{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":994,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":994,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"5bd69d8377a0","filters":{"topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues"}},"results":[{"id":"W1481292239","doi":"","title":"Markets in Higher Education. Rhetoric or Reality","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Education policy; Equity (law); Education economics; Transparency (behavior); Comparative education; Higher education policy; Competition (biology); Economics; Political science; Business; Market economy; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05234581556279271,"gpt":0.2785997936732107,"spread":0.226253978110418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001631589,0.0002327996,0.0002594494,0.000381811,0.00004852479,0.000243046,0.0002150112,0.0002216468,0.03867854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004458538,0.0001833929,0.00006673919,0.0002548891,0.00002647539,0.0005660587,0.00007958307,0.0002211703,0.001648422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004433753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008094098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002523354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001138932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989492,0.000006136324,0.0003221777,0.0003102284,0.000233677,0.0001785733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992821,0.00002296849,0.0002878945,0.0002758281,0.0001200352,0.0000111457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002300746,0.00007655277,0.0001506706,0.0002464104,0.000007840837,0.000005662935,0.00001105281,0.000002022876,1.580809e-7,0.4520614,0.5448965,0.00251871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002200586,0.000001664401,0.01150292,0.0001837491,0.00002000388,3.425387e-7,0.00001112032,0.000003567226,2.172452e-7,0.01819708,0.9695985,0.0002607358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002005462,0.0002444711,0.000005098521,0.002307596,0.001723447,0.0002692378,0.000001494884,0.0001581578,0.9952704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00885808,0.00001984961,0.00005975788,0.004705267,0.003975377,0.00002762195,0.0002116884,0.00003831773,0.9821041],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4338643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604645948","doi":"","title":"BEPS and the New International Tax Order","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Base erosion and profit shifting; Multinational corporation; Tax avoidance; Order (exchange); Status quo; Optimism; Pessimism; Tax policy; Tax reform; Public economics; Political science; Economics; World order; Business; Law and economics; Market economy; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01092342636639524,"gpt":0.2290389628522617,"spread":0.2181155364858664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001784567,0.00008951154,0.00009081001,0.00004152203,0.0001223283,0.0003761432,0.0002017574,0.00003317419,0.003503719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002622787,0.00004665919,0.00003303531,0.000107447,0.00009850333,0.000922269,0.0001169054,0.00006810841,0.001685546],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001005089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00462623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001324836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994105,0.000008612245,0.0001320224,0.0001516264,0.0001734945,0.0001238128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995974,0.00004676684,0.0001042325,0.0001447495,0.00008857747,0.00001823542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004634319,0.00001009831,0.004168026,0.000005173424,0.00001976798,0.000001657237,0.00002872517,0.000001056524,0.0001648035,0.9145637,0.07370079,0.007289918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001447331,0.000001609584,0.003580869,0.00002130023,0.00001139895,8.816316e-7,0.00003870001,0.00005422515,0.00004826004,0.01232714,0.9823786,0.0000896726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1078399,0.000703201,0.002979749,0.1771512,0.002477222,0.0004951206,0.000007803684,0.0003573528,0.7079884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444236,0.00002306812,0.0002180831,0.01073916,0.002220541,0.000008818442,0.000004935433,0.00001263,0.04234913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9086778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197630712","doi":"10.1017/9781108909037","title":"The Constitutional Boundaries of European Fiscal Federalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fiscal federalism; Federalism; Constitutionalism; European union; Political science; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Structuring; Constitutional economics; European integration; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Economic policy; Decentralization; Politics; Democracy; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01889355436729448,"gpt":0.1915604166031031,"spread":0.1726668622358086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000204704,0.0001931026,0.0002077276,0.000119776,0.001609086,0.0005132374,0.000557739,0.00006636891,0.00004823484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003788922,0.0001801999,0.0001585527,0.0000210226,0.001631593,0.000223541,0.0006827917,0.0003382922,0.00003007906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001005492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001940103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005506687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001199531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990329,0.00004275652,0.0001830311,0.0002310471,0.000337715,0.0001726173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990673,0.00005995297,0.0004392873,0.0002677281,0.0001515589,0.00001413813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000353931,0.000005206497,0.000006474535,0.00004653671,0.00004092496,0.00004021447,0.00001569903,0.000002526872,0.000002037839,0.6200573,0.379573,0.0001745662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003107674,0.000005108561,0.00009554008,0.00003554358,0.00009813065,0.000002416485,0.0001162091,0.0000277127,0.000004407671,0.00003229264,0.9990737,0.0001982093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006555537,0.0001414096,0.00009465562,0.0001107994,0.0006857917,0.0002038133,0.0001005566,0.0001015043,0.9984959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009516405,0.00001082368,0.000007657923,0.0002968519,0.0006493143,6.071205e-7,0.0002233687,0.0000185217,0.9892765],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6200251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606301286","doi":"","title":"Policy Forum: Canada's GST and Financial Services--Where Are We Now and Where Could We Be?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Humber College","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Financial services; Goods and services; Public economics; Business; Finance; Political science; Accounting; Economics; Public administration; Economy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02047964735403817,"gpt":0.2792510891041183,"spread":0.2587714417500801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004684596,0.0003554252,0.0005002728,0.0005041838,0.0002843209,0.0007832043,0.0004805738,0.0003822646,0.0001406586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001288814,0.0003326738,0.00006230586,0.0001500245,0.0001787793,0.0004251403,0.001470111,0.0008601775,0.00001098731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004119861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007425681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2163999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9269654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977691,0.00003967071,0.0004347214,0.0007727584,0.0002806541,0.0007030672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987155,0.0001302285,0.0003841869,0.0005160092,0.000174349,0.00007970413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004748511,0.000196185,0.4345067,0.01225588,0.0002216564,0.0002466765,0.000762224,0.0004071401,0.00008305139,0.03279805,0.06258754,0.4554601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005987956,0.00000799912,0.01527682,0.0009557228,0.000008910597,0.000002439771,0.001393994,0.00114648,0.000004285072,0.003315924,0.9768761,0.0004125598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4615248,0.005777059,0.000003544933,0.2681882,0.001347379,0.002170762,0.0004834518,0.000174797,0.26033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9295442,0.05600026,0.00005738516,0.002302857,0.002610862,0.0001195654,0.00005809926,0.00009901614,0.009207735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9142885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605792799","doi":"","title":"Inter-Nation Equity: The Development of an Important but Underappreciated International Tax Value","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Economic inequality; Income tax; Scholarship; Gross income; Economics; Political science; Public economics; Income distribution; Inequality; International taxation; Law and economics; State income tax; Development economics; Tax reform; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04065529874111624,"gpt":0.2737992370484288,"spread":0.2331439383073126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004544043,0.0001360676,0.0001411765,0.0001126949,0.0002831635,0.000188717,0.0004096682,0.00005694879,0.000653579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001277959,0.0001046562,0.00005493718,0.000221246,0.00007522773,0.001118841,0.0001964853,0.0001421286,0.0001526945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006093617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007233449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002779123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003035466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987053,0.00001963304,0.0004742555,0.0002068819,0.0004227041,0.0001712792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991187,0.00002234878,0.0004033822,0.0002062016,0.000228333,0.00002106764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002157105,0.0007945295,0.04589315,0.0001055028,0.0003334426,0.00003216568,0.001919043,0.0003760551,0.008487955,0.9110982,0.008408039,0.02233625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009501764,0.00001723201,0.04296085,0.00006753414,0.00002842862,0.000005872138,0.0008436312,0.004172239,0.003614588,0.003687763,0.9433025,0.000349239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9259003,0.00005742306,0.001359724,0.0009849556,0.0008214487,0.0002396095,0.000005309429,0.000135872,0.07049537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951681,0.000007084754,0.001030426,0.001484518,0.0005991571,0.00001774611,0.0001132398,0.00001664858,0.001563005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9348944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7156231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199856688","doi":"","title":"Effective Tax Levels using the Devereux/Griffith Methodology : Project for the EU Commission TAXUD/2008/CC/099, Final Report 2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"MADOC (University of Mannheim)","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2505660580864241,"gpt":0.3348731239128989,"spread":0.08430706582647479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002314628,0.0003748596,0.0005748176,0.0002990228,0.0009717435,0.0001380093,0.0009955682,0.0003441041,0.0003467203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003673708,0.0002769179,0.0003707384,0.0003336586,0.0003045456,0.0007277663,0.001564709,0.0006633221,0.00003773348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009317717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001214715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01593695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001136214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981741,0.0002364707,0.0002973356,0.0005008849,0.0003647588,0.0004263972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966527,0.0006012729,0.001507224,0.0007466223,0.0004688135,0.00002337442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004365697,0.002618471,0.01139605,0.00771536,0.004454498,0.0004442818,0.01672345,0.006078499,0.001861209,0.07932068,0.7304223,0.1345996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001251961,0.00001828128,0.02959187,0.0001922352,0.0009327052,0.00002545646,0.003175969,0.004501897,0.00005949278,0.001111596,0.9587007,0.0004378488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2121608,0.005475714,0.6940464,0.02309113,0.007545423,0.0145439,0.0003497208,0.0006619485,0.04212502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584981,0.00004514079,0.02134023,0.0006655958,0.00216819,0.00002346856,0.0001817047,0.00007704346,0.0170005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7463374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W655056125","doi":"","title":"Representative Bureaucracy in Action: Country Profiles from the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Geography; Public administration; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02617649296993637,"gpt":0.2809351135198553,"spread":0.2547586205499189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000315708,0.0002569195,0.0004782367,0.0001502232,0.0001286632,0.00008688457,0.0002628271,0.0005522735,0.004478208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008605771,0.000174015,0.00003011385,0.000177823,0.001133388,0.0002404891,0.0003363545,0.0008570799,0.0003467203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001720086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008953256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00909542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001237956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984812,0.0001281307,0.000352684,0.0004963133,0.0002572339,0.0002844937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987076,0.0006067534,0.0003445639,0.0002103836,0.00009320562,0.00003748309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002025333,0.0001423457,0.03689076,0.0001591443,0.0002373159,0.0008324388,0.001065751,5.290715e-7,0.000009828537,0.3960709,0.5335655,0.03082296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005871195,0.00002691005,0.03895926,0.00007159905,0.00008043357,0.00004335494,0.0002971208,0.0001682177,7.822526e-7,0.02648607,0.9330638,0.0002153374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02122342,0.007462863,0.0001032365,0.02060889,0.001665492,0.0008132234,0.00001861957,0.0001512731,0.947953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1560839,0.004211076,0.0001457511,0.02559095,0.006738736,0.0002816838,0.001271137,0.000112643,0.8055641],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3994983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564508652","doi":"10.54648/taxi2013018","title":"Tax Treaty Overrides: A Comparative Study of the Monist and the Dualist Approaches","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intertax","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Treaty; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05990491201820707,"gpt":0.2479748635196607,"spread":0.1880699515014536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001060888,0.00009149952,0.0001565069,0.00003016385,0.0001359744,0.0002764291,0.0001861748,0.00001588664,0.000138308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005146264,0.00004178647,0.00004196597,0.0001218559,0.0001841307,0.0003098088,0.0001291741,0.00007230486,0.00005223367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000539975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000273868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03545981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003987388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994972,0.0000305229,0.0001654135,0.0001128286,0.000118386,0.00007559866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994946,0.00005768465,0.0002037268,0.0001844631,0.00005533263,0.00000417308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006093606,0.00224859,0.4660046,0.0002750478,0.0007417631,0.000003657897,0.1105621,0.0001455277,0.0003345433,0.3262482,0.0855732,0.007253385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006607957,0.00008488593,0.6606195,0.000143202,0.0002561274,0.000002899645,0.2115325,0.02029347,0.0004391132,0.004836255,0.09473468,0.0004493778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9495662,0.00004621788,0.000008306757,0.001258606,0.00009031293,0.000546347,0.000001023493,0.00001706126,0.04846593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972922,5.692781e-7,0.000005488235,0.0003957067,0.0001131066,0.0000645518,0.000001219833,0.000005240288,0.002121985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3214119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9709631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1865361933","doi":"10.59403/16sxx9x","title":"What Can Trade Teach Tax? Examining Reform Options for Art. 24 (Non-Discrimination) of the OECD Model","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; International economics; Tax reform; Double taxation; Public economics; Direct tax; Ad valorem tax; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03602288621857019,"gpt":0.2628615610539826,"spread":0.2268386748354124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004838164,0.0001262846,0.0001481629,0.0002655798,0.0004878528,0.0005965115,0.0003094453,0.00004850419,0.0002851576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007726349,0.00008682861,0.0001209573,0.0002001991,0.00006114283,0.001712509,0.00005455572,0.0004987495,0.00001970711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004033016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004964049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009589164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004521253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990498,0.000008300031,0.0003354664,0.0001263302,0.0002677425,0.0002123448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990991,0.00002428564,0.0005436375,0.0001888965,0.0001210584,0.00002296174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001328218,0.0006623748,0.008097864,0.0004315459,0.0002011651,0.000007582266,0.005789286,0.00581783,0.04988348,0.5481347,0.3125274,0.06831392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001703139,0.00002277779,0.03981533,0.0003719671,0.0002313139,0.00003392292,0.00632607,0.07753997,0.001552377,0.01362105,0.8582628,0.0005192715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7098716,0.0002763388,0.01216661,0.07956709,0.01197297,0.001295949,0.00003567922,0.000147567,0.1846661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682426,0.00001135304,0.002697613,0.0009945475,0.001393736,0.00001829473,0.00001197864,0.00002171654,0.02660812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5457354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5752174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21883580","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05219.x","title":"The Council of the European Union and access to documents","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Political science; Public administration; Business; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04913710888739312,"gpt":0.2716610244760678,"spread":0.2225239155886747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002580069,0.00009394568,0.0001107675,0.000009812808,0.0002244849,0.0003385504,0.000505876,0.000004370675,0.00008368537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001895356,0.00004847477,0.00004476177,0.0002155324,0.0000568804,0.0005091729,0.00043295,0.00006491537,0.0007851406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002400302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001169779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002574118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000308811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990125,0.0002372188,0.00024915,0.0001302988,0.0002613906,0.0001093822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993005,0.00001750745,0.0002195318,0.0003055534,0.0001458094,0.0000111296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005979269,0.0000526144,0.001146304,0.001455144,0.0000298415,0.000004879507,0.0001999891,0.00001223687,0.00008774555,0.2311248,0.2146963,0.5511842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000863952,0.000001984425,0.011186,0.0007774702,0.00002579302,6.010314e-7,0.000003900837,0.000002687034,0.00000584991,0.00002429702,0.9878188,0.00006622588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002314344,0.01422404,0.00001312148,0.009892772,0.0001561759,0.0003543748,7.171465e-7,0.00003932141,0.9730051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95844,0.00378564,0.00002251326,0.03123461,0.0007165644,0.000002738808,0.000002065983,0.00002985356,0.005766027],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9672391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W625838625","doi":"10.5771/9783845232195","title":"Reconciling Fundamental Social Rights and Economic Freedoms after Viking, Laval and Rüffert","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01840726547043814,"gpt":0.222762218750489,"spread":0.2043549532800509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003662317,0.0008264998,0.0009032284,0.0004492255,0.0005374649,0.0008181427,0.0003593308,0.0006747502,0.002063743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001220943,0.0008279713,0.0002348486,0.00002938535,0.0004134972,0.0006861986,0.0003729008,0.0007188792,0.001368224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000194741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001353076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002877413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002136281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973398,0.00003062235,0.0006781786,0.0009992648,0.0003399007,0.0006122178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986835,0.00006444094,0.0006978482,0.0003665688,0.0001076331,0.00008004301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003746692,0.0005041002,0.02942575,0.005688457,0.00296613,0.001074544,0.02202576,0.000003513711,0.001026679,0.3840282,0.4952987,0.05421143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001297389,0.00004559319,0.001483779,0.0002178008,0.0002422953,0.00001488723,0.0001039887,0.000133219,0.00008057605,0.006548273,0.9887491,0.001083131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1456753,0.0006850396,0.000008689476,0.0000530685,0.0009954057,0.0007101048,0.00006771596,0.0002561129,0.8515486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4800557,0.00003128172,0.00006480927,0.0009254482,0.005118373,0.00006760353,0.0001355848,0.0001542594,0.5134469],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4934503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102664123","doi":"10.1163/22129000-01502004","title":"The Prohibition against Arbitrary Conduct and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Investment & Trade","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interdiction; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Element (criminal law); State (computer science); Humanities; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0244563598593707,"gpt":0.2400681630867447,"spread":0.215611803227374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001352569,0.0001411791,0.0001917926,0.00006749301,0.0005779842,0.000427865,0.0001472427,0.00001764655,0.00002472043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004778008,0.00005719041,0.00005767831,0.0001684906,0.0003280113,0.0006108631,0.00005202376,0.0001586728,0.000007197151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000417513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002216045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007756364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002218823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990072,0.000113847,0.0003207921,0.00008658207,0.0002611075,0.000210436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991443,0.0002379595,0.0003955731,0.0001569689,0.00003991826,0.00002530198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001252776,0.0001632954,0.001182399,0.00005105651,0.0002783927,0.000005030173,0.001889772,0.0002428015,0.002412108,0.9617696,0.01754715,0.01320564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007245192,0.00023871,0.01196389,0.0001493113,0.0004527296,0.00002730394,0.003906813,0.002890093,0.002177848,0.09511195,0.8755885,0.0002476487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8852465,0.004073066,0.00010584,0.08413375,0.0002410816,0.0005430462,0.000001549839,0.00003190774,0.02562329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881539,0.0003651065,0.00006013307,0.01023779,0.0005199243,0.000006989887,0.000001409803,0.00001265741,0.0006420974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8666576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4445446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520236492","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow047","title":"Substantive equality revisited: A reply to Sandra Fredman","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02566953463839095,"gpt":0.2908419402038372,"spread":0.2651724055654462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004892396,0.000113198,0.0001753103,0.0002753896,0.00008787814,0.0002267534,0.0003969461,0.0000334903,0.001175518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005694001,0.00007657414,0.0001341655,0.0001500059,0.0003129775,0.001615322,0.00008339803,0.00008964362,0.0005100751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009757957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000843973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001608353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004334771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984698,0.0000161483,0.0005196759,0.0001409236,0.0007246991,0.0001287047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975399,0.00009999898,0.0005265367,0.00009805436,0.001702282,0.00003323108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001982141,0.00005095936,0.004245293,0.000004525453,0.00008650891,0.00005349075,0.00002210308,0.00001385303,0.001750024,0.9820385,0.01045264,0.001083914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007383655,0.0000130269,0.00275494,0.0002410192,0.00001933048,0.00005303105,0.00003447338,0.000004865287,0.0005458964,0.01420409,0.9812664,0.0001245307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1607136,0.0003867358,0.08929208,0.07085283,0.006749102,0.0003720367,0.0001516509,0.0001413111,0.6713407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815769,0.000006908454,0.0005236511,0.015091,0.002460952,0.000002001756,0.000007408193,0.000005514077,0.0003256247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2534600461","doi":"","title":"Tampon Taxes, Discrimination, and Human Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Business; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public economics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02029043404462777,"gpt":0.2629184285586449,"spread":0.2426279945140171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001680093,0.0001365638,0.0001388014,0.00006742586,0.001737588,0.001631512,0.0002814851,0.00005861391,0.00072447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008155714,0.0001166688,0.00003745532,0.00004268593,0.000127335,0.002312451,0.0001511162,0.0001180536,0.0006495178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001234416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003474562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03573165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02376046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999219,0.000007530471,0.0001667779,0.0002430425,0.0001823356,0.0001812942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991983,0.000009095525,0.0002695621,0.0004009618,0.00009507849,0.00002702279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005561408,0.0000315093,0.02041188,0.00004322466,0.000006707477,0.000006908084,0.00003044752,5.701923e-7,0.0003323288,0.9673519,0.01141277,0.0003662205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003898091,0.00000494922,0.1337198,0.00003781089,0.0000212606,6.201082e-7,0.00002915463,0.00003504831,0.0001482021,0.02218054,0.8432603,0.0001724178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6728187,0.00008203281,0.00003819388,0.001453757,0.000379675,0.0001702521,0.000003967819,0.0001338021,0.3249196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869493,0.000001625796,0.00009892181,0.0008664573,0.001299917,0.00001224185,0.00003302803,0.00001506281,0.01072346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040961559","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778792","title":"Paradiplomatie identitaire et diplomatie en Belgique fédérale: le cas de la Flandre","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"International Political Science Association","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Foreign policy; Federalism; Globalization; Jurisdiction; International relations; State (computer science); Political economy; Public administration; Politics; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009819734437916281,"gpt":0.2731618324331613,"spread":0.263342097995245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001551664,0.00008924912,0.000131563,0.0003469811,0.0002865608,0.0006941073,0.0003521604,0.00005361061,0.0002609448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002607518,0.00007802926,0.00005436708,0.0004546176,0.0004638093,0.001544648,0.00001542822,0.0002065982,0.00005688231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002323817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001992362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06984148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03001286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987347,0.00005805898,0.0002392821,0.0001068683,0.0002591921,0.0006018836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991474,0.00009142618,0.000136308,0.000100246,0.0001820671,0.0003425473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[7.375576e-7,0.000009614038,0.02770464,0.0000127442,0.000003201885,0.00009852057,0.0001749564,0.00001510938,0.000105501,0.9708517,0.0009306093,0.00009267442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005338124,0.0000278232,0.7533914,0.0001148414,0.00003238837,0.0003581177,0.00245895,0.0003117321,0.0007560598,0.1247818,0.1169106,0.0003224382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8251208,0.00008861576,0.0006229613,0.003818598,0.0002638736,0.000058043,0.000001910993,0.00001451633,0.1700107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966521,0.000001282746,0.0004127551,0.002500306,0.0002531156,0.000001025596,4.798189e-7,0.000008572842,0.0001703934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8460699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9876869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117415551","doi":"10.52214/cjtl.v12i1.7412","title":"INTER-NATION EQUITY REVISITED","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Journal of Tax Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Public economics; Tax law; Economics; Law and economics; International taxation; Tax avoidance; Equity (law); Double taxation; International law; Tax reform; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05135231746683848,"gpt":0.2708324038987686,"spread":0.2194800864319301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002714912,0.00005937144,0.0001670882,0.00004582031,0.00008550598,0.0006723182,0.0002210611,0.00003397692,0.001154516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003296739,0.00006680866,0.00009083589,0.0002503803,0.00002933939,0.001193403,0.0001065108,0.0001519054,0.0001161878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001960993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001423591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009879281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006500768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992489,0.00001181811,0.0003295844,0.00008030929,0.0002298408,0.00009954743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989207,0.00001463106,0.0006226355,0.00006558365,0.0003528814,0.0000236161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001618423,0.0001648336,0.02349192,0.0004427318,0.0001181926,0.0001109578,0.0003240534,0.00005484408,0.004418811,0.2033457,0.7385237,0.02884239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004326042,0.00002700912,0.002031695,0.00006833392,0.00003738506,0.000003564261,0.00007829762,0.0005004025,0.00003668328,0.001079545,0.9956179,0.00008660389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3190314,0.0009845555,0.007588765,0.03676536,0.002217792,0.0004858213,0.00000900741,0.0002149564,0.6327024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870769,0.000005657577,0.0001721123,0.01026294,0.001991416,5.416912e-7,0.000003981015,0.000009524839,0.0004769096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6680455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943645239","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12176","title":"The Role of Similar Accounting Standards in Cross‐Border Mergers and Acquisitions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mergers and acquisitions; Accounting; Business; International trade; International economics; Economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05267197576008003,"gpt":0.3913732188767178,"spread":0.3387012431166378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008451491,0.0001733301,0.0002582209,0.0005377074,0.0006614566,0.00128201,0.0003992856,0.0001056614,0.000100512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003338902,0.000138029,0.00005475385,0.001302046,0.0004692381,0.002625118,0.0004701786,0.0004704045,0.00004219656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007001873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003101694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003954685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003519572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972527,0.00008319534,0.0005397627,0.0003473081,0.001261175,0.0005158404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969249,0.0003771423,0.0002902884,0.0003499741,0.002023998,0.00003370502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003970308,0.0001262564,0.9152954,0.0001912712,0.00004619206,0.00001655764,0.001223762,0.0001322131,0.001369143,0.04510907,0.02453903,0.01155404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009077828,0.00001480331,0.02531692,0.0001321226,0.000004327447,8.236749e-7,0.008222759,0.004109062,0.0002157495,0.00497398,0.9558966,0.0002051244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.773079,0.006077749,0.00001202285,0.00182589,0.0001913267,0.0004297527,0.00001238211,0.00008018283,0.2182917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983723,0.00003631618,0.00003737725,0.0002261984,0.0005146186,0.00003302527,0.00001799033,0.00003333257,0.0007289125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9313575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086731009","doi":"10.1017/aju.2020.49","title":"Shifting Design Paradigms: Why Tomorrow's International Economic Law May Look More Like the Tax Regime than the WTO","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJIL Unbound","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Unilateralism; Multilateralism; Sovereignty; International economic law; Adjudication; International trade law; Political science; International law; International trade; Law and economics; Economics; Political economy; Law; Politics; Public international law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03743041618757082,"gpt":0.2429330675774077,"spread":0.2055026513898369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003082206,0.0001839108,0.0001439363,0.00004100949,0.0004343099,0.001319443,0.0007158191,0.00004982093,0.0007788651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008114335,0.0001145391,0.00009387716,0.0001388914,0.0001714106,0.0009760722,0.0001916856,0.0001935151,0.001110179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003917934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002249231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00296976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008133316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990039,0.00003095999,0.0002464553,0.0002802348,0.0002088887,0.0002295377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992654,0.0001249529,0.0002695632,0.0002728153,0.00004762028,0.00001970175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009811523,0.00003985125,0.006945725,0.0000347118,0.0001570149,0.00002310942,0.002486893,0.001511052,0.00009372069,0.7304963,0.2567605,0.001352957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002710609,0.000007445903,0.001297719,0.00001437797,0.00003649227,0.000002328537,0.001069023,0.008920429,0.00006986619,0.002370892,0.9857664,0.0001739279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1674653,0.0008360199,0.005048169,0.4574676,0.003599054,0.001390101,0.00001820618,0.0006542262,0.3635213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423037,0.000008883757,0.00007515584,0.05308854,0.002588461,0.00002637932,0.00002404009,0.00002932303,0.001855548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7748383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296471844","doi":"","title":"The Draft Monti II Regulation: An Inadequate Response to Viking and Laval","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hull; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06111057475420504,"gpt":0.314132925452058,"spread":0.2530223506978529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003977642,0.0001964811,0.0002029851,0.0005360748,0.001978704,0.0006518958,0.0004655302,0.00009474796,0.0004787501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001007978,0.0001551796,0.00005675366,0.001230041,0.0002188285,0.001558095,0.0005611886,0.000357619,0.0001883339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003355506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009115836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004080396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004818617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974077,0.0001803495,0.0003727141,0.0004582154,0.0009093965,0.0006716203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985166,0.000203016,0.0001616056,0.000494399,0.000530215,0.00009415775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009201823,0.0005369933,0.03191069,0.0001869198,0.0001461064,0.0009059797,0.007026888,0.00003698764,0.007654116,0.8372756,0.0602787,0.04483918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008479332,0.0001874996,0.1563744,0.00008972516,0.00001580295,0.00001141177,0.00282942,0.001852495,0.000661336,0.004770607,0.8320063,0.0003530253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240026,0.0001904192,0.00003269729,0.003752281,0.0002389804,0.0007597411,0.000005493516,0.0001563321,0.0708614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986016,0.00001811581,0.0001971345,0.0004362814,0.0006755211,0.0000720693,0.00001037944,0.00004110504,0.01253344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.832505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1149469812","doi":"","title":"Multilingualism and Morality in Statutory Interpretation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Legislature; Political science; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Multilingualism; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Interpreter; Ambiguity; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06202192561953192,"gpt":0.3836058690854842,"spread":0.3215839434659523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005444553,0.0001284755,0.0001607954,0.003020643,0.0005407731,0.0002812353,0.0003225748,0.0001179825,0.00001248692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005172557,0.0001178159,0.00001938132,0.002499785,0.00106892,0.001331862,0.0002386989,0.0002989772,0.000008824451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009548046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001845573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006032831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001325778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978999,0.00002457948,0.0002941989,0.0005470326,0.0007259649,0.0005082553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985638,0.000198038,0.0001402816,0.0001317224,0.0009377289,0.00002838159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008378207,0.0001784155,0.0432003,0.0002040604,0.00001122112,0.00000320942,0.0004485773,0.000003163801,0.007130533,0.8051035,0.002274161,0.1413591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00322868,0.0004411642,0.08715941,0.0002927957,0.00001853578,0.00001495447,0.002825306,0.1728747,0.003043175,0.4370488,0.2920162,0.001036226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709033,0.000707023,0.0006245375,0.002061321,0.0002050681,0.0009430079,0.00001696472,0.000201044,0.02433767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981235,0.00005959439,0.000619863,0.0001298964,0.0001146651,0.0001446239,0.00003931944,0.00001087512,0.0007576109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3680547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6192408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566579607","doi":"10.54648/ecta2006036","title":"<i>Halifax</i> and <i>Cadbury Schweppes</i>: one single European theory of abuse in tax law?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EC Tax Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Criminology; Economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01973503773816646,"gpt":0.217610979553701,"spread":0.1978759418155345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008035864,0.0001448611,0.0003269621,0.00008837551,0.00005045813,0.00008871428,0.000150881,0.00002809545,0.0003139465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007807547,0.0001289388,0.000062914,0.0003459611,0.00007685873,0.0005151085,0.00007015798,0.0001060288,0.0002954096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009072176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004033296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001989153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007880498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989476,0.00007565465,0.0004359589,0.0002070357,0.0001634183,0.0001703579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993119,0.00003162609,0.0003596706,0.00022086,0.00006550979,0.00001040768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003111023,0.0007520044,0.007077737,0.0113981,0.00003359499,0.0000546878,0.0001317865,0.0000087889,0.003583456,0.8708586,0.06040584,0.04566426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002920402,0.00000622104,0.002850374,0.002654591,0.00004922385,0.000001254588,0.00002177735,0.000003354792,0.0001253813,0.001065119,0.9927709,0.0001597879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0640485,0.1845949,0.0001219646,0.001538784,0.0002016672,0.0007595095,0.00001323227,0.0001447169,0.7485767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837616,0.006138516,0.0001719804,0.0073953,0.0004547203,0.000009033234,0.00003787458,0.00003304168,0.001997925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9323651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5257972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070147880","doi":"10.1017/s0008197312000815","title":"FREE MOVEMENT, FEDERALISM AND INSTITUTIONAL CHOICE: A CANADA-EU COMPARISON","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Multinational corporation; Diversity (politics); State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Free movement; International trade; Political economy; Economics; Business; International economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02267001476144446,"gpt":0.2402962810305997,"spread":0.2176262662691552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003507002,0.0001178804,0.0001296627,0.00003820829,0.001147267,0.0005249376,0.0002257231,0.00002712927,0.0001348696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006105404,0.0000800915,0.00003398072,0.00009528791,0.00008581067,0.001055733,0.0001204727,0.0002611047,0.00002425507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006341759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005392557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5753902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3814586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990804,0.00001657241,0.0002205128,0.00007644713,0.0003268348,0.000279194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994879,0.00002969651,0.0002282534,0.0001328086,0.00008087089,0.00004049324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000166334,0.00003820007,0.02606512,0.00001691668,0.00003309923,0.000004773635,0.00004786768,0.00003132454,0.00008036721,0.7566783,0.2161662,0.0008211731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004487402,0.000002385193,0.1117623,0.00001657276,0.00002694271,0.00002319864,0.0001794657,0.0003835028,0.00003042502,0.0001762339,0.8868399,0.0001102942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6399592,0.002287147,0.0002631995,0.02070541,0.002553479,0.0002121249,0.00001674343,0.00006344227,0.3339392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976907,0.000008727639,0.00003427118,0.01838566,0.004154287,0.000002946746,0.000008514044,0.000009636907,0.0004889678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7565021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8823968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121436828","doi":"10.3138/9781442660021-011","title":"10. Canada’s Evolving Tax Treaty Policy toward Low-Income Countries","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Withholding tax; Double taxation; International taxation; Tax treaty; State income tax; Income tax; Direct tax; Tax avoidance; Dividend tax; Value-added tax; Tax reform; Gross income; Ad valorem tax; Indirect tax; Economics; Public economics; Treaty; Business; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0110320959550869,"gpt":0.1872475610112885,"spread":0.1762154650562016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007008981,0.0003359078,0.000445876,0.00008087792,0.0002449653,0.0001202664,0.0005505403,0.0003018336,0.01068105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002913639,0.0003869621,0.0001528207,0.000002051291,0.0001853811,0.0005551458,0.0003268382,0.0002271449,0.00007941433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004296843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004318874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987859,0.000005351682,0.0002076819,0.0003283322,0.0004184699,0.0002542584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985499,0.00003064407,0.0006135529,0.0003892034,0.0003762918,0.00004036727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003844407,0.00002632461,0.0001311891,0.001509671,0.0004226679,0.0001666705,0.00147409,0.000007437694,0.00004579527,0.8956546,0.09432674,0.00585033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003888206,0.000008906146,0.0002782843,0.0002084104,0.0001395969,6.223031e-7,0.00004581933,0.00003151534,0.00002596879,0.0001833978,0.9983104,0.000378271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007168452,0.0004877585,0.00001032614,0.0001432126,0.0002409264,0.0002382684,0.0001035306,0.00009615503,0.9986081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02579683,0.00004467792,0.00006482191,0.0001565473,0.0008755614,2.609188e-7,0.0000437664,0.00003801445,0.9729795],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9039837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596891158","doi":"10.1515/ael-2016-0071","title":"International Tax Avoidance – Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax avoidance; Tax haven; Tax reform; Revenue; Indirect tax; Statutory law; Double taxation; Direct tax; Tax law; Ad valorem tax; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Public economics; Political science; Accounting; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01137349149813975,"gpt":0.2183509927636575,"spread":0.2069775012655178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002808442,0.0001247478,0.0001409327,0.00006710343,0.000655704,0.0024106,0.0003141098,0.00005311429,0.0003060625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001126962,0.0001311129,0.00004004074,0.00001830818,0.0001219827,0.002919962,0.0002196306,0.00009761812,0.0002263091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001862917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006781293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003748058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009967675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992878,0.000002316904,0.0001990893,0.0002916489,0.00005368498,0.000165402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990996,0.000013238,0.0004849377,0.0003046854,0.0000874481,0.00001014903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001736784,0.00002029623,0.01529599,0.00002349123,0.00002892081,0.000001281519,0.00003534689,0.00002223319,0.0001765826,0.9707065,0.006753121,0.006918907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003287318,0.000001903577,0.01299774,0.000008272972,0.00001197359,0.000002039222,0.00005390447,0.004476524,0.00006196182,0.002598264,0.9792913,0.000167409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6672366,0.00004673482,0.00004822165,0.01831949,0.003622127,0.0001244718,0.000005734048,0.00008387076,0.3105128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882947,0.00006799675,0.0001177684,0.002556967,0.007259389,0.000008505835,0.00002055341,0.00001837578,0.001655711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536268536","doi":"10.54648/taxi2011020","title":"Worrying Interpretation of Liable to Tax: OECD Clarification Would Be Welcome","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intertax","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Interpretation (philosophy); Tax treaty; Nexus (standard); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Economics; State (computer science); Tax law; Double taxation; Business; Engineering; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04665768955276208,"gpt":0.2563190491095632,"spread":0.2096613595568011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001549798,0.00009677296,0.0001267508,0.0002553544,0.00004332536,0.00008699989,0.0002031264,0.00008336243,0.001616788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001102816,0.00009118801,0.00005149725,0.00019143,0.00001970832,0.0007412026,0.0000655078,0.0001361608,0.0009024858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001831665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005164533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003199107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002730251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993055,0.000007649189,0.0002677766,0.0001645943,0.0001263808,0.0001280985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994271,0.00001267123,0.0002301563,0.0001870414,0.0001311458,0.00001188421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001474302,0.001089382,0.1265197,0.001100894,0.0002707675,0.00001763825,0.03643249,0.0003129044,0.06925819,0.4983525,0.08417358,0.1809976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000645635,0.00008069543,0.05018797,0.0003919904,0.00008552233,0.000001324094,0.003470464,0.0113171,0.02083976,0.004424153,0.9079445,0.0006109026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6630083,0.00006338261,0.02744613,0.001976514,0.001452029,0.0004773206,0.000004033238,0.0002359124,0.3053364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947505,9.732036e-7,0.0008127165,0.002502224,0.0001963689,0.0000209936,0.00001445615,0.00001502594,0.00168675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8237709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1049461079","doi":"","title":"The Troubling Role of Tax Treaties","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Tax treaty; Economics; Political science; International trade; Business; Tax law; Double taxation; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02126077212648981,"gpt":0.2391335998885157,"spread":0.2178728277620259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002986664,0.0001001094,0.0001305715,0.00005058979,0.0001851998,0.0003622146,0.0002247701,0.00003853789,0.0001298004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002304131,0.00006853634,0.0000567539,0.0002005687,0.00007489289,0.0008390631,0.00007210848,0.00009402152,0.0004782086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001523415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001873948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009320743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002379259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992476,0.00001233686,0.0002069265,0.0001205475,0.0002413327,0.000171243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993418,0.00003649175,0.0001998011,0.0002199039,0.0001804007,0.00002152927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005303873,0.00003907589,0.01289832,0.00002172646,0.00002362137,0.000001308571,0.0001857851,0.00008239639,0.00034684,0.967621,0.01501741,0.003709521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003800228,0.000008645145,0.001306241,0.00001704584,0.0000171192,2.856382e-7,0.00180922,0.000438581,0.0005361231,0.01113761,0.9842507,0.00009840294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4224731,0.0021292,0.00004681733,0.001857921,0.0005379575,0.0002159973,0.000003192837,0.0001843701,0.5725514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923668,0.00000744336,0.0001170733,0.0006282245,0.0008887658,0.00001167141,0.000008263633,0.00001425653,0.00595749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886058040","doi":"","title":"A Principled Framework for Assessing General Anti-Avoidance Regimes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Discretion; Interpretation (philosophy); Certainty; Legislation; Political science; Positive economics; Psychology; Sociology; Management science; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01600321473914477,"gpt":0.2767035311784685,"spread":0.2607003164393237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001043995,0.0001539532,0.0001847246,0.0001466698,0.0003500121,0.0004601261,0.0002561517,0.00008042309,0.00007399612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000452672,0.0001022041,0.0001266761,0.0002110183,0.00003456217,0.001460634,0.0000429258,0.0004992851,0.0000913992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002103248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003383303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004477614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008202384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979258,0.00001585745,0.0002534577,0.0002046427,0.0002073443,0.001392851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991763,0.00006924826,0.0004184454,0.0001480731,0.0001719983,0.00001598528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002472925,0.00002720153,0.006988913,0.0000132731,0.00004373689,0.000001347186,0.00001664714,0.000006758708,0.00120299,0.9640766,0.0003325352,0.02726527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001026051,0.00002337203,0.004677967,0.000160096,0.00003713599,0.00002976803,0.0003866871,0.0003029541,0.0002528165,0.7004607,0.2923422,0.000300313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5709335,0.00134063,0.4147865,0.007205094,0.0006813362,0.0002298835,8.693031e-7,0.0001482875,0.004673902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877633,0.0003099932,0.002087479,0.0007764581,0.004278472,0.0000114499,0.000001900377,0.00003549738,0.004735492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4168297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4437006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2364987701","doi":"","title":"Taxation and the Third Country Dimension of Free Movement of Capital in EU Law: The ECJ's Rulings and Unresolved Issues","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Free movement; Treaty; Member state; Capital (architecture); European union; Political science; Law; European Union law; Tax treaty; Member states; Treaty of Lisbon; Law and economics; International trade; Tax law; Economics; Double taxation; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004317943854394955,"gpt":0.2064146209596238,"spread":0.2020966771052289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001428468,0.00009370878,0.0001630568,0.00007593687,0.0001366124,0.00009402755,0.0001485274,0.00003623847,0.00001005418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001222807,0.00005258789,0.0000318792,0.0001360882,0.0001205665,0.0003922085,0.00004620416,0.000385925,9.725319e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003788122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004633866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00495123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004739356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990113,0.00002843849,0.0002828488,0.00009170688,0.0002320848,0.0003535647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991878,0.00004128012,0.0005652047,0.0001113327,0.00008871216,0.000005705815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001498202,0.00003657176,0.00301759,0.00001337489,0.00002471596,4.507855e-7,0.0007611238,0.00003332673,0.001050677,0.9934105,0.0001412289,0.001360671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00491186,0.0001509721,0.05335882,0.0001357248,0.0001058681,0.00001190277,0.01011213,0.002235578,0.0006773964,0.9187361,0.00935722,0.0002064015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827067,0.006737502,0.00006894216,0.007244213,0.00005503244,0.0001856039,6.364834e-7,0.000009028163,0.002992348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968445,0.001423884,0.00001698042,0.001384929,0.0001881226,0.00000134074,0.00000216363,0.000005470361,0.0001326135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07467432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7484812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273155610","doi":"","title":"The David R. Tillinghast Lecture: Trade Agreements and Income Taxation: Interactions, Conflicts, and Resolutions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Scrutiny; Corporation; International trade; Normative; International economics; Income tax; Economics; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00951176050925914,"gpt":0.2323774705115937,"spread":0.2228657100023345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005404181,0.0001194474,0.0000947795,0.0001150197,0.001033328,0.0005604621,0.0001196438,0.00003522878,0.00002038912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001026622,0.00008585649,0.00003487446,0.0001893848,0.00007836981,0.0007270498,0.00004273458,0.0007513264,0.00002088513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001689949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004876833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004334989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988069,0.0000145435,0.0002208535,0.0001370023,0.0001735664,0.0006471531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994476,0.00002922219,0.0003582389,0.0000919525,0.00005388876,0.00001905962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000653626,0.00005633386,0.004843221,0.00001612486,0.0001418072,0.000002957012,0.0004464614,0.0001274359,0.0002931125,0.968283,0.0002798271,0.02544436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001554496,0.00005477137,0.02674169,0.00006427233,0.00008432936,0.0002308098,0.002227389,0.000348541,0.00003136742,0.1503148,0.8180999,0.0002476774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8937915,0.02245519,0.01802559,0.05497187,0.001161987,0.0005401376,0.000003257912,0.0001724062,0.008878037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959797,0.001997696,0.00003928426,0.0006078217,0.0007935789,0.000005091722,0.0000055169,0.00001246846,0.0005588525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8179682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7947631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519173794","doi":"","title":"Tax Treaty Treatment of Royalty Payments from Low-Income Countries: A Comparison of Canada and Australia's Policies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Australian School of Taxation, University of New South Wales; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Double taxation; Gross income; Withholding tax; Income tax; International taxation; Economics; State income tax; International economics; Tax revenue; Treasury; Treaty; Public economics; Business; International trade; Direct tax; Tax reform; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01886301111796583,"gpt":0.2726232037395702,"spread":0.2537601926216044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001132966,0.0001990981,0.0004253709,0.00008317136,0.0001170499,0.00008872214,0.0001253172,0.00006651463,0.0006108337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003409423,0.0001673958,0.00005384836,0.0001739186,0.0001030668,0.0003158441,0.00004046341,0.00006021004,0.00002408771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001205994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005227004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9305263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986945,0.00001023992,0.0004786749,0.0002054535,0.0003294197,0.0002816476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990928,0.00007079433,0.0004383461,0.0002278665,0.000120914,0.00004930592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001225658,0.0001710282,0.9839669,0.0001206826,0.00009166758,0.000008414809,0.0002974215,0.00003569891,0.0002343855,0.0123772,0.002270798,0.0003032046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001542351,0.0000619885,0.6896281,0.0001282759,0.00009524002,2.966184e-7,0.0007749445,0.00008403758,0.007370463,0.0002044051,0.2998551,0.0002548089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935281,0.0003007227,0.00001377092,0.0001778866,0.0001969948,0.0001989494,0.00008819016,0.00002930038,0.00546611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970636,0.00001089614,0.00008582901,0.0002712574,0.0003105448,0.000005790398,0.00004668591,0.00001382288,0.002191625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2975844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6826202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125534901","doi":"10.59403/11ps2z","title":"Exit Charges for Migrating Individuals and Companies: Comparative and Tax Treaty Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin for international taxation","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax treaty; Treaty; International trade; Business; International economics; Political science; Economic geography; Economics; Value-added tax; Tax law; Public economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03320623396324669,"gpt":0.2767963827000447,"spread":0.243590148736798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002001607,0.0001341132,0.0002049585,0.0004537563,0.0001938729,0.0005597505,0.00009532644,0.00004540602,0.0006460847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004680202,0.0001212247,0.00007398116,0.000199185,0.00004408395,0.0004355765,0.00004262019,0.00003854451,0.00005290092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001327227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003014731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001585621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001882944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991941,0.000007998732,0.0002696147,0.0002463511,0.0001570139,0.0001249071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985449,0.0001808967,0.0006729523,0.00006216056,0.0005251371,0.00001391922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001973568,0.0002825774,0.2730858,0.0003248598,0.001892795,2.749502e-7,0.002795101,0.0005700486,0.0008699688,0.3178515,0.3904999,0.01162978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009751645,0.00002318794,0.1733025,0.00002719184,0.0002148344,4.033898e-7,0.001298976,0.04329736,0.0001618075,0.003005779,0.7774692,0.0002236127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.965366,0.0001930243,0.01408961,0.009812446,0.0003349176,0.001517286,0.0001291397,0.000109776,0.008447815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991093,0.00001201815,0.004347202,0.0007964024,0.000587932,0.0003744695,0.0006081256,0.00001075441,0.002170129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3869692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7074174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504529159","doi":"","title":"What the Baucus Plan Reveals About Tax Competition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tax competition; Tax reform; Competition (biology); Economics; Multinational corporation; Lawmaking; Indirect tax; Tax avoidance; Ad valorem tax; Value-added tax; Direct tax; Business; Public economics; Political science; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00945630365856075,"gpt":0.2152670393832872,"spread":0.2058107357247264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000821788,0.0001244527,0.0001192252,0.0001038379,0.0004038532,0.001544752,0.0002893074,0.00004530955,0.001065571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005548581,0.00008026644,0.00007830013,0.0001884648,0.00003831507,0.002746593,0.00003968196,0.000845918,0.001946451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001240495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009563086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001033175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00129213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983685,0.00002547648,0.000229363,0.0001211533,0.0002457518,0.001009738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999375,0.00002644454,0.000298802,0.0001384298,0.0001483037,0.00001305671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001228094,0.00003312688,0.002558642,0.00001157907,0.0000491472,0.000001407582,0.0001086579,0.00001646164,0.0003885338,0.9688583,0.008761936,0.01919991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006312488,0.00003313908,0.01686526,0.0001011197,0.00004758694,0.0000769465,0.008244641,0.000349589,0.00002384913,0.4370063,0.5363423,0.0002780292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9077014,0.007432327,0.001943944,0.03565354,0.002307284,0.0006462531,9.69344e-7,0.0001856372,0.04412865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861441,0.001299499,0.000009551449,0.00295445,0.00238383,0.00001203135,0.000009806656,0.00001733359,0.00716935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5318521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809626988","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0018","title":"From Dualism to Cooperative Federalism and Back?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Dualism; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Normative; Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Supreme court; Dual federalism; Underpinning; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03399657859201802,"gpt":0.2188911901847586,"spread":0.1848946115927406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004767339,0.000302732,0.0003315859,0.0001615977,0.0004812183,0.0007156875,0.0003680437,0.0002294079,0.0004652035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001515356,0.0003259259,0.00007669714,0.00000378662,0.0001141714,0.000501734,0.0005918527,0.0002231567,0.00006760573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003221203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001764933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004975401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000497748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999094,0.000005909265,0.0001218318,0.0004254766,0.0001799292,0.0001728345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991055,0.0000223151,0.0002944832,0.0003661137,0.0001713484,0.00004027124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008066877,0.000004935981,0.000009122987,0.0000398669,0.00009089404,0.0000737219,0.0004125601,0.000001470306,0.00001249443,0.9656335,0.03057728,0.003063513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004734538,0.000008125488,0.00005033103,0.0001392505,0.0001087421,4.698433e-7,0.00008244893,0.00002957664,0.00001277533,0.001511168,0.9971841,0.0003995734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006075844,0.0000371028,0.00007163151,0.0002596056,0.0002894149,0.000341411,0.0000878859,0.00008995068,0.9982154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006044478,0.00003099064,0.0001236157,0.0009918476,0.000959747,5.952134e-7,0.0001079442,0.00003659529,0.9917042],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061568891","doi":"10.1163/187197409x12525781476123","title":"The Dominant Voices in Double Taxation Agreements: A Critical Analysis of the “Dividend” Article in the Agreement between Uganda and the Netherlands","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Withholding tax; Tax treaty; Dividend; Double taxation; Treaty; Convention; Economics; International taxation; International economics; Developing country; Capital (architecture); Investment (military); International trade; International law; Income tax; Public economics; Law; Tax reform; Tax avoidance; Political science; Direct tax; Economic growth; Finance; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04050955960519317,"gpt":0.3371472719513473,"spread":0.2966377123461542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003438773,0.00008885172,0.000212067,0.00006611855,0.0003494477,0.0002558721,0.0008085464,0.00002100637,0.00006120196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005724691,0.00003720028,0.0001037778,0.0006536472,0.000198189,0.0003430856,0.0001592355,0.0002873813,0.000006959297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002298806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005918388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01770158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03154314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986241,0.0003780623,0.0004390596,0.00007570599,0.0003753463,0.0001077111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998397,0.000748264,0.0003630686,0.0003567958,0.000130037,0.000004848092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008581729,0.000183478,0.08449005,0.0001420293,0.0001696059,7.692366e-7,0.001325377,0.00003746133,0.00001083138,0.9047133,0.0004413506,0.008399905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001510227,0.00001261624,0.7141088,0.0009918662,0.0005608879,6.469081e-7,0.0008380265,0.001299417,0.00002068831,0.01332994,0.267209,0.0001179434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8294598,0.01023396,0.00006893795,0.1157856,0.000161979,0.001048682,0.000007897613,0.00001198183,0.04322113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927478,0.00108846,0.000005417278,0.005988038,0.00007773957,0.00002774748,0.0000149897,0.000002359985,0.00004743801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8913834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114648715","doi":"10.59403/1sdqsky","title":"Anti-Avoidance and Tax Treaty Override: Pacta Sunt Servata?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Taxation","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Object (grammar); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01243294494905291,"gpt":0.1933902977926903,"spread":0.1809573528436373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002111966,0.0001346909,0.0001147633,0.00009781841,0.0001499464,0.0005391215,0.0001071465,0.00002207933,0.0005294017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002546314,0.0001177342,0.00002796431,0.0001960938,0.00003215262,0.001867029,0.00007906466,0.0000807834,0.002692937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001258606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000396312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001844223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006695804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992432,0.0000326961,0.0001880105,0.0002270542,0.0001481813,0.000160851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999158,0.00001569362,0.0005194126,0.0001823081,0.0001081359,0.00001640332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002329914,0.0001658629,0.689894,0.0003166055,0.00004417875,0.00002764661,0.000781872,0.00009853626,0.01735354,0.03858197,0.1972298,0.05548266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002348434,0.000004551815,0.6968305,0.000026264,0.000007860011,8.109412e-7,0.00009876567,0.001105541,0.00008437052,0.0001451173,0.3013294,0.0001319813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8720138,0.00008842166,0.0002299971,0.001016877,0.0001704622,0.0002016548,0.000002373857,0.0001694783,0.1261069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929097,0.00002158608,0.0001245186,0.001736998,0.0008242255,0.000005754681,0.00005668388,0.00002913613,0.00429134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1218156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295600152","doi":"","title":"Balancing National Interests in the Taxation of Electronic Commerce Business Profits","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Revenue; Business; Goods and services; Compromise; E-commerce; Cyberspace; Commerce; Service (business); Tax reform; Tax revenue; International trade; Finance; Economics; Public economics; The Internet; Marketing; Market economy; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01087103747998509,"gpt":0.2417570689727473,"spread":0.2308860314927622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001918783,0.0001284914,0.0001465194,0.0002440329,0.0001458476,0.0001469543,0.0003547728,0.00004990266,0.000275635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001961425,0.00009500419,0.00005686361,0.0007795491,0.00003250624,0.0008925881,0.00001825435,0.0009006893,0.00009088412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003036119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004965675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008977045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980954,0.00004581076,0.0003518516,0.0001326314,0.0004295551,0.000944782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991344,0.00003945041,0.0004591507,0.00009647261,0.0002647434,0.000005734938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001476097,0.0002066827,0.03254974,0.00004412089,0.00005322814,0.000002118996,0.000430184,0.0008903793,0.0003377971,0.9275651,0.0007935235,0.03697954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003002135,0.0001161263,0.5428366,0.0002414581,0.00007646173,0.0002100549,0.004149876,0.004721171,0.00005585206,0.2613556,0.182627,0.0006076525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753915,0.000568056,0.0004086418,0.003169912,0.00008912163,0.0001915285,5.251007e-7,0.00002541909,0.02015526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973423,0.0002270875,0.000008448018,0.0009687268,0.0006571178,0.000008182084,0.00001551334,0.00001449834,0.0007581007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6662095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3913097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994796072","doi":"10.3917/cca.083.0267","title":"The impact of accounting differences between France and Belgium","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02314577345496141,"gpt":0.2473834277417352,"spread":0.2242376542867738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005552595,0.0003649422,0.0006205859,0.000109611,0.0006196543,0.0007289871,0.0004757537,0.0001573346,0.002407011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008207257,0.0002617033,0.0002474989,0.0004748691,0.000695464,0.001248489,0.000249977,0.0003252133,0.0003078923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004421301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002092936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005885297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002189246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979149,0.00007297674,0.0006883953,0.0004150885,0.0003359207,0.0005726868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973708,0.0009137503,0.0008076229,0.0004659946,0.0003962154,0.00004563718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001498842,0.0001250695,0.8978314,0.0003035528,0.0001620373,0.000001848691,0.0003233972,0.00001630805,0.00006815435,0.00683395,0.00980659,0.08451267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006701579,0.00004193498,0.6880459,0.0001941535,0.00009895331,8.741699e-7,0.0001984414,0.006800844,0.00001230139,0.001586419,0.3020768,0.0002733181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.894738,0.08668389,0.0001366658,0.006314965,0.001172958,0.0005008038,0.00003196945,0.00007994574,0.01034085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888109,0.0005625461,0.00002753283,0.000125248,0.002002892,0.00001612112,0.000007457068,0.00002985388,0.008417455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2922702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885475764","doi":"10.5744/ftr.2018.0012","title":"Taxation and the Cross-Border Trade in Services: Rethinking Non-Discrimination Obligations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florida Tax Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; International trade; Treaty; Tax law; Business; Double taxation; Service (business); Tax treaty; International economics; Economics; Law and economics; Public economics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01742876493626213,"gpt":0.3265429501280747,"spread":0.3091141851918126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000836912,0.0001232515,0.0002065882,0.0001011786,0.0002537615,0.0003665582,0.0001366265,0.00004585771,0.0003537684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000275267,0.00008434802,0.00004480418,0.000624834,0.0001186714,0.00124169,0.00005838023,0.0001202963,0.0001856307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001709013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001004893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00162086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001906299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990945,0.00002703276,0.0003433391,0.0001988623,0.0001971977,0.000139008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991421,0.00004063287,0.0004875279,0.0001938661,0.0001281477,0.000007757122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001431013,0.0001498164,0.04931576,0.02640326,0.00007754927,0.000007735763,0.01202516,0.00003165783,0.0001835818,0.7520148,0.01801302,0.1416346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001021953,0.000006013225,0.1023733,0.003319852,0.00008696691,0.000001881679,0.000186555,0.003722467,0.00002305655,0.005244115,0.8837985,0.0002153842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6310488,0.06081443,0.001836687,0.0573591,0.003485992,0.005392719,0.00001188337,0.0004380831,0.2396123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984176,0.002870937,0.0001503674,0.01076907,0.001390488,0.00008727764,0.00005571454,0.00001513617,0.0004850418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8657854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3873516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965277367","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1258","title":"Comparative Taxation and Legal Theory: The Tax Design Case of the Transplant of General Anti-Avoidance Rules","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax reform; Tax law; Tax avoidance; Public economics; Indirect tax; Double taxation; Law and economics; Economics; Direct tax","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02000444795618363,"gpt":0.2674586854296543,"spread":0.2474542374734707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008283937,0.0001134502,0.0002080744,0.00003799799,0.0001421797,0.00007687571,0.0002057531,0.00006395877,0.0001520834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001769537,0.00006071623,0.00003995217,0.0001640754,0.01968047,0.0003121133,0.00006639503,0.0002247849,0.00000421911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003021089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001113153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002673492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001521207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992246,0.0001241911,0.0002515443,0.0001262498,0.0001429419,0.0001304452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991226,0.000298795,0.0002744811,0.0002073277,0.00008933325,0.000007485026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008851849,0.00003956879,0.0005668798,0.00003394163,0.00001053149,0.000007861857,0.001353201,0.00006159684,0.004194891,0.9934731,0.0000515869,0.0001183329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008819159,0.00003895268,0.003851973,0.0001244688,0.0001017252,0.00007993125,0.002643574,0.01128879,0.05189669,0.9233466,0.00543349,0.0003119386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.974462,0.00005114401,0.01644298,0.0006480311,0.0002105098,0.0002590128,0.00001167021,0.00001518756,0.007899408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990842,0.000003399575,0.0002975524,0.0003865605,0.0001663573,0.000009724526,0.000003015833,0.000007811944,0.00004140084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07012653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097604017","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1457453","title":"Tax Avoidance in the 21st Century","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tax avoidance; Economics; Psychology; Business; Political science; Double taxation; Public economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007344534447510959,"gpt":0.2225851709508906,"spread":0.2152406365033797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00109048,0.00009418603,0.00008820133,0.0001267324,0.000173613,0.000276408,0.0003156152,0.00003216092,0.00006479854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006605097,0.0000631737,0.00005530092,0.0003380326,0.00001463524,0.0006748573,0.00001156835,0.001042648,0.0001775652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001138861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001067985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002588848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001446484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985325,0.00001961345,0.0001729084,0.00009992212,0.0002128651,0.0009622274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996747,0.00001258333,0.0001619126,0.0001039284,0.00004145722,0.000005408878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001518297,0.00005565148,0.001544523,0.000002408475,0.000005838344,0.000004331688,0.0001167567,0.00001513244,0.00007075665,0.9555234,0.0006944528,0.04195155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000606272,0.00003559754,0.02127717,0.00002354691,0.00001456853,0.00005347855,0.007326783,0.00009957103,0.000006572842,0.2206734,0.7497084,0.0001746496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6127591,0.01327196,0.0006373874,0.03910029,0.0007565971,0.000395149,6.425656e-7,0.0001263012,0.3329526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992021,0.001244854,0.0000087186,0.004657208,0.001384412,0.000001495538,0.000002122717,0.00000643884,0.000673754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7490139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4529844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542903388","doi":"","title":"Corporate Taxation and International Charter Competition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate tax; Charter; Corporate law; Tax competition; International taxation; Tax law; Business; Corporate security; Double taxation; Competition (biology); Direct tax; Tax reform; Regulatory competition; Tax avoidance; Corporate communication; Law and economics; Market economy; Corporate governance; Economics; Law; Political science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03304347036409366,"gpt":0.2412313718079195,"spread":0.2081879014438258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001580871,0.00004504887,0.00003723975,0.0001149648,0.00004614317,0.0001582841,0.00003628189,0.0000197595,0.001197128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002730381,0.00003947853,0.00001027882,0.00007910025,0.00001708044,0.0006941168,0.00002211335,0.00002884391,0.0003780529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006182905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001216157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001888515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001756581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996782,0.000001101753,0.00009554582,0.00008209625,0.0000787387,0.00006431076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996504,0.000006655471,0.0002221803,0.0000361064,0.0000797652,0.000004898747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001965073,0.00002538162,0.06235363,0.00001092737,0.000006172843,0.00000217815,0.00004307492,0.000001889732,0.001218342,0.9215746,0.002896388,0.0118478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003822634,0.000003403376,0.4060454,0.00000969539,0.000006069077,0.000001451819,0.0002304327,0.002475121,0.0002002223,0.005929395,0.5846015,0.0001151045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5796124,0.00001143695,0.01342238,0.001933171,0.0005443793,0.00008650809,5.645379e-7,0.000134451,0.4042547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931249,0.000002115768,0.0002367088,0.002469011,0.0007291933,0.000001246357,0.00004977882,0.000004303489,0.003382732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9156452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603285383","doi":"10.1787/b1887167-en","title":"Competition and Regulation in Auditing and Related Professions ","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD competition law and policy working papers.","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Audit; Business; Industrial organization; Accounting; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02188080885223184,"gpt":0.2745041409407594,"spread":0.2526233320885276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005213776,0.0003091526,0.0003936604,0.0005112836,0.0005207542,0.0004656077,0.00007327834,0.0004266738,0.000444616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001155568,0.000306528,0.00004854298,0.0002554282,0.0002242554,0.0003708529,0.0001207758,0.0006947304,0.00003026126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005484011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000831295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005808302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00388701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984168,0.00004204476,0.0004792858,0.0004491629,0.0003316095,0.0002810409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989819,0.00009500912,0.0006062769,0.0001776346,0.0001035934,0.00003558722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001275366,0.00002791402,0.00342555,0.0003834052,0.00001731502,0.000008280042,0.0001761223,0.000002909906,0.000476982,0.9881245,0.0002700072,0.007074283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005262365,0.000007756706,0.04507933,0.001378126,0.00005233748,0.0000355792,0.0001533709,0.0001485009,0.000006089675,0.006422649,0.9458136,0.0003764028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02239317,0.0004803387,0.000004124744,0.003634973,0.0007380398,0.0003861781,0.000008187716,0.0001860196,0.972169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914139,0.0005079508,0.00007584446,0.001483658,0.002216028,0.00002900338,0.0004557591,0.00004646514,0.00377137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601800967","doi":"","title":"Company Taxation, State Aid and Fundamental Freedoms: Is the Next Step Enhanced Cooperation?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Law and economics; State (computer science); Tax law; Direct tax; Treaty; Double taxation; Business; Sovereignty; Economics; Political science; Public economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01126360089015827,"gpt":0.2308552268539006,"spread":0.2195916259637424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000642596,0.0001447027,0.0001265483,0.00009743438,0.0005944148,0.0008523532,0.0001843653,0.00003087502,0.0003954532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005109067,0.0001023193,0.00004839898,0.0002056595,0.00007477626,0.001655234,0.00004506379,0.000611277,0.0002471181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001686483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000160795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003519089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004325145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985332,0.00002161988,0.0002775384,0.0001579524,0.0002364942,0.0007731574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992585,0.00002144935,0.0004304893,0.0001118939,0.0001616517,0.00001606422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002203695,0.0002622771,0.009720558,0.00003367072,0.0003615715,0.000002011712,0.002689328,0.0007794091,0.004657617,0.7883011,0.01962351,0.1733486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002407755,0.00007419266,0.005614352,0.00003331232,0.00007699424,0.00004894617,0.006731787,0.008813934,0.000397288,0.02089377,0.9544962,0.0004114472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9630286,0.00276253,0.01222347,0.01524023,0.0002604987,0.0003019455,0.000001871329,0.00007753924,0.006103279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895779,0.0006687308,0.0000766356,0.004525612,0.001379002,0.000006409587,0.000008558692,0.00001748069,0.003739627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9348727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8219261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243814312","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.263","title":"BILATERALISM VERSUS MULTILATERALISM IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW: APPLYING THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bilateralism; Subsidiarity; Multilateralism; Political science; Law and economics; Federalist; Government (linguistics); International law; Economics; Politics; Public administration; Law; International trade; European union","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01438606777934497,"gpt":0.2332107599387361,"spread":0.2188246921593911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002494559,0.00006686473,0.0001121484,0.0000368831,0.0001694981,0.00007568867,0.0003614904,0.00004872897,0.001772204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001132299,0.00005931043,0.00007238056,0.00001655492,0.0001154583,0.001374025,0.0001088806,0.0001757976,0.00001497583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007010018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001132238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.231212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3983585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995365,0.00001024284,0.0001544481,0.00008279982,0.0001175418,0.00009849707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994783,0.00002410928,0.0002984151,0.0001038304,0.00008373104,0.00001162393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000350921,0.00007779316,0.01397788,0.000018341,0.00006121518,0.00001572222,0.001113104,0.0002305034,0.002549516,0.9802622,0.0001676478,0.001175222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001820403,0.000007352784,0.02391698,0.00002012116,0.00002228693,0.000003415823,0.0008049795,0.001591078,0.0002401838,0.0005212133,0.9709453,0.0001066621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9170623,0.00002278867,0.0000184464,0.0003867391,0.001371525,0.0001036133,0.00000401158,0.00001127709,0.08101934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991363,0.00001327645,0.0003017457,0.00008686926,0.0003173307,1.578268e-7,0.000004317341,0.000004209087,0.0001358106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W594847841","doi":"","title":"The Design of Competition Law Institutions: Global Norms, Local Choices","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); China; International trade; Political science; Competition law; European union; International law; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04292983830047471,"gpt":0.2595981392165042,"spread":0.2166683009160295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002421698,0.0001804179,0.000194779,0.00004776261,0.0002916481,0.0002365367,0.0002655846,0.0001449935,0.000648938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002751882,0.0001160448,0.00007912025,0.0001084048,0.0003497192,0.0008268036,0.0000923649,0.0001231816,0.001104863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000778215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008293659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002513319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00228421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991134,0.00001026727,0.0002898228,0.0001370268,0.0002765125,0.0001729788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991367,0.0000559131,0.0004033548,0.0002011677,0.0001930339,0.000009796302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001263269,0.00002451853,0.00004317788,0.00008615206,0.00002584187,4.906218e-7,0.000003660047,0.0001140537,5.653409e-7,0.9674859,0.0307576,0.001445392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000143204,0.00000414736,0.0001611753,0.00008548055,0.00006538574,6.260932e-7,0.00003579737,0.0002574442,0.000002792003,0.01330306,0.9857907,0.0001502444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000278322,0.0009161559,0.02699397,0.0002032519,0.000589462,0.0002804261,0.00000704755,0.0001054793,0.9709014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2799183,0.0001721255,0.0005699267,0.004298065,0.005531924,0.00004550749,0.0005383618,0.00004146946,0.7088842],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1451810925","doi":"","title":"How Starbucks Lost its Social License — And Paid £20 Million to Get it Back","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"License; Obligation; Order (exchange); Business; State (computer science); Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01234474834187327,"gpt":0.2212194355350998,"spread":0.2088746871932265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004618665,0.0001698011,0.0001690227,0.0001895455,0.0003008853,0.001089071,0.0001676296,0.00006354685,0.0007404407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007686146,0.0001464315,0.00006436291,0.0002480834,0.00002260763,0.001510054,0.00006956013,0.0006734333,0.001828031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000137865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002948536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00136157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998161,0.00002007922,0.0001851894,0.000190349,0.0002470548,0.001196334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994495,0.00001382137,0.0002056711,0.00007483435,0.0002213877,0.00003481043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003942431,0.0004008044,0.01593802,0.0002681086,0.000547498,0.00002751437,0.002318592,0.00004279279,0.01441683,0.487559,0.3388056,0.139281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009389462,0.0000788848,0.003545555,0.00003127868,0.00004451951,0.00003338305,0.004079265,0.0003570555,0.00007888857,0.01531875,0.9751085,0.0003849724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8989954,0.001388436,0.0009995941,0.08024435,0.0003481093,0.0004668763,0.00000224766,0.0000634324,0.01749156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743418,0.0002679105,0.00004044516,0.003833605,0.002453905,0.000005124039,0.000007029563,0.00002688397,0.01902327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6363028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278006938","doi":"10.59403/3m3s88x","title":"Beneficial Ownership: Current Trends","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expert opinion; Liability; Treaty; Public economics; Business; Object (grammar); Tax treaty; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Law; Tax law; Double taxation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02173090157740133,"gpt":0.2646252626379187,"spread":0.2428943610605174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003019391,0.0001258503,0.0001239622,0.0006132497,0.0003005663,0.0007170861,0.0002295744,0.00003541381,0.007684879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007870697,0.00009793337,0.0001102984,0.0005391759,0.00003221235,0.0008080554,0.00004861819,0.0008109878,0.0006757477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000119868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000147954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001091391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002445519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991003,0.000006372453,0.0002365129,0.0001252911,0.0002840408,0.0002474865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994102,0.00001229802,0.0003097502,0.0001188612,0.0001189699,0.00002998596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004320276,0.0001659441,0.0320357,0.00002412893,0.00002191522,0.00002525965,0.0001022186,0.00002167342,0.001449248,0.1671102,0.1860427,0.6129578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002974214,0.000002498861,0.02831845,0.00001658159,0.00002126018,0.00001099991,0.00003085893,0.0001722025,0.00003236367,0.001441355,0.9695125,0.0001434696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3968112,0.0005554559,0.000370506,0.01423999,0.01841862,0.0001074598,0.000004163035,0.0002808538,0.5692118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767413,0.000004537148,0.0002256854,0.0007196614,0.01337097,0.000002028563,0.00000717991,0.00001667799,0.008911982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7834699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121274648","doi":"","title":"How Nations Share","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Globalization; Jurisdiction; Public good; Law and economics; Public economics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02713227404485525,"gpt":0.2408495853145571,"spread":0.2137173112697019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001808504,0.00007413795,0.00007094691,0.0001896432,0.0005668448,0.001081746,0.0001316388,0.00003878174,0.001374999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001070319,0.00006239769,0.00005604748,0.0002373864,0.00002296776,0.003409309,0.00002836513,0.000174439,0.0006884264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002089944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006340932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003195556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008225754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994116,0.000005738023,0.0001052768,0.0000534001,0.0001932894,0.0002306776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996037,0.00001343526,0.0001725511,0.00006970999,0.0001110546,0.00002951196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003263197,0.000058168,0.02681138,0.00001971437,0.00002396716,0.00001273781,0.0002158508,0.000003468281,0.00004395075,0.9411064,0.02660678,0.005094336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001557926,0.000001551978,0.01158458,0.00001653914,0.00001319535,0.00001896217,0.0004433537,0.00001671651,0.00002996059,0.0008776294,0.9867491,0.00009266218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09109567,0.001444525,0.000446806,0.01479507,0.002617403,0.0001570369,0.00000655035,0.000165731,0.8892712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908711,0.000004594307,0.0001393227,0.001958044,0.005798735,0.000002365707,0.000007571718,0.00001176875,0.001206493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9601423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985666987","doi":"10.1177/0020852304048447","title":"Alternative service delivery — responding to global pressures","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Administrative Sciences","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Service delivery framework; Transformational leadership; Business; Organizational change; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Corporate governance; Public service; Process management; Public administration; Service (business); Marketing; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07202438578415066,"gpt":0.3877539226258637,"spread":0.315729536841713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004716573,0.0001191639,0.0001730708,0.0002211991,0.0001011401,0.0001721244,0.0006711478,0.00001750507,0.0004387274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006073499,0.00009537249,0.00006411065,0.001321763,0.0001159047,0.00113003,0.0001353522,0.00004720459,0.0002276622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004783962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001165637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008619225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002181247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986142,0.00001362405,0.000322018,0.0002640845,0.0006551071,0.0001309878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988682,0.00004468036,0.0003593287,0.00008938285,0.0006188711,0.0000195495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004004249,0.00007804456,0.002705054,0.0004877615,0.00003445993,0.000008644583,0.0001191547,0.0003035431,0.0002570979,0.9923266,0.001397171,0.002242439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000639666,0.0001741692,0.01767057,0.01195173,0.00006541968,0.00001179944,0.001104122,0.0002828284,0.002970805,0.03795945,0.9266437,0.0005256936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3205551,0.005327055,0.00118277,0.04598822,0.001587529,0.0007838903,0.00007393995,0.00009304483,0.6244085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871766,0.0002770076,0.001234245,0.01076288,0.0003506486,0.00001540599,0.000009441127,0.000003447114,0.0001703122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4803757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912358985","doi":"10.59403/her9d7","title":"Confronting Conflicts of Qualification in Tax Treaty Law: The Principle of Common Interpretation and the New Approach Revisited","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Convention; Treaty; Foundation (evidence); Common law; Tax treaty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; Tax law; Double taxation; International law; Economics; Computer science; Public international law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02551537576445152,"gpt":0.282776321441455,"spread":0.2572609456770035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225528,0.00007262987,0.0001802949,0.0001339677,0.0001417925,0.0001596318,0.0001595288,0.0000226079,0.00008732607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001855753,0.00004138801,0.00004046914,0.0002984422,0.0002062344,0.0003653699,0.00004248824,0.000163101,0.00000623759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001054677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009964945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001854487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001317921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991802,0.00008022432,0.0004097708,0.00008254888,0.0001604999,0.00008674731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987392,0.00008478714,0.0008796405,0.0001338103,0.0001541259,0.000008373048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004609864,0.00007867602,0.02524432,0.000107748,0.00005040692,5.560122e-7,0.005656273,0.00006500087,0.0008847719,0.9537365,0.002990034,0.01072474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004852079,0.00002697595,0.115484,0.0005772008,0.0001690623,0.00001552668,0.002596809,0.05072055,0.0009451188,0.007399672,0.8169585,0.0002545628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7548888,0.001438543,0.01130121,0.007651873,0.0003354821,0.0009517716,0.000003876598,0.00003555448,0.2233929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974045,0.00001109591,0.0003221603,0.0004542236,0.0003948114,0.000002511385,0.000005145222,0.000006245139,0.001399305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9463368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2803442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}