{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":132,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":132,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"14e6599cf470","filters":{"venue":"Animal Conservation"}},"results":[{"id":"W2100285054","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2005.00004.x","title":"Wildlife conservation and animal temperament: causes and consequences of evolutionary change for captive, reintroduced, and wild populations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":330,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Temperament; Captivity; Biology; Domestication; Captive breeding; Ecology; Reproductive success; Population; Wildlife; Habitat; Psychology; Endangered species; Social psychology; Demography; Personality","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04968618577840633,"gpt":0.2672941625903012,"spread":0.2176079768118949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002852175,0.0001666271,0.0002036925,0.00007086038,0.0003509965,0.0000298325,0.00005823429,0.000131358,0.00005598805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002266265,0.0001755113,0.00002376645,0.0001643297,0.000683193,0.0009677195,0.00007309925,0.00008312686,0.00000439676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006391677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003207273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00172735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00146036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988161,0.00008102934,0.0003650192,0.000390712,0.0001498421,0.000197238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992943,0.0002220664,0.0002254723,0.0001148065,0.00006920844,0.00007415748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002409019,0.00004138968,0.9700143,0.00002881104,0.00001641182,5.067208e-7,0.0004309908,0.000007527429,0.0166614,0.008786472,0.00305288,0.0007183824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006205863,0.0004029041,0.9872975,0.000029079,0.00005386259,0.00002757812,0.0002073392,0.004987336,0.0005196147,0.001411407,0.004258047,0.0001847271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628611,0.0003246733,0.00007004461,0.03586849,0.00004113469,0.0006920489,0.00004473708,0.00003544928,0.00006230401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883497,0.0001527672,0.006173032,0.004943584,0.00009491182,0.0001398917,0.00006411567,0.0000120607,0.0000699588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03092491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7157142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563702561","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00328.x","title":"Endangered, apparently: the role of apparent competition in endangered species conservation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":261,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Endangered species; Generalist and specialist species; Predation; Ecology; Competition (biology); Umbrella species; Coexistence theory; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biodiversity; Ecological release; Storage effect; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04664368738938188,"gpt":0.2164017421280437,"spread":0.1697580547386618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001900202,0.0001133785,0.0001659901,0.0000170402,0.000143583,0.00003171422,0.0001374523,0.0000516991,0.00006768119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000484122,0.00004647926,0.00005420452,0.0003114072,0.00006329609,0.0001370969,0.00002548535,0.00007984284,0.000009361347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000280539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007186649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000982278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009921941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999137,0.00006483398,0.0002760893,0.0001657087,0.0001872974,0.0001690092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995427,0.0001715999,0.0001482485,0.00002568616,0.00008936774,0.00002236844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001464055,0.00008521516,0.2604864,0.000003605127,0.00000625301,0.000001091737,0.0002759029,7.557461e-7,0.7177482,0.01227033,0.0004346783,0.008541184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001185337,0.0002714952,0.9646276,0.000031657,0.000007370467,0.000002164237,0.001133793,0.0002225073,0.01496459,0.002126386,0.01639551,0.00009836123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903608,0.0003932418,0.000001977859,0.006812461,0.00001994289,0.0002093082,0.00005261887,0.00003372999,0.002115926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989513,0.0001284137,0.00002228144,0.0006236531,0.00009921608,0.00001150437,0.0001218314,5.481222e-7,0.00004123788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7041412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5536676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155888811","doi":"10.1017/s1367943004001404","title":"Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Guelph","funders":"Zoologische Gesellschaft Frankfurt","keywords":"Wildebeest; Geography; Poaching; Protected area; Threatened species; Ecology; Wildlife; National park; Environmental protection; Habitat; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01063841560270024,"gpt":0.2085094612027394,"spread":0.1978710456000391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002930287,0.00009544499,0.00007935354,0.00001073966,0.000340148,0.00001273314,0.0001905839,0.00008346652,0.0000934421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001094037,0.00005983395,0.00004786122,0.0002754125,0.0003131934,0.0001490447,0.00007874727,0.0001526941,0.00002530822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008836239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005934602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007468112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03272581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992658,0.0001193455,0.0001984006,0.0001646117,0.0001096036,0.0001422641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994654,0.00007186952,0.000155224,0.0002603003,0.00002153679,0.00002564756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004052108,0.00004965633,0.9863902,0.000007227531,0.00001324601,0.00002312254,0.0006640614,0.000403082,0.007478486,0.00319152,0.001365061,0.0003738438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002439904,0.00008620008,0.9912779,0.00001270383,0.00002124914,0.0001072296,0.000169837,0.0002962582,0.004401923,0.002463421,0.0008375329,0.00008179185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801358,0.00001688355,0.00001620749,0.01889089,0.00006660988,0.0004261492,0.000003955892,0.00002102407,0.0004224873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964101,0.000002207754,0.0000917053,0.003301096,0.00002254134,0.00004679207,0.000003271299,0.000007088882,0.0001152079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02525769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167755028","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00032.x","title":"Relative vulnerability of female turtles to road mortality","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Bishop's University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Biological and Environmental Research; Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Turtle (robot); Sex ratio; Population; Biology; Vulnerability (computing); Painted turtle; Population decline; Geography; Demography; Ecology; Zoology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02611192748969407,"gpt":0.2700985647196886,"spread":0.2439866372299945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003128419,0.0000842062,0.0001103763,0.00001791455,0.00008071527,0.000006120026,0.00009155406,0.00007994089,0.0003873085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001036519,0.00007972233,0.00003796952,0.0002213867,0.0001403225,0.0002476043,0.00005363414,0.00006603548,0.0001357724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005834065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001262632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006527867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002267201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991717,0.00009450108,0.0002523229,0.0002264381,0.000135489,0.0001195954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996041,0.00006220142,0.000106988,0.0001693421,0.00002878748,0.00002856249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005976452,0.00004711961,0.9288524,0.000003356457,0.000004643512,5.043543e-7,0.00008292156,0.00007199424,0.06603102,0.003631276,0.0007486705,0.000466363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001061052,0.0001041248,0.9807634,0.000004351169,0.00001044313,6.207595e-7,0.00002988709,0.0002891498,0.01241435,0.004876423,0.001313189,0.00008792044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912308,0.00001045804,0.0005668666,0.001021207,0.00004058829,0.000198348,0.00001085477,0.00003114441,0.00688974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980797,5.985399e-7,0.0008846202,0.000506745,0.00002478363,0.00001777699,0.00002832964,0.000004198972,0.0004532571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05361667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9868226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100590800","doi":"10.1017/s1367943003251","title":"Movement and survival parameters of translocated and resident swift foxes <i>Vulpes velox</i>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vulpes; Biology; Biological dispersal; Endangered species; Ecology; Population; Litter; Zoology; Chromosomal translocation; Captive breeding; Predation; Habitat; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01583265373303182,"gpt":0.213929812211221,"spread":0.1980971584781892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003285022,0.0000859041,0.0001119833,0.00002193707,0.00008704724,0.00001230596,0.00003950451,0.00005970322,0.00009450455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007621218,0.00008640443,0.00001476374,0.0001165245,0.0001767619,0.000194597,0.00001945102,0.00005089013,0.00000630997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001857167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001313637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001281082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001686262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992746,0.00009665074,0.0002026183,0.0001896568,0.0001196132,0.0001168477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996772,0.0001120866,0.00008139862,0.00007761319,0.00001337847,0.00003827954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006535237,0.00002261841,0.9772692,0.00001039538,0.00001175905,0.000001016022,0.0002745105,0.00001099267,0.01886771,0.00272952,0.0002932144,0.0004437452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003775202,0.0001770313,0.9889852,0.000008300873,0.00001964423,0.000001912089,0.000165079,0.0003638788,0.007594294,0.001866737,0.0003458366,0.00009450378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997456,0.00006343639,0.0001552117,0.001347896,0.00003702981,0.0001626086,0.000002224942,0.00001468335,0.0007609316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976361,0.00005446274,0.0008831048,0.001300166,0.000002775081,0.00001212175,0.000004620229,0.000005296868,0.0001013995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.352347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121371385","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00373.x","title":"Assessing the long‐term impact of <i>Ranavirus</i> infection in wild common frog populations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranavirus; Amphibian; Biology; Population; Ecology; Habitat; Wildlife disease; Population size; Zoology; Population decline; Wildlife; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03885010541744717,"gpt":0.3338219941371058,"spread":0.2949718887196587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002100041,0.00006866561,0.0000862442,0.00002723973,0.00009673736,0.0000231439,0.00007381838,0.00008531338,0.0002698403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002992413,0.00004728496,0.00005182823,0.0002010283,0.000169638,0.0003283916,0.00003985986,0.0001665122,0.00002641965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005226977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001432191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01387014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02686348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994369,0.00006654155,0.0001910307,0.0001162914,0.00008093554,0.0001082931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996637,0.00004894326,0.0001186551,0.0001377423,0.000008154681,0.00002281284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110365,0.00003178221,0.8894979,0.000001269942,0.000002288607,5.243885e-7,0.00007161136,0.00006041652,0.1083956,0.00008412533,0.0001267164,0.001716779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001268456,0.0000632169,0.9977773,0.000006404192,0.000005922419,0.00000795608,0.000007315065,0.001020252,0.000677124,0.00020633,0.00004584879,0.00005552924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984871,0.000004399072,0.00007591359,0.0003165735,0.00008980733,0.0001313246,0.000002428779,0.00001476666,0.0008776536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996498,0.000004374099,0.0001208699,0.0001457787,0.0000280323,0.00000482251,0.00002246459,0.000005174929,0.00001869756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1082794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977600614","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00163.x","title":"Translocating lions into an inbred lion population in the Hluhluwe‐iMfolozi Park, South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Maple Leaf Foods","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Inbreeding; Panthera; Biology; Inbreeding depression; Ecology; Litter; Zoology; Predation; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03842438401276369,"gpt":0.2386928287129187,"spread":0.200268444700155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005937796,0.0001377404,0.0001229635,0.00007093904,0.0005203402,0.0000254924,0.0002234899,0.0001390715,0.0001464859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001288038,0.0001206813,0.00003937474,0.0006624929,0.0001445004,0.00076918,0.00003000235,0.0001928829,0.0001182213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008909959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002514191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002700358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005297702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985487,0.0003156368,0.000344707,0.0003079722,0.0002490758,0.0002339138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994429,0.0001313698,0.000135235,0.0002271853,0.00001852178,0.00004476242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006372573,0.00009089256,0.9834271,0.000003955132,0.000003062378,0.000006170442,0.01253551,0.0001939437,0.002008824,0.0004448721,0.0006410067,0.0005808983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002957675,0.0001648557,0.9899768,0.000009073701,0.00001147311,0.00001193527,0.0006292805,0.007178793,0.00005698944,0.000914814,0.0006037944,0.0001464071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944487,0.00001774158,0.0002721038,0.004062481,0.0000522419,0.0003516071,0.000001826628,0.00005912594,0.000734163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966177,0.000009673144,0.0009359407,0.002149894,0.00005136865,0.00008364061,0.00008231944,0.00001116616,0.00005833075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01190623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4921239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827162315","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00357.x","title":"The Wildlife Picture Index: monitoring top trophic levels","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Wildlife; Occupancy; Trophic level; Convention on Biological Diversity; Camera trap; Environmental resource management; Ecological indicator; Geography; National park; Global biodiversity; Ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01555601509634295,"gpt":0.2380576839653873,"spread":0.2225016688690444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003468163,0.0001106883,0.00007631067,0.00001583691,0.0006026885,0.00006065051,0.0002289024,0.0001511617,0.0003169334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000288352,0.00008588108,0.00003553302,0.0001952376,0.0001858678,0.000332843,0.00007763767,0.0003504573,0.0002632901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003901129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002791061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001788457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005630342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991199,0.00005350453,0.0001943058,0.0002110149,0.0001974409,0.0002238855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993691,0.0001791293,0.0001364795,0.0002382125,0.00002402537,0.00005307414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003730504,0.00001219005,0.9761929,0.000001028769,0.000005483659,0.000001547119,0.00009754804,0.00001299219,0.0185497,0.0008069128,0.002791789,0.001490598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001643147,0.0000487392,0.9752213,0.000003334082,0.000007137214,0.000006151406,0.000054123,0.0006455512,0.0007411182,0.001376134,0.02162836,0.0001036921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857516,0.000009472044,0.00007279257,0.01252244,0.0005417941,0.0001560522,0.000001434158,0.00005898344,0.0008853852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961293,0.000006455852,0.0002776791,0.002736322,0.0002299696,0.00003283836,0.000003013864,0.000009886543,0.0005745711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01883657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4635453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497931163","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00525.x","title":"Agricultural lands as ecological traps for grizzly bears","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Carnivore; Geography; Habitat; Human–wildlife conflict; Ecology; Livelihood; Population; Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Predation; Wildlife; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02163910642713068,"gpt":0.2423335429548085,"spread":0.2206944365276778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002829114,0.0000949658,0.00009343409,0.00001319745,0.0001960732,0.0000164255,0.00009088001,0.0001277286,0.0008477009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001342422,0.00007615369,0.00005122159,0.0001264224,0.00007157322,0.0004962326,0.00003391232,0.00007422869,0.0005589512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006474341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009358118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001052681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001628544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992692,0.00004534669,0.0001581995,0.0001545119,0.0001043521,0.0002683193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996301,0.0001402731,0.00007190143,0.00006973092,0.00001596503,0.00007201821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007317842,0.00008883674,0.9695659,0.000002440476,0.00000704631,3.53944e-7,0.0001701978,0.000003069737,0.007903349,0.002867843,0.01886267,0.0004551164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002857139,0.0002625628,0.9741749,0.000001662655,0.00001705162,0.00001014407,0.0001095986,0.000113829,0.0003288004,0.000556563,0.02402376,0.0001154528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990979,0.00001008431,0.00005541623,0.004577581,0.0001484823,0.0002859964,0.000004594701,0.00005508603,0.00388379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941,0.000002856132,0.0007713657,0.004133592,0.000131005,0.0000624683,0.00006905977,0.000005490093,0.0007241338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007574548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.928173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143078225","doi":"10.1017/s1367943001001263","title":"Beyond eight forms of rarity: which species are threatened and which will be next?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Endangered species; Passerine; Near-threatened species; Biology; Geography; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02440490581905069,"gpt":0.233076737453373,"spread":0.2086718316343223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001611486,0.00009366906,0.0001430233,0.00002758261,0.0001893335,0.00001918562,0.00006835361,0.00007602265,0.0002359987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009725698,0.00008266381,0.00001718222,0.0002953046,0.00015412,0.0006229097,0.00008645748,0.00006989301,0.00001515985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003176448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008428264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001437143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01864998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993452,0.00002547372,0.0001829636,0.0001835116,0.0001234472,0.0001394038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996036,0.00008335328,0.0001266362,0.00009452451,0.00006200388,0.00002993673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005894549,0.00003330337,0.9847962,0.000009101353,0.00001602443,0.000001543973,0.0003334032,0.00001760788,0.005329703,0.008976438,0.0003031581,0.0001245819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002726793,0.0001274139,0.9848601,0.000007226844,0.00001882235,0.000005926852,0.0003738333,0.002029517,0.0003896604,0.01078449,0.00103465,0.00009572739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795995,0.00007345231,0.0001063263,0.00655057,0.00003159463,0.0001263433,0.000006812836,0.00001759558,0.0134878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979391,0.000321145,0.0003253105,0.0007535871,0.00001271435,0.00001002746,0.00002136242,0.000005510957,0.0006112591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01850627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162429055","doi":"10.1017/s1367943003001185","title":"Species richness and community composition of songbirds in a tropical forest‐agricultural landscape","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Songbird; Species richness; Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Secondary forest; Agriculture; Geography; Old-growth forest; Ecology; Forest farming; Vegetation (pathology); Forest restoration; Forest ecology; Biology; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01502666555429166,"gpt":0.2243025577708911,"spread":0.2092758922165994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009112607,0.00004706309,0.00008097319,0.00001719486,0.0001335391,0.000005565888,0.00004053777,0.00003761579,0.00001802556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000263308,0.00004007577,0.00001144919,0.0001117713,0.0001436246,0.0001394742,0.00004992257,0.0001060792,0.000005142604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000366141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000341041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003992568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009013879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996294,0.00006610074,0.000118267,0.00006173542,0.00005712817,0.00006732577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998198,0.00007261426,0.00004536508,0.00003858376,0.00001124615,0.00001239752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000310228,0.00007421096,0.9868176,0.000007635623,0.000002900446,5.952443e-7,0.0008435756,0.0003388679,0.007076027,0.004777397,0.00001825534,0.00001190726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004154451,0.0001460134,0.9958122,0.000009640404,0.000004746732,0.000003504109,0.0007930621,0.0004946156,0.0001904959,0.00207761,0.000006416983,0.00004621766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978759,0.00001275995,0.0001368331,0.0009296063,0.00001198528,0.00007788937,0.000001914688,0.000009957535,0.0009431117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999455,0.00001137798,0.0003924164,0.0001016186,0.000004350906,0.000006377453,0.00001184387,0.000001589417,0.00001546888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008994628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5029956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516418854","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00423.x","title":"Fragmentation, dispersal and metapopulation function in remnant populations of endangered mountain caribou","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metapopulation; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Endangered species; Woodland caribou; Population; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Local extinction; Habitat; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01910536464444868,"gpt":0.2483898720808998,"spread":0.2292845074364512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003404838,0.00009215177,0.0001140634,0.00007633319,0.0001102156,0.00001415967,0.00005143359,0.000112387,0.0003093113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000137687,0.00009722071,0.00002202643,0.0002887546,0.000110579,0.0005491047,0.00003355131,0.0001057245,0.00001363636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005338073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001571488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007166578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04407528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991278,0.00006689131,0.0003232963,0.0002133385,0.0001473047,0.0001213536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996026,0.00005952354,0.0001604326,0.000117775,0.0000264672,0.00003321559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008343405,0.00003748366,0.9334537,0.00000442477,0.000004315544,4.358794e-7,0.0002601812,0.00006906223,0.05734854,0.007452588,0.0001648169,0.001121043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000341834,0.00008244184,0.982697,0.000004765242,0.00002384031,0.000002599531,0.0001283073,0.01264901,0.0006257808,0.003143895,0.0002067529,0.00009381499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971233,0.00000860985,0.0007631151,0.001463883,0.0001461011,0.0002362946,0.000007176792,0.00002150928,0.0002300148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976047,0.000003160796,0.001789671,0.0003678937,0.00002265667,0.0000272263,0.000135642,0.000007478383,0.00004153321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05672276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128532386","doi":"10.1017/s1367943004001593","title":"Unsustainable harvest of dugongs in Torres Strait and Cape York (Australia) waters: two case studies using population viability analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cape; Population viability analysis; Geography; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Local extinction; Population; Fishery; Nova scotia; Indigenous; Endangered species; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Demography; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07501104314874178,"gpt":0.3293790708472961,"spread":0.2543680276985543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004098321,0.0001376507,0.0002994751,0.00007150252,0.0001254308,0.00002478138,0.00005960735,0.00004073079,0.00005701916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001180702,0.0001329809,0.00005255446,0.0007420377,0.0001679281,0.0003703169,0.0001612361,0.00006748836,0.000002236263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000391167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008691904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1531484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988513,0.00007049907,0.0003867936,0.0003078277,0.000176718,0.0002068485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995769,0.0000518072,0.0001595786,0.0001339764,0.00003899328,0.00003870952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004302846,0.00005210615,0.9930077,0.00007818419,0.00007324137,0.00005285581,0.0006189829,0.004275874,0.001085967,0.0003523345,0.00000506364,0.0003546632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000369642,0.0001145025,0.9953092,0.00001792427,0.0001828376,0.0000206213,0.001565178,0.001055893,0.0002101699,0.00099545,0.00002191991,0.0001366774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993705,0.00007715191,0.00002986218,0.0001668626,0.00001327693,0.0002648028,0.000006233626,0.00001343261,0.0000579127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998533,0.00001668298,0.001335108,0.0000610209,0.000007933135,0.00000870092,0.000009097707,0.000005868435,0.0000226301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1962416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8623044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095531308","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00321.x","title":"Animal behaviour and marine protected areas: incorporating behavioural data into the selection of marine protected areas for an endangered killer whale population","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Washington State University","keywords":"Endangered species; Whale; Marine protected area; Habitat; Fishery; Disturbance (geology); Geography; Wildlife; Population; Wildlife conservation; Critical habitat; Marine reserve; Ecology; Wildlife management; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0520135553853647,"gpt":0.2790497250286239,"spread":0.2270361696432592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005066715,0.0002479977,0.000267389,0.00005171566,0.0004230535,0.00007083314,0.0003148252,0.0001084328,0.0001545442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002916144,0.0002098781,0.00003982101,0.0004779987,0.0001042961,0.0009576372,0.0005961541,0.0001825605,0.000002670381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000147045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002150456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05830049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05508975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981909,0.0001456972,0.0005168426,0.000562421,0.0003377444,0.0002463719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998908,0.00005435056,0.0004602685,0.000382087,0.0001227724,0.00007246213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005404003,0.0001518245,0.945572,0.00003036103,0.00001446359,9.255218e-7,0.0002172358,0.000003780161,0.02606621,0.000136353,0.0002203233,0.02704619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005486635,0.001646236,0.9819763,0.00002326623,0.0000822767,0.00001277484,0.0001202964,0.01361219,0.001071445,0.0005514889,0.0001232171,0.0002317849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963388,0.00001825756,0.0001244566,0.001061873,0.00002325714,0.002185039,0.00002053679,0.00008910853,0.0001387085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901732,0.00001166866,0.00842416,0.0002089239,0.00005597977,0.0001659281,0.0008853754,0.00002293732,0.00005188718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03640443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9621524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1756177932","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00377.x","title":"How does the accuracy of fisher knowledge affect seahorse conservation status?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Aquatic life and conservation","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Extinction (optical mineralogy); Fishing; Geography; Fishery; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03141215377390609,"gpt":0.2528709054350633,"spread":0.2214587516611572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005155038,0.0001534672,0.0001653094,0.00001503054,0.0002492381,0.0001443211,0.000237679,0.0001339484,0.0002032349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001110899,0.00005063056,0.00008922415,0.0004283911,0.0001457999,0.0005724633,0.00005478751,0.0002024814,0.00002006334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001371984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005585531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001764052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0147093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988478,0.0001510525,0.0003030971,0.0002367033,0.0002253359,0.0002360037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977807,0.001351285,0.0003273738,0.0001240781,0.0003569893,0.00005959432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000687174,0.00006103298,0.3103957,0.00001470811,0.00001561071,3.860164e-7,0.000223283,6.788535e-8,0.6611898,0.004748059,0.004597,0.01868561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001747029,0.0001919387,0.896168,0.00001680856,0.00002805508,0.000002118578,0.0006458407,0.0009649061,0.02005114,0.001171779,0.0804319,0.0001528021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.964299,0.00003424169,0.00001679592,0.03442978,0.0001881431,0.0004146628,0.00002584288,0.00005953479,0.0005319996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972012,0.00002167322,0.0001281595,0.001546475,0.0002821608,0.0000433064,0.0001217134,0.000001962098,0.0006533447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6411387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8208137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120735100","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00077.x","title":"Reassembling island ecosystems: the case of Lord Howe Island","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Ecology; Introduced species; Biota; Endemism; Invertebrate; Geography; Habitat; Biodiversity; Biology; Invasive species","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03602481529590559,"gpt":0.2708914119082518,"spread":0.2348665966123462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005275013,0.00006664429,0.00007466909,0.00001601346,0.0001271006,0.00002211371,0.0000807554,0.00004284507,0.005331653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005737005,0.00004922735,0.00003172519,0.0002115771,0.00007073845,0.0001224921,0.00004356826,0.0000525686,0.0001506097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001031431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000502769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003551707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07985193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993954,0.00002818134,0.0001952646,0.0001195518,0.0001180334,0.0001435673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996039,0.0000984244,0.000109881,0.0001327823,0.00002242664,0.00003254144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003458037,0.0001500711,0.7772545,0.00005942511,0.0000309364,0.0003187442,0.001606635,0.000009338442,0.1297903,0.01093097,0.07695785,0.002545367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009801337,0.0003113032,0.8599581,0.00003515685,0.00004921464,0.0007965732,0.01232595,0.002423412,0.01581133,0.0002683027,0.1067071,0.0003333856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818133,0.00003091979,0.0003526678,0.0007242118,0.0000594139,0.0001266328,0.00003609904,0.00001634113,0.01684047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994396,0.00001186339,0.00001510598,0.0003229163,0.00002875643,0.000003498558,0.00002562434,0.000004769558,0.0001478417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.113979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164348389","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00115.x","title":"Dynamics of reintroduction in an indigenous large ungulate: the wood bison of northern Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Government of Northwest Territories; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Biological dispersal; Range (aeronautics); Bison bison; Ecology; Intraspecific competition; Population; Herbivore; Geography; Biology; Indigenous; Competition (biology); Habitat; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005272799932993228,"gpt":0.2020719129596875,"spread":0.1967991130266943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002702262,0.00006446422,0.00009414202,0.00001949257,0.0000809091,0.000003596745,0.0001226838,0.00005883559,0.0004566039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002653272,0.00005671124,0.00001458707,0.000289028,0.00007002097,0.0001937565,0.00001536747,0.00008192558,0.000007254634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001817948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009553329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4604163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9777925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992413,0.00008981652,0.0002511783,0.0001397049,0.0001477655,0.0001302428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996372,0.00003578461,0.0001222399,0.0001640987,0.000023665,0.00001699544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001003669,0.00006424805,0.9953701,0.000003329335,0.000004000768,9.071171e-7,0.0004835377,0.0009824968,0.0009123249,0.0002361799,0.0001009514,0.001741587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001756361,0.0001287423,0.9922791,0.000003965294,0.000007392659,0.000001882291,0.0002327989,0.006339714,0.0003107398,0.0002236616,0.000240089,0.00005631262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974924,0.000009205905,0.00001318609,0.002051522,0.00003560272,0.0001722633,0.00001073689,0.000006644616,0.0002083979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993599,0.000005191596,0.0000462255,0.0003928076,0.00001498469,0.00000674304,0.00005148651,0.000005348233,0.0001173004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5173762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5431769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537384231","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00529.x","title":"Monitoring sea ice habitat fragmentation for polar bear conservation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sea ice; Habitat; Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Population; Habitat destruction; Sea ice concentration; Ursus maritimus; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Climate change; Arctic ice pack; Oceanography; Biology; Sea ice thickness; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04349756073139164,"gpt":0.2826672307025254,"spread":0.2391696699711338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004856052,0.0001668261,0.0001508135,0.00002760733,0.0003203722,0.00004105021,0.0001228933,0.00007386898,0.0002759819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001954377,0.0001782553,0.00006544661,0.0002513223,0.00006441976,0.00110648,0.0001235982,0.00008458006,0.0003108755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002443291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001069777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005579496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00111944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987319,0.00005841866,0.0002922467,0.0002462168,0.0002935186,0.0003776895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993719,0.0001721991,0.000162903,0.0001476807,0.00004958465,0.0000957269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007647131,0.00005415369,0.976455,0.00003295897,0.000015897,2.554411e-7,0.0002357097,0.000004600276,0.01150254,0.0005100879,0.008207585,0.002904722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003433832,0.0001573896,0.9442206,0.00001868868,0.00003761465,0.000002092438,0.0001847208,0.0006482311,0.003698956,0.0001571901,0.05033735,0.0001937667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936547,0.0002330066,0.0007741791,0.002140414,0.0002132882,0.0005979612,0.00001782719,0.0000799187,0.002288687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904978,0.00005850886,0.006886461,0.001903154,0.0002443602,0.0001326852,0.00005688889,0.00002447831,0.0001956531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04212977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8434566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004758011","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00243.x","title":"Spatial and temporal variability in predation on rainforest primates: do forest fragmentation and predation act synergistically?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Ecology; Rainforest; Population; Home range; Biology; Predator; Geography; Habitat; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02726854204343255,"gpt":0.3184455459337387,"spread":0.2911770038903062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006594945,0.0001494123,0.0001744301,0.0001292274,0.00008858126,0.00006435068,0.00005770329,0.0001897896,0.0001510946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002741979,0.0001552291,0.00001739905,0.0001231223,0.00007321843,0.00033511,0.00002037462,0.000137496,0.00001666243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009101693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003636863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006661129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001080035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987233,0.0001847923,0.0003909334,0.0003681859,0.0001207302,0.0002121011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993218,0.0002449729,0.0001463693,0.0001659321,0.00006404746,0.00005690462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008534377,0.0002145888,0.9490073,0.00001927524,0.000006459949,0.000004844292,0.0005917238,0.000007553698,0.00239197,0.03274602,0.0001734481,0.01398338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001059229,0.000889134,0.9897538,0.00001792646,0.00002300337,0.000007373255,0.00008074816,0.00360665,0.00009868109,0.004189608,0.0001328015,0.0001410155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944764,0.000009543921,0.001559739,0.001073943,0.000108073,0.0005630865,0.00001970906,0.00005745595,0.002132042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984455,0.000009805225,0.0005108463,0.00052403,0.00004357019,0.00005333442,0.0003771023,0.000009288866,0.00002649365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04074652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6330059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980567594","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00062.x","title":"Incomplete reporting of whale, dolphin and porpoise ‘bycatch’ revealed by molecular monitoring of Korean markets","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; Dalhousie University; University of New South Wales; University of Auckland; International Fund for Animal Welfare","keywords":"Bycatch; Fishery; Whaling; Porpoise; Minke whale; Marine mammal; Baleen; Delphinus delphis; Biology; Bottlenose dolphin; Geography; Whale; Balaenoptera; Fishing; Harbour","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01848742021935284,"gpt":0.2424593109287131,"spread":0.2239718907093602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005948067,0.0001196631,0.0002625578,0.00002150267,0.00005963158,0.000009191602,0.00009362261,0.00004097974,0.00006448478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002221533,0.0001224665,0.0000448081,0.0002113776,0.0001166222,0.0001639217,0.0002188089,0.00006048684,0.000002797809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004292013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006210139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01594388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003604554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984306,0.00005112926,0.0008718652,0.000237584,0.0002576942,0.0001511518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986197,0.00006190843,0.001095363,0.0001557344,0.0000353609,0.00003188257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003874073,0.00002670045,0.782264,0.00005883169,0.000007629944,0.000006083066,0.00002665892,0.000002813063,0.2151212,0.0001019981,0.0009880421,0.001357338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001856672,0.00008360826,0.9726094,0.00005247491,0.00002027078,0.000005817773,0.00004035211,0.0001958689,0.02566787,0.0002771883,0.0007532719,0.0001082137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941703,0.0002997863,0.00004104457,0.0002575998,0.00001494217,0.0001859,0.000005910326,0.00001674296,0.005007763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970239,0.00005832943,0.002724316,0.00006748076,0.00001527196,0.000008296258,0.000009178753,0.00001127138,0.00008192803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1903454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974682476","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00247.x","title":"How can the feeding habits of the sand tiger shark influence the success of conservation programs?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas","keywords":"Tiger; Carcharias; Fishery; Predation; Endangered species; Biology; Threatened species; Fishing; Ecology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0153277400772991,"gpt":0.2278246969125167,"spread":0.2124969568352176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003753818,0.00008096273,0.00009376085,0.00000984245,0.0002008804,0.0000184686,0.0003320887,0.00006890789,0.00003369356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001896738,0.00004030017,0.00003813751,0.0002566952,0.0005468255,0.0001665807,0.00009381479,0.0001108674,0.000003549775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002215371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002330775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001816555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001595506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992974,0.000116492,0.0001763191,0.0001292557,0.0001450412,0.0001354567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994227,0.0001138447,0.0002055354,0.0001967648,0.00004775912,0.00001339988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004904216,0.00002107014,0.8980464,0.000004093118,0.000006453016,1.581897e-7,0.000319742,0.00001305223,0.09704883,0.002536119,0.0006924374,0.001262584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115569,0.0001527644,0.9827692,0.00001097393,0.00001644023,0.000003657939,0.00007451259,0.0002224524,0.01403067,0.0006731965,0.00188126,0.00004929927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590653,0.00001769063,0.00001066541,0.03970941,0.00004628047,0.0003139428,0.000001946856,0.000009457578,0.0008253008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996473,0.000005566549,0.00004434771,0.003228928,0.00001769534,0.00001220497,0.000004851464,0.000002790931,0.0002105899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08472279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519588639","doi":"10.1111/acv.12161","title":"Influence of artificial food provisioning from fisheries on killer whale reproductive output","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle; Polar Knowledge Canada","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Fishery; Whale; Population; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Provisioning; Geography; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02853693520324803,"gpt":0.2302045247170314,"spread":0.2016675895137834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002454038,0.0001210969,0.0001699786,0.00001648938,0.0001256636,0.00002003442,0.0001382035,0.00004422688,0.0002399475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006770047,0.0001127188,0.00003706671,0.000172292,0.0001470388,0.0003112751,0.0002031781,0.00008644383,0.0001522908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004969285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007490527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005345239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002302726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988437,0.00006974078,0.0002709482,0.0003901577,0.0002781541,0.000147243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993598,0.0001333267,0.0001782171,0.0002579002,0.00003974326,0.00003098933],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004365915,0.0001540558,0.9287556,0.0000250976,0.00003738167,0.000001095244,0.00113967,0.0009451857,0.03413946,0.002712936,0.005867341,0.02578556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105662,0.0008115683,0.9745885,0.00003554627,0.00001142054,2.920665e-7,0.00007417923,0.0006362624,0.007589643,0.001095279,0.01492271,0.0001290148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941049,0.00001528181,0.00003057758,0.001307552,0.0000400406,0.0002015007,0.000005002456,0.00003309206,0.004262106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981793,0.000008749125,0.0007482713,0.0008399311,0.00006598013,0.00001763223,0.000007391859,0.00001021132,0.0001225657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0458328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8080439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171067583","doi":"10.1111/acv.12000","title":"A metapopulation model for<scp>C</scp>anadian and<scp>W</scp>est<scp>G</scp>reenland narwhals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Metapopulation; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05126340009141749,"gpt":0.2625039351177141,"spread":0.2112405350262966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001060301,0.000477136,0.0005163251,0.000109158,0.0005921768,0.0001401362,0.0003220421,0.0002561076,0.0000434152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002365706,0.0004815434,0.0001698681,0.000492932,0.0001942381,0.00151885,0.0004137444,0.000240124,0.0002834534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002618584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000413372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007281141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01144865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969231,0.0001405936,0.0006455426,0.0006994203,0.0005732681,0.001018051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975009,0.001199699,0.0004063738,0.000389158,0.0000841505,0.0004197308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001234343,0.0001573266,0.9248468,0.0001297035,0.0001107873,0.00000362498,0.003153879,0.0002968121,0.003877946,0.004220884,0.06026487,0.002925053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006874679,0.0002749186,0.7822377,0.00003057926,0.0001728326,0.00001490265,0.0008237193,0.06570398,0.0004110818,0.001640289,0.1478982,0.0001042926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810674,0.001175612,0.001759457,0.0003856416,0.0001208105,0.001062325,0.00006265784,0.0001271299,0.01423895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988259,0.0003159558,0.00444239,0.002466153,0.0002247839,0.0002030626,0.0001313258,0.00007067923,0.003886624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.142609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291517370","doi":"10.1111/acv.12264","title":"Predicting free‐roaming cat population densities in urban areas","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Roaming; Transect; Population density; Geography; Population; Abundance (ecology); Population size; Distance sampling; Statistics; Physical geography; Ecology; Demography; Mathematics; Biology; Computer science; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02352891535253964,"gpt":0.302312855965122,"spread":0.2787839406125824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001321585,0.00009783044,0.00009314607,0.0000576388,0.00007987923,0.00001976257,0.00007003749,0.00007451564,0.00001590041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000410085,0.00008340829,0.00003347466,0.0000578286,0.00003293405,0.00002256758,0.00007703969,0.00003437089,0.0000109154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004963923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001939822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007229346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003635921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992787,0.00004817315,0.0002176205,0.0002193806,0.00009388357,0.0001422449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995827,0.00003892827,0.00009509642,0.0001520799,0.0001088457,0.00002231753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008346558,0.000008714513,0.6107398,0.000004476758,0.00001156451,0.00000111896,0.00009600267,7.635114e-7,0.3874102,0.0002087415,0.001239809,0.0001953299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003802708,0.0001604802,0.9611701,0.00005588868,0.000008507444,0.000007079787,0.0002834499,0.0001543225,0.0352239,0.0001052619,0.002321116,0.0001296668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998327,0.00009145736,0.0001349413,0.000749474,0.00008681614,0.000096305,0.000008646596,0.00002420221,0.0004811959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986198,0.0000207003,0.0001736048,0.000317846,0.0002026324,0.00001892558,0.0000386338,0.00001323349,0.0005946013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3521863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3401291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117493970","doi":"10.1017/s1367943003001197","title":"Seroprevalence of pathogens in domestic carnivores on the border of Madidi National Park, Bolivia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; Tinker Foundation","keywords":"Canine distemper; Carnivore; Feline calicivirus; Sarcoptes scabiei; Outbreak; Seroprevalence; Wildlife; Biology; Population; Threatened species; Veterinary medicine; Ecology; Predation; Virology; Environmental health; Virus; Habitat; Medicine; Immunology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03042052194688046,"gpt":0.3106596804861362,"spread":0.2802391585392558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003363182,0.00007945603,0.0001443223,0.00009387644,0.00006208887,0.000002742609,0.0001261182,0.00007415058,0.00007933813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009527253,0.00005811273,0.00003534092,0.0002090466,0.0002868189,0.00005239596,0.0000438753,0.0001540341,0.00003568675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004356409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001523017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003627231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004688211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992559,0.000143433,0.0002328981,0.0001296894,0.0000870966,0.0001509993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990193,0.0005303004,0.0001129514,0.0001055073,0.0002259584,0.000005974297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003944358,0.0001844364,0.1110043,0.00006734664,0.00008509037,0.000004795545,0.001218837,0.0002087008,0.8422665,0.04381683,0.00062649,0.000122235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007512755,0.0003868868,0.9350068,0.0001030492,0.00001067178,0.00001018325,0.0003457371,0.00001661668,0.06091598,0.001884609,0.0004931999,0.00007498023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967518,0.0004542963,0.000007371768,0.001975323,0.00003978817,0.0001984369,0.00005233703,0.000008638184,0.0005119912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994938,0.00009616196,0.00005441335,0.0001643444,0.000005745389,0.00002602133,0.00001586557,0.000004935037,0.0001387234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8240025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2369768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1709664407","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00422.x","title":"Predicting nest survival in sea turtles: when and where are eggs most vulnerable to predation?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Cegep de Saint Hyacinthe","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Endangered species; Turtle (robot); Sea turtle; Ecology; Threatened species; Hatchling; Fishery; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01200425789249523,"gpt":0.2386012348513875,"spread":0.2265969769588923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004453268,0.0001103446,0.0001067603,0.00003609533,0.0001828482,0.00004421382,0.0001093466,0.000132774,0.0003630938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002292516,0.0001115192,0.0000119904,0.0002097882,0.00007807602,0.000447553,0.00008587345,0.0002483088,0.00008346634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003706029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000192973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004751901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06711681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990972,0.00008771091,0.0002021438,0.0003009627,0.0001298584,0.0001821814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995522,0.000125135,0.00008694044,0.000143568,0.00002493924,0.00006718757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005831887,0.00002168043,0.9575471,0.000006101832,0.000002440841,0.000001724857,0.0003622048,0.0000282448,0.03949485,0.0002849015,0.001492389,0.0007000897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000247957,0.00006898452,0.9879526,0.00001695595,0.000005326472,0.000004252661,0.0002588467,0.003909462,0.0008066212,0.000488215,0.006112016,0.0001287686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911761,0.00001244928,0.00007681748,0.006712483,0.0001436918,0.0002575639,0.00001198084,0.00004733304,0.001561595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973567,0.000005829206,0.0008185352,0.001214468,0.00006211621,0.0000371292,0.00003277353,0.000009228811,0.0004631885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06236491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9499059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067383666","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00101.x","title":"Complexities of costing eradications","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Activity-based costing; Limiting; Process (computing); Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Ecology; Operations research; Business; Economics; Computer science; Biology; Engineering; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03676465490334906,"gpt":0.2858432301931205,"spread":0.2490785752897715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002183933,0.00004297299,0.000063905,0.00001603704,0.0001399667,0.00000329988,0.00005618697,0.00002899234,0.0005340232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005322552,0.00004256704,0.00001793779,0.0001162004,0.0002451053,0.0001233795,0.00004371277,0.00004244751,0.000076171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000303584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004469672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004172892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001056373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995712,0.00001086754,0.0001546838,0.00008312894,0.00007921141,0.0001009321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974,0.0000998522,0.00007627223,0.00005155143,0.0000144908,0.00001781114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000269955,0.00003118296,0.9467497,0.000002224402,0.000003322452,9.086985e-7,0.0002126093,0.000001523804,0.04341507,0.007907922,0.0009230704,0.0007254524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007016022,0.00009383853,0.9945348,0.000002895819,0.000009331236,0.000001993346,0.0003649083,0.00005631107,0.002725274,0.0004561513,0.001639398,0.00004493059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777296,0.00001382064,0.0004939822,0.0005009396,0.00002054844,0.00006494737,0.000001924182,0.00002119129,0.02115304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977139,0.000001932508,0.001816031,0.000310093,0.00001097993,0.000003004042,0.000004701035,0.000002692502,0.0001366561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04778508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5847179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099948175","doi":"10.1111/acv.12043","title":"Trophy hunting in<scp>A</scp>frica: long‐term trends in antelope horn size","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Trophy; French horn; Geography; Antler; Biology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01428392338882998,"gpt":0.2246221712005612,"spread":0.2103382478117312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002766591,0.0001536519,0.0001738345,0.0001180684,0.0001011093,0.00004966261,0.0001771176,0.0001500939,0.0008369685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004016309,0.0001625329,0.0000398708,0.0008493433,0.0001075003,0.0008880377,0.00009559375,0.0002102431,0.0006316897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001459443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000159216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002186808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005064279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986519,0.0001060789,0.0003763957,0.0003480759,0.0001661909,0.0003514228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992461,0.0003849454,0.0001378606,0.0001605524,0.00001821413,0.00005235191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001236698,0.00007430305,0.987502,0.000003906955,0.000003456627,0.0000100648,0.0003645362,0.0000179132,0.00443179,0.00008419564,0.002545687,0.004949827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004546287,0.0001093302,0.9966255,0.00001445566,0.00000518393,0.00000309506,0.0001487571,0.001419324,0.0001715652,0.000264071,0.0006979267,0.00008615801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911054,0.00002226841,0.00002073196,0.002227172,0.00007712971,0.0002066889,0.000001157973,0.00004453141,0.006294853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961596,0.00001242797,0.0003674296,0.002277259,0.00003879866,0.00007803956,0.00001789206,0.00001354541,0.001035083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009123552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9164218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1801475959","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00294.x","title":"Is the endangered Grevy's zebra threatened by hybridization?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Princeton University; Smithsonian Institution; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Endangered species; Hybrid; Biology; Equus; ZEBRA (computer); Sympatric speciation; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Threatened species; Zoology; Geography; Habitat; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01406942167606945,"gpt":0.228050733112532,"spread":0.2139813114364626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002258244,0.0001119298,0.00008747977,0.0000145408,0.000324612,0.00003966386,0.0001788768,0.00007291266,0.001030366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006329513,0.00008880944,0.00003919821,0.0002711552,0.00009898833,0.0003907748,0.00003019435,0.0000905651,0.0004470533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006046145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001434338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002460366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001045293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991379,0.00007230783,0.0001954298,0.0002370485,0.0001772017,0.0001801004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995645,0.00007159673,0.0001068783,0.0001978519,0.00002187749,0.00003731981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005595836,0.00004923076,0.7219855,0.000001019987,0.000008293258,0.000001418505,0.0002629913,0.000007009418,0.01321175,0.001190166,0.2607875,0.002439246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000218275,0.0001365988,0.9739512,0.000003156468,0.00001579537,0.000004700883,0.00003076942,0.001258748,0.003108958,0.003579574,0.01757707,0.0001151898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9271462,0.00003534956,0.0003977942,0.06902272,0.00004758145,0.0002230399,0.00000745908,0.00006446389,0.003055402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554264,0.00001831858,0.0001852075,0.04318491,0.00003485379,0.00001640432,0.00005022006,0.000006469933,0.00107721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2519657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1793257462","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2011.00487.x","title":"Seasonal patterns in bycatch composition and mortality associated with a freshwater hoop net fishery","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Bycatch; Fishery; Fishing; Population; Turtle (robot); Fish mortality; Biology; Catch per unit effort; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03078519113267594,"gpt":0.2181410442296819,"spread":0.1873558530970059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001807043,0.00008780634,0.00008543523,0.0000167007,0.00006131113,0.0000131411,0.0000528518,0.0000867715,0.0004711559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001258445,0.00007689656,0.00001149408,0.0001065331,0.00009595761,0.0003045152,0.00003429524,0.00008714331,0.00001714324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005065474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008686695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003367539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01764448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.00009066665,0.0001312871,0.0002013633,0.00009896823,0.0001358479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997795,0.00003089531,0.0000699126,0.00007552158,0.00001208751,0.00003207281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001253259,0.0000614528,0.9948308,0.000002879088,0.000009652203,0.000007530588,0.0003001919,0.000001104792,0.00417655,0.00007847651,0.0002441821,0.0001618539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003343669,0.0001288542,0.997006,0.00001824246,0.00001252669,0.000003655141,0.00003588102,0.001229198,0.000707092,0.0003444168,0.00007227849,0.0001075034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987178,0.000005148421,0.00006561426,0.0004001848,0.0000180929,0.0001330462,0.00001981054,0.00002794039,0.0006123733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984117,0.000003090706,0.0001591249,0.00120026,0.000008232559,0.00002051914,0.0001412054,0.00000544995,0.00005046913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01427694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9846032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790463351","doi":"10.1111/acv.12396","title":"Measuring the impact of an entertainment‐education intervention to reduce demand for bushmeat","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Cedar Tree Foundation","keywords":"Bushmeat; Intervention (counseling); Wildlife; Outreach; Counterfactual thinking; Control (management); Business; Public economics; Marketing; Environmental resource management; Economics; Psychology; Economic growth; Social psychology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08202785174784263,"gpt":0.337118583121625,"spread":0.2550907313737824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004207577,0.00006958206,0.00008516504,0.00001261399,0.000139643,0.00002472081,0.000136819,0.0000307693,0.00008473079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001313944,0.00002582199,0.00009577409,0.00013323,0.00003658608,0.0001538605,0.00003166763,0.0000205574,0.000009879484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002763544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008066564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002019878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007410886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993817,0.00009157287,0.0001850635,0.0001548251,0.00006355284,0.0001232497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995701,0.00008083969,0.0001002453,0.00004405052,0.0001598844,0.00004488292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00175439,0.0003126811,0.1617729,0.00002113547,0.0000576674,9.667414e-8,0.0002796465,0.000006444781,0.7093961,0.002114462,0.01021442,0.11407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009174558,0.002059438,0.991372,0.00002149001,0.00001801729,4.356097e-7,0.0003736651,0.001227378,0.002885058,0.0009452847,0.0009445716,0.00006090383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974177,0.00002406137,0.0001548997,0.001705797,0.00004936075,0.0004053942,0.000009713572,0.00001738665,0.0002156981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989702,0.000002411847,0.0001048152,0.0004675075,0.000240604,0.00005300442,0.00007721404,7.689358e-7,0.00008354908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8295991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3053464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939360627","doi":"10.1111/acv.12503","title":"Population reinforcement accelerates subadult recruitment rates in an endangered freshwater turtle","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ontario Turtle Conservation Centre","funders":"Echo Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Endangered species; Acclimatization; Population; Juvenile; Ecology; Predation; Habitat; Wildlife; Turtle (robot); Captive breeding; Zoology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04843256947915555,"gpt":0.2846328035820416,"spread":0.236200234102886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002471871,0.0001255867,0.000121363,0.00004535211,0.00006589885,0.00003755464,0.0001152147,0.0001096742,0.00220536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001948902,0.0001150065,0.00002426864,0.0001717604,0.00003028031,0.0007406302,0.00005024554,0.00008812241,0.0005467014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001680282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009376549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002370229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0121201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989909,0.00009609081,0.0002729725,0.0002945004,0.0001444077,0.0002011229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996315,0.00002919043,0.0001014471,0.0001803253,0.00001892928,0.00003860418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001672709,0.00003253073,0.8813064,0.000004327478,0.000003078751,9.195967e-7,0.0002634077,0.0002208221,0.116197,0.0004043221,0.000262461,0.001137431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000423414,0.0002547853,0.9749196,0.00001336515,0.000004329278,0.000001097515,0.00008429719,0.008724404,0.01255619,0.0005638618,0.002301178,0.0001535311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976385,0.00001423018,0.00001370839,0.0008989602,0.00008660959,0.0006243922,0.00000364883,0.0000418105,0.0006780963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972703,0.000006691923,0.0002989985,0.001341147,0.00002431637,0.0000863506,0.0003525091,0.000009365652,0.0006103061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1036408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106637786","doi":"10.1111/acv.12170","title":"Linking aquatic and terrestrial environments: can beaver canals serve as movement corridors for pond‐breeding amphibians?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Beaver; Biological dispersal; Habitat; Riparian zone; Ecology; Wetland; Population; Foraging; Biology; Stream restoration; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02375392958203466,"gpt":0.2222377986669597,"spread":0.1984838690849251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002967197,0.0001055085,0.0001191798,0.00002315208,0.0003554315,0.00002533022,0.00008125212,0.00006644324,0.00006385842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001052871,0.0001045338,0.0000300029,0.00005389159,0.0001315742,0.0001585181,0.0001177194,0.00005546009,0.00007570077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001095972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006602368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003216708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007716624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992481,0.00003679279,0.0001516953,0.0002391203,0.0001335956,0.0001906702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996361,0.0001392786,0.00009982188,0.00007096391,0.00000288675,0.00005095483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008877956,0.00002128587,0.9889115,0.000006144833,0.00002292187,0.00000109813,0.000402307,0.00002478126,0.007542333,0.0001109121,0.002131223,0.0007367318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001080466,0.0007802332,0.974699,0.00002128296,0.00007763037,0.000001541836,0.0005066756,0.004418584,0.001437508,0.001622576,0.01513475,0.0002197486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954352,0.000007785665,0.0001561182,0.003661605,0.0001007939,0.00029199,0.0000134459,0.0000139742,0.0003191215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945538,0.00001248282,0.0004193842,0.004678568,0.00005651208,0.00001643722,0.00003017712,0.000005044284,0.0002275599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01421248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4862722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529921555","doi":"10.1111/acv.12113","title":"Rapid assessment of wildlife abundance: estimating animal density with track counts using body mass–day range scaling rules","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Comanis Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Safari Club International Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Allometry; Scaling; Ecology; Environmental science; Wildlife conservation; Relative species abundance; Track (disk drive); Ecosystem; Habitat; Home range; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02022160235932994,"gpt":0.2601066311682871,"spread":0.2398850288089572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005916476,0.0001223283,0.0001707434,0.00002901584,0.0001955784,0.00002423816,0.0000989274,0.00008603063,0.0003133328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008962674,0.0001175997,0.0000305031,0.0001457025,0.0001636121,0.0003501888,0.00003151816,0.0001152657,0.00004831352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000951876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004414626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002064402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004130497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989572,0.0001198113,0.0002595189,0.0002345876,0.0002533345,0.0001755427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994018,0.0001366748,0.0002396748,0.0001377426,0.00004305757,0.00004103149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005848905,0.0000336079,0.985414,0.00002135894,0.00001226179,0.000001160253,0.00005717927,0.0003534571,0.01215612,0.0006930238,0.000560893,0.000638433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002502956,0.0001360021,0.7588404,0.00003604697,0.00002811446,0.000004568097,0.00002055762,0.2397789,0.0002580334,0.0001638927,0.0003743198,0.0001088205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810296,0.000006639678,0.016767,0.0003920532,0.00009114362,0.0001600325,0.000003605331,0.00003874987,0.001511144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528304,0.000002248583,0.04626079,0.0007746955,0.00006989005,0.000006515722,0.00001529599,0.00001232182,0.0000277953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2394255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4795578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129278868","doi":"10.1017/s1367943003003226","title":"Indonesia's threatened birds: over 500 million years of evolutionary heritage at risk","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Geography; Endemism; Near-threatened species; Ecology; Data deficient; Phylogenetic tree; Biology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01119064378426668,"gpt":0.2102978707128601,"spread":0.1991072269285934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024991,0.0001034927,0.0001255107,0.00004063377,0.0001499315,0.000006131995,0.0000902391,0.0001326491,0.001359702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001234373,0.0001154578,0.00005266246,0.0003018463,0.0001596169,0.0003117569,0.00005244881,0.00008783561,0.0003162463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002550306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007438113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000583254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989736,0.0001562173,0.0002529753,0.0002468706,0.000200548,0.0001697733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994476,0.0001137632,0.000195078,0.0001810543,0.00002069545,0.00004174956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119491,0.00005589572,0.9873212,0.000004028318,0.00001221298,0.000003340186,0.0000934746,0.00004617509,0.007390881,0.0007192378,0.003913667,0.0003203892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004241018,0.0001419078,0.9926797,0.000006649591,0.0000222188,0.000006262597,0.00003531085,0.0003983338,0.001205914,0.001134891,0.003821681,0.0001229972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976761,0.00006143673,0.00006211953,0.0003203518,0.00007907801,0.000188281,0.00001069783,0.00003831939,0.001563627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828,0.00004862545,0.0006913267,0.0006014254,0.00001395951,0.00001956374,0.00002391842,0.00001203893,0.0003091287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006184968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988081288","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00263.x","title":"Animal decisions and conservation: the recolonization of a severely polluted river by the Eurasian otter","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Lutra; Otter; Environmental science; Ecology; Trophic level; Habitat; Cadmium; Biology; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01457301530519594,"gpt":0.2241790112921962,"spread":0.2096059959870002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004580168,0.0001343641,0.0001251844,0.00002571106,0.000472479,0.00003821685,0.0002113202,0.0001146558,0.0002739898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002910554,0.00009154647,0.00003657701,0.0004604701,0.000399251,0.0004319466,0.00006075775,0.0001473802,0.00005586729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004764885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000300655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004976637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005326788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988241,0.0001937373,0.0003353556,0.0002431793,0.000225989,0.0001775991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990373,0.0004101155,0.0002301118,0.0002255015,0.00005733842,0.00003960227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002683505,0.00006336946,0.87426,0.000001681396,0.00001593423,0.00000127621,0.0006901777,0.00001455642,0.006830291,0.002270566,0.1133199,0.002263934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003291772,0.0002513027,0.9854574,0.000009494437,0.00003241208,0.00001677008,0.00009833503,0.003058274,0.0003350546,0.001812353,0.008490765,0.000108683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8909225,0.00003935159,0.0002883975,0.1075801,0.00004035723,0.000343825,0.00001142802,0.00002818375,0.0007458675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777169,0.00002255618,0.0003411724,0.02149135,0.00002675804,0.00001097598,0.00003227738,0.000007421403,0.0003505342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1111974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3733157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117419050","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00065.x","title":"Predicting the effects of exploitation on male‐first sex‐changing fish","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex change; Overexploitation; Fishing; Sex ratio; Biology; Population; Population size; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Demography; Ecology; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01760056356911959,"gpt":0.2454544130981891,"spread":0.2278538495290695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005368903,0.000057872,0.00005505694,0.00003489967,0.0001667935,0.00001647111,0.0001015897,0.00003326109,0.0004107712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002891291,0.00004578232,0.00002285989,0.0002763751,0.00007141753,0.0001679995,0.00008250517,0.0000854758,0.00002052561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004731176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004256739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005968398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005207814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992583,0.00003059443,0.000137594,0.0001212925,0.0002718496,0.0001803764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993137,0.0004704669,0.00006398132,0.0001122621,0.00001312443,0.00002649366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007816354,0.0000267286,0.979438,0.00003934725,0.000004980111,0.000004550411,0.001243979,0.000007792428,0.009640717,0.0003188533,0.001432914,0.007763972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002180067,0.0004531427,0.973051,0.00002183347,0.000006623289,0.000003940674,0.0007815731,0.002783867,0.01447945,0.000076162,0.008045042,0.00007940399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.948605,0.000001368667,0.0002984541,0.00075815,0.00004150002,0.0002099182,7.294187e-7,0.00001720156,0.0500677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979943,0.000007332196,0.0001002163,0.0006929425,0.00004148334,0.00001323693,0.000005400938,0.000006590467,0.001138465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04938936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4497657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164443402","doi":"10.1111/acv.12140","title":"Estimating occupancy using spatially and temporally replicated snow surveys","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Occupancy; Spatial correlation; Statistics; Spatial ecology; Spatial analysis; Spatial distribution; Statistical power; Sampling (signal processing); Snow; Correlation; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Meteorology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02744769095559101,"gpt":0.2557787114545951,"spread":0.2283310204990041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001163239,0.0001127754,0.0001226525,0.00002563273,0.0002499277,0.00003721541,0.00008895862,0.00009286761,0.0001666029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005349215,0.0001183799,0.00001857166,0.000185178,0.0001174432,0.000384139,0.00008107715,0.00008922636,0.00007262035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004514827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002040966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002106037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008798747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988785,0.0002674178,0.000250303,0.0003067029,0.0001266677,0.0001703705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994035,0.0001772069,0.000169869,0.0001704239,0.00002648529,0.0000524489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001911195,0.00001577438,0.9870363,0.000004978356,0.00000426755,9.132375e-7,0.00005251496,0.00015038,0.008692225,0.0002373436,0.0003997544,0.0033864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001769126,0.00008430728,0.7892857,0.00001184954,0.000009994492,0.00000689938,0.000004873633,0.209178,0.0002025376,0.0007140389,0.0002141815,0.0001107376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732463,0.000003801841,0.02430985,0.001214356,0.00006859433,0.0001589357,0.000001558782,0.00007171692,0.0009249013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791159,7.753825e-7,0.0191186,0.001604139,0.00004804878,0.000008555216,0.00002589167,0.00001096788,0.00006712213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2090276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4827392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886555123","doi":"10.1111/acv.12439","title":"Assessment of global polar bear abundance and vulnerability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; ArcticNet; Quark Expeditions; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Arctic; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Sea ice; Population; Circumpolar star; Geography; Latitude; Ecology; Physical geography; Climate change; Habitat; Continental shelf; Oceanography; Biology; Fishery; Geology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02250790713049274,"gpt":0.2994585700106949,"spread":0.2769506628802022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002795843,0.00007845907,0.0001176045,0.000003746273,0.0001138751,0.00001150526,0.0000860916,0.00003022186,0.0004723908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000666095,0.00007498076,0.00002081282,0.0001787549,0.0003339311,0.0001747631,0.0002295442,0.0000428854,0.00003496142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001267941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009131367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007252816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992572,0.0000473679,0.0001757038,0.0002132491,0.0001829889,0.0001234895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996858,0.00002896456,0.00008602082,0.00013195,0.00002982986,0.00003745145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001748687,0.00002944089,0.9905819,0.00001338421,0.000005831572,3.486084e-7,0.00002221027,2.712444e-7,0.003342923,0.003250902,0.001002998,0.001732281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001254802,0.0003465832,0.9901444,0.000006494701,0.000008900294,0.000001777362,0.00001627568,0.0008227964,0.0002034467,0.0005685475,0.007682737,0.00007257557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798241,0.00003996355,0.0001338697,0.0006807082,0.00002404749,0.0001292696,0.00001015642,0.00002309433,0.01913484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962437,0.00001794947,0.003026417,0.0006538903,0.0000252046,0.000004714063,0.00000181395,0.000003249481,0.00002304499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0191118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280577124","doi":"10.1111/acv.12788","title":"‘Lost’ taxa and their conservation implications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Taxon; Data deficient; Ecology; Biology; Biodiversity; Endangered species; Threatened species; Conservation status; Taxonomic rank; Global biodiversity; Geography; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04312277033363097,"gpt":0.2451611814245852,"spread":0.2020384110909542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001730423,0.00008086441,0.0000678854,0.00002029948,0.0004592397,0.00003158396,0.0000967911,0.00002301367,0.02937885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003354514,0.0000819716,0.00002354605,0.0002747391,0.00009382434,0.0001768941,0.0001906405,0.00008132275,0.0002224351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002482092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001045267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006007912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003811371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993594,0.00005136777,0.0001388957,0.0001990256,0.0001169926,0.0001343281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996727,0.0000503932,0.00008352961,0.0001323024,0.00001518096,0.00004586322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006346167,0.000102965,0.7175037,0.000005532766,0.000009194595,9.122857e-7,0.0005353071,0.000006468402,0.1204368,0.03431185,0.1251545,0.00186928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001584905,0.00007927215,0.7675803,6.529825e-7,0.000004067451,0.0000126887,0.001304318,0.0004269414,0.0004789375,0.0006877066,0.2291768,0.00008986788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674683,0.00003238178,0.00009235904,0.0193785,0.00003878012,0.000181924,0.0001378958,0.00005038396,0.01261944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932973,0.00001803205,0.00003882733,0.005897664,0.00001035818,0.00008690509,0.0002280537,0.000007167374,0.0004156463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1199578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9715084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071976683","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00113.x","title":"Lineage identification of Galápagos tortoises in captivity worldwide","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Institute for Biospheric Studies, Yale University","keywords":"Biology; Endangered species; Captivity; Population; Ex situ conservation; Locus (genetics); Zoology; Captive breeding; mtDNA control region; Range (aeronautics); Evolutionary biology; Haplotype; Ecology; Genotype; Genetics; Demography; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0142843225359749,"gpt":0.2494020507819914,"spread":0.2351177282460165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008093551,0.00006870944,0.00008923694,0.00005179782,0.00004105488,0.000005890635,0.00008950449,0.00007743679,0.0001608761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001433399,0.00007155948,0.00002493035,0.0003110679,0.0001064131,0.0002677123,0.00003179119,0.00007301894,0.00006399257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006807687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001172492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001495946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005728774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991632,0.00004775757,0.000364888,0.0001734214,0.0001206523,0.0001301288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995455,0.0001140632,0.0001724217,0.0001256604,0.00001900742,0.00002336307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009204462,0.00003913384,0.7149171,0.000003374645,0.00000159681,0.000001773812,0.0001032897,0.0000117265,0.282656,0.0006785545,0.0001593063,0.001336153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001396274,0.0000401562,0.9174419,0.00000617281,0.000004080597,0.000001205758,0.00005332245,0.0005016486,0.08055338,0.0003193794,0.0008716772,0.00006745247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965335,0.00001989766,0.001132392,0.0003825783,0.00005746463,0.0001467634,0.000002697439,0.00002111358,0.00170359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989516,0.000004878224,0.0002795926,0.0003451079,0.00001861117,0.000006772687,0.00001808669,0.000004335104,0.0003710622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2025249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3196791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587261310","doi":"10.1111/acv.12336","title":"Grain spilled from moving trains create a substantial wildlife attractant in protected areas","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Wildlife; Foraging; Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Geography; Habitat; Environmental science; Deposition (geology); Threatened species; Population; Ecology; Environmental protection; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02855504230137475,"gpt":0.2604499978463705,"spread":0.2318949555449957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002976321,0.0001893926,0.0002000992,0.00006197197,0.0004881523,0.0002308572,0.0003094483,0.0001163415,0.0009615829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004430368,0.0001925573,0.00006840193,0.0001614789,0.0001458592,0.001218357,0.00009829111,0.0002240369,0.0001791141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001906586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004140904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03630267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0157085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985121,0.0000903421,0.0004029627,0.0004301184,0.0002854559,0.0002790507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999032,0.00006946668,0.0003434959,0.000446605,0.00003147851,0.00007692083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003349393,0.0001135125,0.8598254,0.000003638389,0.00001502961,0.00002705001,0.0004161282,0.00001889358,0.1350917,0.0002093508,0.001440832,0.00250343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008000053,0.00009464483,0.9803346,0.00006348898,0.00001494116,0.000004578695,0.000131324,0.01228718,0.001307063,0.0004769958,0.004256327,0.0002288236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906137,0.000006472958,0.0002456338,0.005778883,0.0001284272,0.0004860548,0.00002439376,0.00006617176,0.002650287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997383,0.00001004334,0.0008942273,0.001215846,0.00008259192,0.0000805482,0.00005464534,0.00002048415,0.000258615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1337847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150527516","doi":"10.1111/acv.12195","title":"A plea for inserting evidence‐based management into conservation practice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Wildlife Conservancy","keywords":"Plea; Geography; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1079458500932877,"gpt":0.301692592322707,"spread":0.1937467422294193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014147,0.0001853724,0.0001461191,0.00009230036,0.0003875518,0.0001216875,0.0002673607,0.00007927218,0.000092764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009684194,0.0001920196,0.00007025917,0.0004866045,0.000121806,0.001087923,0.0002293693,0.00008186157,0.0002213094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004183101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000506585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003574627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000486973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982259,0.0001404155,0.0003662753,0.000447736,0.0005452099,0.0002745063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987515,0.0003751035,0.0002908002,0.0002808727,0.0001734228,0.0001283544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001774454,0.0002772463,0.9160635,0.0001764347,0.00008396231,0.0000179101,0.002228492,0.0009184545,0.002980335,0.001254082,0.06373802,0.0104871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001759597,0.0005319933,0.4737796,0.0001307438,0.0001954679,0.00000280634,0.003376117,0.04790901,0.0005448997,0.0009215514,0.4704297,0.0004184179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.919161,0.0001052625,0.01241243,0.06205549,0.0001693758,0.001384039,0.00000430628,0.0001625537,0.004545572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221514,0.00003408513,0.04198677,0.03441833,0.00008254968,0.0001712425,0.00007960832,0.00002293835,0.00105302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4422839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7830331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932334445","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00598.x","title":"Mate attraction by male anurans in the presence of traffic noise","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Attraction; Traffic noise; Noise (video); Mating; QUIET; Affect (linguistics); Ecology; Biology; Communication; Psychology; Acoustics; Physics; Computer science; Noise reduction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03622682474419393,"gpt":0.2982263000646456,"spread":0.2619994753204517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002450757,0.00005601734,0.00005169786,0.00001450703,0.00003698055,0.000007567193,0.0001368212,0.00006267914,0.00002292615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003731618,0.00004549513,0.00002757787,0.00008282295,0.00004773869,0.00001488647,0.00001899807,0.00006356173,0.000007365675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005015705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001244136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006794462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000634083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995009,0.00009683648,0.0001420344,0.00007729742,0.00007964829,0.0001032292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999684,0.0000216923,0.00006557391,0.0001688602,0.00004118257,0.00001874118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001036509,0.0001525895,0.08401495,0.00000721659,0.000002574233,1.101096e-7,0.0001371693,0.000003175289,0.9117679,0.0001199604,0.003088456,0.000602241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000285241,0.0002867651,0.8726657,0.0000101044,0.00001580038,0.00001392894,0.0005332435,0.0002050138,0.1019656,0.000003161329,0.02390174,0.0001137346],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998308,0.0003082322,0.00006789224,0.0007749205,0.00002030062,0.0001272206,0.000008845052,0.000004227182,0.0003803442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991245,0.00006900582,0.0001033461,0.000404614,0.00002563199,0.00001817704,0.00009653458,0.00000490062,0.0001532787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8098024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1855237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109220829","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00524.x","title":"Habitat fragmentation effects on annual survival of the federally protected eastern indigo snake","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Threatened species; Habitat; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Mark and recapture; Fragmentation (computing); Geography; Habitat fragmentation; Wildlife conservation; Home range; Biology; Fishery; Population; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0124266656425236,"gpt":0.2252478156033061,"spread":0.2128211499607825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003388418,0.000113858,0.0001059394,0.00002364308,0.0002062681,0.00001278737,0.0001368711,0.00009932522,0.0001239739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001682425,0.00009004899,0.0000440491,0.0002324287,0.00009598131,0.0004779898,0.00006880212,0.0001273413,0.0001692388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007751615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001945486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002182069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005095001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989026,0.0002433028,0.0002114345,0.0001547902,0.0002814293,0.0002065096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994385,0.000145347,0.0001946249,0.000153359,0.00002678749,0.00004137122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001345243,0.00008398142,0.9849394,0.00001294913,0.00001069539,2.788867e-7,0.0005339956,0.00001657198,0.0119467,0.0004632749,0.001032902,0.0008247324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003778448,0.0002441813,0.9931412,0.0000200981,0.00001507508,0.000001389114,0.00009266921,0.000196508,0.005207576,0.0001772722,0.0004290859,0.00009709945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995663,0.000005427237,0.00009120668,0.002326846,0.0002805957,0.0005750977,0.000005667535,0.00002983701,0.001022302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972317,6.284734e-7,0.0001893093,0.002193672,0.0000659756,0.00005799896,0.00001557926,0.000009636084,0.0002354796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008201804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3672091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288847547","doi":"10.1111/acv.12259","title":"Correlates of wildlife hunting in indigenous communities in the Pastaza province, Ecuadorian Amazonia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western Forest Products; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Wildlife; Indigenous; Livelihood; Geography; Biodiversity; Socioeconomic status; Socioeconomics; Tobit model; Agroforestry; Environmental protection; Ecology; Agriculture; Demography; Biology; Population; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01352791420266362,"gpt":0.2158427921171414,"spread":0.2023148779144778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008737543,0.00008935812,0.000116624,0.00006155941,0.0001050726,0.00001359146,0.0002657618,0.000085965,0.0001236517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001151178,0.00006128073,0.00002108104,0.0002848571,0.0002200794,0.0003951862,0.00007308323,0.0001280602,0.0000489009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008523217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004417095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007955397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05639602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989499,0.0002485037,0.0003279537,0.0001176434,0.0001589724,0.0001969691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991685,0.0004650177,0.0001638291,0.0001756989,0.00001305603,0.00001386928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006274616,0.00006356934,0.993448,0.000005401403,0.000002437793,0.000003415931,0.002601411,0.00001490491,0.0006747433,0.0007133209,0.0003154545,0.002094627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003727009,0.0001327034,0.9961964,0.00005087719,0.000004018588,0.000003018181,0.001061981,0.000186088,0.00007486859,0.0007608819,0.001073366,0.00008309513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946246,0.00001128892,0.00002695209,0.004191068,0.00003718914,0.0002924305,0.000003457567,0.00001385491,0.0007991496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977372,0.00001493632,0.0000987539,0.002027838,0.00001327322,0.00003200598,0.000008070692,0.000006090459,0.00006187437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04844063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552394671","doi":"10.1111/acv.12001","title":"Stressful conditions experienced by endangered<scp>E</scp>gyptian vultures on<scp>A</scp>frican wintering areas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Junta de Andalucía; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Corticosterone; Ecology; Biology; Endangered species; Population; Habitat; Feather; Biological dispersal; Range (aeronautics); Zoology; Demography; Hormone","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01918320574087884,"gpt":0.2594042803122111,"spread":0.2402210745713322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014933,0.0002302035,0.0001766367,0.00004565814,0.0004199304,0.00005036172,0.0002455457,0.000168788,0.0008239647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003299475,0.0002230865,0.00006783484,0.0002171086,0.0003477115,0.0007113843,0.0001093724,0.0002247895,0.0007382066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001617748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000140156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001923268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002944837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984885,0.00009268584,0.0002616814,0.0003552256,0.0002564087,0.0005455052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990552,0.0003114294,0.0001669926,0.0002272711,0.00001941196,0.0002196679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006333575,0.0002266926,0.8058032,0.000003471943,0.000011433,0.000005936876,0.003607658,0.000005532781,0.1170289,0.0001679103,0.07291847,0.0002144944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002378175,0.0002583614,0.9211993,0.00001430211,0.00002801316,0.00001397923,0.004605467,0.00003140332,0.0350948,0.00004498393,0.03839898,0.00007255236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908347,0.0000420701,0.0000698573,0.0002343738,0.0001930699,0.0002605615,0.0001005631,0.0001069649,0.008157836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948705,0.000007357036,0.0001951099,0.001435067,0.00008976299,0.0001227508,0.0001380579,0.00002178041,0.003119633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1153962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9488399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766811154","doi":"10.1111/acv.12375","title":"Crowding as a primary source of stress in an endangered fragment‐dwelling strepsirrhine primate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Foraging; Territoriality; Lemur catta; Biology; Ecology; Population; Endangered species; Primate; Lemur; Stressor; Habitat; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06201994800328346,"gpt":0.3592864062507928,"spread":0.2972664582475094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003630866,0.0001450708,0.0002757678,0.0001261309,0.0001867011,0.00006251964,0.0003421057,0.0001639611,0.0004478763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006758743,0.0001620035,0.00004551102,0.00006338335,0.00009767116,0.0004235646,0.0001007468,0.0001658493,0.00004975871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007267512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005042148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002437572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008195766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987325,0.00009238464,0.0004081095,0.0003284616,0.0001324048,0.0003061301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988436,0.00007151858,0.0004046096,0.0005409154,0.00008268219,0.00005672279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004137657,0.0002675878,0.885566,0.00004159854,0.00001620871,0.00003490171,0.0017396,0.000008090142,0.1075009,0.001535389,0.00008066964,0.002795302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009489892,0.0003388381,0.9867961,0.00004500064,0.00002528142,0.000008779265,0.0004244074,0.0002942816,0.01050477,0.0002016707,0.0002532574,0.0001586492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994441,0.00005177035,0.00008428281,0.0003873191,0.0002017703,0.0002352893,0.00001892588,0.00005052529,0.004529091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989403,0.000008221945,0.000356257,0.0002839307,0.00004903974,0.00003179156,0.00008174396,0.0000236905,0.0002249546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1012301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6606312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205958419","doi":"10.1111/acv.12765","title":"Exploring multiple dimensions of conservation success: Long‐term wildlife trends, anti‐poaching efforts and revenue sharing in Kibale National Park, Uganda","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Canada Research Chairs; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst; International Development Research Centre; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Leakey Foundation; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung; National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Geographic Society; National Science Foundation","keywords":"National park; Patrolling; Poaching; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Tourism; Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Protected area; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05967155155747025,"gpt":0.2555578990580991,"spread":0.1958863475006288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007420794,0.0001471793,0.0002040084,0.0001747034,0.0004393671,0.00002495318,0.0001596671,0.00005471023,0.0002026943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002208163,0.0001621487,0.00003991067,0.0005916185,0.000116566,0.001040207,0.0003110323,0.0002316884,0.000005731235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001961748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004064644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002279161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003597508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983819,0.000141492,0.0004669054,0.0004001113,0.0003840617,0.0002255804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992456,0.0002481237,0.0002748147,0.0001485738,0.00003204969,0.00005086338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001075363,0.00009502503,0.990014,0.00001673655,0.00001124336,0.00000756177,0.0006188662,0.001002948,0.006444848,0.0003273633,0.0007329907,0.0006209232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006892176,0.0001022546,0.9891462,0.00003370032,0.00001439851,0.00001458713,0.0001175171,0.008650959,0.0002018233,0.000263155,0.00059466,0.0001714714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972472,0.00003260075,0.00003356428,0.002135152,0.0001207306,0.0002166703,0.00003633591,0.00003022042,0.0001474788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978713,0.00003480599,0.0002455308,0.001484468,0.00002593927,0.00007841949,0.0001457591,0.00001538748,0.00009834451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00764801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6612232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920852881","doi":"10.1111/acv.12493","title":"Complex transboundary movements of marine megafauna in the Western Indian Ocean","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Exclusive economic zone; Overexploitation; Fishery; Marine protected area; IUCN Red List; Geography; Megafauna; Fisheries management; Ecology; Biology; Fishing; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01780270598898574,"gpt":0.2390164198286427,"spread":0.221213713839657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002412586,0.00005890662,0.00008696855,0.00002110702,0.00002966069,0.000004462867,0.000161101,0.00004943587,0.001099661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007707628,0.000045021,0.00001899112,0.0001080839,0.0001093249,0.00009758793,0.00006845337,0.0000737232,0.0001736203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001972847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007405492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003759075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003940254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994544,0.00007892118,0.0001522617,0.0001166808,0.0000853248,0.0001124058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997799,0.00004278821,0.00004738604,0.0001149134,0.000004288357,0.00001069974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008018682,0.00004141157,0.9883044,0.000005992874,0.000003926263,0.000002186224,0.0004666239,0.000004771418,0.009916491,0.0003072276,0.0003584005,0.0005083186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003408986,0.0002170789,0.9921456,0.000002049474,0.000002656189,0.000003984454,0.00007376428,0.00008555103,0.0002424782,0.0004534019,0.006383533,0.00004901736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892972,0.000001782894,0.000004259602,0.001238594,0.00003298016,0.0001948995,0.000002772566,0.000005807651,0.00922172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958161,0.000002475841,0.00005575594,0.003730656,0.000006929457,0.000002719837,0.00004339248,0.000003145708,0.00033879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009674013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}