{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":10,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"295198cbd0d0","filters":{"venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W2125265707","doi":"10.1017/s2194607800000417","title":"377 and the Unnatural Afterlife of British Colonialism in Asia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Charter; Afterlife; Declaration; Human rights; Law; Political science; Alien; History; Ancient history; Ethnology; Art; Literature; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0328866215319174,"gpt":0.3418315737564559,"spread":0.3089449522245385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009754812,0.00004777935,0.0002525687,0.00003677591,0.0001267467,0.00005727,0.0001544746,0.00004552765,0.00003282445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006749404,0.00003813489,0.00004943703,0.0001715667,0.0005266445,0.0002394141,0.000007294506,0.0002391555,0.000001099256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002009683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007495594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002988901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007910786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986904,0.0005778852,0.0003200739,0.00005158783,0.0002473629,0.0001127447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993161,0.0002084589,0.0002305147,0.00004528829,0.0001337838,0.00006582944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002322346,0.00005054148,0.001562835,0.00000201488,0.00002380728,0.00004011401,0.0769771,0.000008829735,0.00002558578,0.9159454,0.001747818,0.003383768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006552547,0.0007703676,0.3883781,0.000318946,0.00007197991,0.0001428243,0.06698075,0.0000845399,0.0001086757,0.4681078,0.06818232,0.0003010814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8561613,0.001301383,0.00005802045,0.0136338,0.0001552732,0.0001553379,0.000002827205,0.000002885585,0.1285292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990881,0.00003987545,0.0001489065,0.0002677143,0.0001234555,5.6305e-7,2.727935e-7,0.000001333321,0.0003297564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4478375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4414404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792885287","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2017.25","title":"Fundamental Human Rights and ‘Traditional Japanese Values’: Constitutional Amendment and Vision of the Japanese Society","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Cabinet (room); Human rights; Fundamental rights; State (computer science); Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04170485564919228,"gpt":0.3357997853767732,"spread":0.2940949297275809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004363324,0.0001026837,0.0002154445,0.00001860466,0.001596338,0.00004532698,0.0001596227,0.00006186525,0.0002402031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003656088,0.00006567241,0.0001105707,0.00009515542,0.007442855,0.0003507724,0.00002775495,0.0001829424,0.000002636482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000840737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007737967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005852968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003829478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998757,0.0002515159,0.0002704021,0.0001100961,0.0004857664,0.0001252324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992426,0.00004851807,0.0002844204,0.00006453785,0.0002381754,0.0001217506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005647575,0.0001693302,0.0004918451,0.000008537114,0.0001080496,0.00000295101,0.2663857,0.000001722714,0.003314831,0.7219782,0.007469317,0.0000130235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006277348,0.003235331,0.04096237,0.0009288705,0.0004081704,0.0007467706,0.3187509,0.00003173012,0.004561576,0.289403,0.3337505,0.0009434762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9289274,0.00020173,0.000005177361,0.0007957782,0.0002886375,0.0001105523,0.00001555466,0.000003819954,0.06965138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988105,0.000002276929,0.0001073876,0.0001337315,0.0003987231,0.000001122984,0.00000202722,0.000001853894,0.0005423274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4325752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989537364","doi":"10.1017/s2194607800000016","title":"Buddhism, Human Rights and Constitutional Reform in Thailand","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Legitimacy; Human rights; State (computer science); Political science; Constitution; State religion; Law; Context (archaeology); Faith; Commission; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography; Theology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04420204786155569,"gpt":0.3730741826063977,"spread":0.328872134744842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000978105,0.00008891185,0.0002809193,0.00007463039,0.0006043692,0.00003836055,0.0001265941,0.00005698597,0.00006515984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001350267,0.0000682672,0.00005404572,0.0001387098,0.005545217,0.0002307842,0.00001949505,0.0002296873,0.000009776619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002541785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005871554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003153483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007009877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988066,0.0001262962,0.0003596575,0.00008529463,0.0003406112,0.0002815249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993498,0.0001074914,0.0001507541,0.00004335235,0.0001572395,0.0001913047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002436498,0.00003660494,0.00845653,0.000001372425,0.00002579872,0.00004064545,0.02745029,1.765528e-7,0.000007080089,0.9638222,0.00009442212,0.00004045522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001751869,0.0002212601,0.08449804,0.000142164,0.00002938467,0.0000630798,0.120017,6.416632e-7,0.000211279,0.677298,0.1154994,0.0002678736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3312406,0.0001963546,0.0003614093,0.001295684,0.0001250878,0.0000732443,0.000002268997,0.00000646829,0.6666989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991097,0.000001233199,0.0003165728,0.00007244314,0.0003047602,5.88455e-7,3.544473e-7,0.000001919113,0.0001923804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6678692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317812162","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2022.30","title":"China's New Global Health Governance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"China; Global governance; Corporate governance; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Global health; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Pandemic; Business; Greenhouse gas; International trade; Economic growth; Development economics; Health care; Economics; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04822449561712825,"gpt":0.4148925619298524,"spread":0.3666680663127241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001341108,0.00009545606,0.0003439596,0.00002265005,0.0004812134,0.0001030292,0.0004005689,0.00005281838,0.0002059687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004952481,0.00008582182,0.000109418,0.0008669893,0.0002108981,0.0004452846,0.00002567616,0.0002361345,0.0001630883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003598219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002129706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006915526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01560741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979123,0.0004909316,0.0004045505,0.0001051927,0.0006286396,0.0004583141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986173,0.00003452729,0.0004613482,0.00009019281,0.0001249339,0.0006717123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001819031,0.00002525735,0.0002767504,0.000003730589,0.00001777294,0.00001347376,0.01752029,0.00001719259,2.006971e-7,0.8235555,0.1505246,0.008027015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003394273,0.0002078191,0.06802407,0.00005451856,0.000003029495,0.00001391537,0.004156728,0.000006704456,0.000001710863,0.09313719,0.8339772,0.00007770382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04096313,0.001348276,0.0005917998,0.3232396,0.001574795,0.0002180812,0.00003740039,0.00007201975,0.6319549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963506,0.0002771034,0.0003457204,0.001560329,0.0007569161,3.98143e-7,0.000001741749,0.000003033618,0.0007041501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9553875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215040550","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2021.36","title":"Constituting and Regulating Democracy: Kenya's Electoral Commission and the Courts in the 2010s","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Democracy; Remand (court procedure); Commission; Judicial deference; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03808501169355889,"gpt":0.3323665804628618,"spread":0.2942815687693029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001161156,0.00006322627,0.0002157837,0.00001595291,0.001286464,0.0001095178,0.0001039605,0.00002371422,0.00001187235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001233591,0.00003447325,0.00003584482,0.0001335948,0.002027741,0.0001561579,0.00003479052,0.0002216151,5.801718e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001917059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001783888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000322723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003431159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986971,0.0006329602,0.0002263465,0.00006495615,0.0002509255,0.0001276846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990754,0.0005091733,0.0001658731,0.00003914,0.0001674444,0.00004299967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005182144,0.00001412244,0.008420318,0.000001149606,0.00002460187,0.00002457656,0.01882651,0.000007438332,0.00002438575,0.9713092,0.000399864,0.0008960554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002777099,0.00008203766,0.06661928,0.000374457,0.00008726813,0.0003510082,0.09571198,0.00009592106,0.0002220889,0.7559829,0.07748767,0.0002082809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5103723,0.007674583,0.0002264436,0.07648186,0.0002675711,0.0001888742,0.00000165346,0.000005658595,0.404781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991658,0.00007691403,0.0001875711,0.000345154,0.0001880928,7.807222e-7,1.79171e-7,0.000001045058,0.00003441858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4887935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211010767","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2021.28","title":"Constitutional Design of Electoral Governance in Federal States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Unitary state; Public administration; Political science; Corporate governance; Dilemma; Federalism; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Politics; Political economy; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06165131828603472,"gpt":0.33879412093905,"spread":0.2771428026530153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003172288,0.00006565319,0.0002796803,0.00001509301,0.0002297252,0.00002616011,0.0001104434,0.00002631034,0.0001436967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005328861,0.00005886546,0.00006641985,0.0002269019,0.001711796,0.0002292073,0.00001519101,0.0001324906,0.00000470136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009481329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008365755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003537302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004104157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988288,0.0002698461,0.0003221366,0.0000684253,0.0003622449,0.0001485892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990737,0.0001396716,0.0002320254,0.0000288969,0.0004709429,0.00005475713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006964368,0.00008376239,0.009893327,0.00000143911,0.00005011764,0.00005864228,0.002692522,0.0007772739,0.0001387492,0.9855356,0.0005594064,0.0001395754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002835581,0.0005238038,0.08953477,0.0006007387,0.00004683763,0.0001192633,0.02486412,0.00006781945,0.0075307,0.7631449,0.1102208,0.0005106908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2978185,0.01303345,0.03458071,0.01700753,0.001587723,0.0003949203,0.00006251126,0.0000188095,0.6354958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984131,0.0001053016,0.001185383,0.0001190138,0.0001283439,0.000001030175,8.19189e-7,8.888871e-7,0.00004612753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7005945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6307184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361296415","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2023.9","title":"Falsehoods, Foreign Interference, and Compelled Speech in Singapore","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Statute; Doctrine; Political science; Misinformation; Law; Government (linguistics); Constitutional right; Free speech; State (computer science); Sociology; Supreme court; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03184545017738778,"gpt":0.280883269538331,"spread":0.2490378193609433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004908958,0.0001262307,0.000329191,0.0002813062,0.00008286317,0.000150018,0.0004078051,0.00004425965,0.00001058601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001315399,0.0001059301,0.00006040292,0.0006673171,0.00009001452,0.0005094712,0.00009535596,0.0002969285,0.00004372657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002728197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004805778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007511749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006595715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998848,0.0001455255,0.0003998241,0.0001635512,0.0002185927,0.0002244938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993107,0.00008740395,0.0002114688,0.000155724,0.0001192218,0.0001154547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002162146,0.0002153921,0.00442355,0.00004554052,0.0001599658,0.00142967,0.01617361,0.0004741528,0.004961658,0.8930271,0.004568259,0.07430486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00824853,0.004876907,0.04875989,0.001552636,0.00005243419,0.004003851,0.01405684,0.05856265,0.07695486,0.7496492,0.03175907,0.001523143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8727957,0.0002326736,0.04556879,0.001482299,0.0005359142,0.0002089384,0.000001743229,0.00008266729,0.07909129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932815,0.00001932943,0.006435876,0.00007719992,0.00005794883,0.000001203768,7.547947e-7,0.000004845298,0.0001213471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1433779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4319704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280546607","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2022.9","title":"Constitutional Statecraft in Malaysian Courts: A Naive ‘Schmittian’ Misappropriation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Misappropriation; Law; Principle of legality; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Liberal democracy; Legitimacy; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03623722061282693,"gpt":0.3402384125194725,"spread":0.3040011919066455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001234298,0.00008024654,0.0002593086,0.000068353,0.0005415092,0.00002564299,0.0002463433,0.0000446559,0.001883702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005276111,0.00007821686,0.00008561358,0.0001845301,0.001519767,0.0002761126,0.00003432724,0.0004882761,0.00001743224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002583405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004606215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000510599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000520885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977148,0.001120008,0.0003663648,0.00009853585,0.0004396396,0.0002606769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992459,0.0001717776,0.0002414153,0.0000610801,0.000137109,0.0001426524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001189237,0.0001144879,0.001212334,0.000001221184,0.00003524503,0.00007285959,0.008975504,0.000305871,0.00000672422,0.9888698,0.0001890328,0.00009794699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000980478,0.000226631,0.005829174,0.00001426154,0.00001557655,0.00006169169,0.02505153,0.00005295044,0.00007004164,0.9162577,0.05130856,0.0001314393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2389527,0.0001080795,0.0009509705,0.003263407,0.0004656133,0.0001658072,0.00002921411,0.000009651869,0.7560545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987943,0.000004098321,0.0003253657,0.000517376,0.0001508853,0.000006358407,0.000003191101,0.000002013326,0.0001964666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7598415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390614834","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2023.35","title":"An Islamic Vision of Intellectual Property: Theory and Practice by Ezieddin Elmahjub. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. 214 pp. Hardback: £106.00.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology; Law; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0225928596114416,"gpt":0.310703446557788,"spread":0.2881105869463464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001809834,0.0001674459,0.0004217387,0.0000751888,0.0005066628,0.0001010755,0.0003245394,0.00008165115,0.00004780691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001473158,0.0001269723,0.0001083391,0.0002160074,0.001336955,0.001066006,0.0000634305,0.0003944421,0.00001272184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002199197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003184577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006172699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002098837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972086,0.001557681,0.0003420457,0.0002243562,0.0004201477,0.0002471559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983183,0.0008220289,0.000307366,0.0001359522,0.0003146375,0.000101778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005396732,0.0001132548,0.000004325738,0.0000215878,0.0001813692,0.00004782314,0.03427928,0.000002728901,0.001103027,0.5382369,0.4244167,0.001053364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003376729,0.0006265326,0.00006098685,0.0001481994,0.000125574,0.00004268365,0.05951609,0.00005667442,0.0004069057,0.000234405,0.9382805,0.0001638394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03064026,0.02016119,0.003986824,0.005097039,0.001097965,0.0004418071,0.00009412439,0.00004962411,0.9384311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827694,0.001665767,0.0002784914,0.0001246004,0.0002364132,5.301735e-7,0.000003119025,0.00001308213,0.01490866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9521291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5177781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123610114","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2020.15","title":"Replicating Silicon Valley? Law and Human Capital in the Making of China's Tech Startups","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"China; Silicon valley; Replication (statistics); High tech; Business; Market economy; Norm (philosophy); Politics; Political science; Economic system; Political economy; Law; Economics; Entrepreneurship","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04083881164053958,"gpt":0.2882188981479716,"spread":0.247380086507432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000476024,0.0001304584,0.0003349867,0.00006095687,0.0001514686,0.0001491687,0.000368729,0.00003599967,0.00002857903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002434079,0.0000944472,0.00008371694,0.000208517,0.0001845742,0.0007992277,0.0001181656,0.0003488964,0.000004630753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001044175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009266265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003473256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001380072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989657,0.00004575273,0.0004686888,0.0001320431,0.0002342513,0.000153591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991558,0.00002908009,0.0005812365,0.000127536,0.00009437725,0.00001199606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006605075,0.00008163292,0.003496867,0.00008839274,0.0000427381,0.0000382404,0.008196195,0.00002513612,0.004132533,0.9832345,0.0004241672,0.0001735879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01042327,0.002218794,0.2728014,0.002328557,0.0005790372,0.0003457979,0.1153535,0.001834449,0.007811431,0.4547811,0.1294688,0.002053848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.93419,0.000241457,0.000138982,0.007687518,0.00004864537,0.0001505894,0.000001304178,0.00000945662,0.0575321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967381,0.00000119169,0.000121795,0.002689608,0.0004357116,0.000001479547,0.000002122341,0.000007839325,0.000002135769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5284534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3851445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}