{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":643,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":643,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"a9bfdb0ffe9c","filters":{"topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance"}},"results":[{"id":"W2116676072","doi":"10.1287/isre.1040.0028","title":"Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Systems Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":777,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Situational ethics; Group cohesiveness; Moderation; Perception; Social psychology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Task (project management); Psychological safety; Computer science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03249317446462396,"gpt":0.3719991150907537,"spread":0.3395059406261297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002612966,0.00009770962,0.0002564511,0.0002215156,0.00007736051,0.00005500421,0.0004546898,0.0001390759,0.0000842324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001432637,0.00006762658,0.00005583821,0.0006877673,0.0003103742,0.0004242817,0.00008061994,0.0002717252,0.0001449344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001638504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001944608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007286437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001067551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978268,0.0002775633,0.0008063014,0.00009134488,0.0006758936,0.0003220564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987794,0.0001603887,0.0002299433,0.0003913907,0.0003927847,0.0000460723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004082997,0.00005965782,0.01630037,0.00008535496,0.0000374846,8.361017e-7,0.0548498,0.0009358362,0.00005040374,0.9123411,0.00009779365,0.01483308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009975044,0.001403208,0.08580913,0.0005255803,0.0000127521,0.0001069683,0.7630196,0.01070806,0.0006475825,0.01851287,0.1088141,0.0004650925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8880287,0.0003614934,0.000533686,0.0001236416,0.0003157788,0.0006227043,0.00015963,0.0000165893,0.1098377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995465,0.00002365081,0.00001023833,0.00001782769,0.00004104459,0.00009399473,0.00001984114,0.000005041351,0.0002418677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8938282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138086691","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1050.0126","title":"Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":689,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Conceptual framework; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006903313857084808,"gpt":0.27614376660951,"spread":0.2692404527524252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004017183,0.00005271066,0.0000485689,0.0001941184,0.0001218821,0.00004341272,0.0001264412,0.0000296513,0.0002274913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000644436,0.0000498733,0.00000178926,0.002815931,0.0001625439,0.0005484725,0.00003867971,0.00006963737,0.000155089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008040471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008484319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000167401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000152844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993597,0.00000857637,0.0001358463,0.0002000481,0.0001269174,0.0001688857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995995,0.000009810363,0.00005407769,0.0001189136,0.0001866817,0.00003104356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003933238,0.00003723111,0.8256927,0.000003540884,8.529502e-7,2.528647e-7,0.006663039,0.0001448393,0.003997098,0.02737639,0.00004825068,0.1360319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001622377,0.00002181819,0.986313,0.000004280237,5.159507e-7,0.00000729838,0.0003123327,0.01061166,0.001422896,0.00003323987,0.001030922,0.00007983034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904636,0.00001002038,0.001749794,0.000514905,0.0001351587,0.00007894848,9.508093e-7,0.00002625206,0.007020371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985327,0.00001119813,0.0006811838,0.0002867275,0.0000419001,0.000002950021,0.000003375621,0.000006161506,0.0004337734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1606203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.249087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093840653","doi":"10.1177/0018720820960865","title":"Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":522,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Teamwork; Inclusion (mineral); Set (abstract data type); Agency (philosophy); Knowledge management; Empirical research; Computer science; Team composition; Task (project management); Government (linguistics); Process management; Psychology; Management science; Business; Social psychology; Political science; Management; Engineering; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09966613329407109,"gpt":0.3694085309428706,"spread":0.2697423976487995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001103345,0.0008391697,0.003299866,0.0001567649,0.001238785,0.0001754855,0.001898692,0.0005395848,0.0001672349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003349252,0.0003642526,0.00387782,0.0008447288,0.0006523466,0.000136773,0.0006675134,0.002568592,0.000001129583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002904517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001971061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005097851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003423327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961958,0.0007203371,0.00188724,0.0004447791,0.0003255925,0.0004262542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945769,0.0003321383,0.003628901,0.001131287,0.0001325917,0.0001982306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001001684,0.001676829,0.2870183,0.06914198,0.1225867,0.0000157082,0.3381296,0.0000555025,0.0000847231,0.009439583,0.1268419,0.04490907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000399972,0.0001959978,0.1180648,0.006992568,0.03250071,0.00005395649,0.001055019,0.00001337448,9.824853e-7,0.0001396993,0.8398376,0.0007453391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2380035,0.7605364,0.00000295137,0.0001207812,0.0004016314,0.0005317142,0.0002742982,0.00001022515,0.0001184767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06448468,0.9337479,0.000009818001,0.0004329261,0.0002619775,0.000007044965,0.00005699339,0.00008222472,0.0009164303],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7129957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169708689","doi":"10.1177/1046496406293125","title":"Teamwork Behaviors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Small Group Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":382,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Task (project management); Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Conceptual framework; Work (physics); Knowledge management; Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Engineering; Management; Artificial intelligence; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08145661874250566,"gpt":0.4104120082933179,"spread":0.3289553895508123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001196542,0.000102982,0.0001123513,0.0002210587,0.0002373574,0.00005999742,0.0003955311,0.0001432187,0.001767275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001149939,0.00009562288,0.000057022,0.0005031117,0.0001695293,0.00004107696,0.00010779,0.0006411354,0.002166356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006311125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002410707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006301674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001128794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981945,0.0001765005,0.0001889344,0.000336025,0.0003507581,0.0007532571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991691,0.0001211209,0.00002521577,0.0005076147,0.00009030845,0.00008670393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002041871,0.001155246,0.4852282,0.00003561424,0.00003398268,0.0002365696,0.001228423,0.00002995759,0.002776815,0.3793191,0.06634482,0.06340703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006625516,0.000334027,0.7959803,0.00001903719,0.000004760234,0.00002408407,0.0004733448,0.0002325379,0.00004823094,0.004966108,0.1969946,0.0002603322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.839348,0.000302454,0.000147349,0.0002273269,0.0004165369,0.0002016183,0.000009400806,0.00007083776,0.1592765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615054,0.00001028595,0.0003755884,0.00003031002,0.0004819188,0.0001002417,0.00003159478,0.00003122528,0.03743342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.374353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149193257","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1110.0677","title":"Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-Functional Teams","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":369,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Embeddedness; Knowledge management; Knowledge integration; Traverse; Process (computing); Novelty; Flexibility (engineering); Interpersonal communication; Organizational learning; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Domain knowledge; Social psychology; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05546582255576447,"gpt":0.3204567502916684,"spread":0.2649909277359039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003425649,0.00006703767,0.00006732849,0.0001947116,0.0001949174,0.0000513797,0.0002781838,0.0000418136,0.004257988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004796626,0.00006011781,0.000009208912,0.001864015,0.0002866127,0.0003194791,0.00002593951,0.00008149008,0.0004164094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005135445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009827129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004999145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003238792,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992118,0.00001664537,0.0001571748,0.0002616833,0.000143233,0.000209399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996166,0.00001740861,0.00004176833,0.0001453363,0.000127999,0.00005095398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004080083,0.00007919648,0.9400875,0.000001980801,0.000001074255,7.443205e-7,0.008860588,0.00000345093,0.0009785467,0.04801597,0.00001782405,0.001949051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001369116,0.00001917552,0.9977694,0.000005543841,0.000001064314,0.000006362759,0.0003283172,0.0005716386,0.0006601153,0.0003463655,0.00007130457,0.00008387314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506589,0.00002004364,0.01170629,0.00002364263,0.001003183,0.00005429406,0.000002184225,0.00004246974,0.03648904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983354,0.000004061625,0.0001889975,0.00003796558,0.00004021205,0.000003302222,0.00000272896,0.000007760172,0.001379558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05768183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121719018","doi":"10.1177/009365001028003004","title":"Impression Formation in Computer-Mediated Communication Revisited","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":350,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Impression formation; Psychology; Conversation; Impression; Neuroticism; Personality; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Attribution; Impression management; Big Five personality traits; Face (sociological concept); Computer-mediated communication; Cognition; Trait; Conscientiousness; Extraversion and introversion; Precedent; Cognitive psychology; Social perception; Computer science; Perception; Linguistics; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1239419307592006,"gpt":0.4579228991059863,"spread":0.3339809683467858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002718295,0.0001030115,0.0001526535,0.000504748,0.0003803958,0.00008162182,0.001161582,0.0001634729,0.0007005215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009559644,0.0001034477,0.00003317497,0.001194275,0.0001299511,0.0003511641,0.0004686056,0.0009180615,0.0007691651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001619696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002271383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006317413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003835394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969462,0.001694818,0.0004514554,0.0001980091,0.000334196,0.0003753058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965426,0.0007569409,0.0001250858,0.002180548,0.0003172397,0.00007755291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007619507,0.001691072,0.08545721,0.0001210703,0.00005256506,0.00002361249,0.02332026,0.0003994779,0.002843678,0.06099304,0.03252191,0.7918141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030866,0.00024016,0.4055993,0.0006083078,0.000005858213,0.00006604157,0.002016728,0.3882334,0.00007716291,0.003960378,0.1956597,0.0004463392],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.940945,0.002758322,0.001784755,0.003497085,0.00005919411,0.0006968855,0.00001011286,0.0001157786,0.05013281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924551,0.004842096,0.001269845,0.000121197,0.00002441734,0.0001526034,0.0006502592,0.00001826814,0.0004662688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7913678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577856010","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0169604","title":"The Effectiveness of Teamwork Training on Teamwork Behaviors and Team Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Interventions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":346,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Meta-analysis; Psychological intervention; Moderation; Team effectiveness; Psychology; Applied psychology; Systematic review; Intervention (counseling); MEDLINE; Medicine; Knowledge management; Nursing; Computer science; Social psychology; Management; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2826943511208046,"gpt":0.4251763599049264,"spread":0.1424820087841218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005636141,0.0004581088,0.01299685,0.0003621886,0.0002543915,0.00004550656,0.0005142207,0.0002893722,0.00007836692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004603049,0.0002498014,0.002702351,0.0004086739,0.0002453669,0.00005149361,0.00009292913,0.0005876806,0.000006475922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003296475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004508759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002026438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001286202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954301,0.001777222,0.001778421,0.0004286554,0.000329218,0.000256363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931107,0.002664725,0.002674777,0.001337758,0.0001422435,0.00006976043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004943176,0.0004215302,0.00002927852,0.7450699,0.2507065,6.274707e-7,0.0001579649,4.0933e-7,1.265457e-7,0.0003937242,0.000003503077,0.003167053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003255413,0.000218395,0.0001050077,0.2482314,0.7507041,0.000004025345,0.00003551821,0.00002441464,1.106739e-7,0.00000462857,0.0001689226,0.0001779058],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001184469,0.9924703,0.000003928045,0.00001357381,0.00004836978,0.005313178,0.0001938404,0.00001451663,0.0007578749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01418387,0.9817185,0.00002830404,0.000009867887,0.0000129337,0.003035737,0.00003511122,0.00004140878,0.000934289],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4999976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039279156","doi":"10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.17","title":"The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; Wilfrid Laurier University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Collective efficacy; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Multilevel model; Task (project management); Self-efficacy; Team effectiveness; Social psychology; Longitudinal study; Collective intelligence; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02762097581663547,"gpt":0.3730029183991134,"spread":0.345381942582478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001649108,0.000130105,0.0002976464,0.0002325797,0.0001072485,0.000008492925,0.0002348619,0.0001317355,0.00004450015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002940473,0.00009301928,0.00004853889,0.0002569971,0.0002128349,0.00002663199,0.00003136657,0.0004624255,0.000007709462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001455871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001254719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009494509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001782386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985712,0.00003576364,0.0007448256,0.0001905723,0.0001502009,0.0003073927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998723,0.0004038222,0.0004932958,0.0001680597,0.0001409765,0.00007082172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02338667,0.004085663,0.1294235,0.00003497192,0.001232188,0.0001800416,0.2176015,0.00006451902,0.008181463,0.09412343,0.002685707,0.5190003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003299848,0.000262043,0.9840661,0.0000174179,0.00001275173,0.0001671108,0.006544956,0.00001325186,0.0001349039,0.002036639,0.003337124,0.0001078899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595111,0.0004762552,0.002123863,0.0002029984,0.0005008534,0.0001775989,0.000001355618,0.000003813728,0.03700217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963904,0.00004437543,0.003232584,0.00008100372,0.00009189812,0.00000543791,2.325978e-7,0.00001269313,0.000141375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8546426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3793216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338729281","doi":"10.1037/10690-009","title":"The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"American Psychological Association eBooks","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":287,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Socially distributed cognition; Cognition; Psychology; Knowledge management; Cognitive science; Computer science; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02139794562600186,"gpt":0.3348120793348653,"spread":0.3134141337088635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005897782,0.000286706,0.0005508102,0.00008990794,0.0001676807,0.00003480254,0.0002931191,0.0004266979,0.0001276764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001363081,0.0002274576,0.0001793013,0.0000960383,0.000300967,0.00002762723,0.00002602099,0.0004139808,0.00002955698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004780027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000960477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005827841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006179799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979445,0.00006989375,0.0008276193,0.0004850371,0.0003039566,0.0003689848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966375,0.0006427523,0.001924944,0.00037984,0.0003575184,0.00005742858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001096587,0.0004124463,0.08079523,0.00004166889,0.0005564956,0.00001034331,0.0009143491,0.00006710232,0.00003411672,0.8580525,0.01721332,0.04080585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006876579,0.003115118,0.3125507,0.0003095907,0.0003272941,0.000009958201,0.00168922,0.0001525002,0.00001711323,0.3710942,0.3020198,0.001837891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06041574,0.0002825656,0.001834532,0.00181163,0.001791011,0.002651166,0.004501787,0.0001584527,0.9265531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8927637,0.00009603859,0.0001991916,0.0006953098,0.000214598,0.0004509473,0.0008237344,0.00005503293,0.1047014],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.832348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.927545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998299333","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9042-x","title":"The Effects of Cultural Diversity in Virtual Teams Versus Face-to-Face Teams","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Team effectiveness; Collectivism; Cultural diversity; Homogeneous; Psychology; Knowledge management; Individualism; Team composition; Virtual team; Psychological safety; Task (project management); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00989681300725125,"gpt":0.279373752656166,"spread":0.2694769396489147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000223935,0.00009575111,0.0001186288,0.00007020219,0.0002089604,0.00002672761,0.0001442915,0.00008642086,0.00001546185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007158965,0.00006735283,0.00003601474,0.0001995866,0.00004025607,0.0001071548,0.0001300586,0.0001087434,0.0000444108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004956213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004558111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006472404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008059018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992028,0.00005885442,0.0001940427,0.000191101,0.0001865225,0.0001666266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999159,0.0005228335,0.00008035636,0.000172248,0.00002628915,0.00003929368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037198,0.0004094536,0.1976448,0.00002530563,0.00004913269,0.00001079624,0.01505044,0.001203443,0.002491609,0.03061021,0.008987014,0.7397981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002731944,0.0005070931,0.9892779,0.00002909808,0.00001111313,0.000001814197,0.001852368,0.002408476,0.00007388325,0.0005371828,0.00244057,0.0001285703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936916,0.0002296678,0.003574973,0.00008384569,0.001337179,0.0002310336,0.000005760438,0.0000162062,0.0008297866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993504,0.0000703176,0.00006492568,0.00004083757,0.0000509017,0.00000649283,0.00001250023,0.000005363828,0.0003982201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7916331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2746569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119169479","doi":"10.1177/1046496403256011","title":"Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Small Group Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":283,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Virtual team; Knowledge management; Team effectiveness; Psychological safety; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.118803597453548,"gpt":0.3650703324728546,"spread":0.2462667350193067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001972358,0.00008888142,0.0001452768,0.000309754,0.00008630699,0.00002002294,0.0001578447,0.0001078267,0.0004086471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000376002,0.00008188419,0.00002098448,0.0004401367,0.000247716,0.00006658713,0.00005055389,0.0004588226,0.00003948317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003604391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001786587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003862961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986341,0.0002207817,0.0002012975,0.0002469182,0.000225766,0.0004711431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994557,0.0001558741,0.00003181914,0.0002550184,0.00003362193,0.00006790019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000216535,0.0001703502,0.6634718,0.00006264234,0.00001966983,0.00001250017,0.007528914,0.00001713185,0.0004708011,0.3175429,0.00006538116,0.01042144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004538783,0.003022801,0.9153896,0.0002048679,0.000006868681,0.00006247284,0.05200896,0.006316812,0.0002389226,0.007960645,0.009675818,0.0005734619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313502,0.0002407337,0.0002665768,0.0000612595,0.0001373268,0.0001719542,0.000003363338,0.000009128609,0.06775949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976287,0.0001357249,0.00009661024,0.00001375377,0.00002611349,0.00002112657,0.000002021137,0.00001828734,0.002057675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3095822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009394805","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2003.12.001","title":"Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant Messaging in the workplace","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers in Human Behavior","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":282,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instant messaging; Unintended consequences; Business; Order (exchange); Internet privacy; Information and Communications Technology; Knowledge management; Emerging technologies; Public relations; Face (sociological concept); Critical mass (sociodynamics); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03685422163608166,"gpt":0.3459914690725974,"spread":0.3091372474365157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004069398,0.0001023531,0.0001586365,0.0002396871,0.00008244181,0.00001888423,0.0007916573,0.00008146009,0.00001443008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000578649,0.00008559738,0.00002662422,0.0003794802,0.0005802276,0.00006516856,0.0001048268,0.0003709796,0.000002226713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000845847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001952446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004658719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003719549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991114,0.00009164322,0.0003346999,0.000169278,0.00009884908,0.0001941825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992087,0.00005570987,0.0001339007,0.0005730508,0.00001978507,0.000008814115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000384818,0.0008212384,0.2540601,0.00003678016,0.00001870752,0.0001346404,0.04151264,0.00129281,0.003370571,0.6777261,0.00006533917,0.02092266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005180185,0.0004873484,0.8584912,0.001752826,0.00005799251,0.0001427919,0.0890239,0.0004784307,0.001294124,0.04108917,0.00112969,0.0008723798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994988,0.0003408432,0.0004531061,0.0009697185,0.0001124174,0.0002627681,0.000002375831,0.00006108187,0.002809693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983443,0.00003481153,0.001460294,0.00005728606,0.000002898983,0.00007102875,0.000007635516,0.000007837009,0.00001391705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6366369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.349056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086309276","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2943","title":"Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":270,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Operationalization; Group decision-making; Cognition; Viewpoints; Social psychology; Unanimity; Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02085135856079764,"gpt":0.3167991813581006,"spread":0.295947822797303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001694955,0.0001419338,0.0001930382,0.0001438873,0.000556767,0.0000463711,0.0001236825,0.00009047346,0.0002614103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002676977,0.0001049178,0.000009934048,0.0004360238,0.0002142039,0.0001061677,0.0003343066,0.0001116628,0.000002516731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009987035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003501021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004856263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003912782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990435,0.00002221256,0.0002691289,0.0002982538,0.0002324748,0.0001344866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987265,0.0006436927,0.0001241058,0.00009861773,0.000361338,0.00004568798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001024779,0.0001780241,0.9818247,0.00002886611,0.000008573028,0.00001001002,0.002413475,3.849665e-7,0.00002246004,0.00257291,0.00002328945,0.01281486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007837558,0.00008780946,0.989314,0.0001154932,0.00004493454,0.00007545423,0.00100888,0.000006222526,0.00001646215,0.008247796,0.0001690559,0.0001301158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972175,0.001907925,0.0002760812,0.00004207202,0.00004163351,0.0002264496,0.00004484385,0.00001532589,0.0002281484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993006,0.0003255487,0.000155531,0.00008737522,0.00001492646,0.0000114593,0.00001888689,0.00001454438,0.00007114035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01268474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4282258,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081963863","doi":"10.1108/13527590110395621","title":"Building trust and collaboration in a virtual team","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Team Performance Management","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":269,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Holland College","funders":"","keywords":"Virtual team; Structuring; Knowledge management; Team effectiveness; Function (biology); Quality (philosophy); Foundation (evidence); Virtual organization; Business; Process management; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009830811708199784,"gpt":0.2918565986043523,"spread":0.2820257868961525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004132474,0.0001850504,0.0001778139,0.0003176125,0.0001304858,0.00006274294,0.0001841252,0.00007718926,0.0002490903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003064348,0.0001856152,0.00002141841,0.0005715162,0.00005637601,0.0002803442,0.0001122055,0.0001797854,0.0001543339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001122851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000980871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005907495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006231671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987049,0.00003030505,0.0003072674,0.0003635558,0.000183948,0.0004100062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994918,0.00001423049,0.00008210797,0.0003275886,0.00002145616,0.00006278622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004201626,0.0003790678,0.4959712,0.0001188905,0.00008771606,0.00004763045,0.004904676,0.002132627,0.00008459967,0.05162031,0.008302906,0.4359302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002555225,0.0004647316,0.6783588,0.0001015541,0.00002949256,0.00003875009,0.004097494,0.08132511,0.00001686902,0.0001754653,0.2323429,0.000493663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.867816,0.0001233094,0.0004366191,0.0001792298,0.0004409996,0.0003883766,0.000003084178,0.00007460138,0.1305377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905021,0.0006474844,0.0008069455,0.0002722928,0.0001029483,0.0001314352,0.000008871791,0.00002243632,0.00750547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4354365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7569166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020293948","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00281.x","title":"Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Systems Journal","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":254,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Meaning (existential); Knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Salient; Face (sociological concept); Process (computing); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Geography; Social science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0114062424776571,"gpt":0.285958301780054,"spread":0.2745520593023969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008735411,0.0001467987,0.0001968051,0.0002371583,0.0005893421,0.0008595585,0.000161652,0.0001179853,0.00008262727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005349559,0.0001351106,0.00003790574,0.0002756679,0.00002347755,0.002563904,0.00001079148,0.0003344988,0.00004245205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008758951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000666651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004527758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006222831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984341,0.00008084036,0.0007864808,0.0001027015,0.0003208805,0.0002750345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988745,0.00005509112,0.0005130745,0.000147106,0.0002710226,0.0001392183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004930076,0.0001182042,0.01735081,0.0001549447,0.0002405393,0.00004234783,0.4837246,0.01943898,0.002374212,0.1987884,0.02364892,0.253625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009307456,0.00246453,0.1200537,0.002609446,0.0001320526,0.0163401,0.191728,0.3340302,0.0001167286,0.0007135436,0.3204076,0.002096661],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8241175,0.0008230377,0.06260189,0.0006115473,0.002692887,0.0004969033,0.00006287513,0.0001700766,0.1084233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982917,0.00003736815,0.0007974957,0.0002233243,0.0003866345,0.000007385364,0.00001159018,0.000007028837,0.0002374901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3145913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8288742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063841963","doi":"10.1177/1046496409335103","title":"Cohesion and Performance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Small Group Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Psychology; Group cohesiveness; Psychosocial; Meta-analysis; Outcome (game theory); Team effectiveness; Task (project management); Industrial and organizational psychology; Knowledge management; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Process management; Computer science; Management; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1105722296138464,"gpt":0.4029300611097414,"spread":0.2923578314958951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001136131,0.00008260373,0.00009686829,0.00016082,0.0002276744,0.00004596922,0.0002043605,0.00009559156,0.0002846593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001586701,0.00007190081,0.00001907705,0.0002617151,0.0001046136,0.00006849711,0.00005702319,0.0004484833,0.0003707091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002608356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000136685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008449728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002882892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987828,0.0001027032,0.0001223962,0.0002712969,0.0002294211,0.0004914096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994209,0.00007904666,0.00001791457,0.000308507,0.00006427887,0.0001093236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003628799,0.0002146245,0.1088318,0.00003720007,0.00001342736,0.0000324412,0.001677774,0.000001653778,0.001511077,0.04936853,0.003120263,0.8348284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004251821,0.001136389,0.9731067,0.00002166692,0.000001365645,0.00002437913,0.0001485588,0.001766468,0.00003650374,0.001012912,0.02220288,0.0001169765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9367117,0.000499915,0.00005028063,0.0005714254,0.0001338971,0.0001630916,0.000002014946,0.00003852408,0.0618292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933426,0.0002542087,0.0002574887,0.0001440243,0.0001395451,0.00001528118,0.000006256155,0.000009939303,0.005830598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.864275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4764839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047660075","doi":"10.1016/j.im.2007.06.001","title":"A Delphi study of knowledge management systems: Scope and requirements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information & Management","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Knowledge management; Delphi method; Delphi; Organizational learning; Business; Knowledge integration; Personal knowledge management; Knowledge engineering; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02708955221828673,"gpt":0.3317167513778687,"spread":0.304627199159582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009637919,0.0001393434,0.0001586609,0.0004457924,0.0000887091,0.00005022589,0.000199987,0.00003933458,0.00005708061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001464336,0.0001337536,0.0000226994,0.0002933778,0.00002575001,0.0004404355,0.0002000557,0.00006338699,0.0002405123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006125286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002671614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007716794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002914076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986074,0.00002821693,0.0006986163,0.0001425884,0.0002670641,0.0002561089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999217,0.00001486178,0.0002560275,0.0003852693,0.00006927593,0.0000575471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004299116,0.001773933,0.01631167,0.002226279,0.001371619,0.00004148766,0.05941917,0.000424776,0.000002395828,0.2261123,0.008936466,0.68295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006272109,0.0006826855,0.6785085,0.0002411348,0.000208258,0.000009406887,0.139324,0.001827337,0.000003970628,0.00009655699,0.1723662,0.0004597822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5814211,0.0002258686,0.006378971,0.00001081897,0.0008327173,0.00161807,0.000005430925,0.0000577479,0.4094493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976764,0.00007815503,0.0003233852,0.0000631787,0.00002333998,0.00007905463,0.00001602204,0.000008154181,0.001732318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6824902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5454313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082619731","doi":"10.1108/02621710210420273","title":"Leadership and trust facilitating cross‐functional team success","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Development","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Variety (cybernetics); Team effectiveness; Psychological safety; Organisation climate; Team development; Team composition; Leadership development; Psychology; Knowledge management; Organization development; Shared leadership; Business; Public relations; Political science; Transactional leadership; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07275145351523146,"gpt":0.2952029706933895,"spread":0.2224515171781581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006016671,0.0001238491,0.0001525569,0.0001968117,0.0001489414,0.00007395463,0.0001536267,0.00004506179,0.00185628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009665769,0.0001077679,0.00004364722,0.0001118793,0.00004917775,0.0001705166,0.00005368229,0.000190293,0.0001098748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007776699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008891591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001638698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000215122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987689,0.00003167934,0.0004864299,0.0001500238,0.0003165888,0.0002464115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947,0.00004383203,0.0002395058,0.0001000552,0.00006461403,0.00008200196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000223008,0.000396673,0.436047,0.0002898038,0.0008003798,0.0001679354,0.01323779,0.0004397492,0.00001218408,0.004204642,0.03108074,0.5131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00125738,0.00007078447,0.8480883,0.00005044208,0.00002002896,0.00006980178,0.002741916,0.0004896395,0.00000631185,0.00007341207,0.1469615,0.0001704609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560984,0.0007887428,0.002693822,0.0005125991,0.001048417,0.000118207,0.000002009586,0.00001553859,0.03872221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681398,0.00007073353,0.00516228,0.0003304245,0.0001045888,0.000007809342,0.000002103405,0.00001084457,0.02617141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5129296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095595227","doi":"10.1348/0963179042596469","title":"The ‘romance of teams’: Toward an understanding of its psychological underpinnings and implications","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Romance; Teamwork; Social psychology; Population; Competence (human resources); Management; Sociology; Psychoanalysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08694579230748804,"gpt":0.4028170666715348,"spread":0.3158712743640467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003724207,0.0001058221,0.0002047718,0.0001331676,0.0001583977,0.00001508065,0.0002082724,0.0001170409,0.00009731506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009491416,0.0000762793,0.00003782644,0.0002994789,0.0003658495,0.0001462321,0.00002776647,0.0001777387,0.000002083908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003597085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007640532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003786903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005452623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988539,0.00005807178,0.000594782,0.0001711141,0.0001863339,0.0001357467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998469,0.0001765775,0.000747156,0.0001356687,0.0003914937,0.00008013834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004643751,0.0003324707,0.1708935,0.00001593249,0.00009679724,0.000002182027,0.001134256,0.0001152525,0.002437318,0.8231424,0.0003293603,0.001036117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001084156,0.0005835221,0.9222361,0.00002067468,0.00002069282,0.0004811111,0.0003851732,0.00002266165,0.00003382704,0.07481463,0.0002393094,0.00007811002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690671,0.0009118263,0.02434872,0.004488621,0.0003523398,0.00008981334,0.00003733345,0.000006079296,0.0006981472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974993,0.0005532678,0.001392219,0.0003871141,0.000115346,0.000001844576,0.00001145676,0.00001119365,0.00002828887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7513426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.311058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049217144","doi":"10.1145/506740.506745","title":"Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":214,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Grounded theory; Axial coding; Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Perspective (graphical); Coding theory; Process (computing); Human–computer interaction; Qualitative research; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Theoretical sampling; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05489389213379445,"gpt":0.3498738756906924,"spread":0.294979983556898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005258277,0.0004323239,0.0004533079,0.0003314785,0.000695809,0.0001789453,0.001269839,0.0001474856,0.000115174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003842379,0.0003383358,0.00008579592,0.0004450422,0.0001822349,0.007202707,0.0001880448,0.0003783482,0.00003514068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002463798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001458131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001989666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004142375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966798,0.0004282444,0.001248203,0.0005066909,0.0004249011,0.0007121659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961881,0.001111068,0.0005746119,0.001794294,0.0001978394,0.000134111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006050477,0.0006072813,0.0002482881,0.0008523338,0.0003103346,0.000001983163,0.0251052,0.04022695,0.0003534324,0.6547831,0.0008975693,0.270563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007434524,0.0004499207,0.0002713226,0.0007140841,0.0001547953,0.0001445735,0.06457797,0.2508324,0.0003846478,0.002736409,0.6705255,0.001773798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1099456,0.00103846,0.8714899,0.000009447615,0.001158716,0.003548784,0.01000984,0.0001325135,0.002666723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8428264,0.0002764883,0.1177553,0.0004571286,0.0006481927,0.00418068,0.03332402,0.0001099476,0.0004217731],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7537345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147312315","doi":"10.17705/1jais.00028","title":"Understanding Virtual Team Development: An Interpretive Study","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Harvard Business School","keywords":"Virtual team; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Knowledge management; Virtual Laboratory; Human–computer interaction; Data science; Multimedia","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05140919654952017,"gpt":0.3091056279735326,"spread":0.2576964314240124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002869594,0.00008092854,0.0001662163,0.0001542475,0.000226514,0.0001477578,0.0002006366,0.00008005598,0.000009381928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002066779,0.00005682958,0.00007763845,0.0001616821,0.000006419061,0.0009962104,0.00001139595,0.0001593733,0.00002382554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001293658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001117407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004408436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006007768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984425,0.0002114063,0.0007787658,0.00004263101,0.0003834439,0.000141292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975108,0.00014395,0.00183572,0.0001123734,0.0003555756,0.00004161305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003395764,0.0005208687,0.3891281,0.00005798763,0.00129554,4.206106e-7,0.3742156,0.004980772,0.00001344952,0.2186181,0.009154825,0.001674789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005022022,0.001514895,0.05880197,0.0001839228,0.0001339947,0.00008161827,0.4766578,0.002159283,0.00002841111,0.0004051164,0.4545898,0.0004211506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7487516,0.00005328256,0.1462039,0.00008492948,0.01622435,0.002471229,0.00005507529,0.00004565615,0.08610991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983593,7.793466e-7,0.00004716458,0.00005573817,0.00009251316,0.00002687486,0.000002625189,0.000006139469,0.001408861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.445435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3382871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151872462","doi":"10.1287/isre.13.1.91.93","title":"Research Report: Better Theory Through Measurement—Developing a Scale to Capture Consensus on Appropriation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Systems Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Construct (python library); Computer science; Nomological network; Scale (ratio); Development theory; Data science; Context (archaeology); Construct validity; Management science; Epistemology; Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Machine learning; Psychometrics; Engineering; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2499821257651017,"gpt":0.4292586744460278,"spread":0.1792765486809261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01636199,0.0001716853,0.0002317919,0.0009085008,0.0006505426,0.000390177,0.0004175558,0.0002788753,0.0003530649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006372622,0.0001484644,0.00005082853,0.001404117,0.0001378508,0.0004548719,0.0001220922,0.001079942,0.009593582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006751532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001150899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000760259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003785267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932402,0.001409021,0.0008989697,0.0003450538,0.003195787,0.0009109738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957259,0.0004198503,0.0001747315,0.0009047227,0.002624106,0.0001506824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006912391,0.0002401544,0.002816723,0.0006972672,0.0002287464,0.000147479,0.1650487,0.001000316,0.000340646,0.2292215,0.5439265,0.05564069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001196615,0.0003517476,0.006972897,0.0005338371,0.000005135847,0.0003857061,0.02973725,0.005135377,0.0001497241,0.001089509,0.9539508,0.0004913776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3021869,0.0003696788,0.01322975,0.009758445,0.002516126,0.003811692,0.00006586632,0.0002167021,0.6678448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991528,0.00001099326,0.0003463094,0.0004259172,0.0003351438,0.0005926214,0.00003581128,0.00002395233,0.006701297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6893411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991942520","doi":"10.1258/135763303322596183","title":"Organizational readiness for telemedicine: Implications for success and failure","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Telemedicine; Telehealth; Alliance; Knowledge management; Health care; Key (lock); Business; Process management; Nursing; Computer science; Medicine; Computer security; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01401072460344846,"gpt":0.3150286580564222,"spread":0.3010179334529737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000409273,0.0001296705,0.0002955945,0.0001588409,0.0001516787,0.000017875,0.0001069894,0.00009003838,0.0001054725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002696581,0.0000962429,0.00004478827,0.0001974515,0.00007730472,0.0000845461,0.000009657508,0.0001414405,4.021748e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001710657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007652017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006283872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002943225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990716,0.00001995316,0.0004389115,0.0001580448,0.0001021744,0.0002093138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985442,0.000266863,0.0002826434,0.0001229129,0.0006462007,0.0001371758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002465107,0.0001628016,0.7477897,0.0003333217,0.0003343084,0.000008354365,0.00234179,0.000004629842,0.00154761,0.1173086,0.09579037,0.034132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01178832,0.003028119,0.3508419,0.0001957139,0.0004822706,0.002641886,0.004219264,0.0001595585,0.0002520219,0.01719251,0.6087162,0.0004821991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9524739,0.003486059,0.02619746,0.01505998,0.0008221025,0.0007664749,0.0001600938,0.0000194427,0.001014465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941496,0.000203146,0.003789575,0.0005994405,0.0007124065,0.0000334249,0.00004239387,0.00002511916,0.0004449273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5129259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3924671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146021054","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00326.x","title":"Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Systems Journal","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtuality (gaming); Knowledge management; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Process management; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02319516072217005,"gpt":0.2925039487538865,"spread":0.2693087880317164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001163806,0.00006076738,0.0001152614,0.00006305989,0.0001542715,0.0001045881,0.0001149937,0.00004670936,0.00002469218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000303349,0.00003918159,0.0000310097,0.00007452376,0.00003875933,0.0005630791,0.000009195061,0.0001854744,0.0000215802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002387939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002106513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004338144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.500392e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990643,0.00008418625,0.0005180719,0.00003243759,0.0001847131,0.0001162905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990996,0.00003919441,0.0005754403,0.0001227197,0.0001194648,0.00004364917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002237539,0.00007762985,0.0559479,0.0001491871,0.0002442572,0.000005485248,0.2223357,0.00464517,0.0004903743,0.3690125,0.006492475,0.3403756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003903897,0.0006764827,0.680418,0.0005740643,0.00005962246,0.005136084,0.1031434,0.02238727,0.0001006786,0.001174384,0.181827,0.0005990617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635358,0.0007199003,0.007949001,0.0002345028,0.00102678,0.0001384922,0.000007735998,0.00001782293,0.02636996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995722,0.00002375666,0.00002275267,0.0001850379,0.000117222,0.000001826087,0.000001138127,0.000001802325,0.00007428607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6244701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1597779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994837612","doi":"10.1177/0149206308331096","title":"Explaining Change: Theorizing and Testing Dynamic Mediated Longitudinal Relationships","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Context (archaeology); Statistical hypothesis testing; Dynamic capabilities; Multilevel model; Scholarship; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Sociology; Knowledge management; Social science; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09052494395485877,"gpt":0.3319141488949431,"spread":0.2413892049400843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009727877,0.00008801412,0.0001314858,0.0002092199,0.0001277649,0.00003362855,0.0001123536,0.00003835073,0.000037269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004031879,0.00007596741,0.00003035097,0.0001869349,0.00001768895,0.0001690342,0.00002701052,0.000277099,0.00001277175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003722961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003959801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003038347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003339051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992024,0.00006000172,0.0003080717,0.0001044647,0.0001525946,0.0001724703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993593,0.0001325318,0.0002924507,0.0001077366,0.00004845363,0.00005953729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002339717,0.0002452022,0.2743322,0.00006819968,0.0003418581,0.0008013558,0.008228612,0.0002144102,0.0001027451,0.06783634,0.0009740714,0.646621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006325946,0.0002651058,0.9899645,0.0001330917,0.00005367544,0.0001639734,0.001489582,0.003772286,4.690295e-7,0.00204029,0.001382168,0.0001022666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759157,0.001026213,0.003218164,0.001853714,0.0005484457,0.0001352085,0.000001489432,0.00002395242,0.01727713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955227,0.0001383809,0.003820285,0.0001693792,0.000133559,0.000002700908,0.00000147046,0.000007564874,0.0002039579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7156323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3097861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072776850","doi":"10.1037/a0030202","title":"Seeing the “we” in “me” sports: The need to consider individual sport team environments.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sport psychology; Team sport; Applied psychology; Sport management; Social psychology; Athletes; Public relations; Physical therapy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04071675118891081,"gpt":0.3132252015812286,"spread":0.2725084503923177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002828047,0.0006004319,0.0005244298,0.0007547486,0.0005089125,0.00006428991,0.001834617,0.0005845705,0.002360511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001024082,0.0004380135,0.0001574612,0.001169423,0.0006470526,0.0001990681,0.0001090747,0.001422726,0.001032956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006932539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002491728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08707485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4781528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941207,0.000250264,0.0008398929,0.001004557,0.0002890657,0.003495491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955053,0.0001802439,0.0002410377,0.00232243,0.00003217954,0.001718812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001128241,0.0001922189,0.6893197,0.000004781691,0.0001639172,0.0002905385,0.01709056,0.00004987384,0.00005022402,0.009549225,0.2485677,0.03460845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005400779,0.00007796486,0.5325416,0.00001513051,0.0000274897,0.0002797832,0.004173307,0.000005600868,0.000001344248,0.0002963991,0.4616892,0.0003521277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8974244,0.001945087,0.00003965384,0.03546357,0.00717887,0.001274371,0.0002241074,0.00006439198,0.05638554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447775,0.0001358596,0.0001273431,0.05111377,0.0005310762,0.0003864108,0.00006324052,0.00009543493,0.002769377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3910779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149880723","doi":"10.1177/104649640203300202","title":"External Activities and Team Effectiveness","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Small Group Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Team effectiveness; Contingency theory; Contingency; Team composition; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Task (project management); Function (biology); Psychological safety; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Process management; Business; Computer science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1120402995085912,"gpt":0.3879505717824805,"spread":0.2759102722738894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001211575,0.0000958729,0.0001248151,0.0001735241,0.0002102613,0.00007240439,0.0001984924,0.00009479532,0.0009821146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000242147,0.00008596141,0.00002976561,0.0001844097,0.0002250359,0.0000800862,0.0001189981,0.0005151135,0.0002905876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004233512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000538965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004113087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009533262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99848,0.0004005185,0.00009412703,0.0002958322,0.0002370564,0.0004924457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991002,0.0004656245,0.00001788574,0.0002799074,0.00003761517,0.00009878333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005606146,0.0007970268,0.3419283,0.0003000028,0.0001212344,0.0001462886,0.007783174,0.000004209948,0.01108058,0.0808365,0.003018586,0.5534235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001342746,0.0008648114,0.969603,0.00009200568,0.000004574491,0.0001032244,0.0008973572,0.002749472,0.0001982328,0.002530918,0.02133273,0.0002809502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.934846,0.00119296,0.0002817029,0.00006348272,0.0002410041,0.0002137575,0.000006484245,0.00003428244,0.06312027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917985,0.0001430319,0.0001157595,0.00002153501,0.0001820481,0.0000955056,0.000001438662,0.00002033308,0.00762182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6276746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068334264","doi":"10.1002/pmj.20268","title":"Teamwork in Integrated Design Projects: Understanding the Effects of Trust, Conflict, and Collaboration on Performance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Management Journal","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université de Montréal","funders":"Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação, Tecnologia e Inovação; University of Salford Manchester; McGill University","keywords":"Teamwork; Competition (biology); Multidisciplinary approach; Knowledge management; Outcome (game theory); Conflict management; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Process management; Business; Computer science; Management; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0723601384957081,"gpt":0.3018263483259309,"spread":0.2294662098302228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009117271,0.0001441044,0.000156638,0.0003806156,0.0001478492,0.00005258851,0.0001865409,0.00005553694,0.00004028737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002025802,0.00009440116,0.00002441766,0.0005835492,0.00007330935,0.0001336913,0.00003354844,0.0003245617,0.00000516696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001240148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003685665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003054775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009442349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989008,0.0002189014,0.0003023363,0.0001687334,0.0001658098,0.000243407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994496,0.00009553231,0.0002210982,0.0001723331,0.00003587276,0.00002559566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007692608,0.001676893,0.1596272,0.001705473,0.001356588,0.0003626883,0.5662332,0.0002694919,0.0001651395,0.1496536,0.01212279,0.09913439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02271114,0.0166491,0.3291258,0.0052753,0.000695252,0.0004949555,0.5236578,0.08003233,0.001484345,0.006445922,0.01129832,0.002129772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487861,0.000456403,0.01165172,0.00005647964,0.0008011296,0.001603209,0.000001329302,0.00002652022,0.03661716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975173,0.000924343,0.0007849332,0.0000859125,0.00003535487,0.0001036094,0.000001058833,0.00001550039,0.0005319522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1694986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3849567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977311727","doi":"10.1348/096317910x502494","title":"Proactively performing teams: The role of work design, transformational leadership, and team composition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Psychology; Team composition; Interpersonal communication; Psychological safety; Personality; Team effectiveness; Social psychology; Proactivity; Applied psychology; Association (psychology); Knowledge management; Computer science; Psychotherapist","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0298283863792663,"gpt":0.309658766157265,"spread":0.2798303797779987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005309156,0.0001144334,0.0001672002,0.0001572535,0.0001739655,0.00002030458,0.0001455417,0.0001287219,0.0004273688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003763498,0.00008169941,0.00003775419,0.0002383893,0.0002477799,0.0002269813,0.00001377054,0.0003927612,0.000005985556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001177838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009702846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002755484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002022311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989597,0.00008225161,0.0004599539,0.0001241356,0.0002406647,0.0001332728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988486,0.0002456171,0.0003774282,0.00008167211,0.0003841175,0.0000625574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002752478,0.0006223233,0.8385772,0.00003246611,0.0003286741,0.000002785443,0.01026466,0.0002152828,0.02182406,0.09686817,0.001526783,0.02698508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008829827,0.0002261933,0.9900741,0.0000185592,0.00003582765,0.0008172829,0.0007280025,0.0004153991,0.0002996,0.004637762,0.001756339,0.0001079549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855349,0.000385241,0.01084678,0.001502642,0.0004443098,0.0001589776,0.00002530316,0.000006440452,0.001095413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951173,0.00003343554,0.004060746,0.0004306455,0.0002759884,0.00000412004,0.00002226111,0.00001214902,0.00004334942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1514969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4679388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150830958","doi":"10.1177/1059601104273067","title":"Effects of Champion Behavior, Team Potency, and External Communication Activities on Predicting Team Performance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group & Organization Management","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Team composition; Psychology; Team effectiveness; Potency; Product (mathematics); Task (project management); Business; Applied psychology; Marketing; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Management; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003572833673213927,"gpt":0.2179120739289823,"spread":0.2143392402557684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001769211,0.0001361929,0.0001270235,0.0001478918,0.000184282,0.0000323302,0.0001603757,0.00006491598,0.00005874817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000044664,0.0001392464,0.00001717307,0.0002759405,0.00005149951,0.0001689851,0.0001057298,0.0001081891,0.00001599947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005353175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003091616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001363105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001196445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991269,0.00006245088,0.0002446015,0.0002131326,0.000187898,0.0001650163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993984,0.00003858285,0.000194577,0.000305477,0.00003874427,0.00002417915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007089106,0.0009773964,0.868251,0.0005002737,0.00006208193,0.00000443835,0.002370614,0.0002856699,0.004208592,0.03901242,0.0007889079,0.08346777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007142788,0.0001968531,0.9956502,0.0001228955,0.00005849636,0.000005890447,0.0003198622,0.001092936,0.001100683,0.00008143315,0.0005121659,0.0001443214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854699,0.0001611902,0.00478939,0.00002850448,0.0002387158,0.0004981254,0.000004035691,0.00008617492,0.008723905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972699,0.0002991551,0.0006937279,0.00005460294,0.00006275959,0.00004894779,0.00006718312,0.00002984402,0.001473874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1273992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5678303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062755142","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00313.x","title":"Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Systems Journal","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Interdependence; Virtual team; Task (project management); Flexibility (engineering); Knowledge management; Virtual work; Work (physics); Computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Sociology; Political science; Management; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02238512331800452,"gpt":0.267272378006539,"spread":0.2448872546885345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008587466,0.00007519977,0.000136932,0.0001083325,0.0002936004,0.00005489411,0.0002201814,0.0000612723,0.0001116488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002632859,0.00004744181,0.00006240106,0.000149949,0.00005978375,0.0006005134,0.00001691254,0.0002518427,0.0002476392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002334449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004621463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009669511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002201616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987919,0.00009820481,0.0006379359,0.0000333309,0.0002809726,0.0001576302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989879,0.00009535291,0.0005427863,0.0001804785,0.0001476633,0.0000458527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003151708,0.0001467232,0.4546805,0.0001180142,0.00055503,0.0000321948,0.2234076,0.03102129,0.00006455752,0.1197048,0.08802669,0.0819274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001850207,0.0003811524,0.470869,0.0002436134,0.00002635124,0.01355597,0.02831442,0.01352951,0.00001726474,0.00009943476,0.4707015,0.000411537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505173,0.0002889362,0.01121055,0.0001187278,0.003587197,0.0001318006,0.00001299495,0.0000221479,0.03411037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990036,0.00005498911,0.00003004141,0.00007149639,0.0002703713,0.000006290441,0.000002762451,0.000004527934,0.0005559193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3826748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3182983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011367146","doi":"10.1177/109442810034001","title":"Enhancing Team Mental Model Measurement with Performance Appraisal Practices","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental model; Psychology; Similarity (geometry); Performance measurement; Field (mathematics); Applied psychology; Performance appraisal; Structural equation modeling; Computer science; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Management; Mathematics; Business; Machine learning; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.202281332311183,"gpt":0.5418131087715147,"spread":0.3395317764603317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006616511,0.0001650814,0.000164484,0.0001744513,0.0005293245,0.00009534515,0.0003764257,0.0001006741,0.009687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006763648,0.0001366798,0.00002326607,0.0009295226,0.0001650059,0.0003535643,0.00006741449,0.0005588357,0.0005388317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002058764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004400211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006447748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000335535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964851,0.0007626217,0.0002683277,0.0004560036,0.001456709,0.0005712927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981521,0.0004577662,0.0001133746,0.0003809436,0.0007346663,0.0001611742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003678389,0.003013483,0.0771411,0.0003544793,0.0009634689,0.00002837362,0.0435173,0.009868003,0.1014274,0.03732775,0.02417351,0.6985068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003671026,0.001817953,0.07047907,0.000252191,0.00007460731,0.0003119511,0.002629472,0.6971792,0.02270081,0.001277595,0.1981514,0.001454763],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7393216,0.0003663618,0.06912004,0.001350219,0.0003602959,0.0006604973,0.00002532828,0.0001425736,0.1886531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557088,0.0001446036,0.1342818,0.0001037674,0.0002161267,0.00006910272,0.0000380336,0.00006117862,0.009376592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.697052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495862623","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2007v32n2a1847","title":"Communication as Organizing: Empirical and Theoretical Explorations in the Dynamic of Text and Conversation.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Empirical research; Sociology; Psychology; Communication; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0236894652025932,"gpt":0.3300927121650307,"spread":0.3064032469624375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001534861,0.00005632198,0.000106351,0.0002017735,0.000129012,0.00003031328,0.0003486664,0.00007152608,0.00008777622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000124737,0.00004633885,0.00001711418,0.0002067617,0.0004520582,0.0001323335,0.00001875117,0.0003076466,0.000003312146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005324581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001536228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001205975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02099578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991516,0.0002568378,0.0003554446,0.00004983048,0.00007748424,0.0001088355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986744,0.0004694049,0.0002041997,0.0004171973,0.0001354171,0.00009936628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006813758,0.00007883852,0.1404774,0.000009985582,0.00003845109,0.00000711742,0.1170324,0.00001486021,0.0001029217,0.7247111,0.0004660081,0.01699279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008214724,0.000181146,0.9266446,0.00008126925,0.00003554623,0.0003171758,0.03477755,0.001260643,0.00001551362,0.03148489,0.004262461,0.0001177579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828502,0.002484586,0.0005561881,0.01051628,0.00003966499,0.00009907061,0.000003331867,0.00000178457,0.003448905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986157,0.0004569116,0.00055076,0.000336937,0.00000771438,0.000001728711,0.00001058497,0.000006417219,0.00001327748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7861671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001809422","doi":"10.1177/104649640103200203","title":"Small Group Brainstorming and Idea Quality","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Small Group Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Brainstorming; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Nominal group technique; Group (periodic table); Nominal group; Social psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2456159282943332,"gpt":0.4430694065309964,"spread":0.1974534782366633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00470146,0.0001915214,0.0002557523,0.0002989823,0.0004150992,0.0001191858,0.0004715968,0.0002260665,0.0005259462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001308868,0.0001814938,0.00007054795,0.0005392392,0.0003082234,0.0001084611,0.0002970513,0.0009323261,0.0003487744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009578974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003180706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005617891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005679195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969472,0.0005934736,0.000369656,0.0006292048,0.0004092968,0.001051193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983261,0.0005262678,0.00006601536,0.0006858744,0.0001247039,0.0002710892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006549424,0.0004430082,0.3950455,0.0002083378,0.0001109589,0.0002791312,0.007300455,0.000002290585,0.003500367,0.2184378,0.001367963,0.3726492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001405901,0.0005090934,0.8826199,0.00005225638,0.000005542046,0.0001026526,0.002196727,0.0005340597,0.000008624133,0.004906768,0.1072529,0.0004056455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.932076,0.001104056,0.0009789699,0.0005874588,0.0003916091,0.0003424337,0.00001063621,0.0000862158,0.06442264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892134,0.0002863318,0.0008390463,0.0002434914,0.0003993872,0.0000829489,0.00002532737,0.00004379313,0.008866262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4875743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8492609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909706795","doi":"10.1177/0018726718817812","title":"From orientation to behavior: The interplay between learning orientation, open-mindedness, and psychological safety in team learning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Relations","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; HEC Montréal","keywords":"Psychological safety; Psychology; Team learning; Team effectiveness; Experiential learning; Interpersonal communication; Curiosity; Social psychology; Cooperative learning; Team composition; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Mathematics education; Open learning; Teaching method; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03750825300240791,"gpt":0.4049421030633305,"spread":0.3674338500609226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003873282,0.0001182667,0.0001565389,0.000110065,0.0004098115,0.0001070419,0.0002411019,0.0001264724,0.002099812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003666853,0.0000990407,0.00002581203,0.000267576,0.00005039782,0.0002071957,0.0001213298,0.000642774,0.0006174503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005898537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001006868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000569423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000285225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987514,0.0002060523,0.0003454802,0.0003899715,0.0001160489,0.0001910641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993174,0.0002131428,0.00012916,0.0002463305,0.00003721143,0.00005674763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000290428,0.00006561774,0.967459,9.477851e-7,0.00001191621,0.000001026527,0.01834728,0.000631511,0.00007136342,0.008436718,0.0002539495,0.004691626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007954577,0.0002125832,0.9826995,0.00002224105,0.00002174858,0.000002305528,0.004299071,0.0002542077,0.00000110669,0.0007071407,0.01084932,0.0001353215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778605,0.00001706127,0.001210054,0.0002310277,0.0003596315,0.0006174467,0.00001545893,0.00003775771,0.01965104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910519,0.000002749867,0.0002364365,0.00007360171,0.00009332087,0.0001050445,0.0003206721,0.00001785471,0.008098383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0152405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934323642","doi":"10.1002/job.1817","title":"The role of positive affectivity in team effectiveness during crises","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Staffing; Positive affectivity; Social psychology; Team effectiveness; Team composition; Mediation; Psychological safety; Applied psychology; Negative affectivity; Management; Personality; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00672633631259875,"gpt":0.2899972979695831,"spread":0.2832709616569843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000508944,0.00007277781,0.0001441654,0.00009257234,0.00008188379,0.00001001223,0.0001255939,0.00005394002,0.000105581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007102098,0.00005249582,0.00004608636,0.0002407636,0.00004381828,0.0001796781,0.00002715617,0.0001815023,0.000008004428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008509575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004105323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002019186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006144828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999216,0.0001492178,0.0002504323,0.00005454728,0.0001779468,0.0001518618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991553,0.0002512868,0.0002500323,0.00008313136,0.000214336,0.00004592624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001125754,0.0004417191,0.9742565,0.000004895999,0.0000224451,0.000003322481,0.0008014787,0.00001738706,0.02140106,0.001994258,0.000007443597,0.0009369223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004379411,0.00007895617,0.9855712,0.00002713765,0.00003170558,0.0001562914,0.0002842195,0.00000392258,0.01322747,0.0000838714,0.00004183875,0.00005543681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998366,0.0005629483,0.00006309503,0.00002230753,0.000478536,0.0001128997,0.0000128263,0.000003175792,0.000378207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997318,0.00001536669,0.00004107746,0.00000456267,0.0001514155,0.000004929649,0.000001755435,0.00001409015,0.00003493734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01131472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2140717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883143972","doi":"10.1007/s11412-018-9279-9","title":"Challenges in online collaboration: effects of scripting shared task perceptions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Teamwork; Task (project management); Perception; Psychology; Group work; Negotiation; Work (physics); Knowledge management; Visualization; Scripting language; Computer science; Medical education; Mathematics education; Engineering; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02305866857406894,"gpt":0.3434953169794521,"spread":0.3204366484053831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005187205,0.0001820063,0.0003730744,0.0005914054,0.00007348916,0.0000743459,0.0004752456,0.0001284161,0.0002770149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002295523,0.0001797339,0.0000781996,0.0006741799,0.0001263961,0.0004335757,0.00008030648,0.0005219865,0.00002213557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001359256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000277627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001459919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000167745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978124,0.0003408655,0.0008712112,0.0002384249,0.000520184,0.0002169223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946957,0.0003629301,0.001077801,0.0001437156,0.003640695,0.00007921411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002696529,0.003682024,0.2289803,0.0002056368,0.003078594,0.001630831,0.2192876,0.01159728,0.02494377,0.01523805,0.01554534,0.473114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007821281,0.005905513,0.8529852,0.00159798,0.00009205152,0.0003227532,0.0241757,0.04196209,0.0005276118,0.0004879425,0.0634461,0.0006757413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710645,0.0007453752,0.01067015,0.001378858,0.0140935,0.0001898742,0.00004095074,0.00002651845,0.001790235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884339,0.0002445094,0.00648483,0.00009473135,0.004545705,0.000006210158,0.00003856539,0.0000220371,0.0001294855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6240049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7329335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778734562","doi":"10.1177/0001839217750856","title":"More and Less Effective Updating: The Role of Trajectory Management in Making Sense Again","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sensemaking; Process (computing); Computer science; Event (particle physics); Test (biology); Trajectory; Cognitive psychology; Work (physics); Psychology; Unexpected events; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02557270114756753,"gpt":0.3697502444296595,"spread":0.344177543282092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008314049,0.0001157318,0.0001374151,0.00009015344,0.0004274429,0.0001183008,0.0004223172,0.00003384756,0.00001376881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001509915,0.00008525679,0.00002605364,0.0001368025,0.001418333,0.0002486949,0.00002943467,0.0001498289,0.000005009375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002584682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004076046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001114956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002647262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989336,0.00007568089,0.0001868259,0.0003422699,0.0001935179,0.0002681741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990983,0.00008655376,0.0002242541,0.0005121009,0.00003814735,0.00004067129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001594483,0.0001891014,0.1046458,0.00003191777,0.00005004063,0.00009796416,0.1201352,0.000004198893,0.003567368,0.1824804,0.00001059788,0.588628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003313386,0.0005618458,0.8977894,0.00004357496,0.000007654527,0.00001646152,0.09798703,0.001183264,0.0002554666,0.001618622,0.00008859079,0.0001168052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9413279,0.00004726277,0.00004925601,0.0001981146,0.0001579134,0.000353899,0.00001007066,0.000007319821,0.05784826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995571,0.000001404122,0.0002159544,0.00004701746,0.00002046752,0.00004746875,5.878064e-7,0.000005413726,0.0001046237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7931436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5225906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981139791","doi":"10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00698.x","title":"The Stages of Group Development: A Retrospective Study of Dynamic Team Processes","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Group dynamic; Teamwork; Team development; Humanities; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Management; Philosophy; Knowledge management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06100721352866301,"gpt":0.3394703689639127,"spread":0.2784631554352497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00384959,0.0002157393,0.0003549494,0.0004432267,0.001619959,0.0001796245,0.000981998,0.00008044881,0.00007800769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001092116,0.0001646643,0.00006860053,0.001926705,0.004383212,0.0004738264,0.00001063449,0.0002516775,0.000001114306],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005246582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01033365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003982832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7561026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973328,0.0002995647,0.0009619298,0.0003713237,0.0003102906,0.0007241295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970199,0.0002750924,0.001209487,0.0002153354,0.0007312422,0.0005489326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001251742,0.0005165525,0.7227432,0.0001570934,0.0001805311,0.0001727031,0.1846599,0.0002199433,0.0004820687,0.08642194,0.0000868528,0.004234048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009946438,0.02851443,0.6379496,0.0003655695,0.00008669565,0.001412973,0.3168045,0.0002881977,0.001082968,0.01009255,0.001806441,0.0006014144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890282,0.0005721518,0.0001966507,0.00009326448,0.0005211015,0.0003211116,0.00003785853,0.000003760475,0.009225973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976527,0.00002206634,0.001980537,0.00001583656,0.00002794748,0.00001445275,0.000001365166,0.000008696571,0.0002763688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7521198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989262698","doi":"10.4018/irmj.2003040103","title":"Virtual Team Trust","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Resources Management Journal","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pennsylvania State University","keywords":"Construct (python library); Virtual team; Knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Confirmatory factor analysis; Exploratory factor analysis; Process (computing); Cognition; Computer science; Applied psychology; Structural equation modeling","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008028424233867175,"gpt":0.2503830584067515,"spread":0.2423546341728843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000629721,0.0001249437,0.0001036808,0.0003288233,0.0002823977,0.0002662083,0.0002476084,0.00005915602,0.003269295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001288408,0.0001093275,0.00007433914,0.0002027538,0.00003390897,0.0006661356,0.00003189045,0.0002769183,0.001756339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004979442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007727186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003260865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.227291e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987924,0.00006424452,0.0004606869,0.00007540592,0.0003115374,0.0002957234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993353,0.00001519207,0.0002796882,0.0002150466,0.00004931111,0.0001053889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001544506,0.000156105,0.01769873,0.00004180479,0.0003791439,0.00003289878,0.02196752,0.00212895,0.000001442364,0.5229521,0.1162861,0.3182008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009326879,0.00009948316,0.01324569,0.00001428533,0.00001793402,0.0001634718,0.008755377,0.0007695253,0.000001398666,0.0006628311,0.9751895,0.0001478343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2363409,0.00004544354,0.007794144,0.000118634,0.001086707,0.0001309344,0.000003652536,0.00004910729,0.7544305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824794,0.00007226341,0.000723607,0.001214458,0.0001295172,0.0000153055,0.000008817105,0.00001072145,0.01534589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8589033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030065216","doi":"10.1177/104649640103200403","title":"Does Diversity Affect Group Efficacy?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Small Group Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Group cohesiveness; Cohesion (chemistry); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Diversity (politics); Group structure; Self-efficacy; Sociology; Communication; Psychotherapist","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1139629635816341,"gpt":0.3971148830703673,"spread":0.2831519194887332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002128144,0.0001563364,0.0001861878,0.0002710255,0.0007446925,0.0000704038,0.0007557276,0.000181917,0.002374202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005887236,0.0001058692,0.0001050644,0.0006168998,0.0002485988,0.00009030027,0.0008239346,0.0008206136,0.001781168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009871053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001474826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002492289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002024222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973999,0.0004359361,0.0001635362,0.0005248752,0.000511011,0.0009647394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985227,0.0004545365,0.00003484622,0.0006860245,0.00009316808,0.0002087365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009882693,0.001111159,0.8408512,0.00005762347,0.0001416867,0.0005064307,0.00386822,0.000005036345,0.0007013337,0.04060889,0.007282923,0.1038773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001255132,0.0005361703,0.9127685,0.0000218195,0.000006710301,0.00001973102,0.0005270272,0.0002662754,0.000009140791,0.001192323,0.08316123,0.0002358793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496338,0.0001534738,0.0003161631,0.000513734,0.0009331183,0.0004002856,0.00001406711,0.0001092721,0.04792608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841907,0.000148801,0.0001361736,0.00008594069,0.0004398619,0.00003567096,0.000026528,0.00002710246,0.0149092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1036414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993425663","doi":"10.3200/jrlp.139.2.101-118","title":"Gender Influences as an Impediment to Knowledge Sharing: When Men and Women Fail to Seek Peer Feedback","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Psychology","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Task (project management); Team composition; Composition (language); Applied psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0415268762719375,"gpt":0.3880405502991686,"spread":0.346513674027231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001818381,0.0001787656,0.0002780296,0.0002208862,0.0001074623,0.00004117089,0.0007122658,0.0001145927,0.001813652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002339921,0.0001226587,0.00004107563,0.0001505982,0.00007743404,0.000169641,0.0001242861,0.0003688461,0.000779724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007498001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003483578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004126768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005119645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984324,0.0001616968,0.0004788298,0.0002451855,0.0002108036,0.0004711128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987348,0.00006447714,0.0001984828,0.0004359847,0.0001787724,0.0003875308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003039492,0.0006893581,0.02842451,0.00001710796,0.0005641758,0.00003275681,0.7068734,0.0003794247,0.004949587,0.003980633,0.1599609,0.09108873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002790781,0.004804565,0.4786121,0.00002725329,0.0000824106,0.001682792,0.01803791,0.0001609699,0.00004532488,0.009162939,0.4841135,0.0004794955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589646,0.0004295505,0.0001963483,0.01019719,0.0006853387,0.0001665929,0.000004562558,0.00001283547,0.02934294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861564,0.00005796549,0.0006727768,0.006385241,0.0007040252,0.00001300032,6.29405e-7,0.00002399933,0.005985956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6888354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143856037","doi":"10.1037/a0037877","title":"Monitoring and talking to the room: Autochthonous coordination patterns in team interaction and performance.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"PsycINFO; Psychology; Nonverbal communication; Checklist; Applied psychology; Team Role Inventories; Delphi method; Social psychology; Teamwork; Cognitive psychology; MEDLINE; Communication; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01518320003291276,"gpt":0.3203605230673254,"spread":0.3051773230344127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007242289,0.000101252,0.0001797465,0.0002279579,0.00006970001,0.00002918392,0.0001279723,0.00009060209,0.00002455899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008406565,0.00007641751,0.00001911979,0.0001132705,0.00002271942,0.00008648899,0.00003043089,0.0004031228,0.00001167991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002918251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005094782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001283681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001341236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991912,0.00004575678,0.0003388812,0.0001565236,0.00008508591,0.0001825762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994566,0.000079479,0.0002316403,0.0001437462,0.0000318509,0.00005662055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006491603,0.00009315425,0.2693074,0.0000192138,0.0000370349,0.000003835673,0.008656876,0.000294582,0.0014474,0.0009431954,0.0004874554,0.7180607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001008505,0.0005348245,0.9860704,0.00005636116,0.0000123384,0.0003366226,0.000963482,0.001170933,0.00004856284,0.0002447178,0.009446825,0.0001064177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877084,0.00006257721,0.002223983,0.0008950839,0.001557215,0.0001260782,6.526192e-7,0.000006878914,0.007419083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987749,0.00008566504,0.0002820318,0.0003224313,0.0004637351,0.00001459485,4.306966e-7,0.00001235687,0.00004387786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7179543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3116215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055617508","doi":"10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01050.x","title":"Group Composition, Creative Synergy, and Group Performance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Creative Behavior","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Brainstorming; Group (periodic table); Creativity; Creative problem-solving; Composition (language); Sample (material); Mathematics; Group behavior; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Art; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01941959219568124,"gpt":0.3044232955727095,"spread":0.2850037033770282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006059379,0.0001756756,0.0002731428,0.0001142338,0.0002535505,0.00002976634,0.0002537644,0.00007344042,0.0007076372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006742027,0.0001119679,0.00007254371,0.0001738623,0.0002816327,0.0002817068,0.00004171228,0.0003766471,0.00002424164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005391779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000145121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001396358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001691137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988194,0.0002152373,0.0003962471,0.0001151681,0.0002185603,0.0002353615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989703,0.0001222688,0.000417899,0.0001971488,0.0001892929,0.0001030355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005619852,0.002262665,0.7796769,0.00003222018,0.0005627691,0.0003361406,0.02801589,0.00005265397,0.0140887,0.01723727,0.002541512,0.1495735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00112814,0.001339771,0.9904708,0.00007508235,0.0002781641,0.001790281,0.001998067,0.00009187195,0.0001231934,0.0001111,0.002432729,0.0001608406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891346,0.0006909673,0.0009885791,0.0001897678,0.0002708898,0.0001679606,0.00001412306,0.00001254888,0.008530541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967081,0.0009296464,0.0002442513,0.0001341274,0.0001918532,0.00001529314,0.000005959026,0.00001985843,0.001750919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2107939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7748131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997730562","doi":"10.4018/jec.2007010103","title":"Virtual Team Leadership","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of e-Collaboration","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Teamwork; Virtual team; Qualitative research; Psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03240829765169296,"gpt":0.3559039781260779,"spread":0.3234956804743849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008320529,0.00008542278,0.0001083616,0.0003081922,0.00003572482,0.00007742695,0.0003134063,0.00009061181,0.0005670484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009456414,0.00007848158,0.0000607435,0.0002165032,0.00003555698,0.000396639,0.0000149165,0.0002111749,0.0001298218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001440536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009702488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001174753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009232682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987653,0.0000354132,0.0004930888,0.00009466382,0.0004576019,0.0001538916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983789,0.00009224152,0.0004334438,0.00009265285,0.00093382,0.0000688915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006178956,0.001553037,0.09731368,0.00001531935,0.001495814,0.000692282,0.04858581,0.001875748,0.024187,0.3289134,0.1403057,0.3488832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00928262,0.00284728,0.3703442,0.0002582389,0.0001150487,0.001591275,0.06484754,0.001936148,0.005751845,0.004327029,0.5377495,0.0009493029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408309,0.0002620413,0.01826128,0.003787801,0.01161212,0.00008480575,0.00001716923,0.00001874188,0.02512514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994512,0.00001583987,0.0005698657,0.0006284166,0.001634643,0.000001110267,0.00001112589,0.00001148999,0.002615524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3974438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6208782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064941040","doi":"10.1177/1046496406296961","title":"Exploring Traditional and Virtual Team Members’ “Best Practices”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Small Group Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Virtual team; Team effectiveness; Psychology; Best practice; Team composition; Psychological safety; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Applied psychology; Social cognitive theory; Cognition; Perception; Social psychology; Computer science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5864915202261933,"gpt":0.455057985168839,"spread":0.1314335350573543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004065048,0.0001147368,0.0001186506,0.0003022175,0.0003079995,0.00008047383,0.0002420858,0.0001035639,0.0007337024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001689179,0.000112064,0.00003363965,0.0003603987,0.0002238827,0.0003218525,0.00007379167,0.0008783241,0.0004020495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003543366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00124194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001132213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980579,0.0001590314,0.0002149692,0.0003912443,0.0004816386,0.0006952313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983631,0.000943966,0.0000793314,0.0002928725,0.0001032556,0.0002175166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001426333,0.001828237,0.06541818,0.0001006617,0.0002079517,0.0004202577,0.01750198,0.00001016124,0.005866491,0.5758974,0.005744391,0.325578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002322427,0.002916567,0.6947091,0.00008326393,0.00001692636,0.0003459997,0.02380167,0.000911706,0.0001663731,0.00172224,0.2723891,0.0006145958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8676993,0.0001741928,0.0002243422,0.0003098425,0.0005296726,0.0001868965,0.0000119644,0.00003394839,0.1308298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927865,0.0001656636,0.000492723,0.00006377372,0.000691924,0.00007505327,0.00002137321,0.00002733014,0.005675655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6292909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8033527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147519974","doi":"10.1002/job.680","title":"Personality and teamwork behavior in context: The cross‐level moderating role of collective efficacy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Agreeableness; Psychology; Conscientiousness; Social psychology; Personality; Teamwork; Interpersonal communication; Moderation; Organizational citizenship behavior; Collective efficacy; Multilevel model; Big Five personality traits; Context (archaeology); Organizational commitment; Extraversion and introversion","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02058490276017443,"gpt":0.3216701921038189,"spread":0.3010852893436445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004452374,0.0001083935,0.0002054021,0.00009987909,0.0001549631,0.00004480702,0.0001902771,0.0001180084,0.0007042795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000146619,0.00008145106,0.00005287343,0.0002890432,0.0001553065,0.0001199682,0.00003643251,0.0005502829,0.000003184795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004457524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002020908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007342016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001682737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989405,0.00006017904,0.0004925569,0.0001225838,0.0002464008,0.0001378079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987479,0.0001861386,0.0003882897,0.0001236135,0.0004955163,0.00005854686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008877387,0.0004656932,0.9769227,0.000002408811,0.00001815978,0.000007716338,0.006201412,0.0000258506,0.01151771,0.002725022,0.00003414742,0.001990408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001028393,0.000103425,0.996722,0.00001152983,0.00005406687,0.0002593689,0.0009115276,0.0001007911,0.000519262,0.0001552817,0.00004881141,0.00008557635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988458,0.000126095,0.00006467791,0.0001288114,0.0003805799,0.0001914504,0.00006574456,0.000003977185,0.0001928765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989485,0.000003620433,0.0005356187,0.00005362179,0.000152162,0.000009315886,0.000004878927,0.00001935272,0.0002729556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01979926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7711367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003693092","doi":"10.1109/52.896247","title":"Using different communication media in requirements negotiation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Software","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Videoconferencing; Face-to-face; Multimedia; Face (sociological concept); Human–computer interaction; Software engineering; Knowledge management; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07190237722778792,"gpt":0.3512841123088291,"spread":0.2793817350810411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009492823,0.00008276397,0.00009686577,0.00006026305,0.00009602366,0.00001112041,0.0001571738,0.00007683878,0.00133001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001031174,0.00008188435,0.00002148986,0.0001377961,0.00002352208,0.00009559807,0.00001557071,0.0001282004,0.000127672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000777294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009682213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002852326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004634599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999333,0.0000696178,0.0001914232,0.0001364217,0.0001011886,0.0001683388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994946,0.00005093394,0.00005090981,0.0003524315,0.0000208075,0.00003036026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001299102,0.00041982,0.7459989,0.00003313383,0.00003768992,0.000008456793,0.02450867,0.002691799,0.0002256123,0.000554404,0.0007925123,0.2245991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001106598,0.00003478844,0.9882095,0.0001126881,0.00001331911,0.00000582946,0.0001684172,0.00680531,0.00003730996,0.001263928,0.002005363,0.0002369075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972446,0.0002134097,0.001049281,0.00004623007,0.0004256171,0.0001075819,0.00001023158,0.00005211916,0.0008509547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985884,0.00005396164,0.0007911152,0.0001221716,0.00005464075,0.00001355877,0.00004518156,0.00001381366,0.0003171659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2422106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050969803","doi":"10.1177/1046496404263765","title":"Group-to-Individual Transfer of Learning","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Small Group Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Transfer of learning; Group (periodic table); Social learning; Cooperative learning; Cognition; Structuring; Task (project management); Group learning; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Transfer of training; Transfer (computing); Developmental psychology; Mathematics education; Teaching method; Pedagogy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1218175496369521,"gpt":0.3966764926379211,"spread":0.274858943000969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002130432,0.0001225714,0.0001904599,0.0003810292,0.0001848542,0.00003587231,0.0005216617,0.0001472222,0.0006388635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004444303,0.0001171049,0.00008001894,0.0006768167,0.0001480743,0.00005339989,0.0001072574,0.0009064866,0.0006098393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005733231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004284824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001153136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007601607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997843,0.0002367109,0.0002628826,0.0003683467,0.0005523972,0.0007366251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991791,0.0001449572,0.00001699535,0.0003631285,0.0001162129,0.000179647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001110086,0.001549073,0.1061395,0.0002347585,0.0003139396,0.0001576902,0.04004602,0.001022152,0.02437828,0.6986133,0.0006679274,0.1257673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006370559,0.007218852,0.8859972,0.0002253899,0.00002875422,0.00006105541,0.007137834,0.0002091662,0.00108909,0.007494237,0.08330034,0.0008674916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779903,0.0001633982,0.00452287,0.0004221208,0.0002276722,0.0003256357,0.00001788587,0.00004602181,0.01628404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973035,0.00002412273,0.0007194055,0.00005553356,0.0001517264,0.00006396019,0.00002731374,0.00003581016,0.00161865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7798578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7838454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007892274","doi":"10.4018/jec.2005070101","title":"Virtual Teams","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of e-Collaboration","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Teamwork; Virtual team; Knowledge management; Empirical research; Computer science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00771520895200994,"gpt":0.329855437659349,"spread":0.322140228707339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000285863,0.0000763373,0.0001002983,0.0002026123,0.00003145829,0.00008669149,0.0002990148,0.00006522016,0.001213618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005080444,0.00006838335,0.00005519125,0.0001456649,0.00002329054,0.0005250991,0.00001757671,0.0001578089,0.0002634859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001569166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001116555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009828398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006269501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998984,0.00003731814,0.0004167379,0.0000847169,0.0003785896,0.00009858624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986364,0.00003920384,0.0003734403,0.00008979537,0.0008096833,0.00005152071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001729935,0.001139297,0.02526056,0.000003992728,0.0009245719,0.0001523969,0.0221573,0.01018929,0.01020632,0.223623,0.1225902,0.5820231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004078546,0.0008771693,0.04636576,0.00007255029,0.00004625613,0.0005634903,0.004859017,0.006178773,0.00131534,0.001435214,0.9338418,0.0003661095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672677,0.0002034042,0.003939924,0.007955014,0.006264139,0.00005984978,0.00002347889,0.0000142815,0.01427219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931783,0.00003942771,0.001053507,0.0005683028,0.002364387,0.000002579856,0.00001086858,0.000009930518,0.002772677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8112515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}