{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":56,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":56,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"1a0ec1377a69","filters":{"venue":"American Journal of Political Science"}},"results":[{"id":"W1988029429","doi":"10.2307/2669265","title":"Reconsidering the Environmental Determinants of White Racial Attitudes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":507,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine; Biology; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05026951301154472,"gpt":0.322568517154638,"spread":0.2722990041430933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001267119,0.00007032234,0.0002156881,0.00006317932,0.0008953488,0.00004109135,0.0004488724,0.00001436047,0.0005133086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000440197,0.00004583932,0.00008178798,0.0003545946,0.008109124,0.0003221275,0.00004913444,0.0001146584,0.00001200859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001192509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003076402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004071224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002446548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981585,0.0001409373,0.0003499811,0.0001130909,0.000729053,0.0005084226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990036,0.0003354423,0.000217196,0.00009913217,0.00006707092,0.0002775359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004252953,0.0001358462,0.7845552,0.000002965606,0.00002337464,0.00001578248,0.04273612,0.00001614008,0.0004996174,0.01582085,0.00007441626,0.1560771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002441934,0.0004914036,0.9595106,0.0000502764,0.00003876721,0.00005906984,0.03030697,0.00006064644,0.001085621,0.00230671,0.005649058,0.0001967326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915285,0.00005754444,0.00002692322,0.001541318,0.0001193752,0.00004180067,0.00000322442,0.000004156782,0.006677135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988082,0.00008049825,0.0003511281,0.0003095811,0.0002102985,6.956943e-7,2.148619e-8,0.000002968049,0.0002365941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1749553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169495003","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00389.x","title":"Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":498,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punctuated equilibrium; Kurtosis; Distribution (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Politics; Perspective (graphical); Control (management); Public economics; Economics; Political science; Economic system; Law; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05250744969455836,"gpt":0.426014744330123,"spread":0.3735072946355647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001698965,0.00008007709,0.0002901475,0.0002026426,0.0001411409,0.00008207817,0.0003502814,0.00002283058,0.00004152127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001354859,0.00006219519,0.00005983186,0.00153591,0.002780892,0.0004959679,0.00001379254,0.0002027823,0.00001656881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009667898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009501672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01745531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007942351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974927,0.000285661,0.0003697413,0.0001456493,0.0007313136,0.000974991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981251,0.0002518272,0.000171923,0.00007968752,0.0005969418,0.0007744593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002120031,0.00007747294,0.004309955,3.510071e-7,0.000001998565,0.000008057096,0.004393212,0.00001023731,0.001740877,0.9887071,0.00003496046,0.0006945797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005093488,0.00290706,0.7235574,0.00008887431,0.00002044623,0.00002626245,0.04128765,0.0003253818,0.002150423,0.2280286,0.0007539112,0.0003446777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484197,0.00001751001,0.0001205789,0.0172326,0.0001198574,0.00007668541,8.519394e-7,0.000009918101,0.03400227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988087,6.732143e-7,0.0002282563,0.0006651049,0.0002459873,6.138775e-7,5.523428e-8,0.000001812907,0.00004879158],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7606785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592290488","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12313","title":"The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":395,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Göteborgs Universitet; National Science Foundation; Vetenskapsrådet; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Austrian Science Fund; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Pledge; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Power (physics); Political science; Business; Public administration; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1015374552639146,"gpt":0.4697373691619765,"spread":0.3681999138980619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003548821,0.00007619745,0.0002571902,0.00004972465,0.001279166,0.0001587684,0.000850038,0.00001326021,0.00002377844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00223642,0.00003541246,0.0001216106,0.0002982719,0.004935342,0.0002268124,0.00005722219,0.0001577607,0.000003148902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003068464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004963447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02796051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008277093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977286,0.000319404,0.0004356604,0.0001077645,0.0008321656,0.0005764464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974228,0.0007337095,0.0007271867,0.0002800846,0.0005329206,0.0003033546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009622731,0.0003178913,0.1949735,0.00000119666,0.00005547548,9.720685e-7,0.0121283,0.00002545565,0.001636967,0.7900805,0.00008125571,0.0006021978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001351788,0.003886144,0.9605002,0.00004069248,0.00001783263,0.000001604561,0.02402651,0.00008846334,0.001900447,0.009300468,0.00003815648,0.00006433364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913171,0.000006002701,0.00003046152,0.0030581,0.0001316415,0.000166858,0.000001891042,0.000002116124,0.005285845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998246,9.979465e-7,0.000005658413,0.00002400463,0.0001021304,0.000003542286,1.358103e-8,0.000002235948,0.00003678093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7807801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138315171","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00352.x","title":"Economic Inequality and Intolerance: Attitudes toward Homosexuality in 35 Democracies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":376,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic inequality; World Values Survey; Inequality; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Democracy; Development economics; Normative; Homosexuality; Social inequality; State (computer science); Survey data collection; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Political economy; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04751034221650008,"gpt":0.369472329958785,"spread":0.321961987742285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004911812,0.0001258463,0.0004504515,0.0001733428,0.0005288111,0.00009027625,0.0006047,0.00004106778,0.00005024298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001568733,0.0001060465,0.00007138602,0.0005655096,0.01053406,0.0009248958,0.0001088359,0.00029699,0.000008149025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007409594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001506059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02055393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001658175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970006,0.0004600043,0.0006608805,0.0002592965,0.0006987574,0.0009204124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981902,0.0004420388,0.0003071844,0.0001622253,0.0001834342,0.0007149371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002932218,0.0001009722,0.7357651,0.000008699115,0.000004952984,0.00001931152,0.008350701,0.000004935323,0.000103976,0.2500162,0.00003474982,0.005561121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002387841,0.0003074504,0.9804958,0.00002524052,0.000004738636,0.00004622008,0.007442276,0.00002833274,0.0001461824,0.01057884,0.0005105139,0.0001756166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913846,0.00006388167,0.0002031006,0.003451457,0.0002901651,0.00006171001,0.0000067746,0.00001193284,0.004526361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977989,0.0001444157,0.0008533662,0.0008691211,0.000302123,0.000001230957,1.275255e-7,0.000004270671,0.00002651378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2447307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008429742","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x","title":"Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":368,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Orthodoxy; Public policy; Policy studies; Institution; State (computer science); Institutional change; Political science; Population; Policy analysis; Theme (computing); Public administration; Economics; Public economics; Sociology; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02965944879117946,"gpt":0.3568628959109649,"spread":0.3272034471197854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005769121,0.0001273626,0.0002852634,0.0006236149,0.0004324386,0.0001180051,0.0006169096,0.00004022188,0.00002057081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003305765,0.0001088236,0.00007554042,0.003731251,0.004121976,0.0005683373,0.00004082333,0.0004913458,0.000003814403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003387461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003010694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03065529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01934362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962727,0.000189511,0.000543564,0.0001941628,0.00107332,0.001726731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975271,0.0009805503,0.0002024178,0.0001210039,0.0002031453,0.0009657501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001977581,0.00003479686,0.1924293,0.000003743978,0.000004317365,0.00004016478,0.008434685,0.00003162587,0.0002057159,0.7951778,0.000001237642,0.003616845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005442782,0.0006671135,0.5561305,0.0001739592,0.0000228398,0.0001481818,0.3772425,0.001720215,0.000117587,0.06272439,0.00007428566,0.0004341121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9219724,0.000006264524,0.01260991,0.005419864,0.0001171231,0.00006261572,0.000002804023,0.00001592902,0.05979307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985095,0.000005104901,0.0008056641,0.0003110321,0.0003341211,4.037382e-7,3.279538e-7,0.0000106202,0.00002322337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7324535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152896665","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00068.x","title":"Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind when It Runs for Office?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":342,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Impartiality; Coercion (linguistics); Accountability; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Social psychology; Sentence; Criminal justice; Value (mathematics); Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04572646034996888,"gpt":0.3791096180838859,"spread":0.3333831577339171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001577426,0.00007769584,0.0002167581,0.00006723173,0.001081455,0.0000990288,0.0003394708,0.00002224828,0.00003943687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001574257,0.00006121714,0.00006746922,0.0004165031,0.01079688,0.0004064346,0.00005792121,0.0001166624,0.000006834542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003228216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001641801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01088409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007969085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982352,0.00003659484,0.0002659523,0.0001744487,0.0006881228,0.000599745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982453,0.0003777416,0.0001456406,0.00006736362,0.0006340437,0.0005299087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006505247,0.00006664017,0.00119686,0.000003639872,0.000009296406,0.000002084821,0.004999711,0.00000271282,0.00007257075,0.9897304,0.0001884272,0.003662586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001827181,0.001591909,0.08178722,0.0001474963,0.0003316346,0.00009232924,0.1500506,0.00001617263,0.0004063555,0.6967338,0.06647256,0.0005428175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8867028,0.0001358657,0.0041035,0.0917513,0.0004867668,0.0001824292,0.0000218798,0.000012388,0.01660307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929469,0.00004134361,0.002580217,0.003909586,0.0004990666,0.000002011838,7.285161e-8,0.000002057523,0.00001872969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2929966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104300977","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00405.x","title":"A General Empirical Law of Public Budgets: A Comparative Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":307,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punctuated equilibrium; Presidential system; Politics; Distribution (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Function (biology); Power (physics); Political science; Institution; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Public economics; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06128039436854357,"gpt":0.3295377310930808,"spread":0.2682573367245372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001208299,0.000144728,0.001019474,0.0006075174,0.0001090422,0.00009691158,0.0006625523,0.00003469263,0.0001724633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003361719,0.0001272235,0.0003964073,0.002052635,0.003446483,0.0004409562,0.00005695344,0.0002227274,0.00003807381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002514931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001587525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001375776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002581545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973598,0.00004564786,0.001158179,0.0002638356,0.0001597233,0.001012841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997631,0.000176487,0.0006783679,0.0002593932,0.0002206323,0.001034108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008489365,0.000143291,0.01419553,0.000001455026,0.00007589056,0.000002521263,0.0002101651,0.0000315439,0.00002575927,0.984848,0.0001158638,0.0003415121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005698524,0.00285917,0.5896219,0.00001244063,0.0001138519,0.00005775178,0.0008910836,0.004543887,0.0004890004,0.3857791,0.01459028,0.0004716852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8737242,0.0001216854,0.0040136,0.01646902,0.0001011613,0.00005051614,0.00006097196,0.000007791532,0.1054511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914659,0.000005017955,0.002767618,0.005553471,0.0001578795,6.821467e-7,6.945373e-7,0.000003443085,0.00004528046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5990689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869341281","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00300.x","title":"Economics, Party, and the Vote: Causality Issues and Panel Data","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Causality (physics); Spurious relationship; Argument (complex analysis); Positive economics; Perception; Economics; Voting; Variable (mathematics); Panel data; Political science; Public economics; Econometrics; Law; Psychology; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1146257380675136,"gpt":0.3945179183706359,"spread":0.2798921803031224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003388242,0.00006381304,0.0002305648,0.00003661872,0.0006338502,0.0001055573,0.0004593321,0.00001839535,0.000008135466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001871245,0.00003927839,0.00002189088,0.0002190981,0.0153899,0.000491176,0.0001277823,0.0001272852,0.000002472372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000743007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004292679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06279677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001613045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983354,0.0003149588,0.0003020495,0.0001646168,0.0003197223,0.0005632766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983164,0.000543104,0.0001601473,0.0001916354,0.00014013,0.000648594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001832704,0.00001537368,0.04600686,0.000001761382,0.000005886195,0.000003396015,0.001302098,4.88675e-7,0.00002061601,0.9499143,0.0001628756,0.002548018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009134891,0.0004981279,0.8681412,0.00003733303,0.00006884523,0.0002824519,0.005168063,0.0008227651,0.0001408236,0.09807533,0.02552337,0.0003282501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615025,0.0001391855,0.00006081687,0.03704669,0.0001099659,0.00006114591,0.000006655757,0.00000514223,0.001067879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985264,0.000119094,0.0002069595,0.0006808899,0.0003861922,6.350361e-7,1.911498e-7,0.00000251376,0.000077139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8518389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987209076","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00194.x","title":"Economic Voting and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Individual‐Level Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":279,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Voting; Corporate governance; Argument (complex analysis); Multilevel model; Public economics; Proposition; Government (linguistics); Political science; Punishment (psychology); Economics; Positive economics; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06481555450135508,"gpt":0.3867787262321502,"spread":0.3219631717307951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001653237,0.00008865077,0.0003518687,0.0001464625,0.0003857111,0.0001669929,0.0002920997,0.00002384858,0.0000429873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003272801,0.00007356187,0.00009245982,0.0006534177,0.003237945,0.0004155804,0.00003865973,0.0001324175,0.000008722613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004174989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004684889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07297788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005510396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978296,0.0001814668,0.0004431082,0.0001719194,0.0005954457,0.0007784266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983937,0.000411926,0.0003752625,0.00006807246,0.0001802646,0.0005708455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004757321,0.00002566899,0.1645753,0.000001086474,0.00002832307,0.000001795538,0.000704047,0.00007530615,0.00009699906,0.8334553,0.00004150267,0.0009898958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001196381,0.0001341089,0.9925524,0.00001263253,0.0001079201,0.000004870634,0.001017354,0.0008214862,0.0002394475,0.004656669,0.0002190704,0.0001143963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938029,0.00002415509,0.001235323,0.001668621,0.00009215233,0.00005197109,0.00002278529,0.000007117766,0.003094997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984152,0.000001190986,0.001019731,0.0001395054,0.0003536154,0.00000121293,3.861892e-7,0.000002742825,0.00006642189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8287986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120643638","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00108.x","title":"Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":265,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Irish; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Public administration; Focus (optics); Geography; Politics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03452882814731853,"gpt":0.3423258635713111,"spread":0.3077970354239925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247522,0.00008491958,0.0002505353,0.000108097,0.0002453026,0.0001070204,0.0002105661,0.00002560928,0.0000154172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001194694,0.00005449196,0.00002469854,0.0008130114,0.005339957,0.0001985949,0.00002237219,0.0002201093,0.000001279468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004441875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002664494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9285508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980378,0.0002030973,0.0003449038,0.0001284964,0.0005264887,0.0007592366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983209,0.000408719,0.0001503726,0.0000649049,0.0001471174,0.000908036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003701368,0.00001087227,0.08961732,0.000001107622,0.000003924497,0.00001311394,0.0008547627,0.000006530562,0.00004838176,0.9084516,0.00006548929,0.0008898643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00587608,0.001038712,0.769124,0.0002662395,0.00007944286,0.0002341211,0.005088963,0.00005549758,0.0005070388,0.2042193,0.01297248,0.0005380596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672603,0.00003292064,0.00005385065,0.03223707,0.0001122374,0.00009138347,0.000001994779,0.000003061155,0.0002071681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989908,0.00000336313,0.00006092767,0.0006800233,0.0001618397,9.849208e-7,1.078705e-7,0.000002588811,0.00009939808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7042323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1732266619","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12145","title":"It's (Change in) the (Future) Economy, Stupid: Economic Indicators, the Media, and Public Opinion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Perception; Recession; Affect (linguistics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Media coverage; Politics; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Media studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03613873549765027,"gpt":0.3564727057531193,"spread":0.320333970255469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005431013,0.00007690831,0.0001834604,0.0001430713,0.0004268927,0.0002576458,0.0006772236,0.00002881222,0.0000278511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007558039,0.00004186212,0.0000440723,0.0005022289,0.003748802,0.0005654081,0.00004096928,0.0002176066,0.000009806414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002420901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005040303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01075889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005840173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976988,0.0006600083,0.0003449547,0.0001366826,0.0003823461,0.0007772222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980628,0.0009799976,0.0002210711,0.0001371441,0.00006060984,0.0005383126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001835473,0.00001492947,0.05585374,0.000001175084,0.000001689339,3.233301e-7,0.003533621,1.908192e-7,0.000001842826,0.930728,0.00009545363,0.009767232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002520951,0.0005566184,0.7351522,0.00003057353,0.00001438804,0.00002913727,0.01989388,0.0001487923,0.00001234759,0.0540705,0.1896308,0.000208697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7311432,0.00006889152,0.00004839741,0.2614736,0.0005537755,0.0001359211,0.000001465484,0.000005031844,0.006569743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931105,0.00002277071,0.000027219,0.004455968,0.002370747,0.000006876652,1.653285e-7,0.000003160902,0.000002559026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8766575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141214233","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00072.x","title":"Race, Bureaucratic Discretion, and the Implementation of Welfare Reform","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Welfare reform; Discretion; Sanctions; Context (archaeology); Welfare; Demographic economics; Political science; Bureaucracy; Population; Politics; Sociology; Economics; Demography; Geography; Gender studies; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008628040850171454,"gpt":0.3284888459888436,"spread":0.3198608051386722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001814439,0.0000560778,0.0001708719,0.00007422923,0.0004531725,0.00005708708,0.0003206031,0.00001312203,0.00001910905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002343414,0.00003288367,0.00004779975,0.0006414609,0.007238232,0.0002942122,0.00002714479,0.00009827776,6.202441e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002926099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006067865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02213893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008982555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998472,0.00009464045,0.0003005825,0.00008884766,0.0006484364,0.0003955273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990022,0.00005789118,0.0002562783,0.0000860369,0.0003123968,0.0002852452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009335063,0.00001333771,0.004086032,0.000001757042,0.000004677097,9.711293e-7,0.007446725,0.000006892146,0.00006507392,0.9854681,0.000001118943,0.002895989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009234657,0.0003582767,0.4772726,0.00001988097,0.00003951644,0.00002595691,0.4447796,0.00002665564,0.0001110485,0.07617678,0.0001684879,0.00009770035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695879,0.00002768814,0.003242113,0.02427467,0.0001122851,0.00007697184,0.000003844786,0.000003591408,0.002670991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983826,0.00005889057,0.001130626,0.0003432135,0.00006852228,8.522802e-7,1.58731e-7,0.000002383401,0.00001278186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9092913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149791711","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00174.x","title":"Cognitive Heterogeneity and Economic Voting: A Comparative Analysis of Four Democratic Electorates","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Voting; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Attribution; Political economy; Survey data collection; Cognition; Accountability; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05778373368133782,"gpt":0.4031287300189785,"spread":0.3453449963376407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00145354,0.00008534708,0.0004634369,0.0002702447,0.0002316104,0.0000651307,0.0001952585,0.00002166391,0.00002538124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006564299,0.00006980736,0.0001034874,0.001028702,0.003502123,0.0003730189,0.00002443846,0.0001056191,0.00000464682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002934127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005424557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007561318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007869787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980415,0.0003042267,0.000485648,0.0001503971,0.0004043971,0.0006138835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977497,0.0007297739,0.0004045429,0.00005506069,0.0003858222,0.0006750345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003796964,0.00008375361,0.4249667,0.000004228352,0.0002374997,0.000001871959,0.002384344,0.0001545835,0.001515421,0.5687563,0.00001244075,0.00184494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000267987,0.0009364788,0.9785128,0.00004858589,0.000648956,0.00001112208,0.003711615,0.007580923,0.00597978,0.001987085,0.00008620859,0.0002284669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967201,0.00002833261,0.0005396238,0.001563923,0.00003843964,0.0000630982,0.00000796575,0.000004745713,0.001033821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993347,0.000002108348,0.0003281513,0.0001618726,0.000159862,0.000001186722,2.313404e-7,0.00000207948,0.000009827607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5667692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121228507","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12436","title":"Social Networks and Protest Participation: Evidence from 130 Million Twitter Users","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Interpersonal ties; Attendance; Social network (sociolinguistics); Social media; Strong ties; Network structure; Political science; Position (finance); Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Business; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0505355972028347,"gpt":0.3885326232243894,"spread":0.3379970260215547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001023074,0.00009332057,0.0002520347,0.0000797573,0.0004213752,0.0001559202,0.0003888489,0.00004864105,0.00009706934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001734848,0.00007890302,0.00006351091,0.0006723809,0.004567194,0.0005662522,0.00005462973,0.0002435344,0.00002072941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002465594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006776667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00557446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007881842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974837,0.0002658075,0.0003083728,0.000184154,0.0008802033,0.0008777703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975773,0.0009836034,0.0002500291,0.00009081196,0.0003157384,0.0007825313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005449989,0.00006493974,0.8484879,0.00000536466,0.00001933975,0.00001639419,0.02687119,0.00001217697,0.001122613,0.1123216,0.0002985988,0.01072534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003973671,0.0008129171,0.936969,0.0002004036,0.00008004531,0.000008632557,0.04750335,0.0004020864,0.0006888108,0.009621794,0.002928944,0.0003865967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865281,0.00004755261,0.0003029692,0.01178234,0.000505064,0.0001210595,0.000001326217,0.00001048343,0.0007010815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966913,0.00002644603,0.0004427676,0.001351543,0.001443386,0.000002715957,1.455274e-7,0.00000572742,0.00003592273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1026998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124915799","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00351.x","title":"Who Cheats? Who Loots? Political Competition and Corruption in Japan, 1947–1993","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Looting; Cheating; Language change; Competition (biology); Politics; Political science; Political economy; Business; Law; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02493523763696689,"gpt":0.3137106501361411,"spread":0.2887754124991743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001649909,0.0001034748,0.0003116821,0.0003014848,0.0004160735,0.00008040335,0.0002967697,0.00003682564,0.0001634541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006690356,0.00009645711,0.00005403706,0.0006453028,0.005600355,0.0005375508,0.00006350621,0.0002324759,0.00002925232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009359259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001026581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003746664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003387305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975879,0.0001338341,0.0004711257,0.0002203275,0.0005808598,0.001006004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982528,0.0001929934,0.0001644301,0.00009176576,0.000189606,0.00110841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002037146,0.00006756201,0.1348932,0.000002376574,0.000002706385,0.00001851053,0.002906091,0.000002680684,0.0001120918,0.8483664,0.00002853308,0.01357953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003306944,0.0002448582,0.9811035,0.00006323892,0.000005327285,0.0002092741,0.01207871,0.000157172,0.000051921,0.002759264,0.002824845,0.0001711884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714219,0.00001345767,0.0003128037,0.008495301,0.0002381114,0.00006708522,0.000001897404,0.00001068054,0.01943875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974141,0.00008224253,0.0005459435,0.001482059,0.000222351,0.000001471984,2.689686e-7,0.00000470526,0.0002468359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8462104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564036394","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12285","title":"Foreign Aid and Undeserved Credit Claiming","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of California, San Diego; Hellman Foundation","keywords":"Receipt; Exploit; Politics; Business; Control (management); Variety (cybernetics); Order (exchange); Finance; Law and economics; Economics; International economics; Accounting; Political science; Law; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02256774949787238,"gpt":0.3260799318988674,"spread":0.303512182400995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001409244,0.00004971366,0.0001090528,0.0001176453,0.0002824752,0.00007270048,0.0003686294,0.0000127881,0.0001116955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001318038,0.00003014891,0.00003335887,0.0002980433,0.003696891,0.0005451828,0.00005098837,0.00006047711,0.00001056762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002347129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005971284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003844707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003362958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984586,0.00005381829,0.0001924326,0.0001013582,0.0006952552,0.0004985722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987589,0.0003043793,0.0001274585,0.00004327382,0.0002890095,0.000477042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007456338,0.000008049617,0.0131212,3.974006e-7,0.000003110608,0.000005566096,0.0002926803,4.410804e-8,0.0009789319,0.9742686,0.00007741277,0.01123654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008716108,0.0008861636,0.4098514,0.0002691164,0.00002392956,0.0001100144,0.01612715,0.00002397667,0.004577311,0.5434907,0.02333482,0.0004338593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9146653,0.000009394425,0.001630725,0.02429374,0.0002438878,0.00002990338,0.000001399593,0.0000086017,0.05911708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964918,0.0000163845,0.002359641,0.0004966985,0.0003109469,3.608866e-7,2.188227e-8,0.000002432223,0.0003217297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4307779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557024252","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12280","title":"Informed Preferences? The Impact of Unions on Workers' Policy Views","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Politics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Face (sociological concept); Position (finance); Political science; Set (abstract data type); Exploit; Selection (genetic algorithm); Political economy; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Sociology; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03344587052641297,"gpt":0.4045958134901971,"spread":0.3711499429637842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001454618,0.00008228612,0.0001931088,0.0002023972,0.0003839133,0.00005604652,0.0009226975,0.00001787681,0.0001528681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003923649,0.0000322388,0.0001430969,0.001574939,0.006432096,0.0003737655,0.00005715604,0.0001143322,0.000004573193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005469115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005254107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02486988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009011677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997837,0.0001819943,0.0003443403,0.00009573617,0.00080466,0.0007362788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975194,0.0009249995,0.0003762642,0.0001924207,0.0003515206,0.0006354419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001365453,0.00005967456,0.01384145,2.641618e-7,0.0000118541,5.496782e-7,0.001156033,0.00000322869,0.0003495922,0.9514318,0.0002409142,0.03289098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001913199,0.00109772,0.974075,0.00009724331,0.000009382069,0.000003165002,0.00508805,0.000001339405,0.0002043307,0.01516735,0.003981213,0.0000838411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9580148,0.000005397682,0.0001632804,0.01527758,0.0001071879,0.00007384828,0.00001387812,0.000005036072,0.02633901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986585,0.00005085457,0.0001286929,0.0007155426,0.0002324485,9.951185e-7,3.861539e-8,0.000002790078,0.000210141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794336686","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12353","title":"Gender, Political Knowledge, and Descriptive Representation: The Impact of Long‐Term Socialization","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Socialization; Representation (politics); Politics; Context (archaeology); Political socialization; Descriptive research; Descriptive statistics; Gender gap; Term (time); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; American political science; Sociology; Social science; Geography; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06811904902769651,"gpt":0.4390994521997221,"spread":0.3709804031720256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001404121,0.00008757292,0.000203981,0.0001513396,0.0005969649,0.000115027,0.0003880112,0.00003105455,0.00005208663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00125813,0.00005581144,0.0001144672,0.0008910174,0.01363882,0.0003535646,0.00007734521,0.0001222202,0.000003838421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003809548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001822103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006531206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001119983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976946,0.0003538541,0.0003645291,0.0001641804,0.0006576648,0.0007652201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973681,0.0003177105,0.0002859543,0.0001354059,0.001216807,0.0006760027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001655358,0.00007811814,0.09626138,0.000002670374,0.00002639293,0.000002561638,0.01885297,0.00000141737,0.0005914209,0.8802181,0.0001031191,0.003845311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001680521,0.0004894629,0.9309877,0.0000142245,0.00003477099,0.00004388385,0.02610046,0.00008942559,0.001067324,0.04089934,0.00001975361,0.00008565344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697894,0.00004886499,0.003150143,0.001817568,0.0002473152,0.00009913139,0.000004077233,0.000006210869,0.02483726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987849,0.00001874173,0.0002543622,0.0001016451,0.00078424,8.836465e-7,2.38238e-7,0.000005142007,0.00004985616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8393188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141053676","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00557.x","title":"Who Controls the Content of Supreme Court Opinions?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Supreme court; Concurrence; Majority opinion; Political science; Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Judicial opinion; Power (physics); Law; Dissenting opinion; Empirical research; Supreme Court Decisions; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08020318407841402,"gpt":0.3343116820694302,"spread":0.2541084979910161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001832717,0.00006064031,0.0002419677,0.00005796894,0.0005502538,0.0000241563,0.0006467075,0.00001237697,0.00006475565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001545946,0.00003515232,0.0001020723,0.0004943492,0.01873428,0.0002059558,0.00006038203,0.0001201982,0.000006014882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001076484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009142862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02038133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002171806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981186,0.0001289161,0.0003304147,0.00008849314,0.0008214365,0.0005121723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983032,0.0003281173,0.0002604942,0.00008402191,0.0006824457,0.0003416631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002036719,0.00004144274,0.01006544,3.511285e-7,0.00001422936,0.00000216857,0.002928492,2.529759e-7,0.0001624069,0.9851172,0.00007752605,0.001570136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003628396,0.0009504684,0.7957311,0.00008284987,0.00005809787,0.00003201019,0.09441985,0.000008190419,0.0008602835,0.1007602,0.006564097,0.000169986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8526599,0.0002093707,0.001039352,0.02698701,0.0006578311,0.0001609064,0.00001427578,0.00001024439,0.118261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986926,0.00003580546,0.0002430238,0.0007927499,0.0002044443,0.000001170733,3.01652e-8,0.000001455155,0.0000286794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.884357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161023744","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00176.x","title":"Democracy and Deceit: Regulating Appearances of Corruption","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Representation (politics); Language change; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Representative democracy; Public trust; Political corruption; Object (grammar); Law and economics; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01733792587747786,"gpt":0.3300103400416927,"spread":0.3126724141642149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00180405,0.00004532612,0.0001545814,0.0001139266,0.0002540663,0.00004405866,0.0002049094,0.00001185764,0.00007676757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005792216,0.00003907719,0.00003226064,0.0003336282,0.002705638,0.0004164641,0.00003229504,0.00007092758,0.000007190833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001962785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004793198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004228415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008712671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987986,0.00005226659,0.0003267902,0.00009578573,0.0003548068,0.0003717607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990045,0.0001206081,0.0002772721,0.00005006508,0.0001634084,0.0003840823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001595353,0.00003050062,0.0327812,0.000002345743,0.000003780445,7.27534e-7,0.003537783,0.00002542732,0.001142288,0.2461929,0.00001353438,0.7162536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005296466,0.0004434007,0.9364733,0.0001483631,0.00002157641,0.00009628891,0.03583945,0.001134038,0.001064808,0.0086073,0.01533798,0.0003038705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834902,0.0000250049,0.0006707425,0.006978074,0.0001598049,0.00002809582,3.966434e-7,0.000004572684,0.008643068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926147,0.00003822221,0.006764282,0.0003107446,0.0001587268,1.65344e-7,2.373017e-8,0.000001783939,0.0001113399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9036921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164666346","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12209","title":"Policy Attitudes in Institutional Context: Rules, Uncertainty, and the Mass Politics of Public Investment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Politics; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Order (exchange); Public economics; Public opinion; Political science; Public policy; Public good; Survey data collection; Economics; Public administration; Political economy; Business; Sociology; Microeconomics; Law; Finance; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07125671130831013,"gpt":0.385465527285312,"spread":0.3142088159770018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004884685,0.00008139213,0.0002988226,0.0002258862,0.0002406741,0.00009453358,0.00039784,0.00002800128,0.000005890157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006443642,0.00005171492,0.0000509563,0.0008720375,0.0155994,0.0003571192,0.00005450099,0.00016291,0.000002833187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008034222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004562764,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09773085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00265802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971079,0.000493806,0.0005116879,0.000115595,0.000972469,0.000798566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974607,0.0005045736,0.0002459987,0.0001027506,0.0005805697,0.001105357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134438,0.00004225439,0.04396257,0.000003209267,0.000005216968,0.000002198353,0.001202951,0.00001384906,0.00003451333,0.9537904,0.00001359515,0.000915824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001931899,0.0007344414,0.2054631,0.0001187907,0.00002568305,0.00004281716,0.01009001,0.0002745899,0.0001322564,0.7776077,0.003352844,0.000225873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9546049,0.00009695229,0.0002079556,0.03820994,0.0001234396,0.0001144942,0.000006206393,0.000004465234,0.00663169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979268,0.000006626446,0.0002383903,0.001494233,0.0002944028,0.000002885186,2.235897e-7,0.000002688688,0.00003372005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1761827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286686095","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12717","title":"How Norms Shape the Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Conformity; Norm (philosophy); Priming (agriculture); Social psychology; Pragmatism; Constraint (computer-aided design); Accountability; Political science; Epistemology; Positive economics; Sociology; Psychology; Politics; Law; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0225890257015376,"gpt":0.3335246686328315,"spread":0.3109356429312939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004408044,0.00007450804,0.0002614386,0.0001783024,0.0005015476,0.0001689183,0.0009013575,0.0000312054,0.0000396336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001787742,0.00004819712,0.00007712407,0.002039732,0.002736249,0.0003886915,0.00007792534,0.0005902383,0.000001049945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005731777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009973082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01521159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004103152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964296,0.0005629315,0.0004131255,0.0001331889,0.001590938,0.000870263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981975,0.0004666821,0.0003744644,0.000143437,0.0003649343,0.0004529715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008850036,0.00004776458,0.02190503,0.000004227763,0.000004009219,0.000005258506,0.0009303679,0.00005673598,0.0006631411,0.9752364,0.00008087845,0.001057302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001318539,0.006089673,0.5719602,0.0002211436,0.000104821,0.0002136238,0.2216238,0.005840066,0.001107889,0.09445068,0.09595998,0.001109574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563771,0.0001176549,0.00008919741,0.04004041,0.0006016376,0.0001348684,0.000008757275,0.00000589728,0.002624426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990559,0.000002237528,0.0000568552,0.000476533,0.000276386,0.000006694847,1.716718e-7,0.000004283902,0.0001209208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8807858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949575272","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12441","title":"Committed or Conditional Democrats? Opposition Dynamics in Electoral Autocracies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political economy; Victory; Political science; Autocracy; Voting; Democracy; Politics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02237023435798901,"gpt":0.3662722463815719,"spread":0.3439020120235828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001573751,0.00009375445,0.000283452,0.0002286098,0.0002280076,0.0001174732,0.0003717442,0.00004038826,0.000287133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009323705,0.00007271817,0.00005825547,0.001550327,0.001865056,0.000633356,0.00002689729,0.0002454233,0.00005854729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00159284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001603499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01300281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007782883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997196,0.0003042243,0.0004692526,0.0001540431,0.0009017838,0.000974678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981046,0.0004573873,0.0002278279,0.00009708659,0.0004722421,0.0006408169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004603689,0.00006923999,0.1177486,0.00000395014,0.000003832921,0.000008963875,0.0002443615,0.00001952061,0.0005449908,0.8803599,0.00005115204,0.0008994126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001022589,0.002720302,0.9031461,0.0002055388,0.00003415669,0.0001079113,0.008673346,0.007411816,0.0007196353,0.07360803,0.001790482,0.000560133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828119,0.000003762433,0.0004608143,0.01200152,0.0002381992,0.0001301751,0.000008212895,0.00001330105,0.004332154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983089,7.092645e-7,0.0003472446,0.0009760323,0.0001980683,0.000002579684,0.000001917082,0.000005289813,0.0001592815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8067518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519420549","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12270","title":"All in the Family: Partisan Disagreement and Electoral Mobilization in Intimate Networks—A Spillover Experiment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Spillover effect; Homogeneous; Mobilization; Turnout; Politics; Leverage (statistics); Causal inference; Interpersonal communication; Social mobilization; Context (archaeology); Survey data collection; Social psychology; Political science; Inference; Economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Voting; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04311659062774315,"gpt":0.3861897858693162,"spread":0.343073195241573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00246171,0.00007345172,0.0001692996,0.00009398922,0.00009966929,0.00007800948,0.0002608256,0.00002043162,0.00001986726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004633802,0.00003940273,0.00002773189,0.0006200523,0.001793766,0.0003569038,0.00002842374,0.0000895813,0.000002793394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004065056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001842113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01456153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002307485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977015,0.0003781467,0.0003867095,0.0001397429,0.0005840343,0.0008099076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990801,0.0002954196,0.0001287403,0.00008703978,0.00008010559,0.0003286566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002259022,0.0001196614,0.3834818,0.000001932753,0.000003072883,0.000008472271,0.002669526,0.00002826706,0.003080924,0.6017542,0.0000634044,0.008766145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003549538,0.000580233,0.9860044,0.00009154926,0.000007937521,0.00000546712,0.004094712,0.0004451208,0.0003274531,0.006838331,0.001105606,0.0001443106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904903,0.00004210617,0.0008620567,0.007861486,0.0001030501,0.0001177485,5.586245e-7,0.000003360451,0.000519347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989851,0.00001426735,0.00007539795,0.0007608953,0.0001469265,0.000006363483,6.840787e-8,0.000002918734,0.000008046687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6025226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971320373","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00129.x","title":"Do Policy Horizons Structure the Formation of Parliamentary Governments?: The Evidence from an Expert Survey","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Dimension (graph theory); New horizons; Constraint (computer-aided design); Political science; Survey data collection; Public economics; Positive economics; Political economy; Economics; Law; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05123042162623603,"gpt":0.4021172566101006,"spread":0.3508868349838646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002873488,0.00008940269,0.0001911365,0.00005034936,0.0005202949,0.0001463818,0.0009081692,0.00002609999,0.00008579633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002531335,0.0000466143,0.00006351293,0.0006715304,0.003367923,0.001172247,0.00004951899,0.0001850811,0.000004105745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006404429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007454281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2346247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01864751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964407,0.000929529,0.000471557,0.0001288487,0.001376121,0.0006532448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973943,0.001150806,0.0004090858,0.0002357527,0.000321621,0.0004884678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002109276,0.000314424,0.1951542,0.000007322901,0.00005778117,0.00000306418,0.05876622,0.0001895422,0.02187256,0.594287,0.001575506,0.1275614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001946655,0.001037042,0.9537767,0.0001236235,0.00003816133,0.00001142233,0.02272588,0.0004998314,0.007266913,0.01173748,0.002363813,0.0002245168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674422,0.00008697957,0.0004480606,0.0315344,0.0001374649,0.0001025107,0.00003504136,0.000004480929,0.0002088469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972377,0.00002048019,0.0002322347,0.001441448,0.001052719,0.000001702803,5.662088e-7,0.000003886018,0.000009265093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7586224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128507287","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12042","title":"A Natural Experiment in Proposal Power and Electoral Success","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Natural experiment; House of Commons; Lottery; Politics; Power (physics); Commons; Public economics; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Microeconomics; Parliament; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01346896035927531,"gpt":0.3608159458175501,"spread":0.3473469854582748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001044473,0.00007711227,0.0002046965,0.0001412312,0.0001715183,0.0001716458,0.0002594371,0.00002113285,0.00009786586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006756736,0.00005675062,0.00003496542,0.0006626431,0.002926051,0.0006883604,0.00003357349,0.0001814205,0.0000119614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003594669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006684696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05042945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001137682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977329,0.0002018708,0.0003339131,0.0001390377,0.0006401371,0.0009521684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986169,0.0001477129,0.0001242959,0.00006537932,0.0002792091,0.0007664423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001225258,0.00007611371,0.1721904,0.000002488649,0.000003334259,0.000006067743,0.001917618,5.49523e-7,0.008225113,0.8153899,0.00005446196,0.002121671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002582427,0.0008096384,0.9781818,0.00004815072,0.000005582201,0.00002223724,0.003955743,0.00009975125,0.001907454,0.01423114,0.0002788095,0.0002014822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989925,0.00004327,0.00002391676,0.008332975,0.0001856577,0.0001207919,2.97151e-7,0.00000657318,0.001361528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991046,8.857869e-7,0.0003742363,0.000328286,0.0001425988,0.000004978931,4.000823e-8,0.000003549737,0.00004084583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8059914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396968564","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12865","title":"Austerity, economic vulnerability, and populism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Austerity; Populism; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04377057760646343,"gpt":0.454381830646947,"spread":0.4106112530404836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001592138,0.00007876932,0.0002306676,0.0001345583,0.0004708529,0.00004159937,0.0002079268,0.00001816052,0.000126614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000281625,0.00005375499,0.00004495776,0.0002026063,0.002068857,0.0002830242,0.0002122021,0.0003628114,0.00005238011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003088107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005253436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001139999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004770112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984472,0.000128476,0.0003915399,0.0001659825,0.0002257932,0.0006409418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988036,0.000480546,0.00009034899,0.00009300253,0.00008864504,0.000443893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001485361,0.0000178833,0.1431988,0.00005246587,0.00001973771,0.00002257321,0.00156891,4.801676e-7,0.0003805059,0.8355029,0.00158761,0.01763332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002330174,0.0008380308,0.9051028,0.0002779525,0.0000445496,0.0001001513,0.006047884,0.0001463691,0.00005432207,0.06998228,0.01697015,0.0002025416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641787,0.0001243375,0.00008217669,0.02845786,0.0009005016,0.00006114185,0.000005928857,0.00001895742,0.006170432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980797,0.00002729645,0.0002217573,0.0009750585,0.0004793062,0.000002041393,8.006774e-8,0.00000552435,0.0002091988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7655206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.762279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104690367","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12191","title":"On Measuring Legislative Agenda‐Setting Power","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Typology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); House of Commons; Political science; State (computer science); Public administration; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08833465377106582,"gpt":0.3979873973356018,"spread":0.309652743564536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004208185,0.00008587231,0.0002129116,0.0001475513,0.0003248863,0.00011907,0.000378226,0.00002365175,0.00003783175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006721391,0.0000664277,0.00006948048,0.000778209,0.002651157,0.0004589082,0.00003003731,0.0002124421,0.00004828643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007310417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001374196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006733067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001616677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966862,0.0003545471,0.0003554469,0.0001482218,0.001423542,0.001032003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970857,0.0004308799,0.0002414304,0.0001043397,0.0006893575,0.001448318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018465,0.00004036984,0.004629834,7.252747e-7,0.000004748308,0.00001046188,0.003807494,0.00001805553,0.0002849349,0.9891241,0.0002575321,0.001803314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002944532,0.01755604,0.2941063,0.0008872207,0.0001665964,0.0002020499,0.09085104,0.0005826682,0.01123632,0.5216096,0.05748156,0.002376012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.887369,0.00001022298,0.0006782751,0.00793218,0.0004377577,0.00006207556,0.000001331254,0.00001605876,0.1034931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981945,2.555811e-7,0.0004263367,0.0008740532,0.0003465787,9.443435e-7,4.383007e-8,0.000005278304,0.0001519703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4675145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132008242","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12215","title":"Turnout Across Democracies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; CONTEST; Legislature; Competition (biology); Power (physics); Distribution (mathematics); Ex-ante; Proportional representation; Economics; Political science; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Voting; Politics; Democracy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05987520759533557,"gpt":0.4290722396972906,"spread":0.3691970321019551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038651,0.00007504517,0.0002262798,0.00007238872,0.0003754982,0.0001682132,0.0004868388,0.00002590237,0.00002336501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004435762,0.00005673541,0.00006886257,0.0009227835,0.00546968,0.0005779905,0.0000447419,0.0001634409,0.00004974048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005249226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001469528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01334979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006679392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968044,0.0002335472,0.000370785,0.0001217745,0.001198975,0.001270563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996473,0.0002348985,0.0002106085,0.000109983,0.0008658923,0.002105654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001711284,0.00004888247,0.03886479,0.000001546919,0.00000470825,0.00001085253,0.00573779,0.000006621995,0.0003315848,0.9490556,0.0003356723,0.005584828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001524011,0.005486612,0.4429616,0.0002115178,0.00009182433,0.0002968198,0.1423963,0.0002634045,0.005165536,0.3105186,0.0898533,0.001230503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753805,0.00002284733,0.0005255996,0.01191589,0.0004584643,0.00004596013,0.000002205311,0.00001587448,0.01163268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979653,0.00000100264,0.0005338116,0.0006107065,0.00068348,9.124904e-7,6.42854e-8,0.000004142299,0.0002006284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.638537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125236319","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00104.x","title":"The Impact of Income on the Taste for Revolt","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Endogeneity; Demographic economics; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Quartile; Per capita; Per capita income; Development economics; Geography; Econometrics; Demography; Sociology; Population; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02191882759176035,"gpt":0.385582861136844,"spread":0.3636640335450836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002897909,0.00007809756,0.000188237,0.00004377367,0.0007025045,0.00008302386,0.001068922,0.0000167304,0.00001269768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007075197,0.00003509353,0.0002119321,0.0006471247,0.009104124,0.0001758237,0.00004073495,0.0001809699,0.000005005306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005065192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001816067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008408287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001021349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997745,0.0001046054,0.0003166232,0.000098127,0.0008247143,0.0009109087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967716,0.001788477,0.0003221881,0.0001813127,0.0004116681,0.0005248066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002916413,0.00002468559,0.0006995848,6.291006e-7,0.000006857742,8.468412e-7,0.0004755277,0.00001208656,0.0001947367,0.9968023,0.0000461047,0.001707419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007714848,0.00556641,0.3746824,0.0002113433,0.00003934516,0.00003028492,0.008922989,0.00005736672,0.003239681,0.5899515,0.01621352,0.0003136911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497986,0.00003544484,0.0005166489,0.03113542,0.0001728014,0.0001444319,0.00001582094,0.000004878329,0.01817593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987994,0.00001533102,0.0001756521,0.0006460323,0.0002629591,0.000002028892,1.799703e-8,0.000003621981,0.00009499253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4068509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196581648","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12633","title":"Censorship and the Impact of Repression on Dissent","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological repression; Dissent; Opposition (politics); Censorship; Authoritarianism; Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02086832341833559,"gpt":0.3964686959911818,"spread":0.3756003725728462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001782751,0.00006200585,0.0002309469,0.00003832563,0.0002239252,0.00005683201,0.000330478,0.00001569572,0.0000511305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007082163,0.00003249482,0.0001280916,0.0005198766,0.01000519,0.000144522,0.00005713313,0.0001708323,0.000001859222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001487629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008774758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006088046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002638485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980298,0.0003092787,0.0002506666,0.0001180319,0.0007438535,0.0005483349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976256,0.001083565,0.000220078,0.0001461416,0.0003180263,0.0006065292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006797646,0.00003120103,0.004837721,9.312803e-7,0.000005579183,0.000009862886,0.001326973,0.000002853079,0.0005305849,0.9909521,0.00002347363,0.00221072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007519347,0.0007423327,0.925039,0.000155942,0.00002960164,0.00007270541,0.009258258,0.00008701183,0.004988729,0.05757356,0.001142882,0.0001580565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628965,0.00005576452,0.00003670424,0.01037595,0.00007169283,0.00002954588,0.000003404743,0.000002530991,0.02652788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991357,0.00003832096,0.00008424414,0.0004282423,0.0001439059,2.89679e-7,2.607651e-8,0.000002186037,0.0001670658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9333786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741970640","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12566","title":"Policy Deliberation and Voter Persuasion: Experimental Evidence from an Election in the Philippines","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Status quo; Persuasion; Voting; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Political economy; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06649143362231258,"gpt":0.423987618824114,"spread":0.3574961852018014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001053597,0.00006412114,0.0001334023,0.00006929957,0.0003044947,0.0001734118,0.0002745209,0.00002025948,0.00002171838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001514703,0.00004274961,0.00002834028,0.0008114648,0.001403833,0.0009198638,0.0000192855,0.0001375456,0.000002996176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001860382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004271739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0362412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008676443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998113,0.0004338437,0.0002630032,0.0001495,0.0006032598,0.0004374081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988927,0.0002626428,0.0001054376,0.0000639729,0.0001361124,0.0005391315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001453807,0.0001931933,0.05789665,0.000005057545,0.000007034307,0.00001586193,0.08459839,0.0000200954,0.08157284,0.7566376,0.00007856391,0.0188293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005910477,0.006027316,0.882845,0.0001668855,0.00003776652,0.00004823753,0.06460749,0.002949995,0.01266375,0.02889428,0.0006985223,0.0004697491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9074607,0.0000370365,0.0002575506,0.09191216,0.00005511514,0.00006650648,7.611143e-7,0.000005634025,0.0002045272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947166,0.000005419002,0.0001714358,0.003970659,0.001128298,0.000002152322,1.511612e-7,0.000002576111,0.000002715698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8249483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9701766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005811290","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12506","title":"Beyond the Unit Root Question: Uncertainty and Inference","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Extant taxon; Unit root; Computer science; Root (linguistics); Set (abstract data type); Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Root cause; Data mining; Mathematics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Reliability engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05906667972576887,"gpt":0.2806846261848037,"spread":0.2216179464590348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001050368,0.0000879381,0.0002791725,0.00008259173,0.0001552409,0.0001108433,0.0004448827,0.00001564327,0.0001261705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001000867,0.00006522887,0.00005304065,0.0003743929,0.001874969,0.0003696522,0.00007444975,0.0002149924,0.00006397699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006570086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008759448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000952121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009386431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988123,0.00002678394,0.0004515622,0.0001762155,0.00006225285,0.0004708634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986723,0.0001899429,0.000333703,0.0001280472,0.00003264184,0.0006433584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001359426,0.00001012848,0.05430864,0.000002307057,0.000009282177,0.00000291368,0.0003684005,0.0003890501,0.00001440639,0.9428458,0.00008038976,0.001955051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004825431,0.001585747,0.7231535,0.00001814169,0.0000168023,0.0001718021,0.001033703,0.02639694,0.0001010436,0.2355411,0.01113651,0.0003621537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9562418,0.0001397606,0.001498621,0.03721668,0.0001096402,0.00003565783,0.00002080488,0.000005100779,0.004731974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933758,0.00002106287,0.0003795448,0.005967429,0.0002347217,5.041554e-7,1.905597e-7,0.000004008899,0.0000167897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7073048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6908402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366988675","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12778","title":"Aid, Attitudes, and Insurgency: Evidence from Development Projects in Northern Afghanistan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Insurgency; Legitimacy; Perception; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Development aid; Control (management); Survey data collection; Complement (music); Public opinion; Public relations; Social psychology; Development economics; Psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04408617062852891,"gpt":0.3509348708211866,"spread":0.3068487001926576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002696419,0.0001323291,0.0002912404,0.0002961221,0.0004320616,0.0001874692,0.000623199,0.00003478274,0.00002271628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001373399,0.0001142473,0.00004689865,0.001506819,0.003404477,0.0003936005,0.000119692,0.0002114472,0.00002474954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005566827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003457325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01089513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01560311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968606,0.0001529325,0.0004912569,0.0002906303,0.001052146,0.001152427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998095,0.0003777298,0.0002089028,0.0001460873,0.0002758896,0.000896337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003618139,0.00008769355,0.3475831,0.00001206061,0.0000141265,0.0001305698,0.006462247,0.000002414584,0.0006821803,0.6273003,0.000004342504,0.01768477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003464623,0.0003554234,0.8830309,0.0005376315,0.00001601374,0.00001780285,0.013206,0.00004152653,0.0005011935,0.00723377,0.09427244,0.0004408411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.981957,0.0001872242,0.0001214905,0.0003977665,0.0004362246,0.0001091865,0.000007722348,0.00002702047,0.01675635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966653,0.0001444247,0.0008974946,0.0002291793,0.0002202359,0.000002683695,3.808592e-7,0.000007970805,0.001832353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6200665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232301179","doi":"10.2307/3647711","title":"Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Irish; Context (archaeology); Political science; Incentive; Variety (cybernetics); Public administration; Kingdom; Geography; Politics; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02062681863495514,"gpt":0.3092520856598472,"spread":0.2886252670248921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001393297,0.00009488066,0.0002898136,0.0000818102,0.0002346784,0.0001133667,0.0003294111,0.00002563214,0.00002593969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001459829,0.00005993832,0.00002916953,0.0006668159,0.006803296,0.0002493476,0.00003782073,0.00025188,0.000001662573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004431345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002283881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.913023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977707,0.0001935305,0.0003608856,0.0001501076,0.0006524749,0.0008723447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979934,0.000578088,0.0001935645,0.00007902466,0.000119137,0.001036835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000320061,0.00001002666,0.05744809,8.403346e-7,0.000004030984,0.00001352226,0.0006655595,0.000001583957,0.00001650773,0.9369133,0.0004623852,0.004432109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003769748,0.000394035,0.634809,0.0001999087,0.00004501933,0.0003151878,0.003838209,0.0001486297,0.0001475817,0.02424649,0.3316218,0.0004644321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568867,0.00008974208,0.00003171136,0.04193645,0.0001049543,0.00007771732,0.000005195811,0.000002837992,0.0008646747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976595,0.00001419189,0.00009824208,0.001397169,0.0002964669,6.937636e-7,4.893626e-8,0.00000265592,0.0005310426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9126669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157321292","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00210.x","title":"Locke on the Moral Basis of International Relations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Normative; International relations; International law; Political science; Post-realism; Relation (database); Natural law; Law; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; International relations theory; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01764938886531104,"gpt":0.3158506262890011,"spread":0.29820123742369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001143341,0.00005950779,0.0001351636,0.0001221688,0.0003916239,0.00004369385,0.000624355,0.00001496737,0.0003142538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001351075,0.0000395979,0.00009239335,0.0006485266,0.01254572,0.0001903351,0.00003242351,0.0001571242,0.00002056541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002765058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002282576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005930985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008777876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980373,0.0001228742,0.0003157648,0.00008993214,0.00101036,0.0004237666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981124,0.000755448,0.0002832885,0.00009984866,0.0005051545,0.0002438091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005992648,0.00004529973,0.01185971,1.941957e-7,0.000004614592,0.000002343085,0.00008844407,0.00002790927,0.00007691142,0.9868089,0.0006879618,0.0003917411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005604316,0.001368051,0.4684189,0.0001525401,0.0001107265,0.000120768,0.02362516,0.0001961581,0.003405699,0.1661696,0.3352857,0.0005862497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3989641,0.000009373002,0.0008075206,0.0378596,0.0003322648,0.00004254177,0.00001525338,0.000006506429,0.5619629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968719,0.000002464447,0.0009218421,0.0009524839,0.0004122059,6.337458e-7,2.598268e-7,0.000002364447,0.00083584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8206393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198191925","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12660","title":"Restoring Anáhuac: Indigenous Genealogies and Hemispheric Republicanism in Postcolonial Mexico","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Emancipation; Memorialization; Politics; Elite; Sociology; Empire; Gender studies; History; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01415269812851377,"gpt":0.3367104599365801,"spread":0.3225577618080663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002123701,0.0001072711,0.0003320597,0.0001018924,0.0004983883,0.0002103536,0.0004855515,0.0000455583,0.00003760151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003702367,0.0001008389,0.00007802928,0.001545959,0.005896745,0.0003756508,0.0001475158,0.0003195748,0.00000158017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007147248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00346549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007449591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002608713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969125,0.0002285488,0.0004199065,0.0002513651,0.0009276761,0.001260036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978275,0.000438435,0.0002482762,0.0001794759,0.000419358,0.0008869258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001830773,0.0002103724,0.1059766,0.000009089058,0.00002329023,0.0003493278,0.0371436,0.00002168444,0.005177692,0.8138599,0.00008460889,0.03712561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008555467,0.00132471,0.7716583,0.0001361904,0.00004696397,0.0006159182,0.1541838,0.0001152637,0.00368005,0.04405865,0.02249712,0.0008274922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803146,0.0001735446,0.0001076372,0.008132886,0.0002500511,0.00004734377,0.000002969777,0.00001371465,0.01095724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913654,0.0002226928,0.006670065,0.001409985,0.0002533767,0.000001461236,1.489156e-7,0.00000697172,0.00006987745],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7698012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408294448","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12959","title":"Attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and globalization: Common microfoundations and political implications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Microfoundations; Politics; Globalization; Political science; Positive economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Keynesian economics; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04271270015547695,"gpt":0.4372600631152118,"spread":0.3945473629597349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008309585,0.00008390993,0.0002204892,0.0001657251,0.001240141,0.0002134032,0.0002957228,0.00003332591,0.000005887897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00136625,0.00006770171,0.0000421946,0.001129142,0.01238098,0.000315774,0.0001224883,0.0001531825,0.000001776666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002336655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008216418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003739818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004132663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984152,0.0001088805,0.0003513737,0.000161834,0.000304052,0.0006587096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998574,0.0003383293,0.000110011,0.00008278171,0.00038995,0.0005048972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004432823,0.00003489163,0.02319676,0.000003708625,0.00001028187,5.908401e-7,0.0009722627,3.417886e-7,0.00006368664,0.9579449,0.00002872025,0.01773937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003893145,0.0001148911,0.2835713,0.00003678616,0.00003800772,0.00001635302,0.01785227,0.00001990864,0.0001836513,0.6974949,0.0005214725,0.0001115165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5096266,0.000213758,0.01965391,0.436884,0.0005301744,0.0002310248,0.00002134395,0.00004216136,0.03279704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961226,0.0001074909,0.0006608973,0.002824708,0.000252327,0.000002042054,2.013032e-7,0.00000227289,0.00002747959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.486496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229875853","doi":"10.2307/3647683","title":"Do Policy Horizons Structure the Formation of Parliamentary Governments?: The Evidence from an Expert Survey","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; New horizons; Public administration; Public economics; Economics; Engineering; Aerospace engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05123042162623603,"gpt":0.4021172566101006,"spread":0.3508868349838646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002873488,0.00008940269,0.0001911365,0.00005034936,0.0005202949,0.0001463818,0.0009081692,0.00002609999,0.00008579633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002531335,0.0000466143,0.00006351293,0.0006715304,0.003367923,0.001172247,0.00004951899,0.0001850811,0.000004105745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006404429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007454281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2346247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01864751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964407,0.000929529,0.000471557,0.0001288487,0.001376121,0.0006532448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973943,0.001150806,0.0004090858,0.0002357527,0.000321621,0.0004884678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002109276,0.000314424,0.1951542,0.000007322901,0.00005778117,0.00000306418,0.05876622,0.0001895422,0.02187256,0.594287,0.001575506,0.1275614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001946655,0.001037042,0.9537767,0.0001236235,0.00003816133,0.00001142233,0.02272588,0.0004998314,0.007266913,0.01173748,0.002363813,0.0002245168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674422,0.00008697957,0.0004480606,0.0315344,0.0001374649,0.0001025107,0.00003504136,0.000004480929,0.0002088469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972377,0.00002048019,0.0002322347,0.001441448,0.001052719,0.000001702803,5.662088e-7,0.000003886018,0.000009265093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7586224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406079739","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12940","title":"Can norm‐based information campaigns reduce corruption?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Language change; Political science; Computer security; Business; Computer science; Internet privacy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01541101659403105,"gpt":0.335601916020643,"spread":0.3201908994266119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001818643,0.00006270709,0.0001510409,0.000345762,0.0004368429,0.0001622077,0.0004378736,0.00001869457,0.0001582693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00108239,0.00005611843,0.00005590605,0.001030848,0.002036617,0.0005823258,0.00003510586,0.0001262436,0.00003504924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001099435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004642425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001838335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002149879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984726,0.00006869024,0.0003930499,0.00008725797,0.0004360716,0.0005423593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986634,0.0001334441,0.0002237186,0.00009347491,0.000388933,0.0004970588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002832918,0.0000515952,0.01362765,0.00000377695,0.00000696054,0.000001960378,0.003699832,0.0000607883,0.0001250372,0.826367,0.000306626,0.1557205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00137155,0.0006425346,0.5653014,0.0002332728,0.00005825815,0.00003189114,0.1422113,0.001265968,0.000995422,0.0122714,0.2749244,0.0006926245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8599464,0.000003762885,0.006743807,0.03992721,0.001285931,0.0001088272,0.000004729083,0.0000255727,0.09195378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935389,0.000004024879,0.001719134,0.004375351,0.00007585771,0.000001612433,3.920461e-7,0.000001282467,0.0002834052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8140956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8235462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402665995","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12916","title":"Authoritarian cue effect of state repression","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological repression; Authoritarianism; State (computer science); Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Chemistry; Computer science; Biochemistry; Politics; Democracy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009586627011479314,"gpt":0.3704675382966465,"spread":0.3608809112851672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037481,0.00009349397,0.0003020457,0.0001565267,0.000215984,0.0001142914,0.0006042056,0.00002526486,0.00006598406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003660474,0.00006428774,0.000136534,0.001089384,0.005472833,0.0004958069,0.00006597592,0.0002721275,0.0000167499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002711531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001183591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006696108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004153006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971286,0.0002719858,0.0003897836,0.000186543,0.001140991,0.0008821049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975895,0.0009712827,0.0001584455,0.0001429619,0.0002140211,0.0009237476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002812323,0.00001617425,0.00149629,0.00001426005,0.000007967758,0.00004081065,0.001170471,0.000001782507,0.002136403,0.9659097,0.00008635593,0.02909166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001635909,0.01601817,0.293768,0.003587774,0.000429612,0.0003769963,0.01173446,0.001831389,0.1378324,0.2787844,0.2521912,0.001809783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474624,0.0001830443,0.0008432793,0.006088676,0.0008044844,0.00007613686,0.00001154086,0.00002696428,0.04450351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988021,0.00002091639,0.000300545,0.000124193,0.0002988269,7.010928e-7,5.058527e-8,0.000005526681,0.0004471423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6871253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384438317","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12805","title":"The Aptness of Envy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04765282063050726,"gpt":0.3965348298196714,"spread":0.3488820091891641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005639021,0.00005764926,0.0001774766,0.0001180981,0.0007668629,0.00006360724,0.000996082,0.00002574818,0.00001381594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007319574,0.0000360721,0.00009720458,0.001871024,0.02049495,0.0002293684,0.00008303902,0.0002632437,0.00002841558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001282904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001313915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00134379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003751703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970797,0.0002211827,0.0003457947,0.00009756437,0.001248806,0.001006957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963847,0.002072386,0.0001927781,0.0001451441,0.0004539188,0.0007510427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007157228,0.00001353139,0.0004337871,0.000001418067,0.000003522074,0.00000489755,0.001006949,0.000002404649,0.0001736416,0.9926783,0.00007123124,0.00560313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001170432,0.0003950145,0.04009178,0.00003753284,0.00001763115,0.00001378919,0.02191116,0.00005265469,0.001007577,0.9241602,0.01206795,0.0001276904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8214868,0.00003042793,0.000202295,0.09317409,0.0007181311,0.0000635766,0.00000572175,0.00002821994,0.08429071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988267,0.00003902357,0.0001120439,0.0005349483,0.0003727907,5.416164e-7,3.41674e-8,0.000003193353,0.0001106705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1773399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407583953","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12953","title":"Power, costs, collective action, bargaining, and solidarity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Collective action; Bargaining power; Action (physics); Power (physics); Collective bargaining; Economics; Business; Political science; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Physics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01563889006528117,"gpt":0.3917001946800327,"spread":0.3760613046147515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00126818,0.00005956588,0.0001656273,0.000157551,0.0009428029,0.0001782883,0.0002741436,0.00002626936,0.00006796746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002419828,0.00005142142,0.00006968219,0.001256239,0.005051145,0.0003472017,0.00004281343,0.0002502802,0.000005422701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009533013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00253441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00276296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001217121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985766,0.0001492137,0.000220543,0.0001271375,0.0004489717,0.0004774836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983001,0.0004170694,0.0001394298,0.00007159173,0.000566647,0.0005051401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001247599,0.0000435533,0.00723751,5.31989e-7,0.00001417158,0.000002451564,0.003367079,4.83447e-7,0.0002655441,0.9822842,0.001897937,0.004874034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008636902,0.001266162,0.327402,0.0001840723,0.00007819207,0.0001112703,0.4130796,0.0001388092,0.001517889,0.1434617,0.1114423,0.0004544125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5973485,0.00004927299,0.002005883,0.02032103,0.0006330329,0.00007381984,0.000001587133,0.00001854198,0.3795483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961285,0.0000878981,0.0004846104,0.00246676,0.00006710614,8.928861e-7,2.624094e-8,0.000001782933,0.0007624534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8388225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412674486","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12880","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Georgetown University; McGill University; University of Arizona; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Emory University; University of Pennsylvania; University of Oxford; University of Wisconsin-Madison; Florida State University; Yale University","keywords":"Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01728353573374732,"gpt":0.2534864686382151,"spread":0.2362029329044678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001362883,0.0001548779,0.0007180819,0.0008791994,0.0001620728,0.0002513431,0.0008914387,0.0000488234,0.01327217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006400954,0.0001484505,0.000177198,0.0007856587,0.002059301,0.0008623424,0.000193938,0.0002771077,0.09256881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005191108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004649471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005350623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.98845e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979185,0.00001016698,0.001020469,0.0002318134,0.0001179759,0.0007010928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979203,0.00008130815,0.001191963,0.0002365551,0.0002259005,0.0003439634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005873527,0.00001679635,0.00006670298,0.00001520808,0.00003068872,7.446993e-7,0.0001709773,0.00001592048,4.250163e-7,0.2566056,0.7408557,0.002215351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001275528,0.0001213668,0.0004550928,0.00004780688,0.000008810209,0.000007668224,0.001052736,0.00004801463,0.00001631741,0.002139113,0.9958073,0.0001681934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005881324,0.0003269362,0.00101813,0.001630109,0.01570216,0.00005904975,0.0004935993,0.000003881905,0.980178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1392303,0.0003655015,0.001432993,0.003558202,0.0008414499,0.000003261454,0.000007254746,0.000009064075,0.854552],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2549517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9876298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245593639","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12551","title":"Issue Information ‐ Table of Contents","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Citation; Table of contents; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Library science; Database","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01755197791655686,"gpt":0.3266056382887343,"spread":0.3090536603721775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001298017,0.0001626616,0.000747523,0.0001624149,0.000227117,0.0001435233,0.001228541,0.00008744288,0.0007242955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003719742,0.000130834,0.0001607643,0.001210226,0.005933327,0.001053186,0.0001054957,0.0004161524,0.001034042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005782368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003059091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0521455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005234042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955726,0.0001816125,0.0009616938,0.0001578255,0.001991084,0.001135158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955125,0.0002738344,0.001486212,0.0001595322,0.001100894,0.001467066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000355732,0.00005852063,0.0001981094,0.00007149119,0.00003179051,0.000005743982,0.002126131,0.000005991878,0.0001733686,0.8640202,0.1266448,0.006628299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000155746,0.0004548647,0.001178,0.0002329673,0.0000233859,0.000008736691,0.003013747,0.00001072806,0.0003494574,0.0005810948,0.993818,0.0001732002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0144008,0.0003370926,0.002168631,0.02208652,0.007148025,0.0003627806,0.0004605573,0.0000150104,0.9530206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891136,0.0001017219,0.0003509359,0.002052418,0.001315307,0.000001564546,0.000001683271,0.00000739794,0.007055386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415396435","doi":"10.1111/ajps.70028","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Boston College; Georgetown University; University of Wisconsin-Madison; McGill University; University of Arizona; University of Notre Dame; Emory University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Yale University; University of Pennsylvania; Florida State University","keywords":"Database transaction; Information and Communications Technology; Transaction cost; Information system; Information technology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01117412849232479,"gpt":0.3118053566357631,"spread":0.3006312281434383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005647038,0.0001210347,0.0002644335,0.0005076436,0.00007134335,0.0001151482,0.00039797,0.00004662374,0.01850242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002109019,0.0001047121,0.00007469468,0.0005484857,0.0007214405,0.0005905282,0.00002668076,0.0003567526,0.03094244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005655605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005587685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007227431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.531417e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998406,0.00003152063,0.000460114,0.00006622743,0.000615307,0.0004208289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989805,0.00005135198,0.0001609959,0.0001259299,0.0003545647,0.0003266341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000406522,0.00000820306,0.000003321228,0.00005144825,0.00001344766,6.288158e-7,0.0002597334,0.003147707,0.0002408009,0.000760684,0.9504804,0.04502953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001295054,0.0001902134,0.001827032,0.0001699289,0.00002909203,0.00002231876,0.000705011,0.003024707,0.0002720661,0.0001334065,0.993287,0.0002097674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01705292,0.00009444149,0.02624569,0.001596492,0.02198457,0.0001567416,0.00005463073,0.0000598466,0.9327547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525418,0.0002091666,0.002158956,0.002597065,0.004061979,0.000004756632,0.00001969498,0.00002072068,0.03838586],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9354889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251541629","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12343","title":"Issue Information ‐ Table of Contents","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Citation; Table of contents; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Library science; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.015944653604352,"gpt":0.3344931499022205,"spread":0.3185484962978685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002126573,0.0001641878,0.0006878247,0.0002261843,0.0002922486,0.0001500905,0.001287582,0.0001028815,0.001276452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003290428,0.0001288455,0.0001484158,0.001088702,0.0103728,0.001167226,0.000102967,0.0003180044,0.001393553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006806717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002980447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06821153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000109961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953891,0.000185938,0.0009678169,0.0001561794,0.002002158,0.001298801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949349,0.000267982,0.001602586,0.0002114653,0.001821241,0.001161887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003851717,0.0000869444,0.0002850835,0.00006002971,0.00003535082,0.000003220729,0.002043969,0.000002324251,0.0001392702,0.7737592,0.217226,0.006320099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001509422,0.0005603238,0.00162162,0.000307256,0.00002199278,0.00001141608,0.00238681,0.000005911345,0.00044767,0.0008264786,0.9934826,0.0001769528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03758158,0.0002153203,0.001421517,0.005300065,0.008543755,0.0002795162,0.0003145144,0.00001035143,0.9463334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783756,0.00008171896,0.0004027626,0.001064556,0.001964339,0.000001645703,0.000001416258,0.000007545717,0.01810043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409404237","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12967","title":"The electoral consequences of mass religious events: India's Kumbh Mela","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008857561441122978,"gpt":0.3629619087443485,"spread":0.3541043473032255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002101252,0.00007109762,0.0002069886,0.0001173229,0.0007628062,0.0001007135,0.0008903167,0.00002872759,0.00001695379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002851315,0.00004668239,0.0001633344,0.001496769,0.0102361,0.0002234859,0.00003601744,0.0002638874,0.000005605895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003554045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002600934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005445192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008857419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977202,0.0002635728,0.000441425,0.0001159655,0.0008232886,0.0006355236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975842,0.0009603645,0.0003449381,0.0001342921,0.000626815,0.0003493656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001731657,0.00003501424,0.0135623,0.000001596968,0.00002583771,0.000003606121,0.001450241,0.000002586968,0.002758902,0.9777378,0.001804867,0.002599915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000815929,0.001756818,0.1277179,0.000428054,0.0001709588,0.0001010809,0.2096584,0.00005904033,0.01516358,0.5224629,0.1210823,0.0005830083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8737615,0.0002494624,0.000849153,0.08372986,0.001360377,0.0001267332,0.000004061086,0.00001797794,0.03990089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972561,0.0003535876,0.0004682348,0.001575386,0.00008627118,0.000001470235,4.093582e-8,0.000002091817,0.0002568363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4552749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214599365","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12454","title":"Issue Information ‐ Table of Contents","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Citation; Table of contents; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Library science; Database","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01755197791655686,"gpt":0.3266056382887343,"spread":0.3090536603721775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001298017,0.0001626616,0.000747523,0.0001624149,0.000227117,0.0001435233,0.001228541,0.00008744288,0.0007242955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003719742,0.000130834,0.0001607643,0.001210226,0.005933327,0.001053186,0.0001054957,0.0004161524,0.001034042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005782368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003059091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0521455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005234042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955726,0.0001816125,0.0009616938,0.0001578255,0.001991084,0.001135158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955125,0.0002738344,0.001486212,0.0001595322,0.001100894,0.001467066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000355732,0.00005852063,0.0001981094,0.00007149119,0.00003179051,0.000005743982,0.002126131,0.000005991878,0.0001733686,0.8640202,0.1266448,0.006628299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000155746,0.0004548647,0.001178,0.0002329673,0.0000233859,0.000008736691,0.003013747,0.00001072806,0.0003494574,0.0005810948,0.993818,0.0001732002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0144008,0.0003370926,0.002168631,0.02208652,0.007148025,0.0003627806,0.0004605573,0.0000150104,0.9530206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891136,0.0001017219,0.0003509359,0.002052418,0.001315307,0.000001564546,0.000001683271,0.00000739794,0.007055386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230604939","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12283","title":"Issue Information ‐ Table of Contents","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Economic and Fiscal Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Citation; Table of contents; Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; World Wide Web; Database","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02211814559271104,"gpt":0.2522883213853023,"spread":0.2301701757925913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008380691,0.000155396,0.0009380673,0.0003956852,0.00008704516,0.00005864965,0.0006859086,0.00005851279,0.001543267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005737405,0.0001223163,0.0001540468,0.0003566369,0.002274414,0.0008069886,0.0001293588,0.0002065111,0.004743675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003598978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001765695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006549205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000118991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976975,0.00001161341,0.001358503,0.0001693872,0.0001122481,0.0006507548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968804,0.0001156075,0.00219307,0.0001849374,0.000275669,0.0003502931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005355072,0.0000920205,0.006815532,0.00007876653,0.0001469562,0.000001919444,0.0003465986,0.000009047848,0.00003188249,0.8767663,0.1035902,0.01206725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006486294,0.001052659,0.0129512,0.0002039687,0.00001882511,0.00003627002,0.0007336687,0.00003966476,0.0003810272,0.0149923,0.9684855,0.0004562913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02704045,0.001277943,0.009000301,0.004594156,0.005739155,0.0001698247,0.001229141,0.000005571882,0.9509435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890499,0.0004144878,0.0004097041,0.000719102,0.0004169961,0.000001889639,0.000002036578,0.000008690617,0.008977197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}