{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":333,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":333,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"8ab2cde52c76","filters":{"venue":"Biological Conservation"}},"results":[{"id":"W2557811647","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.006","title":"Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Waterloo; University of Victoria; University of Saskatchewan; University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Conservation psychology; Reflexivity; Conservation science; Sociology; Salient; Behavioural sciences; Management science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Ecology; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06325914652177446,"gpt":0.3071131222302789,"spread":0.2438539757085045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009586429,0.0001520535,0.0001394085,0.00006242009,0.0009524783,0.0000672062,0.0001456137,0.0001088486,0.0004607355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008949538,0.0001023072,0.00003116766,0.00041202,0.001236637,0.0004398269,0.0002316995,0.00008686138,0.00004961996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001098118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004123391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000368397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001179955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984689,0.000119708,0.0003193505,0.000523976,0.0002685223,0.000299504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993212,0.0002061129,0.0001261239,0.0001592871,0.00003691609,0.0001503911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002102999,0.00004708788,0.4781682,0.000003011614,0.00000213819,3.519213e-7,0.0003846844,4.03576e-7,0.4871852,0.03058078,0.001223557,0.002383602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003781992,0.0001862786,0.9756699,0.00001387316,0.0000059747,0.000001802497,0.00201758,0.0001776765,0.003217227,0.01359382,0.004509338,0.0002283503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719301,0.000003082732,0.003430823,0.02198358,0.0000977794,0.0004565946,0.000007542966,0.00006911404,0.002021335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932776,0.000004425637,0.0009393792,0.005401363,0.00003229409,0.00005243322,0.00001190246,0.000006827936,0.0002737702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4975017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7325789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038411382","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.024","title":"Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":736,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; National Center For Environmental Assessment","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Guild; Life history theory; Habitat fragmentation; Biology; Habitat destruction; Trait; Environmental change; Geography; Climate change; Life history","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07572017065011115,"gpt":0.1997943729723419,"spread":0.1240742023222308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001945336,0.0001411361,0.000176925,0.00000867447,0.0002098557,0.0000272884,0.0001384931,0.0001440415,0.0006545858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004077797,0.00005041152,0.00004523986,0.00005963129,0.0002668452,0.00006756299,0.0001037322,0.0001410755,0.00003363642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002154459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005626415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002706918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007130608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991151,0.0000720668,0.0001753743,0.000315356,0.000112319,0.0002097778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992878,0.0004912994,0.00005465807,0.00001375591,0.00001326027,0.0001392479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001255597,0.00005587889,0.3814501,8.832774e-7,0.000006156123,0.000002675424,0.00002695129,1.770253e-8,0.6120827,0.0004608574,0.003395338,0.002392866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000603944,0.000450939,0.8174819,0.000002438137,0.000003881982,0.000003573889,0.00009776939,0.000004523601,0.0002642765,0.0001096424,0.1813976,0.0001230828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951894,0.0003612572,6.992445e-7,0.003404107,0.00008818314,0.0001896395,0.00013458,0.00008067443,0.0005514278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971054,0.000156663,0.00009976354,0.001836731,0.0002977215,0.00003024267,0.00003529955,5.11128e-7,0.0004376232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6118184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7167255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884266673","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.022","title":"Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":725,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Liber Ero Foundation; Natural Environment Research Council; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Sight Research UK; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Habitat fragmentation; Habitat; Habitat destruction; Biodiversity; Fragmentation (computing); Ecology; Geography; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05068446110587485,"gpt":0.2709027916931425,"spread":0.2202183305872676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001685238,0.00005685991,0.00006047107,0.00001175827,0.0003527263,0.000007826351,0.00006411014,0.00007657349,0.0007128214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001159151,0.00004576338,0.00002962622,0.00008336216,0.0002774558,0.00009221322,0.0000510029,0.00003101761,0.0006935564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004084682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002825961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002958758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002566476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995389,0.00003690346,0.00009614733,0.0001735886,0.00004681043,0.0001076404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997035,0.0001405318,0.00005418405,0.0000539497,0.00002697207,0.00002081649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003046958,0.00002452289,0.9831571,0.000001414815,0.000007461538,1.096403e-7,0.0001694904,0.000002177096,0.001864808,0.001194226,0.0130763,0.0004719258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002689683,0.0003200054,0.9790373,0.000001126694,0.000007045083,3.71021e-7,0.00009665198,0.001258934,0.0006413984,0.006020955,0.01227076,0.00007647777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866076,0.000006613942,0.006165346,0.004560011,0.0001251686,0.0002139103,0.00001873012,0.00003530562,0.002267274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897027,0.000009514075,0.003111865,0.006803765,0.00002812868,0.00002775965,0.00004918045,0.000001235324,0.0002658428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004826729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8914496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538503382","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.001","title":"When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control – Five hypotheses","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":599,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Basic Energy Sciences; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Cotton Research and Development Corporation; Seventh Framework Programme; Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Biodiversity; Ecology; Pest control; Biological pest control; PEST analysis; Agriculture; Natural (archaeology); Integrated pest management; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02788117383733171,"gpt":0.240378858962852,"spread":0.2124976851255203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002794944,0.000236514,0.0003029724,0.00002095394,0.0002475752,0.00009932487,0.0003232603,0.0002092094,0.001042756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009975933,0.00006596011,0.0001494828,0.000169352,0.0001151662,0.0002410963,0.00006006009,0.0001301531,0.0005721682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005577619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001102773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002688025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006609843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982826,0.0002572339,0.0003536814,0.0005205317,0.000153786,0.0004322331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974567,0.001975324,0.0001325456,0.00008850438,0.0002110649,0.0001358765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004297229,0.00007440618,0.03680627,9.254111e-7,0.00001917779,0.000005884531,0.0000213849,2.589489e-7,0.8878052,0.001035144,0.003650313,0.07015137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004967273,0.001846153,0.8346613,0.00006986292,0.00001311817,0.00002661826,0.0002205008,0.00006040861,0.01354118,0.002979038,0.1454966,0.0005884907],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750256,0.0001038687,0.0002839289,0.02304431,0.000313702,0.0004798919,0.0001754822,0.0001708436,0.0004023933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909169,0.00003880967,0.0001790814,0.007457846,0.000390158,0.0001429645,0.00005794815,0.000001219191,0.0008150766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8742639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038412545","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108654","title":"Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":596,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; European Cooperation in Science and Technology; European Commission","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Biodiversity; Genetic diversity; Conservation genetics; Agricultural biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Population; Diversity (politics); Measurement of biodiversity; Global biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Environmental planning; Geography; Biodiversity conservation; Political science; Genetics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05357043164948767,"gpt":0.2345892470465929,"spread":0.1810188153971052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002329183,0.000126795,0.000138456,0.000008889585,0.000346299,0.00006352153,0.0004524134,0.0002344783,0.000244562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006668326,0.00004654724,0.00004549387,0.0007706144,0.000222408,0.00004730792,0.0006146637,0.0002277866,0.00002910124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002662697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001188817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006466766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002554743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987042,0.0002774472,0.0001547547,0.0003834249,0.0002135499,0.0002666505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999375,0.0003103667,0.00005373871,0.00005223182,0.00005774856,0.0001508833],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008613255,0.00004691714,0.9642662,0.00000356541,0.00000559003,0.00001241877,0.0002107082,3.540078e-7,0.02943909,0.0001626269,0.0003617516,0.005404686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001220544,0.0004922734,0.9964095,0.000001655269,0.000005346979,0.00000200469,0.0005610547,0.0000493987,0.0001332352,0.0005274219,0.001581525,0.0001145836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9415411,0.00009028284,0.00002090342,0.05773699,0.00002359046,0.0003419288,0.000168015,0.000038965,0.00003819853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855274,0.00007174977,0.0004191,0.01384341,0.00005672582,0.00000516414,0.00007538378,2.327076e-7,8.520555e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04398625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2677782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907399367","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.12.026","title":"Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":587,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Concordia University; ELUTIS Modelling and Consulting (Canada); University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa; Université de Sherbrooke; Okanagan University College; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Carleton University; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geography; Species richness; Habitat destruction; Extinction debt; Forest fragmentation; Landscape ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05037802176210701,"gpt":0.2731463051701098,"spread":0.2227682834080028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001692986,0.00005631644,0.00005995902,0.00001210645,0.0003555773,0.000007746311,0.00006349314,0.00007527323,0.0008213681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001338471,0.00004523293,0.00002931737,0.00008237361,0.0002966176,0.00009255351,0.00005058259,0.00003031695,0.0007325885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000408277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002777738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000309731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002526383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995426,0.00003669324,0.00009546618,0.0001726466,0.00004615271,0.0001064628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997044,0.0001413461,0.0000520887,0.0000535426,0.00002784047,0.00002079193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000342754,0.00002166637,0.9803448,0.000001210265,0.000006878663,1.163233e-7,0.00017736,0.000002388477,0.001972595,0.0009915044,0.0159067,0.0005404478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002473819,0.0002783272,0.9783756,0.000001115973,0.000006348221,3.389941e-7,0.0000788718,0.001215395,0.0005834051,0.007761382,0.01137742,0.00007447758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867182,0.000006549204,0.006552237,0.004763117,0.0001280519,0.0002061861,0.00001704987,0.00003410727,0.001574459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887997,0.00001043233,0.003157546,0.007692182,0.00002793971,0.00002690195,0.00004842083,0.000001198325,0.0002356607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006769877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9416187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121932776","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.019","title":"Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing: Searching for common issues to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":561,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Fishing; Fishery; Fisheries management; Bycatch; Fisheries law; Recreational fishing; Recreation; Fish stock; Fisheries science; Business; Sustainability; Commercial fishing; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05403444744815188,"gpt":0.2736948205139103,"spread":0.2196603730657584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004732047,0.00009025656,0.0001561264,0.00002169929,0.0002639976,0.00002137834,0.00006352431,0.00006478703,0.00003664268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000473359,0.00007712704,0.00001323766,0.00005706715,0.0002775462,0.0001598576,0.0001386114,0.00005088258,0.000002968784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002781374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002247898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001276484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999266,0.00008919028,0.0002202577,0.0002030777,0.00008898487,0.0001325328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993846,0.0004169822,0.000101438,0.00005711701,0.000003887215,0.00003593316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001417554,0.00004294195,0.9789753,0.00001182925,0.00001689093,1.853609e-7,0.000716028,0.00001132628,0.003612482,0.0003570083,0.003873915,0.01224034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003240412,0.0002497507,0.9528787,0.00002148723,0.00001225199,4.850973e-7,0.0001379286,0.002953127,0.000343401,0.001240912,0.04175065,0.0000872439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737991,0.00003138781,0.0009064595,0.02428827,0.00001467449,0.0005374895,0.000006644364,0.0000170692,0.0003988751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882811,0.0000671665,0.00838172,0.002953138,0.00002465195,0.00006044728,0.00003891847,0.000003854055,0.0001889648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03787673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3145149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001076865","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.020","title":"Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":559,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research; University of Alberta; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; Tropical forest; Agroforestry; Geography; Dry forest; Tropics; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0349270508460397,"gpt":0.2716435825648472,"spread":0.2367165317188075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001734078,0.00004993059,0.00008421073,0.00001219476,0.00005702729,0.000004192286,0.00006236672,0.00005386538,0.00003396163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001805587,0.00003002326,0.0000150499,0.0001225621,0.0002489903,0.00005055758,0.00002193208,0.00005762291,0.000007061131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001561368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002713246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008089067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006812178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994813,0.0001080205,0.0001584579,0.0001123947,0.00006073049,0.00007907982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996384,0.0002197376,0.00006500651,0.00005803529,0.000007746122,0.00001108012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002169791,0.0000473448,0.991839,8.833533e-7,0.000001170332,9.304877e-7,0.0001296988,0.00001624052,0.0007302247,0.005358294,0.0001269826,0.001727561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001498804,0.0001895455,0.9863797,0.000002362543,0.000002331632,0.000001248772,0.00007654598,0.002636658,0.00001380294,0.01025264,0.0002576482,0.0000375786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890164,0.0000384154,0.0006310525,0.009582011,0.00001371121,0.0001376111,8.044866e-7,0.000007750207,0.0005722957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955918,0.00005228286,0.0006152519,0.003704932,0.00000526184,0.00001065848,0.000005776982,6.749403e-7,0.00001336128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006575452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1224313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056733293","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.026","title":"Fire management for biodiversity conservation: Key research questions and our capacity to answer them","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":498,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Adaptive management; Environmental resource management; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Sustainable management; Management science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Business; Geography; Engineering; Environmental science; Sustainability","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1163988235583121,"gpt":0.3000649019718453,"spread":0.1836660784135331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00131904,0.0001018698,0.0001092684,0.00002910368,0.0004518755,0.00005160516,0.0001790183,0.0001421362,0.0001245585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005198715,0.00008204505,0.00002821263,0.0002550477,0.0001463748,0.0001320242,0.0001959842,0.0001901202,0.0003786434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007334819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008390208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001810103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009454862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988872,0.0001876365,0.0001463288,0.0003633506,0.0001839364,0.0002315716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993156,0.0002498757,0.00004232375,0.0002072531,0.00006404506,0.0001209483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008728034,0.0001391076,0.8860999,0.00003371756,0.00001207793,0.000002226253,0.0001564574,0.00000247462,0.02191639,0.007543247,0.07617577,0.007831404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002441453,0.0001836634,0.8269759,0.00001393009,0.000006045654,0.000004405794,0.0001608532,0.001008842,0.0005028843,0.002051543,0.1686939,0.0001539246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984854,0.000003824446,0.0004766719,0.01197901,0.000249396,0.00114681,0.00003798103,0.00006586208,0.001186377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902698,0.000005797237,0.007248991,0.001977511,0.00004496391,0.0001667792,0.0000245659,0.000003439952,0.0002580858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09251811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4866821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073843668","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.03.024","title":"The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":423,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Grassland; Transect; Native plant; Ecology; Introduced species; Disturbance (geology); Invasive species; Wildlife corridor; Belt transect; Plant community; Geography; Biology; Species richness","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02261598956587997,"gpt":0.2237641837441613,"spread":0.2011481941782813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002751029,0.00007931815,0.00009235134,0.000009148554,0.0001567147,0.000008798766,0.0001616029,0.00003984331,0.00005184879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002760444,0.00003899556,0.00002890556,0.0001289024,0.0006270735,0.0001435977,0.00003209128,0.00008488444,0.00000664049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002586921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007920084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003170196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005759809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999293,0.00006491139,0.0002514433,0.0001466881,0.0001493485,0.00009460503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998781,0.0008502117,0.0001767494,0.0001431156,0.00002974936,0.00001915509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001303771,0.00004130344,0.9788629,0.000002804813,0.000006863427,2.808267e-7,0.0002524151,0.001100535,0.01566872,0.001927174,0.0009610071,0.001045618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007534086,0.0001429915,0.9884123,0.00003093635,0.000003599593,0.000001186746,0.0001474701,0.002147271,0.003540261,0.000193141,0.00525398,0.00005156514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994665,0.00002384673,0.00009457493,0.004346292,0.00002907556,0.0002251617,0.00002239911,0.000006841977,0.0005868081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897,0.0001189959,0.0001095414,0.0006080841,0.00001292878,0.00002618896,0.000007342813,0.00000196279,0.0001449172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01212846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2310479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966163956","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108259","title":"Light pollution is a driver of insect declines","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Impact of Light on Environment and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":406,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Light pollution; Foraging; Predation; Insectivore; Insect; Habitat destruction; Biology; Ecological trap; Climate change; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04677197053299734,"gpt":0.2580564991595168,"spread":0.2112845286265195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002117473,0.00007663419,0.0001182404,0.00001807992,0.00003883788,0.000004211471,0.00008883498,0.0001004948,0.00549164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003331486,0.00005339254,0.00004229566,0.0001097023,0.00005714881,0.000114618,0.00005419479,0.00005119236,0.0009027802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006595533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007051232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001739066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001047403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992936,0.0000483677,0.0001904349,0.0001649083,0.0001386716,0.0001640754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996806,0.00003172303,0.0001083752,0.0001248722,0.000004450838,0.00004996574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002997848,0.0000386604,0.8267461,0.000003033516,0.00000203583,1.584765e-7,0.00006881973,0.000002160487,0.1714568,0.0001867659,0.0009827348,0.0004827677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002130813,0.0002308624,0.9651372,0.000005428321,0.000002563513,6.929771e-7,0.00001378445,0.00008880758,0.009139013,0.0004554946,0.02463966,0.00007340399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917316,0.00002287956,0.00006713075,0.004063797,0.00006952316,0.000191494,0.000003357181,0.00002026976,0.003829949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957572,0.00004688483,0.0004071521,0.003351974,0.00002042541,0.000003244712,0.000008650294,0.000003083069,0.0004014378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1623178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015027376","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108571","title":"Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":384,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Biodiversity; Wildlife; Sustainability; Public relations; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental ethics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Biology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1131922374816816,"gpt":0.3371653675271535,"spread":0.2239731300454719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004026584,0.0002241964,0.0005062455,0.00004459377,0.0001050696,0.0000162266,0.0002073287,0.0008361712,0.0001857333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006340478,0.0001314353,0.0002165119,0.0002629591,0.0002000431,0.00003862037,0.00009051743,0.0006266187,0.0000515913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001796031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001345122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001248848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006870014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981917,0.0002420907,0.0004469864,0.0003580836,0.0005445528,0.0002166356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975166,0.001058802,0.0004838932,0.0003285119,0.0004026143,0.0002096124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008274341,0.0001048025,0.1799778,0.0001835049,0.00004524208,0.000003624147,0.00002283528,2.016644e-7,0.0001586854,0.0001586604,0.8173956,0.001121625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008126107,0.0007174828,0.3221801,0.0001670765,0.00008545876,8.653081e-7,0.00002598806,0.00002052895,0.00001592753,0.0001006124,0.6757685,0.0001048923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6620241,0.0002681855,0.00002095013,0.02441304,0.3088736,0.001508279,0.001787308,0.000163071,0.0009414373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6639948,0.00118672,0.0001197012,0.03972824,0.2869276,0.00003793227,0.00771515,0.00003101042,0.000258867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1422023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7590602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912285194","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.013","title":"Why we must question the militarisation of conservation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":361,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; University of Sheffield; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Poaching; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Politics; Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Geography; Criminology; Ecology; Law; Economics; Archaeology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1125266308755923,"gpt":0.3086534341648529,"spread":0.1961268032892606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001196104,0.000355597,0.0008200484,0.00006789048,0.0001931693,0.00002208583,0.0004382279,0.0008043657,0.0009448185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007134326,0.0002202984,0.0002864458,0.0005914518,0.0004825962,0.0002381642,0.0001726752,0.0003775383,0.0005436916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002360082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009720332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009574388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003469705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968897,0.001100201,0.0009565427,0.0005309352,0.0002739231,0.0002486758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971598,0.001287494,0.0009492516,0.0004975352,0.00006285812,0.00004309413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009323262,0.000265642,0.1501991,0.002858456,0.0001605823,0.000002481326,0.0001891577,0.00004260569,0.00004335471,0.00704101,0.1316557,0.7074486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001310701,0.0001443613,0.04674202,0.0007014418,0.0002127742,0.000007032334,0.0000241303,0.0002636752,0.000001709053,0.0009800717,0.9505409,0.0002508067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01094398,0.9727238,0.0009086542,0.01007355,0.0008615804,0.003140759,0.00006279325,0.000139666,0.001145232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005642718,0.9931977,0.0003386363,0.004416393,0.00009609374,0.0002443003,0.0007331382,0.00002127209,0.0003881609],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8188852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117997267","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.018","title":"A review of lead poisoning from ammunition sources in terrestrial birds","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":359,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ammunition; Lead poisoning; Threatened species; Shot (pellet); Lead (geology); Near-threatened species; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Fishery; Habitat; Biology; Medicine; Archaeology; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.179232177485843,"gpt":0.3569859266056125,"spread":0.1777537491197695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004165576,0.0002066366,0.0008888259,0.00004587421,0.00004711595,0.000009886394,0.0001657311,0.0002129042,0.0003113781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004703735,0.0001383475,0.0001766498,0.0003615946,0.0001731948,0.00007784402,0.0001011569,0.0001729975,0.0000878708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009577307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002340773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002843358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002077655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982997,0.000432972,0.0007509481,0.0002322846,0.0001386857,0.000145476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988697,0.0004158589,0.0005312018,0.0001550219,0.000006019203,0.00002217518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001097471,0.00007440409,0.01136102,0.004364486,0.0000264128,0.000002248451,0.00004026852,5.183223e-7,0.00007415134,0.00001725173,0.007723609,0.9763047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001276858,0.00005051069,0.00518376,0.03076934,0.00007959238,0.000001222382,0.00001264581,0.000004172234,0.000005155132,0.0001363608,0.9634454,0.0001841554],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008679492,0.9897399,0.00001889139,0.00008758169,0.00007758066,0.0005069051,0.00004895804,0.00002513306,0.0008155833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000338516,0.9981134,0.0001992336,0.0003703885,0.00006458013,0.00006891236,0.0008090372,0.000007273494,0.00002865621],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5641648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972486549","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.10.007","title":"Conserving Africa’s rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":324,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Sonaca (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Protected area; Outreach; Enforcement; Geography; Business; Population; Environmental resource management; Law enforcement; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Agroforestry; Ecology; Economic growth; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05638916506935705,"gpt":0.2109743928405588,"spread":0.1545852277712018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004031853,0.000124381,0.0001209321,0.00006184153,0.0002778988,0.00004417167,0.0001382004,0.0001118247,0.0001687547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001875201,0.0001001412,0.00002879711,0.0004128414,0.0002735727,0.0001308062,0.0002889148,0.000105244,0.00005119653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001866988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001800299,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002753427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00380476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989558,0.00009111535,0.0002173097,0.0003234166,0.0001382339,0.0002741497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999645,0.00005891826,0.00008012779,0.0001323655,0.00001659399,0.00006697491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001700854,0.00009159218,0.9953393,0.00001037758,0.000004889049,0.000003864735,0.0004294744,0.0005345003,0.002453213,0.0003511174,0.0001568848,0.0006078331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006729328,0.0000957788,0.9853204,0.00002954158,0.000005495287,0.000003193611,0.0002436989,0.0007561383,0.00003525564,0.007927342,0.004761318,0.0001489243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902986,0.00007958603,0.001105976,0.005558209,0.00002697214,0.0007179989,0.000006007969,0.0000829779,0.002123623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980269,0.00003269324,0.001086733,0.0005567099,0.00001091566,0.00006319726,0.00002514933,0.000003765251,0.0001939156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01001886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4162377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164115678","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.023","title":"Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Population; Life history theory; Reproductive success; Biology; Habitat; Mammal; Geography; Life history; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2427500792822981,"gpt":0.2989197065922888,"spread":0.05616962730999078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007986611,0.0001918702,0.0003938272,0.0001496629,0.0001480543,0.00003729337,0.000164931,0.0001330617,0.01577488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007697764,0.0001432494,0.0003805888,0.0006344681,0.00007385794,0.0005669018,0.0000829159,0.0001032743,0.0005611184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003986727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001290779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001040663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002291363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998225,0.0004017391,0.0004364717,0.0003605347,0.0002838376,0.0002924484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990363,0.0002862606,0.0001879497,0.000246299,0.00003323774,0.0002099338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001655086,0.00016199,0.9593409,0.000001760313,0.002426038,5.875647e-7,0.0004035907,0.0002157632,0.007796469,0.001807864,0.02711877,0.0005607342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006374762,0.00006307827,0.8855474,7.357609e-7,0.002505922,0.000001346997,0.00009349055,0.0001727856,0.00005570691,0.00006587621,0.1112485,0.0001814065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991327,0.000286973,0.001719284,0.004117828,0.0001496769,0.0003012652,0.00001890211,0.00009023322,0.001988793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874296,0.000009094747,0.002195961,0.007674672,0.00009292266,0.000146214,0.00009067675,0.000007966319,0.002352888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08412972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264085230","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.016","title":"Climate change modifies risk of global biodiversity loss due to land-cover change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":300,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Institute for Water Security","funders":"Australian Research Council; Queensland Government; Australian Government; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council","keywords":"Climate change; Biodiversity; Land cover; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Habitat destruction; Global change; Environmental resource management; Environmental change; Effects of global warming; Global warming; Land use; Habitat; Geography; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1686409134940137,"gpt":0.2791228817616275,"spread":0.1104819682676138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002713863,0.0001027065,0.0001470722,0.000009904777,0.00007428925,0.00001335716,0.000145046,0.0001071512,0.003127329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001418948,0.00007839472,0.00004714185,0.0002618801,0.0001488177,0.0001460935,0.0002561442,0.00004233269,0.002511919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002775391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003057336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002802317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003605165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991763,0.00008074257,0.000137798,0.0002148582,0.0001764856,0.0002137928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995797,0.00002511287,0.00009973026,0.0001280292,0.00003462616,0.0001327995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105162,0.00005636264,0.9947168,0.000002916176,0.000003063126,0.000003775494,0.00011988,0.000001600435,0.00009998572,0.0005509289,0.003700619,0.0006389123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002929132,0.0001680617,0.9886345,0.000003814411,0.000008060806,0.000002574122,0.0001809805,0.00005361286,0.0001242898,0.0001472357,0.01027521,0.0001087397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934813,0.00003508393,0.00005182832,0.001860424,0.0001274554,0.0002851443,0.001790234,0.00005138154,0.002317113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975313,0.000109936,0.00005087353,0.002045946,0.00003167332,0.00003206062,0.0001913712,0.000001174012,0.000005643916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006574593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033060249","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108665","title":"COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a “Global Human Confinement Experiment” to investigate biodiversity conservation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":267,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Biodiversity; Pandemic; Wildlife; Environmental resource management; Convention on Biological Diversity; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Strengths and weaknesses; Environmental planning; Diversity (politics); Wildlife trade; Population; Business; Geography; Ecology; Political science; Environmental science; Biology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3138720662927779,"gpt":0.4332515203622993,"spread":0.1193794540695214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005894746,0.0004103313,0.001378767,0.00008815046,0.0002538981,0.00006440342,0.0001480805,0.0005418111,0.0006783718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004296525,0.0003111034,0.0002051592,0.0005281483,0.0002005094,0.00004498516,0.0001776623,0.000264921,0.0001167798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001005742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002464872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001977104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008617429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974156,0.0004965672,0.0007487917,0.0007100126,0.0002811681,0.0003478773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972,0.0002240718,0.000441688,0.0002278712,0.0001574216,0.001748962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007254659,0.001122659,0.286391,0.02039705,0.001615361,0.0004092799,0.0006050653,5.568839e-7,0.00009192235,0.01427278,0.2230474,0.4513215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009700964,0.0008921232,0.00641318,0.0009425323,0.0004217725,0.00003283177,0.0001004209,0.00001234217,2.131736e-7,0.0002011875,0.9896994,0.0003138705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.05525069,0.8882437,0.0001248148,0.04737948,0.0002336429,0.005902912,0.001252471,0.000578066,0.001034172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003338892,0.8771369,0.0002086068,0.1117451,0.0001442718,0.0002222929,0.007040084,0.00001591849,0.0001479781],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.766652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119541874","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.014","title":"Predatory fish invaders: Insights from Indo-Pacific lionfish in the western Atlantic and Caribbean","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Queensland; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Predation; Introduced species; Invasive species; Fishery; Biology; Overfishing; Trophic cascade; Habitat; Predator; Geography; Fishing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02929782099137731,"gpt":0.2018072962169921,"spread":0.1725094752256147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001096211,0.00008653403,0.0000979047,0.0000176695,0.0000919364,0.00004786051,0.0001623699,0.0001333167,0.001294043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001438842,0.00005149392,0.0000158137,0.0001074506,0.0003161355,0.0002314826,0.0001182158,0.0001400464,0.0001762682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002514045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004500567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003824078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005290029,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992258,0.0002006289,0.0001544983,0.0002200725,0.0000771525,0.0001218713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994961,0.0002867348,0.00005213938,0.000128444,0.000007226881,0.00002933946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005589232,0.00002877807,0.9875343,0.00000123218,0.000002422814,0.000002271874,0.0003534751,5.603167e-7,0.00114896,0.0001251221,0.0105288,0.0002685193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001647416,0.00007384681,0.9777848,0.000003708485,0.000002086204,0.000001679599,0.000438514,0.00006851825,0.00006205215,0.002217018,0.01910649,0.00007655643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903874,0.00001639648,0.000006540677,0.005405925,0.00004690267,0.0003010191,0.00000312579,0.00001806647,0.003814671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935374,0.00004287667,0.00004318959,0.006101615,0.0000314759,0.00005397082,0.00006133871,0.000002100007,0.0001260291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009749484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989343681","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.014","title":"Impact of landscape composition and configuration on forest specialist and generalist bird species in the fragmented Lacandona rainforest, Mexico","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Rainforest; Geography; Secondary forest; Forest ecology; Ecology; Agroforestry; Old-growth forest; Intact forest landscape; Forest management; Forest restoration; Ecosystem; Habitat; Forestry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04965856643344436,"gpt":0.2739731314441479,"spread":0.2243145650107036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002881333,0.00007066384,0.000101104,0.00002380057,0.00007499044,0.00001565585,0.00004350505,0.00005917082,0.00003667132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009858613,0.00004107134,0.00001635624,0.00009436499,0.0003296972,0.00007281617,0.00002628667,0.0000530353,0.000004813374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003706343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005958896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003812059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002107885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994679,0.0001121231,0.0001528965,0.0001113212,0.00007962646,0.00007614789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996632,0.0001648977,0.00008179039,0.00005059642,0.00001600154,0.00002352143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001112611,0.00003724804,0.9901134,0.000001379021,0.000005014543,8.477805e-7,0.0002811532,0.0004584906,0.001143374,0.007071861,0.0006950475,0.00008086186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005105225,0.0003322063,0.9935428,0.000004111821,0.000003403833,0.000002524718,0.0001252805,0.003745767,0.00002514893,0.001526999,0.0001301861,0.00005104946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960372,0.00002761294,0.0001432331,0.001389896,0.00002264056,0.0001876852,0.000009347317,0.00001032911,0.002172066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992384,0.00005324495,0.0000696709,0.0005218663,0.00001800551,0.00001249282,0.00006469939,0.000001838074,0.00001983625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005544861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1674841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096787453","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00145-3","title":"Integrity and isolation of Costa Rica's national parks and biological reserves: examining the dynamics of land-cover change","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Protected area; Deforestation (computer science); Nature reserve; Geography; Forest cover; National park; Buffer zone; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Agroforestry; Ecology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1587030950979132,"gpt":0.2492965561554708,"spread":0.09059346105755761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005118871,0.00008001401,0.000114652,0.00002687328,0.0001245894,0.00001307887,0.0001051927,0.0001077486,0.0002797756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002953908,0.00004812367,0.00002073341,0.0001657052,0.0004525002,0.00008918045,0.0002266657,0.00009614685,0.0000046286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000415913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002144191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005793793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001341079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992211,0.0001438787,0.0001947368,0.0001880205,0.0001613373,0.00009088198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999441,0.0002656527,0.0001476221,0.0000822489,0.00003704606,0.00002639054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002533802,0.00004012682,0.9968373,0.000006541162,0.000007052095,2.074201e-7,0.0002249722,0.000006316401,0.0004744882,0.0003158275,0.0001693758,0.001892421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001939652,0.0001457043,0.9692273,0.000008559371,0.000006480435,9.974913e-7,0.0001808357,0.02855407,0.0000136133,0.0004299751,0.001175925,0.00006264542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957018,0.00009912483,0.0002719507,0.002643486,0.00002042991,0.0002285602,0.0000289384,0.00001221114,0.0009934958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988157,0.0003039658,0.0003478763,0.0004125691,0.00001486288,0.00000814861,0.00004122588,0.000001481494,0.00005414574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02854776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3063347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992099232","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.023","title":"Patterns of species change in anthropogenically disturbed forests of Madagascar","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Biodiversity; Endemism; Habitat; Grassland; Geography; Phylogenetic diversity; Vegetation (pathology); Taxonomic rank; Biology; Species diversity; Phylogenetic tree; Taxon","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04470731051498177,"gpt":0.2918771657305974,"spread":0.2471698552156156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001317227,0.00006731098,0.0001259119,0.00002297872,0.00001895136,0.000001640849,0.00009257288,0.0002215083,0.00009489492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008523198,0.00005064163,0.0000539526,0.00004427581,0.0001206316,0.000003013019,0.00004543345,0.00007523732,9.20244e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001902016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000138273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008799332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00260707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994909,0.0000360972,0.000202975,0.0001318255,0.00003724034,0.000101008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997041,0.0000184291,0.00008978318,0.0001165795,0.00005341329,0.00001770276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004837758,0.00006263118,0.5147359,0.000004251896,0.00000228021,6.584362e-7,0.000009644094,6.166971e-8,0.4845318,0.0002699264,0.000009663873,0.0003247708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001983353,0.0002554813,0.7854946,0.000004013789,0.000003193653,0.000001581527,0.00001214479,0.000005929756,0.2135286,0.00004162128,0.0004040707,0.00005039649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994035,0.00003352018,0.00004974229,0.0001697636,0.000117297,0.0001393336,0.00003834406,0.000003675459,0.00004485264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993396,0.00004982188,0.0001423549,0.0001339633,0.00007375346,0.00001881046,0.0002009918,0.000002889232,0.00003781058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2710032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2065106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111871000","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.02.020","title":"Modelling the spatial distribution of human-caused grizzly bear mortalities in the Central Rockies ecosystem of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"AXYS Technologies (Canada); Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Parks Canada; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Geography; Ecosystem; Terrain; Vegetation (pathology); Distribution (mathematics); Logistic regression; Spatial distribution; Ecology; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Ursus; Population; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03509389667473245,"gpt":0.2156702082517716,"spread":0.1805763115770392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003595365,0.00007069491,0.0001099904,0.000006524337,0.0001386976,0.000005522224,0.0001724503,0.00007390641,0.00004152057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000754784,0.00004015147,0.00002813435,0.000127515,0.0001436016,0.00006573823,0.00002896348,0.00007867711,0.000001125343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001284167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006332082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3859967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5447954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991215,0.0001613969,0.000300155,0.0001133286,0.0001549871,0.0001485889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995585,0.0001424447,0.0001560329,0.0001127314,0.00001654049,0.00001371739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002466373,0.00004315215,0.9421882,0.000007410716,0.000006089598,0.000001185782,0.0003449184,0.04918087,0.0006930546,0.007319536,0.0001665048,0.00002443685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001848337,0.00006812355,0.9917906,0.00001126717,0.000005632428,9.099647e-7,0.000474438,0.003678599,0.0004372622,0.00316284,0.0001350557,0.000050445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995878,0.00001143417,0.001561617,0.002117707,0.00005266065,0.0002240618,0.00003556866,0.000005941086,0.000112955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995351,0.000005185779,0.00001863222,0.0003076561,0.00001820893,0.00001890039,0.00008667071,0.000001572501,0.000008031244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1587987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.618092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016242205","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.032","title":"Integrating connectivity and climate change into marine conservation planning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Climate change; Environmental resource management; Marine spatial planning; Geography; Marine protected area; Environmental planning; Ecology; Computer science; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05792149686592645,"gpt":0.2584328040169652,"spread":0.2005113071510387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004581801,0.000108341,0.0001474717,0.00001485488,0.0002236983,0.00002426757,0.00005312446,0.0000635983,0.00009951266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004317757,0.00007722853,0.00001888878,0.0001005309,0.0001028645,0.0001669754,0.0003868741,0.00007380018,0.00003204736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003814455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001302166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002063391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001184033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992557,0.0001069112,0.000169039,0.0002423382,0.00007049472,0.0001555671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999534,0.0002400176,0.00009548594,0.00007618514,0.00001465818,0.00003963048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002037245,0.00001173438,0.9594044,0.00001036993,0.000002256035,5.012412e-7,0.00013144,3.305113e-7,0.002899352,0.002820617,0.0001897551,0.03450884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001576153,0.0001505357,0.9824836,0.00001750416,0.000003705203,0.000002957752,0.00007665841,0.006549876,0.00006704287,0.002910541,0.007466372,0.0001135672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929164,0.00001774593,0.0005417431,0.002676322,0.00008351772,0.0002032786,0.000001441804,0.00007836455,0.003481169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970309,0.0000317954,0.001102677,0.001653256,0.00006706765,0.00006013803,0.0000225623,0.000003544636,0.00002803926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03439527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3149288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972513999","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108239","title":"Conservation translocations and post-release monitoring: Identifying trends in failures, biases, and challenges from around the world","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; McGill University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat; Chromosomal translocation; Habitat destruction; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09147378956726233,"gpt":0.2739068676162943,"spread":0.182433078049032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003684277,0.0001382475,0.0001460129,0.00007560304,0.0001689749,0.00005015969,0.0001160746,0.0001373426,0.0003235468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001488248,0.0001025193,0.00002452795,0.0003069776,0.0002231123,0.0003398158,0.00006582699,0.000165973,0.00004244676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005245095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000103606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003109157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008843146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988578,0.0002157392,0.0002625701,0.0003775711,0.0001132732,0.0001730226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989055,0.0007542968,0.000101896,0.0001720956,0.00001775504,0.00004840536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005354853,0.00003661781,0.9842649,0.000004068858,0.000007924219,0.000001282268,0.0002527111,0.0000198289,0.003259036,0.001137516,0.0001353498,0.0108272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004121781,0.00006450781,0.9914225,0.00002597893,0.00001158481,0.000002262075,0.0005495232,0.001404617,0.00008131209,0.001283087,0.004610058,0.0001323929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530253,0.0008449188,0.00002066478,0.04543013,0.0001133678,0.0002449455,0.0000099997,0.00003738524,0.0002732674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972706,0.0005173946,0.0002734007,0.001474055,0.00004449407,0.00005500693,0.00009534665,0.000005866217,0.0002637829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04424534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4934683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994673543","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108368","title":"Indirect effects of habitat loss via habitat fragmentation: A cross-taxa analysis of forest-dependent species","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fig Tree Foundation; Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz; Marshall-Smith Syndroom Research Foundation; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás; Conseil Français de l'Énergie; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais; Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia; Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Center for Stroke Research Berlin; Dermatology Foundation; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Sight Research UK; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Natural Environment Research Council; National Instruments Corporation; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; American College of Dentists; Association of American Railroads; European Commission","keywords":"Species richness; Habitat; Ecology; Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat destruction; Biodiversity; Extinction debt; Geography; Taxon; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01521105770654943,"gpt":0.2518422382997583,"spread":0.2366311805932088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000272008,0.0001105006,0.0003280869,0.00008138568,0.00007096438,0.000007373611,0.0001299864,0.0001202437,0.0005244946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002307768,0.00008528627,0.000121362,0.0004980952,0.0004053132,0.0001212288,0.0001024645,0.00006484993,0.00006947724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006253321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006340742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007863635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00166124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989728,0.0001200294,0.0003480717,0.0002449999,0.0001732755,0.0001408515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987978,0.0006795497,0.0003038295,0.0001462215,0.00004528871,0.00002728453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005070031,0.00008574324,0.9815332,0.00002694224,0.0001971805,0.000001391188,0.0001536782,0.0027007,0.0145839,0.000532108,0.00002598307,0.0001084248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003391116,0.0002913022,0.9923316,0.000006781782,0.0001025299,4.766546e-7,0.00004116308,0.002802143,0.00292297,0.00103938,0.00002881128,0.00009368902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967952,0.00005332217,0.001464654,0.0001526512,0.0001189129,0.0003149116,0.00001285956,0.00001835562,0.001069154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987561,0.00003472357,0.0005605894,0.0002363556,0.00000591303,0.00002723596,0.0000629977,0.000003155355,0.000312966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01166093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5742848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894607922","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.026","title":"A fence runs through it: A call for greater attention to the influence of fences on wildlife and ecosystems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Conservation Association","funders":"","keywords":"Fencing; Wildlife; Fence (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Wildlife conservation; Ecosystem; Empirical evidence; Wildlife management; Geography; Environmental planning; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Engineering; Biology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04804494353652217,"gpt":0.2689493773537956,"spread":0.2209044338172734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004275093,0.00009416532,0.00011441,0.00001323356,0.0002259283,0.00001541375,0.0001561919,0.0001034295,0.00006281774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003755561,0.00005632853,0.00002769286,0.0001594974,0.0003341492,0.000145189,0.00006589395,0.00004638723,0.00009392981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002892972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009282162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004074572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000899441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991422,0.0001019989,0.0002309045,0.0002715959,0.0001029164,0.0001503865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994146,0.0002431469,0.0001224683,0.0001428489,0.00004489276,0.00003210862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001389594,0.00002406883,0.9869359,0.000005315213,0.000005763077,1.88661e-7,0.0002984324,0.00006072347,0.004289511,0.0009061474,0.006938813,0.0003961846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001595156,0.0007906171,0.9822357,0.00002717099,0.000006428806,0.000002149186,0.00005936531,0.0005663634,0.0002440165,0.0007940591,0.01503265,0.00008198233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794221,0.000003460847,0.0008979533,0.01875567,0.00008713485,0.0005760184,0.00001201451,0.00001865523,0.0002269911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845222,0.000007544515,0.0006071574,0.01454229,0.00005617286,0.0001306874,0.0000084738,0.000002804733,0.0001226858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008093839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2297011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781940036","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.021","title":"Is local biodiversity declining or not? A summary of the debate over analysis of species richness time trends","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts; National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center; National Sleep Foundation; Alzheimer Society of B.C.; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Species richness; Argument (complex analysis); Global biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1024737804322661,"gpt":0.2813149861230265,"spread":0.1788412056907604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001784823,0.00006980277,0.0001663879,0.00003707019,0.0001007135,0.000006176883,0.0001845844,0.00008210325,0.09232499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009613348,0.00003893082,0.000120725,0.001097637,0.0008231692,0.00004689314,0.000181583,0.00003390987,0.00009889777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008784029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006000581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003319392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003808848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993192,0.00006689622,0.0001897878,0.0001597085,0.0001591257,0.0001052843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995351,0.00009361379,0.0001602407,0.0001515359,0.00002789222,0.00003158821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001620566,0.00003608188,0.9781491,0.000001436672,0.00004838175,2.923814e-7,0.0001071389,0.000002134246,0.01125113,0.00006750773,0.009784255,0.0003904727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001329979,0.00008205217,0.980436,0.000002824536,0.00008328971,1.996086e-7,0.0002351654,0.000785554,0.006315385,0.000006185456,0.01186251,0.00005789163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962285,0.000004689046,0.00008239999,0.0006205118,0.00003565767,0.00003845521,0.0003050112,0.00001267121,0.002672145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979448,0.00001261465,0.00002382376,0.001295448,0.000006978895,0.000001295785,0.00007330559,9.04243e-7,0.0006407997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09222609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9085047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554533380","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.035","title":"Integrative conservation of riparian zones","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Society for Conservation Biology","keywords":"Riparian zone; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Recreation; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03174077326032105,"gpt":0.2394090165952011,"spread":0.2076682433348801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002086975,0.00008121326,0.0001197011,0.00001504472,0.000050281,0.000002412664,0.0001027525,0.0001128242,0.002562889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001946939,0.00004134753,0.00003007315,0.0001270904,0.0003967503,0.0001610745,0.00002244269,0.00003684258,0.0001251872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002099244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009449692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001486424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001625128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993485,0.00006833154,0.0002114171,0.0001788107,0.00008419289,0.0001087828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995682,0.0001955682,0.00009923285,0.00008550128,0.00002174261,0.00002972583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008752305,0.00005722677,0.8969637,0.000002575801,0.000007348838,9.800893e-7,0.00007630349,0.000001960329,0.09244815,0.005080347,0.001085155,0.004188717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003825228,0.0002584896,0.9470006,0.00002025119,0.0000077757,0.000001388898,0.00002931603,0.00007403595,0.02355208,0.009608669,0.01895451,0.0001103131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98299,0.00001641615,0.008370479,0.005583881,0.0000498476,0.0001144907,0.000008310133,0.00003762186,0.002828988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976946,0.00003967204,0.0007811462,0.001132149,0.00001106476,0.00001638014,0.00001680199,0.000002227267,0.0003059939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06889606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998818448","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.015","title":"Threats, conservation strategies, and prognosis for suckers (Catostomidae) in North America: insights from regional case studies of a diverse family of non-game fishes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Threatened species; Ecology; Outreach; Conservation status; Geography; Habitat destruction; Biology; Environmental resource management; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08100987379091829,"gpt":0.2736533419079663,"spread":0.192643468117048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008445603,0.0001113455,0.0002522867,0.00003590401,0.00008226218,0.000005722437,0.00006453058,0.00007257763,0.000008229352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001165217,0.00008582344,0.00002858896,0.0002017659,0.0007795273,0.0002221753,0.0001102408,0.0000448022,0.000001595687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005426784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001634779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00277683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02335309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992394,0.00004312107,0.0002827495,0.0002510752,0.00007269433,0.0001109346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993644,0.0003096544,0.0001952492,0.00007480311,0.00003645631,0.00001946619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001559465,0.0001233245,0.9957914,0.0000259104,0.00005933856,0.00001722255,0.001042281,0.0001413491,0.001026365,0.0004297044,0.0006366255,0.0005504839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008042042,0.0003581778,0.9868811,0.0000185404,0.00002730259,0.000001498894,0.00606499,0.0001532224,0.00009848632,0.005324228,0.0001720872,0.00009609722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975926,0.0001675812,0.0002257139,0.001326969,0.00002407353,0.0005631666,0.0000274808,0.00001269337,0.00005968268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964818,0.0006353421,0.001730117,0.0009623969,0.000006314272,0.0001107989,0.00006520545,0.000002628145,0.000005407286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02057626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097606878","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.048","title":"Patterns of gastrointestinal bacterial exchange between chimpanzees and humans involved in research and tourism in western Uganda","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Morris Animal Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Antibiotic resistance; Transmission (telecommunications); Zoology; Antibiotics; National park; Bacteria; Ecology; Microbiology; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2345160499590734,"gpt":0.3945283434628284,"spread":0.1600122935037551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006209466,0.00008764111,0.0002245355,0.0001586811,0.00003091993,0.00001356205,0.00007532413,0.0001483908,0.000149809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000530582,0.00007403952,0.0000114379,0.00009944299,0.0001439856,0.00004740046,0.0000709282,0.0001818335,0.000003364606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002634769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009950319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00419194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006881696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988245,0.0002887489,0.0003119552,0.0002486482,0.00005967011,0.0002664943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994876,0.0002877167,0.00006453992,0.00009209591,0.00003714096,0.00003088912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001252251,0.0001046563,0.9851825,0.00001306102,0.000001266568,0.00002194731,0.0001416234,2.314829e-8,0.01363143,0.0003218675,0.00004846122,0.0004080075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009826986,0.0005859052,0.9970934,0.00003119942,0.000002052354,0.000006420543,0.0001139013,0.000001161749,0.0001745,0.0008094585,0.0001318604,0.00006737423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991211,0.00004717548,0.00001438302,0.0003422609,0.00004221703,0.0002192085,0.00003349311,0.00001288997,0.0001672242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996101,0.00001300863,0.00005672388,0.00003450567,0.00008681861,0.00003682821,0.000107734,0.000004121369,0.00005020879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01345693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6336986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966206234","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.002","title":"Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; Alberta Conservation Association; Leuphana Universität Lüneburg; Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España; National Science Foundation; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Advanced Foods and Materials Canada","keywords":"Carnivore; Geography; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Damages; Predation; Political science; Biology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1258545572641339,"gpt":0.3306909016058362,"spread":0.2048363443417023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009475389,0.0003849214,0.001901855,0.00004946279,0.0002043484,0.00002407658,0.0004435282,0.0006884817,0.002933879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001013198,0.0002573803,0.0004222732,0.0005073271,0.0001535774,0.00016093,0.0001843986,0.000396403,0.01121522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002889358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005785854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003241884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001894282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968166,0.0009769782,0.001161895,0.0005797867,0.0002092505,0.0002555322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978701,0.0005013945,0.0009751339,0.0005668469,0.00002576159,0.00006079673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002007532,0.00009662016,0.008844996,0.9324866,0.0001444076,0.000008460497,0.00001128552,9.140231e-7,4.847176e-7,0.001800077,0.0457078,0.01089634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008565229,0.00009640754,0.002780863,0.2719739,0.001626355,0.00002726894,0.000003708291,0.00001132759,1.083309e-8,0.000285976,0.7226354,0.0004730673],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005472226,0.9927547,0.00002551008,0.0003484852,0.0001403374,0.003946869,0.00001407891,0.0001152349,0.002600039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001310595,0.9906068,0.00009175255,0.00364819,0.0000370235,0.0009530381,0.0005439604,0.00002033931,0.004085787],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6769276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064728061","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.019","title":"Second chance for the plains bison","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bison bison; Introgression; Endangered species; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Grassland; Biology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04430881076701486,"gpt":0.2804155328569133,"spread":0.2361067220898985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003183337,0.00007761963,0.00005859393,0.000008335808,0.0001179164,0.000008602286,0.0001314655,0.0001361932,0.00003592345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001516111,0.00004790031,0.00004641355,0.00004250612,0.00008807331,0.000001122449,0.00002862869,0.00004232606,0.000004374839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004236778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000181219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003469861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006715753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994688,0.00001917349,0.000129376,0.0001802343,0.00003947327,0.0001629235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995934,0.0001227268,0.00005049763,0.0001467893,0.00005670257,0.00002986886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00116405,0.0001745175,0.05452898,0.00003321507,0.0001175012,4.138914e-7,0.000145878,0.00009906508,0.7567781,0.1091941,0.02682468,0.05093954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003075853,0.0005327694,0.6076236,0.000002360141,0.00000593059,0.000002719554,0.00005462241,0.00003740368,0.0334763,0.002183611,0.355663,0.0001101069],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7892548,0.0005274481,0.20836,0.00058353,0.0001981315,0.0003047742,0.00001862551,0.00001131007,0.000741313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875848,0.00002192953,0.008968038,0.00218296,0.0003593563,0.0000370783,0.00008706169,0.000005397833,0.0007533454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7233018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1953318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565632709","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.011","title":"Recent increases in human pressure and forest loss threaten many Natural World Heritage Sites","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Biosphere; Geography; National park; World heritage; Natural (archaeology); Environmental protection; Biodiversity; Ecology; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Archaeology; Tourism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03235157782435898,"gpt":0.2254174482817067,"spread":0.1930658704573477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000207952,0.0001138911,0.0001124227,0.00004261977,0.0001490144,0.00002775382,0.0001342185,0.00006184783,0.0007814238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008590879,0.00006764176,0.00002370597,0.0001932051,0.0002749211,0.0001311177,0.0002810084,0.00005446619,0.00003474803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005314893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002444316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008271469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004197889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991589,0.00009140411,0.000160161,0.0002932163,0.0001208334,0.0001754806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996491,0.0001009874,0.00006354574,0.0001257773,0.00001186912,0.00004868834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004124811,0.00005274042,0.9910201,0.000004643415,0.000007549291,0.000006791777,0.00002790679,0.000002255702,0.00403431,0.0001938106,0.0006155405,0.003993102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003973472,0.00004946833,0.9493807,0.00001655046,0.000009509008,0.000001057423,0.00004047783,0.00008020707,0.00007962749,0.000721667,0.04910141,0.0001219566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947196,0.0002978219,0.00001046243,0.003737397,0.00002179133,0.0002507322,0.000009925423,0.00004496415,0.0009073615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996938,0.0002208977,0.00009517243,0.0008372363,0.00002106704,0.00001235557,0.00003028234,0.000003028852,0.001841952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04848587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8556043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165070499","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109175","title":"Global COVID-19 lockdown highlights humans as both threats and custodians of the environment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"COVID-19 impact on air quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nunavut Arctic College; Université du Québec à Rimouski; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Simon Fraser University; McMaster University; Victoria Heart Institute Foundation; Carleton University; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; World Wildlife Fund Canada; University of Manitoba; University of Victoria; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Tula Foundation; University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Ocean Networks Canada Society; Espace pour la vie; Parks Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Red Sea Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology; Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Horizon 2020; Seventh Framework Programme; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Australian Research Council; Natural Environment Research Council; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; South Central Climate Adaptation Science Center; Disney Conservation Fund; California State University Long Beach; Council on Ocean Affairs Science and Technology, California State University; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Science and Technology Major Project; Vlaamse regering; Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund; Provincia Autonoma di Trento; Regione Toscana; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Università di Pisa; Universidad de Costa Rica; Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor; National Major Science and Technology Projects of China; European Regional Development Fund; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Department of Conservation, New Zealand; Ministry of Education, India; Cape Eleuthera Foundation; Labex; King Abdullah University of Science and Technology; Ministry of Environment; Biology Society of South Australia; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Parks Board - Singapore; Ian Potter Foundation; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; European Commission; Sight Research UK; Canada Research Chairs; National Geographic Society; Virginia Marine Resources Commission; Simon Fraser University; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Commission for Environmental Cooperation; Tula Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; University of Tasmania; Hakai Institute; Fundación Charles Darwin; Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação, Tecnologia e Inovação; Save Our Seas Foundation; ArcticNet; David and Elaine Potter Foundation; Department of Environment and Water; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Primate Conservation; National Pork Board; Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS); Australian Institute of Marine Science; Boston University; Fondation Bertarelli; South African National Parks; Liber Ero Foundation; A.G. Leventis Foundation; Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales; Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Pandemic; Custodians; Biodiversity; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Geography; Business; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07475789187892563,"gpt":0.3219177236553838,"spread":0.2471598317764582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003345038,0.0001321453,0.0001595976,0.00000648181,0.0001867245,0.00001913901,0.0001835372,0.000129429,0.002333874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004859784,0.00008328589,0.00006634367,0.0001881513,0.0005563778,0.00007232143,0.0003248538,0.00006552314,0.00007695577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004790873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007884685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001532998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007104832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986172,0.0003212503,0.0002518483,0.0003655913,0.0002561619,0.0001879365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999139,0.0002199028,0.0001304597,0.0003452875,0.000006436906,0.0001588995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002455424,0.0001089182,0.9820793,0.00001020756,0.000008546574,0.000006650539,0.0001384326,0.0001233466,0.009078938,0.005728052,0.001336661,0.001356361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002902879,0.00007754901,0.9207945,0.000004293801,0.00001119804,0.000007156738,0.00005607536,0.00006096057,0.001061747,0.009361041,0.06815839,0.0001167395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739136,0.0001422512,0.0009118268,0.02313977,0.00005345111,0.0002411049,0.00005145335,0.00003303107,0.001513495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854645,0.0001536508,0.0002672767,0.01375984,0.00001225216,0.00001067306,0.0000174811,0.00000314015,0.0003112399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06682173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990626691","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108271","title":"A review of successes, challenges, and lessons from Indigenous protected and conserved areas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporate governance; Legislation; Commit; Indigenous rights; Environmental planning; Political science; Resource (disambiguation); Scale (ratio); Livelihood; Environmental resource management; Business; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1734238575593716,"gpt":0.3023225105514227,"spread":0.1288986529920511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004483072,0.0003129183,0.001059889,0.00005316258,0.0001144288,0.00002156679,0.0002590965,0.0003318186,0.0003168072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002425686,0.0002195646,0.0001179824,0.0002128641,0.0003332708,0.00006393675,0.0005361611,0.0001813323,0.00004368816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006249044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004619609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001555171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002107504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980971,0.0004145012,0.0005130997,0.0006082152,0.0001762131,0.0001909035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986556,0.0003519525,0.0005608113,0.0003197032,0.00003291811,0.00007906046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136741,0.00007950881,0.01706553,0.03851434,0.0001113346,0.000004662426,0.0001210686,3.743373e-8,0.000005389205,0.00003934848,0.0003593047,0.9436858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001635461,0.00009333347,0.09125839,0.01484727,0.0003331862,0.000005154369,0.00003567834,0.000003268779,4.072445e-7,0.00008415324,0.892908,0.0002675705],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006630795,0.9897543,0.00000549614,0.0009605898,0.00004094636,0.002089552,0.000126146,0.00003882416,0.0003533464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00009467623,0.9984999,0.0001638316,0.0006430153,0.00001769621,0.00007549481,0.0004246025,0.000009422986,0.00007133484],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9434182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8953583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979286076","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.008","title":"From hotspots to site protection: Identifying Marine Protected Areas for seabirds around the globe","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Killam Trusts; Northern Ireland Environment Agency","keywords":"Marine protected area; Marine conservation; Seabird; Context (archaeology); Marine spatial planning; Environmental resource management; Sustainability; Citizen science; Key (lock); Marine ecosystem; Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Environmental planning; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Predation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1041457017869004,"gpt":0.2874264044622958,"spread":0.1832807026753954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004615783,0.000138366,0.0001387206,0.00001013281,0.0003081358,0.00004447454,0.0001757001,0.0000832257,0.001006402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005155025,0.00008495193,0.00005809098,0.0002701771,0.00007759268,0.0001684739,0.000506241,0.00009353879,0.0003722427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001488716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004237772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008110973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001143812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989538,0.0001067564,0.0002072366,0.0002729309,0.0001677616,0.0002914679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994836,0.0001265613,0.00009429881,0.0001869376,0.00002692663,0.00008162264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001843361,0.00007693088,0.9486815,0.00001185212,0.0000208343,4.39243e-7,0.0001718694,0.000006423293,0.01730672,0.0001946146,0.003748559,0.02959596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001392935,0.0001115883,0.8834907,0.000006648816,0.00001019412,0.000001540192,0.00004276293,0.0001927946,0.0003568633,0.001164747,0.1143601,0.0001227253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883296,0.00004074532,0.003737495,0.004877334,0.0001410406,0.001959724,0.00001590836,0.00008887645,0.0008092641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929553,0.000009043256,0.003127151,0.00230181,0.0004041988,0.0008911694,0.00003130985,0.000008382172,0.0002716253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1106115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977543966","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.020","title":"Looking beyond the mortality of bycatch: sublethal effects of incidental capture on marine animals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Bycatch; Reproduction; Biology; Population; Organism; Reproductive success; Fishing; Ecology; Marine ecosystem; Fishery; Ecosystem; Medicine; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02674828620316515,"gpt":0.2618757938951587,"spread":0.2351275076919935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005160996,0.00007462737,0.000134005,0.00001084175,0.00004934251,0.00000722297,0.0001934904,0.00008282484,0.001101315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004652471,0.000042584,0.0000433185,0.0001362497,0.0003253597,0.00003960551,0.0002727662,0.0001118586,0.00001079685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002416672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004719867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002519565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000223106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991121,0.000190903,0.0001855414,0.0001568599,0.0002294563,0.0001251736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992673,0.0004014668,0.0001039714,0.0001817639,0.00001538681,0.00003009068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005179676,0.00004503209,0.9629733,0.00001649076,0.000005916623,9.753259e-7,0.00003727398,0.000002834865,0.0290132,0.001717501,0.0002083454,0.005927358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001541069,0.0003177792,0.9869678,0.000002997436,0.000004279548,8.337106e-7,0.0000193551,0.0002650418,0.008508117,0.001615891,0.002092299,0.00005150372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616204,0.000003087976,0.0000681942,0.0004022278,0.00003265123,0.0001958062,0.00000241591,0.000008711839,0.0376665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992588,0.000008842079,0.00008255153,0.0004989708,0.00002017024,0.00001145292,0.00001616259,0.000002744584,0.0001003454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03763836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046548020","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(99)00067-1","title":"Reef classification by coral morphology predicts coral reef conservation value","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Coral reef; Acropora; Reef; Coral reef organizations; Aquaculture of coral; Environmental issues with coral reefs; Coral reef protection; Coral; Resilience of coral reefs; Fishery; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04468478878537022,"gpt":0.2372684703801994,"spread":0.1925836815948292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003449132,0.0002016891,0.0002423386,0.00002086157,0.0002531896,0.00002908728,0.0002018557,0.0002154153,0.003139378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001772135,0.0001586022,0.00005971295,0.000278228,0.0003191234,0.0002280442,0.0001158088,0.0001466859,0.001029172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001476742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001334657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001157296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001224839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983183,0.0002231209,0.0004361095,0.0005002103,0.0002096986,0.0003125842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993343,0.0001364125,0.0001666996,0.0002383721,0.00003391557,0.0000903247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001706755,0.0001227496,0.7996466,0.000005739055,0.0000111418,0.000003769044,0.00003896361,0.000004223994,0.02952585,0.0009822311,0.1563311,0.01315697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000397423,0.0003210941,0.8541325,0.000007978274,0.00001114177,0.00001092623,0.00002964135,0.003971744,0.0002157981,0.001179625,0.1395271,0.0001949923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839171,0.00005734698,0.0002472053,0.007032616,0.0001840389,0.0004491243,0.00004334789,0.0001724448,0.007896778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913782,0.0001493422,0.0004214087,0.003400885,0.00007474436,0.0001020245,0.0004793178,0.000009309269,0.003984781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05448592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149189573","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.041","title":"Dynamics and trends of overwintering colonies of the monarch butterfly in Mexico","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Instituto Carlos Slim de la Salud; World Wildlife Fund; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Monarch butterfly; Overwintering; Danaus; Geography; Population; Butterfly; Ecology; Habitat; Nymphalidae; Population decline; Biology; Lepidoptera genitalia; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05589164324626573,"gpt":0.221199028444879,"spread":0.1653073851986133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001332892,0.00004422434,0.0001078393,0.000005921894,0.00003590443,0.000003744219,0.00007463071,0.00004285381,0.000008797972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007747252,0.00001292242,0.00002463538,0.0001239272,0.000104317,0.00001837507,0.00007259344,0.00003405914,1.630252e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005482405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.911692e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002447897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996296,0.00005273466,0.0001277145,0.00007897914,0.00004492622,0.00006603256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996976,0.0002021591,0.00006291949,0.00001032149,0.00001887136,0.0000081675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003539233,0.00001343342,0.8675117,0.00000257417,0.000001769288,5.58524e-8,0.00001625229,4.336237e-7,0.1197633,0.002472939,0.000009260608,0.0101729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004950091,0.0001830066,0.9955044,0.00001607015,0.000001260016,5.874332e-7,0.00005959002,0.0007200518,0.002495061,0.0006930753,0.000245229,0.00003210606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971254,0.00004403731,0.000001974678,0.002357478,0.0000111583,0.00003223144,0.00002013456,0.000005343932,0.0004022711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997954,0.00003353374,0.00001557828,0.0001061984,0.0000109494,0.000002349055,0.000006379326,1.239459e-7,0.00002950855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1279928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1531216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994505276","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.020","title":"Natural regeneration of forest vegetation on legacy seismic lines in boreal habitats in Alberta’s oil sands region","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Alberta Innovates; Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures; University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","keywords":"Regeneration (biology); Forest regeneration; Disturbance (geology); Taiga; Habitat; Logging; Terrain; Fragmentation (computing); Environmental science; Boreal; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Geography; Physical geography; Geology; Agroforestry; Forestry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04690786298717842,"gpt":0.2622912435023202,"spread":0.2153833805151418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002375199,0.00008890642,0.0001176284,0.00005753619,0.00002788004,0.00001430159,0.00007129167,0.0001074363,0.000001887536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003121396,0.00007006599,0.00002410387,0.0003098304,0.00009319169,0.0001594074,0.00002105612,0.00009820141,0.00002223197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001266349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001840699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007591091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01392267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991449,0.0001159858,0.0002780886,0.0002202948,0.000123932,0.0001168236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995846,0.0001172452,0.000110086,0.0001293297,0.00002359862,0.00003518528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002424491,0.0002107844,0.9191799,0.000009991723,0.000002729028,0.000003792724,0.000646002,0.02056552,0.01383386,0.002302521,0.001217331,0.04178513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004655852,0.0001291337,0.9255125,0.00003058359,0.000001789927,0.000002985275,0.00004711671,0.06933534,0.001397169,0.001975539,0.001006542,0.0000957203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992635,0.00002618047,0.0002439135,0.003291233,0.0000676546,0.0001106615,4.278453e-7,0.00001523341,0.003609665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986135,0.00001576607,0.000626481,0.0004166811,0.00003231675,0.000008027565,0.0001201104,0.000004250176,0.0001628157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04876982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071568548","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00079-9","title":"Birds on organic and conventional farms in Ontario: partitioning effects of habitat and practices on species composition and abundance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Detrended correspondence analysis; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Species richness; Canonical correspondence analysis; Ecology; Population; Geography; Relative species abundance; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03142713596181718,"gpt":0.2558912706006906,"spread":0.2244641346388734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001393298,0.00005757431,0.00008710291,0.00001986863,0.00009986786,0.000009702645,0.00001715764,0.00005129738,0.00006582236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001448359,0.00004593841,0.000006643494,0.00005361388,0.0002568619,0.00009300604,0.00002926516,0.00007193445,0.000004525549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004293884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003487231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006219972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03403704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995544,0.00006888605,0.0001103648,0.0001507741,0.00005049058,0.00006506065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993502,0.0004784575,0.0001195781,0.00002765493,0.000007573818,0.00001645886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007322462,0.00006192212,0.9823524,0.000007371945,0.000004307028,0.00000219399,0.0001052509,0.00001400326,0.01365034,0.003603585,0.00001073603,0.0001147058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003478131,0.0003643152,0.9960541,0.0000299555,0.000004141314,0.000004251131,0.00003686517,0.0003100935,0.0003023857,0.002370332,0.0001242402,0.0000515816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980787,0.00004795943,0.0000674334,0.001162434,0.00002973203,0.0001280048,8.99848e-7,0.000007873005,0.0004769403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991169,0.0001583417,0.0002111211,0.0004327745,0.000004000256,0.00001166244,0.00001048682,0.000001378504,0.00005335689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03341505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105015789","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.022","title":"Spatial organization and food habits of jaguars (Panthera onca) in a floodplain forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Jaguar; Territoriality; Panthera; Carnivore; Predation; Population; Geography; Ecology; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Apex predator; Habitat; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01784227845588324,"gpt":0.2116241507866087,"spread":0.1937818723307254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004957201,0.00007722053,0.0001108409,0.00003600579,0.00005581838,0.000004999617,0.00006783034,0.000164073,0.0002016013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004355608,0.00006591428,0.00001192288,0.0003011083,0.0001673174,0.0001071063,0.00005215177,0.00006962828,0.0000152318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004409187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001032387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003863021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006193112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992692,0.00006979234,0.0002579497,0.0001838323,0.00008020434,0.0001390034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995695,0.0002041349,0.0001043583,0.00007213538,0.00001889886,0.00003092204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003807109,0.00005402564,0.9905428,0.000002642697,0.000002659505,0.000001111192,0.00009036338,0.00001861353,0.005717945,0.00089484,0.00005949305,0.002577447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000353049,0.0002558553,0.9962689,0.000006082062,0.000002862686,0.000003333538,0.00004116387,0.0004910547,0.001195283,0.001106148,0.0001983227,0.00007793606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995204,0.00001367825,0.00351128,0.0006805771,0.0000475348,0.0002017875,0.000002767818,0.0000214363,0.0003169421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986358,0.00001230063,0.0005911219,0.0006865865,0.00001762057,0.000004822287,0.00003401923,0.000003996158,0.00001371471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005806809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3455902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461412668","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.024","title":"Loss of seed dispersal before the loss of seed dispersers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Frugivore; Biological dispersal; Seed dispersal; Threatened species; Biology; Population; Seed dispersal syndrome; Defaunation; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Small population size; Allee effect; Ecosystem; Habitat; Disturbance (geology); Seed predation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01859137760397353,"gpt":0.2365651311721663,"spread":0.2179737535681928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002404789,0.00007529176,0.0001272338,0.00001017583,0.00008573377,0.000001843982,0.0001465074,0.0000862723,0.0001841272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002424173,0.00003378159,0.00005224916,0.0001125806,0.001160645,0.00006653465,0.00009897128,0.00004074572,0.00003834359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003464301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007934581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001301644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004495661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993586,0.00008538074,0.0002107531,0.0001451945,0.00009052813,0.0001095671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994638,0.0002309887,0.0001443363,0.000117694,0.0000227615,0.00002041526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004294764,0.00003490759,0.9849871,0.000003070466,0.00001483885,5.304979e-7,0.0002214415,0.00001239416,0.009731427,0.004702659,0.000069205,0.0001794333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002426371,0.0001449618,0.9966593,0.000007316661,0.000005549562,8.378955e-7,0.0001652635,0.00038251,0.000377706,0.001702879,0.0002634499,0.00004763111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924529,0.00001688903,0.0006207177,0.005496328,0.00006173768,0.0001436597,0.00001751151,0.00001340896,0.001176806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993559,0.00001864874,0.0001036032,0.0002977657,0.00001048427,0.00001095896,0.000006881055,0.000002386766,0.0001933587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01167211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4276445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095774070","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.03.018","title":"Constraints and reinforcement on adaptation under climate change: Selection of genetically correlated traits","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Population; Trait; Environmental change; Lag; Selection (genetic algorithm); Extinction (optical mineralogy); Frequency-dependent selection; Ecology; Genetic load; Adaptation (eye); Environmental gradient; Population size; Biology; Evolutionary biology; Habitat; Computer science; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1027307018600406,"gpt":0.2685281674915789,"spread":0.1657974656315384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003769011,0.00009212201,0.0001070028,0.00001529599,0.0001084224,0.0000100906,0.00003587531,0.0001576153,0.0001319599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005130218,0.0000373704,0.00003122172,0.0001860077,0.0001360243,0.00005663275,0.00001509797,0.00007694889,0.000005629436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001811333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003160239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006474285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007485167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991966,0.0000460829,0.0002544716,0.0002264537,0.0001138657,0.0001625446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995995,0.0001068986,0.0001173166,0.00001834235,0.0001090745,0.00004885919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003224513,0.00007890438,0.0501774,0.000004372688,0.000005563167,6.379416e-7,0.00004737806,0.00001290585,0.7030282,0.007835212,0.00001183056,0.2384751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013782,0.001168785,0.9906466,0.00001593917,0.000009331678,0.000005407346,0.0002030493,0.0003788532,0.007002888,0.0001733567,0.0001674004,0.00009057875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998435,0.00002797762,0.0003414623,0.000518339,0.00006296379,0.0002961663,0.000009119553,0.00004584197,0.000263085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991998,0.00009849972,0.0001656398,0.0003535779,0.00008851085,0.00000888276,0.00006901755,5.824405e-7,0.00001550991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9404692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1523921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140988450","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.020","title":"Effects of habitat loss, habitat configuration and matrix composition on declining wetland species","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Habitat; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Threatened species; Landscape ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Habitat fragmentation; Environmental science; Fragmentation (computing); Turtle (robot); Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01882434792921067,"gpt":0.2332186452139441,"spread":0.2143942972847334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001519836,0.0001173782,0.0001522872,0.00002582447,0.0001126272,0.00002152777,0.00006810317,0.0001617387,0.0002611594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001688685,0.00008676942,0.00003053885,0.00009566844,0.0003310564,0.0001859528,0.00003863189,0.00008338832,0.0001735235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003143662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004714603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009304467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003637007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991413,0.0001556672,0.0002437893,0.000232371,0.00009773196,0.0001290979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991168,0.0005792502,0.0001488345,0.00008510819,0.0000275343,0.00004249042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006394227,0.00004056415,0.6526836,0.00001076464,0.000005206445,9.075764e-7,0.00002973064,0.000007095766,0.343391,0.001973425,0.0007058622,0.001087947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003717929,0.000352814,0.9678283,0.00002325138,0.000008163948,0.000002840213,0.0000175356,0.0003471491,0.02752535,0.002840859,0.0005747765,0.0001071512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959897,0.00004834408,0.0006975771,0.001964381,0.00008434325,0.0004100246,0.00000323766,0.00003892808,0.000763486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980087,0.00004948839,0.000653718,0.001023443,0.0000280594,0.00004361057,0.00007147898,0.00000373931,0.0001177482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3158656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3538354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546792435","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.039","title":"Optimizing land use decision-making to sustain Brazilian agricultural profits, biodiversity and ecosystem services","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; 3M Foundation; Nature Conservancy; Dow Chemical Company","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Sustainability; Biodiversity; Business; Agriculture; Land use; Environmental resource management; Landscape planning; Profit (economics); Habitat; Agricultural productivity; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0854526160154626,"gpt":0.2177775218792759,"spread":0.1323249058638133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003086979,0.000100388,0.0001718594,0.00005794892,0.0001280007,0.00007342346,0.0000888613,0.0001002978,0.0001138439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001257168,0.0000689009,0.00003306975,0.00006764854,0.00002361739,0.0004003943,0.0001007472,0.0000306566,0.000320457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001400019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003067913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009122815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001226998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999195,0.00002180507,0.0002828254,0.0003276342,0.00001950128,0.0001532692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994775,0.0001948542,0.0001518233,0.00009907239,0.00001654502,0.0000602287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002426304,0.00001042259,0.9957228,0.00000723495,0.000008498568,5.51151e-7,0.0000979851,0.00001759325,0.0002038396,0.002247261,0.0001426102,0.001516881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002710433,0.00006300626,0.9950983,0.00003925046,0.000002194416,0.000001704015,0.0001574448,0.0001968648,0.00003206396,0.001246512,0.002748475,0.0001431518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958324,0.00008840401,0.002044694,0.001391501,0.00008622911,0.0002551681,0.0001538554,0.00003152154,0.0001161944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965344,0.0000802693,0.002617412,0.000649311,0.00002767248,0.000009011014,0.00002337363,0.000002905182,0.00005566607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002605865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4118933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046389321","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.001","title":"Range fidelity: The missing link between caribou decline and habitat alteration?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Université du Québec à Rimouski; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Geography; Predation; Home range; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03607624438249423,"gpt":0.2630641670988499,"spread":0.2269879227163557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006938886,0.00009349141,0.0001024236,0.00001075328,0.0003817617,0.00005050621,0.0001277348,0.0001790797,0.0003235527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005952055,0.00005888065,0.0000258418,0.0001103017,0.0003595143,0.0001588366,0.0001226465,0.00022767,0.00006354947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001641043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001146056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002759473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001058557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991834,0.0001344866,0.0002198683,0.0002265301,0.00009307815,0.0001426189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991499,0.0005345211,0.00008551087,0.0001583572,0.00001999318,0.0000517075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001094351,0.000006281885,0.9764602,9.86638e-7,0.000003447643,5.394577e-7,0.0000359789,0.000001863138,0.003732706,0.0005368394,0.0009265756,0.0182836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001640473,0.0000476868,0.9695029,0.000001836127,0.000009530017,0.000003270143,0.000008004403,0.001046569,0.000110967,0.00906964,0.01995258,0.00008301448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.901356,0.00001810124,0.0009810493,0.09701005,0.0001170235,0.0001911625,0.000006524992,0.00003982981,0.0002802804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873266,0.000009146788,0.001577354,0.01069961,0.0002337477,0.0000227202,0.00007223229,0.000003516751,0.00005502667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08631045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3542675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081767525","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.033","title":"Browsing down our natural heritage: Deer impacts on vegetation structure and songbird populations across an island archipelago","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Burke Museum, University of Washington; Washington State University","keywords":"Ecology; Archipelago; Herbivore; Vegetation (pathology); Understory; Geography; Songbird; Woodland; Biological dispersal; Predation; Biology; Population; Canopy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02855781367390778,"gpt":0.2856821427280558,"spread":0.2571243290541479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002536786,0.0001549416,0.0001269822,0.0000227751,0.000416383,0.0000765016,0.0001109866,0.0002588687,0.0001214374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003317059,0.0001190215,0.00002780638,0.0001402363,0.0001480466,0.000436647,0.00005825277,0.0003687621,0.00004350033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003168126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001078896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002096975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0137135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989394,0.0001263826,0.0002078456,0.0003451476,0.000128451,0.0002527528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995208,0.00007979325,0.0001161805,0.0001668047,0.00002268834,0.00009370303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006602755,0.00004027601,0.9488702,0.000002926858,0.000003555579,0.000001698539,0.0003519303,0.00005552622,0.04603217,0.0006374916,0.0001604123,0.003777789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003622789,0.0001511145,0.9911771,0.00000566139,0.000005822926,0.00001487917,0.0001250111,0.002868594,0.0003017243,0.004629769,0.0001928851,0.0001651299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968677,0.00001054091,0.00009440598,0.002260857,0.0003785404,0.0002316456,0.00001683382,0.00007258658,0.00006696032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953214,0.000002462353,0.001903767,0.002427239,0.0001082035,0.00001036684,0.0001843958,0.000007800449,0.00003439244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04573045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7652456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160077014","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.020","title":"Burning biodiversity: Woody biomass use by commercial and subsistence groups in western Uganda’s forests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Agroforestry; Subsistence agriculture; Woodland; Biomass (ecology); Charcoal; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Natural resource; Business; Geography; Environmental protection; Ecology; Agriculture; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03558968522655429,"gpt":0.2128272307141494,"spread":0.1772375454875951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015374,0.0001075897,0.0001060713,0.00002094533,0.0001115182,0.00003785476,0.0000855676,0.00012261,0.00008981847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004030571,0.00008735081,0.0000186437,0.0001157931,0.0002313089,0.0002987443,0.000117136,0.00007208727,0.00004632409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007460329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001856864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006585559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008340975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992422,0.00007628154,0.0001443159,0.0002334089,0.0001035247,0.000200247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997107,0.00009479787,0.00005940245,0.0000808659,0.000001979557,0.00005223205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003029749,0.00005236309,0.9859355,0.000001293572,0.000001312315,0.000006055638,0.00002798103,0.00006293041,0.01273662,0.0000286276,0.0007238226,0.0003932015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003115376,0.00007576402,0.9940681,0.000005451305,0.000003147936,0.000002608126,0.00001451214,0.00006854158,0.0005387898,0.0001357772,0.004649847,0.0001258991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986964,0.00003388112,0.0001059872,0.0008344153,0.00002622337,0.00008587836,0.00001259942,0.00002647693,0.0001780924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988551,0.00003126117,0.0001330189,0.0007452668,0.00001070627,0.000004133331,0.0001094691,0.000002349837,0.0001087108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01219783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}