{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":943,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":4,"predictions_cover":943,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"382de0eed645","filters":{"topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2151605842","doi":"10.1002/sce.10066","title":"How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1381,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Literacy; Reading (process); Critical literacy; Information literacy; Common sense; Mathematics education; Psychology; Science education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04961545036757849,"gpt":0.4303022930243701,"spread":0.3806868426567916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003214831,0.000124857,0.0001033859,0.0008378241,0.001852788,0.003555366,0.0005303551,0.00004992635,0.0007449334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002459828,0.0001289122,0.00004032202,0.005721925,0.0008928471,0.003524615,0.0000348339,0.0001464627,0.0003341327],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007509575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01019065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005144509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004771082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968777,0.0002532215,0.000215999,0.0007232547,0.00103789,0.0008919754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998253,0.000091102,0.00009191499,0.0003528627,0.0005749482,0.0006361634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006488979,0.000640759,0.04781957,0.00000947268,0.000001197172,0.000001254951,0.7136368,0.000007613231,0.01047202,0.1176567,0.01139299,0.09835514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000126926,0.00003060276,0.06809358,0.00005163899,0.000002566007,0.000006190717,0.08623548,0.00006023151,0.005640491,0.00236913,0.8370675,0.0003156663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452904,0.000105321,0.00004626521,0.02321856,0.01058361,0.0004568755,0.000004928548,0.00003178587,0.0202622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620439,0.00001475773,0.001387529,0.00196337,0.0002887324,0.00002826686,0.000004213083,0.000005707995,0.03426357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171719283","doi":"10.1126/science.1201783","title":"Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Section (typography); Physics education; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09687146757617451,"gpt":0.3939698361689189,"spread":0.2970983685927444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003356812,0.00005347243,0.00006522948,0.000103798,0.0008868882,0.00008727289,0.0005532136,0.00002902428,0.0004503877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006077183,0.00005039933,0.00002121675,0.001582785,0.0008460198,0.0005677562,0.00006007565,0.0001652382,0.0001042326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001365104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001257927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001352841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002083166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985542,0.0001080592,0.000110815,0.0002773388,0.0004347613,0.0005148234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995198,0.00004392565,0.00005534661,0.0001329965,0.00009169507,0.0001562039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001000842,0.0003044586,0.2976373,0.000003244075,0.000001301402,0.000002640452,0.4813809,0.00001528776,0.005733184,0.1694859,0.0001320764,0.04529379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007613592,0.0001885159,0.5107511,0.00003201347,0.000004924385,0.000001375243,0.2897825,0.006937048,0.005082924,0.01683472,0.1689909,0.0006327303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7898743,0.00003065617,0.0009186323,0.001144251,0.001252089,0.0001866951,4.832884e-7,0.00007964172,0.2065133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962124,0.0000155458,0.0005382195,0.0003574693,0.0001016799,0.00001087192,1.705637e-7,0.000002380074,0.002761282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2131138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6821317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005828999","doi":"10.1080/03057267.2014.881626","title":"Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":722,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Psychology; Focus (optics); Positive attitude; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5503936245699005,"gpt":0.6066563083782814,"spread":0.05626268380838095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02164598,0.0001815103,0.001168075,0.002558575,0.0008943995,0.0000690991,0.001282245,0.0001227156,0.00003313295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09601277,0.0001561263,0.00004801539,0.007219752,0.01917261,0.0005106402,0.0005876202,0.0002908309,0.000008490842],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001523103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02124345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002988368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007218684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954002,0.000714974,0.001013068,0.000737057,0.00166669,0.0004679633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993386,0.002337575,0.0008591872,0.0005453529,0.002726418,0.0001454269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001201136,0.0001899102,0.0007861357,0.5788578,0.00002345988,8.886925e-8,0.03138287,3.839529e-8,0.00001721031,0.1546041,0.0007529857,0.2333842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001074593,0.0001373212,0.003623271,0.8477396,0.0002288609,0.00002633858,0.06584976,0.000002910022,0.00001208543,0.005952783,0.07581488,0.0005047413],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003835067,0.9872334,7.233554e-7,0.00222679,0.001327613,0.001716731,0.000004266801,0.000006827769,0.003648583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01675813,0.9817827,0.0002328141,0.0000570855,0.0001156911,0.0003160005,0.000002047938,0.000007533282,0.0007280401],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2688817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070547377","doi":"10.1007/s11422-007-9067-8","title":"Indigenous knowledge and science revisited","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural Studies of Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":553,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Epistemology; Plural; Sociology of Education; Hegemony; Sociology; Metaphysics; Traditional knowledge; Science education; Indigenous education; Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Pedagogy; Philosophy; Ecology; Linguistics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1263011110334416,"gpt":0.5005336434377964,"spread":0.3742325324043548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007467966,0.00008812859,0.0001342846,0.0003975067,0.004338399,0.0001395708,0.000627071,0.00003064848,0.00002344015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004075256,0.00006910101,0.00002133482,0.004174855,0.01824963,0.001413262,0.0001123656,0.00008627241,0.00001796735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004223959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004492783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000611041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005218142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981452,0.00004148254,0.0002457772,0.000371595,0.0006986198,0.0004973201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970388,0.0001720808,0.0001619248,0.0001604854,0.002192374,0.0002743736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004338647,0.000141892,0.0244557,0.00002261801,0.000003897128,9.269638e-8,0.697934,2.493588e-7,0.02018641,0.07274384,0.00150906,0.1829979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006305477,0.00004349583,0.2183421,0.00005608151,0.000008349904,0.00000315773,0.7356662,0.000001647997,0.005353748,0.001291816,0.03900684,0.0001635425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528347,0.005473052,0.00000911627,0.0009877176,0.002175806,0.0002387468,4.638302e-7,0.00002850104,0.03825187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961107,0.001162045,0.0007136589,0.0001280183,0.0003138804,0.000005326074,5.284274e-7,0.000002031186,0.001563764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1938864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104305473","doi":"10.1002/1098-237x(200101)85:1<6::aid-sce3>3.0.co;2-r","title":"Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":492,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Traditional knowledge; Science education; Indigenous; Sociology; Science, technology, society and environment education; Philosophy of science; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Sustainability science; Curriculum; Nature of Science; Relativism; Science studies; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Sustainability; Pedagogy; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0515930161008073,"gpt":0.4628903657198734,"spread":0.4112973496190661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007803485,0.0001719343,0.0001372264,0.001301661,0.01419801,0.001802905,0.002858909,0.00006189146,0.0005951473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002586833,0.0001769502,0.0000590702,0.01103686,0.01205757,0.005527969,0.00007079353,0.0001574961,0.0002040378],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001895332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1724203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003026794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006453975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957501,0.00005654556,0.0003590056,0.00110792,0.001450392,0.001276053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962089,0.0001362124,0.000182472,0.0007952798,0.001870507,0.0008066194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004884342,0.000447583,0.007436546,0.000006044722,8.179672e-7,9.421608e-9,0.0572187,0.00002862225,0.01782165,0.3043911,0.0009037683,0.6117403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002238965,0.0001252272,0.5485681,0.00007848629,0.00002465878,0.00001445306,0.1092329,0.0001304936,0.007495572,0.04922624,0.2839862,0.0008938617],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8593977,0.0001076942,0.0002384384,0.009475059,0.005370178,0.00115585,0.000008445923,0.0001094862,0.1241371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831183,0.00009087641,0.00348919,0.000999036,0.001033036,0.0002650083,0.00001001424,0.00001185533,0.01098268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6108465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991134452","doi":"10.1002/sce.20435","title":"Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":381,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pedagogy; Context (archaeology); Teacher education; Confusion; Typology; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Ideology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Politics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2468886641600222,"gpt":0.4674076080397394,"spread":0.2205189438797172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001636587,0.00008156943,0.00007938462,0.000598527,0.0006020663,0.0001796364,0.0007005986,0.00004958766,0.00157735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009643788,0.00008880502,0.00002617485,0.002222315,0.0005559674,0.0009725847,0.00003021633,0.0001538461,0.0003315025],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003313851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01046892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005425368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001088136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983413,0.0001331707,0.0001986259,0.0003810085,0.0005637135,0.0003821618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991076,0.00008221773,0.00009791875,0.0002813563,0.0002019857,0.0002289351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001083605,0.001243097,0.05775826,0.00000590237,0.000001243413,2.624062e-7,0.1836256,0.000001498016,0.0002481232,0.2304114,0.01383053,0.5128632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000778859,0.00004145654,0.7511477,0.0000640797,0.000001861917,0.000001053598,0.1373262,0.00001688538,0.0001327302,0.007558214,0.1034441,0.000187841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7528033,0.00003468467,0.00004069437,0.003461708,0.006769569,0.0002697465,6.889362e-7,0.000031941,0.2365877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935751,0.00002743068,0.001110261,0.001670311,0.0004256192,0.00004188473,0.00000310884,0.000003988072,0.003142325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6933895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989803080","doi":"10.1002/sce.1017","title":"Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":363,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Mathematics education; Science education; Knowledge base; Situated; Knowledge level; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Pedagogy; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.286509666747529,"gpt":0.4871204783583662,"spread":0.2006108116108373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007107736,0.000149083,0.0001792765,0.0007791661,0.002526052,0.0009096668,0.001508935,0.00008635577,0.001166389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002411266,0.0001397222,0.00006722167,0.006083722,0.009082727,0.005316559,0.0001032778,0.0002175296,0.0001424594],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001508873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02642165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00107918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001149063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964895,0.0001986766,0.0003458015,0.0006899365,0.001476264,0.0007998669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978229,0.000239932,0.0002235934,0.0003929546,0.0007455244,0.000575099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005966253,0.0003527344,0.007458566,0.000004527273,0.000001619963,1.675825e-7,0.4040668,0.000003269752,0.002274998,0.4488907,0.0006880887,0.1362526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001194886,0.00005727752,0.00630631,0.00008379202,0.000007396828,0.000005563204,0.8873111,0.0000490554,0.0006699161,0.00703721,0.09814029,0.0002125727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8005087,0.001094865,0.001162118,0.01843354,0.009807174,0.0004685048,8.859099e-7,0.00008217885,0.168442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876725,0.0005264933,0.0003194856,0.0003128745,0.0004800685,0.00001866856,0.000001374052,0.000006640062,0.01066191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4832443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106422082","doi":"10.1080/09500690500336973","title":"Current Realities and Future Possibilities: Language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":361,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Literacy; Scientific literacy; Science education; Reading (process); Pedagogy; Science, technology, society and environment education; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Professional development; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Educational research; Psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05149072946147045,"gpt":0.5095297266885885,"spread":0.4580389972271181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005971814,0.0000608929,0.00007072018,0.001125409,0.001174759,0.001089661,0.0004808927,0.00002665845,0.0000383961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00115257,0.00005419087,0.00001173987,0.0007975822,0.004716119,0.005107995,0.00009767396,0.0002362579,0.000001439074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004059489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004418477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004927577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001331226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997826,0.00005682579,0.0002718709,0.0002021576,0.001402733,0.0002404262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972241,0.0001419842,0.0001855331,0.00008017658,0.002116551,0.0002516883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008839241,0.00003621883,0.006967025,0.000004686036,0.00000129524,2.076255e-7,0.2700594,7.830433e-7,0.001259739,0.04546393,0.00006010987,0.6761377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002252047,0.00007797434,0.09136979,0.0001548482,0.000003203111,0.0001794746,0.7749705,0.0001114332,0.001055771,0.007035715,0.1246804,0.0001357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818221,0.001299861,0.00001791544,0.009964035,0.004140582,0.00007308384,0.000001178309,0.000006790852,0.002674504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935392,0.001975758,0.001397727,0.00009593139,0.002715395,0.00000210241,4.477079e-7,0.000002233468,0.0002712062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.676002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118257175","doi":"10.1002/sce.20063","title":"A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative network; Narrative criticism; Narrative inquiry; Epistemology; Science education; Conceptual framework; Empirical research; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04740235225820965,"gpt":0.4836371987805916,"spread":0.436234846522382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007025715,0.0000766386,0.0000779776,0.000668755,0.002160459,0.0003635097,0.0008285979,0.00005823684,0.0007247407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009015904,0.00007467296,0.00002352852,0.003846368,0.005938961,0.001928972,0.00002716889,0.0001367111,0.0000546417],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008493604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01670956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002345694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007477154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977998,0.00008789347,0.000201755,0.0004706272,0.0008895554,0.0005503615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984667,0.0003618188,0.00009027447,0.0002185982,0.0006071847,0.0002554252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003188943,0.00009018354,0.0007283604,7.436092e-7,1.257061e-7,8.990192e-9,0.1326836,0.00000965555,0.0003818908,0.8185678,0.0001781476,0.04735635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001353959,0.00004777375,0.02125384,0.00004692027,0.000002544213,0.000001156768,0.317013,0.001043773,0.002651534,0.6369061,0.02064856,0.0002494566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8690994,0.00005126964,0.0057551,0.05922979,0.004106367,0.0007915011,0.000001663889,0.00005416059,0.06091069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812055,0.00001258205,0.01646323,0.001047026,0.0007667199,0.0001019424,0.000001760767,0.000003636453,0.0003975758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1843293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058518083","doi":"10.1002/tea.20333","title":"PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Government of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Mathematics education; Test (biology); Literacy; Psychology; Reading (process); Science education; Scale (ratio); Achievement test; Pedagogy; Medical education; Standardized test; Medicine; Political science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2878043853163388,"gpt":0.6688702908396115,"spread":0.3810659055232727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1143923,0.00006145443,0.0001674004,0.002501247,0.002119831,0.001074194,0.001935279,0.00004048435,0.0001274387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004953884,0.00005056389,0.00005222237,0.003911081,0.00297246,0.004007469,0.0000560546,0.001128043,0.000003820217],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005180394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007212574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006733348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001961182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924866,0.001705661,0.0005246646,0.00027102,0.004300003,0.0007120458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969665,0.000583275,0.0002863922,0.0002856434,0.001409844,0.0004682852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002491619,0.001327126,0.1575117,0.00001190092,0.000002427988,0.00003286893,0.2180338,0.000279383,0.05055681,0.1567481,0.001345834,0.4141251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007712054,0.001534441,0.6919821,0.0005910091,0.000004731521,0.00004675121,0.1839339,0.004019873,0.001284592,0.05981182,0.0556729,0.0003466806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618589,0.00005781722,0.0002525243,0.006819458,0.0009093077,0.0001106564,6.187453e-7,0.000006229013,0.02998447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913765,0.00002462701,0.007703229,0.00007529162,0.0003080925,6.970499e-7,1.543239e-7,0.000002100367,0.0005092654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5344704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087184586","doi":"10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01207.x","title":"Misconceived Causal Explanations for Emergent Processes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Science","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":298,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Medical Council of Canada; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Schema (genetic algorithms); Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3465301487217485,"gpt":0.4697017755118859,"spread":0.1231716267901373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001309557,0.00006614986,0.00006530454,0.000146976,0.001921765,0.00008494253,0.0004460177,0.00002710489,0.001267973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006184909,0.00006210715,0.00002453994,0.001273889,0.002194338,0.0006658205,0.00002459996,0.00005020672,0.00009549903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005121817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002926202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004739967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001597323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998693,0.00005321243,0.0001196278,0.0003268145,0.0004131722,0.0003941443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980045,0.0002796289,0.00007024253,0.00007806446,0.001340305,0.0002272474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005276053,0.0004527573,0.01753132,0.00002920637,0.00001343204,0.000002363065,0.7252744,0.000001261614,0.001857529,0.2016246,0.004830581,0.04832981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008314978,0.0003050262,0.09481375,0.0001012863,0.00005304148,0.000003463949,0.7004675,0.00006341575,0.03066857,0.02123125,0.1506389,0.0008223985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4823555,0.0001969838,0.02719456,0.003107526,0.003873788,0.001464769,0.00006802053,0.0001873276,0.4815515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955578,0.00003799373,0.001188155,0.000423004,0.0001660412,0.0001314515,0.000003168647,0.000003392663,0.002488934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5132024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603090530","doi":"10.1007/s10648-017-9403-9","title":"Studying and Constructing Concept Maps: a Meta-Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Psychology Review","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Concept map; Educational psychology; Meta-analysis; Psychology; Diagram; Formal concept analysis; Mathematics; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5348885120143436,"gpt":0.5999654285960475,"spread":0.06507691658170389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002231356,0.00009082122,0.0004573456,0.0000845601,0.00164216,0.0001409484,0.000477026,0.00004837098,0.009801422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001868018,0.00007760793,0.0002471563,0.000267374,0.001049407,0.0002411424,0.00003261986,0.0001295698,0.000106844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001341723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003550447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000339137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001888084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998509,0.0004628055,0.0002599974,0.0003517537,0.0002178368,0.0001985754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984847,0.0003942729,0.0003455151,0.0004683782,0.0001650529,0.0001420889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002443371,0.0003394389,0.2465222,0.0001222534,0.01706033,0.000001659903,0.02194627,6.178461e-7,0.000004145305,0.5438692,0.1332194,0.03691204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001159692,0.00001145879,0.0962363,0.0000336199,0.02622754,0.0000161888,0.005159399,3.645993e-7,4.034528e-7,0.007865191,0.8641031,0.0002304747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004185428,0.2365397,0.0000964715,0.5487456,0.002151687,0.0005758513,0.00001525097,0.00002806947,0.207662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8752829,0.04582375,0.005937873,0.0563001,0.001352396,0.0003121088,0.0000361754,0.0000147087,0.01493992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8710976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092975108","doi":"10.5430/wje.v5n1p13","title":"Science Process Skills and Attitudes toward Science among Palestinian Secondary School Students","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Science education; Psychology; Process (computing); Mathematics education; Test (biology); Science learning; Knowledge level; Sociology; Biology; Computer science; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02417836641944117,"gpt":0.4299288176847695,"spread":0.4057504512653283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007462626,0.00008739151,0.000132586,0.00113376,0.001348296,0.0007471977,0.001074256,0.00002530021,0.0002856313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003790308,0.00007781784,0.00002725237,0.002664671,0.002921219,0.002186206,0.00004919229,0.0002612531,0.00001639572],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002483447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01249573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001333077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004688865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975941,0.0001234241,0.0003247978,0.0002499449,0.001373799,0.0003339988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975122,0.0001370559,0.0004167798,0.0001452052,0.001157487,0.000631254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002631429,0.0002662529,0.9350412,0.00001064844,0.000002071504,1.621276e-7,0.02505176,0.000004129159,0.0003394848,0.004736087,0.0003235232,0.03422202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001181247,0.00004952955,0.9768289,0.00009974036,0.000008351599,0.000007577732,0.01340964,0.000004170686,0.000198093,0.001629384,0.007544343,0.0001020886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740813,0.0001084911,0.00004201244,0.00235466,0.002725874,0.0001260842,2.252551e-7,0.00001083297,0.02055052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958851,0.00004957478,0.0006822597,0.0004908782,0.0007861881,0.000003887077,2.03565e-7,0.000004341438,0.002097567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04178772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986904693","doi":"10.1007/s10956-014-9512-x","title":"Analysis of the Decline in Interest Towards School Science and Technology from Grades 5 Through 11","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Education and Technology","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Subject (documents); Computer science; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04429733219975664,"gpt":0.4028448816873614,"spread":0.3585475494876048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004152434,0.00007825351,0.0002429442,0.003180726,0.000608418,0.0001159217,0.001408265,0.0001168254,0.00005556727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106494,0.00005555886,0.00002895548,0.01708524,0.01412806,0.0007143431,0.0002223157,0.0002905938,9.980394e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001695824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006105365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001633158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006310091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983528,0.00008193209,0.0004129168,0.0002742326,0.0006087141,0.0002694097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997771,0.0001253224,0.0004682721,0.000277047,0.001227931,0.0001303958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002988143,0.0001684787,0.71004,0.000002374469,0.00001064861,1.685362e-7,0.00742828,0.000002152654,0.01004751,0.2036702,0.000180758,0.0684465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003212428,0.0001372247,0.6722467,0.00009144511,0.0001059574,0.00002379417,0.1624531,0.000290621,0.009687368,0.1151125,0.03933941,0.0001905975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.896461,0.0002877873,0.00007307083,0.1013191,0.0009441866,0.00007260095,7.678611e-7,0.00001079539,0.0008307314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976763,0.0002107401,0.001437179,0.0005240837,0.00007015397,0.000002729581,1.060326e-7,0.000001966387,0.0000767115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1550249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071318150","doi":"10.1002/tea.1031","title":"Learning science through technological design","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Mathematics education; Curriculum; Science, technology, society and environment education; Learning sciences; Computer science; Sociology; Educational technology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4950982318202393,"gpt":0.6152720530086239,"spread":0.1201738211883846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1812353,0.00007777664,0.0001634879,0.002329452,0.00584735,0.0008479693,0.003162378,0.00006092906,0.0001280249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04881018,0.00006072018,0.00004341625,0.009670457,0.01546841,0.00383921,0.0002321462,0.002754309,0.00003250825],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001087074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007455136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006769317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005916288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908136,0.002002005,0.0004221428,0.0003653149,0.005079113,0.001317862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963733,0.00176232,0.0002076633,0.000209615,0.001059305,0.0003878017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007824152,0.000506338,0.1363595,0.000006169716,0.00000301058,0.0003263958,0.1946048,0.002458771,0.04326089,0.3084164,0.0006220437,0.3133575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006047744,0.0009689197,0.02110342,0.0003616654,0.000003184981,0.0004455913,0.7056279,0.002358973,0.002632988,0.09028485,0.1751968,0.000410879],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9031941,0.0001221137,0.006379388,0.01522194,0.0006050386,0.0001751773,3.92131e-8,0.00003680727,0.07426543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867107,0.0003039935,0.0121628,0.00007708555,0.0002528501,0.000002851761,1.241536e-8,0.000003546197,0.0004861887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5110232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091496793","doi":"10.1002/tea.20169","title":"Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Situational ethics; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Chemistry; Chemistry education; Concept learning; Mathematics education; Feeling; Science education; Conceptual change; Cognition; Class (philosophy); Social psychology; Epistemology; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3036042136505663,"gpt":0.5717385533461283,"spread":0.268134339695562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05603183,0.00005002756,0.0001192875,0.0006956523,0.001237529,0.000403542,0.0005698917,0.00004072785,0.00005078333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003832231,0.00004431524,0.0000207314,0.001405404,0.0026851,0.0008831124,0.00008576443,0.001447297,0.000001466785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001204854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001538988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001873884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001230729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960158,0.001024548,0.0002899334,0.0001826723,0.00192771,0.0005592738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982761,0.00124248,0.000119173,0.00006177538,0.0001283883,0.0001720586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001103509,0.0001067083,0.8122298,0.000007125047,8.903885e-7,0.0000427981,0.1381017,0.0005701577,0.01035227,0.03648752,0.0002051472,0.0018848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003742869,0.00007192502,0.06513321,0.0001940805,7.364328e-7,0.00001688489,0.9252847,0.0002411457,0.0001981428,0.004947787,0.003447542,0.00008960064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496982,0.0001266796,0.0001094347,0.004527203,0.0001688926,0.00006944005,5.270909e-8,0.000004372188,0.04529571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990743,0.0000593687,0.0001894798,0.00001846839,0.0002453285,0.000001076248,4.022934e-8,0.000002337615,0.000409594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7871829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158013804","doi":"10.1080/01421590903049814","title":"Teaching basic science to optimize transfer","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Teacher","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Phenomenon; Computer science; Cognition; Psychology; Mathematics education; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1760796062590189,"gpt":0.5068401384730755,"spread":0.3307605322140565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0133191,0.0002718715,0.0008103347,0.0004123964,0.001305491,0.0002274851,0.002298426,0.0004407092,0.02006101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006368208,0.0002076806,0.0002761337,0.001432284,0.001232893,0.000224716,0.00006993073,0.001487585,0.00181853],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004476107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008137935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009488443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001510356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941077,0.001159468,0.0004851173,0.000732258,0.002661069,0.0008543503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976364,0.0002258059,0.00005450631,0.0004075685,0.00006941412,0.001606299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.219509e-7,0.00007193495,0.000002122807,0.00007937768,0.000003851186,0.000003878466,0.008977396,9.748489e-8,2.207823e-8,0.004628279,0.006663961,0.9795687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004930106,0.00002116056,0.000001747557,0.001353905,0.00004886034,0.000005044355,0.001043502,0.00001180624,2.401271e-8,0.00006784879,0.9971275,0.0002692627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002369976,0.6841329,0.0005792088,0.008825392,0.001749292,0.0006234186,0.000001291498,0.0001500397,0.3039148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00005291597,0.9395748,0.0003718699,0.001710649,0.002310324,0.0000639248,0.000004034367,0.00002176848,0.05588972],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963628372","doi":"10.1119/1.2885199","title":"Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Physics","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Physics education; Focus (optics); Quantum; Science education; Key (lock)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1634599936669527,"gpt":0.4682869943050476,"spread":0.3048270006380949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001063808,0.00004338796,0.0001177715,0.00005790212,0.001139551,0.00003712981,0.0001528562,0.000010828,0.000005314653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008331771,0.00004022724,0.00003950599,0.0002245312,0.0003120362,0.0002929614,0.00001426034,0.0001769143,8.122818e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006281285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007845915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000296834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004924335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991214,0.0001997378,0.0001572499,0.00007101226,0.0002751369,0.0001754081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987307,0.0006902872,0.0002238182,0.00004884611,0.0001989651,0.0001074374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000177573,0.0000484877,0.002172763,0.000003899664,0.00001987656,0.000001592974,0.1346706,0.0006189289,0.0006386822,0.7162755,0.0005235476,0.1450084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009048757,0.0009095084,0.003933625,0.0001401301,0.00004649577,0.00006255304,0.4011208,0.02016191,0.0005203636,0.4415437,0.1300472,0.0006088099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6959773,0.00002118053,0.2994003,0.004069884,0.000234908,0.00006111897,0.000002147594,0.000006921833,0.0002262908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841877,0.00006872872,0.01488468,0.0002567755,0.0005578487,7.510619e-7,4.4526e-7,0.000004983926,0.00003814785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2882104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8764623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988908320","doi":"10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4","title":"The Literacy Component of Mathematical and Scientific Literacy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; National Science Council; European Science Education Research Association","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Argument (complex analysis); Literacy; Component (thermodynamics); Mathematics education; Curriculum; Information literacy; Science education; Citizenship; Cognition; Science, technology, society and environment education; Democracy; Metacognition; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Chemistry; Engineering; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0371477592733911,"gpt":0.4466430167350829,"spread":0.4094952574616918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01040274,0.00005531798,0.00009152546,0.0003707596,0.000792258,0.0007276656,0.0005990914,0.00002388185,0.00003226752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002729177,0.00003762187,0.00002827333,0.0004257523,0.003052041,0.000936489,0.00005467831,0.00009737175,0.00000338989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009745381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001541732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002654918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001551222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997898,0.00003755429,0.0004856708,0.000106941,0.001304035,0.0001677878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954489,0.0007699975,0.0004734217,0.0001044745,0.003032515,0.000170709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009469625,0.0002933596,0.001406801,0.00001570571,0.000009247982,6.740464e-7,0.1510199,4.247613e-7,0.004304995,0.6510305,0.0005049678,0.191404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004918443,0.0001225197,0.03616203,0.0006626351,0.00004531983,0.0003754435,0.2731124,0.0007342937,0.004702577,0.4926099,0.1906813,0.0002996703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853129,0.0004346632,0.001925841,0.006004037,0.002770182,0.0001000474,7.510737e-7,0.000003621148,0.003447928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899658,0.0001948932,0.008719998,0.00009621066,0.0002520237,0.000001208452,2.978975e-7,0.000002400061,0.0007671862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1911043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1619404567","doi":"10.1007/s11191-006-9060-8","title":"Promoting Issues-based STSE Perspectives in Science Teacher Education: Problems of Identity and Ideology","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Bộ Giáo dục và Ðào tạo","keywords":"Identity (music); Ideology; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Psychology; Teacher education; Autonomy; Mathematics education; Negotiation; Sociology; Social science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04730331976424,"gpt":0.4413026850051298,"spread":0.3939993652408898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00679008,0.00009968964,0.0001287953,0.0008966612,0.001225283,0.0002888119,0.0007253294,0.00005181271,0.0001881671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001534103,0.0001015847,0.00002150247,0.004473643,0.006532004,0.002643123,0.00004165206,0.0001388424,0.00001127677],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004926518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02906269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02836243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01287991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975899,0.0001904859,0.0003019994,0.0005903903,0.0008710177,0.0004562131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984313,0.00006702179,0.0002218903,0.0002658887,0.0008529852,0.0001609359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003447734,0.001346117,0.4396901,0.00002867636,4.563522e-7,7.371561e-8,0.1835287,0.00002828737,0.01455327,0.3403277,0.0002107313,0.02028232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001249854,0.00005003978,0.7759517,0.00008674814,0.000005014303,0.000002444895,0.1906841,0.0003006657,0.001935206,0.02675855,0.003887338,0.000213211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639071,0.0007506135,0.00004841534,0.009423234,0.001128905,0.0004374063,4.435708e-7,0.0000274895,0.02427636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962665,0.0000329122,0.001486007,0.0001003789,0.000285211,0.00003920712,0.000001328484,0.000004175651,0.001784246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3362615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121169557","doi":"10.1111/mbe.12043","title":"Differences in Brain Activation Between Novices and Experts in Science During a Task Involving a Common Misconception in Electricity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind Brain and Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Correctness; Task (project management); Psychology; Science education; Order (exchange); Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Neuroscience; Mathematics education; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04200801248614157,"gpt":0.3625963635065718,"spread":0.3205883510204302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002242655,0.0000823911,0.0001303639,0.0006175931,0.0003611686,0.0001828452,0.0001435332,0.0000736714,0.00002181137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00125996,0.00008395008,0.000007810212,0.001158348,0.0003514879,0.0007772949,0.00002301142,0.0001260146,0.000001172092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002189565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004955387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01205409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02731235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986142,0.0003240938,0.0002143801,0.0003327329,0.0002286565,0.0002859207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991599,0.0005410596,0.00008857121,0.00007918728,0.00003465591,0.00009658245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004433212,0.00006232318,0.8085229,0.000009016369,2.807164e-7,5.023574e-8,0.1160008,6.409736e-7,0.007980502,0.0005743049,0.0000233531,0.06682133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001896139,0.00001966348,0.9510244,0.00008722422,6.233398e-7,4.067051e-7,0.04607901,0.0002073065,0.0006749134,0.001270554,0.000340384,0.0001059309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896027,0.00007976172,0.00001416223,0.009032336,0.0001356736,0.0002059719,2.7562e-7,0.000007030678,0.0009220451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992213,0.00003215174,0.00006250467,0.0003366705,0.0001585707,0.0000295628,0.000003453467,0.00000275595,0.0001530945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1425014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W137759051","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_28","title":"Nature of Science in the Science Curriculum: Origin, Development, Implications and Shifting Emphases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nature of Science; Curriculum; Scrutiny; Science education; Engineering ethics; Argumentation theory; Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0760430390077918,"gpt":0.4136656376307038,"spread":0.337622598622912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003693884,0.0001355112,0.000147368,0.0005615974,0.002084208,0.0003271968,0.001581578,0.0001445981,0.0009098856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008234289,0.00009263821,0.0000237363,0.001054912,0.008431748,0.0006459312,0.0001224438,0.0003718731,0.000042383],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001572169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00583622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001122196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001917489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978468,0.00003054764,0.0002935342,0.0004767497,0.0009685517,0.0003837521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985267,0.0002629352,0.0002121167,0.0003044221,0.0005437643,0.0001500909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[1.566975e-7,0.00001602157,0.002264329,0.000003686856,7.177252e-7,1.172205e-7,0.02101311,1.188722e-7,0.0000716516,0.9672832,0.0008430625,0.008503839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001033736,0.00002008282,0.0373276,0.0001194703,0.00001009341,0.000006718536,0.0373883,0.00001083023,0.0001633584,0.02941197,0.8949898,0.000448433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05832771,0.0002133942,0.00001292909,0.003379957,0.0004539103,0.0003807257,0.000002102722,0.00002156061,0.9372077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935508,0.0002330396,0.00185873,0.0007732605,0.0001522898,0.00002904686,0.000002380022,0.000007391336,0.1033931],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9378712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061584731","doi":"10.1016/s0959-4752(00)00034-7","title":"Fostering conceptual change by analogies—between Scylla and Charybdis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning and Instruction","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Analogy; Chaotic; Conceptual change; Concept learning; Cognitive science; Key (lock); Function (biology); Predictability; Conceptual framework; Affordance; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1690980691669549,"gpt":0.3981891744580397,"spread":0.2290911052910848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003065434,0.00004803865,0.00006593364,0.00004883655,0.0007358748,0.00008510297,0.00003954371,0.00005666286,0.0001396793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001175458,0.00004864619,0.000009077764,0.0001615326,0.0003221684,0.0003002608,0.00003426274,0.0001248307,0.000006734885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001978731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001930023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002493443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002185723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999405,0.0001140418,0.00006987475,0.0001478585,0.0001115083,0.0001517652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997737,0.00004700652,0.00004467102,0.00002905676,0.00002189341,0.00008367819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000230087,0.000001920546,0.3488137,0.0000015756,0.000001875861,1.726542e-7,0.02662659,2.946164e-7,0.000111917,0.001036045,0.0001069326,0.6232966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003121762,0.00009636406,0.1905306,0.00001881418,0.000007568572,0.0000114858,0.1585741,0.0000715397,0.00004214553,0.0005271533,0.6496255,0.0001826066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848877,0.0003000398,0.00006251949,0.001631246,0.0003321083,0.00005456098,7.825603e-7,0.00005862136,0.0126724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966317,0.001072278,0.00005089011,0.00008790103,0.0005105745,0.000004694071,0.000005327965,0.000003073331,0.001633586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6495185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5659828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069151647","doi":"10.1080/14926150609556691","title":"Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socio‐scientific issues into the science curriculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Perception; Situational ethics; Psychology; Medical education; Likert scale; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Medicine; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01299395319130506,"gpt":0.3241041372316801,"spread":0.311110184040375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007951974,0.00007839075,0.00013401,0.001624945,0.00513806,0.0003165342,0.001985526,0.00005904455,0.00005441665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003205972,0.00005030657,0.00003883122,0.008038918,0.06216505,0.0008037673,0.00006187992,0.0002265707,0.000002139037],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004134693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02443437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0115097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01043661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980583,0.00004052544,0.0004060258,0.0002359166,0.0008915241,0.0003676849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964204,0.0000448142,0.0005713829,0.0004042565,0.002356714,0.0002023644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[2.448623e-7,0.0001348137,0.04684899,0.00001101788,0.000002003542,7.987735e-8,0.1751598,0.00001112284,0.0505418,0.7135207,0.001593584,0.01217582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007147937,0.00005681259,0.0385588,0.00008329505,0.0000309151,0.00004711294,0.7896509,0.000145923,0.01735324,0.1453379,0.008515907,0.0001477082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584789,0.00026177,0.00005692089,0.03750325,0.002007923,0.0001629149,8.563446e-7,0.000005726766,0.001521745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963223,0.00002107646,0.002997064,0.00002035739,0.0002007555,0.000003568149,1.719325e-7,0.000002843625,0.0004319074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6144912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6293225","doi":"10.22201/fq.18708404e.2005.3.66101","title":"Research Into STS Science Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educación Química","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Position (finance); Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Science education; Social studies; Curriculum development; Political science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1325754813701546,"gpt":0.5560933679681632,"spread":0.4235178865980086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007029606,0.00008355196,0.00008512674,0.0012744,0.004688006,0.0004028979,0.001194058,0.00007550283,0.003745268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003101429,0.00008302857,0.0000298061,0.0078284,0.00710414,0.0006725746,0.0001051364,0.0002771539,0.003768602],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005351522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02430257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009790133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004122361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968206,0.0004248639,0.0001735466,0.0004910629,0.001333195,0.0007566921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971601,0.0002486201,0.00005432702,0.0004613935,0.001572475,0.0005030819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009282616,0.0003359937,0.005056441,0.000004652916,0.000002145937,1.952928e-7,0.1873993,9.121003e-8,0.004948072,0.5264794,0.1194283,0.1563361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004174858,0.0000572751,0.01661615,0.0000167757,0.000001631676,0.000001268169,0.1086681,0.000004100497,0.002024167,0.0223216,0.8501161,0.0001310704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6413767,0.00008925954,0.00002211134,0.02908989,0.006842385,0.000202974,3.572293e-7,0.00006417075,0.3223122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739273,0.00003303143,0.001690546,0.0008244603,0.004575796,0.00002981454,0.000001319551,0.000007807885,0.01890994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7306878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057696810","doi":"10.1080/14926150109556458","title":"Pre‐service teachers’ understanding and teaching of nature of science: An intervention study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nature of Science; Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Teaching method; Science education; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05333070372548682,"gpt":0.4015638244142469,"spread":0.3482331206887601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005893847,0.00006114782,0.0001401727,0.001751176,0.001129297,0.0001160932,0.0005983112,0.00008825061,0.00001924098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001682796,0.00005526286,0.00001391077,0.001683136,0.00477579,0.0008267473,0.00002456967,0.0002935753,1.358255e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002490312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005384662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004432688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0227796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988857,0.00004619209,0.0003223018,0.0001528201,0.0003739799,0.0002189864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984316,0.00005301849,0.0004345019,0.0001519548,0.0006298076,0.0002991454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001946747,0.0003479929,0.1768921,0.00002435634,0.000006266494,7.476458e-7,0.3726267,0.000001590005,0.002433544,0.4203474,0.00002292438,0.0272944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114967,0.0001962335,0.02030802,0.0001203222,0.00001782574,0.00004474424,0.9316124,0.00008984873,0.0002111048,0.04698251,0.0002357489,0.00006626781],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944019,0.000158361,0.0002697348,0.003018355,0.0005264704,0.000153845,6.367003e-7,0.000004770309,0.001465974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979329,0.00001604618,0.001943015,0.00002545165,0.00003404377,0.000001532388,1.202787e-7,0.0000027126,0.00004420502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5589857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142529937","doi":"10.1039/b4rp90026j","title":"THE FUTURE SHAPE OF CHEMISTRY EDUCATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry education; Metaphor; Curriculum; Scientific literacy; Chemistry; Science education; Mathematics education; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Nanotechnology; Engineering; Epistemology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Materials science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08986770392310722,"gpt":0.5201254966081471,"spread":0.4302577926850399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003820653,0.00006965538,0.00006426126,0.00002574009,0.001564315,0.0002492159,0.0004003796,0.0001105718,0.0007909992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008318533,0.00005899738,0.00002249131,0.0006332575,0.0009191037,0.0004101194,0.00003842113,0.0004104607,0.00002769466],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001777458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01342922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009764879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000637554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984053,0.0002435783,0.0001753997,0.0002318773,0.0006424226,0.0003014565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964253,0.001494751,0.0001396422,0.0002922138,0.001372352,0.0002757545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002967896,0.003555193,0.001507859,0.000405639,0.00004939175,9.26347e-7,0.07824098,0.000002759824,0.08279292,0.0922007,0.1193794,0.6215675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005848771,0.000008241984,0.0003358379,0.00001801646,0.000003611112,0.00001026857,0.274322,4.093156e-7,0.007729294,0.005645943,0.711812,0.00005600016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3658544,0.005353582,0.000005724338,0.183235,0.0009269782,0.0002489565,0.000002326277,0.0000222678,0.4443507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532586,0.006530051,0.0005043649,0.0004248209,0.002980881,0.0001089118,0.00002003636,0.000008749114,0.0361636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6215115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036352550","doi":"10.1002/tea.20060","title":"Developmental growth in students' concept of energy: Analysis of selected items from the TIMSS database","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Mathematics education; Test (biology); Rasch model; Psychology; Item response theory; Cognitive development; Energy (signal processing); Curriculum; Science education; Concept learning; Piaget's theory of cognitive development; Achievement test; Cognition; Item analysis; Classical test theory; Developmental psychology; Pedagogy; Psychometrics; Standardized test; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1563988933828027,"gpt":0.5295182645943851,"spread":0.3731193712115825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03763586,0.00005929052,0.0002378018,0.001836966,0.0005315574,0.0001412583,0.002234258,0.00003451524,0.0001588839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007363288,0.00004200115,0.00005315764,0.009483815,0.001858253,0.001314505,0.0001718418,0.0006851785,0.000001112584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000536431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003421704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02634115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01714633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935495,0.001684781,0.0006199623,0.000195862,0.003513189,0.000436675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965272,0.002140656,0.0003212706,0.0001207522,0.0007216962,0.0001684483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002222837,0.0002866561,0.8336598,0.0000013761,0.00003004455,0.000004103505,0.1457016,0.0002878281,0.007530655,0.003755455,0.0002873426,0.008432939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005184467,0.0000758703,0.7652318,0.0001718471,0.00002257274,0.000002383323,0.2255414,0.001636711,0.003904686,0.0004862255,0.002284344,0.0001236937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953969,0.000149511,0.0001981114,0.002641119,0.0001100451,0.00006679886,0.000005655436,0.000002147489,0.001429782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980246,0.00008619542,0.00162322,0.00006644108,0.0001299733,0.000001475286,0.000001202209,0.000002112531,0.00006480356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0798398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988851995","doi":"10.1007/s11165-011-9260-3","title":"Students’ Research-Informed Socio-scientific Activism: Re/Visions for a Sustainable Future","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Sustainability; Curriculum; Public relations; Environmental education; Political science; Sociology; Science education; Politics; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.477602680249628,"gpt":0.6285534301720742,"spread":0.1509507499224462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07205745,0.0001152293,0.0001416251,0.003106829,0.01058847,0.00190511,0.003107352,0.0001469025,0.0008173243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01180781,0.0001089069,0.00005671236,0.01281,0.00772405,0.003253897,0.0003472309,0.0007796648,0.0001798581],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002724188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05957349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007426307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004528993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906262,0.0009242791,0.0003393518,0.0008866648,0.004841325,0.00238216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916765,0.001277797,0.00009282299,0.0007352056,0.005477704,0.0007399376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004095583,0.001040815,0.01931684,0.00003863639,0.000002058626,0.0000013823,0.4438736,5.454126e-7,0.0003124515,0.4577512,0.05390268,0.02371879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001226087,0.00008044056,0.02545208,0.00003957641,9.20615e-7,4.148352e-7,0.7141163,0.00001423917,0.0002514631,0.05725983,0.2025487,0.0001133948],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8378969,0.0001269022,0.00004982479,0.01480221,0.003308282,0.00254207,0.000002024588,0.00005286436,0.1412189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494132,0.0001190308,0.001017913,0.00007451781,0.0008903669,0.0006633285,0.00000558695,0.00001050139,0.04780555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4004914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804158705","doi":"10.5539/jel.v7n4p191","title":"An Overview of Problem Solving Studies in Physics Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Physics education; Problem-based learning; Field (mathematics); Management science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2493326317911749,"gpt":0.5345222497942981,"spread":0.2851896180031231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001998045,0.00004185208,0.0001135901,0.0001458992,0.0002789848,0.00003951714,0.00009985039,0.00002759428,0.0001029726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008141648,0.00003790274,0.00002136245,0.0003600106,0.0002199615,0.0004955913,0.000006595052,0.000171927,0.000002442873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006975891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002056964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003255723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002430692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990196,0.0003845081,0.0002516124,0.00007126655,0.0001801832,0.00009281652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987058,0.0001316068,0.0003782858,0.00004633282,0.0006620873,0.00007588897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006653094,0.0003892258,0.0803868,0.0000437973,0.000007425694,5.336601e-8,0.5086547,0.00002461041,0.000465773,0.0149001,0.001070239,0.3940506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001151866,0.0002151805,0.06312951,0.0004203683,0.00001343827,0.000006592345,0.8507522,0.00003386243,0.0001093964,0.006264422,0.07884962,0.00009020848],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857479,0.004105796,0.00004755102,0.001552162,0.001533155,0.00006073339,4.492327e-8,0.000003906401,0.006948722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934993,0.0016697,0.002294458,0.0002117089,0.001426069,0.000001556936,3.483422e-7,0.000002947458,0.0008939509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3939604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3648966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148957058","doi":"10.1187/cbe.10-10-0133","title":"The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) for Use in Biology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CBE—Life Sciences Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Perception; Likert scale; Science education; Biology; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3063091352521994,"gpt":0.4976115232448255,"spread":0.1913023879926261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01575336,0.000113581,0.0001281139,0.0003622883,0.005100857,0.0004729367,0.001386132,0.00008163706,0.0001249117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01674331,0.00008712411,0.00004786602,0.002819547,0.006333139,0.001204371,0.00006232956,0.0001761923,0.00004202677],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002483542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01054498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02021712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04117382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971668,0.0007668502,0.000314705,0.0005646552,0.000455893,0.0007311055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968021,0.001930447,0.0002213082,0.0002323622,0.000555541,0.0002582249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001238602,0.0001051502,0.8480687,0.000002020363,0.000001520439,1.993331e-8,0.01524687,0.00001129157,0.0000905675,0.1236219,0.0009325893,0.01190698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008527282,0.00008931148,0.9065304,0.00001318194,0.000002925843,4.046579e-7,0.03442005,0.0002335333,0.00006152863,0.003262585,0.05513698,0.0001637707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753934,0.0004308273,0.0002496536,0.001991092,0.005331664,0.0005862754,0.000003959451,0.00005065905,0.01596243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962772,0.0002165752,0.001146922,0.0005014438,0.000219247,0.0001268253,0.000004469232,0.000005312172,0.001502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1203593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969379996","doi":"10.1002/tea.20001","title":"Why educate “little scientists?” Examining the potential of practice‐based scientific literacy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Agency (philosophy); Curriculum; Science education; Literacy; Mathematics education; Work (physics); Process (computing); Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2300005072014985,"gpt":0.5697090228606678,"spread":0.3397085156591693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.135787,0.00009065821,0.0001769993,0.002321812,0.004866995,0.002075712,0.002718241,0.00004868605,0.00009095583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02768592,0.00006404981,0.00007909237,0.006130337,0.00898484,0.004060673,0.0001758153,0.001469605,0.00001249914],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007373918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01411568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003306124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002979242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904101,0.002158728,0.0006434568,0.0003788066,0.005471222,0.0009376301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942486,0.002020106,0.0005491905,0.0004164978,0.002378027,0.0003876164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001614767,0.002315776,0.02010194,0.00005971062,0.00001637096,0.0001498627,0.6421192,0.009687291,0.09516974,0.1316308,0.004086823,0.09450095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00180546,0.0007388898,0.0458486,0.001349152,0.00002379011,0.0002185869,0.631829,0.001414937,0.004436181,0.02893148,0.2829404,0.00046362],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9418502,0.0002470368,0.001415877,0.04458121,0.003515365,0.000214605,9.649948e-7,0.000008230606,0.008166544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918046,0.00002013681,0.007120052,0.0003695221,0.0004213403,0.000003258312,2.078467e-7,0.000005358721,0.0002555164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2788535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117962730","doi":"10.1002/tea.20153","title":"Concept maps: Experiments on dynamic thinking","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Header; Focus (optics); Concept map; Task (project management); Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2020900081355763,"gpt":0.5848167688805302,"spread":0.3827267607449539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04602309,0.00006689951,0.0001295662,0.001419173,0.002456833,0.0005839609,0.001554433,0.0000466007,0.0001010065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003089705,0.00005504697,0.00004739897,0.001712393,0.002128659,0.001293346,0.00008035376,0.001252017,0.00002288077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00106403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00229501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002873352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004336827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993579,0.001212436,0.0003710658,0.0002268939,0.003867323,0.000743293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982069,0.0008507145,0.0001839489,0.0001650191,0.0003691698,0.000224301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006290646,0.0008872137,0.04997247,0.000008397002,0.000004594552,0.000131547,0.3580615,0.001419488,0.01770516,0.4992746,0.008108477,0.06436369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001375922,0.0007599519,0.05226995,0.0008889508,0.000003339291,0.00005336835,0.6689848,0.001075512,0.002538348,0.1672389,0.1043029,0.0005079853],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8973327,0.0001763313,0.0001596044,0.007984286,0.001242276,0.000126835,4.196123e-7,0.00001269223,0.09296481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969999,0.00002072932,0.001436845,0.0001361446,0.0004367678,0.000002001276,1.558576e-7,0.000004043228,0.0009634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3320356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070091809","doi":"10.1177/09636625030122001","title":"University Students' Interpretation of Media Reports of Science and its Relationship to Background Knowledge, Interest, and Reading Difficulty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Northwestern Polytechnic; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Reading (process); Psychology; Scientific literacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Variance (accounting); Mathematics education; Social psychology; Science education; Epistemology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2309674058448551,"gpt":0.4044384480982892,"spread":0.173471042253434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009066671,0.00006781203,0.0001408407,0.0009122659,0.001092477,0.0001355764,0.0004727893,0.00003604262,0.00001954535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01019517,0.00006802041,0.00001611158,0.004088553,0.007822215,0.001510453,0.0001406558,0.00008242161,5.137376e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005660065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001886227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001259019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006382233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980422,0.0001367304,0.0002715386,0.0003562141,0.0008989369,0.0002943508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978894,0.0006000356,0.0002834436,0.0001494124,0.0007798393,0.000297854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005235009,0.00005923789,0.08774001,0.00001688752,0.000002402511,3.558031e-7,0.1097467,0.000002430924,0.003859514,0.7982079,0.00002950607,0.0003298128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002391346,0.0000981583,0.1777264,0.0001656073,0.00001611474,0.000009241302,0.8069147,0.0002666053,0.002141047,0.01168904,0.0005326406,0.0002013841],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980868,0.00004231146,0.002670063,0.0005601494,0.0004621564,0.0001575284,0.000001632156,0.00001093858,0.01522726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993531,0.00002368107,0.0004188268,0.00001019319,0.000008025788,5.39343e-7,2.171656e-7,0.000002073418,0.0001834064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7865189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991504021","doi":"10.1007/s11165-011-9212-y","title":"The Challenges of Science Inquiry Teaching for Pre-Service Teachers in Elementary Classrooms: Difficulties on and under the Scene","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Conceptualization; Mathematics education; Science education; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Teaching method; Teacher education; Pedagogy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4211701940826973,"gpt":0.5511727144910923,"spread":0.1300025204083949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03727569,0.00006929127,0.00007434066,0.0006016909,0.003174188,0.0001987025,0.001493517,0.00003701061,0.00001365775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002836356,0.00004355231,0.00001365625,0.002321761,0.01118919,0.0009374425,0.0001262843,0.0003686777,0.000002234351],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005118202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006153222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009672469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02359463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967633,0.000600785,0.0002275325,0.0004069404,0.00133502,0.0006663915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977318,0.001290196,0.00008414149,0.0003379048,0.0004197356,0.0001361887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001905983,0.0002512015,0.00955112,0.000009072241,7.586926e-7,2.4631e-8,0.5895707,0.00001028287,0.0006966587,0.2793773,0.0001987868,0.1203151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006822261,0.00005749504,0.2669054,0.00005098448,5.966174e-7,2.060695e-7,0.7152203,0.0001140628,0.0002272356,0.01576969,0.001536595,0.00004911911],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.957492,0.0003731969,0.00001046293,0.03317124,0.000932306,0.0006657561,4.018536e-7,0.000006676163,0.007347939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984823,0.0004715404,0.0003373216,0.000182972,0.0001549269,0.0001454859,2.749908e-7,0.000003376616,0.0002217504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2636076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917098423","doi":"10.1080/09500693.2018.1550274","title":"Research trends in science education from 2013 to 2017: a systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Taiwan Normal University; Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan; Ministry of Education","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Science education; Period (music); Curriculum; Content analysis; Educational research; Mathematics education; Conceptual change; Social science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3166800952474974,"gpt":0.5771411437819296,"spread":0.2604610485344322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02033075,0.0001035123,0.0003291861,0.02342999,0.0005754406,0.0006780967,0.003005045,0.00006182919,0.0007285634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01241264,0.00009264121,0.00008397245,0.03923325,0.002837024,0.002767647,0.00009501467,0.0003231485,0.00003335833],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002175174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03228873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01710351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02306854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936096,0.0005368158,0.001215092,0.0003914678,0.003786562,0.0004604675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785948,0.0004957385,0.0009071995,0.000326898,0.01923944,0.0004359381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001170388,0.004206692,0.4757412,0.00003955165,0.000178566,0.000001488836,0.3272436,0.0004063639,0.06655959,0.06683613,0.01150757,0.04716225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001354085,0.00006903623,0.888252,0.0007141487,0.00003649301,0.000005524358,0.107289,0.0003898239,0.0009570239,0.001133017,0.0009079793,0.0001105365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669749,0.000198204,0.0001883623,0.02157157,0.004640598,0.0002621039,0.000005346339,0.000005971373,0.00615298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966621,0.00008505474,0.001305886,0.0002572732,0.000639723,0.00002625337,0.000004766624,0.000004123788,0.001014853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4125108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151323772","doi":"10.1002/tea.10109","title":"The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher–scientist partnership programs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Curriculum; General partnership; Science education; Value (mathematics); Property (philosophy); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3485302003447787,"gpt":0.5852288606081715,"spread":0.2366986602633928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1039543,0.00007756128,0.0001917649,0.0006344154,0.00192142,0.000425124,0.001946771,0.00004051429,0.00006217592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008763176,0.0000539363,0.00008097381,0.00220701,0.003849603,0.001126693,0.00009036303,0.0007968326,0.000002296735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003124077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002543207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006744412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003998653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888523,0.004746108,0.0007289029,0.0002787627,0.004670561,0.0007233779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969561,0.001077605,0.0005083949,0.0003171324,0.0007852536,0.0003554819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003892947,0.001113657,0.4266014,0.00001078463,0.00001416886,0.000006954081,0.2746212,0.0003112348,0.01286746,0.1901998,0.00007913919,0.0941353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007532068,0.0005837049,0.2348354,0.0002964975,0.00001466846,0.000007696085,0.7088099,0.001248624,0.00323998,0.03263997,0.01736545,0.00020487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919364,0.0001791492,0.0001794624,0.001223157,0.000879164,0.0002160958,5.752474e-7,0.000004906886,0.005381074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978982,0.00006282271,0.001583104,0.000009390057,0.0002001375,0.000003372133,2.749351e-7,0.000004064369,0.0002386195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4341886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1818970564","doi":"10.1002/sce.21135","title":"Inquiry, Engagement, and Literacy in Science: A Retrospective, Cross‐National Analysis Using PISA 2006","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Science learning; Scientific literacy; Mathematics education; Literacy; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09143841100794485,"gpt":0.4992093879492169,"spread":0.4077709769412721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01524335,0.00009759647,0.0001293432,0.002033015,0.002799966,0.001273309,0.0006497534,0.00004369922,0.0002294789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00452563,0.0001005648,0.00003267662,0.01194578,0.0050124,0.003046981,0.00008219315,0.000158941,0.00001774764],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001063996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009771777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003319244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001215329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996789,0.0002451141,0.0002583863,0.0006750657,0.001522842,0.0005096346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980492,0.000143184,0.0001603491,0.0002348647,0.001145857,0.0002665464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001960932,0.00012349,0.8136863,0.000002108053,0.00000231184,3.399022e-8,0.08259585,0.0001308593,0.001215728,0.09190895,0.0001152701,0.01021715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008615459,0.00001282422,0.9677756,0.00001031025,0.00001066284,6.694293e-7,0.01492208,0.005376644,0.0001075021,0.007979032,0.003569097,0.0001494187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667003,0.00003421348,0.0007561296,0.001165286,0.001970261,0.0001822784,0.00000181216,0.00002372813,0.02916595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958917,0.00001302029,0.002326505,0.0004454957,0.0004813216,0.00001279342,0.000002661949,0.000003305684,0.0008231592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1540893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996090661","doi":"10.1007/s11165-008-9111-z","title":"Bridging the Gap Between the Language of Science and the Language of School Science Through the Use of Adapted Primary Literature","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Science education; Reading (process); Curriculum; Mathematics education; Divergence (linguistics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Computer science; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2278254203936431,"gpt":0.5164525102552345,"spread":0.2886270898615915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045848,0.00009262461,0.0001607535,0.0005627507,0.003400621,0.0007098733,0.003612149,0.00004038255,0.00002587171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02000329,0.00004231792,0.00003622183,0.01679704,0.0494652,0.002136594,0.0002700607,0.0005566399,0.000002222959],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003067787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01814596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009869842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003744947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933782,0.0009927979,0.0003775884,0.0004302921,0.004142556,0.0006785407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943568,0.002344235,0.0002621941,0.0009061379,0.001982989,0.0001477147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003000669,0.0001339764,0.008049244,0.00001911494,0.000002166002,2.550294e-7,0.7473708,0.0000339472,0.04206761,0.1188998,0.001115021,0.08227807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002848697,0.0000893886,0.437325,0.0003051998,0.000009687461,0.000005090621,0.5395762,0.0006147721,0.01296105,0.006025902,0.002652738,0.000150092],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9431898,0.001093152,0.00002148418,0.04778651,0.0003260197,0.0008300297,0.000005158487,0.000007386704,0.006740482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982885,0.0002230826,0.0002717766,0.0005289254,0.0002338354,0.00001872605,8.066128e-7,0.00000272427,0.0004316544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4292758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122487450","doi":"10.1007/s11191-006-9024-z","title":"Building a Foundation for the Use of Historical Narratives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Winnipeg","keywords":"Narrative; Argument (complex analysis); Variety (cybernetics); Foundation (evidence); Narrative inquiry; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Psychology; History; Literature; Engineering; Art; Philosophy; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1700958126724346,"gpt":0.4532606437767487,"spread":0.2831648311043141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001834786,0.0000458252,0.00005437153,0.0001486309,0.001861307,0.0001960922,0.000350186,0.00002465308,0.00007285573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001172139,0.00003525438,0.00003307345,0.0011332,0.0009048891,0.001071608,0.000008833766,0.00004291335,0.000005108151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005219185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005593701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009252659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002302321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998935,0.00007559601,0.0001629254,0.0001916406,0.0004315605,0.0002032117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998714,0.000424156,0.0001455828,0.000155697,0.0005073951,0.00005317815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003906276,0.0001157363,0.003049317,0.000002604683,6.817629e-7,3.796599e-9,0.02618682,0.00007809117,0.005889383,0.905241,0.01042051,0.04901199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003721246,0.00001835208,0.01570855,0.000006843395,0.000004312473,2.885851e-7,0.01561583,0.000204281,0.0005880229,0.02207827,0.9456704,0.00006767199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8705411,0.0001842933,0.05897196,0.04917248,0.01058994,0.001018954,0.00000156033,0.00005392063,0.0094658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768293,0.00001240449,0.01606662,0.0001541269,0.0006314192,0.00004797076,0.000001623732,0.000002781635,0.006253703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9352499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598038493","doi":"10.1023/a:1025648616350","title":"The Renewal of Case Studies in Science Education","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Red River College; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Mathematics education; Science education; History of science; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1248930842056014,"gpt":0.5183244802400294,"spread":0.393431396034428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01226623,0.00008399553,0.00009700793,0.0005319287,0.00384129,0.0002231183,0.0007795006,0.0000314605,0.00004741208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009082058,0.00006578291,0.00002502052,0.005956678,0.009732056,0.001231471,0.00002859273,0.0001111583,0.00002023328],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006664473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07395817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003800585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01091853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975975,0.000281295,0.0003059967,0.0003999198,0.000921279,0.0004940056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976346,0.0003219468,0.0001970382,0.0004036612,0.00124642,0.0001962727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002011574,0.0002359076,0.01012044,0.000005564981,9.01572e-7,5.566207e-7,0.117546,0.000006855143,0.001741161,0.8329683,0.0007910241,0.03658124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007150348,0.00003272528,0.006377957,0.00004563862,0.000005989611,0.00007611993,0.9008633,0.00001201407,0.004784596,0.03518215,0.0523729,0.0001751134],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9043816,0.0009364004,0.00000673062,0.002607783,0.007951763,0.0003055027,3.111576e-7,0.00001450184,0.08379544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994772,0.000338288,0.0006606325,0.0001404063,0.0001498954,0.00003349873,2.348498e-7,0.000002966118,0.00390213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7977861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032389487","doi":"10.1021/ed1007266","title":"Organic Chemistry Educators’ Perspectives on Fundamental Concepts and Misconceptions: An Exploratory Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chemical Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry education; Science education; Mathematics education; Chemistry; Scientific misconceptions; Engineering physics; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Epistemology; Engineering; Quality (philosophy); Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08010784137302294,"gpt":0.4190064474895605,"spread":0.3388986061165375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007048827,0.00008807468,0.0001255134,0.00006934613,0.0002029054,0.00006845442,0.0002357902,0.0000633243,0.003748247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005250235,0.00008122304,0.00003795069,0.0002073997,0.0003769673,0.0005267451,0.00001286209,0.0002346733,0.00001378852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002506743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001998671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006726532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002036454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989199,0.0001753554,0.0002530939,0.0001776244,0.0003287344,0.0001452891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998924,0.00007282345,0.0002430021,0.0001240119,0.0003105098,0.0003257021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003850068,0.003483192,0.009698196,0.000004019323,0.00001558223,5.583942e-7,0.9554974,3.746887e-8,0.02406984,0.0009250467,0.001054829,0.005212783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001987224,0.0001558608,0.004606295,0.00001857931,0.00001868021,0.000009351244,0.9861444,2.478215e-7,0.006118768,0.000599175,0.002029745,0.0001002079],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925254,0.0002786724,0.000003157958,0.0007066277,0.000823889,0.0001173882,5.147655e-7,0.00001123756,0.005533109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980655,0.00005994223,0.0002017377,0.0001892081,0.001135987,0.000008917676,0.00000102003,0.000006915805,0.0003307528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03064696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3098005853","doi":"","title":"Design and validation of the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Syllabus; Mathematics education; Graduate students; Test (biology); Psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5361597401360363,"gpt":0.6116988289412382,"spread":0.07553908880520188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008557245,0.0001084161,0.0002591466,0.0001842068,0.000645234,0.0006185955,0.002078684,0.0001019162,0.006841976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002881603,0.00008238098,0.00005583002,0.0009171334,0.0005831082,0.001288043,0.0002587839,0.0003098182,0.000005030825],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002673165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007343272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007766379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001651284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969478,0.001504532,0.0004097983,0.000216626,0.0006992628,0.0002220176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971788,0.001275297,0.0006282781,0.0002698271,0.0004766279,0.0001711519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008162623,0.0002214001,0.7645506,0.00001312526,0.00004700736,7.789349e-7,0.01952424,0.0001237769,0.153846,0.02925053,0.0246845,0.007656399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028581,0.00001044584,0.8970532,0.00005791287,0.00003242356,0.000002561675,0.005408642,0.0002532841,0.0473365,0.03792225,0.01135276,0.0002842419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923392,0.0006256959,0.002295203,0.0005924432,0.002465714,0.0003994892,0.00001227451,0.00001098292,0.00125903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982497,0.00109247,0.0001542185,0.0001540611,0.0001186024,0.000008188211,0.000001869002,0.0000090057,0.000211859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1325026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163913381","doi":"","title":"Moral and Ethical Dimensions of Socioscientific Decision-Making as Integral Components of Scientific Literacy.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science educator","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Science education; Curriculum; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Science, technology, society and environment education; Political science; Social science education; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06495427463272702,"gpt":0.4495959427614437,"spread":0.3846416681287166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005487248,0.0001229144,0.0002219852,0.0006947364,0.002310443,0.000411424,0.0009878346,0.0001223587,0.000291524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00449619,0.00009765512,0.00007925893,0.003187931,0.01382762,0.00061957,0.0001876071,0.0003392149,0.00005230638],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001898594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006306848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001253163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002181454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966059,0.0001430466,0.0004250815,0.0006250927,0.001648382,0.0005525275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976354,0.0005286016,0.0002392235,0.0004064873,0.0007652071,0.0004250318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003551635,0.000716245,0.04142353,0.00002870897,0.000007413034,0.000002787475,0.2958818,0.00003463234,0.06489764,0.5652162,0.001369226,0.03038635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001049379,0.0003156438,0.1833549,0.001252891,0.00005110048,0.00003392107,0.2677588,0.000234748,0.01871946,0.5040511,0.0221714,0.001006687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877258,0.0000967175,0.00006413282,0.003684523,0.006462246,0.0001945128,0.000009692456,0.00002303708,0.001739332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936581,0.00001398708,0.00569691,0.0002295197,0.00009237352,0.000005537613,0.00000157123,0.00000541189,0.0002966351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1419313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016021254","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2015.03.001","title":"Is inhibition involved in overcoming a common physics misconception in mechanics?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Cognition; Psychology; Prefrontal cortex; Conceptual change; Neuroscience; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2047661157043843,"gpt":0.4410526677824473,"spread":0.236286552078063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00120811,0.00007677617,0.0001008353,0.0004266133,0.0001344811,0.0001016015,0.0001305959,0.00006068799,0.00002677909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002145698,0.0000851497,0.00001414088,0.001947002,0.0001580039,0.000886086,0.00002352408,0.0001611583,0.000005218596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002434502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005722394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006343061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01588053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987154,0.0002258763,0.0002070203,0.000310656,0.0002818585,0.0002592168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999616,0.00004580538,0.00007445608,0.000111427,0.00003535037,0.0001169913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002207852,0.0007392506,0.4828117,0.00000868425,2.010952e-7,0.000001896481,0.2710814,0.0001505495,0.00302314,0.03708129,0.002106232,0.2029735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001277473,0.0001535478,0.6857744,0.0001984671,0.000004459442,0.000003403797,0.2001047,0.009215485,0.0008762904,0.08900752,0.01283249,0.0005517995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893217,0.00004930072,0.00003830923,0.00464485,0.001115319,0.00009947735,8.093542e-7,0.00001392193,0.00471631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978306,0.00008597445,0.0000613736,0.001410205,0.0001168698,0.00002721646,0.000004730154,0.000003514576,0.0004595527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2029627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9588853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093446643","doi":"10.1002/tea.10111","title":"Encouraging and analyzing student questions in a large physics course: Meaningful patterns for instructors","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Quarter (Canadian coin); Conceptual change; Concept learning; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Science education; Variance (accounting); Conceptual framework; Mathematics; Sociology; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.165660979381818,"gpt":0.5721715363524832,"spread":0.4065105569706652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06028793,0.00006498601,0.0001539901,0.0009166648,0.001565821,0.0004426789,0.0006012496,0.00003378774,0.00001460774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006517678,0.0000580696,0.00003506011,0.001657072,0.0006721805,0.001342979,0.00005541274,0.0009390817,5.46792e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005214745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002364912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007510977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002304843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961359,0.001102116,0.0003519819,0.0002196453,0.001479294,0.000711088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980945,0.0009726365,0.0001628015,0.0001079919,0.0004004798,0.0002615624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002629253,0.0001181919,0.8267261,0.000006042253,0.000001662091,0.000005675468,0.09933136,0.00009329678,0.0003281906,0.0653,0.00001563193,0.008071257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008556664,0.0001415686,0.3273928,0.0005049059,0.000005313417,0.0000215186,0.6474144,0.0010506,0.0001255891,0.01789911,0.004392732,0.0001957514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930183,0.0001313588,0.002509359,0.002096002,0.0004808209,0.0001736378,9.444737e-7,0.00000468815,0.001584941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975691,0.0001054243,0.002063287,0.00003545201,0.0001779806,0.00000539559,7.220603e-8,0.000003925012,0.00003936562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5480831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168447807","doi":"10.1119/1.4928349","title":"Comparative Cognitive Task Analyses of Experimental Science and Instructional Laboratory Courses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Physics Teacher","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Task (project management); Mathematics education; Cognition; Science education; Physics education; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2995189104406437,"gpt":0.5143481347728258,"spread":0.2148292243321822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009468573,0.00004725433,0.00008067447,0.00002915688,0.0004282472,0.00004431264,0.0001735211,0.00001357747,0.00004801032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001878766,0.0000342509,0.00001191167,0.0005642168,0.003882744,0.0003123365,0.00003300391,0.00007183468,0.00001125567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000601079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001279708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007776777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004212077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990178,0.0001748401,0.00006697066,0.0001163767,0.0005091729,0.0001148362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991821,0.00009638884,0.00006893358,0.00006756078,0.000491548,0.00009348332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003805589,0.0004903473,0.01391703,0.000001545302,0.00004479173,2.060801e-7,0.7916009,0.00002075593,0.05119165,0.1346243,0.004052488,0.004017925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000342972,0.00006619425,0.01533813,0.000009828775,0.00002831126,6.419488e-7,0.8922123,0.0001857209,0.08240854,0.004673424,0.004578829,0.000155054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711756,0.0001710375,0.00003654728,0.0004532973,0.0002004713,0.00007725711,0.00000655312,0.00001056253,0.02786866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994338,0.000003138927,0.00006705116,0.0001031192,0.0002028741,0.000006116743,8.345613e-7,0.000001666071,0.0001814189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1299509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604565736","doi":"10.1002/tea.21396","title":"Toward a durable prevalence of scientific conceptions: Tracking the effects of two interfering misconceptions about buoyancy from preschoolers to science teachers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scientific misconceptions; Conceptual change; Task (project management); Science education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Concept learning; Tracking (education); Cognition; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Scientific literacy; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2339594008709526,"gpt":0.547832849953404,"spread":0.3138734490824514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06069935,0.0001151412,0.0002675625,0.001551088,0.008144039,0.001885917,0.006645202,0.00004425383,0.00008250996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05123164,0.00008687512,0.0001022021,0.002748298,0.01947298,0.00438632,0.0004949935,0.001298584,0.000006369755],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006400936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005882441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005605641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007285076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926791,0.001121904,0.0007167141,0.0005010806,0.004059313,0.0009219585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942577,0.001983561,0.0007820313,0.0008279603,0.001654663,0.000494011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002549418,0.0001842398,0.1516277,0.00007755168,0.000007333167,0.000006331963,0.4427932,0.000457945,0.3608809,0.007962988,0.0001586469,0.03581765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001017125,0.0004519952,0.6824,0.005635466,0.0000263911,0.00001295086,0.2576983,0.0007562549,0.04269565,0.006893435,0.002065103,0.0003473612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895229,0.0003313449,0.0005111771,0.004215447,0.002013494,0.0004426894,0.000003090096,0.000007669166,0.002952129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971676,0.00009740382,0.002121534,0.00002424561,0.0002268926,0.00001275358,5.615533e-8,0.000005647155,0.0003438534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5307723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157985956","doi":"10.1080/09500690010006554","title":"The development and use of an instrument to assess students' attitude to the study of chemistry","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Remedial education; Context (archaeology); Mathematics education; Science education; Psychology; Multimethodology; Data collection; Action research; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1443730974807146,"gpt":0.4916677814056479,"spread":0.3472946839249332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003748746,0.00004769886,0.00006696079,0.000151322,0.0004984291,0.0003249582,0.001482145,0.00001304861,0.00003000513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001181674,0.00003019694,0.00001452064,0.0005775374,0.0004745602,0.0006163369,0.00009736329,0.00007156282,0.000001783729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002107185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002969021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006807644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002033171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975647,0.00008918546,0.0003718114,0.0001183623,0.001735548,0.0001203603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977905,0.0001682772,0.0003078208,0.0001249233,0.001437663,0.0001708323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007329207,0.001979139,0.4045782,0.000001944179,0.00003590384,6.692557e-7,0.3322895,0.0003635576,0.004462503,0.002279121,0.0004139716,0.2535222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001175957,0.0001103128,0.615477,0.00003196703,0.000005481793,0.000009120946,0.3430504,0.000006863629,0.002732437,0.0000813202,0.03832291,0.00005465778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894375,0.00001019148,0.00009202231,0.007989151,0.001978885,0.0001851894,3.919541e-7,0.000001574352,0.0003050951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981826,0.00001994687,0.0009548279,0.0001940641,0.0002334861,0.000007379893,1.805441e-7,0.00000162183,0.0004058814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2534676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5266917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118790449","doi":"10.1007/s42330-020-00114-6","title":"Going Beyond STS Education: Building a Curriculum for Sociopolitical Activism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Engineering ethics; Competence (human resources); Politics; Literacy; Scientific literacy; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Psychology; Science education; Social psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03261111573754841,"gpt":0.3709868692847932,"spread":0.3383757535472448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001219875,0.0000756435,0.0001393026,0.0006358509,0.001356183,0.0002204679,0.0005025242,0.00009444115,0.00005537994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003929703,0.00007276967,0.0000315296,0.001251495,0.002318636,0.0004670245,0.00001433182,0.0001894325,0.000004533114],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002597601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02916526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004819376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000746032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989651,0.00001836176,0.0002574895,0.0001692507,0.0002297066,0.0003600944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979143,0.0001018456,0.0002313728,0.00009399307,0.0008533376,0.0008051334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[3.255212e-7,0.0000476619,0.002363871,0.00001825577,0.000002657265,2.276905e-7,0.02051923,2.762555e-7,0.0004268367,0.9493001,0.001838055,0.02548255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001596014,0.0001475095,0.0004988771,0.0001364481,0.00003846716,0.00008289176,0.4220523,0.0004632301,0.0009141142,0.4532953,0.1219545,0.0002568271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8773718,0.0004133245,0.002247561,0.1128459,0.001748715,0.0002610822,0.00000192758,0.00001671038,0.005092962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96825,0.0000209537,0.03033265,0.0007903266,0.0004479808,0.00001341833,3.423579e-7,0.000005398908,0.0001389675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4960048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}