{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":18,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"3e63af01b072","filters":{"venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)"}},"results":[{"id":"W3123230358","doi":"","title":"Is Every Ballot Equal? Visible Minority Vote Dilution in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Spoilt vote; Contingent vote; Voting; Political science; Group voting ticket; Law","authors":[{"name":"Sujit Choudhry","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael Pal","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01913076512325455,"gpt":0.2413919342084583,"spread":0.2222611690852038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003499184,0.000183884,0.0005147706,0.00134158,0.01062956,0.005115746,0.001520582,0.001030977,0.009964133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0234773,0.0002568818,0.0004155395,0.003058093,0.004534435,0.001480801,0.001809599,0.002967338,0.0006536673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07262181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07001177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923589,0.0006185776,0.0001866541,0.000619207,0.003830562,0.002385996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866632,0.001956662,0.001092277,0.0004788042,0.007184334,0.002624779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004660061,0.0001772206,0.4203824,0.0003287216,0.0001255739,0.001145425,0.02262211,0.001343468,0.0009349606,0.09295436,0.2040177,0.2555021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008553051,0.0001272397,0.5794669,0.0005965667,0.0001011784,0.0004653152,0.03302811,0.003550037,0.00163346,0.01648362,0.3642087,0.00025331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5735648,0.004058583,0.001645152,0.07680131,0.0009101959,0.0001829416,0.001201676,0.0001078136,0.3415274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772686,0.0009956396,0.0003653931,0.004339745,0.00005785818,0.00001389133,0.0002219507,0.00003781042,0.01669907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07262181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5269105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123780835","doi":"","title":"Still Not Equal? Visible Minority Vote Dilution in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Legislature; Spoilt vote; Representation (politics); Census; Contingent vote; Population; Political science; Dilution; Demographic economics; Public administration; Group voting ticket; Law; Economics; Sociology; Demography; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Pal","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sujit Choudhry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01367761541670631,"gpt":0.217335122982237,"spread":0.2036575075655307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002428822,0.0001930246,0.0006694532,0.001453832,0.009119629,0.003878144,0.001115956,0.0007512959,0.004541421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01388523,0.0002026547,0.0003556398,0.003070587,0.005165406,0.001190984,0.002592484,0.001425742,0.0002195549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03819953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03474376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9598039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9797571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944365,0.0005981282,0.0001135578,0.0004993142,0.002487353,0.001865159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961724,0.000691317,0.0004030486,0.000283363,0.001922835,0.0005270994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006352555,0.00007447477,0.4498106,0.0002105976,0.0001847154,0.001592637,0.03673908,0.00513445,0.003839358,0.2518042,0.03610379,0.2138709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001077497,0.0001390487,0.6623474,0.0003632237,0.000159211,0.000671344,0.0522016,0.0099028,0.005928609,0.05479846,0.2131197,0.0002608863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8625091,0.001427877,0.002906777,0.01308752,0.0001267431,0.0000681569,0.0004567999,0.00009905428,0.119318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994823,0.0001849025,0.0004111973,0.0006148941,0.00001277146,0.000006177228,0.0000734688,0.00001960451,0.003854028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04019612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2771583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288180810","doi":"","title":"Protecting Equality in the Face of Terror: Ethnic and Racial Profiling and the Charter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Profiling (computer programming); Racial profiling; Ethnic group; Political science; Criminology; Face (sociological concept); Computer security; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Race (biology); Gender studies; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Sujit Choudhry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03482487780636943,"gpt":0.2821089581291785,"spread":0.247284080322809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006743383,0.0002633347,0.0003816658,0.001002552,0.01957714,0.01377499,0.001052265,0.003571093,0.003271929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006834774,0.0001998676,0.0002164336,0.001294672,0.05237221,0.007484718,0.005787974,0.006509026,0.0003403417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01730143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03958413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3451329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5438125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939538,0.001902107,0.00008310306,0.0002710801,0.001644282,0.002145776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985027,0.0006534715,0.0001484803,0.0001340478,0.0002741498,0.0002872443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004870662,0.000004761519,0.0001628677,0.000008855838,8.898892e-7,0.00003398227,0.009584435,0.00006238677,0.00004765319,0.9770234,0.005923629,0.007142222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001446015,0.00003042813,0.003133238,0.0003987462,0.00001424479,0.0001011571,0.04146316,0.0002984587,0.000476897,0.5598512,0.3941713,0.00004670332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04501922,0.009084158,0.005896324,0.1415603,0.001067085,0.00006821933,0.00006491482,0.00003529189,0.7972046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9278738,0.005390141,0.002587805,0.01976742,0.0004728548,0.00007371687,0.00003670712,0.00003885566,0.04375881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3451329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6862479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008858639","doi":"","title":"del Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Doctrine; Legislation; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Constitution","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03494355135855277,"gpt":0.251587380376171,"spread":0.2166438290176182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003997413,0.0001649855,0.0005475315,0.002930923,0.0206942,0.01324204,0.001854895,0.004411395,0.006005144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01996887,0.0005330094,0.0003661413,0.005596537,0.01215486,0.002938258,0.003247777,0.005915865,0.0002343757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1252517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2018845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948199,0.0008491338,0.0001524646,0.0003234017,0.001756337,0.002098718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880601,0.003991976,0.0006494768,0.0002382552,0.004522917,0.002537402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006564452,0.00008528956,0.01820259,0.0000803753,0.00003676829,0.000287672,0.03000217,0.001185885,0.0001963416,0.8812781,0.03862117,0.02995802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108227,0.00008579258,0.2867786,0.001020787,0.0001634399,0.000243907,0.08254451,0.00591203,0.0005777273,0.1628776,0.4594075,0.0002797825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5249403,0.01920134,0.001044737,0.1093683,0.0003399196,0.00007611809,0.0005517291,0.00005585471,0.3444217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673759,0.002937711,0.0003984706,0.004029547,0.00006699034,0.00002091063,0.00005352045,0.00002032372,0.02509663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1252517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9087691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043446074","doi":"","title":"Strengthening the Foundations: Modernizing the Canada Health Act","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Accountability; Commission; Government (linguistics); Good governance; Democracy; Corporate governance; Administration (probate law)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03198828603357833,"gpt":0.2398064655893474,"spread":0.207818179555769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01912879,0.0008473587,0.0006788183,0.003509318,0.02248473,0.0163173,0.004344465,0.01511832,0.009399989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04691732,0.0008790646,0.001051408,0.003612273,0.01579772,0.006461632,0.006800533,0.01486333,0.001289103],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2075172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5851577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9621667,0.004977104,0.0008099462,0.001651,0.02098039,0.009414869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594861,0.008369069,0.001066232,0.001678856,0.01782241,0.01157722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003355062,0.00006582877,0.001837675,0.0001582858,0.00002173435,0.0003028581,0.0034506,0.000941198,0.0002794252,0.5488641,0.409058,0.03498671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005633911,0.00002664258,0.004911879,0.0004145839,0.00002630502,0.00005866559,0.001886291,0.0009371897,0.0002229932,0.0271748,0.9641747,0.0001096696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.008070797,0.01391538,0.003291858,0.7427741,0.005369524,0.0002708231,0.0007358927,0.0002870097,0.2252847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2917726,0.01787242,0.0163497,0.4888405,0.002901085,0.000334548,0.0009693408,0.0003281195,0.1806316],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7924828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9191677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991854019","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Exploring the Dilemmas of Solidarity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Redistribution (election); Federalism; Politics; Welfare state; Vision; Social policy; State (computer science)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01256300303475947,"gpt":0.1978853409609443,"spread":0.1853223379261848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005492743,0.0006690003,0.0005809491,0.001789488,0.01421963,0.01345364,0.00270526,0.008473829,0.01781029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008966591,0.0003828039,0.000778607,0.003213672,0.02856775,0.008584333,0.003769517,0.008099777,0.001612853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03130042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0266748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3729426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3618689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957511,0.001633279,0.00008574002,0.0005678275,0.00117564,0.0007864109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938836,0.003791079,0.0001847182,0.0002482372,0.001498143,0.0003941768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001386727,0.000007762914,0.0001823459,0.0000781718,0.000003211806,0.00008558973,0.00452793,0.0002876431,0.00006346789,0.9455255,0.0439673,0.005257216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000956196,0.00001259063,0.0004071362,0.0003329511,0.000007080566,0.00008745796,0.005543958,0.0003474423,0.0001313231,0.4516368,0.5414622,0.00002143601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.008202148,0.0296603,0.01197368,0.4805979,0.003302363,0.0001029427,0.0007356821,0.00007890817,0.465346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5368993,0.0416396,0.01640089,0.2042348,0.00636109,0.0003216213,0.0006281769,0.0002736858,0.1932409],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3729426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7415437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024431796","doi":"","title":"S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada/Attorney General of Canada v. S.D. Myers, Inc","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Subject (documents); Process (computing)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008081737050039952,"gpt":0.1567722717064355,"spread":0.1486905346563956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001096606,0.0007065248,0.0003697859,0.001996753,0.01967131,0.004884295,0.00131006,0.008028633,0.02901354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004721232,0.0008861704,0.0006069888,0.002018721,0.001612829,0.001447006,0.001102161,0.00467939,0.004940859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02529309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06342608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9434407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970198,0.0001218414,0.00007240403,0.0001618477,0.001558746,0.001065269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966433,0.0005975182,0.0001436523,0.00007123101,0.002053062,0.0004912681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005807776,0.0000388417,0.004825421,0.00006839945,0.00001740181,0.0003456305,0.0007853445,0.0001583541,0.0007458471,0.08169053,0.8978044,0.01346173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005532614,0.00004332885,0.01784354,0.0002304779,0.00008933057,0.0001950865,0.001461951,0.0004755879,0.001136345,0.006614663,0.9717601,0.00009432751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01454141,0.005480203,0.0007116723,0.05682513,0.0007910928,0.0001321692,0.002170678,0.0002348487,0.9191129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16071,0.005006502,0.001239021,0.06045718,0.0001953422,0.0001374248,0.0009658824,0.000111154,0.7711775],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05655926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1835151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987971761","doi":"","title":"Voter Equality & Other Canadian Values: Finding the Right Balance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Principal (computer security); Legislation; Voting; Legislature; Population; Inequality; Norm (philosophy); House of Commons","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04256906878473336,"gpt":0.2539732784688585,"spread":0.2114042096841251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002251852,0.0003788469,0.0003225001,0.001357955,0.03526768,0.01077742,0.001276693,0.004023525,0.01737839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005008233,0.0002865933,0.0003707768,0.002115166,0.01215512,0.002413269,0.002977257,0.004783514,0.001517809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06546086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1060739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949806,0.0005996559,0.00008002986,0.0004400919,0.002203976,0.001695487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979877,0.0002476636,0.00006331845,0.0001324706,0.00108916,0.0004796443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001455142,0.00001485809,0.001547697,0.00003441301,0.000006832142,0.000175756,0.005045231,0.0001455895,0.0001888626,0.7713714,0.1936232,0.02783168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001213254,0.00001061358,0.005202779,0.0001177637,0.00001485865,0.0000809368,0.007953645,0.0002474704,0.0003533351,0.04550635,0.9404446,0.00005555728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009252945,0.002562625,0.001044238,0.1097839,0.0008357725,0.0000714856,0.0003535358,0.00007515542,0.8760204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4396996,0.003065231,0.002847218,0.04025115,0.0003900891,0.0001042044,0.0002532491,0.0001818097,0.5132075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06546086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.474954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7057213379","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Regionally Differentiated Entitlement to EI on Charter-Protected Canadians","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Unemployment; Charter; Disadvantage; Work (physics); Politics; Differential treatment; Temporary work","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01853718524309376,"gpt":0.2247469282448664,"spread":0.2062097430017726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002691247,0.0002523173,0.0004314384,0.001276121,0.007316709,0.002465619,0.001796345,0.0009029799,0.006500462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01333529,0.0001637952,0.0007474743,0.002126947,0.002403239,0.000655477,0.00251095,0.001263668,0.0004477704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04786999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05086298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929295,0.0006253115,0.0001015459,0.0005385477,0.001807079,0.003997992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910981,0.001068905,0.001381923,0.0005802424,0.002739346,0.003131306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001605329,0.0003753996,0.8062033,0.0001448725,0.0002897778,0.001153809,0.01285269,0.007951581,0.003766822,0.05709024,0.02361118,0.08495508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004663456,0.0001256566,0.9608571,0.00007798975,0.0001008955,0.00009093845,0.01011759,0.001347729,0.0006768307,0.001031686,0.02544869,0.00007827305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9309185,0.0005192137,0.0002724217,0.004383785,0.00004881426,0.00004009217,0.001192067,0.00002785044,0.06259722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937657,0.0001308427,0.0001539839,0.0005428951,0.00001295888,0.000009339833,0.0003195155,0.00001070347,0.005054067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04786999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3473228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072148124","doi":"","title":"Unregulated Private Markets for Health Care in Canada? Rules of Professional Misconduct, Kickbacks to Physicians and Physician Self-Referral in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Health care; Public health; Private sector; Health insurance; Health policy; Medical care","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01176726458730957,"gpt":0.2090425784324313,"spread":0.1972753138451218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007239501,0.0003122739,0.0008523356,0.002875491,0.01640726,0.01301749,0.003211313,0.006193034,0.007278789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03527481,0.0007788935,0.0007513883,0.004718577,0.00894237,0.003505662,0.003113263,0.006688605,0.0002724896],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2803585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3920608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893147,0.0007547505,0.0003497397,0.0006935256,0.003918683,0.004968552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669352,0.009129748,0.004579612,0.0008075955,0.0111705,0.007377468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022559,0.0001430124,0.08322062,0.0001985834,0.0001386875,0.0008216419,0.006357652,0.004141307,0.0003124832,0.7382644,0.1348541,0.03132191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006804903,0.0001323562,0.3985475,0.001614936,0.0006227135,0.0006030328,0.02310435,0.030056,0.00136316,0.1824204,0.3601428,0.0007122923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3977095,0.01626082,0.002396719,0.3704805,0.0005261365,0.0002979911,0.00398184,0.0001211494,0.2082254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615304,0.004316883,0.0008555662,0.01472787,0.0001745895,0.00004655314,0.0003851676,0.00002886745,0.01793409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.993807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8346822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7052432803","doi":"","title":"Review Essay of Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism, 2d ed. by Christopher J. Manfredi","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Judicial activism; Politics; Judicial review; Supreme court; Power (physics); Adjudication","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003665796304082378,"gpt":0.184748353138806,"spread":0.1810825568347236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007510933,0.0007751416,0.001021199,0.004189662,0.01674164,0.01507345,0.003140694,0.01108276,0.005206692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02429354,0.0007781613,0.0006793866,0.008187016,0.01875285,0.005917026,0.001667475,0.007191731,0.001126672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09672642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1325274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8870025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9425255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924923,0.001195476,0.0001990777,0.0005314738,0.004464988,0.001116781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841314,0.006508216,0.0005588104,0.00034886,0.007684098,0.0007687096],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005993153,0.000004550797,0.0001062937,0.0001036947,0.000005653192,0.00004880916,0.0008388836,0.00008816503,0.00003445458,0.07223076,0.9182643,0.00826845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001024916,0.000003021999,0.0009498409,0.0004303326,0.000007801815,0.00002970514,0.0009696534,0.00006042282,0.000035741,0.011912,0.9855665,0.0000246971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000985423,0.3767104,0.0004382843,0.5560344,0.01446378,0.00003422099,0.0002389452,0.00003175442,0.05106274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08761393,0.4202948,0.001134079,0.3095383,0.02892509,0.0001777212,0.0003353495,0.0001683783,0.1518123],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1129975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7018026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992732555","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. Newfoundland Association of Public Employees","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Charter; Supreme court; Legislation; Judicial review; Legislature; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04258538527582147,"gpt":0.2342999941007441,"spread":0.1917146088249226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01437477,0.0008419991,0.0007460649,0.004169268,0.04288412,0.01502805,0.004712506,0.01501615,0.003004269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05687198,0.001015958,0.0009259171,0.007624507,0.01205537,0.003135411,0.001957815,0.01449611,0.0003340626],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1670418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1454869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9771986,0.002880618,0.0008325831,0.0025847,0.009437435,0.007066108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9150138,0.04930396,0.005532384,0.001509506,0.02295942,0.005680902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000430623,0.0002854071,0.1629976,0.0005013163,0.0003425348,0.002459657,0.1090498,0.0009224202,0.001865021,0.1044052,0.5784732,0.03826733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001320486,0.0002216732,0.5172376,0.001173933,0.0006497999,0.000252788,0.1088486,0.001387113,0.003415909,0.004440013,0.3616772,0.000563255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.2898419,0.01284201,0.0008333111,0.5729277,0.002011389,0.000277622,0.002750861,0.0001161807,0.118399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7997201,0.003559718,0.0007721526,0.1533754,0.00137574,0.00015635,0.0006599446,0.00006959215,0.04031093],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8329582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9661134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018542365","doi":"","title":"del Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada, by Gerald Baier","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Constitution; Government (linguistics)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02018346745751686,"gpt":0.2576748748221879,"spread":0.2374914073646711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003315212,0.0005253454,0.0004667566,0.002885188,0.01521541,0.01253276,0.001826365,0.007822526,0.004970648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01386644,0.0007212966,0.0004165132,0.005466163,0.01477174,0.005931044,0.002591768,0.00753643,0.0004202137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06040614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08492644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9547598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.981572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977969,0.0006125101,0.00007451766,0.0001907386,0.0008237454,0.0005016703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949522,0.002254754,0.0002491379,0.0001071014,0.001735133,0.0007016031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002382113,0.00005026091,0.002222405,0.00006971078,0.00002000114,0.00009596859,0.009920339,0.0005608796,0.00006367817,0.6537629,0.3162959,0.01691422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003421399,0.00001254447,0.02058353,0.0009369151,0.00004143002,0.00008740141,0.01925305,0.001173694,0.0001289513,0.2166083,0.7410691,0.00007077631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02191274,0.1985391,0.0007333574,0.5797199,0.002080722,0.00003928364,0.0004336846,0.00003760588,0.1965037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5388747,0.1526744,0.001961132,0.08167913,0.003527888,0.0001054446,0.0002616701,0.000132615,0.220783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06040614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4382793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7056698813","doi":"","title":"Federalism, Devolution & Secession: From Classical to Post-Conflict Federalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Particle accelerators and beam dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Devolution (biology); Cooperative federalism; Accountability; Incentive; Dual federalism; New Federalism","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02729196833856116,"gpt":0.2053356848270855,"spread":0.1780437164885244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007442435,0.0002498587,0.0004050666,0.002320589,0.006343912,0.009681914,0.00141505,0.003835784,0.003183577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007001637,0.0002542754,0.0005113376,0.002690164,0.04872796,0.01055828,0.005165104,0.005890426,0.0002694172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0137248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004839447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008129198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008368712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941095,0.003178046,0.000175755,0.0006749656,0.0008861194,0.0009757228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969303,0.001816457,0.0003933022,0.0003546366,0.0003325079,0.0001728125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001801018,0.000002567788,0.00007841356,0.000005605752,7.334145e-7,0.00001503462,0.0007910351,0.00004299307,0.000007623778,0.9972795,0.0003614868,0.001413359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006354873,0.00001040603,0.0009497334,0.00008238264,0.00000337697,0.00006399778,0.002017827,0.0004222613,0.00009453011,0.9577897,0.03855253,0.000006954036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09856606,0.02641985,0.03600214,0.1034563,0.001052144,0.0000904314,0.00009869006,0.0000518122,0.7342626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982875,0.002688466,0.002343677,0.003604739,0.0003801922,0.00006169813,0.00002799596,0.00001989752,0.0079984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0137248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09958088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990265180","doi":"","title":"del Justice for girls? : stability and change in the youth justice systems of the United States and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Public policy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03583063583601039,"gpt":0.2510306680333881,"spread":0.2152000321973777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002571583,0.0002954023,0.000825669,0.00335219,0.024024,0.01129556,0.003966847,0.001388929,0.004822961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01116433,0.0004065297,0.0005811845,0.007005136,0.007457385,0.003085386,0.006461212,0.003259826,0.0002999439],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1154227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1849554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952992,0.0004825156,0.0001253122,0.0004213322,0.0009080499,0.002763625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907086,0.0005020142,0.000857054,0.0002056505,0.003729826,0.003996885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001862117,0.0002318075,0.7540286,0.00007921489,0.0001730798,0.0004525284,0.1505959,0.0005719115,0.000241172,0.02540109,0.02099142,0.047047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002075386,0.00003891268,0.7505253,0.0001409467,0.00005844338,0.00006222873,0.2275165,0.0004777569,0.0001503659,0.002001381,0.01895075,0.00005658409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695019,0.001096823,0.0001241103,0.01456942,0.00008992337,0.00006370505,0.00115043,0.00001649145,0.01338719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961045,0.0004029435,0.00007692556,0.0005506322,0.00001226623,0.00001940649,0.0002906215,0.00001144003,0.002531452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1154227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.837454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795640617","doi":"","title":"Foreword to Jane Sprott and Anthony Doob, Justice for Girls? Stability and Change in the Youth Justice Systems of the United States and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Gerontology; Political science; Law; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Franklin E. Zimring","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03316421419006109,"gpt":0.2569051368682599,"spread":0.2237409226781988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002391964,0.001570367,0.002055107,0.002750634,0.00700496,0.005978663,0.002696478,0.0142281,0.0306454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01447882,0.0007538268,0.0008184143,0.001998039,0.002340814,0.004580286,0.003196169,0.01769347,0.01789838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006096652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01136276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2323864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3604559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986047,0.0002425918,0.000132734,0.0001973375,0.0006343441,0.0001882737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876401,0.00373935,0.0004327268,0.000180149,0.005871512,0.002136294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002740686,0.00000342671,0.00002094757,0.00002107788,9.710539e-7,0.00001075505,0.00003373074,0.000003688559,0.000006163738,0.0001446507,0.9986097,0.001142238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001733046,0.000007642842,0.0007712882,0.0003431461,0.000009142113,0.00007021896,0.001059826,0.00003285724,0.00003477228,0.0007103313,0.9969246,0.00001886228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001439571,0.03274423,0.0001369443,0.7889571,0.1684742,0.00008462626,0.0005424416,0.00005867919,0.008857781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002294074,0.0304852,0.0002821501,0.7042229,0.09827068,0.0001932752,0.0003212029,0.0001495083,0.163781],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7676136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4620674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7055691674","doi":"","title":"del Hie Impact of Law Reform: Deinstitutionalization in Law and Practice in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Action (physics); Legal practice","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01009438874584431,"gpt":0.2413294204594648,"spread":0.2312350317136205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005731988,0.0002401329,0.0007285303,0.002387349,0.04074134,0.0160052,0.003240801,0.005017014,0.01659046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03083327,0.0005604866,0.0005885011,0.004390911,0.01770633,0.003758715,0.008515763,0.008068347,0.0005957034],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5538983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9852443,0.00178997,0.0003603199,0.00103974,0.003839636,0.007726052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713305,0.006223347,0.001432155,0.001008021,0.008743798,0.01126224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002602704,0.0003506012,0.06901246,0.0001680673,0.00008991723,0.0007676615,0.07468259,0.001950727,0.0007589498,0.7322599,0.05716277,0.06253617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002059255,0.0001744692,0.2525214,0.0008516794,0.0001979146,0.000228631,0.2136657,0.005384073,0.001624969,0.06437615,0.4604101,0.0003591212],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6434284,0.002349794,0.0008778965,0.14068,0.0003362971,0.0001762697,0.0006209115,0.00006412707,0.2114663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643423,0.0005943245,0.0002932514,0.004907205,0.00003233313,0.00003887275,0.00008450224,0.00002698274,0.02968034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8236153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284616397","doi":"","title":"Book Review - Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Doctrine; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Malcolm M Feeley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0191879536593833,"gpt":0.2548938742137268,"spread":0.2357059205543435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001368747,0.000887948,0.001483153,0.007481297,0.003549742,0.006297331,0.001625898,0.003388762,0.01695755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009211846,0.0005208456,0.0005157544,0.02342749,0.002784872,0.002239209,0.0008296252,0.003376154,0.003549204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02608395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06301784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7421066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9137623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980647,0.0002707184,0.00008032609,0.0001227671,0.001274253,0.0001872235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887108,0.002695404,0.0003900954,0.0001315275,0.007647935,0.0004241895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004347188,0.000007169092,0.0002143436,0.0004020308,0.000009288809,0.0000194996,0.0001249856,0.0001840003,0.00002066571,0.00755668,0.9689083,0.02254868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004987879,0.00000634522,0.002077827,0.002241341,0.00003221514,0.00003973694,0.0003435447,0.0000863012,0.00002549976,0.003042215,0.9920846,0.00001541995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008235538,0.8358894,0.0003374045,0.04803111,0.02215656,0.00006908701,0.0007162149,0.00005227276,0.09192444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01422817,0.8386973,0.0005765586,0.0195765,0.01450988,0.0001054202,0.0008156779,0.00008228125,0.1114083],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2578934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5188245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}