{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6296,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":8,"predictions_cover":6296,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"67938bb59287","filters":{"topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation"}},"results":[{"id":"W2126891096","doi":"10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105725","title":"Ecological Impacts of Deer Overabundance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2059,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Foraging; Ecosystem; Ecological succession; Shrub; Biology; Vegetation (pathology); Agroforestry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01026782594504128,"gpt":0.2540290699394593,"spread":0.2437612439944181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007894711,0.00008726365,0.0004140144,0.00002163697,0.00005278452,0.000001394567,0.00009877761,0.0001148962,0.0003218967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007402812,0.000067647,0.00005725986,0.0001426554,0.0002496941,0.0001221953,0.00006680287,0.00006737246,0.00007217293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001138801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003924128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002341839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001196663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988696,0.0001549935,0.0005867644,0.0001307139,0.0001213288,0.0001365986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991994,0.0001514915,0.0004053385,0.0001459984,0.00004785623,0.00004993931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001424156,0.0003172897,0.9563202,0.01140488,0.00004322233,0.000003869453,0.0003452011,0.0001810103,0.0001160006,0.02636117,0.004706895,0.0001860721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003121176,0.0003031617,0.9929819,0.001917397,0.00005478972,0.00004111664,0.0001029711,0.00009898969,0.00001837367,0.003745129,0.0003391689,0.00008493821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914824,0.004643871,0.0004675838,0.0009319182,0.0001328973,0.0004862043,0.00001097964,0.00001032739,0.001833848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952005,0.002841596,0.0008408238,0.001005206,0.000009733817,0.00001885689,0.000003164715,0.000003153107,0.00007703552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0366617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3524543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142023815","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x","title":"Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1764,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique","keywords":"Biodiversity; Spatial heterogeneity; Geography; Land cover; Ecology; Agriculture; Landscape ecology; Natural (archaeology); Cover (algebra); Environmental resource management; Land use; Biology; Habitat; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005870297535078081,"gpt":0.1741893577176829,"spread":0.1683190601826048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001096344,0.00006744541,0.00007213892,0.00002540338,0.0001156269,0.000007838222,0.00006378545,0.00009592431,0.001275173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001734374,0.00005857559,0.00001843977,0.00006876927,0.0001226697,0.000135405,0.00008273345,0.0001785693,0.0003430796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000203258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002908626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005953081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01421231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999498,0.00003519898,0.00007316444,0.0001892292,0.00004755016,0.0001569106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998259,0.00005163894,0.00002914418,0.00005414619,0.000002219917,0.0000369276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002019353,0.00002489429,0.9706041,5.842348e-7,0.000005273111,0.000008034068,0.00003167368,0.00002986356,0.01539725,0.00001337806,0.0138341,0.0000306191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003449422,0.00002911417,0.9989294,2.627322e-7,0.000005655389,0.00002473058,0.00001937333,0.00005262079,0.0001348797,0.00001397993,0.000371029,0.00007398149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868365,0.00000169344,0.000001773754,0.01250972,0.000237451,0.00006422497,0.000002872618,0.00001815891,0.000327593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963784,0.000001097221,0.00009896245,0.0034493,0.00003388922,0.000005546525,0.00001504006,0.000001250887,0.00001657927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0283253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143565343","doi":"10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.367","title":"Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1710,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Fecundity; Biology; Juvenile; Herbivore; Density dependence; Population; Ecology; Reproduction; Vital rates; Variation (astronomy); Population growth; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008946037446281415,"gpt":0.2510882515243733,"spread":0.2421422140780918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007857511,0.00006180708,0.0003216323,0.00002106778,0.00003518565,0.000001397435,0.0000486983,0.00008453905,0.0002349514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009138136,0.00005349228,0.00001692229,0.00009165306,0.00006089096,0.0001188829,0.0000266147,0.00004412284,0.000006902153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002429171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004547699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001647521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001072311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990336,0.0002191131,0.0004965881,0.00009977723,0.00007042734,0.00008044404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995421,0.00011637,0.0002262528,0.00008480675,0.00001266348,0.00001782691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007079086,0.00006027726,0.993162,0.004701389,0.000006935106,7.705574e-7,0.0002745021,0.00001760238,0.00000280316,0.001298943,0.00004122342,0.0004265008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001804681,0.00005372454,0.9933439,0.001330337,0.00002258736,0.000006470723,0.00005143708,0.004037004,3.388565e-7,0.000898605,0.00002978798,0.00004526443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980234,0.0009532989,0.00002540239,0.0003010411,0.00003332723,0.0003300245,0.0000140131,0.000002843627,0.0003166665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979655,0.001431085,0.0002298941,0.0002340335,0.000003365006,0.00001174985,0.00002734465,0.000002493023,0.00009450203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004019402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2572553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111760270","doi":"10.1126/science.1194442","title":"The Impact of Conservation on the Status of the World’s Vertebrates","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1536,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Simon Fraser University; Okanagan College","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Threatened species; Biodiversity; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biome; Geography; Habitat; Habitat destruction; Ecology; Conservation status; Vertebrate; Global biodiversity; Conservation-dependent species; Range (aeronautics); Near-threatened species; Biology; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01001802260627915,"gpt":0.2533564268963726,"spread":0.2433384042900935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007580399,0.00004361431,0.00003896915,0.00001333937,0.0004703458,0.00001716859,0.0005442281,0.00001653895,0.0003656202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006514197,0.00001700791,0.0000329609,0.0006746922,0.002497193,0.000138315,0.0001021003,0.0001186842,0.0000355201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004413278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001298639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005921281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002671323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992985,0.00004465353,0.0001069062,0.0001015084,0.0002432545,0.0002051392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991499,0.0003505731,0.000117904,0.0003300705,0.00002129663,0.00003022452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006875937,0.00001482606,0.9337522,2.365319e-7,0.000001391435,2.067937e-8,0.0001218326,0.0001166942,0.05971524,0.003491877,0.002010818,0.0007679851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003704098,0.00003076585,0.9789948,0.000002420501,0.000001509921,3.443692e-7,0.00003930766,0.001991181,0.01577648,0.002389395,0.0007143413,0.00002240679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990019,0.000003359902,0.00000240964,0.003448762,0.0002040198,0.0001202461,0.000002015152,0.000003483865,0.006196748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991187,0.000003293867,0.00002269074,0.0004011689,0.000006458904,0.000004956311,1.28906e-7,0.000001362794,0.0004412804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0452426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9201013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028644412","doi":"10.1890/04-0953","title":"WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1365,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Geological Survey; National Science Foundation","keywords":"National park; Ecology; Trophic level; Trophic cascade; Geography; Biology; Food web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009518809618625109,"gpt":0.242566763542704,"spread":0.2330479539240789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002517096,0.00009694432,0.000120225,0.00006062973,0.00009226111,0.000005979359,0.0001746758,0.0001419373,0.00458984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001057267,0.0001028145,0.000025465,0.0001683614,0.0002708862,0.0002915037,0.00009014616,0.000155239,0.001338055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003140585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003096343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001352128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005896266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990017,0.00006878493,0.0002600475,0.0002591026,0.0001442879,0.0002660362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997037,0.00008680169,0.00007831947,0.0000769254,0.000009558393,0.00004467829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001385246,0.0002093833,0.9906778,8.859805e-7,0.000004525932,0.00001234805,0.0002389505,0.00490278,0.001550805,0.000137891,0.001401088,0.0008496333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004033774,0.00005914514,0.9933417,0.000001938681,0.000004768367,0.000009678271,0.00003895656,0.0008134741,0.0001090833,0.000557963,0.004554208,0.0001056553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952615,0.00001444529,0.000004151713,0.001943103,0.00007847529,0.0001975059,0.000003408604,0.00002482134,0.002472595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924583,0.0000116722,0.000494051,0.005414807,0.00004994974,0.0002080818,0.000006832052,0.000006388287,0.001349926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005761053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784805535","doi":"10.1126/science.aam9712","title":"Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1287,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of Lethbridge; University of Alberta; University of Guelph","funders":"Division of Biological Infrastructure; University of California, Davis; Norges Forskningsråd; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Robert Bosch Stiftung; Leverhulme Trust; American Society of Mammalogists; Division of Environmental Biology; Irish Research Council; European Commission; Leakey Foundation; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Anthropocene; Environmental science; Geography; Environmental ethics; Astrobiology; Earth science; Geology; Biology; Paleontology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01548073805353641,"gpt":0.281597755414131,"spread":0.2661170173605946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007876359,0.00004581863,0.00003702029,0.00002899206,0.0002770688,0.00003146603,0.0004292884,0.00002591381,0.000290315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001186741,0.00003541197,0.000008648922,0.001169966,0.001493533,0.0003947142,0.00009682707,0.00006340523,0.0001936369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002170539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004603971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009942673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003342115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991507,0.00004840157,0.0001137798,0.0002233123,0.0002279113,0.0002358761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997672,0.0000133359,0.0000304279,0.000161206,0.000002350899,0.00002546883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005426173,0.00003666903,0.9967609,1.273703e-7,1.592564e-7,0.000002265631,0.0002484742,0.00004125173,0.0004735349,0.0001111131,0.0003514938,0.001968597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001439536,0.00003601967,0.995819,0.000003223407,5.283929e-7,0.000003671997,0.0002821446,0.0004572235,0.0001720099,0.002447403,0.0005912257,0.00004362043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862273,0.00000231517,0.00003097683,0.001869309,0.0005088149,0.0001100365,7.47812e-7,0.000006677339,0.01124382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988448,0.000001233625,0.0002347032,0.0007943866,0.00006277246,0.000009264731,3.689422e-7,9.572336e-7,0.00005148625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01261752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5502985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055032654","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12432","title":"REVIEW: Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1245,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Innovates; University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute","keywords":"Occupancy; Wildlife; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Camera trap; Distance sampling; Abundance estimation; Environmental science; Geography; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0729098637738287,"gpt":0.3418696760610518,"spread":0.2689598122872231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005259216,0.0003376098,0.002379969,0.0001134406,0.0001659627,0.0000170736,0.0004443075,0.0003819265,0.0007254476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009640924,0.0002617758,0.0002098562,0.0004484056,0.0001209286,0.000116873,0.0001789157,0.0005261137,0.0001224385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002778129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003655856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001454492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008335843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972962,0.000363093,0.001473602,0.0003884588,0.0001434588,0.0003352049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968385,0.0009656681,0.001624804,0.0001920168,0.0001306837,0.0002483937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009332255,0.0001205772,0.0002197678,0.03277306,0.0001360912,0.000004500357,0.00003233495,0.000004438057,7.481658e-8,0.00005692182,0.4383393,0.5283036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001943924,0.000349945,0.0003204202,0.01094687,0.001447764,0.0001812602,0.000007405011,4.212149e-7,3.810917e-8,0.0004043771,0.9858949,0.0002522227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001195047,0.9847785,0.0001836215,0.01166356,0.0002379995,0.002443182,0.0000217018,0.00001325561,0.0006462851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000003550628,0.9707675,0.002267802,0.0261734,0.0001393226,0.0004835303,0.00005230745,0.00002650283,0.00008610947],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5475556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074807536","doi":"10.1139/z01-094","title":"Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the \"landscape of fear\" in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Idaho State University; Eppley Foundation for Research; University of Wyoming","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Bison bison; Canis; National park; Foraging; Gray wolf; Wildebeest; Cervus elaphus; Ecology; Wildlife; Biology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01132424291598929,"gpt":0.205234382040675,"spread":0.1939101391246857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006818033,0.00004538918,0.0001036624,0.00009970984,0.00007247967,0.000009040301,0.000146682,0.00007124177,0.0008385373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002445823,0.00003568727,0.00001848641,0.0001954921,0.0003459151,0.0001719874,0.00001407885,0.0001780798,0.00000894124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007544193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001957492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004307854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2224867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993903,0.00008281603,0.0002229703,0.0000680093,0.00008385762,0.0001520623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995584,0.0001211764,0.0001413115,0.00005208066,0.00002264635,0.0001043326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001367075,0.000005885273,0.9924451,7.178955e-7,0.000005406494,0.00004035555,0.0003934756,0.0003302428,0.00005640905,0.000192109,0.005622245,0.0008944135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002391671,0.00006731832,0.9903167,0.000007038661,0.000004898768,0.0003294657,0.0003476996,0.0001381932,0.000007756892,0.001634691,0.006870457,0.00003661193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891975,0.0002455074,0.00001381893,0.005748325,0.0001358686,0.00003513641,0.000001652325,6.799248e-7,0.004621524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985098,0.00005039789,0.0001188163,0.000975595,0.00004033707,8.955145e-7,9.505928e-7,0.000002692807,0.0003005688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2181789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9181395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103991154","doi":"10.1038/ncomms2380","title":"The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":910,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute; Society of Canadian Ornithologists; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Wildlife; CATS; Geography; Predation; Wildlife conservation; Fishery; Ecology; Environmental health; Environmental protection; Biology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03139328307666504,"gpt":0.3393207488330284,"spread":0.3079274657563634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003788834,0.0001810023,0.000371155,0.00006333049,0.0004564427,0.00001350415,0.003200777,0.0003537864,0.00006699785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000683538,0.00008819668,0.0003026643,0.0008769374,0.0005574425,0.00005222304,0.0008191716,0.001156709,0.00004786086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001746233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009741418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008011449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003876722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985248,0.0006107669,0.0004046035,0.0001270717,0.0001794788,0.0001532478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936906,0.002518832,0.0006177516,0.003100107,0.00004088014,0.00003189712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002652769,0.001118792,0.05785264,0.001236112,0.001493116,8.475932e-7,0.001425073,0.003633795,0.00001027702,0.01526678,0.4844173,0.4335188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009386968,0.00004200059,0.04206912,0.001072145,0.0002271524,0.000005116615,0.00002900762,0.0003480006,6.575033e-7,0.0007260424,0.955244,0.0001429059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003694998,0.9913036,0.000002535628,0.002325661,0.0001324371,0.0009146581,0.00008661013,0.00001793439,0.001521579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01414551,0.9850501,0.0001239955,0.0002375767,0.00001084536,0.0001013896,0.0001460186,0.00001662024,0.0001679761],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4708267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5947894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073835608","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1323964111","title":"Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":877,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Domestication; Geography; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02338549427581575,"gpt":0.3011877542371018,"spread":0.277802259961286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001420938,0.00003842217,0.00008148597,0.00002420083,0.0001589164,0.000003884827,0.0002794429,0.00002414734,0.000009346701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006065749,0.00001910567,0.00002273662,0.0002694326,0.00291928,0.0002012227,0.0001139012,0.00006513354,7.254593e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001520864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000428746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002045953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.704167e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993086,0.00001203662,0.0001405179,0.0001096291,0.0003799683,0.0000492009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994469,0.0002161038,0.0002612827,0.000005012127,0.00006260258,0.000008074482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002820891,0.00003357329,0.3553995,0.00003718103,0.00001446325,1.695521e-10,0.003080072,0.00007183421,0.005246995,0.6307715,0.001203171,0.00411352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001381324,0.00001658042,0.8063712,0.00001667829,0.00000943588,8.983432e-7,0.001302451,0.0005575636,0.001843785,0.1894901,0.0002306498,0.00002258603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816527,0.0008877367,0.000001613324,0.01577027,0.00001974457,0.00009953315,8.544184e-7,0.000002367798,0.001565212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991419,0.0002912272,0.0003592279,0.0001334585,0.00004425202,0.000006863185,1.28403e-8,6.865816e-7,0.00002232526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4509717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978170239","doi":"10.1038/nature01934","title":"Patterns of predation in a diverse predator–prey system","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":844,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Ungulate; Ecology; Biology; Predator; Biodiversity; Apex predator; Ecosystem; Herbivore; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005860264424340083,"gpt":0.2079539105687188,"spread":0.2020936461443787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001392382,0.00003967679,0.00005328666,0.00001756593,0.00002042622,0.000002256892,0.00006638966,0.0003526651,0.0003672819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005029653,0.00003732201,0.00001325422,0.00009811716,0.00001200284,0.0001163559,0.00002089731,0.000280252,0.00004607606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007226809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006045442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004512187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005390225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995873,0.00005830256,0.00008707732,0.0001054141,0.0000911535,0.00007076361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998191,0.00001947005,0.00004627217,0.00009621446,0.000004362509,0.00001460745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006328619,0.00002228804,0.9979571,0.00001080119,0.000001823015,0.000001784824,0.0001254781,0.0001202913,0.0001517569,0.0008431286,0.0006098843,0.0001493187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001896516,0.00001367735,0.9980398,0.00001553187,0.000003628714,0.000001968396,0.0001667269,0.000154492,0.0006301994,0.00006391379,0.0006831308,0.00003721962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957161,0.00001745005,0.00005105255,0.00005504671,0.0001261787,0.0001126679,0.00000622884,0.00001122791,0.003904037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995086,0.000002308517,0.0001105408,0.0001565022,0.000005946773,0.000007296445,0.000006947911,0.000002276297,0.0001996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003792471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4021479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565238527","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01106.x","title":"Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":819,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Pooling; Statistics; Resource (disambiguation); Categorical variable; Random effects model; Population; Ecology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Biology; Computer science; Demography; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004010736863049636,"gpt":0.2186370680342837,"spread":0.214626331171234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006897569,0.00005877386,0.0002012282,0.00004241124,0.00006804847,0.000002832238,0.0001624958,0.00006266621,0.00006857803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000923959,0.00004265269,0.00004018222,0.0002186664,0.00005854329,0.00005859945,0.00003877574,0.000104759,0.00001325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000585659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001160517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001896427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007605385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999041,0.0002261539,0.0003996646,0.00009108554,0.0001406157,0.0001014497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990938,0.0002861875,0.0004938677,0.00006899018,0.00003354518,0.00002365197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001026868,0.0004712846,0.8943238,0.000003952825,0.00002134793,0.000001166358,0.0001822183,0.001866585,0.08870412,0.00004005513,0.01278216,0.0005764728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001131098,0.004881054,0.9877631,0.000002039905,0.00004265655,0.00001878162,0.0001255172,0.0002635706,0.003543439,0.0001064936,0.002086181,0.00003605225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978166,0.00001891726,0.0006076342,0.0008514837,0.00004042389,0.000358187,6.785514e-7,0.000002876985,0.0003032489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995658,0.000001235955,0.0001380485,0.0001851492,0.00005413107,0.0000122281,4.135997e-7,0.000004046694,0.00003896315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09343935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1739326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123817664","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2010.0107","title":"Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":787,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Home range; Ecology; Biological dispersal; Global Positioning System; Temporal scales; Animal behavior; Resource (disambiguation); Population; Data science; Computer science; Geography; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Biology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07795685372146455,"gpt":0.2551208130009913,"spread":0.1771639592795267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009053114,0.0001207156,0.0002147013,0.00001503744,0.0004547797,0.000006888453,0.000414759,0.0002552811,0.0008512059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001056763,0.00007136838,0.000193964,0.000194525,0.005013393,0.00007392297,0.00005119237,0.0002971581,0.000002313314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001927707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003389788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009213989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001044018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988803,0.000152694,0.0002485613,0.0002921993,0.0002126493,0.0002136071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991723,0.0004597573,0.0001328574,0.0001424361,0.00001573094,0.00007693529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001966879,0.001036527,0.9304922,0.00007663251,0.0001188397,0.000001598772,0.0006449152,0.002226759,0.02032555,0.02609998,0.0001306153,0.01864971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002856242,0.001067723,0.9789078,0.00000725029,0.00003552846,0.000004949498,0.0001963555,0.006507708,0.00139133,0.01084328,0.0005933648,0.0001590998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9437167,0.0001125754,0.0001547755,0.05498907,0.0001342293,0.0001424899,0.00001255797,0.00002016325,0.000717417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974896,0.0002659333,0.001766206,0.0004145445,0.00003469623,0.00001515349,5.913197e-7,0.00000270588,0.00001059229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05457453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000619440","doi":"10.1007/s00265-008-0697-y","title":"SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":722,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Multidimensional scaling; Animal ecology; Association (psychology); Statistics; Distance matrices in phylogeny; Principal component analysis; Null hypothesis; Range (aeronautics); Correlation; Population; Mantel test; Biology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Demography; Ecology; Psychology; Bioinformatics; Genetic variation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02371919525162993,"gpt":0.2904223378352062,"spread":0.2667031425835762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001822015,0.0001408562,0.0002297282,0.00002821986,0.0005449662,0.00001320193,0.0001192731,0.0004634913,0.0007870035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009572439,0.0001316358,0.0000623291,0.0000980885,0.0007121327,0.0001147135,0.00006781289,0.0002314185,0.00006061943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007171802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001671745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000500599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003212984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989116,0.0001575944,0.0001930683,0.0003290258,0.00004624031,0.0003624689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997452,0.00002474818,0.00009175961,0.00007637487,0.000009257266,0.0000526424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004428977,0.000127846,0.9763397,6.99845e-7,0.000009336473,0.00001173957,0.0005234619,0.000001531224,0.001315822,0.002015384,0.0006278706,0.0189823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003068459,0.0007011071,0.9904596,4.181674e-7,0.00005506562,0.00002623207,0.0002221133,0.00002467239,0.00002501831,0.00751081,0.0005229239,0.000145189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964007,0.00002063625,0.000009507896,0.002756625,0.00009998729,0.0001598533,0.000002184048,0.00006203946,0.0004884528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975698,0.000005222518,0.0004570097,0.001711145,0.00007493328,0.00001780113,0.00003969492,0.000004853441,0.0001195396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01883711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8617136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171420116","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01182.x","title":"Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":716,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Home range; Ecology; Foraging; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Data science; Geography; Biology; Engineering; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05107268232173006,"gpt":0.3198694042880913,"spread":0.2687967219663612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005949909,0.0002693223,0.001156574,0.0000850788,0.0002383028,0.000006514548,0.0003401624,0.0004469165,0.0004588696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006114178,0.0002243323,0.0002148613,0.0002615617,0.0004342787,0.00008067367,0.0001948993,0.0004906991,0.00008281071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000209946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004119967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001447154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001686887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980031,0.0004432054,0.0004110299,0.0005376643,0.0001731527,0.0004318208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989478,0.0002120592,0.0004605353,0.0002894491,0.00002155211,0.00006861613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001239771,0.0005698866,0.2889907,0.04612679,0.0006545456,0.0006321978,0.000221125,7.782323e-7,0.00004835626,0.001344223,0.5832222,0.07806522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005706392,0.0006184051,0.4224261,0.002527889,0.0009600226,0.0003186742,0.00002129375,0.0000019054,0.00000146452,0.0002728472,0.5717088,0.0005719393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02044295,0.9710922,0.000007797339,0.00531206,0.0002451924,0.00278425,0.00005627365,0.00002049876,0.00003872198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001085698,0.9943606,0.0005855114,0.003625747,0.0001589016,0.0008877984,0.00004086691,0.00003466328,0.0001972978],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1334354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9148004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114708598","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01326.x","title":"Non‐optimal animal movement in human‐altered landscapes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Functional Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":705,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Habitat; Ecology; Landscape connectivity; Movement (music); Population; Biology; Habitat destruction; Ephemeral key","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01041000018082822,"gpt":0.2215501894133201,"spread":0.2111401892324918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004015257,0.00008181399,0.00009718751,0.00005860952,0.0001204343,0.000004500344,0.00007860648,0.0001155168,0.01073397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001886413,0.00008423162,0.00002757763,0.0001255133,0.00007079361,0.0001050662,0.0000782897,0.0001312732,0.0007653061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001747965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001424467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001098502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007762022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991683,0.00002214019,0.0002091221,0.000224854,0.0001031292,0.0002724607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997381,0.00007957758,0.00005317306,0.00007807808,0.00000641272,0.00004468876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012477,0.0001317521,0.9854748,0.000001087403,0.000006701405,0.00001259352,0.00004771133,0.002206662,0.003300457,0.0006429499,0.007878009,0.0001724853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005778749,0.0002366174,0.9954636,9.560658e-7,0.000003716247,0.000006196327,0.00004861818,0.0006020211,0.0002629219,0.0006868201,0.002024117,0.00008652551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891279,0.000002515313,0.0003522726,0.0006786754,0.0003826436,0.0001171998,0.000001272769,0.0000194138,0.009318128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959898,7.262079e-7,0.0002490544,0.002540281,0.0001508484,0.00002668231,0.00002587806,0.000005298447,0.00101141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009988793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034053655","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01528.x","title":"Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Functional Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":683,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Juvenile; Foraging; Ungulate; Ecology; Reproduction; Population; Habitat; Predation; Physiological condition; Reproductive success; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008497175281496972,"gpt":0.19956352776113,"spread":0.191066352479633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001242087,0.00007248468,0.00009810748,0.00003956777,0.00008498282,0.000002461354,0.00006456703,0.0001013058,0.008791809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005355211,0.00006996944,0.00003903285,0.00007833208,0.0001799363,0.0001177376,0.00002373846,0.00007584412,0.000499275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008735777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001072687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000983707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004256628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993926,0.0000687401,0.0001649747,0.0001614562,0.00008691564,0.0001252707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996613,0.000153066,0.00007050987,0.00008217977,0.000003967152,0.00002895224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002689848,0.0003606425,0.973512,0.000001370625,0.00000912847,0.0000026945,0.00003401607,0.0002220294,0.01548073,0.001007474,0.007569578,0.00153138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003018067,0.000374689,0.9855444,0.00000207297,0.0000088342,0.00001830314,0.0000493722,0.0001550164,0.001708741,0.009387651,0.00238455,0.00006456743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963273,0.00002495271,0.00008646595,0.001682204,0.0001915745,0.0001013652,0.000008158725,0.00002001354,0.001557956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975344,0.00001615224,0.0003684938,0.0009869779,0.0000448212,0.00001594028,0.00005171156,0.000002907549,0.0009785941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01377199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131317366","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04657.x","title":"Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Molecular Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":677,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Michigan State University","keywords":"Landscape connectivity; Resistance (ecology); Biological dispersal; Resistance distance; Biology; Land cover; Ecology; Computer science; Land use; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05805891360070544,"gpt":0.3099189159524968,"spread":0.2518600023517913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001830419,0.0001516406,0.0007924591,0.0000891049,0.000118969,0.00001679691,0.00006599706,0.0002945997,0.00006553898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009050512,0.0001401945,0.0001802868,0.0002074368,0.0002027124,0.00005756344,0.00004990159,0.00006966153,0.000002617158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002653163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003720783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003608396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00158015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99894,0.0001393148,0.000392495,0.0003361421,0.0000456339,0.0001464259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977507,0.001631839,0.0003458624,0.0002052072,0.00003930937,0.00002706037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003035007,0.001123992,0.5094428,0.03545872,0.02873665,0.00008503285,0.001722296,0.01756498,0.0009498617,0.009159324,0.02957769,0.3658752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007891302,0.0005037259,0.07373127,0.0002990652,0.02073913,0.00001707533,0.00004749182,0.003577871,0.00004830961,0.007834052,0.8914579,0.0009550288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.09360417,0.8944235,0.008492424,0.0002823778,0.0002329781,0.002696055,0.0002313349,0.00001948539,0.00001770849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030521,0.9465331,0.04848764,0.000316307,0.00001409759,0.001102598,0.0002502366,0.00002490494,0.0002189844],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8618802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5716964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146793276","doi":"10.1186/2051-3933-2-4","title":"Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Movement Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":649,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Shell Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Animal ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Biological dispersal; Ecology; Resource (disambiguation); Habitat; Wildlife; Wildlife conservation; Computer science; Geography; Biology; Environmental resource management; Machine learning; Population; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01390411386973146,"gpt":0.2536381766571119,"spread":0.2397340627873805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004866837,0.0001992777,0.0007367979,0.0001938207,0.0001073542,0.000005519799,0.0001408611,0.0004495402,0.001080915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005518287,0.0002029809,0.00007472809,0.000417504,0.0002200063,0.0000743943,0.0001353646,0.0002335993,0.000272832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003079187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006631453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002488507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01284965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982986,0.0003033067,0.0006711123,0.000414967,0.00007856781,0.0002334687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988954,0.0003818773,0.0004780821,0.0001894308,0.00001493585,0.00004028905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006429743,0.0002044427,0.6932951,0.0007971718,0.00005051422,6.545604e-7,0.00001674668,0.00002955083,0.000001720992,0.001807214,0.004890112,0.2989004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002125856,0.0001339408,0.2476047,0.00006363491,0.0001280756,0.000004730584,0.000009498378,0.000168068,2.808953e-7,0.0006831976,0.7508522,0.0001391031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.06101677,0.8801506,0.01621845,0.004677196,0.002441069,0.01910882,0.0001494887,0.0003201053,0.01591752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002585263,0.9876885,0.000737074,0.002142953,0.00009236051,0.003715807,0.0002815231,0.00003836716,0.002718148],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.745962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079508856","doi":"10.1126/science.1102425","title":"Bushmeat Hunting, Wildlife Declines, and Fish Supply in West Africa","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":640,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bushmeat; Wildlife; Wildlife trade; Geography; Fishery; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Economics; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01001970374110353,"gpt":0.218044517243349,"spread":0.2080248135022455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005085074,0.00006866688,0.00006751867,0.00005097498,0.0002150686,0.00003841646,0.0002531521,0.00004050094,0.0002377583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001551048,0.00006461688,0.000009554921,0.0006597073,0.0008491731,0.0005417247,0.0001631932,0.00008603789,0.0001819187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001007184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005101324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000478772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00349233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999055,0.00001307368,0.0001249386,0.0003164736,0.0002076498,0.0002829086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999709,0.00003113146,0.00003764105,0.0001389067,0.000006557898,0.00007677836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002652284,0.00002581461,0.9972112,8.934659e-7,2.254369e-7,0.000004285198,0.0003087031,0.000206619,0.0006193695,0.0001879363,0.0003543874,0.001077867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002254652,0.00002772337,0.9928546,0.000008623018,0.00000129761,0.000007767501,0.00006158448,0.0001546645,0.0002050908,0.001862063,0.004506456,0.0000846951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890829,0.00001643028,0.00003893285,0.005477262,0.0001038838,0.00008755938,0.000001016182,0.00002053126,0.005171505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960388,0.00001618463,0.001110826,0.002585541,0.0000167686,0.000008385358,6.735308e-7,0.000002753975,0.0002200651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006955922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3128814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968121043","doi":"10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0346:eohfot]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECT OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ON THE EXTINCTION THRESHOLD: A SYNTHESIS<sup>*</sup>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":635,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat fragmentation; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Fragmentation (computing); Habitat destruction; Extinction debt; Habitat; Ecology; Population; Local extinction; Population size; Environmental science; Biological dispersal; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01381860656140041,"gpt":0.2259038430068273,"spread":0.2120852364454269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004248814,0.0001055548,0.0001193366,0.00002071045,0.0003478462,0.00001082981,0.0002062285,0.0001077513,0.01274032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001768917,0.00006633558,0.00006367844,0.0002549082,0.0002434765,0.00007720177,0.00005538848,0.0001354961,0.003289722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007964103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001791403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004069293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001273354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999068,0.000177289,0.0002034234,0.0002450661,0.0001537555,0.0001524232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980746,0.001521706,0.0001039427,0.0002539363,0.000007525387,0.00003831061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008622183,0.001181665,0.9001514,0.0000177766,0.00003546298,0.000001570554,0.0002653986,0.01288553,0.001178829,0.009071521,0.02702437,0.04810028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002861344,0.0007101341,0.9669911,0.000006166403,0.00005752908,0.000003498998,0.00007112735,0.01965325,0.001857388,0.003679148,0.006517201,0.0001673834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729326,0.000007282674,0.0004771915,0.003615316,0.00001900528,0.0008153021,0.000003720835,0.00004970464,0.0220799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963908,0.00001177004,0.0001389741,0.0008674026,0.00003491064,0.002181439,0.000005679552,0.000005488999,0.0003635577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06683967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281654679","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.12528","title":"Integrated step selection analysis: bridging the gap between resource selection and animal movement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":633,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Killam Trusts; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Resource (disambiguation); Inference; Model selection; Set (abstract data type); Variety (cybernetics); Data mining; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03296824317286588,"gpt":0.3101507573624712,"spread":0.2771825141896053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002950363,0.00009423814,0.0001594545,0.0001211733,0.000248069,0.00001453398,0.00005759449,0.0001632955,0.0000447134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002393429,0.00007803417,0.00002093591,0.0008036269,0.0001527213,0.0001616647,0.00007327806,0.0002358288,0.000006693427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003426656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001958546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008391202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005644046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980816,0.001168447,0.0002089427,0.0002702707,0.00007385408,0.000196838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995586,0.0002172014,0.00009413066,0.00006633541,0.00001504847,0.000048663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005319091,0.00001945461,0.9900789,0.000001350326,0.00004686152,2.759338e-7,0.0002130936,0.002134359,0.0004859051,0.0001487622,0.0004524063,0.006365471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000241406,0.0001512007,0.8943228,0.000001744014,0.0001276522,0.000004721888,0.0002748767,0.101968,0.0000864692,0.002184536,0.0005623779,0.00007427463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8992624,0.00004389345,0.09922245,0.0009300825,0.0000520449,0.0001549258,8.289011e-7,0.00002664944,0.0003067813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782031,0.000006239626,0.02125117,0.0003126973,0.00004566581,0.00003377028,0.000007955749,0.000004186467,0.0001352487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09983362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3182141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210186672","doi":"10.1038/ng.3443","title":"A supergene determines highly divergent male reproductive morphs in the ruff","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Genetics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":586,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; Natural Environment Research Council; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Medical Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Simon Fraser University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Geographic Society; John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation; University of Edinburgh; European Commission; Sight Research UK; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Supergene (geology); Evolutionary biology; Zoology; Reproduction; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0158313989963039,"gpt":0.2374876855652509,"spread":0.221656286568947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003459606,0.00008618216,0.00007077435,0.00001856058,0.00005754832,0.000009631177,0.0002719547,0.0001676594,0.0001910685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001215353,0.0000622095,0.0000225563,0.0002200692,0.00008555989,0.00005822749,0.0001159504,0.0002394767,0.0001846804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000609534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001620349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005160914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004051349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991605,0.00008571843,0.0001176212,0.0002569678,0.000217411,0.0001617582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995667,0.00002569815,0.00003412694,0.000317335,0.00001573425,0.0000403524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000159495,0.00005030799,0.9693968,9.287734e-7,0.000003302751,0.00001697103,0.0008521474,0.000676928,0.0002991225,0.00002189105,0.02788195,0.0007837432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001895159,0.0000626133,0.9692578,0.000001492971,0.000009754796,0.00002699269,0.0001704408,0.000254962,0.0009950313,0.0009750614,0.02796432,0.0000919831],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993517,0.0005129182,0.00001026207,0.002992962,0.0005132252,0.0001776717,0.000003293406,0.00001018845,0.002262474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961076,0.00004209296,0.0009219234,0.001947123,0.0001613851,0.0000215233,0.000007260334,0.000005591337,0.0007855173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002590579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.253683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121091424","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2010.0082","title":"Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":569,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); Population; Dynamics (music); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Ecology; Biology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03176919664795455,"gpt":0.2613721822951582,"spread":0.2296029856472036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006795913,0.00009064118,0.0001053907,0.000004949273,0.0009938468,0.00002189841,0.0004085838,0.0001453237,0.0002029981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005315329,0.00004448758,0.0001315927,0.0002557024,0.0019687,0.00008361637,0.00007776389,0.0003442696,0.000003396425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000320579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006905507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004586632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008379162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999101,0.00008010644,0.0001845912,0.0002414375,0.0002149548,0.0001779088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994814,0.0002578126,0.0000824567,0.0001233147,0.000006886068,0.00004812356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004800879,0.00003200164,0.9870082,0.000001407329,0.000009583106,3.017068e-8,0.00003320609,0.000487786,0.0007071818,0.008681401,0.00001578911,0.003018647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005847175,0.00008917019,0.9024377,0.000002034637,0.00001481272,6.41887e-7,0.00001442369,0.01128756,0.00008028391,0.08592733,0.00002518172,0.00006238819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640903,0.000005868932,0.003693157,0.03166081,0.0001077719,0.0001587696,0.00001204761,0.00001881819,0.0002524494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974129,0.000005788752,0.001827674,0.0006620009,0.00006702339,0.00001034628,0.000001187512,0.000002023663,0.00001104272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08457047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7643966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057011418","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01638.x","title":"Living in the city: can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter'?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biogeography","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":568,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Urbanization; Geography; Ecology; Urban planning; Biodiversity; Economic geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0095346715379083,"gpt":0.205430186923082,"spread":0.1958955153851737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007867692,0.00007079928,0.0001013057,0.0001495426,0.00009530314,0.00003180035,0.0002654554,0.00005132299,0.0002377876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001278569,0.00004960447,0.00008711452,0.0004858631,0.0001081598,0.0003062951,0.00002811005,0.0001653166,0.000006849729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002539158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006838752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000787684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002372448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991544,0.0001313088,0.0002695596,0.00008747289,0.0002013184,0.0001559543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995747,0.00007764062,0.0001836857,0.0001186373,0.000009128308,0.00003624838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000685503,0.0001475839,0.9971427,6.966975e-7,0.000004842559,0.00001797016,0.0004143927,0.000024327,0.0002859349,0.00003129008,0.001535264,0.0003881199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001301341,0.0001430969,0.9962432,0.0000113469,0.00001016944,0.00003822005,0.0002914583,0.0000142727,0.00002231571,0.001174826,0.001858957,0.00006200903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975195,0.00007187294,0.00002675466,0.001507415,0.0001082742,0.00005043996,0.000001793045,0.000004995418,0.0007089566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983148,0.00001483403,0.0002438208,0.001275987,0.0001241787,0.00000237902,0.000001503163,0.000003724727,0.00001878808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001584764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2603607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213329381","doi":"10.1126/science.abg1780","title":"Big-data approaches lead to an increased understanding of the ecology of animal movement","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":565,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Movement (music); Animal behavior; Wildlife; Ecology; Big data; Data science; Biology; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Zoology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.388923983062137,"gpt":0.3283372723297948,"spread":0.06058671073234223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002003001,0.0001235423,0.0003614448,0.00008734559,0.0003100305,0.00001026228,0.002497214,0.00006342497,0.0004063046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002391416,0.00008800591,0.0000563159,0.001291898,0.001178418,0.0001966274,0.00225041,0.0001513375,0.00001297695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004796765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000363975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001517538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003736133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982613,0.000226219,0.0003265008,0.0005221952,0.0004368024,0.0002270141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985804,0.0001426197,0.0003153366,0.0008990971,0.000003915904,0.00005862738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004677531,0.0007319236,0.1022112,0.001665355,0.00006608757,0.000004354283,0.00108904,0.0002287275,0.000504981,0.007007541,0.001204342,0.8852397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000381088,0.001586941,0.3238776,0.0008428235,0.000534599,0.00002328208,0.002274702,0.001684233,0.0001239652,0.002740103,0.6649344,0.0009962673],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.3051652,0.6359527,0.001506269,0.002348765,0.006457569,0.01208564,0.001086897,0.000148523,0.0352485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2693606,0.7233973,0.003104778,0.002636664,0.0002218112,0.0004340057,0.0001775809,0.00008110293,0.0005861719],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8842434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4640487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1739950599","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00955.x","title":"Planning for success: Serengeti lions seek prey accessibility rather than abundance","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":544,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Predation; Woodland; Habitat; Panthera; Geography; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Abundance (ecology); Snag; Predator; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02280725583873821,"gpt":0.291203638349797,"spread":0.2683963825110587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006279387,0.00009891891,0.0002081768,0.00004206208,0.0001764927,0.00001979525,0.0002878911,0.0001378174,0.001322077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000170888,0.00008522842,0.00008913931,0.00009806426,0.0001355836,0.000582605,0.00006833669,0.0002171176,0.00006342294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001528893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005765822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006766152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006241016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989992,0.00008880867,0.0003970956,0.0001663109,0.0001012024,0.0002474335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991373,0.0002509767,0.0003948832,0.00009685574,0.0000390893,0.00008088608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004629548,0.0001617621,0.9899344,0.000005022425,0.00002327679,0.000007101539,0.000294485,0.000872064,0.001607816,0.00007604571,0.005934547,0.0006204611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000590505,0.0009830846,0.9899979,0.000007465586,0.00002564534,0.00005736714,0.00007483414,0.001007004,0.0003817498,0.0007556481,0.006028988,0.00008982493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936505,0.00005666779,0.00049196,0.00409739,0.0002195893,0.0001471656,0.000003294734,0.00001097366,0.001322464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948415,0.000009720694,0.003406866,0.0011425,0.0002760766,0.00001128707,0.000001126368,0.000008539315,0.0003023496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00295489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137315516","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01552.x","title":"The sensitive hare: sublethal effects of predator stress on reproduction in snowshoe hares","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":538,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Arctic Institute of North America","keywords":"Offspring; Litter; Reproduction; Biology; Predation; Predator; Animal science; Ecology; Population; Zoology; Pregnancy; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006912886545935458,"gpt":0.2277523877319427,"spread":0.2208395011860072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005321824,0.0000669207,0.0001566538,0.00004353503,0.00007700743,0.000006176585,0.0001197905,0.00008935055,0.00005759917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005688022,0.00004822905,0.00004404993,0.0001104596,0.0001247884,0.0001591261,0.00002470638,0.0002297169,0.00001659382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001128671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002731182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001453171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002881346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991037,0.0002026493,0.000296822,0.0001272435,0.0001221549,0.0001474524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991413,0.0003696535,0.0003279609,0.0001004268,0.00003005976,0.00003054636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001899943,0.0003941204,0.9693637,0.000007641205,0.00002628236,0.0001355609,0.0003937242,0.0007265871,0.01760497,0.0003898799,0.004959011,0.004098522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003932194,0.003183299,0.9809506,0.00001704406,0.00001118506,0.00005645991,0.00007724521,0.00006240218,0.01467111,0.000384599,0.0001509831,0.0000418406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940147,0.0000255015,0.000004840213,0.005166289,0.0003063504,0.0001140672,9.840105e-7,0.000002926364,0.0003643222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993134,0.00003440271,0.00007047261,0.0004244433,0.00009369742,0.000001541582,5.424566e-7,0.000002723225,0.00005882324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01158685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1966724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114851743","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00303.x","title":"Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":535,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Black spruce; Ecology; Habitat; Woodland; Spatial ecology; Geography; Taiga; Basal area; Range (aeronautics); Boreal; Selection (genetic algorithm); Population; Physical geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01171294965092214,"gpt":0.2143988412772283,"spread":0.2026858916263061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001297849,0.00009355758,0.00007418879,0.0000601763,0.0003171348,0.00002434811,0.00008838451,0.00009006727,0.00290046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005325198,0.00009329549,0.00005637563,0.0005538136,0.00004823643,0.0001967666,0.00001856445,0.0001648682,0.0006907207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003814052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004445679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006496889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005021394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999201,0.00007191743,0.0001450198,0.0002392815,0.0001230311,0.0002197271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996551,0.0001234998,0.00002826956,0.00007961472,0.000004592401,0.000108904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001096132,0.00003291017,0.9848455,9.303697e-7,0.000006048861,3.401641e-7,0.0001963949,0.000239187,0.000129937,0.00003434762,0.01312285,0.001380664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107786,0.00006997457,0.9877259,0.000003111902,0.00000780525,0.000001547403,0.00001609194,0.0001410341,0.0001217769,0.0003740022,0.01131839,0.0001126275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922508,0.00001340537,0.00008778126,0.001039738,0.00007196805,0.0001502473,0.000009908063,0.00006770924,0.006308432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979727,0.000004145377,0.0002851629,0.0007743401,0.00003062469,0.00002253807,0.000040649,0.000008172036,0.0008616631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005721894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109965041","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00548.x","title":"The Last Mile: How to Sustain Long‐Distance Migration in Mammals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":526,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildebeest; Ungulate; Geography; Ecology; Carnivore; National park; Habitat; Biology; Archaeology; Predation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009894704209401193,"gpt":0.2279170630021424,"spread":0.2180223587927412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000432543,0.00009524437,0.00009307985,0.00003654267,0.0002075749,0.00002696964,0.0001890045,0.0001173137,0.00008577883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003789713,0.00007672671,0.00002087134,0.0003894245,0.0002208605,0.0001516915,0.00006238239,0.0000972132,0.0002366135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002151132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004028875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005298434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07024267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991143,0.0001252307,0.0001951872,0.0002476238,0.00006545779,0.0002521951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994768,0.0001809229,0.00008354169,0.0001925212,0.00002312165,0.0000431109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003312739,0.00002058934,0.9815145,0.00000133304,0.000002576459,0.00000265877,0.0001636698,0.0004319542,0.001275599,0.01054292,0.004606194,0.001404935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003001288,0.00006236892,0.9449462,0.000004776275,0.000001893054,0.000002877908,0.0001302873,0.0001108274,0.0002976869,0.005184848,0.04886607,0.0000920829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8908045,0.0000319729,0.006452087,0.1019579,0.000164899,0.0003009443,0.000002859634,0.00002550352,0.0002593295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921032,0.00002559585,0.0004420174,0.006520961,0.00003274653,0.0001057463,0.00003102256,0.000005539413,0.0007331481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1012988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.946723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972803288","doi":"10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00275.x","title":"Bushmeat Exploitation in Tropical Forests: an Intercontinental Comparison","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":521,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Amazonian; Amazon rainforest; Amazon basin; Bushmeat; Geography; Tropics; Ecology; Biomass (ecology); Structural basin; Tropical rainforest; Forestry; Rainforest; Biology; Wildlife","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04030343509873054,"gpt":0.271261922141119,"spread":0.2309584870423885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001119251,0.00009470431,0.0001372432,0.00005560726,0.00006745426,0.00001102701,0.0001353009,0.000148069,0.003025011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009558925,0.0000942537,0.00002321722,0.0001792822,0.0001768649,0.0003510801,0.00004508796,0.0001218705,0.0004927369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009316484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003358858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002682068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007546024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990297,0.000169317,0.000303553,0.0002580448,0.00005458148,0.0001848213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996225,0.00009696926,0.00008435774,0.0001401144,0.00001050759,0.00004552128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002326108,0.0001277469,0.9896858,0.000001040461,0.000002219718,0.000001310335,0.0003875526,0.00003337564,0.0007688585,0.001072431,0.003847607,0.004048814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004854017,0.0001611529,0.9583483,0.000003389143,0.000002933141,0.000003646784,0.0001496917,0.03481201,0.00008422256,0.001416889,0.004431235,0.000101087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923168,0.00002026385,0.001778509,0.004197442,0.0001873569,0.0001571243,0.000001754114,0.00004671816,0.001294007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966053,0.000007183926,0.0006161197,0.002409983,0.00003532727,0.00004978124,0.00005338494,0.000005806853,0.0002171313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03477864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764091861","doi":"10.1038/nature24457","title":"Creation of forest edges has a global impact on forest vertebrates","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nature","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":510,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Imperial College London; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Forest ecology; Habitat; Fragmentation (computing); Geography; Ecosystem; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0360303045153323,"gpt":0.3389734001762192,"spread":0.302943095660887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000149599,0.0002427857,0.0005733952,0.00002855967,0.0001706697,0.00003791984,0.0004195401,0.002003822,0.0003365645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002146311,0.0001643705,0.0002713152,0.0001248697,0.0002027917,0.0001478093,0.0000847691,0.0008798183,0.0003396959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002755471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001050116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001360059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001157865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990817,0.00006535633,0.0002167076,0.0002749516,0.0001889032,0.0001723969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990408,0.00008991833,0.0004044267,0.0004028331,0.0000121284,0.00004989184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002288775,0.00008100476,0.3227842,0.0005747595,0.00008350963,0.000006648647,0.00001165168,0.00004274275,7.681844e-8,0.0004185317,0.03662622,0.6393478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008249215,0.000100122,0.4274576,0.0009094381,0.0001303036,0.000008512,8.508459e-7,0.00001932146,2.350347e-7,0.0006454472,0.5705208,0.0001248793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005033652,0.9826838,0.000006067563,0.0002360358,0.0004158728,0.0005302583,0.0001250992,0.00002483315,0.01094435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05280997,0.9456582,0.00005150415,0.0002211372,0.0001774909,0.00004649934,0.0003607248,0.00001980366,0.0006546512],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6392229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071848559","doi":"10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00243.x","title":"Scale for resource selection functions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":496,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Covariate; Scale (ratio); Selection (genetic algorithm); Spatial ecology; Ecology; Occupancy; Sampling (signal processing); Habitat; Resource (disambiguation); Statistics; Econometrics; Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Cartography; Machine learning; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008407503567313927,"gpt":0.1785465181059585,"spread":0.1701390145386445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005734402,0.0000341405,0.00003241202,0.000008817397,0.002162063,0.000007624786,0.00003042398,0.00004167542,0.0002148205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001177413,0.00003313436,0.00002225664,0.00009701529,0.00009265421,0.0001043777,0.0001314769,0.00003135524,0.00004620261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005067138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002516213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004729376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007393264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999715,0.0000109907,0.00004131388,0.0001056174,0.00003816274,0.00008888164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998869,0.00002952222,0.00001726441,0.00003483019,0.000006877775,0.00002463375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001014219,0.00004061197,0.9526609,8.071467e-7,0.000001633529,7.676607e-8,0.00002236606,0.00005457522,0.00006903586,0.0009084675,0.04601942,0.0002119811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001666789,0.00002064465,0.9409996,5.752879e-7,0.00002146337,0.000001753544,0.00005510623,0.0003521364,0.00004209971,0.002141167,0.05615317,0.00004560095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507715,0.000002508816,0.04541142,0.0009992714,0.00003276109,0.00008949082,0.0001243898,0.00003472223,0.002533994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969761,6.260003e-7,0.0002016154,0.0001034492,0.0000269377,0.000008362262,0.0002161697,9.589869e-7,0.002465721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04620472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019162834","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0050611","title":"Effects of Humans on Behaviour of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":495,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Innovates; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Parks; Parks Canada; Shell Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Wildlife; Predation; Vigilance (psychology); Foraging; Habitat; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Geography; Home range; Cervus elaphus; Human–wildlife conflict; Recreation; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01617486173264609,"gpt":0.2175041717723758,"spread":0.2013293100397297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001805055,0.00006057421,0.0002075514,0.0000475068,0.00001063274,4.843114e-7,0.0001039433,0.00006568055,0.0001070062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009491619,0.00005563976,0.00003010036,0.0001337525,0.0001031735,0.0001046681,0.00004654026,0.00008037387,0.000008001224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001727901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006798982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001579521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006347072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999328,0.00006222531,0.0002155617,0.00008294809,0.0001964602,0.0001148542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999556,0.0001127438,0.000175355,0.0001214358,0.000008990541,0.00002544264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007034912,0.001897115,0.9329987,0.00009180421,0.0000238519,2.76889e-7,0.0006774252,0.000007654889,0.06406716,0.00004003476,0.00008675903,0.00003894078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003876672,0.0001774581,0.8641841,0.0001121912,0.00004645178,7.751125e-8,0.00003429332,0.00004679701,0.1349491,0.00002171043,6.534053e-7,0.00003956737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993118,0.00005833722,6.524013e-7,0.00003768205,0.00002741433,0.000211292,0.000004823356,0.000004221373,0.0003437891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995931,0.000008303665,0.0002533743,0.00004928891,0.000009257626,0.00001012137,0.000003831637,0.000004857273,0.00006781892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07088192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2268924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166911023","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01820.x","title":"An empirical exploration of data quality in DNA‐based population inventories","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":494,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Statistics; Reliability (semiconductor); Population; Sample size determination; Sample (material); Data collection; Abundance (ecology); Limiting; Sampling bias; Quality (philosophy); Data quality; Econometrics; Ecology; Demography; Mathematics; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08615435402667605,"gpt":0.3533880755261479,"spread":0.2672337214994718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006516691,0.00005985424,0.0001141115,0.0000360052,0.00003463289,0.00000393161,0.00016473,0.0001141098,0.0003975765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002478462,0.0000657554,0.00001309085,0.0001839869,0.00008023874,0.0004773115,0.00004114736,0.00006075984,0.00002436187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007054283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002413902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002125503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005626328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986915,0.0006009144,0.0002462878,0.0002472785,0.00009308043,0.0001209558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994462,0.00005042694,0.00009415059,0.0003736716,0.000006317913,0.00002927419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001548942,0.0001474792,0.9946245,0.000002673456,0.000001954698,0.000003622758,0.00008657957,0.002056882,0.001687263,0.001101898,0.00007586499,0.000195811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002763164,0.00007972655,0.9896663,9.383615e-7,0.000004636805,5.276111e-7,0.00004226611,0.002625881,0.001235522,0.005776571,0.0002251794,0.00006608319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931523,0.00000331007,0.005583915,0.0006794585,0.00007372996,0.0001260685,0.000003168831,0.00001107465,0.0003669843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964269,5.31971e-7,0.002448738,0.0008983202,0.000003926136,0.00001612584,0.000190838,0.000004469524,0.00001011204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005413777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4353184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952113774","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.13120","title":"Machine learning to classify animal species in camera trap images: Applications in ecology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":481,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"National Energy Technology Laboratory; Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; University of Saskatchewan; National Wildlife Research Center; Colorado Parks and Wildlife; University of Georgia Research Foundation; University of Wyoming; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Camera trap; Wildlife; Laptop; Convolutional neural network; Sample (material); Citizen science; Machine learning; Cartography; Geography; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0209818672774687,"gpt":0.3171276760884255,"spread":0.2961458088109568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001524957,0.000109853,0.0002037058,0.0002151706,0.0001615631,0.000005908959,0.0001148073,0.0002460696,0.0004867258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003529783,0.0001168396,0.00001680233,0.0005346839,0.0004122688,0.0001481574,0.0001179379,0.0003531541,0.00009754496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003826841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002131965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005083311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03765652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981486,0.0008313843,0.0002926782,0.000362604,0.00004312887,0.0003216341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993519,0.0004236195,0.00006713697,0.0001051633,0.000008017515,0.0000441755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006503553,0.00009101834,0.9926175,0.000002754527,0.00000214851,0.000002513806,0.0005476518,0.0004028531,0.002759968,0.0006895324,0.0001014535,0.002717501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003818741,0.0002758933,0.9878868,0.000003260946,0.000004395285,0.000006431886,0.000344767,0.004488466,0.000114391,0.003878055,0.002503425,0.0001122747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863719,0.0000378191,0.00872125,0.00173918,0.0001240751,0.0003359416,0.000001679757,0.00001965066,0.002648497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613001,0.00002904281,0.03755362,0.0004796899,0.0000394307,0.0001832305,0.000006241766,0.000006300225,0.0004023187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03714819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9799038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280527828","doi":"10.1038/ncomms10698","title":"Fear of large carnivores causes a trophic cascade","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":481,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Raincoast Conservation Foundation; Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Carnivore; Trophic cascade; Predation; Foraging; Herbivore; Apex predator; Ecology; Trophic level; Ecosystem; Biology; Food web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01313120969435369,"gpt":0.2723385751292631,"spread":0.2592073654349095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001445753,0.00005421323,0.00007377125,0.00002360251,0.0001605286,0.000002746046,0.0005636963,0.0001651162,0.0004759999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001936536,0.00003814735,0.00003382169,0.0001558867,0.0002389781,0.000114651,0.0002811759,0.0002117762,0.0001905622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004644534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001412995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006814074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002807922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994767,0.0001065776,0.0001194096,0.00009687854,0.00008939255,0.0001110665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988017,0.0002362146,0.00007396409,0.0008438765,0.0000156862,0.00002852284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006765727,0.00009928947,0.9703453,0.000001463486,0.0000129871,4.327798e-7,0.0001771129,0.000002981981,0.00550844,0.01047845,0.01265264,0.000714098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001849609,0.00001684741,0.9199394,0.000009178975,0.00001173785,0.0000023102,0.00002835515,0.00003506344,0.0005936741,0.0006247996,0.07849697,0.00005669676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779038,0.0006347959,0.00006093821,0.01597877,0.00006563028,0.000113519,0.00002658947,0.00003505904,0.005180853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972378,0.000243544,0.001107173,0.0006703094,0.00001084885,0.00001948894,0.000007136213,0.000005226223,0.0006984903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06584433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5211865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094353923","doi":"10.1890/11-2241.1","title":"Flexible and practical modeling of animal telemetry data: hidden Markov models and extensions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":478,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Hidden Markov model; Computer science; Markov model; Markov chain; Variable-order Bayesian network; Bayesian probability; Machine learning; Variable-order Markov model; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian inference","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07015033126805864,"gpt":0.3071856308862854,"spread":0.2370352996182267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004255392,0.00006116561,0.0001169033,0.00002285484,0.00009182704,0.000003969571,0.00006313547,0.0001063719,0.0003899228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001436989,0.00005819376,0.000007112109,0.00005766574,0.0001671471,0.0006403423,0.0004678013,0.0001018974,0.00002612145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001603955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001282919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005582244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008834628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993404,0.00006788388,0.0001416202,0.0001908598,0.00005696975,0.000202323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995114,0.0001783177,0.00004835483,0.000182842,0.000005884377,0.00007317522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005679623,0.00009995532,0.9929704,0.000005296527,0.00001258136,0.000002899485,0.000123244,0.000148791,0.0005353194,0.001607707,0.003357484,0.001079506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001780801,0.00008740831,0.7821202,0.000001499737,0.00002757349,0.00007614492,0.00009974527,0.215319,0.00002304213,0.001799148,0.0001967472,0.00007150393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947047,0.00007843083,0.001694469,0.001500095,0.00008012541,0.00008813012,0.000005571451,0.0000127441,0.001835778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852545,0.00004664118,0.01405241,0.000514233,0.000035378,0.000005294819,0.000008258658,0.000004966039,0.0000783406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2151702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4269381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148137072","doi":"10.1890/06-1708.1","title":"A MULTI‐SCALE TEST OF THE FORAGE MATURATION HYPOTHESIS IN A PARTIALLY MIGRATORY UNGULATE POPULATION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":471,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; University of Alberta; Parks Canada; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Ungulate; Forage; Biomass (ecology); Population; Ecology; Geography; Growing season; Phenology; Biology; Vegetation (pathology); Environmental science; Habitat; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01766225839426187,"gpt":0.2030051146680796,"spread":0.1853428562738178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001779595,0.00008702738,0.0001243315,0.00003458117,0.0001514711,0.000004023027,0.0001493588,0.0001370804,0.0002671509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002134158,0.0000604042,0.00007967203,0.000407217,0.0002088143,0.0001339627,0.00006230311,0.0001091045,0.00003596078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005421735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007427053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001342535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007564054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991562,0.0001214723,0.0002645527,0.0001847323,0.0001107728,0.0001622575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995215,0.0001863516,0.0001258606,0.0001287932,0.000006874594,0.00003060648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002007612,0.0002460403,0.9956787,0.000001440683,0.000002113355,0.00000276435,0.0001554187,0.0006809318,0.00269306,0.000006749595,0.0002517408,0.0002610105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002400121,0.00006364713,0.9960536,0.000003846545,0.000005638154,0.000003381716,0.0000199554,0.002578851,0.0002906131,0.0006193772,0.00004694208,0.00007408956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990367,0.000007107161,0.00003021122,0.000368703,0.00005752581,0.0002858278,0.000003693303,0.0000228741,0.0001873045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977475,0.000009577263,0.001703635,0.0003898609,0.000008306141,0.00005124473,0.00000324344,0.000004119817,0.00008254085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007429801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.422092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024411896","doi":"10.1111/cobi.13513","title":"Human–wildlife coexistence in a changing world","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":458,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft","keywords":"Wildlife; Livelihood; Geography; Environmental planning; Wildlife management; Human–wildlife conflict; Wildlife conservation; Political science; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecology; Agriculture; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04245586838627247,"gpt":0.266231114187204,"spread":0.2237752458009315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002124808,0.00009129069,0.0001313009,0.0001316184,0.0001110451,0.000007569706,0.0001647601,0.00008346074,0.001549563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001354483,0.00009509541,0.00002380439,0.00122834,0.0001721917,0.0001321202,0.0001155782,0.0001292488,0.0005521273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005314808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001249305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001125329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007061354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990957,0.0001055376,0.00023459,0.0002799336,0.00005061353,0.0002335844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999669,0.00007031978,0.000087662,0.0001064235,0.000007982984,0.0000586121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001111648,0.00001522399,0.9851843,0.000002983845,0.000002418123,0.000003393866,0.0004405962,0.00005488732,0.002367067,0.004905398,0.006630518,0.0003821003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003887248,0.00006238855,0.943248,0.000006902114,0.000003205757,0.000001633971,0.0001016135,0.002139214,0.00009601332,0.001263569,0.05254924,0.0001394627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541062,0.00001149304,0.0002824452,0.03837891,0.00008406123,0.0001611114,0.000002105877,0.00005841742,0.006915259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9309171,0.000002298478,0.0003378321,0.06775374,0.00004956016,0.00003646914,0.00002366056,0.00000564645,0.0008736839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04591873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958600565","doi":"10.1111/ele.13344","title":"Fear of humans as apex predators has landscape‐scale impacts from mountain lions to mice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":453,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Apex predator; Foraging; Predation; Ecology; Wildlife; Predator; Habitat; Geography; Trophic level; Scale (ratio); Trophic cascade; Biology; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008705121872430334,"gpt":0.2099474765114802,"spread":0.2012423546390499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002258887,0.0003679311,0.0005395746,0.0001685644,0.0001951193,0.00003266631,0.000727671,0.001033403,0.00801954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009706512,0.0003824186,0.0001612096,0.0002291633,0.0003757801,0.0001797831,0.0003166841,0.001085144,0.009110134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003111734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007970048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001845688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003293677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975921,0.0002845881,0.0004411151,0.000757778,0.0002740723,0.0006503602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983849,0.0005641037,0.0003214945,0.000626697,0.00001235416,0.0000904284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001899387,0.00002806122,0.3930127,0.000008155357,0.00006637349,0.00004459964,0.0002695261,0.0002089251,0.001575074,5.843777e-7,0.6047589,0.000008128499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000402205,0.0001910957,0.7525687,0.00002168332,0.0001183701,0.000008447292,0.00004677501,0.00003633876,0.0001497677,0.00007873752,0.2460085,0.0003693913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.575821,0.000005370961,0.00002469475,0.4219391,0.0006281406,0.0004016321,0.00009016227,0.00003317139,0.00105675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1131664,0.000004469885,0.0005142878,0.8825315,0.0007183743,0.00006766601,0.0005089521,0.00005307864,0.002435273],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4626547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983025353","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0801737105","title":"Multiple movement modes by large herbivores at multiple spatiotemporal scales","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":438,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University; University of Guelph","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Ministry of Natural Resources; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Foraging; Movement (music); Home range; Ranging; Generality; Occupancy; Habitat; Scale (ratio); Spatial ecology; Temporal scales; Ecology; Mode (computer interface); Range (aeronautics); Geography; Computer science; Communication; Biology; Cartography; Physics; Human–computer interaction; Geodesy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02834703241516443,"gpt":0.2508020530025909,"spread":0.2224550205874265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006444387,0.00008719964,0.0001072239,0.00003786113,0.0005280255,0.00000586046,0.000520397,0.00007875229,0.00009370148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003164224,0.00006211646,0.00005310773,0.0003333958,0.001181298,0.0004903769,0.0002746691,0.00008720941,0.00001336842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008407226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008147688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006833491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001031704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984671,0.000008116415,0.0002593663,0.0002357612,0.0008573032,0.0001722952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995047,0.0001158999,0.000299686,0.000008686668,0.00003728557,0.00003374193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001380511,0.00006265101,0.8887993,0.000007348388,0.000004485807,4.375182e-9,0.0001095417,0.0002811245,0.09939536,0.0006757277,0.01061544,0.00003522161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002152631,0.00002277262,0.8534797,0.00001054512,0.000002452358,0.000001842358,0.0000576299,0.006511006,0.1351918,0.004060558,0.0003798587,0.00006655929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946138,0.00003912682,0.000003839859,0.002585651,0.00001192164,0.0001642524,0.00002327425,0.00001192422,0.002546191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997222,0.00001915391,0.001215175,0.0009222054,0.00002053239,0.00001616968,5.843441e-7,0.000003093428,0.0005810581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03579639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4352543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101518542","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01776.x","title":"A model-driven approach to quantify migration patterns: individual, regional and yearly differences","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":435,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Norsk institutt for naturforskning; Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Predictability; Geography; Population; Range (aeronautics); Movement (music); Home range; Ecology; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat; Statistics; Demography; Biology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04246649275037333,"gpt":0.2535888617577582,"spread":0.2111223690073848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002491692,0.00007005162,0.0001368923,0.0000558498,0.00007786066,0.00002172609,0.0001565001,0.0001263262,0.000151238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005010974,0.00005754581,0.00003031218,0.00005925641,0.00009844419,0.0002184424,0.00006502741,0.0002548171,0.0000238082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001825008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002618811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003228623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001086085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993513,0.00004492426,0.0002162967,0.0001254639,0.0001344124,0.0001275941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996116,0.00005814699,0.0001723069,0.00005388145,0.00001983261,0.00008418979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008130108,0.0001246419,0.9914991,0.000001885753,0.00001276291,0.000002946747,0.0005649546,0.0001819917,0.004451551,0.0004989571,0.002294706,0.0002851547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001987096,0.0007595471,0.9902104,0.000002324485,0.00001653032,0.00009956301,0.00009235313,0.007894112,0.00001530709,0.0004233929,0.0002238391,0.00006392616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995963,0.000003458816,0.0006052541,0.003032942,0.00009967755,0.00007164213,0.000002593351,0.000004177676,0.0002172148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922311,0.00001092785,0.00647485,0.001156648,0.00007276526,0.000004677398,0.000001624876,0.00000395027,0.0000434516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00771212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.234665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120240519","doi":"10.2193/0084-0173(2004)155[1:eosnap]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECTS OF SUMMER‐AUTUMN NUTRITION AND PARTURITION DATE ON REPRODUCTION AND SURVIVAL OF ELK","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":423,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Boise Cascade (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Biology; Animal science; Herd; Population; Juvenile; Cervus elaphus; Ice calving; Pregnancy; Lactation; Ecology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00988153548160768,"gpt":0.2182303024031242,"spread":0.2083487669215165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002383947,0.00009901983,0.0001550038,0.00007183386,0.00008010038,0.000005621206,0.00004687381,0.00008317349,0.00001191978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005635957,0.00009976115,0.00003351115,0.0002153321,0.0003025433,0.0002009402,0.00003523192,0.0000755413,0.000004336465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001278938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004370279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000131939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004834057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991778,0.0000710927,0.0002035544,0.0002914896,0.0001374733,0.0001186083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995868,0.00006735158,0.0001312313,0.0001576663,0.00001059391,0.0000464163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000203354,0.000565102,0.9800464,0.0001941964,0.00003259824,0.000003364334,0.0003634791,0.0001303747,0.01101284,0.001803476,0.00111651,0.004528301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001115189,0.0003214677,0.9800663,0.00008835483,0.00003343441,0.000004705387,0.00005393938,0.00002371162,0.01302381,0.004417401,0.0007496869,0.0001019758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980707,0.0001730849,0.00008300042,0.001073448,0.0001335229,0.0002942873,0.000006147491,0.00002030794,0.0001455019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986487,0.000586642,0.0004403209,0.000232027,0.00002937792,0.00002886409,0.00001789767,0.000006528318,0.0000096519],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004426325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4068142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107752902","doi":"10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110050","title":"Corridors for Conservation: Integrating Pattern and Process","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":423,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Peking University Third Hospital","keywords":"Habitat; Selection (genetic algorithm); Identification (biology); Computer science; Landscape connectivity; Process (computing); Wildlife corridor; Wildlife; Resource (disambiguation); Landscape ecology; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Artificial intelligence; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009401820526711391,"gpt":0.2538763547484626,"spread":0.2444745342217512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006693033,0.00008189266,0.0002786491,0.00001806491,0.000106114,0.000003266184,0.00005214279,0.0000736201,0.00005562661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003798657,0.00006724095,0.00002646291,0.00008351768,0.0001491561,0.0001209912,0.00002688897,0.00004237898,0.000007801902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003536384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001812835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005470584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003931606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990983,0.00009809786,0.0004926222,0.0001373732,0.00007050388,0.0001030758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992498,0.0002496102,0.0003306512,0.00007795815,0.00006841426,0.00002355498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003624282,0.0000321377,0.9763947,0.00966492,0.000008723418,3.619323e-7,0.000128702,0.00000828973,0.000005785574,0.003737499,0.00952101,0.0004942831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004445114,0.0002470371,0.9739464,0.003479674,0.0001198889,0.00005877995,0.0008422281,0.01368064,0.000005773225,0.005168221,0.001822166,0.0001846981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753512,0.005732214,0.01174642,0.002978983,0.0002277787,0.001805255,0.00003938502,0.0000273593,0.002091391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964721,0.0004491725,0.000739167,0.001821319,0.00002805936,0.0001399412,0.00002108733,0.00000527815,0.0003239366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02112083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2742006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120428481","doi":"10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00985.x","title":"REVIEW: The management of wild large herbivores to meet economic, conservation and environmental objectives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":422,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Herbivore; Ecology; Moorland; Population; Biodiversity; Geography; Ecosystem; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Wildebeest; Foraging; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00483415137659494,"gpt":0.2067012560102066,"spread":0.2018671046336117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004973624,0.00007661303,0.0001797627,0.00002525796,0.00008554527,0.000003832844,0.0001445102,0.00004748062,0.0002725922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004661737,0.00005813624,0.0000342284,0.00004367711,0.0001385463,0.00008530536,0.0001123047,0.00006991164,0.00004090457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001096795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001124425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002637178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993318,0.00002757968,0.0003300874,0.0001127216,0.00007039656,0.0001274188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995139,0.00005105317,0.0002915004,0.00009889904,0.000002633864,0.00004197292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008326026,0.0008128069,0.8617952,0.0003199491,0.0006907462,0.00003686433,0.002615731,0.01295321,0.003803274,0.03542727,0.07570022,0.005012107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008365986,0.0002194349,0.9773384,0.00005500368,0.00007966672,0.00003613852,0.0005764373,0.00001546656,0.000349224,0.006058317,0.01435256,0.00008270468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905009,0.000351793,0.0000825038,0.006887962,0.00009500559,0.000298987,0.000003180838,0.000002514825,0.001777115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879572,0.001874443,0.0009652307,0.009132386,0.00002417394,0.0000171501,0.000001361689,0.000004998915,0.00002302773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1155432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2984693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140515818","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00298.x","title":"Countryside Biogeography of Neotropical Mammals: Conservation Opportunities in Agricultural Landscapes of Costa Rica","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":418,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Winslow Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Arboreal locomotion; Ecology; Species richness; Secondary forest; Agroforestry; Forestry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02261923906559853,"gpt":0.2262662411541466,"spread":0.203647002088548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033408,0.0001195364,0.0002538695,0.0001045734,0.00005073589,0.00000438402,0.000128114,0.000182472,0.0006324937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002817049,0.0001033591,0.00005289432,0.0004311728,0.0004128927,0.0001560234,0.00003489525,0.0000896104,0.0000136684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003388044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005536414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007960633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001559533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987073,0.0002956099,0.0005111362,0.0002062152,0.00009485453,0.0001849007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999128,0.0003156928,0.0003062584,0.0001496955,0.00006333784,0.00003705766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000376561,0.00007151633,0.9652371,0.00001002806,0.00001343599,0.000001039831,0.00008215896,0.00002562533,0.006751024,0.02567771,0.001905323,0.0001873916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004985201,0.0001152728,0.9842139,0.00001223777,0.00001233761,0.000005879944,0.0003045203,0.0001408943,0.001496607,0.002766938,0.01032329,0.0001095854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933911,0.00007578344,0.0001530172,0.002893818,0.0001065262,0.0001978329,0.0000232956,0.00001724157,0.003141389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978591,0.00008134005,0.0006255895,0.001218836,0.000008225898,0.00002315235,0.0001108202,0.000004411881,0.00006849995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02291077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6925363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132773282","doi":"10.1017/s1464793101005814","title":"Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":416,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Environment; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Ungulate; Sexual dimorphism; Biology; Predation; Ecology; Forage; Habitat; Sexual selection; Foraging; Sociality; Zoology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1992373758940099,"gpt":0.2967968753331527,"spread":0.0975594994391428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065523,0.0003913472,0.001506792,0.00001466238,0.0001362325,0.000007668325,0.0008952493,0.0004931418,0.001146348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004610081,0.00019134,0.0007533049,0.0007722605,0.001771036,0.0001101244,0.0005195538,0.0005586969,0.0002943016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001331599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007989295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003094491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001443787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959895,0.001099347,0.001597404,0.0006468811,0.0002481724,0.0004186938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968867,0.001476957,0.0009217931,0.0005618117,0.00003309246,0.0001196198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000367841,0.0009841799,0.9617871,0.0001180364,0.00002621867,0.000001103059,0.00009010392,0.00002831897,0.006339537,0.002787714,0.006658707,0.02114217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000459556,0.000770445,0.9550931,0.0002695141,0.00004640955,0.00000672478,0.00001836215,0.001219602,0.0001928063,0.01209631,0.0294296,0.0003975337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758735,0.01579841,0.0000681114,0.00431232,0.00009923955,0.002048407,0.00003244311,0.00002926232,0.001738342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716151,0.0247391,0.0009414035,0.002370144,0.00008912092,0.0001732484,0.00001298995,0.000007115033,0.00005178767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02277089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487352212","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01466.x","title":"Modelling wildlife–human relationships for social species with mixed‐effects resource selection models","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":407,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Canis; Wildlife; Resource (disambiguation); Generalized linear mixed model; Habitat; Geography; Biology; Computer science; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03917761709386359,"gpt":0.2151627379078549,"spread":0.1759851208139913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004450371,0.0001124377,0.0002315457,0.00007578349,0.0009028002,0.000008108105,0.0001281534,0.0001841023,0.00006337678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001674715,0.0001002684,0.00006190881,0.0001543685,0.0002000255,0.0002119263,0.00002569415,0.0003294307,0.00001621765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002019934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003436749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004705033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009313292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990629,0.00006783834,0.0003273334,0.000158661,0.0001549208,0.0002283342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992016,0.000266624,0.0003879563,0.00005756062,0.00003032676,0.00005591148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004665964,0.0001407102,0.1109409,0.000009402633,0.00005837204,0.000008306438,0.001249457,0.8568079,0.0005959769,0.009314465,0.02031754,0.00009044953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003077081,0.001112078,0.8648689,0.00001055377,0.0001632565,0.0003311933,0.00046003,0.07383394,0.0005725145,0.04800893,0.007181268,0.0003802363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9329869,0.000003001636,0.06144519,0.0005655531,0.00007185411,0.0002418364,6.947723e-7,0.00001607056,0.004668912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898123,0.000004333821,0.009004094,0.000505092,0.000243679,0.00003058817,0.000004069087,0.00001471244,0.0003811265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7829739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007401784","doi":"10.1126/science.1240495","title":"Near-Complete Extinction of Native Small Mammal Fauna 25 Years After Forest Fragmentation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":399,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Fauna; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Mammal; Defaunation; Fragmentation (computing); Forest fragmentation; Ecology; Habitat; Habitat destruction; Geography; Habitat fragmentation; Biodiversity hotspot; Tropical forest; Extinction debt; Local extinction; Biology; Biological dispersal","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01102792939698191,"gpt":0.2114921091903276,"spread":0.2004641797933457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002642037,0.00005610431,0.00005586287,0.00003393803,0.0001354574,0.00003320524,0.000189938,0.00003173214,0.002208079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005243213,0.00005372689,0.0000189099,0.0003655261,0.0008464811,0.0006175327,0.00009803829,0.00005638781,0.0008076401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000830931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002502297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000355784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003309636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992228,0.00002586662,0.0001292801,0.0002182993,0.0002274924,0.0001762344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996942,0.00003032743,0.00008101619,0.0001237963,0.00002350391,0.00004720071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007695599,0.00002255327,0.9859457,0.000001664184,0.000001254083,7.054962e-7,0.0005499904,0.0005175089,0.007266007,0.00007467313,0.0001061982,0.005506075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001058115,0.00005308032,0.9931197,0.000003542083,0.000002569506,0.000001457262,0.00009862478,0.004241964,0.0004331275,0.001474084,0.0004051696,0.00006086502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964867,0.00000370523,0.0006327078,0.0002290881,0.0001528415,0.0001899036,0.000001835773,0.00001314714,0.002290125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969987,0.000001097653,0.002269835,0.0003688787,0.00001260707,0.000046526,0.00000186479,0.000002870547,0.0002976503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00717403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}