{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":187,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":187,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"84d431f4d265","filters":{"topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination"}},"results":[{"id":"W4250679855","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490330","title":"Multicultural Jurisdictions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":507,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Autonomy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Normative; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Corporate governance; Environmental ethics","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02390936068418642,"gpt":0.2440911941023104,"spread":0.2201818334181239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001519006,0.0002829668,0.0003095835,0.0008878743,0.006417492,0.005973087,0.0007672116,0.00155469,0.01044107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002500681,0.0002724111,0.0004556752,0.001031006,0.007738774,0.004402073,0.01096457,0.0028201,0.001068669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002910294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003766507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007292349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009771748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970579,0.001017336,0.00007995943,0.0004366329,0.0005793021,0.0008287732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985683,0.0003444355,0.0001515985,0.0002349406,0.0003438149,0.0003568273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005390874,0.00001054813,0.0006124884,0.00004079136,0.000005831983,0.0001657003,0.01212886,0.00007563118,0.0001216279,0.9570659,0.008122,0.02164537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001052005,0.00003643664,0.002502031,0.0003745425,0.00002548208,0.0009632005,0.01453998,0.0002847373,0.0003097359,0.2095292,0.7714021,0.00002206504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02935366,0.007012696,0.002446331,0.008273364,0.0004788023,0.00003317215,0.00003531096,0.00003714283,0.9523294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.878262,0.003694608,0.001449013,0.005566419,0.0003515414,0.00007617426,0.00005237458,0.00003552819,0.1105124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01044107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03492886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535705846","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199253623.001.0001","title":"Religious Freedom in the Liberal State","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Religious persecution; Religious freedom; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Autonomy; Freedom of religion; Convention; Religious identity; Persecution; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Rex Ahdar","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ian Leigh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01698543093061049,"gpt":0.287088133275967,"spread":0.2701027023453565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007894348,0.0001319394,0.0001644029,0.0004046024,0.002478913,0.00374808,0.0002697987,0.001131287,0.004918681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093511,0.00008365487,0.000133179,0.0004579605,0.01302404,0.00182592,0.001836579,0.003149771,0.0004747353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003425682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002411121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004550898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004505958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993857,0.0002785392,0.00001269195,0.00005252628,0.0001785034,0.00009193137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994418,0.0003096493,0.00003395678,0.00006924395,0.00008233006,0.00006298821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001025695,0.000004100627,0.0000174538,0.0000040827,2.677417e-7,0.000006899502,0.0007089915,0.00005631508,0.00001730107,0.994716,0.002411079,0.002056462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006310948,0.00001010121,0.0001980476,0.0001146919,0.000001356625,0.00002405004,0.0008950824,0.0002493042,0.00008135659,0.724673,0.2737418,0.000004888476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01265108,0.006440318,0.001675441,0.01726849,0.0003211135,0.00001234881,0.00002222612,0.0000186277,0.9615904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8334823,0.003303959,0.0008023301,0.004806875,0.0005110166,0.00003753296,0.00003481947,0.0000192052,0.1570018],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004918681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0248552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W574873243","doi":"10.1093/0198297467.001.0001","title":"The Ethics of Nationalism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Argument (complex analysis); Denial; Politics; Political science; Secession; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05553455680622035,"gpt":0.3655998987856322,"spread":0.3100653419794119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001700446,0.000297161,0.000305254,0.0005441038,0.003530465,0.005106251,0.0006199651,0.002120666,0.005187965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002594559,0.00020315,0.0002146119,0.0005341527,0.01810031,0.004325591,0.001946209,0.004180798,0.001268077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004909346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003028288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003994551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003952052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975491,0.001517641,0.0000524331,0.0001985231,0.0004868362,0.0001954448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987676,0.0006384974,0.00006745024,0.0001508315,0.0002679637,0.0001075165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001393598,0.000001825018,0.00002358631,0.000007617779,6.373534e-7,0.000009760094,0.0005882095,0.00003866426,0.00001436277,0.9897571,0.00749532,0.002061622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003160008,0.000005376431,0.0001157864,0.0001336959,0.000001567912,0.00005102426,0.0007439697,0.0001824373,0.00007025833,0.6642811,0.3344081,0.000003629648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002198301,0.006371687,0.00345301,0.01747547,0.0005321248,0.000009500808,0.00002424719,0.00001711337,0.9699185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5372244,0.009058484,0.004833031,0.01088641,0.001031301,0.0001855892,0.0001083452,0.0001151289,0.4365574],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005187965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03562003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505143777","doi":"","title":"Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?: Susan Moller Okin with Respondents","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Courtney Fairweather","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02843794178208949,"gpt":0.308119923631044,"spread":0.2796819818489545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00420635,0.0007225833,0.0006297595,0.001457165,0.03273175,0.005471581,0.001692649,0.008534649,0.008793083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01846536,0.0005232064,0.0004268966,0.002041727,0.004206516,0.002832979,0.004463641,0.01463625,0.001641615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01355605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03047402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5803322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7414392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996548,0.0008947111,0.0001105284,0.0002695461,0.001015037,0.001162241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860415,0.002544546,0.000525755,0.0002303612,0.004083628,0.006574195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001929263,0.00004026439,0.003499727,0.00007009836,0.000006136948,0.0004247375,0.02880311,0.00001315083,0.000142462,0.001507036,0.9569933,0.008480633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000885422,0.00002324382,0.007051859,0.0003797516,0.00001329615,0.0004834798,0.2260844,0.00002362616,0.0001423547,0.0006117944,0.7651288,0.00004854001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01054935,0.00610619,0.00005930936,0.9607766,0.01321055,0.00006680718,0.0002560698,0.00002020975,0.008954918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06665573,0.01221614,0.0002979842,0.8072178,0.006362731,0.000237027,0.0001670555,0.00009702449,0.1067485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4196678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8442787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121641526","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1198","title":"Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Dignity; Religious law; Family law; Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Arbitration; Allegiance; Sociology; Israeli law; Identity (music); Religious identity; Political science; Private sphere; Public sphere; Private law; Islam; Public law; Religiosity; Black letter law","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03512001175155976,"gpt":0.2922466806274343,"spread":0.2571266688758745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01794796,0.0005870764,0.0008442079,0.001578486,0.01246095,0.01083031,0.004102019,0.01707688,0.002025984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02732833,0.0004804632,0.001088102,0.001148184,0.05958904,0.02401007,0.007276498,0.02026085,0.0006886189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006097426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005001936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02055742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02077545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857465,0.01034318,0.0003669127,0.001153964,0.001597603,0.0007919988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825951,0.01404171,0.0004809991,0.0009723006,0.001380445,0.0005294477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001797061,0.00001598804,0.0003104331,0.00006624046,0.00001049764,0.0004238535,0.02592147,0.0002030809,0.00007669474,0.9239921,0.0407808,0.008180965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003847679,0.00003002586,0.0003929764,0.0005115194,0.000008963429,0.0004634705,0.01267079,0.0005853586,0.0001753118,0.70683,0.2782354,0.00005776293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005290342,0.01886417,0.006254135,0.9383276,0.00262529,0.0000247461,0.00002390236,0.0000302546,0.02855963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4732309,0.02593398,0.01300092,0.4421239,0.01830863,0.0002377797,0.00003073937,0.0002169939,0.02691624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02055742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09491903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555603385","doi":"","title":"Religious Arbitration in Canada: Protecting Women by Protecting Them from Religion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Bakht","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02237862211624735,"gpt":0.2173995701327661,"spread":0.1950209480165188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002513108,0.0002762975,0.0003642084,0.001107462,0.03088216,0.006651889,0.00211282,0.002654025,0.009580514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007237768,0.0004051476,0.0002585038,0.00261593,0.008935754,0.00173621,0.005662442,0.003395881,0.0004691158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1370305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.343338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949027,0.0006847944,0.0000858247,0.000346026,0.001217898,0.002762617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947075,0.0007242971,0.0003122873,0.0001769571,0.001259791,0.002819087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002548269,0.0001840332,0.0765598,0.0005537599,0.00005487616,0.002184993,0.2669763,0.0005632764,0.002031871,0.3101246,0.1200195,0.2204922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004835792,0.00005535825,0.07425516,0.0004717984,0.00003650192,0.0003050747,0.1965127,0.0004675254,0.0007453813,0.008984341,0.7179993,0.000118644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5673558,0.01220326,0.001874366,0.163179,0.0008553366,0.0003200839,0.0007134061,0.00007405911,0.2534247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8938159,0.004163045,0.001205547,0.01118841,0.00006009007,0.00006787314,0.0001585955,0.0000381129,0.08930239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1370305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983103512","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqs031","title":"Britain's Religious Tribunals: 'Joint Governance' in Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Transformative learning; Accommodation; Law; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Tribunal; Political science; Corporate governance; Archbishop; Theology; Philosophy; Management","authors":[{"name":"Robert Sandberg","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gillian Douglas","is_ca":false},{"name":"Norman Doe","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sophie Gilliat‐Ray","is_ca":false},{"name":"Asma Khan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04716112217424531,"gpt":0.3697377755753037,"spread":0.3225766534010585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01160938,0.0001321682,0.0002846419,0.0007902537,0.01306569,0.009212464,0.00141642,0.004817057,0.005598037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0236714,0.0003335156,0.0002170898,0.0018794,0.03498675,0.004542954,0.01240371,0.005318934,0.0005878626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009630504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01167617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03909537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06315127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9787957,0.0135571,0.0005141714,0.001120716,0.002944892,0.003067313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870943,0.005236916,0.001392757,0.001750122,0.001154643,0.003371242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002767248,0.0000992395,0.006837516,0.00009872353,0.00000835652,0.0008004828,0.2163206,0.0002521191,0.0003711191,0.7145024,0.01300587,0.04767603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007987471,0.0002086907,0.03584813,0.0008493401,0.00001376745,0.000900721,0.2915946,0.001239207,0.0003147455,0.172191,0.4966763,0.00008372954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5234341,0.007150696,0.008888718,0.1016261,0.0007016659,0.0000798801,0.00002070201,0.00007615041,0.358022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905767,0.0003026678,0.0004686765,0.001918002,0.00004390352,0.00001212448,0.000004514371,0.00000951128,0.00666379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03909537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0777356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202991644","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139104173","title":"Religion, Charity and Human Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Legislation; Abortion; Common law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Kerry O’Halloran","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01852007917386077,"gpt":0.2390484346642779,"spread":0.2205283554904171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005919016,0.0002320521,0.0001950715,0.0006841684,0.003683423,0.004098767,0.0004187276,0.001878541,0.01619906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001050687,0.0001354229,0.0001424511,0.001088597,0.007732973,0.002406663,0.002676745,0.002728717,0.002488809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00325138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004017646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007107531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01636028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994306,0.0002453533,0.00001175686,0.00004152473,0.0001751856,0.00009552306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996905,0.000119161,0.00002823459,0.00003801053,0.00004229194,0.00008176449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004490942,0.00002625422,0.0001433476,0.00006053222,0.000001551226,0.00006387553,0.002723235,0.00007384711,0.00005072854,0.859296,0.1005029,0.03705329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003406519,0.000008233056,0.0003749676,0.0001851229,0.000001007635,0.00009971939,0.001214216,0.00003540783,0.00002178636,0.07883809,0.9192147,0.000003351465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002798354,0.03897867,0.0004197119,0.01960355,0.001483907,0.00001586755,0.00002396525,0.0000246101,0.9366513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1136598,0.02448722,0.0009378318,0.0114676,0.001404942,0.00007258711,0.00005028509,0.00003772535,0.8478821],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01619906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05419123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115370753","doi":"10.1017/s0008197313000718","title":"THE GOD “DILUTION”? RELIGION, DISCRIMINATION AND THE CASE FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Duty; Normative; Reasonable accommodation; Disadvantage; Compromise; Religious discrimination; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Proportionality (law); Sociology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Gibson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01498341944532739,"gpt":0.2772541085213401,"spread":0.2622706890760127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00447134,0.0001379628,0.0002518232,0.0006086169,0.008661144,0.006307341,0.001265372,0.007145214,0.004004644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009776414,0.00019352,0.000315412,0.0005064923,0.04278287,0.004032934,0.004444574,0.006518872,0.0002888377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01057406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007155938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1266811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1457376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954724,0.002021763,0.0001189362,0.0002864783,0.0009559728,0.001144391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960209,0.002232371,0.0003306863,0.0003942414,0.0006078843,0.0004140075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001116653,0.000008167248,0.0004960031,0.00001052705,0.000001383018,0.0002046873,0.004210722,0.00005782795,0.00007431483,0.9908198,0.002071114,0.002034303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005612484,0.00005549287,0.005188895,0.0005435935,0.00002202454,0.0008213635,0.03936141,0.00121743,0.0007844561,0.7178628,0.2339982,0.00008815877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2331178,0.003496837,0.004762738,0.1947774,0.0005545568,0.00003933741,0.00004532202,0.00002656669,0.5631796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897993,0.0001794347,0.0002948786,0.003926564,0.00005132283,0.000006215842,0.000003082008,0.000004152733,0.005735124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1266811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2518874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484722975","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.003.0008","title":"Citizenship and the Challenge of Aboriginal Self‐Government: Is Deep Diversity Desirable?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Government (linguistics); Politics; Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Cultural assimilation; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration; Law","authors":[{"name":"Joseph H. Carens","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02160400461130546,"gpt":0.2521623147136131,"spread":0.2305583101023076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007600684,0.0001500898,0.0001781325,0.0004063714,0.005635123,0.004896478,0.0005675674,0.001091401,0.001752453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006629811,0.00009017361,0.0001218195,0.0007637161,0.01468688,0.001888839,0.001708528,0.002299761,0.0002600161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01256121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01559967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2758404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4631692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994087,0.0002225884,0.000007037879,0.00003080296,0.0001689516,0.0001619718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999696,0.0001073202,0.00001569888,0.00002203307,0.00006722235,0.00009175737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004843025,0.00001052983,0.0003073076,0.00003433533,0.000002063435,0.0001192406,0.03248705,0.0001193177,0.00009543752,0.9257643,0.02391586,0.01713986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004729747,0.00001361161,0.001918844,0.0002793001,0.000004858622,0.0001274029,0.04078485,0.0002015444,0.0001690885,0.1669643,0.7895207,0.00001083663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03074415,0.02329551,0.000985555,0.0570602,0.0005860213,0.00002040031,0.00001632401,0.00001893137,0.887273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6633471,0.01775922,0.001097186,0.006952424,0.0003796991,0.00004060779,0.00003612455,0.00003656707,0.310351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2758404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5484697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063112049","doi":"10.7202/1008034ar","title":"Nationalism, Secularism and Liberal Neutrality: The Danish Case of Judges and Religious Symbols","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Neutrality; Nationalism; Law; Parliament; Political science; Danish; Politics; Islam; Separation of church and state; Mainstream; Legislation; State (computer science); Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Nils Holtug","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.018456475609155,"gpt":0.3012128706937708,"spread":0.2827563950846158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007326509,0.0002804422,0.000634276,0.0009872415,0.02123465,0.01177592,0.001245518,0.01043325,0.00376394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008907157,0.0004350481,0.0005004947,0.001393233,0.03252447,0.004387795,0.00676322,0.006792035,0.0003532764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01275665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008200632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1168372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1614936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9885477,0.004961111,0.0003250857,0.0008916,0.00178685,0.003487652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933491,0.004467305,0.0005923143,0.0004218057,0.000462598,0.0007067689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002326003,0.00001701036,0.001070431,0.00002009715,0.000006835678,0.0005618282,0.0200155,0.0001096834,0.0001016236,0.9759817,0.00110901,0.0009830932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002703862,0.00009067641,0.01131999,0.0005230802,0.0001059449,0.001266535,0.1005445,0.001425911,0.0009792423,0.6815773,0.2017252,0.0001711759],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4331554,0.004685454,0.001934118,0.03634809,0.000225983,0.00003040294,0.00006483808,0.000006323813,0.5235494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923488,0.0004448781,0.0001283608,0.001070742,0.00002594469,0.000007232407,0.000007158441,0.000003225378,0.005963767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1168372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2323143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152695323","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778937","title":"Liberalism, Group Rights and the Boundaries of Toleration: The Case of Minority Religious Schools in Ontario","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Public administration; Toleration; Flourishing; Political science; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Liberalism; Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Linda A. White","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01502355644404245,"gpt":0.2673116232092028,"spread":0.2522880667651603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002356098,0.000260143,0.000425302,0.0007120835,0.05686577,0.007300708,0.00185016,0.004567241,0.004913491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005299592,0.0003319071,0.0004801762,0.001792261,0.0237905,0.002573695,0.006010859,0.004285145,0.0002061827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1149583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08776746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9805871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944548,0.00110533,0.00008281347,0.0002363444,0.0007495081,0.00337123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964747,0.001008406,0.0004260162,0.0001627113,0.0005565102,0.001371664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008839601,0.00006265574,0.01660378,0.00007231472,0.00001540026,0.003450183,0.2747641,0.0005749822,0.0004890538,0.6853501,0.008659515,0.00986943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001809825,0.0000556442,0.04379081,0.0003140655,0.00007691622,0.0007039659,0.4967592,0.001280827,0.0005159818,0.1160716,0.3401253,0.0001247188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6711819,0.001108112,0.001130495,0.05289863,0.00009591705,0.00009081625,0.0000721621,0.00001494869,0.2734071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827217,0.0002790911,0.000170878,0.001360142,0.00001767972,0.00002151149,0.00001151374,0.000006918329,0.01541055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1149583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8340848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W269282748","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.003.0020","title":"Homophobic Speech, Equality Denial, and Religious Expression","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Convention; Denial; Sexual orientation; Freedom of expression; Punishment (psychology); Immigration; Political science; Legislation; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Gender studies; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Ian Leigh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02924679277733437,"gpt":0.3004910290392545,"spread":0.2712442362619201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006674671,0.000185953,0.0002025243,0.0003411389,0.001647203,0.0023792,0.0003809776,0.00118096,0.007134262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001033815,0.00008936033,0.0001277661,0.0002303955,0.01215111,0.002112955,0.001892456,0.002245926,0.0005998868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001452473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000983679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001320417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001793642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993463,0.0003192861,0.0000155485,0.00006328359,0.0001881872,0.00006721993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995895,0.0002664611,0.00003721688,0.00003569911,0.00003899365,0.00003217896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004394404,0.00001344908,0.00006531362,0.00002698909,8.188555e-7,0.0000694035,0.006557104,0.00003545298,0.0001195637,0.9787017,0.004072208,0.01033359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001575369,0.00004285055,0.001647368,0.0005271212,0.000006556233,0.0006200212,0.01132344,0.0003378947,0.0009329712,0.4876303,0.4969007,0.00001496669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03065942,0.01073181,0.002569815,0.008902906,0.0006120447,0.00001963433,0.00001972726,0.00001572313,0.9464689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8417895,0.005769215,0.0007738777,0.003317941,0.0004635515,0.00003510811,0.00003076785,0.0000256116,0.1477945],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007134262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02386647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972761749","doi":"10.5040/9781509911400","title":"Religion, Equality and Employment in Europe","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing Ltd eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Labour economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Katayoun Alidadi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05163308555306596,"gpt":0.3113290036416802,"spread":0.2596959180886143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000498026,0.0002919139,0.0002887975,0.0006229363,0.002889388,0.004376035,0.0003521298,0.001236833,0.006901766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081487,0.000118957,0.0001915456,0.001271688,0.00419278,0.002415348,0.00235023,0.001908434,0.001208593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002048431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001539756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004432397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00559151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995105,0.0001783101,0.00001516389,0.00004000782,0.0001630109,0.00009296925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999881,0.00004439738,0.00001292319,0.00001402184,0.00001825805,0.00002939585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001441645,0.00005019366,0.0003209635,0.00008692111,0.000004769936,0.0001316849,0.007118232,0.0002134703,0.0001194508,0.8094727,0.08722197,0.09524529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004778496,0.00001410865,0.001087062,0.0003060686,0.000002224128,0.0001251216,0.001985317,0.00005831118,0.00004939842,0.08189424,0.9144683,0.000005110002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00669242,0.07583502,0.0004736067,0.009075718,0.00167529,0.00001181236,0.00002168881,0.00001814585,0.9061964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2901963,0.06387117,0.001152982,0.01031861,0.002208539,0.00006175967,0.00008677028,0.00006241562,0.6320415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006901766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02308875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587867489","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1271","title":"In the (Canadian) Shadow of Islamic Law: Translating Mahr as a Bargaining Endowment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation; Canadian Bar Association; McGill University","keywords":"Islam; Shadow (psychology); Multiculturalism; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law; Ideology; Negotiation; Sharia; Law and economics; Plural; Pluralism (philosophy); Institution; Endowment; Narrative; Political science; Comparative law; Legal realism; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Pascale Fournier","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01803040669789701,"gpt":0.2828372173223689,"spread":0.2648068106244719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004837047,0.0003732192,0.0004090869,0.002157448,0.01452798,0.01084174,0.001754646,0.002237378,0.007138912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008271876,0.0003207258,0.0002743482,0.002809452,0.0632304,0.00633365,0.006201289,0.003109976,0.0004246807],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04805002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03715422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7062401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7882656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952198,0.001298097,0.00007609829,0.000443382,0.001915836,0.001046866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975067,0.0009008902,0.0002370729,0.0003415031,0.0006654595,0.000348421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000534594,0.000003514788,0.0002370198,0.000005177052,0.00000102017,0.00003850597,0.004231023,0.0002555843,0.00005550748,0.9920188,0.0003100142,0.00283839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001820983,0.00002833777,0.003268363,0.000118822,0.00001385738,0.0001026954,0.02919071,0.002371262,0.0002955644,0.8751755,0.08936318,0.00005344337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.07856637,0.0009797704,0.01671681,0.01295761,0.0001465273,0.0000532622,0.00005675353,0.00003344989,0.8904894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817215,0.0004745131,0.004123093,0.0007532264,0.00004470691,0.00002455828,0.00001272454,0.00002256984,0.01282318],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2937599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5909798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2338100904","doi":"10.17645/si.v4i2.504","title":"Living Together v. Living Well Together: A Normative Examination of the SAS Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Inclusion","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Normative; Sociology; Oppression; Law; Mantra; Sincerity; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lori G. Beaman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01970681895293581,"gpt":0.293381878033851,"spread":0.2736750590809152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01434213,0.0005612947,0.0007328637,0.002237921,0.01759,0.01444187,0.001942823,0.01196007,0.004463911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02189322,0.0004785084,0.001006221,0.002036048,0.03399285,0.00870036,0.007242559,0.01248247,0.0005780609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01687329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01310644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1062098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.107691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9847451,0.007702508,0.000514294,0.00136405,0.003004163,0.002669891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860548,0.01014793,0.0006058992,0.0005388296,0.001958959,0.0006935317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006744696,0.00001098391,0.0003164337,0.000006607256,0.000002117618,0.0002574121,0.007164122,0.00009731411,0.00005857885,0.9903494,0.0009950255,0.000735334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007329576,0.00008211727,0.002123394,0.0004298225,0.00003534482,0.0006187354,0.07194257,0.003104497,0.000763936,0.7690244,0.1516967,0.0001051228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1498749,0.001340501,0.006522701,0.06915741,0.0003289531,0.0001791865,0.0000968471,0.00005031924,0.7724493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642017,0.0005108585,0.00103725,0.0137731,0.0001904589,0.00029359,0.00004856375,0.00002885565,0.01991566],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1062098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2111832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297473546","doi":"","title":"Arbitration, Religion and Family Law: Private Justice on the Backs of Women","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Private law; Family law; Business; Public law","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Bakht","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01831861055776163,"gpt":0.280770204734995,"spread":0.2624515941772333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006343707,0.0002641132,0.0004980415,0.0007152011,0.02254689,0.01589932,0.001249562,0.01189885,0.01296052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01742375,0.0003652916,0.0002882072,0.001404607,0.03306609,0.007157962,0.004723345,0.008298793,0.0005965064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01909281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0459902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5025858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6820697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938257,0.002571239,0.0001160194,0.0003674099,0.0009900486,0.002129667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943047,0.003207211,0.0003146617,0.0002692938,0.0007975067,0.00110654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001726412,0.00002700526,0.0009391388,0.00001932016,0.000004901121,0.0001228922,0.01528536,0.00009545232,0.00006129285,0.9104018,0.06237793,0.0106477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004127165,0.0000214437,0.00606588,0.000499903,0.00001986608,0.0001607869,0.06219158,0.0005093779,0.0002228805,0.4192313,0.5109806,0.00005505282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05350516,0.02460829,0.002192895,0.4969087,0.001710777,0.00004086203,0.000112401,0.00002804988,0.4208927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8523488,0.004486292,0.0005933585,0.02835614,0.0009155191,0.00004253734,0.00002706753,0.00004337648,0.1131869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5025858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055456844","doi":"10.1017/cls.2013.62","title":"Prejudice Unveiled: The Niqab in Court–","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Multiculturalism; Political science; Prejudice (legal term); Mythology; Islam; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lori Chambers","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jen Roth","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01315429693479495,"gpt":0.2600701568674619,"spread":0.246915859932667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009542786,0.0003129516,0.0005755539,0.001257757,0.02889597,0.008673095,0.002226584,0.01674449,0.01219766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03081877,0.0005508274,0.0006227831,0.0009129699,0.00971837,0.0039734,0.006639833,0.02349062,0.00146021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009700122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0126867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.108321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2537243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9865918,0.0043494,0.0005650252,0.001130911,0.003372171,0.003990831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886734,0.005190828,0.000632407,0.001048407,0.002519067,0.001935837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001159666,0.0003890936,0.01380458,0.0001204696,0.0000880751,0.01990314,0.1250802,0.0003741473,0.004472644,0.5898148,0.1912325,0.05460435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007613409,0.0002268596,0.01548955,0.001078274,0.0001343219,0.005513356,0.1346471,0.001820999,0.003889358,0.1185436,0.7182541,0.0003263963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2423939,0.001553088,0.005608001,0.1925687,0.005252474,0.000260795,0.000149565,0.000201183,0.5520123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8656579,0.0004707395,0.0009165333,0.07660028,0.0007641171,0.00006342245,0.00003893183,0.00005990743,0.0554281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.891679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2153811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105475502","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-41821-6_30","title":"Faith in Law? Diffusing Tensions Between Diversity and Equality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Philosophy and politics","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Faith; Obligation; Separation of church and state; Realm; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1152971104085233,"gpt":0.3132011160626318,"spread":0.1979040056541085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005592574,0.0002517339,0.0003709401,0.0007932826,0.004379656,0.01043793,0.000932334,0.003392147,0.007881911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008437784,0.0002348269,0.0001396297,0.001206784,0.03732788,0.01741866,0.0057184,0.006674951,0.0007288491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003724671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003845427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002715569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00478131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970949,0.001867125,0.00005048839,0.000239756,0.0004742912,0.0002734223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962932,0.002588324,0.000150843,0.0003718988,0.0002582788,0.0003374008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002697698,0.000006995196,0.00008240519,0.00000960633,9.262396e-7,0.00001415375,0.008759273,0.0000284057,0.00003872522,0.9814245,0.002675609,0.00695667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004185081,0.000003534326,0.0001992386,0.0000800374,0.000001286826,0.00002134684,0.007854067,0.00010832,0.00005620008,0.9264504,0.06521744,0.000004042845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04393877,0.009870053,0.008452967,0.1048954,0.000988176,0.00002078299,0.00003533378,0.00003137866,0.8317671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9250781,0.002715505,0.001663489,0.006237354,0.0005384738,0.00003333922,0.0000247865,0.00006613175,0.06364281],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01043793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02957672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788678691","doi":"","title":"The Religion Clauses of the New Zealand Bill of Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Human rights; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Paul Rishworth","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01682139988986197,"gpt":0.2859575613368566,"spread":0.2691361614469946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006516403,0.0003443648,0.0004391311,0.001117924,0.004832658,0.004847358,0.001239892,0.005828444,0.0112155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01845691,0.000522186,0.0006582008,0.001099538,0.005059386,0.002052733,0.002990057,0.006661304,0.002074032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01318172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0321135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5207028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6883061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867823,0.000851322,0.0006586774,0.0006579165,0.009057053,0.001992768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993529,0.001771115,0.0009773512,0.0005783318,0.002191446,0.0009527171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101159,0.00009898426,0.006074973,0.000129109,0.00001971091,0.0004905404,0.004871665,0.000219214,0.002257746,0.74203,0.1926648,0.05104204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008808628,0.00005886857,0.03730753,0.0003097433,0.00002947006,0.0003195197,0.001418253,0.0002773555,0.000677717,0.02762092,0.9318028,0.00008982277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03770186,0.002534424,0.001620074,0.05732513,0.001097717,0.0003575246,0.0008161712,0.00006524492,0.8984819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4253157,0.003758538,0.006070086,0.07376102,0.0007153169,0.0005668983,0.00120439,0.0001056854,0.4885024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5207028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9642398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586913609","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.383","title":"THE PROHIBITION OF THE MUSLIM HEADSCARF: CONTRASTING INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES IN POLICY AND LAW","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Law; Secularity; Politics; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Political science; Oppression; Sociology; Immigration; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Timothy Welch","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05462743661749307,"gpt":0.3140624902249177,"spread":0.2594350536074246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01532782,0.000494847,0.0005086954,0.004363909,0.0055694,0.01470662,0.001598731,0.005397956,0.003416016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01154342,0.0004429699,0.00057963,0.005521543,0.02427156,0.006489219,0.005889675,0.007691384,0.0003519313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0128853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01017525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01173349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01155824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873935,0.007185886,0.000634029,0.0007523217,0.001948371,0.002085827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915704,0.005521767,0.0007205105,0.0004766343,0.001004703,0.0007060425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002885558,0.00005665339,0.001060443,0.0002326764,0.00001117874,0.0001065981,0.02165977,0.0004002519,0.0001920559,0.9549531,0.002223342,0.01907501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007182311,0.000346609,0.02779553,0.008051199,0.00009188805,0.0005852539,0.2759217,0.00129167,0.002381392,0.2846125,0.3986735,0.000176882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1506229,0.05402511,0.004857799,0.09855411,0.001191066,0.0001497152,0.0001445556,0.0000512047,0.6904035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9449139,0.02560821,0.002400202,0.01560874,0.0005728084,0.0001987687,0.0001457797,0.00006073566,0.01049096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01532782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09348983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125280111","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006219","title":"The Anglican Covenant Proposed by the Lambeth Commission","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Commission; Autonomy; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Term (time); Sociology; Theology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Business","authors":[{"name":"Norman Doe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0124212563372787,"gpt":0.2969896724442739,"spread":0.2845684161069952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122903,0.000414544,0.0004387803,0.001051301,0.01399637,0.01324745,0.001322602,0.01245845,0.002390946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01437665,0.0005826653,0.000400195,0.0008013205,0.01375422,0.003254339,0.004881962,0.010962,0.0005276874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00917624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01780026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03157096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04008922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881621,0.005445755,0.0006924138,0.001355532,0.002509083,0.001835125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944127,0.001858219,0.0004342156,0.0006104914,0.001895715,0.0007885683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001647457,0.00001647392,0.0005018864,0.00002268814,0.000002869769,0.0001308683,0.00524209,0.0001066035,0.0001883332,0.9796938,0.01056498,0.003512896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007197383,0.0001459954,0.00441775,0.000769246,0.00002515007,0.0004341161,0.01233206,0.0009186864,0.001056956,0.1341249,0.8455146,0.0001885723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1849452,0.01926068,0.01778303,0.1322825,0.007585705,0.0006404997,0.0001632616,0.0001168222,0.6372223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8040789,0.001993204,0.01143953,0.02959188,0.001026745,0.0004102298,0.0000800947,0.0000432801,0.1513361],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03157096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06657857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123793050","doi":"","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sharia; Framing (construction); Arbitration; Law; Islam; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Trevor C. W. Farrow","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01674414092716521,"gpt":0.2733536071429327,"spread":0.2566094662157675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01781453,0.0003680926,0.0006152191,0.001134497,0.01783026,0.009931087,0.002676736,0.01214853,0.005968471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01636206,0.0003759291,0.0005954181,0.00107167,0.02322941,0.004259442,0.005144963,0.0125564,0.0005879603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04958376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04321586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4841333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6836619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850684,0.004387144,0.0003813493,0.001023717,0.00559155,0.003547971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935471,0.002969462,0.0003246033,0.0003364269,0.002119505,0.0007028807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002982937,0.00001054245,0.000554647,0.00005122945,0.000008313455,0.0001696456,0.0192477,0.0001534168,0.0002108695,0.9222632,0.04850354,0.008797145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004483694,0.00001682758,0.001721596,0.0003082878,0.00002604811,0.00008205401,0.00980009,0.0005833522,0.0004465943,0.1036627,0.8832612,0.0000463161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04403439,0.006912624,0.00463571,0.5203103,0.004966726,0.00004435932,0.00008713431,0.00005931253,0.4189494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8346446,0.002246317,0.001542069,0.07997809,0.002623472,0.00004271045,0.00004175692,0.00007848052,0.07880254],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4841333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9626306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756108888","doi":"10.1177/0191453709358834","title":"Faith in law?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Separation of church and state; Citizenship; Obligation; Faith; Sociology; Realm; Politics; State (computer science); Secular state; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02785350278673347,"gpt":0.3378942874117365,"spread":0.310040784625003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00451082,0.0002262723,0.0003142231,0.0006666366,0.007955395,0.007304689,0.001003138,0.005021555,0.01482077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009976098,0.0001433464,0.0002070136,0.0005162811,0.03445193,0.007802001,0.004208788,0.007826964,0.002164962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00409581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003632373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006276338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006359902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961611,0.001747629,0.00008939055,0.0005150457,0.0009447206,0.0005421296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963085,0.00179024,0.000280126,0.0005803907,0.0005498853,0.0004908104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003247017,0.000009192693,0.0001460914,0.00001100773,9.862645e-7,0.00003963466,0.004911945,0.00002121703,0.00003078786,0.9711797,0.01525924,0.008387066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007770644,0.00001893544,0.0004292362,0.0002665705,0.000002219738,0.0001571144,0.009724427,0.0001293121,0.00009012313,0.4535621,0.5356036,0.00000855526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01268405,0.01069634,0.005347437,0.2563915,0.002741962,0.00002792332,0.00003519939,0.00006131837,0.7120143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8032198,0.003809881,0.001565325,0.05962126,0.001596857,0.00005447522,0.00004111598,0.00006074607,0.1300306],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01482077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04958045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488097330","doi":"10.21991/c9s67t","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Sharia; Religious freedom; Nothing; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Human rights; Hatred; Freedom of religion; Islam; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Trevor C. W. Farrow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04711717255424792,"gpt":0.2850996094726049,"spread":0.237982436918357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01487959,0.0003983384,0.0005704943,0.001343805,0.02090383,0.01040261,0.002833405,0.008687673,0.005904678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01523893,0.000435698,0.000508296,0.001283344,0.03789145,0.004099495,0.005967099,0.008739277,0.000479725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08983638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06671356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7884713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8936877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867374,0.003935943,0.0003454095,0.0009936303,0.004633636,0.003354028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922712,0.003384879,0.0003667726,0.0005826825,0.002283544,0.001110872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002714692,0.000008792177,0.0005692965,0.00004831498,0.00000661144,0.0001195587,0.02647669,0.000130675,0.0001663937,0.9235947,0.04123083,0.007621014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003913692,0.000009851364,0.002234531,0.0002106891,0.00001876056,0.00005541454,0.01236098,0.0003783362,0.0002979916,0.08894254,0.8954144,0.00003739811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.04579755,0.006416454,0.005467426,0.4156603,0.004217129,0.00007475082,0.0001332895,0.0000582241,0.522175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835729,0.001853866,0.001983999,0.04690525,0.001478043,0.00006318702,0.000057582,0.00008813244,0.111841],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7884713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6518116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987627174","doi":"","title":"Theorizing Religions as Vestigial States in Relation to Gender and Law: Three Cases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Judaism; Interpretation (philosophy); German; Islam; Politics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03046045040961023,"gpt":0.2639763899977235,"spread":0.2335159395881133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006576223,0.0006028553,0.0005495415,0.002004285,0.01579316,0.006469393,0.002397073,0.006822259,0.002107998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007750673,0.0004986799,0.0008187898,0.002695515,0.04941774,0.005897316,0.009043821,0.005808631,0.0001580958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01739569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004635404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1235629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1714073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971367,0.001393937,0.0000975864,0.0002024072,0.0004336989,0.0007355604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947464,0.003883429,0.0003415218,0.0003180147,0.000302203,0.0004085104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001700185,0.00003774991,0.002789402,0.00002989951,0.000004190883,0.002086406,0.07339324,0.0001381618,0.0001393827,0.9173619,0.001054508,0.002948081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001586234,0.0001019361,0.01175296,0.001019304,0.00009136143,0.002859398,0.3763207,0.002456652,0.001702438,0.4624761,0.1409417,0.0001187807],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6770958,0.005162624,0.008577162,0.02766006,0.0002115392,0.0003061163,0.0001000328,0.00003768231,0.280849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890763,0.001159852,0.001410643,0.001619261,0.00003326356,0.0001293477,0.00001969125,0.000009535225,0.006542212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1235629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2456874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030039118","doi":"10.1177/002096430405800304","title":"The Righteousness of the Law and the Righteousness of Faith in Romans","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Righteousness; Faith; Philosophy; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Westerholm","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004086506961347935,"gpt":0.2539976573047322,"spread":0.2499111503433842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003532214,0.0002205025,0.0003682142,0.0006908976,0.005939861,0.005743037,0.0004047922,0.002346656,0.004271034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00616969,0.0002339499,0.0002092126,0.0007126752,0.05032897,0.004242052,0.003048761,0.005285233,0.000741164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002385641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001733917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003068187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004281763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950506,0.00323389,0.0001500544,0.0003229897,0.000697244,0.0005452305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978295,0.001077797,0.0002647286,0.0003247571,0.000258034,0.0002451157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007488006,0.000006960393,0.000128021,0.000008826428,8.242351e-7,0.00003158412,0.005312856,0.00002328476,0.00003099941,0.9914518,0.001171302,0.001826039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002629919,0.00001831188,0.001016394,0.0001214766,0.000002622024,0.0001717993,0.004605013,0.0001587484,0.0001575011,0.8830276,0.1106787,0.00001548594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06651096,0.008235862,0.004868091,0.0328761,0.0006275208,0.00002274513,0.00003983399,0.00002709291,0.8867918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759747,0.001241018,0.0008445897,0.002456957,0.0002513469,0.00001393455,0.00001330195,0.0000224438,0.01918175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005939861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01868039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882741937","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139013789.011","title":"Political Liberalism, Islamic Family Law, and Family Law Pluralism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Israeli law; Sharia; Politics; Islam; Religious law; Comparative law; Sociology; Private law; Black letter law; Legal realism; History","authors":[{"name":"Mohammad Fadel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03349742383582321,"gpt":0.2330091172081155,"spread":0.1995116933722923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00216986,0.0001315762,0.0001798866,0.0005789039,0.006829742,0.004560069,0.0004591321,0.001752117,0.001884384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00199513,0.0001375081,0.0001722571,0.0007832089,0.03688812,0.002616571,0.002564824,0.003081434,0.0001292135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005721229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003213932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01109684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01223479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980641,0.001085517,0.0000326812,0.0001269237,0.0003379835,0.0003527298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987025,0.0007439977,0.0001765103,0.00008982224,0.0001106008,0.0001764551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002263913,0.000005790983,0.0001634284,0.000005057444,7.961247e-7,0.00006161586,0.005586731,0.00006058284,0.00003349338,0.9913378,0.0007729728,0.001969576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001209512,0.00001536967,0.002030003,0.00007321456,0.000002517633,0.0001556318,0.008696439,0.0005191663,0.0001174065,0.9075641,0.08080429,0.000009680219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.168744,0.01188523,0.006015246,0.05493424,0.0003121456,0.00002602256,0.00001685412,0.00002381638,0.7580425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873078,0.001401028,0.0005670988,0.001702217,0.0001363433,0.00001293461,0.000005139707,0.000005169388,0.00886231],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01109684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04151058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798079748","doi":"10.4337/9781784719692.00005","title":"International and comparative perspectives on diversity management: an overview","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Sociology; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Alain Klarsfeld","is_ca":false},{"name":"Eddy S. Ng","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lize Booysen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Liza Castro Christiansen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bård Kuvaas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1082530803053345,"gpt":0.3245990219933776,"spread":0.2163459416880431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001029504,0.0006494939,0.0004265344,0.004600078,0.003389481,0.005853609,0.0008330962,0.001724329,0.01770118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009962745,0.0001752509,0.0003311103,0.0101581,0.004697958,0.005209672,0.003256148,0.002827914,0.002158131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004008172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002234508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002655953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004316651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992141,0.0003554056,0.00003870194,0.00007417493,0.0001914275,0.0001262713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994711,0.0003091338,0.00004222931,0.00003654809,0.00006486449,0.00007624137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001231894,0.00005719048,0.0002202612,0.0007219808,0.000006258182,0.0001260682,0.005980792,0.0001998628,0.000126531,0.8295005,0.06997062,0.09307764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001436237,0.00001060731,0.000409911,0.0009399416,0.000002033864,0.0001768596,0.002511291,0.00003773927,0.0000345187,0.0348253,0.9610465,0.000003802023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002159072,0.3357913,0.001365811,0.01121857,0.002457342,0.00001519113,0.0000611556,0.00001819642,0.6469133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1126239,0.6841134,0.003482475,0.008129207,0.008007246,0.0001408459,0.0003250773,0.0000933194,0.1830846],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01770118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05921632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008191152","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.33","title":"Reasonable Accommodation for Age","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; nobody; Reasonable accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Law; Scope (computer science); Opt-out; Conscience; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Refia Kaya","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07395497734515308,"gpt":0.3298034589447745,"spread":0.2558484815996215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008508072,0.0004786288,0.0005946598,0.0007935347,0.007791219,0.006347809,0.001671795,0.01050455,0.008755116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02170871,0.0003302365,0.001355517,0.0005406914,0.01932134,0.007439012,0.007720495,0.009318465,0.001957972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005231767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009066456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01801889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0171246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867887,0.004324151,0.001334516,0.002043078,0.002876599,0.002632899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917509,0.002407992,0.0008659823,0.001771196,0.002165894,0.001038061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007774572,0.00001207127,0.0002809248,0.00002301566,0.000003149087,0.00007955037,0.001311286,0.00007099628,0.00009015733,0.991191,0.004068359,0.00286177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002771737,0.0000818285,0.002077152,0.0003844638,0.00002235661,0.0005190497,0.002201972,0.0005331446,0.0003987731,0.669804,0.3238661,0.00008337903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03021065,0.00407016,0.034414,0.06185543,0.002165029,0.0002707065,0.0002946289,0.0001715018,0.8665479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8609038,0.001354992,0.01361729,0.0399641,0.001349757,0.0005201143,0.0002047584,0.0001189738,0.08196618],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04499555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796386265","doi":"10.1017/lst.2017.11","title":"Autonomy and prenuptial agreements in Ireland: a relational analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Irish; Commission; Common law; Law; Equity (law); Injustice; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Lucy-Ann Buckley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04825470394405566,"gpt":0.3693254662490878,"spread":0.3210707623050321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01226687,0.000204481,0.0003317995,0.00272616,0.006133692,0.01107944,0.002340966,0.001348823,0.009280377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02251069,0.0002577608,0.0006267901,0.003296237,0.01901662,0.007431348,0.01060712,0.002737143,0.0004571887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02880583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01452041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0832618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06122801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845035,0.008021011,0.0005531415,0.0008817211,0.002880429,0.00316018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830375,0.008931259,0.003265923,0.001170354,0.002377436,0.001217545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005341206,0.00007463179,0.02284266,0.0001048004,0.00002194175,0.0005547941,0.1328381,0.0009122855,0.0001304129,0.8292751,0.001274021,0.01191785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004228993,0.00009600571,0.0569741,0.0007072577,0.00006756262,0.0004814649,0.6373721,0.004561158,0.0003580838,0.1998967,0.09935907,0.00008432573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.583334,0.0007636345,0.008252493,0.007583646,0.00006061122,0.0002045381,0.0001589472,0.00002228482,0.3996198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967285,0.0001324218,0.0004449176,0.0001389552,0.000008682106,0.00002460966,0.0000281584,0.000006985662,0.002486773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0832618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2090019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991718069","doi":"10.7202/1008036ar","title":"Beyond Objective and Subjective: Assessing the Legitimacy of Religious Claims to Accommodation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Reinterpretation; Argument (complex analysis); Disadvantage; Normative; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Accommodation; Law; Law and economics; Plaintiff; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01931340330095821,"gpt":0.3397695518732575,"spread":0.3204561485722993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04876309,0.0004566372,0.000865564,0.01427239,0.003452362,0.01072427,0.00230728,0.004477474,0.006338456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2927864,0.0003570183,0.000765056,0.006339729,0.03811482,0.0162549,0.009540042,0.003887725,0.0003683111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002677698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001576122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001693366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002726834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9527429,0.02556964,0.003800255,0.002024659,0.01458531,0.001277239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5701224,0.3144908,0.06233354,0.02224747,0.02423988,0.00656602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000451695,0.0004577584,0.279336,0.0006466772,0.0003293075,0.0009014374,0.04913633,0.001405429,0.0009268856,0.6174915,0.00127365,0.04764331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001143161,0.0005912628,0.2267945,0.001643202,0.0001885181,0.001144783,0.06758516,0.009018861,0.001830406,0.6747054,0.01614178,0.000241918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7254351,0.002201295,0.03439485,0.008468973,0.0002220176,0.0003682703,0.0003585956,0.000037312,0.2285136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969851,0.0001712823,0.001861937,0.0002201566,0.00008128924,0.00006940708,0.00004894663,0.000007512725,0.000554335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04876309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.257887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599675491","doi":"","title":"Eweida v United Kingdom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Freedom of religion; Religious freedom; Kingdom; Law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Accommodation; Political science; Clothing; High Court; Sociology; History; Psychology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Michelle Biddulph","is_ca":true},{"name":"Dwight Newman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04548782921124649,"gpt":0.3187942160396319,"spread":0.2733063868283854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003726944,0.0004654379,0.0007655311,0.001403128,0.007471547,0.007822788,0.001380744,0.01314428,0.02178348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014934,0.0007313375,0.0009427794,0.001200544,0.002846596,0.003166707,0.004986623,0.008647558,0.003908722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005797569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007035544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1044933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1715533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919935,0.001258756,0.0005597573,0.00115273,0.00240142,0.002633888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966558,0.001475623,0.0002237937,0.0004117129,0.0009209975,0.0003119327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002513277,0.00005038995,0.00255373,0.0002954949,0.00006353081,0.00363781,0.00375121,0.0001930119,0.002079972,0.7874588,0.166911,0.03275368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000585328,0.00005928391,0.002246828,0.0004216543,0.00004143186,0.000405722,0.0008141606,0.0001095039,0.0008832392,0.01464428,0.9802514,0.00006408566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04152001,0.01630146,0.001880009,0.04844553,0.003672041,0.0002062818,0.000734342,0.0001777619,0.8870625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3096291,0.004078411,0.001272069,0.1043887,0.0005471269,0.0002759942,0.0004104575,0.0001388144,0.5792593],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1044933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2077702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1674632769","doi":"","title":"Faith Based Arbitration in Ontario","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Sharia; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Faith; Judaism; State (computer science); Dispute resolution; Islam; Alternative dispute resolution; History; Theology; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Pengelley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01212355817616679,"gpt":0.2645991035214753,"spread":0.2524755453453085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00577274,0.0001639166,0.0003313598,0.001196218,0.008120595,0.005528302,0.001249242,0.002371615,0.005608861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009781233,0.0002817054,0.0003139895,0.003061695,0.008386419,0.002192379,0.003410707,0.001902357,0.0003748044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06837013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08294921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9339267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9672579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930307,0.001313107,0.0002947608,0.0004162835,0.003644167,0.001300982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946319,0.001846199,0.000600717,0.0003420151,0.002140405,0.0004388073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002850796,0.000008875614,0.001814244,0.0002682289,0.00001595757,0.0006296401,0.01077889,0.0005274228,0.0002866637,0.8700283,0.06216474,0.05344861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001149242,0.00000784434,0.00587646,0.0003303522,0.00001292114,0.000142274,0.00334238,0.0003312746,0.0002365139,0.03855912,0.951115,0.00003436867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04115147,0.07125995,0.005778028,0.103289,0.001539365,0.0001304375,0.0003032327,0.00005013124,0.7764984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7663683,0.03652672,0.004000418,0.01262434,0.0003848959,0.00009113571,0.0001716307,0.00005097465,0.1797816],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06837013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4960623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257067675","doi":"","title":"Religion, State, and the Problem of Gender: Re-imagining Citizenship and Governance in Diverse Societies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Multiculturalism; Islam; Political science; Sociology; Arbitration; Tribunal; Gender studies; Law; State (computer science); Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01026718193761669,"gpt":0.2479797459274932,"spread":0.2377125639898765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01164287,0.000606102,0.0006898413,0.002598749,0.009522036,0.01697884,0.00183268,0.004511422,0.001844273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005134713,0.0003148243,0.0004491009,0.00278756,0.1094913,0.01817868,0.009191913,0.005372622,0.0001312085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007362723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003645511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006345605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009874879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903452,0.008138509,0.0001015398,0.0003634404,0.0004270999,0.0006241851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935829,0.005305803,0.0003421656,0.0002873555,0.0001931038,0.0002887204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009464373,0.00001105068,0.0006115696,0.00003664945,0.000004318997,0.0001294216,0.2088997,0.0001480525,0.00007206646,0.7843434,0.0008443046,0.004890045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001016848,0.00003035916,0.001118444,0.0003201217,0.000008318131,0.0001711024,0.359661,0.0004826743,0.0001830129,0.5656837,0.07231357,0.00001748276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3945981,0.04676919,0.02273713,0.2139213,0.001105576,0.00007079473,0.00004670031,0.00004272114,0.3207085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898332,0.00405366,0.00101342,0.002058324,0.000265872,0.00003523715,0.000007194657,0.00002069501,0.002712454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01697884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06157416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345542358","doi":"10.1515/wps-2016-0001","title":"The Controversy over Religious Arbitration Tribunals in Ontario: Unspoken Identity-Based Justifications?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Opposition (politics); Islam; Faith; Sociology; Identity (music); Law; Political science; Religious identity; Compulsory arbitration; Epistemology; Negotiation; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Paul May","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02448530334463882,"gpt":0.3369978418985137,"spread":0.3125125385538748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006592169,0.0001871032,0.0003951056,0.001475259,0.02531901,0.0103213,0.001706981,0.003821854,0.006225495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01689359,0.0003187298,0.0002319004,0.002761099,0.02040018,0.002582598,0.004006659,0.003545444,0.0001942558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1333697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08592314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9703608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941251,0.001252729,0.0002348051,0.0005201314,0.002131387,0.001735782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832924,0.008021655,0.001594911,0.0006186698,0.004669375,0.001803015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001573884,0.00005753109,0.02539806,0.000297587,0.00003836061,0.001705687,0.3125813,0.0002525013,0.001115331,0.5994692,0.03414648,0.02478059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006718682,0.00002925573,0.05472196,0.0007448845,0.0000642428,0.0002234255,0.3516572,0.000747091,0.001076761,0.0297851,0.5607501,0.0001328112],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5052863,0.003356508,0.001497793,0.1670522,0.0006035138,0.00009692216,0.0002996168,0.00002073578,0.3217863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789487,0.0006660592,0.0002719823,0.004077423,0.00008060601,0.00001838779,0.00002869418,0.00001238173,0.01589581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1333697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9676697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751457090","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n4p60","title":"Human Rights and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate in Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Law; Political science; The Right to Privacy; Sociology; Liberalism; Political philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Bede Harris","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03672037188946901,"gpt":0.3512015154988274,"spread":0.3144811436093584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005183712,0.0001263057,0.0003461006,0.001051997,0.01570745,0.006349103,0.0008651423,0.007087823,0.003349511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008460727,0.0003558065,0.0002550198,0.001210095,0.01981438,0.003756102,0.005532058,0.006273864,0.0002007245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01335084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0110535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1049673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1679794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954573,0.002656736,0.0001035507,0.000248331,0.0007945015,0.0007396174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962643,0.002204284,0.0003863952,0.0001159756,0.0004224633,0.0006067354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002828663,0.00009661126,0.002815467,0.0001621688,0.00001157413,0.001224142,0.124479,0.0002705595,0.0007763758,0.8378698,0.005165799,0.02710035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004758494,0.0002340558,0.05610557,0.001474283,0.00004178794,0.001176037,0.164266,0.0018881,0.001038567,0.2785638,0.4950582,0.0001059782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.51087,0.0323869,0.001484678,0.1626107,0.0007245514,0.00004699932,0.00001443274,0.00001112628,0.2918505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655047,0.005216353,0.0002757063,0.01208864,0.0001798444,0.00001706292,0.00000371036,0.000006247916,0.01670764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1049673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2087128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605556373","doi":"10.1017/s1740355315000108","title":"The Ethics of the Empty Church: Anglicanism’s Need for a Theology of Architecture","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Anglican Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Architecture; Quarter (Canadian coin); Closing (real estate); Institution; Theology; Work (physics); Sociology; Religious studies; Political science; History; Law; Philosophy; Archaeology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"William Foote Whyte","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1343303403515777,"gpt":0.4093706305743623,"spread":0.2750402902227846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009765793,0.0001694767,0.000381208,0.0007799612,0.008094542,0.006629889,0.0006572141,0.002018854,0.001928344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007256224,0.0002354429,0.0001101155,0.0004872249,0.05558198,0.004742579,0.003011683,0.00453172,0.0002250154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003192215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002655137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005807739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007048941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923868,0.006530078,0.0001087508,0.0001712678,0.0004231283,0.0003799326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908439,0.006416015,0.0005718384,0.0005777366,0.0007923307,0.0007982595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002110989,0.0000190946,0.0006928557,0.0000502947,0.000001890329,0.0001277606,0.1753592,0.00006135759,0.0001311171,0.8154845,0.003310502,0.00474033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002884173,0.00007246282,0.003099244,0.0007207865,0.000008330225,0.00041387,0.2999734,0.0006463572,0.0003569107,0.4645195,0.2301249,0.00003542813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5200996,0.01813298,0.01035702,0.192423,0.00124733,0.00003405055,0.00002185884,0.00002812955,0.257656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944458,0.0005531169,0.000431608,0.001749673,0.0001151443,0.000007524943,0.000001883532,0.000006835483,0.002688398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009765793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05164707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026640410","doi":"","title":"Aménager la diversité: le droit de l'égalité face à la pluralité religieuse","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01117053895381265,"gpt":0.2241654015438933,"spread":0.2129948625900807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001851708,0.0001823541,0.0002726502,0.0008810917,0.008824662,0.007493865,0.0005137816,0.001682838,0.005919408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003327825,0.00009345626,0.0002122044,0.001227023,0.02117009,0.004275169,0.007890405,0.003067949,0.0003494551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003974567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002739679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02121162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04112572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980641,0.000977917,0.00002908046,0.0001050196,0.0003335581,0.0004902643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979926,0.0006738721,0.0003491191,0.000186578,0.000207592,0.00059012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007196343,0.00004736656,0.008759896,0.00006922141,0.0000144697,0.0005933229,0.2422077,0.0001128541,0.0006230848,0.7028623,0.003631352,0.04100651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002130924,0.00007007404,0.02299458,0.0005117147,0.00001761645,0.001021363,0.4506799,0.0001876841,0.0005884005,0.1553503,0.3685089,0.00004822038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.6116427,0.003259157,0.002285731,0.04514035,0.0002308819,0.00001613373,0.00003628465,0.00001752054,0.3373713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910201,0.0004528466,0.0001049199,0.0006923963,0.00004530591,0.000003499429,0.000005059962,0.000006099499,0.007669795],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02121162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04217631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W205819075","doi":"10.5250/fronjwomestud.34.2.0134","title":"The Question of Muslim Women's Rights and the Ontario Shari'ah Tribunals: Examining Liberal Claims","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers A Journal of Women Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Tabassum Fahim Ruby","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01992378099291489,"gpt":0.2871852257690191,"spread":0.2672614447761043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004066923,0.0001787068,0.0002808301,0.0008834137,0.0223233,0.007352954,0.001529308,0.004292893,0.006261129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01100929,0.0002217307,0.0002126916,0.00148838,0.04656724,0.002943189,0.004172063,0.003732761,0.0002740183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03044991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03921717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7321204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8723606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971302,0.0006769623,0.00005707581,0.0001414587,0.000736136,0.001258246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924701,0.004456476,0.0007134459,0.0003878404,0.0009856038,0.0009864125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001498799,0.00006635587,0.01621861,0.00007779094,0.00001350639,0.0004089325,0.309806,0.0001146409,0.0005737824,0.652615,0.007207661,0.01274776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007650901,0.00004435855,0.06245624,0.0003586375,0.00003225562,0.0001245983,0.6808398,0.0003367305,0.0005266234,0.1199966,0.1351508,0.00005682002],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6041804,0.0009589287,0.0002640562,0.05509282,0.00009380234,0.00002998758,0.00008539228,0.00000438983,0.3392902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898416,0.0002246097,0.0000577076,0.001248214,0.00002647823,0.000009454447,0.000008040875,0.00000268539,0.008581242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2678796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5389144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982294728","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.74","title":"A Tale of Two (Diverse) Countries: Religious Diversity in Canada and Singapore","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Secularism; Freedom of religion; Constitution; Diversity (politics); Political science; Religious freedom; Religious diversity; Charter; Sociology; Liberalism; Ethnic group; Cultural diversity; Minority rights; Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Human rights; Ethnology; Economic freedom; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Arif Jamal","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel Wong Sheng Jie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0122257053394054,"gpt":0.2670100807735695,"spread":0.254784375434164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001097362,0.0002402055,0.0003815226,0.001935284,0.02679629,0.00586075,0.001016945,0.001254563,0.004371187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002160907,0.0001537101,0.0002532959,0.00462746,0.008220237,0.001446005,0.005240621,0.00245253,0.0001453817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07315148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06930321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983122,0.000331663,0.00003066161,0.0001135228,0.0003290616,0.0008828479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976496,0.0003044489,0.0001704023,0.00005795467,0.0006671073,0.001150494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000176775,0.0001400143,0.1486693,0.0002212059,0.00007741743,0.007186007,0.5771047,0.0008566528,0.001238906,0.1596735,0.04118429,0.06347126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001070829,0.00002655536,0.07555442,0.0002431866,0.00002857591,0.0003112885,0.8245243,0.0003034713,0.0002680871,0.002926066,0.09571781,0.00008555839],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9135483,0.002257273,0.000221556,0.02237529,0.0001325542,0.00003102913,0.0003442314,0.00001000727,0.06107977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930708,0.0006272845,0.0001106825,0.001100731,0.000006174233,0.000005576997,0.00005678531,0.000005465598,0.005016544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07315148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5307536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035467982","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000177","title":"Multiculturalism meets privatisation: the case of faith-based arbitration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Law; Multiculturalism; Religious law; Family law; Supreme court; Faith; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Law and economics; Islam","authors":[{"name":"Audrey Macklin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03095093799431146,"gpt":0.3302311450385649,"spread":0.2992802070442534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01787243,0.0003156168,0.0007495097,0.0008900019,0.02911777,0.01344859,0.002080269,0.0134651,0.007279857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01830942,0.0005354252,0.001014517,0.0009578782,0.04768381,0.009381248,0.0154089,0.01164308,0.0004161076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01460574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01286374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03692845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03846993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9820766,0.008968421,0.000463749,0.001591177,0.002353892,0.004546169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881126,0.006935909,0.0008658174,0.001516106,0.001464686,0.001104921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000589704,0.00001342445,0.0001757576,0.000006073218,0.000002719704,0.0003453173,0.005509694,0.0001057983,0.00006941454,0.9926737,0.0004572126,0.0006350905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001026989,0.00004921533,0.000780997,0.0001907347,0.00003601773,0.000714685,0.01896262,0.003590394,0.000850893,0.9064032,0.0682547,0.00006384888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.323141,0.001307951,0.02245207,0.09107704,0.0004324942,0.0001651523,0.00003087415,0.00005229869,0.5613412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893702,0.00009477312,0.0007957658,0.001999528,0.0000701905,0.00003472671,0.000002586474,0.0000089757,0.0076232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03692845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1059726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730428860","doi":"","title":"A Destruction of Muslim Identity: Ontario's Decision to Stop Shari'a-based Arbitration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Identity (music); Islam; Law; Business; Political science; Theology; Art; Philosophy; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Donald Brown","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01816390995612174,"gpt":0.3205209524441682,"spread":0.3023570424880465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004232578,0.0002783779,0.000359986,0.0006157177,0.04557588,0.007854473,0.002212916,0.01533541,0.00810984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007211655,0.0007374982,0.0006630285,0.0007183498,0.007242954,0.001394095,0.00302453,0.01237692,0.0006782946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07227391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1325073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9620856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949602,0.0004563644,0.0001491221,0.0002648297,0.001521688,0.002647759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947236,0.001748754,0.000237234,0.0001899106,0.001431449,0.001669042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006308077,0.0002643995,0.03891421,0.0001967315,0.00017384,0.008245801,0.06737541,0.001473028,0.005622965,0.3190791,0.5157678,0.04225587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002362032,0.0001003788,0.04192474,0.0001940248,0.0001589123,0.0006277979,0.04099953,0.001354383,0.002084672,0.01314229,0.8989529,0.0002242097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3240064,0.001165991,0.001099648,0.3007141,0.001571652,0.0002647481,0.0002354891,0.00008355215,0.3708585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6643185,0.0006153607,0.00104162,0.07740482,0.0003786921,0.00009786317,0.00005398388,0.00007021835,0.2560188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07227391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5243864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336079757","doi":"10.7202/1035668ar","title":"The Protection of Religious Freedom under the European Convention on Human Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Toleration; Freedom of thought; Convention; Political science; International human rights law; Freedom of religion; Fundamental rights; Conscience; International law; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Javier Martínez-Torrón","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rafael Navarro-Valls","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02673923157394651,"gpt":0.2759606894391198,"spread":0.2492214578651733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01220683,0.0007675995,0.001175448,0.001384717,0.003935659,0.00946012,0.001720254,0.01515488,0.007396987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107839,0.0003501372,0.001025799,0.002263942,0.01224819,0.003773948,0.004783964,0.01237178,0.003559379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00542631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01057599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02041142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01708414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9830052,0.006483965,0.001112875,0.001703711,0.005530198,0.002163959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968194,0.001460845,0.0003047266,0.0007176427,0.0004883101,0.0002092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009812692,0.00001726386,0.0001114008,0.00005274787,0.000005482152,0.00009422256,0.000752256,0.0001173503,0.0002112631,0.9741715,0.01204603,0.0124108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000355838,0.00004394767,0.0009100735,0.0006125884,0.00001186617,0.000270998,0.0003352096,0.0001784524,0.0002211802,0.1852319,0.8120968,0.00005128633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00536014,0.02177631,0.005728838,0.03559009,0.002413994,0.0002422914,0.0003422005,0.0001045318,0.9284415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4437939,0.02902281,0.02713015,0.1005621,0.005015471,0.001387148,0.001010477,0.000275152,0.3918028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02041142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0645566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129410355","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rws005","title":"How Religious Arbitration Could Enhance Personal Autonomy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Autonomy; Religious freedom; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Law and economics; Law; State (computer science); Business; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Farrah Ahmed","is_ca":false},{"name":"Senwung Luk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01715009676357333,"gpt":0.2908915983203651,"spread":0.2737415015567918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008199523,0.0001539061,0.0002768998,0.0005211734,0.003337835,0.004640209,0.000845183,0.00356822,0.008974981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01910747,0.0001881162,0.0006328437,0.000329791,0.01324844,0.005801751,0.007647068,0.003573367,0.000749047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001572857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002169591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001503194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924728,0.004104049,0.0002240858,0.0006682622,0.001327859,0.00120299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905306,0.004865036,0.0009498156,0.001967266,0.0008035789,0.0008837801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002726447,0.00006123406,0.001378247,0.00002010831,0.000008103809,0.0001993719,0.005339451,0.0004626143,0.0006107333,0.9817519,0.00118788,0.008953114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005373003,0.00007559645,0.002836388,0.00007620396,0.00001936047,0.000297765,0.002447174,0.001605678,0.001049612,0.9494997,0.04200971,0.00002896141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2435116,0.000717743,0.02461248,0.04181617,0.0002869506,0.00006206739,0.00002697089,0.0000535355,0.6889125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927799,0.00007075265,0.001297866,0.0009234228,0.0000585916,0.00001239343,0.000003779963,0.000006661887,0.004846755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008974981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04336375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974262435","doi":"10.7202/1064487ar","title":"Entre Luxembourg et Strasbourg : modalités juridiques et diffractions européennes dans la gouvernance du religieux","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Louis-Léon Christians","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01344378151706797,"gpt":0.2911103719169993,"spread":0.2776665903999314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001854255,0.0002397461,0.0002594999,0.002201336,0.003301321,0.005473761,0.0006495487,0.0007075524,0.008710322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002462296,0.0002179493,0.0001842183,0.004781,0.009724081,0.002616095,0.003003376,0.001327842,0.0006647092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0112144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003912729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2712746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3328606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988821,0.000486803,0.00002077369,0.0001467469,0.00011546,0.000348057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999141,0.0003622863,0.0001984979,0.00007928027,0.0001228108,0.00009612538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002056464,0.00004278356,0.06767494,0.0002155272,0.0000651637,0.0008248045,0.4208903,0.0004015531,0.0009690479,0.4398509,0.004408047,0.06445128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008716154,0.00009253529,0.3913128,0.0009131216,0.00006394621,0.0003380519,0.3599901,0.0003395503,0.0004337834,0.03341828,0.212946,0.0000646655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.901037,0.006522842,0.0007870042,0.01180074,0.00007418331,0.00001582122,0.000289394,0.0000195298,0.07945335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921125,0.0009324189,0.0001534192,0.0003648043,0.00001840964,0.000009029955,0.00008174953,0.00001020161,0.006317413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2712746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5393912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214739763","doi":"10.1080/09637494.2021.2010906","title":"Religious anti-discrimination legislation and the negotiation of difference in Victoria, Australia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion State & Society","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives; University of Ottawa","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Legislation; Negotiation; Etiquette; Sociology; Constructive; Covert; Power (physics); Law; Tribunal; Political science; Public relations; Public administration","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Ezzy","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rebecca Banham","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lori G. Beaman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02262602096536775,"gpt":0.2973799517109,"spread":0.2747539307455322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004168193,0.0001015297,0.0002120752,0.0006813308,0.01534658,0.00350247,0.0008737681,0.001666639,0.002429142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007417699,0.0003114526,0.0001634812,0.0008297461,0.01250773,0.001747994,0.006184054,0.003066497,0.0001496551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02404738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02585459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4163467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6271541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930508,0.004096754,0.0001732263,0.0002724795,0.001156182,0.0012506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996218,0.00118047,0.0007086628,0.0001218026,0.0005207597,0.001250339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004593167,0.000129882,0.0121448,0.0001815036,0.00001203117,0.001223503,0.6804765,0.0003154445,0.001917202,0.2558768,0.0034102,0.04426618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003561007,0.0002392311,0.1462478,0.0007245966,0.00002210942,0.0008504471,0.4212961,0.001430047,0.0007325512,0.05349685,0.3747985,0.0001261467],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8516191,0.002380915,0.001038063,0.02052392,0.0001510253,0.00006797602,0.00001496928,0.000009223871,0.1241948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909836,0.0003341026,0.0002668337,0.0008439557,0.000009143259,0.00001367284,0.000003631243,0.000003023809,0.007542107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4163467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8278466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982351217","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.77","title":"Solidarity in Diversity? State Responses to Religious Diversity in Liberal and Non-Liberal Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; National University of Singapore","keywords":"Solidarity; Diversity (politics); Political science; Secularism; State (computer science); Sociology; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Law; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jaclyn L. Neo","is_ca":false},{"name":"M. Rossbach","is_ca":false},{"name":"Li-ann Thio","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alexander Tischbirek","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01665888651955795,"gpt":0.2981736391142291,"spread":0.2815147525946711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004244263,0.000121648,0.0002275119,0.0006949552,0.00482286,0.006620456,0.0005392054,0.002633272,0.005387733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004788449,0.00009634456,0.0002012406,0.0008536092,0.01676662,0.003972208,0.006160312,0.00390011,0.0002305535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006376905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002588155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01753696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952148,0.002958599,0.0001002978,0.0002197037,0.0007303748,0.0007762609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967353,0.00191023,0.000322415,0.0002151681,0.0003104339,0.0005064833],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000176145,0.00002515832,0.0009914011,0.0000328182,0.000004736272,0.0001007125,0.04005327,0.0000823775,0.0001886962,0.9467652,0.004567411,0.007170612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003102839,0.00008172711,0.01549922,0.000503137,0.00001971029,0.0001516265,0.1944967,0.0006791653,0.000657448,0.491205,0.2966192,0.00005616695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2582742,0.004106385,0.004372626,0.1563948,0.001301034,0.00004094747,0.0000631979,0.00002093334,0.5754257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894382,0.0005279026,0.0001330194,0.004240379,0.0001410172,0.000009936085,0.000008363569,0.00000658132,0.005494478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04626793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153447884","doi":"10.3138/tjt.25.2.239","title":"Beyond Secularism? Rethinking the “Secular” in a Religiously Plural Context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Secularity; Secularization; Sociology; Ideology; Neutrality; Secular state; Context (archaeology); Dialogical self; Plural; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy; History","authors":[{"name":"Thomas E. Reynolds","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01297137400500795,"gpt":0.2919879738528455,"spread":0.2790165998478376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006640248,0.0002763199,0.0004725241,0.0007309786,0.01079533,0.008482135,0.001073175,0.00288014,0.00273883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004786685,0.0001768697,0.0001968388,0.0008498904,0.07772272,0.00665043,0.00690754,0.006163635,0.0001671705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008572994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006015268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01490408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03300573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950498,0.003668415,0.00009451527,0.0002863452,0.0004966676,0.0004042847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964529,0.001486541,0.0004256615,0.0005035765,0.000471269,0.0006601315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000169052,0.00002197142,0.0005699201,0.00003317254,0.000003039521,0.0001090685,0.07974017,0.00008384752,0.0002714381,0.912899,0.001371673,0.004879869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002460703,0.00008466647,0.003382332,0.0005103364,0.00001495122,0.0002189901,0.2028135,0.0007417544,0.0007790099,0.6008507,0.1905395,0.00003968109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4180041,0.007732183,0.01254203,0.1646881,0.002090846,0.0000508829,0.0000441726,0.00005090217,0.3947967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964599,0.0002840686,0.0003978149,0.00116421,0.0001159898,0.000004941683,0.000003358036,0.000007676181,0.001562143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01490408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06220174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809263102","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.n10.5","title":"REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION BASED ON RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR PRACTICES. A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE BETWEEN THE AMERICAN, CANADIAN AND EUROPEAN APPROACHES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Reasonable accommodation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Óscar Pérez de la Fuente","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1426836986483416,"gpt":0.3728837980788236,"spread":0.230200099430482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005295828,0.0002576357,0.0002660975,0.003978232,0.01480423,0.008551585,0.001546939,0.003110534,0.002875429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009252212,0.0001772085,0.0004901441,0.004180451,0.03957734,0.002664018,0.003943681,0.003574449,0.0001665868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06299999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05987969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9073839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9411813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900922,0.002744299,0.000255945,0.000512672,0.003216253,0.003178483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944729,0.001616984,0.0005921305,0.0003171611,0.001914687,0.001086078],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001805085,0.00002294913,0.002772573,0.00004107079,0.000006792872,0.0001815584,0.0322727,0.0001788678,0.0001053072,0.9469856,0.002914089,0.01450054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002954749,0.00008243683,0.08785867,0.001990695,0.00008517257,0.0005852979,0.2655421,0.001027615,0.0006924439,0.1539716,0.4879142,0.0002202067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1819883,0.01700059,0.002922375,0.03679611,0.0003830986,0.00006238627,0.000154304,0.00002594229,0.760667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849498,0.002830202,0.000533996,0.002652395,0.00003940089,0.00001526078,0.00003121714,0.000008336689,0.008939234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09261608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4570991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}