{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":143,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":143,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"482b7aabdd5d","filters":{"venue":"American Political Science Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2131379390","doi":"10.1017/s0003055403000649","title":"Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2353,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Politics; Corporate governance; Political science; State (computer science); Classics; Sociology; Humanities; Law; History; Management; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05954364214638,"gpt":0.3570080009857252,"spread":0.2974643588393452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001980046,0.00012391,0.000292721,0.00001778075,0.0004325925,0.0000578726,0.0008029661,0.00001380031,0.00006833531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007027126,0.00008211248,0.00009878416,0.001362328,0.006282516,0.0002333556,0.00006148923,0.0001499265,0.00003959531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001921894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009198334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007479211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003798765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969861,0.0004504001,0.0002748651,0.000291997,0.0007706783,0.001225941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984572,0.0002967284,0.0002843016,0.0003309876,0.0001763494,0.0004544221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.174572e-7,0.00002863897,0.0006028929,0.00004953875,0.00000312876,0.000001512141,0.0002553569,8.831816e-7,0.00005738443,0.9743965,0.0002644609,0.02433898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002065174,0.00009060705,0.1312711,0.001319353,0.00004728264,0.000009923648,0.001314396,0.00002914153,0.001534713,0.003419857,0.8602751,0.0004820024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07084215,0.1124038,0.008267939,0.1374248,0.001656981,0.003179312,0.000590973,0.0002768512,0.6653572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590481,0.03198498,0.0009604702,0.005740049,0.00005409661,0.000005035085,1.984179e-7,0.000007968079,0.002199084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589179404","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000605","title":"A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":459,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sophistication; Sketch; Deliberation; Ideal (ethics); Voting; Deliberative democracy; Democratic theory; Political science; Politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Polycentricity; Power (physics); Law and economics; Economics; Social science; Computer science; Law; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07751967023305721,"gpt":0.4214526396001939,"spread":0.3439329693671366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006443651,0.0001690435,0.0004383519,0.0000745669,0.002857146,0.0003192447,0.002094266,0.00004506982,0.00005697691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01515784,0.0001328503,0.0001359111,0.0007272719,0.01683385,0.0003940852,0.0002052542,0.0002843346,0.0002836062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003350169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001820543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003498092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004164939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955899,0.0004715968,0.000312993,0.0005419012,0.00110278,0.001980849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959133,0.0005092419,0.0001439574,0.0009083272,0.0002233275,0.002301816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001939647,0.0000689501,0.00008091579,0.0001550339,0.000002011515,0.000001369213,0.000116745,3.369835e-7,0.000004474715,0.9814754,0.0002382409,0.01785454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008757784,0.0001155836,0.001808235,0.001004107,0.00006085989,0.000002325558,0.0003052125,0.00004693144,0.00002840223,0.9278968,0.06823055,0.0004134337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003673091,0.0004550607,0.003257084,0.1414539,0.00008394502,0.0007050057,0.000007243551,0.00008389502,0.8535866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438607,0.0003596917,0.005872612,0.04924927,0.0002323268,0.0000878529,6.165328e-7,0.0000102522,0.0003266415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9434934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795668280","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000151","title":"Can Social Contact Reduce Prejudice and Discrimination? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; United States Institute of Peace","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Contact hypothesis; Social psychology; Psychology; Social contact; Contact theory; Intervention (counseling); Cognitive dissonance; Observational study; Class (philosophy); Homogeneous; Constructive; Medicine; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06263205100054903,"gpt":0.4619129955688303,"spread":0.3992809445682812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001055467,0.0001087997,0.0003214032,0.00005269872,0.0004876458,0.00007385034,0.000442065,0.00003870279,0.0003549221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00264575,0.00009450171,0.00004746947,0.0008538647,0.004841681,0.0002874429,0.0001017483,0.0001229026,0.00002911033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003413655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003802122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08095013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009072645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976956,0.0003452897,0.0002788404,0.0004451837,0.0004288494,0.0008062393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988325,0.0004286179,0.0001009507,0.0001483508,0.0001225845,0.0003670261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004564794,0.0002244413,0.02024207,0.0001030408,0.00001675813,0.00001092657,0.07016907,1.835423e-9,0.006337965,0.6388064,0.005301532,0.2587421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007583218,0.002490077,0.7496496,0.008822668,0.0001265241,0.000009914491,0.09461308,0.00001758364,0.004033467,0.06922771,0.06853314,0.001717891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.789979,0.004922388,0.0000413853,0.174491,0.0004202008,0.0005256325,0.000006996595,0.00004541567,0.02956804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839346,0.004217838,0.0001428274,0.01114682,0.0004549821,0.00005037811,5.216384e-7,0.000004362844,0.00004764294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7294075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004654961","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000807","title":"When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":302,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universität Mannheim; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Operationalization; Conceptualization; Phenomenon; Democracy; Populism; Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Empirical research; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09085768465067101,"gpt":0.3497723236653853,"spread":0.2589146390147143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001804463,0.0001044513,0.0002450627,0.00001338129,0.0004584859,0.00003917172,0.0003782883,0.0000144575,0.00008733357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001424994,0.00004495589,0.0000413171,0.0003913339,0.008668792,0.00009456987,0.0001100169,0.00007581014,0.000006047929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005365256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001920801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002259336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001177196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976145,0.0004291698,0.0002741946,0.0002455426,0.001062654,0.0003739657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989778,0.0002429065,0.0001925334,0.0001941606,0.0001879038,0.0002046744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006615099,0.00003735314,0.0328814,0.0001814737,0.00002952605,4.336682e-7,0.008833303,3.069155e-7,0.0006486404,0.9521965,0.001086465,0.00409799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001199569,0.001162762,0.3468781,0.00965229,0.0006157592,0.00001106359,0.030545,0.000400344,0.0131828,0.01248534,0.5825816,0.001285369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6173627,0.009768542,0.00004702075,0.3649786,0.0001351368,0.00214478,0.0001096197,0.00003348122,0.005420053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731467,0.0008854245,0.00004990728,0.02585308,0.00003237354,0.00001186744,2.624683e-7,0.000004352863,0.00001604092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9397112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152177377","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000094","title":"Rethinking Care Ethics: On the Promise and Potential of an Intersectional Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":282,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Ethics of care; Diversity (politics); Feminist ethics; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Gender studies; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07308542215743548,"gpt":0.4158490771869438,"spread":0.3427636550295083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004609749,0.00008591815,0.0003169084,0.00007267454,0.0009210171,0.00005453673,0.0003765755,0.00002738718,0.0000348974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004083064,0.00005423492,0.00009557915,0.001194637,0.007610114,0.00009818369,0.00008308514,0.0002147352,0.000003108704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001028662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003139219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005222081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007282132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973541,0.0008136368,0.0002234904,0.0003075904,0.0008408093,0.0004604124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848,0.000667496,0.0001147809,0.0002341567,0.0002379538,0.0002656598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003365624,0.00003102446,0.0007489849,0.0001518517,0.00004244414,4.541293e-7,0.0443726,0.000001159502,0.00001845269,0.9238641,0.00002712957,0.03073843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003094449,0.001861243,0.08934432,0.001828743,0.001990752,0.000008343358,0.7794009,0.0007520148,0.000211313,0.08503918,0.03812903,0.001124719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8046297,0.003752169,0.0006430462,0.1125423,0.0003097449,0.0008527319,0.00002262825,0.00008736781,0.07716022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909643,0.001778042,0.0002135605,0.006910159,0.0000932487,0.000009190596,9.308246e-7,0.000002588733,0.00002800885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8388249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107758351","doi":"10.1017/s0003055412000421","title":"On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":278,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Nationalism; Democracy; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05263516533756687,"gpt":0.3802951089819447,"spread":0.3276599436443778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007106146,0.0001150964,0.0002359079,0.00002566153,0.002229432,0.0001343925,0.0004398008,0.00003076307,0.00006857204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008234045,0.00005638709,0.00005346275,0.0007105533,0.01959121,0.0003481611,0.0001443095,0.000312949,0.00006173406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001132543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004338278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008589965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001566843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968978,0.0007020332,0.0002152153,0.0002232184,0.0008458683,0.001115863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953497,0.003475465,0.00007650117,0.0001770626,0.0001220718,0.0007991785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001870364,0.00001550494,0.00006264466,0.00004213168,0.000002771538,1.933223e-7,0.0003989208,8.267434e-9,0.000001142957,0.9960306,0.0002135778,0.003230641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007779206,0.00002731749,0.001640733,0.0002687574,0.0000376782,0.000009155612,0.0003302903,0.00001631012,0.000006780278,0.9223832,0.07507251,0.0001294799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01053796,0.01510786,0.00001500812,0.8074054,0.00008951415,0.0006817348,0.000008033145,0.00003268446,0.1661218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9129086,0.00762409,0.00006333453,0.07906203,0.00022769,0.00003255335,2.707612e-7,0.000004409439,0.00007699982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117882486","doi":"10.1017/s0003055405051488","title":"Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Epistemology; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Sociology; Popular sovereignty; Solidarity; Collective identity; Impossibility; Politics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04193930035387955,"gpt":0.4101236277089392,"spread":0.3681843273550596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003708911,0.000212876,0.0005194761,0.00004271498,0.0009304237,0.0001320361,0.001872906,0.00004701263,0.0004788866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006205142,0.000115303,0.0001619845,0.002462453,0.01440793,0.00109229,0.0002371046,0.000257408,0.0001794761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001243603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002153156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01368108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003885913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944228,0.001126123,0.000497155,0.0005848306,0.001666948,0.001702144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996858,0.0006413187,0.0002143642,0.0006790844,0.0003854052,0.001221842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006199504,0.0001960695,0.0007102114,0.00003745291,0.000007028147,9.851093e-7,0.0003004287,3.30698e-7,0.00002001798,0.9916132,0.0001755077,0.006932562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002529307,0.0008079857,0.02149792,0.001168604,0.000124071,0.000004227371,0.002266915,0.00007957124,0.0006496767,0.9254161,0.04696142,0.0007706307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1556882,0.0008535447,0.0003002767,0.2383049,0.0003396742,0.00246221,0.0003258981,0.0002134141,0.601512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98219,0.0003365809,0.0003294189,0.01668485,0.000319149,0.00004749111,5.024892e-7,0.000007886533,0.00008408642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8265019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098877340","doi":"10.2307/2586386","title":"Political Parties and Foreign Aid","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":261,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"LISREL; Politics; Foreign policy; Political science; Left-wing politics; Welfare state; Relevance (law); Foreign policy analysis; Political economy; State (computer science); Welfare; Democracy; Economics; Structural equation modeling; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02346208427638821,"gpt":0.3637938431761314,"spread":0.3403317588997432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001014653,0.00009529456,0.0002156588,0.00004481395,0.0004656698,0.00009637885,0.0003355787,0.00001632668,0.001584648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000668888,0.00007606138,0.0000480411,0.0005979864,0.006266385,0.0003047817,0.00004487183,0.00008254196,0.0002931506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001876073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004591543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002097719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003554388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975054,0.00009744542,0.000214912,0.0002690276,0.0006762822,0.001236965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988046,0.0001410219,0.00003116188,0.0001091912,0.00009313478,0.000820948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.25715e-7,0.00001099752,0.001149329,0.00001969056,0.000001626659,0.000001719896,0.0000564293,3.999361e-9,0.000001835901,0.9586228,0.0003214792,0.03981319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001012092,0.00008755052,0.01983443,0.0006263154,0.00002757121,0.00001562477,0.001305407,0.00001390484,0.00005025673,0.2072542,0.7703137,0.0003698554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02700713,0.001440004,0.000009016414,0.05977401,0.0000471679,0.0002003845,0.000003940971,0.00005571127,0.9114627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782797,0.004985176,0.0004855134,0.01456872,0.0001392122,0.00001682132,9.4234e-7,0.000004311748,0.001519624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9512725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779364895","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000569","title":"Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Status quo bias; Politics; Personality; Status quo; Discounting; Work (physics); Appeal; Regret; Subject (documents); Social psychology; Political science; Public relations; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1003232516648837,"gpt":0.529907989688136,"spread":0.4295847380232523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001580272,0.0001210021,0.0004645012,0.00005311251,0.001128452,0.00008244597,0.001294671,0.00002202574,0.00006601519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00582324,0.0000813696,0.0001033166,0.0007334727,0.007163021,0.0005054931,0.0002235048,0.0001116803,0.000004390633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002201325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004776967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08893482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003210759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961251,0.0008992601,0.0005598633,0.0003722577,0.001172799,0.0008707145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997394,0.000415753,0.0005816254,0.0008928734,0.0003738916,0.0003418316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002683527,0.001665944,0.183028,0.0001120536,0.00002346413,0.000002816126,0.01124299,0.0000013199,0.00239252,0.7885038,0.00007180402,0.01292842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004325223,0.001925571,0.9100647,0.002322638,0.0001330128,0.000002910638,0.06378818,0.00006498083,0.006638729,0.01399671,0.0002447469,0.0003853191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855804,0.0001818361,0.00003655632,0.001878339,0.00011586,0.0008992093,0.000006906029,0.00001353855,0.01128729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993324,0.00002965431,0.000126461,0.0003594862,0.00008056714,0.00003541517,2.013913e-7,0.000006804278,0.00002907147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7745072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255458947","doi":"10.1017/s0003055415000453","title":"Mixing Methods: A Bayesian Approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Process tracing; Causal inference; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Process (computing); Econometrics; Management science; Bayesian inference; Qualitative property; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Data science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Mathematics; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2958060394346289,"gpt":0.6121796969617302,"spread":0.3163736575271014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02126255,0.0001466949,0.0005978785,0.0001914996,0.0005492408,0.0001624658,0.001169104,0.00002025204,0.0002663361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02033592,0.0001143921,0.0001470976,0.006030277,0.01196241,0.0004660414,0.0001985767,0.0002264164,0.0003828177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008376343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002317576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007671276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007257699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914126,0.004122993,0.0003860901,0.0005639452,0.00179723,0.001717108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953958,0.0008788594,0.0001346416,0.000406935,0.0008175102,0.00236623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001328005,0.00005574208,0.0002626902,0.00005307357,0.000009619167,0.000001384066,0.00181236,3.519852e-7,0.00003484552,0.9306347,0.002401967,0.06473192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001819699,0.0002189849,0.001042765,0.0005621462,0.0001030827,0.000006827233,0.04662689,0.001512578,0.0001578747,0.07581668,0.8730333,0.0007369191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003906215,0.0107007,0.1819742,0.02823651,0.00006391981,0.0006599607,0.000002852907,0.00009966796,0.7778716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7469438,0.004410333,0.2350152,0.0113981,0.0003180187,0.0001574722,0.000003252131,0.00002134507,0.001732432],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8706313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138544629","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000022","title":"Gone For Good: Deindustrialization, White Voter Backlash, and US Presidential Voting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Deindustrialization; Voting; White (mutation); Politics; Presidential election; Presidential system; Political economy; Economics; Political science; Economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0499160684999227,"gpt":0.4028032889315541,"spread":0.3528872204316315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001587562,0.0001101862,0.000336586,0.00003557212,0.0005928414,0.0002030228,0.0001812709,0.00004196907,0.0001559866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003954784,0.00009772412,0.00007369605,0.001089126,0.00174437,0.0003051464,0.00006302378,0.00008465436,0.00002393834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001840031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000819097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007334916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001755502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973252,0.0003334797,0.0003918635,0.0003878352,0.0004310897,0.001130568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982147,0.0003119926,0.0001196937,0.0001513305,0.0004188371,0.0007834054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001618432,0.00002487033,0.01971768,0.0001818374,0.000005316603,0.000001356559,0.00008370868,3.610876e-7,0.0001146529,0.9677661,0.0006163011,0.01148622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001052325,0.0005362725,0.1220807,0.004331237,0.0006086506,0.00003778735,0.001096863,0.0006199122,0.001976511,0.04851319,0.817493,0.001653506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.38441,0.01607958,0.027748,0.4922356,0.002084763,0.006355833,0.0001417586,0.0004818368,0.07046263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938861,0.0005482461,0.0006649116,0.003528405,0.0005341303,0.00005017546,0.000005001029,0.000008671477,0.0007743967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9192529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118437808","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000323","title":"Voting with Your Feet: Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Democratic theory; Empowerment; Monopoly; Voting; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Market economy; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08701216007564758,"gpt":0.3869992719661973,"spread":0.2999871118905497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004908868,0.0001772064,0.0004164214,0.0001739623,0.0004715576,0.00004426848,0.0007186441,0.00004148819,0.0002279543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003041297,0.0001293622,0.00007832451,0.002698341,0.01084266,0.0002842902,0.00006759504,0.0003316163,0.00009256322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003512593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001396177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00580907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003123637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957478,0.0006321523,0.0003845735,0.0004537474,0.000927044,0.001854668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978359,0.0005106816,0.0001149099,0.0002989903,0.0001311564,0.001108372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006323427,0.00009340997,0.001734061,0.0001040357,0.000002218314,0.00001388232,0.0005156061,1.554245e-7,0.000002653957,0.9929301,0.00001713602,0.00458045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004315079,0.0007499009,0.03338015,0.005511834,0.000132327,0.00001164289,0.004931101,0.00009580729,0.0001755852,0.9471161,0.006374615,0.00108943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03514291,0.002377055,0.00159231,0.0499948,0.0001761391,0.001232114,0.000008863032,0.0001955512,0.9092802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787315,0.0005205574,0.001431376,0.01914735,0.00007297439,0.00003589945,4.626587e-7,0.00001024661,0.00004964617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9435886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569043970","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000314","title":"Digging into the Pocketbook: Evidence on Economic Voting from Income Registry Data Matched to a Voter Survey","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd; Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences; Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Survey data collection; Economics; Voting behavior; Disapproval voting; Public economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2021885000756728,"gpt":0.4871787403623084,"spread":0.2849902402866356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007287348,0.0001651631,0.0004427755,0.00003534091,0.002100728,0.0007268014,0.003613276,0.00003242937,0.00008831445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02099267,0.0001124135,0.00006098983,0.0003055184,0.003565626,0.0007904285,0.0007126495,0.0002033787,0.0006515051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006584413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007863929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6142149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0514161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961302,0.0007430643,0.0004599933,0.0007039341,0.0006809326,0.001281845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947389,0.001873218,0.000318004,0.001982918,0.0001087918,0.000978146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002377195,0.00004674261,0.3398753,0.0001728902,0.00002229466,0.000006494949,0.001244991,0.000001784241,0.0001123272,0.574749,0.001952176,0.08179229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000734539,0.0001620597,0.96652,0.00520524,0.00006075035,0.000001175998,0.000292645,0.000334349,0.0000631993,0.007929421,0.01880871,0.0005490201],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7603487,0.0008758172,0.0002316752,0.2313987,0.0005047378,0.0009689824,0.0000807348,0.0000752577,0.005515452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929782,0.0002982519,0.0001786426,0.005936984,0.0004599641,0.00002873002,0.00000433731,0.000009858461,0.0001050286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6266447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145224084","doi":"10.1017/s0003055408080386","title":"What Is a “Right to Have Rights”? Three Images of the Politics of Human Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Autonomy; Politics; Law; Reading (process); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04291927670791675,"gpt":0.3806523311345332,"spread":0.3377330544266164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001227456,0.0002724858,0.0008873979,0.0001667833,0.0017683,0.00006200189,0.0021173,0.00005750639,0.0003586688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009162624,0.0001706034,0.0003759275,0.002334379,0.02607047,0.000648801,0.000381743,0.0002462432,0.0001087085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003774232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007426684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03223165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008952157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941265,0.0003645479,0.0008557275,0.0006071607,0.002055714,0.001990343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959694,0.0004030492,0.0003047168,0.00103961,0.0006469076,0.001636274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.627753e-7,0.0001043024,0.0006970234,0.0001094232,0.000008959027,0.000004636483,0.0007072364,4.674992e-8,0.0001266731,0.9968386,0.001001779,0.0004005078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001815313,0.000398393,0.009511594,0.003188301,0.0001508609,0.00002072042,0.00058842,0.000003004016,0.01646913,0.843406,0.1254072,0.0006748695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3506414,0.007772193,0.0001216714,0.2150356,0.0009772673,0.003558705,0.0002336735,0.0001792678,0.4214802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990325,0.0005493593,0.0003367488,0.007899604,0.0002472856,0.00002398649,6.856213e-7,0.00001236113,0.0006049928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6396836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159810407","doi":"10.1017/s0003055406062095","title":"Electoral Incentives in Mixed-Member Systems: Party, Posts, and Zombie Politicians in Japan","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Incentive; Zombie; Parliament; Reputation; Proportional representation; Single non-transferable vote; Single-member district; Business; Representation (politics); Lower house; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Law; Market economy; Politics; General election; Split-ticket voting; Computer security; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02530880291844293,"gpt":0.3707189439551659,"spread":0.345410141036723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002274012,0.0001885901,0.0005852433,0.0001951638,0.0002427538,0.000151337,0.0003061724,0.00005542306,0.00004358857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009829269,0.0001650593,0.00005734231,0.00223566,0.003504843,0.0004229973,0.00006686027,0.0002020024,0.00006255463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008759511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000537493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4605293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0564984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951954,0.000690917,0.0006745615,0.0004909391,0.0006902703,0.002257933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985104,0.0003543562,0.0001274431,0.0002055335,0.0001214616,0.0006807583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001469881,0.00006979035,0.2193179,0.0001437017,0.000001058149,0.000004558183,0.00007567095,6.327612e-7,0.00004801999,0.7788851,0.00009745078,0.001354737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002472972,0.0001520312,0.9560342,0.002096098,0.00002682538,0.00000847405,0.0009293445,0.0001158077,0.00004241733,0.01694405,0.02288679,0.0005166663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561363,0.005456249,0.000008811534,0.0125624,0.0001726804,0.0008250289,0.00001186272,0.00005259693,0.02477407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979328,0.0004912676,0.00002708729,0.001093134,0.0001959193,0.00007109001,0.000002965097,0.00001041588,0.0001753517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.761941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125285252","doi":"10.1017/s0003055407070268","title":"Federalism, Liberalism, and the Separation of Loyalties","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Loyalty; Liberalism; Dual federalism; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Tiebout model; Political economy; Democracy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Neoclassical economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01871784042806584,"gpt":0.390280781432058,"spread":0.3715629410039921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005525342,0.0000835434,0.0003449667,0.00002622178,0.0004429341,0.00006267758,0.0003297302,0.00001916453,0.00002619714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002134457,0.00004957701,0.0000699875,0.0007647888,0.01420261,0.0002094085,0.00006334748,0.00008401678,0.00001157472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001258772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002861742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06321018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009975297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976339,0.0002116344,0.0003635972,0.0002002845,0.0007114728,0.0008791292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983853,0.0006516438,0.0001707125,0.0001835648,0.000142618,0.0004662165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003279312,0.000007490111,0.0003850499,0.00005955138,0.000001738374,4.687602e-7,0.0002893667,1.799996e-8,0.000006106564,0.9847009,0.0002050527,0.01434093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004357165,0.00009800198,0.04133169,0.001184678,0.00006301978,0.00001250981,0.001658165,0.000022928,0.0001831469,0.03870685,0.9159719,0.0003313916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1241596,0.0319143,0.001296648,0.1766625,0.0003968348,0.001643977,0.00001918533,0.00009894926,0.663808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856459,0.004719005,0.0001824824,0.008544133,0.0001344578,0.000008135943,1.973834e-7,0.000003465019,0.000762262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109307809","doi":"10.1017/s0003055409990219","title":"Why Resource-poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Panel data; Resource (disambiguation); Econometrics; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07496121552790794,"gpt":0.2929875802133446,"spread":0.2180263646854367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003087714,0.0002104191,0.000703419,0.0001164325,0.0001660113,0.0001445268,0.001379985,0.00003673625,0.0003551503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004403938,0.0001805791,0.00006924417,0.0006165799,0.001315993,0.0005730696,0.0004344768,0.0002034024,0.0002553411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001895334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008667859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001455888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002525266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971486,0.00005582525,0.0006884748,0.001016863,0.0001384104,0.0009518787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973707,0.0006779803,0.0002856624,0.0008804522,0.00002406981,0.0007611411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002318409,0.00006167658,0.007452029,0.0001147238,0.00003358406,0.00001319174,0.0002511947,2.703013e-7,0.00001251187,0.6443508,0.01418299,0.3335039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002295931,0.0001291854,0.1293663,0.001612065,0.00004592101,0.00001724628,0.0002058564,0.0005599316,0.00001120789,0.1321689,0.7349209,0.0007329994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2441356,0.5479676,0.001611073,0.1823715,0.0004786443,0.00110685,0.0006324645,0.0001686347,0.02152761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8747646,0.04154212,0.002840918,0.08054464,0.0001665361,0.00001158128,0.0000222735,0.00001525832,0.00009205514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7207379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7363803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187082881","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000241","title":"The Primary Effect: Preference Votes and Political Promotions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Primary election; Politics; Exploit; Political science; Regression discontinuity design; Analogy; Competence (human resources); Microeconomics; General election; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Computer security; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04284344300457281,"gpt":0.3836081709961832,"spread":0.3407647279916104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003209129,0.0001339873,0.0003178589,0.00003236396,0.001142248,0.0001333973,0.0004049342,0.00003040477,0.00003394698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007366837,0.00006362504,0.00006471814,0.0007129004,0.0101665,0.0002455996,0.00009164093,0.0001011131,0.0001146144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003865457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004786606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00541055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004020282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959248,0.0007575725,0.0003307119,0.000355918,0.000705509,0.001925538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955886,0.002491188,0.0000825836,0.0002881352,0.0001690461,0.00138047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001066287,0.00001084764,0.004848629,0.00007011784,0.000001937257,2.778828e-7,0.00001392093,1.011044e-9,0.0001019009,0.9239681,0.0001174151,0.07086573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004722704,0.001614271,0.3192354,0.005344876,0.000224798,0.00003012066,0.0001970581,0.00001917588,0.0007436813,0.2955906,0.3753971,0.001130629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1837937,0.004088973,0.0009532283,0.6932663,0.0003755719,0.00235408,0.00002097966,0.0002852875,0.1148618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956334,0.0009291261,0.00005320035,0.002742733,0.0002026098,0.00009506435,3.397452e-7,0.000006439668,0.0003371498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8118396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734757516","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000259","title":"Does Democratic Consolidation Lead to a Decline in Voter Turnout? Global Evidence Since 1939","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Turnout; Voting; Democracy; Political economy; Dictatorship; Political science; Opposition (politics); Consolidation (business); Democratic consolidation; Voter turnout; Legislature; Salience (neuroscience); Context (archaeology); Development economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Politics; Law; Geography; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07444486485491321,"gpt":0.4673315746379286,"spread":0.3928867097830154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002958587,0.0001575039,0.000459449,0.00005136839,0.0008682598,0.0003792351,0.001027537,0.00003836869,0.00005772153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0185402,0.0001018368,0.00007467806,0.0009369668,0.003733988,0.0008702528,0.0001985952,0.0001261083,0.0002570333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008837941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009101941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1002294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03418917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961025,0.0003958299,0.0005295368,0.0004982791,0.0009319176,0.001541954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997461,0.0003993815,0.0002192548,0.0005895088,0.0002504115,0.001080402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001064168,0.0000699174,0.1619785,0.0002252674,0.000003125955,0.000009243544,0.0001525697,6.555168e-7,0.0001374721,0.7853635,0.0002714239,0.05177771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002886497,0.0005843402,0.8217469,0.01317206,0.0001031619,0.000008073022,0.0003960037,0.0002701308,0.0002879419,0.1185111,0.04351266,0.001118954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3285972,0.001118701,0.0007119038,0.6504606,0.0006100907,0.00215086,0.00001958349,0.00009150727,0.01623961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987606,0.0004901408,0.0004387184,0.0109873,0.0002251678,0.00009488747,5.65015e-7,0.000004941364,0.0001522178],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6668524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891564017","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000527","title":"The Power of the Multitude: Answering Epistemic Challenges to Democracy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multitude; Democracy; Writ; Elite; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Competence (human resources); Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06261548645886392,"gpt":0.4068541026422285,"spread":0.3442386161833646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003798106,0.0001144172,0.0002679171,0.00002821973,0.00167593,0.00004943283,0.00160695,0.0000311521,0.00003550428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01087564,0.00006111372,0.0001236239,0.001311659,0.02155051,0.0001463628,0.0002352327,0.000214611,0.0001247262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002171285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007185112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001849689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000464877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966714,0.0003880842,0.0003380258,0.0003082111,0.0009699598,0.001324252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972449,0.0009554929,0.0001089533,0.0005944753,0.0003500284,0.0007461319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001103313,0.0000145092,0.00006776545,0.00004162928,0.000002538371,2.150813e-7,0.0008761703,2.299364e-8,0.00003606799,0.9819861,0.00005910305,0.01691478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009055949,0.0003488215,0.02895087,0.002829437,0.0000643928,0.000007748818,0.006309921,0.000009541192,0.0004844342,0.4617101,0.4987038,0.000490352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009956369,0.006011977,0.00004480654,0.7312524,0.0004610236,0.0005911469,0.000005692075,0.00004507952,0.2516314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794731,0.006715727,0.0001465666,0.01333484,0.0002197603,0.00001243695,2.893328e-8,0.000005840035,0.00009174998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489258484","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000570","title":"Reading Between the Lines: Prediction of Political Violence Using Newspaper Text","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Variation (astronomy); Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Armed conflict; Computer science; Politics; Political science; Data science; History; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07314714434523127,"gpt":0.4176653248709075,"spread":0.3445181805256762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002606389,0.0001687512,0.000511488,0.00004457264,0.001860662,0.000185499,0.001809214,0.00004945848,0.00006461349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01123308,0.0001144285,0.0001608943,0.0005881227,0.01849254,0.0006004303,0.0002790856,0.0002661473,0.00003732639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004021492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001076847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06095969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007409477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957415,0.0002409674,0.000519186,0.0004110971,0.001160459,0.001926724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967735,0.0006155701,0.0003758925,0.0008566006,0.0002950083,0.001083445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[9.054378e-7,0.00001530534,0.02350115,0.00006588241,0.000004554638,9.083688e-7,0.00006571562,4.000623e-8,0.00006546904,0.9557754,0.00002614922,0.02047847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002445226,0.0002015513,0.8068293,0.007556133,0.0003574089,0.00001314791,0.001651654,0.0002038855,0.0007115047,0.04766204,0.1339332,0.0006357319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4449772,0.004431195,0.001542394,0.1469371,0.0009625246,0.002087412,0.0003063879,0.0002200539,0.3985357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928278,0.002585311,0.0003033927,0.003453319,0.0007087328,0.00001000156,6.140552e-7,0.000009233948,0.0001015832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9081134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151241261","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000080","title":"Ministerial Selection and Intraparty Organization in the Contemporary British Parliament","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Parliament; Delegation; Political science; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Public administration; Negotiation; Political economy; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03113051633103192,"gpt":0.368402686267373,"spread":0.3372721699363411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002175379,0.000066701,0.0001792258,0.00002902014,0.0003850317,0.0002202706,0.0002113808,0.00002763415,0.00009393749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002188431,0.00005238087,0.00001706733,0.001629356,0.002064516,0.0002495513,0.00002288662,0.0001525051,0.00001555576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008838344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005007462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06719243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01561105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981828,0.0003272691,0.000261591,0.0002188018,0.0004154299,0.0005940975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992025,0.000165354,0.00007087242,0.0001009252,0.0001496755,0.0003106619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001462171,0.0000717812,0.04746563,0.0000778781,0.000001542924,0.000002593051,0.0005646681,2.226867e-8,0.0006434109,0.9301243,0.0009103473,0.02013635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004735357,0.0005059883,0.6987267,0.001171299,0.00006543713,0.0001040732,0.002657805,0.00007669833,0.000371376,0.02605092,0.268963,0.0008331569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487078,0.0003460463,0.00003838844,0.04144253,0.000219202,0.000659649,0.000003501932,0.00003596789,0.008546917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953646,0.0002669864,0.00005671875,0.004030775,0.000227747,0.00002741023,0.000001865545,0.000003830611,0.0000200527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9040734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9390192,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155318470","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000198","title":"Counter-Majoritarian Democracy: Persistent Minorities, Federalism, and the Power of Numbers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Federalism; Political science; Politics; Normative; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Law and economics; Inequality; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03065475453241006,"gpt":0.3456204243549922,"spread":0.3149656698225821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002810124,0.0001246499,0.0004725348,0.00002676702,0.0009286394,0.00011126,0.0004617242,0.00003899024,0.0001672079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004887344,0.00008598031,0.0002061006,0.0009002857,0.02608167,0.0002221477,0.0001583676,0.0002378878,0.00001645415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000206293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001411541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01512554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003188628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967893,0.0005657779,0.0003571751,0.000332569,0.0009205868,0.001034644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974754,0.001001899,0.00009975752,0.000318299,0.0003678552,0.0007368009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003093415,0.00002597755,0.0001576532,0.0001117773,0.00001017372,0.000004473819,0.001000747,1.911521e-8,0.000002964659,0.9973394,0.0001965555,0.001147129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000737328,0.0001864903,0.002543672,0.00209239,0.0003908162,0.00008694502,0.0355634,0.00002297548,0.00006605019,0.7022938,0.2553442,0.0006719482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01432383,0.01972685,0.00002711515,0.5601658,0.000289861,0.0003833051,0.00003056596,0.00003716076,0.4050155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634376,0.00923456,0.0002117207,0.02672619,0.0001001156,0.000007989827,9.290491e-7,0.000005087263,0.0002758633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196577388","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000824","title":"The Elite–Citizen Gap in International Organization Legitimacy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stockholms Universitet; Universität Duisburg-Essen; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; American Political Science Association; Universiteit Maastricht; University of Toronto; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Vetenskapsrådet; Yale University","keywords":"Legitimacy; Elite; Political science; Democracy; Perception; Political economy; Democratic legitimacy; Publics; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02040313922315264,"gpt":0.3758452662311635,"spread":0.3554421270080109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001338652,0.00006380021,0.0001213864,0.00004634486,0.0004548957,0.0002060793,0.0005907952,0.00001136907,0.0004585068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005922617,0.00004767414,0.00003389025,0.001969352,0.001719459,0.0002792904,0.0001165667,0.00009969327,0.0001557047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004652558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001435607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001227711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003140854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998044,0.0001399383,0.0002407767,0.0002211568,0.0007828482,0.0005713243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988342,0.000242372,0.00006612484,0.0001157742,0.0005490527,0.000192488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.186856e-7,0.00001325398,0.002159477,0.000006552759,0.000001918575,0.000005349044,0.0001246045,6.63924e-8,0.00002235517,0.9661195,0.0005447292,0.03100193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001056245,0.000008938611,0.04329763,0.0007804745,0.000008503026,0.00001129602,0.001983672,0.00002566818,0.0001913662,0.03518369,0.9181755,0.0002276777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005406201,0.002959424,0.0001283512,0.3892114,0.000720773,0.0002766965,0.000004816306,0.00005193321,0.6012403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414246,0.04411331,0.000496385,0.01190917,0.000219467,0.00001560847,0.000009488902,0.000006189072,0.001805749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7090354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767591425","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000442","title":"Democratic Citizenship and Denationalization","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Citizenship; Political science; State (computer science); Politics; Law; Law and economics; Terrorism; Power (physics); Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09744153784587155,"gpt":0.3641687994074506,"spread":0.2667272615615791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007630437,0.00007369405,0.0001611923,0.00003778492,0.001399915,0.0003846654,0.0002898109,0.000009385213,0.0001894557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002215121,0.00005760396,0.00002685737,0.00004543816,0.006737622,0.0002925714,0.00005481797,0.00007118294,0.00006826717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004749954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001220089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003654688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000679545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989217,0.00004048176,0.0001796489,0.0002174655,0.0003008294,0.0003398799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990083,0.000106122,0.0001475209,0.000298734,0.0002179696,0.0002213368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[2.638866e-7,0.00000534641,0.0002697518,0.0001529198,0.000001615757,3.198681e-7,0.0002057638,1.331769e-8,0.000006810747,0.9847791,0.0008163148,0.01376178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002271295,0.0001410528,0.06682025,0.00251444,0.0002117518,0.00002723173,0.001546459,0.0006071494,0.000100695,0.7921007,0.1349834,0.0007197473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0341014,0.008602835,0.000706943,0.1749781,0.0006779312,0.0008574715,0.00003548987,0.0001471587,0.7798927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911314,0.00208188,0.000140565,0.005320217,0.0002127235,0.00001340056,0.000003420962,0.000004901281,0.001091523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9570299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125598908","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000698","title":"Can Economic Assistance Shape Combatant Support in Wartime? Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Princeton University; Yale University; United States Institute of Peace; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Combatant; Livelihood; Cash; Psychological intervention; Cash transfers; Government (linguistics); Competence (human resources); Economic growth; Economics; Business; Political science; Finance; Psychology; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02857861646411563,"gpt":0.3757502846891488,"spread":0.3471716682250332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001369429,0.0001403054,0.0003619385,0.00007184804,0.0001823314,0.0001130442,0.0008490322,0.00002101394,0.004790441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003576416,0.0001273208,0.00007113874,0.0005311705,0.001819915,0.0005321221,0.0001254985,0.0001184889,0.001132572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001741059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001611323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01814361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001697383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972557,0.000135901,0.0004035087,0.0005141502,0.0007138453,0.0009768285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988704,0.0002525045,0.0001327799,0.0002314396,0.00005964133,0.0004532415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009844059,0.00007371527,0.04943335,0.00004150069,0.000006574385,0.00001523445,0.0009727124,3.397878e-7,0.001059909,0.9412575,0.0006676922,0.006461657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001214109,0.0009846737,0.5934304,0.01499675,0.00008360388,0.00001736377,0.01649779,0.001108027,0.01011572,0.02735586,0.3304217,0.003773947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8428826,0.00339078,0.000006746968,0.04236792,0.0006116912,0.0007958499,0.00004583456,0.00006468461,0.1098339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927365,0.002359494,0.0003652719,0.003873574,0.00007136414,0.00002738392,0.000004780985,0.000007044927,0.0005546064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114736693","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000098","title":"Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Glory; Ideology; Power (physics); Selfishness; Subversion; Meaning (existential); Anger; Contempt; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1132837825312757,"gpt":0.3062589685639798,"spread":0.1929751860327041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009202094,0.0001651125,0.0003595684,0.00004241724,0.0002555708,0.00002234828,0.0006283313,0.00001003747,0.004964191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000722539,0.00007982384,0.0001730926,0.0002201213,0.00981002,0.0001023596,0.0001231576,0.0001452672,0.0002951264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005168016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007464808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004765498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001206337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978027,0.0002072398,0.000367458,0.0002776325,0.000544403,0.0008006151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984152,0.0005342869,0.0001072539,0.0004407959,0.0001073526,0.0003951234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006262388,0.0001589217,0.00002978652,0.00009982171,0.00001144591,0.000001340521,0.0005731029,2.976731e-9,0.000003547567,0.993291,0.0003029235,0.005521895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000843072,0.0007052524,0.001172484,0.00150898,0.0001387746,0.000004951524,0.002003215,0.000002648477,0.0007258141,0.7462462,0.2470796,0.0003278033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03446967,0.007067416,0.00002046247,0.04190493,0.0004367815,0.0008407572,0.0001139057,0.00008257038,0.9150635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767395,0.002371056,0.00002762367,0.0203502,0.0002090784,0.00003155705,8.953637e-7,0.000008181695,0.0002618552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9422699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130335340","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000134","title":"Coevolution of Capitalism and Political Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Incentive; Proportional representation; Legislature; Political science; Political economy; Representation (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Electoral reform; Competition (biology); Economics; Law and economics; Law; Market economy; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03952988541395845,"gpt":0.4314517945858869,"spread":0.3919219091719284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001267779,0.00007681132,0.0003353049,0.00003883451,0.0004589202,0.00002353106,0.0003212205,0.00002941814,0.000009198912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004117193,0.00004594484,0.00006815998,0.001033911,0.01724954,0.0001503518,0.00007696811,0.0001408294,0.000002811669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000600499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003896022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1060022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007114014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998016,0.0001853286,0.0003156621,0.0001789621,0.0005969298,0.0007071103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984937,0.000544981,0.0001700963,0.0001926061,0.0002712658,0.0003272906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[5.676809e-7,0.00001420984,0.004826069,0.00009137693,0.00000485643,1.156255e-7,0.0004317646,1.487449e-8,0.0001584752,0.9929048,0.00007999932,0.001487765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005257555,0.0006121281,0.7934681,0.001875238,0.0005214594,0.00003925968,0.04335577,0.0001054255,0.001139393,0.1003439,0.05699843,0.001015109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7588024,0.01154098,0.00003132996,0.1460174,0.0009685993,0.001498397,0.0000398459,0.00006827134,0.08103278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967754,0.001994279,0.00003708967,0.0008010975,0.0003207587,0.00001497073,3.323889e-7,0.000002951004,0.00005310533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8925609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567622053","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000393","title":"Tongue-Tied: Rawls, Political Philosophy and Metalinguistic Awareness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Normative; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07368246469849857,"gpt":0.4173249267825241,"spread":0.3436424620840255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003101497,0.000281103,0.0007061585,0.0001333733,0.0009896,0.0001108861,0.000862154,0.00008857903,0.0002154726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01803253,0.0001853745,0.0001675293,0.001257748,0.02742465,0.0004063869,0.0002616016,0.0002665804,0.0002468153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005651792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001636483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005413484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005274151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937121,0.0005212401,0.0005318379,0.0007823249,0.00134389,0.003108621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938393,0.001637367,0.000114399,0.0005133506,0.0003847045,0.003510882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000238852,0.00005249363,0.0003618415,0.0001563829,0.000007088151,0.00000979073,0.00005378421,2.501404e-9,0.00001646019,0.9893182,0.00008258387,0.009938998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001575031,0.0001168317,0.001690852,0.001431865,0.0001109169,0.00001687187,0.0002088707,0.000002032113,0.00006364258,0.9149105,0.08082137,0.0004687771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005427467,0.005221527,0.0004813556,0.4593423,0.0005447112,0.0006786053,0.00007935479,0.0002823677,0.5279423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715475,0.004289411,0.0002694196,0.02283953,0.0008498551,0.00003029858,9.908418e-7,0.00001714979,0.0001557799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173795390","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000502","title":"Reexamining the Effect of Refugees on Civil Conflict: A Global Subnational Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Impact of Light on Environment and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; American Political Science Association; Yale University","keywords":"Refugee; Political science; Civil Conflict; Matching (statistics); Development economics; Spanish Civil War; Economics; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01272647097062077,"gpt":0.3432974079355325,"spread":0.3305709369649117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002050601,0.0001363313,0.0004402722,0.00002930882,0.0002047298,0.00002266814,0.0004323984,0.00001603924,0.001883957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009635998,0.00007976325,0.0001716286,0.002952161,0.002972433,0.0001125043,0.0001835955,0.0001064486,0.000181195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005385166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009354119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004637921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000602578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971402,0.0002821859,0.0003159643,0.0003756488,0.001087545,0.0007984105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985486,0.0004082676,0.0001608158,0.0004354994,0.00001298756,0.0004338137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000157887,0.0001362465,0.8834965,0.0001850791,0.00008216481,0.00001366255,0.00004929301,0.00003557906,0.000382626,0.06004802,0.0007010186,0.05485406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009821352,0.0004168355,0.979489,0.0001469179,0.0002525273,0.00001036632,0.00002092472,0.00008081531,0.0006732514,0.0001532757,0.01852651,0.000131376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8933474,0.00181613,0.0001215931,0.01801489,0.00005664025,0.0003378294,0.00002559126,0.00002227319,0.08625764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929495,0.0008969023,0.0001604536,0.005863846,0.00002258415,0.00001098038,0.000003901145,0.000003437621,0.00008832468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09960216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037544043","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000131","title":"Negativity Biases and Political Ideology: A Comparative Test across 17 Countries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Negativity effect; Respondent; Politics; Biology and political orientation; Social psychology; Negativity bias; Psychology; Skin conductance; Work (physics); Political science; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1138656534505219,"gpt":0.4829629239513404,"spread":0.3690972705008185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001029053,0.0001713052,0.0006502458,0.00002498314,0.0008389141,0.0001194609,0.0005103814,0.00004624015,0.0002416281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00946922,0.00013909,0.0000850524,0.001247948,0.03055537,0.00034671,0.0001943734,0.0002218704,0.000160892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001810065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004833754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007150001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004886087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996458,0.0003539189,0.0003276496,0.0005430531,0.0005030805,0.001814321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996034,0.001836759,0.0001151231,0.0001557301,0.0002038638,0.001654572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005728482,0.00005675066,0.01599202,0.00005836433,0.000006737443,0.000007045393,0.003143549,9.372917e-9,0.00004360889,0.973346,0.003099129,0.004241037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005271951,0.001768447,0.223706,0.001131021,0.0001310345,0.00004429463,0.04367775,0.00006709164,0.0001759321,0.02816281,0.6994233,0.001185107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2899205,0.005135151,0.0001174366,0.6067312,0.0001869262,0.0007761481,0.0001156394,0.000214647,0.09680237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092123,0.002187908,0.0001356379,0.08810955,0.000271107,0.00002339052,0.000001051277,0.000004861975,0.00005421717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997690757","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000790","title":"Independent Agencies, Distribution, and Legitimacy: The Case of Central Banks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Discretion; Credibility; Constraint (computer-aided design); Delegation; Monetary policy; Distributive property; Economics; Central bank; Distribution (mathematics); Independence (probability theory); Business; Monetary economics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01799498230365653,"gpt":0.2681046181108913,"spread":0.2501096358072347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001691944,0.0001073391,0.0003914454,0.00004325485,0.0001516414,0.00004358891,0.0003176893,0.00001864754,0.0002418083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008090282,0.00008229909,0.00007638198,0.000970269,0.002573447,0.0001856754,0.0001301418,0.0001089644,0.00005769895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002949518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001628081,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002623044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002646615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982334,0.00003850689,0.0005368809,0.0004173862,0.00009761052,0.0006762326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988115,0.0001394969,0.0002682812,0.000490974,0.00007785067,0.0002119341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[5.005477e-7,0.00002422614,0.04146399,0.0001395877,0.000002806247,0.00000233929,0.00004947072,0.000001520093,0.00000227231,0.9494657,0.00004065478,0.008806935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002026991,0.000180069,0.9217243,0.0002993853,0.00002962146,0.0004152237,0.0002965477,0.00222808,0.00004158372,0.043016,0.03115737,0.0004090895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708,0.01518387,0.001301621,0.004948685,0.0001608655,0.0006652491,0.000201815,0.00001973405,0.006718098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976752,0.0015052,0.0001204333,0.0006296831,0.00001972418,0.000009134268,0.000003762852,0.000004963011,0.00003187648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9064497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9481971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002992174","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000789","title":"Social Network Structures and the Politics of Public Goods Provision: Evidence from the Philippines","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Politics; Clan; Incentive; Elite; Fractionalization; Competition (biology); Scale (ratio); Public economics; Economics; Business; Political science; Market economy; Microeconomics; Geography; Ethnic group","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07718946976691776,"gpt":0.3810021580874345,"spread":0.3038126883205168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00254584,0.0001357695,0.0004664667,0.000008705103,0.001818494,0.0001608113,0.00108497,0.00003556082,0.00008052149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007125973,0.00006850798,0.0001399194,0.001869317,0.02316796,0.0002599907,0.0003123842,0.0002287432,0.00000553613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006664731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006696394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007306602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001635591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964767,0.0009377987,0.0003515413,0.0003267488,0.0009232185,0.0009839589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966265,0.002256033,0.0002185476,0.0001918128,0.0001787277,0.0005284028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003912995,0.000004533792,0.00119892,0.00003547321,0.000007809101,3.518537e-7,0.004164733,1.100153e-7,0.000001645177,0.9444538,0.001947159,0.0481816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000564764,0.0003236799,0.08141752,0.001620091,0.0004573626,0.000004211099,0.03146348,0.0002297181,0.0000143326,0.6528976,0.230189,0.0008182629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04111804,0.1047585,0.0001031372,0.8485778,0.0001800632,0.0009160916,0.00001413081,0.00005902019,0.0042732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509653,0.02162051,0.0001117177,0.02511472,0.002151543,0.00001678284,6.853857e-7,0.000005737848,0.0000129375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122361107","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000559","title":"Coercion and (Global) Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Economic Justice; Socioeconomic status; Global justice; Law and economics; State (computer science); Function (biology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1182377085914494,"gpt":0.4260550252854016,"spread":0.3078173166939522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002105322,0.0001098884,0.0002664283,0.00002918839,0.0006590382,0.00004215538,0.0004523763,0.00003633188,0.0001445931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004143012,0.00009083118,0.00005293209,0.001161259,0.01481814,0.0003171339,0.000116479,0.0001668659,0.0001625549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002433499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006124619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009984854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009465333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972985,0.0002212602,0.0002219171,0.0003407283,0.0006128469,0.001304688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978102,0.000212902,0.00005894138,0.0002225281,0.0001544048,0.001540974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001020493,0.00002357436,0.0002821513,0.0001088664,0.000001317721,0.00000291773,0.0002374761,1.093139e-9,0.00000106123,0.9816464,0.00009801834,0.01759717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007668653,0.0001519997,0.01606716,0.0007316888,0.0002034836,0.00001700911,0.001881524,0.000006196403,0.00001729635,0.8915371,0.08891409,0.0003957778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004296809,0.00440575,0.0001630168,0.04734139,0.0001899784,0.0002852716,0.00001090342,0.0001061856,0.9432007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961945,0.01128427,0.0008970971,0.02567618,0.0001400937,0.000008695315,2.708388e-7,0.0000036793,0.0000447165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9576482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736330361","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000138","title":"Ethnic Segregation and Public Goods: Evidence from Indonesia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fractionalization; Public good; Ethnic group; Leverage (statistics); Decentralization; Diversity (politics); Distribution (mathematics); Development economics; Political science; Economics; Economic geography; Microeconomics; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1166683058052877,"gpt":0.4162851425426253,"spread":0.2996168367373375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001647336,0.0001199232,0.0003140164,0.00005345771,0.0009347583,0.0001459296,0.0004029786,0.00002547792,0.000171493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003267032,0.00009349775,0.00004182851,0.001493764,0.009853764,0.0007497533,0.0001553374,0.00008896779,0.0001645045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002486131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006472678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01170899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002506353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977069,0.0001830365,0.0002678989,0.000449714,0.0004886112,0.0009038748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984542,0.0003671489,0.0001275325,0.000195007,0.0002200998,0.0006359901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002035674,0.00003390173,0.08620975,0.00007741119,0.00001494284,0.000001418837,0.003144439,2.356434e-9,0.0000309786,0.5356639,0.001778436,0.3730428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001290247,0.0001657839,0.771845,0.002269366,0.00007563346,0.000004648224,0.01146426,0.0000106631,0.00006606524,0.02158729,0.1917275,0.0006547357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5508972,0.1129267,0.0004870739,0.2104506,0.0005998688,0.001497766,0.00001640563,0.0003137726,0.1228106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9308439,0.06086439,0.000846476,0.007118916,0.0002281431,0.00002589695,8.840337e-7,0.000003670935,0.00006771317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6856353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380610319","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000527","title":"Do Politicians Outside the United States Also Think Voters Are More Conservative than They Really Are?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Universität Konstanz; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Public opinion; Perception; Politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Democracy; Phenomenon; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07307672638374667,"gpt":0.4176618665538056,"spread":0.3445851401700589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003898901,0.000252936,0.0005844547,0.0001647224,0.001308485,0.0002606979,0.0009702075,0.00005397824,0.00005440416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005096292,0.0001603292,0.0001687472,0.004255047,0.007496361,0.0002911879,0.0001423543,0.0002936323,0.0003722081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000524791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007144371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1821614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01083829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938257,0.001180258,0.0005747246,0.0005298337,0.001336079,0.00255342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995742,0.001634634,0.0003576969,0.0005392017,0.000524341,0.00120217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003754928,0.00004073806,0.03095869,0.000158006,0.00002122186,0.00001600455,0.004087576,0.000007571051,0.00001135271,0.9578327,0.005856301,0.001006077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002510077,0.000305773,0.6193599,0.004702498,0.0002540947,0.00001111595,0.07008401,0.00062987,0.00006707211,0.1553771,0.1477434,0.001214195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4059411,0.0005963673,0.0000373121,0.5807664,0.0002794478,0.001251047,0.0001103925,0.0003989683,0.01061903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700653,0.001761587,0.0000245593,0.02732199,0.0002599715,0.00007892415,0.00001430339,0.00001866091,0.0004546821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8024556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027489367","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000143","title":"The Electoral System, the Party System and Accountability in Parliamentary Government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Electoral system; Public administration; Multi-party system; Competition (biology); Political science; Political economy; Politics; Economics; Law; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04032906206031724,"gpt":0.3636888808233629,"spread":0.3233598187630457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003820688,0.0001239804,0.0003226663,0.000007055991,0.0009243283,0.0001840664,0.0005043588,0.00002100205,0.00001150339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001197824,0.00006470559,0.00005915776,0.001052238,0.003731766,0.0001924977,0.00009974886,0.0001755439,0.00003536366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001322979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003473304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0850794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005160216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960781,0.0008460004,0.0004597668,0.0003439086,0.001073789,0.001198451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981356,0.000689165,0.0001258783,0.0002457955,0.00006861964,0.0007348891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007236954,0.00001570954,0.03142415,0.0004294162,0.000004382098,0.000001755886,0.0003671279,2.025597e-7,0.00001880154,0.9537525,0.000323032,0.01365571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007199473,0.001095164,0.3600301,0.006493693,0.000365774,0.00003072857,0.1031736,0.003406886,0.0002152943,0.003064183,0.5196973,0.001707359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6015465,0.01216139,0.00006271183,0.3648948,0.0003727417,0.003103102,0.00003338731,0.0001782896,0.01764706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946937,0.0004327974,0.00001071829,0.004554263,0.0001890215,0.0001046599,2.894873e-7,0.000004847629,0.000009727149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206353349","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421001337","title":"Enfranchisement and Incarceration after the 1965 Voting Rights Act","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; York University; Johns Hopkins University; Harvard University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Prison; Voting; Mass incarceration; State (computer science); Politics; Voter registration; Race (biology); Political science; Power (physics); Criminology; White (mutation); Sociology; Law; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02324241136306385,"gpt":0.3692436108557238,"spread":0.3460011994926599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002545943,0.00007943533,0.0001744052,0.00003180675,0.001960309,0.00009315817,0.000252649,0.000008005954,0.0003997828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003917729,0.00005200964,0.00004506382,0.0008573361,0.002043098,0.0001703436,0.0001235253,0.0001463625,0.00002219471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003247897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002634225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03667244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001195728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99731,0.0006055877,0.0002423117,0.0002412131,0.0007774644,0.0008234264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990895,0.000218609,0.00007967924,0.0001434861,0.00006304293,0.000405716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022797,0.00002078926,0.004433205,0.00003519352,0.000002293254,0.000001163488,0.0003984052,4.561779e-7,0.0000163669,0.9809411,0.0002956496,0.01385308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001395933,0.000353802,0.08269447,0.0003538147,0.00009861514,0.00001474389,0.0009748204,0.0004263042,0.00003131722,0.02152392,0.8929001,0.0004884744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7321821,0.008203732,0.0001954474,0.1837976,0.0004342177,0.002241958,0.00002093013,0.000129396,0.07279458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925278,0.0001142226,0.00003297921,0.006756566,0.0001572217,0.0001859374,7.992749e-7,0.000003321499,0.0002211955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152852493","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000137","title":"Whose News? Class-Biased Economic Reporting in the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic welfare; Inequality; Yield (engineering); Economics; Welfare; Economic inequality; Media bias; Distribution (mathematics); Tone (literature); State (computer science); Income distribution; Accountability; Political economy; Political science; Market economy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0745070153776287,"gpt":0.4409771131478305,"spread":0.3664700977702018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005441263,0.0001249122,0.000393559,0.0000961046,0.0004155625,0.0001849423,0.0007030096,0.00002774601,0.0002559766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01213291,0.00009028801,0.0001050002,0.002447642,0.004164235,0.0002665228,0.00007502188,0.0002414811,0.0001797369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004692253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002665935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04727624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002957576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959816,0.0006299764,0.000904955,0.0003801564,0.0006235109,0.001479818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972461,0.001032631,0.0004609494,0.0004825126,0.0001618285,0.0006159268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.639599e-7,0.00004214411,0.01241853,0.00009943479,0.00000311318,0.00009037709,0.002019769,0.000005173357,0.00000999389,0.9676716,0.001658263,0.01598096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009748303,0.00005238212,0.009098654,0.0009404614,0.00004178935,0.0000346304,0.02775155,0.0001380081,0.00007588803,0.01729325,0.9441301,0.0003457877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7256438,0.002790933,0.0000178392,0.2026285,0.0002982352,0.0005422839,0.00001451989,0.00006080307,0.06800312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8777859,0.02455445,0.0002666026,0.09690952,0.0002705667,0.00004240289,0.00001507055,0.000008240067,0.0001471971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9503783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039350129","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000227","title":"Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Temple University; Yale University; Harvard University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Politics; Disadvantage; Gender gap; Socialization; Political science; Representation (politics); Gender studies; Sociology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05509635796580101,"gpt":0.3946754689008339,"spread":0.3395791109350329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002446809,0.00008862998,0.00022058,0.00004739544,0.000377998,0.00004616916,0.0006477598,0.00002170092,0.00003828394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002027708,0.00004859002,0.0001057587,0.001409745,0.005402582,0.0001295542,0.0001192862,0.0001536401,0.00001807016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005735626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000629126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03434708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004983125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969954,0.0004978957,0.0003172775,0.0002409752,0.0008476582,0.001100741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987713,0.000301963,0.0001090667,0.0003612369,0.0001175726,0.0003389253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[2.749258e-7,0.00001951397,0.004594516,0.0000493794,0.000001196273,1.482465e-7,0.0002224628,0.000002124319,0.00003487514,0.9924078,0.00003732633,0.002630358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002339519,0.00008714216,0.3388832,0.0009087675,0.00008849028,0.00001169671,0.007366934,0.0002369078,0.0006666605,0.5175443,0.1335452,0.0004267675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4274084,0.001264494,0.0008664146,0.1563502,0.0007953856,0.001532704,0.00001351611,0.00006064561,0.4117083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928685,0.0004654808,0.00008876413,0.006392975,0.0001284181,0.00001495927,3.298912e-7,0.000004629031,0.0000358724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5654602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362470474","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000242","title":"Diversity Matters: The Election of Asian Americans to U.S. State and Federal Legislatures","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Asian American Studies Center, University of California Los Angeles; University of Oxford; Princeton University; Sage Foundation","keywords":"Appeal; Ethnic group; Legislature; Asian americans; Diversity (politics); Political science; State (computer science); Crossover; Representation (politics); Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03858129230010217,"gpt":0.3813286637950657,"spread":0.3427473714949636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032759,0.00006920579,0.0001790142,0.00006737756,0.001395249,0.00005350783,0.0003127849,0.000009443213,0.00001990472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004194397,0.00004695185,0.00004727435,0.002025265,0.003227989,0.0001165449,0.0003281016,0.00007487164,0.00003178556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000208118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04844961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009955619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981871,0.0001585057,0.0001521497,0.0002252658,0.0005643989,0.0007125766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991693,0.0001044225,0.00007410513,0.0001504538,0.0001002553,0.0004013983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009056497,0.00007671738,0.04519996,0.0003793404,0.00003842813,0.000006422676,0.032539,0.000007290726,0.0005300376,0.5542076,0.0219197,0.3450865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001117686,0.000261,0.8324314,0.0003758785,0.00006874896,0.000007688009,0.02313387,0.00004760428,0.0002431781,0.03215371,0.1107585,0.0004066025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3767636,0.0007980771,0.0005430674,0.5797917,0.00032183,0.001232639,0.00002538548,0.000112375,0.04041129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886094,0.003241181,0.00009576494,0.007717322,0.00004483548,0.000008664191,5.305911e-7,0.000003174238,0.0002791293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7872315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224274650","doi":"10.1017/s0003055422000351","title":"The Competing Influence of Policy Content and Political Cues: Cross-Border Evidence from the United States and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Ideology; Foreign policy; Politics; Refugee; Test (biology); Prime minister; Political science; Content (measure theory); Social psychology; Political economy; Public relations; Demographic economics; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05506414671953489,"gpt":0.4495253748350043,"spread":0.3944612281154694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002570364,0.0001170579,0.0002932031,0.00002927448,0.002155461,0.0001483495,0.0004911432,0.00001202157,0.00003484466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01083246,0.00006940953,0.00003288531,0.001197801,0.009365957,0.0001634782,0.0002908412,0.0002094515,0.00000107819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006019411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002438158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5020691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961229,0.000910877,0.0004559978,0.0002835672,0.000991247,0.00123544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929017,0.005635463,0.0001750334,0.0002548571,0.0003154552,0.0007174216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004209262,0.00001050035,0.1137947,0.00005121216,0.000006476759,0.000001053923,0.0004706756,0.000009140391,0.0000366779,0.8836702,0.00007255161,0.001872585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001739069,0.0003035607,0.8471887,0.00139152,0.00008998527,0.00001446817,0.01796438,0.0004159423,0.00006461065,0.01477064,0.1171523,0.0004700367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8861851,0.003403096,0.000004288428,0.1096435,0.00003741509,0.0003151199,0.00004496081,0.00001147495,0.000355023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855307,0.002464741,0.00001677068,0.01181888,0.00007766882,0.00004411088,0.000002090265,0.000004882126,0.00004019309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8688996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366416469","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000199","title":"The Global Resonance of Human Rights: What Google Trends Can Tell Us","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Arizona State University","keywords":"Human rights; Appeal; Political science; Legalization; Hegemony; State (computer science); Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03431326730884844,"gpt":0.4216020625215802,"spread":0.3872887952127318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004129204,0.0001240634,0.0003820427,0.00005002343,0.002066737,0.0002176058,0.001246409,0.0000331521,0.0001083008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008683487,0.00008112146,0.0001223164,0.007394759,0.009734397,0.0004048905,0.0001449767,0.0001368881,0.0000930317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006008057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009134475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01825585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957961,0.0003890882,0.000422916,0.0003663308,0.001183407,0.001842186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979466,0.0002648526,0.0001651662,0.000409639,0.0001897042,0.001024098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.983757e-7,0.00001783076,0.0008363119,0.00003582723,0.00000155771,0.000001961049,0.0001428651,2.532873e-8,4.995824e-7,0.879792,0.002653509,0.1165169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003438248,0.00008582114,0.01884987,0.0004215796,0.000009837187,0.000001870309,0.0008327314,0.000003697565,0.000004040267,0.02198619,0.9576541,0.0001159038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1229139,0.04097533,0.000002943826,0.3349527,0.0009225943,0.0008356959,0.0001253881,0.0003488834,0.4989225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537404,0.04002109,0.00002962051,0.005522671,0.0001612195,0.00002071204,0.000003557601,0.000004166801,0.0004965179],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110472666","doi":"10.1017/s0003055406232568","title":"<b>2. Douglas A. Hibbs, Jr. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.”</b><b><i>American Political Science Review</i></b><b>71 (December): 1467–1487</b> Cited 492 times.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.015124122548526,"gpt":0.2808724454544194,"spread":0.2657483229058934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003764158,0.001066733,0.003231887,0.001038496,0.0009562711,0.0006326039,0.002197351,0.0001397153,0.0008333757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003710005,0.001042159,0.0006157769,0.004824847,0.0332631,0.001248104,0.00108986,0.0008411446,0.002591679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002723363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001612971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05517425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001836414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.984283,0.0001792327,0.003119904,0.002586121,0.0005871879,0.009244508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906589,0.0007152106,0.0009353248,0.001881433,0.0003179652,0.005491205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000691676,0.0001757242,0.004211428,0.0009289821,0.00002042244,0.000009396463,0.00001401347,6.534245e-7,0.00001776772,0.9837353,0.008700335,0.002179105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008380024,0.0007666261,0.0597109,0.002544063,0.0001983299,0.0003671637,0.000194931,0.000723864,0.0002223632,0.3216599,0.6098867,0.00288718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05802411,0.05400966,0.0002797277,0.3856939,0.000922143,0.002680177,0.00132633,0.000555357,0.4965086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975585,0.01374463,0.0009300993,0.08528297,0.001155013,0.0001928628,0.00003488895,0.0001055475,0.0009954717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8395344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387895350","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001016","title":"International Rewards for Gender Equality Reforms in Autocracies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Genève; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; York University; University College London; Uppsala Universitet; University of Cambridge; University of Cyprus","keywords":"Autocracy; Democracy; Competition (biology); Elite; Incentive; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Democracy promotion; Promotion (chess); Economics; Market economy; Democratization; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1364735980073695,"gpt":0.4935937450802623,"spread":0.3571201470728928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003760052,0.00008078945,0.0002123426,0.0001564785,0.0003019214,0.00007693275,0.0005173282,0.00002238309,0.0000681748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002499627,0.00006290704,0.00009060434,0.001758508,0.002075501,0.0002574033,0.0001040016,0.00007715687,0.00007750195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004786288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006290522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001556638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973963,0.00010754,0.000315207,0.0003223341,0.0007641882,0.00109444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989966,0.0001725485,0.00008196523,0.0001882992,0.0001862479,0.0003743749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.877641e-7,0.00001903813,0.001817681,0.00008880656,0.000002843447,0.00000102102,0.0007393867,9.698072e-7,0.00001645209,0.9663068,0.0007136049,0.0302924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002112705,0.00005550289,0.09431169,0.0003084867,0.00002134393,0.000002719942,0.009322143,0.0004307404,0.00006079902,0.1531053,0.7418051,0.0003648428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04343474,0.001017259,0.001356685,0.2301146,0.001635681,0.002505676,0.00009664815,0.000427422,0.7194113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899433,0.005205805,0.0006537957,0.003105346,0.0001898718,0.0001133012,0.000009890657,0.00000644331,0.0007722001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361273008","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000047","title":"An Outbreak of Selective Attribution: Partisanship and Blame in the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Attribution; Blame; Pandemic; Presidential system; Perception; Social psychology; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Competence (human resources); Democracy; Accountability; Public relations; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1700424713267427,"gpt":0.4920785147171844,"spread":0.3220360433904417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006159422,0.00008289029,0.0002869404,0.00007289242,0.0003369851,0.00004381798,0.0003484414,0.00002802622,0.00002981997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003680866,0.00005609607,0.0000396024,0.003416162,0.004228769,0.0002045232,0.00002852207,0.000122659,0.00002709093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002982389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007378117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04670969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004246979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970337,0.0008197604,0.0003234121,0.0002655983,0.0005859925,0.0009715075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980608,0.0008293127,0.00009210743,0.0001902608,0.00009894859,0.0007285459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001616952,0.00002302156,0.2418354,0.00009636428,0.000001208211,0.000001570922,0.0008647639,0.000001090198,0.00004825888,0.7542691,0.0002108544,0.002646676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001779871,0.0004957117,0.8741615,0.0004010317,0.00006005164,0.00001736132,0.004041284,0.0002179084,0.00003935134,0.06617424,0.05385059,0.0003630209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.912513,0.001040634,0.00009998585,0.08194082,0.00005719451,0.0008782804,0.00002226914,0.0001015992,0.003346264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938883,0.0009616819,0.0000103102,0.004986014,0.00007238993,0.00005759219,0.000002475711,0.000003004176,0.00001819487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6880949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036386626","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000258","title":"Human Rights are (Increasingly) Plural: Learning the Changing Taxonomy of Human Rights from Large-scale Text Reveals Information Effects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Center for Research Computing, University of Pittsburgh; York University; University of Pittsburgh; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Human rights; Plural; Political science; Taxonomy (biology); Amnesty; Computer science; Law; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01341521080594659,"gpt":0.2619111905815332,"spread":0.2484959797755866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001083949,0.0002085877,0.0005104321,0.000123589,0.001459036,0.0002127056,0.001234985,0.00003177489,0.00002956122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002835916,0.0001369035,0.000142772,0.002188112,0.0007629852,0.001102188,0.0003553894,0.0003081344,0.0001330367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001195895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005393875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002248215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003301524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970759,0.0003254263,0.0005176034,0.0004310937,0.0006661316,0.0009838338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981585,0.0001754042,0.0004833874,0.0004907646,0.0001624538,0.0005294557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009704316,0.0002105282,0.002739117,0.00221357,0.00007909835,0.00003493776,0.004005902,0.00001984044,0.008438166,0.8776407,0.001915113,0.1026933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001917981,0.003324168,0.04602164,0.01734695,0.0004762945,0.0001006752,0.0014468,0.02016863,0.05761739,0.03626883,0.8119869,0.003323707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8354214,0.002491403,0.1202706,0.01951482,0.0004392869,0.003627078,0.00002412162,0.0009789963,0.01723232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942374,0.00002605245,0.002514798,0.003020075,0.0001221586,0.00004762535,0.000004488042,0.000005419509,0.00002197313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8413718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913465623","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000886","title":"“Judge Lynch” in the Court of Public Opinion: Publicity and the De-legitimation of Lynching","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Newspaper; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Legitimation; Political science; Public opinion; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Advertising; History; Business; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0417557988375189,"gpt":0.390303234008581,"spread":0.3485474351710621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108382,0.00007184689,0.0003269869,0.00006684878,0.0001627945,0.0000669374,0.000744717,0.00002155233,0.00006821218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057659,0.00003928081,0.00006000073,0.001399996,0.008234642,0.000382796,0.00006858434,0.0001394337,0.000009037281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009268351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008398099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008741028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972359,0.0007993082,0.0003700854,0.000158479,0.0007407482,0.0006954605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976887,0.001425951,0.000210943,0.0002892957,0.000166233,0.0002189458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[7.11618e-7,0.00001575253,0.0110288,0.0001433582,0.000001334691,9.328998e-8,0.001894282,1.396526e-7,0.000004584786,0.9749691,0.00005292844,0.01188886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002082024,0.0006118398,0.3561526,0.005994085,0.0001741291,0.00006051452,0.0866893,0.002383813,0.0001614383,0.2293778,0.3151915,0.001120862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.583288,0.007802336,0.0002798434,0.2589434,0.0002586798,0.00201927,0.00001232336,0.00002321724,0.1473729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852205,0.00744168,0.0001586573,0.007095664,0.00005374086,0.00001953392,5.758667e-7,0.000002109981,0.000007571646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7455913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112477729","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000276","title":"The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Law; Political science; Value (mathematics); Politics; International law; Law and economics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01900775171157191,"gpt":0.3103780644785184,"spread":0.2913703127669465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001064925,0.00009474809,0.0002194426,0.00004182398,0.0002554934,0.0001342578,0.0006202082,0.00001451486,0.00001097722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003834868,0.00006455346,0.00005862522,0.0009070591,0.002654167,0.0004057698,0.0001532991,0.00009276949,0.00006425731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007797255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007587347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004031245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001487104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982635,0.00002260895,0.0003684096,0.0001999797,0.0003929886,0.0007525005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992743,0.0001186417,0.0001942008,0.0001830212,0.0001868372,0.0000430438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001125061,0.00001615806,0.001329909,0.00007684984,0.000001625645,1.315963e-7,0.000002238373,0.0000019412,0.00001390268,0.9848865,0.0001111259,0.01355852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009453508,0.00001806859,0.03394787,0.0003446642,0.00002752938,0.000001507238,0.0001664927,0.001521684,0.00001964764,0.7757387,0.1879254,0.0001938773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07088423,0.001523209,0.001318724,0.08927715,0.0005118563,0.001007269,0.000006180576,0.0001220692,0.8353493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852238,0.000203999,0.00005291046,0.01379674,0.0006559303,0.00003566523,0.000002175568,0.000004799175,0.00002397783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9143396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.977939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377023886","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000400","title":"The Right to Hunger Strike","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Freie Universität Berlin; Università degli Studi di Genova; University of Toronto; Universiteit Utrecht; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; University College London; Northwestern University; King's College London; Brown University","keywords":"Redress; Grievance; Oppression; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Prison; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04202098203642787,"gpt":0.4244436039440609,"spread":0.3824226219076331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005397577,0.0001026868,0.0002451141,0.00005237241,0.001811306,0.0001771849,0.001084896,0.00002645517,0.0001598127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006073418,0.00006224204,0.00009875403,0.003764395,0.008081611,0.0001493728,0.0001459548,0.0001980577,0.001377277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002148304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009158443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003856018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001177772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962901,0.0002886905,0.0002500207,0.0003571683,0.001140719,0.001673256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972713,0.0009666947,0.0000628168,0.0003878043,0.0001674145,0.001143944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.8843e-7,0.000005506271,0.0000722648,0.00001693253,0.000001595192,0.000002552231,0.0002751176,5.137334e-8,0.000005533484,0.9158558,0.01057434,0.07318997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001265475,0.00002895984,0.002756067,0.0001469208,0.00001038836,6.746992e-7,0.0007777947,0.000002057164,0.00001160775,0.009287179,0.9868515,0.0001142304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002929764,0.005162793,0.00004536359,0.6151696,0.0008588861,0.0008667997,0.00001035514,0.0003363105,0.3746201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881089,0.03702578,0.0002261293,0.06522352,0.0008193802,0.00009612285,0.000001471515,0.00001749262,0.008481224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}