{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"dc03d5abaf91","filters":{"venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W1982329760","doi":"10.1023/b:arti.0000046007.11806.9a","title":"Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Underpinning; Epistemology; Probabilistic argumentation; Computer science; Empirical evidence; Deductive reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering; Knowledge representation and reasoning","authors":[{"name":"Floris Bex","is_ca":false},{"name":"Henry Prakken","is_ca":false},{"name":"Chris Reed","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09223170808788776,"gpt":0.3304854798686168,"spread":0.238253771780729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0180226,0.00173882,0.002017637,0.006147632,0.002874177,0.01451511,0.005599544,0.008527925,0.006233196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03152883,0.002250122,0.00418888,0.006632063,0.0207565,0.03781152,0.007339352,0.01041991,0.001085674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003950841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002633546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002460787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00198137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.986127,0.008327654,0.001460415,0.001348446,0.002172173,0.0005642303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776992,0.01483459,0.001572777,0.003416986,0.001879329,0.0005971731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005180043,0.000004895627,0.00003992436,0.00005002963,0.00001171075,0.00002641954,0.0002906301,0.001396059,0.00005130532,0.9955259,0.0003564204,0.002241528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052365,0.000001862866,0.00001285042,0.00002273367,0.00000701282,0.00002098089,0.00003223416,0.003219468,0.00003779575,0.9946145,0.002020755,0.000004510948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005290969,0.003072923,0.9645952,0.009281181,0.0001828515,0.00009669925,0.0001842192,0.0001908456,0.01710512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3438911,0.00432197,0.6417254,0.001677492,0.0010006,0.0005161465,0.0006764058,0.0002130924,0.005977737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0180226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09531373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531887372","doi":"10.1023/a:1013803600690","title":"Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Book Review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Bart Verheij","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03570576855092915,"gpt":0.2717127328523034,"spread":0.2360069643013742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001723914,0.001502984,0.001649825,0.006155632,0.002316241,0.006238429,0.002265669,0.004256119,0.02742517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00360917,0.001914595,0.0006656849,0.01065401,0.008038433,0.01256168,0.001777335,0.004370796,0.009051675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008411773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007257382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07886077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1864391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989814,0.000303039,0.00007955941,0.0001110878,0.0004162835,0.0001086021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981707,0.001015993,0.0001540973,0.00006751693,0.0003887358,0.0002029386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005638044,0.00002728242,0.0002970994,0.002403719,0.00004146997,0.0001848911,0.002924813,0.0003093207,0.0001868222,0.1189346,0.7503852,0.1242484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002085895,0.00001010263,0.0009488131,0.001491947,0.0000284306,0.0003548417,0.0008737217,0.0001136237,0.000131221,0.06071678,0.9352866,0.00002304814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009690553,0.9773026,0.00126056,0.006589576,0.001150415,0.000009658782,0.00009895536,0.00003866329,0.01345274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009822831,0.9516721,0.001971619,0.003071432,0.002285227,0.00005629335,0.0002174426,0.00007011636,0.03083298],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07886077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1568035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039190550","doi":"10.1007/s10506-010-9093-9","title":"Evaluation of information retrieval for E-discovery","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Open Text (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval; Data science; Context (archaeology); Precision and recall; Question answering","authors":[{"name":"Douglas W. Oard","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jason R. Baron","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bruce Hedin","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Lewis","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stephen Tomlinson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07755438895016285,"gpt":0.3380923055011545,"spread":0.2605379165509917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03003398,0.001063006,0.001550501,0.005431361,0.001097296,0.004077092,0.001464743,0.002377948,0.005622379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1194391,0.0002069449,0.0008657842,0.002725965,0.001126582,0.004574735,0.001239507,0.0008129923,0.001181469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003577279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002810545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006032267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004284828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9756103,0.0156387,0.001432548,0.0008812856,0.005825684,0.0006115506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8070284,0.1676114,0.004110135,0.006838935,0.01222089,0.002190211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04271667,0.007204709,0.09572834,0.004125441,0.001828814,0.0003707525,0.0008644294,0.1140649,0.01011908,0.02838163,0.01302477,0.6815703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001845247,0.01261032,0.04366994,0.0002867541,0.001422049,0.0004533156,0.0007242751,0.8944385,0.02114914,0.01533352,0.007879605,0.000187183],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8978879,0.01137949,0.04439991,0.002831808,0.0002730156,0.001106579,0.001496337,0.001894689,0.03873021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830014,0.0005231996,0.01364977,0.0001003126,0.00006401454,0.0001058316,0.0006939746,0.00006069393,0.001800837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03003398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1588368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290738699","doi":"10.1007/s10506-022-09327-6","title":"Thirty years of artificial intelligence and law: the third decade","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Variety (cybernetics); Legal aspects of computing; Philosophy of law; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Symbolic artificial intelligence; Law; The Internet; Political science; Artificial intelligence, situated approach; Comparative law; World Wide Web; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Serena Villata","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michał Araszkiewicz","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kevin D. Ashley","is_ca":false},{"name":"Trevor Bench‐Capon","is_ca":false},{"name":"L. Karl Branting","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jack G. Conrad","is_ca":true},{"name":"Adam Wyner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08892713967190774,"gpt":0.3503653536279308,"spread":0.261438213956023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008771435,0.0004656674,0.0007991068,0.005068862,0.003849894,0.01546235,0.0009561473,0.004592686,0.009958932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01885698,0.0004056728,0.000442566,0.006199699,0.01093625,0.0112013,0.004574372,0.00739572,0.001688516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01111781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01149158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007709858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006736616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950377,0.001660814,0.0004021398,0.0004233485,0.001932248,0.0005437217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816926,0.0097234,0.001834925,0.001094484,0.003539975,0.002114596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005318009,0.00006246075,0.0008583986,0.0005083598,0.00001560448,0.0001598326,0.003498744,0.0002039037,0.0001566176,0.7650241,0.1766065,0.05285228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006572647,0.00001453786,0.0006802953,0.0008935182,0.000003669088,0.00007448456,0.001231959,0.00007360619,0.00004407874,0.04453202,0.9524343,0.00001087226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004892532,0.6729399,0.0006866765,0.2364321,0.01750914,0.00001452373,0.000171844,0.000028604,0.06732473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2112926,0.6157817,0.001304357,0.09314649,0.02890799,0.0001009949,0.0002636978,0.0001168492,0.0490853],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01546235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08066565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080571997","doi":"10.1007/s10506-012-9132-9","title":"The epistemology of scientific evidence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Scientific evidence; Argument (complex analysis); Credibility; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Empirical evidence; Component (thermodynamics); Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nanning Zhang","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1927456213403144,"gpt":0.4056515266181242,"spread":0.2129059052778098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06404029,0.001193358,0.002992118,0.01319226,0.005885545,0.01888179,0.004774271,0.01294107,0.005376766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1518396,0.00202559,0.002102039,0.005831957,0.08508372,0.03640124,0.006843019,0.01326733,0.0009300754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007811109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008881859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002508035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001656464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.925306,0.05494444,0.004601293,0.005217999,0.00881138,0.001118864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7148036,0.247731,0.008223416,0.01643739,0.01038933,0.002415313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006554937,0.00000702642,0.0001559634,0.0000919485,0.00002104011,0.00003097241,0.0003648636,0.0001440382,0.0000197834,0.9968238,0.0007238527,0.001610193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001201306,0.000003101793,0.0000485035,0.0001124923,0.000009521485,0.00003344554,0.0001304907,0.0003705693,0.00003631314,0.9953518,0.003885935,0.00000577331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01988296,0.04181385,0.4512942,0.2425083,0.004290153,0.0002793905,0.0007913407,0.0002328336,0.2389069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8320042,0.01175064,0.1255893,0.01551787,0.00706932,0.0009002712,0.0004077757,0.0001543423,0.006606326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3386815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361271390","doi":"10.1007/s10506-023-09353-y","title":"The use of AI in legal systems: determining independent contractor vs. employee status","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Independent contractor; Equity (law); Common law; Labour law; Sample (material); Variety (cybernetics); Business; Legal case; Legal advice; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Actuarial science; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Maxime C. Cohen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Samuel Dahan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Warut Khern-am-nuai","is_ca":true},{"name":"Hajime Shimao","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jonathan Touboul","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09575145007591922,"gpt":0.3239571614963208,"spread":0.2282057114204015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02102312,0.0002696125,0.000342985,0.006578239,0.002209347,0.005820244,0.001317785,0.001019756,0.004235061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1562518,0.0002121854,0.0003752491,0.003016819,0.004037744,0.005450316,0.001550732,0.001586762,0.0005861087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002254092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003378161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01702362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01959301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989038,0.005836231,0.0007659846,0.0007301632,0.002865027,0.0007645707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7354933,0.2316048,0.01018222,0.004279143,0.01430027,0.004140252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009655196,0.0005263452,0.8317107,0.0001716516,0.000148824,0.0003099923,0.007908397,0.003489326,0.001424631,0.05704571,0.001872413,0.09442657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001271917,0.0008493518,0.5932523,0.0005695441,0.0005166304,0.0009052899,0.02572277,0.2065369,0.01027393,0.1487893,0.01230592,0.0001507998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9260371,0.0005575888,0.01102853,0.002897442,0.00006329414,0.0001036849,0.0002461707,0.00003558022,0.05903069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976524,0.000052614,0.001632454,0.00006282741,0.00001549438,0.00001521539,0.00003837176,0.000006346227,0.0005243313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02102312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1111822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071805340","doi":"10.1007/s10506-006-9014-0","title":"Persuasion Dialogue in Online Dispute Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Negotiation; Argumentation theory; Online dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Dispute resolution; Legal aspects of computing; Computer science; Conflict resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; The Internet; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true},{"name":"David Godden","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07303214965820533,"gpt":0.3044647238258081,"spread":0.2314325741676028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009198181,0.0004609322,0.0007823626,0.0009100006,0.002951958,0.005095571,0.001672787,0.00452249,0.0145424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05614569,0.0006601334,0.0004018756,0.001040329,0.002461114,0.01103373,0.00355476,0.003232328,0.00121712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001135204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001339901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001651187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00100188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905844,0.007612607,0.0002587633,0.0004070624,0.0007809699,0.0003562904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9463241,0.04951538,0.0009600852,0.001272772,0.001195203,0.0007324807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003771689,0.001660712,0.005910724,0.0007061929,0.0001144612,0.002354228,0.02559219,0.04373719,0.00482093,0.7316644,0.01113593,0.1685314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004343237,0.0002951771,0.001717115,0.0001441609,0.0000801176,0.0007618349,0.005944887,0.3549486,0.003083993,0.6140874,0.01843713,0.00006534507],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5333297,0.002903163,0.3097218,0.008089785,0.0007838036,0.0002843539,0.0001248401,0.0006539556,0.1441086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772156,0.000163393,0.01668861,0.0001378401,0.00007906429,0.00008367818,0.00004092018,0.00004573281,0.005545055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0145424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04864919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046836002","doi":"10.1007/s10506-012-9120-0","title":"A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Computer science; Legal aspects of computing; Visualization; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; The Internet; World Wide Web; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Thomas F. Gordon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07958655965729128,"gpt":0.2932689512155651,"spread":0.2136823915582738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002803091,0.0008000375,0.0008368056,0.001655829,0.004948143,0.00432646,0.0010762,0.003953512,0.009951741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009629013,0.0004918691,0.0005642357,0.001124012,0.01588435,0.009955303,0.003978856,0.007391817,0.0022939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004798074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002981591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008334403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004222269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987153,0.0005610558,0.00006586703,0.0002912332,0.0002219176,0.000144723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985775,0.0005534966,0.00009912732,0.0002846375,0.0003604873,0.0001248178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002292786,0.000007517077,0.00003391537,0.00001691465,0.000005396779,0.00004647842,0.0003697178,0.0001834915,0.00002514092,0.9811214,0.01498144,0.003185658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001564287,0.00000975041,0.00005529671,0.00006724979,0.00000462663,0.00007057047,0.000204468,0.0004530872,0.0001253018,0.8476707,0.1513078,0.00001558215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02281754,0.03287561,0.0592985,0.2426424,0.01706227,0.0001672428,0.0007382546,0.000260279,0.6241379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.668073,0.01710323,0.02366976,0.04065274,0.007820427,0.0002483849,0.0003234179,0.0004405818,0.2416684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009951741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03481257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366823452","doi":"10.1007/s10506-023-09357-8","title":"A Bayesian model of legal syllogistic reasoning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; CRÉ de Montréal","funders":"Australian Research Council; European Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Syllogism; Philosophy of law; Legal aspects of computing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; The Internet; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Axel Constant","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1316490107469678,"gpt":0.3764715078871092,"spread":0.2448224971401414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005004373,0.0006356957,0.001126708,0.00285262,0.001678524,0.004785069,0.003104255,0.003234436,0.008331097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01876858,0.001001441,0.001548237,0.002391679,0.004063783,0.009157899,0.001909408,0.003506512,0.00142386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004498342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004167311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02211547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01805075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956177,0.001683924,0.0002335939,0.0008253393,0.001317448,0.0003219724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990516,0.006632891,0.0007087219,0.0005337338,0.001188276,0.0004204109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002088444,0.00002871277,0.0003424352,0.00003538301,0.00001957732,0.00009175712,0.0002785971,0.03533855,0.0001343289,0.9545492,0.001392054,0.007768619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002480551,0.000006993974,0.0001407023,0.00002245604,0.00001579269,0.0000636106,0.00004057601,0.1551804,0.00006792975,0.8410442,0.003373852,0.00001867172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0155944,0.0006002206,0.9310223,0.007031683,0.0000817881,0.0001616188,0.000867552,0.0003269229,0.0443135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5666432,0.001899592,0.4039977,0.001291606,0.0003872956,0.0006015589,0.001228442,0.0001288237,0.02382172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02211547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04397351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124147503","doi":"10.1007/s10506-019-09249-w","title":"When expert opinion evidence goes wrong","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Computer science; Jury; Epistemology; Argumentation framework; Probabilistic argumentation; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1204116196810357,"gpt":0.3305491665304403,"spread":0.2101375468494046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04310811,0.000566232,0.001659081,0.00565264,0.002360489,0.009666372,0.003291689,0.01984479,0.01827445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3184969,0.0007329691,0.001097561,0.002580292,0.005177646,0.0161896,0.003287922,0.008841302,0.003828692],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002666088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004680554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003135781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004412017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9671942,0.01219176,0.003681551,0.003637845,0.01037777,0.002916802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6805975,0.2383133,0.02214509,0.0165749,0.03710373,0.005265342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002721117,0.0005857667,0.07454158,0.002094969,0.001543048,0.01276285,0.005540094,0.00194217,0.001395047,0.2690642,0.3600923,0.2677169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005260811,0.0002303905,0.01998812,0.00303877,0.000704642,0.003491144,0.007165106,0.01105067,0.003691467,0.8253329,0.1246014,0.0001793084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.114355,0.01047736,0.03113565,0.5942352,0.01292923,0.0002379643,0.0022625,0.0003786889,0.2339885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8891933,0.0036223,0.01345149,0.07532117,0.005799185,0.0001444322,0.001185033,0.0001240093,0.01115914],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04310811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2279802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061085701","doi":"10.1007/s10506-013-9151-1","title":"Baseballs and arguments from fairness","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Legal aspects of computing; Philosophy of law; Informal logic; Basis (linear algebra); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; The Internet","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04394982316286884,"gpt":0.2628262240864747,"spread":0.2188764009236059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01081388,0.000743139,0.001410428,0.002159729,0.007469101,0.007924979,0.002760587,0.01154267,0.01616936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04099922,0.0008007837,0.001005663,0.001854608,0.02491515,0.01590543,0.005457103,0.009114925,0.001089777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004176237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002017617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004662391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00293478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923809,0.004441358,0.000262842,0.000910889,0.00117134,0.0008325914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823779,0.01346721,0.0009910618,0.001714903,0.0008696768,0.0005791677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001037907,0.000003589246,0.00002734559,0.000007097341,0.000002741927,0.00001511403,0.0001628588,0.0001150569,0.000007170641,0.9981658,0.0007058283,0.0007770186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008606597,0.000001517232,0.00001972075,0.0000100776,0.000001885138,0.000007834273,0.00006084066,0.0002240222,0.00001299359,0.9967841,0.002865948,0.000002358185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04471556,0.006590529,0.1108639,0.09214943,0.002310415,0.0001071525,0.0001321034,0.00008168312,0.7430493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538344,0.001142765,0.007323127,0.00628681,0.001341475,0.000165385,0.00003776502,0.00007076636,0.02979757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01616936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05718994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092547615","doi":"10.1007/s10506-009-9082-z","title":"Meta-relation and ontology closure in Conceptual Structure Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Relation (database); Computer science; Process ontology; Formal ontology; Upper ontology; Closure (psychology); Ontology Inference Layer; Suggested Upper Merged Ontology; Rotation formalisms in three dimensions; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Theoretical computer science; Information retrieval; Epistemology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Semantic Web; Data mining; OWL-S","authors":[{"name":"Philip H. P. Nguyen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ken Kaneiwa","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dan Corbett","is_ca":false},{"name":"Minh‐Quang Nguyen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08347819137130967,"gpt":0.293510902390329,"spread":0.2100327110190193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01096833,0.0006733853,0.002088815,0.004049798,0.005316984,0.006716745,0.003373866,0.003867728,0.006742761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02843954,0.001417169,0.003380268,0.004062205,0.01508704,0.03715789,0.005832383,0.008458583,0.0007145242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003498865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00214136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003685662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001536992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939323,0.002627439,0.0006607979,0.001123823,0.001237502,0.000418177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978738,0.01495996,0.0009703394,0.00331215,0.001448797,0.00057073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001027939,0.000009319682,0.0000621805,0.0000203017,0.000005112957,0.00002333758,0.000242124,0.0002542105,0.0000393152,0.997371,0.0003365802,0.001626445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004810491,0.000002318198,0.00001935791,0.000007737769,0.000005136525,0.00001777442,0.00003985066,0.0009324234,0.00004138659,0.9979704,0.0009554833,0.000003370254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0517483,0.005662714,0.8638406,0.01134494,0.001007488,0.00013733,0.0004138158,0.0002926741,0.0655522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.812504,0.002499842,0.1730527,0.001170736,0.001381731,0.000400027,0.0006757802,0.0002518519,0.008063331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01096833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05800676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319659350","doi":"10.1007/s10506-023-09346-x","title":"Correction: Using attention methods to predict judicial outcomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Computer science; Legal aspects of computing; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law; The Internet; Comparative law; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Vithor Gomes Ferreira Bertalan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Evandro Eduardo Seron Ruiz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1992209616846759,"gpt":0.4873160492234294,"spread":0.2880950875387535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007598794,0.003160006,0.003653299,0.007143696,0.005778556,0.00613721,0.007265422,0.01285412,0.1260413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2402512,0.002358798,0.001979349,0.007834833,0.004263311,0.0046415,0.003379594,0.0144325,0.06343964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004660922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008362194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02299007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03092848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900391,0.001700198,0.002284575,0.001718493,0.003379453,0.000878247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8430964,0.04705379,0.006381075,0.0168,0.08286396,0.003804733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004894709,0.000007228253,0.0002244605,0.0002295513,0.00005263004,0.0002376942,0.0000863804,0.00009589255,0.00004819146,0.00154249,0.991655,0.005771513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003507271,0.00005380806,0.006166154,0.0012219,0.0002856053,0.001228178,0.0004469664,0.003149346,0.001259208,0.01520113,0.9703953,0.0002417937],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005753418,0.0006047359,0.002073019,0.07278328,0.9099664,0.00008122171,0.007967589,0.001322647,0.004625828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09965623,0.005333192,0.0209212,0.1212789,0.4429847,0.001354687,0.01369941,0.004467092,0.2903046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1260413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4216502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412173123","doi":"10.1007/s10506-025-09464-8","title":"The compliance gap in data supply chains: contract specification languages and smart contracts as compliance technologies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Research Foundation","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Business; Supply chain; Computer science; Accounting; Marketing","authors":[{"name":"Pablo Marcello Baquero","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Restrepo Amariles","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel Amyot","is_ca":true},{"name":"Amal Ahmed Anda","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mustafa Bayirli","is_ca":true},{"name":"Luigi Logrippo","is_ca":true},{"name":"John Mylopoulos","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alireza Parvizimosaed","is_ca":true},{"name":"Aidin Rasti","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marco Roveri","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09527793556201541,"gpt":0.3561852737757609,"spread":0.2609073382137455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01555109,0.0006350372,0.001187767,0.002212151,0.002350203,0.01124441,0.002148144,0.005580806,0.006035327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03139706,0.001075495,0.001278292,0.004317588,0.01423683,0.04300056,0.006100305,0.007740792,0.0006863147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002934098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004427457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002563551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001189211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871832,0.007816365,0.000951555,0.001255705,0.002059809,0.0007333361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581035,0.03029247,0.002523307,0.005623173,0.002580812,0.0008767349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001821728,0.00001503829,0.00006812483,0.00002525615,0.000002810703,0.00002312186,0.0003660111,0.001223156,0.00008902135,0.9945628,0.0003447563,0.003261628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001472739,0.00001031164,0.00002617913,0.00004865518,0.000005691153,0.00002887057,0.0001873124,0.01514508,0.0002960643,0.9809608,0.003265353,0.00001101397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04299673,0.002694009,0.8958289,0.02269262,0.000290375,0.00008475722,0.0001745316,0.0004694904,0.03476863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8269219,0.001965353,0.1605825,0.002226727,0.0003949766,0.0002896393,0.0002941696,0.00024054,0.007084233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01555109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08224303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}