{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":44,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":44,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"0f04f8ec0c3d","filters":{"venue":"Argumentation"}},"results":[{"id":"W1977123674","doi":"10.1007/s10503-015-9356-4","title":"A Meta-Level Approach to the Problem of Defining ‘Critical Thinking’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Critical thinking; Term (time); Computer science; Management science; Strengths and weaknesses; Position (finance); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2302165209402242,"gpt":0.3937863471461073,"spread":0.1635698262058831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001944637,0.00005603074,0.0001006833,0.00003695517,0.0002844385,0.00007231716,0.0001832386,0.00003183892,0.00005648212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003495807,0.00003931293,0.00004197166,0.0002590695,0.0001008999,0.0001287166,0.00003046128,0.00006302699,0.0001099256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007293145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002387954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003796785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007019747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987534,0.0002040703,0.000186603,0.0001264561,0.0005685977,0.0001609325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993834,0.0001827862,0.00003468483,0.00008353109,0.0001950611,0.0001204911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003336569,0.00008022971,0.0003283176,0.000005936125,0.00005111748,7.661382e-8,0.152585,0.00002220646,0.000006524986,0.8416341,0.003385457,0.001897659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004849275,0.0001133029,0.003214842,0.00003793179,0.0006434518,0.000002513707,0.2165728,0.00008456908,0.0006077866,0.611417,0.1664722,0.0003486471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05631525,0.0005609634,0.1089521,0.1787098,0.001243243,0.001850971,0.00002514933,0.0002443243,0.6520982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8101656,0.000003836097,0.1864313,0.002419661,0.00005475914,0.0001058147,0.00001142271,0.000005170624,0.0008023852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7538504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016904097","doi":"10.1007/s10503-009-9157-8","title":"Wrenching from Context: The Manipulation of Commitments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Dialectic; Fallacy; Argumentation theory; Sociology; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0258750860710752,"gpt":0.267559195080551,"spread":0.2416841090094758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001412627,0.00005132424,0.00006176212,0.0000302047,0.00008419384,0.00004853512,0.0001830363,0.00001890638,0.00001323726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007783217,0.00003816842,0.00002595796,0.00009052565,0.000005607699,0.0004200276,0.000015479,0.0000292192,0.00002019271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002739007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006022531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003696302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003144948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993755,0.00006691624,0.0001978782,0.0001138342,0.0001825341,0.00006330563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995378,0.00004962096,0.0001720875,0.000196351,0.0000293728,0.00001472866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002122681,0.0002891409,0.06665964,0.00001359481,0.00007567475,0.000002156779,0.02382399,0.001289287,0.09359848,0.1831894,0.001836157,0.6292013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006508377,0.00007304122,0.8820713,0.00003117298,0.00001082434,7.524727e-7,0.0002293566,0.08473961,0.02237472,0.009408774,0.0003209122,0.0000886579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6363726,0.00006387997,0.3618747,0.0007264365,0.0002623878,0.0002202552,0.000001758804,0.00003105891,0.0004469249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969044,0.000004006541,0.002644891,0.0003453193,0.00003323223,0.000004181182,0.00002544792,0.000001606123,0.00003687906],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8154117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1556463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188319134","doi":"10.1023/a:1019901304146","title":"Manifest Rationality Reconsidered: Reply to my Fellow Symposiasts","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rationality; Focus (optics); Political communication; Communication studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Social science; Politics; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07180288928727523,"gpt":0.258824402512435,"spread":0.1870215132251598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001394697,0.00009626094,0.00008067564,0.00007464735,0.0003301066,0.0001812337,0.00007289988,0.00001967501,0.007525502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000391968,0.00009967468,0.00003552108,0.00004036799,0.00004183367,0.000542649,0.0000136947,0.00005482594,0.002134995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006466216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009896492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001400598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001284792,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992031,0.00005395328,0.0002450284,0.0002008028,0.0001620394,0.000135003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995361,0.00006310092,0.00008569899,0.0001741726,0.00007654541,0.00006436743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001672693,0.0002569047,0.0007685723,0.00003411197,0.00004377723,0.000003290231,0.1044462,0.00004418078,0.0006214064,0.7036178,0.1812765,0.008870546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001424372,0.0004470121,0.01437086,0.0001438205,0.0001280188,0.00004236041,0.0122597,0.001309114,0.0049764,0.2495699,0.7142292,0.001099235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5968077,0.0001057224,0.0001761136,0.04295982,0.002488179,0.0006484559,0.00003972531,0.0001803356,0.3565939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838889,0.00001194952,0.0003850105,0.006999223,0.0007335169,0.00007817323,0.00008250563,0.00001132276,0.007809453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5329527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785615823","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9450-5","title":"Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Computer science; Argument (complex analysis); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Modular design; Action (physics); Management science; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0386218640602515,"gpt":0.3220105740568914,"spread":0.2833887099966399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002725779,0.00009311813,0.00008396222,0.00007304604,0.0001664872,0.0001989949,0.0001878425,0.00004370237,0.0000523531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004099355,0.0000875951,0.00003151138,0.0002374286,0.00002270375,0.001457716,0.00007253339,0.00005644,0.0003266919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005142883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002908341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003274178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001713573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988942,0.0000997444,0.0002039515,0.0003245027,0.0002940815,0.0001834991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994105,0.00002599617,0.000135313,0.0003026836,0.00006041925,0.00006514016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005370041,0.001045721,0.02323062,0.00009546661,0.0001979933,0.00002165715,0.01375273,0.0002198279,0.03692013,0.8564428,0.02845176,0.03956757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001376365,0.0002486616,0.0307023,0.00004673561,0.0000248592,0.00005378823,0.000377663,0.9253567,0.02897292,0.002018525,0.01042397,0.0003975521],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05725223,0.00001059906,0.9350117,0.000516354,0.000381708,0.0002451781,6.892865e-7,0.0001555191,0.006425949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7520246,0.000004052582,0.2471181,0.0002745216,0.0001688029,0.00002934653,0.00001687928,0.000007188142,0.0003565822],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4199072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245697206","doi":"10.1023/a:1019945119167","title":"The Practice of Argumentative Discussion","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dialectic; Communication studies; Political communication; Rationality; Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02261811009570617,"gpt":0.2943735452023237,"spread":0.2717554351066175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001605979,0.00006462691,0.00007457785,0.00002991199,0.0004052023,0.00008191573,0.0000831376,0.00000710741,0.001863614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103886,0.00003104704,0.00004843096,0.00003627414,0.0002339727,0.0004113253,0.00002467079,0.00003964808,0.0001279077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001902963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001962975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007257154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001702617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993395,0.00007484845,0.0001870937,0.00008937442,0.0002139349,0.00009526462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993879,0.0001964542,0.0001815761,0.0001202265,0.0001007779,0.0000130647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003028302,0.0002555459,0.0002142412,0.00001233504,0.0004639958,0.000003278858,0.369449,0.00001763417,0.0002712996,0.5001697,0.03456325,0.09454948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004750678,0.0001434636,0.0001732428,0.00002740286,0.0002912411,0.000001249567,0.5292184,0.0003417294,0.001705888,0.003657565,0.4638093,0.0001553974],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02838455,0.001841957,0.0001657718,0.01594418,0.0007811887,0.0003664249,0.00002000584,0.00005483836,0.9524411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980983,0.0002667047,0.0001452195,0.0002316711,0.0001334483,0.00002360856,0.000007789867,0.000006497085,0.01820203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9525985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045422233","doi":"10.1007/s10503-012-9262-y","title":"Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Argumentation theory; Dialogical self; Normative; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Inference; Argumentative; Communication studies; Causality (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02814967440824503,"gpt":0.2811262931950737,"spread":0.2529766187868286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003685996,0.00008340321,0.00009752993,0.00009314102,0.00007055578,0.00003164465,0.0001705196,0.00005000905,0.00005586337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003415391,0.00007622479,0.00003894868,0.0002255599,0.00001920197,0.001197994,0.00003453077,0.00003935668,0.0001068539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005187398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001211805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002472005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001320233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990027,0.0000850533,0.0003194059,0.0001652754,0.0002606116,0.0001669798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993448,0.00005188186,0.0002605028,0.0002157675,0.00007148815,0.00005558893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000187059,0.0005938156,0.2396345,0.0001058637,0.00005243372,4.81483e-7,0.006634504,0.0001243657,0.3344498,0.3230116,0.00118785,0.0941861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008061487,0.00009573506,0.6243016,0.00002568,0.00002720236,0.000006911597,0.0003941473,0.01382561,0.3572605,0.001018642,0.00199977,0.0002380713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5738695,0.00009107769,0.4246389,0.0001862594,0.000433537,0.0002183207,0.000001145929,0.00006260157,0.0004986596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727508,0.00001680779,0.02688453,0.00007981923,0.00008404975,0.0000344977,0.00004131957,0.000004244401,0.0001039591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3988813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3108357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015992625","doi":"10.1007/s10503-009-9174-7","title":"The Uses of Argument in Communicative Contexts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"One Mind","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Oblique case; Argumentation theory; Typology; Epistemology; Proposition; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01755234373517069,"gpt":0.2930221697169443,"spread":0.2754698259817736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003173222,0.00004838553,0.00006866358,0.0000397207,0.00007656274,0.00003880979,0.0003104641,0.00001573701,0.00000276504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018255,0.00003527478,0.00002096015,0.0001419256,0.00001611953,0.0002824204,0.00002857588,0.0000370419,0.00001050252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004355904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001212532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009369993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008891956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993136,0.0001271456,0.000234802,0.00009399489,0.0001445342,0.00008593702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999382,0.0001231019,0.0001567331,0.0002852514,0.0000379538,0.00001492597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000372332,0.0004679476,0.03178326,0.00001556284,0.00003470193,0.000002245354,0.02400459,0.0003889011,0.03357557,0.5548116,0.00111146,0.3537669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001286908,0.0002212228,0.9186653,0.00007403354,0.000004497309,0.000001703883,0.000655382,0.01755232,0.04699617,0.0128162,0.00158217,0.0001440528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9216496,0.0007002691,0.06881406,0.004989545,0.0003034815,0.0007677446,0.000001629532,0.00005105032,0.002722637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979428,0.00008390829,0.001722083,0.0001665688,0.000006537756,0.00001155822,0.000002862432,0.000001316366,0.00006236838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8868821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1438464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189468606","doi":"10.1023/a:1019993002329","title":"Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09520054357920177,"gpt":0.2460012440795053,"spread":0.1508007005003036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001517218,0.00005771737,0.00006509842,0.00002523789,0.0001065681,0.0000321661,0.00007465875,0.00001414211,0.001946754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001701084,0.00003597048,0.00005152655,0.00002200046,0.0001256756,0.0000723574,0.00001027418,0.00008417468,0.000144126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001130425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001995154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002289246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009687218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999503,0.0000495198,0.0001229892,0.00007507581,0.0001788487,0.00007053552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996023,0.0001505307,0.00007198739,0.0001207143,0.00003884673,0.0000155739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004345656,0.00008454471,0.000002925842,0.000004838708,0.0000233149,2.020325e-7,0.006648478,0.00000583405,0.0002256469,0.9904896,0.0006050958,0.001905157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001842481,0.0001315673,0.00005201002,0.00001757953,0.00002526438,1.174633e-7,0.0007106946,0.000411196,0.005620243,0.9507328,0.04204168,0.00007259302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4835065,0.0001725188,0.00004520866,0.020177,0.0005034186,0.0003050588,0.00002126058,0.00007341895,0.4951956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977205,0.00005172668,0.000008730316,0.001566733,0.0001559704,0.00001368175,0.000003862702,0.000008845352,0.0004699406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.514214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999134038","doi":"10.1007/s10503-008-9110-2","title":"Reasoning from Classifications and Definitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Informal logic; Argument map; Political communication; Communication studies; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Machine learning; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08011628943606784,"gpt":0.2550434387325153,"spread":0.1749271492964474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005092467,0.00004765241,0.00004659265,0.00004583265,0.0002577363,0.00004743126,0.00007934051,0.00002215278,0.00001737426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001647882,0.00004889923,0.00001422881,0.0001105922,0.00001604545,0.000487176,0.00002153018,0.00003017938,0.00007922313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002249196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001525471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001951919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001967231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994968,0.00003582266,0.000123918,0.0001684009,0.0001050599,0.00007003363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996584,0.00005512599,0.00006711074,0.0001539578,0.00002805915,0.00003732714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006281949,0.0002432574,0.2606645,0.00001520573,0.00006168696,0.0000152563,0.02350551,0.0001281748,0.04787541,0.6333664,0.00630767,0.02781067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004322414,0.00001916491,0.9530538,0.00001685219,0.000007714987,0.00001686376,0.0001653516,0.03879029,0.002414444,0.0039303,0.0010271,0.0001258834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5663288,0.00006360632,0.4314941,0.0004659685,0.0001376578,0.00009704012,0.000005051832,0.00008233626,0.001325502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9552668,0.00009863783,0.04431683,0.0001266152,0.00003357666,0.00002515419,0.00004905766,0.00000300804,0.00008033511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6923893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1994053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498181842","doi":"10.1007/s10503-016-9406-6","title":"Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Analogy; Defeasible reasoning; Computer science; Similarity (geometry); Inference; Predicate (mathematical logic); Defeasible estate; Argument (complex analysis); Feature (linguistics); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04543287219020772,"gpt":0.2797130563004607,"spread":0.234280184110253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004448118,0.0000789176,0.00007801351,0.00003439122,0.0002095331,0.00007724254,0.00003860889,0.00002414895,0.004538152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002832283,0.00004803128,0.00003439477,0.00001479007,0.000244044,0.0002998171,0.00002250697,0.00003656193,0.00006515982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002356947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005890282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000202539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001239976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994476,0.00004085895,0.000140477,0.0001632113,0.0001047252,0.0001031639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997065,0.00007652494,0.0000457124,0.00008247535,0.0000357258,0.00005304769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000177845,0.00004640204,0.002413474,0.000004684511,0.00002149203,8.3194e-7,0.0008405347,1.343908e-7,0.001089523,0.990798,0.000589155,0.004178012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008023042,0.00008838055,0.05643464,0.0000121939,0.00003451219,0.000001438267,0.0002451861,0.00000556892,0.0007940605,0.9286167,0.01284073,0.0001242616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972006,0.00002217827,0.0002356869,0.001508827,0.0002741385,0.0001382087,0.0001098461,0.00005555588,0.02564956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986226,0.000008807285,0.0000367239,0.0002819508,0.0003117707,0.0000136926,0.0000447712,0.000004671286,0.0006750118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06218125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081478863","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9026-2","title":"Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Chrysler (Canada); University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Communication studies; Political science; Social science; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03350166769368922,"gpt":0.2837933877003815,"spread":0.2502917200066923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001590775,0.00007233165,0.00006696508,0.00005635689,0.0003097843,0.00006776975,0.00007780235,0.00001426602,0.001634446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001447915,0.00006860214,0.00003411664,0.00002969338,0.00009109295,0.0001939757,0.00002524289,0.00004729806,0.0003543471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005309502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001561762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000901492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001155653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994265,0.00001701213,0.0001913485,0.00009584075,0.0001560771,0.0001131877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996226,0.00007935531,0.00007658317,0.0001097246,0.00008042735,0.00003129896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004377693,0.00008922988,0.0008024518,0.00000558911,0.00005674866,0.000003296148,0.05067655,0.000002628199,0.0004105799,0.9283165,0.005715632,0.01387696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001066484,0.0001381238,0.005893708,0.00002065808,0.0000281284,0.000009412341,0.03546477,0.00007598804,0.001083743,0.01018056,0.9457524,0.0002860044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2933645,0.0003725669,0.004349765,0.001414627,0.001248621,0.0002877682,0.000007879496,0.0001782384,0.6987761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897721,0.00006926082,0.0002782074,0.0005890218,0.0002623052,0.00001774318,0.00003863763,0.000006414004,0.008966244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579722416","doi":"10.1023/a:1012021017836","title":"Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Epistemology; Communication studies; Inference; Relation (database); Deductive reasoning; Informal logic; Computer science; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02618880074000957,"gpt":0.3169099835759731,"spread":0.2907211828359635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002743815,0.0001161275,0.0001009232,0.00009123346,0.0002157862,0.0001561808,0.0001190571,0.00004445817,0.00001220611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003494387,0.0001173204,0.00002199971,0.0001076155,0.00001239743,0.0009078339,0.00003885117,0.00003510402,0.00001743405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009130838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000419592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003410812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002306815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990046,0.00004854189,0.0002528755,0.0003274253,0.0001851914,0.0001813392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994935,0.00006972825,0.00014244,0.0001341574,0.00009732434,0.00006284806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001900566,0.0005233777,0.09388237,0.0003803827,0.0002595994,0.00001421239,0.04650838,0.0001719332,0.03861076,0.1921794,0.003912956,0.6233665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01017863,0.0006354797,0.3389551,0.0004337599,0.0000709842,0.00009018496,0.003041056,0.1784322,0.2944628,0.00607456,0.1659729,0.001652331],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2921706,0.00008320327,0.7063599,0.0003570304,0.0001705817,0.0006022438,0.000001444947,0.00007834194,0.0001766371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8600346,0.00005307493,0.138824,0.0002477921,0.00005579519,0.0002932792,0.00006096159,0.000009414037,0.0004210986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6217142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4784188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022807652","doi":"10.1007/s10503-020-09519-x","title":"Annotating Argument Schemes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Premise; Annotation; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03570340326657566,"gpt":0.2588582792412648,"spread":0.2231548759746891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001023651,0.00007387318,0.00007163726,0.00002848056,0.00008874587,0.0001113811,0.0001851889,0.00002007201,0.00003634442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002585599,0.00007222412,0.00002973478,0.000189471,0.000005296659,0.0006122026,0.00005227474,0.00004048945,0.000250367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002940744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001405345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000149057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001024646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991988,0.00004031967,0.0001939737,0.0002305748,0.0002152029,0.0001211281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996397,0.00002301326,0.0001089966,0.0001229325,0.00003411089,0.0000712762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002733433,0.0002344256,0.05106226,0.0002399287,0.0001345008,0.00002824129,0.04427542,0.001576522,0.3589412,0.2100015,0.01317692,0.3203018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002181609,0.0003058334,0.03978793,0.00005717486,0.00001956125,0.000006668922,0.0008302839,0.7359044,0.1923235,0.001271083,0.02670491,0.0006070436],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2308484,0.00005622841,0.7633003,0.004162836,0.0002597277,0.0002363066,0.000001098817,0.0001961313,0.000938952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666343,0.000005193173,0.03167663,0.00150231,0.00009276422,0.00001781595,0.00001131621,0.000004896754,0.0000547687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7357859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3218045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024283275","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9203-1","title":"Enthymemes: From Reconstruction to Understanding","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Phenomenon; Set (abstract data type); Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3097350493222602,"gpt":0.2811590068127098,"spread":0.02857604250955037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009257671,0.00006535326,0.00007430522,0.00005469052,0.0001776114,0.00004444129,0.00004733778,0.00002674232,0.002525702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001022037,0.00006438429,0.00003210511,0.00001888875,0.00008402992,0.0002539594,0.00001005539,0.00005828978,0.0002644005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006905833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001026396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009478506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001278822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995126,0.00003724026,0.0001388455,0.0001353305,0.00007717866,0.00009876645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999749,0.00003737025,0.00006135587,0.00008833063,0.00002681714,0.00003714244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002357208,0.00003317117,0.001388727,0.000007528976,0.00004816036,9.699471e-7,0.206166,7.376478e-7,0.0006301496,0.7852274,0.0007983136,0.005675249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007492104,0.0002519889,0.003194066,0.00007755642,0.0001224364,0.000002330826,0.1836721,0.0000422664,0.01285217,0.779895,0.01874428,0.0003966369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.700653,0.00004233203,0.008328325,0.0005350072,0.003729035,0.000266933,0.00003295029,0.0001187162,0.2862938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968359,0.00001067339,0.00118321,0.0005615415,0.0003289146,0.00001256727,0.00003329583,0.000008850512,0.001025011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.296183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063535110","doi":"10.1007/s10503-013-9306-y","title":"Applying Recent Argumentation Methods to Some Ancient Examples of Plausible Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Skepticism; Epistemology; Computer science; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04566720233134565,"gpt":0.339941475476082,"spread":0.2942742731447364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006864641,0.0001292446,0.0001659574,0.0002073466,0.000128657,0.0001402856,0.0002542777,0.00004126106,0.0001282065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006580375,0.0001266435,0.00004135553,0.000449786,0.00000986637,0.001380994,0.00009362392,0.00004865286,0.0001443437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000149062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003361673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007272971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001408546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983899,0.0001884511,0.0004597363,0.0003588551,0.0003681353,0.0002349507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990686,0.0001022502,0.0003031381,0.0002641966,0.0001579844,0.0001038725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006310678,0.00009881477,0.008192972,0.00005320439,0.00002993202,3.740204e-7,0.00438016,0.001765163,0.6473934,0.02678135,0.001259206,0.3100391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001185013,0.0002402763,0.1947955,0.0001647337,0.00002542539,0.000005761373,0.001335743,0.1123982,0.6797631,0.003107688,0.006499752,0.0004788738],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2972265,0.00007148003,0.7005733,0.000260446,0.0004198034,0.001167722,0.000001345531,0.00006834252,0.0002111491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4389078,0.00002729796,0.5598164,0.0004467392,0.00005302965,0.0006256443,0.0000220064,0.00001014295,0.0000910016],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3095602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5164372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979312761","doi":"10.1007/s10503-012-9272-9","title":"The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Criticism; Explication; Epistemology; Dialectic; Normative; Critical appraisal; Critical thinking; Adversary; Critical theory; Presupposition; Negation; Critical thought; Disinformation; Argumentative; Obligation; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04173456905127048,"gpt":0.3358983056179288,"spread":0.2941637365666583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003925264,0.00004164769,0.00006921783,0.00002503355,0.00008078591,0.00002586153,0.0001669339,0.0000172854,0.00001178089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001413661,0.00003092466,0.00002346825,0.00009931593,0.00008544949,0.0004799045,0.00002387008,0.00002403688,0.000005829892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001656873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001710458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001544916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003627059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992661,0.00008304042,0.0002353306,0.00007439347,0.0002171565,0.0001239836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992605,0.0003136136,0.0001629699,0.0001438948,0.0000930013,0.00002602452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007532008,0.00005560426,0.007271179,0.0001052344,0.0000202617,5.2142e-7,0.0121143,0.00006361007,0.1947508,0.7748761,0.0002567192,0.01047814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008087715,0.0001944072,0.04824192,0.0002836892,0.00003865411,0.00001877603,0.005832028,0.03475597,0.8914167,0.01618658,0.001909084,0.0003134297],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5383674,0.000981602,0.4557445,0.002318335,0.001051052,0.0002428986,0.000004565893,0.00003091617,0.001258723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934448,0.00001392661,0.006401479,0.00003133,0.0000593759,0.000008967393,7.469173e-7,0.000001960979,0.00003743001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7586895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1261071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015722806","doi":"10.1007/s10503-008-9104-0","title":"Evaluating Corroborative Evidence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2398645334628746,"gpt":0.4065833421626628,"spread":0.1667188086997882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002098407,0.00004910533,0.00004748005,0.00003361049,0.0001358366,0.00003214719,0.0002101062,0.00001413148,0.00001655364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009580378,0.00004867776,0.00001561542,0.0001601711,0.00001395839,0.0009626742,0.00005468155,0.0000411787,0.0001007545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004858714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005235403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002670627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002084154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999279,0.00006167425,0.0001261223,0.000197036,0.0002390519,0.00009708149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995416,0.00009349795,0.00006300601,0.0002024846,0.00007301141,0.00002641873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003151672,0.0001710057,0.06506142,0.0000479647,0.00005026196,0.00008793554,0.07879748,0.05835164,0.1508604,0.1265036,0.002265372,0.5177715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000293705,0.0001250837,0.01901825,0.00004431953,0.000004231893,0.00002753437,0.000113013,0.9585335,0.01746083,0.004196121,0.00003802747,0.0001453432],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3625474,0.00005977716,0.6364211,0.0003450116,0.000148588,0.00008073045,7.567785e-8,0.00006096245,0.0003363584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8075497,0.0000142395,0.1919859,0.000247215,0.00002823206,0.00001323338,8.447644e-7,0.000002043615,0.0001586168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9001819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1985021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987103036","doi":"10.1007/s10503-005-4414-y","title":"The Toulmin Model Today: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Work using Stephen Edelston Toulmin’s Layout of Arguments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Work (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering; Social science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05076076247895468,"gpt":0.3743354431500077,"spread":0.323574680671053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001081049,0.0001180377,0.0001473614,0.00004511368,0.0007158807,0.00007529103,0.000281007,0.00009986875,0.0001927104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004216885,0.00008561333,0.00006360733,0.0002523841,0.0003048799,0.0002381968,0.00005296998,0.0001492298,0.000106779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004060792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001193447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006142698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981813,0.0003705222,0.0003641728,0.0002585394,0.0005235273,0.0003019015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990271,0.0003736749,0.0001408652,0.000252251,0.0001219403,0.0000842099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008626746,0.0004278359,0.002203575,0.00001422695,0.0001255266,0.000002179926,0.1923758,0.03578345,0.002169616,0.1827922,0.376669,0.2065739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001086836,0.0002845976,0.001817487,0.00006381265,0.00009140235,0.0000011348,0.06776275,0.005555099,0.004203261,0.01490878,0.9037483,0.0004764934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8587513,0.0001062352,0.001568115,0.1064434,0.002445005,0.001364649,0.00002127456,0.00005507545,0.02924496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833949,0.00002822673,0.0009672327,0.001391701,0.01195592,0.00003982459,0.00001603484,0.00001405993,0.002192125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5270793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5506048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W183851629","doi":"10.1023/a:1014991300192","title":"Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy in Argumentation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Ambiguity; Focus (optics); Fallacy; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04150312515925259,"gpt":0.3190587741036113,"spread":0.2775556489443587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007660454,0.0000646783,0.00005344671,0.00004294214,0.000934097,0.00008480447,0.0001687438,0.00002407393,0.0005903044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002045369,0.00004071556,0.00002653539,0.0005840766,0.0001291307,0.0002559445,0.00001875343,0.0000887634,0.000166745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001326641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001887328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005197673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007885606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989289,0.0003383762,0.0001623817,0.000117461,0.0002675498,0.0001853535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993123,0.0004502317,0.00008401614,0.00008778575,0.00004461626,0.00002098629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001633391,0.0003768211,0.1697374,0.0000132672,0.00005613847,0.000002138027,0.3050864,0.000640609,0.0001208524,0.4386164,0.0169425,0.06839117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001761669,0.00009711521,0.4158924,0.00007901713,0.0001005471,0.000003814362,0.3939414,0.001101841,0.0004212714,0.09312242,0.0929449,0.0005336316],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341609,0.0008623483,0.00007191281,0.02355186,0.0006067216,0.0005517572,0.000001329848,0.00003495957,0.04015824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965081,0.0004455292,0.00003302897,0.0009464292,0.0001982154,0.00009097184,0.000005618088,0.000004048763,0.001768057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.345494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7184414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982432424","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9224-9","title":"Character and Knowledge: Learning from the Speech of Experts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Pathos; Ethos; Character (mathematics); Logos Bible Software; Epistemology; Psychology; Social knowledge; Sociology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1370408861648199,"gpt":0.2752474300216571,"spread":0.1382065438568372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001196763,0.00004644832,0.00006681742,0.00001272641,0.0001210428,0.00001864402,0.00004019982,0.00001996071,0.0005075323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001526779,0.00003218035,0.00002078686,0.000007565382,0.0001572356,0.0001211137,0.00001542833,0.00006372626,0.00002681097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004019979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007053547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007019124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005012765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996526,0.00006907105,0.0001023817,0.00007541745,0.00004494433,0.00005557983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997047,0.0001001044,0.00007194722,0.00006343522,0.00004836506,0.00001149585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001858958,0.00006819628,0.01474113,0.00001651108,0.00005323998,7.020447e-7,0.8631526,7.75385e-8,0.0025535,0.09870916,0.0006881714,0.01999817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002081864,0.0005529656,0.2226452,0.0001850329,0.0003259158,0.000004105873,0.2704194,0.0001748191,0.07855284,0.09275351,0.3316718,0.0006324616],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9617555,0.000261078,0.00002353509,0.0001201626,0.0003565963,0.0000698439,0.000003047696,0.00001343262,0.03739687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968723,0.00005433115,0.00008651968,0.0001774448,0.0002412353,0.000005715939,0.0000197926,0.000005564676,0.002537086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5927331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5557123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964844782","doi":"10.1007/s10503-014-9335-1","title":"Challenges and Remedies for Identifying and Classifying Argumentation Schemes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogical self; Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Curriculum; Process (computing); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1814761086111442,"gpt":0.4438486577627966,"spread":0.2623725491516525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001570322,0.0001019685,0.0001214153,0.0001138237,0.0002161392,0.00004687071,0.00003391567,0.00005712011,0.00002027465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002060312,0.0001017359,0.00001711532,0.00004724894,0.00005770213,0.0001741689,0.00001763323,0.0001070373,0.000007243448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001918376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001376727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000731531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989446,0.0003524578,0.0001794193,0.0002797637,0.00008683149,0.0001569105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993065,0.0003940004,0.0001319079,0.00009180536,0.00004758479,0.00002822108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004725379,0.00002380997,0.007948035,0.0001018016,0.00006185025,2.570097e-7,0.02624194,7.108042e-7,0.01588221,0.09193315,0.0001657579,0.8575932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003470634,0.0004851611,0.9026907,0.000148805,0.0001094828,0.00001839389,0.02586869,0.0009443008,0.005991617,0.0326767,0.02716134,0.0004341743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8880046,0.001649467,0.1027514,0.001010114,0.0005338308,0.0002718911,0.000001046223,0.00009256466,0.005685119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662443,0.000135191,0.03263431,0.0002095883,0.0001527016,0.00008534845,0.00002325584,0.00001769069,0.0004976579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8947427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4148672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124279947","doi":"10.1007/s10503-006-9018-7","title":"The Fallaciousness of Threats: Character and Ad Baculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Political communication; Political science; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01098068647668667,"gpt":0.2864160941137823,"spread":0.2754354076370956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002044033,0.00003526694,0.00004855634,0.00001121105,0.000484587,0.00003480404,0.00004315158,0.0000198024,0.00001791472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000145964,0.00002642727,0.00001729761,0.00006470147,0.0001993126,0.0001159629,0.00001375116,0.00002361303,0.000005862016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001765939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001189828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001963911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01528059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995663,0.00004891242,0.00009028351,0.00006641138,0.0001355928,0.00009250173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997752,0.00007668212,0.00005134154,0.00004285905,0.00004225051,0.00001164457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005065317,0.0001481149,0.1526071,0.00002736877,0.00008922316,0.000002169466,0.1329331,0.000001833993,0.00154945,0.536422,0.003544366,0.1726246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006735889,0.00004945661,0.726159,0.00002651132,0.00005194014,7.008835e-7,0.08382408,0.00001078126,0.001248149,0.08132283,0.1064386,0.0001943925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746625,0.0008767813,0.00001961442,0.003532131,0.0001458158,0.0001331354,0.000003511717,0.00001757522,0.02060895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997862,0.0007560589,0.00002369608,0.00004462547,0.00005755053,0.000009648732,0.000004585047,0.000002081163,0.001239741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5735518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8526926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248259855","doi":"10.1023/a:1011156918137","title":"Emotional Messages","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0442418674709357,"gpt":0.3702571211262045,"spread":0.3260152536552688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005340415,0.00004381387,0.00003677953,0.00004318108,0.00005910341,0.00001247008,0.00003675633,0.00002720232,0.01058038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002461647,0.00004277372,0.00002419562,0.00008471787,0.00001518962,0.0000859734,0.000006014943,0.00003418944,0.001410497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001819417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003853545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005629881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009669842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996076,0.0000270665,0.00008780565,0.0001084189,0.00007394655,0.00009514159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998235,0.0000113586,0.00002704023,0.00009054034,0.00002084665,0.00002668739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004979047,0.0006571751,0.5805357,0.000003823682,0.00005390474,0.00006354828,0.002265544,0.0000156013,0.007143955,0.1691578,0.04410954,0.1959436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004444532,0.00004630667,0.9851713,0.000003570218,0.00001424678,0.00002794738,0.0005264622,0.000005549364,0.0002372609,0.0009289553,0.01252944,0.00006455721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9479966,0.00003757248,0.001401238,0.0006277459,0.0004721321,0.00008752885,0.000003495481,0.00005121058,0.0493225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808825,0.000009087831,0.000507477,0.0002558747,0.00007601426,0.00002853261,0.00006232309,0.000006135293,0.01817212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4046356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011562498","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9205-z","title":"Critical Inquiry: Considering the Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialectic; Critical thinking; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Sociology; Discipline; Argument (complex analysis); Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Critical systems thinking; Communication studies; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1333740345554744,"gpt":0.3935709428632236,"spread":0.2601969083077492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000422047,0.00003442157,0.00003456612,0.00001518378,0.0004504739,0.0000557239,0.00007873356,0.00002342138,0.001377426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004643002,0.00002700751,0.00001616197,0.00007461745,0.0003163475,0.0001546615,0.00001151338,0.00005080034,0.0002341334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000453235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007599455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003764992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000207819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994119,0.0001156753,0.00009681246,0.00007856113,0.0001669641,0.000130045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996013,0.000201288,0.00001496509,0.00005940554,0.00007053668,0.00005247212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001705871,0.00002269714,0.00235236,0.000001345336,0.000003416493,5.441936e-7,0.1994805,1.591268e-8,0.00001669173,0.78969,0.001042989,0.007387724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002508963,0.00003218124,0.04060038,0.00003106221,0.00002574558,0.000002034468,0.4980977,0.000008411797,0.002319543,0.339617,0.1188172,0.0001979143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6684,0.0001462447,0.004548734,0.05293555,0.004427409,0.0004931909,0.000001078562,0.0002373055,0.2688105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930887,0.00001612159,0.001969299,0.004451599,0.0001020604,0.00002324026,0.000001240263,0.000003062341,0.0003447138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.450073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984962811","doi":"10.1007/s10503-004-2071-1","title":"Begging the Question in Arguments Based on Testimony","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Argumentation theory; Sequence (biology); Epistemology; Law; Fallacy; Witness; Point (geometry); Testimonial; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Advertising","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01659462014170406,"gpt":0.2950368186882093,"spread":0.2784421985465053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004584547,0.00008199359,0.00005920138,0.0001123738,0.0001045146,0.0001012477,0.0002033951,0.00002706227,0.00001738011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003035248,0.00006325726,0.00002280451,0.0002257743,0.000007950904,0.000511126,0.00001905452,0.00006689136,0.0001479605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001533024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001781842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001182606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007754883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999063,0.0001225663,0.0002045672,0.0002084601,0.0002626863,0.0001387477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995211,0.00009296452,0.000100846,0.000236946,0.00002214722,0.00002598376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004045498,0.0008220272,0.2047511,0.00004115277,0.00002020641,0.000009934674,0.005561566,0.2448681,0.01338917,0.05038904,0.003080482,0.4770267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005590339,0.0000408148,0.1710195,0.00004641317,0.000002222875,7.918762e-7,0.00002195959,0.8231077,0.004059848,0.0002594061,0.0007991153,0.00008319024],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4760931,0.00003857653,0.5101739,0.009794707,0.0005718743,0.0007699353,0.000001345155,0.0001748511,0.002381755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901982,0.000002671769,0.008335734,0.001220487,0.00006776136,0.0000479527,0.0000102736,0.000004915964,0.0001119974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5782396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2579556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075620909","doi":"10.1007/s10503-014-9328-0","title":"Argumentum ad Verecundiam: New Gender-based Criteria for Appeals to Authority","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St Joseph's Health Centre; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Appeal; Epistemology; Fallacy; Credibility; Injustice; Prejudice (legal term); Sociology; Trustworthiness; Feminist epistemology; Competence (human resources); Adversarial system; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Feminist philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0956511876628936,"gpt":0.4103188837154276,"spread":0.314667696052534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009022263,0.0001069677,0.0001489789,0.00006192064,0.000717291,0.00006314254,0.0001434067,0.0000812794,0.0001628474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002995748,0.0001160849,0.00006220741,0.0001385755,0.00007222928,0.0001143651,0.00002064464,0.00004433604,0.0001459958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001013407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004442041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008629545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998799,0.0002174997,0.0001941781,0.0002740933,0.000195659,0.0003195434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999334,0.0002338177,0.00007594701,0.0001320675,0.00006563233,0.000158476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006520824,0.0004552525,0.02655606,0.000252801,0.000262284,0.000003010199,0.1674918,0.00007297491,0.005162003,0.2510253,0.4195334,0.1285331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002247932,0.0005971396,0.0599877,0.00003317893,0.0001177282,4.91343e-7,0.01116895,0.0002597306,0.004161507,0.1078858,0.8129692,0.0005706568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3072237,0.0003610798,0.5080197,0.06337903,0.007757434,0.00426105,0.0000779708,0.0005706259,0.1083494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789111,0.000008363876,0.01510135,0.002048645,0.0003120686,0.0001160798,0.00003966818,0.000009876482,0.003452849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6716874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5516894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141175123","doi":"10.1023/a:1007837321284","title":"Slippery Slopes and Collapsing Taboos","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03396518697504233,"gpt":0.2555291191052296,"spread":0.2215639321301873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009761025,0.00006198068,0.0000764389,0.0000251805,0.0002534882,0.00009692554,0.00002811207,0.00002290707,0.001700831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000549921,0.00005802863,0.00001960729,0.00001360326,0.0001472934,0.000233115,0.00000532831,0.0000532081,0.0001288436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009353519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001003419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001438717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002855661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995797,0.00003525431,0.0001094263,0.0001084374,0.00007071968,0.00009640861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981,0.00004450258,0.00003095106,0.00006000013,0.00002990394,0.00002463059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005795325,0.0001157701,0.001525488,0.00009679245,0.0001027634,0.000006102202,0.2040883,0.00001962528,0.001747932,0.5418715,0.007792117,0.2425757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007156545,0.0001097281,0.001842334,0.00003555171,0.00007926468,0.000004796421,0.01177883,0.0001081777,0.0014189,0.0181773,0.9654828,0.0002467069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8390789,0.0003081683,0.00002263908,0.0007234502,0.0003984039,0.00013029,0.000008775942,0.00004809844,0.1592813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740795,0.000159586,0.0002153821,0.001348067,0.0003493975,0.00001110315,0.0000265483,0.000009273312,0.02380115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9576907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190206316","doi":"10.1023/a:1014929916547","title":"Speaking Your Mind: Large Inarticulateness Constitutional and Circumstantial","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Epistemology; Articulation (sociology); Phenomenon; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03153362823316836,"gpt":0.2633541447672388,"spread":0.2318205165340705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001190433,0.00007405429,0.00006907097,0.00004931249,0.0001806557,0.0001273338,0.000113465,0.00003119166,0.0001172933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000202984,0.00006919557,0.0000183996,0.0001278685,0.00006774945,0.0005343723,0.00006479514,0.00004304658,0.0001329642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003076122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001292454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007991106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008571405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993209,0.00003184038,0.0001203496,0.0002136216,0.0001416037,0.000171724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997199,0.00002478527,0.0000539403,0.0001077729,0.00004286658,0.00005072005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006915569,0.0003147617,0.03926697,0.00002213602,0.00003858469,0.00006788265,0.01015118,0.00005351826,0.01064639,0.8716426,0.0004353868,0.06735368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01248869,0.0005613998,0.2214182,0.0001780656,0.0001311276,0.0008609245,0.00197635,0.6479714,0.02931971,0.03510027,0.04807508,0.001918745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5715039,0.0002584805,0.421028,0.0002240056,0.0003782523,0.0001031904,0.000002148519,0.00005241679,0.006449566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963033,0.00001660041,0.003384594,0.0001212174,0.00007042199,0.000005223627,0.000007604022,0.000002264435,0.00008872653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2821714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318982896","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09603-y","title":"Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Argument (complex analysis); Communication studies; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Positive economics; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1637048180737664,"gpt":0.3281668976498575,"spread":0.1644620795760911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002074409,0.00007005794,0.0001147872,0.00007558797,0.0002661372,0.00004344835,0.00004118103,0.00002935305,0.00008569491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002281671,0.00006606449,0.00006479779,0.00003977003,0.0002582144,0.0001258693,0.00002368683,0.00005449494,0.00005477881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001327538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001211654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006412747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000125052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994285,0.00004776089,0.0001641564,0.000111594,0.0001318707,0.0001161719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996662,0.00008670206,0.0001012068,0.00005317134,0.00007256258,0.00002022614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002333183,0.00006822096,0.001858958,0.0003820634,0.0001593004,0.000001890652,0.2135947,0.00001074906,0.001973612,0.7659927,0.01266873,0.00326575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003604493,0.0009511395,0.03520749,0.0001274237,0.001792611,0.000005248053,0.525598,0.0009606301,0.006708186,0.1080501,0.3160119,0.0009827536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971504,0.00008776487,0.000010979,0.001383109,0.0004705605,0.0001243362,0.00002321275,0.0000607812,0.02633522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918811,0.000102765,0.00002871219,0.0002420657,0.0002667166,0.00001098678,0.0000601286,0.00000827411,0.007399222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6579426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2694032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782790951","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9448-z","title":"Case-to-Case Arguments","year":2018,"lang":"da","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Presentation (obstetrics); Decision theory; Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06168995435245966,"gpt":0.2999731028729261,"spread":0.2382831485204664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001844911,0.0002817157,0.0002185073,0.0001558919,0.001287642,0.0004647035,0.0001134694,0.00008394478,0.008261809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003644295,0.0002769496,0.0001147782,0.0001361087,0.0003123374,0.0004731057,0.00009630717,0.000156353,0.009179178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001349831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002736676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000507917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001209449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983515,0.000108415,0.0004425141,0.0004621641,0.0002255872,0.0004097758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989889,0.00009744495,0.0001474063,0.0003319639,0.00018071,0.0002535906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003012817,0.001028672,0.0002094702,0.0001326082,0.0004323732,0.02282944,0.08978248,0.000005043764,0.0005596373,0.7842706,0.04970198,0.05074645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003061106,0.002634528,0.000141047,0.0002045053,0.000609686,0.01126478,0.01384855,0.0007638154,0.003686938,0.06951149,0.8929553,0.00131824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8431326,0.0000857504,0.0001604312,0.002581987,0.003790755,0.0006831881,0.0002770129,0.0001028298,0.1491854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805904,0.0000093263,0.0002033696,0.002669899,0.005763992,0.00003859027,0.00005868558,0.00003929353,0.01062642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8432533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081569111","doi":"10.1007/s10503-020-09528-w","title":"Attack, Defense and Counter-Attack in the Inuit Duel Songs of Ammassalik","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Adversary; False accusation; Action (physics); Rhetorical question; Law; History; Psychology; Literature; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Art; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04379366312895286,"gpt":0.3257115206105121,"spread":0.2819178574815592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001971978,0.00007210008,0.00009639218,0.00003535023,0.00002534248,0.00002068692,0.00007063622,0.00004372989,0.0003965085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002301562,0.00005624021,0.00002662564,0.0001422372,0.00003891199,0.00009672149,0.00001197981,0.00007681637,0.00009360716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000132936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008377917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001553512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002222548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992699,0.0001514855,0.0001862507,0.0001560521,0.0001314408,0.0001048932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996839,0.00008056926,0.00008687397,0.00009598656,0.00002713593,0.00002551793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006406429,0.000479605,0.1066138,0.0001686055,0.0001828698,0.00009950594,0.8002017,0.00001524126,0.01112017,0.01015412,0.02025587,0.05006783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00901734,0.001181092,0.6858467,0.00008138755,0.0003346241,0.00006603952,0.2866604,0.0005818632,0.005050353,0.004256728,0.006319828,0.0006036325],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947299,0.0001436447,0.0001900132,0.001185911,0.00009435335,0.0002286243,0.00001773599,0.00001445473,0.003395404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973655,0.00002269569,0.00008975412,0.002291871,0.00005706054,0.00003308354,0.00004167418,0.000008154267,0.00009024593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5792329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4341491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360985377","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09604-x","title":"Teaching the Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Communication studies; Political communication; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05046339114481301,"gpt":0.272851442163362,"spread":0.222388051018549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009852167,0.00003646867,0.0000257083,0.00002757752,0.0006019988,0.00009780608,0.00006726557,0.000006207305,0.0002348437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005296368,0.00002451555,0.00002155762,0.00002874789,0.00005787575,0.0001226132,0.00001337319,0.00004630716,0.001353273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006375171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003352773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007465757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000571035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997056,0.0000199527,0.00006930184,0.00006273702,0.00007247574,0.00006990926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998187,0.00004715222,0.00002458992,0.0000869049,0.00001241577,0.00001017904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[8.008732e-7,0.00000616752,0.00003296627,0.000002409872,0.000006524698,2.103645e-7,0.03670633,0.000006199142,0.0002722741,0.9481447,0.01010706,0.004714312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001236728,0.0000190378,0.001272766,0.000005462967,0.00001401072,6.623857e-7,0.01750913,0.0002523202,0.0002929556,0.1504793,0.8299458,0.00008493451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5523322,0.00001853921,0.00003188127,0.03173796,0.0003309401,0.0002369945,0.00001739247,0.0003342683,0.4149598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837023,0.00000357969,0.00001512999,0.0006377929,0.0004151645,0.00005033217,0.00003712187,0.000005266667,0.01513328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8198388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319985130","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09600-1","title":"Textbook Treatments of Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Philosophy; Epistemology; Section (typography); Literature; Classics; History; Art; Computer science; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04047829285631277,"gpt":0.3742364312572088,"spread":0.3337581384008961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007867049,0.00003213431,0.00004174064,0.00003917592,0.00002797801,0.000003625725,0.00005349017,0.00001672273,0.0007539106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008660785,0.0000267285,0.0000196749,0.0001842458,0.00007030937,0.00004674893,0.0000107246,0.00001411278,0.001531975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009329605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002887321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001912702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.49337e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996346,0.00002683678,0.00007883122,0.00008779106,0.00008344901,0.00008848055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998137,0.00004858172,0.0000282884,0.00007902236,0.000009074784,0.00002136811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001998813,0.00005686329,0.004591963,0.000002526931,0.00002435149,0.000003560138,0.002462259,0.000003271905,0.006590847,0.972358,0.0004266976,0.01345962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007527188,0.0002236635,0.3439449,0.000008471383,0.00002443057,0.000001930761,0.0009512859,0.00005545024,0.01304039,0.6402817,0.0006266576,0.00008838037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.750904,0.00001082093,0.00007962401,0.0002544755,0.0001623663,0.00006948649,0.000005214156,0.00003941687,0.2484746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970127,0.000004309587,0.00004121461,0.00006872545,0.00001611668,0.00001624929,0.00001205278,0.00000241947,0.002826261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.339353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206105180","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9021-7","title":"Book Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04716809738502099,"gpt":0.3149793446257435,"spread":0.2678112472407225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003611721,0.00005249377,0.0000801732,0.00002269238,0.0001144798,0.00001967615,0.00004206418,0.00001656992,0.003018213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001592964,0.00004695644,0.00004032091,0.00001360608,0.00008379059,0.0001776421,0.000006435035,0.00006354068,0.0003966419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001645558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008318368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003766549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001194307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995351,0.00002385285,0.0001586873,0.00008384007,0.00009333684,0.0001051302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997131,0.00005311274,0.00006609671,0.00008520625,0.00005776878,0.0000247219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000596534,0.00004677126,0.00008176879,0.0003698292,0.00002679553,0.000003652346,0.0118064,1.519176e-7,0.0001391107,0.2977962,0.6783063,0.01141707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009820456,0.00002582477,0.0001570456,0.00009599992,0.0000292404,7.82186e-7,0.0005046835,7.95198e-7,0.0004878949,0.002146147,0.9963925,0.00006085321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.005461487,0.3012307,0.001239797,0.01031229,0.002810434,0.0007406289,0.00001208911,0.0002044987,0.6779881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1214545,0.04423368,0.0005797973,0.5121917,0.003113454,0.00005582061,0.0003224719,0.00005770947,0.3179909],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5018793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319870956","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09607-8","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01940754188178577,"gpt":0.2760480560126188,"spread":0.2566405141308331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002646769,0.00005562071,0.00004409999,0.00009608058,0.0001574535,0.0001189197,0.0001848943,0.00001637688,0.00009752738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003038607,0.00004094218,0.00002042059,0.0004668033,0.000004825463,0.0002453677,0.00004019218,0.00003241379,0.006495795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004620148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006525068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002799536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003188569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992832,0.00005287276,0.0001178422,0.0002005082,0.0002360132,0.0001095406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996381,0.00003064113,0.00004444658,0.0002331677,0.00002835178,0.00002526462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000777976,0.00002135978,0.0002993575,0.000005681615,0.000008967834,0.000001142902,0.006965824,0.003410848,0.00332134,0.02156706,0.8578578,0.1065329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002275343,0.0001156934,0.05593277,0.000007803356,0.000003395117,0.00000176398,0.0004510442,0.01283915,0.01095381,0.000493381,0.9188547,0.0001190143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4787695,0.00001381222,0.171277,0.3118657,0.02481904,0.002038013,0.000007629499,0.0009961294,0.01021307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346431,0.00002479801,0.002090443,0.002423965,0.04443773,0.0001345038,0.00006280177,0.00001535691,0.01616732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4558736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319871818","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09606-9","title":"Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0480062366540458,"gpt":0.28564047049037,"spread":0.2376342338363242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003589679,0.00004458579,0.0000655114,0.00002418657,0.0003942402,0.00008559706,0.00003516184,0.00001432952,0.00003471577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002732004,0.00003156489,0.00002221185,0.00002426261,0.000417295,0.0001366055,0.00001410843,0.00006327236,0.0001189501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005282463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004018781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000113666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002265894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995994,0.00007707324,0.0000969433,0.0000730223,0.00007450622,0.00007907658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996927,0.0001500323,0.00005491776,0.00005920891,0.00003338594,0.000009782233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001163504,0.000005020336,0.0004741283,0.00003105214,0.00001900882,4.886081e-7,0.07527407,0.000007291907,0.0001097653,0.9199103,0.001609929,0.002547286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004914884,0.0001181684,0.02372023,0.000134333,0.0001491464,0.000004966446,0.170654,0.003156122,0.001279512,0.5951406,0.2003071,0.0004208653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578447,0.0002580233,0.0001042489,0.006617059,0.000682976,0.0002425471,0.00001040956,0.0001396864,0.03410034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995261,0.00009231542,0.00001249406,0.0007894097,0.0001947763,0.00002301217,0.00003580362,0.000005035817,0.003586134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3247698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3032216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412817136","doi":"10.1007/s10503-025-09669-w","title":"“Deliberative Context” Is not the Whole Story of Deliberative Reasoning: the Site C Case of Disagreement Management in Indigenous Consultations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Political communication; Epistemology; Sociology; Communication studies; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Social science; Public relations; Geography; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02599560431517325,"gpt":0.3147298436546717,"spread":0.2887342393394984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000378268,0.0001074431,0.0001354133,0.0001004497,0.0005158465,0.00008471835,0.0001709784,0.00001803094,0.0001701111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002484258,0.00006897633,0.00004577776,0.0001191642,0.0004189037,0.0002244233,0.00006643195,0.0001356315,0.00001061666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006974438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006092837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001565508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01276185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998912,0.0003336711,0.0003628355,0.0001286641,0.0001550493,0.0001078004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987809,0.0004029881,0.0002587731,0.000335393,0.0002107595,0.00001116434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003137592,0.0001202459,0.0002385564,0.00002588744,0.0001850149,0.000005944773,0.655587,0.0001179012,0.0001289607,0.334893,0.001325724,0.007340395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001127745,0.00006852577,0.004662415,0.0001188608,0.0001589246,0.000003127827,0.9799774,0.0002249587,0.002984026,0.003760469,0.006791271,0.0001223361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.966314,0.0006706834,0.0002747334,0.004794365,0.0001178853,0.001159743,0.0001826865,0.00001605546,0.02646981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945155,0.00006034401,0.0001354012,0.0008678298,0.00001311809,0.0001820443,0.00006455145,0.000006313354,0.004154947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3311325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7121412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003635366","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9233-8","title":"Petitioning the King: The Case of Provincial Printers in Eighteenth-Century France","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Argumentative; Government (linguistics); Competition (biology); Character (mathematics); Censorship; Law; Sociology; Political science; Literature; History; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0334861499248417,"gpt":0.2542287565425639,"spread":0.2207426066177222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001312373,0.00004454703,0.00004983224,0.00003308482,0.0001708737,0.0000405378,0.0000685145,0.000007770534,0.0007472609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001852004,0.00002506439,0.00003717701,0.00002535025,0.0001025141,0.00006679904,0.00001545626,0.00004594363,0.000007143569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001095194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001111376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004211834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004986145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996194,0.00003082707,0.0001486592,0.00006915021,0.00006382883,0.00006816744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997317,0.00002833396,0.0000934636,0.00009121239,0.00004692197,0.000008378694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001160303,0.00007791817,0.004739202,0.00001115692,0.00003258451,0.00003222917,0.0806412,0.00001491139,0.00002351538,0.9124264,0.00009925957,0.00189001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004384797,0.0005812784,0.06023953,0.0004674689,0.001277684,0.00009178992,0.6930246,0.01248824,0.007740336,0.0575443,0.1609084,0.001251546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9219528,0.000132564,0.00005521244,0.0001746265,0.0002803952,0.0001528256,0.000008259443,0.000007319378,0.07723601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993905,0.00003066128,0.0000308718,0.00011537,0.0002179174,0.00001520199,0.000006654086,0.000003860458,0.0001889146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8548821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8181983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973664585","doi":"10.1007/s10503-019-09488-w","title":"Place, Image and Argument: The Physical and Nonphysical Dimensions of a Collective Ethos","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01999540109742253,"gpt":0.2650840113424731,"spread":0.2450886102450505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006102039,0.00005895878,0.0001009136,0.00001849572,0.0002262651,0.00003687382,0.00004038901,0.000008030802,0.00004293993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007596176,0.00003478218,0.00002010071,0.00002746192,0.0002067204,0.000126533,0.00006221667,0.0000524715,0.00001923803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001259501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000950392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005787637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001431075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996249,0.00005036135,0.00008574967,0.00008899883,0.00009086727,0.00005910093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995348,0.0002277996,0.00006184422,0.0001081389,0.00005366495,0.00001376826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008312616,0.0002711346,0.003322592,0.00003915725,0.0001909017,2.428098e-7,0.552776,0.000003525563,0.005727659,0.430133,0.003650028,0.003802569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008343847,0.002129329,0.1364599,0.0002387693,0.0006982937,0.000009797184,0.5704722,0.01168047,0.01208312,0.1087833,0.1479064,0.001194541],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829813,0.0001279361,0.00001397942,0.0006088415,0.00005181566,0.0002252493,0.000007302153,0.00001028681,0.01597329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965664,0.00009972892,0.00006511812,0.00009965384,0.00003918461,0.00002876023,0.000004011773,0.000004400444,0.003092773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3213498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1740271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792093414","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9456-z","title":"David Hitchcock (2017): On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and Critical Thinking","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Communication studies; Political communication; Critical thinking; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science; Argumentation theory; Political science; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05187436558278319,"gpt":0.3124969490664514,"spread":0.2606225834836682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003923987,0.0001091086,0.0001269401,0.00008364109,0.0004090506,0.0001717455,0.0000513453,0.00005595941,0.000101588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000957504,0.00009899733,0.00001688169,0.00002170289,0.0004441772,0.0004675536,0.00003930716,0.000164331,0.00003307397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001970331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001419539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001504023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005925971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992213,0.00006099857,0.0001976538,0.0001845053,0.000139317,0.0001962331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995666,0.0001748911,0.00006143213,0.00009139,0.00006084043,0.00004481733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002775126,0.00003610037,0.003499007,0.00004142266,0.000009543353,0.000003745258,0.07460944,8.696354e-7,0.00006377598,0.9188894,0.0001479351,0.002671008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003836338,0.002306047,0.0524787,0.0007068334,0.00016433,0.00004226992,0.05643518,0.001833218,0.001980528,0.8503466,0.0288395,0.001030474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9149507,0.000147947,0.0001256455,0.001230557,0.000529348,0.0001627034,0.000006443529,0.00004146972,0.08280522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969249,0.00005861847,0.0004749139,0.001681115,0.0003362451,0.00001206986,0.00001822401,0.000008565143,0.000485361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08231986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4036994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636107842","doi":"10.1023/a:1007786123170","title":"Antoine Arnauld (1612--1694)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Neurology and Historical Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02560020867419899,"gpt":0.2628379563130538,"spread":0.2372377476388549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003245778,0.0000572779,0.00006047678,0.00002271367,0.0002096992,0.00001071936,0.00006417164,0.00002197554,0.001447413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003946189,0.00005249792,0.000021359,0.0001164566,0.00005591369,0.0001170554,0.000009365795,0.00006543471,0.00130186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002234588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003513418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001718813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006423492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994481,0.0000444554,0.0000951888,0.00018429,0.0001039423,0.0001240009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998005,0.00006762541,0.00002439041,0.00007450709,0.000005421953,0.00002758056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003268766,0.0004637568,0.009296577,0.00001501094,0.0000136223,0.0001245983,0.001749217,0.0001266698,0.6957886,0.01374759,0.02878776,0.2495597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001347018,0.0004680827,0.05659024,0.000005955691,0.00002900287,0.00004118478,0.0000295849,0.0002055293,0.3470477,0.009193497,0.5847228,0.0003194725],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9421577,0.00005301103,0.00003144949,0.001692599,0.0002453702,0.00009179186,0.000002345427,0.00008141001,0.05564436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989594,0.000195909,0.00004416392,0.003363507,0.0000575029,0.00001288097,0.000001564037,0.000005040124,0.006725465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.555935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410540562","doi":"10.1007/s10503-025-09656-1","title":"Chinese Argument from Qi 氣 and the Place of Ethos in the Kisceral Mode","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Mode (computer interface); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Social science; Computer science; Politics; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01176797545556793,"gpt":0.3369376238112258,"spread":0.3251696483556579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005840676,0.00004694949,0.00007574205,0.00003020903,0.0002053355,0.00002310477,0.0001213004,0.00002543872,0.00001744032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000728785,0.00002640888,0.00002553497,0.0001816522,0.0001794703,0.00009451037,0.00001505845,0.00006791697,0.00000215478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003967644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000317083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009119979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003709859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992104,0.0003827223,0.0001219822,0.00008499606,0.0001517181,0.00004816793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994349,0.0004033372,0.00004916541,0.00008980239,0.00001302713,0.00000978041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002779039,0.0000924485,0.0491453,0.00001276311,0.00002656324,8.452587e-7,0.3234073,0.0001812676,0.0003198795,0.6241022,0.0006808673,0.001752715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001879975,0.00001354469,0.09033857,0.00002481292,0.00002545789,9.310727e-8,0.006129179,0.0006888392,0.00006633801,0.8990923,0.001675467,0.00006543624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9638149,0.000228905,0.00006216129,0.01018911,0.0001689932,0.0002829875,0.000005887896,0.000005705677,0.02524137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987531,0.00002141715,0.00006861636,0.0008535853,0.00005663259,0.00002689971,0.000008516115,0.000001468703,0.0002097756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3172781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400700211","doi":"10.1007/s10503-024-09635-y","title":"Remembering Tony Blair (1941–2024)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02639939242603898,"gpt":0.3374100325706624,"spread":0.3110106401446234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001675578,0.00003380522,0.00003844921,0.00003021208,0.0002028772,0.00006668359,0.00004275701,0.00002450239,0.002213208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014292,0.00003437166,0.00002978034,0.00005787096,0.00005301846,0.0002212416,0.000006575019,0.00003828641,0.001139967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001454323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004537059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008938058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004353229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995861,0.00001932334,0.00007965484,0.0001015439,0.00006980687,0.0001435603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998569,0.00003049867,0.000008040216,0.00003459022,0.000006293055,0.00006366934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006417653,0.00002820251,0.0008674421,0.00004672657,0.00003258968,0.00001716422,0.04100017,0.00001777898,0.001002861,0.7925268,0.06849848,0.0959554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004337187,0.000009216165,0.0006040737,0.00001196113,0.000007656155,4.741561e-7,0.001578154,0.0001964695,0.000164757,0.01371458,0.9836071,0.00006220194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3366086,0.0002780748,0.0001537199,0.002761048,0.002170898,0.00006842374,0.000002682352,0.00013384,0.6578227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438475,0.00005114321,0.00009539248,0.0002674244,0.0003587143,0.000006548864,0.000004571628,0.000003696831,0.05536496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9151086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360980452","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09609-6","title":"Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Mathematical proof; Philosophy; Deductive reasoning; Inductive reasoning; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06861749761720014,"gpt":0.2747787971022493,"spread":0.2061612994850492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003252713,0.00002358698,0.00002590446,0.0001085653,0.0003650459,0.00005446782,0.00009430076,0.000003163159,0.00003527906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001561508,0.00001540614,0.000006341451,0.0001284519,0.001066063,0.0003516849,0.00001219093,0.00001852355,0.00001457137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001070011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001787494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007383298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003969392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997178,0.00001104671,0.00005972388,0.00006173916,0.00009441323,0.00005528839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998459,0.00005374622,0.00002496873,0.00004742647,0.00002106793,0.000006859414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001719495,0.00001061025,0.0002161327,0.000004922807,7.310252e-7,1.357421e-7,0.2753107,0.00001183984,0.002551489,0.7205203,0.0002069335,0.001164539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006074872,0.000245088,0.0757427,0.00004896476,0.00001008156,0.000002970188,0.4216732,0.002079267,0.002385528,0.4080261,0.08894219,0.0002364764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621684,0.00001762193,0.000004363135,0.00132729,0.0001088881,0.00005926017,0.000003851811,0.00001105535,0.03629927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999498,0.00001131127,0.000009972432,0.0001152868,0.0000217935,0.000006584856,0.000002795664,8.511801e-7,0.0003334167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3124942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3927953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}