{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":28,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"3ea7e74836a9","filters":{"venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours"}},"results":[{"id":"W1572730762","doi":"10.4000/aad.1252","title":"Insulte, disqualification, persuasion et tropes communicationnels : à qui l’insulte profite-t-elle ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Diane Vincent","is_ca":true},{"name":"Geneviève Bernard Barbeau","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04959784188851349,"gpt":0.3493032278127482,"spread":0.2997053859242347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001684103,0.0005175606,0.0005481427,0.0004120488,0.001389366,0.0008729433,0.0004992247,0.0001398248,0.004721602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003021837,0.0004786751,0.0004373533,0.0003502947,0.0006409563,0.001948852,0.0001694176,0.000367936,0.0007127704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002175099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001683641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005064988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00198881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960749,0.0009614939,0.001081294,0.0004982033,0.0006980813,0.0006859938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969116,0.0003340524,0.000824402,0.0008878186,0.0006725161,0.0003695486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004836219,0.001923347,0.02105463,0.00008896485,0.0007430501,0.000002522077,0.09100059,0.0007553342,0.0001503879,0.875034,0.007847225,0.001351613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003235363,0.0002742262,0.02509823,0.0004670249,0.005635795,0.00001038994,0.5426132,0.01090685,0.0008344667,0.01136507,0.3975568,0.002002585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5670613,0.03468636,0.006276735,0.176681,0.003589567,0.001678141,0.002012115,0.0003129958,0.2077017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690355,0.008841168,0.0006153465,0.001801367,0.001916501,0.0001172814,0.003587851,0.00008121031,0.01400375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8636689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22849709","doi":"10.4000/aad.749","title":"Meyer, Michel. 2008. Principia Rhetorica. Une théorie générale de l’argumentation (Paris : Fayard)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Humanities; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Marc Angenot","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01798239431628408,"gpt":0.3046674832562437,"spread":0.2866850889399596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008295841,0.000609872,0.0007014155,0.0004826221,0.001001827,0.001120881,0.0003892136,0.0001951975,0.00548036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001055925,0.0006594593,0.0006318149,0.0004978533,0.0003667385,0.001114323,0.00006165433,0.0003946301,0.0004669218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005489208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003536252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009176937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002579954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959439,0.0003645658,0.001126971,0.0007899934,0.0008593544,0.0009152143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997629,0.0001501111,0.0007708605,0.000565325,0.0004510987,0.0004335837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000124623,0.002084176,0.01570655,0.00008230981,0.001740658,0.0001309687,0.02553165,0.005389143,0.0004625454,0.8379605,0.1056397,0.005147083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076566,0.001619855,0.03241268,0.0006099765,0.01849102,0.00004365657,0.1363594,0.03119798,0.003748497,0.2896875,0.4736879,0.00448496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2771045,0.01934743,0.008974863,0.2975943,0.00513834,0.001519633,0.001114284,0.0004049772,0.3888017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454117,0.005547236,0.0009934,0.003338804,0.00296818,0.00004501401,0.001449804,0.00006574291,0.04018007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6683072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W313229293","doi":"10.4000/aad.1969","title":"De l’appel à mobilisation à ses mécanismes sociodiscursifs : le cas des slogans écrits du printemps érable","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Geneviève Bernard Barbeau","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05480768441524738,"gpt":0.3206941398950766,"spread":0.2658864554798292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218427,0.0004478098,0.0004967876,0.0003067629,0.001068356,0.00121799,0.0002905513,0.0001342032,0.001530772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003481241,0.0004378444,0.0004131708,0.0001940796,0.00100057,0.001195477,0.00009507017,0.0002355318,0.0002223406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006243506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008674058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03836247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02490621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970936,0.0004375159,0.0006916527,0.0005500912,0.0005651402,0.0006620364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978654,0.0001627625,0.0004190113,0.0003600465,0.0007672647,0.0004254682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005369733,0.001111139,0.02810022,0.0001350806,0.001068829,0.000062918,0.1838604,0.01062306,0.0001045385,0.755639,0.01781089,0.00143023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002567386,0.0003289426,0.004004833,0.0002933286,0.003780401,0.0000329943,0.7561055,0.01888414,0.001253576,0.141675,0.06988617,0.001187742],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8025866,0.005734333,0.008206801,0.07355084,0.0016712,0.0005751468,0.0006265106,0.0001636316,0.106885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740853,0.001396228,0.0007254918,0.0007140511,0.001705636,0.00005866735,0.0006810041,0.00006420517,0.02056946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.613964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761116884","doi":"10.4000/aad.2420","title":"Une approche comparative des discours institutionnels en éducation aux médias : une analyse socio-anthropologique","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Education, sociology, and vocational training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Marlène Loicq","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3410631500394508,"gpt":0.5516588344486597,"spread":0.2105956844092089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004598808,0.0004745265,0.0006196848,0.0002459328,0.006169931,0.0005883114,0.000825582,0.0003734931,0.0005541366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001454048,0.0004831825,0.0003738648,0.0007835641,0.0121262,0.00312582,0.0000974001,0.0004999961,0.0001871975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001093403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002128896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03420644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0200289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944007,0.002678787,0.0007966662,0.0007796693,0.0006111198,0.0007329999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959045,0.001307473,0.001267206,0.0005810176,0.0006368929,0.0003028825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001330055,0.0007224476,0.05997973,0.00003783992,0.0006819103,0.000002694332,0.4438266,0.001326783,0.00009988389,0.4878542,0.003224976,0.002229628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006231705,0.0000836867,0.1369595,0.0001110467,0.0007175424,0.000003607262,0.7891179,0.0005086953,0.0001518323,0.06983063,0.001417217,0.0004752077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6594255,0.000704853,0.01119829,0.3073374,0.002842544,0.0005152835,0.00007474759,0.00006772874,0.01783363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843258,0.003624892,0.004128611,0.0006690672,0.002132239,0.0001835446,0.0008033201,0.00003006214,0.004102426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4180236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859937076","doi":"10.4000/aad.1787","title":"La rhétorique de la qualification et les controverses d’étiquetage","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Marc Angenot","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01734689487014438,"gpt":0.3375602220976264,"spread":0.320213327227482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002733488,0.0003165071,0.0003822864,0.0002370964,0.0004596841,0.001104843,0.0001962318,0.0001947753,0.002029303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005693105,0.0003074971,0.0003445768,0.00009606266,0.0006168083,0.0004957216,0.00003745629,0.0003449047,0.00009889464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001310073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001649577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01289467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004998021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996011,0.002402652,0.0005310123,0.0003813775,0.0003489871,0.0003250306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975659,0.001284217,0.0004471305,0.0003089988,0.0002315894,0.0001622275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000232789,0.0003979115,0.004156026,0.00005385217,0.0004835556,0.000009691858,0.01755476,0.001433349,0.0001553177,0.9680006,0.005655384,0.002076271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001618067,0.0001330785,0.00528209,0.0001790762,0.002429599,0.000006951795,0.08764303,0.01341055,0.000470678,0.04464271,0.8434251,0.0007590457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2562113,0.003742903,0.04397587,0.06085286,0.001164442,0.000425675,0.0005712972,0.0001749372,0.6328807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800797,0.00238212,0.0003360677,0.0012222,0.001303259,0.00004022181,0.0004629786,0.00004685209,0.01412666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9233579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555114952","doi":"10.4000/aad.2248","title":"Le « printemps érable » au Québec : « Grève » ou « boycott » ? Les enjeux stratégiques d’un conflit de nomination","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Nomination; Art; Law","authors":[{"name":"Gilles Gauthier","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02914547467122787,"gpt":0.300336729090549,"spread":0.2711912544193212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008468666,0.0004176611,0.0004583399,0.0003135666,0.001027883,0.0006440534,0.0002906953,0.0001424832,0.005082623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002791672,0.0003453587,0.0004291059,0.0001052884,0.0005948037,0.0009129088,0.0000700106,0.0001806111,0.0002014037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001846382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.313106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3285645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972911,0.0003587249,0.0007730112,0.0005544475,0.0004289226,0.0005938224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979388,0.0002907736,0.0005534052,0.0003871792,0.0005777909,0.0002521202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004292394,0.000559671,0.01947786,0.00006290065,0.0008901012,0.00002774516,0.01580485,0.0001654465,0.0004710587,0.950981,0.00175914,0.009757333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007018772,0.0007635438,0.02912267,0.001370789,0.00779048,0.00003223493,0.3254145,0.005280972,0.02115774,0.1516405,0.4471307,0.003277048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5740221,0.00331922,0.01370413,0.2622705,0.0009123498,0.0004812975,0.0006110584,0.0001379454,0.1445414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709448,0.001491806,0.0003371174,0.0004823051,0.001446896,0.00005483186,0.0002273048,0.00005736342,0.02495755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7993404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525681879","doi":"10.4000/aad.302","title":"Performance… et contre-performance communicationnelles : des stratégies argumentatives pour le débat politique télévisé","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Guylaine Martel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04443329151310394,"gpt":0.3095437225943805,"spread":0.2651104310812766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006620135,0.0005828076,0.0006394768,0.0004022823,0.00245167,0.0006172589,0.0004979231,0.0001146274,0.002126019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008165948,0.0005645789,0.0003977777,0.0002227706,0.002062067,0.002075681,0.0001303672,0.0003785792,0.0002251565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002045854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006717054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01622276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00662679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996745,0.0005657307,0.0009635887,0.0005255977,0.0005237209,0.0006763093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976415,0.0003250018,0.0006202921,0.0005903146,0.0005809907,0.0002419081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001005353,0.001609165,0.09586344,0.0002350618,0.001640037,0.00003173465,0.1085316,0.007929652,0.0001388412,0.7763368,0.005837546,0.00174552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006280996,0.0008608164,0.2213025,0.001129348,0.003358171,0.00009651089,0.6483855,0.06495926,0.005067908,0.02722549,0.01847409,0.002859442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8621628,0.003935087,0.0004769049,0.02473347,0.0003512432,0.0003060962,0.0003599538,0.00008335213,0.1075911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.937096,0.04429684,0.001123227,0.001038341,0.0006833385,0.00007695861,0.001082211,0.00006726703,0.01453579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7491114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206035181","doi":"10.4000/aad.5483","title":"Discours du tourisme diasporique : l’exemple d’une visite louisianaise en Acadie","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Université Sainte-Anne","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Geography; Sociology; Art","authors":[{"name":"Clint Bruce","is_ca":true},{"name":"Émilie Urbain","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008672682309734493,"gpt":0.2780925566760386,"spread":0.2694198743663041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009029905,0.0003410978,0.0004927615,0.0006959785,0.001356805,0.0009959771,0.0004015764,0.0002699918,0.008647387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001904364,0.0004660664,0.0005036581,0.002064176,0.0009938705,0.001834258,0.0001001849,0.0004355472,0.0008273055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001968481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001765277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.404693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8246986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962141,0.0009019372,0.000626852,0.0007124391,0.0008135724,0.0007311296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981378,0.0002346486,0.0003848942,0.0004106663,0.0002058452,0.0006261689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000507961,0.001020674,0.0223421,0.0001303942,0.001018671,0.001894338,0.2476111,0.001788708,0.0003202298,0.3471879,0.3412884,0.03534668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001071099,0.00006960345,0.04139608,0.0001581063,0.001105547,0.00002599157,0.1354819,0.0003890319,0.0001276968,0.01303399,0.8062446,0.0008962795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3956371,0.009487963,0.00149422,0.5504453,0.003562109,0.0004145766,0.0004822771,0.00009878327,0.03837769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8920227,0.01113504,0.000258971,0.003072424,0.00163189,0.00004111742,0.0005952208,0.00005829583,0.09118439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5473728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W266986670","doi":"10.4000/aad.1978","title":"L’ethos collectif des guerrilla gardeners à Montréal : entre conflictualité et inclusion","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Urban Agriculture and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Anna Giaufret","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02872784984303722,"gpt":0.2860743003259383,"spread":0.2573464504829011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001369601,0.000388685,0.0004183233,0.00005220019,0.0007545433,0.0003050621,0.0002996835,0.0002263156,0.001304106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002783906,0.0001860119,0.0003114632,0.0008554952,0.0003850337,0.0006945935,0.0004199357,0.0002336039,0.0001319186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006434747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001598371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02088273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02357383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964527,0.001146464,0.0005478529,0.0005952463,0.000703574,0.0005541808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982727,0.000278757,0.0002839868,0.0001302973,0.0005333225,0.000500991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008000482,0.00334842,0.3240839,0.0001803312,0.001079442,0.0002366746,0.2841951,0.006881643,0.01425546,0.0381892,0.2446016,0.08214813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002693294,0.001334884,0.1931792,0.000185156,0.0009281092,0.00006536837,0.4865288,0.001451793,0.00281717,0.03847623,0.2708736,0.001466378],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.906336,0.004132751,0.00008772872,0.07912899,0.0004646779,0.0004903616,0.00008560624,0.00007041447,0.009203475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701071,0.0008030904,0.0002358828,0.002469827,0.0003336698,0.00003410097,0.0007461159,0.000004987704,0.02526524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2023337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097506787","doi":"10.4000/aad.4432","title":"Les régimes de rationalité en environnement à travers le prisme des valeurs","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Olivier Turbide","is_ca":true},{"name":"Thomas W Maxwell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05820170062604697,"gpt":0.3121367310398688,"spread":0.2539350304138219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006052922,0.0002215332,0.0002623832,0.00004834324,0.0009958963,0.0001518414,0.0002228765,0.0001046308,0.001182383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001635893,0.000242605,0.0002298392,0.0003819172,0.0009846675,0.0006114992,0.00005019415,0.0001575083,0.00009570301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006088171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000272408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02465924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006981166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975893,0.0007995451,0.0003503579,0.0003390161,0.0005221049,0.0003996271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991983,0.0002115053,0.0001912578,0.00008260187,0.00006081689,0.0002555202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001555407,0.0003186447,0.05603261,0.00005085728,0.0006693933,0.00001497847,0.3948345,0.002184252,0.0002647521,0.5087691,0.01385532,0.02299007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002133209,0.0002611604,0.1850495,0.00007927825,0.001035287,0.000001372612,0.6547618,0.00273022,0.0006537344,0.03563236,0.1167995,0.0008625506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6580043,0.008021544,0.01222621,0.285509,0.0004850647,0.0004349936,0.00009435925,0.00008212053,0.03514232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863473,0.004986315,0.001270823,0.001955013,0.0005649941,0.00003572099,0.0001073998,0.00001972274,0.004712781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4731368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207035486","doi":"10.4000/aad.5779","title":"L’analphabétisme au sein d’une communauté linguistique minoritaire : la construction du sujet en problème social (1984-1998)","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Functional illiteracy; Subject (documents); Political science; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Laurence Arrighi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0221014272715018,"gpt":0.3154444791184577,"spread":0.293343051846956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009198497,0.0005781451,0.0007819418,0.0003314127,0.001806264,0.001209054,0.0003142844,0.0002828744,0.002410996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003540408,0.0006253108,0.0007273024,0.0003984642,0.001054536,0.0005459562,0.0001676424,0.000565603,0.0001789951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004354003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008467057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02242595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04160614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995845,0.001111133,0.001042364,0.0006899759,0.0006670119,0.0006445097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975356,0.0004767158,0.0006610986,0.0004194197,0.0006766984,0.0002304115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004134087,0.000925416,0.01332351,0.0001644851,0.001925594,0.0005293358,0.0866516,0.0005280057,0.00005743054,0.8883008,0.004434438,0.003118038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004874192,0.000292617,0.01703892,0.0008208317,0.01282165,0.000254573,0.6249978,0.01531746,0.0007487689,0.1001007,0.2199951,0.002737356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5901406,0.003814582,0.002716487,0.1800441,0.004999484,0.0006835137,0.001776179,0.0002318809,0.2155932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787358,0.001225587,0.0006535407,0.0007936614,0.007019479,0.00005227813,0.002855464,0.0000800812,0.008584088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3104092441","doi":"10.4000/aad.4696","title":"Les raisonnements contrefactuels dans l’histoire","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Ethnology; History","authors":[{"name":"Marc Angenot","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03275369177592694,"gpt":0.270509863206549,"spread":0.237756171430622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001339137,0.0003579722,0.0005203339,0.00005423407,0.00475939,0.0003091531,0.0002207748,0.00008128955,0.006463957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005164571,0.0002989949,0.0005374966,0.0001684019,0.0006031445,0.0005522631,0.00007223881,0.0002223058,0.000333298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001409712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002706774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01407443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01036937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979143,0.0002207855,0.0005721076,0.0004509506,0.0004620423,0.0003798511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990112,0.00007695224,0.0003218676,0.0001340177,0.0001750133,0.0002810119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005926577,0.0005703919,0.009895932,0.0001330342,0.002726336,0.00006236632,0.6225834,0.0006866429,0.0002540458,0.2729083,0.07236992,0.01775029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001775084,0.0003068742,0.002418952,0.00007077356,0.003068566,0.000001202222,0.3396071,0.001270267,0.00007242413,0.001991851,0.6485425,0.0008744856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2309406,0.00707958,0.0009540303,0.7428237,0.0007808911,0.0002713655,0.0002897679,0.00008400261,0.01677613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554238,0.002519571,0.00005429177,0.003356785,0.0007828369,0.00002863098,0.0003215715,0.00002929852,0.03748323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7394668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366122265","doi":"10.4000/aad.7276","title":"L’« argument de la nature » dans le discours fasciste du 20e siècle en Allemagne, en Italie et en France","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","authors":[{"name":"Marie Reetz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00811859375037639,"gpt":0.2984646267218748,"spread":0.2903460329714985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00268463,0.0006761082,0.0007067642,0.0005245701,0.001117675,0.001377315,0.0006422378,0.000375096,0.001915444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003768874,0.0006567242,0.0007270142,0.0004584258,0.0007758511,0.0009598734,0.0002465401,0.0008394346,0.0004845591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003557479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004769024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007420425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005144445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948736,0.001553577,0.0008771736,0.0008720718,0.0009444341,0.0008791044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973133,0.001026301,0.0004824035,0.0006090555,0.0002243429,0.0003446337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003318787,0.0007945516,0.01049613,0.0001107689,0.001414421,0.0002706737,0.05349617,0.01282208,0.0002715229,0.8966087,0.02308797,0.0005938875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00441769,0.000374858,0.07694203,0.0005796502,0.005748441,0.00004142259,0.4549404,0.03452283,0.001026933,0.07410968,0.3446182,0.002677844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5281739,0.003909749,0.002225455,0.2587087,0.002330102,0.0007733633,0.001895378,0.0003243001,0.201659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450101,0.005220975,0.0002885411,0.001777057,0.002219864,0.0001169644,0.001914369,0.0001242082,0.0433279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.822499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394855855","doi":"10.4000/aad.8017","title":"Michael A. Gilbert : Ne pas argumenter logiquement n’est pas illogique : il y a d’autres façons de communiquer des arguments","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael A. Gilbert","is_ca":true},{"name":"Linda Carozza","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03401115372825377,"gpt":0.3143115835901439,"spread":0.2803004298618902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00144184,0.0008775398,0.0007754165,0.0007139376,0.001167321,0.002486254,0.0005830675,0.0002554776,0.009252778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001199969,0.0008029565,0.0009014615,0.0003495869,0.001195047,0.001057793,0.000292689,0.0007340625,0.0003565621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008000362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004492778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01506562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0300511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950612,0.0009331876,0.001233366,0.0009146124,0.0007170518,0.001140569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976022,0.0004515904,0.0003832512,0.000743767,0.0003674193,0.0004517953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008048691,0.00203624,0.01248123,0.0005068158,0.005147241,0.0004326182,0.0751597,0.001959014,0.0002934853,0.8749022,0.01964067,0.007360312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001739648,0.0006592225,0.002328904,0.001900505,0.007981275,0.00005074839,0.136609,0.01974172,0.001291139,0.0747751,0.7508914,0.002031375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5828728,0.02738677,0.01235633,0.1315483,0.004404224,0.001708604,0.003094595,0.0006213881,0.236007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93362,0.01593544,0.001364099,0.004926028,0.001661594,0.0002412591,0.001561002,0.0001438712,0.04054669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8001271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892526192","doi":"10.4000/aad.2688","title":"Analyse de formules employées par le gouvernement et de leurs stratégies de cadrage sous-jacentes pendant le printemps érable québécois de 2012","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Laurence Pelletier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marie-Josée Goulet","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03169310465657911,"gpt":0.3114491359687777,"spread":0.2797560313121986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001655154,0.0006000663,0.0006537233,0.0004346176,0.001431993,0.001367588,0.0004851081,0.0001525717,0.001550432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001922613,0.0005959666,0.0006346231,0.0002158641,0.000847871,0.001177818,0.0001497989,0.0003532123,0.00008630039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007844851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002777861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3122089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4349691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996035,0.0006149561,0.0009030176,0.0006609616,0.0005398714,0.001246131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977384,0.0002061907,0.0006420179,0.0005254846,0.0004279946,0.0004599073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001559623,0.002412146,0.1228886,0.0002328397,0.00408419,0.0001560829,0.1134247,0.01198672,0.003692613,0.7111189,0.02906793,0.0007792499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003918001,0.0007850613,0.03517478,0.0007071487,0.00823044,0.00004504445,0.7114105,0.03509111,0.03519189,0.0640283,0.1028682,0.002549605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9344186,0.004046403,0.01488535,0.01761041,0.0004010557,0.0003512741,0.0005312471,0.0001193728,0.02763625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825895,0.004321991,0.001568605,0.001877468,0.001252717,0.0000746254,0.0004481774,0.00009526294,0.007771665],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6470906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387670712","doi":"10.4000/aad.7658","title":"Élaboration et légitimation de l’identité francophone dans le manifeste littéraire. J’parle mal, pis j’aime ça de Joëlle Préfontaine","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","authors":[{"name":"Francesco Attruia","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01617509606465875,"gpt":0.2960563823764041,"spread":0.2798812863117454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00160345,0.0004319937,0.0004763212,0.0005569538,0.00111243,0.001223077,0.0002792128,0.0001544086,0.002481604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002442982,0.0004719069,0.0003796431,0.0007127395,0.0003105101,0.001435991,0.00009640749,0.0002744989,0.0007077611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004044969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006011618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03418025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04442754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967046,0.0005296095,0.0008630203,0.000572274,0.0006319134,0.0006986061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998174,0.0002051716,0.0005529764,0.0004335686,0.0003830639,0.0002511825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009026396,0.001146961,0.02459762,0.0002920472,0.001480996,0.0003100452,0.06584325,0.0501258,0.002587326,0.8160195,0.03597014,0.001535994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004596586,0.0005326302,0.0960151,0.000744546,0.004895539,0.00004694027,0.4029563,0.3447932,0.005262181,0.09088936,0.04673663,0.00253097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8500747,0.002132337,0.02180784,0.06991758,0.001889773,0.0007818292,0.00109011,0.0003688867,0.05193692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491399,0.002779615,0.0005915962,0.001146446,0.00222855,0.0001266178,0.003530478,0.00009233582,0.04036448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7251302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366121855","doi":"10.4000/aad.7259","title":"François-Emmanuël Boucher. 2020. Le Trumpisme. Contribution à l’analyse rhétorique du discours national-populiste (Québec : P. U. Laval).","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Maria Saltykov","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02003588531987089,"gpt":0.2985178311712517,"spread":0.2784819458513808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002087464,0.0008977295,0.001107514,0.0008408213,0.002095067,0.001401583,0.0005684766,0.0002969887,0.004577979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007941247,0.0009034924,0.001243099,0.001029246,0.000893446,0.001513731,0.0001979951,0.0005823864,0.001394916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001612667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1402951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2505312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936785,0.0007109782,0.001647235,0.001188659,0.00165101,0.001123678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995799,0.0005054163,0.00108456,0.0006429798,0.001451303,0.0005167435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000127153,0.001067278,0.01553381,0.0001223127,0.003395811,0.0002256506,0.01607488,0.01021139,0.0002147334,0.75035,0.202067,0.0006099968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006493026,0.0004053037,0.02288767,0.0005158123,0.0095845,0.0000323686,0.1463855,0.06556525,0.001026503,0.06756264,0.6761634,0.003378006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3841726,0.01172883,0.001931183,0.5479207,0.005212326,0.001281981,0.003862227,0.0006125629,0.04327762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9321507,0.006682305,0.0000615695,0.001600078,0.005480883,0.000173686,0.00709981,0.0001360826,0.04661491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6827874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843699","doi":"10.4000/aad.8254","title":"Christopher Tindale : Explorer les fondements culturels de la rhétorique et de la raison","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ruth Amossy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02059401128701753,"gpt":0.3631892594230944,"spread":0.3425952481360769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001602491,0.0003742433,0.0003352558,0.0002491621,0.000472187,0.002076796,0.0002063778,0.0001978974,0.006356062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001410953,0.0003386138,0.0004415382,0.000158945,0.00052757,0.0005816655,0.00006247096,0.0004536151,0.0001587839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000341584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003996137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006999339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001199196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971953,0.001012566,0.0004791741,0.0004639858,0.0004051601,0.0004438348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988182,0.000462191,0.0001778147,0.000233265,0.0001178524,0.0001907204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001907113,0.0004447815,0.005845301,0.0001373063,0.001226068,0.0001732399,0.07065148,0.001598091,0.0002825485,0.8763883,0.04174032,0.001493551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007985249,0.00009014457,0.002583604,0.0004511741,0.003002385,0.00001783948,0.06288158,0.005836673,0.0006347309,0.0511992,0.8718206,0.0006835593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3266657,0.02194447,0.008560219,0.03136132,0.002082165,0.000420677,0.0006122116,0.0002500785,0.6081032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628394,0.004783717,0.0004107218,0.001000615,0.002016743,0.00007417509,0.0004038273,0.00007402268,0.02839683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8300803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843725","doi":"10.4000/aad.8277","title":"Christopher Tindale: Exploring the Cultural Foundations of Rhetoric and Reason","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Sociology; Political science; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ruth Amossy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0875440387876914,"gpt":0.3304682653676912,"spread":0.2429242265799998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001665247,0.00007925861,0.00009388805,0.00005461827,0.000351374,0.0002313646,0.00008758654,0.000007624792,0.0002999674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001659103,0.00004939042,0.00005784806,0.00008365866,0.0001913904,0.0005593281,0.00003925394,0.00006742793,0.000022625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002595777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001746983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003236066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003693308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994415,0.0000591654,0.000181896,0.0001074371,0.000138105,0.00007188023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995866,0.0001176047,0.00006396643,0.0001371448,0.00007663973,0.00001802342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005243664,0.00003609043,0.001226975,0.00002429364,0.000246721,6.511907e-7,0.1796478,0.00002225282,0.00005986736,0.801461,0.008495406,0.00877369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003779272,0.00007327717,0.0190624,0.0001375104,0.0005557143,0.000004934599,0.5057214,0.001153537,0.0001827255,0.008244042,0.4641608,0.0003257597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341326,0.003754901,0.0002323811,0.01306877,0.0006713541,0.0001503443,0.00001966389,0.00007423614,0.04789571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938777,0.001759489,0.00003840667,0.00007325717,0.0001449339,0.00006404393,0.00003882437,0.000007638977,0.003995668],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7932169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3284433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843562","doi":"10.4000/aad.8154","title":"Marc Angenot : La rhétorique à l’épreuve de l’histoire des idées","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Philosophy; Humanities","authors":[{"name":"Marc Angenot","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marianne Doury","is_ca":false},{"name":"Théophile Robineau","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03473710804310132,"gpt":0.3204097587585865,"spread":0.2856726507154851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009171491,0.0003995917,0.0003743069,0.0004196789,0.0008687185,0.001905896,0.000236438,0.0001798959,0.005673729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001278419,0.0003800772,0.0005135598,0.0002429241,0.0009866563,0.0007288874,0.00007092234,0.0004193475,0.0002995683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003290444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00962318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009526145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975529,0.0004588554,0.0005303629,0.0005229201,0.0004040135,0.0005310061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987431,0.0003655081,0.0001516796,0.0002944231,0.0002056025,0.0002397567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001848493,0.0003232711,0.001698574,0.0002856398,0.001312964,0.0003261263,0.04492994,0.0006817193,0.0001190024,0.9282444,0.01413821,0.007921636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006339643,0.0002150036,0.001615526,0.0009571759,0.006523889,0.00004527827,0.11908,0.01459372,0.0003963992,0.1409848,0.7137772,0.001176984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1603029,0.08263187,0.004789018,0.05016522,0.003698357,0.0004174471,0.001243968,0.0003412173,0.69641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916262,0.005710271,0.0003251969,0.0005679591,0.002298106,0.00004407707,0.0004047939,0.00007614545,0.07431145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7872596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092763271","doi":"10.4000/aad.4477","title":"La raison interculturelle et les conditions préliminaires de l’argumentation","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Argumentation theory; Philosophy; CONTEST; Theology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03116105619235884,"gpt":0.3697663453250521,"spread":0.3386052891326933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000714907,0.0003687366,0.000350104,0.0001840677,0.0002615328,0.0002748638,0.000213053,0.0002880956,0.006531031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001570128,0.0003787942,0.0003223187,0.0004595626,0.0002656037,0.0008303798,0.0000496235,0.0005138734,0.0007270408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001381131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001137733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001565277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009037385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958626,0.002222267,0.0005715219,0.0005786486,0.0003435254,0.0004214437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986774,0.0003201661,0.0003903526,0.0002134356,0.0001282232,0.0002703758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006372,0.003102954,0.02680763,0.0004086196,0.003077379,0.0004343558,0.4996943,0.001723844,0.02138825,0.2364513,0.1513241,0.05495001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009357951,0.001159354,0.102326,0.000511477,0.00562195,0.000218168,0.8087907,0.00412502,0.01228014,0.01575387,0.03817313,0.001682238],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.782088,0.003641658,0.02638346,0.1520584,0.0008767608,0.0007101853,0.0005632096,0.0001869706,0.03349137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816298,0.00120213,0.0006347302,0.009927144,0.0003405321,0.0001600694,0.003077356,0.00005817024,0.002970033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3090964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403706760","doi":"10.4000/12hvs","title":"Kock, Christian and Marcus Lantz (eds). 2023. Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School (Windsor Ontario: Windsor Studies in Argumentation)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Ecology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Nana Ariel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03839113640303082,"gpt":0.3687856443248722,"spread":0.3303945079218413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000932163,0.0003834867,0.0004109334,0.0003962176,0.0002869717,0.0004439983,0.0002234713,0.0001173406,0.009157401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008235545,0.0002884389,0.0001682842,0.0007615138,0.0002075886,0.0008484616,0.00007640297,0.0004495753,0.001463802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003943733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001791545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0120829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02593573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969893,0.0005619999,0.0007228994,0.0007527221,0.0005309405,0.0004421536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988016,0.0003814984,0.0002001696,0.0003401499,0.0001119465,0.0001646531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001257087,0.002009849,0.2486944,0.000458839,0.009583619,0.002018531,0.4123093,0.0003209836,0.00370866,0.05012207,0.2350795,0.03443713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005570437,0.0004705937,0.6245602,0.0003651135,0.002252823,0.0002183087,0.3433206,0.0004717136,0.0008342488,0.008764018,0.01192689,0.001244977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722398,0.00979579,0.0004386788,0.007645434,0.001676379,0.0009441387,0.0000798084,0.0001104261,0.007069561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846144,0.0006609068,0.0001797611,0.00159782,0.0003181541,0.0004857133,0.0006013931,0.00004511418,0.01149679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3758658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843729","doi":"10.4000/aad.8174","title":"Marc Angenot: Rhetoric put to the test by the History of Ideas","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Pathos; Ethos; Persuasion; Epistemology; Sociology; Object (grammar); Logos Bible Software; Perspective (graphical); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Marc Angenot","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marianne Doury","is_ca":false},{"name":"Théophile Robineau","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02598226217335154,"gpt":0.2848077668052255,"spread":0.258825504631874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004355851,0.0001418376,0.0001569105,0.0001380171,0.0001851442,0.0002502147,0.0002576184,0.000017432,0.002652361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001082694,0.00007799453,0.0001930282,0.0001254098,0.0001805301,0.0001510817,0.00004342746,0.00009930697,0.0001613691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001539348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001385149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002205793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003932958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988977,0.00007207465,0.0002983352,0.000215729,0.0003552115,0.0001608959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991666,0.0002718885,0.0001024193,0.0002802691,0.0001217722,0.0000570234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006407043,0.0001052531,0.0005486754,0.0000208248,0.0003802514,0.00000558367,0.04416817,0.0002030618,0.0001956915,0.3562781,0.5966759,0.001412092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001458122,0.00007408934,0.0003300564,0.00003745685,0.001166238,0.000001317762,0.02791676,0.00283403,0.00009941919,0.008024571,0.9591424,0.0002278598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1382567,0.03308531,0.002260463,0.2413539,0.0105511,0.001442945,0.0014842,0.0003109974,0.5712543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647959,0.0001649522,0.00001873103,0.001430394,0.0007703981,0.00003746412,0.0001115203,0.00002012287,0.03265054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8265392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518327270","doi":"10.4000/aad.556","title":"La normativité naturelle : une théorie de l’argumentation comme discipline engagée","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael A. Gilbert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02437414218079427,"gpt":0.3299178772058468,"spread":0.3055437350250526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001171968,0.0005205088,0.0005453836,0.0003896283,0.001104231,0.001050098,0.0003199602,0.0001879701,0.002613559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001188898,0.0004965222,0.0004782197,0.0003693933,0.0004169863,0.001066213,0.00006427535,0.0006084761,0.000177818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002862746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001993839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003065643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003367461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967179,0.0006787702,0.000834901,0.0005030533,0.0006322871,0.0006331032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981074,0.0003533922,0.0005708384,0.000414017,0.000265876,0.0002884196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006627029,0.001346079,0.002243015,0.00005669053,0.0007081452,0.0000841777,0.04327171,0.003432411,0.00014976,0.927271,0.01510573,0.006264982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006244731,0.0009241551,0.02236302,0.0006300453,0.009261427,0.00005250641,0.2829671,0.04583762,0.001281677,0.4754506,0.1521917,0.002795496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2756607,0.006593291,0.008134518,0.2973873,0.002101653,0.0007834743,0.001067346,0.0002268845,0.4080449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978797,0.001972853,0.0004861846,0.003028835,0.001766836,0.00002561347,0.001816318,0.00004658096,0.01205983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7031363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980608115","doi":"10.4000/aad.3585","title":"Querelles historiennes sur la Révolution française : l’argumentation par le chiffre des victimes et les polémiques sur la qualification génocidaire","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Marc Angenot","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01446165075572932,"gpt":0.2525697677324796,"spread":0.2381081169767503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007303579,0.0005004081,0.0006077204,0.0002057573,0.002781904,0.0005073934,0.0002240289,0.0002324879,0.001330131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001118333,0.0004526795,0.0005547355,0.0002715352,0.0007177726,0.002342555,0.00006337483,0.0003333581,0.0001388819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001264744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001415335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0762029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05372079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964366,0.001168983,0.0008007595,0.0006248598,0.0005348484,0.0004339422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979405,0.0005323776,0.0006368544,0.0002703484,0.0004799464,0.0001399465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000151407,0.001700406,0.06615844,0.0004406281,0.00194159,0.00001440615,0.46055,0.001494362,0.001306996,0.3900137,0.06149754,0.01473052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002839476,0.0003563785,0.04331058,0.0004611788,0.002484129,0.000008872807,0.2124298,0.00204033,0.000511916,0.01123143,0.7225335,0.00179239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8921059,0.01578189,0.0005544109,0.082605,0.0005575073,0.0004100878,0.0001635291,0.0001398087,0.007681878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9152609,0.01472507,0.0001896473,0.0002950974,0.0002989809,0.00008301243,0.0008902596,0.00005283947,0.06820418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.661036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242785050","doi":"10.4000/aad.4867","title":"Guylaine Martel, 2018. Incarner la politique. La construction de l’image médiatique des femmes et des hommes politiques au Québec (Laval : PUL)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","authors":[{"name":"Ruth Amossy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0287927543832386,"gpt":0.3205936300495085,"spread":0.2918008756662699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001075295,0.0002860821,0.0003574473,0.0003757532,0.00109617,0.0009603297,0.0002525637,0.0002292179,0.001034105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004718699,0.0003675833,0.0002815143,0.000572082,0.004278861,0.002052909,0.00005959999,0.0003566017,0.00007776173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00305004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005412759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9567341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9798168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99597,0.002139162,0.0004656151,0.0004180523,0.0003795432,0.0006276794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837,0.0003543763,0.0003084457,0.000153401,0.0001865246,0.0006272682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007345354,0.0002844356,0.1801111,0.0002462949,0.0004583736,0.0001237147,0.325369,0.0001510136,0.0006053775,0.4297972,0.04554117,0.01723891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001522898,0.0002699684,0.3404438,0.000295697,0.001211438,0.00009626888,0.3771358,0.0004137598,0.0009362924,0.05426944,0.2221047,0.001299868],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7452982,0.002171832,0.0009673274,0.216299,0.0002193785,0.0002080123,0.0002627763,0.0001027374,0.03447073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981069,0.00953289,0.001625579,0.003505118,0.000553903,0.00003712522,0.0001443088,0.00004417283,0.003487907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3755278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153348501","doi":"10.4000/aad.5418","title":"La polémique autour de bonjour/hi sur le web : vers la déconstruction du discours d’autorité","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Chiara Molinari","is_ca":false},{"name":"Geneviève Bernard Barbeau","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01611721536432855,"gpt":0.2738258816505661,"spread":0.2577086662862376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001124361,0.0005614751,0.0006548268,0.0004034809,0.0009725725,0.001779217,0.0002863239,0.0002671986,0.003886143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003270057,0.0005983782,0.0007606612,0.0003372033,0.0008310367,0.001075409,0.0001177886,0.0005571441,0.0001167113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003930727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002235917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01362566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01298972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959852,0.001126307,0.0008438845,0.0007394697,0.0006056064,0.0006995939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976278,0.0004180383,0.000550627,0.0004828901,0.0005538861,0.0003667386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004126163,0.001018757,0.01339234,0.00009660361,0.001671903,0.000634051,0.01358459,0.00296489,0.0003735218,0.9535056,0.01013162,0.002584894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005848611,0.0001870296,0.009617323,0.0006753079,0.008596192,0.0004077817,0.3813739,0.03147862,0.001685958,0.05568009,0.5020986,0.00235064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6506106,0.003954633,0.0021071,0.1422207,0.003407937,0.000322342,0.0009804433,0.0002019155,0.1961944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973714,0.004207609,0.0004905171,0.0007743933,0.002717033,0.00003634075,0.0007909883,0.00009221769,0.01717689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8978255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843815","doi":"10.4000/aad.8119","title":"Michael A. Gilbert: Not arguing logically is not illogical: Other ways of communicating arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael A. Gilbert","is_ca":true},{"name":"Linda Carozza","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.126980649537492,"gpt":0.3387212657828483,"spread":0.2117406162453563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007711616,0.0002553681,0.0003966062,0.0001675191,0.0002918186,0.000253371,0.0003584488,0.000101235,0.00122108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006732406,0.0002026636,0.0003171809,0.0001054515,0.0005782718,0.0004432698,0.0001026559,0.0004168625,0.0001327362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004849708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004479654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000664453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005225812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980251,0.0002408634,0.0006551874,0.0003833454,0.0003972196,0.0002983033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985948,0.0004812041,0.000288592,0.0004084019,0.0001582776,0.00006874324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003682799,0.000275597,0.001095736,0.0001644504,0.000736975,0.00001722779,0.1346733,0.00007942223,0.005951314,0.8504384,0.004139887,0.002390817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00406706,0.001122642,0.003553153,0.001588588,0.003650172,0.00002973175,0.216062,0.01757197,0.04334628,0.2333031,0.472346,0.00335923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7791495,0.0007023024,0.003075256,0.1251537,0.001022711,0.0006006759,0.0003326668,0.000323204,0.08963991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967636,0.0001396483,0.0008707645,0.0287859,0.0002585989,0.00002909264,0.0001241522,0.00003888311,0.002116895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6171353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}