{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":135,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":135,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"936de37dc30d","filters":{"venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics"}},"results":[{"id":"W1987478728","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00181","title":"Non‐parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":643,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parametric statistics; Productivity; Parametric model; Econometrics; Computer science; Representation (politics); Production (economics); Operations research; Industrial engineering; Economics; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02627228881133026,"gpt":0.2838772162422562,"spread":0.2576049274309259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002333443,0.0001684114,0.0005304389,0.0008469029,0.0003754349,0.0005856233,0.0007887423,0.00006451639,0.00002316894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003238792,0.00008000743,0.0001323161,0.006555607,0.0002388564,0.0008391959,0.0000385428,0.0003964918,0.00001964261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003226146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03215606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3429627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980834,0.0001485085,0.0006452792,0.0004238334,0.0003971202,0.0003019321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971816,0.000236383,0.0009706992,0.0004933319,0.0006235079,0.0004945116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000611978,0.00009597917,0.3712636,5.697275e-7,0.0005046836,0.000005498378,0.001002797,0.5371205,0.000140044,0.0002377035,0.0005081357,0.08905932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001021587,0.0004096834,0.98561,0.000003128493,0.0003304937,0.0001648254,0.005028347,0.002265496,0.00004570801,0.0001353848,0.005703725,0.0002010322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867191,0.00003124819,0.001478115,0.0112229,0.00004564626,0.00013695,0.000005335473,0.000004436436,0.0003562405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977376,0.00001852652,0.001156695,0.0007235915,0.0001608352,0.000003543822,0.000002446489,0.000006026298,0.0001907256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6143464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9742889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167794741","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01239.x","title":"Standards as Barriers Versus Standards as Catalysts: Assessing the Impact of HACCP Implementation on U.S. Seafood Imports","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Massachusetts; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Business; Hazard analysis and critical control points; Food safety; International trade; Critical control point; Perspective (graphical); Control (management); International economics; Food science; Economics; Computer science; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01101540268306014,"gpt":0.3148235772479115,"spread":0.3038081745648514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000904457,0.0002341666,0.0004657513,0.00002853189,0.0002793722,0.0001621342,0.0003785041,0.00004431906,0.0002713903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001293691,0.00007328267,0.0004470464,0.0003376719,0.0001639884,0.0005437135,0.00003056334,0.0002478406,0.000002498001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006437246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003439639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008995035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002812423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982547,0.0001255726,0.0007000187,0.000196618,0.0003996767,0.0003234508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977594,0.0001906082,0.001287796,0.00008137874,0.0004306047,0.0002502358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003880138,0.000283603,0.004901554,0.0000066458,0.001256804,0.00003511333,0.002158638,0.005665149,0.04889991,0.00139254,0.009372119,0.9221478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001588137,0.03443569,0.9064537,0.00006091575,0.0001723258,0.000286365,0.03834015,0.00001069925,0.01304766,0.0005340824,0.004548851,0.0005213871],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938436,0.00008773607,9.867979e-7,0.004166035,0.000190131,0.0001422503,0.0002960932,0.00001097628,0.001262263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991343,0.000246512,0.00004597502,0.0002191897,0.000300242,0.000001212372,0.00004364267,0.000001625088,0.000007289344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9216264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.298838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976167557","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01319.x","title":"Finding Missing Markets (and a Disturbing Epilogue): Evidence from an Export Crop Adoption and Marketing Intervention in Kenya","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":231,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; World Bank Group; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Production (economics); Business; Kenya; Consumption (sociology); Agricultural economics; Intervention (counseling); Economics; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01478236005938669,"gpt":0.2362979194854143,"spread":0.2215155594260276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001076855,0.000131046,0.0002693103,0.0001622451,0.0001075887,0.0003585716,0.0001009119,0.00003015911,0.00002235997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001129703,0.0001080659,0.00004790242,0.0001183837,0.00005182646,0.002202057,0.00004122865,0.0001520003,0.000002014933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001461431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000140328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001095036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003702172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989646,0.00003193068,0.0006263071,0.0001751737,0.0000506176,0.0001513812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987792,0.00007275249,0.0009937551,0.00004917177,0.00008075227,0.00002430894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002748421,0.00006593334,0.2843694,0.00002846853,0.00004495206,0.0000105952,0.001058242,0.0001615011,0.001085205,0.0004079716,0.0001510392,0.7123418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003563605,0.0000344624,0.9938877,0.0003115225,0.00001588725,0.00002089299,0.003966077,0.0007382453,0.00001480797,0.0002706704,0.0002207607,0.0001625646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972546,0.0001087647,0.00008975526,0.002049396,0.0001733184,0.00006718709,5.487545e-7,0.000009081667,0.0002473469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967965,0.0001692839,0.002018782,0.0006415658,0.0003406934,8.278757e-7,0.00001057536,0.00000564633,0.00001606678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7121793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4406798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113524697","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01061.x","title":"Traceability, Liability, and Incentives for Food Safety and Quality","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Food Supply Chain Traceability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics","keywords":"Traceability; Business; SAFER; Food safety; Stylized fact; Incentive; Liability; Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Economics; Finance; Food science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01697704775292366,"gpt":0.2372603693813707,"spread":0.220283321628447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002278636,0.0001977042,0.0005536202,0.00001596114,0.0001706918,0.00007423193,0.0002087681,0.00006740226,0.00001190173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002728395,0.00007586602,0.0001835031,0.0001543926,0.0005556473,0.0003493568,0.00008358248,0.0001841581,3.790949e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001108477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001368253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008160709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002119799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982738,0.0001218193,0.0008715746,0.0003148883,0.00009614355,0.0003217997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971334,0.001645923,0.0006651058,0.00005915861,0.0002240294,0.0002723209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001862563,0.0004655881,0.4095247,0.00006256239,0.0002218454,8.143954e-7,0.001325911,0.00003932237,0.01977426,0.003303985,0.00006213424,0.5633563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003622042,0.00255839,0.9860601,0.000009128845,0.00002277451,0.00004896301,0.006407464,0.000005596352,0.0008097256,0.0009488607,0.002556789,0.0002099318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99604,0.0002327664,0.00002466603,0.003051597,0.0001127723,0.0003152722,0.0001289902,0.00001939821,0.00007452939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977146,0.0002139476,0.001688646,0.0001151463,0.0002434879,0.000001923706,0.000009238286,0.000001302553,0.00001167554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5765355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3093727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562403057","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00276","title":"Organizational Commitment in a Mixed Oligopoly: Agricultural Cooperatives and Investor‐Owned Firms","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Principal (computer security); Order (exchange); Agriculture; Management; Library science; Oligopoly; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Business; Law; History; Computer science; Finance; Archaeology; Advertising","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01002578192297687,"gpt":0.1882712007138296,"spread":0.1782454187908527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001457954,0.0002267816,0.0004890435,0.0001275096,0.0001776971,0.0002493891,0.0001835228,0.00003035075,0.00006885708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005742534,0.0001444029,0.00007753725,0.0003809474,0.0001902399,0.001076678,0.0001372058,0.0001644082,0.00002345776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001595721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002705035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002073949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001127664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989183,0.00001695483,0.0005705902,0.0001912286,0.00005986125,0.0002430515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989823,0.00005255802,0.0006039494,0.0000664958,0.0002548452,0.00003981469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003828616,0.0007019265,0.8727319,0.00006058602,0.0009714794,0.00004702131,0.004057356,0.01342676,0.002419429,0.07036837,0.01404222,0.02079011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001081207,0.0001418881,0.9711165,0.00003244549,0.00003860264,0.0001016324,0.01484838,0.0002397387,0.00003855061,0.0002737546,0.01172102,0.0003662477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928043,0.0001672479,0.000005238448,0.004656193,0.0002983571,0.0001262397,0.00000369646,0.00001107778,0.001927593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997095,0.0006259372,0.0002816604,0.001100103,0.0007597703,0.000004046793,0.0000187621,0.0000115337,0.0001032209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09838466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5888581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171874924","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaq026","title":"The Combination of Gravity and Welfare Approaches for Evaluating Nontariff Measures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Welfare; Economics; Gravity equation; European union; Gravity model of trade; General equilibrium theory; Partial equilibrium; Econometrics; Estimation; International economics; Microeconomics; Bilateral trade; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06396378644343752,"gpt":0.2223068393979509,"spread":0.1583430529545134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001077403,0.00013131,0.000470061,0.00005916648,0.0002008475,0.00009545186,0.0002733305,0.00005184948,0.000005105353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001639318,0.00009422313,0.0001866633,0.00007188909,0.0002264288,0.000290643,0.00003182548,0.0002120022,0.000002050565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006052115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002223374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000133466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001912746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998746,0.00001443686,0.0008612672,0.0001634213,0.00002305723,0.0001917736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977628,0.0001525103,0.001754382,0.0001314465,0.0001120128,0.00008684915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001916265,0.0001535703,0.05961166,0.00003033547,0.0004335785,2.388117e-7,0.0009876419,0.001482258,0.0003896049,0.8450249,0.0002584461,0.09143611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001752375,0.001490723,0.9158936,0.0000135607,0.00006685442,0.0001260967,0.005926773,0.002262985,0.0004076838,0.05557992,0.01601874,0.0004607159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953693,0.0002559035,0.0001217167,0.002820569,0.0004801559,0.0001612402,0.00005453143,0.000003495305,0.0007331066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965252,0.0002558291,0.003022626,0.00004017495,0.0001125385,0.000006228286,0.000005852319,0.000008949018,0.00002254958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8562819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3842308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115174717","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00561.x","title":"Inserting GM Products into the Food Chain: The Market and Welfare Effects of Different Labeling and Regulatory Regimes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Business; Food chain; Food labeling; Food science; Chemistry; Industrial organization; Economics; Biology; Market economy; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006257221565785301,"gpt":0.1785264432777803,"spread":0.172269221711995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003513316,0.0001480205,0.0002851747,0.0000129752,0.0002689913,0.00007856928,0.0003144828,0.00003451588,0.000005388709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001680997,0.00003760057,0.00006523031,0.0001661813,0.0004365543,0.00009648159,0.000155783,0.0002269263,2.987647e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004574429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001510871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001168646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000149158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989928,0.0001286314,0.0003548791,0.0001758147,0.0001339378,0.0002139282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989287,0.0003228853,0.0004343236,0.00006985691,0.0001388212,0.0001054566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001936907,0.0001726755,0.007685479,0.0001130348,0.0003787148,0.000005261662,0.005711487,0.0002423134,0.5732293,0.003889788,0.0001587552,0.4082195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002710008,0.001709337,0.947311,0.00006270708,0.00003742451,0.0001218482,0.007508439,0.000005368436,0.04181234,0.0007091134,0.000303579,0.0001478522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716507,0.0008781359,5.491534e-7,0.02718259,0.00006159615,0.0001922906,0.000001610755,0.000004955063,0.00002753151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985782,0.0008325257,0.0002627475,0.0001236594,0.0001801856,0.000003099573,9.559866e-7,0.000001644799,0.00001696096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9396255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2068891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966689764","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00759.x","title":"On Solving the Multirotational Timber Harvesting Problem with Stochastic Prices: A Linear Complementarity Formulation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Tembec; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Linear complementarity problem; Mathematical optimization; Markov decision process; Flexibility (engineering); Bellman equation; Markov process; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Applied mathematics; Nonlinear system; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009492508593634352,"gpt":0.2158169679928135,"spread":0.2063244593991791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001766002,0.0001101129,0.0001289902,0.00002393651,0.0001651245,0.00005520351,0.0001816201,0.000009412335,0.0002851708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001328214,0.00005612403,0.00005162241,0.0001123991,0.0001175432,0.0005011883,0.00004688099,0.0001358727,0.0001090903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002261841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001024905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003050157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006241943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992946,0.00002063164,0.0002908256,0.0001011726,0.000125031,0.0001676999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991568,0.0001219093,0.0005771663,0.00006324014,0.00001877629,0.00006206295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004142182,0.00003887014,0.003637738,0.000001364819,0.00003394613,2.873416e-7,0.0007170844,0.9857582,0.00002916385,0.0009451375,0.001015337,0.007781386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002226346,0.002328632,0.7599247,0.0001059458,0.0001553213,0.0001912083,0.001604425,0.2161543,0.00005807207,0.0004963257,0.01604603,0.0007086811],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949642,0.00000184514,0.0006276889,0.001749537,0.00002232687,0.0001624584,0.000002719512,0.000006531492,0.002462687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772152,0.000002745519,0.02182517,0.0005038249,0.0001799223,0.000003626315,0.000007066084,0.00000594018,0.0002565284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.769604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.312242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165588285","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aau049","title":"Estimating the Impact of Minimum Wages on Employment, Wages, and Non‐Wage Benefits: The Case of Agriculture in South Africa","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Economics; Wage; Minimum wage; Legislation; Agriculture; Margin (machine learning); Labour economics; Work (physics); Efficiency wage; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01525893695448354,"gpt":0.2167947759197281,"spread":0.2015358389652445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007069441,0.0001905043,0.0006096608,0.0001491434,0.00008637001,0.00005474957,0.0002878842,0.00004774999,0.00001341452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001406852,0.00009284921,0.0002071546,0.0003921185,0.0001995999,0.0001886725,0.00005027464,0.0002739147,0.000003852023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008512192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001721913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004073284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005407838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984789,0.00004188433,0.001071924,0.0001736174,0.00002853392,0.0002051082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970672,0.0002346665,0.002356122,0.0001860437,0.00009296776,0.00006295756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062298,0.001234944,0.3820516,0.0001559443,0.002249703,0.00006092944,0.08210895,0.3192613,0.001804035,0.1193838,0.007971085,0.0830948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001235745,0.001875688,0.9818747,0.0001056601,0.00003334281,0.0004177331,0.00841544,0.003700036,0.0003011765,0.001383058,0.000283519,0.0003738686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976028,0.0002665379,0.00003583874,0.0007900639,0.0001030672,0.0001264584,0.00009253085,0.000002833947,0.0009798706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991491,0.0000722584,0.0005140897,0.00009478951,0.0001231612,0.000002972792,0.000003600011,0.000009807706,0.00003018079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5998232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3786281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139689717","doi":"10.1111/j.0002-9092.2005.00713.x","title":"Milk by Any Other Name … Consumer Benefits from Labeled Milk","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer demand; Variety (cybernetics); Business; Agricultural science; Food science; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Chemistry; Statistics; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009316534885724875,"gpt":0.1787266820202997,"spread":0.1694101471345749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000423715,0.0004553442,0.001304843,0.0001631197,0.0001293346,0.0001991375,0.0007432291,0.0001636566,0.0006400835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005550261,0.0003756975,0.0005012747,0.0001943489,0.0002067765,0.001024574,0.00008676934,0.0004426988,0.0007614339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003635083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003943654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001922687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969885,0.00003575817,0.001817332,0.0005313088,0.00005118715,0.0005759277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963004,0.0001767102,0.002656499,0.0003237491,0.0001415286,0.0004011425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001165047,0.002868312,0.1893763,0.00005685877,0.009470178,0.00001891033,0.006159607,0.008073301,0.008080135,0.09068146,0.5680586,0.1159912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003802758,0.001076495,0.1736548,0.00007833413,0.0001456285,0.0001670806,0.001776026,0.0001436364,0.002611963,0.002701824,0.8118777,0.001963693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770927,0.01056846,0.00002551505,0.004510997,0.0005681927,0.0001585811,0.0008940558,0.00002918522,0.006152282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870613,0.004966315,0.003795899,0.002239971,0.001094552,0.000007661718,0.00006500569,0.00004803992,0.0007212411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2438191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884086991","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aay050","title":"Money Matters: The Role of Yields and Profits in Agricultural Technology Adoption","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers; Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Economics; Agriculture; Panel data; Public economics; Econometrics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008405854834510432,"gpt":0.2038473044602368,"spread":0.1954414496257264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002754356,0.0001665313,0.0003383311,0.00004455629,0.0001362278,0.00006779873,0.0003367338,0.00008199408,0.00004249374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004336365,0.00004601161,0.00008251106,0.0008561122,0.0003960106,0.0005594731,0.00007981604,0.0002661349,0.000005748465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004937702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002762476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006129682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988368,0.00006915226,0.0006116855,0.0001667834,0.00009408518,0.0002214945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982654,0.0001783949,0.001083691,0.00004862392,0.0003646044,0.00005928062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002036641,0.0002259071,0.07332534,0.00000918538,0.000198934,0.000002506311,0.001534773,0.00008904817,0.4961832,0.007271948,0.00127325,0.4196822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001473896,0.001287449,0.9529927,0.00004384218,0.00003226164,0.0003247577,0.02965307,0.00001166511,0.009159729,0.0007051239,0.005445142,0.0001968351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845086,0.0002777039,5.483512e-7,0.01449622,0.00009613002,0.0001451666,0.00001007799,0.00001005207,0.000455486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987043,0.0002772386,0.0003726528,0.0002351914,0.0003626692,0.000005183294,0.00000769671,9.355664e-7,0.00003420699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8796674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1876299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123421005","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaw059","title":"The Financialization of Food?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Financialization; Economics; Speculation; Vector autoregression; Equity (law); Futures contract; Monetary economics; Recession; Business cycle; Financial economics; Financial market; Finance; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009414365195107804,"gpt":0.1797484254297778,"spread":0.17033406023467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005810907,0.00009486988,0.0003703194,0.00005477949,0.00007002336,0.00002853623,0.0002846632,0.00002850828,0.00002880716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001732053,0.0000490552,0.000189371,0.0001313551,0.0001851956,0.0002236483,0.0000317311,0.00006407287,0.000005713769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001040611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002744446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000255268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004605412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998765,0.00002007715,0.0009250848,0.0001130716,0.00002142486,0.0001553278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974794,0.0001808508,0.002009264,0.0001517622,0.0001188056,0.00005993495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001895788,0.000115176,0.2999714,0.00001430486,0.0003722756,6.152775e-7,0.0003913431,0.0001193631,0.0003632293,0.5666128,0.001698527,0.1301513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009502097,0.001393215,0.8809832,0.00004629544,0.00001936722,0.00004506687,0.0004495163,0.000558466,0.0004273092,0.06841269,0.04634608,0.0003685516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994289,0.0002943561,0.001523927,0.001460416,0.0003737582,0.00005442619,0.000059405,0.000002986538,0.001941666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979905,0.001354062,0.0003081172,0.00003996326,0.0001202822,0.000001195531,9.514821e-7,0.000006436148,0.0001784394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5810118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2000413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985028675","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.t01-1-00454","title":"Cost‐Effective Targeting of Land Retirement to Improve Water Quality with Endogenous Sediment Deposition Coefficients","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Renting; Watershed; Marginal value; Sediment; Productivity; Environmental science; Payment; Land use; Deposition (geology); Water quality; Hydrology (agriculture); Natural resource economics; Water resource management; Business; Economics; Computer science; Geology; Ecology; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03801526665712603,"gpt":0.2137385164455048,"spread":0.1757232497883788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007595048,0.0001624506,0.0005367823,0.00008393874,0.00006986779,0.00003047512,0.0001216521,0.00003191961,0.00006039813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002506125,0.0001147571,0.0001229994,0.0000698373,0.00007621693,0.0002164038,0.0000264593,0.0001054676,0.00004872742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005490822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001260945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001647387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001300676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99848,0.00005192607,0.0009485885,0.0002354237,0.00003956276,0.0002444717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985025,0.00004315805,0.001155615,0.0001145352,0.00005177683,0.0001324433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007724194,0.001149433,0.7170865,0.00008444831,0.001364248,0.000007392608,0.009361598,0.1954326,0.04865954,0.007090357,0.0002077971,0.01878361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004701028,0.007126069,0.7108533,0.00008154166,0.0001214296,0.0001488904,0.007719716,0.0002045023,0.2648411,0.0005812609,0.002440554,0.001180661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959719,0.00007660656,0.002130962,0.0001559678,0.0002230992,0.0004972213,0.00004453044,0.00000382198,0.0008958883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968405,0.00006578644,0.002817363,0.0001402296,0.00005729945,0.0000235154,0.00001716622,0.00001270464,0.00002543357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2161815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4679659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136252054","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaq011","title":"Understanding International Trade in Agricultural Products: One Hundred Years of Contributions by Agricultural Economists","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Economics; International trade; Agricultural productivity; International economics; Agricultural economics; International market; Adaptation (eye); Trade barrier; Production (economics); Agreement on Agriculture; World trade; Macroeconomics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03609019654049656,"gpt":0.2035334465067003,"spread":0.1674432499662037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005201427,0.0002716263,0.001091007,0.0002472221,0.00007121157,0.0001449295,0.0007169293,0.0001522517,0.00006027141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001732566,0.0002797193,0.0003529894,0.0003748163,0.0003062499,0.001051735,0.0000693455,0.0006401482,0.00003127061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008463473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006008808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001993379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001976491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997034,0.00002716997,0.001975247,0.0004214938,0.00005707517,0.0004850096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968423,0.0001118119,0.002528451,0.0002119201,0.00007375681,0.0002317191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005953953,0.003054871,0.08212673,0.0001064458,0.003456559,0.00002284695,0.004839574,0.01039242,0.07382815,0.7928656,0.01891461,0.009796795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002403114,0.0004191272,0.9786364,0.00004582108,0.00004171702,0.0002681392,0.004484025,0.00005859989,0.002151412,0.003864932,0.006882696,0.0007440381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879313,0.0001924043,0.00003433161,0.006833004,0.001456,0.0002164011,0.0006375833,0.00001515772,0.002683856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976126,0.0005492448,0.001063693,0.0001191895,0.0004711605,0.00000623728,0.0001183024,0.00001790224,0.00004168232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8965096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002037937","doi":"10.1002/ajae.12078","title":"The Power of Stories: Narratives and Information Framing Effects in Science Communication","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Framing (construction); Psychology; Agency (philosophy); Multinomial logistic regression; Science communication; Framing effect; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Social science; History; Mathematics education; Science education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06002072855429433,"gpt":0.3306134997032663,"spread":0.270592771148972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006167783,0.0000371292,0.0001070895,0.00003557643,0.0003008674,0.00008531267,0.0002924688,0.00001301079,0.000003682826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003025581,0.0000235165,0.00002179942,0.0002730521,0.0009018668,0.001264586,0.00004623063,0.0001049402,8.95966e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009538914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006931587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001437416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003147903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994454,0.0001225744,0.0002531541,0.00003041576,0.00007505092,0.00007337733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989344,0.000241977,0.0005264318,0.00006232146,0.0001757732,0.00005908199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004468931,0.00001441734,0.005763832,0.000007972902,0.00001092658,4.352277e-8,0.9075864,0.0001349882,0.0009387863,0.02039301,0.00006157321,0.06504336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000171681,0.0001938184,0.270025,0.00003264303,0.000003204669,0.000001845766,0.718969,0.00004227805,0.00005831387,0.000195905,0.01024328,0.00006298759],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987383,0.0001480297,0.00001384174,0.01099692,0.00004907529,0.00006551272,8.411038e-7,0.000002507356,0.00134026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930934,0.006229704,0.0004587271,0.0001939626,0.000020166,9.531371e-7,8.68388e-7,8.72222e-7,0.000001397679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2642611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3322966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138995940","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aas078","title":"Are Food Choices Really Habitual? Integrating Habits, Variety‐seeking, and Compensatory Choice in a Utility‐maximizing Framework","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Technology Sydney; Göteborgs Universitet; University of Arizona","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Food choice; Selection (genetic algorithm); Consumer choice; Cognition; Economics; Management science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Marketing; Psychology; Business; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04542148671717425,"gpt":0.2180374463715095,"spread":0.1726159596543352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009503528,0.0002525047,0.0007957087,0.0001747128,0.0001115167,0.0001001891,0.0002505009,0.0001036503,0.00006278611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002448755,0.0002319883,0.0001615339,0.0001504723,0.0001996584,0.001156809,0.00009215772,0.0004906178,0.00003170897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003887006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001616446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002608867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003014696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979722,0.00005207135,0.001245231,0.0002853511,0.00003406078,0.0004111043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964934,0.0002744974,0.002822547,0.0001662092,0.00002595331,0.0002174102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001302605,0.00008296878,0.9870371,0.00001168958,0.00008521079,4.091035e-7,0.001142181,0.0002680252,0.00001858281,0.008758977,0.00005839874,0.002523401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004204295,0.0002115327,0.991162,0.00007505727,0.00001522296,0.00004973894,0.004026788,0.0002669692,0.00002031107,0.00134763,0.00210206,0.0003022703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955899,0.001843975,0.0004304794,0.0005047458,0.0004068487,0.0001262333,0.00002802716,0.00001042592,0.001059394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927188,0.0004944146,0.005830415,0.0005146491,0.0003873398,0.000005916936,0.00000565125,0.00002113,0.00002165795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007411347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9460208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119403851","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00183","title":"Modeling Recreation Site Choice: Do Hypothetical Choices Reflect Actual Behavior?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Revealed preference; Aggregate (composite); Preference; Aggregate data; Econometrics; Sample (material); Test site; Statistics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Ecology; Engineering; Chemistry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06488143752056506,"gpt":0.2414430760530789,"spread":0.1765616385325138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004427427,0.000221894,0.0005963155,0.0001644306,0.0001167104,0.0001295146,0.0002603687,0.00008078016,0.0003207261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005531578,0.0001997145,0.0002651323,0.0001418396,0.0001164718,0.0008811272,0.0000425953,0.0002524256,0.0003154631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005063507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001926623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002137662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004683318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981678,0.00002766759,0.001152144,0.000312412,0.0000394699,0.0003004768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998417,0.00006943632,0.001110454,0.0001789704,0.00003980529,0.0001843539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001802127,0.0005000436,0.7754999,0.00001000771,0.0003810588,0.000009660615,0.00164341,0.1690332,0.0008709289,0.01107994,0.0003622399,0.04042935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001488207,0.001059331,0.9745278,0.000034755,0.0001046814,0.0004888235,0.001835126,0.009872289,0.0001257382,0.001917249,0.007723995,0.0008220591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951534,0.000373134,0.00060373,0.0004779422,0.0003298449,0.0001258695,0.00002642789,0.00001431236,0.002895356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946772,0.002186331,0.0021661,0.0001871153,0.0004960796,0.000008696593,0.00002457618,0.00002341846,0.0002304861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1990279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8144119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027526095","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00731.x","title":"Process Innovation Activity in a Mixed Oligopoly: The Role of Cooperatives","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Oligopoly; Earnings; Welfare; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Process (computing); Economics; Agriculture; Innovation process; Business; Cournot competition; Social Welfare; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007205628580699666,"gpt":0.2062190184527123,"spread":0.1990133898720126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002160017,0.0001178154,0.0003228573,0.0001195368,0.00008397153,0.00007312924,0.0001945632,0.00001631991,0.00001802395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005071608,0.00006775828,0.00006141378,0.0004774603,0.000136834,0.001168808,0.00005560153,0.0001417821,0.000006823148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007129082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003174997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001387994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992506,0.00001049979,0.0004653841,0.0000949394,0.00004063872,0.0001379417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986035,0.00003847595,0.0009719065,0.00006100022,0.0003184774,0.000006671233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000592369,0.000720849,0.1475201,0.00006258447,0.0006114654,0.000001626971,0.005634188,0.1067869,0.01548942,0.06572317,0.001184979,0.6556723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001115726,0.0001934605,0.920568,0.00005677296,0.00005597291,0.00001678037,0.04639795,0.003937482,0.006458479,0.000753921,0.02000567,0.0004397946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946364,0.00006781543,0.000005304753,0.003038431,0.00008993559,0.00008955036,0.00000193757,0.000003646512,0.002066974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989238,0.00007840503,0.00006710632,0.0003383723,0.0005670022,0.000003344107,0.000001717271,0.000005812411,0.00001443435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7730479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2763102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102212534","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00914.x","title":"Labeling Context and Reference Point Effects in Models of Food Attribute Demand","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Point (geometry); Product (mathematics); Econometrics; Observable; Food labeling; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Food science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03392072930208374,"gpt":0.1816647422114418,"spread":0.1477440129093581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003912595,0.0001345355,0.0006052983,0.0001222354,0.00002871405,0.00002534109,0.0001226685,0.00004554097,0.00001083447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001700439,0.0001215106,0.0000862023,0.00007872649,0.0001131857,0.0004979449,0.00003715371,0.0001342287,0.000008441828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001853996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001068435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003470731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001270468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998631,0.00002083686,0.0009811476,0.0001796971,0.00001761863,0.0001697018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984657,0.00009053148,0.001280023,0.00008428762,0.00001984538,0.00005964954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009901244,0.000276155,0.5397174,0.00007236996,0.0002528511,0.000003528119,0.00107234,0.21659,0.0007035967,0.2310141,0.0002147698,0.009983851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001647445,0.0009138708,0.9623967,0.00006504437,0.00002077856,0.0000577024,0.001436076,0.001960327,0.0009041002,0.03019485,0.00008189087,0.0003212335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968481,0.001530793,0.0005399846,0.0002099489,0.00008500634,0.00009939409,0.00003692736,0.000002741364,0.0006470801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979098,0.0008163691,0.001106886,0.0000723679,0.00005276748,0.000002661412,0.000008480005,0.000008646884,0.00002196522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4226793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4955059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142897576","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00506","title":"Spatial Market Arbitrage and Threshold Cointegration","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Economics; Arbitrage; Commodity; Econometrics; Multivariate statistics; Financial economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01935892647006445,"gpt":0.1864593318687584,"spread":0.1671004053986939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005344003,0.0001925425,0.0006108392,0.000142087,0.00007849394,0.0001051236,0.0001521121,0.00005176519,0.0003625187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007100614,0.0001443558,0.0001779829,0.00007767326,0.0001421784,0.0005393312,0.00001599496,0.0002545744,0.00005193922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001266601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002213873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002860898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005595631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985693,0.00002493104,0.0009029236,0.0002153866,0.00001672987,0.000270797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983733,0.00006073638,0.001215808,0.0001347827,0.00002118984,0.0001941278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007322908,0.0006803124,0.4452127,0.0000796891,0.001896824,0.00004468832,0.005923897,0.02117368,0.0005250037,0.4445467,0.04419149,0.03499276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003940182,0.002917989,0.800689,0.00006732945,0.00009992041,0.00288632,0.004320445,0.007022847,0.001089457,0.05076135,0.1242208,0.001984403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817311,0.0003569654,0.0004642279,0.001191666,0.0003767289,0.00007997766,0.00004498038,0.000007085441,0.01574725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996626,0.0008464995,0.001333074,0.0005490228,0.0001875312,0.000001536983,0.000004121743,0.00001332923,0.0004389482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3937853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5886657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139730585","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00304","title":"Impact of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy on Agribusiness in the United Kingdom: Results of an Event Study of Equity Prices","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Agribusiness; Bovine spongiform encephalopathy; Distributed lag; Equity (law); Autoregressive model; Economics; Econometrics; Benchmark (surveying); Business; Agriculture; Biology; Internal medicine; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06128127207341618,"gpt":0.287839087628646,"spread":0.2265578155552298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001056915,0.0001680434,0.0007433704,0.0005135832,0.00003141205,0.00002406781,0.0005369986,0.00003797873,0.00003404288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001429815,0.000104353,0.0001847303,0.001206691,0.000122482,0.0003768691,0.00004556654,0.0002029569,0.000003011461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001368957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000216211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001802536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000125393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976231,0.00004915933,0.001894821,0.0001725337,0.00007473637,0.0001855865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951329,0.0001312686,0.004204611,0.0002432858,0.0002335727,0.00005441852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004400126,0.01965114,0.7258215,0.0001252256,0.001362527,0.00003116264,0.04156644,0.1391602,0.0008096608,0.04446288,0.0008094437,0.02179964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001627346,0.006599503,0.9871545,0.00003077138,0.00001265571,0.00002458825,0.003495569,0.0005630827,0.00008034189,0.0001885088,0.00008128348,0.0001418633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986517,0.00003043199,0.000007780537,0.0002544361,0.00009940252,0.0001796858,0.0001138066,0.000002357362,0.0006604217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996681,0.00008873054,0.00009968907,0.00004966978,0.00006380933,0.000001704139,0.00001438485,0.00000709921,0.000006866226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.261333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4255393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130794533","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aar009","title":"Relaxing Heteroscedasticity Assumptions in Area‐Yield Crop Insurance Rating","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Homoscedasticity; Heteroscedasticity; Crop insurance; Economics; Yield (engineering); Actuarial science; Econometrics; Sample (material); Statistics; Mathematics; Agriculture; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02900255933796492,"gpt":0.1993446626094584,"spread":0.1703421032714935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002351331,0.0002188188,0.0004438235,0.00002784239,0.0001694405,0.00006001547,0.0004401739,0.00006805472,0.00008547853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001008305,0.00007219402,0.0002128734,0.0004096189,0.0001781749,0.0005719578,0.00006602026,0.000382348,0.00001441196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001041904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001381178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006422921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001505686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984706,0.00007504377,0.0007315062,0.0002380973,0.0001189757,0.0003657493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985468,0.000224835,0.0008506548,0.00004838858,0.0001459326,0.000183436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002002999,0.0004400639,0.7312194,0.000008893159,0.00007644798,0.0000343864,0.002333187,0.003244715,0.1593401,0.0002902377,0.0003071544,0.1025051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001154274,0.0006149852,0.9922452,0.00007986178,0.00001003977,0.0001758309,0.003945854,0.00001889891,0.002370435,0.00006658745,0.000117769,0.0002391192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984933,0.00009966098,0.00000832803,0.0002753663,0.0002117732,0.0001002818,0.00001339809,0.00001849379,0.000779454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998375,0.0004544332,0.0007764673,0.0001087202,0.0002282804,0.000003605332,0.000004104057,0.000001252076,0.00004812461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2610258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2943987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064320019","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00172","title":"Preference Uncertainty in Non‐Market Valuation: A Fuzzy Approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Probabilistic logic; Fuzzy logic; Contingent valuation; Economics; Decision maker; Econometrics; Fuzzy number; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Willingness to pay; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06369823991753279,"gpt":0.202391472214548,"spread":0.1386932322970152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008486273,0.0001890744,0.0006103627,0.0001847593,0.00005350163,0.00006052921,0.0003138637,0.00005926169,0.0002416966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003813358,0.000170032,0.0001747313,0.0002281008,0.000122223,0.0006319751,0.00004407768,0.0002271069,0.0001387639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005979332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002763174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001885336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003723192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982178,0.00003532912,0.001153633,0.0002880764,0.00003366317,0.0002714582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982274,0.00005622906,0.001396055,0.0001675272,0.00003012137,0.00012265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001805283,0.0004561815,0.7694384,0.00001580011,0.0002238382,0.000005274651,0.002164084,0.1914204,0.00004249405,0.01486059,0.001624319,0.0195681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008899241,0.0002783478,0.9865364,0.00001395136,0.00001059642,0.0001160489,0.001990529,0.003926173,0.00000646536,0.004691163,0.001259491,0.0002809479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9684551,0.000185319,0.0004884137,0.0005117324,0.000214451,0.0001519794,0.00001594056,0.000005643315,0.02997142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957321,0.001316305,0.002055557,0.0002096515,0.000192545,0.00001133732,0.00001674327,0.00001280129,0.0004529865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.217098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6933703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147364686","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00835.x","title":"Conservation Payments under Risk: A Stochastic Dominance Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Emil Aaltosen Säätiö","keywords":"Payment; Stochastic dominance; Dominance (genetics); Natural resource economics; Extant taxon; Revenue; Economics; Business; Environmental resource management; Econometrics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005221882929884777,"gpt":0.1842890938010094,"spread":0.1790672108711246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001441694,0.0001157353,0.0001924156,0.00002900526,0.0000757338,0.00004162993,0.0001953463,0.00001784869,0.0001017413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008169353,0.00007786179,0.00008781692,0.0001552581,0.0002090378,0.0003390863,0.00004861074,0.0001078151,0.0001371108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001928747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007555668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001456179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008301392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992508,0.00003390518,0.0003336898,0.0001181933,0.0000841125,0.0001792843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990482,0.00003289911,0.0007685166,0.00007985962,0.00001176474,0.00005879196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009540225,0.0002198585,0.07802919,0.000004113802,0.00009259488,0.00000223988,0.0003052417,0.8609684,0.0003217788,0.003368565,0.04471251,0.01188018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004775086,0.0002037899,0.9936023,0.000005835376,0.00004735708,0.00005944806,0.0002891958,0.001900428,0.00002405493,0.0006221681,0.00257637,0.0001915775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925057,0.0000124899,0.0006901141,0.0005065419,0.00008376594,0.00008191997,0.000003881899,0.000006275605,0.006109277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960424,0.00002845606,0.002494582,0.0002008936,0.0001545872,0.000002343061,0.000006651591,0.000005954086,0.001064088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3175112,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055890570","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00130","title":"Estimating Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Quality in the Presence of Item Nonresponse Bias","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Medical Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Respondent; Willingness to pay; Payment card; Non-response bias; Sample (material); Payment; Econometrics; Missing data; Selection bias; Quality (philosophy); Estimation; Identification (biology); Valuation (finance); Economics; Statistics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08200665575115858,"gpt":0.2558230054985151,"spread":0.1738163497473565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002782515,0.0001332654,0.0005163747,0.00007942176,0.00005462893,0.00004344236,0.0002869708,0.00003395405,0.00002473997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003885164,0.00007643681,0.0001743892,0.00009754403,0.00007092044,0.0003003047,0.00002245204,0.0001208195,0.00001481249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001599323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001783571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001171031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003113023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982137,0.00009240097,0.00125548,0.0001914581,0.00002032774,0.0002266485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981865,0.0004101865,0.00114573,0.0001573029,0.00003449695,0.00006578058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007588188,0.0007653201,0.7415356,0.0001155526,0.0004224136,0.000001983218,0.02423034,0.1693748,0.009626728,0.03320868,0.0006387387,0.01932104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001179844,0.0008758092,0.9787317,0.00003096802,0.00001806233,0.00004229553,0.00592148,0.003579066,0.002674391,0.004341382,0.002204771,0.0004002243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949015,0.00004208599,0.002995024,0.001321188,0.0002787294,0.0002671948,0.00003957381,0.000001974955,0.0001526651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867496,0.00003798891,0.01275338,0.0002953262,0.00007762627,0.0000159157,0.000005670722,0.000009347685,0.00005513038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2371961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3117003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112295864","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00045","title":"The Economic Threshold with a Stochastic Pest Population: A Real Options Approach","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Pest control; Randomness; Integrated pest management; Population; Economic threshold; Agriculture; Sensitivity (control systems); Mathematics; Econometrics; Agricultural engineering; Statistics; Ecology; Biology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01024358121459999,"gpt":0.1882261402674371,"spread":0.1779825590528372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002771007,0.0001991723,0.0005546138,0.0001065093,0.0002928912,0.0002267673,0.0003499301,0.00003807546,0.0001471589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004890113,0.0001200636,0.000296085,0.0001848277,0.000239052,0.0004580349,0.00001922265,0.0002036925,0.0001344957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003787935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003720265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007345745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002513796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985631,0.00001610341,0.0008762567,0.0002385678,0.00003171472,0.0002742341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984728,0.0000604072,0.001066543,0.0002155802,0.00003136265,0.000153293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001934727,0.0001162578,0.008543073,0.000003883086,0.000832859,0.000002505971,0.0007086209,0.4254233,0.000002054966,0.5590663,0.001021766,0.004085906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003581739,0.003232428,0.869364,0.00005970505,0.0005237842,0.001517091,0.01041348,0.0554818,0.000009451759,0.04144586,0.01204034,0.00233035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921757,0.00181399,0.00003066747,0.0009003629,0.0001259352,0.0001129944,0.00003560768,0.00001197817,0.004792756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890355,0.008552102,0.0009105642,0.00007575462,0.0003950653,0.00000898732,0.00002506705,0.00001699482,0.0009799658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8608209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4896053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915677104","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aau035","title":"Optimal Directions for Directional Distance Functions: An Exploration of Potential Reductions of Greenhouse Gases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kruger (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Reduction (mathematics); Productivity; Range (aeronautics); Compromise; Environmental science; Greenhouse; Nonparametric statistics; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Engineering; Geology; Agronomy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04383394111872592,"gpt":0.3075073584034874,"spread":0.2636734172847615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204228,0.0001338425,0.0005411928,0.0003497194,0.0002242094,0.00007912974,0.0003743433,0.00003380148,0.00003003999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009707604,0.00009130062,0.0004330194,0.0007750913,0.0004188208,0.001780151,0.00002332561,0.0001094307,0.000003365788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008235728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009409119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007175656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001381141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977198,0.0001916533,0.001356955,0.0002521497,0.0003281417,0.0001512637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949701,0.000608856,0.002560122,0.0002456134,0.001499973,0.0001153009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000242068,0.0004363111,0.0009776121,0.000003837326,0.0001797885,1.806792e-7,0.0005379824,0.9392663,0.00605535,0.001730282,0.001409857,0.04916046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006228204,0.02719345,0.4928155,0.0003612217,0.003352602,0.001576731,0.1654538,0.1656705,0.04398862,0.02341069,0.0667335,0.003215194],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8379992,0.0000417863,0.1604108,0.0006929472,0.0006315461,0.00007458631,0.00005735504,0.000009453976,0.00008224655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837481,0.00007231626,0.01550797,0.00001713601,0.0004358547,0.000005641272,0.00001242286,0.000007987509,0.000192612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7735958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3723131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098829572","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aau082","title":"On Technological Change in Crop Yields","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Yield (engineering); Econometrics; Variance (accounting); Constant (computer programming); Distribution (mathematics); Technological change; Climate change; Component (thermodynamics); Crop yield; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Environmental science; Computer science; Ecology; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01115249939905638,"gpt":0.2029391738724782,"spread":0.1917866744734218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003076569,0.0002029486,0.0004372842,0.0000328975,0.00008905109,0.00005105408,0.0004932958,0.000101144,0.00005659628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001132764,0.00005627902,0.000184104,0.0004262456,0.0002248491,0.0002499966,0.00005775677,0.0003779131,0.00003483362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008616661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004872988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001415603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000305289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987329,0.00009979279,0.0004816253,0.0002279146,0.0001259351,0.0003318775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988165,0.0003823691,0.0005192281,0.00004988805,0.00008041317,0.0001516017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000126365,0.000244527,0.02459091,0.000002575796,0.00002349289,0.0000107963,0.0001831131,0.0008734267,0.01530693,0.006273331,0.000401149,0.9519634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000183523,0.00205741,0.9915027,0.00004357796,0.000008010571,0.0001272386,0.001068776,0.00004192898,0.001061921,0.0004923678,0.003153438,0.0002590932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955046,0.00005927209,0.000002159099,0.003514495,0.0001399392,0.0001066053,0.000004241121,0.0000222829,0.0006464559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983867,0.0003201464,0.0001782028,0.0006308443,0.0004334312,0.000005737466,0.000004442104,8.871915e-7,0.00003962889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2294992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147657823","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00047","title":"How to Improve the Management of Renewable Resources: The Case of Canada's Northern Cod Fishery","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Renewable resource; Stock (firearms); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource economics; Renewable energy; Fishery; Economics; Environmental economics; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Ecology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005777691864669554,"gpt":0.1553888950386212,"spread":0.1496112031739516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005200368,0.0001883816,0.0006117099,0.00005889098,0.0001340621,0.00008480686,0.0006482141,0.00003162305,0.00009258906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001733233,0.0001078082,0.0002112056,0.0002303569,0.0001319909,0.0001529307,0.00007914603,0.000169612,0.000007191583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003264862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006586492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06156993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07250536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983467,0.00002145153,0.001065977,0.0002148154,0.00004110166,0.0003099806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978006,0.00009625631,0.001578307,0.0003072432,0.00007820842,0.0001394142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001409598,0.0005040262,0.02617932,0.0003406834,0.008806359,0.0004486718,0.01913933,0.1902226,0.0001882103,0.01186331,0.05249809,0.6883998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001847455,0.001255084,0.1361727,0.0001574799,0.0001623418,0.001587533,0.05969154,0.0004234588,0.0007284682,0.001807943,0.7950497,0.001116236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863659,0.0004878346,0.000007785572,0.007820765,0.0002513903,0.0001984776,0.0000922596,0.000002472686,0.004773078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943261,0.0005373801,0.0005906771,0.0003492425,0.0001286575,0.000006140773,0.000002235104,0.00001365538,0.004045984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7425517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9446791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067870526","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aar123","title":"Multiple‐Regime Spatial Price Transmission with an Application to Maize Markets in Southern Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"Michigan State University","keywords":"Economics; Transmission (telecommunications); Magnitude (astronomy); Government (linguistics); Econometrics; Monetary economics; Computer science; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02041251859658801,"gpt":0.1727954478761443,"spread":0.1523829292795563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004021165,0.0002508594,0.0006677858,0.0002306211,0.00005590924,0.00005758309,0.0004780255,0.00007279434,0.000089514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001692711,0.0002052862,0.0001400851,0.0002752343,0.00008070116,0.0005535067,0.00002824171,0.0002231914,0.0001613735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002573136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001156036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004032628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981363,0.00002749556,0.001026522,0.0003843102,0.00003110592,0.0003943031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998195,0.00003883206,0.001118131,0.000231181,0.00005775419,0.0003591342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01059424,0.00358171,0.6021963,0.00009676503,0.001092888,0.00007752632,0.08134766,0.02676863,0.00121361,0.02677506,0.0008560795,0.2453995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002514374,0.002803154,0.96315,0.00005540759,0.00003170864,0.0002137465,0.009938017,0.001918255,0.0002518037,0.002833837,0.01523514,0.001054527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891158,0.00008473304,0.004697118,0.0004261411,0.0001047768,0.0002478979,0.0000557859,0.0000147756,0.005252933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869031,0.0001213993,0.01253912,0.000174495,0.0001399995,0.00001252258,0.000008340236,0.00002599871,0.0000750847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3609537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8371327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247786080","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00773.x","title":"Price Discrimination in the Context of Vertical Differentiation: An Application to Canadian Wheat Exports","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Massachusetts Amherst; University of Connecticut; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Product differentiation; Context (archaeology); Market power; Economics; Price discrimination; Exploit; Quality (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Biology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009527391453814154,"gpt":0.195601383484195,"spread":0.1860739920303808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005457286,0.0001584988,0.0004815638,0.000244719,0.00006056696,0.00007260688,0.0004551401,0.00005779825,0.00002869723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004686972,0.0001132532,0.0001358526,0.0002366374,0.00006144006,0.0007091432,0.00002094724,0.0001759198,0.00003158747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004347907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000500381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004644661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04583707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983592,0.00003338713,0.001089403,0.0002259803,0.00003636041,0.0002556741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987092,0.00006729206,0.0006761414,0.000204264,0.0001110557,0.0002320579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004781628,0.001900791,0.1400595,0.0000609207,0.0005440402,0.000009082441,0.05011778,0.01222213,0.002354083,0.6211606,0.0102116,0.1608813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004943116,0.0006604561,0.9750243,0.00001765154,0.00002063393,0.00006952367,0.008667775,0.0002886807,0.000391421,0.001250093,0.01279477,0.0003203623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864891,0.0001517548,0.0001609583,0.01027953,0.0001372299,0.0002276066,0.00003359958,0.000003551364,0.002516671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976243,0.0001689412,0.0005937607,0.001252346,0.0002919181,0.00001295421,0.00002913282,0.000008727178,0.0000179354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8349648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9715739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214144221","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12274","title":"A bird's eye view of farm size and biodiversity: The ecological legacy of the iron curtain","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Bundesamt für Naturschutz; European Commission; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Agriculture; Geography; German; Leverage (statistics); Wildlife; Diversity (politics); Land cover; Land use; Agroforestry; Agricultural biodiversity; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004888151012499762,"gpt":0.1888107294776367,"spread":0.183922578465137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001734923,0.00007173486,0.0002402901,0.000006527117,0.000118223,0.00001077914,0.0001924077,0.00002263746,0.00006623517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000833613,0.00003279145,0.0001095313,0.0001233699,0.0007962317,0.0001033006,0.0001989025,0.0001234881,0.000005065737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005790054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001642964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007528877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008379659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994036,0.00009743174,0.0002719841,0.00008430547,0.00005000369,0.00009267835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990403,0.0002419718,0.0005836053,0.00007079363,0.00003234671,0.00003096385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003052263,0.000148334,0.9808582,0.00001046068,0.0001664918,0.000003651616,0.001708358,0.005330055,0.002796085,0.0007232266,0.0003001227,0.007924483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001573709,0.0001641311,0.9933362,0.00000560027,0.00004628655,0.00004219158,0.00541875,0.00002076198,0.0001783506,0.0001478423,0.0004323559,0.00005017384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933494,0.0001254285,0.000002113368,0.006130629,0.00008593955,0.00004754229,0.000003964027,0.00000214914,0.0002528286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982303,0.0009984345,0.0002978307,0.0004043948,0.0000130061,5.175032e-7,1.711979e-7,0.000001714328,0.00005361974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01247797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2933749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237035728","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaq116","title":"Bid‐Ask Spreads, Volume, and Volatility: Evidence from Livestock Markets","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Bid price; Market liquidity; Bid–ask spread; Futures contract; Futures market; Economics; Transaction cost; Ask price; Econometrics; Financial economics; Market microstructure; Monetary economics; Business; Microeconomics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01068894482720546,"gpt":0.1872438460871697,"spread":0.1765549012599643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007416299,0.0003657145,0.001060031,0.0001773179,0.0001337566,0.0002733077,0.0006213806,0.0001540998,0.0003061771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002983311,0.0003015379,0.0003194235,0.0001854751,0.000327299,0.001477067,0.0001549569,0.0007109244,0.0001112636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001092997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004892666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004572147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002674763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997538,0.00003627327,0.001432865,0.0005424264,0.00004253966,0.0004079064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965021,0.0003610848,0.00221521,0.0003625324,0.0001453533,0.0004137052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000620693,0.0003987878,0.9167894,0.00004522732,0.001406059,0.00002321446,0.002644598,0.00009948559,0.005938884,0.01322904,0.01832712,0.0404775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004861956,0.0004881452,0.9748914,0.00004723849,0.00004862306,0.0001812638,0.0006283427,0.0002536483,0.0001910938,0.005034939,0.01719321,0.0005558907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916655,0.001958393,0.00005603883,0.002375621,0.001091251,0.0001655804,0.0001401527,0.00002173019,0.002525779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894716,0.002673217,0.006307441,0.0002962747,0.0008419522,0.000005366783,0.00001341856,0.00002510872,0.0003656896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05810202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124116209","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00167","title":"Empirical Specification Requirements for Two‐Constraint Models of Recreation Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Economics; Recreation; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Marginal utility; Observable; Specification; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1657086039822526,"gpt":0.2785468841114142,"spread":0.1128382801291616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005240053,0.0001417995,0.0005142715,0.0001261486,0.00005440522,0.00003024987,0.0002027507,0.00004280612,0.00008207173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004956509,0.0001322647,0.0002310862,0.0001058114,0.0001360368,0.0007123836,0.00002005705,0.0000899872,0.00002369949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003858499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002249558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000679907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001223679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982619,0.00001852575,0.001290077,0.0002187505,0.0000279,0.0001828489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972898,0.00009860146,0.002305585,0.0001435878,0.00006444834,0.00009797325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004462416,0.000804636,0.6384225,0.00004165554,0.0008842977,0.000001188836,0.002405403,0.170591,0.002292245,0.1174199,0.002472492,0.06421842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002755196,0.00123982,0.9537107,0.00004133438,0.00006940426,0.00009947162,0.002536013,0.007000227,0.00091045,0.0251823,0.005917002,0.0005381239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860445,0.0001604874,0.009676538,0.0009948887,0.0002375569,0.0002043552,0.00005093807,0.000005322446,0.002625444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901497,0.0007818604,0.008475969,0.0001278324,0.0002696675,0.00000910503,0.00003682762,0.00001333585,0.0001357105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3152881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5393596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141209297","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00995.x","title":"Wildlife Damage and Agriculture: A Dynamic Analysis of Compensation Schemes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Wildlife; Damages; Compensation (psychology); Wildlife conservation; Stock (firearms); Natural resource economics; Welfare; Business; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Market economy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01959887363649137,"gpt":0.2026950041531761,"spread":0.1830961305166847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007147174,0.0001503489,0.0007407428,0.000336334,0.00005187975,0.00003273543,0.0001586481,0.00005124405,0.00005599223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002858326,0.000126389,0.000251413,0.0003713303,0.0001855537,0.0004127961,0.0000372866,0.0001257948,0.00001133164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002179658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008703909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000108794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001192246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984194,0.00001437059,0.001159051,0.0001991733,0.00002979215,0.0001781852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974381,0.00008516158,0.002202072,0.0001158995,0.00004145249,0.0001173709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009499222,0.00022178,0.9424626,0.00001936403,0.003362342,0.000002487786,0.00172831,0.01302813,0.002559733,0.02761021,0.0002544146,0.008655663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003396849,0.0002002533,0.9953783,0.000006626817,0.0001770601,0.00001837196,0.001811336,0.0006995972,0.0002223079,0.0003538231,0.000614494,0.0001781603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970375,0.0003315458,0.001466085,0.0004544973,0.0001144452,0.00007243834,0.00005400172,0.000004680939,0.0004648258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963273,0.0007169647,0.002589487,0.0002171214,0.0000517968,7.608637e-7,0.00004278911,0.000007726757,0.00004605652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05291571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5153992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334483474","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav065","title":"Bayesian Estimation of Possibly Similar Yield Densities: Implications for Rating Crop Insurance Contracts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Crop insurance; Actuarial science; Sample (material); Insurance policy; Government (linguistics); Agriculture; Yield (engineering); Econometrics; Economics; Nonparametric statistics; Business; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02045869158979734,"gpt":0.2354578095480556,"spread":0.2149991179582583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002829847,0.0001781829,0.000457412,0.00001923204,0.0001525144,0.00006822669,0.000328202,0.00006094143,0.000004863851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003036864,0.00006156562,0.0002162452,0.0002695486,0.0001759353,0.0004961883,0.00002959467,0.0001325535,0.000001839023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008613391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004935395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001295317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001523717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99871,0.00004530401,0.0007161057,0.0001748734,0.0001031058,0.0002505853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972494,0.0004839926,0.001346064,0.00005144978,0.0006355259,0.000233624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006150393,0.0004344269,0.0690058,0.00003599075,0.0002925473,0.000003728753,0.002681267,0.1498777,0.2700749,0.001978314,0.006009745,0.4989905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003770126,0.001864319,0.9811383,0.00008311711,0.00005128757,0.0002177631,0.007759584,0.000510167,0.00625385,0.0007755649,0.0006319321,0.0003370866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956411,0.0001682453,0.00024416,0.003374903,0.0001517562,0.0002158575,0.00007984327,0.00001385321,0.0001102784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958805,0.0001555545,0.003408676,0.0001655503,0.0003185102,0.000006852557,0.00002355272,0.000001398996,0.00003934108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9121325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2510573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215983692","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aau052","title":"By Ounce or by Calorie: The Differential Effects of Alternative Sugar‐Sweetened Beverage Tax Strategies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; York University; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Economics; Fluid ounce (US); Calorie; Per capita; Subsidy; Agricultural economics; Environmental health; Medicine; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004997062182172536,"gpt":0.1764130394367753,"spread":0.1714159772546028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000369487,0.0003711775,0.001165895,0.00008684837,0.0001358334,0.0001979836,0.0008634767,0.00009675644,0.00006166404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001362305,0.00021772,0.0003855498,0.0001818523,0.0003331957,0.0007561503,0.0000949547,0.0003732819,0.00002643329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001649915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004131074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003700066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008201775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977154,0.00007792703,0.001380513,0.000363081,0.00005967613,0.0004034522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957221,0.0005389844,0.003141176,0.0002685268,0.0001385634,0.0001906712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003743443,0.003098452,0.02032016,0.0006073496,0.01121411,0.00003219382,0.01290666,0.006579284,0.04013389,0.2882192,0.5724807,0.04066457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02316852,0.03252228,0.4101873,0.0006734373,0.0009734274,0.0007444589,0.02567216,0.001558475,0.07205691,0.06211536,0.3614919,0.008835788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931354,0.000709375,0.0009573498,0.001286043,0.0009049855,0.000212648,0.0002243021,0.00001083405,0.002559041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964866,0.001815885,0.0002749091,0.0003061914,0.0004589715,0.00001004635,0.00003214982,0.00002311712,0.0005921331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3898671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8878363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136481553","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav051","title":"The Natural Resource Curse and Fiscal Decentralization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; Generalitat Valenciana","keywords":"Decentralization; Resource curse; Natural resource; Boom; Economics; Curse; Blessing; Resource (disambiguation); Politics; Economic system; Development economics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Political science; Ecology; Market economy; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01537754170152929,"gpt":0.1990977555582975,"spread":0.1837202138567682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005689067,0.0001518681,0.0004048198,0.00007179496,0.0001384201,0.000172139,0.0002916835,0.0000399014,0.000003328978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001602216,0.0001027951,0.0001262286,0.0001240878,0.0003138726,0.0004518127,0.00005825918,0.0002172297,0.00003539107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001798141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002531834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004166969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002290391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986858,0.00002938033,0.0007984503,0.0001745188,0.00002401119,0.0002878346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983567,0.0001100972,0.001104721,0.0001297624,0.00004867131,0.0002500571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004536611,0.0001298232,0.1045833,0.00001444705,0.0005443867,0.000006874192,0.00452594,0.001851242,0.00002200318,0.7883738,0.0608794,0.0386151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002640584,0.001149418,0.4871784,0.00003091969,0.00005122244,0.0009290734,0.01055638,0.00224973,0.0001181701,0.14064,0.3534989,0.0009571294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822927,0.001876573,0.00004465537,0.007263681,0.0005689422,0.00007032759,0.00001682936,0.000009240907,0.007857012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982533,0.0002981828,0.0003065612,0.0004818131,0.0004819635,0.000001548883,0.000005255308,0.00001201081,0.0001594036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6477338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4191864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130414852","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00118","title":"Managing Urban Deer","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Opposition (politics); Wildlife management; Population; Environmental planning; Population control; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Control (management); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Computer science; Biology; Environmental science; Political science; Engineering; Sociology; Demography; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004295510657669727,"gpt":0.1698287436776559,"spread":0.1655332330199862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001700425,0.00007253613,0.0001416262,0.00001685266,0.00006326091,0.00001657377,0.0001263357,0.00001832767,0.0003488733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000233033,0.00005072854,0.00006672959,0.00009771156,0.0001284757,0.0002986008,0.00001769907,0.000104134,0.0001166333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000131501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001007836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001694266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003094104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994683,0.00004388137,0.000232413,0.00008239883,0.00003953989,0.0001334177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999478,0.00003758392,0.0003429838,0.00005603208,0.00001080216,0.00007459344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001336252,0.00003216161,0.9741458,4.911801e-7,0.0000395699,0.000003683085,0.0002759435,0.006124422,0.0002262899,0.001076569,0.009472213,0.008589442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001500915,0.0001566667,0.9866902,0.000002564024,0.00001591512,0.0001844625,0.0008522766,0.00001973929,0.0001661069,0.0005029402,0.01115518,0.0001038348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903167,0.0000133031,0.00006767702,0.001414627,0.0001755794,0.00002729278,2.725549e-7,0.000004261861,0.007980217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968807,0.00005310103,0.001819308,0.0008763545,0.00005586373,7.403444e-7,5.651993e-7,0.000003442409,0.0003099256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01254437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3819917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158962388","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01163.x","title":"Promotion and Fast Food Demand","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Business; Almost ideal demand system; On demand; Consumer demand; Market share; Economics; Marketing; Agricultural economics; Microeconomics; Commerce; Production (economics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01428608431622876,"gpt":0.1884221470364817,"spread":0.174136062720253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000132821,0.0001069946,0.0002293701,0.00009338163,0.000121501,0.00008715687,0.0001002746,0.00001722359,0.0000249023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001736399,0.00007371272,0.00007440584,0.0001326655,0.000103103,0.0009026155,0.00004574494,0.0001093385,0.000008058784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002049641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001235621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004787092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003515555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994293,0.000007554981,0.0002854961,0.00009543708,0.00005224837,0.0001299081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992657,0.00002318951,0.0005289559,0.00004898432,0.0001111453,0.00002203255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001215525,0.0001611507,0.6984683,0.00004510672,0.0001919953,0.0000243921,0.0005288688,0.0002340458,0.001671558,0.001094956,0.00171791,0.2957402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003374201,0.0001286047,0.9954849,0.00001779634,0.00006552564,0.0004818726,0.0006388637,0.00003939707,0.00005204916,0.00008097573,0.002515578,0.0001569829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977791,0.00007213498,0.00002843407,0.0008222132,0.0001667038,0.00005241289,8.261989e-7,0.00001089241,0.001067326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988862,0.0001756717,0.0002166069,0.00017042,0.000505569,8.236406e-7,0.000002254236,0.000006642374,0.0000358307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2970166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3005917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092007073","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aas109","title":"Personal Values and Decision Making: Evidence from Environmental Footprint Labeling in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Footprint; Ecological footprint; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Geography; Political science; Sustainable development; Law; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007222814918349185,"gpt":0.2147145892661522,"spread":0.207491774347803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002381376,0.000118971,0.0002014974,0.00001705563,0.00005400514,0.0000190635,0.0001437974,0.00001721097,0.0003307311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004278941,0.00008837192,0.0000430639,0.00005313266,0.000177544,0.0003886646,0.000120345,0.0001576411,0.000008230326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002770792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005166047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1332288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06056599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990882,0.00004782628,0.0003529241,0.000148529,0.0001370439,0.0002254864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992362,0.0002162161,0.0002883968,0.00007206642,0.000002473883,0.0001846992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002731835,0.00004112083,0.9189839,7.650497e-7,0.000007587043,0.00000111223,0.001910944,0.001538398,0.0007835257,9.863352e-7,0.00004884013,0.07665554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001136488,0.00005371143,0.9764166,0.00002129873,0.000008800906,0.00004123417,0.02276813,0.000101598,0.0001449054,0.00008848507,0.0001190535,0.0001225752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991278,0.0002902301,0.00001403538,0.0003179107,0.0001468038,0.00005873921,0.000004351006,0.000001319701,0.0000388074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949653,0.0003454297,0.004424362,0.0001856305,0.00006476842,0.00000135954,0.00000101407,0.000004820265,0.000007350711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07653297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9565762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278882141","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav046","title":"The Impact of Perceptions in Averting‐decision Models: An Application of the Special Regressor Method to Drinking Water Choices","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Valuation (finance); Revealed preference; Econometrics; Ordered probit; Probit model; Discrete choice; Contingent valuation; Multivariate probit model; Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Perception; Risk perception; Empirical research; Bivariate analysis; Economics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0568962452854907,"gpt":0.2728111598422031,"spread":0.2159149145567124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001190281,0.0001121334,0.0003873305,0.00009295827,0.00006697702,0.00003454645,0.0004093873,0.00003554467,0.00001817541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003609486,0.00005830788,0.0002093986,0.0001211075,0.00009606803,0.0004776772,0.00007571797,0.0001264807,0.00001566858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004572484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002186706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007160111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000273113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985749,0.00005224618,0.001019503,0.0001563111,0.00003784031,0.0001591846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983409,0.00007472236,0.00124056,0.000202406,0.00005110073,0.00009032413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001109942,0.0001012973,0.2062251,0.000001551522,0.00007036695,6.934017e-8,0.004385677,0.7593072,0.0006706807,0.003582096,0.0001371791,0.02540778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004624821,0.0004279833,0.9678501,0.00001642525,0.00001102472,0.0000148931,0.003564415,0.0122716,0.0004222274,0.0145115,0.0003031917,0.0001441514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961957,0.00004134938,0.002392366,0.0003803253,0.0001453067,0.0001500463,0.00001242003,0.00000149359,0.0006810206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962757,0.00009293505,0.003295548,0.0000286923,0.000259265,0.000004863487,0.000003653437,0.000008395244,0.0000309495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.761625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2377726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168606282","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00869.x","title":"Rejecting New Technology: The Case of Genetically Modified Wheat","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Agricultural economics; Genetically engineered; Veto; Genetically modified organism; Economics; Business; Agricultural science; Biotechnology; Political science; Market economy; Biology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01220991107640807,"gpt":0.2133154384921087,"spread":0.2011055274157006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003080875,0.0001682402,0.0003811248,0.00003710141,0.0001580617,0.00007046661,0.000582049,0.00007924423,0.0000562535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008032232,0.00005177922,0.000186377,0.0005593402,0.0003855491,0.00009127086,0.0001206992,0.0003207695,0.000007377712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006577899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004882988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001502691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009494523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985772,0.00007781077,0.0006893492,0.0001926532,0.0001176819,0.0003453026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986276,0.000264585,0.0005950054,0.0000925459,0.0002751422,0.0001451386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008396405,0.0001300865,0.002391508,0.000004077828,0.0001003364,0.00009381282,0.0001412762,0.004127373,0.4853842,0.003881439,0.001124738,0.5025372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001634807,0.008189075,0.7010279,0.0000958953,0.0002827047,0.03028576,0.02880932,0.0004374073,0.2067484,0.01606989,0.005023514,0.001395392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915419,0.0001734926,0.00003623939,0.007579641,0.0000737563,0.0001269813,0.000007857703,0.00001382381,0.0004462718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965625,0.00009616239,0.002697569,0.00006566602,0.0004641965,0.000001422344,0.000002546723,0.000001922918,0.0001080485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6986364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.227163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276122769","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav022","title":"Measuring Price Elasticities of Demand and Supply of Water Entitlements Based on Stated and Revealed Preference Data","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council; ACT Government","keywords":"Endogeneity; Price elasticity of demand; Economics; Entitlement (fair division); Revealed preference; Price elasticity of supply; Water supply; Elasticity (physics); Water use; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Agricultural economics; Environmental science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1491525315136065,"gpt":0.2061819232808684,"spread":0.05702939176726196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005726197,0.0001043553,0.0004208948,0.00009297952,0.0000218626,0.00002117904,0.0001702786,0.00002343063,0.00003568188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043245,0.00007816991,0.00003116874,0.00003347106,0.0001406881,0.0003661606,0.00008171031,0.00006956733,0.000005807716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007850351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001583716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008291428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008970606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989518,0.00002211193,0.0007077056,0.0001683026,0.00003055719,0.0001195378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987597,0.00005084306,0.0009215449,0.0001392823,0.00003597108,0.00009263134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000352491,0.0002491377,0.9676486,0.0001201202,0.0004178875,0.00000163148,0.003012416,0.02206957,0.001157102,0.001545377,0.0005444646,0.002881187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001570156,0.0009858314,0.9888508,0.00006826203,0.00004104539,0.00001571781,0.00204719,0.003212634,0.001901134,0.0007720191,0.0003203899,0.0002148111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986933,0.0001588636,0.0001946927,0.0001671668,0.000073253,0.00007801385,0.000163518,0.000001612917,0.0004695368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980383,0.0004091766,0.001410442,0.00003676538,0.00003064548,9.507444e-7,0.00003191726,0.000006564891,0.00003522381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02120219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3187676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096972785","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aau098","title":"Farmland Protection and Agricultural Land Values at the Urban‐Rural Fringe: British Columbia's Agricultural Land Reserve","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Zoning; Agricultural land; Agriculture; Residence; Land use; Subdivision; Agricultural economics; Geography; Land Values; Business; Economics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008106333324478686,"gpt":0.1658670496862441,"spread":0.1577607163617654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009370121,0.0003249588,0.0009891989,0.00007725781,0.0006183053,0.001202768,0.0004610301,0.0001241287,0.0000807901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001573469,0.0002636926,0.0003463431,0.0002508593,0.0003785618,0.0009303935,0.0001930734,0.0004810844,0.00005910498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004024412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01073598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01773848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975635,0.0001081326,0.001261631,0.0004403976,0.00006816756,0.0005581651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972067,0.0001678134,0.001945898,0.0002435032,0.0001586815,0.0002773748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002214694,0.0001820958,0.9403676,0.00007765835,0.0007719287,0.000008286038,0.001999586,0.003865489,0.0002506647,0.0005688047,0.02379085,0.02789558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00117133,0.0005806751,0.98306,0.00005876812,0.00005317741,0.001082181,0.001602421,0.0003054967,0.00002588664,0.0007384534,0.01072056,0.0006010341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991954,0.000508972,0.00002364669,0.001663798,0.0007656391,0.0003127105,0.00006687726,0.00003374117,0.0046706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947565,0.001784552,0.0002198805,0.0001590653,0.001214215,0.00001593534,0.00003670977,0.00003022859,0.00178288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04269243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138926224","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aap022","title":"The Effect of Strict Agricultural Zoning on Agricultural Land Values: The Case of Ontario's Greenbelt","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Zoning; Legislation; Metropolitan area; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Boundary (topology); Geography; Land use; Land Values; Agricultural land; Environmental protection; Economics; Archaeology; Law; Political science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006052990814093039,"gpt":0.1846982669825664,"spread":0.1786452761684733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001830291,0.0004000899,0.001207451,0.0001269535,0.0003956418,0.0001778904,0.0008215186,0.0001217373,0.00005191387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002787524,0.0001896515,0.0006900448,0.0003142371,0.0005190485,0.0004336474,0.0001069548,0.0008987446,0.0000223747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003654522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008433426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007520222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01406522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972611,0.0001126178,0.001779547,0.0003152206,0.00005932,0.0004721741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941812,0.001194614,0.003875475,0.0003980578,0.0001705576,0.0001800653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003481254,0.0007610781,0.7438801,0.0002138228,0.005252441,0.0001859525,0.01938179,0.03698558,0.003714042,0.05447959,0.00935942,0.1223049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002353628,0.004709886,0.9729517,0.00008548435,0.0002184246,0.003896257,0.005304229,0.0001691293,0.00241234,0.0008556314,0.00613163,0.0009116348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894875,0.0001353588,0.000004015754,0.0006334315,0.001415755,0.000262098,0.00005161251,0.00001043675,0.007999773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986386,0.0002668051,0.0002459731,0.0000389645,0.0005108727,0.000006636087,0.000008906078,0.00002054426,0.0002627377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2290716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109439360","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aar121","title":"Does Regulation of Manure Land Application Work Against Agglomeration Economies? Theory and Evidence from the French Hog Sector","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Spatial and Panel Data Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economies of agglomeration; Ceteris paribus; Manure; Externality; Productivity; Production (economics); Economics; Work (physics); Natural resource economics; Dispersion (optics); Agricultural economics; Economic geography; Microeconomics; Ecology; Economic growth; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01729462192506248,"gpt":0.1821203879637185,"spread":0.164825766038656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005632401,0.0001344297,0.0004397103,0.00007571439,0.00007787207,0.00005754239,0.0002696826,0.00004748603,0.0001126596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009652648,0.00007408608,0.0001313666,0.0001694965,0.000133886,0.0005597135,0.0000378208,0.0001201584,0.00001744728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006254811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001405759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001839632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004877047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99881,0.00005739714,0.000783725,0.0002111744,0.00002371587,0.0001139901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972889,0.0003547187,0.002008919,0.0002121809,0.0000714005,0.00006387638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002364782,0.00005378601,0.9453574,0.00001199331,0.0004835269,3.96115e-7,0.00362923,0.0009527015,0.0004060164,0.005963816,0.0003903706,0.0425143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001662571,0.0001406081,0.9901459,0.00003976667,0.00005001342,0.000003090755,0.0006221592,0.0001604383,0.0004957085,0.00768392,0.0003450635,0.0001470777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966652,0.0007821258,0.001418418,0.0005697804,0.0001795382,0.00009987798,0.00009350838,0.000004556133,0.0001869288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966412,0.00174095,0.001087193,0.0001626993,0.0002829139,0.000004769412,0.00003396462,0.000007214568,0.00003915272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04478851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3021142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150849756","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00736.x","title":"Estimating the Structure of Market Reaction to News: Information Events and Lumber Futures Prices","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Aperiodic graph; Event study; Event (particle physics); Futures market; Inside information; Business; Economics; Econometrics; Financial economics; Agricultural economics; Geography; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00356072094788252,"gpt":0.1773638425142459,"spread":0.1738031215663634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008904818,0.00008194718,0.0001578946,0.00004473709,0.00006623435,0.00007236839,0.0001220841,0.00001515675,0.00001195245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003360652,0.00004633201,0.00004094095,0.0001524048,0.0000256855,0.002295772,0.00003150509,0.00008446056,0.000004821557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000327329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001079699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002465909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002866426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994657,0.000003902575,0.000329632,0.00005153415,0.00006543018,0.00008379843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983016,0.00001804464,0.001487865,0.00005344964,0.0001285294,0.00001049456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003177787,0.00004481392,0.1278556,0.00009666408,0.0001540102,6.488063e-7,0.001333058,0.05264004,0.002621956,0.001030726,0.03104271,0.7828621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001751611,0.00003020699,0.9807409,0.00003617542,0.00002685836,0.00002395753,0.001080325,0.000495643,0.00004984813,0.0001041849,0.01715049,0.00008622425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967684,0.00001579522,0.00006378783,0.002575376,0.0001823948,0.00006706401,0.00000432763,0.000003530596,0.0003193326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961506,0.00003520995,0.001842364,0.001014238,0.0009329569,3.822099e-7,0.000002464004,0.000002821089,0.00001893831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8528854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1889365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021140638","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00814.x","title":"Effectiveness of Conservation Programs in Illinois and Gains from Targeting","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Session (web analytics); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01580764849045041,"gpt":0.20881776873183,"spread":0.1930101202413796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003558825,0.0001516676,0.0004644403,0.00001979956,0.00004469016,0.00004242946,0.0001779825,0.00005173357,0.00001538395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003209365,0.00005592013,0.0001202642,0.0001802428,0.0001228699,0.0003573661,0.00004019636,0.0001429013,0.000002522336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009563316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001269938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00183092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00103416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988725,0.0001045791,0.0006157563,0.000163055,0.00004909765,0.0001950412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985901,0.0003644333,0.0007997723,0.00002603781,0.0001105616,0.0001090842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003338348,0.0002923382,0.32014,0.00002460226,0.0001694156,0.000002603866,0.001159892,0.001891177,0.2292719,0.001246845,0.0001702496,0.4452971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002999884,0.0004968058,0.9921905,0.00006544248,0.00001531668,0.00002102549,0.002116567,0.00008037259,0.002993232,0.0001791143,0.001362629,0.0001789586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980206,0.0001843866,7.774961e-7,0.001503782,0.00005731538,0.0001302744,0.00002567171,0.000005850979,0.00007136797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983391,0.0005454777,0.0006322511,0.000102243,0.0003228592,0.00000285165,0.00004804107,0.000001055594,0.000006165748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6720505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2767815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066132435","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00889.x","title":"Pricing Weather Insurance with a Random Strike Price: The Ontario Ice‐Wine Harvest","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Product (mathematics); Weather patterns; Extreme weather; Environmental science; Wine; Business; Meteorology; Economics; Mathematics; Geography; Climate change; Geology; Oceanography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004013205288083606,"gpt":0.1617784734757684,"spread":0.1577652681876848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002774599,0.0003057242,0.0005215269,0.00001565476,0.000366226,0.0001941471,0.0006088526,0.00005571713,0.00007741117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003125603,0.00006890001,0.0002492397,0.000464661,0.0003109806,0.0005226578,0.00005201663,0.0004125813,0.00001389362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002097192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004615425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01132944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03868952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983762,0.00007110356,0.0006335386,0.000266571,0.0002273662,0.0004252106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979789,0.0003634637,0.001145515,0.00007594303,0.0002895245,0.0001466178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002009904,0.0008383002,0.7549215,0.00001573413,0.0005544494,0.00006274028,0.002443152,0.02417394,0.06364505,0.0006777859,0.008738651,0.1419188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005365147,0.0008554732,0.9639271,0.00003667304,0.00003885968,0.0003204372,0.002175433,0.000004170784,0.0009073676,0.00004048622,0.03087627,0.0002811516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961796,0.0001825635,0.000009221012,0.002064532,0.0001748656,0.0002400378,0.00001097024,0.00002133013,0.001116842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967308,0.0002458777,0.0003324705,0.0001938393,0.001295592,0.000006367254,0.00001235495,0.000002086908,0.00118063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2090057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}