{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":422,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":422,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"45ec2a98adc6","filters":{"venue":"Animal Behaviour"}},"results":[{"id":"W2144727534","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2000.1557","title":"Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":718,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Foraging; Social learning; Association (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Social animal; Action (physics); Mechanism (biology); Social psychology; Ecology; Biology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05456039076835083,"gpt":0.3418462905339076,"spread":0.2872858997655568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001448239,0.0001606942,0.0002017358,0.000165612,0.0001908717,0.00002659676,0.0001035623,0.0001817796,0.0008748357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007455804,0.0001642912,0.00004192954,0.0001825178,0.00007432247,0.0001314251,0.00005035597,0.0002634565,0.0002962805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006763853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002258976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008505065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007531931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988552,0.00007417614,0.0002061979,0.0003505599,0.00009923541,0.0004146563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997054,0.00003989502,0.00005450669,0.0001064344,0.00002642669,0.00006728159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000419843,0.0003661797,0.9660873,0.000001490622,0.00001732914,0.0003694851,0.002114643,0.000001163914,0.004160021,0.02334848,0.0009840424,0.002130071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007322957,0.0008080506,0.993924,0.000005995635,0.00004302172,0.0000668057,0.003189992,0.00001732661,0.00008746231,0.0008569669,0.00008612152,0.0001819332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933034,0.00003312323,0.00007498645,0.0002625685,0.0002710893,0.0001573009,0.00001643081,0.00007065752,0.005810475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990065,0.000004194268,0.00005364913,0.0003020794,0.00005766487,0.00008927614,0.0000107878,0.00001956519,0.0004562874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02783678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9578837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124248914","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2001.1953","title":"Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":688,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l'Aide à la Recherche; Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research","keywords":"Foraging; Flexibility (engineering); Biology; Plumage; Ecology; Sexual dimorphism; Trait; Zoology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07315824015649476,"gpt":0.2597949476159563,"spread":0.1866367074594616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002229355,0.0001640581,0.0001794306,0.00002356406,0.0001618136,0.00005911859,0.0001419238,0.000141296,0.0008728776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002155406,0.00007077152,0.00006401889,0.0002998171,0.0000946974,0.0002785017,0.00009114609,0.0002117031,0.00004471203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003660766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001933954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002587257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001668111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986655,0.00006278377,0.0002547861,0.0005223666,0.0001935188,0.0003010557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996885,0.00002668428,0.00005614143,0.00007505363,0.00004205963,0.0001115273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002457254,0.0001911727,0.8533108,0.000001812034,6.433496e-7,0.00001608065,0.00006216567,7.287948e-8,0.13381,0.00003066372,0.0000742062,0.0124778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000147713,0.0004322027,0.9949621,0.00001069277,0.00001515422,0.00003678908,0.00017037,0.00002048477,0.003890718,0.00002565012,0.00009739237,0.0001907273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984697,0.0002705776,1.01809e-7,0.0006163358,0.00008509728,0.0002044228,0.00001650899,0.00009046313,0.0002467973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994425,0.00006882811,0.00002642114,0.00004462715,0.00009724925,0.00001670173,0.00001672496,0.000001743154,0.0002852313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1416513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9557397,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079249693","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2000.1530","title":"Consistency of temperament in bighorn ewes and correlates with behaviour and life history","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":538,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Temperament; Ovis canadensis; Life history theory; Population; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Reproduction; Affect (linguistics); Biology; Personality; Demography; Life history; Ecology; Social psychology; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03881770147453792,"gpt":0.2716621002821118,"spread":0.2328443988075739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001276037,0.0002883697,0.0004592736,0.0001220549,0.0001005205,0.00001688566,0.00009157293,0.0001264305,0.0006832696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001241684,0.000246389,0.00005378795,0.00009338829,0.0004297532,0.0001614251,0.00007635983,0.0002394964,0.00001342065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000811146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005721252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002010321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001592433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985711,0.00005817826,0.000416147,0.0004360581,0.0002087595,0.0003097708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994681,0.00004608709,0.00009574069,0.0001833863,0.00006399389,0.0001426849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008331033,0.0002545605,0.9923221,0.00002660706,0.00002079548,0.000257046,0.001388431,1.229705e-7,0.0035376,0.0001909881,0.0002386966,0.0009298811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009195191,0.002966562,0.9936053,0.00008964624,0.0001733542,0.0001914296,0.001430629,0.000003164394,0.00007691222,0.000005928855,0.0002314978,0.0003060563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940339,0.003931263,2.744795e-7,0.0001343906,0.00004378579,0.0002710089,0.00003881824,0.00005499663,0.001491588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989333,0.0003859562,0.0001369364,0.00006799606,0.00001920186,0.00004531024,0.000007435986,0.00003545581,0.0003684692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004899364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008148786","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.09.007","title":"Defining and assessing animal pain","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":493,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universities Federation for Animal Welfare; National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; Society for Endocrinology","keywords":"Animal welfare; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Non-human; Variety (cybernetics); Noxious stimulus; Preference; Cognitive psychology; Nociception; Neuroscience; Medicine; Ecology; Communication; Biology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05013813998751532,"gpt":0.3510449949913512,"spread":0.3009068550038358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008040784,0.0001793818,0.0001969131,0.00005881384,0.0002520778,0.00008057486,0.0001248344,0.0001221604,0.0002357557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004467156,0.0001792662,0.00005373355,0.00006171049,0.0000857642,0.0002897644,0.000091305,0.000234895,0.0001221534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001514673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001489719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003022273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001381574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987106,0.0003487249,0.0001908796,0.0003238181,0.0001012605,0.0003246792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995017,0.0001671833,0.00007023974,0.0001316049,0.00002149476,0.0001077523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004494693,0.0001292831,0.7878829,0.00003152912,0.00001741403,0.001055174,0.0002253795,2.549915e-7,0.1970724,0.003478746,0.0007720224,0.008885427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000439842,0.003175669,0.9904184,0.00003214606,0.00005808449,0.00168639,0.0001626872,0.0007260973,0.0005162294,0.00007180695,0.002428271,0.000284341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972065,0.0001405477,0.00008918605,0.0003174667,0.00005673066,0.00007247833,0.000002598992,0.0001486874,0.001965777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976568,0.000003901874,0.001404889,0.0006996139,0.0001091804,0.00001492067,0.000008118557,0.00003132479,0.00007129299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2025355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7310265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165501843","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2000.1606","title":"Animal cognition and animal behaviour","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":440,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cognition; Animal cognition; Psychology; Cognitive science; Comparative cognition; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Comparative psychology; Foraging; Ecology; Neuroscience; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.029315989209616,"gpt":0.2485910612335767,"spread":0.2192750720239607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002562745,0.0003342537,0.0002916248,0.00003524468,0.0004973923,0.0001519448,0.0002024364,0.0002567466,0.001023385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002601191,0.0001625125,0.0001515386,0.0003778036,0.0001625534,0.0004916607,0.0001358789,0.0003180899,0.0001451094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003724172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001053966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007101233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002636796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978192,0.00007625126,0.0003701019,0.000807092,0.0003660138,0.0005613135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993187,0.00003824786,0.0001328594,0.00009779941,0.0001551494,0.0002572451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000279857,0.0001984376,0.4995131,0.000001932791,0.00000478788,0.00006248109,0.00003621901,2.273978e-8,0.4951199,0.0001130293,0.0003003301,0.004369914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002789771,0.002383734,0.9822157,0.00001721115,0.0001487299,0.0004609908,0.000588975,0.000005887487,0.01240614,0.00004344573,0.001029223,0.0004210106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967483,0.0002709822,9.567352e-7,0.001235488,0.0001241164,0.0003518833,0.00007041013,0.0002540963,0.0009437363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982468,0.0001442898,0.00007349251,0.0001225064,0.0006182306,0.00003847558,0.0001449737,0.000006029373,0.0006052135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4827138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152708139","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.04.004","title":"Context-dependent group size choice in fish","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":413,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Leeds; Leverhulme Trust; Princeton University","keywords":"Shoaling and schooling; Context (archaeology); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Predation; ALARM; Fundulus; Killifish; Shoal; Ecology; Biology; Communication; Fishery; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02441561100709928,"gpt":0.2403084756378431,"spread":0.2158928646307438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002700294,0.0001552032,0.0001806754,0.00001046308,0.0001246044,0.00004624886,0.0001508515,0.0001272271,0.001107935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001054491,0.0000666878,0.0001114104,0.00023854,0.00004108045,0.0001692099,0.00003199239,0.0002046593,0.00006821282],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004527012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000523239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002245984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007060864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986802,0.0000878717,0.0002333082,0.0004515335,0.0002192938,0.0003277952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996619,0.00008165109,0.00005386688,0.00007062437,0.00003927384,0.00009265816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002442168,0.0002228403,0.7672739,0.000001117107,0.00000225963,0.00001700407,0.00002223068,1.359706e-7,0.2255576,0.0002827137,0.0002057241,0.006390075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002011614,0.0004333382,0.9845055,0.000007016764,0.00001740042,0.00002379128,0.0003646971,3.065887e-7,0.006532141,0.00002924657,0.007693868,0.0001915199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998146,0.0001188112,2.360032e-7,0.0003620132,0.0001656776,0.0002109834,0.00001792268,0.00006861539,0.0009097526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987924,0.00001690715,0.00002063567,0.000208171,0.0001370013,0.00002622159,0.0000127885,0.000001726458,0.0007842077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2190254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087238006","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.007","title":"What do animal signals mean?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":412,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Animal communication; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Quality (philosophy); Communication; Social psychology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02768477901590435,"gpt":0.3143273624714522,"spread":0.2866425834555478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001764431,0.0002183961,0.0001739119,0.00004268337,0.0001397344,0.0001593919,0.0004446755,0.0002021719,0.0002335848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002010856,0.0002107424,0.0001623583,0.0001092578,0.00006995578,0.00002716614,0.0001298611,0.0001785768,0.0001256109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004298225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001248097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001464766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987356,0.00007465146,0.0002649269,0.0004005124,0.0001998851,0.0003244113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991025,0.000006957886,0.00008545378,0.0005214922,0.0001246867,0.0001588716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002396393,0.0002761669,0.01394373,0.000001505629,0.000008466288,0.00001169418,0.00006360414,4.142163e-7,0.9775233,0.0004459736,0.002286474,0.005199042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007924811,0.005144937,0.5884421,0.00004325037,0.00009682593,0.0000674785,0.00099681,0.000008945393,0.3874695,0.0000813952,0.01617228,0.0006839485],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958527,0.00190673,0.00003361705,0.0007372585,0.00007305663,0.0001742509,0.00001023755,0.00004641356,0.001165751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966002,0.0005535936,0.000395185,0.001272557,0.0001630861,0.00001338724,0.00009352052,0.00002315602,0.0008853495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5900538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8593825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991333570","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2003.2100","title":"Predator-induced natural selection on temperament in bighorn ewes","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":384,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fondation Fyssen; Université de Sherbrooke; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep","keywords":"Predation; Ovis canadensis; Boldness; Temperament; Biology; Population; Natural selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Predator; Ecology; Reproductive success; Zoology; Demography; Personality; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01399015956474175,"gpt":0.2404745722246809,"spread":0.2264844126599391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001531898,0.0000930043,0.00007410575,0.00003491173,0.00009258679,0.00001446082,0.00006725781,0.00008614788,0.0007304981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003275464,0.00008897257,0.00002454608,0.0001830255,0.00002459355,0.0001526093,0.00001846474,0.0001859866,0.0004007414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001949574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001357681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003615336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001020023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992424,0.0000776352,0.0001291097,0.0002321243,0.0001279485,0.000190753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998252,0.00001978772,0.0000353066,0.00008007976,0.000004482047,0.00003517582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003061177,0.0001173347,0.9794914,4.363652e-7,0.000001646948,0.000004628796,0.00005972822,0.00001247757,0.01923032,0.0002650718,0.0005258627,0.0002605555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002357045,0.000274148,0.9884576,0.000004002939,0.000005417235,0.000006738101,0.00004664381,0.00005249467,0.01055942,0.00005194841,0.0002026238,0.0001032561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977065,0.000004019041,0.000001151479,0.0002112799,0.0001483737,0.0001487715,7.196122e-7,0.00003090595,0.001748248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990022,0.000001400593,0.0001048746,0.0004424536,0.0000149987,0.00003127079,0.000003208674,0.000007106662,0.0003924598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008966276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7998441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994560175","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.005","title":"How should behavioural ecologists interpret measurements of immunity?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":357,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Immunity; Cognitive psychology; Ecology; Biology; Immune system; Immunology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1135145483532045,"gpt":0.2805764917012886,"spread":0.167061943348084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002699013,0.0002164643,0.0002612189,0.00002357073,0.0001862056,0.00006720674,0.0003543043,0.000182136,0.0001663003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004926777,0.00009262326,0.000203294,0.0002499998,0.00014815,0.0002950987,0.0001205354,0.000249896,0.00001765861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008926212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001564586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001928442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007902888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985576,0.00006501407,0.0002829647,0.0003820697,0.0003756621,0.0003366735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994557,0.00001751906,0.0001197631,0.0001176438,0.0001830852,0.0001062356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005535169,0.0002528496,0.4522248,0.000002049207,0.00000551127,0.00000571086,0.00005269848,3.652477e-7,0.5453749,0.00005079921,0.0000286445,0.001946327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001945528,0.001157686,0.7988359,0.0000186908,0.00005703131,0.0000242829,0.0003999419,1.385378e-7,0.1990525,0.00004463013,0.00003658952,0.0001780364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978453,0.0001009994,0.000003580129,0.001233475,0.0002073146,0.000255093,0.00003951203,0.00009629515,0.0002184497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999435,0.000008341807,0.0001460498,0.00004465668,0.00009931553,0.00002065311,0.00006335235,0.000002630688,0.0001800154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3466111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3777067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039319629","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.05.008","title":"Why do birds participate in mixed-species foraging flocks? A large-scale synthesis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":357,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Flock; Foraging; Flocking (texture); Vigilance (psychology); Predation; Biology; Ecology; Insectivore; Habitat; Zoology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02967117747627249,"gpt":0.2506510810639553,"spread":0.2209799035876828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003307929,0.0002068254,0.0002543507,0.00003431457,0.0002337349,0.0001036604,0.0002133513,0.0001307963,0.0005601333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003612575,0.00009147298,0.0001435496,0.0004509723,0.00004337564,0.0002545584,0.00005486738,0.0001930931,0.0000531557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004955572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005248061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003530001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001316616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982892,0.00007408334,0.000305632,0.0005193318,0.0002530208,0.000558683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996157,0.00004050761,0.00007367099,0.00009520225,0.0000572508,0.0001176247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008225717,0.0004067547,0.5437475,0.000001901518,0.000002346629,0.00003284297,0.0002177519,0.000001464992,0.4407841,0.0001363004,0.0009581535,0.01362864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001005786,0.000408588,0.9693499,0.00002929516,0.00003418251,0.0000138652,0.001295054,0.00001656947,0.02506211,0.00007345732,0.003366913,0.0002495059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963447,0.0001586094,0.000003285539,0.002608972,0.0001129865,0.0001817647,0.00003403635,0.0001388009,0.0004168849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991437,0.00003590423,0.00006554925,0.0002561753,0.0002486207,0.00003421386,0.00001417008,0.000002264666,0.0001993859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4256024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6133067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012154389","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.04.003","title":"Interpreting short-term behavioural responses to disturbance within a longitudinal perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Wildlife; Reinterpretation; Bay; Geography; Term (time); Ecology; Fishery; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02791527484509857,"gpt":0.2867210085826144,"spread":0.2588057337375158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002884445,0.0003416153,0.0003108029,0.00004005664,0.0003022088,0.00009527142,0.0004428721,0.00007298198,0.001097793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008936365,0.0003244032,0.0001492903,0.0003524639,0.0001941264,0.000274879,0.0009581396,0.0002701166,0.0004858064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006918531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001309435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02237836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01580645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976695,0.00008115274,0.0004114278,0.0007827104,0.0004838223,0.0005714566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993248,0.00005194483,0.00009621281,0.000323821,0.00003993951,0.0001632839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002568437,0.0001615105,0.9926136,0.000002961032,0.000007586748,0.0001476253,0.0004985249,0.000006332993,0.003180784,0.000479065,0.002414143,0.0002309829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001413012,0.0004289268,0.9971281,0.00003620564,0.00005924419,0.00005096865,0.0004280313,0.00001778761,0.0009924087,0.00005887448,0.0002461041,0.0004120106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882808,0.0001325219,0.0000369009,0.0005167428,0.000102465,0.0003954209,0.00003073992,0.0001247563,0.01037963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965836,0.000003995739,0.001163802,0.0001958824,0.00008224102,0.00008404844,0.000005780211,0.00003956578,0.001841075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008538558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084128240","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.05.034","title":"The paradox of risk allocation: a review and prospectus","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":315,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Prospectus; Psychology; Geography; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01821600107693911,"gpt":0.3017663425415613,"spread":0.2835503414646222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002041977,0.0002461727,0.0005891635,0.00001343843,0.00009521109,0.00001447474,0.0002778921,0.0001956928,0.00001068602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006337691,0.0001598146,0.0002025803,0.00007467987,0.0001175612,0.000001023171,0.00007864995,0.0001756537,0.000005592537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005522104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001165344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008887655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000884515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988791,0.0001139368,0.0004121552,0.0003249698,0.0001005615,0.000169281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990746,0.00002881353,0.0003387596,0.0004380741,0.00006194317,0.00005775287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001087658,0.0000581811,0.0002139494,0.003676624,0.00009685186,5.251492e-7,0.00001232601,1.055887e-7,0.000005830022,0.001552602,0.00379156,0.9905806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009260936,0.0005764138,0.00974863,0.002590925,0.002134108,0.00006121638,0.000005035402,2.69493e-8,0.00001432917,0.0001417072,0.9843779,0.0002570626],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001721305,0.998746,0.00002624994,0.00003540022,0.00004196434,0.0006482308,0.00006330857,0.000005195227,0.0002615392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004899671,0.9977804,0.001041127,0.00004080979,0.000117603,0.00006315661,0.00008041242,0.00002186623,0.0003646118],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6517052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986970681","doi":"10.1006/anbe.1999.1376","title":"Geophagy among primates: adaptive significance and ecological consequences","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":289,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Primate Conservation","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Ingestion; Zoology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06650056563513998,"gpt":0.3941845559131215,"spread":0.3276839902779815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002518073,0.000178266,0.0002479267,0.00003525215,0.0004951999,0.00001369073,0.0001859788,0.0002206987,0.006210176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004290246,0.0001424224,0.00004042734,0.00009903886,0.0003355728,0.0001913588,0.0000625961,0.0005341576,0.0004710807],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009256606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001073486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009294427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002477179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983078,0.0002565067,0.0003541074,0.0003557141,0.0001917881,0.0005340908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991945,0.000274023,0.0001228142,0.0001502505,0.0001063256,0.0001520691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003311348,0.0001212715,0.9898843,0.00001725115,0.00002712882,0.00005841153,0.0007708186,4.251459e-7,0.002506295,0.000840408,0.001330498,0.004112049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006081411,0.0005386196,0.9961148,0.00004264245,0.00004213485,0.000003136333,0.0008919386,0.00001655316,0.0001894668,0.0003706386,0.001004339,0.0001775933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99538,0.0003169827,0.000001224364,0.0004493057,0.0001307208,0.0007263137,0.00004603825,0.000132778,0.002816615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953364,0.0001280215,0.0004787834,0.001064167,0.00009234297,0.0001245608,0.000007998688,0.00001742906,0.002750313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006230487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125407365","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.08.028","title":"Roost switching, roost sharing and social cohesion: forest-dwelling big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, conform to the fission–fusion model","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Eptesicus fuscus; Ecology; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03817273458834757,"gpt":0.239918307382628,"spread":0.2017455727942804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002848746,0.00021423,0.0002313518,0.00001501911,0.001769137,0.0000679342,0.0003049207,0.0002348354,0.00006212511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003018765,0.00007686293,0.00008868086,0.0001340426,0.0000934253,0.00009794499,0.0004026995,0.0002747934,0.00005367572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003470674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001260026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006088132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01066835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987451,0.00002308056,0.0002424498,0.0004150103,0.0001305016,0.0004438628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996351,0.00006697494,0.00008358,0.00005984073,0.00005605,0.00009845107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002797142,0.0001823175,0.9057853,0.000009023169,0.00003537448,0.0000248365,0.001908045,0.0001733345,0.05650848,0.002743114,0.001636185,0.03071429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002582222,0.0005022616,0.9945987,0.00002435615,0.0000450452,0.00001815148,0.0009808466,0.0002682822,0.0006420506,0.0008726626,0.001520264,0.0002691304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986725,0.000219258,0.00001344384,0.0122604,0.0001386201,0.0002635991,0.00002508172,0.00006854902,0.0002860278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980427,0.00007000192,0.00006702652,0.00115613,0.0003318501,0.00002906813,0.00003222574,0.000002213305,0.0002687844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08881344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965944361","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2001.1786","title":"Changes in lifetime immunocompetence in male and female Gryllus texensis (formerly G. integer): trade-offs between immunity and reproduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Immunocompetence; Biology; Immunity; Reproduction; Zoology; Immune system; Ecology; Immunology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02941919916805948,"gpt":0.2477472625117394,"spread":0.2183280633436799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005205596,0.0002087801,0.0002945288,0.00006382785,0.0001807646,0.00006793233,0.0001336641,0.0001638688,0.0001068672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003587681,0.0001082198,0.00004302367,0.0004896373,0.0001515459,0.0002980478,0.0001055305,0.0003560092,0.000008198732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004594708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006210593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005368525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003619638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984301,0.0001013043,0.0003062866,0.0006527858,0.0001553927,0.0003541214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996349,0.00004558498,0.00009131465,0.000111815,0.00003009126,0.00008631714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007543221,0.00008265244,0.7596765,0.00000390377,0.000002059263,0.00002156915,0.0002508604,9.307595e-8,0.1949498,0.000009319115,0.000006455352,0.04492131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000191491,0.000803636,0.9924445,0.00004120169,0.00002277765,0.0002285138,0.001721303,0.000003192563,0.003943303,0.00002473349,0.000336532,0.0002387944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967873,0.0006814873,2.177696e-7,0.001968833,0.00006437441,0.0003200542,0.00001452217,0.0000477563,0.0001155044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988317,0.0006159181,0.00004770111,0.00002965916,0.0001986525,0.00002598958,0.00003532744,0.000002866052,0.0002121306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.232768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.811564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126759304","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.033","title":"Technical innovations drive the relationship between innovativeness and residual brain size in birds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Brain size; Diversity (politics); Variety (cybernetics); Biology; Cognition; Repertoire; Ecology; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Neuroscience; Mathematics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05572878532269251,"gpt":0.3017525324254044,"spread":0.2460237471027119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005069294,0.0001255108,0.0001394157,0.0000272686,0.0003159178,0.00005077083,0.0001567769,0.0001452096,0.00002618907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004213578,0.00004815479,0.00003028009,0.001189193,0.0001172214,0.0001601079,0.00005126314,0.0003552675,0.000007677429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003209759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001158296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001819078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002490146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989123,0.00009235082,0.0002921699,0.0003225314,0.0001753041,0.0002053126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992149,0.0005167596,0.00007876802,0.00006860621,0.00008409999,0.00003685292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002001002,0.00004833758,0.8382604,4.791054e-7,6.004678e-7,0.000002719265,0.0000558785,6.250602e-8,0.152264,0.00407297,0.0001855147,0.005089106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001059989,0.0004282958,0.9965888,0.00001198166,0.00001153602,0.00001343992,0.0002164585,2.006716e-7,0.001038358,0.001255349,0.0002015533,0.000128074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779127,0.00003623693,0.000002036332,0.02158384,0.00002090782,0.0002350257,0.00001991436,0.00006923066,0.0001200865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993088,0.000002900923,0.00007596651,0.0002128225,0.0002035981,0.00001557884,0.00004156069,0.000001224438,0.0001375283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1583284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2429816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014756414","doi":"10.1006/anbe.1999.1316","title":"Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":274,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"AGE-WELL; Office of Research and Development; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Offspring; Biology; Mating; House mice; Mate choice; Dominance (genetics); Reproductive success; Sexual selection; Sperm competition; Weaning; Mating preferences; Zoology; Animal science; Demography; Pregnancy; Genetics; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01738311512043766,"gpt":0.2339277833109183,"spread":0.2165446681904807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003334389,0.000166668,0.0001895802,0.00001538912,0.000197609,0.00006035381,0.0001446012,0.0001003388,0.0001384837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003664351,0.00008043311,0.00003133339,0.0002197627,0.0001286992,0.0003944747,0.0000971525,0.0001975346,0.000009361259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002558624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003672498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002724125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001046602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986376,0.00006495896,0.0001720981,0.000709111,0.0001373035,0.0002789432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996707,0.0000415311,0.00004864036,0.0001208475,0.00003211227,0.00008621311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001099812,0.00008712809,0.8548686,0.00001126475,0.000001451727,0.000004953713,0.0001031857,5.453302e-7,0.1245708,0.000003889524,0.00001079612,0.02022739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001683341,0.0004754086,0.9835354,0.00002040593,0.00001851827,0.00003168243,0.0001134297,0.00001001682,0.01528653,0.000008186664,0.0001407121,0.000191385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988353,0.000198553,2.481866e-8,0.0003591646,0.00004280486,0.0002971825,0.0000157164,0.00009929636,0.0001519362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993786,0.0001121469,0.00003263676,0.00001845775,0.0001566648,0.0000202237,0.000004075866,0.000002882903,0.0002743656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1286668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.411808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137817013","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2000.1725","title":"Problem solving and neophobia in a columbiform–passeriform assemblage in Barbados","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Neophobia; Captivity; Biology; Dove; Zoology; Creatures; Cowbird; Ecology; Brood parasite; Host (biology); Parasitism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01665115425321995,"gpt":0.2293268479466817,"spread":0.2126756936934617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000217572,0.0001468446,0.0001914389,0.00002735107,0.00009729392,0.00007777385,0.0001223448,0.0001413242,0.0001951152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001240716,0.00007302958,0.00004432194,0.0004023016,0.0000365651,0.0003117923,0.00007614548,0.000216807,0.00001763777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005296114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007571144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01319858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02697608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987659,0.00003302397,0.0002751096,0.0004328158,0.0001442682,0.0003488786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997566,0.00002778661,0.00005810109,0.00005004096,0.00002609891,0.00008132702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004900558,0.0001257561,0.7020849,0.000001294513,5.567191e-7,0.00004513693,0.0001099662,1.362438e-7,0.2905416,0.00001534871,0.00002460039,0.007001656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002467399,0.0003484405,0.9966248,0.00002967065,0.000007948562,0.00003467996,0.0008627204,0.00001733548,0.001212301,0.00008936366,0.0003351185,0.0001908709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984601,0.0001199839,2.018269e-7,0.0003632252,0.00004144321,0.0002894519,0.000007722162,0.00004868189,0.0006691911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994257,0.00009930355,0.00009135436,0.00004601372,0.00009265696,0.00003041923,0.00002545231,0.000001952159,0.0001871441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2945399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113350272","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2002.3012","title":"Cultural transmission within maternal lineages: vocal clans in resident killer whales in southern Alaska","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":252,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Vancouver Aquarium; University of British Columbia","funders":"Nationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle","keywords":"Clan; Biology; Repertoire; Haplotype; Evolutionary biology; Whale; Mitochondrial DNA; Lineage (genetic); Zoology; Ecology; Genetics; Anthropology; Sociology; Allele; Gene; Acoustics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02847711376668308,"gpt":0.2529960789565482,"spread":0.2245189651898652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002138648,0.0002402513,0.0002595314,0.00004509135,0.00007612933,0.00004385081,0.0002925125,0.0001112992,0.007026277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000143888,0.0001941638,0.0000825416,0.0002291238,0.0001067353,0.0002374183,0.00022338,0.0003179832,0.001126156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001981784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003235934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02479986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04196466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981986,0.00008716761,0.0004560292,0.0004386294,0.0003947804,0.0004248203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996275,0.00001876769,0.00007826112,0.0001556303,0.000006621719,0.0001132044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005565053,0.0001398729,0.9896961,0.000009221048,0.000003043275,0.0001848672,0.005546533,0.0000467606,0.001087648,0.000006425643,0.001234675,0.001989221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005820227,0.0001537205,0.9951903,0.00007881864,0.00001244605,0.00002094845,0.001809535,0.0005154612,0.0002935002,0.00001187959,0.00107321,0.000258126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958038,0.0002600536,0.000003279189,0.0004466548,0.00004926458,0.0002235109,0.000006340117,0.00003730184,0.003169821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958021,0.0002096166,0.0003197799,0.0001761771,0.00003718428,0.00002549245,0.000003562768,0.00002335642,0.003402742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0171648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040610856","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2000.1454","title":"Dialect change in resident killer whales: implications for vocal learning and cultural transmission","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Aquarium; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural transmission in animals; Vocal learning; Whale; Variation (astronomy); Divergence (linguistics); Social learning; Coevolution; Biology; Vocal communication; Association (psychology); Communication; Psychology; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04051003861576798,"gpt":0.3131315637277441,"spread":0.2726215251119762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000114411,0.0001221218,0.0001370487,0.00001567441,0.0001844269,0.00002551486,0.00009237388,0.00005129862,0.002366731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001152196,0.0001056842,0.00004911239,0.0001242565,0.00006492191,0.0001985661,0.00007231399,0.0001133661,0.00006198044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007942311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002796883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004904252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003753429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991493,0.00003362494,0.0001658664,0.0002971074,0.00009581121,0.0002582785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997903,0.00003135364,0.00002721354,0.00006659791,0.000005647708,0.00007885708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004760491,0.00003978877,0.9019439,0.000006804158,0.00000192767,0.000002086103,0.0008133225,0.000001310747,0.001048325,0.00003520223,0.0005673525,0.09549236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002910963,0.0002042565,0.9637502,0.00001785218,0.00001605542,0.000006816423,0.00008591865,0.00005958354,0.00004248064,0.0000264432,0.03536128,0.0001380451],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957228,0.0003705081,0.0000074249,0.001058149,0.000009814557,0.0004349517,0.000004864934,0.00002726101,0.002364176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969788,0.001234355,0.0003163108,0.0001490607,0.00003560934,0.0001970763,0.00001073399,0.00001285319,0.001065157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09535431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054110320","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2001.1907","title":"A novel method using hair for determining hormonal levels in wildlife","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Hormone; Testosterone (patch); Saliva; Corticosterone; Biology; Zoology; Endocrinology; Internal medicine; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1009564374241352,"gpt":0.3124171056612479,"spread":0.2114606682371127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000264121,0.0001059461,0.0001240259,0.00003694137,0.0001210953,0.00001490331,0.000125444,0.0001029916,0.0005886762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004773741,0.0001137565,0.00004922053,0.0001347515,0.00004907725,0.0002568112,0.00006802552,0.0001048589,0.00005291772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007383347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003182772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002997658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991326,0.00002972356,0.0002012637,0.0002597543,0.0001094458,0.0002672359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996972,0.00008442748,0.00006788257,0.00009420437,0.000005914673,0.00005033276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001394105,0.00009204357,0.9721578,0.00000121927,0.000002292804,0.000006473474,0.0001915696,0.0001333049,0.02516515,0.00003261708,0.0004299823,0.001773632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004654276,0.0001250999,0.9605691,0.00000669286,0.00001708597,0.00003214212,0.00004502729,0.03812274,0.000303188,0.00004152731,0.0001324138,0.0001395706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855253,0.000007412819,0.01358216,0.0003666942,0.00005299969,0.0001887549,0.00001149072,0.00002177762,0.0002434765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9160058,4.979051e-7,0.08269085,0.001044621,0.0000320965,0.00003355727,0.000001805463,0.00001179173,0.0001789682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06951942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6445591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041671051","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.004","title":"Song repertoire size in male song sparrows correlates with detour reaching, but not with other cognitive measures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":226,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Pennsylvania Game Commission; McGill University; University of Miami; Duke University","keywords":"Repertoire; Psychology; Cognition; Task (project management); Captivity; Association (psychology); Elementary cognitive task; Juvenile; Canto; Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Biology; Communication; Zoology; Ecology; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04191534936931031,"gpt":0.2579301720936861,"spread":0.2160148227243758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002010702,0.0002751985,0.0002248596,0.00004354882,0.0001371794,0.00003074102,0.0002876004,0.0002043049,0.0001981199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006264541,0.0002131514,0.00007130315,0.0001017835,0.0001936324,0.00001810174,0.0001120793,0.0003243549,0.00002772829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002321778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008495566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001110542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003491303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99862,0.0001168185,0.0002462928,0.000468651,0.0002000213,0.0003482458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991907,0.00002331673,0.0001373686,0.000376221,0.0001525681,0.0001198383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002795558,0.0003132027,0.8249134,0.000004344765,0.000029647,0.00006440126,0.0003956083,3.724336e-7,0.1707305,0.00004731223,0.00003757688,0.0006680902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001233559,0.003095526,0.8353173,0.0001108423,0.0001286361,0.0001857285,0.001973589,0.000005632387,0.1572885,0.000003595332,0.0001930848,0.0004640985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954597,0.0001926942,0.0001352511,0.00005005836,0.00001705719,0.0002877897,0.00002793067,0.00003314112,0.003796421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962866,0.00002666808,0.001399984,0.0003161004,0.00003843579,0.00007111685,0.00003081107,0.00006091224,0.001769402],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01344206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8692064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046490337","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.009","title":"Milk bottles revisited: social learning and individual variation in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cyanistes; Variation (astronomy); Psychology; Zoology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.025782153500502,"gpt":0.2426162803230912,"spread":0.2168341268225892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030767,0.0001147741,0.0001159256,0.00001357874,0.0003674428,0.0001689419,0.0001318401,0.0001084192,0.0002728254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002920256,0.000042884,0.0000462454,0.0001970332,0.00005624766,0.0001675206,0.00005223775,0.00023272,0.00004582847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001412292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000362173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00172345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001607682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990206,0.0001297871,0.0001706237,0.0002770551,0.0001992688,0.0002027155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997763,0.0000516928,0.00007133491,0.00002725891,0.00004148049,0.00003190497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001355149,0.00009025401,0.6854274,0.000003146528,0.000003717999,0.00000488628,0.001228837,1.187748e-7,0.3004165,0.0004774181,0.0003490885,0.01198507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007241434,0.0002609876,0.9962269,0.000005689813,0.00002931581,0.00001740398,0.001833419,0.000003242812,0.0003010303,0.00004837161,0.001084934,0.0001162833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980904,0.0001457054,3.045992e-7,0.00115808,0.00003036651,0.0002278082,0.00001091162,0.00003894031,0.0002974673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993207,0.00002884086,0.00002927121,0.00007848518,0.0003018022,0.00002989381,0.00004758912,0.000001325612,0.0001621137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3107995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2987247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121466254","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.036","title":"Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Center for Research Resources; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Institute for Health and Care Research; James S. McDonnell Foundation; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Troglodytes; Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Pongidae; Social psychology; Helping behavior; Social group; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08332264770584723,"gpt":0.32189349219066,"spread":0.2385708444848128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002064362,0.0003413259,0.0005338261,0.0003428771,0.0001635435,0.00001742021,0.0004390351,0.0003042429,0.004143834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002826863,0.0003604748,0.0001782845,0.0002321606,0.0001542291,0.0001742817,0.0002054537,0.0002898142,0.0006609234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001145354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004841645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005726083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003123859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977376,0.0001073959,0.0005795743,0.0005444269,0.0002823494,0.000748641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986964,0.00007752347,0.0001432807,0.0005204636,0.0001279868,0.0004343177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002802482,0.00198909,0.8936126,0.00003014679,0.0002054551,0.001965992,0.01127634,0.00001531679,0.05513725,0.004091156,0.02322445,0.005649731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001117017,0.002523011,0.987437,0.00002515337,0.0001320805,0.00025052,0.002701449,0.000001061404,0.00371452,0.000005229121,0.001654777,0.0004382196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922684,0.00006485814,0.0000264312,0.000181504,0.0006923553,0.0006512192,0.0004337517,0.0001378572,0.005543664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972736,0.00004804033,0.0002352531,0.001007679,0.0000602896,0.0001473267,0.00008238706,0.00006982086,0.001075632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09382436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107104956","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2001.1719","title":"Reproductive success in female mountain goats: the influence of age and social rank","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Demography; Dominance (genetics); Dominance hierarchy; Reproductive success; Weaning; Biology; Population; Social status; Social hierarchy; Affect (linguistics); Rank (graph theory); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Animal science; Aggression; Social psychology; Mathematics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01520558250584671,"gpt":0.2554077515078821,"spread":0.2402021690020354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002964867,0.00005980849,0.00008374547,0.00001454451,0.0001042951,0.000007985673,0.0001206264,0.00005290192,0.0001203465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003117633,0.00004886372,0.00001512681,0.0001517252,0.0002882648,0.0002039532,0.00008545051,0.0001031877,0.00001770907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003772141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005969277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002193338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001567395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993915,0.00006392298,0.0001331716,0.0001943718,0.00009221998,0.0001248343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997901,0.0000311024,0.00006005316,0.00009956866,0.000006719742,0.00001246511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006248136,0.00004344645,0.9951009,0.000001122785,0.000001536572,0.00002074677,0.001200553,0.00004018602,0.003157273,0.0001175939,0.00006891321,0.0001852329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001801312,0.00005492597,0.9988258,0.000002585814,0.000008502441,0.000007597159,0.0003845248,0.00000721439,0.0002270095,0.0001731261,0.00007237963,0.00005619976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982606,0.00001253542,0.00000133573,0.001199871,0.00001263698,0.0001359626,0.000002051176,0.000007354169,0.000367629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995334,0.000007717551,0.00002400907,0.000239082,0.00001808524,0.00001689772,0.00000142989,0.000003624061,0.0001558209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003724889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3315685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978508537","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.02.017","title":"Hastiness, brain size and predation regime affect the performance of wild guppies in a spatial memory task","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Poecilia; Guppy; Affect (linguistics); Task (project management); Brain size; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Predator; Biology; Psychology; Communication; Fishery","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01831362449550176,"gpt":0.2201009232147041,"spread":0.2017872987192024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002161395,0.0001076827,0.0001366885,0.000009988773,0.0001847922,0.0000125311,0.0001095961,0.00007012841,0.00006088642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000621423,0.00003928005,0.00004119494,0.0001845275,0.0001779544,0.0001664264,0.00005191044,0.0001197398,0.000003200933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001102151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008078135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001654777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004617908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992046,0.00005879139,0.0001817112,0.0002434436,0.0001586319,0.0001528173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996874,0.0000950402,0.00009062537,0.00005539176,0.00004326659,0.00002827166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009298592,0.00005447657,0.5741258,0.000003980993,9.792388e-7,0.000002940302,0.0001668196,9.880495e-7,0.422217,0.00000473072,0.000109365,0.003219926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000130767,0.0006754147,0.9875242,0.00001756449,0.00001285035,0.00005674402,0.0001833469,0.00002222131,0.01121644,0.00000284718,0.00006348778,0.00009408339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983951,0.00009864827,3.059773e-7,0.001136131,0.00005010464,0.0002279528,0.00001057232,0.00002505568,0.00005607387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994439,0.00005699548,0.00001592399,0.00003224676,0.0001351497,0.00001596639,0.00001296779,0.000001181491,0.0002857081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4133984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.250154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126258043","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2003.2085","title":"Behavioural flexibility predicts species richness in birds, but not extinction risk","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Extinction (optical mineralogy); Species richness; Taxon; Biology; Ecology; Threatened species; Relative species abundance; Population; Flexibility (engineering); Abundance (ecology); Zoology; Demography; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05062171214476318,"gpt":0.2499902196596843,"spread":0.1993685075149211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000682098,0.0002812229,0.0002850722,0.00003918165,0.0003312152,0.00007940919,0.000211173,0.0002402881,0.0009901469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001394503,0.000130708,0.0001712926,0.0005258444,0.0001323764,0.0003380119,0.00005976396,0.0004314054,0.00008606454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001166773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001725284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001687366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001218428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997615,0.0002486509,0.0004599088,0.0007786526,0.0003908989,0.000506924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993617,0.0000547829,0.000173027,0.000147712,0.0001157262,0.0001470613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001010856,0.000320539,0.7869895,0.000002028128,0.000002149777,0.0000145539,0.00004726661,0.000001238315,0.2107629,0.00009788384,0.00005615647,0.001604751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002394779,0.0005535745,0.9497766,0.000009438811,0.00005243382,0.000036325,0.0007294352,0.000004495915,0.04767184,0.00005180835,0.0005772696,0.0002973076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979977,0.00009180672,0.000002469956,0.0001488787,0.0004014524,0.0003890375,0.0001093313,0.0001942035,0.0006650938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985358,0.00005298338,0.00006763716,0.00002860036,0.0002085731,0.00004420628,0.00005429875,0.000003890041,0.001003973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.163091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110031869","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.006","title":"Repeatability of nesting preferences in the hawksbill sea turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata, and their fitness consequences","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hatchling; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Biology; Adaptation (eye); Sea turtle; Nesting (process); Tern; Nest box; Turtle (robot); Zoology; Hatching; Predation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02567479243106774,"gpt":0.2475772610819283,"spread":0.2219024686508606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004998821,0.00009183788,0.0001168661,0.00001236234,0.00007633807,0.00001198882,0.0002132401,0.00006683294,0.0001450642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001000253,0.00005542559,0.00002340452,0.0001262528,0.0005303461,0.0001680635,0.00007775122,0.0001167943,0.000009855074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002030867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001337064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001860074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001727255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992067,0.0001399223,0.0001968843,0.0002285544,0.00009023281,0.0001377446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995474,0.0001533973,0.00008962789,0.0001747669,0.00001183548,0.00002299555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002248131,0.00004245113,0.9908479,0.000002844483,0.000001223806,0.000001043044,0.0007425623,0.000003938951,0.004596229,0.0001076552,0.00003444338,0.003597192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008793944,0.00008061423,0.9938513,0.000008091482,0.000007315708,0.0000134327,0.0006751826,0.00006494283,0.004414725,0.0006512147,0.0000703397,0.00007489114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979497,0.00009883965,0.000005575914,0.0009458108,0.00001709792,0.0001752973,0.00001569811,0.00001201238,0.0007799679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995052,0.00001017238,0.0002513386,0.0001520844,0.00001689093,0.00002176862,0.000007544538,0.000002466638,0.00003251765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003522301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2811888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009759575","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.11.016","title":"Living on the edge: dugongs prefer to forage in microhabitats that allow escape from rather than avoidance of predators","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Seagrass; Predation; Foraging; Biology; Herbivore; Ecology; Forage; Abundance (ecology); Threatened species; Apex predator; Reproductive success; Biomass (ecology); Tiger; Fishery; Habitat; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01505902271195261,"gpt":0.2383294808125211,"spread":0.2232704581005684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005382896,0.0001437639,0.0001519316,0.00003450528,0.00006097919,0.000007169411,0.0003416394,0.0001331074,0.001301708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005162271,0.0001041588,0.00005198381,0.0001185897,0.0001363253,0.00008466234,0.0002993413,0.0002028508,0.0003866547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006404985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002270344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008581684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989501,0.00009096132,0.0001875538,0.0003113904,0.0001225287,0.0003374357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999422,0.00020137,0.00005389383,0.0002573478,0.000005356737,0.0000600707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000136006,0.0001219187,0.9122787,8.530108e-7,0.000004805527,0.00001129848,0.0008847589,0.000004951407,0.08526459,0.00006894039,0.0006509572,0.0005722799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001144598,0.000280128,0.9723052,0.00001767284,0.000009612801,0.000002066805,0.0002231608,0.000004408414,0.02646988,0.00005419164,0.0004008134,0.0001183858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963728,0.00002152874,0.00003381088,0.0002456013,0.0001090397,0.0002768622,0.00001162156,0.000016163,0.002912564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984572,0.000003466626,0.0002962008,0.0005183782,0.00002813477,0.0000171228,0.000003896414,0.00001419318,0.0006614288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06002658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100635924","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.029","title":"Flower constancy in bumblebees: a test of the trait variability hypothesis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pollinator; Biology; Trait; Foraging; Pollination; Variation (astronomy); Ecology; Pollen","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03664774830706653,"gpt":0.2063186654220067,"spread":0.1696709171149401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002117714,0.00009928281,0.0001656806,0.000003562497,0.00008916536,0.00001200026,0.0002145825,0.00005796401,0.0003475624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001595032,0.00003195984,0.00009650803,0.000207048,0.00008521651,0.00005960263,0.00006305241,0.00009410282,0.00001212706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001945177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005438117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004114808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01379552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992431,0.0000456776,0.0002093281,0.00017634,0.0001323515,0.0001932306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994823,0.0003736293,0.00005705433,0.00002707274,0.00003007152,0.00002988367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001962347,0.0002051337,0.7922568,0.000001466996,0.000002222562,0.00000126624,0.00005327544,1.118441e-7,0.2010544,0.00007404492,0.0001559573,0.006175685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009265016,0.00009518115,0.9931864,0.00001855109,0.00001126446,0.000003040516,0.0001230326,0.000003772937,0.005372177,0.00007185969,0.0009350521,0.00008705314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962537,0.00006067423,5.4059e-8,0.001068861,0.00001453124,0.0001229386,0.0001641815,0.00001769272,0.00229734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996522,0.00001374215,0.00005797529,0.00008965221,0.0000686485,0.000008521562,0.000001280085,5.338955e-7,0.0001074377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2009296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7698227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140087929","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.028","title":"Pain experience in hermit crabs?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Anomura; Hermit crab; Stimulus (psychology); Decapoda; Noxious stimulus; Psychology; Crustacean; Ecology; Biology; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0660632722642247,"gpt":0.3525121666817382,"spread":0.2864488944175135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002382405,0.0001157601,0.0001387197,0.00008975916,0.0001069317,0.00001785195,0.0003495974,0.00009616459,0.0002254909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003602886,0.0001054482,0.0000436173,0.000277789,0.000166973,0.0001751949,0.00004876024,0.0003560967,0.000155844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001816515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002427099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002217126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007289798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984879,0.0003856021,0.0001669223,0.000429497,0.0001074154,0.0004226183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995171,0.0001624976,0.00003011304,0.0002092731,0.00001313022,0.00006782105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008216677,0.0001486998,0.07562632,7.29091e-7,1.57641e-7,0.0001852411,0.0001709764,5.556449e-7,0.9219412,0.0006373106,0.0002234344,0.0009832463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001950821,0.0007882754,0.6930677,0.00000572087,8.325634e-7,0.00002840762,0.00003891692,0.00003011953,0.3052208,0.0003820877,0.0001258099,0.000116157],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970495,0.00001523217,0.000002317589,0.0005064721,0.00005302767,0.0001318015,0.000002550677,0.00005858894,0.002180566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963443,0.00001510675,0.000014176,0.003181722,0.00003198111,0.00001946311,0.000001055077,0.000006698072,0.000385559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6174414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4300051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566523260","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.016","title":"Social influences on female mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: generalized and repeatable trait-copying behaviour","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Guppy; Poecilia; Mating preferences; Mate choice; Copying; Trait; Mating; Biology; Preference; Cultural transmission in animals; Sexual selection; Social learning; Evolutionary biology; Social psychology; Zoology; Psychology; Genetics; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04463010340488366,"gpt":0.2942530701300977,"spread":0.2496229667252141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005097428,0.0002481187,0.0002556783,0.00002719063,0.0005621964,0.0001731898,0.0003052902,0.0001732797,0.0001596314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003012711,0.00009901521,0.0001088971,0.0003232128,0.000129759,0.0003555828,0.00007090357,0.0003241041,0.00002499168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004493546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008098066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002760832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001278413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980588,0.0001536077,0.0003591207,0.0006107857,0.000375517,0.0004421567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995931,0.00005952347,0.0001183178,0.0001028458,0.0000531704,0.00007298039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001071644,0.0002427005,0.8351136,0.000003571174,0.000003795338,0.00002171945,0.0005744774,0.00000161148,0.1568559,0.0004306284,0.0005033343,0.006141487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002568342,0.0004011156,0.9940481,0.00001642884,0.00005117405,0.00004202676,0.0008377454,0.000004506487,0.003004202,0.00003862517,0.001048913,0.0002502814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955928,0.0001581858,9.68726e-8,0.003411129,0.00006185691,0.0003341828,0.00004227473,0.00007066964,0.0003287991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984461,0.00002711552,0.00006388065,0.0003623237,0.0006168871,0.00005002023,0.00005299793,0.000003369111,0.000377315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1589345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4324017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018475790","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.032","title":"Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; The Scarborough Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Animal Behavior Society; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Israel National Road Safety Authority; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"CONTEST; Psychology; Quantitative assessment; Signalling; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04262907453095706,"gpt":0.2710006987774553,"spread":0.2283716242464983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001151435,0.0001916818,0.0002296979,0.00001838422,0.0006059969,0.00003443058,0.0001845426,0.000115946,0.0005116283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002260601,0.00008481405,0.0001461346,0.000205891,0.0001063489,0.0002243413,0.00008795714,0.0002333826,0.00008009528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006194202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001264523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005083543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005232124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985342,0.00005071393,0.0002645343,0.0004903385,0.0002848218,0.0003754087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994746,0.00003634316,0.0001853867,0.00007568486,0.00008757893,0.0001404113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001164458,0.00004776012,0.6904938,0.00000171924,0.000004638441,0.0001094508,0.00002998152,2.041169e-7,0.3082863,0.0000105924,0.00009002873,0.0009138357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001538429,0.0003662121,0.9841678,0.00002414304,0.00003564341,0.0002913347,0.0002485104,8.237533e-7,0.01433941,0.000004910878,0.0001336386,0.0002337172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984398,0.00009034445,0.000001161494,0.0003402494,0.0001084597,0.0002187537,0.00002736808,0.0001292784,0.0006446131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983386,0.00003917127,0.00009631734,0.00003014826,0.0005629258,0.00002042215,0.00005126048,0.000002536149,0.0008585583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2939469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5601972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037252089","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2001.1925","title":"Irrational choices in hummingbird foraging behaviour","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Decoy; Foraging; Preference; Hummingbird; Biology; Statistics; Mathematics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1315366607970139,"gpt":0.233756879850778,"spread":0.1022202190537641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002583417,0.0001318974,0.0002085022,0.0001646291,0.00008703163,0.00005583973,0.0001424446,0.00008655943,0.003825139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001394826,0.000175425,0.00007486044,0.00009610993,0.00003402225,0.0005050426,0.00004352522,0.0001399946,0.002128354],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001776807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002809755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004830859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001286391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988473,0.000008746311,0.0004928396,0.0003585587,0.00003703775,0.0002554957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995936,0.00001537704,0.0001743772,0.0001540502,0.000004943103,0.00005763513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002624681,0.0001180761,0.9895744,0.000002182832,0.000003779771,0.000004295672,0.0002319817,0.00002940245,0.00004944578,0.009385252,0.0003986708,0.0001998876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004453499,0.0000636625,0.9957955,0.000006312715,0.00000475412,0.000004331748,0.000105161,0.00168983,0.00006538774,0.0009315254,0.0006800821,0.0002080821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876162,0.0005329711,0.00005965937,0.0003336054,0.0001409986,0.0001343022,0.00004284396,0.00002868192,0.01111067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971867,0.00005930269,0.0004314875,0.0001768667,0.0000770429,0.00003981605,0.00003003827,0.00002324787,0.001975463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009570466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170235075","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2003.2186","title":"Kinship as a basis for alliance formation between male bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in the Bahamas","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Earthwatch Institute","keywords":"Kinship; Biology; Bottlenose dolphin; Kin selection; Kin recognition; Mammal; Microsatellite; Zoology; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Sociology; Genetics; Allele","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04131945391102337,"gpt":0.2820016405652553,"spread":0.2406821866542319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007475698,0.0002217729,0.0002308936,0.00002264255,0.0002413178,0.00005791457,0.0004385864,0.00009252377,0.001123872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002004116,0.0001731013,0.0001209789,0.0003357175,0.00008460053,0.0003961724,0.0001314233,0.0002011562,0.0004531336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002068552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001281753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002102339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003598622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998297,0.0001303676,0.0003393055,0.0003661329,0.0003841301,0.0004830298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993287,0.0001608573,0.0001200847,0.0002976113,0.00001329215,0.00007939563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004017916,0.0001171379,0.9872534,0.00002124457,0.000005670918,0.00001251057,0.0007788055,0.000002137552,0.0002864034,0.0009411738,0.007859668,0.00268172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000385733,0.0002841259,0.9422763,0.00002167802,0.00004864021,0.00002164081,0.0004977627,0.000008353953,0.0006324472,0.0003776037,0.05521729,0.0002284345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867573,0.0002128307,0.00003416594,0.0009457408,0.00004221367,0.0008206804,0.00003763956,0.00002647391,0.01112291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971756,0.0001141385,0.001081483,0.0008098483,0.00005229709,0.000210071,0.00002245616,0.00002075126,0.0005133098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04735762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136523176","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2003.2252","title":"Social learning of foraging sites and escape routes in wild Trinidadian guppies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fisheries Society of the British Isles; Royal Society; Animal Behavior Society; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Foraging; Shoal; Guppy; Poecilia; Escape response; Predator; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Predation; Fishery; Shoaling and schooling; Ecology; Zoology; Communication; Psychology; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02806263169952385,"gpt":0.2514206845430442,"spread":0.2233580528435203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002062931,0.0001025598,0.0001616743,0.00002235299,0.0001641714,0.000029324,0.00005900663,0.00008066569,0.00008686053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003373565,0.0000483284,0.00005521229,0.0002129882,0.00006651453,0.0001360759,0.00002526084,0.0001470304,0.000003352128],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001176609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004411484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004034975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002420133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992078,0.00006466095,0.0001824896,0.0002429091,0.0001046881,0.0001974848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998058,0.00003246888,0.00006986925,0.00001993904,0.00003274471,0.00003918782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001631337,0.00004244147,0.7474843,0.000002318636,0.000001323553,0.000002751583,0.0002441397,2.411278e-7,0.2473851,0.0005287876,0.00001296989,0.004279256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001124927,0.0002854815,0.9853902,0.000008162595,0.0000148904,0.00001293753,0.0020695,0.000002948847,0.0116803,0.00007445035,0.0002314881,0.0001171248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990616,0.0001821222,2.593988e-7,0.0002403408,0.00001999212,0.00008907263,0.000003370282,0.00002832506,0.0003748963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996879,0.00002203425,0.00003811698,0.000008997349,0.00005967122,0.000005576902,0.00001020634,0.000001266327,0.0001662671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2379059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1970775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130679710","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2003.2297","title":"Behavioural flexibility: the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus, and the northern long-eared bat,M.septentrionalis , both glean and hawk prey","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Myotis lucifugus; Human echolocation; Predation; Biology; Ecology; Foraging; Zoology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02734780250689732,"gpt":0.224652506746464,"spread":0.1973047042395666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007181875,0.0002444091,0.000300483,0.000008569777,0.001119302,0.00008946082,0.0002507351,0.0001973971,0.0003767871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001490039,0.00007462043,0.0001219493,0.000146053,0.001127,0.0001099617,0.0001833171,0.0003057945,0.00002196148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002008754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001225057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001653912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0302974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983008,0.000375854,0.0002698337,0.0004704555,0.0001463454,0.0004367215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991237,0.0004782598,0.0001047791,0.0001216738,0.00007450773,0.00009709853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001417673,0.000078907,0.9952407,0.000001984164,0.000040558,0.000009170193,0.0002907847,8.62352e-8,0.0003383998,0.0009355299,0.000627371,0.002294751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005090483,0.0003685887,0.9957474,0.00000620867,0.000124208,0.00008300335,0.0009392941,0.000003565862,0.0001355549,0.0004153386,0.001481965,0.0001857675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893557,0.002894024,3.281191e-7,0.006706928,0.0001323695,0.0004216266,0.00006311898,0.00004898412,0.0003769143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980787,0.0002411518,0.00001745268,0.0005998076,0.00007347612,0.00005205603,0.00003195859,0.000002415905,0.0009029572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02864349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9873971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135443948","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.014","title":"Chimpanzees share food for many reasons: the role of kinship, reciprocity, social bonds and harassment on food transfers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; National Institute for Health and Care Research; National Science Foundation; National Institutes of Health; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"Kinship; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Troglodytes; Foraging; Begging; Harassment; Kin selection; Provisioning; Welfare; Social psychology; Psychology; Biology; Ecology; Economics; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.043333846036434,"gpt":0.3134476904434043,"spread":0.2701138444069703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002087137,0.0002294807,0.0003240583,0.00007534738,0.0002537435,0.00004312817,0.0003046925,0.0002621738,0.0009366999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001436136,0.0001822175,0.0001515558,0.00008560139,0.0001275754,0.00009489067,0.00006054662,0.0002489482,0.00004516936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004748644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002587778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001715043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001535599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985492,0.0000883199,0.0003209225,0.0003899023,0.0001610647,0.0004906051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993909,0.0000994301,0.0001037063,0.0002429581,0.00007272854,0.0000902553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001111899,0.001730833,0.8263898,0.00005518906,0.0003085887,0.000005350202,0.009777,1.498785e-7,0.0276048,0.08548604,0.01278506,0.03474531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001103258,0.006476875,0.9849312,0.00001073139,0.0001663486,0.00001378574,0.002847193,0.000002482197,0.002260242,0.001473704,0.0005054686,0.000208652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940617,0.0001659278,0.000006013722,0.001137049,0.0001322129,0.001047901,0.0006163807,0.0000542754,0.002778503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984432,0.000008285443,0.00006532596,0.0002441207,0.00009969805,0.0009131411,0.00005095548,0.00004120362,0.0001341129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1585415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128906071","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.12.029","title":"Reduced parental care, compensatory behaviour and reproductive costs of thick-billed murres equipped with data loggers","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Paternal care; Foraging; Biology; Offspring; Attendance; Nest (protein structural motif); Fledge; Demography; Reproductive success; Ecology; Zoology; Breed; Animal science; Hatching","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02354782505136356,"gpt":0.2727315205574589,"spread":0.2491836955060954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000241328,0.0002796026,0.0003478451,0.00005103943,0.000220448,0.0000203198,0.0005343915,0.0001704724,0.0003770287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003198719,0.0002415946,0.00004505025,0.0001812861,0.001049919,0.0004444352,0.000673643,0.00032829,0.00006079743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002580169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006596166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001223063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001319888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978534,0.00007937969,0.0003314287,0.0009747433,0.000349927,0.0004111118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986911,0.0000284139,0.0002100718,0.0008680412,0.00003404918,0.0001682597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000299559,0.0003640154,0.9768443,0.000005199955,0.0000152659,0.0001121143,0.000965648,0.00001044545,0.02074467,0.00002417287,0.0001255014,0.0004891315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001347038,0.000948128,0.9796278,0.00003618539,0.0002221164,0.0001098182,0.002961251,0.000001051677,0.01441227,0.00001198966,0.00001084037,0.0003114994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984479,0.0001132338,0.000005870473,0.0001239036,0.0001106732,0.0005294074,0.000170803,0.0000565884,0.0004416243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985438,0.00001185761,0.001081567,0.00005659067,0.00003151735,0.00002655031,0.0001535466,0.00003152835,0.00006306013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006332397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143305613","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.003","title":"Song repertoire size predicts initial mating success in male song sparrows, Melospiza melodia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Repertoire; Mating; Mate choice; Biology; Sexual selection; Trait; Reproductive success; Mating system; Population; Harem; Zoology; Demography; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0222447418417971,"gpt":0.2527518973614048,"spread":0.2305071555196077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003349541,0.0002759422,0.0003019907,0.00002568916,0.000346552,0.0001128845,0.0003102687,0.0002412576,0.0007456914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112139,0.0001327136,0.0001402288,0.0004494183,0.0001042592,0.0004812642,0.000130298,0.0003580279,0.00007574525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001164572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002943918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004218554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00238259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978043,0.00006949688,0.0004685736,0.0006983706,0.0003858478,0.000573408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994364,0.00005554211,0.0001485093,0.000109765,0.00009048087,0.00015931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001500857,0.0002582399,0.7490359,0.000007666817,0.000004269234,0.0001782916,0.000222993,0.000009933167,0.2443462,0.0001329065,0.00004952907,0.005604018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003822538,0.0008141433,0.9768245,0.00007436974,0.00003350761,0.0001289604,0.0008247861,0.000005247685,0.02040763,0.00008326688,0.00008314448,0.0003382142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971728,0.0001337727,0.000001074084,0.001013977,0.0002446705,0.0003431407,0.00003780731,0.0001620026,0.0008907192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987735,0.00002236282,0.0002149457,0.00008352806,0.0005789725,0.00004341305,0.00005139599,0.000005057179,0.0002268265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2277886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8164798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976650296","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2002.4002","title":"Acoustic systems are adapted to breeding ecologies: individual recognition in nesting penguins","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Polar Knowledge Canada","keywords":"Pygoscelis; Nesting (process); Nest (protein structural motif); Identification (biology); Biology; Territoriality; Ecology; Zoology; Communication; Evolutionary biology; Psychology; Foraging","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1178149404026454,"gpt":0.2971527459287802,"spread":0.1793378055261348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002116007,0.0001679134,0.0001717837,0.00009799939,0.0001130604,0.00007463279,0.0003152916,0.0001914419,0.00008633633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002455872,0.0001778329,0.00005515155,0.0001969678,0.00003182812,0.00001042727,0.0002189414,0.0001994008,0.0001069787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003974905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001513303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001231838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002899375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988296,0.00008578001,0.0002979117,0.0003306677,0.0001526876,0.0003033595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993956,0.00002428057,0.0001090352,0.0002472574,0.0001123668,0.0001114608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001096185,0.0004860808,0.4997686,0.00002464988,0.00001656268,0.00005809074,0.0003580235,0.0000939427,0.4920145,0.00001931688,0.003099988,0.003950646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000748771,0.001674932,0.9864699,0.0001284147,0.00007864955,0.0000653943,0.003832558,0.0004225359,0.004958075,0.000002239653,0.001085166,0.0005333342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984146,0.0002469092,0.00006152126,0.0001629407,0.0000881771,0.0003063738,0.00005098348,0.00004595598,0.0006225127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988298,0.00003423705,0.0003886714,0.0002120385,0.0001083922,0.00008345949,0.00009676447,0.0000256142,0.0002210452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4870564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7251814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073582504","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2001.1904","title":"Discrimination and preferences for pollen-based cues by foraging honeybees, Apis mellifera L.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Pollen; Foraging; Biology; Honey Bees; Botany; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07057045116297567,"gpt":0.2333847963873742,"spread":0.1628143452243986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006995958,0.0001281874,0.0001399961,0.000008704395,0.0003136628,0.00007984921,0.00009607331,0.00005293988,0.000111359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001834088,0.00005210923,0.000051083,0.00007410347,0.00004354117,0.0001144545,0.00002712476,0.00004967244,0.000006533613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008863116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000111685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002489508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007933894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999284,0.00001752505,0.0001237077,0.0002338205,0.0001174721,0.0002235279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997317,0.0001098302,0.00005080434,0.00001213932,0.00003645663,0.00005906471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006590964,0.0001825217,0.5624019,0.00001652013,0.00001221549,0.000002241786,0.0001845983,8.888635e-8,0.3809305,0.0001784563,0.01534147,0.04068357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003148332,0.00116296,0.9738228,0.00003903303,0.00005839055,0.000003127997,0.0007330202,0.0003415325,0.01880016,0.0001936506,0.004171026,0.0003594924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964208,0.001391412,0.000003522583,0.001448646,0.00001983113,0.0001801294,0.0002871052,0.00005616794,0.0001923613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990608,0.0002032546,0.00008935642,0.0001259626,0.0000875945,0.000039229,0.00006861992,0.000001058919,0.0003241024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4114209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2412472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074426304","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.030","title":"Effects of learning on evolution: robustness, innovation and speciation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Animal Behavior Society; Ontario Innovation Trust; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Assortative mating; Robustness (evolution); Exploit; Social learning; Mate choice; Computer science; Natural selection; Biology; Evolvability; Population; Evolutionary biology; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Ecology; Cognitive psychology; Mating; Selection (genetic algorithm); Psychology; Knowledge management; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01249715559577336,"gpt":0.2110085285671445,"spread":0.1985113729713712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000865502,0.00008160223,0.00009560125,0.00002197123,0.0001210533,0.00002342439,0.00004355341,0.00007390101,0.0001292788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004565456,0.00003529921,0.00002512152,0.0003143916,0.00003432276,0.0001707636,0.00002210442,0.0001072877,0.00002164372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002110092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002626159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000263115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008473767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993632,0.00003481299,0.0001555718,0.000200268,0.0001358741,0.0001102655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996824,0.00003762508,0.0001012668,0.00002228684,0.0001321514,0.0000242792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001585418,0.00006382587,0.3230836,0.000005048425,0.000001394632,5.38107e-7,0.00001356736,0.000003243678,0.666055,0.0009752234,0.00007562609,0.009707062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007656287,0.0007322422,0.9712185,0.0000149422,0.00001370544,0.000003251779,0.0001177893,0.00002484435,0.02761333,0.000056025,0.00004892425,0.00007983958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992421,0.00004824051,0.000007542254,0.0002402745,0.0000617939,0.0002159535,0.000001023239,0.0000412187,0.0001418332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999472,0.000008589237,0.00003713025,0.00001080806,0.0001751325,0.00001711021,0.00001695976,8.89448e-7,0.0002613915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6481349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.143946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053896086","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2003.2284","title":"Sex differences in the diving behaviour of a size-dimorphic capital breeder: the grey seal","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sexual dimorphism; Biology; Foraging; Reproduction; Fur seal; Polygyny; Mating; Zoology; Ecology; Demography; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02522375494005024,"gpt":0.2366145235611521,"spread":0.2113907686211019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008301309,0.0002598793,0.0003131411,0.00002098065,0.0002832667,0.00006011959,0.0007693665,0.00007655947,0.001777481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001559071,0.0001536642,0.0001412865,0.0003729565,0.0003502413,0.0001759061,0.0004280587,0.0003522674,0.00009028683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007877192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000170682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01363049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01947163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977676,0.0003155509,0.0003950964,0.000389935,0.0006454003,0.0004864322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999096,0.0002816912,0.0001557728,0.0003890376,0.00001445289,0.00006307057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001042249,0.0002029018,0.9960717,0.000005702325,0.000007833552,0.00002919617,0.001963871,0.000001092566,0.0004828408,0.0004742162,0.0004284768,0.0003217284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002390516,0.0002568256,0.9956489,0.00001384446,0.00005663115,0.00003769276,0.003051711,0.000008299115,0.0002116829,0.0001071652,0.0001723675,0.0001958551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927877,0.0001996878,0.000001545906,0.0005430532,0.0000545335,0.000406216,0.00001265889,0.00002016466,0.0059744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991466,0.00005722723,0.00007171585,0.0002874661,0.00002412883,0.00006260064,0.000001280394,0.00001807068,0.0003308937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006358876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114425528","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.014","title":"A strategic taxonomy of biological communication","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Terminology; Taxonomy (biology); Computer science; Cognitive science; Management science; Relation (database); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Ecology; Psychology; Biology; Linguistics; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1149838387441547,"gpt":0.2690649897701771,"spread":0.1540811510260224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001532151,0.00009475926,0.0001305225,0.000008417382,0.0001048867,0.00001588775,0.0001996076,0.0000987778,0.0006694863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006499821,0.00003580904,0.00008664445,0.0001456325,0.00008947274,0.0001063747,0.00005469621,0.0001083987,0.00005332813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000160611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004696486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002489011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001182853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992724,0.00005238368,0.0002153642,0.0002084663,0.0001008668,0.0001505086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996846,0.00002569458,0.00009654051,0.00007593614,0.00006726004,0.00004992645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004825441,0.0002438328,0.2728699,9.006805e-7,0.000002857963,7.660989e-7,0.00002021981,5.66972e-7,0.7079948,0.0013802,0.0001219382,0.01731574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007581581,0.0005418315,0.9734532,0.000005991547,0.00001504827,0.00001234514,0.0004254523,0.000005610021,0.02250298,0.00006578684,0.002776613,0.0001193153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974285,0.0002069904,5.825878e-7,0.0004956819,0.00001821103,0.0001685551,0.00001576511,0.00005502793,0.001610681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991924,0.00005135232,0.0004125918,0.00002833415,0.0001332027,0.00002695022,0.00004946891,6.273016e-7,0.0001051146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7005833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7330406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903888521","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.11.008","title":"Don't poke the bear: using tracking data to quantify behavioural syndromes in elusive wildlife","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Naturvårdsverket; Norges Forskningsråd; Austrian Science Fund; Canada Research Chairs; Robert Bosch Stiftung; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Boldness; Wildlife; Psychology; Population; Behavioral syndrome; Personality; Ecology; Habitat; Demography; Biology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1341048358098844,"gpt":0.3337742166169292,"spread":0.1996693808070448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005741428,0.0001671119,0.0001626904,0.00005359125,0.000366699,0.00006342158,0.0008190249,0.0001201567,0.0009557317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009798285,0.0001393263,0.00003628161,0.0003812145,0.0002709614,0.0005954838,0.0007206166,0.0002424074,0.000491369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001330164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003058473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007689707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01068261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983903,0.0001092138,0.0003157782,0.0005047998,0.0002621778,0.0004177065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991348,0.00006327983,0.0001009739,0.0005921744,0.00001797542,0.00009073039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003654208,0.00007014855,0.9942664,7.193245e-7,0.000003918708,0.00003466339,0.0005151682,0.00001305987,0.002735418,0.00003238173,0.001967276,0.000324323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001901634,0.0001829895,0.9977236,0.00001792907,0.00004141788,0.00004927399,0.0003518219,0.0006147907,0.0001970366,0.00001820501,0.0004226982,0.0001900324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965636,0.00001188275,0.00003745277,0.002652907,0.000213097,0.0003172338,0.00003049603,0.00003459803,0.000138727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964516,0.000001942477,0.0009122217,0.002369782,0.00009265039,0.00001277109,0.00002349698,0.00001923905,0.0001163116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003457261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034319609","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.028","title":"Trade-offs in activity budget in an alpine ungulate: contrasting lactating and nonlactating females","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Fish and Wildlife; Academy of Certified Archivists; Alberta Conservation Association; Université Laval; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Ruminating; Foraging; Time budget; Lying; Ungulate; Lactation; Biology; Vigilance (psychology); Ecology; Demography; Rumination; Pregnancy; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02145381548279561,"gpt":0.2775410606929788,"spread":0.2560872452101832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007562342,0.0001164142,0.0001428027,0.0000535863,0.0001014686,0.00002064384,0.00007549925,0.000103832,0.00007432489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008271513,0.0001273227,0.00001483391,0.0001957495,0.0000833641,0.00048247,0.00005110101,0.0002377394,0.000006725937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009533442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009064138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001156108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0130726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989697,0.00007501039,0.0002387007,0.0002822042,0.0001076248,0.0003268084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999608,0.0001599736,0.00009084932,0.00006972386,0.000002964528,0.00006849749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007192009,0.0001007567,0.9541367,0.000002926725,9.14615e-7,0.00006127125,0.0009176481,0.0000202616,0.03810808,0.00001535365,0.000003080829,0.006561038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004703661,0.0001452333,0.9953266,0.00001695663,0.000005743648,0.00001257376,0.0006308081,0.00209861,0.001129429,0.00002120207,0.000001562415,0.0001408596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992297,0.00001028638,0.00003591046,0.0002155632,0.00002578493,0.0001449951,0.000001775608,0.00002495107,0.000311069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987382,0.000001051509,0.001031443,0.0001740958,0.00002163913,0.000006321359,0.000004550569,0.00001040912,0.00001232147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0411899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7294819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144339371","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.002","title":"Mechanisms of the group-size effect on vigilance in Columbian ground squirrels: dilution versus detection","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Auburn University; University of Calgary; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Foraging; Alarm signal; Predation; ALARM; Ecology; Dilution; Biology; Statistics; Zoology; Demography; Mathematics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008633982457646763,"gpt":0.2280963829520608,"spread":0.219462400494414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002418962,0.0001450337,0.0001746065,0.00002026124,0.0002147191,0.00001062591,0.0001803293,0.0001265788,0.000150732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003312366,0.0001193912,0.00008988025,0.0002492385,0.0002086598,0.0001155175,0.0001296935,0.0001607998,0.00007661284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000253551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003449178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004881172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02725516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988911,0.0001115825,0.0002105879,0.0002919375,0.0002339438,0.0002608132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995878,0.0001107897,0.0001120199,0.0001608625,0.000005523101,0.00002301278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005907002,0.0003031595,0.8380421,0.000004289653,0.000003469643,0.000009511768,0.00003008784,0.00001552088,0.1592754,0.0005820014,0.00005069566,0.001093011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008777473,0.002139086,0.9807514,0.00001370025,0.0000416787,0.000003111533,0.00004297724,0.0000132972,0.01574352,0.0002215524,0.00002742323,0.0001245363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997981,0.00001197815,0.00002084518,0.00004499444,0.0003078638,0.0003129719,0.000005164543,0.00002819248,0.001286972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997048,0.000001679558,0.00004009806,0.00002881194,0.00001852799,0.00005737427,0.000001384782,0.00001112773,0.0001361886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1435319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107898892","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2003.2230","title":"Female Japanese quail that ‘eavesdrop’ on fighting males prefer losers to winners","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Quail; Coturnix japonica; Courtship; Dominance (genetics); Preference; Coturnix; Biology; Coturnix coturnix; Psychology; Demography; Developmental psychology; Zoology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05195299459769796,"gpt":0.2604257881545093,"spread":0.2084727935568114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002561932,0.0002598955,0.0002124863,0.00002736487,0.0003264046,0.00008422235,0.0002171142,0.000148823,0.0008381567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005589618,0.0001093097,0.0001495514,0.0003180577,0.00005332174,0.0001718466,0.0000463982,0.000207493,0.0004846687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005514009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007907177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006540395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003763441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981889,0.00009514674,0.0002188008,0.0006791582,0.0003429795,0.0004749966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994655,0.00004642158,0.00007752123,0.0001233342,0.00006560117,0.0002216853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009321134,0.0002061761,0.5824452,0.000003348257,0.000005799326,0.00002275499,0.0003366841,0.000002527046,0.4138814,0.0002843184,0.0004766939,0.002241895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001000566,0.001075261,0.9584453,0.00002377403,0.00002988848,0.00002135172,0.002929764,4.515645e-7,0.03215704,0.000006496627,0.004900191,0.0003104089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995724,0.00005047484,2.072537e-7,0.0004919767,0.0002122446,0.0003059397,0.00002013654,0.0001305681,0.003064507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960661,0.000008240156,0.00009534438,0.0002624643,0.0002040598,0.00003066617,0.00002058189,0.000004485538,0.003308076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3817243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9177228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138119834","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.08.014","title":"Individual variation in temporal activity patterns in open-field tests","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Open field; Statistics; Biology; Psychology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03813477390359429,"gpt":0.2870235720535239,"spread":0.2488887981499296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004081841,0.0001264255,0.0001518603,0.00002846845,0.00007980908,0.0001123244,0.0003339846,0.0001907972,0.0004362268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004827405,0.00005918042,0.00003945258,0.0002955742,0.00001772815,0.0004350204,0.0001737128,0.0004579086,0.00001890846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002068868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001209551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02027819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05432542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989143,0.00005739882,0.0001947771,0.0004135328,0.0001719667,0.0002480141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999721,0.00004693421,0.0000745996,0.00007029676,0.00002756496,0.00005959946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003955616,0.0002278624,0.5874106,5.852672e-7,4.734226e-7,0.00000985018,0.00005724503,4.609982e-8,0.4058763,0.00002999714,0.00002024235,0.006327287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001887748,0.0004384053,0.9904456,0.000008496246,0.000006760766,0.000009812321,0.00009393032,0.000003240536,0.008537672,0.00004061255,0.00006944585,0.0001572142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984602,0.000003463849,4.878636e-7,0.0008246739,0.0001846421,0.0003004757,0.00002665794,0.00003038382,0.0001690261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995756,0.000002319409,0.00005096924,0.00005810681,0.0001709676,0.00003417717,0.00003154897,0.000001387775,0.00007492591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.403035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}