{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":82,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":82,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"294182fa92b1","filters":{"venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform"}},"results":[{"id":"W1659725686","doi":"","title":"CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada: Case Comment on a Landmark Copyright Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Landmark; Law; Property law; Property (philosophy); Copyright law; Law and economics; Common law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Property rights; Geography; Cartography; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Parveen Esmail","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02500410964801183,"gpt":0.2528883158151268,"spread":0.2278842061671149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003121922,0.0006798179,0.0006025485,0.001837339,0.02762015,0.008591592,0.004495357,0.03791381,0.01025395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01075105,0.0009675818,0.0008848824,0.003933916,0.006746143,0.002928579,0.002125462,0.01510207,0.001243422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07405747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1621185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943045,0.0002773589,0.0001489146,0.0006462347,0.002313701,0.002309296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946331,0.0022258,0.0002118319,0.0001804632,0.001951075,0.0007976981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006266329,0.00003606514,0.002820109,0.0001369362,0.00001869346,0.002831593,0.007955728,0.0004245722,0.0006771209,0.2727511,0.7015114,0.01077395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004760251,0.00002574655,0.004427365,0.0002571025,0.00006560676,0.0003981804,0.005053141,0.0004887255,0.000714549,0.008974888,0.9793838,0.0001634103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.03593354,0.007167282,0.001156076,0.5768176,0.002947716,0.0002758096,0.001158927,0.0002039349,0.3743392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1888669,0.00518242,0.001035105,0.5057808,0.001134662,0.0002295163,0.0002483978,0.0001346522,0.2973876],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07405747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5373271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293347773","doi":"","title":"THE CRIMINALIZATION OF POVERTY: MONTRÉAL’S POLICY OF TICKETING HOMELESS YOUTH FOR MUNICIPAL AND TRANSPORTATION BY-LAW INFRACTIONS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Racial profiling; Dignity; Poverty; Criminology; Profiling (computer programming); Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Justin Douglas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04837957083844863,"gpt":0.3392598697323698,"spread":0.2908802988939211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002880884,0.0005146945,0.0003141725,0.001774953,0.01196166,0.005016495,0.004088258,0.008356526,0.007473642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01029498,0.0005693848,0.000495966,0.001744261,0.004747098,0.002038129,0.003493549,0.004939666,0.0003704895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03708967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09599228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9533064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.970054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962916,0.0007517466,0.0001015105,0.0002941542,0.001342734,0.00121817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953899,0.001012985,0.0004217421,0.0001556576,0.001451842,0.001567916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009035073,0.0002117699,0.01372955,0.0004250236,0.0000513365,0.001276353,0.009384339,0.0006835532,0.001265388,0.2667179,0.6296242,0.07654029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001041016,0.0001101535,0.04643285,0.0005082111,0.0000622318,0.0002656635,0.00392521,0.001018416,0.0007993469,0.00471021,0.9419324,0.0001312135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1028209,0.02695863,0.001932982,0.6284359,0.006272741,0.0008510284,0.001556639,0.0004750511,0.2306963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6295771,0.009510187,0.00388602,0.188122,0.001644655,0.0005987553,0.0004205195,0.0001563864,0.1660844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04669362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2691056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1830029431","doi":"","title":"Internet Gambling and the Canadian Conundrum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Advertising; Business; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Valerie Jepson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1835673218315281,"gpt":0.3885334826383344,"spread":0.2049661608068063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005177745,0.0006575264,0.001048038,0.005884454,0.01178548,0.00845486,0.004369014,0.01121502,0.01567372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02163665,0.000651222,0.0009882965,0.006852914,0.01911036,0.003037646,0.003628414,0.0119647,0.0007108428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09564713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.224005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9782022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921519,0.0006180323,0.0002130881,0.0006230035,0.004654709,0.001739403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988152,0.003521031,0.0005460304,0.0003066196,0.005264966,0.002209417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008428778,0.0002269498,0.005527135,0.0006294051,0.00004963067,0.0004230395,0.002762284,0.0004944928,0.0001873411,0.4624889,0.3524952,0.1746315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001529995,0.0000609087,0.04290903,0.003985569,0.0001797388,0.0005387062,0.003843624,0.0009309149,0.0001672869,0.07062048,0.8764132,0.0001975641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02242729,0.2114118,0.001138446,0.5561831,0.003720344,0.000106869,0.0007581685,0.0001172435,0.2041368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3746247,0.254452,0.001999809,0.2994302,0.005341874,0.0001903474,0.000783708,0.0001366268,0.06304078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09564713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6939718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486995240","doi":"","title":"MSM Blood Donation Ban: (In)equality, Gay Rights and Discrimination under the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sexual orientation; Guard (computer science); Men who have sex with men; Gay rights; Homosexuality; Political science; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Gender studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Politics; Syphilis; Virology","authors":[{"name":"Rachael Lake","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09598221172391092,"gpt":0.3932796540411008,"spread":0.2972974423171899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004946455,0.0004756772,0.0004319517,0.002142187,0.006958611,0.004390494,0.003162058,0.007296506,0.00645298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008871632,0.0003705955,0.0004310355,0.002605205,0.009763666,0.001705874,0.002096378,0.007224814,0.0007992263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04063572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1303407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.938932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9504002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921553,0.0007585728,0.0002121979,0.0005024201,0.00510783,0.001263785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970152,0.0007770117,0.000209107,0.0001218801,0.00151349,0.0003633657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002575517,0.00007419942,0.001046522,0.0006045186,0.00001135814,0.0002002343,0.003353353,0.000199293,0.0004695723,0.4969225,0.3616464,0.1354463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002247452,0.00002527558,0.005905385,0.001481251,0.00002518919,0.0001235764,0.00084382,0.0001155159,0.0003444802,0.009370702,0.9816985,0.00004393308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00953512,0.2329031,0.002210121,0.2361318,0.006776831,0.0004278829,0.001207623,0.0002355452,0.510572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.255436,0.1747936,0.006920618,0.3859746,0.004174222,0.000553466,0.001608393,0.0001184478,0.1704205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2948341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1826511065","doi":"","title":"Bill C-14: A Step Backwards for the Rights of Mentally Disordered Offenders in the Canadian Criminal Justice System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Criminal justice; Mental illness; Government (linguistics); Criminology; Criminal law; Law; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Mental health; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Grantham","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05871370330278482,"gpt":0.3813573368201027,"spread":0.3226436335173179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007460873,0.0006238558,0.0006676952,0.006478143,0.01121283,0.009813176,0.004361982,0.01031703,0.003864156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01776265,0.0005508214,0.0007927268,0.006032058,0.01661037,0.002691071,0.002415105,0.007935772,0.0006767055],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08405873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.367948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9792392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894161,0.0009119486,0.0004230001,0.0004921826,0.006796331,0.001960425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903839,0.001958356,0.0004117671,0.0002609742,0.005876759,0.001108241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002220471,0.00008821341,0.002415133,0.001884194,0.00002816068,0.0007093023,0.004535886,0.0006412829,0.000497297,0.4062462,0.4191067,0.1638255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002917929,0.00003041165,0.01001823,0.005233325,0.00005262781,0.0002337657,0.002288219,0.0001959069,0.0001659184,0.01490363,0.9667404,0.0001084861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.006445706,0.4012831,0.001159312,0.3546303,0.005347213,0.0003502888,0.0004883397,0.00009445682,0.2302013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1654883,0.4963925,0.00583249,0.2734635,0.003155338,0.0003047037,0.0006779952,0.00008829797,0.05459689],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9159412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6098917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526267715","doi":"","title":"The Portrayal of Sharia in Ontario","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sharia; Business; Islam; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"James Thornback","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03065273646327395,"gpt":0.327599301049737,"spread":0.2969465645864631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002152808,0.0001899873,0.0003098164,0.001921018,0.02148121,0.007641165,0.001492608,0.003905295,0.01006757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009231796,0.0003155326,0.0002230048,0.004178371,0.01259016,0.001742702,0.003518612,0.003049381,0.0003766207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0764317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08749365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9710467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964886,0.0003767762,0.00009013398,0.0001806301,0.001916311,0.000947507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948449,0.001863102,0.0007299262,0.0001589521,0.001651777,0.0007512268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001586128,0.0000466817,0.02819849,0.0010435,0.00004158535,0.003386837,0.3645324,0.0003003227,0.001189848,0.3391739,0.192656,0.0692717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001537753,0.0000255543,0.04233313,0.0008072357,0.00005093306,0.0003896994,0.1385223,0.0002498952,0.0003182111,0.007338992,0.8098826,0.00006606854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3033457,0.01877621,0.000418226,0.1568579,0.0008937876,0.00005069343,0.0005108024,0.00005803196,0.5190887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241315,0.007599378,0.0001495452,0.008862067,0.0002004223,0.00001760944,0.00005748205,0.00003217444,0.05894983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0764317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5545534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1680799814","doi":"","title":"Male Violence Against Women in Prostitution: Weighing Feminist Legislative Responses to a Troubling Canadian Phenomenon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Phenomenon; Sex work; Human sexuality; Feminization (sociology); Sexual violence; Gender studies; Criminology; Sociology; Poverty; Political science; Law; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","authors":[{"name":"Corinne E. Longworth","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04364949911502143,"gpt":0.326218913370109,"spread":0.2825694142550876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01485146,0.0004949187,0.0007042805,0.00732747,0.02854742,0.01258779,0.003269969,0.009033302,0.003916246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01850573,0.0005809217,0.0006004422,0.007795611,0.0284026,0.003493373,0.004245571,0.00827809,0.00025335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1100666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1327335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9492241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.986828,0.003055521,0.0003501138,0.0008841485,0.006081937,0.002800284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818372,0.009585095,0.001110766,0.0003086211,0.006116932,0.001041403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000462438,0.0000574248,0.004757613,0.001793675,0.00004119443,0.0008434772,0.1393766,0.0004250382,0.0007959908,0.6271495,0.09130087,0.1334124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002116642,0.00004676374,0.0170157,0.00349846,0.00009629306,0.0002144203,0.110656,0.0002330693,0.0007000063,0.01804459,0.8493686,0.0001048286],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03417436,0.2363416,0.001083391,0.5267555,0.00302054,0.000128355,0.0001433925,0.00003850041,0.1983144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.604896,0.1885591,0.001988276,0.1641956,0.002680315,0.0001741461,0.0001092199,0.00007426763,0.03732307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1100666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7985927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1789059136","doi":"","title":"Are Men Who Have Sex With Men Safe Blood Donors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Law; Spring (device); Political science; Medicine; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Adrian Lomaga","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01789205969284328,"gpt":0.3175527380594528,"spread":0.2996606783666095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003085217,0.0001143961,0.0003291273,0.000726562,0.003609686,0.002689596,0.0005616631,0.003021487,0.00489165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01276613,0.000312707,0.0002019116,0.0007171206,0.005826491,0.002046617,0.0008108794,0.002631849,0.0006952196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002866387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008960001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1197172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3138493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974565,0.001095816,0.0000956689,0.0001224811,0.0007617231,0.0004677541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952973,0.002510309,0.0008854775,0.00009121816,0.0006746033,0.0005410776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002022593,0.0002280535,0.04757304,0.002493557,0.00009989701,0.001211059,0.06743773,0.0001081734,0.0008466631,0.2186051,0.3706501,0.2905443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001015278,0.0001231153,0.06863904,0.004253208,0.00009369277,0.001046662,0.06627113,0.000048845,0.0003836622,0.02477968,0.8341995,0.00005989519],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07058147,0.2466436,0.0002743679,0.490252,0.004020023,0.00008811315,0.0002001144,0.00001571327,0.1879247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5468894,0.2352205,0.0003348717,0.1668132,0.003266054,0.00007841003,0.0001084669,0.00001627332,0.04727287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1197172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2380407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803927068","doi":"","title":"No Matter How Small: Child Witnesses in Canadian Criminal Trials","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal trial; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey Westman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0563834433490393,"gpt":0.3616044967243237,"spread":0.3052210533752844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03164804,0.0005620972,0.001493437,0.007567509,0.01318661,0.01323594,0.006231401,0.007807842,0.006029248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2543583,0.0008417103,0.0008368304,0.01203334,0.01179696,0.005747025,0.004656111,0.009702848,0.0004407419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09358339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3455461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9755611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.971329,0.006148549,0.002066505,0.002182233,0.01294562,0.005328075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8885702,0.05338453,0.01060245,0.001964619,0.03458253,0.0108957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000332156,0.0001944913,0.09692763,0.006019994,0.0004425063,0.001561619,0.0381452,0.0009924966,0.0003149944,0.1299593,0.2367225,0.488387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002209712,0.0001422692,0.3890612,0.0321309,0.001409964,0.000906607,0.05538523,0.0009393998,0.000494289,0.04594084,0.4729644,0.0004038488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1019785,0.3729863,0.002142272,0.39739,0.005184712,0.0005114788,0.001745244,0.00006179139,0.1179997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7355589,0.1928865,0.002191535,0.05398642,0.002559706,0.0003486519,0.0006628727,0.00008314497,0.01172235],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09358339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6789982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566279991","doi":"","title":"When Rights Collide: Liberalism Pluralism and Freedom of Religion in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Charter; Faith; Law; Liberalism; Public sphere; Political science; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Public reason; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Alex Fielding","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02061554034061915,"gpt":0.2862396717331158,"spread":0.2656241313924966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004245188,0.0003400583,0.0005803862,0.001624514,0.05432006,0.01697552,0.002488599,0.004464307,0.006999847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01066379,0.0004759773,0.0005451366,0.003090128,0.02802986,0.00449307,0.009209844,0.009071195,0.0002912392],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2663306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3120866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901509,0.001250686,0.000143335,0.0008026232,0.00279439,0.00485817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926553,0.001706967,0.0003113252,0.0003171804,0.001998364,0.003010776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005423475,0.00004599136,0.006320084,0.00005461437,0.000024468,0.0009063451,0.04736236,0.0007698248,0.0002696877,0.8868696,0.03380243,0.02352032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009232444,0.00003286725,0.02829271,0.0004264502,0.00007218809,0.0003223549,0.111817,0.003196213,0.000629275,0.2698607,0.5849028,0.0003553158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2252065,0.00712379,0.002395672,0.2164808,0.0007165862,0.0001253456,0.0002746587,0.00007325654,0.5476035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9284638,0.002110342,0.001157263,0.01161841,0.00007439696,0.00003041722,0.00007046786,0.00005202127,0.05642297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2663306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8509525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222141872","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Convictions and the Avenues of Redress: The Post-Conviction Review Process in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Redress; Appeal; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Commit; Prison; Criminal code; Criminology; Statutory law; Criminal law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"A. Springs Anderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04014886537123376,"gpt":0.3479604715189953,"spread":0.3078116061477615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02321198,0.000479956,0.001271792,0.00986413,0.009209297,0.01085132,0.006492761,0.004357762,0.003456998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09035724,0.001009048,0.0007258059,0.01378474,0.009171525,0.002415129,0.003357446,0.005632922,0.0003388048],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2643085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4816066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9758607,0.004125183,0.001671621,0.001611465,0.01383501,0.00289605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8766263,0.03400069,0.008622719,0.001580402,0.06748489,0.01168501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003402267,0.0003034502,0.01699874,0.01407843,0.0002915373,0.0011205,0.01000033,0.001034644,0.000316898,0.06031718,0.2087603,0.6864378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002635996,0.0002612534,0.1494985,0.04050095,0.0006756731,0.0008443309,0.008851334,0.0009787126,0.0006097762,0.007565286,0.7895007,0.0004499567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01250619,0.8883609,0.0003870964,0.07138462,0.001729879,0.000251856,0.0002653668,0.0000495809,0.02506456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2499071,0.7102757,0.002101069,0.02977421,0.001144065,0.0001998801,0.000404247,0.00006029294,0.00613346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2643085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8532978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W938569533","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Baker: A Critical Race Feminist Theory of Disability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; Appeal; Supreme court; Poverty; Sociology; Political science; Critical race theory; Law; Duty; Criminology; Gender studies; Racism","authors":[{"name":"Alyssa Clutterbuck","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0759723442374994,"gpt":0.3736639926635501,"spread":0.2976916484260507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008847543,0.0005195056,0.0005562876,0.003860702,0.01448531,0.01028329,0.003234856,0.008284517,0.002544385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005618049,0.0002668816,0.0003953871,0.002354591,0.08443645,0.01023765,0.005324412,0.01118022,0.0002693497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03794508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03965512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4278534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5392449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947978,0.002512126,0.00008137022,0.0003747607,0.001380809,0.0008530942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959664,0.002953632,0.0001697134,0.0001118745,0.0005547922,0.0002435388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001894254,0.000004190324,0.00007293498,0.00003002125,9.840876e-7,0.00006814399,0.01232725,0.00004931979,0.00001972544,0.9758069,0.007447287,0.004171307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009906852,0.00001119894,0.0005313326,0.0009547306,0.00000769773,0.0001327165,0.02575914,0.0003394599,0.0001110069,0.6451271,0.3269935,0.00002213833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01357888,0.05352009,0.01139859,0.5882469,0.001765033,0.00009309799,0.00008706534,0.00004155277,0.3312688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7952149,0.02870012,0.006365013,0.117268,0.001972468,0.0001952317,0.00005423767,0.00009459633,0.05013546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4278534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8507261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1887086915","doi":"","title":"Apology Accepted: How the Apology Act Reveals the Law's Deference to the Power of Apologetic Discourse","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy of law; Political science; Sociology; Public law","authors":[{"name":"Claire Truesdale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04210419507847231,"gpt":0.3704819856627845,"spread":0.3283777905843122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008413105,0.0004755634,0.0004285006,0.001455828,0.01474123,0.0246026,0.002563707,0.008897063,0.008861993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03581775,0.0006165419,0.0004582869,0.0009016968,0.05871312,0.01573396,0.006511286,0.01202758,0.002033503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01099089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009488765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04025682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04330891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989778,0.005671308,0.0001679195,0.001057382,0.002447975,0.0008774378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857597,0.009006083,0.000886602,0.001513436,0.002111817,0.0007223465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002425608,0.00002135034,0.0005468906,0.00004477461,0.000006593784,0.000436021,0.09098234,0.0002234603,0.0005923084,0.8852138,0.01331074,0.008597461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003481963,0.00004918106,0.00163201,0.0002994279,0.0000237849,0.0005276044,0.03649832,0.00213279,0.00148044,0.5336926,0.423528,0.000101017],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0683751,0.003476138,0.05290307,0.1038282,0.00277863,0.00008677024,0.0001079307,0.0004570644,0.7679871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9008434,0.0008517247,0.006316007,0.008036938,0.0004700523,0.00006633464,0.00004989787,0.0005171098,0.08284846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04025682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08004498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153894299","doi":"","title":"Seeing Justice Done: Increasing Indigenous Representation on Canadian Juries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jury; Law; Duty; Supreme court; Jury selection; Economic Justice; Political science; Representation (politics); Subject (documents); Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Keith Hogg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03169880517529474,"gpt":0.3514218947023078,"spread":0.3197230895270131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008928755,0.0002136554,0.0003641676,0.003553973,0.01370817,0.00490691,0.002565969,0.001741413,0.005997011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0234788,0.0002100661,0.0003056606,0.002847734,0.005998896,0.001525409,0.003985884,0.002161548,0.0004245059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04407423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1014236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9600862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945056,0.001113092,0.0001430433,0.0003704003,0.002521162,0.001346667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922581,0.001618799,0.0004522452,0.0001968003,0.004214583,0.001259434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001977835,0.0001646158,0.05482224,0.001558671,0.000104088,0.001038882,0.1048461,0.0004127821,0.002234329,0.05853438,0.1431435,0.6329426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008073472,0.000193229,0.3142179,0.003991937,0.0002289464,0.0004900226,0.1296327,0.000565786,0.001517267,0.008282182,0.54055,0.0002492957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5218254,0.0559763,0.002525815,0.1649667,0.002441865,0.0003983804,0.0007989304,0.0001001545,0.2509665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299711,0.03323114,0.001821087,0.0158427,0.000467834,0.0001160077,0.0002649357,0.00002636803,0.0182588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04407423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3197824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1746168873","doi":"","title":"Net-Neutrality Regulation in Canada: Assessing the CRTC's Statutory Competency to Regulate the Internet","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Net neutrality; The Internet; Neutrality; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Internet privacy; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Jeff Miller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01699031077299363,"gpt":0.2748392442806186,"spread":0.2578489335076249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01779359,0.0003983357,0.0006705956,0.007569801,0.01754314,0.01553216,0.005946445,0.006457044,0.004631736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04761329,0.0006128092,0.0009664918,0.008366955,0.01060105,0.003657723,0.003397113,0.007101316,0.0004430822],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2275197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4707522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9674598,0.001474965,0.0006646637,0.001336866,0.02202165,0.007042142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9437275,0.01166428,0.001877206,0.0009015288,0.03754919,0.004280346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003269918,0.0005225674,0.1112867,0.001052381,0.0001867215,0.0009444369,0.01664697,0.004089061,0.002168397,0.5586351,0.1422465,0.1618941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002914725,0.0002634895,0.3751753,0.003061712,0.0008673824,0.0003663483,0.03576412,0.008410563,0.004775597,0.0320865,0.5383577,0.0005798119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3744368,0.01912756,0.003383188,0.1294379,0.0009528844,0.0005882221,0.002420627,0.000207768,0.469445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9055894,0.01089146,0.002896588,0.02960866,0.0002130357,0.0001430438,0.0007895372,0.00008317321,0.04978513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2275197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8959677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1666379458","doi":"","title":"Customary Adoption in British Columbia: Recognizing the Fundamental Differences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science; Geography","authors":[{"name":"K Macdonald","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02608421050178936,"gpt":0.3021039939321392,"spread":0.2760197834303498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005798729,0.0002932878,0.0007025409,0.004889822,0.009962628,0.008843145,0.003601886,0.006604503,0.003588102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02409341,0.0005572123,0.0004310863,0.0101998,0.01044911,0.002094673,0.002835802,0.009613919,0.0002409517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08233947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1739917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9825832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926839,0.0007544306,0.0004061848,0.0005785915,0.003457405,0.002119415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809173,0.007846577,0.00110093,0.0004984664,0.008238335,0.001398306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001155796,0.000237961,0.07037127,0.001908509,0.0001130563,0.002932996,0.03128967,0.001386631,0.001356795,0.4123154,0.1642295,0.3137427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005851189,0.00008920994,0.3750686,0.007118901,0.0002688309,0.0008693808,0.03310777,0.001492878,0.0008220377,0.03039698,0.550448,0.0002589388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2574199,0.2213185,0.001676854,0.2730698,0.0019162,0.0001748079,0.001094878,0.0001055762,0.2432236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7841023,0.111774,0.001399324,0.06071766,0.000560569,0.0001206012,0.0004502202,0.00006144992,0.04081399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08233947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5974175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905620639","doi":"","title":"BEYOND BOUNTIFUL: TOWARD AN INTERSECTIONAL AND POSTCOLONIAL FEMINIST INTERVENTION IN THE BRITISH COLUMBIA POLYGAMY REFERENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology; Law; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"M.K. Chan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0735913462719884,"gpt":0.3497773878452161,"spread":0.2761860415732277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003125624,0.0002814474,0.0003575444,0.002079921,0.02708722,0.006306402,0.002169161,0.004244919,0.007240019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004376361,0.0003005602,0.0001367908,0.002562166,0.02165773,0.001841205,0.00632172,0.005877708,0.0004009402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07272248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1246452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9517882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974307,0.0008572977,0.00004453253,0.0001783037,0.0004829051,0.001006238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965694,0.001222944,0.0001589051,0.0001278157,0.0009046074,0.001016272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009369579,0.0002206317,0.006620662,0.0006544119,0.00002175215,0.001695409,0.2427309,0.0003005177,0.001217008,0.3892655,0.1266577,0.2305218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002912785,0.00004001178,0.03059336,0.001250365,0.00002118935,0.0002468222,0.1646324,0.0001479895,0.0004414814,0.01578262,0.786756,0.00005853222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1922307,0.09522247,0.0009556153,0.3090269,0.001640374,0.0001234107,0.00009656334,0.00006599936,0.4006379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.863216,0.02239586,0.0007876887,0.03619939,0.0001878975,0.0001134379,0.00004672269,0.00004153126,0.0770114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07272248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.527641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155743310","doi":"","title":"Student Suicide On-Campus: Tort Liability of Canadian Universities and Determining a Duty of Care","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Duty of care; Jurisprudence; Lagging; Liability; Political science; Law; Public relations; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Shailaja Nadarajah","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04501254650942251,"gpt":0.3986838832286314,"spread":0.3536713367192089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006995887,0.0003259192,0.0005544249,0.006508597,0.009969309,0.008260868,0.00264304,0.004192812,0.001694786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02282597,0.0004020567,0.0006229737,0.006673472,0.01676185,0.00248862,0.003056664,0.005373063,0.000173993],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1001529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2646692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9677925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921213,0.001171675,0.000411411,0.0004331465,0.004672037,0.001190422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797634,0.005304717,0.002401994,0.000285356,0.01039437,0.001850136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004499809,0.0001629633,0.03003924,0.005117961,0.0000930877,0.001495459,0.02146682,0.001184156,0.0004414856,0.2592064,0.1059249,0.5748224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002541538,0.0001111647,0.09991661,0.02106317,0.0002376664,0.001090725,0.04110313,0.0007846354,0.0004308885,0.02242653,0.8125526,0.0002576466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03390263,0.6950105,0.0006844868,0.1982186,0.001666455,0.00008024536,0.0001029709,0.00002008489,0.07031401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3085507,0.6603378,0.0009537039,0.02417276,0.0006603732,0.00002859629,0.0001062824,0.00001279408,0.005177021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7266637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1690248212","doi":"","title":"Customary International Law and the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Declaration; Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Law; International law; Indigenous rights; Linguistic rights; General assembly; Right to property","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Nykolaishen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02077999475172389,"gpt":0.2915995413273116,"spread":0.2708195465755878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01299058,0.0003342521,0.0005016443,0.003435285,0.004357206,0.005972927,0.002192355,0.007832887,0.004200121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02036955,0.0004352107,0.0005287232,0.005299913,0.03251167,0.006562179,0.004749163,0.009875658,0.0005745115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008395914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02466658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0464079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05053916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876936,0.004168965,0.0009784396,0.001066551,0.004752511,0.001339938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873134,0.00860797,0.00161778,0.0007190468,0.001320342,0.000421497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000498731,0.00001810654,0.0002298515,0.0004707749,0.000003876668,0.0001356248,0.005142674,0.0001030072,0.0001104043,0.9495775,0.01781683,0.02638653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001033474,0.00002323335,0.002273153,0.004938588,0.00001501699,0.0002228438,0.003695988,0.00008903797,0.0001837458,0.1525936,0.8359162,0.00003827102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006840501,0.2985953,0.002308147,0.138078,0.003674995,0.00009156727,0.0001088696,0.00004492849,0.5502577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4264853,0.3263496,0.009100693,0.1402848,0.006083163,0.0003308248,0.0004079667,0.0001128166,0.09084485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0464079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09227556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1787790696","doi":"","title":"Benevolent Grandfathers and Savage Beasts: Comparative Canadian Customary Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Elizabeth Anderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07665035861705931,"gpt":0.3391201210979738,"spread":0.2624697624809145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004838282,0.0004925604,0.0009108281,0.005820119,0.04599243,0.01190172,0.003918209,0.00567574,0.01241463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01561025,0.0006125736,0.000544121,0.01164603,0.02507853,0.004446222,0.005466648,0.005752294,0.0004403155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1331779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2086961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939834,0.0007146299,0.0001195227,0.0005594412,0.002162895,0.002459988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947524,0.001687196,0.0002854331,0.0002032657,0.002320939,0.0007507814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009196006,0.00007564155,0.0148211,0.0004126005,0.00003508178,0.0009598474,0.1935233,0.0002781496,0.0002610376,0.6586246,0.04381993,0.08709679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003693846,0.00005043354,0.1185812,0.001791368,0.0001600169,0.0005937321,0.3229157,0.0005069923,0.0003126198,0.03531626,0.5195396,0.00019514],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3496484,0.05366816,0.001018912,0.04998801,0.0005940657,0.00009312862,0.0004370034,0.00003796797,0.5445144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389263,0.01484513,0.0005631591,0.004919032,0.00007675331,0.00003503157,0.0001259303,0.00003668992,0.04047189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1331779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9662775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802181875","doi":"","title":"Cruel, Unusual, and Constitutionally Infirm: Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Criminology","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Chaster","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03243567578332732,"gpt":0.3224616477687284,"spread":0.2900259719854011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01236247,0.0004817632,0.001329664,0.003781546,0.0231034,0.01410656,0.007555071,0.00966739,0.008121228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06114361,0.001132925,0.0007881544,0.006253399,0.01501575,0.00363959,0.004592771,0.01464004,0.0003909434],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1576612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4082145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.979825,0.001810937,0.0008690942,0.001811985,0.009468938,0.00621396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603121,0.01751946,0.002092412,0.0009832309,0.01490845,0.004184342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001690641,0.0002120674,0.0281874,0.0009107194,0.0001434169,0.0009860682,0.01981602,0.001546513,0.0007401399,0.6852966,0.1677084,0.09428369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003102199,0.0001745398,0.2413772,0.005978169,0.0009091774,0.0005924953,0.03641692,0.00433103,0.001708624,0.1195925,0.5877901,0.0008190123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2770861,0.05024391,0.002552183,0.3198652,0.001714386,0.0002967174,0.002149506,0.0001777026,0.3459144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.910857,0.01584972,0.001830257,0.04388184,0.0006769142,0.0001230715,0.0003308163,0.00008408011,0.02636634],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1576612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1823910484","doi":"","title":"Eli Lily and Company v The Government of Canada and the Perils of Investor-State Arbitration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Arbitration; Multinational corporation; Expropriation; Corporation; Law; Government (linguistics); Conflict of laws; Business; Intellectual property; Foreign direct investment; Political science","authors":[{"name":"James Billingsley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0227595384741509,"gpt":0.2393305749646636,"spread":0.2165710364905127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004132106,0.0003893575,0.0004764993,0.002322082,0.01326351,0.01294782,0.001745393,0.01166582,0.006474965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009855136,0.0003726258,0.0005641147,0.003580295,0.01638911,0.003671093,0.00219228,0.009954533,0.000689555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06656187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1356689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9449797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9645064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896158,0.0009032117,0.0002349419,0.0006061572,0.006133975,0.002505862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951395,0.002033134,0.0003800948,0.0001941118,0.001804443,0.0004486597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001468287,0.00001030784,0.0005420275,0.00008987196,0.00000843837,0.000278204,0.001194653,0.0001837592,0.00009841534,0.8835772,0.09408648,0.0199159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003865315,0.00001615987,0.003409156,0.001063948,0.00003990417,0.0002911568,0.001913797,0.0006308967,0.000368384,0.08756071,0.9045927,0.0000746322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01019854,0.1171066,0.001063202,0.2324735,0.001022139,0.00006601457,0.0001765966,0.0000837958,0.6378097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5054072,0.09976038,0.002207274,0.1627929,0.001321608,0.0001075147,0.0002102043,0.0001114128,0.2280815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06656187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4829424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902106734","doi":"","title":"A Minor Issue? The Shortcomings of the Eligibility Requirements for Medically Assisted Death in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Medicine; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jessica Bond","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1394918770565821,"gpt":0.4485535989586108,"spread":0.3090617219020287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0311181,0.0005750892,0.001926079,0.004508239,0.02236408,0.01840428,0.01160607,0.02502018,0.008529427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1143332,0.001621528,0.001611315,0.005842126,0.01622755,0.005034023,0.005606656,0.02619692,0.0007690496],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1576493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4406152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9574075,0.003961334,0.002692843,0.003296928,0.02179302,0.01084846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8830523,0.05092819,0.003695477,0.002227648,0.0502601,0.009836325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001025108,0.0001353471,0.007914003,0.0008606473,0.00009823161,0.0009437535,0.008976883,0.001105113,0.0004696282,0.5934713,0.3335399,0.0523826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002887191,0.0001074745,0.05036392,0.006345469,0.0004665668,0.0004478366,0.01158412,0.002484413,0.0007496385,0.06856735,0.8579339,0.0006604769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.03555365,0.03270174,0.001742469,0.7272193,0.004053135,0.0003370164,0.001273489,0.0001520505,0.1969672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4486597,0.03172981,0.004308303,0.4506713,0.00448773,0.0003660524,0.0007252264,0.0002592996,0.05879263],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1576493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9770074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966633239","doi":"","title":"Historical Infringements of Aboriginal Rights: Sui Generis as a Tool to Ignore the Past","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Supreme court; Law; Statutory law; Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; High Court; Faith; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Craig Empson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02444947449560265,"gpt":0.3442519138024815,"spread":0.3198024393068788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009853917,0.0003253245,0.0007919359,0.00494819,0.006011326,0.00876925,0.002197749,0.004880533,0.001674881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009068384,0.0003342894,0.0005439128,0.004183402,0.04044696,0.0057208,0.002595927,0.007651082,0.0002306309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03829176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07066575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5138247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.679808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994331,0.001935861,0.0002485428,0.0004042013,0.002366885,0.0007135288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994261,0.003011026,0.0004514771,0.0002446881,0.001651009,0.0003807925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001122162,0.00004117995,0.001085973,0.001928976,0.00003102692,0.0005116819,0.01930794,0.0001895702,0.0002540368,0.8018721,0.0272107,0.1475555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001252218,0.00004478915,0.005855395,0.007961863,0.00006209551,0.0005617521,0.01354353,0.0001157263,0.0002112352,0.06407858,0.9075035,0.00004900508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004412177,0.8476444,0.0005258751,0.09426198,0.001116691,0.00001808036,0.0000188426,0.000008998956,0.05199294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1515429,0.8074384,0.00129494,0.02972081,0.001585022,0.00003606262,0.00004002465,0.00001583147,0.00832587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4861753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948860978","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Settlement Trusts: Recharacterizing the Nature of Taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Revenue; Business; Government (linguistics); Tax avoidance; Tax reform; Ad valorem tax; Public economics; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Double taxation; Payment","authors":[{"name":"Frankie Young","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02072167989923257,"gpt":0.3388506069123572,"spread":0.3181289270131246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004243331,0.0001679089,0.0002897404,0.001821061,0.005596497,0.007640854,0.001698988,0.00439467,0.002138761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007812014,0.0003203383,0.0004608119,0.001733508,0.02627369,0.007642296,0.003102463,0.006218522,0.0003404196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01591139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02188653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1226637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1181941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949955,0.001414506,0.0002165344,0.0005471112,0.00200249,0.0008237492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976627,0.0009522518,0.0003197288,0.0002586324,0.0006522492,0.0001545708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.171051e-7,0.000004466368,0.0001552895,0.00002239504,0.000001158996,0.00005591772,0.001119687,0.00009019083,0.00002351793,0.992707,0.001643098,0.004176254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000104344,0.00002973402,0.003405338,0.001232303,0.00002409671,0.0002881196,0.005403157,0.001112215,0.0002884404,0.4953207,0.4928441,0.00004126759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05143181,0.05615466,0.01254314,0.09317574,0.001890632,0.0001285069,0.0000581481,0.00004634463,0.784571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8891888,0.03790263,0.002684251,0.01570507,0.001246208,0.0001027392,0.0000400658,0.00002576544,0.05310449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8773363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2438993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109330350","doi":"","title":"Marginalization through a Custom of Deservingness: Sole-Support Mothers and Welfare Law in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Entitlement (fair division); Welfare; Political science; Social security; Welfare rights; Single mothers; Child support; Working poor; Poverty; Welfare dependency; Law; Economics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca Crookshanks","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03633356149777631,"gpt":0.3388245132266324,"spread":0.3024909517288561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004851656,0.0002382476,0.0005311225,0.001995574,0.01463916,0.008628089,0.002854526,0.003368978,0.003201639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009099334,0.0003434897,0.0003258897,0.004874307,0.01872993,0.002099413,0.003507703,0.004839217,0.0001469328],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1950383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4269661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963453,0.0005501451,0.0001240599,0.0003441022,0.001494936,0.001141464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935968,0.002038726,0.0004581175,0.0001583489,0.002717831,0.001030124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005261962,0.0001107061,0.01091226,0.002031463,0.00004210076,0.001304693,0.05886073,0.0007691982,0.0004722264,0.6652767,0.09945943,0.1607079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004051833,0.00004706992,0.04747621,0.008153965,0.000105474,0.0003749747,0.07058303,0.0006556229,0.0004498282,0.03396364,0.8379918,0.0001579407],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1322948,0.3580007,0.001046171,0.3328386,0.002030701,0.0001827459,0.0005012304,0.00005441782,0.1730506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7151875,0.2166054,0.00124613,0.04529585,0.0003002153,0.0001148758,0.0001569133,0.00004286778,0.02105023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1950383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9336416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626402653","doi":"","title":"A New Hope, or a Charter Menace? The New Labour Trilogy’s Implications for Labour Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Charter; Labour law; Political science; Law; History","authors":[{"name":"Leila Geggie Hurst","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04037535000910514,"gpt":0.3568823761013547,"spread":0.3165070260922496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01456423,0.0005417712,0.001491512,0.004664793,0.02325393,0.02258125,0.006210376,0.01347201,0.01028369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03757117,0.0007512169,0.001016259,0.007743301,0.03087134,0.008274919,0.004787968,0.02052085,0.0006663298],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1810762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4752972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9852985,0.001365197,0.0005029689,0.001247793,0.008197409,0.003388129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722648,0.008820577,0.0009903989,0.0005596993,0.01350936,0.003855303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004001517,0.00006820422,0.00280112,0.0007725408,0.00005128414,0.0002846983,0.006404229,0.0005649168,0.0001829396,0.5765769,0.3444812,0.06777195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006384891,0.00002705919,0.00845692,0.00255419,0.000070113,0.00008544653,0.01077039,0.0006349202,0.0001341445,0.05878133,0.9182651,0.0001565666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006286848,0.08639983,0.0008435323,0.8507043,0.004898582,0.00004559661,0.0003133563,0.00003992474,0.05046802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2790201,0.1408901,0.004170285,0.5007207,0.006546597,0.0001222552,0.000404534,0.0001672879,0.06795822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1810762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9498355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037651573","doi":"","title":"Fundamental Rights for All","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law and economics; Law; Fundamental rights; Political science; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Suzy Flader","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07255290217692785,"gpt":0.3769380089216255,"spread":0.3043851067446977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005878424,0.0007479627,0.0009656745,0.001150397,0.00842368,0.008952442,0.002330838,0.006924463,0.05747388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00951305,0.0004624969,0.0009869701,0.001471462,0.01713569,0.005702427,0.006208802,0.008702112,0.02226092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008587572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03276394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1510538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1407886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990371,0.001643155,0.0004947148,0.001952247,0.003149537,0.002389388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954613,0.0007420525,0.0002951547,0.001432291,0.001641892,0.0004273851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006559069,0.000006544992,0.0001200969,0.00006841457,0.000008404304,0.00003770311,0.0009379945,0.00004745162,0.0001292152,0.9289718,0.05303542,0.01663046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007683128,0.000007296591,0.0004310998,0.0002072384,0.000006813291,0.00007563605,0.0002980265,0.00002343878,0.00007477796,0.05323055,0.9456222,0.00001519747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001305073,0.004885843,0.004533018,0.02315697,0.001467338,0.0001331283,0.000797276,0.0001514382,0.96357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1655847,0.01512754,0.01357127,0.06656829,0.002456531,0.0009851087,0.003433478,0.0003360776,0.7319371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1510538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3003492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868849460","doi":"","title":"Generating a Green Tax Policy For Renewable Electricity in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax reform; Renewable energy; Energy tax; Economics; Tax credit; Business; Tax policy; Carbon tax; Finance; Economic policy; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Greenhouse gas; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Ron Dueck","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05203025605154761,"gpt":0.2513918555232739,"spread":0.1993615994717263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002512054,0.0002437738,0.0002990476,0.003549577,0.004948091,0.004274339,0.001567791,0.001908707,0.002159115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007851237,0.0002312294,0.0003344284,0.00527758,0.003497122,0.001238059,0.001004007,0.002397624,0.000195909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1309599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2893707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973858,0.0001674517,0.00006674376,0.0001123959,0.001721058,0.0005466392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961659,0.0005618383,0.0002027087,0.00008684536,0.00267542,0.0003074203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005843216,0.00009679513,0.004927124,0.001020019,0.00003317327,0.0003388624,0.001034576,0.008404252,0.0004105856,0.6110526,0.1823067,0.1903169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004108954,0.00002699154,0.02031409,0.001880491,0.00004787791,0.00007009177,0.001194834,0.002369188,0.0006955125,0.02396881,0.9493136,0.00007741556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06899901,0.3260935,0.002647906,0.2125158,0.003547231,0.0002915538,0.001909948,0.000204902,0.3837902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.592555,0.3085398,0.004110164,0.02730075,0.0008288863,0.00007462673,0.001026649,0.00007103921,0.06549304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1309599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9501847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296451070","doi":"","title":"Social Assistance and the Charter: Is There a Right to Welfare in Canada?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Social Welfare; Welfare; Political science; Welfare rights; Law","authors":[{"name":"A. G. P. Elliot","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02590660771433017,"gpt":0.3345515156996793,"spread":0.3086449079853492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01109711,0.000712627,0.001359883,0.004451755,0.0301579,0.02100854,0.006261894,0.02023856,0.01198087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04007768,0.0008576988,0.0009770623,0.00777973,0.0261738,0.00517239,0.005690079,0.01765012,0.0005993156],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1785311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5666741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.979767,0.00196904,0.0005037641,0.001198528,0.009685474,0.006876347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788412,0.006083274,0.0009095129,0.0004795624,0.008755341,0.004931015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007416127,0.0001093145,0.00501981,0.0005377858,0.00005659665,0.0003496842,0.007031704,0.0006564531,0.0001622685,0.6746411,0.2619236,0.04943747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001564904,0.00005225153,0.03087882,0.002896273,0.0001833065,0.0001497859,0.01787353,0.00117952,0.000280117,0.1033264,0.8427323,0.0002911451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02506265,0.043387,0.0008392351,0.7930658,0.003130335,0.0001118999,0.000734319,0.00008135794,0.1335873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5031228,0.05655816,0.002486577,0.329865,0.003251792,0.0001943916,0.0004738828,0.0001547644,0.1038927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1785311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9527875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535187990","doi":"","title":"The 1995 Firearms Act: Canada's Public Response to the Myth of Violence","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Criminology; Homicide; Poison control; Political science; Suicide prevention; Computer security; Law; Medical emergency; Psychology; Medicine; History; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Elaine Davies","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03499631491318459,"gpt":0.3524307092356745,"spread":0.3174343943224899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01162821,0.0006834838,0.001042408,0.005409565,0.01715003,0.01730881,0.007409751,0.0237997,0.006221437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05057365,0.0009544807,0.001012465,0.006488534,0.01978549,0.003363235,0.003809266,0.01481527,0.000538808],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2152551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4882934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9744673,0.001774408,0.0006802419,0.001177717,0.01638366,0.005516698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700702,0.009762365,0.001596292,0.0006310798,0.01382706,0.004113058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009906268,0.0001151508,0.0102469,0.0007598213,0.00009456684,0.0004758288,0.00764152,0.001159861,0.0003534977,0.2880161,0.6205775,0.07046016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001329048,0.00006041384,0.06131736,0.002237987,0.0002166424,0.000170953,0.009119003,0.0007988674,0.0004013393,0.02129328,0.9040583,0.0001928926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02570143,0.05640651,0.000686385,0.8018658,0.004116066,0.000156355,0.00108158,0.0001096736,0.1098762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3833447,0.05311513,0.001776429,0.4877136,0.003099279,0.000204807,0.0007648646,0.0001206914,0.0698605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2152551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9101928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295461420","doi":"","title":"The Edges of Exception: Implications for Indigenous Liberation in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Liberation; History; Political science; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Tara Williamson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02209784259531498,"gpt":0.2977908280279306,"spread":0.2756929854326156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008149674,0.0003838092,0.001329993,0.00341625,0.04114563,0.02286183,0.006267595,0.01094117,0.01121167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0250021,0.0006020089,0.00103056,0.006443531,0.03878178,0.005408177,0.007231683,0.01436162,0.0003394209],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1908949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4398043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878936,0.001092388,0.0003740326,0.001244264,0.004867748,0.004527933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851952,0.005381507,0.0006463282,0.0005779069,0.006096226,0.002102967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002955862,0.00002474036,0.003015415,0.0002601537,0.00003207842,0.0003657572,0.02589815,0.0005136082,0.0001434018,0.8951984,0.04275779,0.03176097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007328368,0.00002915621,0.02417073,0.002642806,0.0002121118,0.0002517139,0.05468501,0.001368419,0.0004497723,0.1716193,0.7442305,0.0002672012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1029749,0.04360433,0.003737321,0.3604264,0.001682419,0.000171605,0.0005649342,0.0001333189,0.4867048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.853321,0.02062916,0.003402248,0.06408791,0.0005084315,0.0000988891,0.0001187484,0.0001233062,0.05771039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1908949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9384472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754954890","doi":"","title":"Moving Beyond the Bedrooms of Our Nation: Redefining Canadian Families from the Perspective of Non-Conjugal Caregiving","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coining (mint); Parliament; Perspective (graphical); Media studies; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; History; Art; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jamie Martinez Wood","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03597365728127832,"gpt":0.3149347394209247,"spread":0.2789610821396464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008275495,0.0005145028,0.0005537344,0.002846048,0.03863077,0.01079935,0.003579734,0.009244535,0.003383619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009423462,0.0003768403,0.0004498172,0.003753889,0.05687542,0.005087229,0.004864746,0.009575639,0.0002565518],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1385367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2641928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934169,0.002290208,0.000118826,0.0003637932,0.001939513,0.001870715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954506,0.001922036,0.0002232364,0.0001587079,0.001342645,0.0009029286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002678182,0.00002988702,0.001515215,0.0003749036,0.00001553181,0.0008287277,0.1365725,0.0002611614,0.0002803254,0.6831508,0.1051703,0.07177378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002235713,0.00002063016,0.005648991,0.002009374,0.00003572836,0.0003750739,0.1179587,0.0001557647,0.0002214101,0.05104673,0.822406,0.0000992342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02240752,0.2214206,0.001292559,0.5919457,0.002651961,0.00006956416,0.00007540611,0.00002986834,0.1601069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6184081,0.17036,0.002333912,0.1805786,0.001250211,0.0001092328,0.00006855134,0.00006186096,0.02682951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1385367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1740798251","doi":"","title":"Lawyers Gone Bad: Money Sex and Madness in Canada's Legal Profession (Philip Slayton)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Julia Renouf","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03728442380868719,"gpt":0.3587716732316439,"spread":0.3214872494229568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00367272,0.0005943896,0.0008552579,0.002617753,0.02822277,0.01239537,0.002461853,0.01691081,0.008603321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01271885,0.0006466176,0.0005126633,0.004193597,0.01361291,0.00528187,0.003448204,0.01790428,0.0008959131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05027543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2064149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9608736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962042,0.0007000016,0.0001239722,0.0003410372,0.001661499,0.000969255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914721,0.002790421,0.0003477179,0.00008644637,0.002872118,0.002431299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009181396,0.00002951341,0.0008315325,0.0002464463,0.000007710525,0.0001585419,0.005542263,0.00005696085,0.00004010563,0.01715408,0.9410865,0.03483725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002965848,0.00002013559,0.01044337,0.002713911,0.00004377403,0.00033558,0.026979,0.00009356673,0.00007807167,0.009345571,0.9498403,0.00007700591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002113284,0.1957789,0.00008969178,0.7789884,0.007822087,0.00002352082,0.00005909153,0.00001539361,0.01510959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06400502,0.2440947,0.0004195914,0.597679,0.0106597,0.00008018845,0.00008144797,0.00008141177,0.08289901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05027543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3647755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209828805","doi":"","title":"Misspent Youth: The (Mis)application of the Youth Criminal Justice Act by the Criminal Code Review Boards of British Columbia and Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Criminal code; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Kyle McCleery","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06440637157402879,"gpt":0.3300396250594446,"spread":0.2656332534854158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0296166,0.0004529741,0.0008086567,0.006648282,0.009102469,0.008850371,0.003578546,0.009139718,0.002848778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0873581,0.001324234,0.0006155809,0.005572416,0.005426164,0.001999822,0.002827699,0.006031058,0.0007064086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08531693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3650594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9621704,0.004050106,0.003309447,0.001440654,0.02515479,0.003874613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8743737,0.02875022,0.01059287,0.002461117,0.07274395,0.01107824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001081654,0.00006150884,0.03071209,0.001474269,0.0001114705,0.0003569192,0.005583169,0.0002390616,0.0004492688,0.01560603,0.8171191,0.128179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008041033,0.00006782953,0.1850657,0.004868032,0.0002711934,0.0001678707,0.005087038,0.0004137415,0.0005867181,0.001163928,0.8020739,0.0001535536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05313923,0.1767634,0.001178819,0.6222571,0.01476184,0.001113538,0.004164459,0.0003494785,0.1262723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4337776,0.1233166,0.006172726,0.264642,0.005588175,0.000897812,0.00345552,0.0002882214,0.1618613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08531693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6190205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171956750","doi":"","title":"In Pursuit of Equality: Rethinking the Constitutionalization of Labour Rights after Fraser","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Collective bargaining; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Antipathy; Politics; Bill of rights; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Alex Kerner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02561714340171738,"gpt":0.3308342427572489,"spread":0.3052170993555315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02998196,0.000806404,0.001076243,0.001725951,0.02748735,0.01769667,0.004682789,0.01772286,0.004655875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03704938,0.0008273311,0.0007500838,0.001836023,0.1133971,0.01729724,0.01034961,0.03059051,0.0005947131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05946749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08400791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.750109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7888898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9717439,0.008702883,0.0008136893,0.004539191,0.008071612,0.006128723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822564,0.01203845,0.0004190014,0.001496597,0.002740694,0.001048876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009716852,0.000004787815,0.0001141547,0.00001578019,0.000002717211,0.0000465534,0.005966693,0.0001044758,0.00007242763,0.9787934,0.01044807,0.004421214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005675511,0.00002911528,0.0008414569,0.0005966562,0.00002827947,0.00006119526,0.006951759,0.0004789016,0.0006926939,0.581161,0.4089762,0.0001260232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03156882,0.0235527,0.02299521,0.479651,0.005408918,0.0001331008,0.000182735,0.0001764497,0.436331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.749081,0.007219153,0.006078478,0.1614218,0.003564504,0.0001881561,0.00009642414,0.0002910635,0.07205942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.750109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5027252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507312992","doi":"","title":"Blasphemy and the Modern, \"Secular\" State (2012 recipient of the McCarthy Tétrault Law Journal Prize for Exceptional Writing)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Blasphemy; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Philosophy; History; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca Ross","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02054688940350503,"gpt":0.2969574549642093,"spread":0.2764105655607043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001951226,0.0002256139,0.0002872044,0.0008664754,0.006013344,0.007705889,0.0006030788,0.003614136,0.009022065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003283782,0.0002107405,0.0001640639,0.001073194,0.009008374,0.003964503,0.001848452,0.004539955,0.000713303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005593807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008410818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07574061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1493309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992145,0.0002856433,0.00003009987,0.00009656302,0.0002175009,0.0001555773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987099,0.0005332599,0.0001340698,0.00004572662,0.0002614884,0.0003155976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134361,0.00002476783,0.00081887,0.000266959,0.000008299326,0.0001666416,0.00831007,0.00004671487,0.00009628411,0.411063,0.5368922,0.04229278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001115698,0.00001345936,0.004813784,0.00113054,0.000009925084,0.0001323011,0.008112867,0.0000589299,0.0001138435,0.03903027,0.9465559,0.00001702255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009732547,0.1869099,0.0003469811,0.6747827,0.01513876,0.00002175915,0.0001282307,0.00002794884,0.1129113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4348172,0.1460856,0.0005434221,0.1733516,0.02501603,0.00008096267,0.0001728258,0.0001068896,0.2198256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07574061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1505995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599777945","doi":"","title":"Searching for a Legal Regime for Alberta’s Glaciers: An Analysis of Ambiguous Legislation and Impractical Common Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Common law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Cox","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0389788696663833,"gpt":0.393803640263812,"spread":0.3548247705974287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009875075,0.00034663,0.0006178395,0.007061645,0.01477206,0.01731227,0.005500299,0.008767175,0.006577758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0292534,0.0005379569,0.0009885795,0.007357665,0.02555397,0.005406195,0.003730345,0.007298856,0.0002628857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06332993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1328591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8268656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9251259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896407,0.001154012,0.00031165,0.0008358055,0.005166457,0.002891329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796141,0.0124879,0.001531544,0.0007968363,0.004774738,0.0007947925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000193855,0.00005549895,0.01139408,0.0001571896,0.00002730987,0.0004397066,0.005634035,0.001287095,0.0001944103,0.9535037,0.008611237,0.01867641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007272693,0.00005458243,0.09251298,0.002213608,0.0003596215,0.0004355882,0.0609248,0.009617375,0.001022977,0.626401,0.2061892,0.0001955388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.3981008,0.01692848,0.01263433,0.09918062,0.0003873096,0.0003516593,0.000473632,0.00009843591,0.4718447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669753,0.004870638,0.004676823,0.007009342,0.0001522814,0.0000651818,0.0001662372,0.00003906627,0.01604526],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1731344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4594929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037302220","doi":"","title":"Social Science Evidence in Poverty-Related Charter Claims:","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Poverty; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Sydney McIvor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1193670440976981,"gpt":0.4390345066585063,"spread":0.3196674625608082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07034247,0.0005919303,0.001274773,0.01485241,0.008190915,0.01378183,0.003310381,0.01766425,0.004743628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.154335,0.0008056149,0.001560646,0.007482026,0.05182693,0.0248051,0.008525475,0.0206716,0.0005296135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01253861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03055704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02965193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05167438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9521088,0.02037087,0.003225643,0.003054348,0.01948427,0.001756036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6423517,0.3233444,0.01006189,0.005399954,0.01711788,0.001724127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001423269,0.00005326604,0.001749585,0.001941855,0.00006219786,0.0006391586,0.003719858,0.0002511956,0.0002241966,0.9262737,0.01741491,0.04765587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004590677,0.00006979902,0.004504527,0.01995895,0.0001096502,0.0004475407,0.005809902,0.0005376192,0.0007787636,0.5842627,0.383357,0.000117609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01140684,0.1751365,0.01301822,0.6363814,0.00427667,0.000201882,0.0002433504,0.00005662414,0.1592785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5028614,0.2382304,0.02656174,0.2115789,0.007292211,0.0004255189,0.0003562516,0.00007699234,0.01261658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07034247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.372011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107990315","doi":"","title":"Expanding the Role of Culture in British Columbia's Adoption Scheme","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Government (linguistics); Cultural heritage; Public relations; Perspective (graphical); Ambiguity; Political science; Best interests; Public administration; Law; Business; Environmental ethics","authors":[{"name":"Michael M.J. Choi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02686655347929924,"gpt":0.3207145169181175,"spread":0.2938479634388183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005880924,0.0002285139,0.0003853278,0.004182121,0.01427138,0.008873723,0.002923562,0.00302219,0.005213929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0138155,0.0004505906,0.0002803454,0.005592118,0.01129232,0.002021017,0.004292141,0.004255989,0.0002644957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08505054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1368074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9694287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941266,0.001142532,0.0002631452,0.0004427568,0.002486922,0.001538193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901183,0.003567193,0.0004871027,0.0005482888,0.004141627,0.001137522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003271157,0.00004991479,0.01801208,0.0003113463,0.00002303475,0.001181459,0.01978447,0.0009419011,0.000601588,0.7613334,0.03101968,0.1667084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005089517,0.00006751813,0.1282917,0.004312939,0.0001316649,0.0005953913,0.03125904,0.00264621,0.0007625789,0.07044106,0.7612191,0.0002219115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2680489,0.06258295,0.003418033,0.06599868,0.0007292199,0.0002970726,0.0004818944,0.0001055635,0.5983377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.919999,0.02355551,0.002673601,0.01049568,0.0001140863,0.000133336,0.0001597594,0.00003214683,0.04283679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08505054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6170877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662106987","doi":"","title":"Employment Standards for Non-Employment: A Legislative Framework for Agency Work in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Sociology; Engineering; Social science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Gillian Barnett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07310034734353324,"gpt":0.4164406651350177,"spread":0.3433403177914844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03097216,0.0008769985,0.00169049,0.008624835,0.02912535,0.02530176,0.01300943,0.02061696,0.00626377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06044893,0.002319491,0.002246101,0.008276097,0.01275669,0.004634596,0.005885416,0.01792704,0.0006229049],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2471141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6470685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9568272,0.003535358,0.002688283,0.002771536,0.02416321,0.01001458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9402437,0.01400602,0.00198392,0.001392683,0.03574307,0.006630611],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008201687,0.0002661649,0.01215498,0.0007728422,0.00008811185,0.0005498067,0.01383908,0.002312034,0.001319003,0.6949991,0.2200311,0.05358576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002174457,0.000141083,0.09101686,0.004434013,0.0002840932,0.0001920459,0.01486034,0.004171393,0.0009800418,0.03683492,0.8461612,0.000706555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08209301,0.04451399,0.008671831,0.5211028,0.005725219,0.001912966,0.004200056,0.0006096858,0.3311705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5749271,0.02608015,0.02555479,0.1858508,0.002042809,0.001207542,0.001602685,0.0003811557,0.182353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2471141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8732409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W34689249","doi":"10.1007/s10554-021-02452-4","title":"Regional Self-Government, Mantario or Canada's 11th Province? An Analysis of Self-Determination for Northwestern Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Balance (ability); Diversity (politics); Political science; Power (physics); Federalism; Self-determination; Public administration; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Adam Jantunen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03886105341142086,"gpt":0.3007723198363145,"spread":0.2619112664248937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003631857,0.0001799139,0.0002121769,0.0006230619,0.00182937,0.0007415964,0.000550878,0.0001967471,0.001945116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00166856,0.0001224858,0.0003033367,0.001384853,0.0006613444,0.000212562,0.0007720157,0.0003876128,0.0001792912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009197082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01408279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9699589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9838628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994686,0.00005796291,0.00002891069,0.00006680933,0.0001633606,0.0002143181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979171,0.000122487,0.0006599607,0.00006875092,0.0005376742,0.0006939473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002874619,0.000008700784,0.9970341,0.000005626178,0.0000102906,0.00006911918,0.000785467,0.00001742707,0.0000820097,0.00006626045,0.0003340277,0.001558343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002009111,0.000009201605,0.997587,0.000008221697,0.000006368607,0.0000397552,0.001620913,0.00008240407,0.0000224013,0.00001175058,0.000606793,0.000003319807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974636,0.0001428392,0.00003836831,0.0002687348,0.000005268982,0.000009374569,0.0003781392,0.000002745763,0.001691002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989917,0.00009127863,0.00004263319,0.00004227774,0.000003628108,0.000004934849,0.0001780557,0.000002415203,0.0006431896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0300411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06672984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292892905","doi":"","title":"The Politics of Poverty: Why the Charter Does Not Protect Welfare Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dignity; Politics; Law; Political science; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mary Gwen Shaw","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04083567413627597,"gpt":0.3142010506031132,"spread":0.2733653764668372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008470657,0.0002305014,0.0005856711,0.002327533,0.007875879,0.009383964,0.001728578,0.005941393,0.002555051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01347077,0.0003177195,0.0002992638,0.003283837,0.03383802,0.006047958,0.002365744,0.009414225,0.0004206502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02717298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04447881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3446125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4659763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917467,0.00315915,0.0001684622,0.0005384589,0.003265981,0.001121231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911738,0.005682993,0.0004568007,0.0002067685,0.00198238,0.0004973757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008519749,0.00001844713,0.0004289743,0.0002831575,0.000006218795,0.0001531147,0.005125105,0.0001845402,0.00007550531,0.858833,0.0860196,0.04886383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000163063,0.0000161259,0.002534595,0.002471113,0.00001203435,0.0001448824,0.009114015,0.0002221351,0.0001233764,0.2690741,0.7162425,0.00002882153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005983051,0.2424952,0.001149865,0.6630872,0.001502903,0.00002189623,0.00005292322,0.00002185107,0.08568507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4267105,0.3177732,0.00207761,0.2266736,0.003964534,0.00009234965,0.00009204182,0.00009568116,0.02252043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3446125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6852133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827817526","doi":"","title":"Lawyers Gone Bad: Money Sex and Madness in Canada's Legal Profession (Philip Slayton)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal profession; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Katrina Edgerton-Mcghan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03728442380868719,"gpt":0.3587716732316439,"spread":0.3214872494229568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00367272,0.0005943896,0.0008552579,0.002617753,0.02822277,0.01239537,0.002461853,0.01691081,0.008603321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01271885,0.0006466176,0.0005126633,0.004193597,0.01361291,0.00528187,0.003448204,0.01790428,0.0008959131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05027543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2064149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9608736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962042,0.0007000016,0.0001239722,0.0003410372,0.001661499,0.000969255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914721,0.002790421,0.0003477179,0.00008644637,0.002872118,0.002431299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009181396,0.00002951341,0.0008315325,0.0002464463,0.000007710525,0.0001585419,0.005542263,0.00005696085,0.00004010563,0.01715408,0.9410865,0.03483725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002965848,0.00002013559,0.01044337,0.002713911,0.00004377403,0.00033558,0.026979,0.00009356673,0.00007807167,0.009345571,0.9498403,0.00007700591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.002113284,0.1957789,0.00008969178,0.7789884,0.007822087,0.00002352082,0.00005909153,0.00001539361,0.01510959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06400502,0.2440947,0.0004195914,0.597679,0.0106597,0.00008018845,0.00008144797,0.00008141177,0.08289901],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05027543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3647755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154429129","doi":"","title":"A Gendered Approach to “Quality of Life” after Separation under the British Columbia Family Law Act Relocation Regime","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Guardian; Credibility; Family law; Quality (philosophy); Inclusion (mineral); Distancing; Political science; Family reunification; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Immigration","authors":[{"name":"Meredith Shaw","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07373998263430484,"gpt":0.3668973439004534,"spread":0.2931573612661486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003287384,0.000133848,0.0002475615,0.00327435,0.004642025,0.005015364,0.0009525787,0.001154025,0.001755907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007158019,0.0001234996,0.0002017799,0.003012007,0.01366769,0.001683057,0.002533714,0.00235315,0.0001218444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03073842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03230782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7175093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8880266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957616,0.001844696,0.0001428998,0.0002695752,0.001339855,0.0006414069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969994,0.001217295,0.0003930837,0.0001045356,0.0009480546,0.0003377493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007098391,0.0001304901,0.07630426,0.001074068,0.00004372449,0.001520625,0.1462482,0.0005565837,0.0004387619,0.3016329,0.03052017,0.4414593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001140277,0.00008584703,0.4637943,0.006688198,0.00006419304,0.0007513216,0.1488676,0.000289709,0.0003155686,0.04281719,0.336229,0.00008561656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2816767,0.2531202,0.001955133,0.0939091,0.00122686,0.0001198045,0.0003435864,0.00001844559,0.3676301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9266213,0.05505515,0.0005319645,0.007200209,0.0001972714,0.00007087353,0.00009252453,0.00000627605,0.01022443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2824907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5683086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283679196","doi":"","title":"The Privatization of Justice in Québec's Draft Bill to Enact the New Code of Civil Procedure: A Critical Evaluation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Hull; Public administration; Engineering; Computer science; Programming language; Marine engineering; Set (abstract data type)","authors":[{"name":"P Scott Horne","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.040515454588618,"gpt":0.379686801520273,"spread":0.339171346931655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05547277,0.0009290219,0.00146244,0.006331048,0.02825129,0.02228772,0.008063593,0.02645467,0.007303795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0973048,0.001300051,0.001809886,0.00764798,0.02631442,0.007540369,0.004396375,0.02040422,0.0004390964],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2589301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4018106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9478406,0.01099911,0.00145387,0.003074591,0.02488675,0.01174502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8946606,0.05570012,0.002483841,0.003065351,0.04084559,0.003244525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002247175,0.0001713818,0.004095751,0.0008484162,0.0001704644,0.0004430074,0.01212774,0.001856887,0.0003940072,0.76991,0.1831295,0.02662806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007962755,0.0003050659,0.06063065,0.00468723,0.00104199,0.0002445518,0.02617438,0.004517782,0.00191065,0.07669888,0.8223176,0.0006749658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08920888,0.04686228,0.003374943,0.5824766,0.006415533,0.0009817608,0.001656626,0.0001553754,0.268868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6823221,0.01089613,0.003181746,0.222921,0.001916744,0.000726715,0.0003476875,0.000149379,0.07753848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2589301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8595361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281574189","doi":"","title":"The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada (Florian Sauvageau David Schneiderman David Taras)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"M.R. James","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02516552826368531,"gpt":0.2781546652013999,"spread":0.2529891369377146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001814178,0.0006825673,0.0008785797,0.006589307,0.01571517,0.01058159,0.002109274,0.00748228,0.02291424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01366016,0.0005430517,0.0004267144,0.008476266,0.004975712,0.002631655,0.001829209,0.00506172,0.002404294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04378831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06620058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9758964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965383,0.0002361185,0.00009169566,0.0003027653,0.00221717,0.0006138764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899463,0.00247817,0.0004233999,0.0001934311,0.005968528,0.0009902006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007930831,0.000005245875,0.0005250921,0.0001020254,0.000009195426,0.00006246351,0.0008024746,0.00004416596,0.00005496207,0.009053473,0.978007,0.011326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007369815,0.00000430026,0.007194355,0.0007241693,0.00002800906,0.00004925091,0.00190028,0.00007942862,0.0001047097,0.001463187,0.9884121,0.00003277931],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005651403,0.1899892,0.0002386565,0.6531387,0.02355047,0.00003552512,0.002070778,0.0001142644,0.1252109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1937077,0.1268383,0.000709939,0.2734332,0.03725785,0.00009842199,0.00134508,0.0003715892,0.3662379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04378831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.317708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901806227","doi":"","title":"Episode 5 – The Stories We Tell: Site-C, Treaty 8, and the Duty to Consult and Accommodate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Appeal; Duty; Indigenous; Law; Context (archaeology); Piano; Common law; Political science; History; Art history; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Rachel Gutman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0312352725302119,"gpt":0.3566375705211476,"spread":0.3254022979909357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002450212,0.0003924203,0.000510409,0.0008757614,0.02457364,0.007861797,0.001474544,0.006909264,0.01052094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01284172,0.0004547403,0.0003333786,0.001636257,0.01190057,0.007551299,0.008501293,0.01384128,0.001448135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01145289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007301218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09151112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1382956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947987,0.002563246,0.0001347455,0.0002391596,0.000829931,0.001434346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969879,0.001590242,0.000321037,0.0001342829,0.0003607434,0.000605878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002884519,0.00003420457,0.0007705891,0.0001502805,0.000004637303,0.003085751,0.7755355,0.00004194666,0.0001660805,0.08732323,0.125912,0.006946937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004294403,0.000008541419,0.0007739476,0.0003084801,0.000002733722,0.0007588504,0.5327042,0.00001685786,0.0001107176,0.003816875,0.4614836,0.00001089098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2160665,0.01156925,0.002753616,0.2955396,0.004631783,0.0003886955,0.000877897,0.0001280552,0.4680446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8294428,0.006536094,0.0008928496,0.04076069,0.0009478736,0.0004404328,0.0003902483,0.0001683911,0.1204205],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9084889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1819569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037211946","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Sacred Sites & Lands:","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Religious Tourism and Spaces","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spiritualities; Indigenous; Colonialism; Land rights; Christianity; Charter; State (computer science); Political science; Geography; Traditional knowledge; Ethnology; Environmental ethics; Law; History; Archaeology; Spirituality; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Chase Blair","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03506475635161838,"gpt":0.3304313490616695,"spread":0.2953665927100511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006618482,0.0002346704,0.0001905828,0.001791816,0.006373791,0.005901788,0.001169927,0.001914256,0.00775141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001212074,0.0001547638,0.0001645673,0.002778855,0.01506557,0.002005622,0.002406236,0.001721096,0.0008942441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02512854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06289826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9457536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987757,0.00009636509,0.00003228509,0.00008275852,0.0007118026,0.0003012336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995193,0.00006726139,0.00004580201,0.00003542841,0.0002235035,0.0001086322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001024036,0.00003395768,0.002914829,0.0006574134,0.00000890618,0.0005209103,0.02119356,0.0003344604,0.0005356332,0.6478122,0.1186245,0.2073533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002274625,0.000005277767,0.008488741,0.000589953,0.000006911258,0.0001578462,0.00878924,0.00004098197,0.0001094973,0.007670595,0.9741268,0.00001189139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01828449,0.1126138,0.001160884,0.03834386,0.000873666,0.00009518398,0.0004328364,0.00009228584,0.8281031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4684271,0.1528647,0.003670735,0.02052795,0.0004621249,0.00007553467,0.0005468565,0.00006001652,0.353365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9457536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1823212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614061493","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Crown and Indigenous Legal Orders: The Reciprocal Benefits of Reserving an Indigenous Seat on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Reciprocal; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Medicine; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kayla Cheeke","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06001522478871164,"gpt":0.3408741564477494,"spread":0.2808589316590377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009007893,0.0003148819,0.0008604127,0.003282787,0.01818835,0.01563811,0.005519326,0.007956152,0.005063718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02811717,0.0004423579,0.0004797043,0.005135039,0.02685833,0.004699552,0.00484284,0.008722703,0.0002403583],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09016704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2665257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9634773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857307,0.001695522,0.0003134665,0.001130356,0.007029216,0.004100625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856303,0.006606854,0.0007432547,0.0004354141,0.005442279,0.001141826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003873882,0.00005321542,0.007021958,0.0005818214,0.0001014343,0.0005506192,0.01723899,0.001072108,0.0002687616,0.8650776,0.0323166,0.07567822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000826411,0.00005376149,0.05195571,0.00550155,0.0006618644,0.000482832,0.0605251,0.002479499,0.001057986,0.2734829,0.6034448,0.0002711949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1550892,0.1332039,0.003218514,0.1998927,0.001603218,0.0001097661,0.0002628167,0.00006506067,0.5065549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282681,0.03214714,0.001233224,0.02195843,0.0006380643,0.00002949465,0.00005326066,0.00002868567,0.01564359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.909833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6542107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}