{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":19,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"fab0cddf0b4a","filters":{"venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W233219730","doi":"","title":"Potential Conflicts between Investor Rights and Environmental Regulation under NAFTA's Chapter 11","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Intellectual property; Government procurement; Investment (military); Business; Government (linguistics); Free trade; Dispute resolution; Tariff; Procurement; Political science; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David A. Gantz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01852598104953121,"gpt":0.2654242190960207,"spread":0.2468982380464894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01231397,0.0003422383,0.0003374532,0.0009614542,0.00444091,0.01151198,0.001970105,0.01432429,0.01163608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01551497,0.0005561946,0.0005482939,0.001449115,0.004033518,0.003332881,0.002314086,0.005600962,0.001440307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004094991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008528345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01763084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02765787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991972,0.002435668,0.0005552405,0.000691217,0.003002613,0.001343292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901872,0.006616319,0.0009226675,0.0004890197,0.001588629,0.0001962566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001096975,0.00002625176,0.0007373674,0.00008842865,0.0000059104,0.000230807,0.002054566,0.0002056887,0.0001964742,0.9250919,0.05782066,0.01353108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001509529,0.00003323764,0.00172704,0.00122067,0.0000210027,0.0002382487,0.001433153,0.000371676,0.0003488853,0.1010612,0.8934908,0.00003908888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01411569,0.01049724,0.002979894,0.08250968,0.001425508,0.0001858289,0.0003664235,0.00006782945,0.887852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4456332,0.02211997,0.01087514,0.1023726,0.004199236,0.001378385,0.0009051394,0.00008980565,0.4124266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01763084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06512332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W259213304","doi":"","title":"Shelter from the Storm: Rethinking Diplomatic Protection of Dual Nationals in Modern International Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Torture; Prison; Terrorism; Political science; Nationality; Deportation; Foreign national; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Immigration","authors":[{"name":"Craig Forcese","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03374380977550418,"gpt":0.3136949648404105,"spread":0.2799511550649064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01161275,0.0003520823,0.000344066,0.001299117,0.0201658,0.01567862,0.002600339,0.01081964,0.007891065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01936147,0.0004318719,0.0003981119,0.0009664508,0.05184815,0.01491876,0.01108735,0.01364473,0.0007586097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01067095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01954207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03875139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918487,0.004339194,0.0001751693,0.0007519706,0.001152125,0.001732759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883243,0.007748972,0.0006653452,0.001361815,0.0008249574,0.001074665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002207389,0.00002727837,0.0005524513,0.00005605143,0.000003253385,0.0001731917,0.06414316,0.0000763996,0.0001838275,0.8848128,0.03258878,0.01736061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003824416,0.00005488541,0.001720123,0.001205692,0.00001940054,0.0002476924,0.08970302,0.0006088468,0.0005017954,0.270167,0.6356816,0.0000516167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07816888,0.009164361,0.01252503,0.2359471,0.004774138,0.0001353165,0.00004803494,0.0001972654,0.6590398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9044257,0.002223906,0.002747034,0.05694898,0.001630223,0.0001710156,0.00002487467,0.0001398159,0.03168855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0201658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07746738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W210339887","doi":"","title":"Participation of Developing Countries in the International Climate Change Regime: Lessons for the Future","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Treaty; Greenhouse gas; Developing country; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Climate change; Population; Political science; Convention; Conference of the parties; Montreal Protocol; International law; International trade; Law; Development economics; Economic growth; Business; Geography; Economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Kevin A. Baumert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02577319379954943,"gpt":0.2990293236464349,"spread":0.2732561298468855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004599997,0.0003380764,0.0004082147,0.0008476663,0.002680112,0.007190921,0.001330526,0.004608498,0.01509017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00462509,0.0001291228,0.0003548495,0.002225937,0.00651933,0.009935536,0.004248472,0.005058762,0.001279181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003281216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006158567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006276766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004527465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983674,0.0007814512,0.00004124411,0.0001444322,0.0002294096,0.0004359441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972867,0.00107011,0.0002186128,0.0001543865,0.0004679761,0.0008022755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001174183,0.0001154921,0.004666782,0.0009062812,0.00001742485,0.0003289208,0.006738403,0.000652019,0.0002030367,0.6661601,0.1273402,0.1927538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000154397,0.00002943181,0.003927654,0.003204864,0.000008168555,0.0001367474,0.01405763,0.0002809785,0.0001241509,0.2012281,0.7769574,0.00002932244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01533023,0.1790933,0.002256913,0.6144283,0.00527489,0.00004096661,0.0004408185,0.00004964425,0.1830848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6103786,0.2708876,0.002954062,0.08083536,0.007236254,0.0002506184,0.0006318489,0.00006941175,0.02675619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01509017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05048162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125982139","doi":"","title":"Democratizing the WTO","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Globalization; CONTEST; Politics; Law; Legitimacy; Political economy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeffery Atik","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02359669875026992,"gpt":0.3074491851300884,"spread":0.2838524863798185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01023828,0.0009504351,0.0004422777,0.001423045,0.003761051,0.01084362,0.001515963,0.008546839,0.02422632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01857054,0.0003289714,0.0004567163,0.001505475,0.01016909,0.007442946,0.005712512,0.01021264,0.005595614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005103158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003461777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003289025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880356,0.004566648,0.0004434601,0.001846743,0.00387326,0.001234205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928933,0.003175798,0.0006439487,0.001358498,0.00126313,0.0006653137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001249768,0.00002153792,0.0002066687,0.00009194207,0.000009751466,0.00009596637,0.0006237184,0.0006547943,0.0002179975,0.9092337,0.07169431,0.01713699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005551919,0.00001406137,0.0001997833,0.0002739175,0.000004377624,0.00005726783,0.0002481198,0.0004557602,0.0002264207,0.2600108,0.7384939,0.000009989795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.005840493,0.01771298,0.01344358,0.1896132,0.007832034,0.00009529107,0.0003156171,0.0002724279,0.7648745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4619661,0.02495188,0.01165733,0.1065366,0.01425337,0.0003869696,0.000737576,0.0007179183,0.3787923],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02422632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08104509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225835283","doi":"","title":"En Ruta Hacia El Desarrollo: The Emerging Secondary Mortgage Market in Latin America","year":2002,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Emerging markets; Business; Financial system; Commercial mortgage-backed security; Latin Americans; Finance; Secondary market; Structured finance; Economics; Financial crisis; Political science; Real estate; Real estate investment trust","authors":[{"name":"Georgette Chapman Poindexter","is_ca":false},{"name":"Wendy Vargas-Cartaya","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01852058530804383,"gpt":0.2445164681025719,"spread":0.225995882794528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008654296,0.000210011,0.0001993505,0.0008839407,0.001558949,0.00573809,0.0004778735,0.00137499,0.009519154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001041144,0.00009233937,0.00019227,0.001369065,0.002058876,0.003796033,0.001389878,0.001640945,0.0005178208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004093946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002448538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02951697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03406065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997472,0.00006806132,0.000007904318,0.0000292567,0.0000572836,0.00009030351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994659,0.0001112365,0.0001499593,0.00002155983,0.0001224823,0.0001288474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001560656,0.000302232,0.0587463,0.0004256871,0.00001907252,0.004557247,0.03977749,0.0005741462,0.003126469,0.6769579,0.08119025,0.1341671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001528328,0.00003810659,0.06196449,0.0005041721,0.000008866628,0.0006693623,0.03610756,0.0007199048,0.000467448,0.01386183,0.8856164,0.00002663541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4625054,0.04619009,0.001105875,0.1462093,0.0006461271,0.00005503386,0.0005608731,0.00008096245,0.3426463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9010716,0.02841952,0.0007881525,0.008215099,0.0009450053,0.00004426733,0.0004590906,0.00005348369,0.06000382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02951697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05869031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341705180","doi":"","title":"The Oecd at Fifty: Some Observations on the Evolving Nature of an International Organization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Political science; Successor cardinal; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Position (finance); Marshall Plan; International community; Convention; Law; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics; Politics; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Nicola Bonucci","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04292834697459877,"gpt":0.3014309652371726,"spread":0.2585026182625738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006152307,0.0004664713,0.0002766341,0.00625545,0.004736492,0.01242234,0.0007304599,0.002123446,0.00774944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008027251,0.0002360426,0.0003898011,0.01570805,0.00935963,0.009896049,0.004608721,0.004378346,0.00135625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008392778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004956729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01780085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01436537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952095,0.001765793,0.0002073328,0.0003007342,0.001718748,0.0007978674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943483,0.002687995,0.0005510994,0.0003401775,0.001416971,0.0006554042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001833173,0.0000181057,0.001621791,0.0001036696,0.000003839525,0.0002615773,0.009474514,0.0001241306,0.00006859699,0.890958,0.0661834,0.03116406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002347113,0.000008325907,0.004712908,0.0003429994,0.00000216384,0.0001033599,0.006783675,0.00005392917,0.00004048765,0.04703058,0.9409013,0.00001784348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.020334,0.05184506,0.002979468,0.08711849,0.003055766,0.00006521169,0.0008498474,0.0001748269,0.8335773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.701571,0.1173552,0.0110391,0.04110135,0.00453912,0.0004553462,0.001882556,0.0005493499,0.1215069],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01780085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06089419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W245906344","doi":"","title":"Coming out of the Maze: Canada Grants the Harvard Mouse Patent","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Animal Genetics and Reproduction","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Appeal; Supreme court; Patent Act; Law; Patentable subject matter; Statutory law; Political science; Commonwealth; Legislation; Patent office; Patent troll; Patent law; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Matthias Kamber","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01995267915458522,"gpt":0.2387313333843637,"spread":0.2187786542297785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003761241,0.0004421629,0.0004395598,0.002555926,0.009431313,0.01039909,0.002516653,0.009179107,0.02442873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009853438,0.0004519094,0.0005141334,0.002875459,0.01002656,0.003242614,0.002665427,0.00463503,0.002258765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05216731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07631392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8731601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9227015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929582,0.000381689,0.0001279524,0.0006295673,0.004647222,0.001255352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994833,0.001576107,0.0001866771,0.0002720833,0.002075078,0.001057116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008016617,0.00004036971,0.002143406,0.0001271068,0.00001782625,0.0005063235,0.001018424,0.000190322,0.001207509,0.5198337,0.4330931,0.04174177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003242703,0.00003206309,0.003380668,0.0002818826,0.0000330877,0.0001116016,0.000456091,0.0001903427,0.0006411797,0.01741071,0.9773785,0.00005148703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02188554,0.02392033,0.002145736,0.2289655,0.005366374,0.0001582542,0.001378274,0.0003893774,0.7157907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.364486,0.02978381,0.00370294,0.1458964,0.00381479,0.0001767052,0.0009394788,0.0002791744,0.4509206],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1268399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3785021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287486819","doi":"","title":"India and International Arbitration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aside; Presentation (obstetrics); Law; Wife; Framing (construction); Test (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; History; Political science; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Fali S. Nariman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01748382701819914,"gpt":0.2563181981805371,"spread":0.2388343711623379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002124849,0.000390029,0.0004244077,0.001297553,0.007523338,0.012143,0.0009127663,0.003303702,0.04980965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00370305,0.00021819,0.0004222335,0.002125917,0.009311583,0.003463625,0.005377096,0.004874462,0.003860937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006103223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003672766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009675534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0142666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997246,0.0008243953,0.000107261,0.0004056727,0.0004751697,0.0009415832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988415,0.0003972925,0.0001402807,0.0002309442,0.0001358241,0.0002542589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008669676,0.000007831609,0.0003496932,0.00002133563,0.000003311523,0.00007309158,0.00135214,0.00003069376,0.00002335116,0.9690325,0.02232029,0.006777076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007606639,0.00001060612,0.001964927,0.0001544845,0.000006766285,0.0001702362,0.002534979,0.00009810289,0.0001194285,0.06796419,0.9269578,0.00001075597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006270752,0.0120236,0.0003262711,0.01907248,0.0008977997,0.00001383947,0.00006472399,0.00003821065,0.9612922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5250489,0.006750008,0.0005480837,0.01066362,0.001306511,0.00006469664,0.0001256036,0.0001049439,0.4553876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04980965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1666299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238122678","doi":"","title":"The Landmark 2006 Unclos Annex VII Barbados/trinidad and Tobago Maritime Delimitation (Jurisdiction & Merits) Award","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Law; International court; Jurisdiction; Tribunal; Charter; Political science; International law; Sociology; Public international law","authors":[{"name":"Barbara Kwiatkowska","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007686793036918232,"gpt":0.2536388572695829,"spread":0.2459520642326647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002148743,0.0005337997,0.0005025927,0.0009102963,0.004796801,0.0057341,0.001622856,0.005171255,0.0758657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00441323,0.0004535291,0.0003216318,0.0009920998,0.001167431,0.001437466,0.001840334,0.005828226,0.03526687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01155339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0224981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2858815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5639509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998513,0.0001033237,0.00003339016,0.000128486,0.000708208,0.0005134532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980149,0.0001411195,0.00007041599,0.00009352218,0.00115151,0.000528482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110861,0.00001443452,0.000196781,0.00001577313,8.313452e-7,0.00003959424,0.00004841444,0.00004724338,0.00006729851,0.007179621,0.9863784,0.006000417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004829541,0.000005305422,0.0008715446,0.00005542524,0.000001057255,0.00001145783,0.0002074796,0.00004769832,0.00005398273,0.0006460903,0.9980885,0.000006533944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004904437,0.003875946,0.00096878,0.09779248,0.03503812,0.0003340051,0.003709531,0.0003691726,0.8530076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009946126,0.0008663323,0.0004788155,0.007403567,0.000974318,0.00009435636,0.0009923596,0.0001241734,0.97912],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2858815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5684349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W237515160","doi":"","title":"U.S. International Tax Administration & Developing Nations: Administrative Policy at the Crossroads","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Tax policy; International taxation; Economics; Business; Tax reform; Public administration; Law; Economic policy; Public economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Karen L. Brown","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03810425153992238,"gpt":0.309049266595866,"spread":0.2709450150559436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006450513,0.0005565091,0.0004544742,0.002169057,0.009410789,0.0163198,0.0009320346,0.007475952,0.02736177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01068038,0.0005300089,0.000409369,0.00543358,0.003169416,0.008007031,0.002139211,0.008385114,0.009092725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01028755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02731609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06233341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961635,0.001196873,0.0002842987,0.0004167341,0.001118259,0.0008203884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946202,0.001775283,0.0005946121,0.0004583501,0.001920545,0.0006309916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002097116,0.00006519735,0.001889889,0.0001113076,0.000007537107,0.0001237129,0.001205297,0.000208457,0.0001991459,0.6141553,0.3283671,0.05364605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003007025,0.00001111735,0.001305014,0.0002053276,0.000004337945,0.00004840081,0.0006838588,0.0001014289,0.0001310917,0.009751431,0.9877431,0.00001180285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00660915,0.04006503,0.002306274,0.3206752,0.01026767,0.0001592481,0.0007642289,0.000239849,0.6189134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1324837,0.07100593,0.01147722,0.130051,0.005214873,0.0004851557,0.001027917,0.0002976234,0.6479567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06233341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1239412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W242160138","doi":"","title":"Icj Review of Security Council Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International court; Politics; Political science; Security council; Law; Economic Justice; Judicial review; International law; Public administration; Public international law","authors":[{"name":"Michael J. Matheson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04658642805948117,"gpt":0.3267903818146943,"spread":0.2802039537552132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0511715,0.0009357963,0.001815668,0.01207202,0.01312499,0.02093262,0.005004217,0.02067164,0.01862883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1713935,0.001363008,0.001307531,0.008925288,0.005466324,0.004985992,0.00571968,0.01545816,0.01225866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02173521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07138745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05279259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06438004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9047927,0.0157949,0.01136985,0.007339716,0.04997792,0.01072487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.786567,0.03921605,0.008734903,0.01794747,0.1388414,0.008693144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003318543,0.00003852078,0.0008033923,0.0002483073,0.00002895707,0.0007618954,0.0009809019,0.0002748676,0.0003894206,0.07445449,0.8893834,0.03260264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001548716,0.00001750651,0.001098046,0.0005000361,0.0000189271,0.0001372636,0.000270916,0.0003693777,0.0003535713,0.004928715,0.9922392,0.00005102224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008234395,0.0188985,0.00577174,0.1609347,0.0357759,0.001686695,0.001379992,0.0006542699,0.7666639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1829233,0.02828348,0.01268525,0.1676855,0.04056441,0.002036246,0.004018826,0.0008949681,0.5609081],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05279259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.270624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W271657514","doi":"","title":"Defamation, the Media, and Free Speech: Australia's Experiment with Expanded Qualified Privilege","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Democracy; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Russell L. Weaver","is_ca":false},{"name":"David F. Partlett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04466741549110115,"gpt":0.3342720033940464,"spread":0.2896045879029452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007620229,0.0003018067,0.0003403508,0.0008848011,0.01603025,0.008676576,0.001298177,0.007089326,0.01164188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01238233,0.0005630442,0.0003804559,0.00075811,0.01271561,0.00973787,0.009914788,0.008864365,0.000804744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008961927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01607634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08480425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1914213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929811,0.002984311,0.0001823519,0.0007247953,0.00168058,0.001446977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910484,0.00566621,0.0003429236,0.0006048495,0.0006626432,0.001674972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002154762,0.0003956654,0.004803133,0.0002179582,0.00001731237,0.002192914,0.1623146,0.0002783196,0.002415909,0.6761187,0.02687899,0.124151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000125562,0.0007041777,0.0247261,0.0007272725,0.00004627458,0.001029321,0.03623267,0.001505755,0.002144086,0.1397158,0.792897,0.0001459206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4217567,0.01094817,0.003378619,0.1565732,0.001202537,0.000164688,0.00005216962,0.000089155,0.4058349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8593336,0.004228608,0.002028119,0.03447851,0.000500267,0.0001692145,0.00001619791,0.00005580171,0.09918968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08480425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1686212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W925358830","doi":"","title":"Chapter 20 Dispute Resolution under Nafta: Fact or Fiction?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Scrutiny; Political science; Free trade; Dispute mechanism; Alternative dispute resolution; Free trade agreement; International arbitration; Dispute board; International trade; International trade law; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Marc Sher","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03013144900501238,"gpt":0.2647054923276191,"spread":0.2345740433226068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01008869,0.0003650088,0.0003696434,0.001345369,0.005604437,0.01001597,0.001900725,0.006212716,0.00996833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02692487,0.0002702209,0.0003696453,0.002516171,0.008256137,0.00479883,0.001927726,0.004834977,0.00170542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006906244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01023548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02238202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02159041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905385,0.003546933,0.0006812442,0.0006761349,0.003868999,0.0006881248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871831,0.008493809,0.001247568,0.0003774946,0.002484905,0.0002130874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001770268,0.00003225272,0.000738322,0.0002509645,0.000006339179,0.0003591974,0.01172394,0.000233506,0.0002994886,0.8141862,0.1368901,0.03526195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002742096,0.0000155808,0.0005424563,0.0007180069,0.000005074712,0.0001397047,0.002679557,0.0001174205,0.0002043313,0.03278397,0.9627767,0.00001454038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01592282,0.08038033,0.006948976,0.2285389,0.01302749,0.0002163861,0.0003010815,0.0001081556,0.6545558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4592137,0.08175919,0.009900543,0.09737083,0.01598177,0.0006681188,0.0009584974,0.0001575658,0.3339898],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02238202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05335474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W267706274","doi":"","title":"Home Is Where the Heart Is: Sexual Orientation Discrimination and the Right to Adequate Housing in International Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Lesbian; Housing discrimination; Law; Norm (philosophy); International law; Ethnic group; Political science; Transgender; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Dara Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03105337420272221,"gpt":0.3452579823016861,"spread":0.3142046080989639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001763323,0.000247305,0.0002180295,0.00140472,0.003170979,0.00571018,0.000836209,0.004050449,0.01132797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002444485,0.0001598752,0.0001803417,0.00211379,0.01089931,0.005533095,0.00317089,0.004146204,0.0006375068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002899768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002114303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008147057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0106231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985718,0.0007210445,0.00005325775,0.0001624856,0.0002449191,0.0002466348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974976,0.001410817,0.0004426315,0.00007093365,0.0002087821,0.0003692631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002116154,0.00008702477,0.004977032,0.0002351817,0.000005076964,0.0003395682,0.0123906,0.000121196,0.00007089193,0.8658207,0.07230636,0.04362527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000160101,0.000102415,0.02518349,0.005308256,0.00002111556,0.0009290887,0.03461755,0.000644057,0.0001388367,0.3119903,0.620991,0.00005788901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04554934,0.1569149,0.001338587,0.2136892,0.007042439,0.00004971181,0.0002317656,0.00002675206,0.5751573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8547881,0.07013122,0.0005598925,0.02555109,0.01135333,0.00009919269,0.0001618399,0.00002485874,0.03733045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01132797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03789586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303990125","doi":"","title":"Frozen Assets: Ownership of Arctic Mineral Rights Must Be Resolved to Prevent the Really Cold War","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arctic; Natural resource; Law; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Jurisdiction; Political science; International law; Natural resource economics; Oceanography; Geology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Angelle C. Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02705269540865654,"gpt":0.3230248346962451,"spread":0.2959721392875885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002922594,0.0002948247,0.0002227814,0.0004726762,0.006247701,0.009321006,0.001174565,0.005871985,0.02813199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007408826,0.0001888594,0.0002350901,0.0005030094,0.005169366,0.006402277,0.004481161,0.005155743,0.004954256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004446053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01338071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02980769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04052376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980237,0.0004797114,0.00008790995,0.0001782031,0.0005858655,0.0006445646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970215,0.0006764915,0.0002886854,0.0001586508,0.0009933119,0.0008614387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003161744,0.00004010561,0.002271582,0.0001546528,0.000007016044,0.0004796069,0.002948267,0.00025278,0.0003496895,0.5286636,0.3878547,0.07694642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006022323,0.0000245119,0.001568436,0.0008406405,0.000007591585,0.0002995799,0.005583611,0.0002059218,0.0002791018,0.07146351,0.9196993,0.00002187554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01609456,0.0130363,0.004116981,0.2896633,0.01151749,0.00005494846,0.0001826656,0.0001026496,0.6652312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5063366,0.02300658,0.004078771,0.135747,0.007300075,0.000120999,0.0004906356,0.0001541665,0.3227652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02980769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09411091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W824787426","doi":"","title":"The American Exclusion Rule Debate: Looking to England and Canada for Guidance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Law; Adversarial system; Confession (law); Magistrate; Political science; Adjudication; Suspect; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Search and seizure; Statute; Warrant; Supreme court; Constitution; Probable cause; Economic Justice; Business","authors":[{"name":"Larry Glasser","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01913004110962151,"gpt":0.3150713175067013,"spread":0.2959412763970797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006796138,0.001157038,0.001982213,0.005269591,0.02456198,0.01870912,0.006443421,0.02500872,0.03951007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01592285,0.0005773494,0.001209618,0.008142038,0.01631968,0.0116028,0.00471105,0.01643002,0.004982305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1250086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1588986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9760348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922279,0.001213256,0.0002852215,0.0006715013,0.003007013,0.002595235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893689,0.002916499,0.0003918795,0.000392329,0.005176118,0.001754328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002569956,0.00004382241,0.0004189049,0.000220224,0.000006967392,0.0002231434,0.001004484,0.0001401883,0.00005638313,0.2379981,0.7397838,0.02007828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001379374,0.000004723234,0.001130771,0.0008870108,0.000006634891,0.00003667416,0.001707533,0.0001157296,0.00003444029,0.01561138,0.9804038,0.00004758466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001975016,0.129962,0.0005454308,0.6390071,0.01264532,0.00009041485,0.0006075225,0.00008211743,0.2150851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07633349,0.1045102,0.003411083,0.4762942,0.007857486,0.0002588785,0.0006361317,0.0003203803,0.330378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1250086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9070053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W317641462","doi":"","title":"THE OECD CONTRIBUTION TO THE EVOLUTION OF TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY TRADE LAW[dagger]","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Subsidy; Negotiation; International trade law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Robert Wolfe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01643050782124961,"gpt":0.2691179862120613,"spread":0.2526874783908117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009373443,0.001028679,0.0006455292,0.004403371,0.006700057,0.01910104,0.001914111,0.01044399,0.01504271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01369916,0.0004698038,0.0007392637,0.007160405,0.01172749,0.008244983,0.006667889,0.008755104,0.00421542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02306619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03876328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05905779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04235372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923928,0.002263468,0.0003062781,0.0006062277,0.003329337,0.00110184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954625,0.001297927,0.0003042445,0.0005837578,0.001422413,0.0009292286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009242016,0.00001831608,0.0001610849,0.00006702464,0.000003973425,0.00008128504,0.001168318,0.0002327456,0.00004167699,0.6404302,0.3272548,0.03053126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001318336,0.000001784911,0.000157773,0.0001600999,8.246528e-7,0.00001852499,0.0002817367,0.00002725799,0.00001552364,0.02815489,0.9711738,0.000006273816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001795212,0.07961777,0.002745697,0.2613959,0.02932109,0.00005042976,0.0005867507,0.0003047773,0.6241825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1065247,0.0961971,0.01204077,0.08816042,0.01383615,0.0003290194,0.0009551004,0.0008609411,0.6810957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05905779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1673577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W250370597","doi":"","title":"Extraterritorial Enforcement of Pipeda: A Multi-Tiered Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Personally identifiable information; Law; Business; Enforcement; Privacy law; Possession (linguistics); European union; Population; Law enforcement; Directive; Information privacy; Political science; Privacy policy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Leah E. Frazier","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03111726826172464,"gpt":0.3390862629733977,"spread":0.3079689947116731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02565762,0.000637956,0.001207993,0.005699132,0.003800138,0.009818811,0.00459505,0.002900528,0.02791604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057459,0.0007905663,0.003154858,0.00718879,0.00497774,0.006248503,0.004979493,0.003301314,0.001469046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01295712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01489188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1943054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1288572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9717312,0.007484401,0.001273452,0.002826106,0.009114182,0.007570643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8839538,0.05815036,0.02255165,0.008481732,0.02363359,0.003228964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005567325,0.0005732302,0.4118997,0.0007292946,0.0007261943,0.001221925,0.004448876,0.008310972,0.000705444,0.4989143,0.01705699,0.05485635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001865376,0.0009224024,0.6898857,0.001543173,0.002666647,0.001092321,0.02419547,0.0641164,0.001946216,0.1343291,0.07882136,0.0002945961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6274482,0.007459243,0.03674021,0.01592763,0.0002763246,0.002176237,0.006929352,0.0003781671,0.3026646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820824,0.00088371,0.003145033,0.001509887,0.0001307261,0.0001739978,0.0008574451,0.00005792528,0.0111589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8056946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3863488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W291686183","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review in Canadian Constitutional Law: A Brief Overview","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Law; Political science; Legislation; Charter; Statute; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Jurisdiction; Judicial independence; Constitution; Legislature; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jean Marie Leclair","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03352286788134932,"gpt":0.3220446374953559,"spread":0.2885217696140066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007327025,0.0008135108,0.0008808588,0.01627311,0.01500364,0.01323008,0.002870959,0.005954633,0.009604126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01604927,0.001039473,0.0007598324,0.02901202,0.01395642,0.004256151,0.002454356,0.004386829,0.001179117],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1881979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2325631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9679714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9750812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868377,0.002104595,0.0006421841,0.0009334217,0.006786569,0.002695554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848193,0.00519608,0.0007368379,0.000320238,0.00767884,0.001248723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002891325,0.0000605434,0.002155899,0.001614378,0.00002029351,0.000702438,0.003942145,0.001247824,0.0001691828,0.6207108,0.2016128,0.1677347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006222584,0.00001195286,0.00359371,0.001092705,0.000012042,0.0001725263,0.0006902117,0.0003738943,0.00006251589,0.009377838,0.984556,0.0000504118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003909733,0.6059769,0.004318072,0.0751371,0.003884051,0.0002751888,0.0004631416,0.0001433489,0.3058925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1168658,0.7989218,0.005885783,0.01847003,0.004432211,0.0001892643,0.0003872917,0.0001408026,0.05470707],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1881979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9415754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}