{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":523,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":523,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"6a99f3b63b02","filters":{"topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation"}},"results":[{"id":"W4292156489","doi":"10.1007/b98888","title":"Functional Data Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Springer series in statistics","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3585,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Royal Society; Foundation for the National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4218189557546074,"gpt":0.4366165447251047,"spread":0.01479758897049732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008613856,0.0002890171,0.000639528,0.001330859,0.0001449089,0.0005263514,0.001915239,0.0002073638,0.01513711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005387097,0.0002522698,0.0001072442,0.001277216,0.0002533501,0.0005016903,0.0006480159,0.0003540868,0.001233371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003258903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009164134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001812282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00559819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922783,0.0001892422,0.001290221,0.001289962,0.004633669,0.000318583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946097,0.001090752,0.0006166347,0.002761375,0.0008192371,0.0001023767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004562276,0.00002773857,0.001988696,0.000008255291,0.0002243875,0.00001186897,0.0001518607,0.002602243,0.000002907088,0.03065499,0.9173368,0.04694464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001945877,0.00001884815,0.01312967,0.00001925708,0.0004660086,0.00000123778,0.00007485896,0.01513549,0.000002544613,0.09435866,0.8762599,0.0003389519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004794527,0.0007458428,0.4460464,0.0005699095,0.00599773,0.0005360636,0.006819951,0.00007315909,0.539163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002945132,0.00005665718,0.03285735,0.00008847118,0.0005954694,0.000008464534,0.004428362,0.00002210345,0.9616486],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4224856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009012440","doi":"10.1126/science.1135459","title":"Atom Interferometer Measurement of the Newtonian Constant of Gravity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":542,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Atom interferometer; Physics; Kilogram; Interferometry; Gradiometer; Gravitational constant; Gravitational field; Gravitational acceleration; Newtonian fluid; Gravimeter; Constant (computer programming); Gravimetry; Gravitation; Geodesy; Atomic physics; Computational physics; Classical mechanics; Optics; Quantum mechanics; Astronomical interferometer; Magnetic field; Geology; Body weight; Magnetometer","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2943608841417418,"gpt":0.4190078185771762,"spread":0.1246469344354343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0503197,0.00008158439,0.0001763615,0.0003626002,0.0002169008,0.00008845702,0.001832174,0.00002561548,0.0001919383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005775883,0.00004351235,0.0001100533,0.003381327,0.00176303,0.0002678604,0.0002152175,0.00007160495,0.00002096624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001204519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005409284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000268818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002850051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900041,0.0001387249,0.0007875133,0.0004132725,0.008369734,0.0002866675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956608,0.0002536232,0.0004974388,0.0008725527,0.002619062,0.00009646854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003106704,0.000059972,0.06705833,0.0000034614,0.000003980152,2.562468e-7,0.0009916126,0.00002511764,0.897432,0.004253075,0.0004921891,0.02964897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002571655,0.00006850906,0.3137415,0.00005522578,0.00001046147,0.000002332347,0.0009036328,0.0005817777,0.6633611,0.01722214,0.003706062,0.00009004422],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971962,0.00006887453,0.01606867,0.000453789,0.001814389,0.0002626695,0.000003261337,0.000006706575,0.009359628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988831,5.393305e-7,0.0007508168,0.00004019593,0.00001285166,9.584292e-7,7.194733e-8,0.000001783893,0.0003096398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2466832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9778957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982741317","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/201116487","title":"<i>Planck</i>early results. IV. First assessment of the High Frequency Instrument in-flight performance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Astronomy and Astrophysics","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Science and Technology Facilities Council; Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Tekes; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; UK Space Agency; Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Physics; Planck; Astrophysics; Astronomy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1052633126047265,"gpt":0.2948021323704609,"spread":0.1895388197657344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001562263,0.0001367558,0.000209625,0.00009384399,0.0001876761,0.00007490242,0.0005338294,0.00003452633,0.00009148467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006759455,0.00008666459,0.00006793916,0.0004746932,0.0001543047,0.000403131,0.0001247688,0.0001465734,0.00001699186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004611789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001169013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001909685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006637567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976358,0.0001161786,0.0006239093,0.0003793122,0.001011829,0.0002329534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987397,0.00009531246,0.000391403,0.0005411631,0.0001752324,0.00005714382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069012,0.000164121,0.8019165,0.000005758085,0.00001870008,3.717337e-7,0.001262495,0.0004496313,0.0006616195,0.00810474,0.0002086597,0.1871383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007715443,0.0001543,0.9908983,0.00004247867,0.00001233197,2.936993e-7,0.0002516108,0.0006282209,0.002980384,0.002627115,0.001533943,0.00009948915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880133,0.00001002694,0.004425064,0.0001716377,0.00054239,0.0002424106,0.00002372618,0.000006146685,0.006565303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851413,0.00000222621,0.01461033,0.00001424432,0.00005375491,0.00001339735,0.00000606228,0.000004545434,0.0001541095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1889817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3534079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942003419","doi":"10.34989/tr-59","title":"A Simple Multivariate Filter for the Measurement of Potential Output","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bank of Canada Research","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Univariate; Multivariate statistics; Hodrick–Prescott filter; Filter (signal processing); Simple (philosophy); Generalization; Statistics; Noise (video); Mathematics; Econometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Computer vision","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.521155371380008,"gpt":0.4700242805450446,"spread":0.05113109083496337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03087476,0.00006937237,0.0001928257,0.0001475568,0.0003070841,0.0001020917,0.000755823,0.00003314872,0.001131199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0195602,0.00004242005,0.0001059406,0.000822567,0.0001294244,0.00006922285,0.0001394564,0.00010561,0.000003464274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001772979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005420842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08185709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.451215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9869831,0.0005623811,0.0005944544,0.0003466097,0.01114875,0.0003646673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867224,0.0019899,0.0001616506,0.0006713441,0.01036691,0.00008782904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003677623,0.0001032353,0.0004037384,0.00003928497,0.0001059433,0.000005461183,0.0004829112,0.00734318,0.128746,0.001520391,0.8030429,0.05783914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002716298,0.0001963323,0.04029941,0.00007448172,0.00005473826,0.000002291443,0.00670523,0.2292822,0.3779094,0.03318063,0.3093213,0.0002577362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.743451,0.004495441,0.1304654,0.06749815,0.009562446,0.008061762,0.0009743525,0.00003391782,0.03545752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954748,0.000002228734,0.0002625567,0.00004261218,0.00006845996,0.00003284799,0.000005530911,0.000005126396,0.004105894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4937216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174920776","doi":"10.1086/662268","title":"How Accurate Is the Standard Second?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Unit (ring theory); Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4868677926856267,"gpt":0.4009663322787135,"spread":0.08590146040691321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01519402,0.0001103745,0.0001750667,0.0003358902,0.0005954963,0.0004449814,0.002696536,0.00002684265,0.002002806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003305202,0.00005847554,0.0001030953,0.002537294,0.003093163,0.001326219,0.0001793934,0.0000896095,0.0001295309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003481783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002915428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007683549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001113911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993597,0.0001093473,0.0004142794,0.0005802721,0.005011809,0.0002873418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965594,0.0002586523,0.0004081542,0.0009798347,0.001677514,0.0001163771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004945842,0.000304051,0.02454904,0.00002819548,0.00005697309,0.000005635392,0.06782372,0.00003967611,0.1468605,0.5119665,0.06999242,0.1778787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002710475,0.0001417485,0.01485887,0.00001769032,0.00001093541,0.000001980067,0.00169484,0.001221045,0.1345076,0.8387201,0.008392463,0.0001616376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6616541,0.0002176236,0.004943116,0.02732488,0.003080933,0.0006896288,0.00005635907,0.00004738608,0.301986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971302,0.000002033404,0.0008658062,0.0004166579,0.00006881687,0.00000567426,2.32131e-7,0.000003088642,0.00150754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3354761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517398763","doi":"10.1016/j.ast.2016.08.008","title":"An improved extended Kalman filter with inequality constraints for gas turbine engine health monitoring","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aerospace Science and Technology","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Underdetermined system; Extended Kalman filter; Kalman filter; Invariant extended Kalman filter; Control theory (sociology); Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Nonlinear system; Estimator; Engineering; Mathematics; Algorithm; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1248023070209143,"gpt":0.4027736598147628,"spread":0.2779713527938485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110483,0.0001614376,0.0002771518,0.0006092916,0.0005880747,0.0002339596,0.0008513632,0.0000873301,0.00005490324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003894324,0.00008599412,0.00002386744,0.002050766,0.002246645,0.0007943779,0.0000948947,0.00008722963,0.00001163946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001173253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000533224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001860669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001083703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965181,0.00006716853,0.0004067897,0.0009932362,0.001407588,0.0006070743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968302,0.0002634163,0.0002873242,0.0008323462,0.001573191,0.0002135592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004645683,0.00005461273,0.02177937,0.000003922423,0.000005129668,6.030467e-7,0.0002715337,0.000002060077,0.3677202,0.003358288,0.0003901688,0.6063676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008628718,0.007042516,0.07658619,0.000303172,0.0000412969,0.00008073089,0.01170045,0.01276503,0.7493348,0.1266979,0.0054587,0.001360515],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9374964,0.00008163586,0.03522942,0.02576512,0.0005078287,0.0006663921,0.00001567854,0.0001456143,0.00009195886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911903,0.00001056118,0.008269651,0.0001090552,0.00004818021,0.00005245518,0.000001161322,0.000006700373,0.0003119013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6050071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8277856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611660101","doi":"10.1088/1681-7575/aa70bf","title":"A summary of the Planck constant determinations using the NRC Kibble balance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Avogadro constant; Planck constant; Systematic error; Planck; Physics; Constant (computer programming); Standard uncertainty; Balance (ability); Measurement uncertainty; Statistics; Theoretical physics; Mathematics; Thermodynamics; Quantum mechanics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3751984198812846,"gpt":0.4409034338610398,"spread":0.06570501397975514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01207038,0.00007623859,0.0001593058,0.00007901209,0.001087842,0.0003209353,0.001872793,0.00004607006,0.0002215975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01588996,0.0000330921,0.000104626,0.0002914775,0.0005887016,0.00019381,0.0002179101,0.0001003393,0.00002294861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005475258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001563376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006846897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002756538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968541,0.0003621486,0.0003758047,0.0002487417,0.001987693,0.0001715616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996456,0.0007904072,0.0006427733,0.001426002,0.0006592207,0.00002558899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004514101,0.00004598561,0.9260738,0.000002855494,0.00002525192,0.000001264967,0.0003722514,0.0006514157,0.03000897,0.007040372,0.02431221,0.01142043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008951782,0.00007167258,0.7788896,0.00004618795,0.00008891591,0.000007983064,0.0009256918,0.1173462,0.009209452,0.08031141,0.01200346,0.0002042509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9527658,0.0001412223,0.003643821,0.002815549,0.002434227,0.0003605967,0.00002818506,0.00001261274,0.03779795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978383,0.00000108248,0.0004621005,0.0001348797,0.00004612614,0.000006009945,5.220739e-7,0.000002510108,0.001508436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1471843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762264767","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.09.001","title":"Calibration: Modelling the measurement process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Calibration; Process (computing); Computer science; Process engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7289126639760963,"gpt":0.4623920169424059,"spread":0.2665206470336904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02075077,0.00009258976,0.0001994424,0.0001932322,0.001650149,0.0001082597,0.001180868,0.00001959281,0.00003371775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004021787,0.00005442578,0.00003751764,0.000295902,0.007132695,0.000859715,0.000150411,0.00007873579,0.000004177987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001793224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002857801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001604039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004112313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955942,0.00008044201,0.0004669577,0.0004606522,0.003223118,0.0001746307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974782,0.0001571568,0.0004261977,0.0006796936,0.001209929,0.00004879288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006948998,0.000575185,0.05371075,0.0003528232,0.0001482016,0.00001177487,0.433741,0.120008,0.005490204,0.3047281,0.04673066,0.03380847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004609941,0.00008656311,0.001088911,0.0002161781,0.00002106736,0.000001298914,0.007029854,0.1158393,0.001073005,0.8617777,0.01217944,0.0002256739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7757317,0.01918745,0.001552093,0.01354221,0.01376961,0.001275366,0.000006009859,0.00003111021,0.1749044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995161,0.00005989737,0.00007316612,0.00006963732,0.0001136355,0.00002156277,8.152767e-8,0.000001806036,0.0001441358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5570496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114250109","doi":"10.1116/1.1496783","title":"Recommended practices for measuring and reporting outgassing data","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Outgassing; Data presentation; Presentation (obstetrics); Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Data set; Information retrieval; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Data collection; Physics; Business; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7247137799361862,"gpt":0.4985319727701953,"spread":0.226181807165991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05040435,0.0001927743,0.000558757,0.001534834,0.001156716,0.001077804,0.001952214,0.0001507288,0.00009944916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04505087,0.00013125,0.00007100154,0.002352757,0.0007151329,0.003061895,0.0005901312,0.0003647435,0.000004495801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004717258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001961673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007754431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002149962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941763,0.0001228685,0.002213214,0.0008738605,0.00211535,0.000498361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988065,0.0009694432,0.00820613,0.0008989089,0.001670902,0.0001896391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000164252,0.0002935713,0.177333,0.000045536,0.0001173229,0.00004323237,0.002971549,0.0001540133,0.3915349,0.001213641,0.0191217,0.4070073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004590473,0.001815472,0.03070387,0.0005941786,0.0004716232,0.002677312,0.03882217,0.7352447,0.03779508,0.0726835,0.07322443,0.001377191],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758384,0.002797226,0.003355193,0.01610519,0.001154928,0.0002745822,0.000008786208,0.00003664252,0.0004290124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685143,0.0002147224,0.03065346,0.00007849448,0.00005844261,0.000003286033,7.364271e-7,0.000008407448,0.0004682067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7350907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021846406","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/49/1/l03","title":"Reconciling Planck constant determinations via watt balance and enriched-silicon measurements at NRC Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Avogadro constant; International System of Units; Kilogram; Planck constant; Boltzmann constant; Ampere; Metrology; Physics; Elementary charge; Physical constant; Planck; Watt; Theoretical physics; Constant (computer programming); Quantum mechanics; Thermodynamics; Computer science; Electron; Voltage","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2852008851266507,"gpt":0.3717648690016077,"spread":0.086563983874957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01551354,0.0001690323,0.000284497,0.0001893781,0.0003951585,0.0001181514,0.0003793572,0.00008231865,0.000861042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007807007,0.0001242414,0.00004743091,0.0005021876,0.0001196838,0.0003146756,0.0001076609,0.0001131847,0.0001056731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007074212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002836966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006996329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2097389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948779,0.0004360304,0.0005968503,0.0004720604,0.003117279,0.0004998407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997381,0.0009205525,0.0002916541,0.000453918,0.0007362,0.0002166767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003089244,0.00002550945,0.9356969,0.000003058464,0.00001973242,0.000001172201,0.0001893379,0.00004435096,0.03006753,0.00008932444,0.01680763,0.01702454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001860425,0.0001304786,0.9284494,0.00001880707,0.0001067845,0.00003772135,0.0007349813,0.01850772,0.01402295,0.004640584,0.0308071,0.0006830645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839717,0.0007788236,0.001681336,0.0004665671,0.002236333,0.0002720059,0.00001783923,0.00002962179,0.01054578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975739,0.000004005989,0.0005617553,0.0003988637,0.00009504872,0.0000209189,0.00001000213,0.000006311288,0.001329253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2027426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062980226","doi":"10.1140/epjd/e2003-00001-5","title":"Measurement of isotope shifts, fine and hyperfine structure splittings of the lithium D lines","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Physical Journal D","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperfine structure; Lithium (medication); Atomic physics; Laser; Isotope; Fabry–Pérot interferometer; Beam (structure); Diode; Atomic vapor laser isotope separation; Chemistry; Physics; Optics; Dye laser; Nuclear physics; Optoelectronics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1196969933032721,"gpt":0.3267299040168401,"spread":0.207032910713568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01370961,0.0001159026,0.0002250012,0.00005774069,0.0002430092,0.0001250402,0.0007761433,0.00001349382,0.0000566032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005346496,0.00004707442,0.0001437169,0.0005242749,0.0002476033,0.0001112181,0.0001068561,0.0002416025,0.00001049086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001721299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007052177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002737321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006084377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943359,0.001938854,0.0006132412,0.000200213,0.002758584,0.0001531295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975047,0.0002661246,0.0006149373,0.0004760097,0.001070782,0.00006747083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010751,0.0002412238,0.006767848,0.00002166441,0.00009058242,0.00000234392,0.004733277,0.001293445,0.8256592,0.005410662,0.01698162,0.1386907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002785219,0.0004910676,0.4536987,0.0004935291,0.0003301764,0.00008827265,0.001691977,0.002336689,0.2043816,0.2982681,0.03494225,0.0004924752],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831151,0.0003340483,0.0001585491,0.001398541,0.0005523716,0.0001535586,0.000005003504,0.000004098258,0.01427868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990523,0.000005207183,0.00009660135,0.00005720771,0.00035688,2.390546e-7,1.568891e-7,0.00000818407,0.0004232057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6212775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6400641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074284853","doi":"10.1016/s0142-9418(98)00083-x","title":"Guidelines for performing storage modulus measurements using the TA Instruments DMA 2980 three-point bend mode","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polymer Testing","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Reproducibility; Repeatability; Amplitude; Bending; Composite material; Modulus; Oscillation (cell signaling); Standard deviation; Polycarbonate; Span (engineering); Acoustics; Structural engineering; Optics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7287993159863515,"gpt":0.4891393262172317,"spread":0.2396599897691198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01183532,0.0002771459,0.0002988996,0.0002172709,0.001466351,0.0006358993,0.0009941928,0.00007067511,0.0008754443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008199948,0.0001790888,0.000159369,0.0009938288,0.0001064832,0.0007185009,0.0001076148,0.0001367421,0.00007289134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001603604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002209534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005845689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002288913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937857,0.0002106379,0.001226386,0.0007633309,0.003401228,0.0006126824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962906,0.0006027765,0.0004688749,0.0008186431,0.001679219,0.000139917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006165561,0.00006035243,0.03040386,0.000008459669,0.00004445083,6.587118e-7,0.0008353525,0.02478196,0.05786055,0.00005463787,0.002606408,0.8832816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006870234,0.00004446551,0.001461427,0.00009028367,0.0000642473,0.000008719166,0.000545194,0.978293,0.01419008,0.003770923,0.0005865385,0.0002580975],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.969798,0.0004255956,0.02302021,0.001047877,0.001345283,0.0007814965,0.00001965267,0.00007421791,0.00348768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801499,9.201084e-7,0.01667548,0.000455146,0.0004677509,0.00004879371,0.000009158983,0.00002903962,0.00216382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9535111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055183665","doi":"10.1186/1471-2288-8-24","title":"Comparison of two dependent within subject coefficients of variation to evaluate the reproducibility of measurement devices","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre","keywords":"Reproducibility; Variation (astronomy); Statistics; Coefficient of variation; Computer science; Mathematics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9180959778308471,"gpt":0.6669296548463675,"spread":0.2511663229844796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6611565,0.0001390532,0.0009044636,0.0006982883,0.0002619044,0.00002069292,0.002073867,0.0001391853,0.001129632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.733674,0.00007917111,0.0001645985,0.002659784,0.00128781,0.00008306014,0.0004911315,0.0004092316,0.0000419555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001533264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003290918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001268049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005052481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6569015,0.2129676,0.01114701,0.005604933,0.1114884,0.001890523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8797942,0.09164526,0.001599982,0.005410491,0.02096103,0.0005890735],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003293599,0.001821333,0.5628785,0.0002143024,0.0001632684,0.000002824209,0.03528741,0.01974046,0.2910302,0.004586094,0.004990783,0.07599123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002518258,0.001309801,0.4659801,0.0002032008,0.00007547477,0.000008733773,0.004710839,0.06995758,0.4336515,0.02112283,0.000267819,0.0001938944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7134182,0.0002354528,0.283745,0.0006714931,0.0006923231,0.0008342314,0.00000404504,0.000006204551,0.0003929873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800389,0.000006537564,0.01968389,0.00003771064,0.00006717459,0.00004008443,0.000002400335,0.000006373574,0.0001168792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2666207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991404492","doi":"10.1021/ac203006j","title":"Determination of the Atomic Weight of <sup>28</sup>Si-Enriched Silicon for a Revised Estimate of the Avogadro Constant","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Chemistry","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Avogadro constant; Atomic mass; Chemistry; Silicon; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Kilogram; Atomic physics; Physics; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1193247839465496,"gpt":0.3853269689212351,"spread":0.2660021849746855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004927368,0.0001087777,0.0003093856,0.00003899625,0.0000884728,0.00002371113,0.0006858025,0.00008244895,0.0004010082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00970267,0.0000566281,0.0003004961,0.0006201799,0.0003980229,0.0001091575,0.0001060507,0.00008197592,0.000005286772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004946439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001613492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004463422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001535633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971001,0.0001219756,0.0008335772,0.0002342942,0.001490033,0.0002200825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966571,0.001180444,0.0006141093,0.0007129356,0.0007661657,0.00006926958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002349783,0.0004182092,0.1106282,0.0003463995,0.00008534488,1.549665e-7,0.001112702,0.0002593279,0.8666677,0.003620379,0.006344868,0.01028166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000739503,0.00001626406,0.008092377,0.0001032059,0.0002271807,0.000002151032,0.0003670133,0.38191,0.6006355,0.007066095,0.000722999,0.0001177726],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932431,0.00007149818,0.002124156,0.0004522823,0.000124713,0.0003085878,0.00002798131,0.000004944305,0.003642727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985575,0.000001478874,0.000254957,0.00002746428,0.00004348031,0.000007811029,0.00000375993,0.000004666306,0.001098866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3816506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797556907","doi":"10.1088/1361-6501/aabc9e","title":"The Planck-Balance—using a fixed value of the Planck constant to calibrate E1/E2-weights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Measurement Science and Technology","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Planck constant; Planck; Physics; Calibration; Planck mass; Christian ministry; Constant (computer programming); Standard uncertainty; Planck length; Measurement uncertainty; Computer science; Planck scale; Quantum mechanics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1827582405524365,"gpt":0.3685943208600234,"spread":0.1858360803075869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02615941,0.0001728171,0.0002630736,0.0005856213,0.001917548,0.0003489593,0.002265187,0.00009672131,0.00004396424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01137551,0.00008365314,0.00004855331,0.005342803,0.003930173,0.0002595734,0.0004244958,0.0001541378,0.00004531715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002172477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001088101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003726368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003670394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907202,0.0002052883,0.0006857899,0.0007568204,0.007045852,0.0005860765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939871,0.0002050522,0.0003979307,0.001180393,0.004111171,0.0001182818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001220917,0.00008208483,0.1340099,0.000006426352,0.0000307492,0.000001583842,0.0009866925,0.00007000382,0.6779431,0.1410029,0.01351236,0.03223222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001428656,0.0006094816,0.03955678,0.0002766075,0.00006733242,0.00003380765,0.003480652,0.02888252,0.5376678,0.3263144,0.06108559,0.0005964324],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708878,0.0002974921,0.002371899,0.0126323,0.003221047,0.0009841718,0.00001049843,0.00007031731,0.009524432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990188,0.000002308157,0.0004787843,0.0002537262,0.00006899671,0.00001747024,1.411497e-7,0.000005106337,0.0001546901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1853115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144308037","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/51/5/361","title":"Absolute silicon molar mass measurements, the Avogadro constant and the redefinition of the kilogram","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Material Measurement Laboratory; Physical Measurement Laboratory; Russian Academy of Sciences; National Institute of Standards and Technology","keywords":"Avogadro constant; Tetramethylammonium hydroxide; Metrology; Molar mass; Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Mass spectrometry; Atomic mass; Kilogram; Silicon; Measurement uncertainty; Isotope dilution; Isotope; Materials science; Isotopes of silicon; Chemistry; Physics; Nuclear physics; Nanotechnology; Chromatography; Optics; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.215597919674183,"gpt":0.3483764653371645,"spread":0.1327785456629816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04458845,0.0001265094,0.0002523276,0.00009770958,0.0005679496,0.0002258326,0.0009967329,0.00007098773,0.0002002686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01469657,0.00004500759,0.0001517136,0.0007379017,0.001133688,0.00008371024,0.0001379322,0.0001737132,0.00004072721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003121103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004844872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005151382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001215042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939433,0.002391814,0.0006057862,0.0003611381,0.002447695,0.0002502193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956346,0.002353487,0.0005103698,0.0009808813,0.0004836775,0.0000370322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001801638,0.0002692751,0.2396124,0.00002681655,0.0004463551,9.196659e-7,0.003313635,0.00234898,0.1673083,0.3357889,0.05407282,0.1950099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007010575,0.0003912353,0.2543207,0.00005699964,0.0004480676,0.000009859515,0.002663403,0.06134302,0.01670933,0.6039875,0.05263148,0.0004278333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8991002,0.001202401,0.01293697,0.02530046,0.003249596,0.002311076,0.00002186027,0.00006198929,0.05581547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986232,0.000009949094,0.0001765552,0.0007300911,0.00004286773,0.00003668865,0.000001683938,0.000004163683,0.0003748102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2681985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483604105","doi":"10.1364/ao.55.005772","title":"Bayesian approach to the design of chemical species tomography experiments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Optics","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Computer science; Path (computing); Tomography; Bayesian probability; Algorithm; Covariance; Iterative reconstruction; Covariance matrix; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Optics; Statistics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2700666714982641,"gpt":0.3585269224163342,"spread":0.08846025091807008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004270365,0.0001114775,0.0001742731,0.0001576208,0.00008213189,0.00010543,0.00090737,0.0000488476,0.000195803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006962626,0.00005048763,0.0000722796,0.0008363683,0.0001615629,0.00006363925,0.0001034712,0.00003886102,0.0001593552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002545044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004087673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.030332e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.688276e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967798,0.00008840252,0.0004525463,0.0003848236,0.002078314,0.0002160848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998203,0.0005873456,0.0001492415,0.0007093941,0.0002595258,0.00009146781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001259128,0.0001860129,0.0004508833,0.000002159672,0.00003237326,1.319981e-7,0.002200695,0.0009806757,0.8664195,0.05957399,0.04290778,0.02711989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001008298,0.00007576849,0.001038831,0.000018262,0.00003778587,0.000001132168,0.002890591,0.007514428,0.9287822,0.0474792,0.01080402,0.0003495347],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02493646,0.0000208168,0.9281189,0.000559949,0.0003055954,0.0006736129,0.000005343059,0.00002134031,0.045358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674355,0.000001132811,0.03133658,0.0001211624,0.00008532058,0.00005463213,0.000001414415,0.000006723726,0.0009575053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.942499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2143905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119314514","doi":"10.1006/jmsp.2000.8186","title":"Laser-Induced Fluorescence and Fourier Transform Spectroscopy of NiCl: Identification of a Low-Lying 2Σ+ State (1768 cm−1)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Spectroscopy; Fourier transform spectroscopy; Physics; Sigma; Atomic physics; Ground state; Fourier transform; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Laser-induced fluorescence; Resolution (logic); High resolution; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; Fluorescence; Fluorescence spectroscopy; State (computer science); Nuclear magnetic resonance; Materials science; Optics; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0552500983205701,"gpt":0.3619254907828169,"spread":0.3066753924622468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007959844,0.0002090096,0.0005954924,0.0005574528,0.000112605,0.0001976396,0.0007067764,0.00007908241,0.0006181303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007841138,0.0001650673,0.0002897424,0.0009596855,0.0001746132,0.0005641376,0.0000240988,0.0002535766,0.0000186263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009647918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002929044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002302023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001579326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934125,0.000333309,0.002067353,0.0003990988,0.00345971,0.0003280386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966392,0.0001951438,0.001495324,0.0005436675,0.0009471501,0.0001795004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003217607,0.0001151151,0.0006276339,0.0000165804,0.00004587708,0.00001176547,0.0006725385,0.0001777467,0.9522377,0.00004730401,0.000321258,0.04540468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00110083,0.0004528214,0.003221844,0.0001227165,0.00007086119,0.00002243674,0.0002308955,0.00672745,0.9776782,0.0101027,0.000124896,0.0001443628],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879014,0.0002567298,0.009924632,0.0005699701,0.0003831533,0.0003076218,0.00001200537,0.000007265066,0.0006371672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918658,0.0001995552,0.007575517,0.00004461016,0.00005388584,0.000002543441,0.000001930735,0.00001618531,0.0002399781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04526032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6768094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064481252","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/51/3/161","title":"Molar-mass measurement of a<sup>28</sup>Si-enriched silicon crystal for determination of the Avogadro constant","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Avogadro constant; Tetramethylammonium hydroxide; Molar mass; Crystal (programming language); Analytical Chemistry (journal); Isotope dilution; Atomic mass; Mass spectrometry; Materials science; Standard uncertainty; Metrology; Isotope; Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; Measurement uncertainty; Chemistry; Physics; Atomic physics; Nuclear physics; Optics; Nanotechnology; Chromatography; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1659726559491569,"gpt":0.3528862618283012,"spread":0.1869136058791443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03042579,0.0001585381,0.0004164647,0.0003022256,0.0001848089,0.00007241882,0.0008944984,0.0001166006,0.0002110673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02830148,0.00009374737,0.0002677469,0.000817824,0.000272064,0.0001649142,0.00008534906,0.00009434973,0.00001259769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001188919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001478403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001671201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005251784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937268,0.0009043161,0.001032557,0.0004697734,0.003567662,0.0002989217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943712,0.001483409,0.0008593586,0.0008007528,0.002426245,0.00005906773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003165756,0.0001875139,0.04735893,0.00003759299,0.00005057253,1.559572e-7,0.0006885313,0.00235773,0.8962541,0.004887989,0.002999729,0.04486065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003497053,0.0009356778,0.04097493,0.00005263742,0.0002354346,0.000001833663,0.001653855,0.6766681,0.1989622,0.07078198,0.005863482,0.0003728607],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6894878,0.00009744424,0.3054187,0.0006081355,0.0007245882,0.0009295795,0.00002645947,0.0000220424,0.00268522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972711,9.07837e-7,0.002311049,0.00008095596,0.00004177601,0.00003789989,0.000004050019,0.000007032124,0.0002452864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6972919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998898509","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/49/4/552","title":"On the effective position of the free-fall solution and the self-attraction effect of the FG5 gravimeters","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Gravimeter; Attraction; Position (finance); Geodesy; Physics; Geology; Optics; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06101476218512373,"gpt":0.3315658306317228,"spread":0.2705510684465991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0295094,0.0001181143,0.0002073078,0.00009063996,0.0004409815,0.00006176555,0.0007360094,0.00007476052,0.00004477859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009897193,0.00003526012,0.0002120037,0.0007139088,0.000467113,0.0001610083,0.0001375439,0.0001970292,0.00001688045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007593582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001986043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001014505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004709379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928653,0.004712751,0.0003481966,0.0002116325,0.001677335,0.0001848008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908295,0.007544695,0.0005612236,0.0008183563,0.0002232206,0.00002306086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003970321,0.0004781169,0.631833,0.00004399891,0.0004996283,1.40652e-7,0.006281599,0.001044197,0.2293554,0.0463571,0.03150951,0.04862699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00139129,0.0003422895,0.9009661,0.0000218781,0.0002468594,0.000002560019,0.0002017906,0.004068836,0.0766537,0.01591643,0.0001167679,0.00007149311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918995,0.0001145944,0.0006758884,0.003565432,0.001533154,0.001154279,0.00000470025,0.00001075844,0.001041662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996036,0.000001917875,0.0000236871,0.0001851603,0.00004979967,0.00004904015,7.404409e-7,0.000003599349,0.00008251353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2691331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004322225","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/43/4/s10","title":"Extending<i>E</i><sub>n</sub>for measurement science","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Metrology; Statistic; Statistics; Square root; Monte Carlo method; Mathematics; Range (aeronautics); Measurement uncertainty; Root mean square; Mean squared error; Statistical physics; Computer science; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Geometry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.266023919622216,"gpt":0.3922905407410971,"spread":0.1262666211188812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06777143,0.0001884281,0.0002859654,0.0008786123,0.0007415636,0.0007015596,0.001318397,0.00007251029,0.0001388885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02000698,0.0001325487,0.0001748153,0.002669017,0.000531184,0.0004719725,0.0001139591,0.00009813808,0.000438058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005615361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004324018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002138881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001327273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880233,0.0002012181,0.0007917412,0.001024552,0.009299497,0.0006596327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940442,0.0004927999,0.0003624657,0.0008051415,0.004172319,0.000123055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005511679,0.00008522475,0.006532192,0.00000215693,0.000006237698,7.888834e-7,0.00002765447,0.0006180217,0.8923079,0.006948185,0.05152757,0.04188901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001353962,0.0002778305,0.1231504,0.00001238005,0.0000529585,0.000003900623,0.0001609589,0.01521489,0.7031229,0.1239641,0.03225462,0.0004311284],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8783438,0.000328386,0.1032013,0.001086928,0.003249141,0.0008145185,0.00001179482,0.0001316744,0.01283249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968303,0.000001487955,0.002319538,0.0002021974,0.0002380429,0.00007597144,0.000003931143,0.000008972345,0.0003195652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1891849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045486340","doi":"10.1007/s00216-012-5785-1","title":"Calibration of isotope amount ratios by analysis of isotope mixtures","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Isotope; Calibration; Metrology; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemistry; Isotope analysis; Stable isotope ratio; Isotope-ratio mass spectrometry; Radiochemistry; Environmental chemistry; Geology; Nuclear physics; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0970296071605984,"gpt":0.3631159884830227,"spread":0.2660863813224243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003409505,0.0001803917,0.000654082,0.000228251,0.00007420188,0.0001007668,0.0003593914,0.0001487116,0.002985012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029405,0.0001203981,0.0003345023,0.002369639,0.0004701449,0.0002743531,0.00009357677,0.0001221163,0.000007661521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000288252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005679815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004653591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001057321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959762,0.0001212961,0.001129817,0.0004510113,0.002004882,0.0003168395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975693,0.0007422709,0.0003414074,0.000489886,0.0005386132,0.0003185537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002955486,0.001282211,0.5690849,0.0001170644,0.002428969,0.000001559445,0.0005001581,0.0002858846,0.3688799,0.006324375,0.03998602,0.01081337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007033766,0.00009158292,0.03686374,0.00002722354,0.004185566,0.000002412844,0.0006656538,0.5755489,0.3744255,0.002678407,0.004292833,0.0005147592],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815607,0.000431251,0.00937189,0.001234304,0.00008372223,0.0001540005,0.0001239892,0.0000152859,0.007024824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969655,0.00001420721,0.0001305031,0.0001028593,0.00007092483,0.000003182596,0.00008204681,0.00000474075,0.002626033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5752631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117360805","doi":"10.1121/1.2228790","title":"An international key comparison of free-field hydrophone calibrations in the frequency range 1 to 500kHz","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Hydrophone; Calibration; Underwater; Acoustics; Range (aeronautics); Field (mathematics); Free field; Equivalence (formal languages); Environmental science; Physics; Remote sensing; Engineering; Geography; Aerospace engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1022290182603729,"gpt":0.3932835061850631,"spread":0.2910544879246902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006398165,0.00008542571,0.0002618431,0.00006390012,0.0001598768,0.00007202662,0.002634532,0.00004434896,0.0003197914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002902168,0.00003690517,0.0002559574,0.0009231275,0.0003125395,0.0002143119,0.0001014351,0.0002660848,0.000006130343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004625501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001080377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004868563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000064604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995278,0.0006125441,0.001000741,0.0001159362,0.0028477,0.0001451036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995892,0.002073074,0.0007696583,0.0006079669,0.0006108977,0.00004636961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003419299,0.001252125,0.05511117,0.00000752223,0.00009361504,6.723786e-7,0.01792121,0.2153383,0.1716862,0.0002613818,0.5211635,0.01682234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001356143,0.0009739813,0.1325984,0.0001040116,0.0002242954,0.00001459335,0.02700169,0.7619825,0.009554225,0.06303278,0.002936553,0.0002208332],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5470979,0.00009970769,0.40196,0.04799086,0.0009116642,0.0003102238,0.00002238351,0.000004555193,0.001602645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864741,0.000009076243,0.01209905,0.001162075,0.0001820401,0.000001461724,7.867853e-7,0.000003639625,0.00006779723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5466442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.489566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1871759349","doi":"10.4271/2010-01-2286","title":"Extending SAE J300 to Viscosity Grades below SAE 20","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAE international journal of fuels and lubricants","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Imperial Oil (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Viscosity; Original equipment manufacturer; Oil viscosity; Work (physics); Rheology; Mechanical engineering; Volatility (finance); Viscosity index; Petroleum engineering; Automotive engineering; Materials science; Engineering; Computer science; Base oil; Composite material; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.131946061915721,"gpt":0.4143173696892816,"spread":0.2823713077735606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006223354,0.0001372795,0.000266929,0.0006574692,0.000176907,0.0006734869,0.001059569,0.00005631408,0.001119759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003114142,0.00009651179,0.0001441251,0.0004140345,0.00009530013,0.00060923,0.0001396441,0.0002739725,0.00008817462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006347008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001425508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003692536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006822563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950291,0.0001249316,0.0008439739,0.0003180063,0.003463385,0.0002205845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965618,0.0004641094,0.000630857,0.0002088801,0.001843763,0.0002905643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002092998,0.0001899257,0.1211263,0.000002746406,0.0001322087,0.0000540264,0.00132767,0.0001012341,0.3820354,0.001341191,0.04657832,0.4469016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009994073,0.0001683216,0.9115511,0.00007783376,0.00003046748,0.0002444593,0.0006269565,0.0003277611,0.003716721,0.02548533,0.05657786,0.0001938231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851926,0.0001205727,0.0009284838,0.005617032,0.005853386,0.0001043799,0.00002089465,0.000007601855,0.002155022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960252,0.00003072068,0.001538188,0.000454717,0.0006683255,0.00000160947,0.000002427164,0.000006780531,0.001272046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7904247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626439834","doi":"10.1515/pac-2016-0808","title":"A critical review of the proposed definitions of fundamental chemical quantities and their impact on chemical communities (IUPAC Technical Report)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Pure and Applied Chemistry","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; National Research Council Canada","funders":"International Union of Nutritional Sciences; National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Chemical nomenclature; Avogadro constant; Chemistry; Work (physics); Kilogram; Units of measurement; Constant (computer programming); Thermodynamics; Organic chemistry; Computer science; Physics; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.446380995022444,"gpt":0.4804761880707292,"spread":0.03409519304828512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003149384,0.0003997319,0.001713383,0.00005453024,0.0002555572,0.0001706331,0.0009996031,0.0002905998,0.0002455603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002718542,0.0001944644,0.0005800479,0.0002248062,0.001789068,0.00005903218,0.00040857,0.0005497226,0.000002193948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006083826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003638823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007428305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001459619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965043,0.0001278308,0.001370621,0.0004719109,0.001293344,0.0002320095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953943,0.001619705,0.001114595,0.001437251,0.0003168956,0.0001172717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000234277,0.001552599,0.0001538388,0.194915,0.000770644,0.00001317672,0.0009028786,4.080656e-7,0.04534989,0.01406942,0.04277714,0.6992608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001556743,0.0001920313,0.00008121022,0.2778183,0.003804256,0.00181535,0.002676715,0.00004070668,0.08788443,0.07184438,0.5497395,0.002546364],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00521135,0.9780705,0.000006171973,0.0002183029,0.00009165791,0.000800023,0.0006004474,0.0000187011,0.01498286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1648879,0.8344582,0.00006308898,0.00003938827,0.00009374905,0.00009653388,0.0002382545,0.00001897897,0.0001039578],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6967144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7930028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770497974","doi":"10.1088/1681-7575/aa9a7e","title":"A comparison of future realizations of the kilogram","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Kilogram; Planck constant; Realization (probability); Constant (computer programming); Mathematics; Value (mathematics); Physics; Computer science; Body weight; Statistics; Medicine; Quantum mechanics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4845687568507276,"gpt":0.5397176711420902,"spread":0.05514891429136259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005611635,0.00005314881,0.0002118102,0.0001085871,0.0003515678,0.00009196225,0.001466984,0.00005996716,0.0003202027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00993505,0.00002679684,0.0001129506,0.0003849086,0.0003138179,0.00009818211,0.0001324384,0.00006487952,0.00001397685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001174648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004847304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004708259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002557164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975837,0.0002608761,0.0004756801,0.0001829422,0.001399763,0.00009697956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968717,0.0002338883,0.0009368286,0.001285577,0.0006486873,0.00002331686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001561941,0.00006212254,0.9509274,0.000001732513,0.00000992505,3.152949e-8,0.000326035,0.0004569852,0.00495309,0.006197378,0.01793252,0.01911712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002195566,0.00005843938,0.9652873,0.000005486126,0.00002450932,1.371242e-7,0.0006313221,0.007512761,0.007533663,0.009253906,0.009432503,0.00004043056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776953,0.0001092964,0.00474913,0.002760682,0.002216372,0.0002174461,0.00001224367,0.000009448229,0.01223012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985109,0.000001182896,0.0005286849,0.00002577528,0.00005060502,0.00000334424,0.000001649699,0.000001681358,0.0008761925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02081562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095837028","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/57/1a/07030","title":"Report on the CCM key comparison of kilogram realizations CCM.M-K8.2019","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Kilogram; Planck constant; Standard uncertainty; International System of Units; Mutual recognition; NIST; Realization (probability); Joule (programming language); Metrology; Physics; Primary standard; Nuclear engineering; Mathematics; Nuclear physics; Measurement uncertainty; Computer science; Statistics; Calibration; Engineering; Body weight; Quantum mechanics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4953529610342278,"gpt":0.4662401406886678,"spread":0.02911282034556001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01004583,0.0001200705,0.0003231741,0.0001694828,0.0002186023,0.0001477201,0.0009062584,0.0000830699,0.001547948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03060798,0.00006551361,0.0001413986,0.001648635,0.0001836212,0.00009289425,0.00009550319,0.0001638549,0.000410325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003047258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008182977,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003020356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002833776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951691,0.0006436685,0.0009435264,0.0005102517,0.002528659,0.0002047998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996193,0.001485084,0.0006635439,0.0008589653,0.0007057413,0.00009366174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001343156,0.0002371306,0.2868387,0.000003549079,0.0000508435,0.000005878889,0.001483389,0.008744559,0.004174758,0.02577989,0.6606312,0.0119158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001723832,0.002065906,0.3194407,0.00003298739,0.0002192282,0.000008389444,0.004356766,0.229438,0.01890117,0.04862318,0.3745266,0.0006632081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7967986,0.0002083053,0.0780625,0.04664159,0.002068951,0.001095951,0.00003891146,0.0001720581,0.07491315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970658,0.00000173512,0.0006206809,0.0009367072,0.00008118314,0.00001292529,0.00003030405,0.000005588329,0.001245094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2861045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048613853","doi":"10.1063/1.2759831","title":"Universal joint-measurement uncertainty relation for error bars","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Physics","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Joint (building); Position (finance); Bar (unit); Mathematics; Measurement uncertainty; Error bar; Momentum (technical analysis); Observational error; Applied mathematics; Calculus (dental); Statistics; Physics; Computer science; Engineering; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4192150377811304,"gpt":0.4215894502054055,"spread":0.002374412424275107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03378927,0.0001331746,0.0003779472,0.0002055129,0.0001551824,0.0001425538,0.0004245235,0.00007063407,0.0002356461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01006632,0.00008901805,0.0003636556,0.0005119184,0.00008944741,0.0004722954,0.00003060921,0.0001728381,0.00009568354],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003075999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002258283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.962199e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003403058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932176,0.0001379247,0.001415525,0.0002103534,0.004749797,0.0002687261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937329,0.001258885,0.001098683,0.0003043012,0.003423353,0.0001818619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001847451,0.002545778,0.001040707,0.0001672208,0.0004599094,0.00002520414,0.009695749,0.04555965,0.08089728,0.4202998,0.164755,0.2727062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001445131,0.0003064394,0.002139733,0.0001215923,0.000112373,0.00001050284,0.001736334,0.03574341,0.00371348,0.9502864,0.004214259,0.0001703721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07399981,0.00002848762,0.9198903,0.0008292344,0.0008353872,0.0003148418,0.000002789866,0.00001039769,0.004088674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800735,8.837947e-7,0.01878551,0.00009079414,0.0004979968,0.000001537643,0.000001500958,0.00001170901,0.0005365675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9060737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040663662","doi":"10.1117/12.2062042","title":"A new x-ray optics laboratory (XROL) at the ALS: mission, arrangement, metrology capabilities, performance, and future plans","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Technology Facilities Council; Canadian Light Source; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Metrology; X-ray optics; Optics; Computer science; Systems engineering; Physics; Engineering; X-ray","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03561850266881286,"gpt":0.2811133428513464,"spread":0.2454948401825335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006213761,0.0002785267,0.000402591,0.0001499241,0.0002603207,0.000266367,0.001311051,0.0001786766,0.0001342345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002793306,0.0001677003,0.0003218279,0.0005793681,0.0003378061,0.0005246447,0.0002270891,0.0002539321,0.00000713958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000136528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007363373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000675259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000152114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961093,1.668404e-7,0.0008863754,0.0005381152,0.002085302,0.0003807231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957846,0.0006273653,0.0005468272,0.0001373283,0.002725456,0.0001784374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000361165,0.0001139633,0.005512834,0.000273247,0.0004785202,3.992532e-8,0.002080639,0.0005969367,0.4247703,0.3613164,0.1969073,0.00758859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004563765,0.001282061,0.0185564,0.0003009401,0.0005801103,0.00001908382,0.01512576,0.2111558,0.07158083,0.01218274,0.663588,0.001064404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847117,0.0001614576,0.00008523503,0.01002915,0.0007267386,0.0004901105,0.00003890431,0.00003689878,0.003719796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8761798,0.0005250017,0.1055794,0.001453079,0.004888275,0.0002325266,0.00003159889,0.0001314522,0.0109789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4666807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6838619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232072773","doi":"10.1090/fic/034/03","title":"The Monte-Carlo method for filtering with discrete-time observations: Central limit theorems","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Monte Carlo method; Limit (mathematics); Central limit theorem; Statistical physics; Discrete time and continuous time; Mathematics; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Physics; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2972689683950304,"gpt":0.4015078921668641,"spread":0.1042389237718337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007197861,0.0003141859,0.0003891285,0.0002417877,0.0004486309,0.001095741,0.001322736,0.0001608384,0.01018925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003051807,0.0001433985,0.0002228998,0.0006224271,0.0001454705,0.0001810974,0.0000775502,0.0001258333,0.0003194211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006472414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008846707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001278551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001236193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949687,0.0003897961,0.0006243921,0.0008155678,0.002683258,0.0005183185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951101,0.002560292,0.0005627342,0.001185209,0.0004613214,0.0001203362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003282971,0.00001684447,0.0001060553,0.000003987937,0.00006248141,2.44563e-7,0.0001798597,0.0006169102,0.00008164926,0.002654404,0.9704996,0.0257451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004293977,0.00006560627,0.0001914941,0.00007062723,0.00006381415,9.100654e-7,0.0003954675,0.1353073,0.00005951762,0.004169506,0.8589768,0.0002695341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002467926,0.0004737146,0.4260025,0.002573071,0.001468488,0.002079133,0.00009931446,0.0001913025,0.5670878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001479771,0.00002638046,0.06060886,0.000146494,0.0003608929,0.0001656678,0.0000253579,0.0001312135,0.9383872],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3712994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784211962","doi":"10.1088/1681-7575/aaa677","title":"Establishing comparability and compatibility in the purity assessment of high purity zinc as demonstrated by the CCQM-P149 intercomparison","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Comparability; Compatibility (geochemistry); Environmental science; Materials science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2107030289625397,"gpt":0.454859842748455,"spread":0.2441568137859152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0543745,0.0001814361,0.0004884199,0.0001593463,0.000381005,0.0005522365,0.00152668,0.0001054556,0.0004471466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008739221,0.00008975832,0.00008258293,0.001478232,0.00145303,0.0003982672,0.0002236527,0.0004194599,0.00001872472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001245772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001297473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003273292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005765369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912241,0.004216957,0.001119365,0.0007307411,0.002382998,0.0003259057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928231,0.004572723,0.0005352834,0.001206434,0.0007942885,0.00006817593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009470154,0.000360091,0.9791524,0.000004811327,0.00001447426,3.577362e-7,0.001068895,0.00005546278,0.001622041,0.001795739,0.009007683,0.006823321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005233345,0.0002632062,0.9238532,0.000007269492,0.00002314694,0.000001831212,0.002262531,0.03661396,0.001235415,0.03460563,0.0005125033,0.00009803735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989425,0.00008939823,0.003759968,0.002531455,0.0004911672,0.0006452447,0.00002158216,0.00002003894,0.003016157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990466,0.000001547891,0.0006221284,0.0002289194,0.00003762786,0.00001997304,0.00001365656,0.000003004571,0.00002650139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05529929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036280319","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/43/1/013","title":"Pair-difference chi-squared statistics for Key Comparisons","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Chi-square test; Key (lock); Mathematics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4047697023176953,"gpt":0.4460307228827394,"spread":0.04126102056504405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007963375,0.0001436096,0.0003023806,0.0002644015,0.000275849,0.000282399,0.0007301928,0.00008025503,0.001306026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009418057,0.00009988759,0.00009872064,0.0005610724,0.0001229159,0.0001276399,0.00005560014,0.0001035077,0.000615892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008161096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008581937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001354678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000306355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964855,0.0002902557,0.0006425594,0.0005294859,0.001690077,0.0003621365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966874,0.001648636,0.0002810424,0.0005581473,0.0007151621,0.0001095857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001297112,0.0001582854,0.05727439,0.000003181505,0.00002433968,4.258411e-7,0.0003485065,0.001513671,0.002771456,0.01289111,0.7934259,0.1314591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001523251,0.0003676919,0.1935577,0.000005471637,0.00005884951,0.000001183436,0.0003869324,0.4268711,0.00226978,0.02879377,0.3458443,0.0003199969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1553129,0.0001164786,0.8378757,0.002733541,0.001395885,0.000474599,0.0001526812,0.00007627297,0.001861901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.901038,0.000001121072,0.09009078,0.0004078132,0.0001618574,0.00004811791,0.00004928593,0.000006639346,0.00819638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7477849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944159753","doi":"10.1088/1681-7575/ab1fae","title":"Amount of substance and the mole in the SI","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Avogadro constant; Mole; Constant (computer programming); Value (mathematics); Unit (ring theory); Safeguard; International System of Units; Physics; Mathematics; Thermodynamics; Statistics; Chemistry; Computer science; Law; Organic chemistry; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1588900936447176,"gpt":0.3731112145208528,"spread":0.2142211208761352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02505145,0.00004648015,0.0001407599,0.0000972195,0.000043014,0.00007562304,0.0005755647,0.00002576665,0.0002832576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001812781,0.00001747344,0.00003757685,0.0006992676,0.0001996093,0.00007676659,0.00001934872,0.00007140272,0.00008267155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001139306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001398655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004221492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002320798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975659,0.000625931,0.0002874715,0.0001929086,0.001222807,0.0001050079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973838,0.001881375,0.0001445291,0.0004442816,0.0001366768,0.000009280454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004555957,0.00006144534,0.9108168,0.00000416384,0.00001350226,8.811431e-7,0.00812715,0.0009075318,0.009137649,0.04975745,0.007086901,0.01363088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002179551,0.00009207259,0.9054757,0.00000603696,0.00001315559,0.000001199669,0.004331709,0.01648772,0.001006576,0.06583729,0.004490898,0.00007808846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901583,0.0003401055,0.0002747967,0.001861546,0.000247216,0.0002550459,9.30443e-7,0.000002821556,0.006859231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989027,0.00000533044,0.00006879836,0.0003378946,0.00001015008,0.000007810183,4.308728e-7,0.000001043857,0.0006657851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02323867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8682384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116197003","doi":"10.6028/jres.106.058","title":"Standard Reference Material (SRM 1990) for single crystal diffractometer alignment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences","funders":"National Institute of Standards and Technology; University of Toronto","keywords":"SPHERES; Diffractometer; Crystal (programming language); Materials science; Lattice (music); Single crystal; Mosaicity; Crystal structure; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Physics; Crystallography; Optics; Diffraction; X-ray crystallography; Computer science; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.384941780547424,"gpt":0.5069585859851194,"spread":0.1220168054376954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02047907,0.0000782749,0.0002999245,0.001171098,0.0002157039,0.00009925745,0.0007748089,0.0001112189,0.000161789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01391984,0.0000446585,0.00009452614,0.001134954,0.0009483507,0.0003319332,0.0001809924,0.0001985685,4.741053e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002697078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008143338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005871421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003029052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918379,0.0001359042,0.0008497413,0.0001818764,0.006797381,0.0001971699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863564,0.0004426636,0.000692305,0.0001859417,0.01226968,0.00005303633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004234823,0.000526686,0.004814993,0.00006798856,0.0002183122,0.000006971075,0.0002654429,0.0002687686,0.7983893,0.07233054,0.05091694,0.06795927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002195835,0.001899623,0.001219678,0.0002200638,0.00002793379,0.00008877834,0.0006602196,0.000215558,0.1817457,0.3076752,0.5039396,0.0001117902],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845614,0.0001887489,0.003038992,0.0081883,0.0009226215,0.0003490869,0.0005504088,0.000004760962,0.002195652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979939,0.00006361278,0.001541024,0.00001150272,0.00008828038,0.000004425272,0.000002187634,0.000003552997,0.0002914636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6166435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178280532","doi":"10.1159/000398375","title":"Evaluation of Synthesized Standard 12 Leads and Frank Vector Leads1","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in cardiology","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cardiology; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3396266098579384,"gpt":0.4666079538976336,"spread":0.1269813440396952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0413567,0.0001040913,0.0004677829,0.0002699831,0.00004097332,0.00002923825,0.0002839901,0.00008343259,0.000109164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02323263,0.00007763266,0.00006116225,0.0004106723,0.0002840424,0.0004082797,0.00005120653,0.00008087276,0.00002739772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001310279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002800123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009069588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002061534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938658,0.001798133,0.0005845946,0.0004495964,0.003104235,0.0001975741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964942,0.00117624,0.0002363068,0.0003993317,0.001624969,0.00006896326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005813451,0.00002158753,0.2772819,0.000008711675,0.0000392501,0.000003396355,0.001189241,0.04314765,0.003809348,0.002000469,0.003418244,0.6684989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01278771,0.001192858,0.1913532,0.0001201765,0.0004243258,0.0000406207,0.006136598,0.05483956,0.009431022,0.6046355,0.1182146,0.0008237065],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9430547,0.01434396,0.007965826,0.0003576184,0.002595748,0.0005509213,0.0000162202,0.00001950361,0.03109553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990675,0.0001211354,0.0005872355,0.00002266677,0.00008845863,0.00002828169,0.000003131182,0.000004522934,0.00007700609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6676752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754455648","doi":"10.1016/j.measurement.2017.09.008","title":"Naturalness and convention in the International System of Units☆","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Measurement","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Naturalness; Convention; Set (abstract data type); Metric (unit); Units of measurement; Mathematics; Law; Computer science; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Operations management; Programming language; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5576272019770802,"gpt":0.4293873840767105,"spread":0.1282398179003696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02645583,0.00006140518,0.0001151667,0.0001402899,0.0002317581,0.0004382964,0.001046135,0.00002688304,0.00005671597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004552151,0.00003513586,0.00003018588,0.0001608074,0.00008815802,0.000234732,0.00006882666,0.00006040313,0.00001598579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008447973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006298789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001024012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004814222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949613,0.0002484518,0.0004168716,0.0002238443,0.004055044,0.00009452955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976584,0.00009964472,0.0003814421,0.000562536,0.00127659,0.00002144161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003472862,0.0003143659,0.5442483,0.0001016559,0.0001176475,0.00001214009,0.009779801,0.0002331858,0.05900586,0.09426851,0.0289144,0.2626568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00183295,0.00005342325,0.9441855,0.000249625,0.00002936893,0.000006449389,0.01074209,0.01191727,0.007880718,0.006241065,0.01669813,0.000163401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640315,0.0002059804,0.0009465208,0.003726165,0.003039028,0.0004631135,0.000004870502,0.000009224715,0.02757364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996547,0.000001752166,0.00002626856,0.00003122444,0.00004258939,0.00001230312,0.000001610565,0.000001716705,0.0002278126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3999372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9169115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044846198","doi":"10.1016/j.cam.2005.04.041","title":"Extending chi-squared statistics for key comparisons in metrology","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Metrology; Mathematics; Statistics; Statistic; Monte Carlo method; Statistical hypothesis testing; Test statistic; Key (lock); Null hypothesis; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2122891661237735,"gpt":0.4189385513864782,"spread":0.2066493852627047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005094339,0.00008517872,0.0003235624,0.0003692779,0.00009353839,0.0001258843,0.0002015002,0.00003528485,0.00007678873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009404219,0.0000613243,0.00005073981,0.000246665,0.00005446906,0.0001139993,0.00002271933,0.00009148833,0.00001163085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004041292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008487375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.482043e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009939396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975412,0.00003710289,0.001059877,0.0001300424,0.001101506,0.0001302006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964337,0.002178649,0.0007228179,0.0000744603,0.0005239314,0.00006649318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001534438,0.0004173034,0.0005849467,0.00003438198,0.0000489959,0.000001216913,0.003001471,0.3624165,0.000680031,0.5253522,0.02611045,0.08119903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001265039,0.00006863161,0.003394014,0.00001767305,0.00002608481,0.00001822646,0.0008497568,0.4658765,0.00009028323,0.5223694,0.005941529,0.00008278758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1066622,0.0000668135,0.8916517,0.0007142258,0.0001479288,0.0001705701,0.00001392744,0.000003305042,0.0005692224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4812365,0.000001967714,0.5185283,0.0000694987,0.000083065,0.000003236758,0.000004131159,0.000003408043,0.00006988762],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3745742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2500733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W92155701","doi":"10.5006/c2003-03104","title":"NACE TM0177 Method D Test Procedure (DCB) Learnings from Comparative Laboratory Testing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Shell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Materials science; Engineering; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4744512159995602,"gpt":0.4780438009458188,"spread":0.003592584946258526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01379659,0.0002015851,0.000340424,0.0002101848,0.000438283,0.000583019,0.0005513757,0.0000884059,0.00469061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06416082,0.0001414796,0.00006719057,0.002363696,0.00009572811,0.0005030248,0.00004749804,0.0002212502,0.001697651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007272392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004565508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007593864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001583137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944537,0.0009697116,0.0006706803,0.0008774028,0.002704861,0.0003236553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987873,0.008281251,0.0004742582,0.0006074252,0.002575278,0.000188803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004288886,0.0003532998,0.3313819,0.000007581796,0.00005823782,0.000006044493,0.01063806,0.004339525,0.2064526,0.004448562,0.4229492,0.01932198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003047,0.0004577891,0.1128923,0.0001397625,0.0001389717,0.00001025664,0.05126097,0.2045222,0.2241856,0.0754538,0.3262192,0.00167208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6728809,0.0004443621,0.07977853,0.0009722249,0.001342766,0.0009005364,0.00003778267,0.0003003121,0.2433426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.876619,4.889379e-7,0.1058939,0.0004441764,0.00008749239,0.00002154627,0.00000842352,0.00001108963,0.01691392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2264287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907447734","doi":"10.1002/andp.201800308","title":"The Planck Constant for the Definition and Realization of the Kilogram","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annalen der Physik","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"Royal Society","keywords":"Avogadro constant; Kilogram; International System of Units; Planck constant; Planck mass; Constant (computer programming); Physics; Planck; Planck energy; Realization (probability); Theoretical physics; Context (archaeology); Traceability; Planck length; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Metrology; Planck scale","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3964615511924337,"gpt":0.4305837106098832,"spread":0.0341221594174495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003780287,0.00005741995,0.0000726982,0.00002608129,0.0007579537,0.0001761763,0.0003685123,0.00002283622,0.0000338723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001582275,0.00002202521,0.00006067828,0.0003613231,0.0004846008,0.0001022395,0.00004382069,0.00003196072,0.00001536746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006755552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005394308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001823586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002884966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984264,0.000164944,0.0002615381,0.0001759789,0.0008530582,0.000118085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712,0.00142193,0.0002289694,0.0004152692,0.0007961389,0.00001772355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002959862,0.00008054719,0.01538184,0.00001132497,0.0001024019,6.512942e-8,0.004865482,0.00008173811,0.007068091,0.3541053,0.3879387,0.2300685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004556697,0.0001167082,0.05457872,0.00002657896,0.00006363526,0.000001518418,0.001755271,0.01105377,0.004221495,0.8600093,0.06762512,0.00009227311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7749603,0.003149483,0.08720555,0.04140744,0.009818271,0.00621322,0.000178386,0.0000961866,0.07697121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988931,0.00001734709,0.00003916883,0.0002884408,0.0001342349,0.00002482136,0.000004041449,0.000003036513,0.0005958509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5059039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5829644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998651636","doi":"10.1109/iss46986.2019.8943759","title":"SkyNaute by Safran – How the HRG technological breakthrough benefits to a disruptive IRS (Inertial Reference System) for commercial aircraft","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Safran Electronics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Avionics; Aerospace; Engineering; Inertial navigation system; Aeronautics; Certification; Telecommunications; Manufacturing engineering; Aerospace engineering; Inertial frame of reference","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2363569521541931,"gpt":0.383923962197586,"spread":0.1475670100433928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007562956,0.0002411182,0.000396571,0.0001748879,0.0004659828,0.0006781161,0.001655691,0.000185982,0.0005491659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003170761,0.0001223723,0.0001686898,0.001095899,0.0001715762,0.000338723,0.0002318714,0.0001704682,0.001017886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000150388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008850882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008710118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004862084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950243,0.0002975238,0.0005904032,0.0009422301,0.002658295,0.0004872218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996165,0.001532984,0.0002364485,0.001006106,0.0009224601,0.0001370076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007950529,0.0002265952,0.006822638,0.00002370026,0.00007364347,0.000001130456,0.001967781,0.0007763415,0.03398199,0.07949685,0.5707032,0.3051311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00582163,0.002014868,0.03453106,0.0002699269,0.000187002,0.00002147672,0.03149095,0.04364254,0.03507274,0.008984123,0.8360893,0.001874401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.857473,0.0001243853,0.06037043,0.05481591,0.002999545,0.004716616,0.0002963115,0.0003315295,0.01887225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986188,0.000001359889,0.0008891485,0.0005761479,0.00009764354,0.0001887787,0.00002956028,0.00001107222,0.01201828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3032567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783281660","doi":"10.1016/j.measurement.2018.01.006","title":"Online monitoring and failure detection of capacitive displacement sensor in a Capball device using fractal analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Measurement","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fractal dimension; Capacitive sensing; Fractal; Fractal analysis; SIGNAL (programming language); Displacement (psychology); Acoustics; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Electrical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3279598007365069,"gpt":0.4166606284401547,"spread":0.08870082770364779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009789888,0.0001567763,0.0003351311,0.0008494615,0.0001625403,0.0001110142,0.0001997724,0.00006396755,0.0001336695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001894917,0.0001259819,0.0001003532,0.00205454,0.0001225031,0.0002407349,0.00005628185,0.00009926077,0.00001116273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003976198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008545452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007013684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008987983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942987,0.0003998746,0.0007771364,0.0005503694,0.00372031,0.0002536415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970782,0.0001238787,0.000379485,0.0003661789,0.001961654,0.0000906159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001248031,0.0002146795,0.1943272,0.00001260339,0.0002170577,0.000001455221,0.003536586,0.001508062,0.785458,0.000006807408,0.00002492111,0.01456776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001378355,0.0002488853,0.5612433,0.0001647748,0.0005650386,0.000002418908,0.01282402,0.1118813,0.3104347,0.0003217132,0.0005839947,0.000351598],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.978316,0.0001124212,0.02060918,0.0001153107,0.0004047405,0.0003092621,0.00001028779,0.00000887229,0.0001139002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981129,0.000002196868,0.001691949,0.00001043074,0.0001167994,0.000007489419,0.000002502328,0.000005592144,0.00005015263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4750234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5137393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024563037","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/42/4/009","title":"Chi-squared statistics for KCRV candidates","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2712477366672402,"gpt":0.4453079924905485,"spread":0.1740602558233084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008267698,0.0001071501,0.0002044441,0.000259363,0.0002072825,0.000255567,0.0005242474,0.00006116988,0.002037003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01011129,0.00007232086,0.00007387093,0.0004906453,0.0000804501,0.0001716868,0.00003743797,0.0000604726,0.0007939046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007606274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007505697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001555458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003634372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972583,0.0001653122,0.0004947186,0.0004221245,0.001367003,0.000292511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975961,0.001098225,0.0002016692,0.0004254068,0.0005986249,0.00008001721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001789654,0.00008632198,0.02998421,0.000003117774,0.00002987577,6.499387e-7,0.0003357972,0.00143284,0.004258655,0.01219731,0.7029286,0.2485637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00215627,0.0004421959,0.05124221,0.000004951067,0.00007415739,0.000001934524,0.0003917917,0.2939406,0.00805174,0.09231425,0.5509933,0.000386592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2704552,0.0002628035,0.7156243,0.003618696,0.002028739,0.0008022391,0.0003064491,0.0001053768,0.006796234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382088,0.000001908358,0.05249793,0.00047727,0.0002332806,0.00004329732,0.00005820269,0.000006639752,0.008472709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6677536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970544242","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/42/1/004","title":"Outlier rejection for the weighted-mean KCRV","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Outlier; Mathematics; Logarithm; Statistics; Range (aeronautics); Probability density function; Gaussian; Standard deviation; Pattern recognition (psychology); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2635543440774604,"gpt":0.4227797890914541,"spread":0.1592254450139937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01620475,0.00009788739,0.000143138,0.000216781,0.0004393653,0.0002814266,0.0006504878,0.0000690303,0.001484059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004153539,0.00004886775,0.0001408513,0.0007365235,0.00009335069,0.0002167823,0.00004153944,0.0000922483,0.0008380918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008353775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004067574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001510073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003100716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972118,0.0002200957,0.0004258945,0.0004155414,0.001477969,0.000248757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969876,0.00164758,0.0001913434,0.0005956659,0.0005321429,0.00004562191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001693351,0.00006943866,0.01301271,0.000001043431,0.00003884409,1.805937e-7,0.000590655,0.001584218,0.003768552,0.00463542,0.4141726,0.561957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007633726,0.0001436028,0.03088927,0.000001847109,0.00005332934,0.000001500992,0.0006240511,0.1490012,0.003275979,0.02048271,0.7946228,0.0001402388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4721422,0.000924471,0.4474831,0.04190609,0.008043836,0.00196286,0.00002067166,0.0002324435,0.02728423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823416,0.000003482693,0.003074812,0.0009499225,0.0005290465,0.00006430701,0.000004794194,0.000005823922,0.01302623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5618168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38305253","doi":"10.5006/c2008-08108","title":"Interpreting and Using the NACE Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) Test","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Shell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Cantilever; Materials science; Beam (structure); Composite material; Structural engineering; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4708127666136232,"gpt":0.4359300281589887,"spread":0.03488273845463452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005375826,0.00008231957,0.0001094812,0.0001010184,0.0006011914,0.0002789659,0.0003540118,0.00003000071,0.001083263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002360414,0.00004244245,0.00004084762,0.0005044441,0.0001792279,0.0002858253,0.0001099473,0.00007214771,0.000089887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003084174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009252922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002852268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001932327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976198,0.00007549984,0.000331405,0.0003337625,0.001461249,0.0001782781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981689,0.0009359519,0.0001210971,0.0003566876,0.0003595631,0.00005779919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001222301,0.0001217645,0.6599693,0.000005284061,0.00003198159,0.00001019747,0.01532244,0.002642243,0.1048278,0.001522598,0.1913594,0.02406469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002915332,0.0001494141,0.08552477,0.0001044054,0.00007245249,0.0002488915,0.01604016,0.744032,0.07008448,0.007529087,0.07242943,0.0008696276],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760844,0.00008585126,0.005134289,0.0008293133,0.0005364775,0.0001814483,0.000001077247,0.00002323418,0.01712395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881635,0.000003162645,0.0007007407,0.0002949658,0.00005384387,0.000002324063,5.471907e-7,0.000003859695,0.01077706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7413897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024442437","doi":"10.1198/tech.2010.09037","title":"Leveraged Gauge R&amp;R Studies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technometrics","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Repeatability; Estimator; Operator (biology); Mathematics; Standard deviation; Statistics; Gauge (firearms); Baseline (sea); Set (abstract data type); Sample size determination; Sample (material); Multiple; Integer (computer science); Computer science; Arithmetic; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7407194595640327,"gpt":0.554925390716464,"spread":0.1857940688475688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01513155,0.0001245773,0.0002311431,0.002351688,0.0002857284,0.0002757955,0.001003569,0.0001033314,0.00153052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06978033,0.0000867657,0.00009666758,0.01001325,0.0001728074,0.0002572974,0.0001606134,0.000301208,0.00186394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000501339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005950961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007312047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001779543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954278,0.0000611815,0.00054039,0.0004919378,0.003220469,0.0002581682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960096,0.001328669,0.0002327678,0.001054072,0.001284521,0.00009029383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001737619,0.000163836,0.04772449,0.000007398646,0.00004117003,0.000002941991,0.0007033024,0.00002793843,0.05673127,0.02186606,0.3215461,0.5511681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000603726,0.00005439296,0.0234976,0.000007610618,0.00002974453,0.000005680567,0.0009477012,0.0008227438,0.008493121,0.275007,0.6901308,0.000399904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979636,0.0004646895,0.005816921,0.001029678,0.003581283,0.0002560179,0.000009872081,0.0002066807,0.008998925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823562,0.00001410041,0.005630562,0.0001058186,0.0001127275,0.0000142235,0.000004979619,0.000007666735,0.01175375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5507681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036862731","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/50/5/433","title":"The NRC autocollimator calibration facility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Calibration; Rotary encoder; Traceability; Bar (unit); Rotation (mathematics); Physics; Table (database); Optics; Computer science; Encoder; Computer vision","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2363763575978222,"gpt":0.3928748649182915,"spread":0.1564985073204693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01748128,0.00008635487,0.000124734,0.00009714351,0.0005289557,0.0009635797,0.0006989073,0.00005926182,0.003550614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01593654,0.00004104722,0.00008000222,0.0007010227,0.0001537861,0.0004056977,0.00006845083,0.00008649502,0.003492656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008559098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008548008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006311271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001007758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956173,0.0005874785,0.0004903629,0.0003515764,0.002707268,0.0002460421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968525,0.001271481,0.0001849161,0.000664652,0.0009556718,0.00007073449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004376244,0.00005627554,0.08269133,0.000001442547,0.0000217704,4.067421e-7,0.0002896537,0.0004892813,0.0135514,0.005719671,0.6853495,0.2117855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006135059,0.0001531616,0.4206145,0.000002000074,0.00001632938,0.000001247386,0.001126817,0.2356028,0.003934642,0.1530047,0.1846769,0.0002533787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9250165,0.0001189263,0.04173792,0.0126076,0.002335935,0.001917847,0.00001253023,0.0001454052,0.01610728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933624,0.000001018417,0.0003543645,0.0002601543,0.00004462574,0.0001957327,0.000003963773,0.000001928968,0.005775788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5006726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086736527","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/41/1a/07002","title":"Final Report on CIPM key comparison of 1 kg standards in stainless steel (CCM.M-K1)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrologia","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Metrology; Standard uncertainty; Mutual recognition; Environmental science; Kilogram; Nuclear engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Measurement uncertainty; Statistics; Body weight; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3825062888995991,"gpt":0.4863375655327094,"spread":0.1038312766331103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0270397,0.0001632353,0.0005296327,0.0007487426,0.0001094054,0.0001236919,0.0006765728,0.0001205149,0.0006194136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01359085,0.0001160812,0.0001247745,0.001542951,0.0001810974,0.0001707016,0.00008055542,0.000224463,0.00007542513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004268422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004661928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001164798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007540649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919547,0.0004390019,0.001347255,0.0006663215,0.005245521,0.0003472132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967587,0.0005792062,0.0006622166,0.0008188327,0.001099464,0.00008156695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001479149,0.00111118,0.833137,0.00001706655,0.00004595688,0.0001167474,0.002426516,0.08372297,0.009350707,0.01063639,0.01974887,0.03820744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006417121,0.002110975,0.8590933,0.0001076135,0.00005292563,0.00001309297,0.00423009,0.007188506,0.03425499,0.06538681,0.02058293,0.0005616399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796988,0.0001004378,0.00831484,0.0007349474,0.0008657447,0.0002927416,0.00002531366,0.00002616367,0.00994106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978732,0.000001289227,0.001097027,0.00008286459,0.00003999815,0.00001310334,0.00001227287,0.000006144672,0.0008740328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07653446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964921331","doi":"10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.106594","title":"The Planck constant and its units","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Planck constant; Measure (data warehouse); Physics; Planck; Hertz; Unit (ring theory); Constant (computer programming); Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Quantum mechanics; Statistics; Computer science; Quantum","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1962208158346819,"gpt":0.4106376523536733,"spread":0.2144168365189913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007042712,0.0001279433,0.000313625,0.0002037266,0.0003003987,0.0002737379,0.000239891,0.00004036395,0.0001954574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001240436,0.00006412261,0.00006274468,0.0005531895,0.0002355954,0.0004739422,0.00001153698,0.0002269723,0.00003630345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003084545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001879541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000017948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002842147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971794,0.0005238975,0.000631913,0.0002179732,0.001248322,0.0001984398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954461,0.002966036,0.0002231815,0.0001099848,0.001138665,0.0001160287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002079351,0.00007092041,0.03293831,0.00001690887,0.0002853947,0.00001208645,0.0156114,0.0002028114,0.1770692,0.7635224,0.003723799,0.004467359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014233,0.010234,0.28941,0.0005252783,0.0003987878,0.0001986027,0.08001969,0.02608164,0.1255889,0.4099002,0.04218711,0.001222792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814704,0.006079938,0.004706378,0.002190099,0.000810676,0.0002872842,0.00001965217,0.000003507438,0.004432044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984826,0.0005548593,0.0002989644,0.0000947501,0.00004709485,0.000001151758,5.432765e-7,0.000005132605,0.0005148867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3536223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2639661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998067020","doi":"10.1109/tim.2012.2225957","title":"Elimination of Mass-Exchange Errors in the NRC Watt Balance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"Division of Physics; Natural Resources Canada; Durham University","keywords":"Planck constant; Balance (ability); Beam (structure); Watt; Physics; Mathematics; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Electrical engineering; Nuclear engineering; Engineering; Chemistry; Thermodynamics; Optics; Power (physics); Quantum mechanics; Chromatography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2750735200258054,"gpt":0.3860430061575523,"spread":0.110969486131747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01359605,0.0001235628,0.0001508638,0.0003980078,0.0001822573,0.00007913583,0.0002210506,0.00004919828,0.0003903128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001858659,0.00008313769,0.00006657558,0.000700808,0.00007529558,0.0004914616,9.997689e-7,0.0001105194,0.00004128739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002010373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005549154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004140999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000241197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943135,0.0004577378,0.000589943,0.0002510461,0.004165082,0.000222703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987259,0.000161677,0.0002228849,0.0002820363,0.0005393025,0.00006817922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003065078,0.001116075,0.01343863,0.00005294589,0.00005634101,4.473171e-7,0.02743345,0.002787971,0.07700597,0.001456907,0.003035834,0.8733089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01038631,0.001106093,0.3859627,0.0003523889,0.00033721,0.00001856493,0.06619874,0.02478604,0.4824863,0.006958493,0.02024451,0.001162693],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7005299,0.0001954759,0.28172,0.003992023,0.003566029,0.001455325,0.00002211859,0.00003279927,0.00848633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990575,0.00004157732,0.0003959541,0.0002355523,0.00003120227,0.00008562484,0.000002425038,0.000005085855,0.0001450564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8721462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4712146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083106747","doi":"10.1116/1.1599870","title":"Vacuum science and technology: 1950–2003","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute for Microstructural Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Ultra-high vacuum; Technology development; Science, technology and society; Gauge (firearms); Engineering physics; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Nanotechnology; Materials science; Sociology; Social science; Manufacturing engineering; Metallurgy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08138747609556597,"gpt":0.365675792828666,"spread":0.2842883167331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04096209,0.0004061329,0.0008034047,0.007955089,0.002128695,0.001155092,0.003226462,0.0003804226,0.0002226544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01751524,0.0002801335,0.00008538726,0.03008359,0.009431954,0.002510691,0.0005837042,0.0008180803,0.00004844059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001916342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002838408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005142049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001236164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899681,0.0001672879,0.001622985,0.001385881,0.005672524,0.001183223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877206,0.0003073055,0.00140225,0.001098802,0.008982042,0.0004889764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006568136,0.0002477712,0.1274572,0.00001278542,0.00004237005,0.00005102011,0.0009090821,0.0000510906,0.7865727,0.05016533,0.005993369,0.02843163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005260527,0.003215225,0.04525223,0.0003641818,0.0002861848,0.003690821,0.03351743,0.01746941,0.4290622,0.373976,0.08576655,0.00213925],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836909,0.003140679,0.0008604334,0.00815744,0.002113898,0.0003774505,0.00000637218,0.00008588578,0.001566917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879056,0.0002755867,0.01082003,0.0001551046,0.00002779546,0.000008018857,2.100579e-7,0.00001416699,0.0007935024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3575105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}