{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":81,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":81,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"20da4b3277f9","filters":{"venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2110649000","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35","title":"Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2371,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; CONTEST; Legitimacy; Rhetoric; Element (criminal law); Sociology; Teleology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03612515697114772,"gpt":0.3024322837532248,"spread":0.2663071267820771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002682234,0.0001232299,0.000139917,0.0001843438,0.0002933391,0.0003844854,0.000377298,0.00001754377,0.0004194358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005070663,0.0001046391,0.00003771705,0.001033221,0.0006445093,0.003652958,0.00003563528,0.00005193548,0.0002398646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002452451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009759856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004199356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009302461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987904,0.000003663759,0.0002401295,0.0002599102,0.0004663738,0.0002395392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993189,0.0000255439,0.0001614438,0.0001382827,0.000341803,0.00001404063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008489926,0.00009168025,0.003198704,0.00002367774,0.000009093695,0.00000192418,0.0003470343,0.000009056723,0.001327942,0.9879782,0.001571491,0.005432744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002498989,0.001311633,0.4478169,0.0001390803,0.0001900242,0.000008732367,0.09360129,0.006849722,0.005755854,0.1867693,0.2531313,0.001927142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2499408,0.00007249412,0.003643768,0.003444529,0.0003368424,0.0003034109,0.00000305753,0.0001284331,0.7421267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978859,9.615167e-7,0.0009440046,0.0002609529,0.0005139951,0.000006824884,0.000003434928,0.000006202405,0.0003776951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8012088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4592527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144657509","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32","title":"The Call of the Wild: Zookeepers, Callings, and the Double-edged Sword of Deeply Meaningful Work","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SWORD; Conceptualization; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Sacrifice; Social psychology; Duty; Epistemology; Work (physics); Qualitative research; Centrality; Psychology; Law; Social science; Theology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01954864443391217,"gpt":0.3407545813098896,"spread":0.3212059368759774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007299729,0.0001303102,0.000156915,0.00001938939,0.0005229096,0.00007409845,0.000596459,0.00004064764,0.000003208263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001330681,0.00006218382,0.00008970505,0.0002561984,0.00316147,0.00001417598,0.00003240593,0.0001295286,0.000001424819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001050817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001517045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002650851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001900985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988138,0.00009256401,0.0002967413,0.0002774764,0.0003048116,0.0002145968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989447,0.0001066691,0.0002531217,0.0003745008,0.0002744158,0.00004659628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004242621,0.0002655692,0.006230265,0.00001980618,0.0002852618,0.000003377713,0.03692608,0.00001306154,0.8535818,0.07629474,0.002677388,0.01946006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005788499,0.01161838,0.1652092,0.0002223249,0.0002097977,0.00006972678,0.07001646,0.0001477629,0.7207133,0.003633227,0.02148803,0.0008833907],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890485,0.0005155583,0.0001409015,0.002788601,0.0001529035,0.0002876359,0.000004022339,0.000004660743,0.007057182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990816,0.00002185828,0.0001188923,0.0002435035,0.00004842861,0.00001033825,6.082868e-7,0.000003973776,0.0004708689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1589789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155232257","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189","title":"Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1063,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary-work; Work (physics); Boundary (topology); Agency (philosophy); Organizational field; Field (mathematics); Process (computing); Public relations; Subject (documents); State (computer science); Sociology; Knowledge management; Political science; Institutional theory; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01419184045946153,"gpt":0.2835743898292523,"spread":0.2693825493697907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001171921,0.00008744327,0.00008644658,0.0001166878,0.0004141964,0.0002460229,0.0003916077,0.0000260475,0.00009404737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004330975,0.00005382463,0.00001548046,0.002080842,0.0008136461,0.001993859,0.00002329004,0.0001351142,0.000005192936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006560556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008822783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002766258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001969382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990302,0.00002508152,0.0002537659,0.0001504953,0.0004244893,0.000115966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990925,0.0002974985,0.0001902568,0.0001280499,0.0002840438,0.000007643641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002753519,0.0002967435,0.06332855,0.00004739716,0.0000229026,0.000003297087,0.01935439,0.00001568233,0.0004105192,0.9050731,0.0005084131,0.01066365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005043278,0.0002496824,0.938354,0.00007680653,0.0000549622,0.000007048655,0.03448415,0.0001133855,0.0002615241,0.01419188,0.01145722,0.0002450213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690127,0.00002551906,0.001587369,0.01077812,0.0002577097,0.0003133317,0.000001853305,0.00001153583,0.01801181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984108,0.000001117805,0.0005737859,0.0008666788,0.0001122418,0.000007790909,0.000009951361,0.000003004425,0.00001463694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8908812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3185706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2087142893","doi":"10.2307/3094849","title":"Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Impact of Organizational Identification, Identity, and Image on the Cooperative Behaviors of Physicians","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":906,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Organizational identification; Identification (biology); Identity (music); Beauty; Psychology; Social psychology; Health care; Organizational commitment; Political science; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03193757728052814,"gpt":0.3131643437094057,"spread":0.2812267664288775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005974871,0.0001136477,0.0001191611,0.00008840984,0.0004242931,0.0002190242,0.0006625333,0.0000227385,0.0003644326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001543675,0.00005215106,0.00005872999,0.00199646,0.00139509,0.001058039,0.00003069783,0.0001155029,0.0000139619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002365821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008456476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002478832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001541024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986739,0.00005587677,0.0003377099,0.0001886709,0.0006145673,0.0001293155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985794,0.0001145131,0.0003904713,0.0003030978,0.0006063334,0.000006188022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001335821,0.0007094659,0.6786738,0.00002033216,0.00002668609,9.051267e-7,0.02620383,0.00002485254,0.1160838,0.1757357,0.001929416,0.0005778471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001308565,0.00008184857,0.9819154,0.00001920584,0.00002762773,0.000001113072,0.009805237,0.0002031737,0.006715743,0.001024117,0.00001174006,0.00006395709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943957,0.00001084721,0.00006028607,0.004334776,0.00006892032,0.0003891808,0.00004282193,0.000004609939,0.0006929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999428,0.000001797252,0.00000700458,0.0004331035,0.00003427708,0.000009939999,0.00000362438,0.000006198548,0.00007602038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3032416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5140266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113362774","doi":"10.2307/4131489","title":"The Diffusion of Ideas over Contested Terrain: The (Non)adoption of a Shareholder Value Orientation among German Firms","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":895,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Corporate governance; Shareholder value; Shareholder; Value (mathematics); Accounting; Business; Decoupling (probability); Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01861168207202563,"gpt":0.2759588488763144,"spread":0.2573471668042888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005316339,0.0001355535,0.0001397265,0.00006629954,0.0004606963,0.0001878573,0.0004631164,0.00003110309,0.00001327798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007379672,0.00007987898,0.00006683582,0.0009377574,0.001066459,0.001732268,0.00002456104,0.00009522222,0.00001430487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003520781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001760174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001137477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007016714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985995,0.00001157728,0.0003594256,0.0002642626,0.0005400544,0.0002252214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985262,0.00006122401,0.0007759362,0.0003119047,0.0003119121,0.00001287349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006351437,0.0009733005,0.2600312,0.0002789045,0.00006592459,0.00003955236,0.03060935,0.0003972273,0.122755,0.5552042,0.001170532,0.02783967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006669639,0.0002549283,0.9850272,0.0001259473,0.00001737887,0.000001436862,0.003601407,0.0008700084,0.00114615,0.007875899,0.0002901264,0.0001225595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966999,0.00001400337,0.0008446604,0.0007113938,0.0002121752,0.0003645493,0.000008387723,0.00001376853,0.001131138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995491,0.000002061748,0.00002439115,0.0001994112,0.00009966183,0.00002235387,0.000007102381,0.000006601059,0.00008935397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.724996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3929414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098099463","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268","title":"The Rationalization of Charity: The Influences of Professionalism in the Nonprofit Sector","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":866,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Champion; Bureaucracy; Public relations; Audit; Business; Sociology; Management; Political science; Accounting; Economics; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08537535005882686,"gpt":0.4213336287727662,"spread":0.3359582787139394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003798959,0.00008443878,0.0001083252,0.00005556202,0.001178807,0.0001217691,0.001029378,0.00003896112,0.00002394598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003342306,0.00004010902,0.00004401624,0.001286864,0.002314569,0.0005135306,0.000007007842,0.0001397111,0.00000192659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003528632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009221983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006412392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002138152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978386,0.0003720956,0.0003365743,0.000181251,0.001010924,0.0002605399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986018,0.0005912044,0.0002462399,0.0002248601,0.0003052961,0.00003062807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002907393,0.00008703174,0.01642952,0.000006353383,0.00000457754,9.510984e-7,0.1943266,0.00000385019,0.01398084,0.7687014,0.00005602491,0.006373761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000175068,0.000663496,0.791613,0.00006684781,0.000007631479,0.000001626529,0.1626663,0.0001359401,0.004027912,0.03950704,0.00100701,0.0001280711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.983399,0.0001037953,0.00008828811,0.008657151,0.0002169594,0.000548445,0.000005867366,0.000009052737,0.006971447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995541,0.000006396115,0.0000429854,0.0001938392,0.0000667275,0.00002507789,0.000001013055,0.000001688061,0.0001081748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7751836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9066549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602099217","doi":"10.2189/asqu.51.1.1","title":"Emotional Intelligence, Cognitive Intelligence, and Job Performance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Emotional Intelligence and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":852,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Emotional intelligence; Psychology; Organizational citizenship behavior; Task (project management); Cognition; Human intelligence; Job performance; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Test (biology); Job analysis; Applied psychology; Organizational commitment; Management; Developmental psychology; Job satisfaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05996883226498805,"gpt":0.3673444317191438,"spread":0.3073755994541558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007485783,0.0003109663,0.0002356347,0.0003543977,0.000669135,0.0002016291,0.0004951492,0.0001103734,0.001811406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003239283,0.0002816691,0.00006758979,0.00117684,0.003055518,0.001063452,0.00002445782,0.0003360354,0.001416837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005391476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002979611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001281569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008064925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971979,0.00007087344,0.0005620178,0.0008399632,0.0006232925,0.0007059898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986222,0.0002624455,0.0001791691,0.0002724622,0.0004544846,0.000209171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002096466,0.0005513248,0.07794017,0.00003584327,0.0000445348,0.00004999903,0.009507569,0.00003451114,0.000608555,0.6767834,0.0004898818,0.2337446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002409562,0.0058367,0.9125797,0.0002172561,0.00003674033,0.0004894327,0.03025484,0.00238175,0.01223426,0.03380379,0.0009037274,0.001020921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8261797,0.0001621644,0.01194734,0.0002310906,0.0006521809,0.0002916798,0.00003800753,0.00007010161,0.1604278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943051,0.00001595875,0.0005784191,0.0002274094,0.000284142,0.00005794748,0.00001967082,0.00001442443,0.004496928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8346395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121500353","doi":"10.2307/2667075","title":"How Experience and Network Ties Affect the Influence of Demographic Minorities on Corporate Boards","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":780,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Interpersonal ties; Perception; Business; Social network (sociolinguistics); Public relations; Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Social psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08636161780670826,"gpt":0.3156493175787229,"spread":0.2292876997720146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001381038,0.0001353069,0.000170724,0.00005730679,0.001709526,0.0003739215,0.0006190399,0.00005467579,0.00005193309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000928574,0.0001010717,0.00005004193,0.0009399321,0.009002099,0.00102999,0.00001280419,0.0001363921,0.000005880012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002451434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003380646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005528602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006473232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980006,0.0003301723,0.0001565651,0.0003487005,0.0007316668,0.0004322647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990429,0.0002235535,0.0001728155,0.000245799,0.0001584623,0.0001565175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000149793,0.0001344188,0.1242459,0.00002827534,0.00002619809,0.00001285586,0.6064352,0.00008523821,0.0009476368,0.2489472,0.0002912122,0.01869603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002247187,0.00254836,0.6151443,0.00006266153,0.00001793858,0.000003421829,0.364163,0.0000265146,0.000654968,0.01491751,0.001897836,0.0003388027],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887373,0.00005259796,0.00001085933,0.001442393,0.0001006116,0.0002248298,0.00001156253,0.00002658984,0.009393246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987075,0.00003870274,0.00009161865,0.0001977221,0.00006023656,0.00001119963,4.715849e-7,0.000002320282,0.0008902558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4908984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051037209","doi":"10.2307/2667019","title":"Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains' Acquisitions","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":759,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Perspective (graphical); Observational learning; Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03623705596399512,"gpt":0.2849482451570221,"spread":0.248711189193027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006529031,0.0001427904,0.0001189225,0.0001152753,0.001648264,0.001192164,0.0004951698,0.00002447713,0.0003180773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005099986,0.00008965691,0.00005109291,0.0007896799,0.001208729,0.00107942,0.00003876619,0.000154193,0.00003141577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001563668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005390701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007447621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004346747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987582,0.00003299017,0.0001863305,0.0003215442,0.0004024594,0.0002984842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993503,0.00009075989,0.0001496642,0.0002933671,0.0001001723,0.00001573056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001133144,0.0004185352,0.007514445,0.0001286665,0.0001271924,0.00002930151,0.104355,0.001283958,0.004870605,0.3409609,0.002728121,0.5374699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001014864,0.0006059937,0.09082457,0.0001883837,0.0001954996,0.0000269048,0.4966662,0.3246773,0.000180074,0.003893144,0.08082833,0.0008987015],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9450948,0.0001104866,0.00340155,0.02377833,0.0002096797,0.0005125338,0.000002646372,0.00008831664,0.02680162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975405,0.000002854193,0.00008599502,0.0009043364,0.0002361946,0.00004208946,0.000003745978,0.000008578852,0.001175722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5365712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132999934","doi":"10.2189/asqu.51.1.59","title":"Explaining Compassion Organizing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":703,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Improvisation; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Process (computing); Social psychology; Organizational theory; Sociology; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Management; Political science; Economics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02434580260693464,"gpt":0.2595330586864998,"spread":0.2351872560795651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003390915,0.0001535736,0.0001293515,0.0002316161,0.001002815,0.0006640102,0.0003515896,0.00001988013,0.0003830901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004556001,0.0001330293,0.00002826297,0.001484021,0.0003491788,0.002048118,0.00005070948,0.00006482098,0.0005058151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003611981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004475161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001390358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001549752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985896,0.00000457353,0.0002286704,0.0003577994,0.0004896335,0.0003297275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994112,0.00002845496,0.0001584568,0.0001392412,0.0002498589,0.00001275777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008229545,0.0000810383,0.04037907,0.00002135031,0.000005659535,0.00001302237,0.0002552537,0.000006701866,0.005875511,0.9455464,0.006070348,0.001737417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001153403,0.0002736178,0.8049216,0.0001066282,0.00006674726,0.000006782601,0.02675397,0.003058172,0.00292949,0.0985072,0.06097676,0.00124564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5157169,0.0000469801,0.00520495,0.002199925,0.0006260371,0.0002881005,0.000001641603,0.0003183925,0.4755971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976971,2.356146e-7,0.0006049366,0.000505983,0.0007051179,0.000007645138,0.00001343431,0.00001148096,0.0004540678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8470392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7712939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941781419","doi":"10.2189/asqu.50.4.536","title":"Dancing with Strangers: Aspiration Performance and the Search for Underwriting Syndicate Partners","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":633,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Syndicate; Underwriting; Interpersonal ties; General partnership; Investment banking; Business; Investment (military); Microeconomics; Public relations; Social psychology; Economics; Actuarial science; Psychology; Finance; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04694201795231594,"gpt":0.2920845706477968,"spread":0.2451425526954809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009970337,0.0001318834,0.0001289508,0.00007146165,0.0007779084,0.0005528844,0.0002447101,0.00002047788,0.000007083414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002113462,0.00008569992,0.00002427271,0.0005417865,0.001006309,0.003040165,0.00001015527,0.00009708232,0.00001756616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000298395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001564729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005627172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002681837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987933,0.000007371017,0.0001830133,0.0003401528,0.0003385087,0.0003376223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993639,0.0000735398,0.0001995505,0.000157363,0.0001885103,0.00001711618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001491691,0.0001665481,0.07382216,0.0004211761,0.00004666326,0.00001470015,0.008155629,0.0006404677,0.003440868,0.4277295,0.0005100846,0.4835605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01538665,0.00395402,0.6717176,0.0008811415,0.0002358225,0.00007950715,0.04406034,0.2285938,0.007465988,0.004726476,0.02074089,0.002157851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843763,0.00002310578,0.006220963,0.003708972,0.00004418878,0.0004532438,0.000003090392,0.0000341062,0.005136035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982367,0.000002052002,0.0004925559,0.0007761537,0.0003110244,0.00005533031,0.000002686591,0.000008319823,0.0001152457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5978954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5983121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089576145","doi":"10.2307/3094807","title":"Capitalizing on Diversity: Interpersonal Congruence in Small Work Groups","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":609,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Moderation; Categorization; Diversity (politics); Interpersonal relationship; Working group; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.198510499172672,"gpt":0.3261017871895667,"spread":0.1275912880168947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001339948,0.0001468792,0.0001642388,0.0001973218,0.0017063,0.0002484989,0.0009015063,0.00007393769,0.0005510126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001664695,0.0001538606,0.00006525646,0.001208879,0.002174501,0.0008970778,0.00006282461,0.0002432981,0.000269612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002980554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001765477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001721179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004173716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997737,0.0002364236,0.0001917894,0.000539083,0.0006709761,0.000624766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991901,0.0001657404,0.00009621202,0.0001956841,0.0001228403,0.0002294054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004636615,0.0003676442,0.08701769,0.000006781899,0.000009574356,0.000106118,0.7823087,0.000003319763,0.0001395758,0.1194509,0.0003253785,0.01021801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009079084,0.002324775,0.1859619,0.0001508,0.00001532349,0.000003693867,0.799279,0.0002120846,0.000251578,0.008254108,0.001804283,0.0008345181],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9158823,0.00002367542,0.0000714487,0.001526889,0.0003771763,0.0001857034,0.000008466016,0.00004577601,0.08187859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985759,0.000004546804,0.0001428699,0.0004701998,0.00004495806,0.000003987815,8.83514e-7,0.000002924873,0.0007537773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1111968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123354546","doi":"10.1177/0001839213500032","title":"Keeping up Appearances","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":601,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Prosocial behavior; Reputation; Impression management; Repertoire; Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06331496867873718,"gpt":0.3928850514864522,"spread":0.329570082807715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005744408,0.0001276956,0.0001600497,0.00008678203,0.001622981,0.0005236202,0.0005828168,0.0000378256,0.0004306991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005476804,0.0001238553,0.00005096854,0.0004768939,0.003822197,0.001958774,0.00001842604,0.00009637022,0.001029543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001768445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004720337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002913575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001003718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983185,0.0000685681,0.0002252336,0.0004142016,0.0003993641,0.0005741116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992393,0.00005867329,0.0001054699,0.0001801462,0.0001772965,0.0002391121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001466766,0.0002284466,0.02930271,0.000008086111,0.00002299044,0.000008440664,0.4556042,5.676738e-7,0.09135935,0.3449168,0.001603583,0.0769301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004577475,0.001598688,0.0348546,0.00004695977,0.00001144782,0.000004063863,0.9111995,0.00006333378,0.0220517,0.02263068,0.006215476,0.0008658464],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7588636,0.00007824317,0.00004071534,0.001796171,0.0006756129,0.0003956516,0.000002356049,0.00008199774,0.2380657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997194,0.000006004967,0.0008219755,0.0002350521,0.0001002279,0.00009877138,5.012358e-7,0.000005574715,0.001537922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4555952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155448232","doi":"10.2189/asqu.53.2.266","title":"Bringing the Context Back In: Settings and the Search for Syndicate Partners in Venture Capital Investment Networks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":482,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Syndicate; Venture capital; Business; Investment (military); Context (archaeology); Maturity (psychological); Social venture capital; Popularity; Web syndication; Industrial organization; Finance; Politics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03748353399216502,"gpt":0.2888030205134176,"spread":0.2513194865212526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001641973,0.0001582928,0.0001840479,0.0001293247,0.0005656419,0.0003582848,0.0005052377,0.00004314681,0.0000139141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007766086,0.000096352,0.00005312168,0.0006517292,0.002111861,0.00105033,0.00006678828,0.000265453,0.00001733392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004474722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001083505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001563997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003016649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998553,0.00003353062,0.0002627029,0.0003660441,0.0002878947,0.0004968076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993766,0.0002064523,0.0001277852,0.0001942016,0.00006832316,0.00002662772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006693563,0.0003027724,0.04492103,0.0001709574,0.0000488448,0.0001429606,0.07185524,0.0001952546,0.0005333775,0.8685411,0.003096847,0.00952226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01749845,0.001450166,0.4831874,0.0008230607,0.000101553,0.0002209467,0.2727678,0.166446,0.0006338776,0.03537049,0.01939144,0.002108893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871657,0.000247944,0.0001698395,0.008558547,0.0002059697,0.0008074281,0.000001897808,0.00001517031,0.00282743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964677,0.000007969011,0.00002747985,0.00316297,0.0001900934,0.00006418448,0.000004948568,0.000007647217,0.00006697189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8331706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7781241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984711778","doi":"10.1177/0001839219887663","title":"Editorial Essay: The Tumult over Transparency: Decoupling Transparency from Replication in Establishing Trustworthy Qualitative Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":427,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Conflation; Tying; Replication (statistics); Trustworthiness; Qualitative research; Computer science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer security; Social science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06495649930329646,"gpt":0.404184240898798,"spread":0.3392277415955015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009366265,0.0005708697,0.0006460091,0.0007828334,0.001453474,0.002618124,0.002472719,0.0004274474,0.0002487834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003769059,0.0004541858,0.0001359984,0.00402536,0.001177305,0.004302473,0.0001141628,0.001686632,0.0002145475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004248831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001437393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005732703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008703612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991274,0.0002010875,0.001075205,0.001974152,0.004499428,0.0009761297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922196,0.00375843,0.000742621,0.001125155,0.00210954,0.00004466665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001727305,0.0001690273,0.001296534,0.0001628075,0.00005916812,0.000008152984,0.02940387,0.00002201114,0.00007189636,0.0113825,0.955692,0.0015593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001881598,0.00039295,0.004939428,0.0006784498,0.000172134,1.225635e-7,0.06397522,0.001915597,0.00002529059,0.04535941,0.8792455,0.001414333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.01013699,0.0002408767,0.0005938344,0.001393125,0.9739032,0.00164166,0.0002141659,0.0001182529,0.01175788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2459433,0.00002432111,0.0001068647,0.00007653656,0.7524962,0.0001810159,0.0006879325,0.00005350067,0.0004302523],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2358063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137503951","doi":"10.2189/asqu.53.4.655","title":"When Competence Is Irrelevant: The Role of Interpersonal Affect in Task-Related Ties","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":419,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Competence (human resources); Affect (linguistics); Feeling; Perception; Organizational behavior; Interpersonal relationship","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03285902203463769,"gpt":0.3468753780738802,"spread":0.3140163560392425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000987185,0.0001300151,0.0002123708,0.0001217301,0.0007341615,0.00004861363,0.0009086557,0.00008547897,0.0003958315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001379885,0.00009605821,0.00008952509,0.00084336,0.008275982,0.0005062568,0.00001706055,0.0002423047,0.00008395028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008308067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006305608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001895122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001919882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979882,0.0003020709,0.0003200928,0.0003574123,0.0005856358,0.0004465833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990817,0.0002919008,0.0001715617,0.0001906086,0.0001563414,0.0001079088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004383581,0.0001519191,0.02583131,0.000002169857,0.00001390579,0.00001261706,0.8799733,1.064389e-7,0.01269893,0.07361436,0.0004407626,0.007216794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006004066,0.003274218,0.2151104,0.00009648309,0.00001226609,0.00003768054,0.7161349,0.0002001867,0.003583397,0.05459082,0.005920344,0.0004388593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9093673,0.0001200542,0.00001667012,0.002367159,0.0003731113,0.0002254838,0.00001019013,0.00002494117,0.08749507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989488,0.00001291994,0.0000867577,0.0002705387,0.00005197012,0.00001748776,7.35835e-7,0.000004471278,0.0006063508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1892791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332088928","doi":"10.1177/0001839216639577","title":"Whitened Résumés","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":418,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Stanford Bio-X; University of Toronto; Harvard University","keywords":"Seekers; Diversity (politics); Transparency (behavior); Disadvantage; Audit; Racism; Racial diversity; Social psychology; Presentation (obstetrics); Equal employment opportunity; Inequality; Psychology; Sociology; Ethnic group; Political science; Economics; Law; Management; Gender studies; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1043334588649695,"gpt":0.4490576440112576,"spread":0.3447241851462881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001938218,0.0001051316,0.0001156067,0.0002321252,0.001490917,0.000470621,0.0008231516,0.00005263671,0.001602002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007384397,0.000073299,0.00005923174,0.00101764,0.004416353,0.001669575,0.00001697242,0.00007164801,0.0007135526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001825368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001952524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004569396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003154839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971218,0.0001950766,0.0002061558,0.0004464668,0.001388299,0.0006422059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984536,0.0002171206,0.00007728193,0.0002616167,0.0005706157,0.000419748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002860624,0.0002007584,0.01621531,0.000005900326,0.000008136797,0.00002490633,0.02896225,2.753044e-8,0.0234008,0.8202085,0.004540488,0.1064043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002882087,0.005148048,0.3136024,0.0001672489,0.00004187996,0.00001387089,0.2352922,0.00002338355,0.01838005,0.3068448,0.1158156,0.001788334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3551647,0.00003241871,0.002093804,0.02238969,0.0007392848,0.0004214767,0.00002557991,0.000147399,0.6189857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773057,0.00001011217,0.0002661927,0.000122853,0.0001597591,0.0000205342,6.740413e-7,0.000004917989,0.02210933],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6221409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154698993","doi":"10.1177/00018392211010118","title":"The Invisible Cage: Workers’ Reactivity to Opaque Algorithmic Evaluations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Third party; Work (physics); Computer science; Psychology; Business; Internet privacy; Public relations; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04394486010557001,"gpt":0.3843965281236131,"spread":0.3404516680180431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002297948,0.0001031803,0.0001034238,0.00006470841,0.002871288,0.001227693,0.0004631688,0.00004168377,0.00006866011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004100734,0.00008670343,0.00005615703,0.001633662,0.001109708,0.00215152,0.00001110629,0.0001357929,0.0002237375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001957531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003542402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002465785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008273833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981418,0.0002029847,0.0002381229,0.000339708,0.0006100272,0.0004673182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986118,0.0003504412,0.00007664046,0.000271857,0.0004108945,0.0002783872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002139849,0.0001467062,0.0009112023,0.00000314639,0.00001530077,0.00001204926,0.09301009,0.00001462807,0.0012684,0.2896497,0.001009101,0.6139383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006021773,0.001463615,0.05423237,0.0001093801,0.00003619504,0.00001930396,0.5873228,0.0003936556,0.01456919,0.0606844,0.2796496,0.0009172784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3476911,0.0000518489,0.007416766,0.03407243,0.0009284251,0.0008048484,0.00002688951,0.0001011445,0.6089066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963375,0.000005321605,0.0007188177,0.0002776021,0.00009297541,0.00006644535,0.000003962435,0.000003871505,0.002493514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6486464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912561681","doi":"10.1177/0001839219832310","title":"Explaining the Persistence of Gender Inequality: The Work–family Narrative as a Social Defense against the 24/7 Work Culture","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Harvard Business School","keywords":"Narrative; Status quo; Sociology; Inequality; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1766356355463901,"gpt":0.3444932746809684,"spread":0.1678576391345784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006476797,0.000243251,0.0002740405,0.00005017977,0.005438149,0.0004573809,0.002106028,0.0001255378,0.0001321117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004238129,0.0001269019,0.0002346761,0.002261775,0.006305176,0.0007776218,0.00008361111,0.0005531766,0.0001110701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000135328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001393949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002708262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002582286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950968,0.001771632,0.0003935094,0.0005660734,0.001477198,0.0006947651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975397,0.0007863201,0.0004430712,0.0005345878,0.0005547832,0.0001415557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007267595,0.00005700451,0.00345086,0.000005113441,0.00003683388,0.000002426004,0.9367705,0.000004486331,0.000383621,0.05716243,0.001010721,0.001043333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001881527,0.0003340243,0.03386887,0.00002268252,0.00002568382,8.85821e-7,0.9594603,0.000006842878,0.0000810745,0.002731091,0.003079987,0.000200411],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123414,0.00009228667,0.00006196749,0.008994983,0.0005604017,0.0006893188,0.00001612052,0.00003391778,0.07720961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963233,0.000008342796,0.0000602426,0.002173745,0.0001598718,0.00002393273,0.000002583534,0.000006329423,0.001241691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08398186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126885704","doi":"10.1177/0001839213475800","title":"Punctuated Generosity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Punctuated equilibrium; Context (archaeology); Generosity; Natural experiment; Politics; Community cohesion; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Political economy; History; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04759420767085416,"gpt":0.3602980079805334,"spread":0.3127038003096792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007794399,0.0001219948,0.0001223628,0.00009222152,0.001286692,0.0004987936,0.0005785393,0.00005231793,0.001129339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001245372,0.0001062325,0.00004773078,0.0008884148,0.001941638,0.001455647,0.00001060339,0.0001187338,0.0007027578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001256177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007393693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006226071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001899085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981155,0.00008947073,0.0001762042,0.0003753107,0.0006414612,0.0006019953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989685,0.00006910734,0.00006878791,0.0002163426,0.0003248269,0.0003524348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001822964,0.0002864255,0.06514655,0.00001340571,0.00002615549,0.0000192695,0.1871978,0.000001329624,0.3773865,0.2955661,0.002929735,0.07140855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000700066,0.002475485,0.7345008,0.00004725101,0.00002253229,0.000009737941,0.1936677,0.0005435431,0.0296934,0.02418895,0.012803,0.00134753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8960049,0.00001113781,0.0005453912,0.0008930227,0.0004136741,0.0003287465,0.000002464686,0.000125161,0.1016755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972159,0.00000105308,0.0007927866,0.0001620425,0.000161099,0.00003959856,0.000001048312,0.000005602941,0.001620925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6693543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125381863","doi":"10.2307/3556680","title":"Why Firms Want to Organize Efficiently and what Keeps Them from Doing So: Inappropriate Governance, Performance, and Adaptation in a Deregulated Industry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Transport and Economic Policies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Industrial organization; Transaction cost; Business; Adaptation (eye); Deregulation; Process (computing); Database transaction; Microeconomics; Economics; Market economy; Finance; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02152260236905314,"gpt":0.2229837759016413,"spread":0.2014611735325881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003654493,0.0001853085,0.0001943579,0.0001361429,0.000317924,0.001279309,0.0001755617,0.00007952967,0.00006531653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002351365,0.0001663738,0.00001526534,0.0007702543,0.0003591601,0.004312358,0.00001690199,0.0001673571,0.00003163357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004044271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001178053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007252506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001529002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986896,0.000008126371,0.0002955212,0.0004480749,0.0001875851,0.0003710777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995574,0.00002668664,0.0001587905,0.0001448063,0.00006419565,0.00004809718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003821536,0.0004590051,0.655297,0.0002238448,0.0000600484,0.00005380427,0.09158113,0.0004042533,0.01206428,0.05594001,0.0003982132,0.1831362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001265597,0.000223199,0.9225702,0.0003123925,0.00002414507,0.000009116791,0.05682752,0.00711558,0.001086857,0.001602848,0.008364932,0.0005976023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996896,0.00003614724,0.00008987292,0.0007341232,0.0002046656,0.0002302368,0.000003963877,0.00003042493,0.001774588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982061,0.00001222417,0.000480678,0.001175653,0.00006361755,0.00001219914,0.000004704706,0.00001062703,0.00003422506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2672731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848478910","doi":"10.2189/asqu.51.4.560","title":"Social Structure and Exchange: Self-confirming Dynamics in Hollywood","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":267,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social exchange theory; Hollywood; Preference; Promotion (chess); Microeconomics; Box office; Business; Industrial organization; Social media; Marketing; Economics; Advertising; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01246084094012466,"gpt":0.2554806801200944,"spread":0.2430198391799698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002135706,0.0001439919,0.0001321772,0.0002405926,0.0005306829,0.0004670363,0.0001997725,0.00003270678,0.00006684081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001528903,0.0001340595,0.00001673133,0.001070201,0.0002971678,0.001211099,0.00004460067,0.00007596624,0.00001333708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006698749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000346637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002410033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003954261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989042,0.000005598739,0.000180682,0.0003263626,0.0003052372,0.0002779332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999679,0.00001591747,0.000116367,0.00006802499,0.000112306,0.000008366435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001086688,0.00009070338,0.1819011,0.00009776636,0.000009534486,0.00002046704,0.001135158,0.000001267616,0.0003279138,0.8114313,0.000797031,0.004176916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008050347,0.00009618352,0.9115214,0.00002154897,0.0000345645,0.000003026404,0.01087377,0.004085283,0.00008082829,0.06836522,0.003587508,0.0005255931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9461204,0.00004351461,0.000142053,0.001820428,0.0001363978,0.0002350204,0.000005365257,0.00007909109,0.05141768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988615,6.018365e-7,0.0002715633,0.000238873,0.0004025624,0.000005807471,0.000015895,0.000007914233,0.0001953046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7430661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5466787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124152171","doi":"10.2189/asqu.53.1.73","title":"Can you have your Cake and Eat it too? Structural Holes' Influence on Status Accumulation and Market Performance in Collaborative Networks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cooperativeness; Business; Industrial organization; Investment (military); Structural equation modeling; Information sharing; Stylized fact; Structural holes; Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Social capital; Personality","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03722793309597468,"gpt":0.2932993400803494,"spread":0.2560714069843747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003423245,0.0002320781,0.000190703,0.0003054881,0.0006724508,0.0004512906,0.0001539714,0.00007422904,0.00002092122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007061609,0.0002065208,0.00001129786,0.001476713,0.001085638,0.003993454,0.00002260772,0.0002038048,0.000003206545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006285527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002128333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002679696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006032703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984222,0.0000186941,0.0003183824,0.0004881781,0.0003303991,0.000422166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990898,0.00003838628,0.0002380111,0.000155551,0.000443164,0.00003511675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003643369,0.00005174116,0.9627889,0.00006059003,0.000008948128,0.00003501881,0.004775142,0.001594232,0.0005674058,0.0182495,0.000114568,0.01138958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005216728,0.0002585163,0.9508361,0.00005393266,0.000005338115,0.000009368858,0.00470562,0.04269944,0.00006426637,0.0004137214,0.0001747984,0.0002572736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927307,0.00002061687,0.00004124688,0.0008560825,0.0001221332,0.0003267486,0.000008399172,0.00002672442,0.005867366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989892,0.00001424172,0.00008192885,0.0006751037,0.0001089683,0.00001863682,0.00001944765,0.000008575234,0.00008393168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0411052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8421672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760371630","doi":"10.1177/0001839217733972","title":"From Synchronizing to Harmonizing: The Process of Authenticating Multiple Work Identities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Identity (music); Work (physics); Process (computing); Sociology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Feeling; Social psychology; Authentication (law); Cognitive reframing; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2171126775835703,"gpt":0.395137144896645,"spread":0.1780244673130748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001751843,0.0001030832,0.0001483761,0.00005072267,0.004945141,0.0009342278,0.002051697,0.00003923934,0.00007681245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001242263,0.00008368624,0.00005691775,0.0003332648,0.003224884,0.001249797,0.00006070809,0.0001179298,0.00004605552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006510929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006602523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003104176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001224952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980974,0.0001252602,0.0002272562,0.0003617456,0.0007934365,0.0003949602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983838,0.0002416615,0.0003290188,0.0005324532,0.0003367863,0.0001763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002140192,0.00006852667,0.04718275,0.00001034681,0.00001744589,0.000003480179,0.9308682,0.000001783053,0.002271608,0.01374878,0.0001132673,0.005692418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001752365,0.0002444758,0.1453225,0.00008807595,0.00002213081,2.709569e-7,0.8334362,0.00006182932,0.007412671,0.01279465,0.0002254768,0.0002164695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814286,0.00001407938,0.000788157,0.003254,0.0003871523,0.0002658632,0.00002296112,0.00002629349,0.01381286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988438,7.613758e-7,0.0006012667,0.00006760437,0.0001337149,0.00001048884,8.243988e-7,0.000003341972,0.000338203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09813979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126038992","doi":"10.1177/0001839214554990","title":"The Contaminating Effects of Building Instrumental Ties","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"Carnegie Mellon University; Harvard Business School","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Friendship; Social psychology; Morality; Power (physics); Interpersonal ties; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01450725039644686,"gpt":0.3656717641509928,"spread":0.351164513754546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001538059,0.00008251881,0.0001231182,0.00004713787,0.001619451,0.0001413494,0.0005812147,0.00004362313,0.00001362556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006915004,0.00005978304,0.00005031918,0.000407028,0.00475134,0.0003779327,0.00001213722,0.0001020898,0.000007773063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005978561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002079299,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005439734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998502,0.0002720138,0.0002055264,0.0002136455,0.0004366571,0.0003701345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985924,0.0008710765,0.0001682564,0.0001326172,0.0001367575,0.00009889203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001056846,0.00003840264,0.001926942,0.000005603187,0.000007487928,8.42552e-7,0.06379509,2.148944e-8,0.02945999,0.7717844,0.00006606171,0.1329046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001419469,0.01199059,0.1194755,0.0002191683,0.00003565959,0.000008266579,0.6582983,0.000201812,0.08612762,0.09843014,0.02305046,0.0007430577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9299752,0.00002289536,0.00052822,0.0008322644,0.001096709,0.0001716605,7.458351e-7,0.00002592494,0.06734636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991481,0.000002691813,0.0002512402,0.00009958784,0.0001404674,0.00001560259,1.556957e-7,0.000003194462,0.000338939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6733542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185378072","doi":"10.2307/3094844","title":"ASQ Forum","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05801109120079501,"gpt":0.3712576098599271,"spread":0.3132465186591321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008664308,0.0001112574,0.0001205456,0.00007260281,0.001767999,0.000166318,0.000601323,0.0001020624,0.001231178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002086288,0.0001037952,0.00006545465,0.0007000534,0.00515105,0.0009058134,0.000008739061,0.0001557199,0.0008458083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009651391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002530882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000170244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000598778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980986,0.0001578862,0.0001708029,0.0003715973,0.0005360489,0.0006651091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991278,0.0001205215,0.00007759115,0.0002061954,0.0001838438,0.0002840725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003510039,0.00008012874,0.002729751,0.000001168201,0.000005655574,0.0000179132,0.09883366,6.123898e-8,0.0003437463,0.8778265,0.005893886,0.01426409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006631637,0.003522486,0.0177611,0.0000275027,0.00002326095,0.00002123747,0.6062056,0.000092242,0.0005420956,0.1559795,0.2142161,0.0009457459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3185363,0.0002712437,0.00007333919,0.01646357,0.0007164601,0.000221877,0.00001208952,0.0001297809,0.6635753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943249,0.00001225907,0.0002686044,0.0009582912,0.0001553129,0.00001185185,9.349756e-7,0.000003499099,0.004264321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045607848","doi":"10.2307/2666982","title":"Culture and Procedural Fairness: When the Effects of What You Do Depend on How You Do it","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Psychology; Social psychology; Outcome (game theory); Self construal; Proxy (statistics); Social exchange theory; Construals; Construal level theory; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03752556955264463,"gpt":0.3511167034453518,"spread":0.3135911338927072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002504932,0.0002534702,0.0002446268,0.00004668018,0.0003606575,0.0007504018,0.0005558773,0.00009249804,0.0005255989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004474084,0.0001341915,0.00007173726,0.0003184854,0.001139196,0.0009627875,0.00001057356,0.0002127505,0.0000617804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001880742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007632312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003683964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007255816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981956,0.0001312957,0.0002025816,0.0006145295,0.0004480405,0.0004079639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991044,0.0001400578,0.0001344466,0.0003566341,0.0001181021,0.0001463331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003890754,0.000425866,0.002330592,0.0001264979,0.00009980125,0.0000556844,0.5907702,3.177771e-7,0.01249025,0.05122461,0.006940088,0.335147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002396174,0.02928966,0.2071147,0.0009247455,0.0001354341,0.000255651,0.7219763,0.00004710381,0.008526895,0.01821314,0.01000252,0.001117698],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.985521,0.0005464021,0.000005523117,0.004459405,0.0003955875,0.000522612,0.00001330173,0.00002460808,0.008511583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921579,0.00004017011,0.00004143778,0.0004466244,0.00008637198,0.00005518287,0.000003309686,0.000007066595,0.007161964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3340293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7236142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140296865","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2011.56.1.001","title":"The Ethical Dangers of Deliberative Decision Making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Framing (construction); Ethical decision; Psychology; Normative; Deception; Social psychology; Altruism (biology); Embodied cognition; Feeling; Epistemology; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2032803987374313,"gpt":0.3809952807632362,"spread":0.1777148820258048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008603047,0.0001189809,0.0001163864,0.00006850364,0.0007005041,0.00005463445,0.0007743891,0.00006932565,0.0000740166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004222112,0.00007328803,0.00005826076,0.0004997387,0.003910132,0.0002895866,0.00002373123,0.0003006352,0.00006761551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002853314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000197099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004358785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001617422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981529,0.0001390535,0.000293862,0.0004466117,0.0006346699,0.0003329118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986673,0.0006739825,0.0001584479,0.0002725729,0.000125938,0.0001017569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006397564,0.0003548572,0.0005086748,0.000005004714,0.000008818882,0.00006078088,0.02792412,0.000001498713,0.3207415,0.4890333,0.0007120594,0.1600096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008021345,0.0093659,0.1060386,0.0001669002,0.00001819794,0.0001875304,0.01378129,0.0004775316,0.5855579,0.2821575,0.0008806405,0.0005659395],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9479818,0.00001382163,0.002559085,0.001484026,0.0006059016,0.0002016026,0.000008974504,0.00002733653,0.04711744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963402,0.000002804441,0.002590194,0.0009527723,0.00002150642,0.00001195763,1.258939e-7,0.000003901134,0.0000765786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2648164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098551983","doi":"10.1177/0001839215576401","title":"Concealable Stigma and Occupational Segregation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Lesbian; Stigma (botany); Psychology; Independence (probability theory); Social psychology; Occupational segregation; Social stigma; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1527958952661586,"gpt":0.4591924982008606,"spread":0.306396602934702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000700996,0.0001138764,0.000117117,0.0001284852,0.000349125,0.0001628881,0.0002091425,0.000057878,0.0002144835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008226888,0.00010576,0.00001778461,0.0004388253,0.001074602,0.0006540359,0.000007827703,0.0001097895,0.0004231114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007265098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001194236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001253412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002700772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985508,0.0000977354,0.000219045,0.0003849513,0.0003896323,0.0003578742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989049,0.00007982246,0.0001160901,0.0002188225,0.0002854472,0.0003949148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000207462,0.0002728819,0.3252647,0.0000568466,0.00002266186,0.00003400582,0.03876765,8.329515e-7,0.0006479131,0.5627643,0.03819255,0.03376815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001280806,0.003598309,0.9475928,0.000008615943,0.00002206615,0.0001065971,0.01119686,0.0001248046,0.00008885519,0.03275507,0.002901497,0.0003237069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9070141,0.0001357323,0.0002431062,0.001718879,0.000763734,0.0002041183,0.00003001019,0.00004402215,0.08984633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941717,0.000001881488,0.0004165004,0.0003355333,0.0001578612,0.00002105242,0.000008615453,0.000005430335,0.004881375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6223281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5438382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938815745","doi":"10.1177/0001839219844175","title":"Duality in Diversity: How Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Cultural Heterogeneity Relate to Firm Performance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intrapersonal communication; Interpersonal communication; Creativity; Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Profitability index; Social psychology; Psychology; Interpersonal relationship; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03827997114467472,"gpt":0.2824178614854093,"spread":0.2441378903407346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006714303,0.0001613142,0.0001532091,0.0003002601,0.0003549349,0.0005153687,0.0003259479,0.00003274142,0.00006842718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002743344,0.0001407293,0.00002974996,0.001056798,0.0002778959,0.002209316,0.0001866934,0.000140485,0.0002668769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007364419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003734241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003545998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002115398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986344,0.0000113071,0.0001669863,0.0004725581,0.0003776872,0.0003370892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995178,0.00001391845,0.00009575734,0.0001450919,0.0001959026,0.00003154637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002059176,0.0001864746,0.8184654,0.0002010592,0.0000251652,0.00002011808,0.01200002,0.000001793991,0.004504882,0.1430481,0.0003980904,0.020943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00111491,0.0006068089,0.949403,0.0001159437,0.00001428573,0.00000657836,0.03719904,0.005596834,0.0003524184,0.0005481633,0.004421777,0.0006202342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.957364,0.000004315504,0.00001842311,0.002136496,0.0003295958,0.0002986297,0.000002156876,0.00003128375,0.03981515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976957,4.196833e-7,0.0001207953,0.00155136,0.00009047567,0.000008846985,0.000004783827,0.00000446623,0.0005231411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5738773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123734257","doi":"10.1177/0001839215589813","title":"Place and Institutional Work","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Accommodation; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Public relations; Qualitative research; Process (computing); Political science; Social science; Geography; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04779860323548296,"gpt":0.2727015033691405,"spread":0.2249029001336575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003814193,0.000098579,0.00007988485,0.0001284316,0.0004336009,0.0004374392,0.0001919264,0.00001462171,0.00006029782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001110737,0.00008342481,0.00001127254,0.0009773454,0.0006740376,0.001721742,0.00004706887,0.00004385802,0.0002451135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002652049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001036773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002823724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004575165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990564,0.000003228062,0.0001152123,0.0002507248,0.0003920118,0.0001824078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995807,0.00001571242,0.00006665811,0.0000816608,0.0002270802,0.00002820832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004200776,0.0000730064,0.06927576,0.00002048189,0.00001327412,0.0000160458,0.001097985,0.00001138465,0.00007795039,0.9116079,0.01081918,0.006944988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001938192,0.0004575108,0.6692902,0.0000790475,0.00006661852,0.00001203392,0.02456036,0.001756659,0.00009059469,0.07456744,0.2261047,0.001076636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6858141,0.0001528388,0.002014073,0.004209491,0.0006332477,0.0002773216,0.00000186541,0.0001364457,0.3067606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976997,5.241916e-7,0.0006403968,0.000723335,0.0002893202,0.000006756629,0.000004436823,0.000003772265,0.0006317713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8370405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4218236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618376294","doi":"10.1177/0001839217712240","title":"The Acquisitive Nature of Extraverted CEOs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Extraversion and introversion; Psychology; Personality; Social psychology; Assertiveness; Big Five personality traits; Trait; Affect (linguistics); Discretion; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02384392322257879,"gpt":0.2933537200628461,"spread":0.2695097968402673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005234535,0.0001365193,0.0001407034,0.00005075791,0.001782685,0.0008580537,0.00135418,0.00005381489,0.00002876535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002171112,0.00009199217,0.00005928937,0.0003101066,0.001809535,0.002657927,0.00003966536,0.0001775967,0.00008348816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001675971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001877594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001638837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000346284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987021,0.000005418123,0.0002052611,0.0003205368,0.0004574779,0.0003091978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980628,0.00005182028,0.0007534751,0.0006646171,0.0004524758,0.00001481507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002121794,0.0001444751,0.04872538,0.00004249755,0.00002783714,0.00007235057,0.0007664119,0.000001069749,0.01461993,0.8643692,0.003127231,0.0678914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003388691,0.0001595343,0.9732916,0.00005136496,0.00001325917,0.000002728073,0.001564598,0.0003306773,0.002065807,0.009081823,0.01290661,0.0001931801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323984,0.00005214336,0.0001764154,0.003482461,0.0007380809,0.0002496584,0.0000160054,0.00002586692,0.06286096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987208,0.000002581621,0.00003708051,0.0003457754,0.0002575698,0.00001020846,0.000001241205,0.00000596658,0.0006187485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9245661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993954029","doi":"10.1177/0001839214560743","title":"To Hive or to Hold? Producing Professional Authority through Scut Work","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Jurisdiction; Bureaucracy; Deference; Work (physics); Identity (music); Task (project management); Relevance (law); Business; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Management; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04508583923096362,"gpt":0.3185180352835953,"spread":0.2734321960526317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008932361,0.0002284248,0.0002120209,0.0002186894,0.001119839,0.0006117927,0.0006342027,0.00002972265,0.0003531009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006401058,0.0001693392,0.00003541919,0.003165365,0.0002352297,0.001784038,0.0001640598,0.0001059289,0.001181177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005088753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001130391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006479004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002249675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976904,0.00001853568,0.0002846288,0.0007574256,0.0007533958,0.0004955666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990011,0.00006753983,0.0001374218,0.0002968567,0.0004413864,0.0000556934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005228943,0.0006417013,0.0855535,0.0002413591,0.0000662777,0.00002593015,0.02439097,0.00006150456,0.003229466,0.7277108,0.1263639,0.03119169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007162105,0.001191029,0.7871165,0.0003809072,0.00006834342,0.000002038001,0.01866134,0.0002979305,0.0008713579,0.02626638,0.1630271,0.001400869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.832423,0.00001362829,0.02125977,0.03612257,0.002981273,0.00222028,0.000006934715,0.0003838053,0.1045888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843543,1.443592e-7,0.004742085,0.004941909,0.001060449,0.0000681711,0.000006357136,0.00001478935,0.004811752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.701563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069347445","doi":"10.1177/0001839212447181","title":"Falling Flat","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Upstream (networking); Downstream (manufacturing); Possession (linguistics); Industrial organization; Business; Emerging technologies; Competition (biology); Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2002138491875469,"gpt":0.4676306115140297,"spread":0.2674167623264828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004680084,0.0001206101,0.0001425128,0.0002045677,0.0008413089,0.0003940521,0.001031155,0.00003680203,0.0008095725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005576084,0.00008779841,0.00007099075,0.001917924,0.001245529,0.002296423,0.00001929035,0.0001248519,0.003317411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003608309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000206931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002652028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004120947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973088,0.0001108733,0.0004254195,0.0004442458,0.001224683,0.0004859792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979599,0.0005510123,0.000201183,0.0005890612,0.0003112544,0.0003876202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001552957,0.0001246944,0.007057881,8.002987e-7,0.000004918472,0.000001235929,0.01484099,0.000003668024,0.04143324,0.8413556,0.001018846,0.09414257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004811053,0.001382033,0.1039366,0.00001599576,0.00002235955,0.0001457569,0.1436482,0.0007310672,0.1005992,0.5687513,0.07929344,0.0009928803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8751286,0.00003839851,0.03907313,0.001229073,0.0007115534,0.0001942538,0.00001106571,0.00007765583,0.08353625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951646,2.66932e-7,0.002005107,0.000197258,0.0002061609,0.00002330052,8.021796e-7,0.000004292714,0.002398151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2726043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315717040","doi":"10.1177/0001839216644253","title":"How Cinderella Became a Queen","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Allusion; Sociology; Resistance (ecology); Product (mathematics); Object (grammar); Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Subcategory; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; History; Computer science; Literature; Art; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02605036762239028,"gpt":0.2522963641508535,"spread":0.2262459965284633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002866737,0.0001654572,0.0001327972,0.0002052672,0.0004893825,0.0008113342,0.0004623326,0.00002426232,0.0003323676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001359583,0.0001042683,0.00004066488,0.0009328485,0.0006055539,0.002756596,0.00005368992,0.00003969112,0.0005619696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003705403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006158504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003737825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008649641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998547,0.000005480387,0.0001486986,0.0004208267,0.0005156753,0.0003622802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992934,0.00004319721,0.0001474883,0.0002014814,0.0002913011,0.00002309001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002011073,0.00008720325,0.03272187,0.00003143072,0.00002739034,0.00001708682,0.0003400289,9.734141e-8,0.006104804,0.9260712,0.01103836,0.02354047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002515337,0.0008341662,0.4177705,0.0002075422,0.0001190242,0.000006305258,0.01976794,0.0001406257,0.003558259,0.185902,0.3672357,0.001942557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3563212,0.00008544371,0.02487653,0.144021,0.001616539,0.001197369,0.00001697121,0.0006773325,0.4711877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991069,0.000001530646,0.0002206148,0.0008592063,0.0004834758,0.00001359159,0.00000202377,0.00001050862,0.007340039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7401692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7823715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054837157","doi":"10.2307/3556618","title":"It's All in the Name: Failure-Induced Learning by Multiunit Chains","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Component (thermodynamics); Standardization; Investment (military); Knowledge management; Business; Organizational learning; Chain (unit); Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05399375661203395,"gpt":0.3023876095679247,"spread":0.2483938529558908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001119844,0.0002009917,0.0001803825,0.0001299209,0.0007370189,0.0007568298,0.0004872185,0.00003591008,0.0001569355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002358408,0.0001490966,0.00004795562,0.0007572024,0.0003527033,0.001477205,0.00002112749,0.0002757271,0.0002234184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005129549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000951043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001679726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001827396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985051,0.00004287916,0.000271951,0.0004346189,0.0002456218,0.0004997869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994009,0.00009085242,0.0001501365,0.0002060028,0.0001312866,0.00002087644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008792691,0.001383865,0.05209719,0.0001009401,0.0001238237,0.0001309177,0.116656,0.0001266643,0.02906463,0.7274108,0.03519767,0.03761958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00140537,0.0008302538,0.01231956,0.00003979059,0.00002692002,0.00001206678,0.3851671,0.004177636,0.0005543122,0.001062229,0.5934662,0.0009385424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9210884,0.00002686913,0.0000899498,0.006879714,0.0002013564,0.0003303919,0.000001994738,0.00003119649,0.07135014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967169,0.000002395073,0.00006639671,0.002732017,0.0001073704,0.00003912187,0.000005446131,0.000009225007,0.0003211047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7263485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7298127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160344757","doi":"10.1177/0001839214523603","title":"When Does Prior Experience Pay? Institutional Experience and the Multinational Corporation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Internationalization; Experiential learning; Foreign direct investment; Business; Affect (linguistics); Investment (military); Institutional theory; Economics; Marketing; International trade; Finance; Political science; Sociology; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02178401121413357,"gpt":0.2789936920318429,"spread":0.2572096808177093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006616393,0.0001485021,0.0001225425,0.0001335301,0.001086758,0.0009841423,0.0004523383,0.00002858829,0.0001321675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003673616,0.00007715123,0.00003472887,0.0003479997,0.002901769,0.003769901,0.00004466531,0.00009348914,0.00005206046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002898811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001170517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002399016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009116478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99844,0.00001663233,0.0002629271,0.0003999261,0.0006646092,0.0002158808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998921,0.0001052725,0.0002399164,0.0001665927,0.0005452298,0.00002194204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007056705,0.00003856904,0.005582216,0.000007844481,0.00000265652,0.000001675049,0.003363609,0.000003717142,0.00153126,0.9802989,0.00003238498,0.009066571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003774504,0.0002154987,0.6321433,0.0001028504,0.00002805842,0.00003923031,0.01564953,0.1160193,0.001120758,0.1872221,0.0427796,0.0009051784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654156,0.000006835236,0.01221738,0.005625579,0.0008660483,0.0003358067,0.00000451593,0.00005250889,0.01547573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968957,5.135978e-7,0.0007270398,0.001426326,0.0005148287,0.0001001849,0.000009369565,0.000004776443,0.0003212869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7930768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529640113","doi":"10.1177/0001839216687743","title":"Not All Sparks Light a Fire: Stakeholder and Shareholder Reactions to Critical Events in Contested Markets","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Shareholder; Stakeholder; Business; Opposition (politics); Politics; Corporate social responsibility; Corporate governance; Event study; Stakeholder engagement; Shareholder value; Critical mass (sociodynamics); Stakeholder theory; Stakeholder analysis; Public relations; Economics; Accounting; Finance; Political science; Microeconomics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1372759915079673,"gpt":0.3689447118980858,"spread":0.2316687203901184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001849793,0.0002024863,0.000245716,0.0002002593,0.0009125292,0.001163921,0.000495245,0.00006473489,0.00008532822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00571114,0.0001980438,0.00004411848,0.0004525351,0.0005629637,0.003402096,0.0001023676,0.0002090865,0.00006523753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008252924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000266831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005890844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001551459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976981,0.00003099414,0.0004942875,0.0007203287,0.0005343689,0.0005218898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983895,0.0001980433,0.0003757127,0.0005528393,0.0003884192,0.00009550933],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00128893,0.001612014,0.6750649,0.0004121202,0.00006784032,0.001160141,0.01287767,0.000002019337,0.148535,0.04969794,0.001673303,0.1076081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003831104,0.0001682622,0.9891276,0.0001414402,0.00001529203,0.00001124803,0.003337458,0.0003900897,0.0003180712,0.003549404,0.002239775,0.0003182849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785375,0.000005512468,0.00003778309,0.01194365,0.0003136632,0.0004768472,0.000006074565,0.00004382879,0.00863515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983179,2.344899e-7,0.0001476136,0.0008446549,0.0001555309,0.00004627109,0.000002569877,0.00001273915,0.0004725066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3140627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138792223","doi":"10.1177/0001839214549042","title":"Imprint–environment Fit and Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Imprinting (psychology); Psychology; Core (optical fiber); Resource (disambiguation); Social psychology; Business; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02971660357635197,"gpt":0.2493571018375177,"spread":0.2196404982611658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005208233,0.0001257351,0.00009798165,0.0001351553,0.0004094221,0.0003944315,0.0002046123,0.00003073493,0.0001167459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002321673,0.0001081911,0.00001406084,0.0004707258,0.0005837834,0.002622284,0.0000218378,0.00008501906,0.000239585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001517647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003493968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002352643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005725002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989907,0.000004278669,0.000175722,0.0003274102,0.0002535864,0.0002482902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995713,0.00001339361,0.000125943,0.0001755852,0.00009747101,0.00001637128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006171953,0.0001564198,0.05273146,0.0001308044,0.000008745948,0.000002772625,0.0004577215,0.00001910051,0.01661155,0.6428374,0.0002017116,0.2867806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004811068,0.0005524512,0.9517453,0.00003402724,0.00001550341,0.000008260751,0.001095752,0.02246452,0.001298532,0.006577215,0.01527745,0.0004499326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9598731,0.000004293801,0.001022121,0.0009640658,0.000154917,0.0001077597,4.194887e-7,0.00004260893,0.03783073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987376,0.000001055536,0.0003024574,0.000596186,0.0002269123,0.00001173572,0.000002798866,0.000005747823,0.0001154507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8990138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4411905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141068531","doi":"10.1177/0001839214545277","title":"Portfolios of Political Ties and Business Group Strategy in Emerging Economies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Legislature; Politics; Government (linguistics); Market economy; Business; Diversification (marketing strategy); Portfolio; Emerging markets; Corporate group; Political economy; Economics; Corporate governance; Finance; Political science; Marketing; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03006241674694108,"gpt":0.2854573352428914,"spread":0.2553949184959503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005065192,0.0001797884,0.0002671928,0.0003553228,0.0001417742,0.0003959052,0.0002843199,0.00004702104,0.00003670458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007574593,0.0001591953,0.00002853351,0.0007727555,0.001726043,0.002831485,0.00002903808,0.0001035709,0.00002070026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002077519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001491735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001253032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004461397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984321,0.00001364738,0.0004008281,0.0003658956,0.0002216363,0.0005658999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993355,0.00006090346,0.0001672838,0.0001784154,0.0002080936,0.00004980783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001310136,0.00004232506,0.0151052,0.00005781052,0.000002579489,0.000004755211,0.0000953393,0.000006603801,0.001195253,0.9809911,0.00001062424,0.002475287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005883187,0.0004546842,0.6044616,0.0001189134,0.0000214869,0.00001362131,0.02803833,0.003450319,0.0006862595,0.3611916,0.0004371112,0.0005377583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9105238,0.00001613989,0.0001346643,0.0003946047,0.00008080445,0.0001022128,0.000002749981,0.00002864164,0.08871637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993112,0.000001000344,0.0001004987,0.0003687168,0.0001635114,0.00001124584,0.00000321138,0.000007065108,0.00003353475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6197995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6491796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921205889","doi":"10.1177/0001839219836670","title":"Organizational Structure from Interaction: Evidence from Corporate Sustainability Efforts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational field; Situational ethics; Politics; Structuring; Organizational structure; Sustainability; Organizational studies; Organizational learning; Knowledge management; Public relations; Sociology; Organization development; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Institutional theory; Computer science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02785815366708364,"gpt":0.2713865906489922,"spread":0.2435284369819086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000234582,0.0002248616,0.0002051786,0.0001508737,0.0004556206,0.0008173211,0.0005415336,0.00004360205,0.005858405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002511977,0.0001965542,0.00003803396,0.001469049,0.0003613445,0.00397772,0.0001031239,0.0001269409,0.0006180843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001386258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002271505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006207314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004558723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980049,0.00001455443,0.0003081651,0.0006995152,0.0006869226,0.0002859487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980388,0.0001462318,0.0004194668,0.0003233814,0.001044679,0.00002749835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008487191,0.00008351208,0.915419,0.00005136,0.00004907031,0.00001417086,0.001198712,0.00003185541,0.004812686,0.0757461,0.001159158,0.001349463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004062301,0.0001424136,0.7294253,0.00008517905,0.00005521164,8.362488e-7,0.009300942,0.002169164,0.001006666,0.2548091,0.002077343,0.000521611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915076,0.00003855144,0.0008335354,0.001657112,0.0009662206,0.0004331661,0.00002748235,0.00009597965,0.004440283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978293,9.426853e-7,0.0004080447,0.0006393762,0.0006231419,0.000006404322,0.0001302497,0.00001367087,0.0003488313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1859938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169034499","doi":"10.1177/0001839212466521","title":"Fatherhood and Managerial Style","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Harvard Kennedy School; Aalborg Universitet; Louisiana State University; Northwestern University; National University of Singapore; York University; George Mason University","keywords":"Daughter; Psychology; Generosity; Chief executive officer; Parental leave; Danish; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Labour economics; Economics; Management; Political science; Work (physics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1162848514773334,"gpt":0.3594331716771714,"spread":0.2431483201998379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001750619,0.00007989186,0.00009001977,0.00005743482,0.001185762,0.0002077461,0.0002839501,0.00004237481,0.0002336895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008163062,0.00007666779,0.00002593301,0.000359702,0.001782978,0.001572114,0.00001661134,0.00007444305,0.00009223812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004911552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002342673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003233755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002352934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985762,0.000144066,0.0001048486,0.0002200827,0.0004521951,0.0005025876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993332,0.00005541039,0.00005780066,0.0001280233,0.00007226824,0.0003532859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001662892,0.0001574555,0.01816068,0.000005431182,0.000008774213,0.000002603977,0.4442585,2.235697e-8,0.001382463,0.5198189,0.0002734838,0.01591502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004249846,0.0008536573,0.1639916,0.000008272042,0.00002089282,0.000003963001,0.8009287,0.000007510708,0.0008544375,0.006925391,0.02556975,0.0004108553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8379054,0.00003490362,0.0002701883,0.001073326,0.0004848013,0.0001532577,0.000008295302,0.0000456689,0.1600242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985502,0.000003064744,0.0004605977,0.0001322999,0.0002108316,0.00000314434,6.780328e-7,0.000002117859,0.000637014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5128935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9120043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922276896","doi":"10.1177/0001839218817520","title":"What Is Dead May Never Die: Institutional Regeneration through Logic Reemergence in Dutch Beer Brewing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Craft; Brewing; Context (archaeology); German; Industrial Revolution; Sociology; History; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06934967247341396,"gpt":0.3289185787111033,"spread":0.2595689062376894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006249429,0.0002079794,0.0001582509,0.0001819374,0.000728939,0.000883628,0.0004711346,0.00009758933,0.0005767044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000687546,0.0001862177,0.00004737297,0.001250736,0.001077976,0.01706807,0.00004168411,0.0002059113,0.0005491463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000646012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002629031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000378722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002273287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979854,0.000018052,0.000363226,0.0006186201,0.0005553877,0.0004592792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991322,0.0000231435,0.0001794959,0.0002792494,0.0003582671,0.0000276091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002830688,0.001158243,0.04420358,0.0001512921,0.00006394997,0.0005672928,0.02344363,0.0001158802,0.04387235,0.7772952,0.05241669,0.05642883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003309577,0.002127043,0.2850129,0.001122569,0.0001128486,0.0001101723,0.04599107,0.01698299,0.04801895,0.2149906,0.3786091,0.003612132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9294693,0.0000668877,0.002139227,0.03378405,0.002704584,0.0003502945,0.000004354084,0.00007802554,0.03140321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905509,0.000002735809,0.0006408138,0.00421102,0.003542519,0.00002130445,0.00001106843,0.000007688431,0.001011987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5623046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157263331","doi":"10.1177/0001839215571125","title":"Marks of Distinction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Identity and Reputation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Novelty; Public relations; Framing effect; Sociology; Media studies; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07092482277787719,"gpt":0.2973860814538756,"spread":0.2264612586759984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006390121,0.00006820101,0.00008636096,0.0001308565,0.0001404637,0.0002261496,0.0001758801,0.00002060835,0.00004372855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097869,0.00005940143,0.00002641403,0.0008587335,0.0004186318,0.002196123,0.00001336271,0.00004485433,0.0001303283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002347369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000180462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002262128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002132798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991096,0.00000581496,0.0001809742,0.0001844842,0.0003712901,0.0001477875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991575,0.00001161561,0.0002261179,0.000114679,0.0004706913,0.00001941725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003179241,0.0006406731,0.09283078,0.0001993893,0.00002974465,0.00004582424,0.003682912,0.0002165988,0.01974218,0.7918127,0.007453775,0.08302753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001964545,0.001736024,0.5759525,0.0001297962,0.0001087353,0.00002693849,0.04451403,0.01507315,0.002721507,0.3419382,0.01486046,0.0009741384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9194764,0.000006956406,0.002464081,0.0004150522,0.0006487736,0.0001259533,0.000001295467,0.00004046119,0.07682102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999204,5.737566e-8,0.0002288078,0.00007680877,0.0002495453,0.000004039035,0.000006234271,0.000003100402,0.0002273852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4831217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.242232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768254789","doi":"10.1177/0001839217744555","title":"Field Expansion and Contraction: How Communities Shape Social and Symbolic Boundaries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Identity (music); The Symbolic; Symbolic capital; Symbolic power; Boundary-work; Sociology; Social identity theory; Politics; Social group; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Law; Physics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04894194024033163,"gpt":0.3004390950046286,"spread":0.251497154764297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002382904,0.0001171049,0.0001285728,0.0000800015,0.00675177,0.00562509,0.0002570583,0.00002686749,0.00007389303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008685818,0.0001029622,0.00001472289,0.00009991293,0.001951248,0.003143743,0.00009769262,0.00007559503,0.000008130725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007596286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003561776,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003017457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000872264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993173,0.000006038277,0.00009234963,0.0001778759,0.0002288521,0.0001775907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994747,0.00004247356,0.0001672031,0.0001362753,0.0001663164,0.00001301649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007600294,0.00007023382,0.1579868,0.0001320834,0.00004388958,0.00001196896,0.009693898,2.172889e-8,0.0008572476,0.7777895,0.004816878,0.04852145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004614971,0.0002259439,0.9119631,0.00003189691,0.00003994349,0.000003378553,0.05636879,0.0005861755,0.0000940285,0.01235566,0.01756283,0.0003067528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611516,0.00005717661,0.0001277428,0.0165568,0.0002619608,0.0001447273,0.000002073412,0.0000405815,0.02165731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985497,0.000008403272,0.00006330497,0.0007451451,0.0003336589,0.000007776832,0.000003023744,0.000004789643,0.0002841907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7654338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778734562","doi":"10.1177/0001839217750856","title":"More and Less Effective Updating: The Role of Trajectory Management in Making Sense Again","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sensemaking; Process (computing); Computer science; Event (particle physics); Test (biology); Trajectory; Cognitive psychology; Work (physics); Psychology; Unexpected events; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02557270114756753,"gpt":0.3697502444296595,"spread":0.344177543282092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008314049,0.0001157318,0.0001374151,0.00009015344,0.0004274429,0.0001183008,0.0004223172,0.00003384756,0.00001376881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001509915,0.00008525679,0.00002605364,0.0001368025,0.001418333,0.0002486949,0.00002943467,0.0001498289,0.000005009375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002584682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004076046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001114956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002647262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989336,0.00007568089,0.0001868259,0.0003422699,0.0001935179,0.0002681741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990983,0.00008655376,0.0002242541,0.0005121009,0.00003814735,0.00004067129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001594483,0.0001891014,0.1046458,0.00003191777,0.00005004063,0.00009796416,0.1201352,0.000004198893,0.003567368,0.1824804,0.00001059788,0.588628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003313386,0.0005618458,0.8977894,0.00004357496,0.000007654527,0.00001646152,0.09798703,0.001183264,0.0002554666,0.001618622,0.00008859079,0.0001168052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9413279,0.00004726277,0.00004925601,0.0001981146,0.0001579134,0.000353899,0.00001007066,0.000007319821,0.05784826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995571,0.000001404122,0.0002159544,0.00004701746,0.00002046752,0.00004746875,5.878064e-7,0.000005413726,0.0001046237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7931436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5225906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168716590","doi":"10.1177/0001839213504403","title":"Whose Jobs Are These? The Impact of the Proportion of Female Managers on the Number of New Management Jobs Filled by Women versus Men","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Sample (material); Demographic economics; Inequality; Work (physics); Business; Point (geometry); Sociology; Economics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09454260233042987,"gpt":0.3621154520954224,"spread":0.2675728497649925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00175065,0.0001291854,0.0001836241,0.00003452319,0.0005627826,0.00009023501,0.001217707,0.00004185346,0.000748579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001335625,0.0000620053,0.0001480882,0.0008005903,0.002303705,0.0005104109,0.00004717483,0.0001169844,0.00002893798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001586288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003893591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004071654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001528028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976489,0.0003561444,0.0002929577,0.0002516162,0.001093672,0.0003567247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984329,0.0001955199,0.000546584,0.0004793007,0.0002339319,0.0001117537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004172463,0.0008095973,0.07778127,0.00006391798,0.0004365408,0.000002227883,0.7243995,0.00002056407,0.00260739,0.1675213,0.01618211,0.009758354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004154702,0.0009631469,0.3833662,0.00003391827,0.00002535537,1.907379e-7,0.6067305,0.00002144195,0.001777092,0.006332427,0.0002138766,0.0001204074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318525,0.000004779725,0.00001879447,0.002951097,0.0001049612,0.000783718,0.00002461099,0.000007609345,0.06425199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976713,0.000005138691,0.00002867771,0.00004468756,0.00001661404,0.00002155032,6.907512e-7,0.000003025032,0.002208331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.305585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8488097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918609758","doi":"10.1177/0001839219835867","title":"Gender Gaps in Perceived Start-up Ease: Implications of Sex-based Labor Market Segregation for Entrepreneurship across 22 European Countries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Seventh Framework Programme; University of Alberta","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Salary; Wage; Order (exchange); Labour economics; Differential (mechanical device); Economics; Perception; Demographic economics; Psychology; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03462204111786917,"gpt":0.3089187167376968,"spread":0.2742966756198276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001057171,0.0002094657,0.0002424482,0.0001695903,0.0003282255,0.0003600754,0.0005083008,0.00003350911,0.0002611296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001496076,0.0001881173,0.00007637934,0.0007801526,0.0005915556,0.001441494,0.00003112104,0.00008554266,0.00006182104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004288238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001808241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008697194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002651743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980617,0.0000452655,0.000440865,0.0006009344,0.0003685546,0.0004827477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984416,0.0002178529,0.0003617728,0.0003941148,0.0005544711,0.00003013976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001499897,0.0001418868,0.9722857,0.000229931,0.0000145686,0.00000194321,0.005010597,0.00005643641,0.006831814,0.01196862,0.0004428805,0.002865629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000908501,0.0002448867,0.9752824,0.00006687389,0.00001722188,6.190492e-7,0.01789123,0.0005822177,0.0008537336,0.001770169,0.00210951,0.0002726398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891104,0.0000362131,0.0000699885,0.001242937,0.0002474909,0.0007347136,0.0001223509,0.0000450076,0.008390957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985623,0.000002805184,0.00012752,0.0008340072,0.00008467802,0.00006081133,0.00002975078,0.0000142676,0.0002838116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01288063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132639594","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.379","title":"Contentious Implementation and Retrenchment in Neoliberal Policy Reform: The Global Electric Power Industry, 1989–2001","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Economics; Liberalization; Opposition (politics); Market economy; Politics; Political economy; Economic system; Public administration; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03278852878649335,"gpt":0.3477471637139803,"spread":0.314958634927487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004283465,0.0001805406,0.0001444666,0.0002019065,0.0003039662,0.0008144592,0.0003395498,0.00006595268,0.00005588854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000263867,0.0001147258,0.00003230304,0.001923537,0.0004574538,0.002193286,0.00001780858,0.0002177864,0.00003388029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002328323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004245943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003698523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008062365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982812,0.00001611902,0.0003219637,0.0003480723,0.0003612942,0.000671323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994526,0.00001116799,0.0001634136,0.0001808936,0.0001418584,0.00005008027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003437931,0.00009161514,0.01716672,0.000005021524,0.000005469393,0.00002667688,0.0004890068,8.24016e-7,0.001242459,0.9555659,0.0001930112,0.02517888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005401883,0.0007675654,0.725894,0.00001844163,0.00001079868,0.00001962432,0.01758832,0.0001635743,0.0001679911,0.2541653,0.0004091933,0.0002550953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9144419,0.00001622291,0.00001280415,0.01016869,0.0000702862,0.0002531189,0.000004496826,0.00002970727,0.07500273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945658,0.00000144901,0.00001904824,0.005121525,0.0001667743,0.00001420084,0.000004319026,0.000002778228,0.0001041015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7087272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7853849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012321052","doi":"10.1177/0001839220916401","title":"Maintaining Places of Social Inclusion: Ebola and the Emergency Department","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Custodians; Inclusion (mineral); Meaning (existential); Public relations; Democracy; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Geography; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03071063750607413,"gpt":0.3441000844165785,"spread":0.3133894469105044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001318877,0.00009596459,0.0001498522,0.00003658082,0.002411433,0.0001058489,0.0006380944,0.00002537815,0.0001661792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001267043,0.00006437634,0.00004688675,0.0006350853,0.00452749,0.0004526312,0.0001411662,0.00007810421,0.000008107834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001906458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002597193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007648665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003443089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982339,0.0002026607,0.0002420179,0.0002864503,0.0007438972,0.0002910477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994286,0.00009164309,0.000164972,0.00008255821,0.00009239646,0.00013979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008216904,0.0000243717,0.000543591,0.000007358794,0.000008382506,0.000002893074,0.4402562,4.674807e-7,0.0005804066,0.5515556,0.000268153,0.006670401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001473621,0.001646843,0.01212223,0.00002147454,0.00005443218,0.00000108656,0.9358076,0.0004359034,0.0005543292,0.02657705,0.02091684,0.0003885746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7867593,0.00008827014,0.0003778096,0.0308173,0.0002282956,0.0005134753,0.000006232918,0.00003671315,0.1811726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990898,0.00001136522,0.0001219942,0.0002613396,0.000127984,0.00001344217,5.610596e-7,0.000002660783,0.0003708534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5249786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}