{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":667,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":667,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"bec976f06328","filters":{"topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2077002469","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x","title":"Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents, 1953‐2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Heritage College","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Deference; Presidential system; Assertiveness; Context (archaeology); Political science; Adversarial system; White (mutation); Politics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04610514520876348,"gpt":0.2807071089102456,"spread":0.2346019637014821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000219041,0.0002231927,0.0004021912,0.0002624711,0.0006335393,0.0001799742,0.0002966285,0.00004304804,0.0003899664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000203352,0.0002069213,0.000125602,0.0001215585,0.0001964087,0.0003914661,0.0000837788,0.0001746016,0.00008519412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005131215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002046488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02105509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03020124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998255,0.0001420174,0.0006233361,0.0003062311,0.0003304835,0.0003429887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991949,0.000124626,0.0001710718,0.000320539,0.0001540779,0.00003475781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001166916,0.0005745937,0.01770184,0.00007353896,0.0003909949,0.00004550009,0.2514707,0.00005559835,0.00003326186,0.241287,0.4364246,0.05182564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001630245,0.0004664376,0.09989277,0.0001557466,0.0001644333,0.000006290149,0.02790612,0.00004540736,0.00002091224,0.03625736,0.8325647,0.0008895946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.417416,0.1848037,0.000328241,0.008273132,0.007191564,0.0006752269,0.0000161535,0.0009828439,0.3803131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9230592,0.0002085663,0.00006064418,0.00004096856,0.001138593,0.000118786,0.000007319832,0.00001940413,0.07534655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5056432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495551685","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316181645","title":"The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Audience reception; Rhetoric; Sociology; Ambivalence; Focus (optics); Psychology; Social psychology; Media studies; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06095400508634036,"gpt":0.2130385516083293,"spread":0.1520845465219889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001264355,0.0001301284,0.0001883115,0.0000375824,0.0005372113,0.00003844044,0.0003218915,0.00005323702,0.000001875551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007677111,0.0001043841,0.00005600173,0.000002691927,0.0009644539,0.00005147831,0.0003582261,0.0001531443,0.000004076322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001053771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007663716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007083327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009363265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994103,0.00005159862,0.0001258327,0.0001424336,0.0001728954,0.00009699422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990208,0.0000867868,0.0002183426,0.0003492809,0.0002833066,0.00004146519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002120284,0.00000407625,3.886066e-7,0.00002376871,0.00005524924,8.485669e-7,0.001938315,7.046718e-8,4.433844e-7,0.760505,0.2364076,0.001043034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001556163,0.00004272683,0.000003159304,0.00007062892,0.00006942099,5.763735e-7,0.001257156,0.000004175261,0.000003997447,0.0002831637,0.9979981,0.0001112396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006241858,0.001647796,0.000008324741,0.00007714138,0.0002071505,0.0001623257,0.00006511981,0.00002686828,0.9977428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002813101,0.00179227,0.000006922985,0.00001927492,0.0001631782,0.000001249031,0.00001155413,0.000008177152,0.9951842],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7615905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4256659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245008094","doi":"10.23943/princeton/9780691167732.001.0001","title":"Ethical Life","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Princeton University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Creatures; Epistemology; Ethnography; Social science; Anthropology; Natural (archaeology); History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1197099218173623,"gpt":0.2424093007026696,"spread":0.1226993788853072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001879856,0.0002405667,0.0003750226,0.00008092605,0.0004632534,0.00008917881,0.0007541166,0.0003357199,0.000202795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002664306,0.0002465158,0.0001351489,0.000003022984,0.0006504693,0.00005594117,0.0008265268,0.001030503,0.0001000081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001936203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001697871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007931991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989047,0.0001115442,0.0001697215,0.0002689527,0.0003496259,0.0001954575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985576,0.0001063937,0.0001917961,0.0005998657,0.0003764797,0.0001679197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002277417,0.000007354759,2.832383e-7,0.00002530546,0.0000968136,0.000006292213,0.006632003,3.184892e-7,4.593668e-8,0.6520783,0.3405076,0.0006230006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002814291,0.00002860886,5.68513e-7,0.00005553583,0.0001055337,5.943925e-7,0.001049861,0.000006037095,0.000001034802,0.001984075,0.9962063,0.0002804643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004918254,0.0004345554,0.00002049332,0.0002242432,0.000370953,0.0001828084,0.0000642771,0.0002048289,0.9984929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005222703,0.0002429955,0.00003327753,0.0003575618,0.0005363616,0.000001569086,0.00003021481,0.00002464083,0.9982511],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6556987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131916307","doi":"10.1111/1467-7660.00239","title":"Conservation Narratives in Costa Rica: Conflict and Co‐existence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development and Change","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioprospecting; Narrative; Nature Conservation; Tourism; Narrative inquiry; Political science; Wildlife; Environmental ethics; Geography; Sociology; Ecology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2879354903130871,"gpt":0.2797252036073258,"spread":0.008210286705761294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000652795,0.00006780095,0.00009295776,0.00004197484,0.0002508712,0.00005074278,0.00003934508,0.00001482317,0.0001792512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004371862,0.00005746213,0.000004978437,0.00002320868,0.0001333544,0.0001205186,0.00003370222,0.00004064314,0.00001541845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001146452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003221154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005052383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004668027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996367,0.00001777464,0.000113478,0.00008998632,0.00005980573,0.00008224023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998276,0.00003115957,0.00003644359,0.00005337763,0.00003154874,0.00001983347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004929955,0.00003285856,0.02158104,0.00001693053,0.00001552751,0.000001448415,0.9094896,1.711113e-9,0.000003258958,0.04264271,0.005492797,0.02071895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002085475,0.00001442336,0.05637514,0.00002411171,0.000001362604,7.347109e-7,0.03066844,0.00001825471,0.00001058639,0.0001042784,0.9124796,0.00009451914],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9106938,0.01066452,0.000003571563,0.003409636,0.00007089476,0.0001774526,0.00000382762,0.0000297097,0.07494658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889969,0.004620924,0.0001581027,0.0008544544,0.0000489448,0.00009276764,0.0000091858,0.00000418034,0.005214578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2343237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003970540","doi":"10.1177/1750635210360082","title":"‘The vermin have struck again’: dehumanizing the enemy in post 9/11 media representations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Media War & Conflict","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Framing (construction); Newspaper; Media studies; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Narrative; Aesthetics; Sociology; History; Political science; Literature; Law; Art; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05966750655358802,"gpt":0.2816946077630074,"spread":0.2220271012094194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004936059,0.0001514495,0.0001732157,0.0000628028,0.00127222,0.0001784558,0.000657687,0.00004640867,0.000480359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006114538,0.00009079441,0.00007686199,0.00005615388,0.0007254136,0.0001343409,0.0001880965,0.0004275045,0.0001027259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002194624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005675531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001546807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09798805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987778,0.0001247637,0.0003603468,0.0001875058,0.0002755265,0.0002740517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968762,0.002002069,0.0001333936,0.0007476727,0.0001850384,0.00005558351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002133968,0.00005258113,0.004941798,0.000005451699,0.00006856885,0.000006720878,0.5417354,0.000001757675,0.0001858777,0.4225826,0.01570342,0.01469458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002603914,0.000008618763,0.02007794,0.000008977851,0.00002043895,0.000002544942,0.07210062,0.00006247059,0.00007695924,0.0009659212,0.9062855,0.0001296418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8881837,0.002581792,0.000008047138,0.01293169,0.003253919,0.0004925969,0.00004750033,0.0001266104,0.0923742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945008,0.0007224472,0.0000403343,0.0005370823,0.0008787768,0.000112515,0.00003014094,0.0000209081,0.003157004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.890582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485805819","doi":"10.1017/ccol9780521860543.009","title":"The politics of rhetorical education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Excellence; Politics; Summit; Cicero; Rhetorical device; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Aesthetics; Sociology; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Cartography; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04914708977687465,"gpt":0.22462884160938,"spread":0.1754817518325053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005392077,0.0001612301,0.000213775,0.0000539038,0.0007592944,0.00004377307,0.0004551378,0.00008491181,0.000005843668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000716431,0.0001364832,0.0001407658,0.000001922177,0.0005334268,0.00003734491,0.000162997,0.0002170644,0.000008561332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001118862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001473762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001592944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005397884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993661,0.00002659328,0.0001746232,0.0001356542,0.0001704014,0.0001266469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987473,0.0001136967,0.0002294108,0.0005043119,0.0003567121,0.00004852053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009139566,0.00001074111,1.64773e-7,0.00001175782,0.00006244238,8.122872e-7,0.0008127852,4.046734e-8,2.871449e-7,0.8672847,0.124701,0.007106063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007938141,0.00003180584,0.000003301673,0.0000506753,0.0001020151,9.29915e-7,0.001130944,0.000001591688,0.000007278789,0.0004085485,0.9980435,0.0001399716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001824111,0.001546855,0.000008815391,0.0001111928,0.0003936142,0.0001433176,0.00005272262,0.00003859758,0.9976866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00229953,0.0009472425,0.00001066828,0.00005754633,0.0003556151,5.461853e-7,0.00001484324,0.00001295679,0.9963011],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8733425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5839955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992886693","doi":"","title":"Discourses of dehumanization: enemy construction and Canadian media complicity in the framing of the war on terror","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Dehumanization; Adversary; Framing (construction); Hacker; Media studies; Political science; Computer security; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0360696696495148,"gpt":0.2374392890733575,"spread":0.2013696194238427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006643879,0.00003782367,0.00006996438,0.00003017293,0.0002072544,0.00001042145,0.0001125138,0.00001009794,0.00006815551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001549615,0.00001927639,0.00001327822,0.00002947918,0.0002302738,0.00003577474,0.00001114886,0.0000427876,3.960301e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009613128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001629883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01390363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1929708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996931,0.00003572041,0.0001149756,0.0000386526,0.00007110492,0.0000464355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997098,0.00005798239,0.00005187571,0.000131361,0.00004011536,0.000008908499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001794669,0.00002103605,0.004685919,0.000003327074,0.000005854656,3.729779e-8,0.0682646,0.000003367875,0.000009429244,0.9232573,0.0005911434,0.003156218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004892005,0.0001326807,0.4250787,0.0001203593,0.00003875299,0.000003814388,0.4818425,0.0001170664,0.0006426315,0.01628757,0.07503572,0.0002110101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8478149,0.0003190883,0.00002397135,0.006458398,0.0001027719,0.0001360776,0.00001309225,0.000006678007,0.1451251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994074,0.00004481098,0.00002968519,0.0003330423,0.00002946662,0.000001539549,0.000001575643,0.000001192848,0.0001513337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060638714","doi":"10.1177/0002764211419357","title":"Picturing Protest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Behavioral Scientist","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Indigenous; Newspaper; Action (physics); Social movement; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Media studies; State (computer science); Public opinion; Mass media; Political science; Politics; Law; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1482882295765307,"gpt":0.2947496504576732,"spread":0.1464614208811425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007060389,0.00008463465,0.0001115844,0.0000449822,0.0005396644,0.00008893231,0.0002741161,0.000005976065,0.001487056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003451052,0.00006919717,0.00004535621,0.00007733108,0.001198223,0.0001458659,0.0001130769,0.00006637113,0.0002734174],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002324144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001132731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00471763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001129398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993689,0.00002099967,0.000128887,0.0001533723,0.0001413152,0.0001865074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994974,0.000006550491,0.00009232234,0.0002801975,0.00006869325,0.00005482651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003265539,0.001345715,0.1222622,0.00001067209,0.00004368875,0.00002739245,0.2411066,1.892942e-7,0.0003003851,0.3408827,0.0235441,0.2704437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001787578,0.0003166853,0.08139791,0.00001441711,0.00004427396,0.000004789948,0.02666822,0.000003502916,0.0003007331,0.000481863,0.890204,0.000384849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7487646,0.00006115707,0.00004277693,0.00009632672,0.0004799333,0.0001439768,0.00001026388,0.000139856,0.2502611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882997,0.000007246065,0.0006130683,0.00008687032,0.00008466742,0.00004834618,0.000003070326,0.000008294133,0.01084878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8666599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108202824","doi":"10.1177/1077800406295625","title":"Social Semiotics and Fieldwork","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Inquiry","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Social semiotics; Sociology; Ethnography; Epistemology; Semiotics of culture; Visual semiotics; Postmodernism; Structuralism (philosophy of science); Qualitative research; Social science; Anthropology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2072466770126772,"gpt":0.4032542605224365,"spread":0.1960075835097593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001781276,0.00006610805,0.0001059877,0.00002077666,0.0004528077,0.0000516719,0.00006018564,0.00002186574,0.0001481132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002084518,0.00005637904,0.00002680126,0.00001835119,0.0005215051,0.00007258805,0.00004633113,0.00006838363,0.00003562009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009931845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005681023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001251719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000862938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994805,0.0001295302,0.0001401182,0.00008015673,0.00007902893,0.00009062458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994659,0.0003228307,0.00005303603,0.00007432806,0.00007326343,0.00001057819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002486307,0.00001195973,0.00003819989,0.000004297119,0.000009516792,1.646074e-7,0.3645619,1.001767e-7,0.000001183886,0.5747309,0.06017084,0.000468378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001451215,0.00002704385,0.0007099951,0.000007602987,0.00001019847,2.433578e-7,0.4032573,0.000004018312,0.000007548289,0.1188033,0.4769094,0.0001182001],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3675926,0.003343864,0.001175732,0.009664874,0.0007056493,0.000153986,0.00001916887,0.0001605685,0.6171835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844673,0.00002959248,0.0001603306,0.0003423631,0.0009671988,0.00000929828,0.000007370739,0.000005664225,0.01401083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6168747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3482676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065933926","doi":"","title":"Putting theory to practice A critical approach to journalism studies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Compromise; Curriculum; Sociology; Politics; Object (grammar); Meaning (existential); Liberal arts education; Bridge (graph theory); Technical Journalism; The arts; Vocational education; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education; Social science; Media studies; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1766379127582961,"gpt":0.3889251032915336,"spread":0.2122871905332375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007724291,0.0001088565,0.0001785753,0.00006953553,0.0008086623,0.0002015668,0.0002211797,0.00001466303,0.0003024821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001921027,0.00007751634,0.00004519138,0.00006857538,0.0001197626,0.0002633745,0.0002421916,0.0001208233,0.0003396858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003475717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001123576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000396311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000237305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990416,0.0001583167,0.0002284655,0.0001566736,0.0001983584,0.0002165398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980413,0.001037134,0.00003460032,0.0002686072,0.000519792,0.00009861462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001960873,0.00009231488,0.000007261245,0.000005102805,0.00007822461,0.00000193771,0.1010104,0.000003497115,0.00000157632,0.8382797,0.05278207,0.007718351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005420946,0.00004002336,0.00001109254,0.00001411466,0.00002636642,0.00001594298,0.1961066,0.000006987037,0.000001887955,0.01420804,0.7894256,0.00008923853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005304362,0.00233689,0.01799664,0.04771316,0.000436235,0.0001477531,0.000001207835,0.000108024,0.9307296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7267781,0.0009118069,0.06638861,0.03535571,0.001854108,0.0002021947,0.000001148905,0.00003417225,0.1684742],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8240716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6219658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079357922","doi":"10.1080/07350190802540690","title":"Metis, Metis, Mestiza, Medusa: Rhetorical Bodies across Rhetorical Traditions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Metis; Rhetoric; Sociology; Mainstream; Normative; Subject (documents); Mythology; Epistemology; Literature; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1326650696711928,"gpt":0.3553509111752561,"spread":0.2226858415040633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009159194,0.0006179842,0.001415905,0.0001007432,0.001640933,0.0002621978,0.0009611206,0.0001310695,0.001911018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003339569,0.0004897817,0.0005954193,0.0003641968,0.0003740136,0.0005319374,0.0001264921,0.0005827592,0.001074438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003561349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008424192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001007682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005300569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959617,0.0003819908,0.001288797,0.0006753384,0.0008476408,0.0008445447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971046,0.0004230459,0.0004236052,0.001246814,0.0004729713,0.0003289202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001052661,0.0004108517,0.00003428098,0.0003529729,0.000162787,0.00001454205,0.008366316,7.021118e-7,0.000007963917,0.4481438,0.4891434,0.05335185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003050883,0.0001958468,0.0004578584,0.0008089815,0.0002591155,0.00003691926,0.0005532164,0.000008029078,0.000008526755,0.004103202,0.9926572,0.0006059982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004181923,0.7540287,0.0007936892,0.02452579,0.003512725,0.001262073,0.0001463254,0.0007917702,0.2145207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2163905,0.7395791,0.001018434,0.005784825,0.003091872,0.0005188092,0.0001513554,0.00008610989,0.03337898],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5035138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009716711","doi":"10.7748/nr2002.04.9.3.28.c6187","title":"<i>A post-colonial analysis of healthcare discourses addressing aboriginal women</i>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nurse Researcher","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Health care; Cervical cancer; Sociology; Healthcare system; Political science; History; Medicine; Cancer; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2369412342566131,"gpt":0.467175027496661,"spread":0.2302337932400479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005382032,0.0003283155,0.001915379,0.0007435624,0.0004866679,0.0001792982,0.0007051603,0.0001485624,0.003713036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000620698,0.0002375204,0.0006741316,0.0005579688,0.0007978052,0.0001310638,0.00008962034,0.0006800585,0.0001001516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003235082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004006673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001661475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001096709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970984,0.0006312603,0.000663936,0.0003458986,0.000712348,0.0005481031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976181,0.0003804155,0.0004144074,0.0008308071,0.0006031377,0.0001531367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001720059,0.0002314267,0.000009391298,0.004025299,0.003283425,0.000007178163,0.04025183,2.50816e-7,3.52213e-8,0.03672827,0.006976272,0.9084694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008087561,0.00008709472,0.00001005597,0.001740656,0.001355491,8.569251e-7,0.005537879,0.000005122166,3.409812e-8,0.00003390369,0.9909279,0.0002201714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000469451,0.9706644,7.163463e-7,0.0006510725,0.0001881169,0.0003448687,0.0006501268,0.00003878013,0.02741498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005095843,0.9654717,0.00001296364,0.00003773777,0.0004383608,0.0002789818,0.0001628555,0.00004308939,0.03304467],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999011748","doi":"10.1177/0170840608101481","title":"The Construction of General Public Interest: Risk, Legitimacy, and Power in a Public Hearing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Normative; Public interest; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Ideology; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09318661039922686,"gpt":0.2773756332651185,"spread":0.1841890228658917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000194515,0.00008180581,0.0001509017,0.00007966298,0.0007455845,0.0001525111,0.00009865951,0.00001588375,0.00003679166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003885757,0.00005677513,0.0000147217,0.0001614885,0.0004009751,0.0002424375,0.0001079277,0.00008204423,0.00000374946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003037159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001741727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002701633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004307895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999378,0.00007488466,0.00024798,0.0001011549,0.00008468949,0.0001132825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991034,0.0001040651,0.0001434767,0.0001506479,0.0004818522,0.00001655514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003174327,0.00003017549,0.03358149,0.00000424178,0.00007131074,1.596022e-7,0.02229234,3.539456e-7,0.00001528773,0.9333512,0.001925224,0.008725025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001458997,0.0002746918,0.209116,0.00008980328,0.00006708866,0.00001731941,0.2730847,0.00007398309,0.0003199158,0.04051169,0.4744263,0.0005595544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.955024,0.007677358,0.0001578553,0.02060436,0.000402014,0.0001876765,0.000006524959,0.00008260192,0.01585761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937666,0.005427066,0.00009399074,0.0000999125,0.00006039086,0.00000477061,0.000002795484,0.000006207705,0.0005382831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8928396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5734509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167133869","doi":"10.1177/0957926504046503","title":"There’s Risks in Everything: Extreme-Case Formulations and Accountability in Inquiry Testimony","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse & Society","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Accountability; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2392399050635899,"gpt":0.3713928652313692,"spread":0.1321529601677793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002907727,0.0001214487,0.0001612245,0.00002503193,0.000378249,0.00008448931,0.00009887053,0.00004538714,0.00008426646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002695048,0.0001019007,0.00007370289,0.00006730948,0.0004336222,0.0002994275,0.0001352834,0.0002318585,0.000007331427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001249569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005004095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007083635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01502153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999261,0.00003372448,0.0002422518,0.0001779405,0.0001065748,0.0001785051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994804,0.0001073835,0.0000637566,0.0002689231,0.0000492835,0.00003028055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001004073,0.0003913598,0.06159468,0.00002395813,0.00003171734,0.00001189335,0.8274901,0.0001667265,0.000004348906,0.1055583,0.0005815724,0.004135273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00160207,0.00003610798,0.1780699,0.0000992312,0.00003346884,0.00001645576,0.7514563,0.0005500908,0.000003964924,0.0624568,0.005303008,0.0003725092],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892973,0.001572203,0.00004749561,0.001277562,0.0000951818,0.0001779952,0.00001198343,0.00003613129,0.007484142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989833,0.0002611712,0.000236661,0.0001818192,0.00009797018,0.00005144045,0.000006061431,0.000009835972,0.0001717014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1164753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W822259891","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1005","title":"Fundamental Assumptions in Narrative Analysis: Mapping the Field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative network; Narrative criticism; Narrative inquiry; Variety (cybernetics); Openness to experience; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Representation (politics); Sociology; Object (grammar); Narrative psychology; Narrative structure; Narratology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2659360211332156,"gpt":0.4564633243485719,"spread":0.1905273032153563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00192519,0.0000812451,0.0001719586,0.00006563214,0.0007754568,0.0000681117,0.0001971357,0.000013325,0.0003918302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002873915,0.0000414094,0.0001049678,0.0001536368,0.0003029678,0.00007802594,0.00007074977,0.0001518885,0.00003378309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002895519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001353995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008258937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002254887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985599,0.0007197785,0.0003329676,0.0001135859,0.0001650814,0.0001087138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975098,0.001777669,0.000204154,0.0003970986,0.00009871308,0.0000125799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004237169,0.00001995524,0.0004765299,0.00000154914,0.0002958975,9.053918e-7,0.7707742,0.000007434457,0.000001570857,0.2248773,0.003274488,0.0002659035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005991495,0.00002711067,0.00379406,0.000008369412,0.00005919679,0.000001658372,0.7861662,0.00008292885,0.000002688193,0.0119726,0.1977558,0.00006953011],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4306524,0.0008063979,0.004140174,0.05055805,0.000363685,0.0003903834,0.000008283785,0.00007446208,0.5130062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839017,0.00002283415,0.0000380281,0.0008215907,0.0001091259,0.00008899778,0.000008417643,0.000003818545,0.01500553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5532492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5964265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503708994","doi":"10.1017/ccol9780521860543.012","title":"Rhetoric and the Roman Republic","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Passions; Hyperbole; Power (physics); History; Literature; Law; Art; Political science; Philosophy; Metaphor; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03962136649337158,"gpt":0.1946222763653821,"spread":0.1550009098720105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001226618,0.0002416073,0.0003405951,0.00008167414,0.0008978042,0.0001482294,0.0004611387,0.00009755245,0.00001904012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007032644,0.0001882464,0.000146703,0.000002462346,0.001020617,0.00008126054,0.0003650421,0.0003314036,0.00001206706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006326653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002884697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001870488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000153019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992273,0.00004988788,0.0001547937,0.000249007,0.0001694786,0.0001495321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988489,0.0001179808,0.0001977105,0.0006189034,0.0001585768,0.00005790413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004271161,0.000003319975,9.665678e-8,0.0000100856,0.0001142409,0.000008100203,0.001650846,2.80997e-8,4.424981e-8,0.8715323,0.123409,0.003229222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006039374,0.00002470285,0.000006110274,0.00004029186,0.0001718782,0.000004420224,0.0005034605,0.000006006599,4.668327e-7,0.0002635523,0.9981542,0.0002210008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002158685,0.002003177,0.000006907729,0.0002757259,0.0001992606,0.0002470017,0.00003877364,0.000108087,0.9970995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003114537,0.00146913,0.000006231572,0.0001984446,0.0002923607,0.000001033639,0.00001345814,0.00001840819,0.9948864],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8747451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7676464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540835822","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977800","title":"Ethics and the Media: An Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Journalism; Media ethics; Political science; Social media; Citizen journalism; Democracy; Public sphere; Digital media; Sociology; Public relations; Media studies; Engineering ethics; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1393408899407903,"gpt":0.2659861596080293,"spread":0.1266452696672391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005214081,0.0001028105,0.0001660668,0.00002417751,0.0006972716,0.00007750334,0.0001698055,0.00009257532,0.002081007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005793605,0.0000535761,0.00003221981,0.000003381298,0.001155608,0.00007518535,0.0001020128,0.0006406882,0.00006374328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001238528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004586096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001294226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001775735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994626,0.0001203914,0.0001317045,0.0001159305,0.000112088,0.00005725176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990296,0.0003400136,0.00007994028,0.0003825861,0.0001510592,0.00001681986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000662151,0.000003317144,8.048848e-8,0.000004708671,0.00002654706,3.27206e-8,0.1131791,3.645122e-9,3.584264e-9,0.6926121,0.193043,0.00112454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001038487,0.00001070569,0.00000139481,0.000003680333,0.00004023443,7.353449e-7,0.007238567,9.864955e-7,1.028522e-7,0.1430352,0.8494977,0.00006673922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001952719,0.002571359,0.00001348167,0.00982824,0.0007402733,0.000084317,0.00000376567,0.00005071315,0.9867059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007421672,0.004408179,0.00002365083,0.0006399504,0.003844709,0.00001682016,0.00003027002,0.00001181876,0.9902824],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6564547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032870531","doi":"10.1080/0951839032000086763","title":"Creating spaces: Testimonio, impossible knowledge, and academe","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Law; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2826980239566068,"gpt":0.5211227139776282,"spread":0.2384246900210215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001149758,0.0001049383,0.000212806,0.0002401178,0.0001781633,0.0000730789,0.0001780653,0.0000205851,0.0000564566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001688033,0.00008442173,0.00004464421,0.00005740536,0.0003890464,0.0003850445,0.00005154476,0.0001800125,0.000006511142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001780141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001578672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003764743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008032508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987351,0.0003465063,0.0005196735,0.00009403678,0.0002107753,0.00009391448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969137,0.00110193,0.0004394354,0.00006589042,0.001448062,0.00003093354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001262642,0.0001587175,0.001914445,0.00001400443,0.0002022312,6.221471e-7,0.623769,0.000002583865,0.000008473879,0.3655381,0.004082433,0.004296759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003272397,0.00007484292,0.0008472629,0.0002467785,0.00001640842,0.00001488294,0.7552668,0.000004059732,0.00002885127,0.06161261,0.1814616,0.00009860916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5967273,0.130486,0.0002105219,0.006243561,0.00838092,0.0002221854,0.00001053199,0.00002152269,0.2576975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890711,0.005043854,0.001900243,0.0001574505,0.0004542758,0.00001959916,0.000001296717,0.000007665968,0.003344486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3923439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3442618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017689028","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.48.6.887","title":"Seeing Red over Black and White: Popular and Media Representations of Inter-racial Relationships as Precursors to Racial Violence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Antipathy; Hostility; White (mutation); Mythology; Racism; Sociology; Race (biology); Hatred; Gender studies; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology; Art; Law; Literature; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1111335443389305,"gpt":0.3052609115345451,"spread":0.1941273671956146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007901372,0.0002561334,0.0004728102,0.0004972005,0.0006733424,0.0001224158,0.0003263205,0.0002164856,0.00007383081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003287583,0.0002675688,0.00007209554,0.00005899429,0.001311324,0.0002940788,0.00008872915,0.0007005216,0.000002161284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002108434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006243805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02162472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2180621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997887,0.0004095817,0.0006849859,0.0002999278,0.00008566445,0.0006328128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972426,0.0009676315,0.0004201575,0.0002631415,0.0004859017,0.0006205165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002602755,0.00005355707,0.00936808,0.0008145539,0.0001312657,0.0005037267,0.3858931,0.0002728379,0.0001036181,0.5936993,0.002298314,0.006601404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001239666,0.0008422318,0.1976091,0.0008128571,0.008486371,0.002186021,0.7265846,0.0002828712,0.00008199442,0.03591658,0.02516944,0.0007883368],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986221,0.002681029,0.0006064018,0.002506501,0.0003753197,0.0001486032,0.00004695599,0.00001441831,0.007399831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961419,0.001083279,0.001497821,0.0004666479,0.0003978964,0.00001249195,0.0000101258,0.00002191534,0.0003678824],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5577827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998147233","doi":"10.1177/0196859904267121","title":"9/11 in the Service of Corporate Rhetoric: Southwest Airlines’ 2001 Letter to Shareholders","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Communication Inquiry","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Shareholder; Service (business); Consciousness; Focus (optics); Sociology; Public relations; Corporate communication; Stakeholder; Business; Political science; Marketing; Corporate governance; Linguistics; Psychology; Literature; Finance; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.215305538495174,"gpt":0.3146335834646829,"spread":0.0993280449695089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001045684,0.0001146801,0.0002593434,0.0001778629,0.0002376532,0.00007166323,0.001302752,0.00003784106,0.00009925936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000696252,0.00007868075,0.00008871396,0.0002294517,0.0002011437,0.0003047521,0.0001606348,0.0003163399,0.00003438061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006622656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007638267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000421134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002262651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984784,0.0002476463,0.0007678421,0.00006444894,0.0003064889,0.0001351675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972827,0.0002262072,0.000930273,0.0007972491,0.0007225798,0.00004096246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001010528,0.0007115793,0.004323207,0.00004862678,0.0001225031,0.000004940853,0.7588198,0.003545583,0.0001178615,0.1161713,0.115023,0.001010488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001647302,0.0002101916,0.01165359,0.0004365045,0.00006395602,0.0000250328,0.1861458,0.00001951827,0.00007570639,0.007661348,0.791787,0.0002740045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8529471,0.003154129,0.001048093,0.1286752,0.001051322,0.0004348384,0.00001777438,0.00002900959,0.01264258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931396,0.0004416315,0.0006937764,0.005132575,0.000405823,0.00001416408,0.000006313963,0.00001107355,0.0001550646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.676764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3208508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295613278","doi":"10.1080/09644016.2016.1154124","title":"Scaling up site disputes: strategies to redefine ‘local’ in the fight against fracking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Politics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Civil society; Hydraulic fracturing; Environmental movement; Insider; Political science; China; Political economy; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Politics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02768717530185456,"gpt":0.233536020064492,"spread":0.2058488447626375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000103926,0.0001171794,0.0001101077,0.0000354621,0.0003389099,0.0000902867,0.0002310116,0.00002135872,0.0002527403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001187493,0.00006642513,0.00004103152,0.00001816409,0.0002746023,0.0001511359,0.0001330393,0.00008093881,0.0003445155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009646635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000715821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007163871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008301685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991984,0.00005438664,0.0002027991,0.0001296124,0.0001738601,0.0002409788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999409,0.0001963516,0.00004128504,0.000310834,0.000003888163,0.00003868302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001004384,0.0001900824,0.003155706,0.00001363702,0.00004518518,0.000008194591,0.1697279,0.00006490479,0.0004870212,0.7866881,0.01268501,0.02692415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002506585,0.00003298967,0.00573053,0.00006396323,0.000009415503,0.000001028792,0.08610908,0.00003031765,0.0001055999,0.004541676,0.9029351,0.0001896494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8638102,0.001090751,0.001215551,0.009242301,0.0004193654,0.0003609664,0.0001752053,0.00006557825,0.1236201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992448,0.0002668764,0.00003452827,0.002859628,0.000234809,0.00003833233,0.0000129499,0.00001192631,0.004092915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8902501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4428164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496724065","doi":"10.1075/dapsac.55.07wes","title":"The Qualitative Analysis of Political Documents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Politics; Trustworthiness; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Perspective (graphical); Discipline; Task (project management); Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Political science; Epistemology; Data science; Social science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1626037375710497,"gpt":0.3464741306747391,"spread":0.1838703931036894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000306474,0.0003174683,0.0006158826,0.00003800098,0.0008780953,0.0001601763,0.0003273269,0.0001680551,0.0001029415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002225159,0.0001960815,0.0006214777,0.00002686845,0.001860021,0.00005044314,0.0002095516,0.000320164,0.00001606165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005863688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003320932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001550906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001664206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985561,0.00006986922,0.0004096245,0.0002887743,0.0003230609,0.0003525506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987228,0.0002277343,0.0002300912,0.0004932297,0.0001745712,0.0001515814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003291932,0.00001571932,0.000002448123,0.00002766362,0.002798608,4.973609e-8,0.256787,7.289589e-7,3.801338e-8,0.7214836,0.01870211,0.0001787097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007825916,0.00004665409,0.000008338818,0.00003204319,0.001626665,1.748402e-7,0.287619,0.00002406323,8.272748e-7,0.08829302,0.6220475,0.0002234348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002562889,0.004339517,0.0001776825,0.008555948,0.0001333402,0.0002889294,0.0006141123,0.00003247159,0.9856017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1378997,0.0007342715,0.0001297343,0.000832294,0.0005104929,0.00003661149,0.0002021863,0.00002759865,0.8596271],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6331906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7995971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551210841","doi":"","title":"Translation Quality Assessment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vitae (Universidad de Antioquia)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Style (visual arts); Quality (philosophy); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Epistemology; Statistics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1180781135878321,"gpt":0.3458399967761542,"spread":0.2277618831883221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002032351,0.00008680191,0.0001346893,0.00008311823,0.0005184754,0.00008137315,0.0001694596,0.00003140269,0.0005041747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004581211,0.00009108437,0.00008771723,0.00006388694,0.0000905178,0.0003535232,0.00001684992,0.00009827599,0.00006393706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006312024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003438624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001413112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000131486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993522,0.00007656809,0.0001305516,0.0001267588,0.0001559209,0.0001579766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994993,0.00005574822,0.0000757599,0.000242349,0.00008699708,0.00003987521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001533808,0.0001079625,0.0005029963,0.000006128837,0.0000381055,0.000002684224,0.02093191,0.000005342679,0.0005511102,0.914614,0.006112678,0.05711174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001028565,0.0002195919,0.1146857,0.00002827894,0.00006643653,0.000002289127,0.04497667,0.0004006889,0.00005532439,0.02239893,0.8157128,0.0004247477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1847365,0.0004386351,0.005668105,0.008510006,0.0001885453,0.0001316544,0.00001420313,0.0001950943,0.8001172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991887,0.0001819052,0.0009164336,0.0005157011,0.0001164797,0.000001579624,0.00001371808,0.000004816571,0.006362336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8922151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.552036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155927173","doi":"","title":"A Narrative Approach to Research.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of environmental education","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Humanities; Narrative inquiry; Metaphor; Epistemology; Philosophy; Conversation; Sociology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09200541785744251,"gpt":0.2910542965123083,"spread":0.1990488786548658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003236699,0.00004978821,0.00007169149,0.0001853093,0.0005123999,0.00006396281,0.0001381252,0.00001361032,0.001427046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000630898,0.0000444537,0.00002979623,0.00003917578,0.0001904191,0.0001252433,0.000005756256,0.0001384904,0.00006712307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003109223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005503407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001190696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002891071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994215,0.0001085769,0.0001502363,0.00005868394,0.0001283674,0.0001326692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994825,0.00002269058,0.00005876221,0.0001187259,0.00005480001,0.0002625467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004128141,0.0001830722,0.0006873972,0.000003291886,0.00003367865,6.471329e-7,0.6333029,0.000008402382,0.00004375023,0.2594425,0.09925411,0.007036104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003902538,0.00004287951,0.001020262,0.000007297614,0.000003203958,0.000008234279,0.288128,1.966293e-7,0.00001506656,0.0009971469,0.709699,0.00003972228],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3851691,0.002453677,0.00002757448,0.001201653,0.0008493701,0.0001624368,0.000008025995,0.000001880542,0.6101263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883001,0.00003246466,0.0003556247,0.0002707728,0.0001821216,0.00001139204,0.000002705405,0.000006307921,0.01083846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6104448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067689688","doi":"10.1558/lhs.v3i1.3","title":"Breast Cancer Narratives as Public Rhetoric","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistics and the Human Sciences","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Ignorance; Rhetoric; Sociology; Action (physics); Aesthetics; Social function; Media studies; Epistemology; Linguistics; Literature; Social science; Art; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1180145515028306,"gpt":0.3144287696567645,"spread":0.1964142181539338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000269537,0.00008472098,0.0001285765,0.00003932797,0.004835737,0.000227271,0.0003163277,0.00001117026,0.0003585169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009275496,0.00004571156,0.00003237112,0.00006047454,0.004113857,0.0000397332,0.0001099576,0.00007643802,0.00001670139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008597983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005234788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004970237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001985403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993448,0.00004566841,0.0001418324,0.0001337325,0.0001902301,0.000143781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999404,0.0001161728,0.00008518738,0.0001418,0.0002183862,0.00003448098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002268362,0.00001289037,0.0006027679,0.000001777416,0.00001350217,4.677157e-7,0.06957927,3.622316e-7,3.998349e-7,0.9283187,0.001342821,0.0001247093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003162182,0.00003124404,0.001240868,0.00001301195,0.00001050578,0.00001207921,0.01741099,0.0000426478,0.0000012922,0.1125152,0.8682674,0.0001385133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.104323,0.004287317,0.00000361602,0.003914062,0.0009612722,0.000089088,0.00001082149,0.00004527385,0.8863655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840631,0.001137619,0.00001783138,0.0002505391,0.001080528,0.00001945785,6.006302e-7,0.000003613601,0.01342673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8797401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012995914","doi":"10.1177/0196859906294840","title":"Internet Web Logs as Cultural Resistance: A Study of the SARS Arts Project","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Communication Inquiry","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; CONTEST; Resistance (ecology); Opposition (politics); Politics; The arts; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Media studies; World Wide Web; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1511653271603313,"gpt":0.3427193912365698,"spread":0.1915540640762385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004597868,0.0001035349,0.0002439148,0.00006819137,0.0003332075,0.0000897863,0.001054328,0.00002642063,0.00006196297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006078853,0.00006230205,0.0001250794,0.0000934503,0.0004715057,0.0002726242,0.0002660536,0.0002858157,0.000006899866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005455677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007225571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003273727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001491221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984226,0.0003596255,0.0007372376,0.00006026261,0.0003312408,0.00008906247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973434,0.0001473941,0.001035029,0.0007660199,0.0006951276,0.00001309586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001897111,0.001350351,0.004421712,0.00002212706,0.0002602598,0.000001576291,0.3621489,0.0000199545,0.0001017098,0.2237713,0.4073046,0.0004078228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001108859,0.0002485571,0.008853571,0.0002016477,0.00009680885,0.00001695475,0.1922922,0.00001095932,0.00007466276,0.005224203,0.7917318,0.0001397414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9163067,0.003254129,0.00000686954,0.00177572,0.0003982572,0.0002233856,0.000002054577,0.00001318488,0.07801963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906226,0.0004447065,0.00008034868,0.0001015646,0.0002100212,0.00001320902,0.0000018244,0.000008375348,0.008517394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3844272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2562796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109917548","doi":"10.1080/14608940500201912","title":"Rhetorical Theory and the Critique of National Identity Construction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Identities","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; National identity; Identity (music); Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Politics; Linguistics; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04156175480146074,"gpt":0.3122702853450285,"spread":0.2707085305435677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009787038,0.00006500918,0.0001143242,0.00007796343,0.0004417299,0.0001220374,0.0001366399,0.00002283699,0.0005879182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003702304,0.0000476053,0.00005585337,0.00003557197,0.001240548,0.0006460737,0.00007330951,0.00008394266,0.00002400709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000532929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000523602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005077898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001621676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989366,0.000143951,0.0002399949,0.0000786023,0.0005386033,0.00006227013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982871,0.0006678049,0.0001045722,0.00006391949,0.0008635847,0.00001295598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002896555,0.00001976037,0.00009316031,0.000007636154,0.00004798579,2.891836e-8,0.006419062,0.000004685838,0.000002340108,0.986396,0.006569035,0.0004113759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005127807,0.000007193702,0.0008856864,0.000009506896,0.00001507686,0.000007196583,0.007791721,0.00006135253,0.00002459199,0.896738,0.09387477,0.00007213232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05762581,0.006249969,0.001606536,0.009237886,0.0009848018,0.0002733787,0.0001186472,0.00009046315,0.9238125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872019,0.0006300653,0.0001389692,0.0004246881,0.0006005821,0.00003092959,0.00000737854,0.000004319909,0.01096117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6437292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910170733","doi":"10.1089/env.2018.0019","title":"Toxic Bios: Toxic Autobiographies—A Public Environmental Humanities Project","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Justice","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"BIOS; Resistance (ecology); Narrative; Environmental justice; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Political science; Media studies; Environmental ethics; Art; World Wide Web; Computer science; Ecology; Literature; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04025601017626758,"gpt":0.2194663435424124,"spread":0.1792103333661448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001434489,0.0003209191,0.0002737741,0.0002002608,0.0008520997,0.0002132615,0.0004745782,0.00006507205,0.009469553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006617459,0.0002946787,0.0001656296,0.00005326172,0.0007602937,0.0005421044,0.0003752908,0.0002352985,0.004204332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001675717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001406128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004715729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004353538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983255,0.00009583952,0.0003528883,0.000398188,0.0003946236,0.0004329943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999043,0.0001089518,0.0001560241,0.0006268887,0.000004466863,0.00006066429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002404191,0.005409688,0.03168788,0.0006071633,0.001911499,0.00004066265,0.2717549,0.00002194489,0.01972747,0.5421424,0.1085035,0.0179525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004995232,0.0002192666,0.003892725,0.00001765628,0.0001459317,0.00000744182,0.1265459,0.00003787302,0.0001697358,0.0001369443,0.8678598,0.0004672105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8017541,0.003746237,0.00001065434,0.0003684831,0.001260331,0.0006807012,0.0002043683,0.000220811,0.1917544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491629,0.001720845,0.00006995913,0.0007248449,0.0003496432,0.00008113296,0.0001324265,0.00004340228,0.04771486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7593564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081478863","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9026-2","title":"Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Chrysler (Canada); University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Communication studies; Political science; Social science; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03350166769368922,"gpt":0.2837933877003815,"spread":0.2502917200066923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001590775,0.00007233165,0.00006696508,0.00005635689,0.0003097843,0.00006776975,0.00007780235,0.00001426602,0.001634446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001447915,0.00006860214,0.00003411664,0.00002969338,0.00009109295,0.0001939757,0.00002524289,0.00004729806,0.0003543471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005309502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001561762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000901492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001155653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994265,0.00001701213,0.0001913485,0.00009584075,0.0001560771,0.0001131877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996226,0.00007935531,0.00007658317,0.0001097246,0.00008042735,0.00003129896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004377693,0.00008922988,0.0008024518,0.00000558911,0.00005674866,0.000003296148,0.05067655,0.000002628199,0.0004105799,0.9283165,0.005715632,0.01387696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001066484,0.0001381238,0.005893708,0.00002065808,0.0000281284,0.000009412341,0.03546477,0.00007598804,0.001083743,0.01018056,0.9457524,0.0002860044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2933645,0.0003725669,0.004349765,0.001414627,0.001248621,0.0002877682,0.000007879496,0.0001782384,0.6987761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897721,0.00006926082,0.0002782074,0.0005890218,0.0002623052,0.00001774318,0.00003863763,0.000006414004,0.008966244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108376675","doi":"10.1177/1741659011433366","title":"Elves, environmentalism, and “eco-terror”: Leaderless resistance and media coverage of the Earth Liberation Front","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crime Media Culture An International Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Mainstream; Environmentalism; Blame; Ideology; Front (military); Civil disobedience; Resistance (ecology); Political science; Media studies; Terrorism; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Politics; Engineering; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04166806855540089,"gpt":0.2544641941107179,"spread":0.212796125555317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001724376,0.00009620802,0.0001146436,0.0000294141,0.000308477,0.000142679,0.0002253589,0.00003157731,0.0002995314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003287351,0.00006042581,0.00003839223,0.000008057158,0.0003029087,0.0006444644,0.00008198576,0.0001838991,0.000005334928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002520552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001194921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001085201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003238324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991937,0.00008967633,0.0002176739,0.00007973582,0.0003170579,0.0001021196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994943,0.00004469419,0.0001758812,0.0001166589,0.0000955583,0.00007297772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007237829,0.0001960148,0.01672021,0.00001288972,0.0001967395,0.000001913714,0.8768201,0.000001138707,0.0008348239,0.08737287,0.01171402,0.006056889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007688357,0.00003077453,0.1729502,0.0000944466,0.00007351262,0.00006062595,0.04738645,0.000008807097,0.0006693532,0.002634193,0.7751144,0.0002084226],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9480827,0.01374221,0.0001567276,0.002449905,0.003334192,0.0001334066,0.00009204516,0.0000180098,0.03199082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923185,0.002372942,0.000170496,0.0003604162,0.001424533,0.000004317453,0.00002101554,0.000007497795,0.003320308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8294337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3279658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979702281","doi":"10.1023/b:jomh.0000007447.19765.ee","title":"Ultrasound: A Window to the Womb?: Obstetric Ultrasound and the Abortion Rights Debate","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Humanities","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Ultrasound; Abortion; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Obstetrics; Medicine; Psychology; Pregnancy; Radiology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03230042324028682,"gpt":0.2536246881795374,"spread":0.2213242649392506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001793144,0.0001429343,0.0002960194,0.000103826,0.001405509,0.0003715581,0.0005374226,0.0000437963,0.001232184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001460611,0.0000624934,0.0001166534,0.00007228905,0.001113247,0.0001905856,0.00004683848,0.0004479939,0.00002976441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004037993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007001023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001406626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007740096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978186,0.000370442,0.0005473418,0.00008583513,0.0009828504,0.0001948762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964731,0.002583464,0.0002981297,0.0002350732,0.0003113124,0.00009895634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004353617,0.00005273184,0.00009061665,0.000008857709,0.000150178,0.000006969206,0.108037,0.000001567661,0.000002062559,0.8656773,0.02537322,0.0005559491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009564431,0.00009706438,0.0007408596,0.00006609184,0.00007857479,0.0002829414,0.04773781,0.000001803404,0.00001110962,0.02078591,0.9291366,0.0001047457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6834655,0.04880773,0.0006127047,0.02167504,0.005253687,0.0006708627,0.00001418898,0.00006686833,0.2394334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878219,0.003035244,0.00003108066,0.002370635,0.0009384243,0.0000148166,6.594961e-7,0.000009631744,0.005777636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9037634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075338117","doi":"10.7202/013589ar","title":"Byron and Shelley: Radical Incompatibles","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Poetry; Politics; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Epistemology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02608542590570595,"gpt":0.2076350516381926,"spread":0.1815496257324866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000107441,0.00008402843,0.0001103464,0.00002504856,0.0005054136,0.00008871477,0.0001487665,0.00001657004,0.0005251935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006528549,0.00004924459,0.00002643943,0.00001750065,0.0002948583,0.00003684666,0.00004913506,0.0000859396,0.0001027193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006609303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004374301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003344131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001389793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995066,0.00004903331,0.0001270787,0.00009003884,0.0001171442,0.0001101419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995043,0.0002026445,0.00004185372,0.0002176542,0.00001821973,0.00001537138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007595767,0.0000477173,0.0001379235,0.000003101788,0.00001514225,8.230083e-7,0.003176001,0.000003346152,0.00001165575,0.9083329,0.08714389,0.001119931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002287728,0.00007656203,0.002920686,0.00002766757,0.00002180154,0.000001901831,0.001887791,0.0004145489,0.00007829876,0.02784687,0.9663591,0.0001359339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5631668,0.00191553,0.00007957203,0.008785172,0.0002524274,0.000156327,0.000007268672,0.00009889911,0.425538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986083,0.000138837,0.00002812668,0.0005826843,0.0002462576,0.00001027382,0.000003036282,0.0000076081,0.01290021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.880486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5750501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602075128","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.21401","title":"Dialectics of Humanitarian Immigration and National Identity in Canadian Public Discourse","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Refugee; Immigration; National identity; Identity (music); Negation; Political science; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05253922441295145,"gpt":0.2769585991238305,"spread":0.224419374710879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002813956,0.0001052863,0.0001783252,0.0002636997,0.0008440964,0.00007498235,0.0001719192,0.00002880538,0.0002105801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001054271,0.00009220117,0.00003385899,0.0000932553,0.0001707079,0.0003921003,0.00002310044,0.0002597058,0.000002097033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007726316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002044425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3608047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988081,0.00007783707,0.0003431794,0.00009818358,0.0004435614,0.0002291751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991442,0.00004900905,0.000177574,0.0001208554,0.0003257444,0.0001826187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006176113,0.00003043842,0.004159834,0.000004801913,0.00002984611,0.0000264847,0.0005599483,0.000003301094,0.000002779625,0.9940672,0.00103,0.00007920316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002283353,0.0000461742,0.0168008,0.0000232564,0.000006545436,0.00004269429,0.0001910696,0.00002466311,0.000003787505,0.001672363,0.9808474,0.0001129716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939463,0.0008563224,0.000003751364,0.001710389,0.0003408772,0.00006153735,0.00004309562,0.000004295966,0.003033452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977279,0.0005401352,0.0000128324,0.0005287592,0.0002232332,0.000004340979,0.00001017026,0.000008932411,0.0009437486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6492193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092822807","doi":"10.1525/jlin.2001.11.1.65","title":"See No Evil, Speak No Evil: White Police Officers' Talk about Race and Affirmative Action","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Linguistic Anthropology","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; White (mutation); Race (biology); Officer; Sociology; Ideology; Racism; Criminology; Action (physics); White supremacy; Law; Gender studies; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04775040852548029,"gpt":0.3306697680099184,"spread":0.2829193594844381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002926144,0.0001765781,0.0004599435,0.0001387264,0.0006250091,0.00007650514,0.0002062739,0.00006892726,0.003633115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005625962,0.0001406972,0.00009594292,0.00005180843,0.00114987,0.0001420881,0.00009034055,0.0003486268,0.0002398394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007515929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009902415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008380032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006191815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987198,0.0001556084,0.0005732432,0.0001290988,0.0001871491,0.0002351494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973894,0.0003271255,0.0006980196,0.0001968756,0.001299737,0.00008881524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002023651,0.001224349,0.007173238,0.0003285409,0.001880326,0.0002661705,0.4997634,0.00003928821,0.0002173559,0.2089906,0.2662079,0.0118852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005458833,0.0004807985,0.001006358,0.00009042602,0.0001091858,0.0002276124,0.03187648,0.00007767201,0.000006026356,0.0004088111,0.9650105,0.0001603011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1245228,0.01252058,0.001668753,0.009027332,0.01309632,0.0002982447,0.0000304023,0.00009796064,0.8387376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969393,0.01204277,0.0003602171,0.000299151,0.004464208,0.000002234695,0.000002524984,0.00001854917,0.01341741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8448702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327976147","doi":"10.5840/symposium20059112","title":"Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brother; Genealogy; History; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03514933510129798,"gpt":0.2410325079905356,"spread":0.2058831728892376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006881641,0.00008131361,0.0001494177,0.00003416631,0.0001180086,0.00002894309,0.0002036793,0.00001875481,0.0007027165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001044631,0.0000689287,0.0000459633,0.00003431496,0.00006319071,0.00004620709,0.00007706858,0.0000436002,0.00030689],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002475585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001140667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005661784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001303409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99944,0.00002777103,0.0001838782,0.0001096581,0.0001286861,0.0001100155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993771,0.00008817808,0.00006249066,0.0003349753,0.0001036185,0.00003367498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001153603,0.0005959269,0.02130616,0.00003947183,0.0003872042,8.90701e-7,0.260013,0.0001697813,0.005445421,0.4116932,0.2573742,0.04285938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001220305,0.00002966903,0.00139057,0.000009209117,0.000004982119,7.165674e-8,0.001090659,0.0000104261,0.0004418748,0.0001891761,0.9966154,0.00009595534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1976147,0.002238713,0.000313763,0.009635939,0.002086842,0.0002417713,0.0001550604,0.0001327027,0.7875805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776316,0.0002063289,0.0001792202,0.0003199214,0.0009642243,0.00001658154,0.000006404452,0.00001211204,0.0206636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7800169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7694253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742237371","doi":"10.1215/17432197-4129161","title":"Innis’s Infrastructure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural Politics an International Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dirt; Sociology; Presentation (obstetrics); Work (physics); Media studies; Epistemology; Geography; Engineering; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09418999690177354,"gpt":0.3603538662654326,"spread":0.2661638693636591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007879907,0.00009212262,0.00008898538,0.00003704069,0.001998881,0.002412592,0.001142606,0.00002397972,0.0009372862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009274193,0.00006424796,0.00007060589,0.000002888202,0.0003405478,0.001116078,0.0001623778,0.0002241963,0.00005713728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007191021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003235929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001183577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000431273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992999,0.00002300789,0.0001911915,0.00007671766,0.0002637795,0.000145371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985781,0.00001082107,0.0002306852,0.0002643749,0.0008217956,0.00009416795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004513061,0.00002241717,0.001764351,8.103113e-7,0.0000967148,0.000007633968,0.01404125,0.000002729901,0.0000130391,0.962217,0.01845733,0.003372164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002700394,0.00002937919,0.02458495,0.00001602503,0.00001064096,0.00009143191,0.006935621,0.00005248872,0.00001697099,0.04127241,0.9265956,0.0001244068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5651684,0.0001385979,0.00004144587,0.008305374,0.006594934,0.00004477249,0.00005540726,0.00004184439,0.4196092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819598,0.0002274258,0.0001607132,0.0006608437,0.0056038,0.000001829097,0.00001320389,0.000006986411,0.01136542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9209446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002126060","doi":"10.1177/2158244020901800","title":"“Superbugs” in the Risk Society: Assessing the Reflexive Function of North American Newspaper Coverage of Antimicrobial Resistance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAGE Open","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Risk society; Reflexivity; Elite; Modernization theory; Mass media; Resistance (ecology); Function (biology); News media; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Media studies; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0600779615385206,"gpt":0.2977424210534801,"spread":0.2376644595149595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002455714,0.00006813098,0.0001746913,0.000006298583,0.0003431606,0.0001189402,0.0005192315,0.00000751656,0.00005596181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000255016,0.00003842455,0.00006545112,0.0001114394,0.0003387877,0.0001959318,0.0001936746,0.0001412199,0.000003673286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001068248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002894766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001325202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006514601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993089,0.000197081,0.0002064549,0.00009837557,0.0001115274,0.00007770509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992846,0.0001581248,0.0002308527,0.0002630023,0.0000545797,0.000008812942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003708091,0.0002638647,0.09372834,0.0001301346,0.0004419339,0.000001794758,0.7263847,0.0001144088,0.0003104088,0.02020519,0.09798659,0.06006185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005221857,0.0001027841,0.3215168,0.00006315325,0.0000856182,1.325325e-7,0.08153407,0.00003023924,0.00004376538,0.0002639629,0.5956848,0.0001525141],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8481336,0.0006454899,0.0002773978,0.008537952,0.00009368202,0.0004910337,0.00007925231,0.00001390521,0.1417277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959458,0.0009647543,0.00009637902,0.002120769,0.00008652914,0.0000125783,0.000006553742,0.000006248293,0.0007603542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6448506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113171648","doi":"10.1177/1363459312441009","title":"The moralization of healthy living: Burke’s rhetoric of rebirth and older adults’ accounts of healthy eating","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Healthy eating; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Gerontology; Art; Medicine; Philosophy; Physical activity; Theology; Physical medicine and rehabilitation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08211495195553721,"gpt":0.4188157709144246,"spread":0.3367008189588874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004589489,0.0001633316,0.0008340232,0.0001057851,0.00834451,0.00001212661,0.0002379787,0.00003639044,0.00001519035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001082023,0.00009019415,0.00006367204,0.0001127239,0.000640643,0.0001732455,0.0002010445,0.0002441419,4.865831e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008052846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001873103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002589719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001469505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996842,0.000546566,0.001680722,0.0001293759,0.0004083914,0.0003930041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957663,0.000828287,0.002508759,0.0002103442,0.0005087823,0.0001774567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006708333,0.0006733658,0.0123867,0.001428832,0.00009153892,3.280666e-8,0.8996484,0.00000106395,3.446846e-7,0.01361388,0.001612195,0.06987276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001510015,0.006731093,0.08437891,0.0009477576,0.00004279278,0.000006010848,0.9030356,0.00007126923,2.809354e-7,0.0005093896,0.002684205,0.00008269161],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9300376,0.05062844,0.0002452996,0.0160518,0.00153025,0.001320284,0.00002474371,0.000008146084,0.0001534399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903056,0.008568496,0.00001654061,0.0002605195,0.0007252695,0.00004000681,0.00000326453,0.00001715475,0.00006314117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07199221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487459737","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.483","title":"Dialectical Obligations in Political Debate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Balance (ability); Action (physics); Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1213658247406551,"gpt":0.2760168390355902,"spread":0.1546510142949351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005484368,0.00006126812,0.00009407662,0.0000572821,0.000327738,0.00002676765,0.0001113029,0.00002314555,0.0005343884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000529609,0.00004775413,0.00003367185,0.00004171021,0.0003071689,0.0002146485,0.00006207152,0.0001145971,0.0005143776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002305022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003040435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001684692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001526867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994346,0.00001601017,0.000193082,0.00005042297,0.00009086481,0.0002150363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996768,0.00008269436,0.00002205055,0.0001227015,0.00005221613,0.00004354285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004095182,0.00002843026,0.002692771,0.000001652757,0.000004140979,0.000003814208,0.00737817,0.000003423223,3.250974e-7,0.9886656,0.001006918,0.0002107068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005415553,0.0001336739,0.06777287,0.00001174556,0.000008404062,0.00003672976,0.007191615,0.0002260868,0.00001796964,0.03890401,0.8848709,0.0002844183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1342832,0.00007344969,0.00004737387,0.00130258,0.0001632556,0.00005643459,0.000003215403,0.00005781886,0.8640127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941801,0.00004526809,0.00007417188,0.001075473,0.0001454531,0.00002291796,0.000005079925,0.000002844641,0.004448685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9497615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6611455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900367403","doi":"10.2304/pfie.2003.1.3.4","title":"On Enfraudening the Public Sphere, the Futility of Empire and the Future of Knowledge after ‘America’","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Futures in Education","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Face (sociological concept); Meaning (existential); Empire; Mythology; Sociology; Public sphere; Administration (probate law); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02170364404307164,"gpt":0.3025075045357125,"spread":0.2808038604926408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003783942,0.00009130177,0.0001377442,0.00004901904,0.0003610479,0.00004442504,0.0002622967,0.00002601342,0.0001466879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001778177,0.00004011248,0.00005298368,0.0001384839,0.0008002268,0.00006176487,0.00005451781,0.0001624607,0.000003137819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002734524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001679173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005498183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002026995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990911,0.0003826701,0.0002246015,0.00008994513,0.0001059995,0.0001056908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987971,0.0004302015,0.0001567745,0.0004770654,0.0001245101,0.00001441135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002354678,0.00009177648,0.0007566629,0.00001368611,0.00001789098,5.864078e-9,0.1425659,4.936028e-7,3.732586e-7,0.8037828,0.006354467,0.04639243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001881279,0.00001766363,0.02181953,0.0000190271,0.00001435629,8.401319e-7,0.1654663,0.000005644612,0.000008885578,0.03361923,0.7787848,0.00005559191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5970744,0.07317886,0.000007224954,0.04715393,0.001749491,0.0005523692,0.00001195174,0.00001651527,0.2802552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954913,0.001378017,0.00001385126,0.001026775,0.0008332399,0.0001236653,0.000001528572,0.000005965521,0.00112571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7724303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2948469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986262524","doi":"10.5250/0095182x.35.1.104","title":"From the Tomahawk Chop to the Road Block: Discourses of Savagism in Whitestream Media","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Indian Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Mainstream; Colonialism; Indigenous; Newspaper; Shit; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Law; History; Art history","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03502305212689452,"gpt":0.2463246995229476,"spread":0.2113016473960531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002055934,0.0001437923,0.0002414215,0.00004454804,0.0003377931,0.00006035974,0.001047362,0.00001155433,0.000211776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002622334,0.0000648194,0.00007040775,0.000146917,0.001141255,0.00007463844,0.00006567059,0.000175093,0.0001421316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001824855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003268943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05929992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04234868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989705,0.0002045692,0.0002802792,0.0001410411,0.0001880876,0.0002155117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983263,0.0004273579,0.0002386067,0.0009154745,0.00005293527,0.00003934028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002958696,0.0000658831,0.001929264,8.600514e-7,0.00006267781,0.000001338333,0.8968087,3.878949e-7,0.000005074374,0.005868937,0.01061942,0.08460789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001708388,0.0003982469,0.2122611,0.00003731548,0.00004269477,0.000001838332,0.7157041,0.000003509003,0.00001366559,0.003116501,0.06807165,0.000178511],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683286,0.0005420392,0.000002975193,0.01116261,0.000224326,0.0002243848,0.00007319604,0.00002721816,0.01941465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975335,0.0000593057,0.00002421131,0.001120654,0.0004291853,0.00007595994,0.000003642624,0.00001367371,0.00073984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2103318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.975126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135151384","doi":"10.1177/1750698021995932","title":"Claiming Martin Luther King, Jr. for the right: The Martin Luther King Day holiday in the Reagan era","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Victory; Appropriation; Reinterpretation; Opposition (politics); Politics; Law; Sociology; Affirmative action; White (mutation); Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1098277082431616,"gpt":0.3123784672128089,"spread":0.2025507589696474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001718675,0.0002440407,0.0003294086,0.00003816618,0.00309552,0.0002567529,0.000629226,0.00003439006,0.000341028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003289013,0.0001082721,0.0001750038,0.0001166257,0.0006059089,0.0001081681,0.000368951,0.0003308213,0.00005190107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004419677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002813579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001299721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005236741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981547,0.0004841421,0.000432838,0.0002699934,0.0002833021,0.000375008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968588,0.001865236,0.0001913678,0.0008406087,0.0002280749,0.00001586667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003391422,0.0001330161,0.0021143,0.00005074761,0.0007517858,0.00001385716,0.8012582,0.00002629336,0.00002923009,0.07973772,0.1040319,0.01181905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002809603,0.00001958914,0.002939531,0.0000592873,0.0001032278,0.000002881112,0.2864668,0.00005755101,0.00006742949,0.002906614,0.7069353,0.0001608186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.301319,0.1261051,0.0001620784,0.2032447,0.00457563,0.002589905,0.00005108178,0.0002750626,0.3616775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413872,0.0009621937,0.00003807685,0.00338244,0.0009419038,0.0005189609,0.000003596491,0.00003250384,0.05273312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6400682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1663408855","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0508","title":"Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience:","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Identity (music); Rhetoric; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03019749857148778,"gpt":0.2482754903876877,"spread":0.2180779918161999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001196477,0.00009046226,0.0001631694,0.00003480345,0.000428195,0.00005600986,0.000106767,0.00003864279,0.0001174581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002737074,0.0000502582,0.00003554351,0.00004685124,0.0006343778,0.0001770562,0.00008357887,0.0001535282,0.00001491715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008845471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005414186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008993568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004036275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994404,0.00005276414,0.0001759064,0.0001122877,0.0001295392,0.00008905418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994242,0.0001848955,0.00009589782,0.0001557676,0.000108953,0.00003025328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001390543,0.00002009491,0.000227339,0.00001762564,0.00003055029,6.113149e-8,0.01318463,1.171887e-7,0.000005073516,0.983286,0.00138368,0.001830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001854826,0.0001396122,0.006223265,0.00004942411,0.00008800307,0.000006005101,0.00687566,0.0001921222,0.00003239232,0.8549564,0.1293012,0.0002811468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2737241,0.05472147,0.00007447193,0.04006451,0.002030058,0.001055959,0.00001484536,0.0001114479,0.6282031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957052,0.002436766,0.00003302009,0.0002865405,0.0003585774,0.00005451147,0.000001714785,0.000004837785,0.001118825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3293373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545932476","doi":"","title":"Morals and the media : ethics in Canadian journalism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Wonder; Reading (process); Political science; News media; News values; Media studies; Media ethics; Technical Journalism; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02438919798423147,"gpt":0.1827620220443586,"spread":0.1583728240601271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004545602,0.0005408005,0.0008017758,0.0007138654,0.001237737,0.0007724106,0.00118183,0.0004432758,0.001018508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001090104,0.0004372965,0.0002673721,0.0001586903,0.002539205,0.00150275,0.0006146925,0.001727941,0.00009248175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003144002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001816518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08384793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3157887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976193,0.0002846604,0.0005064076,0.0004658813,0.0004501534,0.0006736545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973068,0.001168048,0.0003405432,0.0006875563,0.0001522183,0.0003447943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002978152,0.00001334167,0.0001779,0.00002034946,0.00006946552,0.00005631464,0.01047499,0.000001003867,9.483527e-9,0.5710328,0.4178232,0.0003008848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009372437,0.00001315422,0.0002712673,0.0001504983,0.00007813814,0.000004576953,0.002273514,0.000008679069,3.404529e-7,0.06640052,0.9293679,0.000494154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002614032,0.002139058,8.134536e-7,0.03861959,0.0004407998,0.0003746051,0.0005562419,0.0001338334,0.9574736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01543976,0.002556884,0.00002234753,0.001224209,0.0005052248,0.000003207216,0.0006454114,0.00007477561,0.9795282],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5115447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044369604","doi":"10.1177/1461444820912541","title":"Picturing the pipeline: Mapping settler colonialism on Instagram","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Media & Society","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Colonialism; Mainstream; Sociology; Indigenous; Hegemony; Citizen journalism; Politics; Pipeline (software); Media studies; Aesthetics; Political science; History; Ecology; Archaeology; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1136853011853079,"gpt":0.2529345457864173,"spread":0.1392492446011094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000103548,0.0001105945,0.0001335634,0.00000499931,0.000594283,0.00009846649,0.0002861125,0.0000345104,0.0003866157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005624989,0.00007062486,0.0001385179,0.0000455861,0.0001620361,0.00005905924,0.0001184101,0.0002696494,0.000158993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002827956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004246896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007902292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993088,0.00003449033,0.000162119,0.0001316588,0.0002091929,0.0001537296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993734,0.0002240001,0.00006614809,0.000215445,0.00005127452,0.0000696951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003240104,0.000008562207,0.00001871676,0.000005389803,0.00002933261,2.051024e-7,0.4463347,0.000004209826,0.000008712145,0.02083216,0.5289157,0.003839107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002422738,0.00001514364,0.0001988522,0.0000108407,0.00001225425,1.429744e-7,0.05540651,0.0001702971,0.00001767636,0.0004493321,0.9433895,0.00008718199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1423875,0.006355896,0.0007669159,0.6067758,0.004307697,0.0009066991,0.00006595835,0.0009240095,0.2375095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599386,0.0009126883,0.0001960452,0.02990479,0.004103306,0.00002304414,0.0000134695,0.00001781856,0.004890169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8175511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4570805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575075381","doi":"10.5860/choice.38-1376","title":"Beyond public speech and symbols: explorations in the rhetoric of politicians and the media","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1201072020797725,"gpt":0.3108011555630638,"spread":0.1906939534832914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005907756,0.00009316525,0.0002854352,0.00003619761,0.0002520751,0.00006947558,0.0002218175,0.00001665828,0.0002018052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002323935,0.00004458722,0.00004230319,0.0000974251,0.000461693,0.000145912,0.00003783529,0.000123563,0.00001137222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000814797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001432242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001483323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003682124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990752,0.0002542159,0.0003606658,0.00009334796,0.0001043417,0.000112228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988313,0.0006619334,0.00009261638,0.0003335711,0.00005857113,0.0000219855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004529409,0.0001473739,0.0003259825,0.00008295256,0.0000233921,2.879759e-7,0.06762552,8.524415e-8,6.804377e-7,0.7578713,0.002888279,0.1710296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000301497,0.0000119962,0.001468136,0.0000660326,0.00003456607,0.000002312086,0.00796362,0.00001458761,2.064033e-7,0.005584075,0.9844945,0.00005848514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1431035,0.6053681,0.000007461058,0.05859024,0.0002471044,0.001429978,0.0001152897,0.00003812802,0.1911002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5830012,0.4119834,0.0001058223,0.001945831,0.0006747118,0.000138137,0.00003839566,0.00001038697,0.002102112],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2209626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014687644","doi":"10.2752/174063106778053255","title":"Under the Kitchen Surface: Domestic Products and Conflicting Constructions of Home","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Home Cultures","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Assumption University","funders":"Johnson and Johnson","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Housekeeping; Narrative; Assertion; Safe haven; Reading (process); Competition (biology); Business; Sociology; Marketing; Political science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0318025312605568,"gpt":0.2670534320985357,"spread":0.2352509008379789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007484172,0.00007893945,0.0001253029,0.00001468532,0.000536003,0.00007511382,0.0000984642,0.00001782105,0.00007151999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001301584,0.00004548401,0.00002355531,0.00004003727,0.0006199386,0.00006732671,0.00005312125,0.00007725394,0.00000617386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007096598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000122246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003489013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000150617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995389,0.00003168421,0.0001525018,0.00009385506,0.00009188411,0.00009116562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994722,0.00008982474,0.00008655511,0.0001804674,0.0001595731,0.00001138972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000399524,0.00003038686,0.001419112,0.00002739009,0.00005894822,2.304796e-7,0.0225475,0.00004723933,0.0003984983,0.9659953,0.009318597,0.0001528298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006851587,0.0000540545,0.05207402,0.00005835223,0.0001456442,0.00003647771,0.1662825,0.0000223289,0.0004454839,0.03900058,0.7408063,0.000389055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.938148,0.008750369,0.000009396327,0.002420746,0.0002794115,0.0001467152,0.00001807469,0.00005730839,0.05016993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913053,0.0001821443,0.00007359732,0.00005218448,0.0001912742,0.000007192527,0.000005421643,0.000005413429,0.008177502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9269947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4122556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578193204","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i2.1115","title":"Pluralism, Disagreement, and the Status of Argument in the Public Sphere","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Attribution; Identity (music); Function (biology); Positive economics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Politics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05978217062056419,"gpt":0.2602218745834,"spread":0.2004397039628358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002197446,0.00005526292,0.00008652767,0.00001497528,0.0001902736,0.00008115947,0.0001902017,0.00000967041,0.0003502853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002053973,0.00002338537,0.00002610655,0.00002493926,0.0003610406,0.0002174825,0.0000965775,0.00007234632,0.00001909216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001184148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001127216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002252606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001744762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994542,0.00003722383,0.000194487,0.00003334748,0.0001159537,0.000164796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996054,0.00009786553,0.00007726913,0.0001725578,0.00003237297,0.00001456505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001346821,0.00002064509,0.001174703,0.000003472726,0.00001239805,7.846395e-8,0.07065225,0.000003516622,8.336346e-8,0.9124694,0.001586983,0.01406297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000500957,0.00002646172,0.003788888,0.000003554518,0.000005140954,7.141337e-7,0.04528982,0.00005404779,7.914854e-7,0.001309302,0.948981,0.00003927858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2147263,0.004763823,0.000008728208,0.01424522,0.00008755452,0.0002870453,0.00001004283,0.0000162888,0.765855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955233,0.001439427,0.00001983748,0.001505367,0.00006135632,0.0000303285,0.000003339252,0.00000136965,0.00141567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3835378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612437179","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2017.1309904","title":"A Rhetorical Bestiary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Metis; Bestiary; Literature; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07141585429859594,"gpt":0.2915769428938861,"spread":0.2201610885952902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002176296,0.0002140464,0.0002815693,0.00001836063,0.003589189,0.0006402913,0.0008532829,0.00007609028,0.000517286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003015127,0.000185109,0.0003406101,0.00002278761,0.0005190423,0.0005051405,0.00009953588,0.0002421144,0.0006146029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009594612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004331727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003454385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006305056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987342,0.00003818827,0.0002901307,0.0002848218,0.0003119188,0.0003406809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981149,0.0001090403,0.000246166,0.001244975,0.000179217,0.0001056446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001198045,0.0002142076,0.00129569,0.00002749908,0.0002678106,0.000004188687,0.1992012,2.078941e-7,0.00002273319,0.4406673,0.3146464,0.04364084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004716718,0.0002060211,0.00308948,0.00002088652,0.00004689411,0.000003541931,0.02024461,0.0001292028,0.000004057171,0.005682897,0.9697514,0.000349364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1029117,0.004267996,0.001575007,0.01411125,0.01157325,0.0006402049,0.00005431131,0.001045844,0.8638205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673612,0.0002039279,0.0003743735,0.0003032863,0.002059314,0.00006898002,0.000006749064,0.00002683883,0.02959534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8644495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277532566","doi":"10.29173/pandpr22144","title":"What’s in a Name? The Experience of the Other in Online Classrooms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phenomenology & Practice","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Experiential learning; Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Online learning; Thematic analysis; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Multimedia; Qualitative research; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05976106888627016,"gpt":0.3074081245431584,"spread":0.2476470556568882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000408544,0.00007270992,0.0001348949,0.00003281341,0.0001512778,0.00003630992,0.0004479376,0.00002574082,0.0002632111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003561679,0.00004076082,0.00002296489,0.00006785276,0.0005265106,0.0003742973,0.0001778526,0.0002443478,0.00002406945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002709028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001837663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001085896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005650272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999014,0.0004139305,0.0002366142,0.0001103088,0.00009022364,0.0001349167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998446,0.0008228229,0.0001941368,0.0004703602,0.0000589771,0.000007663497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003700344,0.0002645838,0.002664817,0.000003479616,0.0000234634,2.314045e-7,0.3816539,0.00001119056,0.00001085848,0.6087666,0.000167633,0.006396219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001707033,0.0000266395,0.002517526,0.00001284078,0.000006946008,0.000001201571,0.2503261,0.00004818369,0.000002349424,0.003482234,0.743362,0.000043267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6309752,0.007553958,0.0000333261,0.1004514,0.001316518,0.0003502184,0.000003550849,0.0000277992,0.259288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924624,0.000681932,0.00004118257,0.003064351,0.00008822892,0.00005360339,4.127674e-7,0.000006552056,0.003601366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7431944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3152984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}