{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1045,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1045,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"528aa0b52271","filters":{"topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation"}},"results":[{"id":"W2517342784","doi":"10.1038/ncomms12558","title":"Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1860,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Australian Research Council; James Cook University; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecological footprint; Footprint; Planet; Natural resource economics; Population; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Ecology; Sustainable development; Economics; Biology; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0774075739550155,"gpt":0.3338045099103339,"spread":0.2563969359553184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002359645,0.00004756884,0.00005874715,0.00002341944,0.0001928248,0.00001330058,0.0004619057,0.00008058046,0.00001257355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001255324,0.00003507231,0.00003012449,0.0001933934,0.0001834574,0.0001316111,0.000172505,0.0001107208,0.000004530025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008444971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007570905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001263491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008023321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995301,0.00008791045,0.0001386612,0.0001070969,0.0000631201,0.00007308957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989884,0.0003100404,0.00009239811,0.0005747962,0.00001689908,0.00001738881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001013426,0.0000772291,0.9662445,0.000001058944,0.000005120673,2.554201e-8,0.0002294848,3.886514e-7,0.001771861,0.01439155,0.001853419,0.01541519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002872933,0.00002444453,0.9513112,0.000008702531,0.00001020521,0.00000125091,0.00006224109,0.00002169392,0.0000250131,0.002315505,0.0458895,0.0000429253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9459984,0.00007787115,0.0001358577,0.0526187,0.00003695811,0.0004766861,0.0001184434,0.00001156425,0.0005254995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982634,0.00007809776,0.0008033247,0.000686975,0.00001452993,0.0001109032,0.0000344716,0.000001677362,0.000006677168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05226492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4477201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W653200273","doi":"10.5751/es-02815-140121","title":"Effects of Roads on Animal Abundance: an Empirical Review and Synthesis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1296,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008019159439880005,"gpt":0.2704670751287543,"spread":0.2624479156888743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001263708,0.00005207059,0.000117107,0.000003590062,0.00009521775,0.000004095073,0.00003379743,0.00006195149,0.000199746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003490516,0.0000438215,0.00003101593,0.00004607762,0.0001042581,0.00009470316,0.00001518396,0.00006962603,0.000009863256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002047254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003803895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009852885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006869678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996222,0.00004339014,0.00008403576,0.0001341771,0.00003947614,0.00007677703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997589,0.0001072516,0.00003682562,0.00005971207,0.00000345269,0.00003387457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006856863,0.001156744,0.8307993,0.0003358473,0.00006313622,0.000005366732,0.001962498,0.000009456952,0.009658006,0.0005223004,0.1084599,0.04695884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008967742,0.000357742,0.9968964,0.00002914195,0.00003297984,0.000004279001,0.00002529258,0.000167234,0.0003765313,0.000113363,0.001859987,0.00004730075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960462,0.0003514552,0.000006202546,0.002621026,0.00002004764,0.00009533658,6.686757e-7,0.000008158729,0.0008508643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897141,0.002002501,0.0003050856,0.007867097,0.00001206648,0.00000934048,6.66511e-7,0.000001742088,0.00008743391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1660971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2187079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134924002","doi":"10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900102.x","title":"On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Landscape connectivity; CLARITY; Fragmentation (computing); Computer science; Confusion; Landscape ecology; Habitat fragmentation; Functional connectivity; Variety (cybernetics); Ecology; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Habitat; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Biological dispersal; Population; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01662978211486737,"gpt":0.2092577930239132,"spread":0.1926280109090459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001684719,0.0000316948,0.00003289105,0.00000468333,0.00005392212,0.000007877147,0.00003759441,0.00001075548,0.01155582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000230606,0.00002021835,0.00001189907,0.00004253658,0.00003334459,0.00005025355,0.000009901459,0.00003269853,0.000154693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001766355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002001912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000207537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001019431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996708,0.00002692672,0.00004956077,0.00007021138,0.0001368284,0.0000456471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998283,0.0000425756,0.00001770228,0.00009496306,0.000003382932,0.00001311101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001922087,0.0005442121,0.4695289,0.00001162179,0.00004991457,0.000002814003,0.001077934,0.001045934,0.0500429,0.003591165,0.09902012,0.3748923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002010716,0.0001074799,0.9530437,0.00001868094,0.000008127071,0.000003215255,0.00006804252,0.001965415,0.004253937,0.0007716803,0.03948202,0.00007661159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9259669,0.000006002573,0.0000173451,0.0009079227,0.00001569909,0.00005502443,0.000001193655,0.00000456416,0.07302541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989523,0.000007560862,0.00001536897,0.0003564011,0.000006510854,0.000006640106,2.381293e-7,0.000001735248,0.000653244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4835148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102906279","doi":"10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00099-085.x","title":"Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Wildlife Underpasses in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":485,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildlife; National park; Habitat; Geography; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Carnivore; Landscape ecology; Mammal; Biology; Predation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01701936636537175,"gpt":0.2416697380215997,"spread":0.2246503716562279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003345289,0.00009746887,0.0001247638,0.0000307238,0.00008749386,0.000008439452,0.0001480684,0.00006007355,0.001644347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002630424,0.00007103853,0.00002652232,0.0002904689,0.0001388465,0.0001664766,0.00002539915,0.00009222188,0.00001869687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002853197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001899384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7801201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7774291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989758,0.0003146496,0.0002647603,0.000177321,0.0001320028,0.0001354287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983053,0.001423812,0.00009162675,0.0001231396,0.00003163473,0.00002452906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003336174,0.00002057524,0.9941671,0.000004261153,0.000009055897,1.526272e-7,0.00007205977,0.001307776,0.001575554,0.0009515843,0.001336183,0.0005222721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001716401,0.00002089295,0.9732984,0.00001595787,0.000003252926,0.000001323221,0.00009277539,0.0007146307,0.0005304099,0.0009007659,0.02417161,0.00007834647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919164,0.000007536599,0.00002714042,0.001570558,0.00009773294,0.0001587644,0.000008670129,0.000006205355,0.006206995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972738,0.000006134019,0.00001608656,0.002410951,0.00001114277,0.00003006488,0.00004481061,0.000004765207,0.0002022305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02283542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801359147","doi":"10.1038/s41893-018-0059-3","title":"Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Sustainability","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":483,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental degradation; Environmental planning; Raising (metalworking); Business; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Engineering; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009833936123739603,"gpt":0.2656316804521583,"spread":0.2557977443284187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003114622,0.00009374751,0.00006925091,0.00001141191,0.0003613729,0.0000212074,0.0001163428,0.0001182384,0.0003387442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002910628,0.00006406722,0.00003773834,0.00005720961,0.0005019266,0.0002246955,0.0001171935,0.0002086875,0.00001208381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002825058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001411994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009016432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002045515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992843,0.00004979699,0.0001024268,0.0002685197,0.000126428,0.0001685678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994681,0.0001876531,0.00004701147,0.0002344929,0.00002549305,0.00003720487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003376532,0.0003601781,0.144855,0.00005222447,0.00006684476,0.000001988893,0.007478199,0.00001722943,0.0005981851,0.004031983,0.01005554,0.832145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001735424,0.0001466182,0.865792,0.000001852889,0.00001380898,0.000003255963,0.00437371,0.0006334743,0.0002350688,0.008349427,0.1201873,0.00008998653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781519,0.0006050839,0.0002228465,0.01744984,0.0001634499,0.000700841,0.00001506797,0.00002314205,0.002667904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983983,0.00006538152,0.000145304,0.0009276522,0.000122005,0.00008978212,0.000003975462,0.000006321626,0.0002413037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.832055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3709011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137555276","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.12.015","title":"Predicting when animal populations are at risk from roads: an interactive model of road avoidance behavior","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Modelling","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":474,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Road surface; Population; Avoidance response; Affect (linguistics); Noise (video); Ecology; Environmental science; Psychology; Computer science; Biology; Environmental health; Engineering; Medicine; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05557052049293756,"gpt":0.2676126630489665,"spread":0.212042142556029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001555064,0.0001562794,0.0001955955,0.00003128047,0.0003184833,0.000029534,0.0002016529,0.0001235516,0.002260327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005800752,0.000142962,0.00008727382,0.0000787666,0.00007401704,0.0008765367,0.0001608111,0.0002766884,0.0001150302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003563665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000705103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002042875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002646431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986073,0.00009574954,0.0004247427,0.0004300272,0.0002143622,0.0002277915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991848,0.00008280008,0.0003673022,0.0002372515,0.00002794782,0.00009984902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004533655,0.0002447526,0.3499225,4.422931e-7,0.000004927416,6.326434e-7,0.0004693186,0.6459883,0.001791862,0.00001854341,0.00004796245,0.00146538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001257573,0.00007089665,0.2918998,0.00001066192,0.00003080316,9.430096e-7,0.0001357666,0.7063883,0.0002977684,0.0008901792,0.00003674342,0.0001123602],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621539,0.0000152946,0.03645496,0.0001598957,0.00006818459,0.0002194634,0.00008541265,0.0000681085,0.0007747796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563804,0.00001081508,0.04308856,0.000133149,0.00008817673,0.00006537043,0.00003449888,0.0000131803,0.0001858055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06039998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073843668","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.03.024","title":"The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":423,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Grassland; Transect; Native plant; Ecology; Introduced species; Disturbance (geology); Invasive species; Wildlife corridor; Belt transect; Plant community; Geography; Biology; Species richness","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02261598956587997,"gpt":0.2237641837441613,"spread":0.2011481941782813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002751029,0.00007931815,0.00009235134,0.000009148554,0.0001567147,0.000008798766,0.0001616029,0.00003984331,0.00005184879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002760444,0.00003899556,0.00002890556,0.0001289024,0.0006270735,0.0001435977,0.00003209128,0.00008488444,0.00000664049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002586921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007920084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003170196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005759809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999293,0.00006491139,0.0002514433,0.0001466881,0.0001493485,0.00009460503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998781,0.0008502117,0.0001767494,0.0001431156,0.00002974936,0.00001915509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001303771,0.00004130344,0.9788629,0.000002804813,0.000006863427,2.808267e-7,0.0002524151,0.001100535,0.01566872,0.001927174,0.0009610071,0.001045618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007534086,0.0001429915,0.9884123,0.00003093635,0.000003599593,0.000001186746,0.0001474701,0.002147271,0.003540261,0.000193141,0.00525398,0.00005156514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994665,0.00002384673,0.00009457493,0.004346292,0.00002907556,0.0002251617,0.00002239911,0.000006841977,0.0005868081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897,0.0001189959,0.0001095414,0.0006080841,0.00001292878,0.00002618896,0.000007342813,0.00000196279,0.0001449172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01212846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2310479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110928007","doi":"10.1650/condor-13-090.1","title":"Bird–building collisions in the United States: Estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ornithological Applications","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":417,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warbler; Geography; Bird conservation; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Population; Flycatcher; Habitat; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03806574468132139,"gpt":0.3088855997183908,"spread":0.2708198550370694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005379493,0.00007978638,0.000107904,0.00003482334,0.0001808463,0.00002310002,0.0001801531,0.00004533969,0.0002007317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002104914,0.00005094989,0.00002393979,0.0005400424,0.0004141885,0.00009781274,0.00008579114,0.0001305851,0.00003444252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002846635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003121118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002952244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002670304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991785,0.0001315538,0.0002324832,0.0002098769,0.0001322937,0.0001152802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989697,0.0006306874,0.00007812184,0.0002660182,0.00002141995,0.00003399025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003679967,0.0001658036,0.9930449,0.000003363205,0.000002137022,2.021759e-7,0.0002050645,0.001431293,0.0008624491,0.00312115,0.0002574275,0.000902564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007108141,0.0000384844,0.9737301,0.000003745854,0.000009057394,0.000004086207,0.0005229295,0.001867052,0.00008883532,0.009438233,0.01416521,0.00006115683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764238,0.000003988298,0.02116206,0.001239048,0.000008034254,0.0002819914,0.0000267925,0.0000490158,0.000805287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953287,0.00001752658,0.003992907,0.0004020959,0.00001216919,0.0002089175,0.00001652697,0.000004991318,0.00001618243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01931473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2197872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966168558","doi":"10.1890/09-2190.1","title":"Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":413,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Computer science; Network analysis; Landscape connectivity; Network theory; Ecological network; Graph theory; Habitat; Network science; Vulnerability (computing); Ecology; Complex network; Computer security; Mathematics; Ecosystem; Engineering; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01763878238527985,"gpt":0.2662968402113827,"spread":0.2486580578261028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000305177,0.00008137048,0.0001117545,0.0000179903,0.000219472,0.00002391744,0.0001277596,0.0001477919,0.003089167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006421189,0.0000807818,0.00004191784,0.0001658709,0.00007633264,0.0001151699,0.00006034392,0.0001990026,0.0005269883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005714972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002126645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001635348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01027186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992736,0.00004087139,0.0001445215,0.0002337956,0.00007534038,0.0002318671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991106,0.0005246348,0.00006001844,0.000203697,0.00002528568,0.00007577012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006481457,0.00006970711,0.7301266,0.000001745834,0.00001358846,9.080139e-7,0.0001092635,0.0007216508,0.003823471,0.01281491,0.2462128,0.006040463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101173,0.0000945027,0.589091,0.000002133082,0.000005807989,0.000005044752,0.00001457977,0.00108598,0.0001267213,0.009828173,0.3995633,0.00008159289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517136,0.000001611584,0.02117133,0.02110268,0.001716982,0.0004009288,0.000004444704,0.00004897167,0.003839487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660656,8.619468e-7,0.02110303,0.01149453,0.000348758,0.0002600534,0.000004646086,0.000009565122,0.0007129317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1533505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112183145","doi":"10.1046/j.1526-100x.2002.02041.x","title":"Importance of Backyard Habitat in a Comprehensive Biodiversity Conservation Strategy: A Connectivity Analysis of Urban Green Spaces","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Restoration Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":378,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Biodiversity; Wildlife; Wildlife corridor; Wilderness; Biota; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03115249452600777,"gpt":0.2424224500248753,"spread":0.2112699554988675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000122105,0.00007539355,0.000238904,0.0001575321,0.00004652651,0.000006266592,0.0000779132,0.00006719753,0.001046386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000571945,0.00008189858,0.00005919264,0.0008914847,0.0001618634,0.0003422213,0.0000325571,0.00006619754,0.0000358423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001712854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001249522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004042212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07422613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991521,0.0001418235,0.0002976815,0.0001893259,0.0001190867,0.0001000386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992593,0.0001526502,0.0003449054,0.0001589505,0.0000581654,0.00002602694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002723143,0.0001294965,0.9879452,0.000005390584,0.00005970162,0.00000173908,0.0002877971,0.005848381,0.002813709,0.0001023466,0.002637527,0.0001414617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002331491,0.0001308184,0.9653984,0.000002622522,0.00007076836,7.306004e-7,0.0002371865,0.0332843,0.000132381,0.00004833838,0.0003947576,0.00006658975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980163,0.00001449171,0.0001093986,0.001214706,0.00004082698,0.0001580756,0.00002615241,0.000008825069,0.0004112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995334,0.00001351547,0.0001344219,0.0002140689,0.000004288474,0.000007594368,0.0000287903,0.000001861568,0.0000621309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07018392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148373626","doi":"10.1023/a:1008177324187","title":"How should we measure landscape connectivity?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":365,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Landscape ecology; Habitat; Landscape connectivity; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Geography; Habitat destruction; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Population; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01589278686455569,"gpt":0.2209840053420395,"spread":0.2050912184774838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001424516,0.0001413096,0.0001741466,0.00003638115,0.0001577647,0.0000607755,0.0001683789,0.0001472872,0.05154695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004111168,0.0001205222,0.0000648611,0.0001907453,0.00005735216,0.0003248268,0.00004352768,0.0001834648,0.002130974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004622461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001214268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006416738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001757894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990135,0.00008766943,0.0001310304,0.0003176555,0.000154979,0.00029516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995043,0.000106541,0.00005137303,0.0002459857,0.000009991433,0.00008182175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007353574,0.0001530765,0.7723572,0.000003881207,0.00002868759,0.00001730462,0.000197097,0.0003767868,0.0006669139,0.0001103643,0.1768866,0.04912858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006435089,0.000174658,0.4970135,0.000006185668,0.00002384109,0.00007278026,0.0001686435,0.002934425,0.0001921708,0.0004159231,0.4981079,0.00024651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8984113,0.00005076598,0.00007102233,0.0173608,0.0003099044,0.0001506058,0.000006633851,0.00008699481,0.08355197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805414,0.00007787813,0.0001199062,0.001400075,0.0001458871,0.00004449517,0.00001519735,0.00001410895,0.01764107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3212213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087406926","doi":"10.1139/f03-095","title":"The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":338,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Species richness; Ecology; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Land cover; Environmental science; Marsh; Water quality; Amphibian; Land use; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01871268104865241,"gpt":0.2058844327465938,"spread":0.1871717516979414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004561507,0.00005301066,0.00008190383,0.00003659435,0.0008786221,0.0001826842,0.00009526161,0.00001562446,0.00003619009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002997345,0.00003311456,0.00001623461,0.0001292372,0.0007499294,0.0002942754,0.000007909629,0.0001005266,6.699175e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003203109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004946198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006065878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03037899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994158,0.0001601085,0.0001444822,0.00005039957,0.000124637,0.0001045478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991416,0.0005453919,0.0001226405,0.00006332614,0.00001018702,0.000116886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006284868,0.00001277464,0.995437,0.000006092729,0.000005558458,0.000002535699,0.000770182,0.00001339177,0.0005365708,0.0002611512,0.001075127,0.001873295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001902556,0.0005098538,0.984035,0.00008873388,0.00001300785,0.00004893702,0.001964973,0.0001463185,0.0006532578,0.0006726573,0.0116081,0.00006889685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977005,0.0000926353,0.00002412092,0.0009816688,0.0001654389,0.00005262639,0.000001194206,7.39723e-7,0.0009810919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995019,0.00009811023,0.0001278061,0.0001656967,0.000008082062,7.286517e-7,2.345658e-7,0.00000152446,0.00009589535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02431311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556258011","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0166941","title":"How Effective Is Road Mitigation at Reducing Road-Kill? A Meta-Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":334,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Concordia University; Carleton University","funders":"Concordia University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Baker Foundation","keywords":"Fencing; Wildlife; Poison control; Transport engineering; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Computer science; Ecology; Engineering; Environmental health; Biology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.107512597834307,"gpt":0.2881498498034162,"spread":0.1806372519691092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003284339,0.0004361605,0.002138976,0.000216041,0.0002247418,0.0001325703,0.0002921449,0.0002364921,0.008933147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001484673,0.0002843165,0.002005536,0.0009086335,0.00009090924,0.0004995014,0.0002080242,0.0002368698,0.002479893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009451464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002040643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000536309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001020197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973443,0.0003672301,0.0004989573,0.0008287384,0.0006702098,0.0002906037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981825,0.0001909306,0.0007134944,0.000754948,0.00004081898,0.0001172478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007001451,0.0005026724,0.0001563911,0.001077222,0.1694517,0.000004663802,0.0001721998,0.000003928775,0.0002601434,0.000006155098,0.003027936,0.82533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001097279,0.00007399741,0.0005112768,0.001384481,0.4751052,0.000005892946,0.00001052914,0.0001980482,0.0003756352,0.0000316065,0.5215126,0.0006810426],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002109552,0.990272,0.0001170615,0.001765588,0.00007702229,0.001907697,0.0002058012,0.00008857017,0.003456658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007374416,0.9555034,0.0007257966,0.0002727685,0.0001597681,0.001370196,0.0001890777,0.00005831544,0.04098323],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8246489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026050145","doi":"10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99086.x","title":"Response Time of Wetland Biodiversity to Road Construction on Adjacent Lands","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":327,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Habitat; Extinction debt; Ecology; Wetland; Geography; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Wildlife; Habitat destruction; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat fragmentation; Local extinction; Biology; Population; Biological dispersal","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01090357040890528,"gpt":0.223939720504449,"spread":0.2130361500955437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002326519,0.00009157832,0.0001222343,0.00006871184,0.0001019701,0.000008401427,0.0001057321,0.00008397269,0.01337579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007955581,0.00008556336,0.00003765241,0.0002454433,0.0001390354,0.0001005111,0.00003194913,0.00006111311,0.003285239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008219817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001553723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006510168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005717677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991916,0.0001621225,0.000205994,0.000226036,0.0000855846,0.0001286764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995483,0.00009616746,0.00008041361,0.0001919612,0.0000252776,0.00005785265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002417086,0.0001102407,0.8360177,0.000002026892,0.00001860329,0.00000126467,0.0002483688,0.0002841144,0.08351497,0.0001019784,0.04647507,0.03080861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004067633,0.0003787584,0.7750696,0.00001001572,0.000007864678,0.000007734186,0.00004338178,0.0004849273,0.003936591,0.00007912835,0.2194573,0.0001179414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884554,0.000002460441,0.00008665478,0.007915343,0.0001095651,0.0001604262,0.0000433792,0.00003290156,0.003193916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930204,0.00001260719,0.0006190891,0.004528933,0.00001910159,0.00001169363,0.0000742003,0.00000399157,0.00171003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1729822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981167838","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.027","title":"Spatial wildlife-vehicle collision models: A review of current work and its application to transportation mitigation projects","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Petro-Canada","funders":"State University of New York","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Foraging; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Collision; Terrain; Ecology; Environmental science; Carnivore; Cartography; Computer science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02342043499574217,"gpt":0.2793316957246152,"spread":0.255911260728873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004455891,0.0002867434,0.0006740445,0.0001560073,0.00007157948,0.00001948852,0.0002570664,0.0001052894,0.0001565069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001243718,0.0002451944,0.0002443713,0.0003113344,0.00004709876,0.0004246957,0.00008627649,0.0003274437,0.00004747024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003273183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000160563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009608938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008681805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975498,0.00009530316,0.001201959,0.0003321278,0.0006617893,0.0001589954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981751,0.00003979019,0.00139541,0.0002427104,0.00001352528,0.0001334912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002173658,0.0002500694,0.0001257984,0.00723013,0.00004710534,0.000002873937,0.00006609301,0.0001147397,0.00003373786,0.00006825369,0.0009963367,0.9910432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002402354,0.00015909,0.002472846,0.02700017,0.0008394084,0.00001034377,0.00002656219,0.0001366448,0.0000134941,0.00006771259,0.9687604,0.0002730651],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005724262,0.9873368,0.003171867,0.0002476503,0.0003064907,0.002923426,0.00005685704,0.000008483417,0.0002241636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004494462,0.9940178,0.0009009612,0.0001887297,0.0000715065,0.0001557082,0.00007869273,0.00002873109,0.00006337663],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.99077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494793062","doi":"10.1111/rec.12049","title":"A Framework to Optimize Biodiversity Restoration Efforts Based on Habitat Amount and Landscape Connectivity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Restoration Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":307,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Landscape connectivity; Restoration ecology; Forest restoration; Habitat; Landscape ecology; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity; Geography; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Wildlife corridor; Landscape planning; Environmental science; Biological dispersal; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Population; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01109878464696324,"gpt":0.2271728131481804,"spread":0.2160740285012172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001721819,0.0001040392,0.0001116172,0.00008269226,0.00024554,0.00006699137,0.00006655511,0.0001215555,0.001759944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002555331,0.0001024237,0.0000230432,0.0001867471,0.0000601717,0.0004348474,0.00004797119,0.0001175416,0.001416939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002268412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001790581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005600703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001419593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991678,0.0001163286,0.0001442851,0.0002823811,0.0001359013,0.000153318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993697,0.0002149057,0.00008692502,0.0001962263,0.000032195,0.0001000087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009531322,0.0001367421,0.9065318,0.000003651385,0.000005789455,0.000002423304,0.000186277,0.02787343,0.0008863,0.0002988979,0.0626948,0.001284648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002383175,0.000377517,0.9564008,0.000006750099,0.000007335075,0.000002200703,0.00005392805,0.03675267,0.00009186684,0.0003159303,0.005624055,0.0001286739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828848,0.000001857019,0.00660018,0.008787834,0.000262502,0.0004474726,0.000005346267,0.0000446162,0.0009654317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919295,0.000002517127,0.004135103,0.00368985,0.00003263989,0.0000882336,0.0000241854,0.000004656263,0.00009328512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05707074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164115678","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.023","title":"Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Population; Life history theory; Reproductive success; Biology; Habitat; Mammal; Geography; Life history; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2427500792822981,"gpt":0.2989197065922888,"spread":0.05616962730999078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007986611,0.0001918702,0.0003938272,0.0001496629,0.0001480543,0.00003729337,0.000164931,0.0001330617,0.01577488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007697764,0.0001432494,0.0003805888,0.0006344681,0.00007385794,0.0005669018,0.0000829159,0.0001032743,0.0005611184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003986727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001290779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001040663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002291363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998225,0.0004017391,0.0004364717,0.0003605347,0.0002838376,0.0002924484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990363,0.0002862606,0.0001879497,0.000246299,0.00003323774,0.0002099338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001655086,0.00016199,0.9593409,0.000001760313,0.002426038,5.875647e-7,0.0004035907,0.0002157632,0.007796469,0.001807864,0.02711877,0.0005607342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006374762,0.00006307827,0.8855474,7.357609e-7,0.002505922,0.000001346997,0.00009349055,0.0001727856,0.00005570691,0.00006587621,0.1112485,0.0001814065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991327,0.000286973,0.001719284,0.004117828,0.0001496769,0.0003012652,0.00001890211,0.00009023322,0.001988793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874296,0.000009094747,0.002195961,0.007674672,0.00009292266,0.000146214,0.00009067675,0.000007966319,0.002352888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08412972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155695434","doi":"10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00328.x","title":"GIS‐Generated, Expert‐Based Models for Identifying Wildlife Habitat Linkages and Planning Mitigation Passages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":301,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Calgary","funders":"Government of Canada; Public Works and Government Services Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Linkage (software); Empirical modelling; Expert opinion; Empirical research; Computer science; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Class (philosophy); Geography; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics; Simulation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07984501649435177,"gpt":0.2991628953285284,"spread":0.2193178788341766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000186539,0.0001467038,0.0001450996,0.00007355975,0.000311554,0.00006857554,0.0000963194,0.0001390264,0.0003127009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000159256,0.0001442384,0.00004378322,0.0001608335,0.0001530785,0.000509965,0.00003810218,0.00008450635,0.00003460494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006144305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007736559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001737943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006366386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989622,0.00009014914,0.0003006036,0.0003544993,0.00008286314,0.0002097241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993129,0.0002581371,0.0001558269,0.0001588499,0.00005331945,0.00006094919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005562538,0.0001444578,0.6705336,0.00003833921,0.00005419031,0.000003133131,0.00136591,0.01104853,0.1264681,0.001763162,0.1733546,0.01517038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009409185,0.000130934,0.05916353,0.00005653717,0.00002042198,0.000007795613,0.0002884026,0.8899254,0.00349271,0.003118782,0.0425096,0.0003450035],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8756331,0.0003417323,0.1113863,0.01130815,0.0003195547,0.0003571637,0.00001873162,0.00009329665,0.0005419141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786204,0.00006868284,0.009798068,0.01063752,0.0001087284,0.0002061924,0.0001471386,0.00001681447,0.0003964967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8788769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5881873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121612415","doi":"10.1139/z02-060","title":"Quantifying barrier effects of roads and seismic lines on movements of female woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":295,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Threatened species; Woodland; Habitat; Boreal; Taiga; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01540651900966643,"gpt":0.2190116211725072,"spread":0.2036051021628408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008323965,0.00006078306,0.0001552437,0.0001359384,0.00002833319,0.000005427672,0.00008097068,0.00004597856,0.0003489328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008212407,0.00005507573,0.00002902995,0.00009032412,0.00008510585,0.00009816271,0.000009580476,0.00009664984,0.000006549898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005626913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002599087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07064065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3940012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994245,0.00004763067,0.0002606452,0.00007586159,0.00006518624,0.0001262418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995326,0.00008504949,0.0001702914,0.00007592938,0.00001468739,0.0001214315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009834081,0.00001416246,0.9936975,0.00001077857,0.00001200893,0.00002154783,0.0006816016,0.0007722599,0.0009365886,0.000007173858,0.00006317637,0.00377333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004331808,0.0002673675,0.9952144,0.00008865068,0.00001035128,0.00004504842,0.0001145564,0.002314194,0.0006003564,0.00002818634,0.0008290964,0.0000546056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987887,0.0001095247,0.00001305106,0.0003176396,0.0001778274,0.00005274536,0.000003215123,3.414844e-7,0.0005369208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993651,0.00002093705,0.00003317262,0.0002667581,0.00001887978,9.674476e-7,6.469452e-7,0.000004446367,0.0002890788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3233606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.935548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980344423","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.12197","title":"Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":294,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Wildlife; Grid cell; Habitat; Grid; Current (fluid); Site selection; Wildlife conservation; Node (physics); Perimeter; Geography; Computer science; Cartography; Environmental science; Ecology; Geology; Biology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02019846344956613,"gpt":0.3048219237308411,"spread":0.2846234602812749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001127191,0.00005633471,0.0001165116,0.00004783793,0.00009836329,0.000005377813,0.00002818554,0.00007984908,0.00003738618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000350729,0.00005463136,0.00001122367,0.0000698208,0.00008266422,0.0001373873,0.00003877632,0.00005281791,0.000002473523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000572735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006626869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006275059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003715747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993334,0.0002163232,0.0001674648,0.0001550003,0.00003447383,0.00009334873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993771,0.0004561781,0.00007934868,0.00005813299,0.00001044436,0.00001879363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002827946,0.0000409516,0.9655038,0.00001434659,0.000004448432,4.578859e-8,0.0002883083,0.000222219,0.003045265,0.0008735955,0.0001976921,0.02978112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003607573,0.0000679411,0.9761152,0.000007064144,0.000006727056,0.000002865007,0.0001024006,0.01166342,0.00315693,0.003396565,0.005058517,0.0000616434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8489714,0.00001499622,0.1501573,0.0002104649,0.0001124895,0.0001338745,0.000001430632,0.000007040889,0.0003909752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8076392,0.000008302416,0.1921453,0.00006767458,0.00001306444,0.00003889047,0.000006340952,0.0000025569,0.00007865152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04198796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2227802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605003690","doi":"10.1111/cobi.12943","title":"Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land‐use change","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":286,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Centre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Montreal Biodome; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Habitat; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Geography; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Land use; Robustness (evolution); Prioritization; Ecosystem; Landscape connectivity; Ecology; Environmental science; Business; Population; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07457351431057058,"gpt":0.278038919293187,"spread":0.2034654049826164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003764006,0.0001528604,0.0001812871,0.00003706021,0.0007911208,0.0002036264,0.0002208999,0.0001136254,0.0001914174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002577008,0.0001406222,0.00003132171,0.00009332834,0.0001616753,0.0005121166,0.0003874604,0.000109109,0.0001283623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006694174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000044194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009457169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005271341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989222,0.0001035463,0.0001897207,0.000371749,0.00007048603,0.000342353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990144,0.0002386367,0.0001901109,0.0004072215,0.00002939199,0.000120261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006590773,0.00001150187,0.9796056,0.000003192345,0.000007837231,0.000001765519,0.0001225357,0.0006677266,0.0002266785,0.0008272733,0.005186847,0.01327319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001841753,0.00004796984,0.9046149,0.00004633274,0.000008554425,0.000005107542,0.00008396657,0.003426974,0.00001228491,0.0002402333,0.09116375,0.0001657331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781495,0.00006239146,0.01089661,0.008792451,0.0006297359,0.0009356037,0.00002248581,0.00006565929,0.0004455785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778001,0.0001559079,0.004747653,0.01599742,0.0003037788,0.0005818814,0.00003453878,0.00001777677,0.0003609699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08597691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6084741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943557153","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01716.x","title":"Toward Best Practices for Developing Regional Connectivity Maps","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecoregion; Naturalness; Geography; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Linkage (software); Wildlife; Landscape connectivity; Wildlife corridor; Ecology; Computer science; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Biology; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3707685498135713,"gpt":0.4029282029505333,"spread":0.03215965313696201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004529135,0.0003181163,0.0006709931,0.00009748113,0.0002151399,0.00003825827,0.0003299192,0.0004364934,0.0006610226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007744482,0.0002767419,0.0002293889,0.0002767407,0.0002038393,0.0003668086,0.0001361855,0.0002332171,0.0006905418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002844135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002270582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001925787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005412936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998189,0.0002635033,0.0005894413,0.0006054289,0.00007458652,0.0002780168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971062,0.0009569851,0.001505094,0.0003051017,0.00007403149,0.00005260281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002681417,0.00007891245,0.002027308,0.0009783022,0.000114679,0.000001014184,0.00006871143,2.304207e-7,0.00001015911,0.01511144,0.03699983,0.9445826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001268747,0.00008555382,0.0002096169,0.0005787075,0.0001669597,0.00005194522,0.00002495844,0.00002345659,0.000002262463,0.001755381,0.9966387,0.0003356345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003843949,0.9697168,0.01264763,0.004680517,0.00162111,0.002556817,0.0001900213,0.0001500427,0.008052663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00002440502,0.9879467,0.006079196,0.001877564,0.000193666,0.0008281362,0.0009358351,0.00003527364,0.002079258],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137517217","doi":"10.1046/j.0021-8901.2001.00678.x","title":"Drainage culverts as habitat linkages and factors affecting passage by mammals","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":270,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Parks Canada","funders":"Government of Canada; Public Works and Government Services Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Culvert; Transect; Habitat; Environmental science; Wildlife; Ecology; Drainage; Traffic volume; Geography; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006170245967587697,"gpt":0.222558759281801,"spread":0.2163885133142133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002731183,0.0001000565,0.0001750819,0.00004993275,0.0001371023,0.00003389486,0.0000997265,0.00008743152,0.001169952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005179249,0.00008336553,0.00004491356,0.00009404366,0.00007714942,0.0002155915,0.00006127026,0.0002038645,0.00007392059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001106599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008757615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004225144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009172364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999267,0.00003192895,0.0002663031,0.0001298788,0.0001222135,0.0001826717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999357,0.00020113,0.0002726339,0.00007339743,0.00000955713,0.00008628675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008669701,0.0002032538,0.8917323,0.000007469537,0.00006828875,0.00008029111,0.001172627,0.0004939631,0.06239451,0.000259376,0.03353498,0.009966264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006349058,0.0004209999,0.9510953,0.0000101181,0.00003982186,0.0003318055,0.001839667,0.0001421464,0.003890782,0.002769775,0.03863453,0.0001901165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747333,0.00001563045,0.0001093309,0.0008864735,0.0001669466,0.00008774504,8.416651e-7,0.000008899324,0.02399082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984186,0.00006278717,0.0003206185,0.000663703,0.00005488861,0.000002464522,0.000001478737,0.000008772806,0.000466674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05936306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155551460","doi":"10.1007/s10980-009-9436-7","title":"The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":268,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Landscape ecology; Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Landscape connectivity; Ecology; Sensitivity (control systems); Geography; Matrix (chemical analysis); Environmental science; Biology; Chemistry; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008803783142372143,"gpt":0.2400363014380694,"spread":0.2312325182956972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003698288,0.0000822215,0.0001188562,0.00001906969,0.0001937426,0.0000139825,0.00009114735,0.00005477242,0.0002843268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001443772,0.00005999288,0.00004560013,0.0001971295,0.00008659761,0.0001459245,0.00004693475,0.000106181,0.000350908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004851505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001085873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001283592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003576288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992002,0.0001699829,0.0001597849,0.0001753781,0.0001015794,0.0001930455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992141,0.0004484736,0.00008191494,0.0001822351,0.00002108427,0.00005216066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009417419,0.0001094022,0.9376474,8.862896e-7,0.00001834813,0.000005414889,0.0004317868,0.00402322,0.006126335,0.001544828,0.04266139,0.007336833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001508057,0.0001820358,0.9841841,0.000003574973,0.00000945325,0.00001066834,0.0001595558,0.001930303,0.0005798155,0.001481239,0.01123023,0.00007816919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.981435,0.000009371885,0.0003187438,0.006182981,0.0002202132,0.0002776948,0.000007559366,0.0000183301,0.0115301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997537,0.00001528938,0.0002865691,0.0009313417,0.000016493,0.00000860511,0.000005530438,0.000004125047,0.001195059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04653677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.451033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098310793","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00304.x","title":"Effects of Road Fencing on Population Persistence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":258,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Centres de Recerca de Catalunya; Parks Canada","keywords":"Fencing; Population; Fence (mathematics); Persistence (discontinuity); Geography; Population growth; Habitat; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Environmental health; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01459350290088379,"gpt":0.2349719584847718,"spread":0.220378455583888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009385639,0.00007951795,0.0001001904,0.00004569567,0.00008689017,0.00000622867,0.00008776644,0.00007077889,0.0001943111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001629427,0.00007384394,0.00004120031,0.0001874571,0.00008015351,0.0001529321,0.00002835486,0.00006348555,0.0001374161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001377498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001098583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003065539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001771668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993729,0.00004878033,0.0001999421,0.0001889632,0.00007903278,0.0001103804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996002,0.00008428365,0.0001388945,0.0001307137,0.00001857561,0.00002730509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006748415,0.0001660434,0.7391541,0.00002342712,0.00001673563,0.000001616755,0.0003330018,0.002223516,0.2311907,0.007655906,0.0005276417,0.01863984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003467912,0.0001751357,0.9830846,0.00003378909,0.000008681673,0.000003079387,0.00003435439,0.0004910422,0.01250757,0.002093714,0.0011325,0.00008869784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995243,0.00001208636,0.001350204,0.001544,0.0002007092,0.0001592472,0.000001466935,0.00002874526,0.001460532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974694,0.000007919373,0.0007398837,0.001605234,0.00002133299,0.00001823993,0.00002458967,0.000004866009,0.0001085746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2439305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4634199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506493560","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01635.x","title":"Effects of Road Networks on Bird Populations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":245,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative","keywords":"Habitat fragmentation; Habitat destruction; Habitat; Fragmentation (computing); Geography; Ecology; Species richness; Climate change; Traffic noise; Population; Biology; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06677961914653874,"gpt":0.3206598875808089,"spread":0.2538802684342702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000155599,0.0002822846,0.000698382,0.0001359788,0.0001017719,0.000009757951,0.0002663346,0.0004173097,0.0007865105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001614681,0.000233669,0.0002430385,0.0004356357,0.0001752913,0.0001041182,0.00009828986,0.0002568149,0.0006697495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001145677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000353164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001389149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002193948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983806,0.0002988568,0.0006524706,0.0003899588,0.00007041312,0.0002077247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985946,0.00029629,0.000655417,0.0003721663,0.00002619621,0.00005527957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001055836,0.0001235526,0.005789175,0.0005005902,0.00005569477,0.000001019588,0.00001794482,0.00002489596,0.000008014692,0.005583261,0.007159147,0.9807261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001072604,0.0001327421,0.01420143,0.000966573,0.0001818624,0.00000591702,0.000001451315,0.000354524,0.000002409513,0.0003397656,0.9834778,0.0002283203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001392378,0.9883568,0.002628824,0.0001798747,0.001843405,0.001533943,0.00002261761,0.0001787941,0.003863365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008848716,0.9969214,0.0003848393,0.0006674894,0.000105023,0.000242847,0.0002080748,0.00004765057,0.0005378525],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9528747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472558198","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1522488113","title":"Assessing large-scale wildlife responses to human infrastructure development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Scale (ratio); Geography; Environmental resource management; Critical infrastructure; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Cartography; Computer science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0345553980655801,"gpt":0.3180509754038591,"spread":0.283495577338279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009535761,0.00007769938,0.00008666065,0.000092526,0.0003925548,0.00004084616,0.0005473506,0.00004784357,0.0002358504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003434469,0.00004334553,0.00003498366,0.0005478286,0.0003545316,0.001056181,0.0002499,0.00006968204,0.00001444544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001192711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002373218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005822308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.538835e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984353,0.000007707641,0.0002835295,0.0002232445,0.0009008627,0.000149405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995503,0.00007427701,0.0002593535,0.000009272791,0.00006397464,0.00004279859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009998101,0.00003080337,0.3332118,0.000005644667,0.000004439064,2.26946e-9,0.0003626665,0.00004041288,0.6541738,0.001992204,0.007833164,0.002335068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008419211,0.00001737191,0.8742102,0.00008407119,0.00000253853,0.000002767013,0.0002176658,0.00004596339,0.1100662,0.004425803,0.01077404,0.00006920956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868985,0.000002472551,0.00002291453,0.007161168,0.00001816284,0.0001037494,0.00000442059,0.00001015486,0.005778475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908012,0.000001204828,0.007139899,0.001273409,0.00003290296,0.00001029868,4.912156e-8,0.000003059636,0.0007379993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5441076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3019254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142288624","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01403.x","title":"Do small mammals avoid roads because of the traffic?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Peromyscus; Wildlife; Habitat; Limiting; Ecology; Population; Environmental science; Geography; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01042978995467121,"gpt":0.2214696678518193,"spread":0.2110398778971481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007053048,0.00007076225,0.0001531435,0.00004817147,0.00007050207,0.000008365981,0.0002554465,0.00008033793,0.00144212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003235046,0.00004848271,0.00008852515,0.0001523019,0.0001098952,0.00006786388,0.00006495573,0.0002119059,0.00006532065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001199487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002290585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001598689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004600258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991243,0.00002414065,0.000458006,0.00008533927,0.000147192,0.0001610339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991758,0.0001242981,0.0004860898,0.0001425337,0.00002024787,0.00005101277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001529426,0.001676692,0.4675428,0.00003191992,0.0003078752,0.00005958234,0.003961319,0.06577644,0.2732526,0.004333675,0.05256041,0.1289673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005806491,0.0001992643,0.9586619,0.000009073751,0.00004231139,0.0001286802,0.0005259888,0.0001049497,0.01074796,0.0007093971,0.02819374,0.0000960508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863895,0.000006591319,0.0001530324,0.0007624818,0.0003468461,0.00009142623,7.424994e-7,0.000003355342,0.012246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980781,0.00001121094,0.0009104055,0.0006409856,0.00008818667,0.000001722596,2.3377e-7,0.000006085555,0.0002630844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4911191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281717750","doi":"10.1126/science.abl8974","title":"Functional connectivity of the world’s protected areas","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":233,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Landscape connectivity; Environmental resource management; Functional connectivity; Geography; Wildlife corridor; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Wildlife; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01370979098979044,"gpt":0.2190690408139525,"spread":0.205359249824162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003852532,0.00003541922,0.00003350873,0.00003517281,0.000688555,0.00001334745,0.000291198,0.000004114891,0.005931682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008738949,0.00002614706,0.00002574884,0.001426848,0.0004334376,0.0002221773,0.0003615417,0.0001017087,0.0000337271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001858602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005997682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002384744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001719369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991189,0.00004443657,0.00007904921,0.0001652295,0.0004901068,0.0001022247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996694,0.00002883797,0.00007013689,0.0001955855,0.00001368105,0.00002241181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003364259,0.0002019894,0.5887986,0.000001978701,0.000003342692,5.000571e-7,0.0002470848,0.01183052,0.3807769,0.002205728,0.009525153,0.00637456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005325765,0.00001891916,0.9710076,0.000001631275,0.000001464121,0.000006461546,0.00007220123,0.001905605,0.009168121,0.0005229654,0.01720353,0.00003821018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898179,0.000001899475,0.0001221618,0.001307287,0.0003453396,0.0001449933,0.000003789153,0.00001212242,0.00824454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960623,6.896848e-8,0.0001204886,0.0002973402,0.000008676362,0.00004697647,3.778538e-7,0.000001627315,0.003462178],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3822091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063662214","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.015","title":"Measures to reduce population fragmentation by roads: what has worked and how do we know?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fragmentation (computing); Wildlife corridor; Habitat fragmentation; Environmental planning; Transport engineering; Environmental resource management; Population; Habitat destruction; Need to know; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; Biology; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02256731010758212,"gpt":0.2698710090432727,"spread":0.2473036989356906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003556592,0.0001269156,0.0001317538,0.0001742601,0.0001767726,0.00008781596,0.0000723513,0.0001297001,0.000579698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004984497,0.0001322794,0.00002711439,0.0004247702,0.00007131386,0.001796125,0.00005262204,0.0001177634,0.0001052706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006953193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005008145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005417544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002176585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989089,0.0001753922,0.0001920955,0.0002696868,0.0001626607,0.0002912111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995972,0.00004783677,0.0001095881,0.000144612,0.0000103417,0.00009044069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003699251,0.0001051951,0.7479477,0.000001319846,0.000006196969,1.435527e-7,0.0006267696,0.0005026399,0.003673455,0.0000601914,0.02042903,0.2266104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002791174,0.00007083649,0.9801261,0.0000270512,0.00001465932,0.000006126962,0.0006236568,0.0008521758,0.0001580261,0.0001923842,0.01751462,0.0001352327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868789,0.0007738989,0.0004707293,0.01083332,0.0006036743,0.0001494236,0.000002512329,0.00003410262,0.0002534757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974874,0.000232851,0.0006159889,0.0001757856,0.00007321576,0.00008889231,0.00005395267,0.00001024769,0.001261643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2321784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6347286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103908718","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2013.1705","title":"Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Biological dispersal; Grizzly Bears; Gene flow; National park; Ecology; Geography; Genetic diversity; Biology; Population; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02793490224854302,"gpt":0.2618278372908749,"spread":0.2338929350423319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000799139,0.0001035764,0.0001280463,0.000009587754,0.0007645804,0.0001044732,0.0003937214,0.00007118784,0.0002228207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004650413,0.00005979761,0.0001376907,0.0002740113,0.001440831,0.0001447776,0.0002513824,0.00009132413,0.000004555473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001317034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001483845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002540741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003726087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988962,0.00001557469,0.0002019408,0.0003225614,0.0003293349,0.0002344331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995128,0.0002038341,0.0001712047,0.00003676593,0.00003862498,0.00003677631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001540037,0.0000295874,0.9803047,0.000004728182,0.000003506622,5.191769e-9,0.0001846813,0.001086054,0.01208706,0.001778154,0.003900327,0.0006058143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001775345,0.00009913622,0.9595456,0.00001109594,0.000002755795,9.773422e-7,0.0001414873,0.02358571,0.002061393,0.01018416,0.004087352,0.0001028526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939969,0.000009453585,0.0001038663,0.001397728,0.00008916243,0.0001937725,0.000006069017,0.00001465269,0.004188409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995227,0.000002634959,0.003487005,0.0009881936,0.00008746983,0.00002244578,5.753456e-7,0.000002550009,0.0001821622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02249965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5880612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562604665","doi":"10.1111/cobi.12337","title":"Evaluating multispecies landscape connectivity in a threatened tropical mammal community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Panthera; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Threatened species; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Geography; Carnivore; Landscape connectivity; Mammal; Camera trap; Biology; Biological dispersal; Predation; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0620791886698071,"gpt":0.3262053137380685,"spread":0.2641261250682614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005831615,0.0001033169,0.0001553569,0.0000482871,0.0002071578,0.00002019474,0.0001450641,0.0001028372,0.001250484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007252169,0.00009446629,0.00003341078,0.0001973379,0.0001592756,0.0001775303,0.0001059791,0.000240975,0.0001577532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008139243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001173368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003436357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007082307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984966,0.0007981449,0.0002530811,0.0001936812,0.00007726555,0.0001812261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990064,0.0006003852,0.00009393175,0.0002391035,0.00002442766,0.00003573164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000437435,0.00007171013,0.9744426,0.000002178381,0.000003581878,2.256135e-7,0.000158193,0.0001309405,0.01273252,0.001323774,0.0004029438,0.01068758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005944345,0.00016783,0.9354348,0.000007573358,0.000004060518,0.000004683789,0.0001184168,0.05742215,0.0003231281,0.002081727,0.003736917,0.0001043471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917514,0.000005073464,0.002447035,0.002219509,0.0001286357,0.0001499913,0.000003233134,0.00004402809,0.003251143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969031,0.000003449436,0.001221717,0.001609618,0.00003542897,0.00004630712,0.00002803689,0.000006007587,0.0001462998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05729121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108397748","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02041.x","title":"Are the negative effects of roads on breeding birds caused by traffic noise?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Traffic noise; Noise (video); Transect; Ecology; Geography; Road traffic; Wildlife; Environmental science; Biology; Transport engineering; Computer science; Noise reduction; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01239606657256374,"gpt":0.211621813092745,"spread":0.1992257465201813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002088075,0.00008319299,0.0001744171,0.00004585637,0.00008058087,0.000006345417,0.0001838581,0.0000653765,0.0005206796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005197206,0.00005542959,0.00005981732,0.0001263095,0.0001205802,0.00008827682,0.00003150877,0.0002086044,0.00006147112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001053358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001051062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002644869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007767228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993208,0.00003729175,0.0002795267,0.00009173736,0.0001415619,0.0001290764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998943,0.0002394513,0.0006622126,0.00009496209,0.00001716359,0.0000431545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001971935,0.002774562,0.2366352,0.00006799167,0.0006273147,0.00008280155,0.01537275,0.01100384,0.5289797,0.001037587,0.1670284,0.03441788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009954218,0.001036939,0.9359056,0.0000264514,0.00006782124,0.00002276635,0.001306305,0.00035796,0.0577996,0.0005773422,0.001779957,0.0001238861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944657,0.000004386031,0.00004932488,0.0004051255,0.0002776413,0.0001281109,9.718809e-7,0.000004949143,0.004663788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989834,0.00001102497,0.0001250091,0.000753877,0.00004791349,0.000008951877,2.138606e-7,0.000007673135,0.00006194129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6992703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5701077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508802981","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12768","title":"Characterizing wildlife behavioural responses to roads using integrated step selection analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Safari Club International Foundation","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Home range; Predation; Population; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Engineering; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02028575898490793,"gpt":0.2601032957527316,"spread":0.2398175367678236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004253123,0.0001138395,0.0002620007,0.0003387172,0.0001213233,0.00002989675,0.0001492011,0.00008682594,0.001927168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006388436,0.00008034732,0.000112582,0.0006990129,0.00004893252,0.0002995946,0.00005369632,0.0001405357,0.0001027266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005886323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004299582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001568297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004251514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988834,0.00007299706,0.0004856925,0.0001694667,0.0001740955,0.0002143115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992065,0.00009846771,0.0004274368,0.0001036254,0.00005068667,0.0001133068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005331199,0.00007799167,0.6385776,5.617953e-7,0.000142493,0.000005671894,0.0001327611,0.000757046,0.351285,0.00002078597,0.001328752,0.007138171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003463568,0.000238056,0.986645,0.000009694368,0.0002494079,0.00007660265,0.000159552,0.0009588358,0.00436201,0.00002878346,0.006793762,0.000131882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989421,8.328735e-7,0.008416993,0.001579872,0.0002187421,0.00009347046,0.000003444918,0.00001240504,0.0002532424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932547,0.000004859624,0.005174634,0.001227507,0.00007768789,0.000006413811,0.000001364231,0.000009939366,0.0002429142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3480675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074122564","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02180.x","title":"Vehicle traffic shapes grizzly bear behaviour on a multiple‐use landscape","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Innovates; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Land use; Home range; Ecology; Limiting; Range (aeronautics); Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Transport engineering; Population; Biology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.013960296572609,"gpt":0.2240804502213438,"spread":0.2101201536487348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002875027,0.00009388106,0.0001549866,0.00006479646,0.00008920194,0.00002257218,0.0001295808,0.00008771221,0.001737255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004560798,0.00007810159,0.00006825205,0.0000951631,0.00004385058,0.0003244226,0.00003512197,0.0002367558,0.0005065108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001085353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001106806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001259719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007918389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991899,0.00003188429,0.0002872675,0.00009748898,0.0001534448,0.0002400424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993324,0.0002262492,0.0002276774,0.00008295433,0.00001194117,0.0001188243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004352749,0.0008209058,0.9579665,0.000002990989,0.00003568218,0.00001081222,0.0005450516,0.008499038,0.01226173,0.0001800594,0.01478865,0.00445332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005975921,0.0002354178,0.9889369,0.000004732945,0.00002673095,0.00005525222,0.0002189199,0.0007148648,0.0004368544,0.0000255591,0.008655745,0.00009143391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969868,0.000005686522,0.0000116584,0.0003772496,0.0002731609,0.00009201833,0.000002105312,0.000010949,0.002240372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983284,0.00001053586,0.0005555007,0.0007935294,0.0001638706,0.000008017729,0.000001984698,0.00001064193,0.0001275506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03097042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526475465","doi":"10.1002/9781118568170.ch28","title":"The Impacts of Roads and Traffic on Terrestrial Animal Populations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geography; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02586613696901156,"gpt":0.2736992426686595,"spread":0.247833105699648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008300078,0.00008873965,0.00008379545,0.00002996353,0.00005378054,0.00002352387,0.00007801002,0.00007350274,0.002476255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003355006,0.00005482479,0.00002394896,0.0000728304,0.00008384642,0.0000427229,0.00003006894,0.0000681875,0.0001203814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003716319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001291741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001947952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00587423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994877,0.00002671558,0.0001244855,0.000118892,0.0001569674,0.00008522993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996679,0.00002365492,0.0001044313,0.0001565952,0.000002259335,0.00004520218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002588463,0.00002409605,0.001410252,8.228915e-7,0.000007110231,1.953651e-7,0.00002406283,0.00003468008,0.00004109607,0.0001142004,0.9941637,0.004153885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002206698,0.0001714726,0.02744607,0.00002667108,0.00001549304,0.000002638488,0.0000504657,0.0007357476,0.000007208529,0.00004216429,0.9711813,0.0001001254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1442658,0.00005088057,0.000004704252,0.0006463032,0.0003271915,0.0002249964,0.00001977058,0.00004175793,0.8544186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5185219,0.0000448816,0.0002073737,0.000115157,0.0002130766,0.000009871513,0.00003219273,0.00007260929,0.4807829],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.374256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118695472","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01526.x","title":"Thresholds in landscape connectivity and mortality risks in response to growing road networks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; University of Alberta; Alberta Conservation Association; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Foraging; Geography; Home range; Occupancy; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Population; Environmental science; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02264724448923009,"gpt":0.2698926636639176,"spread":0.2472454191746875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009266729,0.00006959723,0.0001896144,0.000107297,0.00005531109,0.000007782759,0.00008141431,0.00008144278,0.0002047052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006098607,0.00006514228,0.00002354719,0.0002085229,0.00005155655,0.0002000502,0.00006440075,0.0002542069,0.00001133533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001429021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000189231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003940524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002691177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992256,0.0000805979,0.000312895,0.0001282565,0.0000910576,0.0001615746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995594,0.0001619894,0.0001281374,0.00008058488,0.000006614997,0.00006324769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006788106,0.00007689573,0.9552669,6.233213e-7,0.000005510864,0.00005367933,0.0003061667,0.03986262,0.00220946,0.0000195521,0.0004141754,0.001105595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000566881,0.0001205505,0.995742,0.000004764297,0.000003705323,0.0001024422,0.0001532549,0.00270402,0.00004740152,0.0002004518,0.0002898709,0.00006465343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997832,0.000008723903,0.00009128178,0.0007234913,0.0001084512,0.0001018967,3.716757e-7,0.000003080525,0.001130728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988692,0.00003076248,0.000192457,0.000847724,0.00003567172,0.000008380991,2.616134e-7,0.000004347524,0.00001113566],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0404751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2656425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536681555","doi":"10.1111/cobi.12075","title":"Demographic Connectivity for Ursid Populations at Wildlife Crossing Structures in Banff National Park","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; National park; Wildlife; Geography; Foraging; Population; Ecology; Habitat; Demography; Biology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03990196835250966,"gpt":0.2969664336298042,"spread":0.2570644652772945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002470618,0.0001355415,0.0001467758,0.0001186642,0.0004537352,0.00006955065,0.000120916,0.0001532513,0.001752147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003848295,0.000132515,0.00006389636,0.0003434311,0.0002905943,0.0004632805,0.00006349114,0.0001052719,0.000103468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002027889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004109988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003229141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005235928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988491,0.0001044836,0.00034659,0.0003440737,0.0001144333,0.0002413442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992385,0.0003052674,0.0001713645,0.0001459034,0.00008455078,0.00005442054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002707799,0.00003462469,0.9649487,0.000002967557,0.000007017355,7.693561e-8,0.00006775146,0.0004385565,0.007974394,0.005746749,0.01933021,0.001421861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004062731,0.00003965079,0.9187774,0.000005998244,0.000004278808,0.000005660986,0.00002331471,0.009364665,0.0001266699,0.03654905,0.03455044,0.0001465677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984997,0.00001734279,0.003311623,0.009898791,0.0003011248,0.0005436762,0.00002942924,0.00004400098,0.0008570222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897313,0.000002886076,0.003249616,0.006186516,0.00006020001,0.0002884811,0.00023881,0.00001064932,0.0002315125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04617127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046535835","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0084135","title":"Applying Circuit Theory for Corridor Expansion and Management at Regional Scales: Tiling, Pinch Points, and Omnidirectional Connectivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Canadian Space Agency; Natural Resources Canada; Government of Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Science and Industry Endowment Fund","keywords":"Computer science; Traverse; Tile; Point (geometry); Function (biology); Omnidirectional antenna; Geography; Cartography; Mathematics; Geometry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03620943643018769,"gpt":0.219570788982014,"spread":0.1833613525518263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003361321,0.00009047449,0.0001052674,0.00003116615,0.0003025918,0.00002633926,0.00004710511,0.00003704865,0.0002312133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005055915,0.0000895397,0.00002262057,0.00005112075,0.00009942908,0.0001674593,0.00009802236,0.00005267631,0.00003652045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002575856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004185026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007637723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992209,0.00004893272,0.0001189153,0.0002934118,0.0001914007,0.0001264181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995371,0.0002111794,0.00006092988,0.0001208675,0.00001266499,0.00005731757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009084814,0.002485208,0.6218076,0.0006575316,0.0004956719,0.000003231347,0.0008793719,0.0001391236,0.1124748,0.04569943,0.01381821,0.2006313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002188276,0.0003642432,0.8698528,0.000430236,0.0002469747,0.00003788909,0.0003887427,0.04623304,0.006676789,0.03832075,0.03459249,0.0006676937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913207,0.00003235519,0.005074693,0.0003139558,0.00004212089,0.0005430418,0.000005512379,0.00003977771,0.002627892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943395,0.00008801277,0.002415569,0.0008386631,0.00006505109,0.0003866558,0.00001730128,0.00001213872,0.001837095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2480452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3651323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058852073","doi":"10.1007/s10980-011-9700-5","title":"Landscape connectivity analysis for conservation: insights from combining new methods with ecological and genetic data","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Landscape ecology; Landscape connectivity; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Conservation biology; Geography; Ecosystem services; Context (archaeology); Biological dispersal; Landscape epidemiology; Ecological network; Restoration ecology; Habitat; Landscape assessment; Population; Ecosystem; Biology; Landscape design; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04052040225285018,"gpt":0.2997473215771674,"spread":0.2592269193243172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002068497,0.0001303885,0.0002883042,0.00005709388,0.0001735103,0.00003643749,0.0001885887,0.0001171824,0.002552444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001332808,0.00009967461,0.00003270929,0.0002947199,0.00007095567,0.0003737312,0.0002063329,0.00009810265,0.00003183944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002646871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002137521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005047324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006726658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989253,0.0001787331,0.0001993736,0.0003824476,0.00007718954,0.0002369721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982587,0.001094452,0.0001307389,0.0003697594,0.00001376054,0.0001325957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006066757,0.00009335701,0.990401,0.000001442687,0.0001817509,0.000001333575,0.0001544814,0.0002052957,0.0002033839,0.00009939453,0.006874275,0.001723612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006877569,0.0001619455,0.9397207,0.000001539151,0.000334517,0.00001104799,0.0001214714,0.0434175,0.00003084135,0.0003879941,0.01498195,0.0001426888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655325,0.0001024216,0.03185614,0.0011377,0.00018194,0.0002166874,0.00002355959,0.00003227574,0.0009167856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462591,0.00001658976,0.05207464,0.001067829,0.000121813,0.00004037915,0.0002644579,0.000008475664,0.0001466606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05068026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167189097","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0011785","title":"The Effect of Map Boundary on Estimates of Landscape Resistance to Animal Movement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Habitat; Resistance (ecology); Buffer zone; Landscape connectivity; Ecology; Boundary (topology); Ground truth; Computer science; Biology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008164926852494238,"gpt":0.2129499682091999,"spread":0.2047850413567057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001541536,0.00005103475,0.00007996969,0.00001213111,0.00007741905,0.00001287103,0.0001102765,0.00001732304,0.0003872773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008289229,0.00003435646,0.00002007209,0.00006677894,0.00005810125,0.00005139005,0.00004012845,0.00006808364,0.0001021644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001531427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003304232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005978037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002843179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994813,0.00001572893,0.000117496,0.00009260901,0.0002129306,0.00007993533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995661,0.0001526323,0.00005895182,0.0001890559,0.000008388108,0.00002488906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000325611,0.0002362128,0.2504987,0.00002891493,0.0000295916,3.512592e-7,0.00006684579,0.00001773859,0.7436111,0.000149953,0.004244725,0.0007902759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001630786,0.0006840136,0.3624736,0.00007820566,0.00002297782,8.322912e-8,0.00001437433,0.0005402296,0.633485,0.0001708473,0.002307944,0.00005960155],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994271,0.00001113798,0.00000576314,0.001209868,0.00003769701,0.0001621786,0.00000569955,0.000007782934,0.004288827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982071,0.000002470425,0.001001449,0.0001099148,0.00001614387,0.00002635286,0.000001661088,0.000004487294,0.0006304146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1119749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4240415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129289082","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.99070.x","title":"Influence of Timber Extraction Routes on Central African Small‐Mammal Communities, Forest Structure, and Tree Diversity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Geographic Society; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Understory; Logging; Transect; Geography; Species richness; Ecology; Secondary forest; Belt transect; Rainforest; Abundance (ecology); Old-growth forest; Forestry; Salvage logging; Vegetation (pathology); Disturbance (geology); Forest management; Canopy; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01742504864824619,"gpt":0.2221858020297813,"spread":0.2047607533815351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005589977,0.00009830991,0.0001097692,0.00003638161,0.0002266378,0.00001176769,0.0001208964,0.00008511624,0.001471471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002473297,0.00009246639,0.000023286,0.0001212656,0.0002822855,0.0002230552,0.00008595019,0.0001151942,0.00002270726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006179805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009968714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01351387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009777904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993656,0.00009484559,0.0001837159,0.0001425287,0.00006615388,0.0001471871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995226,0.0001401541,0.0001081478,0.0001656811,0.00002045151,0.00004299954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009614987,0.00003705729,0.9864191,0.000002596244,0.000009011693,3.727433e-7,0.0003252925,0.003275951,0.001941041,0.000442017,0.0003490261,0.007102337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002278252,0.0001281889,0.987098,0.000008764759,0.00001033978,0.00000713525,0.000106251,0.00218671,0.0003527775,0.0006951412,0.009086786,0.00009210975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967524,0.000006556682,0.000064489,0.0007328327,0.00004398233,0.0001174796,0.00003051469,0.00002159226,0.002230147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983059,0.00003967583,0.0002954614,0.0009550606,0.00001646259,0.000004855598,0.00007481533,0.00000427568,0.0003034918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00873776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050614254","doi":"10.1007/s10980-011-9659-2","title":"Characterizing connectivity relationships in freshwaters using patch-based graphs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Magyar Tudományos Akadémia; Hungarian Scientific Research Fund","keywords":"Landscape ecology; Ecology; Nature Conservation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04352518602442403,"gpt":0.2280746184140727,"spread":0.1845494323896486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002390855,0.00008340293,0.0001084265,0.00008492259,0.0001205547,0.000009862229,0.00008423168,0.00008923352,0.003320257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005010041,0.00008098777,0.00003272943,0.0001982933,0.00005306623,0.0002396596,0.00003644884,0.0001685499,0.0001630757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008241413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001212529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002078412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01655113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999224,0.000143336,0.0001747888,0.0002031558,0.00005727735,0.000197409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996384,0.00009514561,0.00008150643,0.0001398753,0.000005627508,0.00003947716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002644069,0.00007572972,0.9954728,0.000001533306,0.000003354152,0.000007329329,0.0003697703,0.0001653155,0.003493662,0.00008582862,0.0001517481,0.0001464326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002765498,0.00004034585,0.9704179,0.000005714025,0.000006168358,0.00000627079,0.0001207618,0.02755548,0.0005190282,0.0005356674,0.0004163569,0.00009981354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950761,0.000001870677,0.0001714901,0.0002388973,0.000248758,0.0001128973,0.000003391701,0.00002879001,0.004117787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985408,0.000001491395,0.0009130614,0.0004509119,0.00001319818,0.00002245484,0.00001189311,0.000008089735,0.00003805806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02739016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126204850","doi":"10.1007/s10980-007-9174-7","title":"Accessible habitat: an improved measure of the effects of habitat loss and roads on wildlife populations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Species richness; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Biodiversity; Wildlife; Landscape ecology; Habitat conservation; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008663350686069512,"gpt":0.2452093592896833,"spread":0.2365460086036138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002254446,0.00008512413,0.0001379828,0.00004297176,0.0001054379,0.000007850902,0.0001460543,0.00008592605,0.0001155169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001516861,0.00006040166,0.0000396826,0.0001803715,0.0001201277,0.0001738519,0.00006896015,0.00009795817,0.000008354012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002887851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001174855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001740454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008554379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992757,0.00007015112,0.0002214814,0.0001694642,0.0001160924,0.0001471148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993603,0.0001831412,0.0001593678,0.0002305821,0.00001875558,0.00004787307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004288452,0.0001229858,0.9872893,0.00001227944,0.00000860513,7.5468e-7,0.0001289058,0.00008184926,0.009522604,0.000181824,0.001123958,0.001484014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003820783,0.0003294924,0.9955624,0.00001463434,0.00001905011,0.000005465011,0.00004362762,0.0008531464,0.002047894,0.0004363294,0.0002416575,0.00006422496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967815,0.00001536062,0.00009162303,0.0005452729,0.0003914566,0.0002148475,0.000003263812,0.00001069914,0.001945988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990214,0.000003404605,0.0002569277,0.0005176007,0.00002947028,0.00001118314,0.000004722009,0.000007310843,0.0001480125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008380333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4773544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081387228","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0049390","title":"Comparing Habitat Suitability and Connectivity Modeling Methods for Conserving Pronghorn Migrations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Mitacs; Ministry of Environment - Saskatchewan; Ministry of Environment; University of Calgary","keywords":"Habitat; Easement; Land cover; Geography; Wildlife; Landscape connectivity; Ecology; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Land use","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1294903899444658,"gpt":0.3189954927647528,"spread":0.1895051028202869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006764827,0.00008751468,0.0001492538,0.00002035263,0.0002683428,0.00003578209,0.00006007679,0.00003730627,0.00009957023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003710862,0.00008827828,0.00003053177,0.00008238252,0.00005710412,0.0006259439,0.00008524815,0.0000863785,0.00001626951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001022608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006576022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005452727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007637955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992332,0.00009787663,0.0001725059,0.000189024,0.00009365017,0.0002136707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993458,0.0003264903,0.00005163056,0.0001666957,0.00002532877,0.0000840763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001617205,0.0005461539,0.9511533,0.00003159521,0.00003246761,1.560209e-8,0.0004695064,0.0002921362,0.04561819,0.0001353443,0.0000577229,0.001647354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002054917,0.00003796283,0.2322046,0.00003520034,0.00008597315,0.000001668503,0.0003072432,0.759159,0.006844461,0.0007916441,0.0001664272,0.000160362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9178762,0.00008057246,0.08037991,0.0005404904,0.00003935688,0.0004201674,0.00000357048,0.00004289511,0.0006168547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8905758,0.000004062528,0.1090508,0.0001085543,0.00003660403,0.0001461531,0.000005550251,0.000008405815,0.00006410308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7588668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3599884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W635628323","doi":"10.5751/es-03022-140223","title":"Behavioral Responses of Northern Leopard Frogs (Rana pipiens) to Roads and Traffic: Implications for Population Persistence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Leopard frog; Leopard; Persistence (discontinuity); Ecology; Population; Population decline; Rana; Geography; Biology; Amphibian; Habitat; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0244678673841754,"gpt":0.2846254729283567,"spread":0.2601576055441813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001113756,0.00005223848,0.00008114045,0.00001025623,0.0002130117,0.000007957039,0.00004062495,0.00006096224,0.00003241246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001795308,0.0000512217,0.000046145,0.00006239333,0.00006886032,0.0001014891,0.00001551374,0.0000379449,0.000002607094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006443683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008533935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000818982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995854,0.00001894968,0.0001159872,0.0001538821,0.00003161529,0.00009413144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997715,0.00005288876,0.00004556072,0.00007698709,0.00001438786,0.00003865461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004182462,0.00009194001,0.9733444,0.000002046971,0.000006415717,5.669075e-8,0.002144623,0.0002240275,0.003361547,0.0001067992,0.001587914,0.01908839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001472286,0.0002427745,0.9976111,0.000001901528,0.00001875084,0.000003590626,0.0003814021,0.0005747481,0.00003177914,0.0001638326,0.000767175,0.00005573164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963055,0.00001262639,0.0001564836,0.00320317,0.00003089012,0.0001895447,0.00001392318,0.00001121734,0.00007669683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969512,0.00001387552,0.002107984,0.0006420191,0.00001138495,0.00002303005,0.00001143675,0.000002414974,0.000236708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02426667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.208876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609102980","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.12799","title":"Spatio‐temporal connectivity: assessing the amount of reachable habitat in dynamic landscapes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad","keywords":"Habitat; Biological dispersal; Landscape connectivity; Ecology; Spatial heterogeneity; Temporal scales; Geography; Biology; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02073264027981828,"gpt":0.3583715022497256,"spread":0.3376388619699073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001516622,0.00005415927,0.000113821,0.00003696778,0.0002298069,0.00002368501,0.00009316781,0.00007259793,0.00004838858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004263212,0.0000431514,0.00001588863,0.00006466328,0.0001735353,0.0004134338,0.00008084996,0.0001287621,0.000003877906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001697806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001304563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003570556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06191611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991679,0.0003715229,0.0001624453,0.0001426403,0.00004353463,0.0001119698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999373,0.0002835648,0.0001553031,0.0001706917,0.000006355017,0.00001114219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001174796,0.00003750278,0.9905946,0.000003162753,0.000002203383,6.674419e-7,0.0001106872,0.0003989925,0.001325539,0.0002213912,0.00002898146,0.00726455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001792211,0.00003061154,0.92915,0.0000116009,0.000004517434,0.000004614061,0.0001901582,0.06354237,0.00007874726,0.006569728,0.0001947381,0.0000437281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881457,0.0000289371,0.00900693,0.00106733,0.0001878817,0.0001037478,7.629313e-7,0.000004571438,0.00145412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842575,0.00001104211,0.01559596,0.00003972974,0.00000718658,0.00002140442,0.000001789221,0.000002795426,0.00006265349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06314338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9552015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012550767","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1910853117","title":"A better Amazon road network for people and the environment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Millennium Challenge Corporation; Inter-American Development Bank; World Bank Group; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Business; Transport engineering; Geography; Engineering; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02431714485889857,"gpt":0.2474937127059679,"spread":0.2231765678470694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000649096,0.00005328506,0.00008458178,0.00001010526,0.0002374019,0.00002111238,0.0003297627,0.0000266479,0.00007141068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001485311,0.00002908285,0.00004657021,0.0002292008,0.0006494983,0.0002810861,0.0001493549,0.00006947968,0.000003661687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001756041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003032646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002196977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.320132e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991085,0.000005183841,0.0001719633,0.0001573453,0.0004665873,0.00009045377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996545,0.00010059,0.000204742,0.00000525418,0.00001278799,0.00002207202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003470326,0.0001220047,0.6477634,0.000106819,0.00007495981,3.882628e-9,0.004477971,0.01020808,0.1417371,0.08729347,0.08829104,0.01957808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005980551,0.00008485409,0.8674008,0.0000289195,0.00002800532,0.000002770015,0.0003077223,0.06737789,0.008632203,0.0449182,0.01050814,0.0001124155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290801,0.00003263369,0.0000176642,0.06845335,0.000009989409,0.0002641339,0.000004644178,0.000003978795,0.002133528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935724,0.00001662302,0.002422156,0.00381438,0.00006971499,0.00002995163,8.101548e-8,0.000002004559,0.00007265055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2196374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2393103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011455955","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01717.x","title":"Factors affecting the permeability of transportation and riparian corridors to the movements of songbirds in an urban landscape","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Riparian zone; Wildlife; Vegetation (pathology); Traffic volume; Geography; Ecology; Physical geography; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology; Transport engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01142182721526503,"gpt":0.2381185945537178,"spread":0.2266967673384528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004083031,0.00005024824,0.0001233,0.00003404002,0.000050016,0.000005723826,0.0001089423,0.00003243336,0.0001236892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001705458,0.00002904515,0.00002640523,0.0001109341,0.00004217011,0.00009591737,0.00000658018,0.0001039588,6.403424e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000374618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008620127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005790408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001625059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994233,0.0000350278,0.0002975722,0.00006928569,0.00009821656,0.00007662057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995475,0.00007536216,0.0002586234,0.00007860197,0.00001228192,0.00002759113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007939863,0.0001117054,0.979619,0.000001903746,0.000006090394,2.669179e-7,0.004817799,0.005630187,0.007408502,0.00003597854,0.0001237672,0.002165362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002038107,0.0003027687,0.9945255,0.000003346493,0.000009616078,0.000001018201,0.003144837,0.0003202409,0.001168053,0.0001968917,0.00009707014,0.00002682708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990048,0.000001945768,0.00004417595,0.0004520765,0.00006346848,0.0001347901,0.000002065394,0.00000124292,0.0002954769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996997,0.000002429446,0.00006225581,0.0002116678,0.00001535789,0.000001264861,0.000001193699,0.000002121183,0.000003994094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01490648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.135431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005825300","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.13349","title":"Operationalizing ecological connectivity in spatial conservation planning with Marxan Connect","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Queensland; University of Leeds; University of Melbourne; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council","keywords":"Computer science; Operationalization; Landscape connectivity; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Biological dispersal; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03719736691774362,"gpt":0.3237609615918702,"spread":0.2865635946741266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007343109,0.00008988014,0.0001508384,0.00004723226,0.0001181093,0.00001490161,0.00004969137,0.0001132421,0.0003476056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004927061,0.00008241556,0.00001234133,0.0002305296,0.000118576,0.000291785,0.00005518807,0.0002050306,0.00001254439],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002099453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000208846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001013948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005388437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987068,0.0005799701,0.0002102442,0.0002835618,0.00006190901,0.0001575776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993637,0.0004637246,0.00006900451,0.00005340753,0.000009757684,0.0000403593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001316064,0.00005182945,0.9852894,0.000004472768,0.000002892862,0.000007002764,0.0003127693,0.008085781,0.003616297,0.0006032009,0.00008220183,0.001812574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004939548,0.0002036182,0.8790426,0.000008325804,0.000004617993,0.00001193445,0.0002141665,0.1186932,0.0001482871,0.0007555475,0.0003281353,0.00009570571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9034273,0.00001098586,0.09180573,0.003662318,0.00007511643,0.0001910408,0.000001093794,0.00001923403,0.0008072075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642971,0.000003240733,0.0339762,0.00162038,0.0000258787,0.00005242793,0.000008011627,0.000004341226,0.00001244855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1106074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3806037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}