{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":378,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":5,"predictions_cover":378,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"da33103a7cdb","filters":{"topic":"Research, Science, and Academia"}},"results":[{"id":"W2147649479","doi":"10.1177/0162243906291865","title":"The Linear Model of Innovation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Technology & Human Values","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":837,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Relation (database); Linear model; Epistemology; Conceptual model; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1487679535645634,"gpt":0.4587658279194895,"spread":0.3099978743549261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01423833,0.0001187854,0.0002005503,0.002696977,0.00290116,0.000234747,0.005098217,0.0001261667,0.00002203912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005581547,0.00006720857,0.00004575693,0.01711056,0.01831435,0.0007519568,0.0005884396,0.0003827158,0.00008421251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005565867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000442943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003221193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002315215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949043,0.00005490224,0.0009113007,0.0006546012,0.002857289,0.0006176426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965026,0.0003178133,0.0004199602,0.001066356,0.001651357,0.00004185874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002239312,0.00002146862,0.006816868,6.749845e-7,8.530242e-7,4.552074e-7,0.00008326394,0.001421456,0.2825736,0.6951837,0.002326221,0.01156928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008107281,0.00005100483,0.003573186,0.000005559944,0.000001353089,0.000002043744,0.0006668273,0.04467997,0.09713906,0.8517737,0.001944623,0.00008161167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751757,0.0001073749,0.003667896,0.003455926,0.0001277087,0.0001649037,0.000003115735,0.0001183744,0.01717895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915048,0.000009692086,0.002300272,0.00005213983,0.00004787594,0.00001095945,4.342573e-7,0.000004711389,0.006069075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1854345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2019072219","doi":"10.1023/b:mine.0000030019.99709.a0","title":"Truth for Its Own Sake: Academic Culture and Technology Transfer at Johns Hopkins University","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minerva","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Skoll Foundation; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Technology transfer; Higher education; Orientation (vector space); Sociology; Future orientation; Culture of the United States; Engineering ethics; Political science; Management; Media studies; Engineering; Law; Psychology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08001147105164963,"gpt":0.3572983159352444,"spread":0.2772868448835948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001000824,0.000142944,0.0002404813,0.0007105944,0.0003899804,0.00005606834,0.001095234,0.0003539239,0.00008284496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001218081,0.00009723868,0.00008290302,0.00238581,0.0004452578,0.0004510264,0.0001783171,0.0004279576,0.0001174664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001005625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001265272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003308199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000204402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978871,0.00004420871,0.0002468925,0.0006144792,0.0007375246,0.000469737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989657,0.0002852057,0.00004546282,0.0002742324,0.0002182002,0.0002112219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006198596,0.0002751429,0.03919902,0.0001007578,0.0001131873,0.0002246743,0.01441312,0.0005345956,0.3602593,0.1986954,0.1027166,0.2828483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001411471,0.0001325609,0.003237934,0.00002377685,0.00001441822,0.00004107269,0.001154182,0.0003042535,0.01714106,0.006094381,0.9702328,0.0002120996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787828,0.000420725,0.0018655,0.01138155,0.0001568981,0.0003314019,0.00009241286,0.00006594224,0.006902706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836946,0.001462568,0.0004643893,0.0001966934,0.00008775882,0.000004157844,0.000003224009,0.000007965537,0.01407869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8675162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3965278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501386359","doi":"10.1023/a:1017924027522","title":"Changes in Academy/Industry/State Relations in Canada: The Creation and Development of the Networks of Centres of Excellence","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minerva","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Excellence; Higher education; Political science; Science policy; Public administration; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.105944715849032,"gpt":0.3524600781257646,"spread":0.2465153622767327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001812282,0.00005212707,0.00013202,0.0001118944,0.00007147729,0.00001211642,0.000527732,0.00005801172,0.00005180222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006861953,0.00002644312,0.00001150791,0.001166416,0.000245535,0.00009044886,0.0001225241,0.0002637046,4.241236e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005980908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005578711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1484768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8134767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983219,0.0001427817,0.0004454683,0.0001482425,0.0007662983,0.0001753081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988288,0.0007146999,0.0002070979,0.0001438927,0.00006951161,0.00003599331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006663548,0.000009532278,0.9493067,0.000002294272,0.000001493143,5.197928e-7,0.002355492,0.008742387,0.0006569033,0.00004513662,0.0006343158,0.03823856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001028446,0.00000370481,0.9824237,0.0000584555,8.788556e-7,7.784442e-7,0.002315925,0.01036286,0.001401093,0.000292024,0.003007188,0.00003055547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950781,0.0003337935,0.00005939451,0.003688828,0.00003198565,0.0001295841,0.000003133052,6.595151e-7,0.0006744788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983678,0.0001376249,0.00006529844,0.00004274676,0.000008558928,0.00000433702,2.427227e-7,0.000001515395,0.001371916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6649998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8571935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W79280821","doi":"10.3998/mpub.17333","title":"Taking Trade to the Streets","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Michigan Press eBooks","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Free trade; International trade; Globalization; Trade barrier; Government (linguistics); Economic integration; Liberalization; Fair trade; Commercial policy; Trade agreement; International trade law; Political science; General Agreement on Trade in Services; Economics; International economics; Political economy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1556383484969034,"gpt":0.3415390429620144,"spread":0.185900694465111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00190425,0.0002544649,0.0004754621,0.0004338538,0.0005124409,0.0001500525,0.005575039,0.0002738733,0.0003093395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003771299,0.0001883118,0.0002925406,0.0001183715,0.0007247667,0.0001397493,0.000918902,0.0007970121,0.0001210034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006099392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000532602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003229868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002077763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955934,0.0002332692,0.0003796651,0.0007672202,0.00254935,0.0004771087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969938,0.0008652266,0.0005649247,0.001095047,0.0001736883,0.0003073583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001802979,0.00003860925,0.00008190949,0.00003466616,0.0001187629,0.0002284928,0.02302363,0.0004254366,0.0004850248,0.02432041,0.738354,0.2127088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001999068,0.00004846715,0.0003193464,0.0001024738,0.00002813882,0.000006743311,0.001450272,0.000122638,0.0002104836,0.004015821,0.9932804,0.0002153133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003368798,0.0001419266,0.0006558659,0.0007039272,0.0002285233,0.0004726161,0.000131403,0.00003488476,0.994262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01034793,0.00005046546,0.0002662463,0.0001886341,0.0001831545,2.407984e-7,0.000004407756,0.00001536521,0.9889436],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2549264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883757688","doi":"10.21300/19.4.2018.773","title":"Investing In Academic Technology Innovation And Entrepreneurship: Moving Beyond Research Funding Through The Nsf I-Corps™ Program","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology & Innovation","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine; University of California, San Diego; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; New Mexico State University; University of South Florida; University of Akron; Advanced Research Projects Agency; Dartmouth College; York University; University of Rochester; University of Louisville; Stony Brook University; University of Pittsburgh; Arizona State University; Tulane University; University of Connecticut; Washington State University; Brandeis University; Mississippi State University; Wichita State University; Louisiana State University; George Washington University; University of Kansas; San Diego State University; National Science Foundation; University of Minnesota; Oklahoma State University; Jackson State University; Michigan Technological University; Ohio State University; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Division of Industrial Innovation and Partnerships; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; University of Central Florida; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Oregon State University; University of Texas at San Antonio; University of Pennsylvania; Brigham Young University; Purdue University; University of Southern California; Johns Hopkins University; University of Washington","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Political science; Engineering; Management; Engineering management; Business; Economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3006170973340867,"gpt":0.5049143654777135,"spread":0.2042972681436268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01914145,0.000230099,0.0003276751,0.009451475,0.001178814,0.0003097207,0.002367568,0.0009303329,0.00003609116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03862865,0.0001656967,0.00001995491,0.07510319,0.005370309,0.001250675,0.001319671,0.003475601,0.0001153825],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001954508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002925221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005550844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006924407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938965,0.0003382982,0.001530811,0.00119559,0.00184611,0.00119273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947298,0.001147423,0.0005804047,0.0009757791,0.00252999,0.00003665348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001355953,0.00002387473,0.2525486,0.000004770633,0.000004092483,0.000004531583,0.0006839376,0.000003037627,0.09398112,0.3815528,0.0008811493,0.2702986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003499697,0.0002656417,0.01755952,0.00008972934,0.000002621492,0.00005540222,0.005561815,0.001033123,0.06073164,0.9035934,0.0105504,0.000206721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.952509,0.0001919523,0.0011288,0.04132765,0.0002157931,0.0008917671,0.000001783946,0.000427826,0.003305413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955878,0.00004440858,0.002811529,0.0005846255,0.0001898525,0.0002241659,0.00000496981,0.00001976609,0.000532865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5220407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891901093","doi":"10.1139/cjc-2014-0305","title":"Chemistry at The University of Western Ontario – A brief history","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Chemistry","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Science education; Library science; Chemistry; Boom; Chemistry education; Political science; Engineering physics; Engineering; Psychology; Law; Enthusiasm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05173609977109014,"gpt":0.2669909531560642,"spread":0.215254853384974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002328808,0.00009196212,0.0002310181,0.00005021097,0.0002051817,0.00004608495,0.001946697,0.0001033162,0.008378439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001085937,0.0000664658,0.0001645599,0.000186431,0.0008957643,0.0001786674,0.0000695785,0.0005077556,0.00003663409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001237028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004878574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0236231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1449488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981536,0.00005567915,0.0003635644,0.0001946128,0.0009331449,0.000299386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976106,0.000299933,0.0004412991,0.0004324319,0.0003966425,0.0008191065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000770508,0.00002161541,0.2617924,0.00004524941,0.00004583479,0.0002508045,0.00748496,0.0001884188,0.1180207,0.00001744798,0.6030079,0.009047654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002599075,0.00001100904,0.01641788,0.00003218182,0.000007429434,0.0001590382,0.0006686106,0.00002328957,0.01451981,0.0003021214,0.967512,0.00008679716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.928187,0.000405362,0.00006229102,0.001242287,0.0001302707,0.00002054977,0.000006630487,0.00000153415,0.0699441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.874844,0.00000720492,0.00002159702,0.0001238027,0.0001181126,4.868109e-8,5.586522e-7,0.000003861454,0.1248809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3645041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585924826","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1038","title":"Profiling Regional Innovation Ecosystems as Functional Collaborative Systems: The Case of Cambridge","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Innovation Management Review","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Resolute Forest Products (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Profiling (computer programming); Ecosystem; Knowledge management; Business; Regional science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1334835656639499,"gpt":0.4155968873235321,"spread":0.2821133216595821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01163335,0.0001823169,0.0004196132,0.002225524,0.0003372288,0.00008499155,0.001028713,0.0001270692,0.0001333837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003832658,0.00008974747,0.00004663822,0.02679653,0.0005441516,0.0005423141,0.0002899553,0.0002355117,0.0003612832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001225142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001811556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001339913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004897681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955286,0.0003059554,0.001920295,0.0005965318,0.001347977,0.0003006428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934057,0.000486887,0.001430743,0.0009187498,0.00373557,0.00002237794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007272333,0.000016992,0.000967859,0.0002432528,0.00003319307,0.0000327964,0.000006801552,0.000004335979,0.0009575757,0.8684397,0.07208077,0.05720942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007518516,0.0001421483,0.0005640884,0.003031756,0.00005116267,0.0006689261,0.003842809,0.0003427025,0.001565346,0.04880353,0.9398896,0.0003460831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6086879,0.04496238,0.07426057,0.2029871,0.002369678,0.01326106,0.0001520707,0.0006613769,0.05265791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766629,0.008193882,0.0007088034,0.001769361,0.0001332483,0.0008171483,0.00002741051,0.0000178853,0.01166932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8678088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102547396","doi":"10.7202/1014346ar","title":"Brief Periods of Sunshine: A History of the Canadian Government’s Attempt to Build a Solar Heating Industry, 1974-1983","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Demise; Politics; Solar energy; Objectivity (philosophy); Ideology; Political science; Solar power; Political economy; Engineering; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Electrical engineering; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04699225424293692,"gpt":0.3009494156312011,"spread":0.2539571613882642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009829994,0.0001986387,0.0006838802,0.003554015,0.0009140838,0.00003509668,0.005181064,0.0002603121,0.0007527625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01127379,0.0001114252,0.000169711,0.005429586,0.02914543,0.0004942166,0.0003129973,0.001132246,0.000002025843],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005049968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03333053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6735922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8818852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936724,0.0001755221,0.001151124,0.0004955403,0.00366803,0.000837345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944546,0.0001956622,0.001167833,0.001016628,0.001503688,0.001661606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001317415,0.00002158998,0.1573322,0.00003171835,0.00008318792,0.00002809666,0.01234751,0.000138262,0.07336137,0.004416091,0.7416151,0.01061169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007136196,0.0005063428,0.1573707,0.0005826368,0.0002165435,0.0004637583,0.01340485,0.0003401839,0.005000289,0.004345418,0.8166868,0.0003688251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9138453,0.003936543,0.00001204429,0.0720366,0.004753996,0.0003583138,0.00002483282,0.000003658267,0.00502872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840388,0.000009635795,0.0001917371,0.001533162,0.00004924026,0.000003532888,5.496998e-8,0.000007220898,0.01416662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.208293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123128778","doi":"10.1177/0539018409344475","title":"The value of science: changing conceptions of scientific productivity, 1869 to circa 1970","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Plea; Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Value (mathematics); Social science; Sociology; Economics; Positive economics; Classical economics; Political science; Economic growth; Computer science; Library science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07388312239436938,"gpt":0.4358320607446185,"spread":0.3619489383502491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03855564,0.0001050574,0.000197645,0.001980297,0.006538152,0.001664957,0.003794516,0.00004459278,0.00002128674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01254428,0.00006764585,0.00009117983,0.02500515,0.01363814,0.008624172,0.0004403478,0.0001930682,0.0001000872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001925722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001978724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002651097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005492277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900213,0.00009101853,0.0008660405,0.0004172549,0.007752761,0.0008516159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956105,0.0002766194,0.0005694191,0.0005489278,0.002767155,0.0002274001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001666681,0.00004078853,0.0009571307,0.000004823741,0.00000128162,8.605929e-8,0.05507801,0.0004412313,0.1384394,0.3412858,0.001686131,0.4620487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005813753,0.0005423814,0.4150779,0.00008948254,0.0000123478,0.000008887724,0.09218992,0.02111978,0.2391572,0.1777089,0.05281518,0.0006967317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9511951,0.00001128549,0.002432351,0.004437819,0.001059348,0.0005333484,0.00001408153,0.00002466288,0.04029198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991165,0.000002641658,0.0002638152,0.0001492588,0.00009982795,0.000007526069,7.942556e-7,0.000001338406,0.0003582488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4613519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W127990294","doi":"","title":"A history of patenting life in the United States with comparative attention to Europe and Canada: a report to the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"IUScholarWorks (Indiana University)","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Genealogy; History; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1750574206266401,"gpt":0.3140639729260811,"spread":0.1390065522994409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01087862,0.0002164947,0.0003458047,0.002934904,0.0004264588,0.0002861916,0.002472722,0.0001259272,0.000004082367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005087371,0.0001312487,0.00002402843,0.005372832,0.001228941,0.0004766481,0.0006490609,0.002238627,0.000005650572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008929217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003131451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0601869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3582325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994863,0.000842819,0.0004288371,0.0008425178,0.00260814,0.0004146339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968351,0.001289323,0.0003968068,0.0006533977,0.0005887203,0.0002367127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007937485,0.0002828497,0.1460031,0.0001448445,0.0001252989,0.01765346,0.1453111,0.009939871,0.0003587554,0.01962307,0.6115226,0.04824131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003659899,0.000219005,0.1062644,0.0006764441,0.00001350616,0.00002865451,0.02152271,0.0002623574,0.000002501376,0.0001781133,0.8701612,0.0003051088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7774647,0.0007405677,0.0004314772,0.01918129,0.0002336045,0.00238921,0.00003963069,0.00005717731,0.1994624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7641566,0.0006592283,0.0003371734,0.002517848,0.00006165807,0.000003879789,0.0000154645,0.00003312665,0.232215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2980456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9725846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078946154","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00528.x","title":"Innovation in the Absence of Principled Knowledge: The Case of the Wright Brothers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Creativity and Innovation Management","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Competitor analysis; Closing (real estate); Product (mathematics); Unintended consequences; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Management; Operations research; Economics; Political science; Law; Engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1291719999533349,"gpt":0.4280744576379127,"spread":0.2989024576845778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01026772,0.00008219972,0.0001340997,0.000560287,0.0002633203,0.0001034352,0.0007934482,0.00003426658,0.00003813466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001195778,0.00003440051,0.00002580122,0.01134811,0.0004471063,0.0003324156,0.0001342087,0.0001848075,0.000003697055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002160302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004066455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003419634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004412491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978625,0.0003606786,0.0007013284,0.0002307828,0.0007012167,0.0001434911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980912,0.000554424,0.0004102662,0.0005161689,0.0004187127,0.00000918556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001810631,0.00009776586,0.01034217,0.00001497878,0.000005920853,0.000004638724,0.002774672,0.00008239624,0.00103345,0.8079765,0.002126326,0.175523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005084446,0.00009288183,0.8057374,0.0000689138,0.000006693727,0.00001530717,0.007898537,0.004273467,0.002630818,0.1481962,0.03045902,0.0001122691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9382792,0.00004149749,0.002504264,0.00524108,0.00005139269,0.0005872147,0.000002758378,0.000004193073,0.05328836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971754,0.00002541444,0.0001090994,0.0004728083,0.00001822638,0.00001299142,6.862326e-7,0.000001625267,0.002183734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7953953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5452391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528348484","doi":"10.1177/0073275316656007","title":"The changing identity of research: A cultural and conceptual history","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Science","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Government (linguistics); Identity (music); Social science; History of science; Science studies; Public sphere; Epistemology; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5048143755602826,"gpt":0.4888352531238142,"spread":0.01597912243646843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03157457,0.00008222047,0.0001927909,0.0008142634,0.0006805653,0.00005235892,0.003102779,0.00003958724,0.000192988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01467363,0.00003824341,0.00006188981,0.001631662,0.07099501,0.002356181,0.0006811435,0.0002029458,0.00005269811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001096774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001477396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001109986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003580094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924694,0.0003076455,0.0004827684,0.0005596332,0.005551827,0.0006287295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951516,0.00231982,0.0002818461,0.0005912483,0.001414228,0.0002412392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000510579,0.00003360953,0.00553349,0.00001056337,0.000003166383,0.000004673513,0.03822435,0.000001195916,0.6173353,0.1433416,0.1528919,0.04256921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003660443,0.0001749866,0.02238126,0.0001037026,0.000002580114,0.00001083745,0.02467605,0.0002636201,0.005813453,0.01513784,0.9308872,0.0001824297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9632387,0.009247268,0.0002367049,0.001134435,0.001642756,0.000177284,0.000004049637,0.0000149928,0.02430377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564781,0.0003099559,0.0001286579,0.0000373406,0.00004963893,0.000004943684,2.235569e-8,0.00000274791,0.04298863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7779953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883732222","doi":"10.1115/1.2009-jun-3","title":"To Protect and Serve","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering; Computer science; Environmental science; Forensic engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0778870881161329,"gpt":0.3766060859265465,"spread":0.2987189978104137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002217302,0.00008709151,0.0001546393,0.000175903,0.00006739283,0.0001885399,0.0005461301,0.00005401429,0.00005740917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003631019,0.00006114374,0.00003840835,0.0008123119,0.00001017418,0.0002005936,0.0001185497,0.000229198,0.000142337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001809124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001561823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000465099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001139398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981474,0.00002587622,0.0002380222,0.000361437,0.0009013921,0.0003258501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991174,0.0002311817,0.00001887013,0.0002487925,0.00005460261,0.000329183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003621946,0.00004131072,0.0001314538,0.00001043232,0.000006459111,0.000047491,0.0004054592,0.01164869,0.4831845,0.07420865,0.003130314,0.4271491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007140981,0.0009495977,0.02822211,0.0001152647,0.000006083491,0.00006152738,0.0002004416,0.6610262,0.1039099,0.09728836,0.1066409,0.0008654991],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7007065,0.0001154505,0.2875508,0.009116393,0.0002655997,0.0005072099,0.00000301372,0.000176435,0.001558613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934335,0.000003727612,0.005623647,0.0003692567,0.0000825833,0.000007695121,8.670103e-8,0.000004359859,0.0004751872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6493775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4346931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597772182","doi":"","title":"Reflections on the Commercialization of Research Conducted in Public Institutions in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Enthusiasm; Public relations; Political science; Phenomenon; Action (physics); Scale (ratio); Business; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.38028419388052,"gpt":0.4787530482041411,"spread":0.09846885432362101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006829212,0.00009277261,0.0001988955,0.0007207492,0.0005833281,0.0003512541,0.00150549,0.00007734094,0.001590885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01150498,0.00005879623,0.00003423274,0.007024205,0.0007240999,0.0009263512,0.000184781,0.001009788,0.0003598901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006156354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.919156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9853733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945544,0.001309503,0.0006712589,0.0003926146,0.002522172,0.0005500506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569,0.002457309,0.0001064973,0.0006756038,0.0008431528,0.0002274057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001030024,0.0000970786,0.07166725,0.000003760689,0.000003609899,0.000005032451,0.0003658904,0.0006851129,0.002825635,0.8487998,0.07417279,0.001363765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007854763,0.0001036856,0.4982699,0.0001280338,0.000001524019,0.000004577361,0.01167571,0.002770036,0.002733119,0.1608506,0.3223872,0.000290102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8618556,0.00004450371,0.00003674886,0.02812521,0.0002575428,0.0005681446,0.00001434155,0.00001051345,0.1090875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976557,0.00003242859,0.00004526091,0.0009412597,0.00004735116,0.0001020611,0.000003834563,0.000005029106,0.001167087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6879492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018707856","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01078.x","title":"The challenge of change: Canadian universities in the 21st century","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Government (linguistics); Political science; Collective bargaining; Skepticism; Democracy; Face (sociological concept); Boom; Public administration; Economic policy; Business; Sociology; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2442587804087117,"gpt":0.3657300916040804,"spread":0.1214713111953687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003061125,0.00008908358,0.0001036268,0.0006562383,0.0007542055,0.0005318786,0.001672413,0.00009390606,0.0006651086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008668911,0.00005341665,0.00004737376,0.0015071,0.000411736,0.0007522877,0.0000197212,0.0002698164,0.00008884088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003539527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002742556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975764,0.0002782102,0.0003114854,0.0002593346,0.0009769857,0.0005976132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980868,0.0004941624,0.0001022292,0.0004828241,0.000215929,0.0006180573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002814339,0.00001711328,0.003487381,0.000002848583,0.000004600643,0.00005270843,0.005221034,4.577941e-7,0.000002275629,0.8502312,0.03055766,0.1104199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007458608,0.00005270961,0.009963288,0.000004292416,0.000001106651,0.000006805253,0.04139348,0.0005381563,0.000003229708,0.002361479,0.9455256,0.00007524589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05908184,0.001423733,0.000002800579,0.5967773,0.0004160945,0.0005096494,0.0001286028,0.00000844659,0.3416516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969088,0.0004652371,0.000004200747,0.0007843663,0.0001200622,0.00001367598,0.000007051679,0.000003571524,0.001692978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.937827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8228934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083968777","doi":"10.1080/10429247.2005.11415294","title":"Deriving Value from Industry-University Partnerships: A Case Study of the Advanced Engineering Materials Centre","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Management Journal","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Government (linguistics); Leverage (statistics); Value engineering; Value (mathematics); Investment (military); Business; Private sector; Engineering management; Marketing; Engineering; Management; Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0732679828422154,"gpt":0.3237410542640637,"spread":0.2504730714218483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002485135,0.0001657186,0.0002457362,0.0003652047,0.0002724571,0.0002873023,0.001300852,0.00007170232,0.0002331758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005275164,0.0001182704,0.00008847131,0.0008765497,0.00003035825,0.000621539,0.0004708512,0.000662478,0.0000157679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001283108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002494037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000340877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001472808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972078,0.0001684374,0.0005265319,0.0003122517,0.001373362,0.000411571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987448,0.0003156245,0.0002226714,0.0004427657,0.00008366752,0.0001905005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002969861,0.0002025399,0.01189249,0.00002055863,0.0001911462,0.002055848,0.004790655,0.9531273,0.009704427,0.0009362719,0.001052554,0.01599647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01036516,0.0003831619,0.274169,0.001323359,0.0004432424,0.002031217,0.2611925,0.3060026,0.01909,0.0008674697,0.12178,0.002352312],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954775,0.00004006025,0.003073998,0.0003994525,0.0005175357,0.0002420332,0.000004716113,0.00003026723,0.0002144404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964951,0.00001603359,0.002432421,0.00001681757,0.0002133828,0.000001022366,1.615077e-7,0.00001175966,0.0008132834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6471248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4822927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385530273","doi":"10.1515/9780773598980","title":"Canadian Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Technology innovation; Science policy; Business; Political science; Industrial organization; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04302111863457291,"gpt":0.3154468011196427,"spread":0.2724256824850698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002753855,0.0003925504,0.0005129325,0.02602398,0.002297562,0.000384519,0.004052804,0.0007132459,0.00004650026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001738706,0.000314221,0.0000909163,0.003497237,0.004484532,0.0008716162,0.001622821,0.000928334,0.00009296335],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002124191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005806967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02211082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001564467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942682,0.0001209157,0.00051083,0.001495714,0.002461964,0.001142357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956703,0.0003419068,0.0004501067,0.001168279,0.001644484,0.0007248882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001134768,0.000003171702,0.0000776505,0.00000672662,0.00001154316,0.00005948967,0.00004039848,8.0323e-7,0.00009661524,0.947999,0.03006254,0.02163069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002987728,0.00004295577,0.00008933593,0.00008432241,0.00001155174,0.00000706215,0.0001148822,0.00001194319,0.0004961074,0.05780683,0.9406695,0.0003667326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001806342,0.000002065878,0.00005546792,0.004029709,0.0002098527,0.0004628607,0.0005512466,0.0001101122,0.9943981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009802126,0.00005783794,0.0001307957,0.0003098825,0.0001475739,0.000001752095,0.0000056469,0.00002240482,0.989522],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.910607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137305902","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v43i1.1895","title":"The great divide between business schools research and business practice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Criticism; Executive education; Business Review; Business education; Management; Sociology; Business history; Focus (optics); Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Higher education; Economics; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2113852549045407,"gpt":0.4819406219819471,"spread":0.2705553670774064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008770761,0.00009625208,0.0001721827,0.0007905037,0.001197755,0.002883899,0.001425768,0.00008050823,0.000414292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0157254,0.00005486576,0.00002952837,0.003155508,0.000600172,0.00277835,0.0000534472,0.0007419058,0.0003249251],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002245085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007202756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01801565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001853453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962934,0.0005553198,0.0005721875,0.000244492,0.001778022,0.000556581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844918,0.003455298,0.0003542258,0.0004153833,0.01010416,0.001179092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006766156,0.0000120324,0.22051,0.000003741704,0.00001114628,0.000006159711,0.0003104065,0.000004591428,0.00006773487,0.001930414,0.6757901,0.1013469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000485055,0.00001581883,0.5042968,0.00002498348,0.000003402222,0.00002969017,0.0007691539,9.425016e-7,0.000009803566,0.04167955,0.4530811,0.0000402799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.705489,0.007922836,0.00009247391,0.2742227,0.002271528,0.0003567411,0.000004926788,0.000003791158,0.009635969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642777,0.0001915686,0.0002834432,0.0004454095,0.001419226,0.0000107524,9.03496e-7,0.000008983654,0.03336198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2837868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230864654","doi":"10.7554/elife.42254.018","title":"Author response: How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Promotion (chess); Public relations; Work (physics); Subject (documents); Cornerstone; Citation; Political science; Scholarship; Public service; Engineering; Computer science; Library science; Politics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.287764484656535,"gpt":0.4804220933006737,"spread":0.1926576086441387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04062034,0.000417915,0.001438792,0.0006548595,0.0002627871,0.0005722729,0.002581229,0.0003565818,0.0009861339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04780529,0.0001703133,0.0003037111,0.004978176,0.0006449767,0.000686392,0.0008192288,0.001471068,0.0002617895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001009184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007496607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003437765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005621132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871653,0.003223678,0.001474328,0.001393929,0.006028733,0.0007140039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916347,0.003385947,0.001362758,0.001824136,0.00146794,0.000324478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000237578,0.00004194768,0.001284726,0.0007230514,0.00001005612,0.000007251408,0.00004996416,3.815533e-7,0.00003647459,0.00007079459,0.9807997,0.0169519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001449751,0.00007730854,0.0116387,0.01227129,0.00003138859,0.000009230073,0.0003435552,0.00002240294,0.00001056888,0.0005963829,0.9746114,0.0002427953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001624288,0.08887053,0.00004990511,0.9036561,0.0008396539,0.003507408,0.0003117319,0.00002325378,0.001117084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01065767,0.05819509,0.0002189364,0.002836875,0.0000877615,0.0001962217,0.00008451481,0.0000238994,0.927699],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9265819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171157744","doi":"","title":"Implications of nanotechnology applications: using genetics as a lesson.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nanotechnology; Nothing; Intellectual property; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Data science; Sociology; Engineering; Epistemology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3240114742634397,"gpt":0.4245028391443298,"spread":0.1004913648808901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001484717,0.00007700607,0.0001711128,0.0004094885,0.000200586,0.0000837018,0.001508323,0.0001138976,0.0001512391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001485678,0.00006019368,0.00006554381,0.002160553,0.0004793668,0.0001682452,0.0001998295,0.0001673154,0.0001822962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004153896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003488333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001921584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005723291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978139,0.00006765309,0.0004819953,0.0004123484,0.0008150695,0.0004090288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981574,0.000419674,0.0002121124,0.0007894875,0.0002760513,0.0001452379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001416529,0.00004948812,0.007933146,0.000002117205,0.000004405269,3.726898e-7,0.0000914335,0.00009038951,0.002403767,0.01178905,0.001970621,0.9756638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000369837,0.00002543068,0.1744565,0.000004600209,0.00001619259,0.0000515628,0.0004724166,0.00775055,0.01712851,0.3533918,0.4460365,0.0002960049],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9020751,0.003817037,0.03689878,0.01444447,0.0001546639,0.002256201,0.00004045559,0.0001157647,0.04019759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541,0.0002711419,0.001580501,0.0001619325,0.00004873611,0.0008097053,4.369982e-7,0.000006158411,0.00171136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2802864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W771866892","doi":"","title":"The State of Science and Technology in Canada. The Expert Panel on the State of Science and Technology in Canada, Council of Canadian Academies, Ottawa 2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Library science; Public administration; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08373059299089573,"gpt":0.3101074755500575,"spread":0.2263768825591618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02679413,0.000243112,0.0004877436,0.002396382,0.0009494267,0.00008231943,0.005077021,0.0001030914,0.00001560022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01932814,0.0001212428,0.00001830675,0.02014262,0.01968198,0.0006947093,0.0007307488,0.001003267,0.000001958957],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003341734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08680712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898632,0.0002241208,0.001147699,0.0007033763,0.006308229,0.001753388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931501,0.002576627,0.0005534729,0.00113595,0.002136812,0.0004470781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001396378,0.0000895314,0.5540954,0.00003540003,0.00002777237,0.00004145935,0.02041049,0.0004384958,0.08701422,0.02493871,0.04528347,0.2674854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001100208,0.0002429006,0.6084108,0.0002119175,0.000009436718,0.00008971629,0.05917156,0.006268137,0.1100071,0.02659767,0.1871309,0.0007596792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685199,0.003090088,0.000001539713,0.02646335,0.0002811638,0.0005251967,0.00008791431,0.000005667078,0.001025175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983658,0.0007634261,0.0000368076,0.0003872601,0.00001119929,0.00002888107,1.392358e-7,0.00000881799,0.0003977251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2667257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518448012","doi":"10.1080/14926150309556586","title":"Science reform or science conform: Problematic epistemological assumptions with/in Canadian science reform efforts","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06591943118243432,"gpt":0.3845229483015545,"spread":0.3186035171191202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03837894,0.0002471388,0.0004650565,0.01928382,0.004834995,0.001854886,0.005444643,0.0001412213,0.0001400462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01944487,0.0001439799,0.00003799959,0.03724411,0.0493623,0.004394897,0.0001448649,0.000720312,0.00002781569],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005423738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1708675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03049384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1903572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922081,0.00002819617,0.001255612,0.0008889622,0.003531814,0.002087368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909859,0.0001327681,0.0007687887,0.0009298299,0.004154563,0.003028156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004477797,0.00009868007,0.01439082,0.00003384574,0.000002605891,0.00005344361,0.002668811,0.00001320493,0.00753526,0.9489449,0.0000677421,0.02618619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00101422,0.001734367,0.0795297,0.001428522,0.00003707457,0.01263247,0.1206471,0.006673852,0.02335428,0.7421327,0.00945661,0.001359074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9544601,0.0001450778,0.0001431145,0.00565747,0.0007231158,0.0005140427,0.000004278042,0.0000125522,0.0383402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828643,0.00002547342,0.01632774,0.0001329744,0.00001951299,0.00001768094,1.369115e-7,0.000007688981,0.0006044629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2068122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W236917814","doi":"10.3138/jcs.37.3.71","title":"Canadian Science at the Public/Private Divide: The NCE Experiment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Politics; State (computer science); Relation (database); Sociology; Public policy; Science communication; Economics; Social science; Political science; Public administration; Science education; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3465135528637764,"gpt":0.4422147584596547,"spread":0.09570120559587836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01243334,0.0001589415,0.0003011578,0.001957595,0.00421143,0.00107931,0.004446307,0.00003926006,0.0007740446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01075782,0.00006751304,0.0001476996,0.005019458,0.002896203,0.001013669,0.0003319598,0.0004978335,0.0003194893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00168249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002172765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.150118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9188845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937766,0.0002369913,0.0007246173,0.000328752,0.003789019,0.001144009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947695,0.001165054,0.0003795119,0.0006610467,0.00140438,0.001620508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003007695,0.000007465756,0.01311216,0.000001050252,0.00005105541,0.0001323024,0.007016536,0.00005910866,0.0004477229,0.004328594,0.9428117,0.03202935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001105672,0.00004845543,0.01285465,0.0000152129,0.000006250812,0.0001321455,0.008954881,0.0001200026,0.0004645801,0.002902494,0.9742787,0.0001120189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4857807,0.0251088,0.000009138804,0.4508856,0.0018922,0.0002487045,0.00001992563,0.00000496618,0.03604996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860058,0.001994155,0.00003667739,0.003554586,0.0003126267,0.000005840611,3.591467e-8,0.000005992746,0.008084305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7687665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908862090","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.12964","title":"Indigenous Knowledge, Perspectives, and Design Principles in the Engineering Curriculum","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Curriculum; Traditional knowledge; Engineering ethics; Capstone; Internship; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Engineering; Pedagogy; Social science; Computer science; Law; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04134231746387849,"gpt":0.3222577922029835,"spread":0.280915474739105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005247355,0.0001251585,0.0001527179,0.0006533595,0.0003195693,0.0004089413,0.001048832,0.0001088509,0.00001631258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01244995,0.00008520378,0.00004967216,0.002007803,0.00007134351,0.0004041013,0.000058903,0.0003404516,0.00001829986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001144916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009368561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003548332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004733363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998073,0.00003205222,0.0003489647,0.0002952263,0.0008437222,0.0004069772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979627,0.0004092648,0.0002552832,0.0001504949,0.001033169,0.000189091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006111715,0.0002706395,0.6446068,0.0001179265,0.00007033412,4.526255e-7,0.1841834,0.002783713,0.003737636,0.0662325,0.0887959,0.009194632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001778707,0.00004783134,0.8614594,0.0001205124,0.00001438383,0.0000103315,0.01417524,0.02935077,0.000953755,0.001589036,0.09179916,0.0003017035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881348,0.0005841893,0.0001005234,0.0050023,0.0007598026,0.0006337411,0.000006195344,0.00003009509,0.004748373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969915,0.00002141737,0.0007475464,0.00007773311,0.000270853,0.00004212855,3.792667e-7,0.00001138477,0.001837103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2168526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123073729","doi":"","title":"Dimensions of Occupational Changes in Canada's Knowledge Economy, 1971-1996","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge economy; Period (music); Business; Economic geography; Economy; Geography; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1698272945903536,"gpt":0.4353862322158389,"spread":0.2655589376254853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140512,0.0003626469,0.001020186,0.002358621,0.0002182342,0.0002291747,0.003249085,0.0004044452,0.0005400232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006619593,0.0003011069,0.0001770815,0.00111331,0.0008127178,0.0002288254,0.002254369,0.002565402,0.00004076447],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003260696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01957379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1854312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.937396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924342,0.001224369,0.001726377,0.001773772,0.001473985,0.001367312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911408,0.005578794,0.0004945126,0.001657725,0.0006162464,0.0005119394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002373459,0.000378702,0.6243012,0.0001682908,0.00007119483,0.00008622352,0.001440428,0.03111069,0.000235928,0.003319198,0.009293782,0.3293571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001712612,0.0001777713,0.4878516,0.0006007003,0.000008152869,0.00002007442,0.008141265,0.05447254,0.001327391,0.0434158,0.4007519,0.001520076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8551234,0.0004784205,0.000002285308,0.001351015,0.0007810557,0.0009319389,0.0002411073,0.000009114869,0.1410816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899537,0.003372368,0.0002512635,0.0001289603,0.0001389599,0.0001861478,0.00002733853,0.00003127522,0.005910013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7519648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W240041370","doi":"","title":"High-Performance Research Organizations: Here Are Ten Attributes That Help Managements Do the Right Things to Turn Their Visions into Reality","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research-Technology Management","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Set (abstract data type); Vision; Audit; Business; Quality (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Knowledge management; Process management; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Sociology; Accounting","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1570855419899362,"gpt":0.4493844991708985,"spread":0.2922989571809623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04456053,0.0004302347,0.0005928763,0.00559732,0.005611565,0.001850929,0.0125072,0.0004074365,0.000801473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007718808,0.0002503665,0.000112527,0.0310718,0.003136201,0.0014575,0.01113646,0.002993837,0.005192134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006955742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001833637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000343419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002304086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9826134,0.001851173,0.001073594,0.002222592,0.00947717,0.002762027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893746,0.002364883,0.0002625632,0.004310735,0.003169641,0.0005175396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001873946,0.0005738695,0.1379753,0.0001336096,0.0002538044,0.000483368,0.001873048,0.0008670934,0.0005376987,0.1761188,0.4449463,0.2360497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006566431,0.0003491123,0.0845052,0.0003525643,0.0000144863,0.00002083329,0.05637955,0.001706291,0.003297682,0.3076867,0.5445253,0.0005056764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.662837,0.000924849,0.00392365,0.3060219,0.0004239398,0.004250205,0.0000338625,0.0005015576,0.0210831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695053,0.004706136,0.001017993,0.0006353501,0.0001557557,0.0005331617,0.00001270421,0.00005000946,0.02338363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3066683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290721667","doi":"10.1108/s1048-4736(2010)0000021004","title":"Different yokes for different folks: Individual preferences, institutional logics, and the commercialization of academic research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Incentive; Outsourcing; Publication; Affect (linguistics); Academic community; Technology transfer; Public relations; Business; Political science; Sociology; Marketing; Economics; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1665951966146727,"gpt":0.432131416589642,"spread":0.2655362199749693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009995626,0.0001536378,0.0003809076,0.0005612763,0.0005071309,0.0001274785,0.001436581,0.00008855094,0.0000201111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00418269,0.00007779052,0.00003636036,0.0007913302,0.001970047,0.0006319525,0.0002869943,0.0005799928,8.388502e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001810061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000752223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001136775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001120743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965544,0.0006153064,0.001117464,0.0005113342,0.0009128924,0.0002886446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937218,0.004947542,0.0004882859,0.0003791103,0.0004246733,0.00003861749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001378602,0.0001208598,0.7060353,0.000014374,0.00001095444,5.650856e-8,0.005358009,0.00005593528,0.00009971976,0.278763,0.00009574723,0.009308245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00159786,0.0001939927,0.5059701,0.0000161199,0.000009823047,0.00000173828,0.007363288,0.0002182989,0.0005864858,0.4835715,0.0003879846,0.00008286454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962609,0.0004903289,0.0002498048,0.001042065,0.0003386195,0.001085847,0.0000402391,0.000004785586,0.000487407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998627,0.0009896806,0.00003173794,0.00006265381,0.0001174044,0.0001273671,0.00001200917,0.000004503726,0.00002762992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2048085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.725872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625844008","doi":"10.2308/0148-4184.28.1.19","title":"INTERNAL AUDIT AT THE HISTORICAL HUDSON'S BAY COMPANY: A CHALLENGE TO ACCEPTED HISTORY","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Historians Journal","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Accounting; Internal audit; Business; Compliance (psychology); Bay; Function (biology); Management; Economics; History; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1406389206176598,"gpt":0.3745620712311677,"spread":0.2339231506135079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01198328,0.0003688026,0.0006111035,0.0009356883,0.001870291,0.0006392568,0.004973431,0.0001983466,0.01109421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006435144,0.0002358146,0.0004392586,0.001332836,0.0003696068,0.00132038,0.0007300236,0.001912932,0.002666274],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01493786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007233248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004734706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007410897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903513,0.0005728251,0.001404707,0.0009170857,0.005544784,0.001209293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946411,0.001556176,0.0009169849,0.001027189,0.001049002,0.0008095283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118574,0.00006833444,0.009893273,0.000001819396,0.00001786925,0.0001700728,0.003831994,0.0000614743,0.001099783,0.0001945417,0.9498277,0.03471452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004239839,0.0001137929,0.008232302,0.00003396566,0.00001553247,0.0005296962,0.0006536117,0.0003352359,0.00001106483,0.000884939,0.9884563,0.0003095761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5158722,0.01686256,0.01358921,0.1367062,0.06527637,0.0008848236,0.00001292053,0.0003088407,0.2504869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8364618,0.0004766542,0.0005775877,0.002563413,0.008055246,0.00002009432,0.000001065849,0.00005622908,0.1517879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3205896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006398869","doi":"10.1080/08109028.2011.641385","title":"Paradox and potential: trends in science policy and practice in Canada and New Zealand","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prometheus","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"BRIC; China; Face (sociological concept); Science policy; Political science; Ideology; Globalization; Politics; Economic growth; Regional science; Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1496957365547216,"gpt":0.4326304286769152,"spread":0.2829346921221936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006872911,0.000107134,0.0002084865,0.001340729,0.0001286569,0.0002768742,0.0005805217,0.00004026441,0.00004653731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01074375,0.00007467403,0.000009333041,0.003749313,0.0006297395,0.001200698,0.0003114851,0.0002524933,0.000002804856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009719941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001757929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8632118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5326155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970719,0.0002123913,0.0003421027,0.0006106401,0.001262572,0.0005003441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981059,0.001011768,0.0001142838,0.0002487961,0.00008257604,0.000436652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007106253,0.00002570503,0.2410488,0.000002745487,0.000002119585,0.00006931247,0.006020822,0.000003809079,0.001106675,0.0007898364,0.0008333366,0.7500257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004775575,0.00006345376,0.9611499,0.00001211346,0.000002173209,0.0001195454,0.001323758,0.0005772098,0.000247676,0.02999697,0.005893803,0.0001358957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873233,0.000547143,0.00001597418,0.004422994,0.0000640058,0.0001122939,0.000003240348,0.000004869542,0.0075062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957194,0.000371908,0.001534623,0.0002281348,0.00002738062,0.000004033204,1.116777e-7,0.000004110343,0.002110307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7498899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1939229375","doi":"10.4321/s0211-95362015000200002","title":"Clouds, airplanes, trucks and people: carrying radioisotopes to and across Mexico","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dynamis","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Atomic energy; Truck; Political science; Nuclear weapon; Engineering; Geography; Environmental protection; Sociology; Archaeology; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1007518164379583,"gpt":0.425986727497264,"spread":0.3252349110593057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004256999,0.0001482017,0.0003004757,0.0001527745,0.000352574,0.0007289077,0.0007556534,0.00009215945,0.00003800614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002931953,0.0001031799,0.00003335323,0.0008662008,0.0002618987,0.0004322046,0.0004291897,0.0002203471,0.0001036578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003966895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009523985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006213997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009200625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996857,0.0001384486,0.0003399103,0.0006437738,0.001492287,0.0005285321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979673,0.0005805761,0.00007414361,0.0004048833,0.0001782875,0.0007948098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001007712,0.00002400964,0.6522627,0.00001478266,0.00001356471,0.00004905834,0.03621104,0.0002946584,0.000985314,0.001320023,0.03907132,0.2696528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001617154,0.0003195959,0.6040975,0.00004833259,0.000008781288,0.0002782521,0.03425916,0.03640953,0.0003678731,0.01753132,0.3043113,0.0007511483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991649,0.0008166297,0.0008354367,0.002597586,0.0002678229,0.0002072459,0.00004717746,0.00003438864,0.003544764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947309,0.00007979744,0.0006284206,0.0004135879,0.00009624383,0.00001083251,0.000002592957,0.000008993687,0.004028581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2689016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7028874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136858692","doi":"10.5204/mcj.160","title":"Unplanned Educational Obsolescence: Is the ‘Traditional’ PhD Becoming Obsolete?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"M/C Journal","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obsolescence; Product (mathematics); Marketing; Turnkey; Business; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3216853076276856,"gpt":0.4483043017267841,"spread":0.1266189940990985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00602079,0.0001502981,0.0001949295,0.0003073416,0.001606246,0.001374146,0.002363049,0.00007540637,0.003700722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002447769,0.00008276397,0.0002135052,0.001007448,0.0003170109,0.0009660804,0.00006163774,0.001029957,0.0009119639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001002582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006756856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004631843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002582865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945295,0.0002798468,0.0006900989,0.0003793407,0.003553785,0.0005673984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968285,0.001658806,0.0003088302,0.0003803317,0.0004470207,0.0003764855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004239301,0.0001349434,0.0161702,0.00000120623,0.00001578116,0.00002518684,0.002704568,0.0001962938,0.002516612,0.01840772,0.8934247,0.06636042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003731477,0.0001128074,0.3357999,0.00004995136,0.000006851486,0.0006814156,0.001931625,0.001750259,0.0005384347,0.5651205,0.09342684,0.0002082495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5464543,0.001222244,0.002600431,0.4126257,0.002313296,0.0002499608,0.00003786138,0.00002749202,0.03446873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808775,0.0001193455,0.0006919042,0.007683509,0.001793739,0.000002708961,0.000001883248,0.0000054164,0.008823956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7999978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971900992","doi":"10.1007/s11024-013-9242-x","title":"Techno-Nationalism and the Construction of University Technology Transfer","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minerva","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Institutionalisation; Higher education; Technology transfer; Symbol (formal); Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Politics; Law; Business; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04104646048793584,"gpt":0.3092408805716593,"spread":0.2681944200837235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001334299,0.00004170425,0.0001072106,0.0002844488,0.0001208607,0.00003486653,0.0005286901,0.00006767046,0.0002450559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007754521,0.00002254878,0.00003081313,0.00107945,0.001872641,0.0002573607,0.00007097444,0.0001233533,0.00004057623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008322047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003263663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001471068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001589711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989488,0.00007668196,0.0001555211,0.0001700604,0.0005414311,0.0001075027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989858,0.0004989518,0.00003473125,0.0001867822,0.000260923,0.00003280301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003422751,0.00001891043,0.0367024,0.00000401254,0.00001278244,0.000001881857,0.0004673802,0.00001501337,0.02102058,0.7355495,0.005518169,0.2006551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002377567,0.00006370441,0.08933826,0.0000204558,0.00001688781,0.00008535685,0.01064231,0.009926736,0.01232881,0.7751666,0.09982753,0.0002058215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669683,0.0001009782,0.001850665,0.02476834,0.00004492954,0.0001443231,0.000004367789,0.00001577584,0.006102298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963229,0.00003760509,0.0007865863,0.0000522159,0.00001138995,0.000001727752,2.16077e-7,0.000001186525,0.002786115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2004493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6899824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599489099","doi":"","title":"Federal Support for Academic Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Rochester; Michigan State University; Emory University; Carnegie Mellon University; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; Yeshiva University; Princeton University; Ohio State University; California Institute of Technology; York University; University of Miami; Vanderbilt University; Office of Research and Development","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1032402626969162,"gpt":0.3128028397652664,"spread":0.2095625770683502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001994017,0.0006453289,0.001512543,0.002880018,0.001238166,0.0003011872,0.009516714,0.0007989743,0.003078553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005580491,0.0007311443,0.001159169,0.002264781,0.004264259,0.009927173,0.004176206,0.002460193,0.002210547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002814448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003405172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001054739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004813765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905197,0.0003304155,0.0008439571,0.001710903,0.004975524,0.001619512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991768,0.002999947,0.001308858,0.00146214,0.00122157,0.001239486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004030915,0.000110378,0.5823277,0.0001110219,0.00009557556,0.00009934611,0.0001162519,0.00001947355,8.333414e-8,0.001000968,0.3957752,0.01994093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006635173,0.0003101066,0.4083749,0.0000821212,0.00004178665,0.000009785211,0.000122294,0.00004836296,0.00000250093,0.003252675,0.5866366,0.0004553217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2558933,0.0004710999,0.001027395,0.001613384,0.0005577671,0.002624506,0.01523639,0.0002843978,0.7222918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1029335,0.0005470989,0.000665504,0.00006471862,0.0002675993,8.782205e-8,0.001371975,0.00006218834,0.8940873],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1908614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010746111","doi":"10.1257/jep.23.3.189","title":"Retrospectives: Trouble in the Inaugural Issue of the <i>American Economic Review</i>: The Cross/Eaves Controversy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Eaves; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Law; History; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04680662530375174,"gpt":0.4213923318527599,"spread":0.3745857065490081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01581405,0.0002090154,0.0007130078,0.0001817338,0.0004600354,0.0003133483,0.005372406,0.00003760141,0.0002753518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001933118,0.00007597325,0.0004796298,0.0005643942,0.002405818,0.0009068561,0.0001540951,0.0009241032,0.00006825334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004442914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004246642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002840139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001591412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958519,0.001386556,0.001264607,0.0003161729,0.0007566203,0.0004241457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934844,0.003177395,0.002031136,0.001000324,0.0002264934,0.00008025591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003693818,0.0006815568,0.1138507,0.00003765583,0.0005203377,0.00002436586,0.1613297,0.01318525,0.006734272,0.1353048,0.5287588,0.03587874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001252438,0.0007735356,0.7201475,0.0001549523,0.00005800678,0.0002372286,0.1350131,0.0008288461,0.0005549008,0.1193711,0.02134949,0.0002589322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8912211,0.01064362,0.00001901929,0.08281691,0.0003486384,0.0004492359,0.00001654543,0.000003874284,0.01448107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878545,0.008543743,0.00001856512,0.002478642,0.0005105443,0.000002900239,6.57157e-8,0.000007038793,0.0005840158],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6062968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537594794","doi":"10.3395/reciis.v2i1.832","title":"La science sous observation – cent ans de mesure sur les scientifiques 1906 – 2006","year":2008,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09027888377794317,"gpt":0.3443005161733214,"spread":0.2540216323953782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006761104,0.0005846939,0.0007855503,0.001722077,0.002907065,0.001219347,0.006243312,0.000274573,0.001512345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004702437,0.0004803998,0.0003529782,0.01501427,0.01363263,0.008780912,0.001202162,0.001105742,0.0004936944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002382148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00557997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02063798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000105469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868113,0.001336433,0.00126733,0.002297992,0.006036535,0.00225039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935648,0.001929763,0.0007760632,0.001589918,0.000709152,0.001430275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003810824,0.0001933093,0.7677686,0.00001908114,0.00001517087,0.0001837576,0.003107025,0.0002339211,0.00465673,0.001323422,0.1465506,0.07591026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003745282,0.0001784214,0.9119316,0.0001320026,0.00001672006,0.00006910734,0.002875892,0.01063246,0.008105229,0.001194049,0.0637744,0.000715537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763782,0.002303648,0.002625954,0.008053841,0.0008234582,0.0005102236,0.0001541654,0.0002454006,0.008905085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964405,0.003444569,0.002987682,0.001529823,0.0002644048,0.00002823739,0.00001746776,0.00005791235,0.02726492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.144163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008663066","doi":"10.7202/1013983ar","title":"Canadian Science Policy and the Retreat from Transformative Politics: The Final Years of the Science Council of Canada, 1985-1992","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Public administration; Politics; Transformative learning; Political science; State (computer science); Agency (philosophy); Sovereignty; Public policy; Government (linguistics); Interventionism (politics); Sociology; Law; International relations; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04686831728609738,"gpt":0.2806302273050991,"spread":0.2337619100190017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01960098,0.000171251,0.0004907469,0.003425456,0.003123456,0.00009180186,0.008275559,0.00008597,0.00009375603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02355209,0.00007504661,0.00008294175,0.01232608,0.1838779,0.0008000812,0.0003098813,0.0007082387,6.361731e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005456691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2362921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9851013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915368,0.0001699255,0.0009391486,0.0004622682,0.005819644,0.001072242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925364,0.0006796583,0.0009450733,0.001107599,0.00343189,0.001299411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009698144,0.00004377686,0.05611923,0.00005814443,0.0001239588,0.00006814107,0.1641521,0.0003645581,0.1164898,0.3498939,0.2464523,0.06613709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003091226,0.0004611668,0.5360307,0.0009219149,0.0002143779,0.001008439,0.08831447,0.002850077,0.01891062,0.1682622,0.1792762,0.0006586518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8911333,0.002308297,0.000004994558,0.09933578,0.001773331,0.0003211548,0.00004937369,0.000001772416,0.005072007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964027,0.00004278454,0.00004551921,0.001154038,0.00004846459,0.000002084674,4.481219e-8,0.00000399318,0.00230039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4799114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1562756282","doi":"10.1590/s1678-31662009000100004","title":"Ciencia, tecnología y democracia: distinciones y conexiones","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Government (linguistics); Epistemology; Political science; Technology and society; Politics; Sociology; Social science; Public relations; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0341124305013368,"gpt":0.3475440412674622,"spread":0.3134316107661254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00164358,0.0007386031,0.001211368,0.001308211,0.001382572,0.001119579,0.005259833,0.0003476893,0.004694626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003133424,0.0005637925,0.0004908816,0.007850478,0.003769531,0.005363547,0.0007684327,0.001154666,0.003954946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008434131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001052345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00175518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007523335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898302,0.0007223188,0.001614527,0.002104974,0.003736915,0.001991071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940131,0.001900131,0.0009157885,0.001673927,0.0002572029,0.001239849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001077334,0.0002934133,0.3113246,0.00001012753,0.00003398463,0.0002498151,0.0003899464,0.00003752835,0.002190621,0.0277773,0.2090967,0.4484882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004329643,0.0008190737,0.7866768,0.0000873467,0.00003218087,0.00003980511,0.001369878,0.001139338,0.002638571,0.02962629,0.1762584,0.0008793724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8402115,0.004534178,0.00168036,0.08529168,0.001019379,0.0007405803,0.0001591027,0.0005139951,0.0658492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632289,0.001987101,0.002355687,0.008668873,0.0007261694,0.00002090413,0.00002118268,0.00004735066,0.02294384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4753521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079245035","doi":"10.1086/664976","title":"Senator Fred Harris's National Social Science Foundation Proposal: Reconsidering Federal Science Policy, Natural Science–Social Science Relations, and American Liberalism during the 1960s","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Isis","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Natural science; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Law; Social science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07876100903909426,"gpt":0.4265420745466482,"spread":0.3477810655075539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03031476,0.0002960118,0.0003356959,0.003351306,0.02363533,0.007158812,0.004330025,0.00006579443,0.00006274444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01923333,0.0002041997,0.000109411,0.02474172,0.05129062,0.01407086,0.001664478,0.0007224408,0.0001151711],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001771289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01098263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004001453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000319698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9831191,0.0002188345,0.0007884861,0.00155372,0.01220645,0.002113382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947678,0.0006629663,0.0005895002,0.000496378,0.002782064,0.0007013111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007417669,0.0001429524,0.1290257,0.0000134612,0.00001405277,0.000004101291,0.03406065,0.0000362658,0.5362645,0.1857222,0.00189929,0.1127426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003910471,0.00003498383,0.9441379,0.00001720676,0.000006346637,0.0000799453,0.006225229,0.003851763,0.02567037,0.01574521,0.003331234,0.0005087515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747459,0.000062751,0.00005154108,0.01181625,0.0009885314,0.0004110115,0.00001284983,0.00008906019,0.01182207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995818,0.0000095057,0.001677774,0.000588936,0.00103642,0.00002778615,7.912892e-7,0.00001513144,0.0008256658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8151122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W619739641","doi":"","title":"Strategic science in the public interest : Canada's government laboratories and science-based agencies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Wildlife; Sustainable development; Public administration; Engineering; Business; Library science; Environmental planning; Geography; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2093324147336368,"gpt":0.3897940600177315,"spread":0.1804616452840946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03863134,0.0003966726,0.0004569419,0.001209139,0.001517689,0.00577145,0.009447526,0.0001585435,0.0003680059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007360568,0.0002099483,0.00005625123,0.008505717,0.01399999,0.001516721,0.000891567,0.001103602,0.0000269043],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07190292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007964832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.532747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9736367,0.0001804369,0.0009825797,0.001645749,0.02206969,0.001484828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937356,0.002506946,0.0004040724,0.001344718,0.001346334,0.0006623973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000247457,0.00005257771,0.005363694,0.00002710246,0.000004689167,0.0002379954,0.0007570589,0.00001223971,0.0008980734,0.8832133,0.09397475,0.01543371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004518453,0.0002386453,0.01226282,0.0001363917,0.000008839588,0.00003277801,0.04336093,0.002256151,0.001402547,0.09377678,0.8450154,0.001056875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06241602,0.0003888824,0.00005998957,0.006607307,0.0009270295,0.0005474788,0.0000787063,0.00002253259,0.928952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8391884,0.00004887751,0.0001264524,0.001657481,0.0001259889,0.00001338285,0.000001392007,0.00001039682,0.1588276],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7894366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388525094","doi":"10.1108/978-1-80382-701-820231004","title":"History of Research Administration/Management in North America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); License; Publishing; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Management; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4551436089787714,"gpt":0.4957735153913876,"spread":0.04062990641261621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007530564,0.0001936079,0.0004682482,0.003003729,0.00008072516,0.00008819147,0.002568397,0.00018,0.004033443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001153615,0.000143956,0.0001585028,0.001105636,0.001487366,0.000226622,0.0006941014,0.001021991,0.005098906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005073709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001106438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001137599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001372306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896779,0.000162274,0.001135992,0.000988106,0.007508348,0.0005273462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958853,0.001958292,0.0002807282,0.001059848,0.0005987973,0.0002170287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004960924,0.00003584807,0.0004590764,0.00003739934,0.00002099599,0.0002301069,0.0005220423,0.00002362724,0.00000638722,0.2958586,0.6105227,0.09223355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009535036,0.0001099636,0.002249359,0.00004056215,0.000002356746,7.5441e-7,0.0004920876,0.0001494987,0.000003070183,0.06295286,0.9337557,0.0001484098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001802979,0.000227624,0.00004784138,0.0007635959,0.0003314343,0.0004245516,0.00002010299,0.00003383396,0.9979707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00655817,0.001059151,0.0002563962,0.00009308672,0.00007383634,0.00002266211,0.0000114018,0.00002178533,0.9919035],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3232329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036060244","doi":"10.4236/ce.2012.37b039","title":"Beneficial Experience from Teaching and Education to Research and Development","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Creative Education","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; École de technologie supérieure","keywords":"Excellence; Field (mathematics); Perception; Selection (genetic algorithm); Government (linguistics); Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.337000750823388,"gpt":0.5630520424624388,"spread":0.2260512916390507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005236243,0.0000944993,0.0001199189,0.0004537576,0.0009841159,0.0004270769,0.0003715436,0.00005234138,0.0002158081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006100114,0.00007255113,0.000009123572,0.0005681593,0.0002460536,0.001056858,0.0002064196,0.0003223451,0.0001811695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001427466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008050714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000992146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003295704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973011,0.0003956654,0.0002808628,0.0004725662,0.001189106,0.0003606934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975917,0.001175273,0.00006908676,0.0002404701,0.0004723675,0.0004510608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001310892,0.0001635281,0.1531306,0.000001754086,0.000001723037,2.619185e-8,0.09890657,4.278726e-7,0.002688941,0.004135768,0.007556176,0.7334014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004202042,0.00003070665,0.7712498,0.00003368615,9.234495e-7,0.00000136043,0.08904844,0.00001617106,0.003287954,0.008477934,0.1277038,0.0001072353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805711,0.0007319256,0.0004827838,0.001038595,0.0004797625,0.0002805177,0.000002598312,0.000008699171,0.01640401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863319,0.00002138862,0.007540718,0.0001883253,0.0005960925,0.00008429442,0.00000805399,0.000005414103,0.005223841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7332941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7569123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3371375","doi":"10.1007/bf00256630","title":"Recognising the Value of the Arts and Humanities in a Time of Austerity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Norges Forskningsråd; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Austerity; Value (mathematics); The arts; Humanities; Art; Visual arts; Aesthetics; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1473536593604992,"gpt":0.3607096449073071,"spread":0.2133559855468079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01204723,0.00006192198,0.0002438107,0.0001844987,0.0001013887,0.00005808549,0.001160806,0.00001187786,0.0006930472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003636895,0.00002415639,0.00005277493,0.0003774401,0.001114407,0.0002599698,0.000222043,0.0003592361,0.0000421324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008578711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002589705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002816942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001429776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966492,0.0009718104,0.0007818528,0.0000995143,0.001366697,0.0001309374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981523,0.0006878288,0.0005810232,0.0002281589,0.0002847742,0.00006598723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000340804,0.0002303528,0.04597066,0.0000784793,0.0000828905,0.0001722066,0.1211611,0.0001244271,0.2296639,0.002331892,0.3360716,0.2637717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008248072,0.0005650673,0.9383178,0.0007166925,0.00001374688,0.0001581432,0.01135158,0.0006917965,0.0002330886,0.004671808,0.0423886,0.00006682208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718832,0.0002096582,0.000007714461,0.008863844,0.0001267632,0.00007440313,5.300245e-7,0.000001253197,0.01883258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983624,0.00006950148,0.0000867239,0.0006491221,0.0001383944,4.79562e-8,1.581327e-8,0.000006392227,0.0006874427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8923472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7588381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238659492","doi":"10.22230/cjc2016v41n1a3104","title":"Getting It Right: Canadian Conservatives and the “War on Science”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Media studies; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1215567719786095,"gpt":0.4005621161064732,"spread":0.2790053441278637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01677347,0.00007972344,0.0001731652,0.0009876103,0.001762482,0.0004417829,0.003316762,0.00004264075,0.0002124635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01314671,0.00003555217,0.00005275964,0.001023277,0.004341982,0.0009588925,0.00005932257,0.0003443749,0.00005555323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002819679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005205867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07198229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4973134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973647,0.0005858548,0.0005144804,0.0001609874,0.0009718456,0.0004021468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937388,0.003090846,0.0003690938,0.0007342789,0.0009505405,0.001116443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001184126,0.0000167148,0.109699,0.00000329595,0.00004297913,0.00005682556,0.02524306,0.00007370752,0.002476429,0.3903227,0.1280465,0.3439003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001342065,0.000102822,0.172068,0.0002774049,0.000009028347,0.0001288897,0.006173151,0.0006830749,0.0008491797,0.1579522,0.6601961,0.0002181394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6074136,0.001421741,0.0001457065,0.3276722,0.0002362142,0.0001868709,0.00001375354,0.000002950886,0.06290697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964504,0.0002521088,0.0002198467,0.002218295,0.00004599888,0.00000151325,1.240022e-7,0.000003641138,0.0008080865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5321495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549218909","doi":"","title":"I'm Still Your Baby: Canada's Continuing Support of U.S. Linkage Regulations for Pharmaceuticals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Notice; Pharmaceutical industry; Status quo; Patentability; Business; Statutory law; Law and economics; Public economics; Law; International trade; Economics; Political science; Patent law; Medicine; Pharmacology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3343465214202145,"gpt":0.4277973384479963,"spread":0.09345081702778174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007436673,0.0002744787,0.0008801552,0.0001374324,0.000178809,0.0001004788,0.001861842,0.00009698694,0.009434678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01837013,0.0001442789,0.0002977431,0.001082132,0.0005999826,0.0003847762,0.0003014183,0.0004217627,0.0001957702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009211418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006940522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02388579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01434743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945995,0.0004935566,0.00166443,0.0007484708,0.001799228,0.0006948193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949075,0.002314801,0.0003888844,0.0007935197,0.001212401,0.0003828843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009277091,0.00009541,0.0001804021,0.0008159736,0.00005099168,0.00001532804,0.001523786,0.000002954761,0.001194532,0.003623841,0.6779587,0.3144453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002083322,0.0001393066,0.00005241025,0.0006311671,0.00004745709,0.00001662081,0.00006477335,0.0007696767,0.006223081,0.001264819,0.990342,0.0002403602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03669604,0.1229789,0.02576543,0.06814791,0.004192117,0.02590603,0.002031321,0.0005094564,0.7137728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9260169,0.01240817,0.003080772,0.02034675,0.0002576356,0.0003075546,0.00003872473,0.00006112709,0.03748242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8893208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1661346537","doi":"10.24908/ijesjp.v2i2.3512","title":"What can engineers learn from the past? A potential role for history in engineering education.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Polity; Perspective (graphical); Narrative; Class (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Social issues; Sustainable development; Energy (signal processing); Environmental ethics; Engineering education; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; History; Politics; Law; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02910682735750317,"gpt":0.3288970369547905,"spread":0.2997902095972873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001024295,0.000103768,0.000159898,0.0002774789,0.00005980598,0.000434771,0.0008343264,0.00006213215,0.00006305589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001766835,0.0000764326,0.0001014494,0.0001619288,0.00004345337,0.0009376951,0.00006111243,0.0003723378,0.000006535189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002087694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002259564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001530221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001028154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982739,0.0000322946,0.000428418,0.0001540296,0.0009120672,0.0001992921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998026,0.001037569,0.0001675697,0.00007517361,0.0005888668,0.0001048211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002040804,0.0002916394,0.004661787,0.000125277,0.0004155597,0.00004981781,0.06130136,0.2803681,0.04859187,0.009060025,0.3617679,0.2331626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001982006,0.0001333986,0.1393746,0.0005086743,0.0001712281,0.00009932382,0.06231612,0.2775926,0.0002482804,0.003823365,0.5130343,0.0007160918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9331492,0.01250449,0.02231939,0.01901355,0.01256914,0.000268981,0.0000168051,0.00001937664,0.0001390413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934961,0.0006794897,0.001231722,0.000454893,0.003504721,0.00001430666,0.000002826261,0.00001298436,0.0006030065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2324465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4192507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031172479","doi":"10.1080/15575330.2011.645044","title":"Lessons from the field: mapping Saskatchewan's Pipeline of Entrepreneurs and Enterprises in order to build a provincial operating system for entrepreneurship","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Community Development","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Order (exchange); Field (mathematics); Pipeline (software); Business; Finance; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1311694912625665,"gpt":0.39801782093825,"spread":0.2668483296756835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007025315,0.0001499803,0.0003068353,0.0001921744,0.0005967983,0.0002215625,0.001486437,0.0000690434,0.00002072046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01255826,0.00009723728,0.00003553903,0.0009212779,0.00009588521,0.0003010474,0.001069323,0.0004247252,0.000009987274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008295362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004037808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001925378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003531938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969355,0.0008488853,0.000727821,0.0002710624,0.0007710328,0.0004456569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912051,0.007418819,0.0002096038,0.000634308,0.0003473804,0.0001847892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005558183,0.0001324373,0.6814886,0.00003498546,0.00001193501,7.6494e-7,0.1235569,0.00006672919,0.003433256,0.00008032859,0.00239502,0.1887435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001219849,0.0000848961,0.6730013,0.0009589605,0.00001184989,0.000005918545,0.254923,0.0009925297,0.05262262,0.0005617543,0.01514783,0.0004694133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820378,0.0001962458,0.01348616,0.00316412,0.000197391,0.0006069685,0.00001884084,0.00001633931,0.0002761623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919781,0.000007171749,0.00713856,0.0005428777,0.00006951202,0.00008148625,0.000006180401,0.000006639191,0.000169453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1882741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911382742","doi":"10.22230/src.2012v3n1a49","title":"From Writing the Grant to Working the Grant: An Exploration of Processes and Procedures in Transition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Grant writing; Work (physics); Public relations; Corporate governance; Inclusion (mineral); Scale (ratio); Political science; Process management; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Business; Library science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4311310873747218,"gpt":0.498412880295559,"spread":0.06728179292083719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03316126,0.00007517976,0.0001231785,0.0003365171,0.001424336,0.001486981,0.001403055,0.00006902829,0.000007236477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009796434,0.00003835947,0.00001686541,0.002098389,0.0006359548,0.007667678,0.0003132732,0.000916054,0.000005588247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002061718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001258514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007077565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001578067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946619,0.002421046,0.0004127244,0.0002584279,0.001905367,0.0003404954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946681,0.00357163,0.00009407452,0.0006922837,0.0008331725,0.0001407218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004212631,0.0003485966,0.1090096,0.00009119755,0.00001561193,8.916948e-7,0.430111,0.0001565501,0.04001643,0.01385613,0.0004805839,0.4054921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006721864,0.0002402723,0.4679024,0.0007939637,0.000008434784,0.000006961024,0.2601644,0.002833316,0.007725155,0.2550229,0.004367583,0.0002624189],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705787,0.005627914,0.0006889565,0.02222879,0.00001888454,0.000531179,0.000004390073,0.000008194751,0.0003129522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973008,0.00199811,0.0003963953,0.0001092071,0.00007973077,0.00008509537,0.000004518241,0.000005144766,0.00002100695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4052297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239016746","doi":"10.3138/9781442681804","title":"The National Research Council in The Innovation Policy Era","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Research council; Political science; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4436459860835799,"gpt":0.4239376168332881,"spread":0.01970836925029174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03348742,0.0001527987,0.0002423377,0.0002606195,0.001031515,0.0003147407,0.00516483,0.0002626569,0.0001900455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008111624,0.00009571775,0.0001065352,0.0001128291,0.001657022,0.000390948,0.0006141356,0.001056712,0.00005202093],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004278949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006065991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04809379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04047309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9802405,0.0008533294,0.0004553094,0.000521806,0.01745877,0.000470252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857548,0.004239341,0.0003547455,0.0006666105,0.008915843,0.00006859068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003995291,0.00001313497,0.00000550464,0.000005052427,0.000009586511,0.000005682631,0.00719931,0.00001087779,0.00001569693,0.2364862,0.7384409,0.0177681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002202066,0.00003737804,0.0003788168,0.00003213586,0.00000242555,0.000001788132,0.0006800295,0.0003009577,0.000005254287,0.04239521,0.9558522,0.00009361397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007470857,0.0007072503,0.00001612347,0.001019052,0.00008272588,0.0004375368,0.00005167205,0.000009056246,0.9976019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002629216,0.0004403351,0.00003795716,0.0001144506,0.0002695846,0.000001390164,0.000002309807,0.000006751942,0.996498],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2174113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234764270","doi":"","title":"A Map of the Interface Between Science & Policy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interface (matter); Argument (complex analysis); Science policy; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Focus (optics); Public policy; Taxonomy (biology); Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Management science; Public administration; Engineering; Geography; Linguistics; Law; Physics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04892416183172087,"gpt":0.4348224731433047,"spread":0.3858983113115838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03541265,0.0001139478,0.0002317036,0.0005812166,0.0007662839,0.0003334973,0.005646712,0.0000505852,0.00005255179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006427043,0.00005782373,0.0001622537,0.002311388,0.001476331,0.000666807,0.0004947032,0.002064762,0.0002254082],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005367827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007727394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001105571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000108188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927095,0.0003698367,0.0005873239,0.0003629167,0.003494269,0.002476213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976869,0.0006177963,0.0004090358,0.0006093753,0.0004600373,0.0002168443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002554643,0.00003751355,0.09432195,0.000003161719,0.00002590606,2.842638e-7,0.0009879962,0.0001821495,0.01973457,0.5383357,0.001865514,0.3444797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002247559,0.0001751754,0.02829636,0.00001575654,0.000004634158,0.00005403111,0.001305802,0.0004150764,0.006367434,0.9442936,0.01874932,0.00009807514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523543,0.0004496883,0.02055307,0.01818242,0.0003445349,0.0001258868,0.000002225921,0.00001121207,0.007976629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925675,0.00008211593,0.00005724172,0.0001097818,0.000467391,7.968989e-7,2.940033e-8,0.000005884889,0.006709215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4059578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899692542","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.5861","title":"Approaching the Loop: A Brief Review of Effective Practises in Continuous Program Improvement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Process (computing); Institution; Diversity (politics); Loop (graph theory); Process management; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Knowledge management; Engineering; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05625482993753602,"gpt":0.3974537952652151,"spread":0.3411989653276791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01545396,0.0002970489,0.001165347,0.0007445976,0.0001608251,0.0003233464,0.002022885,0.0002550751,0.0000160464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04086708,0.0001793085,0.0003753578,0.003328902,0.00008119794,0.000450776,0.0001458493,0.0009693747,0.00001048117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003318373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004484277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00610524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001625515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953331,0.0001329566,0.001330251,0.0004969459,0.002194828,0.0005119606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935918,0.0009971366,0.002725375,0.0003313563,0.00206592,0.0002883493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.069829e-7,0.00006118554,0.0006235364,0.009714424,0.00005343501,6.680539e-8,0.0003763543,0.00000763741,0.000003109871,0.0007888608,0.03496443,0.9534063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007414943,0.0000342065,0.0009533493,0.01723282,0.0001165712,0.00000411536,0.0002732614,0.0001252023,0.000008651065,0.0002040382,0.9807805,0.0001930681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002858771,0.9847587,0.000003226535,0.002505137,0.001008648,0.005803308,0.00005170752,0.00002914559,0.005554203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002064549,0.9912522,0.0003662969,0.0003132459,0.0003142069,0.001775147,0.00001570185,0.00005644546,0.003842229],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9672121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}