{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":827,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":14,"predictions_cover":827,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"abc0d43116f7","filters":{"topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication"}},"results":[{"id":"W2114232665","doi":"10.18438/b8sg8r","title":"An Evidence Based Checklist for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"Medical Library Association","keywords":"Checklist; Computer science; Peer review; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Library science; Psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05456863726662404,"gpt":0.3201746414648391,"spread":0.2656060041982151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004701252,0.0001190036,0.0001355276,0.00007746941,0.0005535219,0.00336408,0.0007568892,0.00005482418,0.0005251255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006562228,0.00008402613,0.00005687872,0.0001031086,0.0001951852,0.3545707,0.00005483759,0.0006376512,0.000006901192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007149884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006520023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001069758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000359719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983686,0.0003784971,0.0004410017,0.0001176077,0.0005074994,0.0001867692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927133,0.005319852,0.0003996244,0.0006718788,0.0008298132,0.00006554241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002533138,0.00004817604,0.00002284525,0.001688164,0.00001480434,9.824601e-8,0.001497742,0.00006978235,0.0001454923,0.9755555,0.01269573,0.008008305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001586579,0.000220875,0.0003500511,0.001862579,0.00006014653,0.000002105662,0.002086301,0.01174954,0.0007662993,0.0002138866,0.9824031,0.000126478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008419442,0.06243559,0.007249462,0.8819899,0.000740018,0.002721514,0.0001612333,0.0003625554,0.03592031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9144095,0.02426042,0.002221303,0.05741018,0.0002946933,0.0002061899,0.0002715808,0.00001684459,0.000909252],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563885251","doi":"10.1108/07378830510636300","title":"Open Journal Systems","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Computer science; Insider; Originality; World Wide Web; Electronic publishing; Publication; Library science; The Internet; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05464594909309639,"gpt":0.2457894410662516,"spread":0.1911434919731552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002632722,0.00006471737,0.00009215859,0.00007806365,0.0005205093,0.01082968,0.001517019,0.00003374866,0.002089152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000183451,0.000051832,0.00003100193,0.00003365445,0.00003678743,0.01294446,0.0003442244,0.0003378133,0.0002350512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000131895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005037348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000481848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001181737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994043,0.0000879513,0.0001856923,0.00008264648,0.0001141749,0.0001252221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994615,0.00003287,0.00008384755,0.0003316562,0.0000273632,0.00006281224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005833073,0.0000433955,0.0002677926,0.000004013449,0.00001189182,0.000002051915,0.003287771,0.000005711454,0.00001269099,0.4857868,0.4991507,0.01142131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001355602,0.00002206516,0.0001181232,0.00002993879,0.000003439314,0.00001781791,0.0008136065,0.0001365855,0.00002697097,0.00299913,0.9956157,0.00008105794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02119594,0.001889153,0.00001822882,0.01359337,0.0005603752,0.0001284555,0.0000127154,0.0002276008,0.9623742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.867036,0.00007914347,0.0007676187,0.0008992474,0.001563197,0.00001125716,0.00002780032,0.00001829552,0.1295974],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8458401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250419719","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.399","title":"The University of Minnesota Press","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Test (biology); Library science; History; Mathematics; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Arithmetic","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04436229118638178,"gpt":0.219301264394607,"spread":0.1749389732082253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004155305,0.00008299318,0.0001716159,0.0001389442,0.0009029566,0.03376117,0.002075555,0.00007768051,0.00005380127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002556961,0.00005964804,0.0001443746,0.00008807799,0.0001390132,0.1076097,0.0000966606,0.001418482,0.000002446792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001241208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001875033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001161154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984751,0.0002426191,0.0004186128,0.00007901388,0.0006152379,0.0001693793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960548,0.0002929308,0.0007986964,0.0003705785,0.002380928,0.0001020461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001690689,0.0001958479,0.0009712486,0.00001156276,0.0001224786,0.00002204836,0.03558303,0.00002583042,0.0006704779,0.5664024,0.3215096,0.07431642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004067258,0.0001401162,0.005657027,0.00006983787,0.00003276294,0.00001942856,0.006362457,0.00002826385,0.00003574224,0.006206532,0.9809629,0.00007816751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.428771,0.01550304,0.0003436556,0.1376854,0.002145148,0.0001851012,0.00002437092,0.00007249562,0.4152698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948573,0.0005884619,0.0004837714,0.0002372303,0.0004915016,5.344844e-8,0.000002274215,0.000006215376,0.003333185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6594533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9672419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112341358","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2013-0133","title":"Beyond traditional publishing models","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Timeline; Originality; Audience measurement; Publicity; Scholarly communication; Sociology; Product (mathematics); Electronic publishing; Process (computing); Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Social science; History; Political science; Qualitative research; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1789991944869216,"gpt":0.282738277874853,"spread":0.1037390833879314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001197598,0.00005359628,0.0000888683,0.0001667763,0.0001284815,0.003720309,0.0002637037,0.00002596828,0.0002279827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001810753,0.00004555036,0.00005528576,0.00003728806,0.00003686519,0.02551517,0.00001679426,0.0002562631,0.00001019174],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001156396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006401425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003867257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989694,0.00009757598,0.0003363928,0.00004673458,0.000473179,0.00007671425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987118,0.00006289777,0.0003625623,0.00008906713,0.0006772898,0.00009635314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003488357,0.0000792713,0.00008788867,0.000003274282,0.00003304284,0.000002463767,0.03586059,0.0007602285,0.00003716883,0.840519,0.1180628,0.004519392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001276114,0.0002127599,0.0002426549,0.00003362012,0.00003752433,0.00004353842,0.01414622,0.001230853,0.00004929091,0.9215463,0.06106907,0.00011208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3930804,0.0008925746,0.002694917,0.01984037,0.002561988,0.00011252,0.00002194901,0.0000457651,0.5807496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964548,0.00001512776,0.001270693,0.0004311682,0.0009570674,0.000001638134,0.00004268821,0.000006579397,0.0008202349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6033744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12803258","doi":"10.28945/1333","title":"Starting to Publish Academic Research as a Doctoral Student","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of doctoral studies","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Sociology; Publication; Library science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.325214018832797,"gpt":0.4948906395995111,"spread":0.1696766207667141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003516892,0.0001283308,0.0002338115,0.0005850079,0.0004440697,0.002185242,0.00190723,0.00005702601,0.0003601924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003713815,0.00009939817,0.0001157138,0.0001092221,0.0002569069,0.0026229,0.0006405646,0.001941537,0.000088532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001937489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001341237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002984163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001574623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971676,0.000185542,0.0006839462,0.0001524831,0.001528126,0.0002822998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934666,0.0003581366,0.0003450008,0.0001986933,0.005470472,0.0001610881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003615425,0.0006254892,0.0638098,0.00001669603,0.001553416,0.0001200914,0.2168151,0.00002344485,0.005804632,0.4104347,0.2788205,0.02161458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000827108,0.0003956942,0.01058481,0.0001818788,0.00002652087,0.00002664262,0.02975553,0.000007599497,0.000260605,0.02130711,0.9363887,0.000237838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587346,0.0009690094,0.000005987335,0.02725417,0.006161086,0.00009739129,0.00001057951,0.00002795906,0.006739176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991966,0.0001265038,0.0004651065,0.000881415,0.00357524,0.00001029938,0.000003009165,0.00001382469,0.002958592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6575682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230545602","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.2.184","title":"Reflections on Ten Years of Teaching Writing for Publication to Graduate Students and Junior Faculty","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Style (visual arts); Graduate students; Mathematics education; Course (navigation); Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Visual arts; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2143210131868709,"gpt":0.4039979263714051,"spread":0.1896769131845342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006211734,0.0001261381,0.0002638887,0.0008600582,0.0006695964,0.04484392,0.001077691,0.00009225664,0.000007598382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112558,0.0001179559,0.0001182662,0.0001665582,0.00003568,0.05640519,0.0001033316,0.001606358,0.000001632447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001264201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007529018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009559109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003786122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977199,0.0001992191,0.000786783,0.0001805507,0.000887776,0.0002257892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958134,0.0002923303,0.0007864356,0.0002900489,0.002619167,0.0001985839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003727387,0.001106066,0.008595333,0.00005729109,0.0002837552,0.000005755028,0.1037813,0.00006117922,0.005493131,0.3895032,0.0997473,0.390993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004285493,0.00366755,0.4421965,0.001625706,0.0002572204,0.00009355601,0.03754912,0.00009366851,0.0002900377,0.02864382,0.4804502,0.0008470758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458526,0.0001214355,0.0004355095,0.03501882,0.0003907575,0.0002627342,0.00004545186,0.0000474967,0.01782524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907706,0.00001520124,0.006314806,0.001603944,0.0006377666,0.000006278097,0.00002971922,0.00001674644,0.000604976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4336012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178887404","doi":"10.1163/9789004304338_004","title":"Writing for Scholarly Publication in a Canadian Higher Education Context: A Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Library science; Political science; History; Computer science; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1698371414797995,"gpt":0.3129147994584967,"spread":0.1430776579786972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001709067,0.0002426946,0.0002678038,0.0008508505,0.0004762597,0.006036879,0.0004557973,0.0002178349,0.001809285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002480237,0.0002454138,0.00007097011,0.00002686345,0.0000524352,0.003840647,0.0000562903,0.0007024112,0.00008546191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008674852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002011917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7041523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9690115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985304,0.00006735406,0.0005342991,0.000351454,0.0002316742,0.0002847572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964862,0.0001033868,0.0002385555,0.0006893597,0.002196559,0.0002859042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000509891,0.00009184664,0.0002896495,0.00001249939,0.0000292767,0.00001445955,0.00909063,8.263223e-8,7.927439e-8,0.9051862,0.06872275,0.01655746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004090312,0.00009536301,0.00006716932,0.0000804358,0.00004100618,0.00002946317,0.01082819,0.00001160416,2.683987e-8,0.01326295,0.9748796,0.0002951196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002355332,0.001173223,0.000001069273,0.003461777,0.000618941,0.001422982,0.0001106651,0.00008871291,0.9907673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4825923,0.000002282393,0.00003413753,0.0006020848,0.0004363035,0.0002058297,0.0003850483,0.00003636328,0.5157056],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9061569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W342449701","doi":"10.3138/9781442627475","title":"Print Culture and the Blackwood Tradition, 1805-1930.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Print culture; Politics; Romance; Publishing; Journalism; History; George (robot); Art history; Subject (documents); History of literature; Media studies; Political culture; Literature; Art; Classics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02300248985294256,"gpt":0.1942332851845065,"spread":0.171230795331564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003589721,0.0003555114,0.0003768608,0.003385922,0.0009980088,0.001268227,0.0009412825,0.0002679318,0.00008682671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004991276,0.000271683,0.0002153057,0.0004392683,0.0007683028,0.001091295,0.0002711737,0.001114521,0.00003071702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002933322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005614673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02289374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02941669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985295,0.0002917554,0.0002331848,0.000401917,0.0002993393,0.0002442973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984681,0.0001543919,0.000304549,0.0007280457,0.0002878303,0.00005708529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007081541,0.00006859163,0.000002670368,0.00006401631,0.000146496,0.00001947576,0.04764094,0.000001123904,6.376382e-8,0.8195993,0.1302457,0.002140813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001277077,0.00005544876,0.000007053683,0.0001190602,0.0002528712,0.000007319122,0.001162361,0.00002532169,8.103089e-7,0.0004350685,0.9963025,0.0003550741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001505329,0.00003187952,0.00002287446,0.0006244173,0.0002561841,0.0006430133,0.000214736,0.0002278793,0.9978285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01680748,0.08380548,0.0001588663,0.0005380036,0.002031483,0.00001366497,0.001750485,0.0001130276,0.8947815],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8660569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045659127","doi":"10.7152/acro.v17i1.12493","title":"SOCIAL TAGGING AND THE NEXT STEPS FOR INDEXING","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Classification Research Online","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Search engine indexing; Computer science; Similarity (geometry); Situational ethics; Automatic indexing; Process (computing); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Data science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.29099386369688,"gpt":0.4456171541809319,"spread":0.1546232904840519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002670877,0.0000637044,0.0001043389,0.0001657918,0.00108151,0.0008826212,0.000351016,0.00003664143,0.00001540006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005931627,0.00004602454,0.00002736066,0.0001235001,0.0007500276,0.001536967,0.00006968353,0.0004473574,0.000002238982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006199337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004207004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002892716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004606673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987427,0.0003268856,0.0002531301,0.0001720892,0.0002812122,0.0002239541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980308,0.001323232,0.00008642137,0.0002125753,0.0003290016,0.00001800958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006256832,0.00006444418,0.0002890771,0.00001844226,0.000002367633,9.885837e-8,0.002972191,0.00001061343,0.00006781462,0.9587381,0.001129251,0.03664504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009311933,0.00001701746,0.002930277,0.00002480194,0.000002550808,2.725002e-7,0.009289443,0.009531576,0.00000622593,0.1117648,0.865431,0.00007079171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3698986,0.03201067,0.002876566,0.3597152,0.0007524141,0.003861097,0.0002357858,0.0003592921,0.2302904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955732,0.0006144423,0.0005076941,0.0001319029,0.0006516095,0.0001727937,0.0001417482,0.0000105864,0.002196038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8643018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8511137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498109303","doi":"10.29173/cais174","title":"Complementary or Discrete Contexts in Online Indexing: A Comparison of User, Creator and Intermediary Keywords","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Search engine indexing; Humanities; Point (geometry); Computer science; Art; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04615130863840024,"gpt":0.2937453815662746,"spread":0.2475940729278743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007812919,0.0003430959,0.0008777429,0.0002831329,0.0002137336,0.004282437,0.001842169,0.0001933266,0.0002848484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007635044,0.0002615407,0.0001264921,0.0002054408,0.001729275,0.01429623,0.001140072,0.000755219,0.000001400133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007905831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002393988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009943612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003367254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976417,0.0001084138,0.001079842,0.0003070819,0.0004341818,0.0004287767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786382,0.0004835026,0.001324467,0.0002935146,0.01910055,0.0001597723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004165505,0.000913265,0.6673952,0.001236743,0.000229653,8.440432e-7,0.230169,0.000001381493,0.002167437,0.06833953,0.0121478,0.01698262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002855018,0.001691925,0.552753,0.005468726,0.0002940338,0.00002113991,0.1175028,0.002216237,0.003370877,0.008823964,0.304238,0.000764253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979964,0.00218585,0.00000326033,0.01173934,0.0002659977,0.0005634821,0.0009226213,0.00001978049,0.004335639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958786,0.0006365488,0.0003168882,0.000230055,0.0001441646,0.00003243809,0.00004595954,0.00002830057,0.002687076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2920902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009710424","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.4.397","title":"Sustaining Scholarly Publishing: New Business Models for University Presses","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Scholarship; Digital scholarship; Business model; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Product (mathematics); Scientific communication; Sociology; Electronic publishing; Business; Marketing; Management; Library science; Political science; The Internet; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1603123226516099,"gpt":0.2368552250906329,"spread":0.07654290243902301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008356635,0.0003570219,0.0005687937,0.001480492,0.001492872,0.2914864,0.00507501,0.0004298133,0.0003159037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02118859,0.0003387203,0.0003510624,0.0006307317,0.0001696015,0.7185622,0.0004936669,0.004012711,0.000005608083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004038122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001603458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002774185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004091454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960459,0.0004094031,0.001100948,0.0004131855,0.001345375,0.0006851841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782295,0.0005687574,0.001781439,0.0008033836,0.01794903,0.000667865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000715895,0.000426969,0.002701977,0.0001192196,0.0004400856,0.00004725471,0.07281603,0.0001508329,0.0003606726,0.6818705,0.2137082,0.02664241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031967,0.0002821377,0.003221925,0.0004136595,0.0002417799,0.00006230611,0.02995561,0.0001830555,0.00008568132,0.1126007,0.8491601,0.000596301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1115566,0.01010247,0.1239291,0.07701539,0.007915446,0.001288196,0.0002342138,0.0007368952,0.6672217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559679,0.0002771155,0.02857355,0.001200021,0.003351489,0.000003730033,0.00008910398,0.0001061064,0.01043097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8444113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W240213713","doi":"10.7765/9781784991760","title":"Empire of scholars: Universities, networks and the British academic world, 1850–1939","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Index (typography); History; Political science; Association (psychology); Media studies; Economic history; Classics; Sociology; Ancient history; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02430170736635455,"gpt":0.2174729606895033,"spread":0.1931712533231487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007698185,0.0002003438,0.0003896899,0.0001308143,0.001077194,0.004114106,0.0009993871,0.0002756429,0.002001407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003646724,0.0001646278,0.0001238166,0.00003501366,0.001196999,0.001838757,0.0004058256,0.002147238,0.00002502559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001077065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002710008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004254285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01074071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987467,0.0002038919,0.0003708954,0.0002172519,0.0002588883,0.0002023753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983668,0.0003995292,0.0003294729,0.0005525143,0.0002844796,0.00006715308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009641645,0.000004692703,0.00001279278,0.00002102006,0.00006736487,7.775872e-7,0.00198581,0.000002653547,4.05228e-8,0.4810879,0.5128054,0.004001918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005320809,0.00001310603,0.00005562143,0.0004312261,0.00008705211,0.00000489651,0.001994254,0.0001871279,8.067811e-8,0.01329284,0.9831942,0.0002075174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007249741,0.01746766,0.00001054648,0.0007891921,0.0002996541,0.000279063,0.00004171891,0.00008730817,0.9802999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01460834,0.002624551,0.00002069936,0.0007554634,0.0006249158,0.000008798286,0.000209905,0.00003241025,0.9811149],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4703888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164406362","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2006.03.003","title":"The self-publishing phenomenon and libraries","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Corporatization; Mainstream; Subsidy; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0586264983214787,"gpt":0.2857857727217174,"spread":0.2271592744002387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004124463,0.00006649613,0.00005664533,0.000476305,0.005597041,0.08289049,0.001449297,0.00002986768,0.0001047494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004428254,0.00004373962,0.00001623543,0.0006395186,0.001557901,0.1885869,0.0006954221,0.0005035982,0.00007359149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002960103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004357591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001846017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001798837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980402,0.0001488647,0.0002759369,0.0001102288,0.001014984,0.0004097758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985808,0.0005140076,0.00008179162,0.0004049288,0.0003304666,0.00008806872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004719268,0.000007813238,0.0004053014,0.000006152859,0.0000013397,7.098324e-8,0.01221182,0.000001624501,0.000007736354,0.9425564,0.032144,0.01265301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008384496,0.00002274715,0.003824729,0.000008507991,6.330907e-7,0.00000105128,0.007766974,0.001058296,0.00008096567,0.0425515,0.9445362,0.0000645516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08430039,0.0004303011,0.000008568006,0.02397701,0.0001722858,0.0001712202,0.000009685429,0.0002323481,0.8906982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937287,0.0001617804,0.0004465211,0.0003401068,0.0002970545,0.00002563928,0.00004938878,0.000005726702,0.004945074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9123922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980987091","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.4.347","title":"Giving It Away: Sharing and the Future of Scholarly Communication","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Scholarship; Scholarly communication; Publishing; Openness to experience; Focus (optics); Public relations; Obstacle; Sociology; Business; Marketing; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04590017760953421,"gpt":0.2515267491722263,"spread":0.2056265715626921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02151209,0.0001971975,0.0004351638,0.0004858803,0.001243963,0.1036108,0.002833257,0.0001993567,0.0001377966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005848614,0.0001342329,0.0002050253,0.000226085,0.0003747396,0.3339757,0.00077375,0.004315958,0.000003861816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001175379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003395409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001621314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965498,0.000761574,0.001135109,0.0001447364,0.001050259,0.0003584645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935006,0.0006799689,0.001683011,0.0009136703,0.00299056,0.0002322124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001489128,0.0001587726,0.0557016,0.00006882875,0.0002297345,0.000001106084,0.106868,0.000005771529,0.0002264526,0.8018548,0.01746794,0.01726802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002906978,0.00009033408,0.0232079,0.0006341675,0.0001900443,0.0001281984,0.06568646,0.0001534681,0.00004714803,0.02069749,0.8859146,0.0003432651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.762745,0.07266983,0.0001472883,0.09659266,0.00193906,0.0002529758,0.00001477532,0.00005629347,0.06558213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929054,0.001312896,0.00134308,0.001199949,0.002212958,0.000004855653,0.000008461853,0.00002979204,0.0009825627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8684466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024161129","doi":"10.1136/ip.2004.007864","title":"Eats, Shoots & Leaves","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Injury Prevention","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Cargill (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Shoot; Forensic engineering; Engineering; Materials science; Botany; Chemistry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06273803248041888,"gpt":0.3034680890053121,"spread":0.2407300565248932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003575229,0.00007609457,0.00007757999,0.00008602231,0.000293562,0.0006207946,0.0002346779,0.00003259062,0.001150785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005360273,0.0000714499,0.0000722431,0.00002676969,0.00004639993,0.001751498,0.00004964474,0.0001720803,0.0006866953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003885891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000180483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005201592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008629273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993619,0.0001015904,0.0001582287,0.0001183976,0.000138836,0.0001211009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999463,0.00002298838,0.00007372381,0.0003319437,0.00007407494,0.00003432709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004492243,0.0005233882,0.000767853,0.00002161583,0.00005725608,2.661336e-7,0.03416442,0.0000152244,0.001538101,0.3322212,0.1272914,0.5033543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001036235,0.00003814109,0.0009366822,0.0000242515,0.00001398395,7.755743e-7,0.0002247128,0.00004329035,0.0001905893,0.0117092,0.9866103,0.0001044351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8040199,0.0003259169,0.0001511479,0.001913481,0.00034142,0.0001173675,0.00001259572,0.0002049777,0.1929132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162192,0.00002439715,0.0004071324,0.0001387848,0.0008219557,0.00001586882,0.00005887397,0.00001011632,0.08230369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8593189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001956072","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0040","title":"University Press Forum 2011: The End of the Tunnel?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Publishing; Stupidity; Subject (documents); Sociology; Media studies; Law; Library science; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07487764539186842,"gpt":0.2018938420384975,"spread":0.1270161966466291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003858192,0.0001096817,0.0001827712,0.000158043,0.000850184,0.01403231,0.003689575,0.0000980454,0.0003182138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001545199,0.00006084428,0.000234255,0.00009791184,0.0003324435,0.08507466,0.0004823408,0.002114943,0.000002977957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007854607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000184331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001514814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004526144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980413,0.0004880653,0.0004627705,0.00009786995,0.0007039534,0.0002059992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961245,0.0002287347,0.001048357,0.0006284473,0.001881219,0.00008875367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001204011,0.0002237296,0.01491375,0.00001975723,0.0002349478,0.000007320064,0.06938379,0.000006974317,0.0002962537,0.7255206,0.1827646,0.006507909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005234951,0.00009552524,0.03323915,0.0001017831,0.00009925732,0.0000296077,0.02717104,0.00001569593,0.000217322,0.006177483,0.932202,0.0001276378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5001186,0.002525876,0.0001125251,0.03988474,0.003139208,0.0002330626,0.00005257267,0.00004196709,0.4538915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935956,0.00007278272,0.0002245502,0.0004043562,0.0003322352,3.473623e-7,0.000001268745,0.0000118197,0.005357046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7494374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095153281","doi":"10.1087/20120407","title":"Article and book reading patterns of scholars: findings for publishers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"BC Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Library science; Academic library; Scholarly communication; Value (mathematics); Humanism; Work (physics); Media studies; Discipline; Sociology; Publishing; Computer science; Political science; Social science; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06117438188012286,"gpt":0.2670039770478111,"spread":0.2058295951676882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002738004,0.0001327066,0.0001956128,0.0002251148,0.0004958487,0.0135237,0.0004897932,0.0001092414,0.0003139308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002901413,0.0001272059,0.00007478614,0.00007600582,0.00008451106,0.05639819,0.0001749972,0.0005412837,0.000005701945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004998338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002911936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004884321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007458872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986316,0.0001174494,0.0003377408,0.0002015443,0.0002586939,0.0004529607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985975,0.0003855783,0.0001765924,0.0003855932,0.000280756,0.0001739837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000606783,0.0001984783,0.1381513,0.0002032358,0.0001177047,3.697239e-7,0.1032754,0.000004352358,0.001711507,0.660787,0.07127764,0.02421233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009207394,0.0000658777,0.01479837,0.0001435911,0.00005268633,0.000004244461,0.01755827,0.000177834,0.0009161755,0.002996044,0.9620252,0.0003409623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513632,0.001371414,0.000277949,0.00818204,0.0006197615,0.0002698358,0.00003784784,0.0001682259,0.0377097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940305,0.00002108131,0.0005594174,0.0009193568,0.0004838846,0.0000324742,0.00006909108,0.00003087475,0.003853299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8907475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132541216","doi":"10.1007/s40037-015-0177-9","title":"Enlisting the power of the verb","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Medical Education","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Verb; Computer science; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Mathematics; Medicine; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04533029635841358,"gpt":0.302970331997493,"spread":0.2576400356390794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008880533,0.00005047672,0.00005656224,0.00002994978,0.0002571858,0.0001552418,0.0005203441,0.00002978786,0.0004641523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006568262,0.00002570564,0.00004043905,0.00005693008,0.0003324992,0.0002199624,0.00005312313,0.0003236627,0.00001930929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007935121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005901673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004286995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000114954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990501,0.0001974181,0.0001214685,0.00008996353,0.0004680978,0.00007289465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989777,0.000160309,0.00008974004,0.0003827075,0.0003234173,0.00006608032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007033106,0.0002217217,0.000223046,0.000001883509,0.000007852414,2.351683e-8,0.3738899,0.000001057198,0.000002416464,0.5944401,0.02768559,0.003519369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002006882,0.00007295025,0.006421395,0.00009492754,0.00001446122,0.000002146177,0.6353356,0.0001169089,0.00002025383,0.01293292,0.3447019,0.00008580412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4595274,0.001178086,0.00001590602,0.07759553,0.001905668,0.0001484122,0.00000274935,0.00003729585,0.459589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964196,0.00001233939,0.00001787763,0.0009370559,0.0004048963,0.00001238984,0.000002792731,0.000005066037,0.002187949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5815072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7863297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073954718","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0032","title":"The Changing College and University Library Market for University Press Books and Journals: 1997–2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic library; Work (physics); Library science; Academic community; Profit (economics); Sociology; Political science; Management; Economics; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0345659091901103,"gpt":0.2163426179543355,"spread":0.1817767087642252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008156351,0.0001241021,0.0001921362,0.0005044332,0.002624653,0.03771336,0.0009675802,0.0001165943,0.00001909042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001317957,0.0001001392,0.00009598883,0.0001364608,0.0001916676,0.1051699,0.0003513807,0.001376927,1.194794e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001008199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001359993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004512187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001167905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985681,0.0002504878,0.0003401615,0.0001359366,0.0003818779,0.0003235071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970892,0.00102399,0.0006034765,0.0002014623,0.0008333155,0.0002485436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001295043,0.00009678148,0.005279662,0.00007366911,0.0003622964,0.0001225602,0.03070317,0.000002315532,0.00007832412,0.5119006,0.415343,0.03474258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009543187,0.00008101531,0.003019406,0.0001276476,0.00005734923,0.00006336874,0.0445987,0.00006286212,0.00001231306,0.001718059,0.9491826,0.0001223493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6124898,0.03630272,0.002330323,0.08812151,0.002527337,0.0007937684,0.0005155954,0.0001845562,0.2567345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400962,0.002252664,0.002450219,0.0005799921,0.001434318,2.603184e-7,0.000008153896,0.00003745419,0.05314074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5338396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239654533","doi":"10.5260/chara.13.3.22","title":"Literary Encyclopedia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Charleston Advisor","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03959543182738285,"gpt":0.2341456308461802,"spread":0.1945501990187974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005432568,0.00008730508,0.00008036215,0.00004083969,0.0004573531,0.0004266736,0.0004735855,0.0000256344,0.001291868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000714035,0.00005465948,0.00004869255,0.00003019901,0.0001119316,0.001618499,0.00008944349,0.0002556857,0.0008727108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001795265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001283138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006500161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002520309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993216,0.0001177935,0.0001329209,0.0000706605,0.0001307549,0.0002262176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992445,0.0001039089,0.00006170671,0.0004758674,0.00004658501,0.00006744089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001356052,0.0001534969,0.002325588,0.00001111218,0.00002135792,3.408702e-7,0.2485374,2.415524e-7,0.00007032311,0.6167524,0.09508494,0.03702927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008055329,0.00001141397,0.005193388,0.00000980593,0.00001009821,0.000002384504,0.00135837,0.000008494015,0.00001737253,0.002602706,0.9906133,0.00009205045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3297311,0.004928401,0.000008891746,0.006079929,0.001147307,0.0001383482,0.00001525485,0.0001940535,0.6577567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671615,0.0001691654,0.00004055104,0.000953578,0.001456201,0.00002447271,0.00002832368,0.00001485069,0.03015134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8955284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246268276","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.4.251","title":"A System Destabilized: Scholarly Books Today","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Politics; Principal (computer security); Character (mathematics); Sociology; Scientific communication; Political science; Social science; Media studies; Epistemology; Publishing; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03789630717143656,"gpt":0.227074253623417,"spread":0.1891779464519804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01040924,0.0003183286,0.0005593991,0.001053921,0.001256504,0.2838686,0.002792707,0.0002908202,0.0002054814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004654395,0.0002685171,0.0003890635,0.000280462,0.000181196,0.3453701,0.0002919972,0.004504084,0.00004485746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000635341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004668423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00148227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004404204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994938,0.0006830955,0.001678322,0.0003067362,0.001841906,0.0005519812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906786,0.0004196327,0.001614038,0.0007988393,0.00617553,0.0003133325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001119096,0.0002851083,0.009675104,0.000101405,0.0001412285,0.00009001332,0.007945316,0.00004224115,0.001948722,0.8742207,0.09894183,0.006496471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002009687,0.0002607005,0.006854831,0.0006781923,0.0001499209,0.0003485934,0.01334714,0.00009287874,0.000182784,0.01345093,0.9620734,0.000550918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5636141,0.006424928,0.0005667778,0.01233898,0.003257115,0.0002550024,0.00003685198,0.0003238117,0.4131824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883207,0.00002165812,0.002487004,0.0005436629,0.003498903,0.000008251628,0.00002190192,0.00006083822,0.005037054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8631316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740910591","doi":"10.18352/lq.10210","title":"The Surge in New University Presses and Academic-Led Publishing: An Overview of a Changing Publishing Ecology in the UK","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Scotland’s Rural College; University of Westminster; Cardiff University; University of Hertfordshire; University College London; University of Central Lancashire; University of Surrey; University of Warwick; York University; University of Chester; Kingston University; University of Huddersfield","keywords":"Publishing; Typology; Sociology; Scholarly communication; Project commissioning; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1750110824313574,"gpt":0.3270764730727589,"spread":0.1520653906414015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02899873,0.00008936972,0.0002095556,0.0002760791,0.001633287,0.008220354,0.004770455,0.00007012054,0.00001784938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007399522,0.00004495421,0.00007915592,0.0002204943,0.0004256889,0.0151226,0.0005574216,0.001889405,5.709942e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006732124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002757161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007940545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005163118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896266,0.008639588,0.0005437908,0.00009466737,0.0007784744,0.0003168684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924931,0.004663419,0.00155989,0.0007282187,0.0005019723,0.00005341491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002686826,0.0001146793,0.161706,0.00004064785,0.0001330925,0.000005347802,0.3845986,0.000009314692,0.00006936,0.3790579,0.06433617,0.009660241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009440607,0.0002558019,0.7528494,0.0002970222,0.00003295975,0.000004575601,0.08053349,0.00005335865,0.00002152632,0.03853601,0.1263764,0.00009536699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8494815,0.002061157,0.00000253212,0.1253659,0.0003497093,0.0002413959,0.0000140322,0.000007334585,0.02247646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956686,0.000993402,0.0000144173,0.0001492647,0.0002756357,4.400703e-7,0.000002863938,0.00001086217,0.002884469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5911434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993184086","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.1.003","title":"Monographic Purchasing Trends in Academic Libraries: Did the ‘Serials Crisis’ Really Destroy the University Press?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Proposition; Exploratory research; Sociology; History; Business; Social science; Marketing; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06664208371302845,"gpt":0.2499317261886329,"spread":0.1832896424756044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0129871,0.0001940753,0.0003198479,0.0007500837,0.001492347,0.0690671,0.004108762,0.000221149,0.00004998014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004163047,0.0001186306,0.0002233368,0.0004831876,0.0002814335,0.1372504,0.0004269334,0.005214636,0.000001627249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001217239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001440459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000757821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002868964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960144,0.001766787,0.0008112091,0.0001986772,0.0008340823,0.0003748213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962709,0.0009605635,0.001091112,0.000676124,0.0008474957,0.0001538352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003253435,0.000156386,0.01310386,0.00002429197,0.0002280502,0.00001624186,0.1062222,0.0002936416,0.0003550143,0.6215058,0.2172335,0.04053576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007886043,0.0001157755,0.02377833,0.000163505,0.00008150102,0.00002737486,0.02248033,0.0001704687,0.00002310319,0.01162572,0.9405432,0.0002020726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7534279,0.004234688,0.0004392945,0.1668413,0.001866955,0.0001963426,0.00002037281,0.0001089488,0.07286417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954531,0.0003671287,0.0003035525,0.001174268,0.001709898,0.000001526518,0.000008353908,0.00002356601,0.0009586728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7233098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402104843","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v30i2.52434","title":"On Book Reviewing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06090885310551426,"gpt":0.3128412726511551,"spread":0.2519324195456408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006793599,0.00005850442,0.0001038293,0.0001180466,0.0002961638,0.0003647262,0.0003219919,0.00001852158,0.005088624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007788846,0.00004373873,0.00007777354,0.00003820252,0.00009577343,0.001138614,0.00001687689,0.0002283988,0.000239052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005444107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001683409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005308684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009105609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992548,0.00008741044,0.0002975934,0.00005344169,0.0002261777,0.00008063389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984866,0.000328951,0.0002977308,0.0001755903,0.0006570668,0.00005400116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009670577,0.00007042896,0.00004376064,0.000003330609,0.00001328285,1.303346e-7,0.002455725,4.714211e-7,0.00001555821,0.631642,0.3647413,0.001004372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008699088,0.0001231566,0.0005771235,0.0001346226,0.0000115381,0.00001213911,0.0002102165,0.000003162173,0.00003002545,0.03133562,0.9674237,0.00005168216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08299981,0.008668216,0.00003297939,0.06048979,0.00514603,0.0000847802,0.000006134772,0.00001300834,0.8425593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9013119,0.0003140531,0.002082043,0.006464933,0.01368885,0.000003538145,0.000008550369,0.00001649244,0.07610963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8183121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896189921","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v6i1.1424","title":"Open Access Funds: A Canadian Library Survey","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Context (archaeology); Scholarly communication; Business; Library science; Diversity (politics); Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4254571234026784,"gpt":0.3982267549193773,"spread":0.02723036848330107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004847223,0.00007781579,0.0001093984,0.0007290728,0.002003422,0.02494748,0.00184837,0.00006405087,0.001531942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001200116,0.00005212261,0.00002064295,0.0002584199,0.0004052051,0.1997181,0.0003033625,0.0009215507,0.00002380378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001881596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003790522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2912948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3214373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978393,0.001231521,0.0003424055,0.00006244839,0.0002205701,0.0003037733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976228,0.0008297336,0.0002280331,0.0002332398,0.0002820502,0.0008041341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001774177,0.00001220247,0.01509088,0.0000216616,0.00005749705,0.00001395709,0.07140464,5.271809e-7,5.839759e-8,0.7276381,0.1800502,0.005532916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001646979,0.00009262035,0.02738822,0.00003604336,0.000008758131,0.00004890799,0.01278268,0.00001838582,0.000005784625,0.0045671,0.9548097,0.00007707535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02103593,0.001084968,7.20877e-7,0.07049226,0.0001571198,0.0002031057,0.00004784876,0.000007177468,0.9069709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988324,0.000838109,0.0000621077,0.007060287,0.0001498126,0.000005863802,0.0000551427,0.000008819223,0.003495798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9672881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991331343","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0035","title":"Sustaining Scholarly Publishing: New Business Models for University Presses: A Report of the AAUP Task Force on Economic Models for Scholarly Publishing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Task force; Task (project management); Management; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Business; Economics; Public administration; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.115371344714879,"gpt":0.2420225637961708,"spread":0.1266512190812917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02046128,0.0007088157,0.001183136,0.001985607,0.002644956,0.3613437,0.01013688,0.0009424373,0.00008029153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04354472,0.0006071011,0.001045036,0.0008037753,0.000319946,0.7791147,0.001158548,0.006693248,0.000002037768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001326683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004195931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004666248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008763116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922748,0.0007238321,0.002724331,0.0009701059,0.002132655,0.001174283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669677,0.001554289,0.005999542,0.002270181,0.02239669,0.0008116208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001738084,0.0005742958,0.001586951,0.0003151415,0.0009307537,0.00004018253,0.04415444,0.006664316,0.000527816,0.7966098,0.138314,0.008544195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01006007,0.000941303,0.002181308,0.002187337,0.0009123399,0.0003129454,0.03824433,0.007366336,0.0004142458,0.4642992,0.4714313,0.001649242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2539232,0.006181889,0.2463631,0.1290752,0.01505951,0.006284176,0.001834145,0.0007732952,0.3405055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692366,0.0001425681,0.01694619,0.001436014,0.002788838,0.00002992366,0.0002049485,0.000206256,0.009008646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7153134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1923626479","doi":"10.18438/b8r88c","title":"The Scholarly Communications Needs of Faculty: An Evidence-Based Foundation for the Development of Library Services","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Publishing; Demographics; Descriptive statistics; Public relations; Exploratory research; Foundation (evidence); Library science; Psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07906754229580093,"gpt":0.2965405936365584,"spread":0.2174730513407575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002719373,0.000116069,0.0001207398,0.0001650093,0.001755971,0.004862387,0.001411812,0.00005369878,0.00006135035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002154424,0.00007416769,0.00004682121,0.0002132211,0.0002576568,0.4037122,0.0001975734,0.0002664664,0.000007144961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007701496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004074241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002751833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004540382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981828,0.000615712,0.0007075439,0.00007335183,0.0003007283,0.0001198232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872464,0.01038723,0.0009680787,0.0009629265,0.000380867,0.00005448475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004110679,0.00007023558,0.000656314,0.0002645431,0.00003734019,5.647567e-9,0.01727811,0.00009202386,0.00005344397,0.8841356,0.0006645012,0.09633682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002497465,0.0001598936,0.003259148,0.0005504732,0.00005185477,3.39646e-7,0.01411616,0.02446263,0.0009798501,0.0005427946,0.955516,0.0001110518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09664584,0.01139945,0.04564052,0.810712,0.0008925057,0.003712372,0.0001728548,0.0006303238,0.03019413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681144,0.001093212,0.01752338,0.01229827,0.00008348128,0.0001497309,0.0005104959,0.00001249313,0.0002145319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121268485","doi":"10.1353/scp.2006.0012","title":"A System Destabilized: Scholarly Books Today","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Principal (computer security); Character (mathematics); Scholarly communication; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Media studies; Publishing; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03789630717143656,"gpt":0.227074253623417,"spread":0.1891779464519804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01040924,0.0003183286,0.0005593991,0.001053921,0.001256504,0.2838686,0.002792707,0.0002908202,0.0002054814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004654395,0.0002685171,0.0003890635,0.000280462,0.000181196,0.3453701,0.0002919972,0.004504084,0.00004485746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000635341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004668423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00148227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004404204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994938,0.0006830955,0.001678322,0.0003067362,0.001841906,0.0005519812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906786,0.0004196327,0.001614038,0.0007988393,0.00617553,0.0003133325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001119096,0.0002851083,0.009675104,0.000101405,0.0001412285,0.00009001332,0.007945316,0.00004224115,0.001948722,0.8742207,0.09894183,0.006496471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002009687,0.0002607005,0.006854831,0.0006781923,0.0001499209,0.0003485934,0.01334714,0.00009287874,0.000182784,0.01345093,0.9620734,0.000550918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5636141,0.006424928,0.0005667778,0.01233898,0.003257115,0.0002550024,0.00003685198,0.0003238117,0.4131824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883207,0.00002165812,0.002487004,0.0005436629,0.003498903,0.000008251628,0.00002190192,0.00006083822,0.005037054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8631316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586601312","doi":"","title":"Complementary or Discrete Contexts in Online Indexing : A Comparison of User, Creator, and Intermediary Keywords","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Computer science; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02715429426790177,"gpt":0.2489368719618119,"spread":0.2217825776939101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000145044,0.0002337185,0.0006547344,0.0004057526,0.0004267185,0.0001668218,0.0006352902,0.0001686257,0.0005324525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002062827,0.0002460858,0.0001042313,0.000093081,0.0005364051,0.0005225905,0.0005080876,0.0004146147,9.247618e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001182843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001114301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03406901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1510901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987203,0.0001911368,0.000361645,0.0002829774,0.0002659139,0.0001779523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986446,0.0001147981,0.0006867116,0.0004051652,0.00008470329,0.00006396377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005194833,0.001092463,0.06116016,0.0006755946,0.000509537,0.00007777719,0.06703263,0.000004949573,0.000191668,0.004287737,0.8604698,0.00397826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001257268,0.000274237,0.01417166,0.001163738,0.0001070139,0.000004818871,0.03611368,0.0001757369,0.00001441178,0.00003543004,0.946318,0.0003639622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4346133,0.004986579,0.00007762408,0.0003657688,0.0006662986,0.0005682269,0.0007526312,0.0001988657,0.5577707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6971529,0.0001812712,0.0006105612,0.00002265415,0.0001725638,6.7232e-7,0.0005918616,0.00007295391,0.3011946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2625396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154781321","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.1.01","title":"Academic Libraries and the Economics of Scholarly Publishing in the Twenty-First Century: Portfolio Theory, Product Differentiation, Economic Rent, Perfect Price Discrimination, and the Cost of Prestige","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Portfolio; Prestige; Economics; Product (mathematics); Product differentiation; Sociology; Financial economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04806720215392401,"gpt":0.2400435669540155,"spread":0.1919763648000915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03497088,0.0002672602,0.0006077546,0.0006028882,0.000826948,0.1113331,0.003102806,0.0001895258,0.00002339733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02710946,0.0001423863,0.0001608485,0.0002252551,0.001212191,0.2364764,0.0006445365,0.003933656,5.342304e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000168548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005155294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008539426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004376782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945819,0.002314072,0.001715894,0.0003007514,0.0007640527,0.000323378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915788,0.002717601,0.002934431,0.0007609921,0.001845083,0.0001631459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005998863,0.00007568423,0.0381326,0.0000572418,0.0001517479,6.329612e-7,0.1057093,0.00007404922,0.000008325957,0.8444643,0.007603073,0.003123131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01844869,0.0003444103,0.2234378,0.001019475,0.0007625424,0.0001926781,0.1376908,0.001329585,0.00007563196,0.4442593,0.1717101,0.0007289799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8760166,0.02079259,0.00007149501,0.08935022,0.0009782524,0.0008133428,0.00005223312,0.00001967956,0.0119056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995139,0.003186284,0.0001135257,0.0005584906,0.0007509345,0.00002472869,0.00003156805,0.00002848366,0.0001669984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.400205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313028397","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-78318-1","title":"The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Victorian Women’s Writing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; History; Art; Library science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01910722219533025,"gpt":0.2136303467784634,"spread":0.1945231245831331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001055242,0.0001429432,0.0001963776,0.00007945716,0.001132953,0.0008769779,0.0009684145,0.00006867812,0.007905447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001200738,0.0001002038,0.00009781827,0.00001556372,0.0001584674,0.0001647361,0.0003040766,0.0007730827,0.0000250095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002602295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002669293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001031169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005821195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987837,0.0001271183,0.0003891878,0.0001411773,0.0003572096,0.0002016278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982888,0.0005314929,0.0002964961,0.0006766579,0.0001652429,0.00004137023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003386529,0.000005478326,0.000003075512,0.00001427518,0.00003703678,4.219764e-7,0.0286288,1.782725e-7,1.608573e-7,0.8313769,0.1373918,0.002538501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005747961,0.00003754594,0.000005863903,0.00001835956,0.0000113431,3.625444e-7,0.006643815,0.000003185705,1.218964e-7,0.05323547,0.9398668,0.0001196359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008634508,0.000849898,6.835186e-7,0.0005224081,0.001047552,0.000114445,0.00006237874,0.00006714062,0.9972491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009412598,0.0007100055,0.0000113654,0.0001352153,0.00101825,0.00007930909,0.0001673165,0.00002912748,0.9884368],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.802475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252030016","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.1.1","title":"The University Press in North America: A Brief History","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Management; Quarter (Canadian coin); Subsidy; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Economics; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06105525916122998,"gpt":0.197709239922414,"spread":0.136653980761184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00211076,0.0001079325,0.0001952358,0.0002945419,0.000939719,0.01395202,0.00194938,0.00006969037,0.00004811459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002855184,0.00008268837,0.0001230706,0.0001486031,0.0003195482,0.1128493,0.0001871482,0.002588272,0.000003679828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007153463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000403974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001469401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001732755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980946,0.0004259305,0.0004692723,0.0001184513,0.0006507554,0.0002409597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971184,0.0003697026,0.0006468754,0.0003714631,0.001359828,0.000133736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002276671,0.0002874469,0.03722689,0.00001419801,0.0001238998,0.000275649,0.1159713,0.00009621374,0.00003118198,0.08003361,0.7484266,0.01728539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004600878,0.00005324387,0.02934396,0.00002534428,0.00001099564,0.00004042166,0.004716644,0.00003400506,7.317565e-7,0.00009060378,0.9651279,0.00009603454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7891808,0.01014475,0.00005825779,0.01280791,0.001736278,0.0001133943,0.0000109716,0.00005307565,0.1858945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859597,0.001353659,0.0002349916,0.0005921471,0.0006004239,6.549789e-7,0.000005569788,0.00001498096,0.01123787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2167014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254428067","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.156","title":"The Importance of Encouraging Librarians to Publish in Peer-Reviewed Publications","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Apprehension; Hostility; Field (mathematics); Resistance (ecology); Advice (programming); Psychology; Public relations; Peer review; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1167648160464661,"gpt":0.2684599176161937,"spread":0.1516951015697275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01521522,0.000181127,0.0003865282,0.001015919,0.000637362,0.06639942,0.00406269,0.0001220027,0.0003283672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02719012,0.0001304124,0.0002016965,0.0008022178,0.0001479784,0.1889228,0.0003740244,0.002429722,0.000008375562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001503625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004942733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004127798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001802113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959483,0.000432071,0.00172518,0.0002126163,0.001274251,0.0004076083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906423,0.0004842236,0.001552368,0.000921843,0.006112865,0.0002863912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005703136,0.0002661435,0.1142781,0.00002729427,0.00009397131,0.000005564398,0.06397605,0.000005753349,0.00009918679,0.5909041,0.2146006,0.01568623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004777893,0.0001146932,0.06179688,0.0002636104,0.00003309153,0.00002333201,0.01411408,0.00002026315,0.0000395918,0.01982608,0.9030783,0.0002123197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3100214,0.007078034,0.0003703349,0.2181048,0.002666141,0.0005343919,0.00003829438,0.0001075471,0.461079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900469,0.0001903176,0.003345199,0.00155185,0.0006020819,0.00002101962,0.00001218863,0.00003525101,0.004195157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6884777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W580086655","doi":"10.5860/choice.185359","title":"The novel: a biography","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; History; Art; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08386657733718153,"gpt":0.2948482893491968,"spread":0.2109817120120152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001227072,0.00009458924,0.0001565153,0.00004747212,0.000643724,0.0008254975,0.000619749,0.00002306296,0.00006479082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000982968,0.00005211908,0.000134036,0.00008167871,0.0001286635,0.00040002,0.00006044517,0.0002419887,0.0001016826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009935546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009244996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001335675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002750625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999195,0.0001550921,0.0002812636,0.0001144293,0.000105638,0.0001485854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986951,0.0003317827,0.0001443119,0.0006781953,0.000103597,0.00004695004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003059755,0.0002238271,0.0004110966,0.00006997823,0.00002945633,4.449631e-8,0.001825238,3.507002e-7,0.00009215623,0.3137296,0.06690475,0.6167104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009554746,0.00001855052,0.0006134862,0.00008276508,0.00001529333,3.998144e-7,0.00006373178,0.00009839553,0.00000106105,0.0005625894,0.9983713,0.00007684968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04046678,0.560324,0.001392176,0.05643619,0.004348671,0.001908836,0.0001952019,0.0009079845,0.3340201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5798691,0.3053786,0.008417821,0.02427329,0.02174927,0.0004609796,0.001394632,0.0002168897,0.0582395],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9314666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7960292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251385240","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0046","title":"The Scholarly Book Review in the Humanities: An Academic Cinderella?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Humanities; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; History; Art; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1708005677963418,"gpt":0.2899838984759417,"spread":0.1191833306795999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0295067,0.000266287,0.0003949621,0.000457061,0.002465653,0.1464279,0.007297982,0.0002301335,0.0005172172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009142565,0.0001501318,0.0002402871,0.0003090265,0.0003797399,0.3196697,0.0002602515,0.01024038,0.00002630685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001810065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004267314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004717296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006249701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938886,0.00202946,0.001630478,0.0002394676,0.001687497,0.0005244801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937171,0.0007905252,0.001444534,0.001136957,0.002763565,0.0001472711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007594327,0.0002239715,0.002179122,0.0001144732,0.0001028577,0.00003988619,0.1386019,7.978853e-7,0.00003192283,0.3168381,0.5278093,0.01398169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004031746,0.0002054756,0.004067613,0.001118881,0.00006932855,0.0001010552,0.02044337,0.000005024207,0.000004608256,0.01093315,0.9624442,0.0002040573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04203164,0.5865544,0.00003208785,0.06859262,0.002186045,0.0006870958,0.00001469816,0.00009820197,0.2998032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7301085,0.0919333,0.0004759345,0.1595912,0.004975586,0.00007112361,0.00003196734,0.0001414531,0.01267099],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6880769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240891936","doi":"10.1017/s0960129508007391","title":"Editors' note: bibliometrics and the curators of orthodoxy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Structures in Computer Science","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Technische Universität Berlin; Chalmers Tekniska Högskola; Imperial College London; Institut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique (INRIA); McGill University","keywords":"Ellipse; Citation; Orthodoxy; Metaphysics; Term (time); Politics; Epistemology; Inertia; Series (stratigraphy); Task (project management); Mathematics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Geometry; Law; Physics; Geology; Management; Economics; Library science; Classical mechanics; Astronomy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02910316576555434,"gpt":0.2837472436446655,"spread":0.2546440778791112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00164745,0.00007364285,0.0001513466,0.0008099787,0.0002548901,0.0009842876,0.0008244297,0.00002193101,0.00003051145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006379804,0.00004061677,0.00002599643,0.001314082,0.001343541,0.0007171002,0.0001756682,0.0001907576,0.000001163254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001425844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003067624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001834441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004933705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989657,0.00007147513,0.0002492938,0.0001430403,0.0004222391,0.0001482989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988474,0.000549715,0.00008678554,0.0003480622,0.0001232617,0.00004483911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004781515,0.00001991126,0.0001088211,0.000008753331,9.061867e-7,3.830144e-7,0.006990147,0.00001870924,0.0000103784,0.9474586,0.0004948764,0.04488373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000429793,0.0000492865,0.009134102,0.00003840233,0.000005346792,0.000007838865,0.0001124034,0.04730535,0.0000773078,0.9398291,0.002893846,0.0001172968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.784927,0.0008929939,0.1742864,0.009473868,0.004505162,0.0006643406,0.0000102382,0.0001465944,0.02509348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871839,0.000007033644,0.01214181,0.0002381459,0.0004172212,0.000001219989,3.263445e-7,0.000002045988,0.000008306166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2022569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9491507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206489874","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2007.0043","title":"\"Different Planes of Sensuous Form\": American Critical and Popular Responses to Elizabeth Barrett Browning's Aurora Leigh and Last Poems: Annotated Bibliography, American Periodicals, 1856-62","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian periodicals review","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Diction; Scholarship; Politics; Literature; History; Browning; Art history; Classics; Art; Law; Political science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0313548256655233,"gpt":0.3060919632937038,"spread":0.2747371376281805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001648124,0.0004554132,0.001255759,0.001659764,0.0007849486,0.001335998,0.000517155,0.00008896516,0.0001466478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001852485,0.0003664119,0.0001900368,0.001628926,0.00246783,0.0005440103,0.0002636281,0.0005554216,0.0000157493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003256356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007167053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001178938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000854952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963142,0.000670456,0.001084633,0.0005986894,0.0006606302,0.0006713411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970277,0.0006898502,0.0003672928,0.0007576612,0.0004063942,0.0007510873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002125865,0.002335668,0.3844893,0.01209031,0.001140322,0.0003625896,0.08836108,5.112862e-7,0.004043025,0.1278554,0.1229407,0.2542552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002834021,0.0008226411,0.06806879,0.001726303,0.0001509768,0.00004137912,0.001198204,0.000006483539,0.00002399315,0.0001300999,0.9270298,0.0005179463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9147246,0.07503985,0.00007526535,0.007982618,0.0003311913,0.0006454097,0.0003228167,0.000209783,0.0006685031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397209,0.05612499,0.0006543063,0.002888,0.0003256992,0.0000383787,0.0001174845,0.00005324899,0.00007697986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8040891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900853539","doi":"10.1353/vcr.2017.0030","title":"Indexes: Periodical Parts and the Bookish Afterlife","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian review","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Afterlife; Index (typography); Reading (process); Periodical literature; History; Order (exchange); Content (measure theory); Set (abstract data type); Hierarchy; Period (music); Literature; Aesthetics; Art; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Library science; World Wide Web; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0371230987010988,"gpt":0.2672270546147781,"spread":0.2301039559136793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001121772,0.00008977024,0.0002210017,0.0000127534,0.002126876,0.004715888,0.000653277,0.00002829241,0.0004484706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000678857,0.00005141991,0.00006974101,0.000007229765,0.0007383979,0.0008146618,0.0001633948,0.0002340619,0.00006926481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009778931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003442259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001142159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003067956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992246,0.0001850375,0.0001995493,0.0001217629,0.0001531137,0.0001159622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986708,0.00008098096,0.0001582952,0.0009535745,0.00007339026,0.00006302597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000152932,0.00002451564,0.001371487,0.0004859295,0.00003976467,0.000002477578,0.0173284,5.305985e-9,4.724447e-7,0.8990616,0.05209896,0.02957109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002700942,0.000008926137,0.0009358278,0.0007799853,0.00003637671,0.000002145395,0.00004111381,0.000001938915,1.704185e-7,0.001465358,0.9963832,0.00007483701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009690449,0.4923876,0.00001200142,0.1253809,0.003024359,0.001112035,0.00003016571,0.0001670644,0.3681954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454034,0.04495191,0.00001571843,0.004218752,0.001163096,0.00007730359,0.000008672195,0.00001181406,0.004149357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9442843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247480655","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.3.129","title":"The Futures of Scholarly Publishing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Publishing; Library science; History; Business; Geography; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Financial economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04822615935739133,"gpt":0.2452873922877818,"spread":0.1970612329303905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01806729,0.0003130486,0.0005254664,0.0009022622,0.002632134,0.4981979,0.006069517,0.0003664809,0.00009949723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03684241,0.0002137541,0.0004605833,0.0005179485,0.0004120183,0.5845859,0.0005842765,0.007647817,0.00001083953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000400406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000948163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001138478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009757784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938831,0.0005877864,0.00192046,0.0002851432,0.002712161,0.0006112952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838355,0.0008811656,0.002636071,0.00107239,0.01118904,0.0003858099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001522989,0.0002637329,0.002509188,0.00004238334,0.0003437694,0.00002394623,0.03613319,0.00013677,0.001315366,0.8682431,0.05678421,0.03405205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002411229,0.0003695556,0.008363267,0.000567273,0.0001265058,0.0001361056,0.03427991,0.00001120102,0.0005330105,0.09217019,0.8606073,0.0004244861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6483998,0.02396011,0.0005072759,0.1689496,0.006997212,0.0003478083,0.00005789343,0.0001688493,0.1506114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914951,0.0004684066,0.001925014,0.001520158,0.003235671,0.000005579193,0.0000156465,0.00005476838,0.001279626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8038231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126550737","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2004v29n3a1426","title":"Publishing Trends and Practices in the Scientific Community","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Library science; Business model; Scientific communication; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1289594158528486,"gpt":0.2985368014765926,"spread":0.1695773856237439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006785308,0.00006143784,0.00009336548,0.0005719994,0.001881034,0.009510573,0.001840443,0.00003952179,0.00003771912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001681329,0.00004665373,0.00003154058,0.0002128584,0.0004566667,0.006609041,0.0000447488,0.001358731,0.000001799327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001248741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004994064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07761543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7396083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983577,0.0009967512,0.0002991454,0.00004430341,0.0001693662,0.0001327598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978111,0.0003840297,0.0005849399,0.0007648932,0.0003435567,0.0001114586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009132477,0.00009475715,0.004656201,0.000008658602,0.00002039716,0.000004744585,0.4556122,0.00005714517,0.00001878953,0.5013756,0.007672769,0.03046965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008249911,0.000106337,0.0878733,0.0002267567,0.00003392356,0.0001133739,0.08292075,0.00003046061,0.000007260675,0.08127144,0.7464265,0.0001649247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8556257,0.00365507,0.000007458749,0.07178145,0.0002036123,0.00004911902,0.000007127631,0.000006228822,0.06866422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990477,0.00005590815,0.0002368738,0.0004264968,0.00006176485,0.000002191586,0.00002767045,0.000005179321,0.0001362311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7387537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486479915","doi":"10.1007/s40037-016-0284-2","title":"The three ‘S’s of editing: story, structure, and style","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Perspectives on Medical Education","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Visual arts; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01220146143026777,"gpt":0.285015936503915,"spread":0.2728144750736473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001062691,0.0001744099,0.0002122236,0.0001134765,0.0006855628,0.0004746064,0.0006781117,0.0003059506,0.0005405315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01768237,0.0001023367,0.00005913765,0.00002900576,0.0008613319,0.0003322447,0.000084859,0.001309896,0.00000782335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001636073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001308382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002749803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001081835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979529,0.0002456881,0.0002504789,0.000288115,0.001098937,0.0001639081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960615,0.002117511,0.0003514146,0.0005435462,0.0007967359,0.0001292782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001818342,0.00007674256,0.000006758729,0.00002087736,0.00003348953,5.829412e-8,0.02402385,8.790876e-9,8.647218e-7,0.1178291,0.8353223,0.02266777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001672267,0.00008703108,0.00009609443,0.0002651106,0.00002460887,2.794814e-7,0.02016027,0.000004527564,0.000001568824,0.008126236,0.970953,0.00011401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.002279651,0.007709587,0.00001312411,0.01743323,0.9437115,0.0002494204,0.0001711579,0.00006067569,0.02837162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09716725,0.001322016,0.00002000881,0.0000640526,0.8964332,0.0000379679,0.0001360125,0.00003292094,0.004786595],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1356308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W162185356","doi":"10.1023/a:1021881026651","title":"Editorial: The Numbers Game: The Impact Factor and All That Jazz","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Jazz; Public health; Sexual behavior; Factor (programming language); Social psychology; Medicine; Art; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05616950805174574,"gpt":0.3139964394963488,"spread":0.257826931444603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004747697,0.0003477972,0.0003621357,0.00008807751,0.0005003224,0.001447728,0.001354744,0.0002446088,0.0001632002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003867527,0.0001822274,0.0001333985,0.00002677255,0.0009931594,0.0005785326,0.0002608726,0.001774755,0.000008477404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002884511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001929454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004594848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008692457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978464,0.0004532446,0.0003417463,0.0003088375,0.0007300053,0.0003197706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957375,0.002644805,0.0003962825,0.001002591,0.0001260186,0.00009280727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003146965,0.00008565652,0.0001950106,0.00001781425,0.0001026503,5.429858e-7,0.03059235,2.652648e-7,0.00005500536,0.0004467649,0.964505,0.003967487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002668246,0.0002023308,0.0008705844,0.00003119283,0.0002433719,9.729179e-7,0.002683674,0.000001414341,0.000007185681,0.0003249048,0.9951364,0.000231147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0178919,0.0009818984,0.000001153356,0.0002495778,0.9732329,0.0004478023,0.001273154,0.000051718,0.005869898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05274427,0.0003031034,0.00001532341,0.00002629073,0.940079,0.00008681352,0.0005351372,0.00006142641,0.006148575],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03485238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990022978","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0004","title":"How to Write for a General Audience: A Guide for Academics Who Want to Share Their Knowledge with the World and Have Fun Doing It (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Sociology; Audience measurement; Media studies; Public relations; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1028960041177675,"gpt":0.2982332853683549,"spread":0.1953372812505874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006031627,0.000262245,0.0004897006,0.000483225,0.001807656,0.03534832,0.001835742,0.0001011321,0.00001520079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004699795,0.0001558333,0.0001972293,0.0002646782,0.0001024587,0.04956514,0.0003321299,0.00179747,0.000001089538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001738637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002825309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003347545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00155387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978319,0.0001771746,0.0006795073,0.0002934671,0.0005496496,0.0004683035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937601,0.0007559898,0.0006404301,0.0004345956,0.004035914,0.0003729483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001161035,0.00003964944,0.000428124,0.0001537327,0.0001061217,0.000003065348,0.04510351,0.00001446031,0.0001972328,0.01126176,0.9225832,0.01999308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634885,0.0003163693,0.0006966082,0.001779671,0.00006802881,0.00008270476,0.007195766,0.000126766,0.00003264936,0.000345152,0.9884765,0.0002448824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1392935,0.05596201,0.00787131,0.7726907,0.0008352291,0.002599772,0.0003560483,0.0000844449,0.020307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5876837,0.009658165,0.1036121,0.1145849,0.01553455,0.0009536282,0.0001207955,0.0003408481,0.1675113],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6581057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005485269","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.384","title":"How Scholars Credit Editors in Their Acknowledgements","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Arizona State University; Princeton University","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Publishing; Invisibility; Publication; Library science; Sociology; Dual (grammatical number); Media studies; Political science; History; Law; Computer science; Literature; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04771927469616238,"gpt":0.2478713816230351,"spread":0.2001521069268727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007064474,0.0002479743,0.0004120231,0.001284556,0.0005101483,0.1778514,0.002573549,0.0002287648,0.0002082813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01504459,0.0002007436,0.0002202834,0.0003626951,0.00008690177,0.3046591,0.0001673073,0.0045052,0.00002021339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003381571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002481423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002552418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001174357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969307,0.0004004787,0.0008686876,0.0002324815,0.001118081,0.0004496009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932867,0.000206343,0.0009078468,0.0005294553,0.004800474,0.0002691516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001179999,0.0007295241,0.01172884,0.00002375375,0.000135381,0.00005175832,0.03284469,0.0000172992,0.001190304,0.02841091,0.8360869,0.08866261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00122859,0.0002701563,0.01778733,0.000291648,0.00002364607,0.00001672706,0.00859558,0.00002951675,0.0000933549,0.014539,0.9568546,0.0002699013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7388353,0.005440618,0.0001602402,0.1283095,0.02354879,0.0003007141,0.00002860979,0.0001484524,0.1032278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779944,0.0001034537,0.0007055677,0.001271177,0.01676417,0.000002477407,0.00001527148,0.00002560119,0.003117891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2391591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W377411873","doi":"10.1023/a:1014582710287","title":"Quinarianism after Darwin's Origin: The Circular System of William Hincks","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Biology","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of biology; History of science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04510719168269604,"gpt":0.206630421106671,"spread":0.161523229423975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009540819,0.00007243307,0.0002322435,0.00007767794,0.0001248484,0.00002433767,0.0008496987,0.00006825629,0.0004049081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009460616,0.00003736623,0.0002044123,0.00002085214,0.0005225575,0.0002416135,0.0000642352,0.0003749059,0.00000529055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000243688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006243351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007381953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002604746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988255,0.0004516795,0.0004390533,0.00005496975,0.0001380875,0.00009074371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983749,0.0001034718,0.0008031378,0.0004481863,0.000246546,0.00002377254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003111371,0.0006237243,0.00565978,0.0003726441,0.0008901815,0.00002050918,0.2346562,0.00004360374,0.01046109,0.2677279,0.472873,0.006360187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002058062,0.000128812,0.0008904908,0.00007702394,0.00006007242,0.0000414174,0.0009627343,0.00002683259,0.00001543271,0.000565152,0.9969766,0.00004968099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7575708,0.07046909,0.0000912172,0.008602189,0.02235663,0.0002646315,0.00004019756,0.00002997233,0.1405753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942537,0.00005868525,0.00002899658,0.00017895,0.000319899,0.000001589728,4.725286e-7,0.000006359116,0.005151378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5241035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.443346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964557241","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0004","title":"The Importance of Encouraging Librarians to Publish in Peer-Reviewed Publications","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Apprehension; Publication; Hostility; Field (mathematics); Resistance (ecology); Advice (programming); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Social psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07632522094347405,"gpt":0.2835434242458681,"spread":0.2072182033023941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021171,0.0001797539,0.0003819938,0.000937406,0.0006953099,0.08145469,0.003239226,0.0001223365,0.0001947672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03447715,0.0001287711,0.0001967622,0.0008129061,0.0001199474,0.2640083,0.0003702359,0.002493132,0.00001006457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002026057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003836991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001697301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006451893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957199,0.0004901316,0.001633275,0.0001610889,0.001445072,0.0005505048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915397,0.0007809614,0.001482848,0.0008477963,0.004946513,0.0004021722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002629332,0.0002368175,0.2224584,0.00002430824,0.00006897732,0.000001080739,0.03248255,0.00001134726,0.0001244558,0.4406527,0.2909834,0.01292968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003234594,0.00004465438,0.05495012,0.0001704392,0.00002497223,0.00001898071,0.009213344,0.00001260787,0.00001942066,0.003809091,0.9312568,0.0001561371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3894414,0.01714907,0.0002906284,0.3930891,0.003653513,0.0004720106,0.00003649969,0.0000881703,0.1957795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991193,0.0001799082,0.001719567,0.00168476,0.001405634,0.00001879704,0.0000157999,0.00003164097,0.003750917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6402734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256419905","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.2.106","title":"The Price of University Press Books, 2012–14","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Publishing; Closing (real estate); Library science; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Accounting","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04221417619652325,"gpt":0.2159397393296907,"spread":0.1737255631331674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007341825,0.0001065016,0.0001959865,0.000205832,0.0007661781,0.02564077,0.002355102,0.0000953674,0.00007664723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005786644,0.0000585682,0.000158441,0.00008429612,0.0002301576,0.1538531,0.0002674066,0.001120786,0.000003479114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001368714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002023375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001495513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000894782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978276,0.0005286123,0.0005412357,0.0001062035,0.0007656984,0.0002305932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937665,0.001124815,0.001103378,0.0004755712,0.003389317,0.0001403818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002265573,0.000107382,0.001543114,0.0000163066,0.0001863932,0.000008816611,0.006508194,0.000001951608,0.001317404,0.6705433,0.2856903,0.03385025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005926784,0.00008021257,0.00272968,0.000141391,0.0000292752,0.00001203209,0.0020804,0.00000247987,0.0001155185,0.002130171,0.9919975,0.0000887041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2477596,0.01228568,0.001424601,0.1021844,0.004339082,0.0002901835,0.00009131518,0.0001122694,0.6315128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521322,0.0008735499,0.0003723378,0.0001806845,0.0008238216,4.322825e-7,0.000001384418,0.00001776985,0.04559786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7063071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9753707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022095654","doi":"10.3138/jsp.38.1.1","title":"Plagiarism, Publishing, and the Academy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Misconduct; Public relations; Ambivalence; Order (exchange); Dishonesty; Identity (music); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Academic dishonesty; Political science; Media studies; Law; Business; Psychology; Higher education; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03540922971001967,"gpt":0.2296023244091336,"spread":0.1941930946991139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01637345,0.0002114767,0.0003931383,0.0005451278,0.00125994,0.3474341,0.002529911,0.0003339377,0.0001429017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009468933,0.0001326855,0.0002059601,0.0002170285,0.0005603997,0.3259151,0.0004096426,0.007034425,0.000006688552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001102804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000153949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001497739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002454923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963152,0.0006943406,0.001103797,0.0002054078,0.001311527,0.0003696927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951562,0.001004855,0.001334169,0.0003682702,0.001959071,0.0001773931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008389732,0.0000491023,0.002167224,0.000009564217,0.00006028006,0.0000050566,0.007238301,0.000008686835,0.00004034736,0.7416803,0.2429787,0.00567857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002652278,0.00004069724,0.007536637,0.00009541282,0.00007974182,0.0001215926,0.004031871,0.00009168047,0.00001661842,0.1082387,0.876901,0.0001937663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3107993,0.0165881,0.0002410573,0.3460373,0.001906245,0.0002597165,0.00002507892,0.000130079,0.3240131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873056,0.0001685606,0.0006475208,0.003783959,0.003927872,0.000005113503,0.00001249194,0.00003143435,0.004117419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3174711900","doi":"10.13110/criticism.63.1-2.0151","title":"Teaching Women Writers in a \"Great Books\" Program","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criticism","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04302896769776123,"gpt":0.284417872886209,"spread":0.2413889051884477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004190376,0.00007643934,0.0001129671,0.00007888916,0.0002651886,0.001346883,0.0002069973,0.00003251129,0.0004422061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002160649,0.00007695771,0.00003437156,0.00002697288,0.00007795673,0.0008098018,0.00007710853,0.0004048477,0.00003214741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000826118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000410656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002380191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006181885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991631,0.0001647243,0.0001652543,0.0001443957,0.0001150883,0.0002474473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994497,0.00008222563,0.00001886746,0.0003112513,0.00008046014,0.00005746551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007667654,0.0003723454,0.0004885345,0.00006757746,0.00001842521,0.00008265334,0.19508,6.393979e-7,0.0002246177,0.6888553,0.00600753,0.1087947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002719175,0.00003994877,0.0004777468,0.00007507032,0.000004562557,0.000006832907,0.01604398,0.0001171442,0.00002980021,0.01443508,0.9683601,0.0001377847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6005522,0.0005370292,0.000005986541,0.004988463,0.0002549346,0.00009700205,0.00000722429,0.0001733591,0.3933838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677878,0.00000728507,0.0003778911,0.001138626,0.0001746789,0.00008915042,0.00002316677,0.00001248349,0.03038893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250403465","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.137","title":"Peer Review: Fetishes, Fallacies, and Perceptions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Excellence; Creativity; Perception; Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Scholarly communication; Project commissioning; Key (lock); Public relations; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1025120135987828,"gpt":0.2630741396571898,"spread":0.160562126058407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008436768,0.0001517672,0.0003018483,0.0003657789,0.00064069,0.0488788,0.001204216,0.0001131165,0.001231068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01048457,0.0001241236,0.0001391694,0.0001261889,0.000164702,0.1522907,0.0002147598,0.002260458,0.0000147764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000852218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001384735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003642107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002009055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973565,0.00027439,0.0007402493,0.0001546373,0.001241098,0.0002331187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917755,0.0001103293,0.0006304069,0.0003894776,0.006846213,0.0002480612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002015627,0.0001306172,0.007428711,0.000103654,0.00009192326,0.00001562888,0.05009626,1.2041e-7,0.00007374277,0.09674148,0.8234267,0.02187102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003120855,0.0001090087,0.01655575,0.0006481929,0.00008573773,0.0001458923,0.007108034,0.000002814594,0.000003151627,0.006133851,0.9687207,0.0001747382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1309271,0.07635483,0.0002255055,0.1386078,0.002236942,0.0002798442,0.00004745359,0.0001413563,0.6511791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484359,0.009359971,0.005316389,0.006319478,0.001482783,0.000007149853,0.0000329362,0.00004654737,0.02899882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8175088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}