{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"6ddf4441cc0b","filters":{"venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W845056165","doi":"","title":"The Debates About Same-Sex Marriage in Canada and the United States: Controversy Over the Evolution of a Fundamental Social Institution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Social institution; Political science; Same sex; Sociology; Genealogy; Gender studies; Law; Social science; History","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008276374304678785,"gpt":0.2106227789109247,"spread":0.2023464046062459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01401805,0.000254311,0.001060659,0.002026885,0.0504012,0.01717351,0.004932649,0.01728145,0.005131099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03150697,0.0005058576,0.0007049785,0.003662026,0.06682499,0.005658392,0.006047614,0.02170749,0.0002074768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1170913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2579103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880475,0.002689909,0.0002972401,0.0009454489,0.003286201,0.004733653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803273,0.008075915,0.0008884015,0.0006011156,0.005754306,0.004352964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003513638,0.00002583415,0.002007997,0.00002450179,0.00001200624,0.0001277823,0.02494757,0.000178904,0.00008467798,0.9556326,0.01072692,0.006195934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002245925,0.00006538135,0.03876832,0.001307546,0.0001805342,0.0003068411,0.1880616,0.001783323,0.001120627,0.341069,0.4267934,0.000318669],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1846043,0.008283133,0.001563764,0.54928,0.0009736618,0.00006653015,0.000263095,0.00002479295,0.2549408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439712,0.002299854,0.0004933773,0.04308691,0.0003070047,0.00002855412,0.00004699676,0.0000264468,0.00973974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1170913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8495607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550600082","doi":"","title":"The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: Law and Policy Considerations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Meaning (existential); Law; Sociology; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Gender studies; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Jane Adolphe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01853885757025264,"gpt":0.2344385148810098,"spread":0.2158996573107571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007104295,0.0003627579,0.0006101659,0.002335011,0.04120536,0.01277393,0.004682405,0.02097608,0.006693862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02000551,0.0005482438,0.0007145021,0.004063612,0.0172729,0.004507616,0.004926934,0.01389987,0.0002976106],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1428067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2980764,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877208,0.001506874,0.0002569354,0.000707458,0.003503629,0.006304266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886925,0.005117291,0.0004948308,0.0002036842,0.003145252,0.002346438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002553941,0.00002593873,0.003243939,0.0001331678,0.00001292994,0.001069097,0.01206616,0.0004297303,0.000197878,0.9162657,0.0535054,0.01302465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001066867,0.00005084497,0.01780142,0.001965585,0.0001571387,0.0009761222,0.06722191,0.003189656,0.000683286,0.1949485,0.7125942,0.0003046605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04233275,0.02033673,0.0009418023,0.7557887,0.0009365372,0.0000822025,0.0001825282,0.00003193314,0.1793667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7224693,0.02081736,0.001339959,0.2111604,0.0007460677,0.00009355295,0.0001092177,0.00003028075,0.04323391],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1428067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W783605720","doi":"","title":"The Effect of the United States Supreme Court's Decisions During the Last Quarter of the Nineteenth Century on Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Original jurisdiction; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher B. Chaney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00941201857367935,"gpt":0.2308099474662531,"spread":0.2213979288925738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00372925,0.0002434208,0.0004884888,0.002548552,0.01517428,0.008322548,0.00110961,0.005895357,0.01210095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01622841,0.0005706966,0.0005358837,0.002483601,0.007855503,0.002314078,0.003600167,0.008763802,0.000901994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01476356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007187909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2964848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5920641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966305,0.0007357958,0.000110486,0.0003489876,0.0005996302,0.001574662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936474,0.003108878,0.0007477021,0.0002053945,0.001354097,0.0009364478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001129301,0.0007362409,0.05465026,0.0001979192,0.0002115428,0.003227589,0.06395381,0.002196929,0.002663382,0.6975105,0.1142303,0.05929223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002561632,0.0002773059,0.3830923,0.00100086,0.0003045487,0.0005421871,0.05181888,0.0008530671,0.003649531,0.03871145,0.5192659,0.0002277457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.6386434,0.003497811,0.0002364598,0.0326882,0.0009291691,0.00003388042,0.0006860406,0.00001871025,0.3232662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723316,0.0009119011,0.0001063263,0.008505903,0.0003219976,0.00001797024,0.0001244684,0.00003035865,0.01764948],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2964848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5895182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785144732","doi":"","title":"Legalization of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Foundational Issues and Implications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Assisted suicide; Jurisdiction; Legalization; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial opinion; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Psychology; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Sean T. Murphy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2120342541438214,"gpt":0.4729004329198958,"spread":0.2608661787760744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02709338,0.0005607955,0.001172623,0.003874552,0.01809177,0.01451173,0.006145864,0.01507227,0.003551706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04992961,0.0004775114,0.0005969774,0.003606782,0.1064699,0.01613508,0.009331178,0.01664157,0.0002234291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06974749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09324241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4433641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4305274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9803524,0.009013196,0.0009282899,0.001217203,0.004843665,0.00364527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9232776,0.05666729,0.00401035,0.001556535,0.010875,0.003613238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000169466,0.00003442072,0.000942014,0.0002897184,0.000008823127,0.000582397,0.01348836,0.0002490988,0.0000382619,0.9575832,0.006682113,0.02008455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002407741,0.00004664973,0.006149167,0.004387713,0.00002068139,0.0009721767,0.06863861,0.0007348484,0.0001932333,0.8265643,0.09216914,0.00009958881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02515691,0.09366598,0.005057272,0.7419477,0.003047134,0.0000948474,0.0001030643,0.00002990347,0.1308971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8662223,0.04691806,0.002570129,0.07454894,0.003524199,0.000172486,0.00007924015,0.000036144,0.005928404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4433641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8815668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589306392","doi":"","title":"Parent, Child, Husband, Wife: When Recognition Fails, Tragedy Ensues","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Wife; Narrative; Confusion; Promiscuity; Drama; Social recognition; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Literature; Social psychology; Political science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Scott T FitzGibbon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0659089534730652,"gpt":0.2354986400982929,"spread":0.1695896866252277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001866527,0.0001560675,0.0002239026,0.0002937241,0.005595645,0.002947079,0.0004761622,0.002217276,0.00381221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006281497,0.0001698368,0.0001100886,0.0004301434,0.006722557,0.003290703,0.003151212,0.003292912,0.0007345183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002535292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006330658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03828996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04191594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981993,0.0008891957,0.00006309676,0.0001268282,0.0003731179,0.0003484293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990671,0.0003133319,0.0001851317,0.00004701819,0.0001641998,0.0002232697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002761716,0.00003926178,0.01317117,0.00007748261,0.00001009024,0.01565843,0.3575521,0.0001593979,0.0006508364,0.4981697,0.05404085,0.06044318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001177929,0.0000898014,0.01292621,0.0005358687,0.00001762958,0.02774054,0.3865642,0.0003326112,0.000865782,0.04971368,0.5211333,0.00006866715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.349664,0.0103814,0.01661557,0.1578602,0.00214211,0.00008486075,0.0001544078,0.0001492183,0.4629482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699451,0.002080565,0.001032824,0.005142624,0.0001070311,0.00002024574,0.00002460773,0.00002100756,0.02162593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03828996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0761342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}