{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":16,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"40548d49253d","filters":{"venue":"Argument & Computation"}},"results":[{"id":"W2383705587","doi":"10.3233/aac-160001","title":"Combining explanation and argumentation in dialogue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Floris Bex","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02049617440807758,"gpt":0.2571513154001686,"spread":0.236655140992091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01106965,0.0009929035,0.001345987,0.002243357,0.002069546,0.008397271,0.001662068,0.003895603,0.004324236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01812056,0.0007746155,0.001311007,0.001595438,0.008307477,0.01431854,0.008794966,0.002687282,0.0006331079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001956166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001651706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001461617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001140979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9806463,0.01510443,0.0006682022,0.00115945,0.001813992,0.0006077181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875939,0.009902765,0.0004129512,0.001176697,0.0005733765,0.000340224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001008001,0.00004123892,0.0005505365,0.0003209304,0.00007267245,0.0003022808,0.004001161,0.01007647,0.0009859761,0.9265628,0.001338722,0.05564638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003551448,0.00004843028,0.0002149744,0.0001119169,0.00004364784,0.0001799717,0.0004829355,0.03097199,0.0006223557,0.9462118,0.0210416,0.00003487417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0230214,0.004676067,0.9149678,0.006352413,0.000357239,0.0001584137,0.00006119402,0.0005413585,0.04986414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7393842,0.001822858,0.2512388,0.0006417068,0.0003787999,0.0002497034,0.0001254459,0.0001096333,0.006048912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01106965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05854261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060774598","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2012.708670","title":"Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Deliberation; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Katie Atkinson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Trevor Bench‐Capon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02560558168211338,"gpt":0.2613166062438729,"spread":0.2357110245617595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005199143,0.000546633,0.0006648195,0.001483631,0.002518296,0.005995756,0.0009233275,0.003250849,0.006366631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0179302,0.0005287497,0.0007612116,0.001260921,0.01247104,0.007913425,0.00461362,0.002924135,0.001033475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001585819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001227345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007751022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003516033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9852707,0.008757159,0.0008600409,0.001781898,0.002327467,0.001002718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876061,0.008201209,0.001376828,0.001237729,0.0009376835,0.0006403248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005238055,0.00001585948,0.000337135,0.00009220775,0.000007169147,0.0001673312,0.007403892,0.0005033062,0.0008641955,0.9813856,0.0005487817,0.008622161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005112125,0.0000589748,0.0008474601,0.00006682421,0.00001377366,0.000649019,0.002337403,0.004364388,0.0009162678,0.9442943,0.04636194,0.00003840317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09971473,0.002325109,0.6127764,0.007440122,0.0003903088,0.0005900404,0.0003842686,0.001017925,0.2753612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9131189,0.0003178538,0.07314016,0.0004358178,0.0001803568,0.0006418004,0.0001462631,0.000168433,0.01185037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006366631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02749604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594775042","doi":"10.3233/aac-170015","title":"Emotions and personality traits in argumentation: An empirical evaluation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Psychology; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Serena Villata","is_ca":false},{"name":"Elena Cabrio","is_ca":false},{"name":"Imène Jraidi","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mohamed S. Benlamine","is_ca":true},{"name":"Maher Chaouachi","is_ca":true},{"name":"Claude Frasson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Fabien Gandon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09652659358343366,"gpt":0.4403280025059979,"spread":0.3438014089225642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006674057,0.0004556025,0.0006173339,0.001902461,0.001002499,0.001542596,0.0005507665,0.0009150556,0.00487803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01677084,0.0002594542,0.001293361,0.001112806,0.0009885051,0.000839346,0.001032746,0.001060657,0.001374165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005403754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003661214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009242209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000752328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971039,0.001760192,0.0002092313,0.0002959151,0.0004678096,0.0001629794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777594,0.01394196,0.002986482,0.001204535,0.002185878,0.00192184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002181652,0.003865506,0.9459692,0.0004890553,0.0003626792,0.0005047028,0.007544481,0.0003314542,0.0004112148,0.0007545445,0.001863833,0.03572169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001974686,0.001881383,0.9866253,0.0001380237,0.000207059,0.0005099121,0.00537365,0.001439987,0.0001913022,0.0005077198,0.002889411,0.00003873138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997063,0.0003329103,0.0004016441,0.00006895488,0.00002168173,0.0002926115,0.0003316833,0.000005558359,0.001481902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964264,0.0002796863,0.0007617297,0.00006649934,0.00004258905,0.0006672547,0.0005273483,0.00001002272,0.001218441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006674057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0352962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761184889","doi":"10.3233/aac-170028","title":"Rhetorical figures as argument schemes – The proleptic suite","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Suite; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Law","authors":[{"name":"Ashley Rose Mehlenbacher","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03890601643358559,"gpt":0.3164928090384211,"spread":0.2775867926048355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005629953,0.0007054197,0.000825442,0.004013298,0.003154568,0.01594695,0.001692034,0.00254523,0.01261265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01926073,0.0007642083,0.001046279,0.003552123,0.01704791,0.02539057,0.005203228,0.003628944,0.00427726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001519901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008014243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009998998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947261,0.003005949,0.000317382,0.0006286648,0.001121904,0.0001998688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992083,0.00456576,0.0005343289,0.00189881,0.0006850089,0.0002331093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003613174,0.000001575372,0.00004576455,0.00002209908,0.000001540761,0.00001454713,0.000625322,0.000106158,0.00007790612,0.9954498,0.0004704659,0.003181091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006283786,0.000004973027,0.00007988633,0.00006759915,0.000004844734,0.00008199999,0.0006467952,0.002327444,0.0003287735,0.9588181,0.03762477,0.000008500811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02347112,0.002090523,0.6968586,0.007221079,0.0004051714,0.0001732949,0.0006660323,0.0009692376,0.2681449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6124091,0.002143426,0.3562634,0.0009402117,0.0004469897,0.0003798273,0.0008748388,0.001093611,0.02544853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01594695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04219347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763036384","doi":"10.3233/aac-170030","title":"Rhetorical figures, arguments, computation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Computation; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":true},{"name":"Chrysanne Di Marco","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02716298233572081,"gpt":0.3223292686524524,"spread":0.2951662863167316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002431879,0.0007170116,0.001129141,0.004322769,0.002896288,0.01201818,0.001335425,0.003300033,0.01469236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01074089,0.0009005509,0.000877286,0.005246506,0.01356911,0.0212451,0.002350659,0.004267377,0.002653767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003102117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001318952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002324801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002111046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979522,0.001000299,0.0001325283,0.0004085551,0.0004047457,0.0001016044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947746,0.003944766,0.0003130811,0.0004965983,0.0003365773,0.0001344134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001011488,0.00001304929,0.0001234825,0.0001171812,0.000007046078,0.00003745259,0.0003629194,0.0003750803,0.0002130935,0.9821537,0.002909327,0.01367761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000468188,0.00000240212,0.00008893993,0.00002942436,0.000005850575,0.00006138878,0.0001107161,0.001174857,0.00009502169,0.9879696,0.01045204,0.000005124909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04798031,0.07887578,0.6018583,0.03448528,0.001630579,0.0001330794,0.0007963078,0.001266341,0.232974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7483954,0.01925393,0.196144,0.002014091,0.00303224,0.0002477346,0.0007909882,0.0004785828,0.02964296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01469236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04915088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547096835","doi":"10.3233/aac-160009","title":"Towards a richer model of deliberation dialogue: Closure problem and change of circumstances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Aberdeen; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Deliberation; Computer science; Closure (psychology); Natural (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Extension (predicate logic); Epistemology; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering; Geography; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alice Toniolo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Timothy J. Norman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04854872818810164,"gpt":0.2641609590991205,"spread":0.2156122309110188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01389674,0.0007510519,0.001898901,0.001812743,0.002861958,0.009980164,0.003095562,0.005903878,0.004729934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04000671,0.0009731023,0.003328464,0.001588317,0.01137748,0.02589868,0.008906432,0.007653037,0.00063053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002830186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002183705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002641967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001725078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868302,0.008965939,0.000792812,0.00145748,0.001288833,0.0006647462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9708804,0.01831861,0.00261136,0.005216953,0.00131044,0.001662266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001012268,0.0000558434,0.0008803676,0.0001049601,0.00002825637,0.0002556598,0.004548303,0.03048241,0.0006446644,0.952532,0.0007847622,0.009581542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004122748,0.00005419659,0.0002237718,0.00007682896,0.00002401952,0.0001741794,0.001026244,0.1704967,0.0004297628,0.8196861,0.007722446,0.00004439422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02511116,0.0004714398,0.9523965,0.006055927,0.0001244704,0.0001477167,0.0001100816,0.0002435873,0.01533907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6132549,0.0004783192,0.3809333,0.0007206469,0.0002153615,0.0004164813,0.0002212422,0.0001535167,0.00360616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01389674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0734939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752756221","doi":"10.3233/aac-170027","title":"Ontological representations of rhetorical figures for argument mining","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Natural language processing; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Jelena Mitrović","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cliff O’Reilly","is_ca":false},{"name":"Miljana Mladenović","is_ca":false},{"name":"Siegfried Handschuh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06141192465762198,"gpt":0.3821481057053004,"spread":0.3207361810476784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004009389,0.0009543184,0.0008177945,0.009890767,0.002865087,0.007227654,0.002393516,0.001717585,0.007215279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01894887,0.000815152,0.003026314,0.009433295,0.002442389,0.01196234,0.00350211,0.003443321,0.002499021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003119351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002532553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004859195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007971955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964561,0.001533992,0.0005220279,0.0003971,0.0009321111,0.0001586558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940644,0.00325434,0.0005390079,0.001335544,0.0006072998,0.000199366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003253296,0.00009595585,0.001477816,0.0003883463,0.00006018787,0.0002300816,0.002639896,0.008685062,0.001242041,0.8828461,0.00612085,0.09618112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001852862,0.0000216613,0.0008985723,0.0004774129,0.00007328329,0.0002649147,0.002091851,0.0977225,0.001922585,0.7633438,0.1331115,0.00005341596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006572835,0.000660023,0.9748107,0.001619846,0.0001297076,0.0003264121,0.002070094,0.001033121,0.01277725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08982019,0.0007798676,0.901221,0.0002250365,0.00008435149,0.0005510258,0.004722244,0.0002486666,0.002347643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009890767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02413756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163927353","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2013.858183","title":"On a razor's edge: evaluating arguments from expert opinion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Computer science; Matching (statistics); Scheme (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Management science; Mathematics; Engineering; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04759823815506257,"gpt":0.3282752797136055,"spread":0.2806770415585429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04316426,0.000949242,0.00134176,0.00375913,0.002428909,0.007908814,0.001898869,0.004253478,0.004648853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1655716,0.0006016447,0.001412884,0.001882957,0.007669197,0.01376755,0.004398014,0.0038123,0.0006333328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002658498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001890358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001503963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00197655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9522154,0.03429741,0.001773962,0.001997606,0.008967819,0.0007477088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8616405,0.1152372,0.004986,0.006012856,0.01067676,0.001446642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009115065,0.000116535,0.003551602,0.0005646592,0.0002227342,0.0002919981,0.006049362,0.01542903,0.002895452,0.7655306,0.003587121,0.2008493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001575726,0.0003231482,0.001694406,0.0004300262,0.0001559021,0.0002653351,0.00177487,0.1558031,0.005147408,0.8188417,0.01528209,0.0001245464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06271389,0.0006925911,0.9149946,0.004062297,0.0002326337,0.000219542,0.00006315319,0.0002672597,0.0167541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5516129,0.0002549234,0.4441519,0.0006489387,0.0001401027,0.000176714,0.0001140632,0.0001592117,0.002741157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04316426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2282771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810540096","doi":"10.3233/aac-180037","title":"An annotation scheme for Rhetorical Figures","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Annotation; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":true},{"name":"Chrysanne Di Marco","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sebastian Ruan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Cliff O’Reilly","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02827859794793445,"gpt":0.3577931504042945,"spread":0.3295145524563601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007821249,0.0007544121,0.0006573378,0.006890336,0.004289913,0.005748145,0.00229262,0.003276324,0.01995141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02778049,0.001035274,0.0009868358,0.0046217,0.004183618,0.01281909,0.005291978,0.003909177,0.01014013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002213794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002207858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001478841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001270131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993646,0.002559593,0.0009414448,0.00113987,0.001394252,0.0003188363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750004,0.009535926,0.001556642,0.007546687,0.005646658,0.0007136894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001261767,0.00003492472,0.001112745,0.0002220605,0.000009919353,0.0002675388,0.003724515,0.001080123,0.004650679,0.8627875,0.01946464,0.1065191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003522565,0.00007912087,0.0007788497,0.0004219757,0.00004499293,0.0006916987,0.0009509429,0.01555329,0.009109879,0.3436363,0.6285955,0.0001022043],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009198661,0.0002821673,0.9385226,0.003281547,0.001108542,0.0003365841,0.002484705,0.005158837,0.03962638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1005633,0.0004009386,0.8720481,0.000790039,0.0004213435,0.000591502,0.003418221,0.001638675,0.02012788],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01995141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06674409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122806568","doi":"10.1080/19462160903494576","title":"A dialogue model of belief","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02176194539871587,"gpt":0.2552434514275449,"spread":0.233481506028829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003293872,0.0006272436,0.0006331315,0.0011749,0.002107505,0.006284748,0.00209504,0.002743333,0.009521802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006193633,0.0004189933,0.001205444,0.001096871,0.005533785,0.0110776,0.00405448,0.003090343,0.001440409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00300531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001770423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002882901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001637759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963218,0.001963699,0.000177899,0.0005698991,0.0006899551,0.0002767338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969091,0.001661013,0.0001972282,0.0004889524,0.0004401665,0.0003034643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008417784,0.000005997496,0.00003872332,0.00001448754,0.000003502228,0.00003695375,0.0004837185,0.001081764,0.00007864371,0.995837,0.0004132081,0.001997669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002354094,0.00002214911,0.00004924687,0.00003361386,0.0000114199,0.0001048637,0.0002239493,0.02084194,0.0001449007,0.9515743,0.02695527,0.00001486715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01287683,0.001764805,0.8153632,0.01173272,0.0003671566,0.000114662,0.0002858159,0.0003570248,0.1571377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7366109,0.001159218,0.2251272,0.001319627,0.0004664389,0.0004130832,0.0003122779,0.0001135805,0.03447761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009521802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03185362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001675652","doi":"10.3233/aac-190480","title":"Using argumentation schemes to find motives and intentions of a rational agent","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09130547309951224,"gpt":0.3223798003914414,"spread":0.2310743272919291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01061166,0.0009042335,0.0007003166,0.004149774,0.001675701,0.004254805,0.002158517,0.00231987,0.005142155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0356412,0.0005680692,0.001520474,0.001323561,0.003372076,0.0101653,0.003474126,0.001616835,0.0007827902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00122922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001456569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008860037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001078539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932239,0.004209233,0.0005213536,0.0007236283,0.001174457,0.000147515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802216,0.01513044,0.001358208,0.001614132,0.001234279,0.0004413348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001878167,0.000103789,0.002775221,0.0003654063,0.0001493304,0.0002071582,0.002991714,0.02625168,0.002763013,0.8514904,0.001110322,0.1116042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001330241,0.0001163784,0.0008208677,0.0002939972,0.0001017283,0.0002387857,0.001039149,0.2099981,0.005122305,0.7627168,0.01932567,0.00009319306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02663982,0.0002897301,0.9649289,0.0007700584,0.00004658105,0.0001900747,0.00006509934,0.0001920682,0.006877763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2118475,0.0001456037,0.7859428,0.0000553502,0.0000181023,0.000135611,0.00009458514,0.00002986236,0.001730563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01061166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05612046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520165696","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2016.1171255","title":"Argumentative meanings and their stylistic configurations in clinical research publications","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Syntagmatic analysis; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Linguistics; Topos theory; Deixis; Computer science; Semantic field; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Anaphora (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"O. L. Gladkova","is_ca":true},{"name":"Chrysanne DiMarco","is_ca":true},{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4129835440451434,"gpt":0.4416579211516708,"spread":0.02867437710652737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01703394,0.0004919003,0.000618681,0.01619653,0.006359215,0.01788564,0.001151028,0.001543641,0.003460285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09625036,0.001003517,0.0005919819,0.01522252,0.01335444,0.01272548,0.007316223,0.002891764,0.0005857116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004366541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002188868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000843471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001228334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9599685,0.02887003,0.004131183,0.001849554,0.004381701,0.0007990301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8536687,0.1187943,0.01176275,0.00927193,0.005352019,0.001150282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001843134,0.00003896471,0.00833034,0.0004809874,0.00004686828,0.0007734887,0.1850258,0.0008177799,0.004878066,0.7599035,0.00174159,0.0377783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009730723,0.0001290984,0.02768122,0.001607304,0.0001551055,0.004125363,0.1584863,0.01163553,0.00622963,0.6563425,0.1332793,0.0002312406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6809452,0.006121858,0.1734658,0.01028226,0.0006214848,0.0005542222,0.001906663,0.0004971253,0.1256054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976218,0.0005873058,0.02136075,0.0001084751,0.0001169472,0.0001920695,0.0004014006,0.0001168138,0.0008982883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09008521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030170053","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2010.486481","title":"The structure of argumentation in health product messages","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01080003608730033,"gpt":0.2800755219068811,"spread":0.2692754858195807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0117708,0.0006486866,0.0007037249,0.007149901,0.004081953,0.01139487,0.001530978,0.003566128,0.005663516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05911483,0.0009098527,0.001024709,0.004010499,0.00893687,0.01600054,0.004088342,0.002162443,0.0008177267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004204936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002256118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001724299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00105025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9772691,0.01615797,0.001341878,0.001158297,0.003322975,0.0007498199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9383964,0.05109416,0.004291369,0.002389668,0.003103919,0.0007244642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000228986,0.0000608097,0.002217008,0.0003603964,0.00004231253,0.000596164,0.0391435,0.004659693,0.002416342,0.9121832,0.001029173,0.03706244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001077215,0.0001232228,0.00333572,0.000524523,0.00006075127,0.0004286921,0.01133465,0.03276853,0.002794389,0.9088886,0.03956043,0.00007282551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3295629,0.003926243,0.5079302,0.008846799,0.0002942531,0.0007615461,0.000399964,0.0005258104,0.1477523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084218,0.0005018458,0.08556307,0.0001385422,0.00006950326,0.0002623128,0.000246985,0.00008892621,0.004707085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06225067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046052255","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2014.1001790","title":"Context-aware reconfiguration of large-scale surveillance systems: argumentative approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control reconfiguration; Argumentative; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Scale (ratio); Political science; Embedded system; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Peter Novák","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cees Witteveen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03168491562197925,"gpt":0.2753068880884409,"spread":0.2436219724664617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004487859,0.0008396227,0.000801519,0.002117092,0.001541357,0.004630676,0.002603178,0.002314744,0.002682021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01472139,0.0006113849,0.001511362,0.001419021,0.004575869,0.004881698,0.00371895,0.002056163,0.0003195815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002531605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001421214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001787877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001951371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961299,0.001922991,0.0002724746,0.0005900598,0.0007537892,0.0003307818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892803,0.007943436,0.0008274842,0.0009818601,0.0006327212,0.0003342003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002629054,0.0002230844,0.002351143,0.00062682,0.0001909145,0.001457721,0.002932251,0.4034996,0.008359247,0.4886149,0.001891187,0.08959026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005141357,0.00005109395,0.0003199814,0.0001048782,0.0000687901,0.0001813929,0.0005820509,0.7873043,0.003614324,0.2008877,0.006803947,0.00003006765],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0357037,0.0004041998,0.9546967,0.001111538,0.00004305174,0.0002023526,0.00005982862,0.0004792417,0.007299383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6385155,0.0003201996,0.3586774,0.0001428912,0.00006852309,0.0002176073,0.0001393207,0.00008043635,0.001838098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004630676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02373433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786363783","doi":"10.3233/aac-180039","title":"Representing argumentation schemes with Constraint Handling Rules (CHR)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Thomas F. Gordon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Horst E. Friedrich","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02331531191173238,"gpt":0.278048186050768,"spread":0.2547328741390356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004389643,0.001391555,0.0008290767,0.002576898,0.001259874,0.005389944,0.00374038,0.002970572,0.006901527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01073904,0.001040295,0.002874012,0.002561386,0.002824634,0.006753435,0.003099914,0.00337885,0.002134513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001133518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002320261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004765809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003716643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954771,0.00166807,0.0006882042,0.0007950827,0.0009884939,0.0003830263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993261,0.003749578,0.0008960546,0.001062774,0.0008327605,0.0001978076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008626961,0.00008865797,0.0004643901,0.0005499433,0.00008887281,0.001047792,0.001186648,0.06197704,0.00537464,0.8576587,0.005168522,0.06630856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001834984,0.0001174707,0.000239681,0.0002529772,0.000158347,0.001158283,0.0002924161,0.2857592,0.01691629,0.5136728,0.1810803,0.0001686705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003212918,0.0001785847,0.9899558,0.0002616174,0.00006351117,0.0001876156,0.0003399773,0.001957348,0.003842633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0536165,0.0003357283,0.9410437,0.0001797992,0.00005584694,0.0004181957,0.0008514887,0.0003198032,0.003178907],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006901527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02321494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002330963","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2011.637641","title":"Reasoning about knowledge using defeasible logic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Descriptive knowledge; Computer science; Non-monotonic logic; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1088828001548048,"gpt":0.3128346801907785,"spread":0.2039518800359737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01259834,0.0009239599,0.001356585,0.003115632,0.003616328,0.01034439,0.003609313,0.003596655,0.004917816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02124836,0.001057829,0.002677524,0.002647573,0.009648617,0.0163344,0.007102264,0.004364644,0.0007966745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003037191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002626389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004072156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004614933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894878,0.005862414,0.0009680693,0.0008113032,0.002401959,0.0004685507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987575,0.008734955,0.0008704046,0.001620766,0.0007858168,0.0004130622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002574874,0.00001792762,0.0001639166,0.0001081506,0.00005449231,0.0002768177,0.0007424374,0.01436604,0.0002197073,0.9748292,0.0009413628,0.008254282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002284494,0.000008110205,0.00004311216,0.0000574862,0.00001958217,0.0001076738,0.0001981375,0.03006515,0.0003567295,0.9576582,0.01144512,0.00001789543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01300819,0.00106432,0.9565018,0.006751658,0.0001673677,0.0001679693,0.0001589998,0.0002974629,0.02188226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3516074,0.001346599,0.6398901,0.0008898005,0.0002404853,0.0003564161,0.0004317509,0.00009081791,0.005146522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01259834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06662714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}