{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":8,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"68ba60c9d7b9","filters":{"venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics"}},"results":[{"id":"W4317937833","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10890","title":"THE FUTURE OF POST-KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS: Post-Keynesian Economics at 50","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Post-Keynesian economics; Keynesian economics; New Keynesian economics; Schools of economic thought; Institution; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Social science; Monetary policy","authors":[{"name":"Louis‐Philippe Rochon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0167462232714176,"gpt":0.2555084441207358,"spread":0.2387622208493182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003361389,0.0003571162,0.0007717971,0.0002060264,0.001254751,0.0001828603,0.001877409,0.0004483853,0.0002029958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001944544,0.0002673859,0.0006648607,0.0001766516,0.001305019,0.0005766783,0.0003582951,0.000683766,0.0002927115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006760686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001018486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003041876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006294596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965685,0.0003570234,0.001636926,0.0003470807,0.0001366348,0.000953856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954995,0.001675173,0.001234996,0.0006460338,0.0002840181,0.0006603087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004674347,0.00008020583,0.0003493391,0.0000194534,0.0002525921,0.000008735659,0.001652651,0.0008516291,0.00002580651,0.9833628,0.0006280451,0.01230132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009508184,0.0003398592,0.002468649,0.0000188928,0.0001191121,0.00008086269,0.004273617,0.0007345973,0.00006366491,0.5682505,0.4222526,0.0004467397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7889467,0.0004164611,0.00000871971,0.1907293,0.002370752,0.0003278317,0.000147749,0.00003896562,0.01701357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983566,0.007043432,0.00007345331,0.003696394,0.00489805,0.00000872977,0.0000130521,0.00005750284,0.0006434214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4216246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554209335","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10693","title":"Aristotle on justice in exchange: commensurability by fiat","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Historical Economic and Legal Thought","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commensurability (mathematics); Stipulation; Currency; Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Action (physics); Economics; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Neoclassical economics; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Mark Peacock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03516583253736748,"gpt":0.2851392804907014,"spread":0.2499734479533339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002405384,0.000123093,0.0003228413,0.00006258398,0.0002301319,0.00002440968,0.0005435168,0.0001431516,0.0002734274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003351356,0.00007753236,0.0001262044,0.00009192273,0.0003645423,0.0002095951,0.00004308382,0.0004224775,0.0001137079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001111524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001914086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000162754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007722922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984502,0.0003693102,0.0006125602,0.0001566396,0.0001232511,0.0002880376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976889,0.001458315,0.0003533615,0.0002170978,0.00005242735,0.000229929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002859719,0.002266547,0.003472321,0.00008226596,0.000204078,0.00006149145,0.01299505,0.0005898174,0.0003869232,0.6453993,0.1258061,0.2058764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008371738,0.000190919,0.0003137377,0.0000226712,0.00002835124,0.000005145722,0.0001516891,0.00004548778,0.00001432018,0.2253543,0.7728687,0.000167493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4881055,0.0006288948,0.000394457,0.3893495,0.002893813,0.0003416702,0.00008582031,0.00002703714,0.1181733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952596,0.0006480967,0.00003567195,0.002385309,0.00114945,0.000002156347,4.058147e-7,0.00001251648,0.0005068391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6470626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3161678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939070806","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10714","title":"Financial bubbles and their magic: asset price as a heroic journey in the financial markets","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Mythology; Financial market; MAGIC (telescope); Asset (computer security); Universality (dynamical systems); Financial economics; Neoclassical economics; Finance; Positive economics; History","authors":[{"name":"Alexandru Balasescu","is_ca":true},{"name":"Apurv Jain","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02867715185551983,"gpt":0.2219433484856999,"spread":0.1932661966301801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00303694,0.0002598267,0.0007539348,0.0002745347,0.0002593985,0.0001929281,0.0008093756,0.0001693383,0.0003928925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002642005,0.0001755955,0.0002818415,0.0003247437,0.0002763011,0.0002996965,0.0001452448,0.0005623735,0.0001283747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001149462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001127196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001519899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006900541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977728,0.0001219855,0.001393079,0.0002822186,0.00005766785,0.0003722764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979711,0.0003289162,0.001069294,0.0004162573,0.0001021842,0.0001123186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007917683,0.0003809638,0.00919624,0.00005305979,0.0002731966,0.00004714602,0.003861064,0.0002311086,0.00002189527,0.9778982,0.002825068,0.004420267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009850208,0.0004339851,0.02332033,0.00002744327,0.00002440426,0.0004538083,0.000261916,0.004152527,0.000005532917,0.879081,0.0909702,0.0002838324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651921,0.002317989,0.0005153095,0.01633269,0.0005187121,0.0002197813,0.00006447406,0.000006391085,0.01483253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954903,0.0006592404,0.00007174269,0.00178125,0.00185152,0.000003960535,0.000002064668,0.00002309413,0.0001168441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09881722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7160577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795745614","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10709","title":"Crises, confidence, and animal spirits: exploring subjectivity in the dualism of Descartes and Keynes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal spirits; Rationality; Subjectivity; Soul; Subject (documents); Dualism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Passions; Irrationality; Realm; Psychology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Sonya Marie Scott","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09984827522575836,"gpt":0.2525812775754376,"spread":0.1527330023496793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002158252,0.0001375805,0.000442014,0.0001710673,0.000163718,0.00006252522,0.0003273282,0.00008356781,0.00003408802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001439863,0.0001087514,0.00008149228,0.0000982862,0.0007298408,0.0006051908,0.00008059245,0.000293832,0.000009999832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004128071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003691915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008357594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001715329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998653,0.00006577453,0.0008988021,0.0001814877,0.00002090371,0.0001800244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985982,0.00047122,0.00058723,0.000227784,0.00004635715,0.00006919522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001193642,0.00006075164,0.01172799,0.00001437657,0.00003998579,0.00000243888,0.001241521,0.00003168888,0.00004507231,0.9864192,0.00002203083,0.00027557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007232219,0.0004494452,0.03200456,0.00003446711,0.00002181152,0.000212238,0.0006330289,0.000773247,0.000198621,0.9618708,0.002908794,0.0001697375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901223,0.001328469,0.0001406799,0.004314642,0.0002919242,0.0001101099,0.00004382195,0.000003457342,0.003644569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977093,0.001278119,0.00009557807,0.0004145431,0.0004823409,0.00000421496,4.861527e-7,0.00001021699,0.000005252609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02454838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4434755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973100564","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10723","title":"On Amartya Sen's concept of sympathy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Altruism (biology); Epistemology; Section (typography); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Mark Peacock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01670944270389455,"gpt":0.2584302133620308,"spread":0.2417207706581363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001142327,0.0001126684,0.0003744337,0.00006865251,0.0001120313,0.00002619755,0.0005289938,0.0001533389,0.0005186547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001313027,0.00008590285,0.0002176027,0.00006257139,0.0004607682,0.0001967351,0.00005127693,0.000372881,0.0001447523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001317036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002930938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007185565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004373344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986918,0.000182193,0.000582752,0.0001140604,0.0001404678,0.0002887054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998007,0.0009887922,0.0004454828,0.0002189753,0.0001015404,0.0002382292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001066746,0.000073511,0.0001239092,0.000004955612,0.00004319697,0.000002173861,0.0007835713,0.0004641445,0.00001361358,0.9971605,0.0001850579,0.001038668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008045505,0.0004610086,0.0002380749,0.00002832586,0.00003664257,0.0000117357,0.0005902097,0.0002594824,0.000207931,0.9625621,0.03464369,0.0001562527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8707208,0.00005176711,0.00003244464,0.02195361,0.0008406573,0.0001496705,0.00001659636,0.000007721389,0.1062267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996227,0.00006905843,0.00003551973,0.002606774,0.0007946738,6.732522e-7,5.964237e-7,0.0000104133,0.0002552686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1255062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5678905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298240765","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10564","title":"Classifying Heterodoxy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Heterodoxy; Heterodox economics; Scholarship; Positive economics; Discipline; Economics; Epistemology; Mainstream economics; Neoclassical economics; Strengths and weaknesses; Sociology; Orthodoxy; Applied economics; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Rick Szostak","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0777712372618511,"gpt":0.22878963543066,"spread":0.1510183981688089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00115675,0.0001865126,0.0005546068,0.0002039133,0.0003757937,0.00003723608,0.0006616632,0.0001476358,0.0003283696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000752692,0.0001694164,0.0003344631,0.0001010001,0.0003679018,0.0005148952,0.00008611284,0.0005283617,0.0006597958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001857201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007708767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001231939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000114212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980349,0.00004043268,0.001405407,0.0002094318,0.00002361406,0.0002862041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981688,0.0001888178,0.001017348,0.0004016753,0.0000473748,0.0001760147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008564296,0.0001078424,0.003414544,0.000006833408,0.0001264932,0.00001560767,0.0003057901,0.002936973,0.00002188903,0.9923309,0.0004497133,0.0001977853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001024932,0.000202181,0.002685618,0.0000123121,0.00001899545,0.001136497,0.00005129331,0.002330316,0.0000557514,0.9128894,0.07927742,0.0003153354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9430635,0.001074028,0.002737195,0.007482708,0.001500704,0.000116798,0.00006128562,0.00001998,0.0439438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959147,0.0009708743,0.0003320058,0.001484788,0.001049658,0.000002451948,0.000002248961,0.0000262091,0.0002170461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07944154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.848056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W643978122","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10610","title":"The capacity to choose: reformulating the concept of choice in economic theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Realism; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Possession (linguistics); Rational choice theory (criminology); Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Mark Peacock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06423312031436564,"gpt":0.2378038139951421,"spread":0.1735706936807764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004640276,0.0002141317,0.0005729911,0.0001625397,0.0003596992,0.00005005872,0.001382279,0.0001375063,0.0001938755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002870283,0.0001387996,0.0002843421,0.0001202664,0.0005775886,0.0003983567,0.0001684847,0.0006434467,0.000146382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003456808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009090213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003088859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005988494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972574,0.000140723,0.001986155,0.0002311601,0.00002613052,0.0003584454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966463,0.001031573,0.001473476,0.0006677013,0.00004619476,0.0001347972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001517469,0.00005088783,0.002293529,0.000003610421,0.00009467519,6.440426e-7,0.001792175,0.004632573,0.000006066505,0.9901446,0.00003664659,0.0007928285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006675345,0.0001570359,0.0103909,0.00001999773,0.00001890792,0.0000404618,0.0003565856,0.001258535,0.0001784278,0.9764274,0.01027788,0.0002063792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674397,0.00068391,0.0004593626,0.004765232,0.001087475,0.0003022995,0.00009822055,0.00000739875,0.02515647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982076,0.000162334,0.0001584215,0.0008293544,0.0005305803,0.000009125636,7.854725e-7,0.00002441625,0.0000773964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03076796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5660083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178742903","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10741","title":"Rejoinder on animal spirits in Descartes and Keynes: a response to Kurt Smith","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Rationality; Philosophy; Dualism; Order (exchange); Animal spirits; Subjectivity; Relation (database); Reading (process); Physicalism; Sociology; Metaphysics; Economics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Sonya Marie Scott","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05352577066229615,"gpt":0.232810631129708,"spread":0.1792848604674118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001591453,0.000191114,0.0005466182,0.0002422831,0.0001123106,0.00007082604,0.0003941478,0.0001266171,0.00008510287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003235948,0.000180375,0.0001317908,0.0001587688,0.0001402889,0.0003004792,0.00009708157,0.000475011,0.0002610432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001535621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008326247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008021592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001780919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982566,0.00007567953,0.001094884,0.0002949618,0.00002281688,0.000255042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986435,0.0003599092,0.0004332802,0.0002298735,0.00002792825,0.0003054747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00638999,0.0001909181,0.007687117,0.00002367411,0.0001092266,0.00003459719,0.002038904,0.007668428,0.0001947125,0.9747525,0.0004478318,0.0004621436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004911583,0.004541235,0.05033363,0.0001224569,0.00003945178,0.0002663175,0.000566788,0.009107611,0.0002255117,0.8498191,0.07910823,0.0009581289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197265,0.0004003546,0.0001998757,0.07573459,0.0001884048,0.0001680767,0.00006314483,0.000008819255,0.003510252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99185,0.000170325,0.0002424111,0.007243586,0.0004397274,0.000004111216,6.338809e-7,0.00002344435,0.00002577979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1249334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.735548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}