{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":44,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":44,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"0f04f8ec0c3d","filters":{"venue":"Argumentation"}},"results":[{"id":"W1977123674","doi":"10.1007/s10503-015-9356-4","title":"A Meta-Level Approach to the Problem of Defining ‘Critical Thinking’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Critical thinking; Term (time); Computer science; Management science; Strengths and weaknesses; Position (finance); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ralph H. Johnson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Benjamin Hamby","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2302165209402242,"gpt":0.3937863471461073,"spread":0.1635698262058831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.072354,0.001998548,0.00355817,0.01765801,0.006442774,0.02554269,0.007874121,0.009881572,0.009510252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1119301,0.002159915,0.003061802,0.01006236,0.04003837,0.03964926,0.01063332,0.01390418,0.001293039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01177229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01351702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001886458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00201744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9258139,0.05310208,0.007731477,0.004320964,0.008023,0.001008639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8313754,0.1260862,0.007347883,0.01936837,0.0127907,0.003031551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009683716,0.00001222769,0.00006215545,0.0001666901,0.00003942282,0.00002823832,0.002172633,0.0003151103,0.00008639936,0.9919191,0.0007461183,0.004442269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001499234,0.000009043481,0.00004896353,0.0003050835,0.00002476077,0.00005037121,0.0005544992,0.001591305,0.0001491613,0.9890029,0.008237195,0.00001166598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00363554,0.004319278,0.9093153,0.0433685,0.000882851,0.0002590437,0.0001789412,0.0002878861,0.03775262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2255797,0.001312142,0.7641168,0.003313411,0.0007948788,0.001409262,0.0002357986,0.0002378216,0.003000154],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.072354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3826491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016904097","doi":"10.1007/s10503-009-9157-8","title":"Wrenching from Context: The Manipulation of Commitments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Dialectic; Fallacy; Argumentation theory; Sociology; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Fabrizio Macagno","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0258750860710752,"gpt":0.267559195080551,"spread":0.2416841090094758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007600214,0.0007656001,0.0007733878,0.001113805,0.002922173,0.007651433,0.002921773,0.004009873,0.00791012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05278025,0.0008869591,0.001084188,0.001114762,0.006133515,0.01375386,0.006881744,0.004934015,0.001128411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001166145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001615723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001341847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000906206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886709,0.008270471,0.0003453834,0.0008592518,0.001412756,0.000441255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752948,0.01760733,0.001194249,0.003934144,0.001234152,0.0007353539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002612002,0.00006914448,0.0005313831,0.000220549,0.0000688273,0.0005075489,0.007437711,0.006970088,0.004809074,0.9265739,0.002888568,0.04966201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006658246,0.00004913445,0.0003063255,0.00009789733,0.00006040749,0.0002092691,0.001340365,0.0578743,0.003213295,0.9181715,0.01855718,0.00005372692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09285103,0.002034784,0.7892966,0.007033534,0.0005516724,0.0002089899,0.0001124001,0.000656089,0.1072548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8860452,0.0006760223,0.1037718,0.0004159918,0.0001396861,0.0001794191,0.0001218562,0.000242425,0.008407731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00791012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04019427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188319134","doi":"10.1023/a:1019901304146","title":"Manifest Rationality Reconsidered: Reply to my Fellow Symposiasts","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rationality; Focus (optics); Political communication; Communication studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Social science; Politics; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Ralph H. Johnson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07180288928727523,"gpt":0.258824402512435,"spread":0.1870215132251598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01669171,0.001254188,0.002147397,0.001828294,0.01017313,0.0161304,0.004896127,0.06835982,0.006413495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08912195,0.001012794,0.002899061,0.002096491,0.01607679,0.01032832,0.007067803,0.08178081,0.003154843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01170059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00754185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006048391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005595338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895995,0.004497097,0.0007732896,0.002069501,0.001688104,0.001372489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9381341,0.04794241,0.002204913,0.00200798,0.007086582,0.002624081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005665465,0.00003374297,0.0001671336,0.00009874124,0.00003369946,0.0003120273,0.001554868,0.0001062507,0.00008276437,0.04207503,0.9527004,0.002778677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001793269,0.00003951789,0.001290125,0.001038591,0.0001127957,0.000519928,0.004653609,0.0009796686,0.0003609451,0.108427,0.8822553,0.0001432921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.000276695,0.002034744,0.00014063,0.9699895,0.02668032,0.00000385085,0.00001508303,0.0000101262,0.0008490004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01501666,0.002484813,0.0004092322,0.8685507,0.1075557,0.00006787463,0.00002589147,0.00007881619,0.005810453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06835982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08827525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785615823","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9450-5","title":"Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Computer science; Argument (complex analysis); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Modular design; Action (physics); Management science; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Fabrizio Macagno","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0386218640602515,"gpt":0.3220105740568914,"spread":0.2833887099966399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01568643,0.001410187,0.001493469,0.004375345,0.002446166,0.008551341,0.006021637,0.004394365,0.01753097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03391666,0.002039601,0.005214055,0.002633015,0.006049382,0.01778455,0.008964371,0.005019192,0.003234999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001609211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002018287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004807534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006390166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876859,0.006478566,0.0009859531,0.00122635,0.003121551,0.0005016013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757813,0.01458979,0.001090109,0.00520823,0.002437392,0.0008931998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005511264,0.0001020895,0.0003004003,0.0001624007,0.0000972149,0.0001272223,0.0008483445,0.005666417,0.001075041,0.9435819,0.001414779,0.04656905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004630208,0.00002989604,0.0001481856,0.00008470565,0.0001245172,0.0001195566,0.0001309775,0.05165185,0.0009158127,0.9379497,0.008776953,0.00002168122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004529894,0.0001685863,0.9820246,0.001215045,0.00004340866,0.0001541677,0.00006145141,0.0003624197,0.01144041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1488964,0.0002093016,0.8441048,0.0002076269,0.0001660011,0.0004212453,0.000194064,0.0002109162,0.005589569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01753097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0829587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245697206","doi":"10.1023/a:1019945119167","title":"The Practice of Argumentative Discussion","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dialectic; Communication studies; Political communication; Rationality; Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Hitchcock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02261811009570617,"gpt":0.2943735452023237,"spread":0.2717554351066175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0791584,0.001746265,0.002434393,0.01064863,0.01356307,0.0316752,0.00739379,0.01748858,0.01228595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1122475,0.001935494,0.001889173,0.007492684,0.1275358,0.04206632,0.01140312,0.01505517,0.002764872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008085967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007049703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001396859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001257875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8401808,0.143427,0.002379829,0.005638103,0.006953224,0.001420981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.694366,0.2778858,0.004795282,0.0167107,0.00459038,0.0016518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001043385,0.00001007265,0.00004672144,0.0001288491,0.00001197154,0.00003356655,0.01066267,0.0001449534,0.0000425922,0.9823802,0.001938635,0.004589404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002407413,0.00000617746,0.00004116707,0.0003080654,0.000007135496,0.00006300805,0.002245079,0.0005864467,0.0001515715,0.9571203,0.03943747,0.000009567746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01484926,0.03361153,0.4583578,0.1271778,0.00373481,0.0003715536,0.0001603932,0.000653484,0.3610834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7771775,0.009739812,0.1815896,0.00624555,0.00291704,0.001738277,0.0001428796,0.000644967,0.01980429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0791584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4186346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045422233","doi":"10.1007/s10503-012-9262-y","title":"Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Argumentation theory; Dialogical self; Normative; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Inference; Argumentative; Communication studies; Causality (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Giovanni Sartor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02814967440824503,"gpt":0.2811262931950737,"spread":0.2529766187868286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01391842,0.0008280425,0.001760919,0.00479485,0.00404726,0.008324926,0.003203773,0.006077006,0.01181331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05240967,0.001303547,0.001945592,0.004209198,0.008898038,0.01780309,0.004347659,0.005387084,0.001005223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004422149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002621904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001162368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001383829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9790876,0.01305488,0.001557161,0.001387103,0.00401173,0.0009015089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506,0.03570075,0.002571337,0.005380669,0.004862853,0.0008843765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001862979,0.00001248476,0.0000409249,0.00003621045,0.000009335112,0.00002091077,0.0001845282,0.0008895352,0.00006948785,0.9959383,0.0002978771,0.00248175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002029403,0.000005244071,0.00003567472,0.00002233301,0.000007149028,0.00001539369,0.00004787728,0.004933507,0.0001148578,0.9927495,0.002041455,0.000006806145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05025514,0.002703297,0.7764164,0.007986058,0.0006297888,0.0002487389,0.0003314218,0.0003133822,0.1611157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8539525,0.001107693,0.1283666,0.0004837619,0.0008197645,0.0004282459,0.0004821839,0.0001360203,0.01422321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01391842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07360852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015992625","doi":"10.1007/s10503-009-9174-7","title":"The Uses of Argument in Communicative Contexts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"One Mind","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Oblique case; Argumentation theory; Typology; Epistemology; Proposition; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Robert C. Pinto","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01755234373517069,"gpt":0.2930221697169443,"spread":0.2754698259817736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01812501,0.001036466,0.001104534,0.007674665,0.005552392,0.02216274,0.003448407,0.009192629,0.006689945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06619379,0.001924289,0.001336239,0.00792866,0.03173956,0.04651782,0.005870941,0.004720683,0.000924357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002974876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001480743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001127453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000957741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9591606,0.03322115,0.001421291,0.00176796,0.003573891,0.0008551435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8947515,0.09424082,0.002422195,0.005537082,0.002220595,0.0008277438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003475012,0.00001732597,0.0004044059,0.0001178053,0.0000215333,0.0001412397,0.01246305,0.0004950567,0.0002229309,0.9771544,0.0004905778,0.008436842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002433232,0.00001317765,0.0004061162,0.0001499891,0.00002877765,0.000294684,0.002975689,0.002483176,0.0003726336,0.979109,0.01411873,0.00002356234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1456687,0.03227809,0.3938404,0.01992676,0.000525275,0.0002289127,0.0003303116,0.0003025473,0.4068989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597971,0.003082332,0.03114978,0.0002952996,0.0003092757,0.0002695917,0.00008526254,0.0001231987,0.00488809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02216274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09585536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189468606","doi":"10.1023/a:1019993002329","title":"Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Leo Groarke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09520054357920177,"gpt":0.2460012440795053,"spread":0.1508007005003036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01012137,0.001128001,0.001923915,0.004074245,0.006185238,0.01236007,0.002107355,0.01079455,0.008986511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02553549,0.00115241,0.001441501,0.003458666,0.0421583,0.01831907,0.002844078,0.009904088,0.001573309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008945476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004488984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008366453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005900215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9872867,0.009153822,0.0005015071,0.0009487586,0.001668414,0.0004408108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691681,0.0266015,0.0007688418,0.001648362,0.001437323,0.0003758019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005043334,0.000005228502,0.00002966943,0.00002384963,0.00000489678,0.00001288514,0.0003143931,0.0001440705,0.00001231075,0.9963045,0.0022607,0.0008824267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008177552,0.000001954126,0.00002555594,0.00003676042,0.00000496146,0.00001076751,0.00009700407,0.0001966594,0.0000258352,0.9914021,0.008186758,0.000003384135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01299677,0.05655358,0.1362446,0.1962869,0.002751808,0.0001360667,0.0003414883,0.0002044334,0.5944844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8179347,0.01881339,0.06179418,0.02219024,0.005368486,0.0004957581,0.0002066399,0.0003409885,0.07285563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01236007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06490433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999134038","doi":"10.1007/s10503-008-9110-2","title":"Reasoning from Classifications and Definitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Informal logic; Argument map; Political communication; Communication studies; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Machine learning; Law","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Fabrizio Macagno","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08011628943606784,"gpt":0.2550434387325153,"spread":0.1749271492964474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008988843,0.001305561,0.001438954,0.006865068,0.003063443,0.01191996,0.003191389,0.003235322,0.01354987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0386354,0.00171891,0.003306386,0.005464901,0.006270164,0.03847826,0.008832986,0.006139901,0.002738335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002922551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001488307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002016988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002006981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859366,0.008484338,0.001099031,0.001550477,0.0024386,0.0004909988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773835,0.01599287,0.0008624695,0.003253025,0.002096011,0.0004122412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002243724,0.00001635086,0.0002425215,0.00009326587,0.00003046077,0.0001025976,0.0008093202,0.001072173,0.0001643076,0.9814636,0.003152081,0.01283074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007592163,0.00000331991,0.00004303276,0.00006177199,0.00002021613,0.00006106193,0.0002824914,0.005947961,0.0002557079,0.9826007,0.01070861,0.000007638454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01769635,0.001989025,0.9221864,0.008962318,0.0003999317,0.0001908383,0.001016395,0.0007599448,0.04679868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4445588,0.001935881,0.5334401,0.001315542,0.0004683859,0.0005044458,0.003544051,0.0004747112,0.0137581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01354987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0475381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498181842","doi":"10.1007/s10503-016-9406-6","title":"Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Analogy; Defeasible reasoning; Computer science; Similarity (geometry); Inference; Predicate (mathematical logic); Defeasible estate; Argument (complex analysis); Feature (linguistics); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Fabrizio Macagno","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04543287219020772,"gpt":0.2797130563004607,"spread":0.234280184110253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02348122,0.00123203,0.001898875,0.006268473,0.004904326,0.01003746,0.003887308,0.009970114,0.01588485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08821804,0.00194941,0.003396821,0.004020605,0.02079058,0.03781816,0.007833499,0.01255367,0.001557045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003551506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00170502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000466143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003986822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9815193,0.01019868,0.001450591,0.002587948,0.00341522,0.0008282086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8552043,0.1228995,0.003720168,0.009926124,0.00656438,0.001685517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003407857,0.00002873792,0.00008411914,0.00004765539,0.00001581285,0.00005263223,0.0002231512,0.0002815359,0.0001015192,0.9970619,0.000433146,0.00163564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002108236,0.000005318957,0.00003516205,0.00001838015,0.000008917906,0.00003987085,0.00005023515,0.001009415,0.0001028816,0.9981627,0.0005413257,0.000004652224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1128187,0.003225895,0.6380886,0.03086219,0.0007351378,0.0002868033,0.0007953429,0.0004384751,0.2127488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9059889,0.001178365,0.08155944,0.001731242,0.001320751,0.0004138919,0.0007959979,0.0001275008,0.006884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02348122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081478863","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9026-2","title":"Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Chrysler (Canada); University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Communication studies; Political science; Social science; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03350166769368922,"gpt":0.2837933877003815,"spread":0.2502917200066923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01302855,0.0006718797,0.001002255,0.002547816,0.004024936,0.01601959,0.002876951,0.007063695,0.007186735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03356143,0.0006856792,0.0008707947,0.002648372,0.04449202,0.02287185,0.005477599,0.005237062,0.0006879495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003162045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003300888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001477221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009697099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.982117,0.0137479,0.0004403956,0.00128478,0.00173568,0.0006742356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567905,0.0353044,0.00177006,0.003936836,0.00136822,0.0008299209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006760398,0.000007920426,0.00005116327,0.00001999392,0.000004182753,0.0000219179,0.001972715,0.0002638908,0.00007228352,0.9956396,0.0002784378,0.001661026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007107071,0.000003316089,0.00004159289,0.00002293429,0.0000036132,0.00001924849,0.0005728513,0.001065917,0.00008216753,0.9949729,0.003204235,0.000004126561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09633715,0.004511909,0.4469984,0.03674488,0.0003910858,0.000178439,0.0001384753,0.0002280596,0.4144715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656173,0.0005599748,0.02826699,0.000675132,0.0001805533,0.0001321046,0.00005308294,0.0001034685,0.004411425],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01601959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06890237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579722416","doi":"10.1023/a:1012021017836","title":"Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Epistemology; Communication studies; Inference; Relation (database); Deductive reasoning; Informal logic; Computer science; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Social science","authors":[{"name":"J. Anthony Blair","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02618880074000957,"gpt":0.3169099835759731,"spread":0.2907211828359635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0320293,0.001945379,0.002889558,0.01286398,0.004996504,0.01277436,0.01081621,0.01496889,0.01015506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08643148,0.001765443,0.001786837,0.01012129,0.03017181,0.03141976,0.007149065,0.01241168,0.003328274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01150512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006456445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005614744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004438329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9736227,0.01330389,0.00212005,0.001660612,0.008625391,0.0006672938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9128437,0.06653292,0.002231586,0.0051094,0.01217118,0.001111213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001839622,0.00001464028,0.0000457385,0.00018064,0.00001441811,0.00002048992,0.0007403086,0.0004083589,0.00002370559,0.9800645,0.006004022,0.01246485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003838496,0.00001275379,0.00007378925,0.0003151837,0.00002407137,0.00005440474,0.0002603445,0.003372731,0.0001750666,0.9637656,0.03188644,0.00002120082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007152228,0.0316527,0.6227865,0.1762232,0.004120686,0.0003675472,0.0004531181,0.000507144,0.1567368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4135603,0.03510008,0.4796005,0.02208364,0.006847944,0.002056039,0.0003988037,0.0007524109,0.03960031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0320293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1693891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022807652","doi":"10.1007/s10503-020-09519-x","title":"Annotating Argument Schemes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Premise; Annotation; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Jacky Visser","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Lawrence","is_ca":false},{"name":"Chris Reed","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jean H. M. Wagemans","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03570340326657566,"gpt":0.2588582792412648,"spread":0.2231548759746891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01685085,0.001373135,0.0009032346,0.01691307,0.005129276,0.005898767,0.002596655,0.002343739,0.03071114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07544494,0.001006709,0.001152192,0.01339478,0.002870432,0.00942616,0.007831328,0.003795339,0.01194452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002995136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004704861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002294824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004510283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9804984,0.01033945,0.002594104,0.002766568,0.003308601,0.0004927822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9204999,0.04290669,0.003577004,0.01722691,0.01491759,0.0008717673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005334894,0.0001612144,0.009878928,0.005066642,0.0001123012,0.001326708,0.07274593,0.003479332,0.02978056,0.3237228,0.1686103,0.3845818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003175949,0.0000256808,0.003930318,0.001032945,0.00005449114,0.0003971692,0.006039413,0.006746592,0.007714889,0.05571519,0.9182346,0.00007683134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.05838424,0.001998766,0.6926522,0.003852797,0.002793937,0.002697406,0.06058796,0.006247012,0.1707856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1659434,0.001229775,0.7106174,0.0007033046,0.0003905537,0.005432812,0.07287183,0.004894735,0.03791612],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03071114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024283275","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9203-1","title":"Enthymemes: From Reconstruction to Understanding","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Phenomenon; Set (abstract data type); Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Fabio Paglieri","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Woods","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3097350493222602,"gpt":0.2811590068127098,"spread":0.02857604250955037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01240859,0.001038801,0.0007995585,0.003528191,0.003450489,0.01339284,0.002815092,0.004609767,0.007206611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022686,0.0006565595,0.0009071883,0.002277026,0.04546596,0.03027562,0.00919392,0.006949148,0.001246508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003653908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002205909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001347035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009143993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9883847,0.008890635,0.0003546329,0.0008056992,0.001164066,0.0004001486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891747,0.007217006,0.000679373,0.001920772,0.0006517292,0.0003563972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001089848,0.00000343601,0.00005190014,0.00003269295,0.00000330206,0.00005425448,0.005507345,0.0002224662,0.00007667279,0.9898911,0.0004454377,0.003700594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004324488,0.000004709294,0.00003645901,0.00005118805,0.000002308772,0.00007211116,0.001908498,0.0009024747,0.0001562296,0.9828767,0.01397948,0.000005549358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02981826,0.009058245,0.7185442,0.03185011,0.0006554437,0.0001392399,0.0002302035,0.0005189122,0.2091854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8495025,0.003670434,0.1299322,0.001415621,0.000506888,0.0002059504,0.0003047127,0.0004389859,0.01402265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01339284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0656237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063535110","doi":"10.1007/s10503-013-9306-y","title":"Applying Recent Argumentation Methods to Some Ancient Examples of Plausible Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Skepticism; Epistemology; Computer science; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true},{"name":"Thomas F. Gordon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04566720233134565,"gpt":0.339941475476082,"spread":0.2942742731447364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004345449,0.0009002961,0.0007680389,0.002908434,0.002629271,0.004201211,0.002534767,0.004056694,0.007309612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0174293,0.0005820001,0.001281704,0.003329543,0.006931877,0.006916339,0.002617056,0.004587764,0.0009419884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00179058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000490461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009556063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001354444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963332,0.002325901,0.000187622,0.0002358461,0.0008010374,0.0001163573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945234,0.004252779,0.0001598757,0.0005031035,0.0004632864,0.00009742982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001690218,0.00001587486,0.00007290801,0.0001408994,0.00002269648,0.0001521088,0.0006609875,0.002327052,0.0001545071,0.9816949,0.001754074,0.01298712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001828929,0.000006743428,0.00009971089,0.0000725121,0.00001323297,0.0001904224,0.0001487845,0.01182924,0.0002620314,0.9682451,0.01909703,0.00001688125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01982915,0.009411157,0.853835,0.008065454,0.0006849747,0.0001026168,0.000179827,0.0002437525,0.107648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3824815,0.006603953,0.5833624,0.0007998282,0.0009152182,0.0002867533,0.0003346838,0.0001693342,0.02504625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007309612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0244531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979312761","doi":"10.1007/s10503-012-9272-9","title":"The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Criticism; Explication; Epistemology; Dialectic; Normative; Critical appraisal; Critical thinking; Adversary; Critical theory; Presupposition; Negation; Critical thought; Disinformation; Argumentative; Obligation; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jan Albert van Laar","is_ca":false},{"name":"Erik C. W. Krabbe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04173456905127048,"gpt":0.3358983056179288,"spread":0.2941637365666583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1117865,0.001052738,0.001704916,0.007557957,0.0190602,0.0197084,0.00656443,0.04533028,0.01356941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4923894,0.001425131,0.001312131,0.003957553,0.04381731,0.03108564,0.01782936,0.02536084,0.002437442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007872446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009450321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002467429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002215129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.851985,0.09173214,0.005547679,0.009281351,0.03553705,0.005916782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3993973,0.4730623,0.02951367,0.03456503,0.05203878,0.01142288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002452582,0.0001126179,0.001566176,0.0001836797,0.00007358399,0.00108045,0.02544378,0.0003964026,0.0004541581,0.9072177,0.04479362,0.01843268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002010814,0.00003333138,0.0007217911,0.0005186871,0.00006706108,0.0006479149,0.007382022,0.001579188,0.000414886,0.930167,0.05820321,0.00006387317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04504694,0.002497608,0.04717369,0.5939072,0.004285505,0.0001931424,0.00009789529,0.0002457293,0.3065523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138052,0.0008116857,0.01403425,0.0550101,0.004425827,0.0004177885,0.00005685411,0.0003598309,0.01107847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1117865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5911906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015722806","doi":"10.1007/s10503-008-9104-0","title":"Evaluating Corroborative Evidence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Chris Reed","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2398645334628746,"gpt":0.4065833421626628,"spread":0.1667188086997882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06131902,0.002037868,0.002175897,0.0145133,0.003207719,0.01163523,0.004062184,0.007995498,0.0115554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4773132,0.001511523,0.002193488,0.006135501,0.004431642,0.01660185,0.007717336,0.004624755,0.001698557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002733822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004232177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00126415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00196876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8962923,0.06456127,0.006660989,0.006355863,0.02471708,0.001412533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.355587,0.5628299,0.02515366,0.03107917,0.02260337,0.002746765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003873946,0.001150983,0.04894385,0.004598668,0.002368582,0.002423275,0.009726509,0.02882216,0.006575782,0.3184124,0.01762023,0.5554835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005339517,0.0008130385,0.01223181,0.002528252,0.001732693,0.00144894,0.004370813,0.2133702,0.01645217,0.6991298,0.04716524,0.000223214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2868614,0.01158861,0.6087654,0.02401235,0.001312486,0.00131025,0.002181191,0.001481179,0.06248706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8411905,0.001393616,0.151282,0.0005088197,0.0007753404,0.0003579093,0.001488944,0.000150254,0.002852575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06131902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3242898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987103036","doi":"10.1007/s10503-005-4414-y","title":"The Toulmin Model Today: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Work using Stephen Edelston Toulmin’s Layout of Arguments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Work (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering; Social science; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Hitchcock","is_ca":true},{"name":"Bart Verheij","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05076076247895468,"gpt":0.3743354431500077,"spread":0.323574680671053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005893954,0.001121116,0.001269597,0.004740824,0.003786459,0.01087107,0.0022566,0.005921841,0.00724523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01207061,0.0006528597,0.001065533,0.004625139,0.01541212,0.01661792,0.003639167,0.01044458,0.002563063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005949726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004180689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002764557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004103268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995622,0.002983441,0.000194905,0.0003215295,0.0007003414,0.0001777337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939162,0.00444393,0.0003528488,0.0003691969,0.0006431225,0.0002746979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008447752,0.00001576262,0.0000494339,0.00008985749,0.000005093978,0.00002711851,0.001301253,0.0001457228,0.00006704762,0.934283,0.05161019,0.01239719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000734094,0.00001034255,0.00008003278,0.0002621238,0.000006556248,0.00006874234,0.0004688563,0.0006073414,0.00009162181,0.634739,0.3636419,0.00001613557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.003875732,0.07814444,0.2311855,0.390379,0.03500164,0.0002308246,0.0002868585,0.0005555814,0.2603404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.369123,0.113752,0.2025424,0.07211698,0.05809427,0.002188887,0.0006397079,0.003106317,0.1784365],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01087107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04316843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W183851629","doi":"10.1023/a:1014991300192","title":"Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy in Argumentation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Ambiguity; Focus (optics); Fallacy; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","authors":[{"name":"Michael A. Gilbert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04150312515925259,"gpt":0.3190587741036113,"spread":0.2775556489443587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02702817,0.0007406584,0.001384501,0.003327157,0.005752307,0.01011652,0.002270234,0.009193472,0.005139128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1076425,0.0009372378,0.0007700344,0.001826599,0.04325654,0.03392834,0.007963057,0.01106094,0.0007342597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003735236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003171112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001372804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001182759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9597573,0.03152429,0.00124788,0.002456602,0.004337163,0.0006767918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8786847,0.1044795,0.003938669,0.008187094,0.003883792,0.0008261569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001871231,0.00001157745,0.0002442967,0.00003475815,0.000006649766,0.00005024998,0.002642065,0.0001736668,0.00006620205,0.9912722,0.00084624,0.004633403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001086715,0.000003591499,0.00005046912,0.00002942417,0.000003580409,0.0000617546,0.0004444727,0.0008339031,0.00007979234,0.996545,0.001932187,0.000004975776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1026878,0.005112146,0.5413538,0.1478307,0.001093136,0.0001064179,0.0001380248,0.0003418595,0.2013361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485129,0.0006037453,0.04363539,0.002551483,0.0003550338,0.0001276008,0.00004528872,0.0001128204,0.004055761],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02702817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1429403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982432424","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9224-9","title":"Character and Knowledge: Learning from the Speech of Experts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Pathos; Ethos; Character (mathematics); Logos Bible Software; Epistemology; Psychology; Social knowledge; Sociology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1370408861648199,"gpt":0.2752474300216571,"spread":0.1382065438568372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01089858,0.0005947616,0.0005299036,0.001740654,0.00206646,0.009551718,0.001506465,0.003672343,0.006725065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1021451,0.0003762661,0.0003723907,0.001019852,0.00708841,0.01771865,0.004683029,0.003707876,0.001282596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00141006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001421373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001161301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001241608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887388,0.00900447,0.0002293495,0.0007602374,0.0009816702,0.000285497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8971977,0.09193815,0.002492467,0.003734273,0.003331615,0.00130578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008471703,0.0005006969,0.03149879,0.0008883851,0.0001245323,0.001424711,0.3440467,0.00537562,0.003285573,0.3245487,0.01048263,0.2769765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007262164,0.000187421,0.01132349,0.0008989539,0.0000591559,0.000608419,0.09590506,0.02955772,0.003464089,0.8098719,0.04794576,0.0001053684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.652963,0.002476973,0.171108,0.01909566,0.0003486222,0.0001923472,0.0004062271,0.0002471001,0.1531621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822015,0.0004885191,0.01208624,0.0003578456,0.00008243128,0.00006457179,0.0002311593,0.00004985146,0.004437842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01089858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05763793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964844782","doi":"10.1007/s10503-014-9335-1","title":"Challenges and Remedies for Identifying and Classifying Argumentation Schemes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogical self; Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Curriculum; Process (computing); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Robert Anthony","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mijung Kim","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1814761086111442,"gpt":0.4438486577627966,"spread":0.2623725491516525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04333114,0.001967251,0.002895072,0.01367346,0.008160578,0.02345947,0.007848359,0.006785293,0.003669943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2462704,0.001154016,0.002343599,0.006821277,0.007840647,0.02779107,0.007899119,0.00892213,0.001767228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003867337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009167232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003345515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005570815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.932291,0.02585174,0.01496339,0.01064979,0.01470948,0.001534544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7128561,0.1657125,0.02389186,0.04639909,0.04569334,0.005447028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003127542,0.0009818847,0.08109717,0.002324947,0.0002558689,0.0003975126,0.01155313,0.005415025,0.007413478,0.1863114,0.01200368,0.6919332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009573691,0.0002639016,0.01505934,0.002718464,0.0003572632,0.001278351,0.02137377,0.1489709,0.0152316,0.7391933,0.05512152,0.000335879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0721852,0.002320618,0.8970596,0.0155319,0.0005155372,0.00143041,0.0009838998,0.003512842,0.006459952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2456071,0.0006498788,0.7486872,0.0003601277,0.0001857488,0.0006685384,0.001507227,0.0002823789,0.002051784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04333114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2291597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124279947","doi":"10.1007/s10503-006-9018-7","title":"The Fallaciousness of Threats: Character and Ad Baculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Political communication; Political science; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Fabrizio Macagno","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01098068647668667,"gpt":0.2864160941137823,"spread":0.2754354076370956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02357195,0.0005721262,0.0007502815,0.007358741,0.008603537,0.01664373,0.002414959,0.0101986,0.006444691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1107934,0.0006350959,0.0005527165,0.002381659,0.0361653,0.02028427,0.007705463,0.006102239,0.0004357371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00304688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00268615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006060529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006155801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9638277,0.02550936,0.001336644,0.001946084,0.006127852,0.001252379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8680955,0.09882503,0.01224257,0.006939743,0.009918603,0.003978582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005896859,0.00007094353,0.004933589,0.0001235003,0.00003916559,0.0003244547,0.03013153,0.0002108919,0.0003031183,0.9440786,0.002947606,0.01677762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003817356,0.00006340003,0.003308063,0.0002909934,0.00003517333,0.001032415,0.02683576,0.002461229,0.0003439499,0.9335616,0.03198815,0.00004116873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2773152,0.003348714,0.04778942,0.0765302,0.000900672,0.0001659296,0.00009639905,0.0001089608,0.5937445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944325,0.0002278087,0.002107888,0.000954996,0.0001712605,0.00004875403,0.00001485066,0.00002116081,0.00202078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02357195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1246619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248259855","doi":"10.1023/a:1011156918137","title":"Emotional Messages","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Michael A. Gilbert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0442418674709357,"gpt":0.3702571211262045,"spread":0.3260152536552688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00116493,0.0006255792,0.0002154388,0.0009422263,0.001045229,0.002974828,0.0004362057,0.002042868,0.04482942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01364181,0.0001694138,0.0002747246,0.0003926329,0.0007948652,0.002359411,0.001643959,0.002092326,0.01068756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005787955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002867967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001554847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001553662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983032,0.0006939039,0.00007775066,0.0001512991,0.0006121065,0.0001618524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947838,0.002606932,0.0005642819,0.000437815,0.001303918,0.0003033451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009913302,0.0006160315,0.009279493,0.001091474,0.00009186244,0.001323746,0.02435688,0.000745641,0.03989549,0.5114915,0.111347,0.2987696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001512465,0.0004840889,0.02677539,0.0007896263,0.0002023145,0.002073284,0.01097775,0.004620649,0.02351816,0.1675384,0.7627473,0.0001217421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07474498,0.0007619846,0.02120914,0.009182856,0.001650804,0.0002207605,0.0005490458,0.0005849827,0.8910956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7872445,0.0005879942,0.008175533,0.004016568,0.00124205,0.0002705354,0.0007142948,0.0003249953,0.1974236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04482942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1499694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011562498","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9205-z","title":"Critical Inquiry: Considering the Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialectic; Critical thinking; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Sociology; Discipline; Argument (complex analysis); Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Critical systems thinking; Communication studies; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Mark Battersby","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sharon Bailin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1333740345554744,"gpt":0.3935709428632236,"spread":0.2601969083077492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0324626,0.001180935,0.001528495,0.006048087,0.0110281,0.02786012,0.003535796,0.009256194,0.005674789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07554237,0.0008809722,0.0006944322,0.00378997,0.08843948,0.03426006,0.01064856,0.009315401,0.0004366923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01000236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01415121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00358363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005227666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.944272,0.0492858,0.0008505923,0.002044258,0.002500001,0.001047385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8728034,0.1132439,0.003714164,0.003354991,0.00431316,0.002570487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001686064,0.00001722153,0.000264236,0.0001914843,0.00001274687,0.00017656,0.01642636,0.0002659503,0.00007321395,0.9758059,0.001178581,0.005570833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001701464,0.00001082186,0.000129906,0.0003872109,0.00001062209,0.00009936909,0.01182475,0.0006059568,0.0001093168,0.9671988,0.01959512,0.00001106013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05526825,0.0496219,0.2764761,0.2984621,0.004037336,0.0003823711,0.0001464476,0.0001921447,0.3154135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944069,0.006423378,0.039004,0.004024766,0.001268478,0.0003422339,0.00004496293,0.000102632,0.004720612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0324626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1716807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984962811","doi":"10.1007/s10503-004-2071-1","title":"Begging the Question in Arguments Based on Testimony","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Argumentation theory; Sequence (biology); Epistemology; Law; Fallacy; Witness; Point (geometry); Testimonial; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Advertising","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01659462014170406,"gpt":0.2950368186882093,"spread":0.2784421985465053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02661742,0.001349022,0.00173262,0.003647845,0.004574399,0.01091831,0.003087751,0.01473457,0.00857119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1733854,0.001417268,0.001870987,0.002711568,0.008187639,0.02553092,0.009273992,0.007850862,0.001417951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001628762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005032559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006093084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9579946,0.03269952,0.001865514,0.001841408,0.004553487,0.001045502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8344137,0.1513129,0.004225474,0.00489083,0.003767473,0.001389609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000416757,0.00008343726,0.000655579,0.0006654671,0.0001310566,0.001219538,0.00681494,0.004437489,0.002092448,0.9585711,0.002568956,0.02234338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000791984,0.00005571559,0.0002551083,0.0002860736,0.00007517372,0.0002935682,0.001170027,0.02037673,0.001405941,0.9665642,0.009393902,0.00004423784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1189128,0.003262946,0.7136793,0.02633084,0.001798454,0.000455761,0.0002523372,0.0002982907,0.1350094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8465119,0.001295841,0.1422397,0.001303341,0.0007077711,0.0002564446,0.0003030065,0.000112736,0.007269315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02661742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1407681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075620909","doi":"10.1007/s10503-014-9328-0","title":"Argumentum ad Verecundiam: New Gender-based Criteria for Appeals to Authority","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St Joseph's Health Centre; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Appeal; Epistemology; Fallacy; Credibility; Injustice; Prejudice (legal term); Sociology; Trustworthiness; Feminist epistemology; Competence (human resources); Adversarial system; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Feminist philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michelle Ciurria","is_ca":true},{"name":"Khameiel Al-Tamimi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0956511876628936,"gpt":0.4103188837154276,"spread":0.314667696052534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02391276,0.001388667,0.002175837,0.0123739,0.009439129,0.02566092,0.004463152,0.01243655,0.01602208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09998912,0.00118211,0.002169388,0.005491732,0.04822608,0.04184116,0.01229365,0.01327745,0.002220912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008296336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004228448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001608646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001814188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9567294,0.02445308,0.00391942,0.004142426,0.00852349,0.002232301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9237338,0.04997392,0.005261785,0.006774554,0.01138864,0.002867341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001472648,0.000009520734,0.0001941256,0.00003796388,0.000004581168,0.00004279432,0.002640504,0.00004371563,0.00009622856,0.9938428,0.0009842379,0.002088789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002235903,0.00001663188,0.0004008772,0.0001351369,0.00001529839,0.0001735975,0.003319266,0.0014592,0.0002666751,0.9766517,0.01751356,0.00002577345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0545128,0.002556241,0.3314369,0.03881506,0.003502228,0.000773986,0.0005281497,0.000433392,0.5674413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9148034,0.0003771297,0.06658346,0.001558435,0.001218049,0.0008610758,0.0002476809,0.0004028928,0.01394801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02566092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1264642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141175123","doi":"10.1023/a:1007837321284","title":"Slippery Slopes and Collapsing Taboos","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"John Woods","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03396518697504233,"gpt":0.2555291191052296,"spread":0.2215639321301873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01847293,0.0008625383,0.001722072,0.007345861,0.01025336,0.01674169,0.002764142,0.005212779,0.02506262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1089392,0.001147963,0.001203379,0.005607146,0.04043728,0.02710524,0.01525656,0.007408875,0.003194201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002970007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003348147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002399478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002764677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9776058,0.01340098,0.001044089,0.002252519,0.003970863,0.00172567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491571,0.02931968,0.002713977,0.01155626,0.00571809,0.001534924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002679826,0.000008660791,0.0003712896,0.00003367922,0.00001074392,0.0001107371,0.00877508,0.0002989164,0.00007398637,0.9806241,0.0017141,0.0079519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001082965,0.000005527408,0.0001276094,0.0001116211,0.000008938084,0.00006747743,0.004859189,0.0009930178,0.0001001828,0.9802941,0.01341142,0.0000102514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1204931,0.004281662,0.4256124,0.03085313,0.001407878,0.0002976705,0.0003981172,0.0008071425,0.4158489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291552,0.0008903116,0.04815567,0.001091882,0.0002971179,0.0002046256,0.0001631692,0.0006414496,0.01940065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02506262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09769535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190206316","doi":"10.1023/a:1014929916547","title":"Speaking Your Mind: Large Inarticulateness Constitutional and Circumstantial","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Epistemology; Articulation (sociology); Phenomenon; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"John Woods","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03153362823316836,"gpt":0.2633541447672388,"spread":0.2318205165340705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02013878,0.0006147816,0.002081924,0.002568496,0.006562104,0.008437138,0.00289684,0.005352534,0.01269786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09573089,0.001223252,0.001852247,0.001750036,0.02190092,0.02408696,0.0104526,0.008249351,0.001175359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003285179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002318663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001977016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001632011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9793539,0.01102686,0.001081244,0.003847935,0.0030918,0.00159824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9089338,0.05801679,0.004476166,0.02195032,0.004408636,0.002214297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005764562,0.00002363487,0.0004687574,0.00002731705,0.00002180879,0.0001006267,0.0009787552,0.0002525507,0.0001670597,0.9941301,0.0007604172,0.003011341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002195221,0.000006228446,0.0002374568,0.000009257605,0.0000149581,0.00006398435,0.0002456397,0.001036133,0.000141621,0.9967778,0.001436812,0.0000082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2736987,0.001531921,0.3118505,0.03779272,0.0004998331,0.0002734388,0.0004671784,0.0009002889,0.3729855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824768,0.0001762194,0.01256257,0.000651143,0.0001930208,0.0001252822,0.0000776274,0.0001255158,0.00361179],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02013878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1065053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318982896","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09603-y","title":"Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Argument (complex analysis); Communication studies; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Positive economics; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Hundleby","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1637048180737664,"gpt":0.3281668976498575,"spread":0.1644620795760911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09331504,0.0007849606,0.002874255,0.00791424,0.01350859,0.01941806,0.004660442,0.01470765,0.007584222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2221335,0.001109319,0.001354308,0.005335474,0.08474559,0.03237469,0.01276829,0.0132414,0.0006786683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009316383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009103575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003098776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002471052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.908805,0.05726349,0.005196924,0.01050082,0.01401771,0.004215977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6570458,0.2835078,0.0166402,0.02651825,0.01306832,0.003219689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002231309,0.00001961029,0.0005672228,0.00005555977,0.00002908455,0.00007189406,0.004681539,0.0001899241,0.00003969133,0.9899219,0.001017899,0.003383384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001189686,0.000001803655,0.00006909401,0.00004392381,0.000005086228,0.00001886806,0.000749377,0.000282364,0.00003629848,0.9973574,0.001419876,0.000003849511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1910647,0.01053289,0.2186918,0.3481959,0.001696775,0.0002455332,0.0003582458,0.0002413913,0.2289728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793363,0.0008103012,0.01374701,0.002909441,0.0006032672,0.0001715962,0.00006999561,0.00008185477,0.002270237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09331504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.493503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782790951","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9448-z","title":"Case-to-Case Arguments","year":2018,"lang":"da","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Presentation (obstetrics); Decision theory; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Katharina Stevens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06168995435245966,"gpt":0.2999731028729261,"spread":0.2382831485204664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02963541,0.001573695,0.001886407,0.005137613,0.005286141,0.009831643,0.005216363,0.01803424,0.02576605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1376163,0.001013204,0.001898052,0.002849628,0.0173324,0.03116552,0.007393192,0.008153842,0.002008032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005113826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002879251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007284585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007978749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9583762,0.0273485,0.001790027,0.003576411,0.007470912,0.001438069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8484972,0.132732,0.003642951,0.008148711,0.005689639,0.001289615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000251596,0.00001887403,0.00007378546,0.0000552813,0.00002111126,0.000147277,0.0003064076,0.000250841,0.00003779721,0.9943229,0.00214463,0.002595906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002412542,0.000004977514,0.0000466154,0.00006110346,0.00001258519,0.00009547361,0.0002409162,0.001176911,0.00007916098,0.9894549,0.008797288,0.000006013357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02337731,0.005482364,0.3420588,0.1158269,0.002467667,0.0005385428,0.000340019,0.0001922042,0.5097162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8599275,0.00262185,0.09787926,0.009838312,0.00212008,0.0008250997,0.0003308495,0.0001051113,0.02635195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02963541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1567289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081569111","doi":"10.1007/s10503-020-09528-w","title":"Attack, Defense and Counter-Attack in the Inuit Duel Songs of Ammassalik","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Adversary; False accusation; Action (physics); Rhetorical question; Law; History; Psychology; Literature; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Art; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Christian Plantin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04379366312895286,"gpt":0.3257115206105121,"spread":0.2819178574815592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001231688,0.0004775668,0.0004727156,0.0007606967,0.008433293,0.004986058,0.0006827524,0.001916805,0.003752648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003458773,0.0002278623,0.0001969038,0.0004718899,0.005299082,0.001661691,0.002094949,0.002857319,0.0004428829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002474423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007391013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01979709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06017697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987112,0.0006696271,0.00003870674,0.0001330347,0.000192664,0.0002547653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985146,0.0008134337,0.0001827997,0.00005406921,0.0001571469,0.0002779026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004893416,0.0002049215,0.01220595,0.0002176836,0.00005556801,0.002520575,0.9075078,0.000183426,0.008954192,0.04857917,0.005378739,0.01370264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004851186,0.000289156,0.08012529,0.000271852,0.0000566487,0.002668136,0.7612005,0.001627029,0.001813908,0.008214115,0.1435411,0.0001437156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429775,0.0007835174,0.0006579249,0.001916058,0.0002068928,0.00002153199,0.00004443045,0.0000240002,0.05336826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948283,0.00009738647,0.0003106661,0.0001742051,0.00002961527,0.00000516287,0.00002281374,0.00001611094,0.0045156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01979709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03936368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360985377","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09604-x","title":"Teaching the Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Communication studies; Political communication; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"J. Anthony Blair","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05046339114481301,"gpt":0.272851442163362,"spread":0.222388051018549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004831778,0.000787179,0.0004922267,0.001661908,0.005271526,0.008443299,0.001570589,0.003440488,0.02231439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01588576,0.0004326937,0.0004752369,0.001089371,0.01483323,0.01184712,0.004887991,0.007560532,0.003909786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004671408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003315949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00137444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002596803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948643,0.003367741,0.0001157811,0.0005572871,0.0008023895,0.0002925653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932334,0.004765815,0.0003767421,0.0006461659,0.000579173,0.0003986653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001674803,0.00003807058,0.0002260659,0.00006813339,0.000005644028,0.00005345985,0.008348132,0.0002693983,0.0001737476,0.9432326,0.01925203,0.02831593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001184034,0.00001135145,0.0001340665,0.0002558348,0.000007293222,0.0000890799,0.003431609,0.0008915988,0.0004475704,0.8087477,0.1859647,0.000007243882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02994562,0.006479237,0.08001764,0.06613807,0.002133778,0.00005789416,0.0001080187,0.0004760961,0.8146436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8596481,0.002920727,0.02470563,0.003569691,0.0006847482,0.00009074887,0.0001212337,0.0004443753,0.1078147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02231439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0746491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319985130","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09600-1","title":"Textbook Treatments of Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Philosophy; Epistemology; Section (typography); Literature; Classics; History; Art; Computer science; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"David Hitchcock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04047829285631277,"gpt":0.3742364312572088,"spread":0.3337581384008961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002440036,0.0009484726,0.0007156085,0.005060822,0.002886537,0.005267181,0.002241073,0.00601307,0.02068312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01056017,0.0006276162,0.0007744402,0.005380938,0.01115408,0.007447886,0.002523465,0.006010611,0.005033741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004633429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001817768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001512034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001546676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969024,0.001703789,0.0001923277,0.000257412,0.0007593828,0.0001846862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959045,0.002614513,0.000318752,0.000485456,0.0005747706,0.0001020073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002680309,0.00000419637,0.00002197403,0.00003491882,0.000002058265,0.00001095869,0.00021432,0.0001030679,0.00001499677,0.9866092,0.008480512,0.004501166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000500419,0.000002717078,0.00005395009,0.0001185905,0.000003771721,0.00006250262,0.00009701974,0.000361599,0.00003987009,0.9379098,0.06134132,0.000003898862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005123227,0.02730849,0.1009207,0.03896511,0.002320206,0.00006857763,0.0003477212,0.0002968497,0.8246492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6270682,0.0248422,0.0701768,0.0133975,0.00574605,0.0006257517,0.0009657869,0.0004773511,0.2567003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02068312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06919187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206105180","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9021-7","title":"Book Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Robert C. Pinto","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04716809738502099,"gpt":0.3149793446257435,"spread":0.2678112472407225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008861438,0.0004612436,0.0008206684,0.003581703,0.0009780709,0.004837762,0.001504781,0.002239705,0.2989239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004956962,0.0002943178,0.0004128658,0.004734582,0.0008278172,0.002880904,0.001542226,0.002282382,0.1992433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002065408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00389916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004245688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009145074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992546,0.0001029441,0.00003433542,0.00009439356,0.0004443446,0.00006939062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975907,0.0006220265,0.0001283711,0.0001579558,0.00115615,0.0003448434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006737313,0.000009090773,0.0000244872,0.0002667155,0.000002594426,0.00002200004,0.00002346838,0.0000283946,0.00004027259,0.004704171,0.9185947,0.07627737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002128918,0.000001923458,0.00005100023,0.0002344852,0.000001636065,0.00003748655,0.00001809784,0.000004891156,0.00000984815,0.0007883804,0.9988486,0.000001602829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.000347612,0.3950786,0.001288609,0.04299308,0.04408694,0.0001029457,0.0016813,0.000335441,0.5140855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002721105,0.1849829,0.0008632214,0.01434619,0.01475831,0.00007693786,0.001494221,0.0002046451,0.7805524],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2989239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":1,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319870956","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09607-8","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Hans V. Hansen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01940754188178577,"gpt":0.2760480560126188,"spread":0.2566405141308331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003900831,0.00214587,0.003238568,0.005980596,0.003187608,0.0110275,0.002393422,0.007171859,0.06371941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01701667,0.0008516569,0.002105302,0.004006788,0.00299878,0.009641881,0.004915816,0.01203784,0.02717016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002233123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002333749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009898692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001961149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967548,0.0008448224,0.00039711,0.0005986108,0.001150449,0.0002542115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822349,0.009873598,0.001019853,0.001102769,0.003932333,0.001836558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002152366,0.00002433335,0.00006759025,0.0002480709,0.00001239858,0.00004955829,0.00005957331,0.00008967867,0.0001267229,0.007969286,0.9657485,0.02558296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007629858,0.00002057759,0.0002061759,0.0003974294,0.00001163489,0.0001409297,0.00006007343,0.0001809339,0.00005927201,0.009625166,0.989275,0.00001528255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003662092,0.05158689,0.007090096,0.08572675,0.8234478,0.00006067508,0.0003946763,0.0002563761,0.03107047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003210257,0.0252909,0.002111874,0.01936968,0.8912201,0.0001087267,0.0007529238,0.0005040031,0.05743157],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06371941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2131627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319871818","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09606-9","title":"Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Hans V. Hansen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0480062366540458,"gpt":0.28564047049037,"spread":0.2376342338363242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02812901,0.0008863034,0.002330077,0.003303779,0.009019602,0.01114154,0.004641456,0.01689033,0.01737463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2034983,0.001562856,0.002232777,0.002452804,0.02942459,0.02595102,0.01222918,0.01880977,0.001697764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004126801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003893082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002084491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001358829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9652054,0.01881035,0.002316692,0.005313803,0.005462615,0.002891107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7972608,0.1581137,0.006950735,0.0224286,0.01170288,0.003543269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002722075,0.00002169963,0.0002528339,0.0000361307,0.000008311677,0.00009496012,0.0006147926,0.0003136963,0.00006651349,0.9949935,0.0009117142,0.002658556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002196468,0.000004904668,0.00004185839,0.00002592808,0.000006204103,0.00006021082,0.0001281289,0.001280074,0.00007747482,0.9970152,0.001331525,0.00000645766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1382874,0.001596289,0.5071589,0.07500176,0.001266903,0.0003089316,0.0004100203,0.0007096031,0.2752602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289052,0.0004344369,0.05493033,0.002217724,0.0006161708,0.0003799432,0.0002277289,0.0002294563,0.01205894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02812901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1487622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412817136","doi":"10.1007/s10503-025-09669-w","title":"“Deliberative Context” Is not the Whole Story of Deliberative Reasoning: the Site C Case of Disagreement Management in Indigenous Consultations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Political communication; Epistemology; Sociology; Communication studies; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Social science; Public relations; Geography; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Oxana Pimenova","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02599560431517325,"gpt":0.3147298436546717,"spread":0.2887342393394984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0367202,0.0005987139,0.0009676666,0.002519195,0.04057794,0.01970894,0.004411983,0.02035713,0.007380302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06065027,0.0008879636,0.001046922,0.003493464,0.06537204,0.01735713,0.01526668,0.01430067,0.0008606772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01139272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01261544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03836792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03833478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9339538,0.05638201,0.0008562291,0.001618707,0.003583006,0.003606214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9115882,0.0780059,0.00219862,0.003100132,0.002163099,0.002944023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007176021,0.000035493,0.0006165167,0.0001082572,0.00001792047,0.005191451,0.5481507,0.0005163558,0.0003934474,0.4376876,0.002955307,0.004255291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001187233,0.0000593117,0.001300602,0.0005034927,0.00004744267,0.002743616,0.6387173,0.002685525,0.0009859976,0.2616582,0.09106337,0.0001163901],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3656781,0.001102703,0.04294408,0.09046941,0.0004669008,0.0003176323,0.00007891434,0.0002188652,0.4987234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860609,0.0001163472,0.004613535,0.001202948,0.00005207232,0.0001165402,0.000009590055,0.00006975912,0.007758406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1941973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003635366","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9233-8","title":"Petitioning the King: The Case of Provincial Printers in Eighteenth-Century France","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Argumentative; Government (linguistics); Competition (biology); Character (mathematics); Censorship; Law; Sociology; Political science; Literature; History; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Hans V. Hansen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jane McLeod","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0334861499248417,"gpt":0.2542287565425639,"spread":0.2207426066177222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008867193,0.0004569438,0.0008256119,0.001974599,0.05731176,0.01708853,0.002855981,0.01695843,0.007232788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02029385,0.0006079742,0.0005380197,0.002655712,0.02913734,0.005961091,0.007206099,0.01121391,0.0006071352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03833712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01832127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4346508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5149691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879531,0.006468889,0.0002428632,0.0008341424,0.001182976,0.003318038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818186,0.0143731,0.0008097068,0.0004451649,0.001541087,0.001012359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006377508,0.00003802537,0.002622005,0.00004884524,0.00002439691,0.005197876,0.7495039,0.0002931973,0.0002494139,0.2316729,0.005835708,0.004449953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003764061,0.00003187162,0.005463117,0.0002814906,0.00004904077,0.001063762,0.6773819,0.0007691338,0.0007322871,0.02144159,0.2926661,0.00008206441],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7236507,0.001869635,0.002072052,0.04050199,0.0002224484,0.00003010764,0.00005027801,0.00005514344,0.2315477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806322,0.0002269535,0.0002513285,0.001122678,0.00004152693,0.000007971695,0.00001265886,0.00003043778,0.01767425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4346508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8642418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973664585","doi":"10.1007/s10503-019-09488-w","title":"Place, Image and Argument: The Physical and Nonphysical Dimensions of a Collective Ethos","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jianfeng Wang","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01999540109742253,"gpt":0.2650840113424731,"spread":0.2450886102450505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01701623,0.0005056956,0.0007196883,0.003469276,0.007426323,0.01805645,0.002215181,0.007808423,0.007674204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03586532,0.0005810307,0.0005011389,0.002118055,0.0805611,0.02248802,0.006654555,0.00522542,0.0005068152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003007447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003598672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001158789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001216478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9841732,0.01262226,0.000302118,0.0007918316,0.00159328,0.0005173341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9540564,0.03894471,0.002092207,0.002298493,0.001628348,0.0009797765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002087567,0.0000197274,0.000250057,0.00006938258,0.000007168842,0.00005883854,0.017946,0.00009854993,0.0001166387,0.977241,0.0007468716,0.003424762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004639071,0.00002533398,0.0007090672,0.0002133826,0.00001426961,0.0001326429,0.01843147,0.0007066319,0.0002461703,0.9589674,0.02048691,0.00002021019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1789319,0.01046826,0.08779438,0.1264996,0.001403204,0.000100144,0.00009437565,0.00008906356,0.5946191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989617,0.0004854111,0.004999583,0.0007880998,0.0002274544,0.00005310471,0.00001437323,0.00003937527,0.003775638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01805645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08999151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792093414","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9456-z","title":"David Hitchcock (2017): On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and Critical Thinking","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Communication studies; Political communication; Critical thinking; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science; Argumentation theory; Political science; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05187436558278319,"gpt":0.3124969490664514,"spread":0.2606225834836682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004847486,0.001506808,0.001001291,0.002723866,0.005239058,0.01035941,0.0017236,0.01071104,0.01065655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02219601,0.000447932,0.0004920212,0.00469567,0.01272974,0.01595269,0.004810182,0.01217652,0.003575531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004250593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004201623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009307801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01460603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958013,0.003020558,0.0001252557,0.0003374969,0.0005742437,0.0001412765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818109,0.0147857,0.000506126,0.0003343698,0.001828717,0.000734213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005042803,0.00005053365,0.0005224344,0.0003282045,0.00002666362,0.0001167499,0.009216375,0.0002190964,0.0001073529,0.3549387,0.6137569,0.02066656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005367774,0.00001416966,0.0009801477,0.001610346,0.00002817415,0.0001525057,0.007535834,0.0004204211,0.0003914762,0.4701236,0.5186322,0.00005740767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003794986,0.1924129,0.01323082,0.7349211,0.02243923,0.00004940929,0.0002091392,0.00009488017,0.03284753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2713584,0.1281622,0.01748851,0.3779114,0.07763219,0.0004486601,0.0005054821,0.000702787,0.1257902],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01071104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03564978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636107842","doi":"10.1023/a:1007786123170","title":"Antoine Arnauld (1612--1694)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Neurology and Historical Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"John Woods","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02560020867419899,"gpt":0.2628379563130538,"spread":0.2372377476388549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007832417,0.0009386878,0.000852823,0.0008364493,0.002380419,0.002408472,0.0005418592,0.002661758,0.2253831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002623107,0.0002476191,0.0002278492,0.0007670428,0.0008545867,0.001473999,0.001299452,0.002077299,0.07891944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001377588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000845063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003951335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004814941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995199,0.0001254851,0.00002257496,0.0001240553,0.0001728973,0.00003514803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989638,0.0006412002,0.00007384627,0.00003088521,0.0001576343,0.0001325703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002216552,0.00002818763,0.0002403256,0.0003048474,0.00001755281,0.0008524585,0.0004345614,0.0003613349,0.001011495,0.06576166,0.8146833,0.1160826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006262178,0.00000602857,0.0002690695,0.00004688319,0.000002132107,0.0002378573,0.00009682273,0.00005522646,0.0001194509,0.001947502,0.997209,0.000003868744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045636,0.09598889,0.003054569,0.115553,0.05905775,0.00004762517,0.001311899,0.0005381685,0.7198846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02748029,0.01374908,0.001374849,0.003436423,0.005137257,0.00003994476,0.0002075298,0.0001955659,0.9483792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2253831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7539816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410540562","doi":"10.1007/s10503-025-09656-1","title":"Chinese Argument from Qi 氣 and the Place of Ethos in the Kisceral Mode","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Mode (computer interface); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Social science; Computer science; Politics; Law; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Jianfeng Wang","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01176797545556793,"gpt":0.3369376238112258,"spread":0.3251696483556579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006784793,0.0005079822,0.000677517,0.002901727,0.007662738,0.005568578,0.001327781,0.002809493,0.005376055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006384856,0.0003402107,0.0004745407,0.002606529,0.03299303,0.005738933,0.003137725,0.00357271,0.0003391567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009849433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006019258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008142874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007189689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955602,0.00262607,0.000183925,0.0004667355,0.0006243316,0.000538687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969764,0.001721409,0.000244829,0.0004076842,0.0004146251,0.000235076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001658181,0.000005799132,0.0001948353,0.00003447684,0.000005664807,0.00005478805,0.005983751,0.00009315531,0.00008089084,0.991276,0.000382213,0.001871789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007766223,0.00005092912,0.002585129,0.0001353598,0.00004375534,0.0001268317,0.004550567,0.002443515,0.0005910589,0.9515195,0.03783356,0.00004219894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1754791,0.002658507,0.01702388,0.01779079,0.0003391883,0.0001194187,0.00007189404,0.0000658729,0.7864513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887972,0.0002346854,0.001255307,0.0004701783,0.00008538706,0.00004123177,0.0000116987,0.00001364538,0.009090615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009849433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07146293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400700211","doi":"10.1007/s10503-024-09635-y","title":"Remembering Tony Blair (1941–2024)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Hans V. Hansen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02639939242603898,"gpt":0.3374100325706624,"spread":0.3110106401446234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003844886,0.001359387,0.001211066,0.002060638,0.006091476,0.009394418,0.001115489,0.01195153,0.008427166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01871067,0.0005682934,0.0006867151,0.00190982,0.008088785,0.0103822,0.003846965,0.01994662,0.004893222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006368188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003328616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01784115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03093312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964823,0.001179792,0.0001987567,0.0008689602,0.0009271866,0.0003430592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935666,0.00296124,0.0005985672,0.0002737366,0.00144389,0.001155885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002761055,0.000009026302,0.0001342768,0.00007418991,0.00001320244,0.0001295457,0.001193275,0.00002577817,0.00005011163,0.01105791,0.9797087,0.007576239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005579103,0.000004996013,0.0002944212,0.0003036154,0.000005054076,0.0001038378,0.000615237,0.00001704887,0.00005921983,0.002963906,0.9956083,0.00001865392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006132041,0.1242573,0.0002631989,0.6916482,0.1739702,0.000006186123,0.00008792351,0.00001869241,0.009135033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03258793,0.05748327,0.0005240314,0.5434091,0.2150522,0.00005805017,0.00009189703,0.0001950565,0.1505985],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01784115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04620469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360980452","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09609-6","title":"Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Mathematical proof; Philosophy; Deductive reasoning; Inductive reasoning; Computer science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"John Woods","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06861749761720014,"gpt":0.2747787971022493,"spread":0.2061612994850492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01571722,0.0005164603,0.001308785,0.007447079,0.01150119,0.01732916,0.002582737,0.008493219,0.007564279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0491773,0.001003563,0.0007554442,0.005021312,0.0630804,0.02274323,0.007026488,0.009286404,0.0005459074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007990209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004734924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003885207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00368725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9825543,0.01348141,0.0005939097,0.00110338,0.00151868,0.0007482406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9344975,0.05448496,0.002793273,0.004028567,0.002870153,0.001325669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007130646,0.000003950774,0.0001044166,0.00001394769,0.000002776919,0.00001984458,0.00288032,0.0001073924,0.00001940867,0.9952808,0.0002019997,0.001358044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005153408,0.000003096894,0.00006794468,0.00003504922,0.000002755836,0.00001969408,0.0008384958,0.0003080018,0.00002523788,0.9951181,0.003573676,0.000002803081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1588965,0.01898066,0.1788101,0.08080354,0.001067928,0.00009323422,0.0002236412,0.0002725618,0.5608518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986055,0.001101295,0.008833153,0.0004244762,0.0002079397,0.00004394703,0.00004129922,0.00005274031,0.003240173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0831216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}