{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":795,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":795,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"01e92679d4c5","filters":{"topic":"School Choice and Performance"}},"results":[{"id":"W1549469887","doi":"10.26522/brocked.v20i2.172","title":"The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brock Education Journal","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1853,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Redeemer University","funders":"","keywords":"Standardized test; American education; School choice; Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0614801490255448,"gpt":0.3142746257675891,"spread":0.2527944767420444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003081822,0.0000676198,0.00008334363,0.00004380951,0.001653294,0.0002227614,0.0001958659,0.00002791797,0.000009922403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002650239,0.00004245187,0.00002119402,0.0002473509,0.0001466306,0.0003362379,0.00002453459,0.0001899451,0.000001649586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007857302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00215848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001585481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005984587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99922,0.0001750842,0.0001573519,0.00009258368,0.0002055755,0.0001494409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986366,0.0002372706,0.0004695462,0.0001139047,0.0003069381,0.000235745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003323775,0.0000158625,0.9729846,0.00001729142,0.000007386482,2.659213e-8,0.002765562,4.345283e-7,0.00002540941,0.0002794932,0.00293601,0.02096459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005090201,0.00001785146,0.9042659,0.0001933164,0.00002330969,0.00003496525,0.08875502,0.000008665043,0.00001581304,0.0002231135,0.006355115,0.0000559668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887239,0.001193255,0.00001444125,0.002803507,0.0008145522,0.0001220748,4.8446e-7,0.00001106461,0.006316775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963734,0.0002723961,0.0004920277,0.0002869464,0.001161319,0.00001107523,1.164994e-7,0.000005944792,0.001396752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08598945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992826861","doi":"10.2307/40264552","title":"Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TESOL Quarterly","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1561,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Citation; Persistence (discontinuity); Sociology; Inequality; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03253147384487827,"gpt":0.3131416455948152,"spread":0.2806101717499369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003232375,0.0001420487,0.000255879,0.0001085322,0.0004969081,0.0001446073,0.0004764663,0.0001021204,0.00004644219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001683036,0.00008512667,0.00006900035,0.0007245545,0.001034627,0.0003255419,0.00001504057,0.0002835861,0.00001578447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003547805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008950448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01620163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01805038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997695,0.0008280165,0.0004191133,0.0002094032,0.0005163386,0.0003321467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982874,0.001025074,0.0002207185,0.0002848629,0.000137213,0.00004473232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00208469,0.0003669632,0.1525797,0.00008549965,0.00004356354,0.0000150846,0.8015642,0.0001085043,0.0001831353,0.02719718,0.00255657,0.01321492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01503864,0.001026499,0.5428675,0.0001699111,0.0001692469,0.00001581761,0.3454109,0.005925561,0.0001162526,0.04273215,0.04560716,0.0009203639],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923139,0.000347727,0.00005748568,0.003505329,0.00009728394,0.0004817599,0.00001504915,0.00002921532,0.003152204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986169,0.000071304,0.00006662192,0.0006192364,0.0002952048,0.00004606954,0.00002004848,0.000006778437,0.0002578507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4561532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066547796","doi":"10.1093/qje/121.4.1437","title":"The Persistence of Early Childhood Maturity: International Evidence of Long-Run Age Effects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Journal of Economics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":598,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Cohort; Maturity (psychological); Demography; Percentile; Cutoff; Cohort study; Psychology; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02070994787332257,"gpt":0.2673093851965397,"spread":0.2465994373232172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001456011,0.00007155926,0.0001736331,0.00004914626,0.000217878,0.0001012031,0.0008938021,0.0000455605,0.00001765055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007964299,0.00004575918,0.0001648133,0.00007526718,0.0003135517,0.000555457,0.0000149121,0.0001981211,0.000007325936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005568246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001644948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004436761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001550816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990275,0.0001250624,0.0004547392,0.00006630263,0.0001740778,0.0001523297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981785,0.0007147944,0.0007444374,0.0001676546,0.0001540315,0.00004052141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002044029,0.0009148676,0.4133777,0.0002531257,0.001329618,0.00007576718,0.2802199,0.00246037,0.002559034,0.0512784,0.005153938,0.2403333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008152177,0.001446957,0.9645932,0.0005615084,0.0001137984,0.00004966056,0.008740313,0.00009994938,0.001383757,0.0201909,0.00179194,0.0002128123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944523,0.001115516,0.00002603889,0.001937299,0.0007076833,0.00008229275,0.000002148515,0.000002607121,0.001674125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982238,0.000705792,0.00009106423,0.00004727847,0.0007459009,0.000001009449,1.990222e-7,0.00000474714,0.0001801971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5512155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1866005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129368568","doi":"10.1080/00461520.2012.670488","title":"Classroom Climate and Contextual Effects: Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Evaluation of Group-Level Effects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Psychologist","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":594,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Multilevel model; Psychology; Construct (python library); Context (archaeology); Classroom climate; Context effect; Control (management); Mathematics education; Social psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2911183398929723,"gpt":0.5176182321866443,"spread":0.226499892293672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006807845,0.00008355268,0.0001418718,0.00004523927,0.0001948484,0.00003079463,0.0001418544,0.0001007454,0.0000869112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002784249,0.00005797026,0.00002144009,0.0001623551,0.0008127866,0.0002560787,0.0000247974,0.0001507561,0.00001241507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003326617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004986197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003594574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003349864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970896,0.001944643,0.0001697017,0.0001628461,0.0003976783,0.0002355622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579,0.003868034,0.00009264233,0.0001076785,0.0000808562,0.00006081167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006476645,0.0003714124,0.7959479,0.00004513051,0.0000163021,2.460236e-7,0.03496515,7.75013e-7,0.0002581399,0.1064443,0.006668436,0.05521743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004940595,0.00008216582,0.9830256,0.00002419867,0.00002257972,0.00000321921,0.00733657,0.000005671581,0.00002011896,0.005612735,0.003298223,0.00007486065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769722,0.007022643,0.00003263184,0.007501659,0.0006641912,0.0004148364,0.000006050238,0.000007951129,0.007377803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967761,0.000516805,0.001099907,0.0006976869,0.0007448493,0.0001029052,0.00001212366,0.000003144893,0.0000464999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1870777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3333207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125717822","doi":"10.1111/1468-0297.00068","title":"New Evidence on Classroom Computers and Pupil Learning","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":425,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematics education; Test (biology); Miracle; Psychology; Political science; History; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06220132094620052,"gpt":0.2962667268277127,"spread":0.2340654058815121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000759492,0.00005091283,0.00006958313,0.00002845511,0.0007977745,0.0002515012,0.0002316541,0.00002824527,0.001262701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062711,0.00003735972,0.00002825674,0.00002846012,0.00006320484,0.0003831176,0.00001939602,0.0003595552,0.0006039698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001295872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007317111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002758769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003293265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994432,0.0001095846,0.0001130584,0.00007565886,0.0000788668,0.0001796451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994303,0.0002856884,0.00008983757,0.00006431188,0.000007716969,0.0001221506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005806141,0.00001213068,0.1268643,0.000004849975,0.00006528893,0.00001004554,0.04246548,0.00711498,0.00003488666,0.005965364,0.3018886,0.515516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009340262,0.0003446995,0.06236021,0.0002918384,0.00003419446,0.0001506337,0.005690845,0.0110082,0.00003330387,0.005268712,0.9134737,0.0004096981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561863,0.001238831,0.0001336792,0.02001814,0.0009380871,0.00004520113,1.624485e-7,0.00002007724,0.02141955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850941,0.004806652,0.0001260224,0.0006246777,0.002853214,3.822764e-7,3.449486e-8,0.000004578169,0.006490375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.611585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051436187","doi":"10.1111/1529-1006.003","title":"Class Size and Student Achievement","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gothic.net","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":384,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Earnings; Mathematics education; Psychology; Space (punctuation); Cognition; Class size; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02625421572521237,"gpt":0.3374307579878155,"spread":0.3111765422626032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006143059,0.00007673138,0.00009333215,0.00002132321,0.000369133,0.0001056886,0.0001827968,0.00007848853,0.000655011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000771604,0.000069946,0.00002349855,0.0001502441,0.0001132226,0.0001807746,0.00004881014,0.0001503228,0.0001884864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004736979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005641613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001076401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004769747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989935,0.00007558944,0.0001187711,0.0001661214,0.0003677602,0.0002782388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995517,0.0001182148,0.00003908054,0.0001320777,0.00003358728,0.0001253631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003266309,0.0001268888,0.9432974,0.0000120074,0.00002958772,0.00001560281,0.01686868,0.00001050643,0.0002031676,0.007381868,0.02258691,0.009434747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002243273,0.00003908383,0.3384094,0.000009310005,0.000006885129,8.70966e-7,0.001951795,0.000007996481,0.00001418995,0.0003689027,0.6588761,0.00009112833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9249205,0.0003556724,0.000009264045,0.009806545,0.0002864353,0.0001318541,0.000002429481,0.00005447357,0.06443284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837523,0.001421576,0.0001070154,0.00275191,0.0007349631,0.00001386061,0.000001446572,0.000006389589,0.01121061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6362892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7171911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969168383","doi":"10.1198/016214506000000447","title":"Evaluating Kindergarten Retention Policy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Statistical Association","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":377,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Grade retention; Propensity score matching; Retention rate; Psychology; Covariate; Multilevel model; Average treatment effect; Affect (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Demography; Mathematics; Econometrics; Academic achievement; Statistics; Computer science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03241118186837891,"gpt":0.3965013558341809,"spread":0.364090173965802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002213277,0.00005121353,0.00014882,0.00006029631,0.0003476628,0.00007797641,0.0001817785,0.00003036454,0.00004891478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004355938,0.00003684037,0.00008338949,0.0004783094,0.0001019834,0.000196815,0.00001594634,0.0002058638,0.00001690203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008488031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003904279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003804612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007604581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978979,0.0005266496,0.00032859,0.00005989055,0.0009553787,0.0002316322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976632,0.0005766213,0.001291866,0.0000642911,0.0003473966,0.00005661351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001232977,0.0001517692,0.7617533,0.000008758769,0.0001003859,0.000004317278,0.00149966,0.0006368816,0.002060644,0.04939521,0.09973516,0.08453063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002435712,0.0001201479,0.9587475,0.00001786359,0.00005791975,0.000002262637,0.0004897214,0.0002899808,0.00003791819,0.0264672,0.01345234,0.00007354662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637054,0.00002932371,0.003443901,0.0232635,0.0005213329,0.00009275728,0.0000162198,0.00001530988,0.008912315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992539,0.00002841788,0.002955765,0.0004628896,0.002429113,0.000001072761,0.000001385939,0.000005275373,0.001577119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1969942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5751461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049665839","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.03.002","title":"What can be learned about peer effects using college roommates? Evidence from new survey data and students from disadvantaged backgrounds","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":348,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Peer effects; Disadvantaged; Variation (astronomy); Empirical evidence; Survey data collection; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Higher education; Peer review; Peer group; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1647452608605262,"gpt":0.3909116260147189,"spread":0.2261663651541927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004187558,0.0001615642,0.0003964758,0.0001070526,0.0003730818,0.002209297,0.00129253,0.0001335611,0.0001294027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001183932,0.0001568596,0.0000552959,0.0001700247,0.0001196558,0.007600863,0.0002735796,0.0003222021,0.00000646274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003598593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06343727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2742228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979081,0.0004583584,0.000570299,0.0002932932,0.0004239625,0.0003460542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968132,0.001575883,0.0006753906,0.0003875238,0.0002083968,0.0003395826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004570351,0.00004130993,0.9913111,0.000004948677,0.00008148992,0.000007307807,0.001872675,0.00009812033,0.00005326594,0.00002901349,0.005252404,0.001202615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001240645,0.00005085749,0.9765298,0.0002131455,0.00007451651,0.00000450445,0.004951509,0.001096199,0.0000410914,0.001278007,0.0142509,0.0002687972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914292,0.002591146,0.00008177667,0.003745739,0.001732317,0.0001148145,0.0002388158,0.000009501802,0.00005670157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899644,0.005642331,0.0008524737,0.0003359236,0.002320925,5.704395e-7,0.0001037618,0.00001952454,0.0007600503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2107855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137636117","doi":"10.3102/0034654308326158","title":"A Review of Empirical Evidence About School Size Effects: A Policy Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Review of Educational Research","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":341,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Perspective (graphical); Class size; Psychology; Mathematics education; Empirical research; Variety (cybernetics); Empirical evidence; Economic growth; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3379277035906479,"gpt":0.6455643202481193,"spread":0.3076366166574714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01266629,0.0003668912,0.002661761,0.0005180879,0.0003472285,0.00004675352,0.001852045,0.0002786358,0.005044826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2683752,0.0002871482,0.001072417,0.005799593,0.00074926,0.0003874395,0.0001627533,0.001363903,0.0008727096],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001959369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04482176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001806572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007131857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894058,0.004934037,0.001511725,0.0006632323,0.002754967,0.0007302168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685207,0.02478537,0.0009268517,0.0009658358,0.004271089,0.0005301487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002585075,0.0001287992,0.00002517198,0.5983003,0.00005146672,3.718049e-7,0.0001390838,2.825348e-9,5.043135e-8,0.005740216,0.1397002,0.2559117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002029698,0.00005685779,0.0001103278,0.4863706,0.0001507955,0.000003106908,0.00003008405,1.248723e-8,7.755588e-8,0.0004355556,0.5127037,0.000118603],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[4.902095e-7,0.9347814,1.855689e-7,0.02813277,0.0001225014,0.00338873,0.00002610842,0.000007166742,0.03354065],"genre_scores_gemma":[8.706617e-7,0.9903412,0.0001930844,0.002466031,0.002588867,0.0007548101,0.00002157818,0.00002754461,0.003605975],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3730035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106270656","doi":"10.1257/jep.22.3.189","title":"Peer Effects and Alcohol Use among College Students","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":335,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Peer effects; Psychology; Lottery; Test (biology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Percentage point; Peer group; Alcohol; Demography; Social psychology; Medicine; Mathematics; Sociology; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03548796185607819,"gpt":0.3303039879356861,"spread":0.2948160260796079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001121815,0.0000697112,0.0001516557,0.00006346891,0.0005122687,0.00005439268,0.0002963048,0.00003711502,0.00006310469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002037219,0.00004889418,0.00005361564,0.00004845664,0.0004261213,0.0008353019,0.00003442541,0.000176352,0.0000191944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001685561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001188445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007062208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009762958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992384,0.0001664253,0.0001588114,0.00006932359,0.0002185348,0.0001484582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991314,0.0003920879,0.0001834257,0.0000849481,0.0001123633,0.00009574569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009981247,0.00004502581,0.8684589,0.000002692043,0.0001173243,0.00001682063,0.1193403,0.0000373259,0.00005590406,0.001013623,0.01072726,0.00008498313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005882968,0.00008330036,0.9596148,0.00001673878,0.00003042714,0.00004870389,0.03547535,0.00001441269,0.00004317934,0.0003375832,0.00366895,0.00007825818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947146,0.0006621754,0.00000266953,0.001186916,0.0002534788,0.00009695649,0.000002480934,0.000005858771,0.003074914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928758,0.002290152,0.00002939234,0.00006576303,0.0006799749,9.821337e-7,4.705617e-8,0.000005496324,0.004052358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09115584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3940009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942725897","doi":"10.1080/00461520.2019.1587297","title":"Emotion Regulation in Achievement Situations: An Integrated Model","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Psychologist","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":298,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Value (mathematics); Control (management); Process (computing); Domain (mathematical analysis); Object (grammar); Cognitive psychology; Point (geometry); Social psychology; Academic achievement; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06677923970729127,"gpt":0.4087985032708688,"spread":0.3420192635635775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006493982,0.00006389074,0.00006148335,0.0001171504,0.0001508752,0.00005216548,0.0001677763,0.00007762055,0.001215943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009559283,0.00006455441,0.00002008887,0.0003557432,0.00006733608,0.0005734373,0.000008229646,0.0001214404,0.0004954516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001893786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002920871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008535781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002681346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999113,0.0001057754,0.0001742681,0.0002141027,0.0002402028,0.0001526452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999541,0.00004964732,0.0000674797,0.0001810052,0.0001063941,0.00005445315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001196125,0.001759656,0.6278051,0.00001486429,0.00001391868,1.911363e-7,0.02302569,0.03284483,0.001084125,0.2428117,0.03115637,0.039364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002779645,0.00003689844,0.9360899,0.00002035038,0.000002209214,2.435987e-7,0.002886466,0.00507766,0.000008915052,0.04634662,0.00912478,0.0001279866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9241319,0.0000271779,0.0010575,0.02151674,0.0007502984,0.0002792677,0.000005137625,0.00003454228,0.05219745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988824,0.00003244268,0.002123117,0.0006581606,0.0003432282,0.00003560985,0.0002017557,0.000005008831,0.007776643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3082848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146457157","doi":"10.1111/ecoj.12267","title":"Does Management Matter in schools?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":289,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02759670256745011,"gpt":0.2991767989255164,"spread":0.2715800963580662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001640474,0.00004197877,0.00005962518,0.00004744418,0.000190186,0.000173897,0.0003220064,0.00002209933,0.00113254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008713321,0.00002175873,0.00002613745,0.00003576404,0.00004126734,0.0003693145,0.00002977342,0.000213514,0.00333853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003396258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001235582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004713956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001857318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994396,0.00008321134,0.0001410359,0.00005977227,0.00008139717,0.0001949573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997217,0.00001718128,0.00005940993,0.00009593755,0.000009723053,0.00009605841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005057226,0.00001566865,0.7028888,0.000003473777,0.00003733772,0.00001617841,0.01287472,0.0009340647,0.000001310347,0.005613034,0.2692305,0.008334333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008331374,0.00001525417,0.1472676,0.00003301584,0.0000110967,0.00001561025,0.03084756,0.00009068743,0.00001037981,0.04607126,0.7746413,0.0001631044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8283303,0.00006686828,0.000006976754,0.02218712,0.00138461,0.00006143521,4.95963e-7,0.000006626714,0.1479556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870091,0.0002968883,0.00008645,0.0009913704,0.001774333,0.000003809833,1.426712e-7,0.000004442282,0.009833447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5556211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142744427","doi":"10.1162/rest.89.2.300","title":"Do Peers Affect Student Achievement in China's Secondary Schools?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Desegregation; Affect (linguistics); Tracking (education); Voucher; China; Academic achievement; Student achievement; Peer effects; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Selection bias; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Econometrics; Computer science; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02103848834825416,"gpt":0.3443849803235342,"spread":0.32334649197528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003469107,0.00007455247,0.0002168165,0.00003137007,0.0001302892,0.00003527598,0.0001909852,0.00002593474,0.00008985932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009952297,0.00005631206,0.00002893919,0.0000747528,0.00009094947,0.00007832461,0.00004020165,0.0001678588,0.000009794576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006076303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001134875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004193933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003328368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992362,0.00007324858,0.0003279159,0.0001066119,0.00007581992,0.0001801981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994309,0.0001874678,0.0001499372,0.0001429022,0.0000251632,0.00006363307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003492617,0.0001411325,0.08778501,0.002329977,0.00007520831,0.00000457227,0.0058251,0.00004671353,0.000002145249,0.4687946,0.007581883,0.4273787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005499097,0.0001426481,0.6777608,0.001613342,0.00006628504,0.000001763453,0.003266849,0.00007319662,0.000009464928,0.009270745,0.3069587,0.0002862916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.9130839,0.06330352,0.0003504241,0.003723406,0.0003532017,0.0007213299,0.0001181374,0.000007221665,0.01833888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3354248,0.6620694,0.001430659,0.0007477301,0.0001416194,0.000006817329,0.00000843892,0.00000668263,0.0001638837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5987659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2296339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77903994","doi":"10.1177/016146811011200408","title":"School Composition and Contextual Effects on Student Outcomes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Context (archaeology); Proxy (statistics); Composition (language); Mathematics education; Psychology; Literacy; Academic achievement; Developmental psychology; Population; Pedagogy; Geography; Sociology; Demography; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02012895123679676,"gpt":0.3500470986943362,"spread":0.3299181474575394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00222026,0.0001257943,0.0001806508,0.0001692961,0.0003888348,0.00009167519,0.0003513035,0.0001486952,0.00005215598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000949045,0.0001003243,0.0000452475,0.00036882,0.0001704226,0.0005522777,0.00002772792,0.0008358292,0.00005223371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001525539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003859804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00115335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00658321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984738,0.0004741729,0.0002490681,0.0002049932,0.0003823663,0.0002156049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984987,0.0008506887,0.0001612045,0.0002555913,0.0001052636,0.0001285568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004954241,0.0003045787,0.9561808,0.00001627259,0.0000151333,3.415833e-7,0.009357287,8.076415e-7,0.001842272,0.003815816,0.0004585335,0.02795864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000446623,0.00007332007,0.9805872,0.0001042779,0.00001862447,7.975144e-7,0.01083774,0.000002117466,0.0004890779,0.0008111101,0.006505923,0.0001231397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988216,0.0001324141,7.617436e-7,0.004644715,0.001572618,0.0006248999,0.000002938702,0.00002867976,0.004776956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977099,0.0001061133,0.0002271496,0.0005962172,0.0004250724,0.00008923735,0.0000032673,0.00001085121,0.000832155],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0278355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4091108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100418226","doi":"10.1007/s10802-005-3576-2","title":"Peer Effects in Drug Use and Sex Among College Students","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Psychology; Binge drinking; Developmental psychology; Peer group; Injury prevention; Sexual behavior; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Human factors and ergonomics; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01493658392964397,"gpt":0.345638696371511,"spread":0.330702112441867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001830183,0.0001000634,0.0002297745,0.0002178456,0.000181227,0.00007074774,0.0003028009,0.0001243131,0.00008280563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001953083,0.00008753846,0.00005589505,0.0002253335,0.0001594188,0.001051574,0.00003206672,0.0005600193,0.00002057073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004789272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003809102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003139039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005368144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984244,0.0002597016,0.0003578637,0.0001256969,0.0005274083,0.0003049209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992144,0.0001767177,0.0002128451,0.0001010418,0.0001111493,0.0001838945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006631194,0.0001252343,0.9701501,0.000004318609,0.00001888152,0.00006161234,0.008307035,0.00001596593,0.000005143161,0.0001644001,0.0199241,0.001156957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001349119,0.00009571668,0.8855594,0.00004436532,0.00001067557,0.00007294975,0.0004459933,0.000003424375,0.00001581389,0.00006084202,0.1122549,0.00008671013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98224,0.0003859181,0.000004208648,0.006386822,0.0005795192,0.0001151496,0.000002193705,0.00000718259,0.01027901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936784,0.000519254,0.0001856407,0.002088029,0.001427994,0.000001875006,4.093758e-7,0.000007606495,0.002090796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09233083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3569715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107814245","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_00339","title":"Match Quality, Worker Productivity, and Worker Mobility: Direct Evidence from Teachers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Quality (philosophy); Quarter (Canadian coin); Teacher quality; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Econometrics; Business; Operations management; Economic growth; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08736307050210677,"gpt":0.3711332675115205,"spread":0.2837701970094137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003687205,0.00008903357,0.000294698,0.00001038452,0.0001786924,0.00004612577,0.0001420284,0.0000360411,0.00008566849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007493097,0.00006440804,0.00002683103,0.00006200828,0.000303238,0.0002825736,0.00007409538,0.0001045665,0.000009668413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002852299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006382188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002080966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001780136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990207,0.000278682,0.0002905678,0.0001500692,0.00007302389,0.0001869367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984248,0.001004166,0.0001929394,0.0002444691,0.00004054532,0.00009309127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002550634,0.00008252187,0.4580313,0.001056289,0.00009745184,1.396759e-7,0.01413008,0.000005133154,0.000004285757,0.02313806,0.007656236,0.495773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002011024,0.00004385179,0.597632,0.004369949,0.0003004603,0.000001545533,0.001810867,0.0001029024,0.00002233686,0.01775047,0.3772776,0.0004868788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.7477377,0.2462222,0.000106462,0.003179898,0.0002292767,0.0003584417,0.0001103887,0.000008471729,0.002047116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3887655,0.6082977,0.00202403,0.0002616774,0.0003385119,0.00001361191,0.000004283463,0.000006841288,0.0002878923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4952861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3145812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140000358","doi":"10.3386/w15803","title":"Identifying Effective Classroom Practices Using Student Achievement Data","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Manning Diversified Forest Products (Canada)","funders":"Joyce Foundation","keywords":"Student achievement; Mathematics education; Academic achievement; Psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6979321726526299,"gpt":0.6657892331647236,"spread":0.03214293948790625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03047924,0.0001816328,0.0003923469,0.0006628585,0.000831572,0.0003938057,0.002125998,0.0005183152,0.0006730295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006774133,0.0001893384,0.00009816056,0.0002678811,0.0004389877,0.001295582,0.0008919334,0.001842233,0.0001840475],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002845576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0114012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03616789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03928379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932025,0.0006611798,0.0006398142,0.0007450146,0.004222794,0.0005286949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930349,0.002639221,0.001218422,0.0006845527,0.002268926,0.0001539799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000483338,0.002008401,0.3510574,0.002005961,0.003869353,0.00004460358,0.01053236,0.0007064677,0.002864766,0.1557129,0.4315206,0.03919386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006697026,0.0001171955,0.02541791,0.0004445249,0.0001151843,0.000008676429,0.003462685,0.0005776591,0.0001850605,0.03454053,0.9338902,0.0005707297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09994797,0.001673077,0.00001152695,0.002175294,0.004105149,0.002049776,0.0003016638,0.00003236318,0.8897032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946415,0.01091748,0.001627945,0.00005784348,0.02069733,0.0002343423,0.00153867,0.00009424023,0.01841714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.871286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003166044","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-682x.2001.tb01110.x","title":"The Role of Caring in the Teacher‐Student Relationship for At‐Risk Students","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Inquiry","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Perception; Value (mathematics); Investment (military); Psychology; Mathematics education; Productivity; Action (physics); Social psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.142463750536412,"gpt":0.4380611713274515,"spread":0.2955974207910395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003182016,0.00006100128,0.00009632138,0.00001339011,0.001139149,0.00003920805,0.0006272062,0.0001418634,0.00002339241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008951681,0.00003175246,0.00007964903,0.0001424578,0.0005448426,0.00005615039,0.00007591468,0.0002775486,0.00001537364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009158289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002746072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003739113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001651699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985914,0.0005104552,0.0001988448,0.0001249735,0.0003171381,0.0002572429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978195,0.001871742,0.0001000597,0.0001440119,0.00003533853,0.00002935674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002276864,0.00004499905,0.9452383,7.05666e-7,0.000006711083,2.772998e-7,0.04788304,0.0000174645,0.000007257425,0.005251231,0.0002880435,0.001239201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001609745,0.00004307378,0.8892078,0.000004381453,0.000008223932,1.668026e-7,0.07384843,0.00001139618,0.000002707878,0.01753527,0.01913144,0.00004617124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913456,0.001161381,0.0000103906,0.0009933929,0.0001572718,0.0003034996,0.000001376934,0.00001576423,0.006011368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978448,0.0007060693,0.00002512571,0.0001473966,0.0005205989,0.0000994716,0.000002138191,0.000002874902,0.0006515033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05603053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.876153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242895532","doi":"10.3368/jhr.50.3.549","title":"Leaving Boys Behind","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Human Resources","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Psychology; Mode (computer interface); Demographic economics; Mathematics education; Decomposition; Demography; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07535634288568982,"gpt":0.3532528757209349,"spread":0.2778965328352451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003180261,0.0000516009,0.0001023887,0.00005848205,0.0005869529,0.00008914253,0.000532352,0.00003537818,0.0001376758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001818192,0.00003117458,0.00005008038,0.00007886645,0.0001772039,0.0002681932,0.00003049653,0.0002487524,0.00003917246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004138566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008166354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005369564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001239509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988157,0.0002448056,0.0002032986,0.00003489677,0.0005356777,0.000165677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992638,0.0001106345,0.0002440524,0.0001004081,0.0001461709,0.0001349888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001854054,0.00008318253,0.07268054,0.00001113314,0.00008367212,0.0000301451,0.7364582,0.0002522805,0.001474311,0.0009907862,0.1811005,0.006649891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005724636,0.0003441276,0.02387989,0.00007863409,0.00006595928,0.00003664888,0.09183564,0.000006031394,0.0005024098,0.004203743,0.8783267,0.000147713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583249,0.001109462,0.000004165997,0.002187916,0.0001747926,0.00002861888,2.262302e-7,0.000009158098,0.03816078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936557,0.00009156406,0.00002622968,0.0002125534,0.002284749,2.088383e-7,7.090362e-8,0.000005083329,0.003723809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6972263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4514426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509097014","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9442.2012.01742.x","title":"Information and College Access: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment*","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Economics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Calculator; Educational attainment; Economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Actuarial science; Economic growth; Medicine; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03235551140405151,"gpt":0.3091444430548134,"spread":0.2767889316507618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007416842,0.00006863023,0.0002701879,0.00009125366,0.0001720484,0.0003689944,0.0002675453,0.00006266617,0.0009238504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005046915,0.00005843324,0.00007422353,0.00006189219,0.000102966,0.005583541,0.00003205644,0.0001177507,0.00003841104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007475601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001416479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002536168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000285641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992214,0.0000883652,0.0004346395,0.00004786412,0.00007234649,0.0001353139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986359,0.0005905023,0.0004360526,0.00007446313,0.0001124012,0.0001506842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03241481,0.0001294335,0.516911,0.00009573546,0.0007946794,0.00001199634,0.1889678,0.0003531328,0.000222663,0.01700193,0.1276652,0.1154317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.3021896,0.001890549,0.1239932,0.00461081,0.0007109314,0.0001316845,0.1643469,0.007376784,0.01224125,0.2353826,0.1438972,0.003228429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916739,0.0008127262,0.0001019969,0.003503382,0.0004932725,0.0002026689,0.000004366035,0.000004602377,0.003203014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993438,0.004969706,0.0004391008,0.0005801024,0.000460414,0.0000097815,6.980819e-7,0.000002825098,0.00009939128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3929178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W44275065","doi":"","title":"School Leadership and the Bottom Line in Chicago.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phi Delta Kappan","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Academic achievement; Test (biology); Educational leadership; Reading (process); Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Standardized test; Student achievement; Teacher leadership; Achievement test; Principal (computer security); Quality (philosophy); Pedagogy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05776209752029164,"gpt":0.3147896455037825,"spread":0.2570275479834908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009945991,0.00007939157,0.0001208112,0.00004038741,0.0003158631,0.00009578759,0.0002488921,0.00007664313,0.001242307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001905387,0.00005625732,0.00003147641,0.000322593,0.0002936389,0.0002478741,0.00001483733,0.000323,0.00029245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002406622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007968196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01183823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990018,0.0001633599,0.0001465244,0.000160391,0.0002230035,0.000304949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995443,0.0001363814,0.00002649363,0.0001605945,0.0000182046,0.0001140272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001402655,0.0002555386,0.4496968,0.00008183437,0.00007462683,0.00002423437,0.09120813,0.0002680357,0.0000630054,0.02178633,0.03313582,0.4020029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005864404,0.00007930668,0.189659,0.000133523,0.00004088868,0.000006289611,0.01739685,0.002191618,0.00006685375,0.01037732,0.7735814,0.000602541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9148003,0.001382039,0.000002063596,0.04205831,0.0000767707,0.0002088474,0.000002462183,0.00004731485,0.04142191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906642,0.001191988,0.00005274776,0.002496193,0.0007964006,0.00002059503,0.000002434075,0.000006620883,0.004768807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7404456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111758481","doi":"10.1257/jel.20191507","title":"Upgrading Education with Technology: Insights from Experimental Research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Literature","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Regression discontinuity design; Technology education; Key (lock); Psychological intervention; Educational technology; Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Knowledge management; Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Computer security; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04318571761605204,"gpt":0.3706567295041183,"spread":0.3274710118880663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000185054,0.00005480178,0.0001151668,0.0001624179,0.000214296,0.0002178947,0.0002678646,0.0001043026,0.0001223979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004896914,0.00004189153,0.00003160552,0.0002765197,0.0000882729,0.0008051882,0.00001745302,0.0005054161,0.00004566627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001709199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006179486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005813859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994075,0.00006424572,0.0001689663,0.0001016076,0.0001356955,0.000121978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994906,0.00004856184,0.0001338401,0.00006963393,0.0001267576,0.0001306747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001082232,0.0003493453,0.1292412,0.00004259209,0.0003011422,0.0001144599,0.5111073,0.0001016421,0.02689144,0.07794835,0.2431769,0.009643412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009643878,0.0006488492,0.002271034,0.0005192257,0.00001680042,0.00002575228,0.06704395,0.00006174317,0.01427427,0.008573769,0.9053362,0.0002639927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.974888,0.006274641,0.000001942508,0.01147366,0.000378449,0.00005600465,0.000002759604,0.000009103022,0.006915412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950029,0.0001634962,0.0006008318,0.0004422521,0.003588675,0.000002298325,0.000002530498,0.000005687379,0.0001913743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6621593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.219581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068232229","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.015","title":"Mandatory summer school and student achievement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Standard deviation; Student achievement; Quarter (Canadian coin); Class size; Range (aeronautics); Academic achievement; Statistics; School district; Mathematics education; Econometrics; Mathematics; Geography; Economics; Engineering; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1300769175034525,"gpt":0.3543400149634748,"spread":0.2242630974600223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003636061,0.00005398037,0.0001296311,0.0005678906,0.0001689376,0.00009179108,0.0001872588,0.00005008684,0.0003028204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003155001,0.00004776661,0.00004880015,0.0004940429,0.00005336561,0.0004763498,0.00002797389,0.0001928624,0.00003131581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001674639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001109731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003853839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002526534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990886,0.00002494,0.0003480402,0.0000663726,0.0002773449,0.0001947052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999087,0.0001789102,0.0002656107,0.00006357361,0.0001219117,0.0002830409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001592158,0.00006314831,0.9855058,0.000004357437,0.00002732115,0.000008628796,0.0008062252,0.000003937656,0.0000064478,0.0006573425,0.003108231,0.009792631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003024058,0.00009182158,0.6727062,0.000007703803,0.00001198567,0.000002959004,0.002715792,7.027474e-7,0.00002785739,0.0001142495,0.3239596,0.00005873121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813513,0.002115323,0.0001711813,0.0006900444,0.0006266942,0.00004828602,9.552042e-7,0.000003755134,0.01499249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944032,0.002867648,0.0003909786,0.0005331521,0.001125873,3.026105e-7,1.728945e-7,0.000004322145,0.0006742874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3208513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3315671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125484610","doi":"10.1080/15700761003731500","title":"Characteristics of School Districts that Are Exceptionally Effective in Closing the Achievement Gap","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leadership and Policy in Schools","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); School district; Student achievement; Academic achievement; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics education; Psychology; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09252299848232638,"gpt":0.3596801379808888,"spread":0.2671571394985625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001095281,0.0001212066,0.0001864327,0.0001786446,0.0001965152,0.0001036938,0.0002618454,0.0001514095,0.00005551894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001094493,0.00009607518,0.00004116682,0.0004974711,0.0002386388,0.0003123275,0.00003291438,0.0008187649,0.0000261202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008244895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001813328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003400916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01314581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986596,0.0002405834,0.0002317944,0.0001779712,0.0003144454,0.0003756548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991549,0.0003655679,0.0001534432,0.000177902,0.00004028969,0.0001079569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003319867,0.00003566349,0.9848197,0.00003793982,0.000005013714,0.000001692247,0.005733399,0.000001303565,0.000372573,0.004416818,0.000198641,0.004344114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003299491,0.00002147181,0.9868003,0.0001255046,0.000005158112,7.77165e-7,0.008045416,0.000005025927,0.0001316072,0.001828857,0.00259504,0.0001109136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751468,0.00009964115,0.000004571032,0.0220865,0.0001799488,0.0003643968,0.00001706993,0.00001259694,0.002088524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969369,0.0002275567,0.00003089999,0.001465191,0.00105405,0.00004916995,0.000004901587,0.000007816988,0.0002235121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02179015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.733567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103485166","doi":"10.2202/1935-1682.1868","title":"The Causal Effect of Studying on Academic Performance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Function (biology); Production (economics); Causal model; Causal analysis; Production function; Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03900413398963669,"gpt":0.357933912491437,"spread":0.3189297785018003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004001458,0.0001005527,0.0003467599,0.0002785782,0.0009804099,0.00001956523,0.0007873873,0.00005848922,0.0000481775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002337971,0.00005238123,0.0002803546,0.0005027901,0.0003512245,0.0002548551,0.00003244684,0.0004117816,0.00005507096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002129802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003839651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002024491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000694987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998478,0.0004161182,0.0005259493,0.00006883282,0.0002517718,0.0002593037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978008,0.001079409,0.0007520819,0.0002266359,0.0000552616,0.00008582016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006648577,0.00002791642,0.9198626,0.00000979334,0.002260126,0.000002131918,0.02400405,0.03635354,0.0001204733,0.001904675,0.004005524,0.01078429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002139805,0.001913434,0.9353101,0.0001099493,0.003810257,0.00006646135,0.006554249,0.005301994,0.003862086,0.0006481219,0.03972275,0.0005608534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928365,0.0004301327,0.000004356161,0.00222976,0.0001208052,0.00006415231,0.000001136514,0.000003884008,0.004309325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988032,0.009355733,0.000002613642,0.0001482393,0.001658451,0.000001353411,1.934568e-7,0.000005599315,0.000795824],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03571723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.754062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277947026","doi":"10.3386/w19331","title":"Leaving Boys Behind: Gender Disparities in High Academic Achievement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Academic achievement; Psychology; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.477459652016329,"gpt":0.5558339300008345,"spread":0.07837427798450547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01114443,0.0001717311,0.0003935374,0.0009006757,0.0003389249,0.0001132652,0.0008447803,0.0006804354,0.001724484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001347756,0.0001821889,0.0001033231,0.0001654192,0.0004135671,0.0005910196,0.0001998445,0.001844424,0.0004093682],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003550674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007124319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1147893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01684576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951528,0.0003236013,0.0007443373,0.0004400567,0.002673143,0.000666056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973891,0.0009719521,0.0002798303,0.000204619,0.001011237,0.0001432297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004294469,0.0001087758,0.2640072,0.0003550506,0.0001487407,0.000003566804,0.00238403,0.0005064839,0.00003219251,0.3201717,0.4086149,0.003624414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007393039,0.00007904998,0.2384083,0.0004173592,0.0000171802,0.000002871227,0.001697968,0.0001444383,0.00008062472,0.4435191,0.3142387,0.0006551055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1546467,0.002185778,8.858103e-7,0.005061363,0.001146577,0.0008443893,0.0000783084,0.00002248102,0.8360136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9394352,0.01448761,0.00006120068,0.00006947687,0.003853524,0.0002448303,0.000228679,0.00002995154,0.04158949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7944241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096550507","doi":"10.3386/w9584","title":"Does Education Improve Citizenship? Evidence from the U.S. and the U.K.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Unobservable; Voter registration; Citizenship; Political science; Educational attainment; Turnout; Democracy; Politics; Voter turnout; Demographic economics; Public administration; Economics; Law; Econometrics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2132603790455157,"gpt":0.4985707974268373,"spread":0.2853104183813215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006444986,0.00004101577,0.0000703456,0.00004177881,0.0005656014,0.0001198114,0.0003201015,0.00004918423,0.000398517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004117357,0.00001944561,0.00002917817,0.0001094411,0.0007831499,0.0002133348,0.0000301506,0.0002031412,0.00005791151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001394829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001317654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008363578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003384696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985813,0.0005518367,0.0001460042,0.0001454867,0.0004233546,0.0001520043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938787,0.005566677,0.00005898761,0.000135367,0.0003183963,0.00004187381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004470339,0.000007955729,0.01903312,0.000003524432,0.00001697673,2.443066e-8,0.002886795,0.000006037272,0.00007697773,0.9602958,0.01488925,0.002738844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002554141,0.00001008812,0.01051441,0.00002720619,0.000003734266,1.697069e-7,0.003426601,0.000065879,0.0003499504,0.9699219,0.0153786,0.00004598195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.633795,0.002586422,0.000002451203,0.06361908,0.0007751308,0.0006144865,0.00001348807,0.000008749334,0.2985852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948128,0.001449354,0.00005539866,0.0002246329,0.0007815558,0.00005400779,0.000002839229,0.000003034736,0.002616364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3610179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081816865","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.965818","title":"Identification of Peer Effects through Social Networks","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Psychology; Computer science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01122386106695268,"gpt":0.3206879350562027,"spread":0.3094640739892501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006717992,0.00006791974,0.0001088985,0.00004767786,0.0006666766,0.00004636198,0.0002459213,0.0001127029,0.00002255016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001728106,0.00006455123,0.00008872527,0.0003111925,0.0001029585,0.0003900746,0.00001061986,0.0009465723,0.00001843529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000440527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008365571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003023965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005837909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976079,0.00009855142,0.0002731626,0.00009285292,0.0005257365,0.001401837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993361,0.0001010092,0.0002352339,0.00006479704,0.0002191501,0.0000437121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001459135,0.0001181084,0.02399565,0.00001769338,0.0001635076,0.00000326238,0.01476745,0.00009206866,0.001631976,0.8797103,0.003015063,0.07633906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002591409,0.000562332,0.117796,0.00007542099,0.000230338,0.00007683085,0.0385955,0.0002060701,0.005655451,0.7380967,0.09526214,0.0008518046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9196087,0.001907577,0.0658462,0.002097178,0.0009966569,0.0001486699,4.855186e-7,0.00003506347,0.009359433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993381,0.00142443,0.00001981149,0.0000844674,0.002623137,0.000001254292,0.00000120768,0.000007909132,0.002456792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1416136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5127605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768091137","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0187367","title":"Examining the accuracy of students’ self-reported academic grades from a correlational and a discrepancy perspective: Evidence from a longitudinal study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Longitudinal study; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2955283465316867,"gpt":0.421790766244,"spread":0.1262624197123133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008594303,0.000114207,0.0002382691,0.00003240303,0.001241099,0.0002263358,0.0007724087,0.00007606928,0.0001127734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004677731,0.00008714242,0.0000294197,0.00009894995,0.0002772205,0.001062375,0.0002316719,0.0003687246,0.00001177248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006651354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001445287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02810976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005426606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979076,0.0001851578,0.0002761543,0.0003429115,0.001105024,0.0001831365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972587,0.001518441,0.000508985,0.000436765,0.0001970009,0.00008012239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004273447,0.0005312552,0.9415339,0.000003719417,0.000473139,0.000004406014,0.05694922,3.062242e-7,0.000272408,0.00008975758,0.00001528565,0.0000839331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003879791,0.00007937398,0.9767987,0.0003428086,0.0004384647,2.216349e-7,0.02042639,0.0000741645,0.00006362727,0.001277124,0.000005541603,0.0001056287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967186,0.001304377,0.000005789671,0.001089544,0.00006896476,0.0004916479,0.0000203118,0.00003933111,0.0002614131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787,0.001045565,0.0003403601,0.00001853014,0.0005607679,0.00004803861,0.000002398885,0.000007581052,0.0001067269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03652282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9783621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598704444","doi":"10.1111/caje.12086","title":"How important are school principals in the production of student achievement?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Student achievement; Principal (computer security); Reading (process); Mathematics education; Percentile; Quality (philosophy); Teacher quality; Production (economics); Academic achievement; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Standard deviation; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Operations management; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1197238301380398,"gpt":0.236797594737627,"spread":0.1170737645995873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003506888,0.0001434862,0.0003676859,0.0004075049,0.0002360723,0.0001775461,0.0007728538,0.00010977,0.00006335705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009597497,0.0001343148,0.0001198024,0.0001799752,0.0001797977,0.0006074515,0.000010358,0.0003458476,0.000003618486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001190049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002009195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.138296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983865,0.0002045069,0.0006736041,0.0001999157,0.000009255084,0.0005262218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976614,0.0001231157,0.0009270862,0.0003178168,0.0001781874,0.0007924123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002443675,0.00002558412,0.876634,0.00002804264,0.00005082079,0.00002085984,0.00970955,0.0007698921,0.00001341242,0.1107217,0.0009102641,0.001091407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001038382,0.0006086816,0.564061,0.0004409053,0.00008152604,0.0001029903,0.04728584,0.0001571677,0.000195527,0.04722932,0.3381075,0.0006911201],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977294,0.00016716,0.000002678567,0.02015564,0.001255587,0.000283456,0.00001397997,0.000002116132,0.0008253984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970225,0.0002507769,0.00005943424,0.0005789892,0.001582951,0.00001386877,0.000001804436,0.00001373849,0.0004759053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8587602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8674422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280568119","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00110","title":"Evaluating Individual Students' Perceptions of Instructional Quality: An Investigation of their Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Relations to Educational Outcomes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Confirmatory factor analysis; Psychology; Measurement invariance; Perception; Quality (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Latent variable; Exploratory factor analysis; Scale (ratio); Mathematics education; Social psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1472198940204979,"gpt":0.4567834909797826,"spread":0.3095635969592847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001132239,0.00007777898,0.0001744512,0.0002617596,0.0001333422,0.00001227016,0.0002181281,0.0001039255,0.000241055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003956765,0.00006176282,0.00002389643,0.0002871874,0.0002962523,0.0003285203,0.00002586422,0.0000888737,0.000002163578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008785772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002388026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002166682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001817684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983217,0.0003965546,0.0003747055,0.0002132294,0.0005550415,0.0001387367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992696,0.0001032425,0.0001781655,0.0001563799,0.0002066822,0.00008589694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001913774,0.00003306629,0.9699535,0.00000371057,0.00002538672,1.023854e-8,0.009045874,0.000004990319,0.00221404,0.001433093,0.0007167475,0.01655045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004906359,0.00006297416,0.9652327,0.00002575896,0.000007819667,2.902344e-7,0.001575816,0.00000201806,0.00003027046,0.03234655,0.0001533325,0.00007182707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934345,0.00004911302,0.001363674,0.003774065,0.0009195439,0.0002106169,0.0001223967,0.000006951806,0.0001191053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981465,0.00002657207,0.01800631,0.0003102648,0.0001192495,0.0000223637,0.00001205925,0.000004811538,0.00003330597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03091346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2639383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575337377","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdy026","title":"Cool to be Smart or Smart to be Cool? Understanding Peer Pressure in Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Peer pressure; Test (biology); Peer effects; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Incentive; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1827572583401467,"gpt":0.4183952877254117,"spread":0.2356380293852649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00190275,0.00009423498,0.0003277183,0.00005066941,0.000285509,0.00002247762,0.0002889269,0.00002572908,0.0004486537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008015778,0.00006292168,0.00004492116,0.0002037524,0.0001685163,0.0001436694,0.00009085984,0.00006076898,0.0001786201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002546007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002791864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001001314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03365958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991006,0.0001127682,0.0003032432,0.0001647185,0.0001211763,0.0001975044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992244,0.0002602974,0.0001139342,0.0002240834,0.0001198823,0.0000574303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009790799,0.0000336213,0.007680597,0.001177049,0.000152744,1.466188e-7,0.0554745,0.000006653815,0.000003322479,0.008654509,0.9207508,0.005968167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008746637,0.00006825533,0.002923699,0.001636404,0.00005450287,3.281631e-7,0.02462439,0.000002165108,0.0000170827,0.0002651496,0.9702126,0.0001079368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3711669,0.1886132,0.00001372993,0.3462028,0.004258166,0.003567484,0.00004899962,0.00005780693,0.0860709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6636074,0.2783507,0.0001855116,0.03441717,0.002009685,0.0003407191,0.000004074211,0.00002374712,0.02106106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3117857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9839736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931934008","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-985x.2010.00642.x","title":"Children’s Educational Progress: Partitioning Family, School and Area Effects","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Sibling; Pupil; Developmental psychology; Psychology; Multilevel model; Variance (accounting); Mathematics education; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008213977751724177,"gpt":0.285815936558515,"spread":0.2776019588067908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001090716,0.0001828628,0.0002893744,0.00001784956,0.0009619308,0.0002833131,0.0003923,0.0001989376,0.0002512595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001634972,0.0001409729,0.0001841741,0.0002865352,0.00148226,0.0003123999,0.0001017221,0.001247251,0.000005821562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001717951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007182628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002649963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008017521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979271,0.000160963,0.000510872,0.0001944245,0.0007630937,0.0004435611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977381,0.001139784,0.0003586512,0.0001508035,0.000301519,0.0003111496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005255437,0.0002280167,0.6675404,0.0001287905,0.0001745071,0.000005926898,0.007448465,0.00008341834,0.00006221639,0.09399413,0.226075,0.004206569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007895836,0.0001207497,0.9291794,0.0001475974,0.0001036703,0.00001753891,0.002723515,0.0009317423,0.00002036248,0.05108284,0.01459396,0.0002890742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624811,0.00173449,0.01611185,0.01312274,0.00384524,0.000805571,0.0005345785,0.00004282733,0.001321541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8092365,0.001031032,0.1846393,0.001312694,0.002725077,0.00003516106,0.00002083711,0.00003267846,0.0009667384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.261639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7398492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123826764","doi":"10.1002/jae.2299","title":"DO PEERS AFFECT STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT? EVIDENCE FROM CANADA USING GROUP SIZE VARIATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Peer effects; Instrumental variable; Intuition; Affect (linguistics); Econometrics; Endogeneity; Variation (astronomy); Simultaneity; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06569618045714457,"gpt":0.3222417638451701,"spread":0.2565455833880255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002586057,0.00009763204,0.0002156409,0.000210571,0.0002657262,0.0001416687,0.0003465748,0.00006741493,0.000320839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004418827,0.00009312332,0.00005975277,0.0008217176,0.00002519401,0.0009310396,0.00003782247,0.0002246403,0.00001031748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001517265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005451352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1279655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06655483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984897,0.00005199022,0.0004032351,0.0001061209,0.0006296915,0.0003192557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978931,0.00104717,0.0006028548,0.0001129758,0.0000860798,0.0002578434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007460129,0.0001172189,0.9805367,0.00001376452,0.0001456718,0.000002608132,0.009956649,0.001464048,0.0004343259,0.0007601869,0.001536095,0.004958133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003982419,0.00004635604,0.9791234,0.00003323695,0.00008829117,9.716215e-7,0.005658831,0.00004426813,0.0001085935,0.0001762908,0.01413098,0.0001905606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948367,0.0008827274,0.0004720583,0.0002307488,0.001479227,0.0001141314,0.000005056926,0.000004942397,0.001974342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947237,0.0005350997,0.002334504,0.0002516261,0.002125554,0.000001800203,6.589139e-7,0.000007873396,0.00001912175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06141071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9504781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109947660","doi":"10.1257/app.2.2.95","title":"Ability, Gender, and Performance Standards: Evidence from Academic Probation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Applied Economics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Regression discontinuity design; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Academic achievement; Mathematics education; Medical education; Medicine; Statistics; Engineering; Geography; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02850681914016992,"gpt":0.3084753230234676,"spread":0.2799685038832977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001995355,0.0001774691,0.000308489,0.00009161587,0.0006781667,0.0002690472,0.0004635273,0.0001232192,0.0004318994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008900846,0.0001915801,0.00005578516,0.00006302811,0.0007538583,0.001192691,0.00007425334,0.0009693268,0.0001373454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005190732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008660234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008833256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002281605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985368,0.00004298183,0.0005132614,0.0003648018,0.0001148829,0.0004273137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985361,0.0002815279,0.0005650083,0.0002364058,0.00005024324,0.0003307918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002977063,0.00002306548,0.6031426,0.00001566508,0.00009346187,5.883623e-7,0.0135853,0.001132944,0.001007183,0.006751643,0.001417515,0.3725323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001325563,0.0002382546,0.818525,0.00005864129,0.000099389,0.00005827235,0.01502133,0.003537085,0.001049225,0.0287702,0.1299328,0.001384259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901906,0.0001205199,0.00007173422,0.0007801216,0.0007123656,0.0001956133,0.00003021855,0.00003821636,0.007860619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982543,0.01342874,0.001390449,0.0004003576,0.002159672,0.00001262553,0.000003066468,0.00002028887,0.00004177758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.371148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7812408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105214646","doi":"10.1177/000494410204600205","title":"Classroom and School Factors Affecting Mathematics Achievement: A Comparative Study of Australia and the United States Using TIMSS","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Education","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Educational Research Association","keywords":"Mathematics education; Student achievement; Academic achievement; Tracking (education); Quarter (Canadian coin); Variation (astronomy); Pupil; Work (physics); Psychology; Pedagogy; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1715557108217172,"gpt":0.4097285079247385,"spread":0.2381727971030212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007685371,0.00008321092,0.0001862498,0.0001328012,0.000286972,0.00009807962,0.000111034,0.00003507893,0.0001219304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001380991,0.00005649664,0.00002788415,0.000302616,0.0001708217,0.0003687119,0.00001042214,0.0002011039,0.000001706274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004841787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005146401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002073055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003425532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989893,0.0002332753,0.0003495342,0.00006540771,0.0002369329,0.0001255209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988734,0.0002335857,0.0005283782,0.00006821666,0.0001901509,0.0001063339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003808814,0.0005899595,0.5731495,0.00004832286,0.0001312735,5.622061e-7,0.4234353,0.0002913045,0.0001519721,0.000228176,0.00180756,0.0001279926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001155363,0.0003069402,0.1986866,0.0001935799,0.0001814653,0.00000923638,0.7979594,0.0002398132,0.0002055602,0.0004612325,0.0004841473,0.0001166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989148,0.00005179569,0.000008136115,0.0005575824,0.0001799787,0.0002290488,0.000001176177,0.000002566659,0.000054857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989842,0.00006406527,0.0003102774,0.00001352792,0.0001518108,9.409901e-7,9.191651e-7,0.000003540224,0.0004707809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3745242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3133852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034339688","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2354.2007.00454.x","title":"A SIGNALING THEORY OF GRADE INFLATION*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Exaggeration; Grade inflation; Grading (engineering); Incentive; Value (mathematics); Economics; Inflation (cosmology); Psychology; Construct (python library); Mathematics education; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics; Higher education; Engineering; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05105440290319284,"gpt":0.367231006156228,"spread":0.3161766032530351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002183109,0.00003903041,0.00009991795,0.0000440274,0.00004845274,0.00001251177,0.0002241352,0.00002360481,0.002277791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001540281,0.00003803645,0.00006466453,0.00004110613,0.0000524002,0.0002242239,0.00001361956,0.00004778392,0.0002235667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009124658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007970571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000136179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002493994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994007,0.00003799644,0.0002971644,0.00007621241,0.0001031418,0.00008475174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994761,0.0002114671,0.0001627088,0.00006814798,0.0000468533,0.00003472996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002681406,0.00003660621,0.0480359,0.0002683132,0.0001149968,0.000002106265,0.002053343,0.0001204802,0.0001597108,0.7538078,0.006707309,0.1886666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001081245,0.000006322438,0.006496305,0.0006386141,0.000012999,0.000001255175,0.0001688562,0.00001904935,0.0002714397,0.009388055,0.9828035,0.00008543544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3458477,0.03715504,0.001440315,0.008442116,0.002434802,0.0005072632,0.00001804064,0.00005979083,0.6040949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628739,0.03290156,0.0003206598,0.001405147,0.0009350022,0.000006582375,0.00000834308,0.000005276976,0.001543519],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999045574","doi":"10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18031.x","title":"Factors Associated With Mathematics Achievement and Participation in Advanced Mathematics Courses: An Examination of Gender Differences From an International Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School Science and Mathematics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Perspective (graphical); Mathematics education; Academic achievement; Exploratory research; Psychology; Mathematics; Demography; Social science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07449796656500804,"gpt":0.3742327679040141,"spread":0.2997348013390061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001706631,0.0001604397,0.0002486601,0.0001986459,0.0003175189,0.0001998513,0.0003474719,0.0000773501,0.00006301946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001171149,0.0001221249,0.00001517475,0.0004515279,0.0005757663,0.002478728,0.00004878452,0.0001316766,0.000001710215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002523188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002282986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001596061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003883656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979492,0.00006543226,0.0003601379,0.0003016236,0.001037485,0.0002861297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985641,0.0002335484,0.0003206416,0.0002005301,0.0004664913,0.000214753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001898687,0.003045831,0.2907547,0.00008327469,0.00007116802,0.000001147389,0.621471,0.000155451,0.003354613,0.074122,0.000007916263,0.006913959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005381271,0.0001819912,0.7545118,0.0001797574,0.00004550221,2.855028e-7,0.2165545,0.0160445,0.000708402,0.01097442,0.00001405686,0.000246683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968699,0.00002975357,0.0003842968,0.0002068532,0.00005127208,0.0003158767,0.000017961,0.00003216666,0.002091985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909351,0.0001004313,0.008781523,0.00003728635,0.00006128008,0.00002155664,0.000008190181,0.000009310968,0.00004531943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4637571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4980111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144062847","doi":"10.3102/01623737024003201","title":"Do Low-Achieving Students Benefit More from Small Classes? Evidence from the Tennessee Class Size Experiment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class size; Differential effects; Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Academic achievement; Randomized experiment; Psychology; Reading (process); Differential (mechanical device); Student achievement; Scale (ratio); Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Physics; Geography; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1088547008286126,"gpt":0.4471015832571122,"spread":0.3382468824284997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001296953,0.0001453503,0.0001890328,0.0001338121,0.0009100875,0.0004820907,0.0005064966,0.00008486442,0.01007686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002092099,0.0001166048,0.0001343902,0.00119324,0.0001426256,0.000403944,0.00006102394,0.0001400232,0.0001297476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000257907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003217219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03343158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01429918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997378,0.0003875312,0.0003079117,0.000367999,0.00132825,0.000230316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996651,0.002314949,0.0001978677,0.0003421572,0.0003373812,0.0001566221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001676457,0.0002071643,0.9226873,0.000003608599,0.0006804217,1.494412e-7,0.0618125,0.001075859,0.0001806825,0.001415221,0.00431313,0.007607205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002063069,0.000008517618,0.9804381,0.0000524497,0.0006770285,6.973824e-8,0.007373558,0.004532584,0.00002791942,0.001502805,0.005010586,0.0001701431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9181305,0.003778516,0.00001820104,0.07637128,0.0001894343,0.0002150991,0.00003395345,0.00001559138,0.001247427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908316,0.001529563,0.0001975118,0.00285374,0.002712733,0.0001244862,0.00006800943,0.000007315917,0.001675114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07351755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122781196","doi":"10.1257/mic.20130080","title":"Grading Standards and Education Quality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Grading (engineering); Incentive; Welfare; Economics; Mathematics education; Marketing; Business; Microeconomics; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03437645552851322,"gpt":0.3814143626993701,"spread":0.3470379071708569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002327705,0.000101595,0.0002287564,0.0001036639,0.0003679239,0.0003241782,0.0002086858,0.00003600013,0.00008156553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001304978,0.0001143894,0.00005157335,0.00004704353,0.000415084,0.00071354,0.00002998195,0.0002047349,0.00008337644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00145695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003019543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003873802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002801151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989949,0.0001285187,0.0003526277,0.0001701218,0.00007043661,0.0002834301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988611,0.00007649821,0.0004089244,0.0001201046,0.00009579057,0.0004376354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001248255,0.00005086239,0.453261,0.000007552548,0.00008604879,0.00000136427,0.01524699,0.0001353061,0.00006645395,0.01490472,0.07752025,0.4385946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004066724,0.00007638306,0.01120378,0.00001155827,0.0000138378,0.00005880144,0.03601244,0.00003292203,0.00004205536,0.006214181,0.9456533,0.0002740217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705096,0.0005212495,0.00006554132,0.003197327,0.001112654,0.00006598886,0.00001795703,0.00001936779,0.02449029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924604,0.002749603,0.001234668,0.001220318,0.001601599,0.000003685778,0.000002249726,0.00001522794,0.0007121985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8681331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5856056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037845007","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2020-055","title":"Pandemic School Closures May Increase Inequality in Test Scores","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Inequality; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Test (biology); Demographic economics; Cognition; Educational inequality; Psychology; Political science; Geography; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology; Economics; Medicine; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0679160575519878,"gpt":0.3405674024604455,"spread":0.2726513449084577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008052916,0.0001295949,0.0001763738,0.0004252115,0.0004144498,0.0002537371,0.0005751693,0.0001607351,0.0009436226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01258891,0.0001380696,0.0000478276,0.00170885,0.0002099268,0.0006573368,0.00003644351,0.0003553466,0.0004763527],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007622091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01647986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9518642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9830848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998144,0.0002047487,0.0002537846,0.000264925,0.0002735942,0.000858995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966988,0.0001684157,0.00006008736,0.0002183858,0.00008081883,0.002773483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003141384,0.000008212609,0.9476479,0.000009072922,0.000003577078,0.00001100693,0.001414289,9.016953e-7,0.000009214073,0.01089452,0.03665704,0.003341132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002412665,0.00001706549,0.4927367,0.000010461,0.000001999111,8.698407e-7,0.0004892643,0.00001991079,0.000003399366,0.000603053,0.5057134,0.000162648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7913979,0.0002101546,8.367118e-7,0.1488895,0.00007629981,0.0001814387,0.0001218197,0.00008781788,0.05903425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647231,0.0001474242,0.00001399197,0.03179695,0.002706265,0.00002353325,0.00001941339,0.00001278785,0.0005565445],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4690563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555121813","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.37.1.1","title":"Family Size, Family Type and Student Achievement: Cross-National Differences and the Role of Socioeconomic and School factors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Psychology; Academic achievement; Demographic economics; Contrast (vision); Developmental psychology; Developing country; Demography; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics; Population; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06348967262860063,"gpt":0.3860164236489259,"spread":0.3225267510203253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008966936,0.0001522745,0.0005133967,0.0000674492,0.0006149813,0.0001393361,0.0001707575,0.00004383997,0.000005339892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000122187,0.00009259245,0.00005256765,0.0001040571,0.001431779,0.0004108837,0.00008521881,0.0001976899,0.000002269777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006182941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001467888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003582723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003238633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985821,0.0001932826,0.0004780179,0.0001300371,0.0004517588,0.0001648366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976069,0.001133499,0.0004796347,0.00004841999,0.0006658426,0.00006575332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001508489,0.000045867,0.9822101,0.000008525243,0.0002657528,3.068267e-7,0.01238534,0.00002136647,0.000378629,0.003430718,0.001025943,0.00007660694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001043134,0.0001417006,0.9118291,0.00002962654,0.00004429562,5.354278e-7,0.0778645,0.00001238442,0.00002936322,0.006462409,0.002450439,0.00009249564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542751,0.04110747,0.000001815567,0.0003320106,0.0001922942,0.000143189,0.00000965569,0.000004367207,0.003934107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903658,0.008909201,0.00005629638,0.0001597563,0.0002950484,0.000003651502,3.194023e-7,0.0000036718,0.0002062697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07038098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5275451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471621520","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-444-63459-7.00001-4","title":"Behavioral Economics of Education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Handbook of the economics of education","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Behavioral economics; Field (mathematics); Order (exchange); Behavioural economics; Behavioural sciences; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Positive economics; Management science; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03429428774669564,"gpt":0.3065819968717604,"spread":0.2722877091250648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003162108,0.0001480102,0.0003147958,0.0001416099,0.0001049199,0.00001651388,0.0005364065,0.0002496306,0.0005043931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003237267,0.0001321735,0.0002101226,0.00001670101,0.0003522523,0.0002774612,0.00005217086,0.000109144,0.00003508269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002904811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003978279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005390836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001463513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999037,0.00002207493,0.0005587992,0.0001878501,0.00007098124,0.0001233093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997776,0.00007614595,0.001347321,0.0004937807,0.0002465824,0.00006011775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009599623,0.0004159094,0.007792507,0.0002553798,0.0001390397,9.634709e-9,0.007612986,0.00003130603,0.0003548081,0.7598795,0.0171144,0.2063082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004367631,0.0001620853,0.001969187,0.002747245,0.0003332373,0.000001447742,0.001608864,0.000005040396,0.01172677,0.2538128,0.7265348,0.0006618318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2871214,0.001941018,0.000004485106,0.0008987774,0.005701122,0.00055002,0.0001149956,0.000008297932,0.7036599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2686586,0.01865733,0.0006324374,0.0002056323,0.003084584,0.00004349268,0.00005704584,0.00007148763,0.7085894],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7094204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7057297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980838979","doi":"10.3102/01623737027001001","title":"Success for All: First-Year Results From the National Randomized Field Trial","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Randomized experiment; Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); Psychology; Randomized controlled trial; Multilevel model; Control (management); Treatment and control groups; Reading (process); Mathematics education; Statistics; Medicine; Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09148252164579562,"gpt":0.4777966616051301,"spread":0.3863141399593344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00530625,0.00007420599,0.0001773031,0.000166956,0.0006722764,0.0001490899,0.0001724478,0.00006946439,0.001629785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01363002,0.00005553096,0.0001946219,0.0006047653,0.0001004307,0.0002461806,0.00001036951,0.00006821372,0.00003431012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001153415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009487715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009939523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0262929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981626,0.0004112064,0.0003305115,0.000194459,0.0007644497,0.000136737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920203,0.007086719,0.0001770596,0.0001015826,0.0005418729,0.00007243117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.2049459,0.0004038739,0.01097264,0.000007214694,0.003375257,1.591555e-8,0.04875922,0.009509581,0.000002678702,0.246451,0.4597055,0.01586712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.3219653,0.00005460146,0.02213892,0.00001395347,0.002718351,9.256178e-8,0.001500741,0.05194182,0.00001817175,0.06947659,0.5298158,0.0003556511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.194245,0.0002354526,0.0002732514,0.7853158,0.0003037759,0.00112145,0.0001869348,0.0000168593,0.01830158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798663,0.0002265717,0.000581775,0.006394526,0.01006703,0.000348274,0.0004903023,0.000003532216,0.002021678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7856213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482194397","doi":"10.1086/686262","title":"How the Timing of Grade Retention Affects Outcomes: Identification and Estimation of Time-Varying Treatment Effects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of Wisconsin-Madison","keywords":"Unobservable; Grade retention; Retention time; Selection (genetic algorithm); Retention rate; Identification (biology); Employee retention; Estimation; Econometrics; Psychology; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Economics; Academic achievement; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03173254093674505,"gpt":0.2964977163560911,"spread":0.264765175419346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006330144,0.00005058259,0.0001571536,0.00006353311,0.00009002224,0.00004169857,0.00008698534,0.00003768991,0.000005276129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002211434,0.00002868294,0.00005828507,0.00005558803,0.00006695399,0.000593227,0.000006690919,0.00003003635,0.00000153636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009739461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006343412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003020665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005492644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995007,0.00007536378,0.0002218326,0.00005278247,0.0000774165,0.00007192835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987245,0.0004017552,0.0006946212,0.00007936983,0.00006759649,0.00003218395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002472929,0.0002802711,0.4300101,0.000310459,0.0006002418,0.000003353268,0.02187294,0.001701339,0.1029334,0.005236739,0.0005658261,0.4362381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004000333,0.000928232,0.8183591,0.0007561521,0.0004743159,0.00001504264,0.001885283,0.004864177,0.1599398,0.005980901,0.00247478,0.0003219003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955947,0.0001577781,0.0002718953,0.003604473,0.0001992596,0.0001045875,0.000004101614,0.000002527788,0.00006063169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980823,0.001215659,0.0003227899,0.00001559333,0.0001039404,0.000001704406,4.713449e-7,0.000003772485,0.0002537658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4359162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1169656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153308398","doi":"10.3102/01623737023003251","title":"Class Size and Eighth-Grade Math Achievement in the United States and Abroad","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class size; Mathematics education; Curriculum; Class (philosophy); Student achievement; Academic achievement; Math education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05050335955880637,"gpt":0.4362833388378362,"spread":0.3857799792790298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001679092,0.00006505414,0.00008553884,0.0003208914,0.0003847465,0.000129574,0.00007135087,0.00003571987,0.0002974498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003644263,0.00004903362,0.00002257856,0.001564498,0.000116082,0.0001598573,0.00001041358,0.00007100085,0.000004988549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000560644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002213735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01904708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01879295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988443,0.0003444011,0.0001447561,0.0001376789,0.0003993803,0.0001294455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991557,0.0005346884,0.00006073173,0.00008253274,0.00009881904,0.00006755573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000186381,0.0001549827,0.8749432,0.000008317875,0.0001642082,1.846888e-7,0.05833197,0.000678323,0.000009743751,0.05839717,0.002544132,0.004749131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002007758,0.00001065644,0.9204629,0.000003954623,0.000173555,5.649806e-7,0.007261671,0.008256371,6.589066e-7,0.009025307,0.05453733,0.00006623167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8555945,0.0003316723,0.000004872946,0.1421307,0.00001901485,0.0001138557,0.000005027587,0.000003802088,0.00179651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906656,0.003980331,0.00005659995,0.004002596,0.0003328701,0.00003902511,0.00009283672,0.00000206073,0.0008281364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1381281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067608907","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.006","title":"Will not want: Self-control rather than motivation explains the female advantage in report card grades","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning and Individual Differences","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Psychology; Self-control; Control (management); Report card; Developmental psychology; Gender gap; Social psychology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0597134988225433,"gpt":0.3085067858322344,"spread":0.2487932870096911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001508547,0.0001236223,0.0001792216,0.00007231913,0.0005851121,0.0002135806,0.0002064806,0.00009674457,0.0000241613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006681213,0.00008147077,0.00003378227,0.0002148242,0.0001600964,0.000585007,0.00003421977,0.0003552146,0.000009725079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002861955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001059057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001273414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001604669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983252,0.0004245836,0.0002080808,0.0002315794,0.0005084318,0.0003020666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992713,0.0003344581,0.0001413212,0.00009737299,0.00005196004,0.000103598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001277146,0.00001937332,0.9261208,0.000004254092,0.00001478943,0.000007493101,0.07123227,0.0000105169,0.00001334319,0.0003585292,0.00006207937,0.002143736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005382103,0.0001403195,0.9105103,0.0000453361,0.00002498623,0.000005583825,0.07117351,0.0001058229,0.00003757246,0.0005527443,0.01668346,0.0001821442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992018,0.0002672326,0.00002479405,0.00184969,0.0002005627,0.0001617341,0.000003837122,0.00007625867,0.005397833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975801,0.0002568096,0.00003609418,0.0001347207,0.0003926636,0.00002621324,0.000008959673,0.000007444586,0.001556995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01662138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4500269,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985344502","doi":"10.1353/urb.2006.0024","title":"Understanding Trends in the Black-White Achievement Gaps during the First Years of School","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Quarter (Canadian coin); Reading (process); Academic achievement; Literacy; Separate but equal; Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Race (biology); Political science; Pedagogy; Gender studies; Law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03178321945732886,"gpt":0.2598789764791033,"spread":0.2280957570217744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009965858,0.0001918428,0.0001953591,0.000243087,0.0006593654,0.0001617079,0.0006833953,0.000113551,0.0004772696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005714043,0.0001389968,0.0001577513,0.0009325455,0.0003972826,0.0002376922,0.00004510818,0.0003939064,0.00005375268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000456438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000604206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001039611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01549069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977349,0.0001666131,0.0003664425,0.0003121943,0.0008769484,0.0005429017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991204,0.0001976115,0.0001935001,0.0003950901,0.00002170882,0.00007171627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003511155,0.0004713967,0.7841173,0.00009872964,0.00009152551,0.00005155214,0.07329931,0.002330342,0.00134993,0.04275196,0.0937192,0.001367611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009430795,0.0001165682,0.7961157,0.0001705755,0.00002727444,0.000001433123,0.0439968,0.00001770562,0.0002085889,0.0002884929,0.157804,0.0003097759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6465684,0.0001343879,0.000001578205,0.006217501,0.0001958002,0.0002642642,0.000007360602,0.00005575436,0.3465549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941525,0.0001017061,0.000008129048,0.0004664557,0.0005085014,0.00002578324,0.000005807392,0.00002037799,0.004710664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3475842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.864417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288074143","doi":"10.1257/aer.20200224","title":"The Impact of Childhood Social Skills and Self-Control Training on Economic and Noneconomic Outcomes: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment Using Administrative Data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; Université de Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Control (management); Treatment and control groups; Psychology; Randomized experiment; Demographic economics; Economics; Demography; Medicine; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08171832082338737,"gpt":0.4169450792569223,"spread":0.3352267584335349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00270167,0.0002015874,0.001191181,0.00003614015,0.0008299694,0.00009438881,0.0005684172,0.00002533509,0.0002532931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001989837,0.0001516591,0.0001991707,0.00004764581,0.0006345777,0.0003982423,0.0001623193,0.0002019333,0.00001022221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005031526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009089621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009675402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006034969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976822,0.0008698181,0.0006414708,0.0004414637,0.00008529251,0.0002797706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960328,0.002537193,0.0009136498,0.0004019574,0.000008468694,0.0001058912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009225353,0.001021076,0.1451987,0.0002841194,0.01102795,0.00001006549,0.2586423,0.001766918,0.00006362941,0.003691494,0.009044727,0.5600237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1646399,0.003822445,0.5827824,0.004122684,0.004757356,0.00007258809,0.119835,0.03330413,0.00004150118,0.002047148,0.07852111,0.00605369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782472,0.01766488,0.000003436988,0.002180043,0.0001341933,0.001030969,0.0002718786,0.00001596499,0.0004514546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226276,0.07636691,0.000113005,0.0005493734,0.0001909088,0.0001185573,0.000009478422,0.00001360576,0.00001053925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.55397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163829751","doi":"10.3102/1076998607307355","title":"Causal Inference for Time-Varying Instructional Treatments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Causal inference; Endogeneity; Weighting; Mathematics education; Value (mathematics); Inverse probability weighting; Multilevel model; Causal model; Econometrics; Inference; Outcome (game theory); Average treatment effect; Academic achievement; Computer science; Psychology; Propensity score matching; Statistics; Mathematics; Machine learning; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08936654137525234,"gpt":0.4135590799087178,"spread":0.3241925385334655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001147589,0.00005715784,0.00009722733,0.00005447289,0.0004758042,0.00002842076,0.00006788928,0.00003600422,0.0004669715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001371019,0.00004974733,0.00002725883,0.00006926066,0.0001399727,0.0002684446,0.000006154937,0.00007773375,0.000008491247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006963133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007239177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001885744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005884775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993528,0.00002122459,0.0002052804,0.00005884902,0.0002486323,0.0001131771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990662,0.0002701001,0.0001650904,0.00002578422,0.0003573429,0.0001154823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001604055,0.0007930362,0.8915326,0.00001864141,0.00005920235,0.00001016738,0.0054138,0.00003018878,0.0003642583,0.02561071,0.04111246,0.03489453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001338692,0.0006704963,0.9266776,0.00005183799,0.0001738916,0.0002144054,0.0004947408,0.00007052416,0.00006835662,0.02067322,0.04928864,0.0002776191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974995,0.000101049,0.0004716234,0.0009482193,0.0004917372,0.0000673259,0.0001372322,0.000002177413,0.0002811809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389415,0.0004097764,0.05440943,0.00008838187,0.001690017,0.000009202104,0.00004983905,0.000006673122,0.004395146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05855792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.511301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}