{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"191561bacfe3","filters":{"venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2532410346","doi":"","title":"Commonalities, intersections, and challenges for the scrutiny and interpretation of legislation in Trans-Tasman jurisdictions and beyond","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Commonwealth; Charter; Human rights; Law; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Bryan Horrigan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06420674695101623,"gpt":0.3248939014124738,"spread":0.2606871544614575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04643541,0.0002409675,0.0008221983,0.003584701,0.01162563,0.01525441,0.00242705,0.00286745,0.001709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03774014,0.000765861,0.0005798656,0.004106896,0.04908011,0.007689012,0.008046779,0.004938377,0.0001465137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03210574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04033256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2218419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3596253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9499777,0.03478513,0.002030516,0.003458572,0.004642867,0.005105276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645068,0.02057637,0.003288517,0.002269439,0.007702999,0.001655877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003557498,0.00001840491,0.008488025,0.0003961032,0.00008181905,0.0007365443,0.4366379,0.0005768926,0.001009829,0.516146,0.002497254,0.03337573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001937481,0.0001059697,0.06582578,0.002738705,0.000118187,0.0007895364,0.5575547,0.00152404,0.001235165,0.2133773,0.1565179,0.000193443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6224324,0.04336936,0.01709073,0.1293818,0.0006217456,0.000159389,0.00009211304,0.0000803019,0.1867722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935386,0.001552533,0.00159679,0.00159863,0.00005472328,0.00002656229,0.000008347253,0.00001568077,0.001608239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2218419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4411012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509187215","doi":"","title":"Petitioning the Australian parliament: Reviving a dying democratic tradition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Redress; Political science; Law; Democracy; Public administration; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Reynolds","is_ca":false},{"name":"George Williams","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0456153088006012,"gpt":0.3120668076720401,"spread":0.2664514988714389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03351161,0.0002888506,0.0009524889,0.001933773,0.005755666,0.005604661,0.001732012,0.005675131,0.002653472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03155523,0.0004369975,0.0005318591,0.002044565,0.01479427,0.005813019,0.00484621,0.007305202,0.0004822876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01131865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03490949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03977051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06006797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9725028,0.01671873,0.001196118,0.0009763946,0.007009315,0.001596697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808631,0.01052791,0.001833228,0.001538207,0.003847262,0.00139032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004330996,0.00008876284,0.0007571547,0.003563056,0.00005687625,0.0003979467,0.03052197,0.0003648005,0.0004886442,0.7213748,0.03596353,0.2063791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001458242,0.0001081782,0.004606467,0.004038895,0.00003627748,0.0003323114,0.003359223,0.0001610259,0.000282737,0.03579609,0.9512324,0.00003177932],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03235972,0.5076072,0.004340928,0.231407,0.005312108,0.0001725942,0.00004953039,0.00003769583,0.2187134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.582641,0.2796736,0.004198671,0.07094989,0.002676711,0.0001717233,0.00004165861,0.00004550126,0.05960113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03977051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1772285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556394426","doi":"","title":"Oversight as it intersects with Parliament","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Contempt; Law; Parliament; George (robot); Wrongdoing; Officer; Political science; Injustice; Select committee; Commons; History","authors":[{"name":"Roger Macknay","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02901104827814463,"gpt":0.322251712728459,"spread":0.2932406644503144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06228372,0.0004526204,0.001261196,0.002801588,0.008539352,0.01558671,0.002103085,0.005618894,0.004927145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0954143,0.000866515,0.0005648664,0.005199542,0.01752229,0.009233627,0.007602181,0.007789394,0.0009041913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02626976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07692508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1232514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1207463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.91552,0.04623433,0.004253903,0.007127543,0.0183809,0.008483404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8930556,0.05868774,0.01249876,0.006624064,0.02264789,0.006485933],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001521155,0.00005681286,0.003448362,0.002189799,0.0001137358,0.000325088,0.02532042,0.0005146826,0.0004034923,0.6123779,0.1126665,0.2424311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004737047,0.00007290819,0.003720044,0.001803061,0.00005162555,0.0001374922,0.004007797,0.00007270358,0.0002286911,0.04078824,0.9490388,0.00003130794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02418115,0.3917269,0.005749237,0.2824397,0.01027527,0.0001327464,0.0001711846,0.0001458732,0.285178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7846161,0.08394973,0.002411484,0.07309201,0.004332307,0.0001645343,0.0001377899,0.0001118702,0.05118419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1232514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3293917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}