{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":187,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":187,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"84d431f4d265","filters":{"topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination"}},"results":[{"id":"W4250679855","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490330","title":"Multicultural Jurisdictions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":507,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Autonomy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Normative; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Corporate governance; Environmental ethics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02390936068418642,"gpt":0.2440911941023104,"spread":0.2201818334181239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009925772,0.0002044401,0.0002187109,0.0001384704,0.0008898031,0.00008766024,0.0004336696,0.0004362788,0.000007959563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002931384,0.0002332932,0.000205312,0.00002329936,0.0005346829,0.0001342443,0.0001023297,0.0002947629,0.00004588786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007067528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004664432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008475131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003977022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987251,0.0001166624,0.0001268659,0.0003263556,0.00038745,0.0003175533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999078,0.0000659492,0.0001466003,0.0002487399,0.000250184,0.0002105321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009411813,0.000008610344,8.806387e-7,0.000009907605,0.00002498172,0.00005219552,0.001261761,0.000001224229,0.000003078351,0.5158191,0.4824412,0.0003677111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003240301,0.00001524853,0.00001208954,0.00005055899,0.0001742571,0.000002812602,0.001034246,0.00001134581,0.00000878443,0.00002765898,0.9980628,0.0002761913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004313992,0.000118825,0.0001167018,0.00005793112,0.0006052369,0.0003961413,0.00008753692,0.0002631101,0.9983114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001351787,0.0005373566,0.0000480133,0.0000433741,0.0006008012,0.000001117219,0.00009942284,0.00001832983,0.9972998],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5157914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535705846","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199253623.001.0001","title":"Religious Freedom in the Liberal State","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Religious persecution; Religious freedom; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Autonomy; Freedom of religion; Convention; Religious identity; Persecution; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01698543093061049,"gpt":0.287088133275967,"spread":0.2701027023453565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000876716,0.000183458,0.0002068338,0.000147168,0.0002104993,0.0001909562,0.0006508844,0.0002867318,0.0002055216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007407072,0.0001275399,0.0001236261,0.0001304802,0.0003282599,0.0001212839,0.00003493574,0.0003408069,0.0004522297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003032366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007438581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01465855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1311046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981592,0.0001822708,0.0002988386,0.0002621803,0.0007358954,0.0003616637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992489,0.0002082919,0.0001211545,0.0002853725,0.00007151979,0.00006478505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004025902,0.00001890649,0.00001761699,0.000004566455,0.000004208705,0.00001357639,0.01639249,0.00002435907,1.298892e-7,0.1783369,0.8005788,0.004604387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001694759,0.00002078064,0.00005767256,0.00002600116,0.0000133239,0.000001123336,0.0007154714,0.00001115521,2.324549e-7,0.2384549,0.760353,0.0001768786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000622951,0.00115932,0.00002777873,0.003363402,0.0003964804,0.0004815318,0.000007747632,0.00008815907,0.9944133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004644732,0.004508463,0.0001399864,0.001221157,0.00131765,0.00002508158,0.00003763313,0.00002190281,0.9880834],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.116446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W574873243","doi":"10.1093/0198297467.001.0001","title":"The Ethics of Nationalism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Argument (complex analysis); Denial; Politics; Political science; Secession; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05553455680622035,"gpt":0.3655998987856322,"spread":0.3100653419794119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001167115,0.00005377857,0.00007441422,0.00003311519,0.0004855516,0.00003772675,0.000245218,0.0003411128,0.0001908028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006249054,0.00003574766,0.0000674474,0.00004850956,0.0004849835,0.00003041629,0.00001632231,0.0002126381,0.00004170172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009061962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001372493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003346606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01979071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988714,0.00009601182,0.0001473356,0.00007616867,0.000716017,0.00009302716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984444,0.0009239853,0.0001265843,0.0001037828,0.0003738023,0.00002741373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.696108e-7,0.000002079664,0.000001186433,0.000003104652,0.000004031805,1.596866e-7,0.001634954,3.431378e-7,1.242859e-7,0.6732248,0.3238135,0.001315111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001745164,0.000002700245,0.000004116634,0.000008371887,0.00000580635,7.024655e-8,0.0002995866,8.317967e-7,8.112195e-7,0.4460709,0.5535623,0.00002705321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[5.310405e-7,0.0005414873,0.0001301594,0.007785235,0.0003883182,0.0001110768,0.000003120047,0.00002108201,0.991019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006821093,0.005368202,0.00004450501,0.0002213418,0.0003999665,0.000003478761,0.00001667484,0.000005626246,0.9932581],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2297488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505143777","doi":"","title":"Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?: Susan Moller Okin with Respondents","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02843794178208949,"gpt":0.308119923631044,"spread":0.2796819818489545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003227133,0.0001555,0.0002182241,0.0001343348,0.001117583,0.00009634397,0.000189789,0.00007439615,0.0008444324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001216332,0.0001228916,0.00004172362,0.0002937453,0.0003513408,0.0001700332,0.000009340958,0.0000549719,0.00007467243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001511679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003392778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02210717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2528075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984031,0.00006213249,0.0001515596,0.0002759911,0.0002818918,0.0008252877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990203,0.00008341501,0.00004321877,0.0001428476,0.0002344731,0.0004757861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001753835,0.00003546178,0.001447061,0.00004509735,0.0002821761,0.00003012568,0.8918622,0.00001683617,0.00002049774,0.01150673,0.09025691,0.004321588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001327551,0.0002115333,0.002080583,0.00003831095,0.00002479189,0.000001243147,0.5669311,0.00000754027,0.0000258787,0.01447722,0.4144505,0.0004237719],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9243435,0.0002335421,4.794835e-7,0.002655015,0.0001881169,0.0004806845,0.00005629479,0.0000398227,0.0720025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8885792,0.0003695906,0.00006259109,0.001792961,0.0001669235,0.0004128824,0.000005278158,0.00001377885,0.1085968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3249311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121641526","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1198","title":"Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Dignity; Religious law; Family law; Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Arbitration; Allegiance; Sociology; Israeli law; Identity (music); Religious identity; Political science; Private sphere; Public sphere; Private law; Islam; Public law; Religiosity; Black letter law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03512001175155976,"gpt":0.2922466806274343,"spread":0.2571266688758745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004617331,0.0001120975,0.0001795007,0.00007009623,0.0006341783,0.00004144178,0.0002474965,0.0001797122,0.0000629087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002087498,0.0001155467,0.00004701713,0.0002894444,0.03654731,0.0003394243,0.0001779971,0.0001894934,0.00003805052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001871475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007543706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01709482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984608,0.0002702133,0.00026828,0.0002555484,0.000435638,0.0003095329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993087,0.0003400088,0.00004878557,0.0001667046,0.00005523537,0.00008054156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005042085,0.00007488431,0.00323561,0.000003161753,0.000003102512,0.00006096993,0.03407885,0.00001681309,0.0001184037,0.9618624,0.0004403615,0.0000549938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004056936,0.00003630471,0.00101642,0.00003455585,0.000007433896,0.00000165863,0.004144544,0.0001132292,0.000187547,0.9930705,0.0008242935,0.0001577479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.615597,0.0002767264,0.004437005,0.0009747769,0.000274736,0.0002330789,0.000008012996,0.00008409291,0.3781146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974152,0.000325422,0.0004395943,0.001578572,0.0001613519,0.00001301045,0.00002593489,0.000008585883,0.00003227952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3818183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555603385","doi":"","title":"Religious Arbitration in Canada: Protecting Women by Protecting Them from Religion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02237862211624735,"gpt":0.2173995701327661,"spread":0.1950209480165188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004827992,0.0001902483,0.0002238168,0.001715532,0.001008864,0.00004637288,0.0003345043,0.0001515039,0.00001283929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004269181,0.0002188087,0.00005306656,0.004475994,0.0001017942,0.0004598967,0.00006221551,0.0004454482,0.000009973672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00374555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004023301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997729,0.0005112453,0.0002446217,0.0004501275,0.0005075485,0.0005574788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991505,0.0001832858,0.0002152045,0.0002076794,0.0001262736,0.0001170391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008871768,0.0005986763,0.05407416,0.0001241335,0.0001448522,0.001294994,0.8816977,0.0002666326,0.0009020359,0.007146281,0.01051672,0.04234669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001927922,0.00011508,0.0006932134,0.0001311548,0.00002776084,0.00001039831,0.06421079,0.0003741852,0.002295135,0.000185982,0.929251,0.000777414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6413398,0.000003870194,0.0002311909,0.0001925736,0.0001172663,0.0008748244,0.000009998589,0.0001193108,0.3571111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726005,0.02682061,0.0002574556,0.0001126501,0.0001118343,0.00002243909,0.00001606482,0.00001956334,0.00003894701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9187343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983103512","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqs031","title":"Britain's Religious Tribunals: 'Joint Governance' in Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Transformative learning; Accommodation; Law; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Tribunal; Political science; Corporate governance; Archbishop; Theology; Philosophy; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04716112217424531,"gpt":0.3697377755753037,"spread":0.3225766534010585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003052586,0.000108621,0.000326946,0.00008819318,0.0002546164,0.00007180661,0.0001696478,0.00005356611,0.000008036486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005254023,0.00008854563,0.0001296125,0.0002911636,0.0002120738,0.00148244,0.00004617517,0.0002424683,0.000006888739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004162433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001676473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003290171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001939481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998021,0.0002614572,0.0005377957,0.00008359231,0.000694208,0.0004019379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982443,0.0003706953,0.0006380781,0.00007481623,0.0005452242,0.0001269128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004592878,0.0008753174,0.03013546,0.00006249407,0.0004495502,0.0002949347,0.1256784,0.00006191983,0.0000846576,0.5685557,0.2285011,0.04484125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008846524,0.000202729,0.007429712,0.0001471815,0.0001079691,0.00008550662,0.05681543,0.000001043029,0.00006249764,0.01144486,0.9226431,0.0001752629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2074613,0.1954464,0.0001739422,0.03523869,0.003430165,0.0003174811,0.000004099293,0.00003289478,0.5578949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916918,0.08060224,0.000703284,0.0004194437,0.0009155806,0.000003447205,1.764939e-7,0.000007426097,0.0004304434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7094566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6289936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202991644","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139104173","title":"Religion, Charity and Human Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Legislation; Abortion; Common law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01852007917386077,"gpt":0.2390484346642779,"spread":0.2205283554904171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002773625,0.000220427,0.0002928108,0.0001518616,0.001479813,0.00009405731,0.0004075821,0.0004901857,0.0000021741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001453222,0.0002551256,0.0001112852,0.00001291733,0.0008018665,0.00009889506,0.0001594654,0.0002819685,0.00001222214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002954404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001741697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03068708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00182656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986033,0.0001755236,0.0001410742,0.0004297051,0.0003665992,0.0002837935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990122,0.00006913709,0.0001895265,0.0003062584,0.0001901214,0.0002327529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006036185,0.000004513404,0.000003892932,0.00002747078,0.00001274865,0.00001748526,0.0002633145,3.982917e-8,0.000002785543,0.6144735,0.3851134,0.00007479525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003297025,0.00003231808,0.00004143702,0.00008321243,0.000126565,0.000001494125,0.00004421944,0.000002509787,0.00001876634,0.00199893,0.997016,0.0003049186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004452792,0.000100624,0.0001037571,0.00003761609,0.0002424069,0.0003553047,0.0000327532,0.0001598959,0.9985223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01212866,0.00009044835,0.00001970123,0.00005181838,0.0004320925,7.011676e-7,0.00005830072,0.00001546462,0.9872028],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6124746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115370753","doi":"10.1017/s0008197313000718","title":"THE GOD “DILUTION”? RELIGION, DISCRIMINATION AND THE CASE FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Duty; Normative; Reasonable accommodation; Disadvantage; Compromise; Religious discrimination; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Proportionality (law); Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01498341944532739,"gpt":0.2772541085213401,"spread":0.2622706890760127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034019,0.00009492484,0.00009811346,0.00002095577,0.008375708,0.001058863,0.0003073923,0.0000563122,0.000008026854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005167435,0.00004201744,0.00009005895,0.0001185413,0.0009118352,0.0005613694,0.00004147933,0.0001829257,0.00001307769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009961161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006497329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04144673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01658249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985365,0.0005156606,0.0002663932,0.0001097717,0.000286773,0.0002848738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981439,0.0009221359,0.0002348686,0.0001973155,0.0004175477,0.00008425769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003977392,0.000008901198,0.00001587651,0.000003008839,0.00001146284,0.000002395515,0.002088525,0.000009367517,0.00001099828,0.9001665,0.08682735,0.01081585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002680462,0.00008554404,0.001549615,0.00004341908,0.0002225235,0.001502722,0.03677394,0.004740483,0.00007427031,0.7772967,0.1747735,0.0002568936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1459497,0.005610839,0.01259951,0.4755689,0.002363766,0.003873705,0.00002183925,0.0001131888,0.3538985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946193,0.002049754,0.00009024959,0.0006276245,0.0007491731,0.0001165411,0.000005191439,0.000009947074,0.001732186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8486696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484722975","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.003.0008","title":"Citizenship and the Challenge of Aboriginal Self‐Government: Is Deep Diversity Desirable?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Government (linguistics); Politics; Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Cultural assimilation; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02160400461130546,"gpt":0.2521623147136131,"spread":0.2305583101023076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000556054,0.0001585942,0.0002537428,0.00003068464,0.0006895448,0.00004069101,0.0002685924,0.0002406699,0.001903714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001250321,0.0001138219,0.0001166796,0.00002207504,0.0007182221,0.00005767596,0.00008144332,0.0001396353,0.00003151461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009907728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006702484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002405111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001491558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984742,0.000054203,0.0001772792,0.0002300194,0.0008736018,0.0001907298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993528,0.0001672174,0.0001568672,0.0001769864,0.00006897601,0.00007713649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005156028,0.000008445568,0.00005696072,0.00001915385,0.00005251005,0.000002332466,0.01306263,1.518131e-7,6.496079e-8,0.979201,0.00442123,0.003123971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006937638,0.00003666953,0.00006742543,0.00003326566,0.0001919811,5.667657e-7,0.0007566219,0.0000107165,0.000003884901,0.9557738,0.04225802,0.0001733059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001336908,0.001400227,0.00003686323,0.001270874,0.00008714281,0.0002879958,0.00001947079,0.0000366091,0.9967271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4748547,0.04496096,0.0001052751,0.0003227286,0.0002320154,0.000002301991,0.000003158236,0.00001547874,0.4795034],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5172238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063112049","doi":"10.7202/1008034ar","title":"Nationalism, Secularism and Liberal Neutrality: The Danish Case of Judges and Religious Symbols","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Neutrality; Nationalism; Law; Parliament; Political science; Danish; Politics; Islam; Separation of church and state; Mainstream; Legislation; State (computer science); Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.018456475609155,"gpt":0.3012128706937708,"spread":0.2827563950846158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001005837,0.00008305386,0.0001085267,0.00003709852,0.000368616,0.00007408936,0.00008741612,0.0001839668,0.000006448944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001918733,0.00006541182,0.00003597264,0.00009498575,0.0004688667,0.0001758343,0.00003875345,0.000148659,0.000001048586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000467765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005115564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01364655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00242147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990603,0.000279229,0.0001504929,0.0001170675,0.0001577276,0.0002352288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994375,0.0001711496,0.00008034462,0.0001046705,0.00008498251,0.000121323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001066223,0.00002758137,0.02430693,0.00004110315,0.0000266858,0.00003370654,0.09390648,0.000008108397,0.0002904798,0.8736605,0.004966402,0.002721324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001150328,0.0001206672,0.04912915,0.00008410404,0.000257797,0.001518346,0.08670497,0.0002638517,0.002394067,0.840073,0.01758067,0.0007230857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635361,0.003124909,0.0001540293,0.005142635,0.000103316,0.0002219368,0.000006931397,0.00003352607,0.02767656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966394,0.001613531,0.000316199,0.001088219,0.0001562067,0.00001369388,0.000004089547,0.000008570601,0.0001601334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03358756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152695323","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778937","title":"Liberalism, Group Rights and the Boundaries of Toleration: The Case of Minority Religious Schools in Ontario","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Public administration; Toleration; Flourishing; Political science; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Liberalism; Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01502355644404245,"gpt":0.2673116232092028,"spread":0.2522880667651603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002723606,0.00005201035,0.0001408832,0.0001190945,0.0008042296,0.0002436901,0.0002674942,0.0000404971,0.00002408969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001379307,0.00002936387,0.00004257433,0.0003355508,0.006688514,0.0002856675,0.000007801592,0.000183204,3.968567e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003717365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006136157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9825777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987217,0.000222926,0.000320246,0.00008158886,0.0002841984,0.0003693777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987962,0.000196662,0.0001284706,0.0001036868,0.0002944803,0.000480529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004898942,0.00000554596,0.006328449,0.000001905305,0.000001600074,0.00005974074,0.01187052,0.000001810139,0.000005709284,0.9813501,0.0003156503,0.00005404036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006837654,0.00008978924,0.05280599,0.00004124781,0.0000282963,0.0005001932,0.009042749,0.00001636976,0.0001837358,0.9319423,0.004576439,0.00008911533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9593042,0.0002927275,0.00002824107,0.003963584,0.0002692236,0.0001085773,0.000002090374,7.819278e-7,0.03603065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995383,0.000004239596,0.0001340744,0.0001840129,0.0000436487,8.404001e-7,6.39084e-8,9.092341e-7,0.00009388832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04940782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W269282748","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.003.0020","title":"Homophobic Speech, Equality Denial, and Religious Expression","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Convention; Denial; Sexual orientation; Freedom of expression; Punishment (psychology); Immigration; Political science; Legislation; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Gender studies; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02924679277733437,"gpt":0.3004910290392545,"spread":0.2712442362619201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004717116,0.0002518363,0.0003146932,0.0001278897,0.0004054227,0.0001593908,0.0002228172,0.0006030282,0.0003698022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000721128,0.000225381,0.0001199017,0.0000308407,0.0003416511,0.0001268528,0.00006372937,0.0002149547,0.0001752023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001107038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001584562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005957656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005354058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982843,0.00005969624,0.0003170449,0.0004345474,0.0006300162,0.0002743259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991027,0.00009116023,0.0001905977,0.0002860404,0.000129023,0.0002005063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001841018,0.0000176784,0.0000107932,0.00002048196,0.000007770634,0.00002441205,0.002246281,1.852252e-7,0.0001446209,0.8093249,0.1317681,0.05641634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001912167,0.00005326971,0.00001663816,0.0001033375,0.00003902995,0.000004049494,0.0002179901,9.792958e-7,0.0001474906,0.6341617,0.3647341,0.0003302804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002528411,0.00248763,0.00007912036,0.0006044876,0.0003029596,0.0003495125,0.000006487766,0.0001837488,0.9957332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05496987,0.01577744,0.0007889362,0.0004377328,0.0006926791,0.000004132609,0.00002493647,0.00002908496,0.9272752],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2329659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.919077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972761749","doi":"10.5040/9781509911400","title":"Religion, Equality and Employment in Europe","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing Ltd eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Labour economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05163308555306596,"gpt":0.3113290036416802,"spread":0.2596959180886143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00305424,0.0002617288,0.0003745589,0.0002603887,0.0007876583,0.004509055,0.0007984812,0.0005467097,0.0000244965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002045856,0.0002687143,0.00007384831,0.00004465461,0.000534637,0.001027083,0.0002808533,0.0005982678,0.00004750431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003408911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00138451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02976073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04738284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974178,0.0002981517,0.0004473964,0.000569083,0.0007978816,0.000469686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982114,0.0001485512,0.0004301665,0.0005652377,0.0004125252,0.0002321233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000638117,0.000009818243,0.0001777035,0.00003255908,0.000007657405,0.00001602969,0.00546234,1.417539e-7,0.000002836713,0.4635687,0.5231118,0.007604095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002545776,0.00001875737,0.0003767335,0.000251122,0.0000207511,0.000001204577,0.0001144236,0.000001258011,0.00000402673,0.1551278,0.8435528,0.000276558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001674837,0.0005630534,0.00002081536,0.002431863,0.000782148,0.000423315,0.00001881725,0.0001338943,0.9954586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013789,0.0004400798,0.00005173659,0.0006606231,0.0009069318,0.00002950493,0.00008593072,0.00004479881,0.9839914],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3204411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587867489","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1271","title":"In the (Canadian) Shadow of Islamic Law: Translating Mahr as a Bargaining Endowment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation; Canadian Bar Association; McGill University","keywords":"Islam; Shadow (psychology); Multiculturalism; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law; Ideology; Negotiation; Sharia; Law and economics; Plural; Pluralism (philosophy); Institution; Endowment; Narrative; Political science; Comparative law; Legal realism; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01803040669789701,"gpt":0.2828372173223689,"spread":0.2648068106244719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001411405,0.00008766045,0.0001267187,0.0000808069,0.0009998454,0.0002027998,0.0003008913,0.00008500583,0.0001343297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003462185,0.00006912347,0.00009086866,0.0001602722,0.0002025487,0.0002845069,0.000006216686,0.0002489977,0.00001314296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001643938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002313314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984173,0.0002701601,0.0003243892,0.0001070314,0.0005172752,0.0003638746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995512,0.00008502454,0.0001371623,0.00008748024,0.00007141494,0.00006771231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000447923,0.00002923533,0.0002513095,0.000002880103,0.000004540412,0.00003714336,0.007490158,0.0001344192,0.0001561954,0.9908828,0.0003758782,0.0006310259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003878193,0.00003596412,0.0002612447,0.00004110584,0.00001415859,0.00003842475,0.003986953,0.00005888388,0.0001158881,0.9946805,0.0002976701,0.00008144876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005618402,0.0003010297,0.00008011843,0.002621875,0.0001329502,0.0001357343,0.000003319929,0.000007182823,0.996156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983703,0.00004290758,0.0004081334,0.0006713916,0.0003140744,0.00000485902,0.000002523927,0.000008013123,0.0001778283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7690104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2338100904","doi":"10.17645/si.v4i2.504","title":"Living Together v. Living Well Together: A Normative Examination of the SAS Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Inclusion","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Normative; Sociology; Oppression; Law; Mantra; Sincerity; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01970681895293581,"gpt":0.293381878033851,"spread":0.2736750590809152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001856885,0.0000970055,0.0001246959,0.00006084918,0.002534671,0.00002802513,0.0002496241,0.0001608225,0.0002772359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007972327,0.0000601605,0.0001133315,0.0002853817,0.0003731976,0.0003007557,0.0006475947,0.00007565125,0.00002586313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000269124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001057924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01193993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0196138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979563,0.0009150022,0.0002288868,0.0001502587,0.000531849,0.0002176845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987174,0.0006529915,0.0002474426,0.0001226945,0.0002161423,0.00004328206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007784108,0.0001287643,0.003803961,0.00002248042,0.00001528537,0.000007350945,0.8016039,0.000001363334,0.008036967,0.0471277,0.001301702,0.1379427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002187027,0.0004349846,0.1980641,0.003111279,0.0003746914,0.00005982963,0.573943,0.0003526328,0.01130795,0.179893,0.02818432,0.002087139],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8056101,0.00007947391,0.0005911266,0.001687534,0.0004169085,0.0002892771,0.000005701811,0.00004944588,0.1912704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966992,0.00005947968,0.00004780158,0.0001232024,0.0003747239,0.00001009696,3.421576e-7,0.00001193276,0.002673257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2276609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297473546","doi":"","title":"Arbitration, Religion and Family Law: Private Justice on the Backs of Women","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Private law; Family law; Business; Public law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01831861055776163,"gpt":0.280770204734995,"spread":0.2624515941772333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004785033,0.00004444613,0.00005731816,0.00002036005,0.0002500078,0.00003914257,0.00008682175,0.00004201,0.00002542166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001215571,0.00002893838,0.00001494854,0.00008591398,0.0001844631,0.0001079094,0.00001081298,0.0000398681,0.00001981063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004383832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000325221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003538179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001681152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993758,0.00006727591,0.0001164142,0.0000896021,0.0002105339,0.0001403356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996306,0.0001371007,0.00004842299,0.00009191693,0.00004386651,0.0000480796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007941545,0.00001851642,0.00004481822,0.000003847394,0.000002236797,7.357836e-8,0.007217149,0.000007491203,0.0008586661,0.986454,0.004698753,0.0006865303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009875508,0.0003843867,0.006957385,0.00006035844,0.00008404945,9.059406e-7,0.03839364,0.0004678977,0.008409714,0.7326826,0.2111527,0.0004188188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4003844,0.00005070553,0.0001295124,0.003043904,0.00004159315,0.00009595633,3.71756e-7,0.00001816866,0.5962354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949453,0.0004895987,0.0002916585,0.003409449,0.0001245844,0.000008282722,6.918645e-7,0.000002919331,0.000727538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5955079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5348691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055456844","doi":"10.1017/cls.2013.62","title":"Prejudice Unveiled: The Niqab in Court–","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Multiculturalism; Political science; Prejudice (legal term); Mythology; Islam; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01315429693479495,"gpt":0.2600701568674619,"spread":0.246915859932667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002780484,0.0001199259,0.000260284,0.0000634784,0.0007977591,0.0001623681,0.0003585232,0.0001727435,0.00005370181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003882833,0.0001086637,0.0001866103,0.000227437,0.0007288338,0.0002644678,0.00001076222,0.0003863292,0.000002244537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000647784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001204896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5406985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9751526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985462,0.0002492697,0.0003444374,0.0001532646,0.0001390328,0.0005678089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982152,0.0003185911,0.0002220804,0.0001480749,0.0002396192,0.0008564412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002935663,0.000007021304,0.0008075173,0.00001782311,0.00002596738,0.00001842598,0.1120457,0.00003209321,0.000007089816,0.8761649,0.008638108,0.002232415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001727969,0.0002094689,0.009877697,0.0002688673,0.0001323039,0.0001143404,0.1833391,0.0004715745,0.00001077907,0.2838367,0.5194632,0.0005479189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6389857,0.001332582,0.0001923155,0.02112767,0.001218394,0.0002907131,0.00002062134,0.00001176872,0.3368202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929903,0.0004850983,0.00008136733,0.004939604,0.0004697954,0.000004380855,0.00000267138,0.00001435644,0.001012487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5923281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6135799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105475502","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-41821-6_30","title":"Faith in Law? Diffusing Tensions Between Diversity and Equality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Philosophy and politics","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Faith; Obligation; Separation of church and state; Realm; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1152971104085233,"gpt":0.3132011160626318,"spread":0.1979040056541085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002234378,0.0001464521,0.0002402003,0.00008498394,0.001140266,0.00003350513,0.00008829038,0.000276678,0.00001337425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004089994,0.0001282505,0.00004438958,0.00001521271,0.001037836,0.0001038638,0.0002928537,0.0001526495,0.000006426286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006957461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004144822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005863016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009553459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990991,0.0000503908,0.0001678155,0.0002205196,0.0002339851,0.0002281762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993473,0.0002157645,0.00008641706,0.0001136423,0.00006042904,0.0001765022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001924839,0.000005481679,0.003215763,0.00002718998,0.0000090293,0.000003535215,0.003892924,1.239327e-8,2.711724e-7,0.9924054,0.00004461225,0.0003938965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002056236,0.00001761107,0.001287841,0.0001374846,0.00005660156,4.545593e-7,0.00007572364,3.484735e-7,6.01544e-7,0.9846358,0.01340417,0.0001777632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006197526,0.0003657164,0.00002124658,0.002530541,0.0001021892,0.0001384851,0.0001520433,0.00002603116,0.9904662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812217,0.0007371693,0.00001882775,0.0003548858,0.0009720069,6.283207e-7,0.00001038521,0.00001030554,0.0166741],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8863167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788678691","doi":"","title":"The Religion Clauses of the New Zealand Bill of Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Human rights; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01682139988986197,"gpt":0.2859575613368566,"spread":0.2691361614469946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012601,0.00004611743,0.0001077458,0.00009757863,0.0005536765,0.00001033864,0.0005112572,0.00007605592,0.00002161091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002027693,0.00002722712,0.00009400515,0.0004671039,0.0009368524,0.0001008177,0.00009583192,0.00009840952,0.000004319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004749777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002495584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2820521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2287979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987424,0.0001624141,0.00009047058,0.0000961833,0.0006860038,0.0002225012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988542,0.0004317054,0.0001507538,0.0002267412,0.0002425996,0.000093951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007728678,0.0001457233,0.05478901,0.00004324324,0.00008461436,0.000009032073,0.05903698,0.00002742841,0.003286471,0.2380859,0.638285,0.005433666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002582735,0.0004715997,0.1912302,0.0002595671,0.00009529237,0.000001970438,0.05991406,0.00007075699,0.007863746,0.2574933,0.4797375,0.0002792966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8528736,0.0005671594,0.0003699534,0.02129096,0.0001713794,0.0004212447,0.000008252164,0.00002179535,0.1242757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791253,0.001340909,0.00008446199,0.000004115022,0.00003647736,2.815938e-8,7.879784e-7,0.000002413905,0.01940557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1585476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7852746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586913609","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.383","title":"THE PROHIBITION OF THE MUSLIM HEADSCARF: CONTRASTING INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES IN POLICY AND LAW","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Law; Secularity; Politics; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Political science; Oppression; Sociology; Immigration; Human rights","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05462743661749307,"gpt":0.3140624902249177,"spread":0.2594350536074246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002569821,0.0000480609,0.00005787886,0.00002277095,0.001418299,0.0001526053,0.0002419682,0.00003320785,0.000002563322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003318396,0.00002343178,0.00003940554,0.0001062854,0.00058163,0.000231687,0.00004459632,0.0001811516,6.00494e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007305739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004553969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007141264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008501899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989571,0.0003071974,0.0001779493,0.00004436811,0.0003040191,0.0002093496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994003,0.00027318,0.0001683222,0.00006295413,0.0000545676,0.00004073106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008942824,0.00001593703,0.003858648,0.000001785587,0.000008428777,1.902905e-7,0.02753615,0.00003055093,0.0001323662,0.9652497,0.00007858984,0.003078663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00279298,0.00009937792,0.1642259,0.0006480556,0.0001317342,0.0003987276,0.2762341,0.002479855,0.00258977,0.5267044,0.02319545,0.0004995744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6179782,0.0008652603,0.0001852068,0.01498363,0.000878899,0.0002406607,0.00000174805,0.00001192094,0.3648545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987188,0.00008597858,0.00003614407,0.0001770614,0.0008836855,0.000003874783,3.083351e-7,0.00000407739,0.00009010143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4385453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125280111","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006219","title":"The Anglican Covenant Proposed by the Lambeth Commission","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Commission; Autonomy; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Term (time); Sociology; Theology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0124212563372787,"gpt":0.2969896724442739,"spread":0.2845684161069952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001589627,0.00008576108,0.00008938795,0.00001101338,0.004512066,0.0004655435,0.0004338321,0.00006961484,0.0001079866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004505281,0.00003942138,0.0000793096,0.000107688,0.0008958129,0.000145408,0.00003400875,0.0003517348,0.00005169997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001103304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001140442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001379553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006243651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982191,0.0004205557,0.0002379638,0.00009931982,0.0006431658,0.0003798453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988839,0.0005209741,0.00009802359,0.0001319893,0.000116501,0.0002486385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003065179,0.00006214322,0.00004322907,8.323627e-7,0.000008024173,0.000005747313,0.001511152,0.00001107781,0.0001325946,0.8546433,0.1033717,0.04017963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003685576,0.0000801908,0.0003646573,0.00002051175,0.00002727939,0.00005203041,0.003134312,0.0004215009,0.0003272034,0.05093526,0.9441536,0.0001148844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007325934,0.001046736,0.004740687,0.1241285,0.0006039201,0.0003307634,0.000007326462,0.00006907617,0.861747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965502,0.0002163536,0.0001925798,0.0006016448,0.001053044,0.000002388075,0.000001059282,0.000008478814,0.001374268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123793050","doi":"","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sharia; Framing (construction); Arbitration; Law; Islam; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01674414092716521,"gpt":0.2733536071429327,"spread":0.2566094662157675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007114862,0.00009387119,0.00008980773,0.00002753311,0.001068647,0.0003482763,0.0002724365,0.0001024541,0.000240397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000163587,0.00007243108,0.00006772066,0.0002158654,0.0002128809,0.0003663366,0.00002477703,0.0001465994,0.000320955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008617531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009450299,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1066609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1884639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987487,0.0001611161,0.0002032152,0.0001974997,0.0004024907,0.0002870329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994199,0.0001066217,0.00008938319,0.0002183397,0.00009003966,0.00007572587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005480773,0.00002411648,0.001156289,0.000003795245,0.000003958063,0.000002944966,0.001071656,0.00005817644,0.0004677002,0.9763926,0.02026158,0.0005516534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006879108,0.00004981957,0.01420471,0.00004865262,0.00006344463,0.000001850388,0.005536222,0.0004173479,0.00183188,0.6535922,0.3231136,0.0004524505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0721548,0.0004911385,0.0006781795,0.00465024,0.0005638177,0.0002924742,0.000003246422,0.000158061,0.9210081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921981,0.000045774,0.0002754601,0.001169601,0.001003816,0.00002599149,0.00001661529,0.0000106403,0.005253982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9200433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8992879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756108888","doi":"10.1177/0191453709358834","title":"Faith in law?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Separation of church and state; Citizenship; Obligation; Faith; Sociology; Realm; Politics; State (computer science); Secular state; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02785350278673347,"gpt":0.3378942874117365,"spread":0.310040784625003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004351255,0.00009994024,0.0001481574,0.00007509105,0.0006638728,0.00009160096,0.0002361275,0.0001847572,0.0001590261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001896398,0.0001102179,0.00008707261,0.0002269242,0.0008982094,0.0002607089,0.00002740017,0.0002988269,0.0001091163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005080564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000852064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008866644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02143683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987589,0.0001050307,0.0001892111,0.0002007565,0.0003920455,0.0003541068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995678,0.00008725337,0.00003641822,0.00009966619,0.0001088049,0.0001000354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004797621,0.00007011473,0.0002454207,0.000007437819,0.000002016847,0.000007888382,0.01230282,7.45899e-8,0.0004905825,0.9851789,0.0008690901,0.0008208138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002879348,0.00001267952,0.001331566,0.000005796749,0.000008138875,4.054242e-7,0.001383307,0.000002757573,0.00009222545,0.9828141,0.01391204,0.0001490636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07162689,0.0000446381,0.00002615392,0.02475018,0.0008668331,0.0001741235,0.000006775062,0.00009748447,0.9024069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995517,0.00001248387,0.0001297979,0.001530839,0.002461356,0.00002648991,0.000004559229,0.00001387328,0.0003036684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9238901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488097330","doi":"10.21991/c9s67t","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Sharia; Religious freedom; Nothing; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Human rights; Hatred; Freedom of religion; Islam; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04711717255424792,"gpt":0.2850996094726049,"spread":0.237982436918357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008937349,0.0002483565,0.0002048024,0.0001683901,0.004307307,0.0001982021,0.0005542588,0.0002352041,0.0006823946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008133965,0.0002012739,0.0002027661,0.0004699711,0.007776425,0.001012841,0.0001011013,0.0002751907,0.0004298301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002456353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001732095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004328762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0104608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997505,0.0001715209,0.0004993498,0.0004238566,0.0006737836,0.0007264911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986072,0.0001881853,0.0002149149,0.000361302,0.000412025,0.0002163286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003502,0.00007702124,0.005961847,0.000006059779,0.00003472312,0.00001254938,0.002060354,0.00005635266,0.00006810284,0.9820347,0.00867994,0.0009732982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001590546,0.00009132111,0.003127992,0.0001780538,0.000185019,0.00008053462,0.0428571,0.0008439582,0.0007648424,0.7470372,0.2023226,0.000920826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002597897,0.0006924177,0.1071026,0.007479957,0.002651039,0.0007568802,0.00004827305,0.0002918669,0.878379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953935,0.0001650408,0.001106313,0.002150892,0.000305896,0.00011013,0.00006420053,0.000008923374,0.0006951498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987627174","doi":"","title":"Theorizing Religions as Vestigial States in Relation to Gender and Law: Three Cases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Judaism; Interpretation (philosophy); German; Islam; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03046045040961023,"gpt":0.2639763899977235,"spread":0.2335159395881133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001998192,0.0001111598,0.0001136955,0.00274889,0.0004071792,0.0001168764,0.0001537342,0.0001014445,0.00002382034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002020271,0.0001182926,0.00003376869,0.002512041,0.0001717231,0.0006908773,0.00007774659,0.0001041995,0.00005844052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001962893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002232488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7997304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3636838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989899,0.0001450071,0.0001151848,0.0002656252,0.0002067233,0.000277603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994037,0.0001914081,0.00005249422,0.0001285933,0.0001053767,0.0001184335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005257804,0.00007052103,0.006046387,0.00001478003,0.00001488393,0.00007237668,0.06457285,0.00008045883,0.00002540429,0.9221565,0.0007894596,0.006103862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001337536,0.0002802398,0.01268003,0.00009088303,0.00007597841,0.00001073988,0.0327,0.000290611,0.00009459754,0.01256503,0.939249,0.0006253013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3954053,0.000003574701,0.000272259,0.000402558,0.00008086453,0.0004942824,0.000003357002,0.00007423449,0.6032636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984986,0.01423247,0.000483184,0.0001719388,0.00006423461,0.000005265248,0.000008275505,0.0000098559,0.00003878955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6479273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030039118","doi":"10.1177/002096430405800304","title":"The Righteousness of the Law and the Righteousness of Faith in Romans","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Righteousness; Faith; Philosophy; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004086506961347935,"gpt":0.2539976573047322,"spread":0.2499111503433842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001179155,0.00005277816,0.0001684207,0.00009923177,0.0002122707,0.00002877422,0.0002282263,0.00005453356,0.000006549869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001653573,0.00002242405,0.00006094092,0.0002259153,0.001778849,0.0001210683,0.00002916748,0.0001081769,2.690047e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001581754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008544807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003875495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01404531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989235,0.0004028974,0.0003467471,0.0000554036,0.0001760145,0.00009545827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987742,0.0005462768,0.0004057796,0.00008005926,0.000171784,0.00002185418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002410313,0.00002392643,0.0009004189,0.000007472143,0.00002163121,0.000001543333,0.03513449,0.0001056735,0.0001225632,0.9623286,0.00001812269,0.001094545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001619744,0.0001265083,0.003618945,0.0001030743,0.00004361085,0.00004173652,0.008935779,0.0001441616,0.001292605,0.9837455,0.0002849638,0.00004343239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321545,0.002358818,0.00226835,0.007848068,0.0004024931,0.000194148,0.000001385386,0.000002730978,0.05476953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987317,0.0009777969,0.00003352602,0.000176852,0.0000286367,0.000002255738,9.309997e-8,0.000002573011,0.00004658852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0665772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7837611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882741937","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139013789.011","title":"Political Liberalism, Islamic Family Law, and Family Law Pluralism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Israeli law; Sharia; Politics; Islam; Religious law; Comparative law; Sociology; Private law; Black letter law; Legal realism; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03349742383582321,"gpt":0.2330091172081155,"spread":0.1995116933722923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001766986,0.0003731034,0.0004205298,0.0001333904,0.0007446521,0.0001412454,0.0005174199,0.0007007469,0.000004998734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009600681,0.00043707,0.0002034974,0.00001009422,0.00234268,0.0002355263,0.0002817576,0.0003979612,0.00002527571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002697789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001736533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1074612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001037906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980555,0.0001173585,0.0002181824,0.0005706445,0.0004592072,0.0005791205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988067,0.00009364355,0.0001608249,0.0003847399,0.000226928,0.0003271973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003550942,0.000008987871,7.825793e-7,0.00002764591,0.00005046131,0.0001175196,0.001050492,3.953727e-8,0.00002628758,0.9773934,0.02110116,0.0001877078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005726726,0.00005211863,0.00002933761,0.0001162213,0.0002687897,0.000004810374,0.0007034122,0.000002598768,0.00003735891,0.02580021,0.9718144,0.0005981007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005270275,0.0003430255,0.00004990308,0.00009114176,0.0004313217,0.0004386461,0.0002092747,0.000208974,0.9977007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1039699,0.000284287,0.0000486099,0.00150997,0.0003102382,9.81018e-7,0.00004549992,0.00004424905,0.8937863],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798079748","doi":"10.4337/9781784719692.00005","title":"International and comparative perspectives on diversity management: an overview","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Sociology; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1082530803053345,"gpt":0.3245990219933776,"spread":0.2163459416880431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006193613,0.0002387217,0.0002513465,0.0002787469,0.0008368454,0.001165278,0.0006524823,0.0002645523,0.0002967739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006036027,0.0002136836,0.0001026176,0.00001527717,0.0004345239,0.001043877,0.000464339,0.0002770319,0.00005756196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003353734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005763791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007765763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001002461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981084,0.00008630229,0.0001785222,0.0005335783,0.0008615096,0.0002316877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990253,0.00009673611,0.0002089894,0.0002386898,0.0002549303,0.0001753693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002480602,0.00001423528,0.00001831661,0.00001272637,0.00009938586,0.000009934156,0.02913771,1.32412e-7,3.893685e-7,0.9321494,0.01490896,0.02362397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003937542,0.00005863485,0.0002050447,0.0002592588,0.00006143336,8.974068e-7,0.007737379,0.000002030532,0.000001330821,0.2778035,0.7131388,0.0003379042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009661997,0.0004758617,0.00003784259,0.001052505,0.0008434932,0.0003222497,0.00004973742,0.0001338694,0.9969878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1280286,0.002295077,0.0001987834,0.0003419747,0.001289786,0.000009474021,0.00003871309,0.00002587422,0.8677717],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6982298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008191152","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.33","title":"Reasonable Accommodation for Age","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; nobody; Reasonable accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Law; Scope (computer science); Opt-out; Conscience; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07395497734515308,"gpt":0.3298034589447745,"spread":0.2558484815996215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004690151,0.00005746245,0.0001189007,0.00004592528,0.0004249392,0.0001615623,0.0003393311,0.00006337072,0.00007295635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005432626,0.00005779777,0.00007843105,0.000141367,0.0001816893,0.0004197871,0.00000449496,0.00009122548,0.00001319103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001280484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001266649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06716219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2902209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991966,0.00005715508,0.0002097718,0.00008547815,0.0002131741,0.0002377598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987288,0.00007694343,0.0001576082,0.00006110899,0.00028238,0.0006931917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002008152,0.000006591732,0.0007613005,0.00001870141,0.00001065542,0.00007350466,0.01343048,0.00006857212,0.0001959269,0.9224501,0.05878151,0.004182609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004261913,0.0001757187,0.0008919695,0.00006708849,0.00004122878,0.000008331099,0.002048323,0.00007082274,0.0003422681,0.05200083,0.9437633,0.0001639878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09026112,0.004383723,0.02349762,0.1095589,0.002775812,0.001155743,0.00007756461,0.00006296868,0.7682265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960952,0.00006768297,0.001288826,0.001679208,0.0006091619,0.000002715993,0.000002678049,0.000007075652,0.0002474795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.905834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9390497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796386265","doi":"10.1017/lst.2017.11","title":"Autonomy and prenuptial agreements in Ireland: a relational analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Irish; Commission; Common law; Law; Equity (law); Injustice; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04825470394405566,"gpt":0.3693254662490878,"spread":0.3210707623050321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002505533,0.00004909844,0.0001103277,0.0001110773,0.0003210814,0.00003212829,0.00004361679,0.00003260435,0.00003073078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001320164,0.00004303932,0.00002902536,0.0003362504,0.00033503,0.0001553451,0.0000359118,0.00003464567,0.00001575355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008628468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004645404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06958288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993901,0.00005481876,0.0001160003,0.0001313585,0.0001817181,0.000125958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999764,0.00005445325,0.00003873793,0.00004244725,0.00007294941,0.00002737861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000328874,0.0000590171,0.6075492,0.00000749732,0.0005242285,0.000004829999,0.1123228,0.00002519041,0.00001095056,0.2687945,0.003815733,0.006853111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009138294,0.0001218331,0.888194,0.00002473741,0.0003587957,3.596064e-7,0.01402473,0.000485871,0.00001676333,0.03068774,0.06492013,0.00025117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7391748,0.001371205,0.0002389683,0.002032795,0.0002485339,0.0001525345,0.000002814894,0.00003093725,0.2567474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967987,0.0001801899,0.0002348205,0.00006138154,0.0002191944,0.00001178881,0.000002480563,0.000001611276,0.002489812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2806448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991718069","doi":"10.7202/1008036ar","title":"Beyond Objective and Subjective: Assessing the Legitimacy of Religious Claims to Accommodation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Reinterpretation; Argument (complex analysis); Disadvantage; Normative; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Accommodation; Law; Law and economics; Plaintiff; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01931340330095821,"gpt":0.3397695518732575,"spread":0.3204561485722993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001255359,0.00009575805,0.0001254502,0.0000813615,0.0004822252,0.0001095798,0.0001571648,0.0001563054,0.000007515659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004126775,0.00007709014,0.00004438967,0.0002553948,0.0002898526,0.0004235934,0.00004778245,0.000176797,0.000005754079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000187567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001151759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01155261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001528788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987776,0.0003748095,0.0001635565,0.0001395266,0.0002330978,0.0003113735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991598,0.0003132826,0.0001113408,0.0001348296,0.0001572469,0.0001234693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004742606,0.0001011115,0.1093971,0.00003686018,0.00004285589,0.000001960034,0.2435117,0.0001515729,0.004698545,0.6026491,0.003459726,0.03590208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006920812,0.0001494624,0.3487288,0.0001182823,0.0001241745,0.00001943716,0.1392362,0.0002355166,0.01295652,0.4927078,0.004449829,0.0005818548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7759162,0.0006769621,0.006459238,0.002274438,0.0002300349,0.000445723,0.000003409032,0.00005120438,0.2139428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974279,0.0003740819,0.001193152,0.0006562177,0.0002329969,0.00002940015,0.000003464861,0.00001183039,0.0000709386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2393317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599675491","doi":"","title":"Eweida v United Kingdom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Freedom of religion; Religious freedom; Kingdom; Law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Accommodation; Political science; Clothing; High Court; Sociology; History; Psychology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04548782921124649,"gpt":0.3187942160396319,"spread":0.2733063868283854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001071649,0.0000292274,0.00003168712,0.0000552537,0.0001814937,0.0000847679,0.00008889616,0.00003670009,0.002065704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008927481,0.00002364289,0.00001830197,0.0002075604,0.00007936181,0.0001509988,0.000009500371,0.00002302092,0.001113309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002032779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002607112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1749093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00363007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995665,0.00003840379,0.00005680228,0.00006213856,0.0001497223,0.0001264344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997393,0.00003539081,0.00001574301,0.00006036974,0.00008782525,0.00006132304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[2.964962e-7,0.000009372564,0.001580824,6.664222e-7,0.000001251511,1.912033e-7,0.001314541,0.00000129024,0.00009001316,0.906521,0.08783735,0.002643205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004049355,0.00003534365,0.01705132,0.000008683436,0.00001103402,4.241973e-7,0.01076635,0.0004348459,0.0004211892,0.3688203,0.6017793,0.0002662727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.160163,0.000007702939,0.0005823396,0.00288409,0.0001447272,0.0001048266,1.176715e-7,0.00009855561,0.8360147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836652,0.00001248966,0.0003803753,0.0005761497,0.0001061153,0.000009153083,0.00000277311,0.000002520057,0.01524518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8235023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1674632769","doi":"","title":"Faith Based Arbitration in Ontario","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Sharia; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Faith; Judaism; State (computer science); Dispute resolution; Islam; Alternative dispute resolution; History; Theology; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01212355817616679,"gpt":0.2645991035214753,"spread":0.2524755453453085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001763101,0.00006044296,0.00007060948,0.0001143659,0.0002465641,0.00007194484,0.0001330332,0.000063814,0.0001006486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005200175,0.00005745174,0.00004793439,0.0001318383,0.00004219356,0.0002976072,0.000003474782,0.0008096817,0.00002635066],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003198951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007118925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2314481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982978,0.0001002694,0.0001656247,0.00009385919,0.0002896411,0.001052843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997495,0.00002275668,0.00007141797,0.00005209192,0.00004985887,0.0000543624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003112678,0.00009416509,0.01513071,6.775287e-7,0.000007992085,0.000001598651,0.004759085,0.0004556287,0.0000693765,0.9537261,0.0003024502,0.02542106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001636042,0.000214359,0.01478053,0.00002222877,0.00002131865,0.00001886779,0.008001371,0.0005086467,0.0001071274,0.9449296,0.02949394,0.000265957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5605059,0.0009033148,0.008195872,0.008123484,0.0002670893,0.0002220383,3.063381e-7,0.00004603838,0.421736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956521,0.0004306072,0.0001739257,0.0002464717,0.0002775689,0.000003056379,0.00000214591,0.000005091706,0.003208974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7631023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257067675","doi":"","title":"Religion, State, and the Problem of Gender: Re-imagining Citizenship and Governance in Diverse Societies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Multiculturalism; Islam; Political science; Sociology; Arbitration; Tribunal; Gender studies; Law; State (computer science); Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01026718193761669,"gpt":0.2479797459274932,"spread":0.2377125639898765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002486534,0.00006816331,0.0001189234,0.00003238141,0.0003266161,0.00006607713,0.0001076617,0.00003857254,0.000003330266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005062896,0.00005006016,0.00003506953,0.0001273793,0.0005134098,0.0001298487,0.00002444155,0.0004159311,5.078447e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002207947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005411532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01071294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02462129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985899,0.0001685695,0.0002096011,0.0001025361,0.0002710008,0.0006583888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995713,0.0001024903,0.0001879804,0.00004359351,0.0000702785,0.00002442011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004966533,0.000008987294,0.01039837,0.000008142906,0.00001245055,0.000001021495,0.01145641,0.00002219535,0.00002119311,0.9733185,0.001799616,0.002903463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001027703,0.0000291011,0.003506218,0.00001807334,0.00001311953,0.00001296417,0.02537354,0.0000208559,0.00001011572,0.9697403,0.0001865996,0.0000614326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6452032,0.03813947,0.0006691613,0.008565047,0.00009173243,0.0003740441,0.000004231384,0.00002163591,0.3069315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519124,0.04661448,0.00008196188,0.00005195212,0.00007469999,0.000002517825,4.230432e-7,0.000004916857,0.001256629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3067092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345542358","doi":"10.1515/wps-2016-0001","title":"The Controversy over Religious Arbitration Tribunals in Ontario: Unspoken Identity-Based Justifications?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Opposition (politics); Islam; Faith; Sociology; Identity (music); Law; Political science; Religious identity; Compulsory arbitration; Epistemology; Negotiation; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02448530334463882,"gpt":0.3369978418985137,"spread":0.3125125385538748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00260337,0.00008947517,0.0001035313,0.0001916681,0.00101592,0.0003672783,0.0005836756,0.00004567616,0.0001012971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002057853,0.00005505262,0.00005604566,0.0009899035,0.002328384,0.0007183669,0.00003157087,0.0001120944,0.0001008851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001617117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001878826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3794555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9075944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99742,0.0001473363,0.0002953065,0.0003070819,0.0009303696,0.0008999315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981813,0.0009542311,0.00007751307,0.0002704892,0.0001913763,0.0003250759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001231587,0.00003066085,0.01369915,8.01572e-7,7.888794e-7,0.000001171496,0.0003455458,0.00000250335,0.0007531932,0.9834525,0.001348862,0.0003525202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008310815,0.00003336099,0.2753533,0.00005359152,0.000016615,4.095253e-7,0.0005458783,0.00009060711,0.0009776673,0.6706144,0.05125609,0.0002270019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2530781,0.000112448,0.005288069,0.07737661,0.001435267,0.0009198953,0.00001316565,0.0001448739,0.6616315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950786,0.00001603153,0.0001029042,0.001128462,0.00009249006,0.00003141367,0.000001175596,0.000003864151,0.003545027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7420005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8579029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751457090","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n4p60","title":"Human Rights and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate in Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Law; Political science; The Right to Privacy; Sociology; Liberalism; Political philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03672037188946901,"gpt":0.3512015154988274,"spread":0.3144811436093584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000648259,0.00003576331,0.0001043025,0.00002892881,0.0008017679,0.0002436178,0.0001195711,0.00003732634,0.00001104927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000494354,0.00002129519,0.00002637944,0.00001044067,0.000693447,0.0001345048,0.0000173777,0.00007765364,4.971205e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001722769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001381056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08189996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03871649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995112,0.00006399559,0.0001441375,0.00003667379,0.000128512,0.0001154863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996323,0.00004437259,0.0001518643,0.00006475246,0.00004034486,0.00006639168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003063173,0.000007459646,0.0010721,0.000002297738,0.000005705713,0.00001034572,0.003793487,2.244079e-7,0.00001229985,0.9944251,0.0006113864,0.00005658752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009622404,0.00002955045,0.02585564,0.00002721654,0.00003150375,0.000007068912,0.0006885061,0.00001275139,0.00003007137,0.9522839,0.02002459,0.00004691559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8717766,0.00007922017,0.000001767141,0.001751675,0.0001465055,0.0000390207,0.0000013585,0.000001027529,0.1262029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970248,0.00003759065,0.00001888565,0.0001473462,0.000212785,2.702191e-7,9.217747e-8,0.000001514767,0.002556728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1252482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9788244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605556373","doi":"10.1017/s1740355315000108","title":"The Ethics of the Empty Church: Anglicanism’s Need for a Theology of Architecture","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Anglican Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Architecture; Quarter (Canadian coin); Closing (real estate); Institution; Theology; Work (physics); Sociology; Religious studies; Political science; History; Law; Philosophy; Archaeology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1343303403515777,"gpt":0.4093706305743623,"spread":0.2750402902227846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00300634,0.00006882941,0.0002626869,0.00004860999,0.0003644435,0.00001120466,0.0003996887,0.00007665181,0.000001046909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005941252,0.00003209317,0.0001920796,0.0002010388,0.001547057,0.00003760041,0.0000651285,0.0002198713,1.088794e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004570376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004369243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003656507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002310338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985731,0.0003888231,0.0003622963,0.0000573242,0.0004627683,0.000155745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962436,0.001412015,0.0006857696,0.0001302675,0.001475878,0.00005244447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003750205,0.0001020947,0.004059784,0.00005405601,0.0004266669,0.000001594017,0.3896542,0.0001001828,0.0005979053,0.5430576,0.05487367,0.006697247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00123725,0.0009484909,0.005459807,0.00009896196,0.0002257188,0.00001317461,0.3376519,0.000006208888,0.001355722,0.6122707,0.04061319,0.0001188614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7223393,0.01849489,0.001113604,0.1863305,0.002792462,0.0009365926,0.00002905612,0.00001917487,0.06794444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978952,0.0008710478,0.0002977213,0.000257844,0.000328805,0.000004648661,9.418684e-8,0.000004825868,0.0003398609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2755559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7112662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026640410","doi":"","title":"Aménager la diversité: le droit de l'égalité face à la pluralité religieuse","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01117053895381265,"gpt":0.2241654015438933,"spread":0.2129948625900807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001552831,0.001260631,0.00127979,0.001218108,0.00414363,0.002978952,0.004134891,0.001410888,0.0002770326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004223209,0.001440447,0.000953562,0.003134625,0.003600041,0.003627147,0.002916777,0.001283131,0.0001438755],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003866174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001549192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02207137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001301049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992475,0.001693526,0.0006468935,0.001635215,0.00117328,0.002376033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942392,0.001596693,0.0007216634,0.00115178,0.0004701867,0.001820442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002314095,0.0003899648,0.002585791,0.0001309577,0.0003856097,0.002415474,0.193259,0.0006669168,0.0001060234,0.7679245,0.01634481,0.01347684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007823324,0.0004978841,0.01701098,0.0004766321,0.001076403,0.0005133898,0.03819022,0.001077185,0.0004108845,0.07964662,0.8509597,0.00231674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3171726,0.003905853,0.006389543,0.0549924,0.0004119685,0.001379068,0.0005457207,0.0006517668,0.6145511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8756054,0.005143796,0.0006142249,0.003390226,0.0002824968,0.000005636887,0.0001941406,0.00011789,0.1146462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8346149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W205819075","doi":"10.5250/fronjwomestud.34.2.0134","title":"The Question of Muslim Women's Rights and the Ontario Shari'ah Tribunals: Examining Liberal Claims","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers A Journal of Women Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01992378099291489,"gpt":0.2871852257690191,"spread":0.2672614447761043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003662704,0.0001113349,0.000393652,0.00008417829,0.001000276,0.0001512113,0.0002477267,0.00004999316,0.00001852779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004044731,0.00005402983,0.00006856597,0.0001348929,0.001135654,0.0003862737,0.00005416248,0.0001788,0.000001263783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007607416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001386333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007034256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006966439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981981,0.0003987715,0.0004664083,0.00009598142,0.0004777983,0.0003629501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983309,0.0004166533,0.0005670519,0.00009309086,0.0004826257,0.0001096793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001980075,0.00003466848,0.005371573,0.00001065164,0.0004736509,0.000002729815,0.9559169,0.000005717647,0.00000993488,0.007138047,0.0255726,0.005265547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001593445,0.0003122264,0.0103197,0.00006395997,0.00006311364,0.000004514325,0.615646,0.0000167793,0.000008784129,0.3650017,0.006865774,0.0001039857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881974,0.005778208,0.0001087755,0.00168589,0.0009148634,0.0002289329,6.026431e-7,0.000006399554,0.003078852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929924,0.002656699,0.0002414565,0.00008045557,0.0002319693,0.0000407997,1.572377e-7,0.000004826815,0.003751224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3578636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982294728","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.74","title":"A Tale of Two (Diverse) Countries: Religious Diversity in Canada and Singapore","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Secularism; Freedom of religion; Constitution; Diversity (politics); Political science; Religious freedom; Religious diversity; Charter; Sociology; Liberalism; Ethnic group; Cultural diversity; Minority rights; Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Human rights; Ethnology; Economic freedom; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0122257053394054,"gpt":0.2670100807735695,"spread":0.254784375434164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000328664,0.00004858245,0.000110499,0.00003922123,0.0003756724,0.00003397631,0.0001203655,0.0000280296,0.00006879613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001442202,0.00004713658,0.00002247809,0.00007395404,0.0001369023,0.0001745493,0.00006122067,0.0001003673,0.000004240977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002923553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004634979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992014,0.00005972552,0.0001371338,0.00007562746,0.0003585073,0.0001676383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996256,0.00004196485,0.000113347,0.00005468569,0.00008505874,0.00007933692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005088415,0.00002929909,0.7799975,0.00003547793,0.00002042431,0.0001466128,0.04631867,0.00006720913,0.00006463852,0.1587066,0.01316057,0.001402091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01425281,0.0004454066,0.3810791,0.000692263,0.0002242569,0.0003574058,0.1743249,0.0003720902,0.0005700508,0.340516,0.08554735,0.001618413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9422541,0.000222893,0.000004406865,0.0002003058,0.000277894,0.00006726092,0.000006810826,0.000003556702,0.05696282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992155,0.0004403678,0.00002198932,0.0001622679,0.00005637632,1.57747e-7,9.096228e-7,0.000002321138,0.0001001223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3989184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2889406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035467982","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000177","title":"Multiculturalism meets privatisation: the case of faith-based arbitration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Law; Multiculturalism; Religious law; Family law; Supreme court; Faith; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Law and economics; Islam","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03095093799431146,"gpt":0.3302311450385649,"spread":0.2992802070442534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005695582,0.00005839689,0.0001035716,0.00007444397,0.00008933154,0.0001063789,0.0003019478,0.00005139545,0.0001419278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003856363,0.00003873543,0.00007898993,0.00007697943,0.0002293908,0.0005019344,0.00001199861,0.0001030255,0.000007874789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001066719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001044705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0397716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03169656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988004,0.0001629189,0.0004632938,0.00006072363,0.000429482,0.00008319366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979257,0.0003261593,0.0004358372,0.00006140903,0.001211474,0.00003945056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004531494,0.0001398281,0.0007871068,0.000005587121,0.0000505626,0.0001590289,0.03098484,0.0004672638,0.001903009,0.9417771,0.001942775,0.02173757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02446094,0.001204147,0.0559757,0.002090307,0.0003079553,0.002566213,0.2142258,0.02429263,0.04537656,0.4745869,0.1531425,0.001770254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9268641,0.0002999583,0.0005065766,0.03199821,0.001257558,0.0003211799,0.000004707743,0.000007994599,0.03873974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983106,0.0000382199,0.0004482812,0.0008635804,0.0002532761,0.000007062492,0.000002136372,0.00000331773,0.00007351783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4671902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730428860","doi":"","title":"A Destruction of Muslim Identity: Ontario's Decision to Stop Shari'a-based Arbitration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Identity (music); Islam; Law; Business; Political science; Theology; Art; Philosophy; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01816390995612174,"gpt":0.3205209524441682,"spread":0.3023570424880465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001454535,0.00008961319,0.0001652907,0.0003645082,0.0001737367,0.00006821738,0.0003665041,0.00008425352,0.0001533327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003659622,0.00008698018,0.0001617321,0.0002484043,0.0001074186,0.0007251156,0.00002123713,0.0001638104,0.00001116037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005951684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004114244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0529172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6877711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977117,0.00004701458,0.0006518933,0.0001202232,0.001307248,0.0001619798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975682,0.0001446842,0.0005243352,0.00009097598,0.001514738,0.0001570956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001253317,0.0003745481,0.3025673,0.00001693557,0.0001043532,0.00007936222,0.01805737,0.005395117,0.001500893,0.6555361,0.0008054924,0.01430915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003121179,0.0009142245,0.8631567,0.0003521555,0.000164486,0.00008206497,0.002880531,0.0002379207,0.004603831,0.09482139,0.02921742,0.0004480738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9124147,0.00003253164,0.05576501,0.0003826141,0.001766297,0.0001255263,0.000005710805,0.000008817579,0.02949885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927672,0.00002182423,0.00618431,0.0003946091,0.0005129381,0.000001235332,0.00001116574,0.000007076034,0.00009963106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6348539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9533895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336079757","doi":"10.7202/1035668ar","title":"The Protection of Religious Freedom under the European Convention on Human Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Toleration; Freedom of thought; Convention; Political science; International human rights law; Freedom of religion; Fundamental rights; Conscience; International law; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02673923157394651,"gpt":0.2759606894391198,"spread":0.2492214578651733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001374271,0.00006195733,0.00008268595,0.0000400862,0.001043957,0.00005716493,0.000299589,0.00005860925,0.00001337753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000922348,0.00003991005,0.0001014251,0.0001368031,0.000405067,0.0000780325,0.0000207297,0.00008082387,0.00009887999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001590099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002556268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004173208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006298621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986483,0.000519321,0.0002141725,0.0001545988,0.0002466016,0.0002169547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992374,0.0001467249,0.0001871167,0.000284216,0.00009748041,0.00004704446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001802351,0.00003919576,0.0001136684,0.000008922195,0.00001363275,0.000002218427,0.001531967,0.00001956672,0.003346247,0.9843283,0.003943117,0.006635198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004830634,0.0001477587,0.00619214,0.0001586431,0.00003157907,0.000004353499,0.0007440627,0.00002083293,0.001595952,0.9711698,0.01932109,0.000130677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3007313,0.0001036264,0.002542536,0.006444774,0.0004850567,0.0006793957,0.000003942258,0.00009831592,0.688911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935287,0.0001388104,0.00001069795,0.00002947336,0.0004941527,0.00002338385,0.000001538094,0.00001098472,0.005762267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6927974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8029379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129410355","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rws005","title":"How Religious Arbitration Could Enhance Personal Autonomy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Autonomy; Religious freedom; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Law and economics; Law; State (computer science); Business; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01715009676357333,"gpt":0.2908915983203651,"spread":0.2737415015567918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007633776,0.0001029777,0.0001692131,0.00007415436,0.0003800934,0.0001656821,0.0000999541,0.0001422988,0.000004814592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007242721,0.00008259741,0.0001020359,0.00008926367,0.0002225672,0.0008057925,0.00001269787,0.0001826242,0.0000022917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001053118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001614833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008012029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002432515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988672,0.00009317246,0.0002507514,0.0000912228,0.000420805,0.0002768636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991242,0.00006332352,0.0003212766,0.00005936361,0.000209107,0.0002227173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001031571,0.0001306732,0.001909187,0.00003459799,0.00003782253,0.0000108551,0.0261738,0.000002039972,0.002472693,0.9466057,0.01443099,0.008088408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005797619,0.0002678493,0.0003922976,0.0001030071,0.00009008557,0.0001078603,0.002145667,0.00002685191,0.002236269,0.03586715,0.9579432,0.0002399978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3502753,0.02099273,0.005835715,0.01151677,0.002245764,0.0002768964,0.000002384711,0.0000438525,0.6088106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835111,0.01335064,0.0005525062,0.000681782,0.001167418,0.000001935215,0.000001726654,0.000008487462,0.0007244432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9435122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3368225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974262435","doi":"10.7202/1064487ar","title":"Entre Luxembourg et Strasbourg : modalités juridiques et diffractions européennes dans la gouvernance du religieux","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01344378151706797,"gpt":0.2911103719169993,"spread":0.2776665903999314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000981415,0.000378022,0.0003886059,0.00008768658,0.0004673402,0.0003139764,0.0004487862,0.0002337123,0.000283765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005065629,0.0003930237,0.0002567126,0.0005391152,0.0005353651,0.0008841604,0.0001724883,0.0004881393,0.001238607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002294552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006755341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01152144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008526227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961848,0.001390451,0.0004636534,0.0006514346,0.0006781885,0.0006314596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980611,0.000709495,0.000349482,0.0004300732,0.0002205363,0.0002292907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002728519,0.000539847,0.04160072,0.00007047404,0.00006244761,0.0000931018,0.03159573,0.0002314857,0.0008877811,0.784308,0.1387745,0.001808578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008011936,0.0001850406,0.3264935,0.0002250701,0.0001345615,0.0000296127,0.008092649,0.0001063873,0.0001369752,0.01846587,0.6447096,0.0006195157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4343541,0.003471079,0.0001795801,0.03282849,0.004300856,0.0004021564,0.0001129625,0.0001902118,0.5241606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9123072,0.03061894,0.0001281596,0.001104394,0.000567372,0.00002012704,0.0000241537,0.00006273801,0.05516689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7658422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214739763","doi":"10.1080/09637494.2021.2010906","title":"Religious anti-discrimination legislation and the negotiation of difference in Victoria, Australia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion State & Society","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives; University of Ottawa","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Legislation; Negotiation; Etiquette; Sociology; Constructive; Covert; Power (physics); Law; Tribunal; Political science; Public relations; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02262602096536775,"gpt":0.2973799517109,"spread":0.2747539307455322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001706362,0.0001153322,0.0002062112,0.00007060751,0.0005760487,0.00006251953,0.0001850425,0.0000686876,0.00001290019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000133836,0.00009878155,0.000120814,0.0005440604,0.0003810028,0.000179092,0.00008265192,0.0002048834,0.000002208824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002496378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001009972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03305838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00193536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997879,0.0004926216,0.000443513,0.0002485581,0.000696917,0.0002394156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990751,0.0002418011,0.0003442545,0.000161415,0.0001322088,0.00004519961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002477156,0.0002367198,0.0437784,0.00008786135,0.00004638448,0.000002894906,0.6330405,0.002774431,0.003069313,0.2768151,0.03489804,0.005002571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01122424,0.0003419563,0.2413562,0.0001288241,0.0002149293,0.000007759209,0.09804971,0.010625,0.0008133485,0.6067584,0.02942573,0.001053898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912831,0.0009451315,0.001047333,0.001976433,0.000476288,0.000632355,0.00001475179,0.00004807482,0.003576538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912978,0.007829266,0.0001162822,0.0001227112,0.00006503882,0.00005931447,0.00003218266,0.000009616288,0.0004678278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5349908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9733806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982351217","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.77","title":"Solidarity in Diversity? State Responses to Religious Diversity in Liberal and Non-Liberal Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; National University of Singapore","keywords":"Solidarity; Diversity (politics); Political science; Secularism; State (computer science); Sociology; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Law; Democracy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01665888651955795,"gpt":0.2981736391142291,"spread":0.2815147525946711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009349527,0.0001034757,0.0001804423,0.0002340724,0.001038386,0.0001642737,0.0002488233,0.0000745008,0.00003480406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000551434,0.0001063042,0.00005217994,0.000222518,0.0001872248,0.000568448,0.0005038675,0.0002944079,0.00003183746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003043371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008128275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04157879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05770249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985722,0.0002596174,0.000174841,0.0002155807,0.0004030793,0.0003746969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994604,0.00007744743,0.0000754225,0.00009222801,0.00009188045,0.0002026318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004273342,0.00009570728,0.6411155,0.000007969581,0.00001074778,0.0001647522,0.3437481,0.0000422411,0.00006759223,0.01026803,0.003515784,0.0005362583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001665361,0.0001678099,0.8752644,0.00006150446,0.00001106473,0.00002266026,0.01813933,0.00003144408,0.00002042318,0.1039181,0.0004204141,0.000277441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588802,0.0001459001,0.00001177068,0.001422534,0.0002289576,0.0002046446,0.000005827829,0.00001595,0.03908424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980921,0.0004606965,0.00008328501,0.0002842133,0.00009067072,8.702727e-7,6.446655e-7,0.000005342636,0.0009821897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3256088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9648034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153447884","doi":"10.3138/tjt.25.2.239","title":"Beyond Secularism? Rethinking the “Secular” in a Religiously Plural Context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Secularity; Secularization; Sociology; Ideology; Neutrality; Secular state; Context (archaeology); Dialogical self; Plural; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01297137400500795,"gpt":0.2919879738528455,"spread":0.2790165998478376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002169295,0.00009239351,0.0002330225,0.00005440673,0.0002215112,0.00004608004,0.0004816318,0.0001572795,0.0001183409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004405806,0.00006260376,0.0001400705,0.00007873063,0.0002688848,0.0002692812,0.00002189739,0.0002519682,0.000005658662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002804653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001717955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01558696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06587258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982861,0.0005859039,0.0004021274,0.0001002077,0.000346294,0.000279408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999088,0.0001862444,0.0003308066,0.0001377928,0.0001839888,0.00007312622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001355807,0.00005356967,0.0007121293,0.000001652691,0.0000225296,0.00009591857,0.09645661,0.00003980969,0.0003402971,0.8820801,0.008000135,0.01206164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008739065,0.0003489713,0.003677661,0.00003216058,0.00003616148,0.0001208979,0.01393753,0.00003518708,0.00007840753,0.9769046,0.003838896,0.0001156464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5040532,0.02113074,0.000971891,0.02607285,0.001407955,0.0003029884,6.331067e-7,0.00002653545,0.4460332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958208,0.001038142,0.000218179,0.002184361,0.0003753418,0.000001069616,4.21819e-7,0.000004925129,0.0003567678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4917676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809263102","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.n10.5","title":"REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION BASED ON RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR PRACTICES. A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE BETWEEN THE AMERICAN, CANADIAN AND EUROPEAN APPROACHES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Reasonable accommodation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1426836986483416,"gpt":0.3728837980788236,"spread":0.230200099430482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001765636,0.0001054165,0.0001691351,0.0001181085,0.003388935,0.0002546702,0.000420976,0.00002411499,0.00003409666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001590652,0.00005019088,0.00004519753,0.000216779,0.001641967,0.000194407,0.00002083083,0.0002552656,0.00001321057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001781337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002121238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3642435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5824885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979731,0.001130074,0.0001926304,0.0001444562,0.0003303168,0.000229456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984074,0.0003467101,0.0006688369,0.0001955116,0.0002560719,0.0001254738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005252101,0.0002700075,0.005493364,0.00001155324,0.0003109118,0.000127263,0.5014435,0.00008692317,0.0001166146,0.3924914,0.09606603,0.003057173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002408919,0.003954214,0.300721,0.0002708003,0.0006059154,0.00007566145,0.1294321,0.0005699238,0.0004683176,0.4921037,0.06854989,0.0008395451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5641972,0.00007310425,0.00009087911,0.009755055,0.00006639982,0.0003296326,0.000007143481,0.0000171552,0.4254634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982809,0.00002522748,0.0001322436,0.0002320217,0.0008225642,0.000002560232,0.00000462645,0.000007973179,0.000491861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4340837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}