464,0.002060485,0.2324196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02089872,0.001555505,0.3563889,0.005988738,0.000566609,0.00008795477,0.2880243,0.003145541,0.07833079,0.20845,0.03457823,0.001984712],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818919,0.0114921,0.0001735119,0.003890406,0.0001392732,0.0003887004,0.000005000926,0.0000110957,0.002007968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983544,0.0005652583,0.0006112168,0.0001688536,0.0002262647,0.000007480653,5.636872e-7,0.000008105115,0.00005779692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4086484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9158629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249342864","doi":"10.1177/0959354315604408","title":"Introduction to the special issue: Unplugging the Milgram machine","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory & Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Milgram experiment; Obedience; Relevance (law); Skepticism; Psychology; Misrepresentation; Distrust; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Philosophy; Psychotherapist; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03684956990154491,"gpt":0.3999415292999906,"spread":0.3630919593984457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006581547,0.0001511112,0.0001810454,0.0000749314,0.0009938045,0.00006084651,0.001187954,0.0001742708,0.002156614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001087217,0.00009877842,0.00007062899,0.0006347789,0.001785298,0.0001237879,0.00008631555,0.0004635658,0.00403666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009825044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007927352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003589474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009679596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964505,0.00200395,0.0002426394,0.0004223633,0.0003296605,0.000550911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986094,0.0002908971,0.0001100957,0.0006741767,0.0001322051,0.0001831975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002057831,0.00004988423,0.0002482877,4.796411e-7,0.00002569353,0.000003618936,0.04408177,0.00001854651,0.0000618838,0.1455715,0.7300076,0.07972495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002061631,0.00007076728,0.00237555,0.000001911013,0.00001453529,0.00001088717,0.006182917,7.771444e-7,0.000007501511,0.120055,0.8709648,0.0001091896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04450675,0.0003804664,0.0006785492,0.5706201,0.01341842,0.0005891485,0.000005680893,0.0001868603,0.369614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6486901,0.0002108252,0.000640819,0.1033026,0.2021686,0.0001722203,0.000009893075,0.0000679677,0.04473688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6041834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1858888420","doi":"10.1111/josi.12068","title":"The Emergence of Milgram's Bureaucratic Machine","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Issues","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Milgram experiment; Bureaucracy; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Ideology; Obedience; Social psychology; Conformity; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02168302993998518,"gpt":0.3971065862579368,"spread":0.3754235563179517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002676481,0.00008926248,0.000288514,0.00004832604,0.0009859467,0.00004485696,0.0006690777,0.0001279921,0.0001524484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001151321,0.00006544255,0.000181531,0.0002809557,0.001242392,0.0002044619,0.00002790455,0.0002615436,0.00001619534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002999999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009672565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00108906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007328539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998053,0.000480342,0.0005199967,0.00008025175,0.0006030746,0.0002633199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983082,0.0003326206,0.0007169043,0.00009647598,0.0004585898,0.00008724913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002295348,0.000366704,0.02851753,0.00004319807,0.0004191688,0.00001641213,0.2248058,0.00001571295,0.006639766,0.5381776,0.1362677,0.06450088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005949721,0.0003432648,0.0620759,0.00007019502,0.0001014668,0.000004985372,0.03254417,0.00001363825,0.0005612361,0.1385877,0.7648255,0.0002769655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.818845,0.007494334,0.000373475,0.07665116,0.003850132,0.0002616651,0.000005283466,0.00004536541,0.09247364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958094,0.001043031,0.0003721006,0.0002323367,0.001399292,0.00000129626,1.356693e-7,0.000007988054,0.001134447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6285578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7583205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76581385","doi":"","title":"The High Cost of Lost Trust","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard business review","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vietnamese; Business; Rank (graph theory); Marketing; Service (business); Point (geometry); Scale (ratio); Creole language; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05894796139896599,"gpt":0.3379082681869607,"spread":0.2789603067879948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000876181,0.0001004364,0.0002941687,0.00002637996,0.0005035074,0.00003740238,0.000581832,0.000078513,0.004473804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00114289,0.00007290832,0.00008026822,0.001158734,0.001080505,0.000189739,0.00003918129,0.0001099823,0.003641074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004513454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005047018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003810637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001345857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986532,0.0002268408,0.0003240316,0.0001653412,0.0003426173,0.0002879587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987944,0.0001884276,0.0002282442,0.0003224592,0.0004016325,0.00006482441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001003174,0.0001866071,0.003651674,0.001197053,0.00006546063,0.00001579891,0.001324286,0.000001959385,0.00005080529,0.0913047,0.4321109,0.4700807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008099338,0.000003891486,0.01435061,0.0008086519,0.00002750298,0.000001324196,0.00004682483,7.073515e-7,0.000003796252,0.0003737113,0.9842148,0.00008713908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008303328,0.220374,0.00013312,0.1423811,0.003325529,0.003085663,0.00004528991,0.0001930619,0.6221589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08506917,0.898388,0.0001432802,0.006881485,0.0004012383,0.00007491447,0.00000289848,0.00001887677,0.009020181],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6780139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W249729507","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00419.x","title":"Do people tip strategically, to improve future service? Theory and evidence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Norm (philosophy); Service quality; Marketing; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1168795549045886,"gpt":0.2595529552909677,"spread":0.1426734003863791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005410334,0.0002230615,0.0004584983,0.0004493802,0.0004879043,0.0002424141,0.000822434,0.0003501978,0.0003771455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007283866,0.0002711596,0.0001108467,0.0002801616,0.0003523366,0.0007396142,0.00002592536,0.0004624932,0.00005250157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001740748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003585088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2653033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977359,0.0001856919,0.0006583464,0.0003880636,0.000006628221,0.001025426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946046,0.0005952542,0.000444515,0.0002888129,0.0003795316,0.003687315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001631114,0.000007287706,0.01267528,0.00002262593,0.00006888921,0.00012782,0.03181902,0.00008661026,0.00006481125,0.9426961,0.0004517702,0.01181669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008991682,0.000722307,0.0688769,0.0003942714,0.00008869619,0.0003553833,0.07045995,0.00001630964,0.00006633546,0.766952,0.08998113,0.00118755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744967,0.0007675159,0.00007349037,0.01738345,0.00228289,0.0003041587,0.0000334759,0.000007428135,0.004650936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915749,0.0002553358,0.0004589662,0.005066372,0.002207937,0.000004716762,6.937602e-7,0.00002730684,0.0004037662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7325457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531088400","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.002","title":"Ask in person: You're less persuasive than you think over email","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Compliance (psychology); Moderation; Social psychology; Empathy; Internet privacy; Ask price; Instant messaging; Face-to-face; Face (sociological concept); Computer-mediated communication; World Wide Web; Computer science; The Internet","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08456002414087817,"gpt":0.4359012321204995,"spread":0.3513412079796213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001365376,0.00026327,0.0005829739,0.0002516891,0.0005989611,0.00005004617,0.0008646891,0.0006115382,0.001443496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000210906,0.0002180818,0.0003814576,0.0003946791,0.001919883,0.0007118002,0.00005839015,0.000535177,0.00008945585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007083828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002601983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000779871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004838516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996744,0.000748064,0.0006446332,0.0004069519,0.0006956754,0.0007606862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985267,0.0001640191,0.0007045335,0.00017701,0.0001780454,0.000249694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002093636,0.002426645,0.119725,0.000008257219,0.0004077138,0.0007693444,0.5408533,4.584251e-7,0.2187413,0.02796098,0.05784503,0.0291684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01112289,0.001461735,0.443549,0.0001877153,0.00005870218,0.0001125955,0.4757735,4.484124e-7,0.002189572,0.009727652,0.05474173,0.001074525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9047598,0.001231108,0.00003062255,0.02205944,0.002964623,0.0002098401,0.000009972913,0.00003252825,0.06870203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934089,0.0002005244,0.0001992086,0.002781796,0.00217457,0.000009982024,5.612e-7,0.00003015249,0.001194368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.323824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502816948","doi":"10.1111/pere.12012","title":"The joys of genuine giving: Approach and avoidance sacrifice motivation and authenticity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personal Relationships","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Quality (philosophy); Interpersonal relationship; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0646697954137197,"gpt":0.2951978527870766,"spread":0.2305280573733569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009971283,0.00005536301,0.00007484696,0.00002601157,0.001345131,0.00005833158,0.00009562205,0.00008920568,0.000022131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001570335,0.00004653001,0.00001818936,0.0001591863,0.001003153,0.0002647061,0.00001920027,0.0002056419,0.000009978723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002370247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003018893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007148339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000107419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991469,0.0002304076,0.000133883,0.0001402715,0.0002010424,0.0001475459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987668,0.000888848,0.0001005161,0.00006729531,0.0001126278,0.00006394418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001159087,0.00005674597,0.7267141,0.00002818767,0.00003185946,1.457351e-7,0.1145604,0.000004149183,0.001083096,0.1488117,0.001322491,0.007375487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007810424,0.000006867639,0.9706813,0.00001224862,0.00000830317,6.776251e-7,0.01187229,0.0003720427,0.000006708062,0.01533583,0.001570279,0.00005541115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822465,0.0008502479,0.0004269764,0.003686529,0.00005840615,0.000229829,0.000002606443,0.00002001906,0.01247892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973466,0.000158229,0.0007931162,0.00004322538,0.00004203728,0.00002118447,9.165645e-7,0.000003844635,0.001590823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2439671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107515675","doi":"10.1086/660129","title":"“Shocking” Masculinity: Stanley Milgram, “Obedience to Authority,” and the “Crisis of Manhood” in Cold War America","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Isis","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Milgram experiment; Obedience; Masculinity; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04771259914291598,"gpt":0.3375852323147259,"spread":0.2898726331718099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001411235,0.0001029003,0.0002722108,0.00009508437,0.0002872857,0.00001771425,0.000545813,0.0001206794,0.0001342705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006708059,0.00008647966,0.0000652974,0.0007630427,0.001360547,0.0001449976,0.0001171433,0.0001821844,0.00004437048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005569618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006299232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03702007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005724572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984143,0.0003387458,0.0002713922,0.0002820039,0.0003393274,0.0003542519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991377,0.0002881676,0.00008898184,0.0002562832,0.00009748081,0.0001313833],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003357648,0.0003075447,0.1246777,0.00002628353,0.00008899567,0.00002767447,0.7795353,0.000003095812,0.0003476506,0.0637983,0.01508282,0.01576887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002772815,0.0004667464,0.5113295,0.0001963853,0.0001392879,0.000002514176,0.3060941,0.0000185038,0.001545627,0.07431917,0.1021526,0.0009627141],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9448738,0.0004476976,0.0001386136,0.0138808,0.0003960443,0.0004693798,0.0000127369,0.00004992434,0.03973109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958133,0.0005786759,0.001616735,0.00177931,0.00005785251,0.00003349374,1.506828e-7,0.000006998879,0.0001134444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4734412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9693925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995351141","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12106","title":"Auditing and the Purification of Blame","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Audit; Business; Accounting; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1090427901670225,"gpt":0.4276154517043625,"spread":0.31857266153734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01955875,0.00005003097,0.0001359054,0.00009448218,0.001157321,0.000104229,0.0004519731,0.00009042036,0.00002185925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007054223,0.00003991735,0.00003003302,0.0004208099,0.004041334,0.0003426806,0.00009213899,0.0003305092,0.00002495127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002220136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001667876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002509835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007450575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974702,0.001290715,0.000220964,0.0001903105,0.0005543677,0.0002734443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967289,0.002442016,0.000152025,0.0002126959,0.0004189401,0.00004543759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001522902,0.00004546631,0.1373763,0.00005324044,0.00003010514,0.000001110852,0.04074558,9.741151e-7,0.00294424,0.7790972,0.01359123,0.02596226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003507094,0.0001005868,0.2610288,0.0003541351,0.00001051116,0.000002148453,0.05129971,0.0004978284,0.0009015017,0.1984934,0.4833867,0.0004175807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6868287,0.0006276896,0.00006362768,0.02104252,0.0001117664,0.0003334736,0.000001017322,0.00003638053,0.2909549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985358,0.00006471475,0.00009424125,0.0001970382,0.0003161684,0.00001999839,8.64919e-7,0.000006242385,0.000765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5806038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993807875","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.061","title":"How surgeons design treatment recommendations in orthopaedic surgery","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Leverage (statistics); Orthopedic surgery; Surgery; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.200776333104291,"gpt":0.3952735165613711,"spread":0.1944971834570801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005923643,0.0001722311,0.0003704314,0.0004642544,0.00186591,0.0000503052,0.0005297414,0.0001554665,0.0005699186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002150547,0.0001527698,0.0001025068,0.002915048,0.007373976,0.0009088313,0.00002801961,0.0001832923,0.00002481287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007271967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001198828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01352575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004403098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969827,0.0005597289,0.0003332713,0.0004774269,0.0007378049,0.000909091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984828,0.0006150677,0.0001986638,0.0001853376,0.0002008884,0.0003172517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005220519,0.0004240816,0.3004802,0.000004249402,0.00002435234,0.00007349998,0.4697447,2.280195e-7,0.0006224944,0.04717236,0.01497906,0.1664226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001934698,0.0004544948,0.6115046,0.0002244368,0.00009319011,0.000007874185,0.1450366,0.000007787825,0.0003503916,0.0430528,0.1962122,0.001121019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6038225,0.0004417441,0.00139517,0.1686697,0.005990533,0.001509631,0.00001156732,0.0004374105,0.2177218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967641,0.0003968506,0.0001734404,0.0009497057,0.0004873664,0.00007522777,0.000002702757,0.00001024077,0.001140427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3929416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310536335","doi":"10.5555/3109939.3109943","title":"Please continue, we need more data: an exploration of obedience to robots","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human-Robot Interaction","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Obedience; Robot; Task (project management); Autonomy; Milgram experiment; Psychology; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Engineering; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3724511849204335,"gpt":0.5123273230712866,"spread":0.1398761381508531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006138405,0.0001197565,0.000178955,0.0001406075,0.0003765537,0.00006023805,0.0006577713,0.0001156307,0.0003107119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005638358,0.0001070213,0.00003812737,0.000251723,0.0003756762,0.005771771,0.00009175956,0.0001131406,0.0001900974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001394191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005798147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00212896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004680737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984035,0.0002082506,0.0003364501,0.0004313443,0.0003438604,0.0002766281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998641,0.0001444648,0.0002651703,0.0005362882,0.0002483954,0.0001647154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005519841,0.0009662308,0.008402002,0.0000375028,0.00009456757,0.00002097553,0.1492977,0.00051323,0.6153857,0.05661016,0.03412438,0.1339956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006178547,0.002864646,0.2198011,0.003297971,0.0003005451,0.00001882793,0.2628903,0.0003293728,0.04144583,0.04943234,0.4097373,0.003703167],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9347231,0.00005792817,0.02199761,0.02613527,0.0031929,0.000810379,0.00004762018,0.0002817731,0.01275337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965266,0.0000590061,0.0008002642,0.0004012516,0.0005390812,0.00003061793,0.00001924764,0.00001267763,0.001611268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5739398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4364203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125542500","doi":"10.1002/mar.20208","title":"Consumers' waiting in queues: The role of first‐order and second‐order justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology and Marketing","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Order (exchange); FIFO (computing and electronics); Injustice; Service (business); Queue; Perception; Advertising; Product (mathematics); Queueing theory; Aside; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing; Business; Law; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Computer network","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02255828426314804,"gpt":0.3329912557478127,"spread":0.3104329714846647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002464833,0.00009341478,0.0001727376,0.00006107826,0.0008188899,0.000009930156,0.0001659614,0.0001874822,0.0001801212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001682874,0.00008536226,0.00001813144,0.0002772657,0.002007295,0.0001117382,0.00004692677,0.0002806427,0.000003846127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009335764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003851698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006191547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00236038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984834,0.0006018326,0.000239443,0.0002615885,0.00009516202,0.000318562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980741,0.001539945,0.0001331464,0.000116195,0.00008239322,0.00005421685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001659113,0.00007099845,0.921481,0.00004621599,0.00003836374,0.00001658644,0.04896485,9.142752e-7,0.0005498314,0.003897708,0.001019329,0.02374835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009591207,0.00003415658,0.8591771,0.00009025088,0.00003615858,0.00005905526,0.03924499,0.00009341677,0.00001694878,0.0042461,0.09578665,0.0002560505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8508613,0.003533808,0.00000818907,0.00309259,0.0001885838,0.0001344268,0.000001756318,0.00002017763,0.1421592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954616,0.002521863,0.0004364182,0.001255887,0.00006623128,0.00001276609,3.913563e-7,0.00000679868,0.0002379795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1446004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7395962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164869577","doi":"10.1177/1948550613490967","title":"Once Bitten, Twice Shy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Psychological and Personality Science","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Helpfulness; Psychology; Social psychology; Seekers; Affect (linguistics); Compliance (psychology); Attribution; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1000531345959669,"gpt":0.4403623241777346,"spread":0.3403091895817677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002284098,0.0001678813,0.0002284902,0.00007050882,0.003664519,0.0003443392,0.0008747927,0.0002569082,0.001455192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006240117,0.0001476291,0.00007579897,0.001202266,0.01350852,0.0009297864,0.0001149512,0.0003862366,0.0004436258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009002417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001110677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005038412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001702958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996969,0.0002976104,0.0002392255,0.0007844178,0.0008387941,0.0008709374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988293,0.0001865524,0.000111433,0.0001664085,0.000286982,0.0004192916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009287778,0.0008486115,0.11928,0.00002759254,0.00004209487,0.00002296517,0.1426916,3.17974e-7,0.03221886,0.4767171,0.03959409,0.188464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002344442,0.000103081,0.9159287,0.000006549168,0.000007566513,0.000003934162,0.01162608,0.000005394438,0.00000968552,0.05041748,0.02133811,0.00031901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8155999,0.0001132295,0.00003183039,0.03187134,0.000380166,0.0002663887,0.000005154624,0.0001368547,0.1515952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888924,0.00004922838,0.0005250677,0.008769398,0.0005697389,0.00003532615,6.819805e-7,0.000005324204,0.001152823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7966487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073875405","doi":"10.1097/nmd.0b013e3182a21298","title":"“What If I Make a Mistake?”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Mistake; Computer science; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02272658152706391,"gpt":0.3218284375269279,"spread":0.2991018559998639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000423663,0.00005956421,0.00008934295,0.00002195691,0.0004175457,0.0001152941,0.0002231038,0.00002702349,0.0002005313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004821457,0.0000390104,0.00005751982,0.00006127746,0.0005235003,0.0004340388,0.00002453733,0.0001040183,0.00003074448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003843557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007241682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003612404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003484708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992434,0.0001287461,0.000154463,0.00005218713,0.0002486036,0.0001726317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993359,0.00005907441,0.0001383195,0.00007223443,0.00006706964,0.0003273718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001502876,0.001489848,0.05240038,0.00008836855,0.0004601044,0.0003515829,0.3043115,0.00002523531,0.01138006,0.01573419,0.2221285,0.3901275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001354412,0.0002293706,0.7064041,0.0002007896,0.0001631803,0.00005664359,0.1275166,0.00001529567,0.00002932407,0.04009655,0.1236299,0.0003038386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733064,0.002885695,0.00000391403,0.02036674,0.0005898207,0.000139413,0.000002711591,0.00000670545,0.002698669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932513,0.002960197,0.00002884329,0.002252189,0.0002377888,0.000002044477,2.632121e-7,0.000004400965,0.001262962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6540037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3211466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890517865","doi":"","title":"Contrary to Popular Belief, Refs Are People Too! Personality and Perceptions of Officials","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sport behavior","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Personality; Perception; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03384751094860543,"gpt":0.3861763401819534,"spread":0.352328829233348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002403955,0.0001000342,0.0004088435,0.0001503362,0.0002951207,0.00002092771,0.0002512336,0.0001729096,0.0002218292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001194627,0.0001000605,0.0001440726,0.0002784534,0.0003620513,0.0002682633,0.00002504369,0.0002474914,0.000006256365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001159045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001636837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001480114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002556571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983528,0.00002998425,0.0006457838,0.0001403552,0.00054615,0.0002849828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985207,0.00003266855,0.0005887941,0.0001132483,0.0004308466,0.0003137998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006291077,0.000242131,0.9817598,0.000004530968,0.00001234284,0.00006802362,0.0118422,4.419647e-7,0.002141694,0.001266507,0.0005998273,0.001999584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002086642,0.0001027621,0.9765918,0.00004233209,0.00007994602,0.00003017326,0.019501,1.259487e-8,0.00006993628,0.000147712,0.003126534,0.00009910025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965016,0.000207815,0.00002641912,0.001523865,0.0003706993,0.000205509,0.00001603707,0.00001174155,0.001136359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978139,0.00008683263,0.0009719282,0.0004408301,0.0003773901,0.000002255919,8.836208e-7,0.000008478256,0.0002974415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007658794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4080347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114096760","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101491","title":"The language of power and authority in leadership","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Leadership Quarterly","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Traditional authority; Power (physics); Psychology; Business; Political science; Public administration; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1496868693992902,"gpt":0.3529846810677834,"spread":0.2032978116684932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001406747,0.0000867794,0.000137197,0.00001982915,0.0003515459,0.00005019996,0.000528638,0.0001160638,0.00003573899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038703,0.00005964766,0.00004685882,0.0003044691,0.001989543,0.0001373733,0.00001068209,0.0003603876,0.00004280469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002257966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005646489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001122894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003190868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983776,0.0006262017,0.0001875148,0.0001721379,0.0002458342,0.0003906953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988073,0.0008171126,0.00008827249,0.0001714301,0.00002685351,0.0000890049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005668672,0.0000123307,0.005700827,0.00001387969,0.00001338823,0.000005341361,0.9546629,3.130968e-7,0.00053315,0.02379671,0.001127725,0.01407674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000236026,0.0001650748,0.04372875,0.00001895612,0.000007380116,6.191406e-7,0.9492055,0.000006198626,0.00003662834,0.003549136,0.002943652,0.0001021321],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6412998,0.001865771,0.00001583824,0.3494679,0.0001612831,0.0002473677,0.000002371139,0.00005177215,0.006887925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951985,0.00001425393,0.00001957115,0.004308447,0.0001542123,0.000005464777,2.08058e-7,0.000006833123,0.0002924918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3538987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7330554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344415213","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.007","title":"Questioning authority: new perspectives on Milgram's ‘obedience’ research and its implications for intergroup relations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Opinion in Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Milgram experiment; Obedience; Psychology; Harm; Social psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Criminology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3669027758093,"gpt":0.5924366935834368,"spread":0.2255339177741368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00151646,0.0001031449,0.0001409207,0.0003650996,0.000712736,0.00003619311,0.0003520765,0.0002144586,0.00005867565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001983602,0.00009440932,0.00003867016,0.0005680822,0.0009601375,0.0002585331,0.000044441,0.0003443672,0.00007973683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000199837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001489338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007177803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009342343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981186,0.0003758681,0.0002658141,0.0005942218,0.0001625652,0.00048293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982318,0.001008766,0.00008734983,0.0002195623,0.0002779289,0.000174627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003934724,0.0001581329,0.01558299,0.000004578301,0.000005142147,5.02897e-8,0.009707348,1.575724e-7,0.0001606718,0.8793401,0.02164102,0.07336053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000998731,0.0003464526,0.2478899,0.0003531624,0.000002606466,0.000001956472,0.003095948,0.000002691218,0.000002955951,0.4306737,0.3164392,0.0001927414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1580668,0.02502274,0.03176381,0.708486,0.02917892,0.004080319,0.0001240052,0.0004724095,0.04280505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872216,0.00899285,0.0007407057,0.0001126219,0.001555846,0.0004096937,0.000006532654,0.00001772997,0.0009424163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8291548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5481862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969220631","doi":"10.1177/0190272519861952","title":"Credibility and Incredulity in Milgram’s Obedience Experiments: A Reanalysis of an Unpublished Test","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Psychology Quarterly","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary; Yale University; American Psychological Foundation","keywords":"Milgram experiment; Obedience; Psychology; Social psychology; Relevance (law); Credibility; Perception; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Deception; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03025962907431308,"gpt":0.4103746626158923,"spread":0.3801150335415793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002592003,0.0001984432,0.0005519871,0.0002183123,0.0003119729,0.00005510933,0.000661297,0.0005238614,0.0002816588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003841956,0.0002254597,0.0001092365,0.0009415573,0.002519568,0.0008196962,0.00002860197,0.0003882479,0.0000351974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001165364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001352198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006587299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004937808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966017,0.0009706563,0.0006151674,0.0008033668,0.0004133313,0.0005957487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985279,0.0002991387,0.0003196385,0.0004800975,0.0001953997,0.0001778629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002147454,0.001257125,0.7818889,0.00002124525,0.00006130135,0.00001137287,0.1803759,2.802896e-7,0.007414604,0.006900117,0.0005520129,0.02130244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001150204,0.0005936231,0.9398165,0.00001218442,0.00001829073,0.000001270886,0.03417397,0.000008460309,0.00002191154,0.02342398,0.0005304954,0.0002491168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715784,0.00009814386,0.00001442264,0.003356191,0.0004843726,0.0004109691,0.00002002266,0.00006987336,0.02396766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984047,0.00001575594,0.0004176795,0.000822408,0.0001694614,0.00003213691,0.000007341134,0.00001228988,0.0001182633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1579276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017936643","doi":"10.3917/enf.574.0363","title":"Empathie, contagion émotionnelle et coupure par rapport aux émotions","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Enfance","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05453966468038571,"gpt":0.4080173954245122,"spread":0.3534777307441265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001287932,0.0002654924,0.0003267897,0.00006153798,0.001183095,0.00007253999,0.0005146415,0.0004973186,0.00237089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002047208,0.0003258443,0.0001840378,0.0006207027,0.002106713,0.001013445,0.00005888053,0.0006184316,0.003130869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002321689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005254529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009994616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001873684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973323,0.0004821549,0.0004448012,0.0005519196,0.0004546717,0.0007341433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986889,0.0001733047,0.0002687112,0.000372742,0.0002140714,0.0002822393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003045727,0.0009332846,0.01470939,0.00003840743,0.0001155481,0.00004886771,0.08980506,0.000495306,0.0005252362,0.3605264,0.4780532,0.05471889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005127804,0.00007158544,0.05649338,0.0001324118,0.00003820741,0.00001125972,0.002920218,0.0001300934,0.0001203181,0.008240247,0.9309282,0.0004013415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4269681,0.02519231,0.00330036,0.2742695,0.008573745,0.0007142286,0.0001058349,0.000387961,0.260488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9023198,0.004249591,0.001904741,0.009263879,0.002098373,0.00004428084,0.00001341006,0.00002959112,0.08007626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4753518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087327455","doi":"10.1068/d2310","title":"Beware of Contingency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning D Society and Space","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01625473243080032,"gpt":0.2838342899143849,"spread":0.2675795574835846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003819967,0.00005464494,0.00008894665,0.000006080739,0.0003865044,0.00001312287,0.00005787668,0.0001334001,0.00007320565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003703803,0.00005708787,0.00003132745,0.00002639699,0.000823415,0.00007431392,0.00002566043,0.0001692756,0.000002655798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004592675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009095235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001599866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001763392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995368,0.00002613616,0.00006884416,0.000123113,0.0001061552,0.000138998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997283,0.00009052731,0.00005466692,0.00005579994,0.000005123146,0.00006557695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006987691,0.00003075412,0.7923308,0.00001345117,0.0000328439,0.000001905618,0.1825722,0.00000316272,0.008055127,0.009018321,0.005673276,0.002261196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005003441,0.00006161706,0.5648227,0.0000372587,0.00003408795,0.000001544924,0.0556722,0.00002649678,0.0003590586,0.003374473,0.3748019,0.0003083523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904511,0.000742602,0.00005963847,0.001691774,0.0001341006,0.00006152158,0.000003421163,0.00001507753,0.006840785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958425,0.0009832379,0.001831523,0.0001498822,0.0001209576,0.000002043353,0.000001181111,0.000003303602,0.001065373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3691286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3033907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148947740","doi":"10.3390/socsci3020194","title":"Stanley Milgram’s Obedience to Authority “Relationship” Condition: Some Methodological and Theoretical Implications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Sciences","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; Nipissing University","keywords":"Milgram experiment; Obedience; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2524790734812727,"gpt":0.5174137007528596,"spread":0.2649346272715869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005660014,0.0001263704,0.0002220473,0.0000897063,0.0051521,0.000206119,0.0006255972,0.0002487695,0.0002489029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00536453,0.0001179827,0.00006419087,0.0009564392,0.0108008,0.0004642373,0.0001065565,0.0002455373,0.0001071972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008815022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001700564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003642728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003284901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967797,0.001336305,0.000248949,0.0005318657,0.0005233024,0.0005798695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973263,0.002036916,0.0001044217,0.0001186562,0.0001319579,0.0002817483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003581645,0.00002202632,0.02102816,0.000001334155,0.000002475982,2.25502e-7,0.006146489,8.309868e-7,0.00009727056,0.9679403,0.001396822,0.003360456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006420587,0.00006947523,0.2752008,0.000004403756,0.000007881154,7.305345e-7,0.003662614,0.000004456921,0.000008727358,0.7106765,0.01015786,0.0001423333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6744483,0.00009983785,0.007181286,0.1779705,0.0007999511,0.0005280349,0.00002610169,0.0002828605,0.1386631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889093,0.00002119136,0.006738608,0.003467584,0.0006460755,0.00005211483,0.000001388638,0.000004417008,0.0001593002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.314461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173624455","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6091-731-8_2","title":"Practical Rationality and A Recovery of Aristotle’s ‘Phronesis’ For the Professions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Phronesis; Rationality; Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Philosophy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1229554555064456,"gpt":0.3918447798699384,"spread":0.2688893243634928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002040133,0.0001943768,0.0003216838,0.00006887368,0.0008737634,0.0001054443,0.0002348192,0.0007076238,0.0002061269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001139353,0.0001577612,0.0001697895,0.00001991353,0.002558693,0.0003228968,0.00007869176,0.0004954546,0.000008769079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001155899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008245789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004642509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009069764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983907,0.0001606181,0.0003652773,0.0003114001,0.0004398217,0.0003321673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963371,0.002318504,0.0004920674,0.0003219005,0.0003803284,0.0001501486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009279198,0.00002285783,0.00005212537,0.0000342417,0.0001760145,0.000001453371,0.008181035,8.643264e-8,0.00002522545,0.8637834,0.1170461,0.01058465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001956683,0.00003459863,0.0004716485,0.00006111016,0.0001585497,0.000003312516,0.002092684,7.62803e-7,0.000005054854,0.166713,0.8300547,0.0002089086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002360187,0.0005017006,0.0003027488,0.0134654,0.001498825,0.001309411,0.00007477441,0.0000575055,0.9825536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02463715,0.000163441,0.002931581,0.002175379,0.001608459,0.0001296265,0.00002401052,0.00007362357,0.9682567],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7130086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9427612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146710565","doi":"10.1348/026151007x231048","title":"Sex differences in help‐seeking appear in early childhood","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Developmental Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Task (project management); Matching (statistics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02889607072089761,"gpt":0.3329368172141153,"spread":0.3040407464932177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003669197,0.0001352684,0.0004099828,0.0004463144,0.0002135241,0.00006612151,0.000622344,0.0002953801,0.0001306115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000302917,0.0001785572,0.00007469919,0.0007037008,0.0005980037,0.0004041461,0.00004444629,0.0007895289,0.00003364641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002690694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002393792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001322368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009731147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973537,0.0003196026,0.0009201481,0.000272305,0.0004320355,0.0007022214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991748,0.0001651812,0.0003442128,0.00006006542,0.00007478775,0.0001809103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004412882,0.0003218033,0.8102417,0.000002015239,0.00002231009,0.001565887,0.02469907,1.889752e-7,0.0004540413,0.0001243501,0.0002513529,0.1622731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001263852,0.00007169852,0.984809,0.0002229149,0.000002233298,0.0008533803,0.008890869,4.956289e-8,0.00003246267,0.002125746,0.001541226,0.0001865202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689581,0.0006693639,0.0001148653,0.0006768442,0.000895258,0.0001478939,0.000001456261,0.00001582531,0.02852037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957649,0.0006065621,0.002103868,0.001127482,0.0002335697,0.000002448925,5.232034e-7,0.00001315297,0.0001474878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1745673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7281349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114797780","doi":"10.1080/01973533.2013.856786","title":"Reach Out and Reduce Prejudice: The Impact of Interpersonal Touch on Intergroup Liking","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Basic and Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Prejudice (legal term); Friendship; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Outgroup; Feeling; Casual; Interpersonal relationship; Interpersonal interaction; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04722671938236108,"gpt":0.4191015351904144,"spread":0.3718748158080533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009286003,0.0001574841,0.000297477,0.00005588325,0.0006758747,0.0000336673,0.0003038635,0.0002925117,0.00006060668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001039823,0.0001248539,0.00008804913,0.0001399209,0.002474518,0.0000575396,0.00005814053,0.0003779296,0.00001482988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004805098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003798365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001273768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985561,0.0002927172,0.0002334904,0.0003751317,0.0001774921,0.0003650459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992328,0.0003014487,0.0001838143,0.0001518597,0.00004018531,0.00008985252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008436121,0.0003639947,0.009724973,0.0000182425,0.0002519809,0.000001967073,0.2221796,0.000001071056,0.01283113,0.3955688,0.03322294,0.3249918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003528111,0.001162999,0.7683932,0.00009608646,0.0001012521,0.00001213152,0.03181542,0.00001308649,0.0001995465,0.1610921,0.03271084,0.0008751273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7901787,0.00004674546,0.000121964,0.004997682,0.0002793747,0.0002078311,0.000004663728,0.00003483606,0.2041282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996761,0.00005983133,0.00005916945,0.002158965,0.0006987707,0.00002550692,0.000001570897,0.00001325368,0.0002219664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7586683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9117466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2438792598","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.013","title":"Work activity in food service: The significance of customer relations, tipping practices and gender for preventing musculoskeletal disorders","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Ergonomics","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail; Aids Fonds","keywords":"Exploratory research; Work (physics); Customer relationship management; Service (business); Medicine; Population; Psychology; Physical therapy; Business; Environmental health; Marketing; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04395481382251903,"gpt":0.3416738086329016,"spread":0.2977189948103826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009804802,0.00007574655,0.0001142933,0.00003387892,0.0002983596,0.00001803899,0.0001944118,0.0001073403,0.000007691581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002121537,0.00005993208,0.00003348815,0.0002182704,0.0003186039,0.0002547848,0.00003996183,0.0000986148,0.000006453721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007229533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007170618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000235996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002599149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992391,0.00008230012,0.0001670361,0.00021206,0.00007834647,0.000221128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985296,0.0008864691,0.0004022517,0.0001278737,0.00002726466,0.00002660358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008549888,0.0003760734,0.2229646,0.0002273431,0.0003194495,1.71617e-7,0.0639829,0.0003365179,0.01561413,0.2110538,0.0007245619,0.4835455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001552338,0.0000406884,0.9039809,0.00005892821,0.00006597284,1.595462e-7,0.01165048,0.00003124005,0.0003003867,0.04715628,0.03467287,0.000489727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908736,0.00006491945,0.000592653,0.00304429,0.0000905195,0.0006430421,0.000004060081,0.00001807203,0.004668838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986382,0.0001234785,0.0008642075,0.0001004029,0.00007424615,0.0001393122,3.97327e-7,0.000009193529,0.0000505366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6810163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2443959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068574046","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.004","title":"Location in negotiation: Is there a home field advantage?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Singapore Management University; Lee Foundation","keywords":"Negotiation; Visitor pattern; Disadvantage; Psychology; Space (punctuation); Social psychology; Intervention (counseling); Field (mathematics); Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01672252414758224,"gpt":0.3600233846835948,"spread":0.3433008605360126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002216681,0.00008462595,0.00009744449,0.0001074793,0.0005856741,0.0001111935,0.0002117377,0.0001712883,0.002596224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006350904,0.00008804398,0.00001059541,0.0006918141,0.000195775,0.0004420434,0.00003179649,0.0001746466,0.00004943327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002252337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002076022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001501696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003200129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990796,0.00002311914,0.0002018184,0.000240567,0.0003121848,0.0001427454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990411,0.0001996084,0.00007666452,0.0001029984,0.0005092288,0.00007040498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000727715,0.0001334114,0.9601973,0.0000130793,0.000001720779,0.000004143973,0.005765156,4.060443e-7,0.0009774093,0.02812196,0.0007263009,0.004051794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003270379,0.00004054262,0.9593847,0.0000444314,0.00001129951,0.000003587561,0.001560199,3.408731e-7,0.0006015148,0.03355312,0.00429401,0.0001792549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995808,0.0001845302,0.0002266083,0.001195578,0.0002062452,0.0001681705,0.000003546915,0.00004652276,0.002160814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982538,0.0001092134,0.0004336253,0.0004955473,0.0001425286,0.00001956705,0.000008682323,0.0000109841,0.0005260406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005431158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031717024","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12141","title":"The Influence of Mood on Subordinates’ Ability to Resist Coercive Pressure in Public Accounting","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obedience; Audit; Psychology; Social psychology; Mood; Affect (linguistics); Accounting; Insignificance; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1657144183841616,"gpt":0.4480447667218547,"spread":0.282330348337693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02713506,0.0001763851,0.0003396887,0.0004080243,0.001486056,0.0004554879,0.002149297,0.0002764098,0.00001277698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0340601,0.0001558859,0.00006553185,0.002663763,0.002387939,0.001302527,0.0004687214,0.001098623,0.0001021307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003280649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001838711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01168218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004330028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936894,0.001924505,0.0006487721,0.0006327385,0.002006249,0.00109836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928076,0.003246345,0.0002519806,0.0007513259,0.002638516,0.0003042382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003195453,0.0001804922,0.9482039,0.00003984104,0.0000230892,0.000007320009,0.01564441,0.0001178409,0.0006917752,0.01938172,0.01380468,0.001585358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007483531,0.0001720332,0.841945,0.0002318963,0.000003056944,4.205012e-7,0.02298743,0.00001978209,0.0001071498,0.01181494,0.1216857,0.000284195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8785331,0.000474221,9.587535e-7,0.02284465,0.0002140213,0.0009564362,0.00001336918,0.0000675919,0.09689564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986017,0.00002494268,0.00003443015,0.0002559116,0.0002048894,0.0001106496,0.000002156334,0.00002079459,0.000744567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1200686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162445614","doi":"10.1007/s10865-011-9366-0","title":"Fear-related predictors of vasovagal symptoms during blood donation: it’s in the blood","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Blood Services","keywords":"Fainting; Lightheadedness; Vasovagal syncope; Health psychology; Blood donor; Psychology; Medicine; Blood pressure; Psychiatry; Anesthesia; Public health; Internal medicine; Immunology; Nursing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05880260451357035,"gpt":0.3580414644612562,"spread":0.2992388599476859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002223608,0.0001114058,0.0003311221,0.0002245355,0.0001594429,0.000007338825,0.0006338622,0.0001817034,0.0004347054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002022479,0.00007681361,0.00009201849,0.0005871446,0.001092331,0.000303343,0.00002178003,0.000532091,0.000002821175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004568372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001275525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001368572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003781692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976195,0.0003118816,0.0008078571,0.0001155091,0.0008871912,0.0002581399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986726,0.0001044574,0.0006799724,0.0001436422,0.0002823559,0.0001169602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009154744,0.001137087,0.7589802,0.00001113672,0.0001130523,0.0004435389,0.2310319,0.000001270719,0.005464609,0.001488689,0.0004872768,0.0007496946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002990284,0.001125548,0.9715317,0.0003354311,0.0004938694,0.0001644587,0.02169914,1.423905e-7,0.0004932187,0.0006923588,0.0003662431,0.0001076122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989159,0.0002748555,0.000001102781,0.003196839,0.001016597,0.0001602491,0.000001457341,0.0000110741,0.006178839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990165,0.0001591248,0.00007306837,0.0001547177,0.0004333524,0.000002926314,4.221037e-7,0.000007777969,0.0001521033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2125515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4759719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121977430","doi":"10.7202/011541ar","title":"La mesure du contrat psychologique dans un contexte de travail francophone","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02019689961749696,"gpt":0.3043478678983895,"spread":0.2841509682808926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002437673,0.0003073948,0.0003604715,0.00008465179,0.001339056,0.0000818832,0.0005557453,0.002562504,0.002557395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000817237,0.0003611465,0.0001820593,0.001190486,0.003916701,0.0005098565,0.00003438996,0.001832793,0.001324286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004191479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007758896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001961268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001482693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957563,0.002119649,0.0005777529,0.0004840724,0.0003223361,0.0007399478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976087,0.001274855,0.0002924119,0.0003470219,0.000161915,0.0003151167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005716145,0.0009228922,0.1003554,0.000003427976,0.0003378425,0.00008961456,0.1902864,0.001117715,0.0005706759,0.07758819,0.1623231,0.4663477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001374412,0.00008628954,0.2292108,0.0001232602,0.00009261494,0.00006389646,0.02966306,0.0001077221,0.0002268921,0.004453054,0.734112,0.0004860389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7384439,0.01271283,0.002978145,0.06892847,0.001595032,0.0003972464,0.0000768771,0.0001680739,0.1746995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968197,0.003676897,0.001229922,0.001734641,0.001699918,0.00004252928,0.000007838566,0.00003282395,0.02337838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5717889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990576973","doi":"10.1080/01973533.2010.497456","title":"Exploring the Efficacy of Compliments as a Tactic for Securing Compliance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Basic and Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Compliance (psychology); Moderation; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Test (biology); Norm (philosophy); Conformity; Norm of reciprocity; Prosocial behavior; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2224638816847763,"gpt":0.4385080646492455,"spread":0.2160441829644691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006789099,0.000124736,0.0002494215,0.00003875837,0.001289212,0.00002578779,0.0003892679,0.0001541128,0.00004427827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001100579,0.0001168925,0.00007380305,0.0001912021,0.001944143,0.00009599364,0.00004290625,0.0003413579,0.00002773172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001508947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004670938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001539235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001347847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987985,0.00007551575,0.000237486,0.000318161,0.0001681834,0.0004021405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990147,0.0004966356,0.0001815219,0.0001679794,0.0000608451,0.00007831382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000329971,0.0002732498,0.001580749,0.00002779268,0.0000953172,0.000001132724,0.04996936,5.529246e-7,0.02826457,0.8426927,0.001581251,0.07518329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005870559,0.0001958996,0.6375146,0.00004035467,0.0001278855,0.000008299231,0.02133423,0.000002854915,0.001196283,0.1711388,0.161806,0.0007642074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9308017,0.00002429052,0.0001530899,0.005077198,0.001006737,0.0005908592,0.000006386271,0.00005052434,0.06228916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966994,0.00003325724,0.0004206004,0.001861536,0.0006792453,0.0001813847,0.000001698935,0.0000149453,0.0001079097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.671554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766734793","doi":"10.1111/cdev.13029","title":"Becoming Kinder: Prosocial Choice and the Development of Interpersonal Regret","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child Development","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Department of Education, Northern Ireland","keywords":"Regret; Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Task (project management); Child development; Interpersonal relationship","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03922379276670052,"gpt":0.3475124060760036,"spread":0.3082886133093031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001683485,0.0001286426,0.0002126513,0.00005419284,0.00178891,0.00004330637,0.0003870956,0.0001185319,0.00009026433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000372817,0.0001008497,0.00003634991,0.0002007676,0.002493662,0.0001162103,0.0001479131,0.0001712611,0.00003919774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001516276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005910281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001195618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002542409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984664,0.0001447075,0.0003857686,0.0002635224,0.0004041159,0.0003354843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992839,0.0001818818,0.0001904149,0.0001106012,0.0001431863,0.00008998383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008850884,0.00007772061,0.03618445,0.00001974432,0.000144013,6.904817e-7,0.8754021,4.325946e-8,0.00005089835,0.01452828,0.00168471,0.07181885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002241044,0.00002704966,0.6170793,0.0002599009,0.00001735824,0.000003115339,0.01958069,0.000002228794,0.002374995,0.001953383,0.3560455,0.000415457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9115314,0.00017818,0.0002244694,0.006765975,0.0006345265,0.000462016,0.000001031624,0.00005148136,0.08015089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880242,0.00001329067,0.009925736,0.001085689,0.0003804014,0.00003657454,0.000001460656,0.000009199198,0.0005234618],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055280955","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.03.011","title":"Tipping behavior in Canadian restaurants","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Hospitality Management","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hospitality industry; Staffing; Demographic economics; Marketing; Advertising; Economics; Econometrics; Business; Tourism; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02181066984935692,"gpt":0.3899245728920763,"spread":0.3681139030427194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001208626,0.0000614333,0.0001043149,0.0003625078,0.00008895923,0.00007711621,0.0007020952,0.00005286939,0.00007495125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001126723,0.000068068,0.00006826752,0.0001543614,0.0001037568,0.000377526,0.00001835738,0.0001465903,0.00001416384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008254374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001459714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07617102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1104539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986236,0.00007954381,0.0003470689,0.00009958353,0.0005852515,0.0002649712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993466,0.00001876626,0.0001755739,0.00007345188,0.0002214027,0.000164277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009669747,0.0006386917,0.6161137,0.000004426117,0.0002006805,0.004670936,0.01248351,0.00008878338,0.0000706209,0.1691701,0.006368253,0.1900935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003141267,0.00004742595,0.9683298,0.00004774252,0.000009509075,0.000004472413,0.002693764,0.000001009033,0.000005441866,0.007689633,0.02077829,0.00007875723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8945679,0.00007772465,0.00002488768,0.02400397,0.00142344,0.0001373742,0.000002754338,0.000008278967,0.07975365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976331,0.0001410473,0.0003864848,0.00137964,0.0002299787,0.000002036307,7.271468e-7,0.000002664756,0.000224344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3522161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9299808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971117515","doi":"10.1177/0193945906288597","title":"Editorial","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1113235662504222,"gpt":0.5431514608103848,"spread":0.4318278945599626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01436667,0.0002245638,0.0006197245,0.0007622146,0.001102564,0.000512108,0.002093579,0.002173885,0.00004054425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007227622,0.0002291165,0.000266469,0.0006634856,0.00332524,0.0004891424,0.00005916111,0.006041008,0.000116841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002070577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00449616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009792825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002524179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874996,0.002202132,0.0008141746,0.0003346667,0.008031473,0.001117977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894115,0.003719619,0.0007397865,0.0003073722,0.005435097,0.0003866295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001568463,0.0001998781,0.000119996,0.00001169979,0.0000307776,0.00006221318,0.005767995,0.000001420894,0.00002811315,0.00005962156,0.9891886,0.004372904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005102908,0.0002953189,0.0001055861,0.001389852,0.00003071153,0.000003783106,0.001253239,3.333933e-8,0.000003177669,0.008858136,0.9873623,0.0001875463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006313287,0.0008874933,0.00001457742,0.00215599,0.9624346,0.0001676939,0.00001884557,0.00002444886,0.03366501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007543087,0.0004182917,0.00009853591,0.00001010204,0.993059,0.000003039356,0.000007116948,0.00005040295,0.005599174],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03062441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}