{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":16,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"40548d49253d","filters":{"venue":"Argument & Computation"}},"results":[{"id":"W2383705587","doi":"10.3233/aac-160001","title":"Combining explanation and argumentation in dialogue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02049617440807758,"gpt":0.2571513154001686,"spread":0.236655140992091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003560258,0.00009726625,0.0001047351,0.0001928982,0.00006986492,0.00008810147,0.0001061571,0.00003803828,0.000004567094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002433659,0.00007814441,0.00001726478,0.0001787179,0.0000123097,0.0009151349,0.0000504228,0.00003188962,0.00003558032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001073872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001521225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007829454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004648398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998937,0.0001079135,0.0002969301,0.0002915561,0.0002174148,0.0001492419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995139,0.0001402468,0.0001491856,0.0001121883,0.00004067249,0.00004384293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002595405,0.0002572026,0.1102514,0.00005674603,0.00003233302,0.00001403708,0.007826432,0.001777717,0.03728329,0.1199187,0.0005306404,0.7220256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00485289,0.0002257162,0.6473382,0.0002712563,0.000009122791,0.00001417996,0.0001595424,0.3195402,0.006912901,0.01964736,0.0005600926,0.0004685389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4357039,0.00002658132,0.5628328,0.0007869689,0.0002460602,0.0001989436,7.826916e-7,0.00005732827,0.0001466872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937904,0.0000291583,0.00594609,0.0001138046,0.00003057281,0.00003074533,0.00001676727,0.000005510297,0.00003692014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3186637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060774598","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2012.708670","title":"Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Deliberation; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02560558168211338,"gpt":0.2613166062438729,"spread":0.2357110245617595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002251741,0.00007831228,0.00009510986,0.00006689945,0.00008748406,0.00004531215,0.00006888224,0.00003256059,0.000002013744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001898521,0.00006895189,0.00002379486,0.00009931313,0.00001488574,0.0006730022,0.0000536064,0.00003404904,0.000006993051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003176448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000830752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006523963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005355379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992957,0.00007957082,0.0001761621,0.0001466546,0.0001869674,0.000114917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959,0.00005515522,0.0001441824,0.0000922809,0.00006998746,0.00004834338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004859544,0.0006580569,0.06224012,0.0001864179,0.00009561042,0.00000135005,0.04228418,0.002151372,0.03078031,0.1153121,0.001606438,0.7446354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004626965,0.0001091589,0.9210123,0.00003569761,0.0000134095,0.000006509608,0.0001213124,0.0706277,0.006078837,0.001192955,0.0001949418,0.0001445075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4725678,0.0002244784,0.5263647,0.0001173088,0.0003019531,0.000156935,0.000001107923,0.00003568505,0.0002299643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875362,0.00001441442,0.01225864,0.00004233092,0.00008038916,0.000008376782,0.0000276038,0.000003824405,0.00002821448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8587722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2811776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594775042","doi":"10.3233/aac-170015","title":"Emotions and personality traits in argumentation: An empirical evaluation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Psychology; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09652659358343366,"gpt":0.4403280025059979,"spread":0.3438014089225642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006251556,0.00009117194,0.00009768302,0.00007295909,0.0003059182,0.0001245488,0.00009384771,0.00005648574,0.0002618561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001766563,0.00009646457,0.00002080181,0.00004808548,0.00005399197,0.0003864781,0.00002224303,0.0000935315,0.00003572029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007671285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002631384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000291476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000456051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990239,0.000145011,0.0002016467,0.0002761764,0.0002090023,0.0001442472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995412,0.00003112957,0.0001364895,0.0001717207,0.00006283211,0.00005665468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005655697,0.000470281,0.5451063,0.00001456407,0.00003117702,0.000004135097,0.01533226,0.001495293,0.00008885606,0.003689819,0.0002772024,0.4334336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009690134,0.00009248233,0.8150288,0.000009226871,0.0000145664,0.000005184079,0.0003521638,0.180271,0.000001836643,0.003049369,0.0001202886,0.00008603735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912,0.00003771538,0.003157306,0.001321133,0.0003115872,0.0003292063,0.00000817357,0.00002265955,0.003612245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986569,0.000005692264,0.000835171,0.0001698136,0.00007956236,0.00004822508,0.00009979756,0.000007673042,0.00009712775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4333475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3933711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761184889","doi":"10.3233/aac-170028","title":"Rhetorical figures as argument schemes – The proleptic suite","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Suite; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03890601643358559,"gpt":0.3164928090384211,"spread":0.2775867926048355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002296374,0.0001623236,0.000174156,0.0000489964,0.001786018,0.000934027,0.0003468588,0.0000205445,0.0008552952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008098753,0.0001040888,0.0001158689,0.00001658104,0.000320576,0.000316018,0.00015306,0.0001015629,0.0004894643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005358124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002162565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002577892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002764131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998864,0.0000492795,0.0002278962,0.0002384809,0.0003944839,0.00022586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991487,0.00007574233,0.0002347686,0.0003842114,0.0001187292,0.00003785728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003480051,0.0003683257,0.001558748,0.00005554006,0.001028305,0.00002625177,0.05078482,0.0005628346,0.00005853726,0.8453761,0.03485425,0.06529143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001662479,0.0005128076,0.009980768,0.000232866,0.001054599,0.000007413932,0.02730168,0.009342112,0.0007206568,0.06560856,0.8825449,0.001031122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5371913,0.001599122,0.0007441101,0.01344029,0.001780534,0.0008568075,0.00001231024,0.0001985258,0.4441769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869638,0.00003617311,0.0001012672,0.0004062154,0.0007055848,0.00006348181,0.00002106193,0.00001409365,0.01168829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8476907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763036384","doi":"10.3233/aac-170030","title":"Rhetorical figures, arguments, computation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Computation; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02716298233572081,"gpt":0.3223292686524524,"spread":0.2951662863167316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003148628,0.0001965262,0.0001835956,0.0001241995,0.0007393271,0.001092289,0.001144268,0.00008827359,0.000007407722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008575845,0.0001875811,0.00006838309,0.0001240378,0.00005377151,0.001449573,0.0004244467,0.0001829942,0.00009689232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001615663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004715991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006802336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003161608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983343,0.00006917737,0.0003034494,0.0004951463,0.0005026779,0.000295272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987149,0.00007025053,0.0003954566,0.0005555727,0.000164681,0.00009919453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001900204,0.0002770001,0.001532469,0.00007375252,0.00005676733,0.00006995333,0.0007297055,0.0009572142,0.00198986,0.1668671,0.01314082,0.8142864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001592766,0.0003437238,0.009482603,0.0002261426,0.00003375537,0.00005432687,0.00002428227,0.5483994,0.01389112,0.4177432,0.007243671,0.0009649983],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006594809,0.0004309078,0.9872376,0.00178694,0.0006606035,0.0002762819,0.000001529361,0.0007047763,0.002306565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6669236,0.00001199668,0.3325682,0.0002189793,0.00008105474,0.00001627773,0.00002093857,0.00001007565,0.000148884],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8133214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547096835","doi":"10.3233/aac-160009","title":"Towards a richer model of deliberation dialogue: Closure problem and change of circumstances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Aberdeen; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Deliberation; Computer science; Closure (psychology); Natural (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Extension (predicate logic); Epistemology; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering; Geography; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04854872818810164,"gpt":0.2641609590991205,"spread":0.2156122309110188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002673456,0.00008721524,0.0001463866,0.00008503202,0.00003568223,0.00002163697,0.0001061222,0.00004280871,0.000001804881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009212208,0.00006372839,0.00003101203,0.0001310705,0.00002200157,0.0006072664,0.00004767433,0.00001998532,0.000002185731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000305907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002965823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006457759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001763757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990491,0.0000625883,0.0003204716,0.0002123212,0.0002548555,0.0001006353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993703,0.00003985823,0.0002899345,0.0001134974,0.0001548611,0.00003154844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003775452,0.0003641253,0.01921847,0.0004695868,0.00009659225,0.000001078093,0.0191967,0.008316264,0.1056978,0.07771672,0.0004140371,0.7684709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001266385,0.0002212894,0.04197698,0.0002226078,0.00001858406,0.000001570125,0.00002526967,0.9192339,0.01100046,0.025783,0.00004503883,0.0002049047],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2831153,0.0001209587,0.7158549,0.0004087655,0.00008277749,0.0002796324,0.000004584173,0.00002512831,0.0001080213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754142,0.00005864745,0.02438813,0.00004099283,0.00003168873,0.00003116187,0.000005565497,0.000004882053,0.00002475941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9109176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2598768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752756221","doi":"10.3233/aac-170027","title":"Ontological representations of rhetorical figures for argument mining","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Natural language processing; Philosophy; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06141192465762198,"gpt":0.3821481057053004,"spread":0.3207361810476784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002604827,0.0001191249,0.0002240394,0.00009968263,0.0003719888,0.000156448,0.0007090706,0.00005119818,0.000005463393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002056918,0.0001108365,0.0001264775,0.00009089537,0.00006433357,0.000563846,0.0002213321,0.00005307929,0.000004244533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007185648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002700193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000227126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001011751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987243,0.00004445487,0.0003691344,0.0003839367,0.0002871422,0.0001909672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984565,0.0002457904,0.0004681062,0.0005918239,0.0001818331,0.00005595482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006308562,0.0008889285,0.01692734,0.00008992162,0.0002603325,0.00001569434,0.002255801,0.01287913,0.01016124,0.4663888,0.008313111,0.4817567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001413259,0.0006686781,0.04984435,0.00009313107,0.00008458897,0.000007708832,0.0001370214,0.7181324,0.0324567,0.1935834,0.003074083,0.0005045844],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0333616,0.0000401586,0.9635826,0.001011267,0.0001456751,0.0003313782,0.000002101614,0.0001349112,0.001390281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6450034,0.000008140262,0.3547469,0.00003997068,0.00002975151,0.00006156222,0.00001008829,0.000004163947,0.00009596918],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7052533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.451978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163927353","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2013.858183","title":"On a razor's edge: evaluating arguments from expert opinion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Computer science; Matching (statistics); Scheme (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Management science; Mathematics; Engineering; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04759823815506257,"gpt":0.3282752797136055,"spread":0.2806770415585429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003065409,0.0002038143,0.0001807175,0.0001289674,0.0002067923,0.0003555648,0.0003616624,0.00006784075,0.000121546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004567025,0.0001896737,0.00007035428,0.0002046358,0.00001114824,0.000766033,0.0001223629,0.0000956966,0.001392279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000167547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003371245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006468777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002792379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978747,0.0002040789,0.000433051,0.0005528332,0.0006634216,0.0002718871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989105,0.0002116602,0.0002727502,0.0003701829,0.0001283024,0.0001065508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002750309,0.000787504,0.002149878,0.0000345247,0.0001508065,0.000004000612,0.008196495,0.02352381,0.03625769,0.01526751,0.0305136,0.8830867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001220175,0.000244121,0.02564606,0.0001264896,0.000003372276,0.000001312209,0.00005639887,0.9587817,0.002756782,0.009957687,0.0009245676,0.0002813252],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3983136,0.0001478472,0.5969295,0.0008857115,0.002056765,0.0008268923,0.000001717765,0.0002130525,0.0006248633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674502,0.00001764823,0.03117844,0.0007886821,0.0002357369,0.0001508838,0.00008208959,0.00001488848,0.00008143537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9352579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810540096","doi":"10.3233/aac-180037","title":"An annotation scheme for Rhetorical Figures","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Annotation; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02827859794793445,"gpt":0.3577931504042945,"spread":0.3295145524563601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002059474,0.0001073874,0.000111902,0.000127184,0.0001800862,0.0001318403,0.0003401099,0.00004268655,0.000005531365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002915979,0.0001074528,0.00005106589,0.0003255569,0.00003299247,0.0009289562,0.00004569927,0.00004175532,0.00003344668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008235838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000240486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005316384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004712946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989659,0.00004223447,0.0002170149,0.0003667714,0.0002252908,0.0001827818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991711,0.00007073621,0.0001236699,0.0002751189,0.0002983634,0.00006103329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003942627,0.0004441607,0.0009462367,0.00002753392,0.000062485,0.000002359554,0.001817179,0.002604613,0.0378072,0.3127714,0.008235228,0.6352422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707397,0.0005445107,0.001336926,0.000009707084,0.000008439741,0.000001474455,0.0000165194,0.8852614,0.02316177,0.08541729,0.003795441,0.0001758198],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03029546,0.00001733392,0.9681867,0.0003330263,0.0001453799,0.0002560083,9.824892e-7,0.0004457603,0.0003193919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5542969,0.000001608336,0.4453268,0.000167116,0.0001134042,0.0000339654,0.00002525035,0.000005555657,0.00002943747],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8826568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4381796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122806568","doi":"10.1080/19462160903494576","title":"A dialogue model of belief","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02176194539871587,"gpt":0.2552434514275449,"spread":0.233481506028829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002237012,0.0000775173,0.0001050547,0.00008244927,0.00005799843,0.00004090592,0.000226883,0.00004336853,0.000004853091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001478511,0.00007366067,0.00004304353,0.0001294391,0.00001373336,0.0003164468,0.00006531728,0.00007124516,0.00003373049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001422726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003383393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005847924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002640297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991753,0.00002770832,0.0002493692,0.0001993421,0.0002341978,0.0001140985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994492,0.00004091413,0.0001629462,0.0002145054,0.00008873081,0.0000437046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001124543,0.0004241766,0.004389017,0.00009487918,0.00005065416,0.000002468032,0.006260309,0.2120176,0.3406103,0.3264864,0.001627736,0.1080252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002783852,0.00003287002,0.00385059,0.00000836854,0.000003298562,0.000001319595,0.000004465066,0.9846928,0.005973339,0.004967855,0.0001079107,0.00007877608],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.355596,0.000005814389,0.6432962,0.0001617221,0.0003693027,0.0001290746,0.000001412354,0.00004882806,0.0003916111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364791,0.000002101312,0.06332111,0.00007565379,0.0000428593,0.00001003549,0.00001209917,0.000004499854,0.00005252539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7726752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3003795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001675652","doi":"10.3233/aac-190480","title":"Using argumentation schemes to find motives and intentions of a rational agent","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09130547309951224,"gpt":0.3223798003914414,"spread":0.2310743272919291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001372508,0.00009627829,0.0001226445,0.0001050175,0.0001005346,0.00008515774,0.0001099812,0.00002415386,0.000008854509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004141068,0.00009959859,0.00003674505,0.000277308,0.00001474349,0.0004694485,0.00009514946,0.00003656261,0.0000119534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004463715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003576944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002180688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002227718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998911,0.00006613241,0.0003202061,0.0002741496,0.0003256029,0.0001029237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994724,0.00004389963,0.0001771672,0.00008139476,0.0001327309,0.00009234004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000578882,0.0004373229,0.02179685,0.0002927153,0.0002142401,0.000004857983,0.02840147,0.1463681,0.6637791,0.07765421,0.0008478606,0.06014539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005414849,0.000144213,0.06399865,0.00005246234,0.00001442994,0.000002552196,0.0002008733,0.9221579,0.01198581,0.0005966621,0.0001703115,0.0001346845],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.411439,0.00002597583,0.5872622,0.0008878011,0.00008980869,0.0002352313,0.000002357316,0.00002518781,0.00003243981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.896862,0.000004033134,0.102756,0.0002977778,0.00003772561,0.00001071042,0.00001635701,0.000004701036,0.00001073548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7757897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4061512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520165696","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2016.1171255","title":"Argumentative meanings and their stylistic configurations in clinical research publications","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Syntagmatic analysis; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Linguistics; Topos theory; Deixis; Computer science; Semantic field; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Anaphora (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4129835440451434,"gpt":0.4416579211516708,"spread":0.02867437710652737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009530391,0.00008769818,0.0001464884,0.0001905586,0.0003115197,0.0001892893,0.00007265274,0.00002927181,0.00004292421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004917991,0.00007270421,0.00002089701,0.00007111865,0.0004702846,0.0001289464,0.00006921694,0.0001794102,0.00004693336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000549181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006399394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002388939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000797336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989108,0.0001917428,0.0003493751,0.0002233334,0.0001468115,0.0001779097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986473,0.0005640812,0.00008495757,0.00008794255,0.0005460972,0.00006964595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001340118,0.000214448,0.007185252,0.000007620888,0.00005665558,0.000002497451,0.1027673,0.00002121285,0.000003808699,0.8757211,0.007387429,0.006619317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00340575,0.0009813847,0.0711652,0.00008334371,0.00005306593,0.000005920886,0.1089588,0.02774299,0.00003164837,0.4195107,0.3675455,0.0005156701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8435839,0.000313904,0.001009493,0.004487082,0.0006776655,0.0006389014,0.00003815897,0.0001093539,0.1491416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983181,0.00002655691,0.0002203724,0.0001692139,0.0001925843,0.00005532377,0.0000637448,0.000007501597,0.0009465715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4562104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2964791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030170053","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2010.486481","title":"The structure of argumentation in health product messages","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01080003608730033,"gpt":0.2800755219068811,"spread":0.2692754858195807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005397412,0.00009147757,0.0001185405,0.00009342923,0.0001454874,0.00008793038,0.0002618374,0.00002156242,0.000004528696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003158291,0.00006828891,0.00002682818,0.0002799102,0.00002186657,0.0003456964,0.00004675197,0.0001206924,0.000004791044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004578902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000643371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002518725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004838142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987128,0.0001347087,0.0004415986,0.0002419973,0.0003044754,0.0001643998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991735,0.0000939559,0.0003735524,0.0002501269,0.00007436925,0.00003456169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002882149,0.000347779,0.04870835,0.000284639,0.00005734975,0.000002268442,0.0118928,0.02403527,0.2151209,0.1516961,0.001634415,0.5461913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001562159,0.0001785577,0.5828178,0.0001026769,0.000005587971,0.00001103585,0.0002268511,0.3346979,0.06099522,0.01641729,0.002664616,0.0003203273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8643826,0.0001282952,0.1306229,0.002945363,0.001158171,0.0006566317,0.000002044724,0.00004807728,0.00005588572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896189,0.00001938024,0.01017751,0.00007599616,0.00004956239,0.000006203418,0.00001475172,0.000004918079,0.0000327669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.545871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2784741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046052255","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2014.1001790","title":"Context-aware reconfiguration of large-scale surveillance systems: argumentative approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control reconfiguration; Argumentative; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Scale (ratio); Political science; Embedded system; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03168491562197925,"gpt":0.2753068880884409,"spread":0.2436219724664617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008577359,0.0001848999,0.000308927,0.0001117762,0.0001017297,0.0001355154,0.0003639609,0.00007307216,0.000004055717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004332139,0.0001696194,0.00006620455,0.0003543362,0.00004146861,0.0005812831,0.00009845367,0.00009267702,0.00006458116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001567464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001175991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008130661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002701021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981026,0.0003179927,0.0004556731,0.0004400356,0.0004141065,0.0002696023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985716,0.0001142189,0.0003963249,0.000279553,0.0005087437,0.0001295637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003123114,0.00442479,0.06328768,0.000929967,0.0006992113,0.00003297434,0.1700013,0.1205961,0.001130314,0.4467402,0.03652246,0.1553228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002075638,0.0003764692,0.004978153,0.00005569428,0.00001327515,0.00001809499,0.004349644,0.9817581,0.001080567,0.00287642,0.002063629,0.000354348],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04326212,0.0004133274,0.9430575,0.0001199551,0.000760671,0.0005157765,0.00001047521,0.0001525319,0.01170769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990953,0.00001020265,0.008467478,0.00007649294,0.00007594665,0.00004803079,0.000105357,0.00001052971,0.0002529383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9476909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6916876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786363783","doi":"10.3233/aac-180039","title":"Representing argumentation schemes with Constraint Handling Rules (CHR)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02331531191173238,"gpt":0.278048186050768,"spread":0.2547328741390356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003950002,0.0001631846,0.0001526606,0.0001431661,0.0003404573,0.0003434513,0.0002255155,0.00004427824,0.00002320397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002593304,0.0001443317,0.00004206491,0.0002539738,0.00006695028,0.0008254175,0.00008660654,0.0000709421,0.0001520912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008065777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005021604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007494669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001693618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983678,0.000092631,0.000368193,0.0004799455,0.0004319762,0.0002594894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990331,0.00008184974,0.0003127191,0.0002644659,0.0002354534,0.00007241264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001479101,0.0008916143,0.08953054,0.000336678,0.0005895255,0.00006048417,0.0223016,0.01348978,0.06651687,0.18922,0.002442228,0.6144728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001852523,0.0003613031,0.02601508,0.0002545414,0.00002928238,0.00003882771,0.0003515565,0.9295856,0.03671076,0.00267583,0.001652193,0.0004725073],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3984802,0.0000258017,0.5998688,0.0002293457,0.0002654114,0.0002489678,7.996078e-7,0.0001485379,0.000732123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935252,0.000003969649,0.1060147,0.0001309132,0.0001904739,0.00002189225,0.00003175758,0.00001060257,0.00007053411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9160958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5885677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002330963","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2011.637641","title":"Reasoning about knowledge using defeasible logic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Descriptive knowledge; Computer science; Non-monotonic logic; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1088828001548048,"gpt":0.3128346801907785,"spread":0.2039518800359737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003558094,0.0001324799,0.0001330553,0.0001321346,0.0001936138,0.0001002893,0.0002644485,0.0000509094,0.0000240434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001523962,0.0001283954,0.00005712185,0.0002934347,0.0000136347,0.0005788236,0.0001096164,0.00006344839,0.000187834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001088933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000460534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001500146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001054474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988371,0.0001224634,0.0002835412,0.0003377583,0.0001907572,0.0002284162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993687,0.000033425,0.0001919433,0.0002241211,0.000108567,0.00007322209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005863708,0.002131414,0.06938591,0.0004492805,0.0002872377,0.00007676056,0.062468,0.03733866,0.03096428,0.6020766,0.001872358,0.1928908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004988425,0.00008278702,0.0400178,0.0001192521,0.00001467938,0.0000225343,0.00006298265,0.9501312,0.003334389,0.00514384,0.0003119192,0.0002597687],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1253386,0.0002304407,0.8690423,0.00001597264,0.0006186712,0.0002943242,3.888967e-7,0.0001395641,0.004319769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.854069,0.000004931065,0.1457101,0.00005168747,0.00006257052,0.00001472849,0.00000535239,0.000008440327,0.00007320024],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5235811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}