{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":4,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"b2ccf31030fd","filters":{"venue":"Australasian User Interface Conference"}},"results":[{"id":"W1936951549","doi":"","title":"Persuasive interaction for collectivist cultures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian User Interface Conference","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Persuasion; Set (abstract data type); Persuasive technology; Product (mathematics); Social psychology; Psychology; Individualism; Order (exchange); Sociology; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0825605238884178,"gpt":0.4057111287757692,"spread":0.3231506048873514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005857803,0.0002616046,0.0002485909,0.0000663801,0.0001562327,0.0002122238,0.0002822093,0.0001493479,0.002297266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002830345,0.0002110062,0.0001422723,0.0001284865,0.0001141296,0.0002019848,0.0000355095,0.0002147339,0.0002464148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007308128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002120461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001090373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008829305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986542,0.00005940643,0.0002887353,0.0004784618,0.0001154317,0.0004037938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992464,0.00008439262,0.0001398552,0.0002387838,0.0002185013,0.00007202617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009280875,0.0006829795,0.03058214,0.00009216672,0.0003632432,0.00001775026,0.01437661,0.00006898835,0.03487059,0.1103735,0.8005788,0.007065135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003940844,0.001985927,0.5993692,0.0003691021,0.0002500542,0.0001596806,0.04833671,0.0004528709,0.04525632,0.009686003,0.2884781,0.001715194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9573495,0.00006390845,0.004177801,0.001790679,0.001350443,0.0006434845,0.00007621031,0.0001516881,0.03439625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300569,0.000003250052,0.0002678454,0.00008660231,0.0002313415,0.0001644741,0.00004087626,0.00001964401,0.06912911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.568787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499478300","doi":"","title":"A case for iconic icons","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian User Interface Conference","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; USable; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Creativity; Representation (politics); User interface; Interface (matter); World Wide Web; Multimedia; Programming language; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05038648897905978,"gpt":0.3271686746544512,"spread":0.2767821856753914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001192251,0.0001777939,0.0001696056,0.00009568664,0.0001152962,0.0005199546,0.0007738601,0.00007369136,0.0001116426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003609648,0.0001736668,0.00007370129,0.0002324857,0.00007459689,0.0005758838,0.000148893,0.0001055109,0.0001444358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000312062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001119143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008875183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002368002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987664,0.00003111293,0.0002999157,0.0004262846,0.0001226708,0.0003535749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990451,0.00006313577,0.0001023989,0.0005600246,0.0001271942,0.0001021579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007039259,0.000177066,0.001274934,0.00004512393,0.0000371938,0.0003221763,0.0004217191,0.0001453244,0.002029121,0.9409833,0.0497292,0.004827812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003982908,0.0007786621,0.002039815,0.0002876688,0.000134869,0.005214087,0.001099376,0.3964785,0.09017551,0.03653999,0.4608387,0.002429982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02843185,0.00001480262,0.9664362,0.00139264,0.0002479182,0.0002286442,0.00004779709,0.0002133806,0.002986738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791171,0.000002448686,0.0126128,0.0001661034,0.00004890451,0.0000215112,0.00001865731,0.00001172334,0.00800075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9538234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7081926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517385187","doi":"","title":"A taxonomic analysis of user-interface metaphors in the Microsoft Office Project Gallery","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian User Interface Conference","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; User interface; Interface metaphor; Interface (matter); Human–computer interaction; User interface design; Taxonomy (biology); Natural user interface; Graphical user interface; World Wide Web; User experience design; Programming language; Operating system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04795099176587093,"gpt":0.336025446854666,"spread":0.2880744550887951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000633053,0.0004001663,0.0006936489,0.000628231,0.00005773718,0.0001255723,0.001053422,0.0002345677,0.003964971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000694057,0.0003117943,0.0003485165,0.00111808,0.0002279018,0.0002797435,0.00008932604,0.000562583,0.0005146809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007782922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001443433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004886365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970735,0.0005234497,0.0008223559,0.0007195029,0.0002696139,0.0005915277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982256,0.0002330844,0.0003743428,0.0009356361,0.0001574774,0.00007391201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006073916,0.008733818,0.2046922,0.0004944453,0.02537532,0.0003240997,0.4462593,0.00304511,0.1275805,0.01890623,0.09902583,0.05948933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005957826,0.001368385,0.6154362,0.0005494526,0.007244098,0.0002346903,0.1499442,0.001192297,0.07773913,0.0001518349,0.1374153,0.002766624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786997,0.0001997516,0.00298528,0.0004921734,0.0003043488,0.0006710663,0.0001074036,0.00006212537,0.01647812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926371,0.00003215316,0.0005869452,0.0002271439,0.0000592738,0.0001318955,0.00003259211,0.0000300918,0.006262809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.410744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536947856","doi":"","title":"From pushing buttons to play and progress: value and interaction in fable","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian User Interface Conference","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Fable; Human–computer interaction; Interface (matter); Computer science; Value (mathematics); Game design; Computer game; Key (lock); Video game design; Game mechanics; Expression (computer science); User interface; Multimedia; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02523312675496185,"gpt":0.3226696830498305,"spread":0.2974365562948686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001377284,0.000116449,0.0001428834,0.00007166985,0.00004858637,0.0004793962,0.0001415786,0.00008119073,0.00008458195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007079907,0.0001164089,0.00001486748,0.000123613,0.0001809405,0.0005940805,0.00007374094,0.0001529947,0.00002556745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005233196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004893916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009948383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02212395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990432,0.00004871731,0.0001736929,0.0002971238,0.0001424285,0.0002948212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995984,0.0000718738,0.00004753832,0.00009733516,0.00003710213,0.0001477372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001517053,0.0004164735,0.4094422,0.0000673565,0.0000614431,0.0002473565,0.1876671,0.0001699506,0.007787376,0.06412023,0.008375556,0.3214933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008296891,0.000226606,0.3681635,0.001049857,0.00002947882,0.00001501456,0.05904098,0.0001732902,0.005923301,0.005658385,0.5581673,0.0007225813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9625086,0.00006749881,0.0001661372,0.003182411,0.0002260173,0.0002326648,0.00001465658,0.0000422986,0.03355974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924966,0.00001720544,0.0005906162,0.00005038214,0.00008981777,0.00001784878,0.000004118249,0.000008099286,0.006725349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5497918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}