{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1787,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":1787,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"94cc5fd38cf1","filters":{"topic":"Religion and Society Interactions"}},"results":[{"id":"W2044683788","doi":"10.1177/1069397103037002003","title":"Cooperation and Commune Longevity: A Test of the Costly Signaling Theory of Religion","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-Cultural Research","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":571,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Taboo; Test (biology); Ideal (ethics); Action (physics); Collective action; Sociology; Theory of reasoned action; Positive economics; Population; Longevity; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Law; Demography; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1128754116805585,"gpt":0.4759959587443511,"spread":0.3631205470637926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002632003,0.00005358772,0.0001087442,0.00002728406,0.001321415,0.0002263921,0.0002140856,0.0000785146,0.00006679803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007301262,0.00003395797,0.00007528054,0.0004792428,0.002249445,0.0002747587,0.00005565799,0.0003263689,0.00000763159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000733338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001621077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001528936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004322269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998145,0.0008255942,0.000202353,0.0001105949,0.0005115148,0.0002049206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970268,0.001344526,0.00007079145,0.0001715668,0.001327321,0.00005897229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006447465,0.0002149916,0.04674152,0.00007026691,0.00003987372,0.000001026273,0.0604766,0.00004697574,0.3089605,0.5710665,0.01027561,0.002041699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002105583,0.0006070342,0.05685269,0.0007802569,0.00005241368,0.00001823031,0.1433901,0.000189477,0.3902808,0.05202551,0.3531134,0.0005844696],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.975444,0.0005136844,0.00001180455,0.001176295,0.00008793735,0.0002539931,0.000005600028,0.0000108626,0.02249578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950389,0.001128742,0.00003533881,0.00007941356,0.00002755896,0.000009248111,0.000001639568,0.00000412461,0.003674987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.519041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900744207","doi":"10.4324/9781003469490-14","title":"When Social Comparison Goes Awry: The Case of Pluralistic Ignorance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05865607775638921,"gpt":0.3747764754511913,"spread":0.3161203976948021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002517006,0.0001638784,0.0003058467,0.00003822186,0.0007081417,0.0001404527,0.0002681036,0.0002919677,0.002867616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000385775,0.0001135895,0.0003559225,0.00004292818,0.0007071995,0.00005745706,0.00005265116,0.0004722018,0.0004180474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001204517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001454993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01171481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02176121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989634,0.00004270692,0.0003343069,0.0002013252,0.000286835,0.0001714751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991571,0.0002979157,0.0001793957,0.0001578391,0.0001530804,0.00005469329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002400106,0.000005759569,0.000001309967,0.00001732296,0.00006550442,0.00003017246,0.02341854,8.524797e-7,8.834733e-7,0.7115864,0.2644587,0.0004121531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003654981,0.00001064698,0.000001076051,0.00005549599,0.0001088986,0.00001170759,0.01514771,0.000042367,0.000001886898,0.1324081,0.8520404,0.0001351854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001018374,0.0006676569,0.00005213873,0.01235913,0.001061406,0.000225577,0.00007132735,0.00009430625,0.9853666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1797108,0.0003054651,0.00003274998,0.0004422083,0.0006620205,0.000007804952,0.000008825373,0.00001985555,0.8188102],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5875818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611176864","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12319","title":"Becoming a Religious None: Irreligious Socialization and Disaffiliation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":223,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Ambrose University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Socialization; Sociology; Phenomenon; Population; Qualitative analysis; Social psychology; Religious studies; Qualitative research; Psychology; Social science; Demography; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05507444989759027,"gpt":0.4076276260837799,"spread":0.3525531761861897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00276318,0.000109753,0.000191647,0.0001077173,0.01402539,0.001673571,0.0005568634,0.00008663341,0.000005041361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001370928,0.00008204149,0.0001851702,0.0001625998,0.0005537319,0.000422887,0.00007682973,0.0001869436,0.000005468059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001147311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001342028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002832373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002719935,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998283,0.0001366411,0.0004172499,0.0002357722,0.0006670792,0.0002602136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997737,0.0003701661,0.0008381357,0.0003840405,0.000563111,0.0001075679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002320642,0.0009828261,0.01985674,0.00003782895,0.0003478133,0.000005009758,0.4245788,0.0003080199,0.001138214,0.01793721,0.5143338,0.02024169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007404101,0.001293484,0.03589022,0.0003498731,0.0009555717,0.00006592621,0.2962721,0.004804649,0.0003025684,0.07424559,0.5775012,0.0009146478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803803,0.0006273529,0.001604307,0.007785222,0.007354473,0.001030105,0.000005290681,0.00003206535,0.00118091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932163,0.003358036,0.0001151354,0.0000680736,0.0004129115,0.00002432189,0.000001731457,0.00001173551,0.002791691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1283067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235039437","doi":"10.2307/2672185","title":"The East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Orientalism; Welfare; East Asia; Welfare state; Political science; History; China; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00847883639112209,"gpt":0.2544219760903529,"spread":0.2459431396992308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004753769,0.0001063646,0.0001071656,0.00001293815,0.004114713,0.0003165805,0.0002500665,0.00006575073,0.0006505044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004604745,0.00006049343,0.0001212485,0.0001902633,0.001032333,0.0001504052,0.00002367212,0.0002049959,0.0001056742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000609473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000384689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008066124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009272444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987997,0.0002069769,0.0001648987,0.0001832865,0.0003343368,0.0003107315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994761,0.00006188371,0.00004954914,0.000236336,0.00005200253,0.0001241341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008666808,0.00003645004,0.00005948706,0.000003489591,0.00005616273,0.000002952729,0.388054,0.0002154701,0.000001567201,0.5565434,0.02246733,0.0324731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000202616,0.000004862103,0.00002426197,0.000003329497,0.000007384954,0.00000201603,0.5820451,0.001061395,6.514666e-7,0.003543647,0.4130375,0.00006729138],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002130278,0.0002521314,0.000040047,0.1224191,0.0003077721,0.0002588778,0.00002060231,0.00009135667,0.8744798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695535,0.001530075,0.00002618736,0.0000632783,0.00007842739,0.0000371467,0.000004000971,0.00001091702,0.02869642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912106215","doi":"10.1038/s41562-018-0512-3","title":"War increases religiosity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01944815961547394,"gpt":0.3478699399790524,"spread":0.3284217803635785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000353946,0.0003404365,0.000428157,0.000157442,0.001217845,0.0001890184,0.0008230003,0.004812603,0.001654977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001979355,0.0003413801,0.0006038721,0.0002219393,0.0002484673,0.000179915,0.00008885819,0.008327023,0.0009183641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004494677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002915564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01300087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001600799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971115,0.000351342,0.0003135849,0.0005738749,0.001065064,0.0005846315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984562,0.0002324534,0.0002704512,0.0006260397,0.00031334,0.0001015265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001514515,0.00004635655,0.003904114,0.00001584791,0.00002937492,0.00009415966,0.00130238,6.963614e-8,0.000008613678,0.0009604211,0.9936197,0.00001747692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001437996,0.00002541294,0.002393557,0.00008576424,0.0001218851,0.000005924137,0.0004862669,1.04854e-7,0.000007767019,0.0004907131,0.9958356,0.000403185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0389192,0.001609808,0.000001958296,0.7847021,0.005192816,0.000967257,0.0002127688,0.0006651889,0.167729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08645635,0.0005222963,0.00004699843,0.7890036,0.009445241,0.00003256764,0.0006956867,0.00007217909,0.1137251],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05400386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W821015727","doi":"10.5860/choice.192280","title":"Nations under God: how churches use moral authority to influence policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moral authority; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Business; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Moral development","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.271341286070845,"gpt":0.4730721731781461,"spread":0.2017308871073011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007529721,0.0001366864,0.0002692367,0.0001261033,0.0004494158,0.0002566065,0.0003346792,0.0001114502,0.00003842358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01247485,0.0001202472,0.0001707525,0.001321809,0.0001395096,0.0006997664,0.00006143446,0.0002451966,0.0003103646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004529087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005464426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009520371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01345432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984795,0.0003419128,0.0002741125,0.0002354451,0.0003544895,0.0003145419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983255,0.0002926438,0.0001272567,0.0003039571,0.0004078016,0.0005427892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001280905,0.001076387,0.02761394,0.0001562027,0.0001004817,0.000004093324,0.04156312,0.0005743457,0.0004867777,0.3160438,0.5748425,0.03752553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009599176,0.00001848554,0.009452912,0.00009526884,0.0000154356,8.715619e-7,0.001758307,0.00002291291,0.000003911547,0.0007837029,0.9876102,0.0001419601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.329869,0.007894628,0.0022903,0.6233688,0.001755754,0.00298654,0.0002321182,0.0006010954,0.03100173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6450855,0.08926261,0.03774881,0.06110551,0.009268616,0.00043596,0.0002460866,0.00009991424,0.156747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5622633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110731744","doi":"10.1093/jcs/csq039","title":"The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Church and State","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Ideology; Religious studies; State (computer science); Secular education; Sociology; Classics; History; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006885087798545153,"gpt":0.2985685106396229,"spread":0.2916834228410777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00128434,0.00004585076,0.000167591,0.00002267681,0.0002507365,0.00003331429,0.0001439631,0.00004844074,0.000006181835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002762,0.00002318858,0.00009369929,0.00005833323,0.00100944,0.00006382646,0.00001956847,0.0002914065,2.975148e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005467946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001046941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004421321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001581791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991617,0.0001533748,0.0002971333,0.00004504359,0.0002272895,0.0001155179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987739,0.0004737464,0.0003421822,0.00007626002,0.0002627869,0.00007110689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002486788,0.0002725009,0.01848646,0.0001021505,0.001246976,0.00005638948,0.5251942,0.0001906959,0.08187217,0.1900296,0.05800098,0.1220612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005923173,0.0007333359,0.02847234,0.0002123153,0.0001891047,0.0003297212,0.03433289,0.002005439,0.002223682,0.6246246,0.3006562,0.000297274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984179,0.0029569,0.0002332326,0.01022189,0.0002790671,0.00007176612,0.00000259016,0.000001918304,0.002053701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599722,0.03937728,0.00004801841,0.0003491095,0.00004839215,7.423815e-7,7.120018e-8,0.000002288466,0.0002019216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4908612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3719323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144803566","doi":"10.1177/002071520204300302","title":"Do Islamic Orientations Influence Attitudes Toward Democracy in the Arab World? Evidence from Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, and Algeria","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Democracy; Politics; Democratic consolidation; World Values Survey; Consolidation (business); Political science; Development economics; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Democratization; Geography; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09741908497245542,"gpt":0.4347990848052792,"spread":0.3373799998328237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005826392,0.0001040006,0.0002288388,0.0001456941,0.0002687368,0.000139872,0.0006261237,0.00006753182,0.0005034799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004273998,0.00007985286,0.0001184178,0.0001825024,0.0007507287,0.0006637049,0.00003874664,0.000465455,0.00005114545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002050369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001128653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008675263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001249585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980693,0.0007167533,0.0004694436,0.0001432826,0.0004398634,0.0001613449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966241,0.002286754,0.000394823,0.00007686696,0.000570407,0.00004708555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000839832,0.0002496466,0.1865921,0.0000021369,0.0003581175,0.00005359013,0.6509337,0.0007183361,0.0009251606,0.1428081,0.0165145,0.0007605301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001378301,0.0001840637,0.6329792,0.0003282378,0.00005780313,0.00008470487,0.1121357,0.0004898161,0.00009233168,0.2247711,0.02714091,0.0003578228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662336,0.001599715,0.0006082066,0.02763293,0.0007650973,0.0001056963,0.000007433308,0.000007182109,0.003040203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943126,0.003015886,0.0006611763,0.001464741,0.0003642462,0.000008468713,0.000001838931,0.000003290328,0.0001677398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.538798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5512752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122160523","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/9780262019750.003.0020","title":"The Cultural Evolution of Religion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"The MIT Press eBooks","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Royal Society Te Apārangi; Aarhus Universitet; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Religiosity; Multidisciplinary approach; Scale (ratio); Variation (astronomy); Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Epistemology; Anthropology; Social science; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Geography; Social psychology; Philosophy; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03659118929418206,"gpt":0.3014944542531627,"spread":0.2649032649589806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000323994,0.0001438452,0.0001563873,0.00001455215,0.001048378,0.0001391621,0.0005456419,0.0002518429,0.0000585298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005663647,0.0000769197,0.000291889,0.0000062024,0.0008677185,0.00005974732,0.00007388829,0.0003829385,0.0001280586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001510347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009507324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01147836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009811684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988633,0.0001048926,0.0002708738,0.0001408603,0.0004242114,0.0001958102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987293,0.0002781582,0.0003007526,0.0003715622,0.0002678166,0.00005241688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005194342,0.000001807839,2.589024e-7,0.000004390752,0.00005470163,1.391496e-7,0.005720964,0.000001023146,0.00002963976,0.8589969,0.1337578,0.001427166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004680307,0.00001238018,0.000003286641,0.00007358228,0.00005879354,9.211258e-7,0.0007390777,0.000006893297,0.0000406796,0.0478831,0.9510384,0.00009612148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001099634,0.002636926,0.00001627209,0.0009687949,0.0006816125,0.0004606797,0.000007320068,0.00005400438,0.9950644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01811918,0.003990557,0.00001088966,0.0001039675,0.000397113,0.00003293598,0.000002244001,0.00001625078,0.9773269],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8172806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552507009","doi":"10.1177/030437540202700403","title":"Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? The Relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe Debate for Third World Politics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives Global Local Political","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Public reason; Liberal democracy; Public sphere; Politics; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Deliberative democracy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04025816555252819,"gpt":0.3628912024212441,"spread":0.3226330368687159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002227231,0.0001898723,0.0002468337,0.00001987466,0.00117144,0.0001066362,0.0006945846,0.0000896669,0.0001212705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00183371,0.000107131,0.0003183251,0.0003929001,0.002513476,0.0001857255,0.0001051078,0.0002802044,0.00005039179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004980926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001729746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003093875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002581604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975656,0.0004183802,0.0004170702,0.00025775,0.0005522432,0.0007890105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968495,0.002101412,0.0001462593,0.0002922284,0.0003408121,0.0002697804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001996566,0.00008223885,0.0003292531,0.000007188746,0.00006354026,0.000003515675,0.002712334,0.00003052406,0.000003371498,0.9811639,0.01493367,0.0006505382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001247681,0.0002271132,0.004200081,0.0001865465,0.0002012747,0.000040761,0.01738307,0.01288794,0.000769332,0.6416665,0.3206253,0.0005643489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06988702,0.0005620739,0.019436,0.2917103,0.003310866,0.002007531,0.0007375369,0.0001930683,0.6121556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781502,0.00009765596,0.0003695017,0.007984843,0.0004957772,0.00003580582,0.000002375298,0.00001111943,0.01285266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9082632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9261007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169947742","doi":"","title":"Fundamentalism and Authoritarianism.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamentalism; Authoritarianism; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01778249731672498,"gpt":0.3555394823033794,"spread":0.3377569849866544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001140794,0.00002349289,0.00002855899,0.000009455181,0.0003607352,0.00006638983,0.00003498498,0.00003286045,0.001518485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001694879,0.00002168333,0.00002209231,0.00004073458,0.00007511278,0.0001334303,0.000008709978,0.00004027149,0.0001958407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003619536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001959541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002243817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001822393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997036,0.00002257423,0.00004673282,0.00005724294,0.00008379319,0.00008605613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998504,0.00002608489,0.000008711244,0.00003313547,0.0000132113,0.00006849413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.489641e-7,0.00001554241,0.0003864918,3.320699e-7,0.000004899248,2.403015e-7,0.01823508,4.549735e-7,0.00007591357,0.8944257,0.07818253,0.008672239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004908431,0.000003867488,0.0004770397,9.517988e-7,0.000001785634,6.284188e-7,0.01463416,0.00002776724,0.00002669674,0.001814752,0.9829295,0.00003376204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05434017,0.00007101068,0.0002697544,0.05921134,0.0002143211,0.00005655666,7.031475e-7,0.00008736504,0.8857488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307439,0.0002558259,0.001815705,0.002442138,0.0002132114,0.000002375451,4.552209e-7,0.00000179496,0.06452463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9047469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311565555","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139030953","title":"Federalism in Greek Antiquity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Representation (politics); History; Law; Archaeology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04459365016434612,"gpt":0.284013843583092,"spread":0.2394201934187459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003739274,0.0002070924,0.0003273356,0.0001426195,0.0004779723,0.0001118555,0.0005484928,0.0005596128,0.000008495489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005213706,0.000266812,0.0002298552,0.00003094921,0.0004442585,0.0001617725,0.0001781969,0.0006756745,0.00004372763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001491885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00140304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01220899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008665129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984018,0.0002616268,0.0001669833,0.0003499218,0.0004587353,0.0003609108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989337,0.00009617233,0.0001586265,0.0002829484,0.0002595313,0.0002690101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001370922,0.00001179449,0.000005988828,0.00001192163,0.00002323412,0.0002399448,0.002056955,8.024172e-7,0.000001061112,0.3438338,0.6536686,0.0001322661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003579992,0.00001379615,0.00001543487,0.00008931459,0.00003585566,0.000004397618,0.001884803,0.000009507531,0.000002453888,0.00005366878,0.9972568,0.0002759572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003687283,0.0000826183,0.00002674304,0.0002545285,0.0006495574,0.0003565585,0.00008939246,0.0001389725,0.9980329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000998779,0.0004194239,0.00002634898,0.0002465147,0.0002691146,8.398197e-7,0.0000425024,0.00001909214,0.9979774],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3437801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913790069","doi":"10.1177/0037768618816096","title":"Unorganized atheism and the secular movement: reddit as a site for studying ‘lived atheism’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Compass","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Uppsala Universitet","keywords":"Atheism; Sociology; Rhetoric; Rationality; Gender studies; Epistemology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02253368007091787,"gpt":0.3197275894377888,"spread":0.297193909366871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008525106,0.0001139847,0.0002489531,0.00002145601,0.00175422,0.0002025528,0.0002119102,0.0001051532,0.0002415593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001173295,0.00009036324,0.0002316078,0.0001972591,0.0002889019,0.0001092575,0.00006608784,0.0001756996,0.0001490354],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001098242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008681006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002393093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002935783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987143,0.0002901058,0.0001896009,0.0002064495,0.0003150637,0.0002844631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990805,0.0004552522,0.0001243413,0.0001241537,0.0001502878,0.00006550661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001210739,0.00006700319,0.0006817884,0.00001273805,0.0002022709,7.013643e-7,0.3053494,0.000003435093,0.001083267,0.6798086,0.01227897,0.000390731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008657777,0.0001147516,0.003491998,0.00004051402,0.0001751021,0.000001181807,0.2167857,0.0008487999,0.0001399307,0.1156762,0.6535538,0.0005141941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9463302,0.0001175871,0.000294629,0.02417498,0.0006884608,0.001378138,0.00001540443,0.00009955456,0.02690106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876186,0.0001188122,0.00007843264,0.003158469,0.000409003,0.00007589387,0.000008320147,0.00001665988,0.008515807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6412749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144651035","doi":"10.1177/0952695112441301","title":"The evolution of atheism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of the Human Sciences","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Atheism; Humanism; Enlightenment; Epistemology; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Criticism; Dialectic; Politics; Sociology; Religious studies; Law; Theology; History; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06760620611673503,"gpt":0.3413643466807619,"spread":0.2737581405640269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001547934,0.00003207863,0.00005411435,0.00002125396,0.00143212,0.00000822137,0.0005442638,0.00002665565,0.00009311127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001432842,0.00001783614,0.0001128774,0.0001521037,0.003531155,0.0001710367,0.00003198787,0.0000581925,0.00001055193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005051192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002572999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003430971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005707409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991056,0.000165794,0.0001325552,0.00005418963,0.0003922533,0.0001496059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994629,0.0001304166,0.0001784809,0.0001389256,0.000057107,0.00003214607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.958368e-7,0.00003390583,0.00760765,0.000002002154,0.000004352696,4.885517e-9,0.05748146,0.000004308056,0.00204569,0.8728415,0.05980605,0.000172381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003142802,0.00001350827,0.01479375,0.00001211927,0.000007569442,2.514297e-7,0.02126849,0.000007556999,0.00008562301,0.005526593,0.9582121,0.00004105165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4931275,0.003370808,0.00002228303,0.001645658,0.004081832,0.0001072535,7.316925e-7,0.00001658803,0.4976274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569835,0.00004622875,0.00002455092,0.0000519822,0.00009658222,0.000002384355,2.537504e-8,0.000001230138,0.04279353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.898406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046300749","doi":"10.2307/3712520","title":"Making the Sacred Safe: Woman Abuse and Communities of Faith","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Sociology; Religious studies; Media studies; Criminology; Theology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03427367153195745,"gpt":0.3454405497434525,"spread":0.3111668782114951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000399342,0.00005909008,0.0001528854,0.00002387698,0.0005293919,0.000008500723,0.000180047,0.0001448705,0.0001311366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003181623,0.00004514772,0.00008794724,0.00007137888,0.002686774,0.00006043119,0.00001460151,0.0001774704,0.000009466858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002352227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003892448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004617286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007897444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991231,0.0003815293,0.0001837482,0.00006348759,0.000108759,0.0001393927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992379,0.0004214965,0.0001105653,0.0001442851,0.00006343525,0.00002229536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005451729,0.00005144361,0.01280943,0.00001937396,0.00009112635,6.57723e-7,0.8516402,0.00002335487,0.0002160552,0.06736698,0.06537534,0.002351519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006234508,0.0002272725,0.012483,0.0001401214,0.00007123011,0.000008848144,0.4625727,0.00007581941,0.0001153575,0.04511778,0.478331,0.000233452],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695352,0.001264984,0.00001456903,0.0033294,0.00009743086,0.0001011176,0.000003468164,0.00002198395,0.02563188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734937,0.02480802,0.0001240395,0.0007575739,0.00004550358,0.000005208491,0.00000273543,0.00000416744,0.00075905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4129556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.989953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088853374","doi":"10.1111/imre.12012","title":"Bridges and Barriers: Religion and Immigrant Occupational Attainment across Integration Contexts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Migration Review","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Social integration; European Social Survey; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Thriving; Attendance; Diversity (politics); Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Ethnic group; Social capital; General Social Survey; Status attainment; Political science; Gender studies; Politics; Social science; Geography; Economics; Population; Socioeconomic status; Law; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01792365914067152,"gpt":0.3671249158133664,"spread":0.3492012566726949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004823593,0.0001283971,0.0001671456,0.00004180311,0.0004360799,0.0003081888,0.0001242285,0.00007634852,0.000515609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006399965,0.0001144871,0.00008747964,0.000108056,0.0001855803,0.0006987831,0.0000353609,0.0001221157,0.0001130689],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001390643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006827055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01116169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004684777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986237,0.0001493534,0.0003861822,0.0002494911,0.000429402,0.0001618487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989507,0.0001533836,0.0001757618,0.00009846446,0.0004531859,0.0001685311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004458401,0.0001503249,0.04646355,0.0003105784,0.0002229096,0.000004272161,0.03559755,0.00001180702,0.001254256,0.2442657,0.4045371,0.2671373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004106244,0.00005112191,0.05321822,0.001452981,0.00003524627,0.00002095295,0.007465225,0.001006421,0.00007910647,0.002004535,0.9339324,0.0003231209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6992977,0.04600213,0.004105872,0.2400869,0.001636228,0.002557969,0.00009835568,0.0002163185,0.005998523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8014771,0.1877143,0.0002680006,0.008471758,0.0001731778,0.0001972004,0.0000814938,0.000007899253,0.001609102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5293953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891617466","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12278","title":"System justification: Experimental evidence, its contextual nature, and implications for social change","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"System justification; Status quo; Ignorance; Legitimacy; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Extant taxon; Status quo bias; Positive economics; Resistance (ecology); Social influence; Political science; Law; Politics; Ideology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.155349674127869,"gpt":0.4808313255433573,"spread":0.3254816514154883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007576387,0.00007842752,0.0002196702,0.00005933841,0.002002654,0.0001446446,0.0002377614,0.0003424198,0.00007272464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002383291,0.0000985452,0.0001768235,0.0001886781,0.0006257521,0.0003849734,0.00001708863,0.0002986256,0.00001263811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001473504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001013594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001545621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988087,0.0002061034,0.0003760048,0.0001717392,0.0001763345,0.0002611641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984681,0.0001498775,0.0003736169,0.00004522072,0.0008481211,0.0001150765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001969601,0.000302098,0.0004239694,0.00003530624,0.0001673515,0.00001005324,0.07324578,1.155996e-8,0.003177937,0.3669887,0.5149948,0.04045709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002429859,0.0006140526,0.1965273,0.0002860712,0.0001517391,0.001131905,0.08850562,0.000004610117,0.0001476231,0.002172358,0.7075741,0.0004547626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7778396,0.02329659,0.001978719,0.1354174,0.01208873,0.001968559,0.0002426861,0.0001811511,0.04698657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896804,0.000743615,0.0001634261,0.002205155,0.006828634,0.00005792647,0.000002946174,0.0000115736,0.0003063112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3648163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122058610","doi":"10.3386/w23093","title":"A Model of Secular Stagnation: Theory and Quantitative Evaluation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economic stagnation; Econometrics; Mathematics; Economics; Political science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.667929811190365,"gpt":0.6542828119593762,"spread":0.01364699923098878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02724852,0.00009914218,0.0002966953,0.000391069,0.0005392728,0.00008432744,0.0003448564,0.0002796823,0.0003683111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01035378,0.0001054774,0.0001573601,0.00007581061,0.001002535,0.0002831492,0.0000748621,0.0003895093,0.00001784111],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001443166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01365524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004490904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009574191,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995621,0.0008804158,0.0004607888,0.0002852051,0.002567182,0.0001853897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902474,0.00193174,0.0005618251,0.0002123153,0.006971234,0.00007551294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003254906,0.00003666719,0.00006181268,0.00005098836,0.0001505668,1.373649e-7,0.003746076,0.0009548395,0.00006602897,0.9573522,0.03668623,0.000861958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002672237,0.00004952892,0.0001306762,0.0001187958,0.00003401362,0.000001054945,0.003713136,0.01406307,0.00004739278,0.9675741,0.01388182,0.0001191397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006034601,0.001237715,0.0000796118,0.001297688,0.0003248567,0.0006791099,0.0001321274,0.000007004153,0.9902073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649019,0.01049034,0.0003980004,0.00001810716,0.0002762584,0.0001063226,0.0001658787,0.00001704413,0.02362614],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9665812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967598978","doi":"10.1163/1569163053084360","title":"Reading `Opium of the People': Expression, Protest and the Dialectics of Religion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Sociology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Dialectic; Hegelianism; Capitalism; Opium; Phrase; Expression (computer science); Metaphor; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01501301138396953,"gpt":0.3504816575720221,"spread":0.3354686461880526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000516511,0.00004684903,0.000149732,0.000009216625,0.0004795197,0.000009983166,0.0001550478,0.0001400444,0.000038789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004339511,0.00002625279,0.000100623,0.00008136644,0.003325646,0.0000504674,0.00005323994,0.0002022678,0.000003396186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002820249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006647455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005499644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000142932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989299,0.0005023517,0.0001986924,0.0000897781,0.0001256612,0.0001536858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974225,0.002222467,0.00006279268,0.0001187067,0.0001332021,0.00004030933],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001637962,0.00003774383,0.004690984,0.00001328078,0.000007489571,6.38643e-8,0.05225199,0.00000209746,0.001904308,0.9352647,0.005669498,0.0001414681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002610889,0.0002424861,0.03442336,0.0003054108,0.00024097,0.00001857496,0.09053147,0.0005494951,0.01354666,0.6797355,0.1773004,0.0004947821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7754831,0.0005503983,0.0007029394,0.1981421,0.0006719253,0.0004775411,0.000004838076,0.00003202731,0.02393514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979843,0.0004552231,0.0002173272,0.0008885488,0.0001998699,0.00001883417,2.728706e-7,0.000003313813,0.0002322573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2555292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770398430","doi":"10.1177/0032329217751688","title":"Cohort Change in Political Gender Gaps in Europe and Canada: The Role of Modernization","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Society","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Religiosity; Modernization theory; Salience (neuroscience); Cohort; European Social Survey; Demography; Politics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Economics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02822348416599155,"gpt":0.3176042519935898,"spread":0.2893807678275983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002899917,0.0000568482,0.00009175888,0.00001169309,0.0001972195,0.00002121421,0.00009971071,0.00006823117,0.00002777212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001397765,0.0000490905,0.00003241018,0.00020837,0.0003933168,0.00007009059,0.00003355775,0.0001330299,0.000002015661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002909185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004756909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8967581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.700566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990602,0.0001102852,0.0001583666,0.0001082199,0.0002287969,0.0003341178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995,0.0001109612,0.00003528011,0.00009152564,0.00017223,0.00009005165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[5.916903e-7,0.00002487953,0.4320718,0.000004735538,0.00000968009,2.176005e-7,0.06085206,8.655795e-7,0.00002282866,0.5055276,0.00144946,0.00003526366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002337699,0.00001682439,0.8307118,0.00002254259,0.00001952308,0.000001570224,0.08077251,0.0042784,0.0001674201,0.01987655,0.06372552,0.0001735188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9575167,0.0001731814,0.00002132001,0.005186372,0.0001385742,0.000195458,0.00001885079,0.00001135248,0.03673816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967239,0.0004133045,0.00004851512,0.002416886,0.0002426496,0.00001029205,0.000003259387,0.000006370565,0.0001347757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.485651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3048979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140035081","doi":"10.1177/002071520204300304","title":"Muslims and Democracy an Empirical Critique of Fukuyama’s Culturalist Approach","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Democracy; Liberal democracy; Islam; Capitalism; Modernity; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.133712518846958,"gpt":0.471662862876641,"spread":0.337950344029683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003882526,0.00007913764,0.0002589545,0.00007722423,0.0001770864,0.00003844669,0.0003116335,0.0001159198,0.0002986253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001512297,0.00006511337,0.0001461044,0.00005556517,0.0009434946,0.0003758525,0.00002375974,0.0003018178,0.000006520736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009521949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006036494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001231886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003753229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985256,0.0005528279,0.0003967888,0.00009879329,0.0003048161,0.0001211775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998174,0.0003411724,0.0003483788,0.0000469642,0.0009791324,0.00011037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009403255,0.0007799195,0.02111193,0.000005416758,0.0005366048,0.00001939999,0.7824277,0.0001240444,0.001082666,0.1492898,0.04363514,0.0008934004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003169577,0.001177602,0.05125701,0.000089743,0.0001189552,0.0005756687,0.7106538,0.004984499,0.0004111835,0.07687755,0.1500691,0.0006153356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9544855,0.0003735335,0.001432951,0.01677684,0.0006345216,0.00006584131,0.000007702268,0.000009374166,0.02621375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961885,0.0006284146,0.001453609,0.0009943948,0.0004507816,0.000001800243,0.000003903255,0.00000314003,0.0002754975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1064339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3476345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951214210","doi":"10.1080/1369183x.2019.1620408","title":"Religion and integration among immigrant and minority youth","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Socioeconomic status; Social integration; Sociology; Formative assessment; Perspective (graphical); Gender studies; Political science; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05277195332724744,"gpt":0.3689565571426436,"spread":0.3161846038153962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005510804,0.00006183171,0.0001620165,0.00005253877,0.0002300187,0.00004713872,0.00002519535,0.00004931358,0.000003112094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001901551,0.00004507778,0.00004193171,0.00008863449,0.0001912026,0.0003340885,0.00001467858,0.0001394891,0.000001111084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000278137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002370564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001635798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006172763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993781,0.00008770255,0.0002245388,0.00007748175,0.0001575817,0.00007453804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993172,0.0001478809,0.0002007787,0.00003294551,0.0002437459,0.00005749548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001341197,0.00008484565,0.1182986,0.00007300059,0.0002977399,0.000003153377,0.8272783,0.000004033308,0.00281602,0.01594603,0.0179302,0.01713394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009464754,0.0005668388,0.1939477,0.0002690105,0.0002231693,0.00001943483,0.7920191,0.000083005,0.0001669844,0.003410938,0.008138877,0.0002083566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829832,0.01304503,0.000089728,0.002621829,0.0002773841,0.00008887534,0.000001109321,0.000006252604,0.0008865864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8958031,0.1029123,0.00008296534,0.0001690934,0.00009519554,9.695765e-7,4.843104e-7,0.00000172462,0.000934113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08986731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3444547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71538948","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308532.001.0001","title":"Religion and Politics in Post-Communist Romania","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Communism; Disenchantment; Political science; Democracy; State (computer science); Democratization; Communist state; Elite; Political economy; Nationalism; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01654172478993223,"gpt":0.3253971588775434,"spread":0.3088554340876112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003636812,0.0001289662,0.0001841916,0.0001306853,0.0003901996,0.0001080191,0.0001879905,0.0004750447,0.0002005509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007924836,0.0001324113,0.00009544642,0.00007586442,0.0003261979,0.00007795798,0.00005277849,0.000512224,0.0001250218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004459505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004496956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03162036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04952086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990029,0.00006957477,0.0002380298,0.0001565099,0.0002616634,0.0002713523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992546,0.000250575,0.00007404129,0.000185104,0.0001064071,0.0001293134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001480128,0.00001448254,0.00004184615,0.000006173406,0.000008731046,0.000006387033,0.006267259,4.339751e-8,0.000001423515,0.7481732,0.2451921,0.0002868058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008252889,0.00002042476,0.0001662954,0.00005853606,0.000009226926,0.000002864285,0.00257276,0.000002016619,5.691964e-7,0.02413631,0.972795,0.0001534294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006780258,0.0003540975,0.0000103759,0.002844905,0.0003003342,0.0001658353,0.000007289656,0.00007041791,0.9955687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003683046,0.006149508,0.0001697058,0.003792711,0.0002783272,0.0000027108,0.00003796952,0.00001699797,0.9858691],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7276029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346942379","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfw016","title":"Cross-National Trends in Religious Service Attendance: Table 1.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Library science; Service (business); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04319358314710601,"gpt":0.380311628092841,"spread":0.3371180449457349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006986249,0.0001084864,0.0001308937,0.0002183178,0.0003479128,0.0003159582,0.0003132439,0.0001458748,0.001289051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114708,0.00008853824,0.00009041264,0.001073566,0.0001345753,0.001082638,0.00001282666,0.000125628,0.0005754394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003420778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002984915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003882174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003947654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998252,0.0001413984,0.0003069387,0.0002859827,0.0005731643,0.0004405133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989427,0.0001609584,0.0001067281,0.0001675171,0.0004497565,0.0001723444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003144169,0.0003860554,0.07337046,0.00001501025,0.00004499872,0.000002697276,0.0463417,0.000004883876,0.0002695852,0.2459872,0.4878747,0.1456713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006982838,0.00005687531,0.02875034,0.00003111266,9.710761e-7,0.000002558449,0.003281194,0.0000417577,0.000003685121,0.005095966,0.9618527,0.000184515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1606434,0.0002774185,0.0008771241,0.4877779,0.00575716,0.0003414873,0.0001290098,0.0005768426,0.3436196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863246,0.000176887,0.00009001177,0.001952787,0.0005798099,0.0000622926,0.00002756476,0.00001284532,0.01077318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243677071","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195146967.001.0001","title":"Jesus of Hollywood","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Hollywood; Biography; Passion; Movie theater; Art; Literature; Historicity (philosophy); Character (mathematics); Human sexuality; Politics; Art history; History; Philosophy; Religious studies; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03096446131817013,"gpt":0.3722074638619197,"spread":0.3412430025437495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002920461,0.00007550397,0.000161511,0.00005949969,0.0001354657,0.00001870646,0.0001760929,0.000346384,0.002946079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006045942,0.00007136368,0.0002399181,0.00006961818,0.0002491185,0.0000377253,0.00001595295,0.0002050252,0.0003273133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001437262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005734549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001240548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001276731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991729,0.00002384254,0.0001943147,0.0001041533,0.0003609785,0.0001438173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993706,0.0001590295,0.0001199245,0.0001280536,0.0001461376,0.00007621512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.58393e-7,0.000009836298,0.000004275934,0.000004418693,0.00002024638,9.438714e-7,0.002219647,1.051258e-7,0.000001553328,0.3904298,0.606656,0.0006522078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000424916,0.0000106647,0.000006294029,0.00002538371,0.0000135231,2.520233e-7,0.001674349,2.562941e-7,0.00001135978,0.009442464,0.9886958,0.00007717716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001126191,0.0001221751,0.0001155037,0.000519012,0.0006593246,0.0001062819,0.000006256772,0.00005502757,0.9984052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006562654,0.000942564,0.0002012253,0.0004484945,0.0003660199,0.000001348224,0.000008723263,0.000008819606,0.9973665],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3820398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057934914","doi":"10.1177/2050303213490040","title":"The will to religion: Obligatory religious citizenship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Research on Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Citizenship; Sociology; Religious freedom; Perspective (graphical); Religious identity; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1044717502718294,"gpt":0.4844876048133869,"spread":0.3800158545415575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003747008,0.0002128685,0.0002245138,0.0002562841,0.004420936,0.001251165,0.0009885856,0.0003278524,0.0001937632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02159588,0.0001608982,0.000262223,0.001371308,0.001811214,0.0002444597,0.0001961891,0.001403539,0.01102478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006134158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000464323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003122178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002357805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932285,0.001470778,0.0004786415,0.0006199054,0.00255099,0.001651197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866242,0.009181418,0.00003685953,0.0008223212,0.00191439,0.00142079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002397954,0.00003163919,0.00003420938,0.000005451015,0.000007180471,0.000008520449,0.001035949,0.000001734901,0.0001431285,0.4246281,0.5730339,0.001046201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001313215,0.0002843893,0.0001717882,0.0001339912,0.000004625255,0.000003547748,0.005292863,0.00002850471,0.0001877685,0.2712116,0.7223449,0.0002046849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05761347,0.001608001,0.0001970059,0.5408635,0.001583528,0.001602219,0.000005383792,0.0004054047,0.3961215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651446,0.01413742,0.0001586414,0.01099388,0.0009519432,0.0005564325,0.0000028197,0.00004272399,0.008011512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9075311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909979169","doi":"10.1080/13510347.2019.1566903","title":"Beyond elections: perceptions of democracy in four Arab countries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Democratization","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Scholarship; Prima facie; Liberal democracy; Political economy; Public opinion; Government (linguistics); Political science; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Civil society; Law; Representative democracy; World Values Survey; Public administration; Law and economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008907157151970513,"gpt":0.296224913035631,"spread":0.2873177558836605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000269303,0.00006422235,0.0001186246,0.0002075819,0.0003136865,0.00004771186,0.00009336359,0.0001027611,0.00113595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001677252,0.00006994392,0.00006298855,0.0008953345,0.00008334177,0.0004065736,0.000008778021,0.0001112474,0.000292581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001455284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007422271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002102673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990751,0.0001384152,0.000255237,0.000131109,0.0002454398,0.0001546615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993962,0.0001393337,0.0001046542,0.0001128823,0.0002071455,0.0000397648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001780062,0.0001219115,0.7112302,0.00002741212,0.00002625173,7.843708e-7,0.02444006,0.001688717,0.002888317,0.2309718,0.02779165,0.0007951477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002148107,0.0002177223,0.6045213,0.0002625115,0.00008407558,0.00001153586,0.07698847,0.01266226,0.001207708,0.1892928,0.1116159,0.0009876053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8705155,0.00005455601,0.005006671,0.007005712,0.0006992465,0.000511283,0.000007978179,0.00008255663,0.1161165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928745,0.001282962,0.0003989491,0.0003930408,0.0000742117,0.00001490397,0.00001583338,0.000007323696,0.004938247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.122359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340045955","doi":"10.1515/9781474407106","title":"Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: debating the dividing lines","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interculturalism; Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Ethnic group; Field (mathematics); Latin Americans; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Anthropology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03523630307632351,"gpt":0.3334263064377994,"spread":0.2981900033614758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002869156,0.0001667737,0.0001727465,0.00002061374,0.001228861,0.0003386296,0.0002545496,0.0002514074,0.0004003238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000355211,0.00007454298,0.0001707429,0.00003959793,0.0004035818,0.0002012339,0.00009201731,0.0002744905,0.0001170976],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001676083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008293816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001209151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00162123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989877,0.0001070446,0.0002160797,0.0002064403,0.0002656023,0.0002170988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988122,0.0006496511,0.0001409081,0.0001243989,0.0001838313,0.00008901709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001133954,0.000003804311,0.00001292465,0.00001009961,0.00007103336,0.000001239686,0.09208824,1.301674e-7,0.0000901124,0.1101831,0.7933379,0.004200248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006095293,0.000004369682,0.00001180306,0.0001977932,0.00002838845,0.000003321673,0.01556941,0.000007712985,0.000008413184,0.002026184,0.9819211,0.0001605046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005695627,0.0004381442,0.00002889638,0.03683507,0.0010003,0.0002780195,0.000009070483,0.0001449174,0.960696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01083593,0.003280291,0.0001044775,0.001825343,0.0014004,0.00001589966,0.0000087722,0.00001276078,0.9825161],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1885832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481643022","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511499326.006","title":"Crises of Charismatic Legitimacy and Violent Behavior in New Religious Movements","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Charisma; Lust; Legitimacy; Social psychology; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0425052900427959,"gpt":0.2706070165691982,"spread":0.2281017265264023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007955502,0.000189034,0.0003196961,0.0001592398,0.0001799003,0.00003831099,0.0002644131,0.0002738249,0.00002335808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001564035,0.0002364111,0.000170927,0.00001311615,0.0002983535,0.00009512637,0.0001188525,0.0003084377,0.0000079433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002935966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001595404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01267666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006436525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99894,0.00004342733,0.0002310152,0.0002722584,0.0003057909,0.0002075338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992174,0.00006576943,0.0002287334,0.0002145579,0.00009227615,0.0001812462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003337498,0.00006597894,0.0001702589,0.00008261796,0.0001019473,0.0001524795,0.01289818,0.00000121025,0.00003531922,0.8643897,0.1198111,0.002257857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005946925,0.00004930326,0.0001472016,0.0003528935,0.0001494456,0.000002421172,0.002600717,0.0000141421,0.00004733611,0.00006159777,0.9956731,0.0003071538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.005778552,0.0002802816,0.00002617695,0.00006193505,0.000193828,0.0005523305,0.00005562598,0.00004386126,0.9930074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01369812,0.005519975,0.00004095171,0.00009054158,0.00006023594,0.000001221563,0.000007769373,0.00001681452,0.9805644],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.875862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117912279","doi":"10.7202/1007655ar","title":"Sécularisation, catholicisme et transformation du régime de religiosité au Québec. Étude comparative avec le catholicisme au Canada (1968-2007)1","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches sociographiques","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07124077069056522,"gpt":0.3528943091738326,"spread":0.2816535384832674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003641013,0.0005063242,0.0006166607,0.0001982711,0.001658049,0.0001538701,0.0004469244,0.0009355665,0.00006071915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003025726,0.0005654623,0.000700381,0.00114315,0.0008971783,0.001363902,0.00004428804,0.00122218,0.00006170925],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01773086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01283535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937626,0.003078219,0.0007947522,0.0003791255,0.0006943909,0.001290989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969018,0.00118611,0.0004174065,0.0003395778,0.0004862108,0.0006689432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001482968,0.0003383918,0.0949991,0.00006402603,0.0002562517,0.000002353971,0.828118,0.00008765651,0.0001156818,0.04211421,0.0334819,0.0004075948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007246355,0.0001325966,0.4402936,0.0003144933,0.0004543838,0.00006560123,0.1056096,0.0004435528,0.001886806,0.00513941,0.4435361,0.001399149],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8331373,0.005990594,0.002787796,0.1192619,0.001577804,0.0006120907,0.00006965591,0.0002157745,0.03634709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797207,0.01068578,0.00114915,0.005274718,0.001422018,0.0001425612,0.0000876784,0.00005347366,0.001463959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7225084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093402754","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12681","title":"Racial Diversity in U.S. Congregations, 1998–2019","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Ethnic group; Racial diversity; Quarter (Canadian coin); White (mutation); Sociology; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Religious diversity; Demography; Race (biology); Demographic economics; Geography; Political science; Ethnology; Law; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07041695654670417,"gpt":0.3652864266856509,"spread":0.2948694701389468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001621277,0.00006007831,0.0001288521,0.00007855602,0.003686579,0.0002303261,0.0004359681,0.00004342314,0.00002102352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005302991,0.00004426931,0.0001670825,0.0005920387,0.0002216102,0.0002066901,0.00009373206,0.0002137198,0.00002950977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008280253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001125575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001635358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001869816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986491,0.0001500983,0.0002847757,0.0001494006,0.0005929503,0.0001737009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990699,0.0002885752,0.0002170332,0.000105142,0.0002178603,0.0001015492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001594342,0.0004534043,0.01476879,0.000006998559,0.00007862481,0.000003549986,0.38576,0.0005419091,0.0002208238,0.004085919,0.5915004,0.002420201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00202991,0.0004723646,0.003708337,0.00003270854,0.00009778877,0.000003047683,0.1486136,0.0008861998,0.00005542147,0.003545738,0.8403884,0.0001664968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804611,0.0002119119,0.0003028701,0.01376793,0.003743899,0.0006857623,0.000009479895,0.00001700394,0.0008000482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975768,0.0003505172,0.00003889653,0.0002359048,0.0002372048,0.000005036591,0.000001298499,0.00000349571,0.001550801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.248888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345657503","doi":"10.2979/5595.0","title":"Religion, Morality, and Community in Post-Soviet Societies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Indiana University Press eBooks","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04096789991531672,"gpt":0.2726953719545433,"spread":0.2317274720392266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004319292,0.000220782,0.0003393091,0.0001669004,0.001972162,0.00008841782,0.0005738225,0.000690478,0.00001758894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006793138,0.0002830961,0.0002136165,0.00003810894,0.001286981,0.0001779556,0.0002736544,0.00171973,0.00001016525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000551524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009274131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07240573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01419958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980351,0.0008391797,0.0001931938,0.0002432913,0.0003613101,0.0003279257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987291,0.0003654856,0.0001852092,0.0003301852,0.0001937877,0.0001962132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003294161,0.00006516925,0.0001456535,0.00007136619,0.0001226807,0.000132535,0.1687104,0.000002030377,0.000002234913,0.1704077,0.6599073,0.0003999645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002909249,0.00003512906,0.0002059632,0.00010965,0.00003760333,0.000004648193,0.0200909,0.000001550592,0.000002260723,0.001553103,0.9773834,0.0002848207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00632795,0.0002108557,0.000002010481,0.0008563715,0.0001807019,0.0003510836,0.0001183247,0.0001079599,0.9918447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009884396,0.007423418,0.00003697886,0.0007518719,0.00008906502,0.000001287963,0.00005151582,0.00001901823,0.9817424],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3174761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097293541","doi":"10.1111/0021-8294.00034","title":"Disciplined Litigation, Vigilant Litigation, and Deformation: Dramatic Organization Change in Jehovah's Witnesses","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Successor cardinal; Millenarianism; Political science; Law; Consolidation (business); Sociology; Business; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04133376819340621,"gpt":0.3599560646669931,"spread":0.3186222964735869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001873535,0.00008671945,0.0001434988,0.0001838189,0.002497893,0.0005225989,0.0002149044,0.00005411955,0.00002323769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006099059,0.00006147135,0.00005491396,0.001265966,0.0002271386,0.0007353926,0.00003018784,0.000126613,0.000005189649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001115488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009504072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008063173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002111804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985155,0.0001387853,0.0004833219,0.0001509682,0.0005210073,0.0001904165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983716,0.0002760684,0.0003499796,0.0001469265,0.0007756901,0.00007971717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008329605,0.00097505,0.1462869,0.00007583712,0.000108352,0.000003999382,0.8001894,0.0006049971,0.0004921046,0.02397347,0.02104527,0.006161288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005761603,0.0008833585,0.2231559,0.0008215396,0.00034956,0.0001857242,0.5932964,0.008746174,0.0004389813,0.05987059,0.1056959,0.0007942031],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872827,0.0002187155,0.001176494,0.008494078,0.001677654,0.0009378169,0.000002644226,0.00002222004,0.0001876865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997532,0.001174124,0.00007494025,0.0000862517,0.0002377735,0.00003998169,0.000009827151,0.000007814659,0.0008372801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.206893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328670666","doi":"10.1093/socrel/sru001","title":"Toward Religious Polarization? Time Effects on Religious Commitment in U.S., UK, and Canadian Regions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multinomial logistic regression; Polarization (electrochemistry); Logistic regression; Demography; Multinomial distribution; Logit; Geography; Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Econometrics; Sociology; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01062216686337411,"gpt":0.2811461395922394,"spread":0.2705239727288653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006879781,0.0001645036,0.0003348293,0.0002564753,0.000418595,0.00002224095,0.0002039233,0.0004733455,0.00001008494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000612735,0.0001693712,0.0001245396,0.000232526,0.0007569209,0.00005784716,0.00002724812,0.00035174,0.0001167421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000345579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002561581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1917016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04003929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998089,0.0006196835,0.0003235516,0.0003176092,0.0002074842,0.0004426577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984819,0.0007790289,0.0001527381,0.0002422723,0.00008158891,0.0002624802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008109338,0.0001521914,0.05599004,0.00005573553,0.0001230407,0.00002829536,0.1323084,0.0000631485,0.0008414154,0.3358048,0.4723126,0.002239285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003831106,0.001970237,0.02893781,0.0006333,0.0001511937,0.00003327078,0.01081264,0.0004261106,0.0005720566,0.4200964,0.5311757,0.001360178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9065526,0.001215976,0.0001180618,0.05387769,0.0006823129,0.0006830349,0.000007522602,0.0001098261,0.03675301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889595,0.005934515,0.0001632408,0.004132492,0.0001348977,0.00002864964,0.00002552647,0.0000160013,0.0006052151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1516623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805462692","doi":"10.1177/0038026118778174","title":"‘That’s how Muslims are required to view the world’: Race, culture and belief in non-Muslims’ descriptions of Islam and science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Sociological Review","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Sociology; Modernity; Theme (computing); Criticism; Gender studies; Democracy; Islamic culture; Secularity; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Politics; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08115829637964753,"gpt":0.3925028319489275,"spread":0.31134453556928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003206857,0.0001172094,0.0003297175,0.00002993688,0.001291515,0.00008955078,0.0004826312,0.0000817707,0.00007931007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00181605,0.00005560429,0.0001094491,0.0009360402,0.004040604,0.000153514,0.0001625457,0.0002824199,0.00002438866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007143246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006562757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001194128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006833573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983805,0.0005491621,0.0002162972,0.0002573547,0.0002915784,0.0003050615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988939,0.0004081065,0.0001550579,0.0002473557,0.0001795019,0.0001161352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002062309,0.0002745282,0.004406305,0.0006649024,0.00008431356,0.00000486922,0.5960445,9.436922e-7,0.002386708,0.1341207,0.2116864,0.05030517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002523992,0.0002409794,0.03883908,0.003753535,0.0001043352,0.000007644789,0.1445622,0.00001974981,0.00002724928,0.01141435,0.8004194,0.0003590754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3692144,0.07836462,0.00009575036,0.5149356,0.0006110885,0.003350151,0.00001889917,0.00008393179,0.0333256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7805113,0.2060027,0.0001239357,0.01189161,0.0001063129,0.00006222798,6.252038e-7,0.00000331345,0.001297932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.588733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1793552385","doi":"10.29173/cjs570","title":"Why doesn't Canada have an American-style Christian Right? A Comparative Framework for Analyzing the Political Effects of Evangelical Subcultural Identity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian right; Politics; Sociology; Protestantism; Identity (music); Humanities; Morality; Religious studies; National identity; Political science; Gender studies; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03872437840748762,"gpt":0.3664070016101993,"spread":0.3276826232027117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004283582,0.00009794257,0.000339866,0.0000412052,0.001846934,0.00003706527,0.0005102225,0.0001122828,0.00004534668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007906823,0.00005696044,0.0002186715,0.0001447919,0.004311266,0.0001322917,0.000008946753,0.0005699786,0.000001608175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006864646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002983907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9467231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981591,0.0007612357,0.0003048784,0.00009437865,0.000216711,0.0004636798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968324,0.001784307,0.0003183701,0.0001260489,0.0004288924,0.0005100074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005149275,0.00004259129,0.0149441,0.00001190997,0.000463042,0.00007190875,0.2991968,0.00003864282,0.00005832513,0.5794344,0.1056198,0.00006703162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007495775,0.000803963,0.09164903,0.00009166425,0.0003219405,0.0002031385,0.724364,0.0001233523,0.0001933026,0.1087362,0.07232492,0.0004389601],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373121,0.0004361585,0.0009555786,0.06001444,0.0006848723,0.0002148003,0.00002756115,0.000003898803,0.0003505655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992932,0.00003748679,0.0002345171,0.00618954,0.0005571969,0.000004566759,0.000002371837,0.000005298188,0.00003705818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4706982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586521938","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12307","title":"Secularization and the Wider Gap in Values and Personal Religiosity Between the Religious and Nonreligious","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Nuffield College, University of Oxford; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Religiosity; Secularization; Spirituality; Sociology; General Social Survey; Sociology of religion; Population; Secularism; Religious values; Religious studies; Social psychology; Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Demography; Psychology; Theology; Islam; Law; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02817119599692808,"gpt":0.3353981239587027,"spread":0.3072269279617746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005670546,0.0001372526,0.0002421355,0.0001040953,0.003605116,0.0005454598,0.0003108468,0.00008657833,0.000001788194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009196802,0.0000575258,0.0001266009,0.0003635097,0.00172593,0.0002079083,0.0001053246,0.0002513053,0.0000015227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006699327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008090609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002142288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00101183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978035,0.0005421233,0.0004370974,0.0002889403,0.0006518837,0.000276458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966556,0.002414065,0.0003265851,0.0002174407,0.0002899843,0.00009626752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008663185,0.0003439806,0.1360013,0.00004292815,0.0005583207,0.000007338962,0.5865399,0.00002450305,0.0008303921,0.01304511,0.2409145,0.0208254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02371456,0.001562535,0.127147,0.0008812164,0.00154608,0.0003217642,0.2794902,0.001433359,0.000247881,0.4209154,0.1416118,0.001128279],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677112,0.003693304,0.0005113006,0.02589796,0.0008982396,0.001064235,0.00000520726,0.00001382831,0.0002047844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808723,0.01777207,0.00002901829,0.0001959577,0.0001964523,0.00002522831,4.768027e-7,0.000009621843,0.0008988808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4078703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591281942","doi":"10.1111/cars.12046","title":"Assessing Variation in Tolerance in 23 Muslim‐Majority and Western Countries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; World Values Survey; Development economics; Ethnic group; Inequality; Democracy; Variation (astronomy); Political science; Multilevel model; Developing country; Politics; Economic inequality; Demographic economics; European Social Survey; Survey data collection; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04470817518687075,"gpt":0.3346637291727104,"spread":0.2899555539858397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003523279,0.0001520727,0.0005474727,0.0001477215,0.000310114,0.00003080775,0.000271215,0.0004259613,0.00004920442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00270906,0.0001713061,0.00009812489,0.0002383779,0.000943345,0.0002404358,0.00001886132,0.0004709948,0.000009546869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002109877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001360803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2314548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8560832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973325,0.0009858384,0.0004810465,0.00031636,0.00005388173,0.0008303328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983206,0.0007395511,0.0002134338,0.0001926408,0.0001462508,0.0003875502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000262057,0.00002185206,0.768818,0.001347934,0.00002585663,0.0000246206,0.1646527,0.00002776802,0.00003780019,0.0610396,0.001491048,0.002510272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000332904,0.00004450475,0.9090155,0.002485964,0.00002756572,0.000006884734,0.04421743,0.0001282629,7.706198e-7,0.01183895,0.0315688,0.0003325104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712459,0.005491487,0.00003895204,0.01979218,0.0003863232,0.0003527175,0.00002182068,0.00002076798,0.002649857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651451,0.02695115,0.0001366684,0.007472014,0.0001420104,0.00005302348,0.00001790959,0.000009893354,0.00007229444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6246284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.773663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211583683","doi":"10.29173/cjs21830","title":"How Unreligious are the Religious “Nones”? Religious Dynamics of the Unaffiliated in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Secularization; Sociology of religion; Sociology; Spirituality; Context (archaeology); Norm (philosophy); Social science; Interdependence; Positive economics; Social psychology; Political science; Geography; Law; Psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02464861852719131,"gpt":0.2639214096794545,"spread":0.2392727911522632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001405535,0.0001305686,0.0003109785,0.00007223969,0.0006997655,0.00006110392,0.001177492,0.0001973071,0.000006839124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001447223,0.00007087066,0.0002012907,0.0004459941,0.001547206,0.00006315622,0.00003004322,0.0008991662,0.000003205243],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003593354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0201482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976055,0.0009540331,0.0004426487,0.0001061528,0.0004106055,0.0004810358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974769,0.0005388624,0.0006857536,0.0003058497,0.0006216604,0.0003709416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003808645,0.00002061884,0.1507958,0.000007067389,0.0001913057,0.0001367021,0.1395588,0.002325071,0.000007446047,0.02557612,0.6810086,0.0003343835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001261991,0.0001529261,0.02478206,0.00014893,0.0001349052,0.0002953737,0.6695538,0.0003611083,0.00001978253,0.1083558,0.194532,0.0004013168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7250924,0.002471722,0.000007533199,0.2675823,0.002291557,0.0002059033,0.00002444554,0.000004780783,0.002319408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947007,0.0009623204,0.000008053888,0.003715908,0.0001943807,0.000003475208,0.000001375709,0.00001216003,0.0004016032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.529995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545405717","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1566123","title":"Do Religious Contexts Elicit More Trust and Altruism? An Experiment on Facebook","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01055812306529207,"gpt":0.3364910042292744,"spread":0.3259328811639823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001118643,0.0001356515,0.0001472907,0.00006460642,0.0009981862,0.0002401191,0.0002430979,0.000149287,0.0001767124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009000789,0.000119449,0.0001136101,0.00008226601,0.0002041916,0.0002097305,0.00001580228,0.002025811,0.00006892498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004410046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001068939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001239701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004119118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978127,0.0001212428,0.0002086121,0.000209125,0.0003757422,0.001272511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992942,0.00006293829,0.0001161888,0.0001648299,0.00009532514,0.0002665608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000836373,0.0002156639,0.0009124511,0.000001614762,0.0001262604,0.000007435526,0.06413559,0.000007458037,0.006863702,0.8835979,0.006094862,0.03795339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001745266,0.001115498,0.0007533598,0.00003682016,0.00004749391,0.000381832,0.232392,0.00006981415,0.001147648,0.2007474,0.56094,0.0006228428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702989,0.0007712892,0.00007884909,0.006514445,0.0007042148,0.000262829,0.000001498679,0.000059674,0.02130826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843189,0.01014536,0.00004334971,0.0009055998,0.0004859823,0.00001782654,0.000001124273,0.00001646517,0.004065413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6828505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8801255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918623991","doi":"10.1017/s0008423918000999","title":"A Tale of Two Liberalisms? Attitudes toward Minority Religious Symbols in Quebec and Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Concordia University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Neutrality; Opposition (politics); Liberalism; Rest (music); Conscience; Religious freedom; Political science; Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Economic freedom; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01390186687404912,"gpt":0.309969460461388,"spread":0.2960675935873389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006911429,0.00005956806,0.0001720592,0.0001369172,0.0001581513,0.0001104048,0.0003436423,0.0000406076,0.00009633853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005931578,0.00005451097,0.000047615,0.0003363165,0.001035805,0.0003288262,0.00001418226,0.0001921249,0.000003038584],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001250782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0160317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985225,0.00006479608,0.0002728433,0.000113457,0.0004206492,0.0006057951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980617,0.000146283,0.00008616882,0.00008380073,0.0002565242,0.001365518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002012474,0.00001154109,0.3511792,0.00001244907,0.000005061404,0.00004286849,0.006412529,0.000009539074,0.0002209166,0.6393479,0.002609134,0.000146983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005237791,0.00009430992,0.9567361,0.000188292,0.00001470983,0.00006282764,0.01985556,0.00003987361,0.0003345612,0.008330751,0.01355836,0.0002609004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810684,0.0001024525,0.000003046133,0.008029886,0.0004572934,0.00006746306,0.000008215405,0.000001530404,0.01026171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982987,0.00002183758,0.00009474204,0.0008986607,0.0000718737,4.252948e-7,1.141399e-7,0.000002000684,0.0006116694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6310171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035141570","doi":"10.1057/s41290-020-00106-x","title":"The religion of the heart: “Spirituality” in late modernity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Cultural Sociology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Sociology; Sociology of religion; Sociology of culture; Modernity; Epistemology; Social science; Late modernity; Sociological theory; Gender studies; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03466266249954093,"gpt":0.3581518573999604,"spread":0.3234891949004194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005442786,0.0000543444,0.0002135098,0.000007998521,0.0003541986,0.00001637671,0.0003212299,0.00004956215,0.0000114783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006538103,0.00002714925,0.0002502581,0.0001965023,0.001952927,0.00009063692,0.00002970028,0.0004291133,0.000005101473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006846634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001313559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001442241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002776049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983536,0.0008828567,0.0003460746,0.00006010627,0.0001963187,0.0001610712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988753,0.0003467231,0.0004519595,0.00006190745,0.0001902845,0.0000738888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002226859,0.0000912941,0.04612262,0.000006330813,0.0001639602,0.000004162912,0.8326861,0.001393972,0.005193896,0.03447162,0.07395052,0.00569281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008885782,0.0009557443,0.07881639,0.00006110947,0.00005959499,0.00002139818,0.4075672,0.0002623189,0.0002492715,0.0291183,0.4817155,0.0002845603],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8059711,0.0001958314,0.00001598172,0.1925392,0.0001966981,0.00004744097,9.085292e-7,0.000004033957,0.001028896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927192,0.001183282,0.00005116993,0.005803698,0.0001578755,9.753787e-7,1.45706e-7,0.000002474103,0.0000812076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4251189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7195642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891134090","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00623.x","title":"Balm for The Soul: Immigrant Religion and Emotional Well‐Being","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Migration","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Immigration; Context (archaeology); Solidarity; Sociology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Psychology; Mental health; Politics; Political science; History; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01020505448255746,"gpt":0.3166265572688406,"spread":0.3064215027862831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003917829,0.00006419361,0.00004920814,0.00004378507,0.0006956059,0.0001949213,0.0001599273,0.00008217972,0.0001562703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003416969,0.00005069987,0.0000929615,0.00006814111,0.0001289455,0.0002431469,0.00001543112,0.0001581916,0.00003758166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004100588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000507037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003580092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01564315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992767,0.00002854917,0.0001571087,0.0001399921,0.0002843961,0.0001132396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999155,0.0004047843,0.0000745107,0.00007663114,0.0002429037,0.00004616317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002943641,0.00004770976,0.005328015,0.000003518716,0.00004880648,3.872574e-7,0.01341586,0.00003948154,0.006961534,0.9189852,0.05044298,0.004697067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002325052,0.00001613165,0.007987154,0.00001279441,0.00001470296,0.000005946873,0.002680599,0.006409165,0.0002655243,0.02140122,0.9608768,0.00009749788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7342063,0.000104056,0.02350531,0.1933215,0.007912149,0.0007603791,0.00002579507,0.0001464195,0.0400181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921424,0.0004833441,0.0007356801,0.001204301,0.0009981241,0.00005791243,0.00003290492,0.000006655359,0.004338723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9104338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8729246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132767039","doi":"10.1017/s0010417510000332","title":"The Varieties of Secular Experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Studies in Society and History","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Secularism; Secularization; Politics; Protestantism; Islam; Secular state; Political science; Religious studies; Law; Sociology; Political economy; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1450837308743308,"gpt":0.4313920890687887,"spread":0.286308358194458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003778317,0.00005870567,0.0001436535,0.000006944389,0.0008845372,0.000009391596,0.0001218226,0.00004978852,0.00002573492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001099687,0.00004469516,0.00009179191,0.00007828859,0.005516533,0.00008436091,0.00004499962,0.000236259,0.000001842776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001294538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008998487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003704018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00217412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994105,0.00008106284,0.000139426,0.0001015157,0.0001460678,0.0001215053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992334,0.0004357934,0.00006937313,0.00009216263,0.0001416841,0.00002763877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002948223,0.00001584628,0.0007650384,0.000004662179,0.00003250301,1.374294e-7,0.765966,7.426124e-7,0.0003125436,0.1485191,0.0843168,0.00006362569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005264255,0.000007253304,0.000959483,0.000004696014,0.000002872065,1.807322e-7,0.4257599,0.0000139016,0.00002286048,0.001194538,0.5719431,0.00003850437],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8517152,0.04002439,0.00004175671,0.001819195,0.00331288,0.0002235878,0.00000143031,0.00003241156,0.1028291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851704,0.01190598,0.000186603,0.0001821998,0.00006522606,0.00003183433,1.592502e-7,0.000001784363,0.002455791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4876263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595814488","doi":"10.1093/jaarel/lfw012","title":"Durkheim with Data: The Database of Religious History","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Academy of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Digital humanities; Sociology; History of religions; Social science; Library science; History; Computer science; Epistemology; Archaeology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05566273621411121,"gpt":0.3775207529080783,"spread":0.3218580166939671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001390544,0.0001005869,0.0003334528,0.0000550245,0.0005361849,0.00003458246,0.002907502,0.00005420117,0.000008224857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007838249,0.00005255532,0.0002195513,0.0001450889,0.002720488,0.0004893157,0.0002523166,0.0006214548,0.000003336392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001618704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003757506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006103349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009442237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981335,0.0002713231,0.0004791366,0.0001295208,0.0008104076,0.000176101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947382,0.000271504,0.003994005,0.0007322703,0.000171615,0.00009242045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002894583,0.00009657774,0.008146278,0.00001767919,0.0002196785,0.00000384017,0.005747731,0.00004172257,0.002861018,0.004420194,0.9762225,0.001933362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005195748,0.0001726028,0.01802642,0.0003930423,0.0002705304,0.0000781151,0.005052488,0.00004017249,0.0008665242,0.001142627,0.9732782,0.0001596628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.85827,0.004596675,0.000197529,0.1252118,0.001094075,0.0002922735,0.00003406375,0.00001617896,0.01028734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642419,0.03255383,0.0005281672,0.001683589,0.0003447447,0.000001002371,5.42769e-7,0.0000112032,0.0006350185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1235282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954148254","doi":"10.1093/socrel/srv027","title":"How Academics View Conservative Protestants","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Protestantism; Antipathy; Perspective (graphical); Identity (music); Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Politics; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1078531004284011,"gpt":0.3829676896393902,"spread":0.2751145892109891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007223554,0.00008261301,0.0002059875,0.0000321721,0.000214818,0.00001499269,0.000187535,0.0003856261,0.000008036166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001172273,0.00007689391,0.0001072311,0.0001464628,0.001653268,0.0001677973,0.00002709546,0.0003071304,0.00003937228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001295229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003748505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008550129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008189424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988432,0.0003922428,0.000174059,0.0001506988,0.0002154473,0.0002243441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989667,0.0002332288,0.0001975407,0.0001082702,0.0003629283,0.0001313601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004008656,0.00006342209,0.01552627,0.00001864902,0.00007522677,0.000003195501,0.1649495,0.000003218834,0.0004939485,0.3899657,0.4279653,0.0008954402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004169229,0.0001443904,0.0003651692,0.00004472798,0.00002078158,0.000002970531,0.06273544,0.00001461969,0.0002545945,0.1189779,0.8168637,0.0001587459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8153384,0.003459821,0.0009403341,0.1295918,0.001621917,0.0007885237,0.00001330095,0.0001922519,0.04805365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869447,0.006092912,0.0007732486,0.002105842,0.000239633,0.00003150733,0.000007630947,0.000008977671,0.003795521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3888984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6091536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084383009","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00080_5.x","title":"Handbook of the Sociology of Religion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Sociology; Sociology of religion; Pluralism (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01551743584178597,"gpt":0.3164481481572153,"spread":0.3009307123154293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000848623,0.00005099522,0.0002760795,0.00003095618,0.0002706024,0.000006742001,0.0003272153,0.0002408449,0.0001674583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005159875,0.00004569028,0.0003886703,0.00006367471,0.002585201,0.0001039561,0.0000304577,0.0003873245,0.000006592765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008695759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002920951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006554806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003959092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985359,0.0005104473,0.0005238367,0.00006610828,0.0001922893,0.0001713794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984723,0.0003256182,0.0006884216,0.00007231469,0.000389249,0.00005210342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009961862,0.0005583577,0.02537145,0.00003839037,0.0005089053,0.0000273689,0.2199714,0.0002029685,0.0177588,0.1020006,0.6108149,0.02264719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003685018,0.0008254154,0.06744435,0.001180076,0.0002766306,0.001579993,0.07727432,0.00002466766,0.005432846,0.1353175,0.7064546,0.0005045588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728164,0.008020022,0.0001592764,0.01066998,0.0008277104,0.000084222,0.000006576785,0.000006642959,0.007409181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836995,0.01373629,0.0003876828,0.001027646,0.0004620196,0.000001090101,4.303784e-7,0.0000049759,0.0006803644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1426971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9525279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037975770","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8675.2007.00434.x","title":"How Religion Speaks to the Agnostic: Habermas on the Persistent Value of Religion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constellations","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Citation; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02972077734850649,"gpt":0.3070703827940317,"spread":0.2773496054455252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008676124,0.00009315634,0.0001017625,0.00006702517,0.001205356,0.0001261283,0.0002725164,0.00008667376,0.00005103037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001032684,0.00005905714,0.0002513532,0.0005048136,0.0003417686,0.00007187402,0.00003287744,0.0001928502,0.000135661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001101091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001120253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001249201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987808,0.0001712891,0.000225743,0.0001583526,0.000423417,0.0002404099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972849,0.001928451,0.0001200341,0.000339429,0.0002147447,0.0001124667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001318392,0.00005350914,0.001287424,0.000002732389,0.00004343949,0.000001194874,0.02133203,0.001252516,0.0002635345,0.7338496,0.2406505,0.001250313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000931075,0.00006319425,0.001394918,0.00006068391,0.0000476147,0.000003267224,0.02261834,0.0001587739,0.0004393801,0.001402493,0.9736017,0.0001165062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.173957,0.0003028112,0.003106284,0.2673684,0.001323334,0.001001605,0.00001235572,0.00008540956,0.5528427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903109,0.000484139,0.000125124,0.003338611,0.0002486905,0.000007222327,0.000003325267,0.000007893796,0.005474079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8163539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9270747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234505966","doi":"10.1080/20566093.2016.1085243","title":"Destroying arguments and captivating thoughts: Spiritual warfare prayer as global praxis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prayer; Aesthetics; Vision; Charisma; Militant; Performative utterance; Politics; Sociology; Praxis; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Religious studies; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01841413827206317,"gpt":0.3723404442649728,"spread":0.3539263059929096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008751386,0.0001149537,0.0002001508,0.00003435241,0.0004510744,0.0002046896,0.0001070801,0.0001340282,0.00002343691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006834009,0.00007625225,0.00009194167,0.0001087998,0.0003567314,0.0008783281,0.00004500952,0.0002655992,0.00002002545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002292052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002570966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001450753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003007965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982488,0.0003199668,0.0003974937,0.0001464695,0.0004721132,0.0004151278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971622,0.001486021,0.0003388412,0.00007949138,0.0004156136,0.0005178754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002388745,0.0002349734,0.0127017,0.00002715014,0.0002627579,0.0002213002,0.01027243,6.041197e-7,0.0004081724,0.9372566,0.02392447,0.01445091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001038064,0.0004804526,0.0007783227,0.0002809767,0.0001637646,0.001541758,0.0364942,0.00000425927,0.0000968507,0.05634398,0.902542,0.0002353567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6111243,0.002038557,0.0013856,0.2133991,0.0008821232,0.0002174914,0.0000137846,0.00004384294,0.1708951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889501,0.004113906,0.002220914,0.003509132,0.0007501806,0.00000138079,1.48539e-7,0.000007648014,0.0004466308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8181441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913281857","doi":"10.1177/2050303218823069","title":"Modern Democracy as the Cult of the Individual: Durkheim on religious coexistence and conflict","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Research on Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cult; Democracy; Demise; Sociology; Relation (database); Christianity; Construct (python library); Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Religious studies; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.141148873487961,"gpt":0.4822183729493552,"spread":0.3410694994613942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002125467,0.0001195994,0.0001703811,0.00007778347,0.00127145,0.000223979,0.0007006649,0.0001882426,0.00006191828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006779697,0.000070523,0.0001553233,0.0004948625,0.001928701,0.0001002524,0.0001795756,0.001040644,0.0004125187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001089718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002648307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001808808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004833788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958869,0.001014006,0.0002596687,0.0003479755,0.001951166,0.0005402654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933594,0.005277977,0.00004823313,0.0005389373,0.000551239,0.0002241864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001040455,0.0001484618,0.0008808048,0.00002933166,0.00002332992,0.000004953675,0.01382464,0.00001651147,0.0005775905,0.9126835,0.07073186,0.0009749177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001109323,0.001340176,0.008986087,0.001029576,0.0000524916,0.0000230089,0.03220563,0.001019786,0.003034265,0.5020489,0.448647,0.0005038747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6842452,0.0004993286,0.00001015247,0.1260157,0.0004044221,0.0007531257,0.00001131124,0.00004739256,0.1880133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879969,0.004990677,0.00001460403,0.004310552,0.00009621982,0.00002825866,0.000001268603,0.00001406493,0.00254746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4106347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9779095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}