{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"2933a3e1dace","filters":{"venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2562018607","doi":"10.1080/00028533.2016.11821871","title":"Navigating the Visual Turn in Argument","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Argument map; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Key (lock); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Leo Groarke","is_ca":true},{"name":"Catherine Helen Palczewski","is_ca":true},{"name":"David Godden","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01634468291548511,"gpt":0.3438215733245135,"spread":0.3274768904090284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00655531,0.0008657819,0.000588281,0.00282882,0.005220457,0.01397224,0.0019446,0.004475149,0.01397247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02978219,0.0006251411,0.0008220851,0.001518246,0.024074,0.02425556,0.01177118,0.00447481,0.001727384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002854272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001792238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00188059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002322655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991372,0.00649139,0.000144936,0.0006884724,0.0008191124,0.0004842168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873426,0.009714674,0.0008169529,0.0009171068,0.0007359441,0.0004726968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000619769,0.00001866953,0.0005152323,0.0001340386,0.000008887128,0.0002707262,0.0327908,0.0005142012,0.0008644561,0.9434574,0.00299412,0.01836943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003124885,0.00002854021,0.0002252657,0.0002624791,0.000008702006,0.0002873281,0.01570062,0.002078935,0.0007261984,0.9027595,0.07786988,0.00002133876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08213324,0.006033081,0.3535596,0.03719216,0.001390089,0.00009415174,0.0001197054,0.0005360749,0.5189419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242564,0.001200442,0.06187311,0.001230269,0.0001778039,0.0001025618,0.00009646482,0.0003402774,0.01072256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01397247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04674256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254013976","doi":"10.1080/00028533.2008.11821684","title":"Proleptic Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0211992023394098,"gpt":0.2464517050404841,"spread":0.2252525027010743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152579,0.001165367,0.000869599,0.003228813,0.004101524,0.01409456,0.002871761,0.004133609,0.013197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03366318,0.0006063426,0.001062993,0.002637903,0.01049781,0.0103881,0.007333122,0.004547061,0.007232647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003071481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004171805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009389271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009520543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9772745,0.01350807,0.001481534,0.001984818,0.005033514,0.0007175357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760731,0.01372123,0.001615753,0.004317223,0.003377416,0.0008953251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001864526,0.00001829917,0.0001408933,0.0001812484,0.00001080441,0.00009104976,0.001489711,0.0003280769,0.0001888881,0.9604868,0.00602708,0.03101852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002259833,0.00002167002,0.000101906,0.0003532256,0.00001351861,0.0004051163,0.0007572212,0.002394248,0.0007749568,0.6660009,0.3291328,0.00002179736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004227763,0.004225906,0.5871642,0.009212279,0.0008487733,0.0005931046,0.0003059118,0.0007628228,0.3926593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.290729,0.005969893,0.6095564,0.00345945,0.0009499009,0.001037446,0.0007816709,0.0003954968,0.08712086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0152579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08069253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901372401","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2019.1525002","title":"Making room for auditory argument","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Leo Groarke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09086863553332207,"gpt":0.3361495280654507,"spread":0.2452808925321286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00754718,0.0008139765,0.0004609279,0.001744227,0.004973311,0.01254899,0.001697545,0.004020181,0.0318852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04635512,0.0003676391,0.0007167721,0.0008163471,0.009084265,0.01485836,0.01029303,0.004517075,0.008075823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001087711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00150111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003129104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006039986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913237,0.005421871,0.0002434555,0.0007720112,0.00167482,0.0005641858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825763,0.01332255,0.0008625705,0.001294478,0.001183143,0.0007610673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002066818,0.0001013128,0.0009346276,0.0006089137,0.00002724688,0.000812211,0.05797388,0.0006121028,0.004173648,0.8166783,0.03196152,0.08590949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007370135,0.00009362612,0.0006205906,0.000964166,0.00004696826,0.0005201256,0.03431066,0.002275161,0.003028843,0.4770989,0.4809121,0.00005510881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04242283,0.003589563,0.1494683,0.03898506,0.007376106,0.0001578198,0.0001285655,0.00108079,0.756791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8585087,0.002300069,0.05304386,0.003930713,0.002404264,0.0002409286,0.0002028905,0.0006989617,0.07866964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0318852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1066666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W832645221","doi":"10.1080/00028533.2012.11821778","title":"Dialogic Potential in the Shadow of Canada's Indian Residential School System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Argumentation theory; Sociology; Negotiation; Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Indigenous; Compromise; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Social science; Pedagogy","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Belanger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01903988630529818,"gpt":0.2322119849819659,"spread":0.2131720986766678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005622561,0.0003895366,0.0004537243,0.001840511,0.07915977,0.02424369,0.002787041,0.004648411,0.008155404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01026292,0.0003396416,0.0002948478,0.002331787,0.05232384,0.005314143,0.01122965,0.007414638,0.0004542733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1158501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1072707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.866484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9381675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932996,0.003163045,0.00008893592,0.0005785582,0.0008500626,0.002019837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923913,0.004015451,0.0003549313,0.0003401305,0.001027129,0.001871171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004350179,0.00003559154,0.00172035,0.0000652505,0.00000867593,0.001544156,0.5825626,0.0003013452,0.0003555173,0.3928397,0.009590278,0.01093302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003182471,0.00001849431,0.002475686,0.0001871729,0.00002163242,0.0002344135,0.6478179,0.0007890256,0.000533662,0.04062939,0.3071969,0.00006390333],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4888588,0.002270211,0.003328673,0.07308509,0.0004251035,0.00009620532,0.0001088835,0.0001466848,0.4316803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891869,0.0001601738,0.0003498911,0.0009100831,0.00002539284,0.0000122721,0.000007887413,0.00002134897,0.009326132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.133516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8405552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403784918","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2024.2419747","title":"Understanding fallacious reasoning <i>via</i> detecting moves of motivated criticism in Argument Continuity—a new strategy of circular reasoning in coping responses to disagreement within a distorted reasoning context","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Analytic reasoning; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Coping (psychology); Verbal reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Social psychology; Philosophy; Cognition; Law","authors":[{"name":"Oxana Pimenova","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03524668090648599,"gpt":0.2840686886128992,"spread":0.2488220077064132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01632426,0.0008014815,0.000547073,0.008288697,0.003122675,0.01191525,0.002691597,0.002807435,0.003537098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0763956,0.0007113873,0.0008097219,0.004431819,0.012786,0.01464305,0.008458511,0.003084796,0.0009008376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002988832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003256052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004421591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00559054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859337,0.007690932,0.0009436206,0.002894361,0.002025938,0.0005114034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9225802,0.04793829,0.01288175,0.01123696,0.004354269,0.001008483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003245384,0.0001499277,0.06984552,0.000972452,0.0001086763,0.001745836,0.3260547,0.003529143,0.01882313,0.3502396,0.005822364,0.2223841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004781079,0.0001214434,0.04898776,0.001227992,0.0001405003,0.002310074,0.1172366,0.0863949,0.02144174,0.5992861,0.1225054,0.0002997676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2192644,0.000636206,0.7333419,0.006042882,0.0001821252,0.0004843322,0.0006776929,0.001659096,0.03771143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7334667,0.0001717245,0.2620956,0.0003477098,0.00005985318,0.000320153,0.0004539745,0.0002954792,0.002788735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01632426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08633202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117575203","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2025.2600219","title":"Assessing <i>tu quoque</i> arguments using real-world data: media coverage of the start of Russia’s war in Ukraine","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Media coverage; Interpretation (philosophy); Journalism; News media","authors":[{"name":"Anton Oleinik","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06115856072451619,"gpt":0.3815702006917,"spread":0.3204116399671838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005248191,0.0002572965,0.0003508743,0.007174239,0.0008387248,0.004383571,0.0003703802,0.0009646408,0.001906483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02912153,0.0001633463,0.0002617507,0.005768278,0.001381973,0.003105285,0.002227886,0.0007839836,0.0005273133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001295645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005224822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006502551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006674066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967758,0.00128755,0.0003740102,0.00029918,0.00101655,0.0002469126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650328,0.02198478,0.008601378,0.001026894,0.002920443,0.0004337763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002672213,0.00009119543,0.9509987,0.0003116937,0.0002676064,0.000391992,0.02337175,0.000479897,0.0008136835,0.003034162,0.001432274,0.01853995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006675667,0.0000946662,0.9434842,0.000204893,0.00006996602,0.0002029177,0.0434875,0.001248439,0.0008573975,0.0004541959,0.009863556,0.00002538062],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893048,0.0004406289,0.000217808,0.0003908908,0.00002693252,0.00001998939,0.00134928,0.000004845485,0.008244921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981771,0.0001774845,0.000142679,0.00004925417,0.00003340331,0.00002190567,0.001137828,0.00000490734,0.0002554843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007174239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02775538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}