{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":732,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":732,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"fbe72cf0b3f3","filters":{"topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization"}},"results":[{"id":"W2043129860","doi":"10.1023/b:lida.0000036389.14073.dd","title":"Covariates and Random Effects in a Gamma Process Model with Application to Degradation and Failure","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lifetime Data Analysis","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":572,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Gamma process; Covariate; Degradation (telecommunications); Process (computing); Random effects model; Econometrics; Goodness of fit; Computer science; Statistics; Sequence (biology); Mathematics; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003535797549385565,"gpt":0.210394489702789,"spread":0.2068586921534034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001603878,0.00009406773,0.0001869783,0.0001692938,0.0000275242,0.00004738765,0.00009579647,0.00004385886,0.000001119646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005205612,0.00007998712,0.000009588419,0.0007404319,0.00001680181,0.0003265085,0.00002844955,0.00005107454,0.000001699042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002255903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001087129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001164506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007568509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999404,0.00001133623,0.0001297093,0.0002687975,0.00008457008,0.0001015542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995509,0.00003074995,0.00002218687,0.0003157713,0.00002882191,0.00005153125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000369915,0.00001273254,0.00196491,0.00007619752,0.00008507357,4.465893e-7,0.0001885697,0.9963082,0.0002379696,0.0001500401,0.00001442219,0.0009244436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008466626,0.00001364898,0.002156567,0.00002706765,0.0002821693,8.714651e-7,0.00003350587,0.9958894,0.0001883595,0.0004384661,0.00001733278,0.000105894],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1500194,0.00005931308,0.8493059,0.0002336194,0.000002257802,0.0002850668,0.00003442829,0.0000433154,0.00001666721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945764,0.00007085493,0.05323378,0.00003121317,0.000006937005,0.00006949979,0.0008078386,0.000009647024,0.000006238402],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7960722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.326178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973585648","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2003.08.011","title":"Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":405,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Risk analysis (engineering); HVAC; Reliability engineering; Preventive maintenance; Profitability index; Engineering; Scheduling (production processes); Risk management; Asset management; Risk assessment; Reliability (semiconductor); Operations management; Computer science; Air conditioning; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02729353277704647,"gpt":0.2894291095724483,"spread":0.2621355767954018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001784119,0.0001337506,0.0002155375,0.0001546222,0.0001426605,0.00007251012,0.0001299863,0.0001182464,0.00000175521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001580261,0.00009725166,0.00006484587,0.000379321,0.0001099941,0.0004411601,0.000004229119,0.000481255,1.544134e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008452327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009217179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001395474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002647393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989023,0.0001186927,0.0004801472,0.0001224323,0.00017304,0.000203412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990186,0.0001800756,0.0003588309,0.00008685993,0.00032352,0.00003209043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001431377,0.00007568233,0.006589032,0.0002349415,0.00003476697,0.000002502463,0.00186239,0.9873565,0.00002515213,0.002728797,0.0001898315,0.0007572428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008030603,0.001181589,0.005640638,0.002880597,0.0002747791,0.0003421964,0.06583543,0.8253787,0.00706357,0.08124556,0.00130793,0.000818423],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2769714,0.0005438879,0.7215883,0.0001000466,0.0001598607,0.000320421,0.000004202782,0.00002523065,0.0002867597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673604,0.0001623187,0.03231034,0.00001667757,0.00005006174,0.0000582455,0.000003148222,0.00001592862,0.00002284884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6903891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3965808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140635263","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2014.3.028","title":"Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":373,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Quality (philosophy); Reliability (semiconductor); Production (economics); Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Rank (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Cost reduction; Reduction (mathematics); Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Mathematics; Engineering; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004386457513619024,"gpt":0.2078387690055508,"spread":0.2034523114919318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005307557,0.0001113911,0.0001134362,0.000326614,0.00008535743,0.00008161865,0.0002553251,0.00001862029,0.00001124843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002743786,0.0001009853,0.00003364237,0.001019002,0.000235131,0.0003995961,0.00001621241,0.00007769898,0.000007636479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001029548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007498502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003370574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001716676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989038,0.00001525432,0.0001724444,0.0002600563,0.0003519186,0.0002965342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996428,0.0000179587,0.00004411286,0.0002229997,0.00003230082,0.00003983269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008279424,0.00001565014,0.000296886,0.0001760079,0.000004236482,7.326004e-7,0.00005015763,0.9920648,0.002387053,0.00333395,0.0003343742,0.001327918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002036621,0.00005185387,0.003152633,0.00007581111,0.000009653066,3.371361e-7,0.0001316047,0.9937857,0.001607792,0.0006657311,0.0001923445,0.0001228589],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1956175,0.000001612923,0.7647753,0.001439994,0.000238152,0.000371096,8.632614e-7,0.000220702,0.03733478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992708,0.000005139235,0.006570222,0.0006275432,0.00001633173,0.00002577027,0.000001604356,0.000009619072,0.00003579752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7970905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4118061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989618028","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2010.10.028","title":"Condition based maintenance optimization for wind power generation systems under continuous monitoring","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renewable Energy","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":357,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Turbine; Wind power; Prognostics; Condition monitoring; Reliability engineering; Condition-based maintenance; Maintenance actions; Engineering; Maintenance engineering; Interval (graph theory); Computer science; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007728710704583281,"gpt":0.2030739373142882,"spread":0.195345226609705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001814122,0.0001702785,0.0001819958,0.00008986596,0.0001185788,0.0001090585,0.00009092134,0.0001972937,0.00004990165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006191553,0.0001751459,0.0000592371,0.0001464653,0.00002887748,0.0002089722,0.000007061834,0.00008164392,0.000001899677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001041216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003682212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000287395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005923969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990484,0.00002138994,0.0002750012,0.0002359756,0.000133034,0.0002862246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993219,0.00005254468,0.00006907167,0.0002562498,0.0002283669,0.00007186474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009032172,0.00001649671,0.00003090074,0.00002628777,0.00001310039,4.483803e-7,0.00001123512,0.9356405,0.0608674,0.001855701,0.00137626,0.0001526939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005126318,0.00003621273,0.00002046146,0.00003836237,0.00001380807,0.000002926759,0.00004935953,0.9518458,0.03777358,0.0001309279,0.009370707,0.0002052356],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02235632,0.0001076259,0.9724851,0.00004628862,0.003183217,0.0002333468,0.00001844445,0.0002744747,0.00129516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762216,0.00005552459,0.02189674,0.00003819563,0.0004909739,0.0001322984,0.0002268695,0.0000585073,0.0008792849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9538653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7142243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790716556","doi":"10.1080/00207543.2018.1436789","title":"Selective maintenance scheduling under stochastic maintenance quality with multiple maintenance actions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Research","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":268,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fundo para o Desenvolvimento das Ciências e da Tecnologia; China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Maintenance actions; Scheduling (production processes); Optimal maintenance; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Predictive maintenance; Preventive maintenance; Simulated annealing; Condition-based maintenance; Mathematical optimization; Component (thermodynamics); Corrective maintenance; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07131587596696437,"gpt":0.3766434791121299,"spread":0.3053276031451655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002539938,0.0002047778,0.0002748899,0.0005476591,0.00024493,0.0001381284,0.0005643281,0.0001054689,0.00007581375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003005902,0.0001649394,0.0001048472,0.0007948935,0.0006205162,0.0008728201,0.00006646215,0.001009408,0.00005482896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001014185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002628343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006407699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002050432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968882,0.0001983988,0.0006946267,0.0003716584,0.001299076,0.0005480643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903626,0.0002706528,0.0002635616,0.0003176295,0.008634876,0.0001507173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001219381,0.0002037938,0.0010028,0.00004766665,0.0003060909,0.00001286289,0.0007399581,0.9671763,0.0124425,0.004048955,0.008173685,0.004625974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01735484,0.004852597,0.1763356,0.007464934,0.0002020262,0.005257101,0.02471252,0.5395347,0.1122773,0.05540111,0.0528306,0.003776675],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3153755,0.0001018086,0.6722027,0.005848268,0.003733166,0.0004695175,0.00001621824,0.000124528,0.002128319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842625,0.0002368863,0.01246511,0.00006086351,0.001609513,0.00003124404,0.000005300565,0.00004512392,0.001283499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.668887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6726034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040405051","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.023","title":"Condition based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems using proportional hazards model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":267,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condition-based maintenance; Component (thermodynamics); Preventive maintenance; Reliability engineering; Condition monitoring; Dependency (UML); Engineering; Work (physics); Maintenance actions; Unit (ring theory); Computer science; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Systems engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0249531931011578,"gpt":0.2221492380271124,"spread":0.1971960449259546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001012812,0.0004015281,0.0005064447,0.0001590287,0.0001498636,0.0000472817,0.0002060102,0.0002676345,0.00001278269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001704584,0.0004070789,0.0002106842,0.0002526642,0.00005221801,0.0003835684,0.00001861629,0.0001940581,0.000004913546],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001389965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001215372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005580029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001431136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975773,0.00004839058,0.001017669,0.0005112861,0.0003079758,0.0005374552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985704,0.00006738979,0.0001583666,0.0005623369,0.0004790349,0.0001624861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000681032,0.00007589582,0.0000834038,0.002637959,0.00003360766,0.000001287111,0.000094075,0.993571,0.0007742516,0.002581603,0.0000361396,0.00004261834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009318036,0.00003632672,0.000260721,0.0005522193,0.00005709658,0.00001302859,0.00006259795,0.9969367,0.0005686006,0.00001215758,0.0001227309,0.0004459545],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01112529,0.00008491162,0.983924,0.00001091458,0.001229712,0.002018695,0.0002267025,0.001218186,0.0001616199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6888313,0.0000126823,0.3105021,0.000005044836,0.00006587715,0.0003159083,0.0001626799,0.00008545419,0.00001899009],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.677706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969004393","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2012.02.030","title":"Opportunistic maintenance for wind farms considering multi-level imperfect maintenance thresholds","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renewable Energy","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Corrective maintenance; Maintenance actions; Preventive maintenance; Wind power; Proactive maintenance; Imperfect; Reliability engineering; Turbine; Predictive maintenance; Optimal maintenance; Risk analysis (engineering); Component (thermodynamics); Planned maintenance; Computer science; Engineering; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03896343840959492,"gpt":0.2386543358455003,"spread":0.1996908974359054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003744673,0.0003277021,0.0003667692,0.0001236074,0.0001441104,0.0000498462,0.0002031596,0.0001885913,0.00006122609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002327051,0.0003062383,0.0001456979,0.0002488636,0.00009202337,0.0002927718,0.00005063329,0.0001104988,0.000009622765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002215524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005596942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002841114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002153867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980934,0.0000252029,0.0004050575,0.000314335,0.0001507506,0.001011311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989526,0.0001359705,0.00007787593,0.000446515,0.0001285988,0.0002584685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002534548,0.00005486489,0.0005631146,0.0001352213,0.00005162436,0.000003826059,0.00009820998,0.978049,0.007807308,0.004145594,0.006535593,0.002530338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001856538,0.00008349725,0.0006123772,0.000250069,0.00006257579,0.00008285353,0.0002377028,0.7913837,0.01773266,0.001368102,0.1853721,0.0009578199],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006441096,0.0008117676,0.9855896,0.00007681146,0.001301502,0.0002773729,0.00008346094,0.0003974513,0.005020891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553997,0.0007863704,0.03564845,0.0002133383,0.0002944049,0.0001416227,0.0000747575,0.0001142355,0.007327152],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983371987","doi":"10.1080/15732470601012154","title":"The influence of temporal uncertainty of deterioration on life-cycle management of structures","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University Network of Excellence in Nuclear Engineering","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Gamma process; Stochastic modelling; Process (computing); Random variable; Preventive maintenance; Stochastic process; Computer science; Product life-cycle management; Conceptual model; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.002446432957465737,"gpt":0.1731256776319262,"spread":0.1706792446744604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005544378,0.0001807027,0.0002485888,0.00007593766,0.00005701542,0.000007173504,0.0001460707,0.00009931961,0.000007949726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003888445,0.0001298698,0.00004639843,0.0002052147,0.000134252,0.0001149053,0.00003026949,0.0001532121,5.640403e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002147879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001448798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001063816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002252221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991137,0.00001059282,0.0003985943,0.0001308508,0.0001867489,0.0001594553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994686,0.00004473606,0.0001115172,0.0002485666,0.00007994054,0.00004667732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002892601,0.000001652576,0.0008104123,0.0003501589,0.00005795066,7.586933e-7,0.0002726928,0.9824599,0.01148188,0.002647338,0.00002684756,0.001861501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001025507,0.0002793259,0.749784,0.000369693,0.00007415953,0.00003067862,0.0002941092,0.1970595,0.04333188,0.006621968,0.0006167147,0.0005124861],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966024,0.0002462066,0.002634361,0.000008395379,0.000181127,0.0001805283,0.00002881332,0.00003796011,0.00008019183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948819,0.0004375718,0.004613393,0.000006039828,0.0000272376,0.000003572852,0.000009622894,0.00001797046,0.000002656413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7854004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5295936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399793648","doi":"10.1080/03155986.2001.11732424","title":"A Control-Limit Policy And Software For Condition-Based Maintenance Optimization","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Nanyang Technological University","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Control (management); Software; Computer science; Control limits; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Operating system; Artificial intelligence; Control chart","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02083121742888067,"gpt":0.2946814852633072,"spread":0.2738502678344265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008784954,0.0001135884,0.0001445448,0.0003380092,0.0003401767,0.0004816349,0.00006903427,0.0001118661,0.00001651847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001119522,0.0001027222,0.00002220717,0.0003369725,0.00009910805,0.001623947,0.00001332217,0.0001165579,0.00001160068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001426892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001884606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001002412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000821809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988329,0.00003252949,0.0004187056,0.0000991386,0.0003420036,0.0002747102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980184,0.0003729745,0.00004413976,0.0001141899,0.00134534,0.0001049858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005611786,0.000004892208,0.0002520011,0.0001956835,0.00001150964,1.770414e-7,0.0001338351,0.9597006,0.000009018859,0.03544455,0.002183195,0.002008431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012075,0.00006601273,0.0003446543,0.00006344055,0.000002744932,0.00001192329,0.000179879,0.9095792,0.00001368716,0.0001413582,0.08827771,0.0001118487],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003877852,0.0001039169,0.9908834,0.0008609085,0.0001262307,0.001354491,0.0002075854,0.0001107937,0.00247489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989757,0.0003401962,0.007578388,0.0004274866,0.0001667553,0.0007743972,0.0006429541,0.00001611406,0.0002966878],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4644416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005362891","doi":"10.1142/s0218539300000213","title":"GENERAL SEQUENTIAL IMPERFECT PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE MODELS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","funders":"University of Hong Kong; University of Windsor; City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Imperfect; Preventive maintenance; Schedule; Hazard ratio; Hazard; Statistics; Reliability engineering; Reduction (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Econometrics; Engineering; Confidence interval; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01041670103590322,"gpt":0.248793112411156,"spread":0.2383764113752528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013301,0.0001927849,0.0003240471,0.00009994759,0.00003865735,0.00006396242,0.0002899123,0.0001254175,0.0001507736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000213368,0.0001805074,0.0001934761,0.0001027704,0.00006558125,0.000734457,0.00003173744,0.000385759,0.000004087383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002522352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000394916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003027337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003954833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982029,0.00006380541,0.0008944382,0.0001841446,0.0004229532,0.0002318071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990525,0.0001667144,0.00010565,0.00017314,0.0003802759,0.0001217239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001835172,0.00003627041,0.0001291241,0.00007400863,0.0001150168,0.000009017379,0.0003121837,0.9827586,0.0007880868,0.003224277,0.00009972656,0.0122701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001596635,0.0001041808,0.006979444,0.0003128716,0.00004137199,0.0001994507,0.00007133765,0.9687544,0.001180576,0.01067031,0.00963217,0.0004572368],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7480835,0.0004098119,0.2473966,0.0006614478,0.001289404,0.0001761944,0.00004592706,0.0001131932,0.001823878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845219,0.003851636,0.01098572,0.00006545432,0.0003148073,0.000004929449,0.00001075995,0.00002507982,0.0002196666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2364384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7360879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059795097","doi":"10.1109/24.855543","title":"Generalized multi-state k-out-of-n:G systems","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Reliability (semiconductor); Component (thermodynamics); Mathematics; Binary number; Discrete mathematics; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Combinatorics; Algorithm; Physics; Engineering; Arithmetic; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01491835992754301,"gpt":0.2291471955575747,"spread":0.2142288356300317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002674583,0.0001906216,0.0002834568,0.00006591358,0.0000733691,0.00002132411,0.0001289388,0.00011977,0.0003513118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007206202,0.00018084,0.000152552,0.0002118891,0.000100209,0.0001579274,2.370124e-7,0.0002202509,0.00009611647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001224626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002077778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001340216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003347378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987548,0.00007966046,0.0004720466,0.0002683602,0.0001744849,0.0002506493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991756,0.00007029526,0.00003048434,0.0005419559,0.00009249424,0.00008914252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005263627,0.0001619431,0.0000109406,0.0001306356,0.00002389548,6.294694e-7,0.0002220327,0.9833447,0.001087415,0.000008781548,0.0001027208,0.01485371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008294461,0.00007343244,0.0002863058,0.00005751234,0.00003284498,0.000001842708,0.00002629421,0.9805744,0.01502204,0.00009505761,0.002731242,0.0002695586],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2647012,0.00006047309,0.7312886,0.00003408841,0.00137255,0.0004868958,0.00008323519,0.0004164684,0.001556494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923863,0.0006153701,0.005515932,0.00001778889,0.00001786844,0.00009319514,0.000004341437,0.00002757559,0.00132166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.727685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.737444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052304942","doi":"10.1080/02664760903406488","title":"Optimal design of accelerated degradation tests based on Wiener process models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Statistics","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kootenay Association for Science & Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile; Wiener process; Estimator; Mathematics; Robustness (evolution); Delta method; Statistics; Random variable; Sensitivity (control systems); Mathematical optimization; Range (aeronautics); Computer science; Applied mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01996768820333731,"gpt":0.2430872403094555,"spread":0.2231195521061182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002604805,0.0001008403,0.0001763645,0.000100267,0.00002447814,0.00002215596,0.0001075203,0.00007681938,0.00002411244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008620186,0.00008661397,0.00001910965,0.0001442581,0.00003357288,0.0001223539,0.000003172528,0.0002607869,0.000001191535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002818517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008592665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.438292e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.84637e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991955,0.000008826665,0.0003836237,0.00006588592,0.0002322943,0.000113886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991571,0.0001371059,0.0001890651,0.0001014795,0.000360126,0.000055077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001332464,0.00005810653,0.000004814201,0.00005547551,0.00001124065,0.000002004473,0.00008927995,0.9813689,0.01293736,0.002779541,0.0005429058,0.002017144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004538766,0.0001115408,0.0000661834,0.0000234369,0.0000231647,0.000002593878,0.00002469524,0.9789407,0.01607716,0.004171181,0.00001961734,0.00008580455],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03264637,0.000002685447,0.9663205,0.00001237002,0.0001495516,0.0001336162,0.00002563428,0.00001846915,0.0006908451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6292545,0.00001125686,0.3706644,0.00001457043,0.00002521706,0.000003193086,0.000008902558,0.00001407595,0.000003875934],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5966082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3532015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023345879","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601261","title":"Optimal component replacement decisions using vibration monitoring and the proportional-hazards model","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Operational Research Society","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Context (archaeology); Purchasing; Computer science; Preventive maintenance; Reliability engineering; Operations research; Operations management; Engineering; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07724871446964189,"gpt":0.3347167128229625,"spread":0.2574679983533206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002547973,0.00007405561,0.0001116601,0.00003095454,0.0006185588,0.0001562243,0.000184523,0.00004943834,0.00002803399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004630618,0.00004026399,0.0001352641,0.0001789779,0.000208107,0.0003609333,0.00008175937,0.0004518313,0.000001165755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002948457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009835264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004046761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.246405e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998284,0.0001299323,0.0003642928,0.00008406528,0.0009769335,0.0001607407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988379,0.0002526126,0.00006867768,0.0001456432,0.0006379415,0.00005717219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003188939,0.00002595391,0.00007732969,0.000006974401,0.00003991742,2.132282e-7,0.000730221,0.9910305,0.003701532,0.001069776,0.003100666,0.0001850054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005827859,0.00002082801,0.0003540476,0.00006602655,0.00001066831,0.00002486486,0.0002948676,0.996924,0.0008009179,0.0006570683,0.0002195768,0.00004429649],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8017094,0.0007835078,0.1889298,0.007478027,0.0003365866,0.0004959257,0.000005875699,0.0000123753,0.0002484448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951772,0.00176028,0.04595504,0.00004278193,0.0002283703,0.00001187128,0.000001037409,0.00001114437,0.0002175021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1500625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4757517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018718829","doi":"10.1109/tste.2020.2986586","title":"Operations & Maintenance Optimization of Wind Turbines Integrating Wind and Aging Information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Wind power; Offshore wind power; Turbine; Reliability engineering; Revenue; Optimal maintenance; Production (economics); Maintenance engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Renewable energy; Engineering; Computer science; Marine engineering; Power (physics); Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005592530214258211,"gpt":0.1885301410360039,"spread":0.1829376108217457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009816306,0.0001676931,0.0001836654,0.000160375,0.0001702028,0.00007966496,0.00008220122,0.00009239605,0.00005138027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004776528,0.0001674279,0.00004871686,0.0004894687,0.00005760273,0.0008957814,0.000002215549,0.0001526576,0.000002166669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009312569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004477243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002255935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003872413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999095,0.00002556621,0.0003640168,0.0001483,0.0001304213,0.0002366793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993914,0.00004115377,0.00004437134,0.0001451934,0.0002909731,0.00008693751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001887333,0.00001525185,0.000002917768,0.0001589005,0.00002058501,7.134818e-7,0.001133223,0.9928389,0.0003283628,0.001526686,0.0001090274,0.003846626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003662286,0.00005767021,0.000005541682,0.00005065909,0.0000219248,0.000003758126,0.002222154,0.9866834,0.005170361,0.00007276417,0.005168828,0.0001767625],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008777704,0.0000520473,0.9890825,0.0004843883,0.0001219754,0.0001606626,0.00001292904,0.0001733529,0.001134413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98478,0.0003108489,0.01411872,0.0002137224,0.00003048422,0.00001935736,0.00002529184,0.00002417719,0.0004773625],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6827513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995373625","doi":"10.1080/00949655.2012.658805","title":"Bivariate degradation analysis of products based on Wiener processes and copulas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Bivariate analysis; Copula (linguistics); Mathematics; Joint probability distribution; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Markov chain; Dependency (UML); Bayesian probability; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01587334204348506,"gpt":0.2693712940123766,"spread":0.2534979519688915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002622145,0.00006170969,0.0001653703,0.0002264651,0.00002603642,0.00001946456,0.00001410853,0.00003176225,0.000006921292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000464338,0.00005134915,0.0000143906,0.000375843,0.0000274014,0.000241086,0.000002645585,0.00005271616,1.996794e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002085513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000152722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001626401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.427033e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993748,0.00003748144,0.0003092964,0.00005426446,0.000156412,0.00006776258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990981,0.000373205,0.0001301495,0.00003048771,0.0003165859,0.00005152959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004547221,0.00003837954,0.002881034,0.0001252798,0.00004494507,1.826243e-7,0.0001496941,0.9903939,0.00007234481,0.0008936696,0.00001305293,0.005342007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002554524,0.00007902227,0.06702773,0.00002443026,0.000190101,6.696336e-7,0.00001853277,0.9318445,0.00008875675,0.0003990358,0.00002329973,0.00004847968],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2098264,0.00005564977,0.7899134,0.00003783096,0.0000588574,0.00005519764,0.000008093814,0.000007962159,0.00003659381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650906,0.00002309636,0.03480051,0.00001807289,0.00002468924,5.210513e-7,0.00003555459,0.000005129932,0.000001850139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7552642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2093958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172471105","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2015.11.015","title":"Integrated preventive maintenance and production decisions for imperfect processes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Reliability engineering; Imperfect; Quality (philosophy); Production (economics); Sizing; Context (archaeology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Control (management); Operations research; Point (geometry); Engineering; Computer science; Operations management; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009712888612852624,"gpt":0.202891605786752,"spread":0.1931787171738994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00119326,0.0002852496,0.0003857004,0.00009467908,0.00007831602,0.00004817202,0.0001351623,0.000149852,0.000001601723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004250681,0.0002500064,0.00007416884,0.0004667426,0.00004694671,0.0003464106,0.00002577306,0.000176944,0.000005848691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006522732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001083422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000194093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000105465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984194,0.00003953065,0.0005313177,0.0004537408,0.0001838838,0.0003721014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984104,0.0002869937,0.00005652469,0.0004132503,0.0006501761,0.0001826378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001132778,0.00003328624,0.0002071368,0.002338325,0.00004119076,8.428824e-7,0.0004946325,0.9917228,0.000652736,0.0005518192,0.00133027,0.002513682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009137961,0.000161297,0.0009163953,0.001440462,0.00006759792,0.00005495226,0.0007734825,0.9753469,0.002532039,0.0003309643,0.01690429,0.0005577966],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1074265,0.0007438071,0.8855082,0.0001837355,0.001760259,0.00228601,0.00008677626,0.001529042,0.0004756965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775432,0.0002611255,0.0214864,0.000003384759,0.0001240544,0.0003489438,0.00004570343,0.00006238148,0.0001248294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8701167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060250681","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2013.09.003","title":"Selective maintenance for multi-state series–parallel systems under economic dependence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Component (thermodynamics); Series and parallel circuits; Reliability engineering; Series (stratigraphy); State (computer science); Maintenance actions; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Genetic algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Engineering; Algorithm; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007771529503925715,"gpt":0.1949150969736654,"spread":0.1871435674697397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007406874,0.0004884809,0.0006620579,0.000107097,0.0001350867,0.0001405908,0.0003448134,0.0002461205,0.00001361066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001479451,0.0004825489,0.0002065775,0.0001980043,0.00005726132,0.000782705,0.00003853159,0.0002996296,0.0001773325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002185208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008209629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003632115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003253652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973232,0.00005658809,0.0009789119,0.0006432449,0.0001790086,0.0008190967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983997,0.000213954,0.0001168467,0.0007400704,0.0003091508,0.0002203111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003328842,0.00001810796,0.0001436226,0.001800223,0.00006701957,6.853465e-7,0.0001204215,0.9926586,0.000615728,0.003922698,0.0005035792,0.0001160386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007420866,0.00005288457,0.002980442,0.0003076289,0.00002078483,0.0000298571,0.0002291349,0.9927999,0.0002952902,0.00008244839,0.001910784,0.0005487453],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01755951,0.0002559375,0.9745073,0.00008697274,0.002211937,0.003166289,0.0001246444,0.001578704,0.000508746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657511,0.0001514873,0.03169194,0.000009559824,0.0001330708,0.001399431,0.00003698865,0.00013564,0.000690744],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9481916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052461311","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2009.08.004","title":"Performance evaluation of multi-state degraded systems with minimal repairs and imperfect preventive maintenance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Reliability engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Imperfect; Maintenance actions; Limit (mathematics); Markov process; Failure rate; State (computer science); Degradation (telecommunications); Process (computing); Function (biology); Renewal theory; Markov chain; Mathematical optimization; Inspection time; Production (economics); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006999054080612516,"gpt":0.1978709968814139,"spread":0.1908719428008014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002225802,0.0003308421,0.0005316033,0.000109692,0.00006275436,0.00002811046,0.0001366999,0.0001275551,0.000001624293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001744518,0.0002811463,0.00008311661,0.000344635,0.00005816329,0.0003212966,0.00001424348,0.0002027202,0.000002089575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005964895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002318388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002854591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978551,0.0001202261,0.0007451602,0.0004248316,0.0004601938,0.0003945265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998671,0.0001002258,0.00013699,0.0005358093,0.000445078,0.0001108766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008887405,0.00003508297,0.00146521,0.001560667,0.00004446643,0.000001129361,0.0003506962,0.9930948,0.001235264,0.000116546,0.00001010967,0.001997169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001008211,0.0002094435,0.06535096,0.0011473,0.00008416071,0.00003373603,0.0001572287,0.9307202,0.000946919,0.000003032316,0.00004851524,0.000290342],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.93803,0.0006934137,0.0580428,0.00002250749,0.0003372948,0.001700044,0.00002844619,0.0005988229,0.0005466799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947467,0.0001578959,0.004899835,0.000001702117,0.00002738523,0.00008873567,0.0000130928,0.00003847148,0.00002614625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06388575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036815968","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.01.011","title":"Risk-based maintenance of ethylene oxide production facilities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Fault tree analysis; Reliability engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Engineering; Risk assessment; Interval (graph theory); Risk analysis (engineering); Schedule; Preventive maintenance; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01552794783487907,"gpt":0.2454631130824683,"spread":0.2299351652475893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001284305,0.0003721683,0.002047168,0.000288842,0.00003567647,0.00004864896,0.0002771864,0.000299729,0.00008010658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006676666,0.0002780015,0.0004613155,0.000176132,0.00009537266,0.0001957431,0.00001885098,0.0003234643,0.00001349703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003931668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003396022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002469048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002873292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972073,0.0001982478,0.001845928,0.0001768235,0.0003082584,0.0002633878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975333,0.00007769059,0.001599791,0.0003478621,0.0003766428,0.00006466931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001839321,0.0002191775,0.000002162156,0.2339539,0.0009324414,0.00006521934,0.0003376022,0.5472276,0.00403311,0.0001560062,0.003379285,0.2095096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008507571,0.0003028849,0.00001063367,0.07300214,0.001452906,0.0004346953,0.00008779908,0.00005506136,0.02561285,0.0009574702,0.8963659,0.0008669284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002366027,0.9882659,0.005147443,0.00002704081,0.003216251,0.0005660058,0.0002824856,0.00006690161,0.00006199503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001254185,0.9938456,0.004398079,0.000002594533,0.0002642498,0.00001864135,0.00002136599,0.0000671341,0.0001281628],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8929866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601712886","doi":"10.1109/tr.2015.2430491","title":"Ordering Heuristics for Reliability Evaluation of Multistate Networks","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Reliability (semiconductor); Disjoint sets; Heuristic; Computer science; Path (computing); Terminal (telecommunication); Mathematical optimization; Reliability engineering; Algorithm; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03342313046835089,"gpt":0.2706196956357848,"spread":0.2371965651674339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002641535,0.0002207113,0.0003166432,0.0000795923,0.00008485219,0.00001975621,0.0001447217,0.0001856691,0.00002322851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003982295,0.000223654,0.0001602162,0.0003072402,0.0001362687,0.0001988663,0.000001039997,0.0002513543,0.000004294346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004964654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001083707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006176421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004522646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981272,0.0001453912,0.0006227251,0.0003673857,0.0004379699,0.0002993018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975567,0.0003145387,0.00008013911,0.0006645077,0.001237784,0.0001463246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001314218,0.0001767916,0.00004335829,0.0001455542,0.00001887618,8.816084e-8,0.0001635291,0.9783512,0.00007546196,0.00001733323,0.0002658675,0.0206105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001232799,0.0001507968,0.0003047282,0.00003629529,0.0001173586,9.126425e-7,0.00007628218,0.9913048,0.004281593,0.001871568,0.0004132819,0.0002095874],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09596232,0.00004955052,0.9003208,0.00006374155,0.001511135,0.001222837,0.00008053446,0.0002514226,0.0005376544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820122,0.0000748141,0.01747983,0.00001331824,0.00004129274,0.0002998404,0.00001659198,0.00003237278,0.00002974458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8860499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9120346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153591206","doi":"10.1109/tr.2010.2103596","title":"Periodic Inspection Optimization Models for a Repairable System Subject to Hidden Failures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Component (thermodynamics); Reliability engineering; Maintenance engineering; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Algorithm; Engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01786902427402762,"gpt":0.2025127870691147,"spread":0.1846437627950871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004250908,0.0002460835,0.0002732607,0.0001948965,0.000283591,0.00004511782,0.000149454,0.0001940495,0.00004642676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000252677,0.0002503963,0.0001927335,0.0004238508,0.00005460131,0.0004556642,8.927183e-7,0.0001896358,0.00002055052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005617022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004207141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002988224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007413739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985048,0.00005888043,0.0004476103,0.0004743119,0.0001802174,0.0003341852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989181,0.00006750013,0.00004313808,0.0005906934,0.0002420057,0.0001386119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001891622,0.000117297,0.000007224035,0.0002659373,0.00002471809,3.986939e-7,0.0009024782,0.9962876,0.0001290323,0.0002349285,0.0001706859,0.00167058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003882449,0.0002001451,0.00006779003,0.00007640031,0.00005269102,0.000004631848,0.0003956686,0.9903234,0.007784929,0.0003348231,0.00009752491,0.000273711],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01787036,0.00001411353,0.9745851,0.0000644859,0.001006047,0.001391944,0.00006314815,0.00186663,0.003138225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9041141,0.00003442953,0.09491188,0.00002735955,0.00003371776,0.0007384593,0.000007895625,0.00004406904,0.00008809978],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8862438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041628555","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.12.021","title":"Integrating noncyclical preventive maintenance scheduling and production planning for a single machine","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Economics","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Time horizon; Production (economics); Sizing; Production planning; Scheduling (production processes); Computer science; Operations research; Planned maintenance; Holding cost; Corrective maintenance; Reliability engineering; Total cost; Constraint (computer-aided design); Operations management; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02160655366941448,"gpt":0.2315704345962995,"spread":0.209963880926885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004387574,0.000102874,0.0001478245,0.0001408985,0.00004055874,0.0000381969,0.0001195775,0.00004815606,0.000007726518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005278657,0.00009934663,0.00006505792,0.00004015017,0.00004704513,0.0006634528,0.00001786173,0.0001543751,8.501353e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001806263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002105773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003522413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006227843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999196,0.0000140879,0.0004621489,0.0001551946,0.00006080745,0.0001117528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992247,0.00002470821,0.0002517026,0.00007259734,0.0003861991,0.00004009259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001069473,0.0003862162,0.005855502,0.0001687834,0.0007396068,0.000008239165,0.006884066,0.8553621,0.03848996,0.006039018,0.0008002663,0.08419679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003409017,0.001061235,0.004536646,0.001626189,0.0002281485,0.003153179,0.004657982,0.5801909,0.3371309,0.0500284,0.0127477,0.001229704],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7666981,0.0002871276,0.2253293,0.0008025452,0.005914318,0.0002642958,0.000007594856,0.00004708179,0.0006495463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9123082,0.000417444,0.08638348,0.0000205683,0.0007627755,0.00001036298,0.000005795927,0.00002053855,0.00007079033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2986409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4051238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076529707","doi":"10.1080/00207540600596882","title":"Optimal condition based maintenance with imperfect information and the proportional hazards model","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Research","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Condition-based maintenance; Optimal maintenance; Partially observable Markov decision process; Markov decision process; Dynamic programming; Reliability engineering; Preventive maintenance; Mathematical optimization; Maintenance actions; Markov process; State (computer science); Process (computing); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01045369359090833,"gpt":0.2776738950681543,"spread":0.267220201477246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001974307,0.00007978692,0.0001033074,0.0002846883,0.0001000681,0.0001409583,0.0001655716,0.00004120038,0.00002163141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003031874,0.00004948768,0.00004200571,0.0001801337,0.0003249262,0.0009864491,0.00001754184,0.0003409145,0.000003903176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001887289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001723365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002270782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007843716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984081,0.00007246387,0.0003839778,0.00008470644,0.0009034087,0.0001473261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973083,0.00006374678,0.0001307104,0.00009317374,0.002372228,0.00003185669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005801603,0.00002572191,0.0001596091,0.00002004479,0.00003154629,0.0000025374,0.00007939749,0.9863811,0.0004648054,0.005103949,0.005393995,0.001757174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001879228,0.00009385137,0.001462902,0.00009048681,0.000011228,0.0002268451,0.0001364309,0.985976,0.003427976,0.003704526,0.002901498,0.00008896457],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5157635,0.0001431462,0.4678525,0.01320487,0.0007603882,0.0005318725,0.0000166931,0.00005199146,0.001675087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919047,0.0001336382,0.007401405,0.00003325589,0.0003296381,0.00002609507,0.00002514209,0.000008854131,0.0001372751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4761412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2018049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067640696","doi":"10.1080/0740817x.2012.761371","title":"Selective maintenance modeling for a multistate system with multistate components under imperfect maintenance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIE Transactions","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Imperfect; Component (thermodynamics); Maintenance actions; Reliability (semiconductor); Function (biology); Computer science; Predictive maintenance; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01019662276905371,"gpt":0.1972156953615536,"spread":0.1870190725924999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001130198,0.0002798823,0.0002925964,0.0001188909,0.0002492032,0.00007728033,0.000125877,0.00009478324,0.00001925631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008486648,0.0002388388,0.0001136305,0.0002979905,0.00006755378,0.000482257,0.000002742678,0.0002316973,0.00003933395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004177783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002933276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006676116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003298333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99859,0.00002869501,0.0003425719,0.0003499023,0.0001315459,0.0005572921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999144,0.00008261552,0.00004797909,0.0002566757,0.0003435776,0.0001251243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008935798,0.00003847664,0.000007931132,0.0002537326,0.0001018147,0.000001402927,0.0003227311,0.9951668,0.002586562,0.000304441,0.0001379574,0.0009887288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001451372,0.00007215074,0.0002094698,0.0002375899,0.00004441124,0.00002582662,0.0006677326,0.9960752,0.0006023149,0.0001681374,0.0001222022,0.0003236466],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04407347,0.00003630923,0.9528262,0.0001421475,0.0002779606,0.001448048,0.000102761,0.0006151216,0.0004780041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714282,0.00008822228,0.02681463,0.00003149272,0.00002744153,0.001044217,0.00003007218,0.00008404528,0.0004516424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9273548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9739563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053510719","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2010.04.003","title":"Periodic inspection optimization model for a complex repairable system","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Reliability engineering; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006478532688058146,"gpt":0.185568211057742,"spread":0.1790896783696838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001069329,0.0003765962,0.0005130093,0.0001519417,0.0002577662,0.00009101095,0.0002322031,0.000338047,0.000009409678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002513364,0.0003949243,0.0002278801,0.0003621283,0.00004747534,0.00036534,0.00002529281,0.0003698721,0.00001314361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009451733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005951256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003621909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000145843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978172,0.00002930705,0.0008605484,0.0005261374,0.0002555364,0.0005112958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984475,0.0001188044,0.00009555947,0.0008483167,0.000319906,0.0001699545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003833804,0.00002321397,0.00005463403,0.003107968,0.00002491577,5.405977e-7,0.0001936172,0.9877533,0.003412406,0.005101155,0.0002060259,0.00008387608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005380947,0.00003130467,0.0001691138,0.0001961315,0.00004220003,0.00002853703,0.00014202,0.9971064,0.0001689561,0.000008767813,0.001174104,0.000394413],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01105947,0.00003267151,0.9787263,0.00004621557,0.001788875,0.001470261,0.00009275739,0.005438616,0.001344808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8357427,0.00001621396,0.1634588,0.000004583589,0.0001887088,0.000320665,0.0001121272,0.0001017987,0.00005446132],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8246832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033721775","doi":"10.1109/tr.2020.2995277","title":"State-Based Opportunistic Maintenance With Multifunctional Maintenance Windows","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Initialization; Spare part; Scheduling (production processes); Maintenance engineering; Computer science; Probabilistic logic; Maintenance actions; Preventive maintenance; Interval (graph theory); Software maintenance; Corrective maintenance; Engineering; Real-time computing; Operations management; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01348958919451938,"gpt":0.1960511003331629,"spread":0.1825615111386435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000235014,0.0003596517,0.0003423246,0.00006822899,0.0001696462,0.00004667223,0.0002066079,0.0001242101,0.0002638973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005550043,0.0003052792,0.0001559778,0.0004718617,0.0002621565,0.0002465109,8.634605e-7,0.0005589713,0.0000908459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002861984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001417988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002991629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003589987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980235,0.00006534975,0.0004642771,0.0005993715,0.000366777,0.0004808039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986514,0.0001812531,0.00006422714,0.0005216268,0.0002536767,0.0003277951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005219857,0.0001542567,0.00007618484,0.0001732887,0.00003108313,0.00001121642,0.00009829988,0.9921057,0.0004397265,0.00003672347,0.0009416673,0.005409831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001644652,0.0004278046,0.0008393691,0.00009805495,0.00004601753,0.000006586735,0.00006612131,0.9870822,0.004877711,0.0001717141,0.004247462,0.0004922941],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01558513,0.000007354681,0.9791713,0.001716318,0.0004877194,0.0006876275,0.0002387866,0.0008153648,0.001290392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890128,0.00004833032,0.009534834,0.0009011133,0.00003658356,0.0001840215,0.00002126691,0.00005485275,0.0002062194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126691367","doi":"10.1109/tr.2010.2056412","title":"An Integrated Model for Production and Preventive Maintenance Planning in Multi-State Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Corrective maintenance; Time horizon; Production (economics); Sizing; Reliability engineering; Operations research; Holding cost; State (computer science); Engineering; Planned maintenance; Genetic algorithm; Computer science; Production planning; Total cost; Operations management; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01622437822571341,"gpt":0.2547837867690253,"spread":0.2385594085433119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005749993,0.0001803069,0.0002034328,0.0001124736,0.00009242351,0.00003725075,0.0000827494,0.0001369316,0.000002161764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006720555,0.0001697488,0.00004750835,0.0001844011,0.0001140805,0.0003975733,4.005875e-7,0.0004484784,0.000001008916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001188106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003085762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007662634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004532701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988799,0.00004499709,0.0003315537,0.0004068719,0.00008490426,0.0002517634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993275,0.00006023921,0.00003561383,0.00034695,0.0001537792,0.00007585912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009668789,0.0001761353,0.0001144354,0.0001502463,0.000007713646,2.814375e-7,0.000905791,0.9906752,0.005075715,0.00001281736,0.0000198121,0.002765176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003920112,0.00006021763,0.0006942521,0.0000976002,0.00001139359,0.000002938381,0.000211637,0.9945414,0.003539387,0.000234316,0.0000348455,0.0001799775],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3589524,0.00000811891,0.6392875,0.00002892899,0.0007078978,0.0007869389,0.00005036934,0.0001637709,0.00001408413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974231,0.00004237631,0.02507308,0.000006893065,0.00001248311,0.0004199347,0.000007462097,0.00002501247,0.0001817256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6152787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6922154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025521447","doi":"10.1111/j.1937-5956.2000.tb00465.x","title":"COMBINED PRODUCTION AND MAINTENANCE SCHEDULING FOR A MULTIPLE‐PRODUCT, SINGLE‐ MACHINE PRODUCTION SYSTEM","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Production and Operations Management","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Scheduling (production processes); Markov decision process; Production (economics); Product (mathematics); Reliability engineering; Operations research; Industrial engineering; Markov process; Operations management; Mathematics; Engineering; Economics; Statistics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00848559295328552,"gpt":0.1934608859521583,"spread":0.1849752929988727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004620144,0.0002277612,0.0001962732,0.0001535652,0.0004687679,0.0001438793,0.00006147471,0.00004606152,0.00001388473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001990925,0.0002218317,0.00003381138,0.0003069185,0.00008248594,0.00059232,0.00002187285,0.0001093655,0.000008635418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001474706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007181996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001486942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008583348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985119,0.00003756724,0.0003732136,0.0006800356,0.0001390764,0.0002582089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993529,0.000007863357,0.00003430436,0.0003679051,0.0001748811,0.000062162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001291134,0.0001481974,0.0001652733,0.001220243,0.00008161953,6.198599e-7,0.0004236162,0.9145641,0.003536987,0.00296759,0.001421705,0.07534091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001138989,0.0002136501,0.00130168,0.000654988,0.0002209583,0.00008902574,0.001362818,0.9571272,0.01243166,0.0002613911,0.02437546,0.0008221504],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8272763,0.002767659,0.1285126,0.01649133,0.007196406,0.01169376,0.00003184668,0.002488376,0.003541775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579627,0.001983133,0.03374521,0.0000314417,0.0004261115,0.0006166504,0.00006373374,0.00004210369,0.005128949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1306864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9046036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165933339","doi":"10.1023/a:1009616111968","title":"Alternative time scales and failure time models.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lifetime Data Analysis","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Scale (ratio); Computer science; Measure (data warehouse); Accelerated failure time model; Statistics; Reliability engineering; Econometrics; Survival analysis; Data mining; Mathematics; Engineering; Geography; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006880506656244254,"gpt":0.1997418170113651,"spread":0.1928613103551208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001676148,0.0001472785,0.0002774831,0.0001335195,0.00005343147,0.00007587832,0.0003369779,0.00007080241,0.002605264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001789542,0.000138144,0.00006066884,0.0005431292,0.00005792837,0.0006573825,0.00007415582,0.00008970054,0.0006447744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002010608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004678768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007314102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002612863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990847,0.00003196735,0.0002041228,0.0003481899,0.0001459284,0.0001851426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999055,0.00004069721,0.00002204923,0.0007680866,0.0000294279,0.00008469477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006807486,0.00001475907,0.00005275915,0.000009514776,0.00061889,0.000002173254,0.00007649635,0.9836876,0.00009539499,0.00003495157,0.009269547,0.006131118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001085246,0.00000686576,0.00009617717,0.000007680101,0.0004449074,0.0000014651,0.000007188111,0.9945335,0.00003463767,0.0004331451,0.004164151,0.0001617324],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3114237,0.003062583,0.606576,0.002242113,0.0001287147,0.001107871,0.008951095,0.002314223,0.06419381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8894306,0.00491377,0.06943769,0.0003226579,0.0003742413,0.00003559286,0.02085916,0.0001359445,0.01449039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5780069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169572499","doi":"10.1287/moor.28.2.382.14484","title":"Optimal Replacement Under Partial Observations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Optimal stopping; Bellman equation; Piecewise; State (computer science); Projection (relational algebra); Markov process; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.109759728247854,"gpt":0.3453108476573518,"spread":0.2355511194094978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009295926,0.00006996231,0.0001120587,0.000109189,0.0001502143,0.00005716832,0.0001114451,0.00005181933,0.0002636524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004817379,0.0000658688,0.00003153292,0.0003623918,0.00008325187,0.0001559153,0.00002025792,0.000146257,0.00003921704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007059743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006645494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008326698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001704327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990004,0.00006044342,0.0003074423,0.0001050707,0.0003172461,0.000209372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991356,0.0001072415,0.000008673089,0.0003463364,0.0003546517,0.00004752978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001167329,0.00008564183,0.00001396344,0.00005822724,0.00001305588,1.368593e-7,0.000451417,0.823271,0.004355598,0.1710136,0.0007188249,0.00001739061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002122306,0.0000559841,0.00006683576,0.0000361377,0.000006269717,0.000002283474,0.001158348,0.976741,0.01768597,0.002394413,0.001545173,0.00009533847],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4376779,0.00006743844,0.5486867,0.0002648884,0.00009861442,0.0005499463,0.000009522189,0.00007753965,0.01256752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8037218,0.00008505094,0.1949344,0.000006394983,0.00001146406,0.0001212171,0.00001450756,0.00001941725,0.001085704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.366044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2886809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343581650","doi":"10.1109/tr.2015.2494689","title":"Selective Maintenance for Multistate Series Systems With S-Dependent Components","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Component (thermodynamics); Series (stratigraphy); Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Stochastic process; Context (archaeology); Maintenance engineering; Failure rate; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01649225922313175,"gpt":0.2131802180610275,"spread":0.1966879588378957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003693383,0.0002307929,0.0002754171,0.00006288123,0.0001190232,0.00004869212,0.0001187219,0.000106675,0.000003587373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002423646,0.0001937175,0.00007271682,0.0001933271,0.0001134263,0.0003241594,5.303495e-7,0.0002254448,0.00001446893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004977651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005134241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000147777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001042271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987083,0.00005642243,0.000311902,0.0003538199,0.0002328175,0.0003367275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988915,0.0000958374,0.00004572337,0.0003880211,0.0004235492,0.000155419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005419569,0.0001326935,0.00003359691,0.0001731826,0.00004243615,0.000001217084,0.0002776758,0.9974059,0.0002696902,0.00004817691,0.0003975687,0.0006758409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003229266,0.0009072118,0.0005398098,0.0001778507,0.00007884287,0.00003250682,0.0007048081,0.9745428,0.01557503,0.0006384913,0.002929281,0.0006441083],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04316974,0.00002274965,0.9528306,0.0001190815,0.001151787,0.001289516,0.0001820934,0.0004620576,0.0007724062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918973,0.00004767034,0.006799715,0.00001714171,0.00002611991,0.0005690629,0.00001180227,0.00003702271,0.0005942071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9487275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7899569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759313934","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.010","title":"General model for the risk priority number in failure mode and effects analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Konkuk University","keywords":"Failure mode and effects analysis; Reliability engineering; Mode (computer interface); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Econometrics; Mathematics; Engineering; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003492155636325762,"gpt":0.2105865770698364,"spread":0.2070944214335107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001104549,0.0002663041,0.0004967555,0.0000674846,0.0002844741,0.0001201831,0.0003067789,0.0001903801,0.000001315805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005128408,0.0002106645,0.0002125032,0.0001761626,0.00005258125,0.0002660546,0.00005464768,0.0002833427,0.000002120144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003458412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002013494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003988175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003000701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985977,0.00004190446,0.0004470809,0.0003825619,0.0001581333,0.0003726549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982408,0.0003812087,0.00008971921,0.001117641,0.00008173051,0.00008886214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001863078,0.000010294,0.01675718,0.0009188404,0.0001398931,5.501618e-7,0.0002170771,0.9802366,0.00006884892,0.001185505,0.00002477128,0.000421818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000428099,0.000006484169,0.06422803,0.0000756159,0.0002495412,0.000001619685,0.00001805901,0.9344598,0.000056801,0.00009845194,0.0001599083,0.0002175954],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2609453,0.0001019311,0.7373192,0.00009329972,0.0002684817,0.000875866,0.00006460473,0.0002321489,0.00009914384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805275,0.0001949347,0.01891403,0.000003453301,0.00007348146,0.0002006736,0.00001083933,0.00003741379,0.00003769159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7195821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.859065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043475556","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2005.12.002","title":"Coupling ant colony and the degraded ceiling algorithm for the redundancy allocation problem of series–parallel systems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Computer science; Ant colony optimization algorithms; Heuristics; Mathematical optimization; Metaheuristic; Distributed computing; Algorithm; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003239535675779656,"gpt":0.1668358979205964,"spread":0.1635963622448168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002101508,0.0002787921,0.0005077825,0.0000510918,0.0002244196,0.0000716759,0.0002255701,0.0001584168,6.369533e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001157129,0.0001848235,0.0001385557,0.00027671,0.0001464628,0.0001883437,0.0000287358,0.0002021372,8.467799e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003223649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004202194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003348586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001088832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980871,0.00004774654,0.0009662564,0.0003081277,0.0002351197,0.0003556623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982173,0.0007879836,0.0001572256,0.0005295284,0.0002609629,0.00004695667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005919638,0.00001347934,0.00004505173,0.002136709,0.00004736104,2.429467e-7,0.0001619854,0.9815131,0.0003111644,0.01524294,0.00004791249,0.0004208128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009985927,0.00003084212,0.0004591591,0.0004001938,0.0000805054,0.00002084614,0.0003146594,0.99504,0.0001960168,0.00008000839,0.002178516,0.0002006342],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007202154,0.003086752,0.9849371,0.0002349859,0.000771357,0.003077948,0.00004729845,0.0004488,0.0001936421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633194,0.0004999568,0.03513802,0.000002046918,0.0002130122,0.00063342,0.00003520316,0.00006405836,0.00009492662],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9561172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7536884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385603717","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.07.014","title":"Reinforcement and deep reinforcement learning-based solutions for machine maintenance planning, scheduling policies, and optimization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Manufacturing Systems","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Computer science; Categorization; Risk analysis (engineering); Asset (computer security); Scheduling (production processes); Predictive maintenance; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Engineering; Reliability engineering; Operations management; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01570343180326461,"gpt":0.2321526244594865,"spread":0.2164491926562219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007613139,0.0001492118,0.0002437788,0.0002497279,0.0002074002,0.0001067669,0.00007414823,0.00007503162,0.000003149672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001258789,0.0001317313,0.00005340021,0.00008752986,0.00003142649,0.000210577,0.00002921268,0.0001772484,7.679213e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001303988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000204005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001868447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001729719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988455,0.0000242927,0.0005226861,0.0001080966,0.0001787327,0.0003206784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993697,0.0001057516,0.0002365872,0.00009477892,0.00009973947,0.00009342324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003256792,0.000003214325,0.00008370722,0.0004128364,0.00004195569,0.000002690829,0.0002778703,0.9985636,0.00005018161,0.0001076872,0.0002037151,0.0002199575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008346634,0.0001427412,0.0001796059,0.000403195,0.00003019983,0.00003045032,0.000361906,0.9948505,0.000464652,0.0000223735,0.002542941,0.0001367508],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02661501,0.0008611096,0.9713411,0.0001777021,0.0004497445,0.0003427133,0.000001808488,0.0001127644,0.00009804739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951619,0.0006999743,0.0037133,0.00002390778,0.0001205636,0.000022899,0.00002143361,0.00002913968,0.0002068976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5371848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978269173","doi":"10.1007/s00170-013-4730-6","title":"A hybrid GA–PSO approach for reliability optimization in redundancy allocation problem","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Particle swarm optimization; Redundancy (engineering); Mathematical optimization; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Computation; Nonlinear system; Genetic algorithm; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004808010910748596,"gpt":0.2089082066542618,"spread":0.2041001957435132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003552462,0.000131688,0.000187675,0.0003102465,0.00003808449,0.0000426695,0.0005996843,0.00008817139,0.00001861659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002193658,0.0001020557,0.00006789284,0.00009865197,0.00007477761,0.0005021173,0.00005185608,0.0002886656,0.00000193295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003102659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002755535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008689075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002171633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989023,0.00001688923,0.0005508848,0.0001469845,0.0001905138,0.0001924019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990839,0.00007529725,0.0002166256,0.0002117317,0.0003865956,0.00002581214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004593715,0.00004493453,0.00002886088,0.00003047805,0.00002646713,9.043365e-7,0.00005627478,0.9769213,0.002178343,0.0004931634,0.0002193656,0.01995403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001642167,0.0001573995,0.0004121785,0.000154356,0.00001973094,0.0001484584,0.0003294511,0.734024,0.1726481,0.08851697,0.001679986,0.0002671782],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2972487,0.0001093483,0.6980276,0.003119346,0.000398405,0.0006279433,0.000002964129,0.0001117536,0.0003539761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7284927,0.0003355346,0.2708972,0.00003955063,0.00006000708,0.0001133649,0.00001109999,0.00001906001,0.00003146276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.431244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.416171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123870732","doi":"10.1057/jors.2010.49","title":"Optimization models for critical spare parts inventories—a reliability approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Operational Research Society","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spare part; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Project management; Operations research; Reliability engineering; Purchasing; Scheduling (production processes); Systems engineering; Operations management; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05358588123528438,"gpt":0.3332193809567216,"spread":0.2796334997214372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003300669,0.00008763627,0.0001378626,0.00002717845,0.0003808353,0.0001402492,0.0003167671,0.0001415428,0.00003805578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002735756,0.00005949503,0.0002287771,0.0002297072,0.0002571735,0.0006404521,0.00005236382,0.0007961686,6.79231e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001695149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002563999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003044618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002125939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984523,0.00009903212,0.000359929,0.0001218593,0.000714959,0.0002519341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971712,0.0004308489,0.00004014666,0.0002305196,0.002018539,0.0001087975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001958294,0.00006330542,0.00004456616,0.00006943123,0.00001715274,7.04276e-8,0.0004389659,0.9658201,0.0004553357,0.01381815,0.01918961,0.00006375316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002347661,0.00003617855,0.00005712394,0.00001896576,0.0000083513,0.00000814918,0.0002389472,0.9825475,0.0004694826,0.01374752,0.002568257,0.00006472706],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007703531,0.00006892809,0.9850615,0.004461356,0.0009436363,0.000488741,0.00002440847,0.00002043518,0.001227439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7339312,0.0001360106,0.2649918,0.00008757511,0.0005651641,0.00005257949,0.00001258314,0.00002131499,0.0002017669],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7262276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3459001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106687296","doi":"10.1109/tr.2009.2034947","title":"Evaluating the Reliability Function and the Mean Residual Life for Equipment With Unobservable States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Unobservable; Residual; Moment (physics); Markov process; Reliability (semiconductor); Degradation (telecommunications); Markov chain; State (computer science); Stochastic process; Continuous-time Markov chain; Bayes' theorem; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Mathematics; Reliability engineering; Markov model; Statistics; Econometrics; Markov property; Algorithm; Engineering; Bayesian probability","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02228747341722617,"gpt":0.2583616720662186,"spread":0.2360741986489924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002635895,0.0002502449,0.0002722954,0.00003537768,0.0005854923,0.0000939759,0.00016476,0.0001040797,0.00002395207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000130801,0.0001369369,0.0001101803,0.0002563867,0.0003279406,0.0002493564,0.000001237015,0.000366108,0.000003599008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001655668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006426711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007350551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007382907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982279,0.000220243,0.0004479041,0.0004294064,0.0003319293,0.0003426334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979007,0.0009632409,0.00006672306,0.0007422898,0.0002376424,0.00008944917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002211644,0.0001031878,0.00001564107,0.00007828701,0.00003468703,5.474871e-8,0.0005101512,0.9868747,0.0001175786,0.0002248267,0.0001971738,0.009632088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003250158,0.00185024,0.002621925,0.00005944733,0.0002509365,0.000002311311,0.000548078,0.9723479,0.00148854,0.01683234,0.0004434842,0.0003046062],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3612139,0.00008111195,0.6307679,0.005092504,0.0003501332,0.001970274,0.00003615456,0.0002721057,0.0002159206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940332,0.0001707366,0.004756544,0.0004545835,0.00004769929,0.0004071369,0.000009385904,0.00002083939,0.0000998754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6328193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5584123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124019770","doi":"10.1109/tr.2006.874916","title":"Performance Evaluation of Generalized Multi-State<tex>$k$</tex>-Out-of-<tex>$n$</tex>Systems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Mathematics; Monotonic function; State vector; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0206599683264571,"gpt":0.2454927015663153,"spread":0.2248327332398582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003670052,0.001004574,0.001417344,0.0005667485,0.0004563199,0.0001129588,0.0006736862,0.000762584,0.0003447394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001941662,0.001022472,0.0007262503,0.001272709,0.0005403286,0.0009772521,0.00001219572,0.0007944717,0.0001226582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001362295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003708155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005201183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009897718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922491,0.0007735693,0.002672081,0.001340305,0.001831129,0.001133762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945976,0.0004021347,0.0006130935,0.002134194,0.00194795,0.0003050769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002962887,0.001028628,0.0004172029,0.0009087558,0.0001521352,0.000001701053,0.0006628315,0.9408473,0.04668669,0.00009388476,0.0007664104,0.008138147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004018628,0.0003494312,0.008528996,0.0003762051,0.0004603132,0.00000885483,0.00006160595,0.9400336,0.04127381,0.0002280197,0.003621501,0.001039058],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6722019,0.0005571631,0.3175986,0.0001246035,0.003664273,0.002773353,0.0004136416,0.0006161242,0.002050401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885867,0.001179971,0.00800284,0.00002709651,0.0001764691,0.0006247374,0.0001512085,0.0001620334,0.001088951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3163848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007073703","doi":"10.1007/s10479-011-0885-4","title":"Workforce-constrained maintenance scheduling for military aircraft fleet: a case study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Operations Research","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; Theory of computation; Integer programming; Operations research; Computer science; Scheduling (production processes); Aircraft maintenance; Job shop scheduling; Constraint (computer-aided design); Workforce; Constraint programming; Fleet management; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Aeronautics; Operations management; Stochastic programming; Mathematics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2253498403542211,"gpt":0.399505614178517,"spread":0.1741557738242959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001555241,0.0001148596,0.0001770997,0.0002242482,0.0002563597,0.0000241139,0.0001810303,0.00007212455,0.00006706065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005288695,0.0001080727,0.00007510464,0.0004257266,0.0001647717,0.0003125453,0.00003748221,0.0002152329,0.00001067449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002422449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008060028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001024427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001220718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986754,0.00009526441,0.0003735178,0.0002256241,0.0002100831,0.0004200901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983152,0.0001225905,0.000008572178,0.000380836,0.001077909,0.00009487288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001103492,0.0005898537,0.000809036,0.00016313,0.0001202892,0.0001388959,0.009702291,0.9752115,0.0009044905,0.003870432,0.001226412,0.007153304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007618706,0.0006979989,0.0004158413,0.0001038694,0.0000119101,0.00006820083,0.01702046,0.9761263,0.003662398,0.000550782,0.0003491472,0.0002312267],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9297081,0.0003998582,0.06597085,0.0002496698,0.00009370158,0.001624694,0.00003315417,0.00008621928,0.001833733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686473,0.0002333051,0.03037753,0.00002299643,0.00004113388,0.0003811996,0.000008476866,0.00002632289,0.0002617498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03893917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4407078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057320483","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2005.12.001","title":"Reliability optimization using multiobjective ant colony system approaches","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Redundancy (engineering); Ant colony optimization algorithms; Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Probabilistic logic; Multi-objective optimization; Heuristic; Optimization problem; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007849150253308916,"gpt":0.1696887581511154,"spread":0.1618396078978064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001602849,0.0006451083,0.0008598294,0.0001732041,0.0002550869,0.0001103629,0.000324062,0.00047406,0.00001244541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000252844,0.0006535559,0.0002914194,0.0008269562,0.0001015517,0.0005769698,0.00006203118,0.0004421213,0.00002020342],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004528366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008970921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004670779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007576737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962029,0.0001828372,0.001437243,0.0008815102,0.000494781,0.0008007462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978796,0.0002706196,0.0001845121,0.001132392,0.0003511423,0.0001817913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004940727,0.0000714711,0.0006684703,0.00321596,0.00003603648,0.00000494304,0.0001087601,0.9928977,0.0006461957,0.002177757,0.00004121779,0.00008207187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000609258,0.00003549,0.002888091,0.000504487,0.00008139606,0.00004658388,0.0003534964,0.9937281,0.0006894886,0.0000108417,0.0004062595,0.0006465102],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07706507,0.0002770754,0.9123108,0.00002104401,0.001632471,0.001827374,0.0001026204,0.003574699,0.003188869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351511,0.000022331,0.06412493,0.000002303512,0.0003118091,0.00009835977,0.0001072878,0.0001416923,0.00004017607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.858086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998897999","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2020.106273","title":"Joint optimization of production and maintenance strategies considering a dynamic sampling strategy for a deteriorating system","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Preventive maintenance; Quality (philosophy); Production (economics); Reliability engineering; Sampling (signal processing); Control (management); Constraint (computer-aided design); Production planning; Computer science; Engineering; Production manager; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Industrial engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04787367796418796,"gpt":0.221256481003804,"spread":0.1733828030396161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001718692,0.0001966848,0.0003220594,0.00007981628,0.00005171051,0.00009569906,0.00007176083,0.0001213223,7.959976e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002191023,0.0002183432,0.00005253795,0.0002068332,0.00002829681,0.0003448194,0.00003045532,0.0001720533,1.671818e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001017627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003905994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004427822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.601383e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989489,0.00001266622,0.0004610236,0.0002547261,0.00008680157,0.0002358286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995651,0.00005955861,0.0000949659,0.0001106276,0.00009012118,0.00007967874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001838473,0.000002761131,0.000005387051,0.0007167427,0.00002982486,8.10387e-7,0.0002875404,0.983637,0.01220266,0.0003884115,0.00001587342,0.002694558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004485398,0.00008721893,0.00001348528,0.0006149816,0.00002176048,0.00001084285,0.0006757861,0.9962153,0.001673809,0.000007943027,0.0000330241,0.0001972934],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07151101,0.00009970758,0.9266842,0.0000714914,0.0006410417,0.0005641946,0.000008761359,0.000404125,0.00001546495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9031252,0.0000264641,0.09657541,0.000004850634,0.000182742,0.00003361945,0.00001190032,0.00003907574,6.864784e-7],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8316143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8903776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975782246","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.09.006","title":"Efficient aircraft spare parts inventory management under demand uncertainty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Transport Management","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spare part; Mean time between failures; Operations research; Reorder point; Economic shortage; Computer science; Total cost; Point (geometry); Economic order quantity; Order (exchange); Reduction (mathematics); Reliability engineering; Mathematical optimization; Linear programming; Cost reduction; Operations management; Failure rate; Engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Supply chain; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00586787784124496,"gpt":0.1888684523639723,"spread":0.1830005745227273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007177634,0.0002048304,0.0002864973,0.0002099151,0.00006096889,0.00001599052,0.0002317104,0.00005788183,0.00006283305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002150684,0.0001805869,0.0001869069,0.0001879536,0.0000440782,0.00009003581,0.0000172638,0.0001663003,0.00001540353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001845884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006733492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002484808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001068812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984249,0.0000327315,0.0006237628,0.0001716368,0.0004442571,0.0003027383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993763,0.00001326044,0.0001273212,0.000271374,0.00007652974,0.000135227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003819192,0.0001023413,0.0004911122,0.0004993297,0.0002287372,0.00005579809,0.0001720867,0.9888006,0.00000394895,0.004344911,0.002020102,0.003242786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004744971,0.0003837741,0.06992733,0.00126729,0.0009865349,0.00003891162,0.001728671,0.6909888,0.000160103,0.004986795,0.2237734,0.001013392],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1168409,0.0003358327,0.8580959,0.0006113898,0.001236818,0.0004843402,0.000002740571,0.0001322969,0.02225979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940329,0.000645718,0.004554363,0.0002290537,0.00009301117,0.00001220818,0.000007773742,0.00003040506,0.0003945259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.877192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7364119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212263828","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2021.108191","title":"A deep learning predictive model for selective maintenance optimization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Predictive maintenance; Component (thermodynamics); Benchmarking; Modular design; Reliability engineering; Turbofan; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Maintenance actions; Engineering; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00378129399622761,"gpt":0.177417110569024,"spread":0.1736358165727964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006426934,0.0003467395,0.0004844703,0.0000829082,0.0001600342,0.00005609681,0.0001544423,0.0002526554,0.00000611189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009452743,0.0003777262,0.0002100615,0.0004881919,0.00003098527,0.000328802,0.0000333523,0.0003667958,0.000005575666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001264584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009030209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004859391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004049228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979246,0.00006205118,0.0006498881,0.0005691872,0.0002324531,0.0005618064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983589,0.0002620745,0.00007690748,0.0004523595,0.0007088503,0.0001408932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005872944,0.00002560579,0.00006260273,0.001178736,0.00006032558,0.000002076634,0.0004543432,0.9961627,0.0003340824,0.001214268,0.00009098959,0.0003555834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005864502,0.00004444555,0.0001328178,0.0002739159,0.00005152769,0.00001936364,0.000228324,0.9970028,0.0006845528,0.00005488511,0.0005475151,0.0003733859],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008781425,0.0002585032,0.9942827,0.00005347943,0.0005655253,0.0008625485,0.00004185813,0.001553717,0.001503562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.866058,0.0002211497,0.1327683,0.000009553055,0.0001121352,0.0003537119,0.0001355005,0.0001121405,0.0002295098],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8651798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061267743","doi":"10.1007/s10845-009-0358-7","title":"Condition based maintenance optimization considering multiple objectives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Condition-based maintenance; Reliability engineering; Multi-objective optimization; Decision maker; Process (computing); Optimization problem; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Production (economics); Preventive maintenance; Engineering; Operations research; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008533576907598112,"gpt":0.2159324134761419,"spread":0.2073988365685437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002658807,0.0001684879,0.0002387701,0.0002181194,0.00006177567,0.00006265073,0.0001272765,0.00007868832,0.00008761603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001824598,0.0001518995,0.0001344515,0.0000836332,0.00003034633,0.0004516515,0.000007142236,0.0002534993,0.000005831674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002198516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002550744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001630277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001408759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988813,0.00002923912,0.0005499159,0.0001138693,0.0001982546,0.0002273543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993131,0.000108601,0.0001991585,0.000133453,0.0001590794,0.00008664155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004200999,0.00003172944,0.00006163853,0.00003348983,0.00002169396,0.0000140454,0.0001345092,0.9911893,0.00155702,0.00003670362,0.000235005,0.006642858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004111118,0.0001091261,0.0007512532,0.0002361936,0.00001976562,0.0000513503,0.0001753004,0.6400958,0.3564533,0.0005236068,0.0009915079,0.0001816954],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08794674,0.0001607528,0.9101318,0.0001727197,0.0005116545,0.0001414713,0.000002193635,0.00009389026,0.0008387956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646833,0.0003427634,0.03468899,0.0001285154,0.000109079,0.000001804311,0.000005083623,0.00001864423,0.00002181461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8767366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6194282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066074156","doi":"10.1109/tr.2015.2421819","title":"Periodic Inspection Optimization of a k-Out-of-n Load-Sharing System","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Load sharing; Interval (graph theory); Component (thermodynamics); Reliability engineering; Poisson distribution; Function (biology); Hazard; Process (computing); Moment (physics); Poisson process; Mathematical optimization; Interval arithmetic; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Distributed computing; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01683839238325013,"gpt":0.2205046413844796,"spread":0.2036662490012295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005403878,0.0001625836,0.0002931813,0.0001206486,0.00005886883,0.00001436866,0.0001301047,0.0001506181,0.00001821303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003588852,0.0001652053,0.0001252772,0.0003690404,0.0001149521,0.0002492839,0.000001072125,0.0001895694,0.000008554138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006597242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008731525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001160759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002797732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998664,0.00004740794,0.0005448734,0.0002599623,0.0003150148,0.0001687808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988272,0.000045488,0.00009127791,0.0004963456,0.0004448395,0.0000949005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007671535,0.0001150875,0.00005973386,0.0003883939,0.00002030216,2.802014e-7,0.000820794,0.9968323,0.0004337102,0.00005448075,0.00003010898,0.001168074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005258811,0.0001382707,0.00007004697,0.0001349519,0.0000450755,0.000004141924,0.0005156944,0.9765031,0.0218127,0.00006143186,0.00003634009,0.0001523683],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1000484,0.00003044411,0.8947999,0.00001736445,0.001385174,0.0003487318,0.00002322461,0.0004643567,0.002882461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917061,0.00004042648,0.008128663,0.000002651416,0.00002099913,0.00004404979,0.000003717026,0.00002158323,0.00003185836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8916577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6736876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093664936","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.07.011","title":"Simultaneous control of production, repair/replacement and preventive maintenance of deteriorating manufacturing systems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Economics","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Reliability engineering; Production (economics); Reliability (semiconductor); Maintenance actions; Computer science; Markov decision process; Time horizon; Sensitivity (control systems); Order (exchange); Failure rate; Operations research; Planned maintenance; Markov process; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Business; Economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007545413346551625,"gpt":0.1901403065791052,"spread":0.1825948932325536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005276909,0.00009580877,0.0002249228,0.0001371497,0.00001800792,0.00001223172,0.0001122168,0.00003885929,0.00001000635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003116407,0.00009298179,0.00007136042,0.00002734091,0.00006491823,0.0003975811,0.0000164308,0.00009452634,4.983166e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001442217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002744563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001332688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005310708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998863,0.00002881159,0.0007918664,0.0001337687,0.00009666307,0.00008591345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985781,0.00003143989,0.0006599884,0.0001183699,0.0005820164,0.0000300368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003567255,0.00006967411,0.001733963,0.0001500215,0.0003818946,0.000002377076,0.001082362,0.9880733,0.004157219,0.0003248319,0.000071309,0.003596356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003299101,0.001085828,0.006485888,0.001584896,0.0002862085,0.001470825,0.004385468,0.4397567,0.5351688,0.002878221,0.002892688,0.000705431],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656653,0.000195159,0.03015664,0.00008262479,0.003490703,0.0002301707,0.000009261777,0.00002141704,0.0001486641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941853,0.0006719531,0.004791787,0.000004201078,0.0002422341,0.000004469332,0.000001277099,0.00001309405,0.000085693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5483166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3791687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265194661","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2015.11.011","title":"A risk-based shutdown inspection and maintenance interval estimation considering human error","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Shutdown; Reliability engineering; Interval (graph theory); Criticality; Human error; Engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Process (computing); Computer science; Power (physics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01227864041269068,"gpt":0.2075917494950508,"spread":0.1953131090823602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000221919,0.0001386426,0.0001246624,0.00005195033,0.0002008896,0.00003510692,0.0000274613,0.00008400503,0.000007575612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004460628,0.0001400139,0.00001788981,0.00005366036,0.0001204796,0.0003995338,0.00001728036,0.0001819692,0.000005043699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001807369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005745455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003667808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003283563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993145,0.00002807892,0.0001982187,0.0002115532,0.0001067405,0.0001408528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997611,0.000007905609,0.00006323089,0.00008092645,0.000009898013,0.00007694708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001423734,0.0000348816,0.001278314,0.0001932669,0.00001270665,7.787878e-7,0.0008798885,0.9838861,0.001108697,0.00002528675,0.000009423403,0.01242831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007793234,0.0001401062,0.003128212,0.00006885175,0.00001782683,0.00001708413,0.0005514448,0.9913136,0.001889923,0.001722953,0.0001921973,0.000178454],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2961527,0.0001162726,0.7024145,0.00009287194,0.0001157823,0.0004495696,0.000009728862,0.0002766237,0.0003720543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985368,0.0001193205,0.001162397,0.00001603905,0.00002590327,0.00007561033,0.00002556618,0.00001949475,0.00001886363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7023842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5709599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002736705","doi":"10.1016/j.apnum.2006.11.010","title":"Simultaneous control of production, preventive and corrective maintenance rates of a failure-prone manufacturing system","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Numerical Mathematics","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corrective maintenance; Preventive maintenance; Production (economics); Reliability engineering; Productivity; Failure rate; Control (management); Production planning; Computer science; Operations research; Operations management; Engineering; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003525842608239134,"gpt":0.1948739825486563,"spread":0.1913481399404171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002954175,0.0001397547,0.000373835,0.00004800371,0.0000257111,0.000005670734,0.00006832158,0.00006785089,0.000003482736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001603012,0.0001196216,0.00003586101,0.0001283598,0.00009739724,0.00004321408,0.00001621703,0.0001000977,0.000002386464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006182091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006402043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003696104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001830386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990703,0.000009895321,0.000447747,0.0001537732,0.0001319845,0.000186225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991741,0.0003477479,0.0001650908,0.0001704914,0.00009891752,0.00004370953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004131818,0.000553607,0.0001995792,0.01043376,0.00049611,0.00001031101,0.008634608,0.8678756,0.05774966,0.03344189,0.0001962628,0.01999539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001301397,0.0001683727,0.0005901481,0.0007254253,0.0001677506,0.00005639924,0.009181305,0.4781978,0.5030515,0.005966332,0.00010862,0.0004849262],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1474802,0.00004206405,0.850538,0.00001364726,0.00008477084,0.0006668089,0.000005656992,0.0000901462,0.001078721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643986,0.00001438885,0.03548708,0.000003084822,0.00002124267,0.0000254376,0.000001666824,0.00002242923,0.00002607102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8169184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4878029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731618922","doi":"10.1109/tr.2017.2711621","title":"Two-Phase Degradation Process Model With Abrupt Jump at Change Point Governed by Wiener Process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Degradation (telecommunications); Wiener process; Unobservable; Jump; Process (computing); Point process; Maximization; Computer science; Stochastic process; Gamma process; Jump process; Mathematics; Control theory (sociology); Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01802597597072788,"gpt":0.2736218958871999,"spread":0.2555959199164721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002852616,0.0003319915,0.0002939606,0.00005940476,0.0005925503,0.0001045553,0.0003168416,0.0001631927,0.00006048155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002919715,0.0002863999,0.00009650937,0.0001486865,0.0002060365,0.001258303,0.00000169187,0.0003188061,0.00001982503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004289862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005256057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001273027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003013447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982886,0.00002951274,0.0003472962,0.0005625036,0.0003837659,0.0003883285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983969,0.0000362871,0.0001299735,0.001021493,0.0002536357,0.0001617193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003733573,0.0004954836,0.00008946418,0.0002865303,0.00002797886,0.000001180187,0.0004764187,0.9906493,0.00087141,0.000009990495,0.0001618509,0.006556994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001984645,0.0001752885,0.0001446853,0.00008394014,0.00006619209,0.000004421903,0.00006922457,0.955463,0.04118777,0.0003668254,0.00006405262,0.0003899467],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4576059,0.00001735821,0.5388768,0.0004603055,0.0002503845,0.0008607453,0.0001829843,0.0004615304,0.001283928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968837,0.00009455381,0.001732109,0.00007407602,0.0000306677,0.0006367849,0.00003137,0.00005312093,0.000463573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5392778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W317510280","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.013","title":"Search for all d-MPs for all d levels in multistate two-terminal networks","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Path (computing); Binary number; Heuristic; Reliability (semiconductor); Algorithm; Binary search algorithm; Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Integer (computer science); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Search algorithm; Statistics; Arithmetic; Power (physics); Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02387257834581962,"gpt":0.2593243840548468,"spread":0.2354518057090272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002690276,0.0003831543,0.0006003389,0.0001375529,0.00004476282,0.000059997,0.0002924546,0.0002445647,0.000002490197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003147514,0.0003981253,0.0001926962,0.0002499363,0.00003450279,0.0002720446,0.00004055188,0.0003012627,0.000007228233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001379612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006655222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001037303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003099449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973771,0.00006409565,0.0009132911,0.0005298244,0.0002438795,0.000871826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982851,0.000490391,0.00005711941,0.0005983681,0.0002882483,0.0002807592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001309174,0.0000334824,0.0003064413,0.001754957,0.00003665371,0.000003959966,0.0003975206,0.9950519,0.0002020044,0.0009419349,0.0002080468,0.0009321572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002096642,0.00009300604,0.0008061667,0.0002833355,0.00002984212,0.00001603905,0.0001212864,0.9886588,0.0003302496,0.00003775974,0.007105926,0.0004209752],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04412477,0.0002156377,0.9505675,0.0001072729,0.00134232,0.00258279,0.0001626825,0.0007004855,0.0001964862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625528,0.00003144016,0.03627667,0.00001576008,0.0002567501,0.0005634499,0.0001350931,0.0001149572,0.00005305234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9184281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}