{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"9f4c9615bc80","filters":{"venue":"Administrative law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2354679302","doi":"","title":"The Defects of Emergency Plans in China and Its Perfection","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative law review","topic":"Safety and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Plan (archaeology); Emergency plan; Business; Perfection; Emergency management; Emergency response; Medical emergency; Emergency department; Operations management; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Law; Geography; Nursing","authors":[{"name":"Zhang Hong","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0491167018982027,"gpt":0.2935329469964458,"spread":0.2444162450982431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000330879,0.000107769,0.0001961753,0.00002419154,0.0002341638,0.00001159145,0.0001024495,0.00002162809,0.00008410261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006424332,0.00006959029,0.00005669688,0.0002815306,0.00005121453,0.0002853922,0.00005274665,0.00008114992,0.00003591605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006503266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000096052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001559443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001042971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992903,0.00002706799,0.0002891312,0.0001488522,0.0001178569,0.0001267838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996242,0.00003202531,0.0001768199,0.0001182583,0.00004188348,0.000006834013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003245288,0.0001146122,0.01264704,0.003956739,0.00003797007,0.00002456961,0.00008108655,0.00000248737,0.00003057917,0.9766968,0.00248912,0.003886478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003975751,0.00007892855,0.2526431,0.001651651,0.0001244568,0.00001189858,0.00008372729,0.0001183618,0.00007428832,0.003443805,0.7410902,0.0002820051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5435791,0.1784744,0.0000325908,0.005671173,0.0007819811,0.00234976,0.000007171692,0.00007564187,0.2690282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8823184,0.1169708,0.000004085418,0.0003803631,0.00008789208,0.00003105005,0.000005191005,0.000005925844,0.0001962624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.283781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560945108","doi":"","title":"A Regulatory Quick Fix for Carcieri v. Salazar: How the Department of Interior Can Invoke an Alternative Source of Existing Statutory Authority to Overcome an Adverse Judgment Under the Chevron Doctrine","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Statutory law; Doctrine; Legislation; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Federal jurisdiction","authors":[{"name":"Howard L. Highland","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2261992412020433,"gpt":0.3938734833854143,"spread":0.1676742421833709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001912853,0.0002248052,0.0005075829,0.00002164118,0.0004415018,0.00003147667,0.0006426414,0.00005187689,0.0001013539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001214463,0.000117649,0.0001726113,0.0002002481,0.0008823446,0.0002716409,0.00009724146,0.0001677456,0.000001336532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001895527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004546891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01128468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03113634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975526,0.000822151,0.0004891374,0.000352999,0.0004385807,0.0003445669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983225,0.0001675039,0.0004688116,0.0005193072,0.0002922408,0.0002296035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002436119,0.0003256082,0.0001903328,0.0008141469,0.0002053611,0.000005402269,0.04756435,0.000001883049,0.0007105875,0.9417211,0.000547097,0.007670519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006095235,0.003337406,0.006115549,0.001552822,0.000304358,0.000003868464,0.01224084,0.00002071193,0.007737564,0.002177794,0.965415,0.0004845661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9243299,0.01344085,0.0008429441,0.01580641,0.0006822117,0.01312654,0.0006959478,0.0001222696,0.03095292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958631,0.0007389981,0.0005460212,0.001335428,0.00012559,0.0002359938,0.00001812936,0.00001531569,0.001121417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9648679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518167023","doi":"","title":"Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein, Supreme Court of Canada, Address to the American Bar Association, Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Association (psychology); Section (typography); Political science; Administrative law; Economic Justice; Bar (unit); Psychology; Business; Advertising; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Justice Marshall Rothstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06840600996292688,"gpt":0.355291241529521,"spread":0.2868852315665941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002173257,0.0001755931,0.0006033797,0.00001361467,0.0004774185,0.0000327932,0.0002831048,0.00006617718,0.0001037358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001966315,0.000138094,0.00006692515,0.0004227795,0.0005467547,0.0003600977,0.00004015346,0.000179825,0.000003081992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002011267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001689946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6762417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8983734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970421,0.000999155,0.000627668,0.0002849226,0.0007600613,0.0002861064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962197,0.0008097952,0.001333539,0.0002380338,0.001202049,0.0001969095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009900721,0.0001289495,0.000508521,0.001209757,0.0002035058,0.000009469401,0.008483245,3.08299e-7,0.0000591095,0.9741027,0.01493522,0.0002601857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001355779,0.0006599817,0.003789219,0.001352302,0.0005208378,0.000006616022,0.01118502,3.63669e-7,0.001248082,0.0004730403,0.9803638,0.0002651233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01735903,0.01958312,0.00004131934,0.023073,0.0006809275,0.003082722,0.000310577,0.00004486653,0.9358245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918753,0.002614947,0.0001771895,0.004441535,0.0002160523,0.00006389538,0.000003499485,0.00001216783,0.0005953953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9745163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5631308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}