{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":52,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":52,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"dbaf8de7cf19","filters":{"venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2069475098","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2010.524770","title":"The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval Philosophy and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Medieval philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; History of philosophy; Classics; History","authors":[{"name":"Paul Helm","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04619760930760119,"gpt":0.2282949709015021,"spread":0.1820973615939009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001697563,0.0002547074,0.0005006051,0.0001312494,0.0008508384,0.00003331538,0.001149787,0.0001269697,0.0009056487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003988645,0.0001886759,0.0006506282,0.00002726575,0.004809782,0.0002416599,0.00008270999,0.001100025,0.00002037689],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003451519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004805162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001720743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002579426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997712,0.0001689675,0.0009158103,0.0002454834,0.0005623509,0.000395461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968479,0.0009324109,0.0009349079,0.0004895111,0.0006250294,0.0001702392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003225905,0.0001883407,0.000002665074,0.0001045589,0.0002080338,0.00002354629,0.003710154,0.000001268631,0.0005866367,0.7920859,0.1974775,0.005288767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008240713,0.0002483224,0.00001667323,0.00008685236,0.0001295521,0.0003720709,0.00010621,0.00002285304,0.00001864937,0.2665365,0.7314721,0.0001661377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01156014,0.1130531,0.00006452599,0.009978535,0.1247358,0.00102021,0.0003042352,0.00008058157,0.7392029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456943,0.001161698,0.00006545921,0.0008840266,0.01308729,0.00004586307,0.00001076325,0.0000788568,0.03897169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9341342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065711826","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.679779","title":"Hume and Ancient Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Literature; Ancient philosophy; Classics; History; Art","authors":[{"name":"Peter Loptson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0851335377081105,"gpt":0.2495663736007044,"spread":0.1644328358925939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005845007,0.0001843343,0.0003052562,0.00007805489,0.0007034586,0.00006784339,0.0002914701,0.0000602182,0.0009176871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001053122,0.0001513231,0.0003207826,0.00002502514,0.00109516,0.0003830004,0.00006161109,0.0003759705,0.00002422218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001619882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004050614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003506278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004688103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984936,0.0000817843,0.0004619847,0.0001629387,0.0003392881,0.0004604412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988526,0.0002502473,0.0002230035,0.0001685851,0.0001754658,0.0003301448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007822183,0.0003976208,0.00002904276,0.0001093397,0.0001035087,0.000005874412,0.002852091,6.146783e-7,0.00003709354,0.9400042,0.05201632,0.004366033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005571392,0.0001202859,0.0001312848,0.0001162251,0.0000863033,0.0002618224,0.00006956985,0.000007385438,0.000006886657,0.2593493,0.7391319,0.0001619098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05392516,0.4486018,0.0002863298,0.02587701,0.05664835,0.001641016,0.0009263188,0.0001781204,0.4119159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795703,0.0007292765,0.00009537027,0.002448526,0.01131061,0.00002275227,0.000007857435,0.00003907859,0.005776273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9256451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001579879","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2019.1664980","title":"Kant’s lectures on metaphysics: a critical guide","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Relation (database); Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Damian Melamedoff-Vosters","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1114586155937869,"gpt":0.2807317843998352,"spread":0.1692731688060483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004722314,0.0001647381,0.0003281799,0.00004894129,0.0006835427,0.0001022725,0.0004825811,0.00006205013,0.0008047226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008693278,0.000136715,0.0005064657,0.00002344347,0.001215003,0.0001552114,0.00003952456,0.0007535829,0.00002909945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001032563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001355167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000357497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001471309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986196,0.0001135002,0.0004342252,0.000203604,0.0003967769,0.0002323588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983304,0.0008297087,0.00017251,0.0001504853,0.0003284175,0.0001884536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001619594,0.0001312037,7.847456e-8,0.00007564049,0.0001202138,0.00004637272,0.003804922,0.00001551388,0.00009689755,0.9311388,0.06118562,0.003222777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000306143,0.0002589914,7.946318e-7,0.00008248344,0.00006889674,0.00005149286,0.00006146549,0.00005222205,0.00001514024,0.5369906,0.4620099,0.0001018355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001884295,0.07275093,0.002248912,0.2478857,0.02154907,0.0009569534,0.0008116953,0.0002133947,0.6516991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746215,0.0002389413,0.00008144522,0.01636984,0.007373002,0.00001589406,0.000003925723,0.00004630744,0.001249132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8811148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007126587","doi":"10.1080/09608781003643618","title":"The Ontological Argument from Descartes to Hegel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Ontological argument; Epistemology; Humanity; Theology; Philosophy of religion","authors":[{"name":"Charles P. Rodger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0536098042117221,"gpt":0.2376220770187749,"spread":0.1840122728070528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004407962,0.0001393718,0.0002257129,0.00003184551,0.00144279,0.0001749195,0.0006249439,0.00005697888,0.0006599979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002214722,0.00009042444,0.0003506535,0.00001784585,0.0008550413,0.000124927,0.00005622854,0.0005983243,0.00003692486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005930245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001630295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001592707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988332,0.00005755139,0.0003946146,0.0001721759,0.0002950388,0.000247378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985045,0.0007127473,0.000192867,0.0002394917,0.0001955097,0.0001548888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001924853,0.0002456923,0.000005614029,0.000008110278,0.0001288755,0.00002439539,0.002756643,0.000002616817,0.0004615701,0.8172802,0.1417583,0.03713553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002682673,0.000103002,0.00007836139,0.00002994442,0.00003711419,0.0000485627,0.00007995912,0.0000100791,0.00001698131,0.4018131,0.5974296,0.00008501302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2650767,0.06640543,0.0004874477,0.1264229,0.1201807,0.002703159,0.001197485,0.0002497451,0.4172765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827777,0.0001252304,0.0002157181,0.001334091,0.007865576,0.00004366968,0.000004563881,0.00002441284,0.007609066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.717701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059453367","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.664025","title":"Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Dialectic; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Critical philosophy; Reflexive pronoun","authors":[{"name":"Brian A. Chance","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06562803257129741,"gpt":0.23684473839375,"spread":0.1712167058224526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001500791,0.00009701783,0.0002005952,0.00002962269,0.0009907465,0.0000310789,0.0003479823,0.00003926543,0.0001671044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001055979,0.00005387044,0.0002520398,0.00001657423,0.002346273,0.000121773,0.00004067636,0.0004021198,0.000001673598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008592556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001074966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002685354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007941611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989397,0.0001384958,0.0003905052,0.00007029259,0.0002875625,0.0001734357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990407,0.0004093653,0.0002542242,0.0001219796,0.0001136109,0.00006010205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001481301,0.0001456574,0.00000664239,0.00007329653,0.0001332059,5.320401e-7,0.04971956,8.087009e-7,0.0001001929,0.9435339,0.000692352,0.005445698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001699537,0.00004132202,0.0002523354,0.0002056546,0.0001601215,0.0001878117,0.0006343927,0.00001102282,0.00005068858,0.8375746,0.1590606,0.000121888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3583077,0.2673559,0.0007876459,0.03457384,0.05000979,0.003102025,0.0002474041,0.00006435512,0.2855513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970545,0.0001527199,0.00003492067,0.000440916,0.00128263,0.00001407876,5.243969e-7,0.00001614317,0.001003535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6387468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8644942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986418568","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2010.502359","title":"Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Monad (category theory); Philosophy; Epistemology; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Richard T. W. Arthur","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05040132283498604,"gpt":0.2228933352059956,"spread":0.1724920123710095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005957339,0.0001353737,0.0002365899,0.0000869674,0.001186234,0.00008009061,0.0007106932,0.00005709822,0.0009519231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001166155,0.0001179838,0.000320167,0.00003911287,0.001367319,0.0003752857,0.00001926815,0.0006589541,0.00002887971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001697142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001244407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001307719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004715243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987163,0.00003377459,0.0004092569,0.000188151,0.000390495,0.0002620546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988181,0.0001807454,0.000283023,0.0002297298,0.0003387399,0.0001496778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000545316,0.0001810338,0.000005135025,0.00002848311,0.00003332422,0.00002744611,0.004947205,0.000002929673,0.00114472,0.7971027,0.1912255,0.005247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003320105,0.00008499774,0.00002855129,0.00003255209,0.00002837367,0.0001987933,0.00004791392,0.00002989683,0.00001174017,0.2029816,0.7960864,0.0001371569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04066214,0.03545067,0.0005267097,0.00692752,0.09906598,0.0008427389,0.0002698849,0.0001479694,0.8161064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553316,0.0001597376,0.0001769461,0.000539028,0.005234517,0.0000173401,0.000002467097,0.00002802419,0.03851031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9146695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337735366","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1154007","title":"Materialism in the mainstream of early German philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft","keywords":"Materialism; Mainstream; German; Philosophy; German philosophy; Epistemology; Theology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Corey W. Dyck","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06148565831719774,"gpt":0.241086954209271,"spread":0.1796012958920732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009519654,0.0001494579,0.000305073,0.0001349793,0.0004524405,0.00004936838,0.000963676,0.00005246797,0.0003771671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009360919,0.00008697237,0.0003020373,0.00005417471,0.001475997,0.0003783105,0.00003407574,0.0002056547,0.00001319581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002385922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009148031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002124421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005951636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983224,0.0001505571,0.0006266786,0.0001812073,0.000462877,0.0002562569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987259,0.0003025504,0.0004296638,0.0002804988,0.0001933926,0.00006798538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002340495,0.0003855142,0.00001550358,0.00008816549,0.00004829868,0.00005222572,0.0210704,0.000001322864,0.001197432,0.9278166,0.03910844,0.009982086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000939141,0.0003358432,0.0001754967,0.0003224521,0.00003652168,0.0001541693,0.00008380396,0.000001823675,0.00002354198,0.5444108,0.453354,0.0001624141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.429568,0.02726068,0.0003411578,0.0392501,0.04327822,0.002374167,0.001290422,0.0001047301,0.4565325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938254,0.00018711,0.00002991017,0.000438775,0.002296489,0.00002217455,0.000001206323,0.00001965649,0.003179247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5642574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5438372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229017849","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2060181","title":"On the significance of A. A. Robb’s philosophy of time, especially in relation to Bertrand Russell’s","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Relation (database); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Theory of relativity; Minkowski space; Theoretical physics; Physics; Mathematical physics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Richard T. W. Arthur","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04790631278482065,"gpt":0.2185602732257187,"spread":0.170653960440898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001363542,0.0001422191,0.0003481835,0.0002644458,0.000900605,0.00002035994,0.0008228084,0.00002994506,0.001473723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001295708,0.0001244006,0.0002815482,0.0001178818,0.0009608538,0.0001988108,0.00005429587,0.000442969,0.000007369931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003989564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002067943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000142763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009545975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980636,0.0001783239,0.00070175,0.0002122032,0.0006530418,0.0001910766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983635,0.0004909181,0.0006390419,0.0002470391,0.0001977548,0.00006177636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009977317,0.0007133523,0.000005168799,0.00009536119,0.00006992416,0.00001734129,0.02406808,0.003520236,0.002801727,0.8886724,0.0773685,0.001670196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001128448,0.001400369,0.0001671852,0.0003210416,0.0000621728,0.00005693701,0.0003769645,0.000119238,0.0000854587,0.5861263,0.409887,0.0002689427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1824805,0.02186203,0.0002174112,0.03527384,0.01683946,0.004381186,0.001591611,0.00006350346,0.7372904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932653,0.00005815918,0.00004844872,0.0006466095,0.0007051712,0.00005954979,0.000003847304,0.00002350299,0.005189377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8107848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016777474","doi":"10.1080/0960878032000058473","title":"The World as Representation: Schopenhauer's Arguments for Transcendental Idealism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Transcendental idealism; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Politics; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Douglas McDermid","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05727256063038989,"gpt":0.2804476096165112,"spread":0.2231750489861213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093738,0.0001709141,0.0002602815,0.00008259046,0.002445202,0.000341768,0.000521811,0.00003980795,0.001631473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001433756,0.0001349583,0.0005295729,0.00003694059,0.0005382519,0.0003513567,0.00001447333,0.0003315302,0.0000358038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002215503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001723006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001403192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001139549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983748,0.0001143674,0.0005803384,0.0002129428,0.0003946186,0.000322934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985488,0.0004042299,0.0003609546,0.0002365105,0.0003289852,0.0001205047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002215132,0.0001134398,0.000004295011,0.00003764366,0.0001958564,0.00001099035,0.003567073,0.000004400217,0.00007616088,0.3698691,0.621289,0.004610551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001777308,0.0001308372,0.00001333013,0.0001043352,0.0001171285,0.0002342782,0.001255749,0.00000621159,0.00008420929,0.1037396,0.8923746,0.0001624861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.008700036,0.2037145,0.0005918645,0.009365962,0.05017307,0.004126357,0.0005043231,0.0001026123,0.7227213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4534221,0.00363299,0.0004188582,0.001966705,0.005366753,0.0003395957,0.00003004077,0.0001232758,0.5346997],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.444722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908726607","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2018.1537256","title":"Patriarchal power as unjust: tyranny in seventeenth-century Venice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Power (physics); Politics; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Moral philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Marguerite Deslauriers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05225700864332328,"gpt":0.2552111298935706,"spread":0.2029541212502474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007233087,0.0001386982,0.0003200733,0.00008081712,0.0005774781,0.00002754937,0.0002740795,0.00005984673,0.001057375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007579249,0.000129308,0.0003365513,0.00004131639,0.0003303962,0.0001541644,0.00003299102,0.000433911,0.00005323383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000904215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001482557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006524762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002878484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998565,0.00009689293,0.0004489771,0.0002398515,0.0003498161,0.0002994343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991171,0.0001145525,0.0002644095,0.0001805788,0.0002280143,0.00009535011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001158932,0.001907045,0.0002474391,0.001043152,0.000616504,0.000110848,0.4196696,0.00004177297,0.0000719789,0.1409399,0.4009715,0.03322135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009636681,0.0002991642,0.0001299844,0.0001034139,0.00003215027,0.0001100786,0.005826893,0.00000340428,5.818039e-7,0.008429369,0.98395,0.0001513292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.184579,0.5857719,0.00002008014,0.009086378,0.07149499,0.001918724,0.000193613,0.00008161331,0.1468537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9342098,0.01276,0.00002188837,0.0008304918,0.003480894,0.00002955664,0.000006478716,0.00004523469,0.04861572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7496307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332652228","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2014.946470","title":"The Philosophy of Praxis: Marx, Lukács, and the Frankfurt School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Columbia College; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Agnes Judit Vashegyi MacDonald","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02640576270109966,"gpt":0.2739537506377253,"spread":0.2475479879366256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00724861,0.0001754418,0.0004145296,0.0001221028,0.002766336,0.0001110826,0.001089147,0.0001304217,0.0001176411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003662683,0.0001126014,0.0004726082,0.0003066621,0.006497096,0.0002426629,0.00008611769,0.0006536994,0.00000738151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000143052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001891263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002083531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004382686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968821,0.00117463,0.0006744437,0.0002125922,0.0006867475,0.0003694638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942567,0.004250257,0.000475876,0.0003613739,0.0004295166,0.0002262528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005251188,0.00007767199,0.00001855106,0.00005457238,0.0001066003,0.000002985544,0.00153948,0.000003795901,0.00001862624,0.97097,0.010429,0.01625354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001072872,0.00008716062,0.00005127822,0.0001251804,0.00008232926,0.00005627089,0.0001973342,0.00001978706,0.000004631565,0.5925049,0.4057039,0.000094387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006988248,0.2452191,0.001968707,0.168622,0.01670713,0.003152367,0.0001649382,0.0001078774,0.5570697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888091,0.003999478,0.000115021,0.001233202,0.003710382,0.00004137288,0.000001202884,0.00003045178,0.002059809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584133136","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1266461","title":"Donald C. Williams’s defence of real metaphysics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; University of Manchester; Arts and Humanities Research Council; British Academy; Princeton University","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); History; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"A. R. J. Fisher","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06861166619446298,"gpt":0.3166726351151308,"spread":0.2480609689206678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009823317,0.0001234946,0.0003218437,0.00004315768,0.0006658856,0.00003189253,0.001494652,0.00007868973,0.0002490869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002469705,0.0001079585,0.0004086354,0.00004283585,0.002325252,0.0002475842,0.00008027074,0.0003183852,0.00001262282],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009689841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000852896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002562495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001202965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986377,0.00009479388,0.0004287524,0.000214566,0.0003610816,0.0002630678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979652,0.0002931151,0.0008122094,0.0005796454,0.0002187252,0.0001310621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002201811,0.0002902223,0.00007021066,0.00003115604,0.0001511743,0.00004259817,0.0004897651,0.000004463123,0.0009168377,0.9682436,0.01044338,0.0190964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008503997,0.000242868,0.004295372,0.0001483765,0.0001220645,0.0003866556,0.00002665103,0.00001808367,0.0001126321,0.9663357,0.02730585,0.0001554226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05770468,0.0213476,0.002892673,0.005349347,0.0204623,0.0006545449,0.0002891819,0.00003744133,0.8912622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962634,0.0003533898,0.00030835,0.00016692,0.0007277731,0.00001312575,0.00000100147,0.00001714755,0.002148889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8567488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032427725","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2013.771609","title":"Embodying Justice in Ancient Egypt:<i>The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant</i>as a Classic of Political Philosophy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Peasant; Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Literature; Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Chike Jeffers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03853613673637077,"gpt":0.2756476520904255,"spread":0.2371115153540548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001310636,0.0001337264,0.0003499343,0.00009014501,0.001012771,0.00001676248,0.0008878126,0.00008425847,0.000160624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005654701,0.00009686338,0.0004189182,0.0002086677,0.002767856,0.0001349177,0.0001067113,0.0004594099,0.000006073119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009563878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005989461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005640156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004898729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976511,0.0003097398,0.0006812515,0.000172542,0.0007366352,0.0004487254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981709,0.0004713787,0.0005952667,0.0002614547,0.0004045911,0.00009643528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008028146,0.0005032215,0.0002448757,0.0002654585,0.0001258228,0.0000148597,0.02869146,0.00003099183,0.0005981169,0.8767436,0.08771151,0.004989793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002787477,0.0004557473,0.01710658,0.001909901,0.0006329683,0.0002869288,0.02269555,0.00009920721,0.00005402395,0.3840863,0.5693218,0.000563544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3105826,0.1297069,0.000122268,0.04895701,0.02902877,0.003467567,0.0001317645,0.00003926616,0.4779638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948341,0.0005589841,0.00004310479,0.0008803637,0.001075474,0.00004341657,4.182911e-7,0.00001897307,0.002545181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6842515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079914764","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.689750","title":"The Limits of Experience and Explanation: F. A. Lange and Ernst Mach on Things in Themselves","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy; Denial; Vision; Mach number; Inference; Philosophy of science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Theology; Computer science; Mechanics; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Scott Edgar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08236861792178442,"gpt":0.2544564984952087,"spread":0.1720878805734243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005695557,0.0000816971,0.0001421679,0.00007709116,0.0006195782,0.00004263343,0.0002230465,0.00002129348,0.00003219134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006296272,0.00005890068,0.00005690137,0.00001865291,0.001135154,0.0004236976,0.00001916424,0.0001621862,9.250874e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008024703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002941983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001201859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001061097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992518,0.00004164774,0.0002415661,0.00009254985,0.0002180951,0.0001542828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993505,0.000221558,0.0001996014,0.00009544162,0.00007339423,0.00005952071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001846786,0.0002792857,0.0004086324,0.0001071558,0.00004280318,0.000008436301,0.2327879,0.000001819692,0.000282906,0.7154657,0.02113958,0.0292911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000699379,0.0001889811,0.001819822,0.0002539061,0.00002772501,0.0001880373,0.003975873,0.00003295792,0.00002779294,0.03849596,0.9541096,0.0001799289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4959432,0.2753535,0.000014035,0.003879176,0.01016621,0.0006354803,0.00009356534,0.0000303879,0.2138845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954166,0.001526711,0.0000206316,0.0002959081,0.0007744647,0.00001342211,6.920261e-7,0.000009276666,0.001942317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.93297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4765357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966471514","doi":"10.1080/09608780600792067","title":"Alternative possibilities in descartes's fourth meditation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","authors":[{"name":"C. P. Ragland","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04967137649723556,"gpt":0.2354972113379695,"spread":0.1858258348407339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004178493,0.0001212884,0.0002278232,0.0001205412,0.0003196548,0.00006975258,0.0002520569,0.00003759624,0.0002550162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009415771,0.0001085939,0.0002402084,0.0000278603,0.0006868057,0.000347609,0.00001764489,0.000283037,0.000006000586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003233163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000732422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001090229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00168429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988331,0.00007792868,0.0004778611,0.0001455658,0.000275574,0.000190003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989666,0.000378177,0.0002783964,0.0001061413,0.0002279459,0.00004276608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001379512,0.0003489434,0.00001271997,0.00006242831,0.00005242279,0.00005010008,0.008127037,0.0001835754,0.00004082577,0.9385676,0.04643327,0.005983121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008706109,0.0001195908,0.0001009049,0.0001551894,0.00003008634,0.00007241746,0.0002694296,0.0002099527,0.0000111374,0.841714,0.156326,0.0001207163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1862749,0.0817474,0.002076876,0.01374888,0.05338438,0.00225685,0.0008904191,0.0001735328,0.6594468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798594,0.00007572112,0.0001097261,0.0002031613,0.006205078,0.00002584386,0.000012086,0.00002445671,0.01348459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7935845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4428331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091317637","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.583413","title":"The Unity of Efficient and Final Causality: The Mind/Body Problem Reconsidered","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Causality (physics); Mind–body problem; Epistemology; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Henrik Lagerlund","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1518580751963127,"gpt":0.2409242923422125,"spread":0.08906621714589982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001065578,0.0001290916,0.0002335665,0.00003721296,0.001403664,0.00005838964,0.0003818152,0.0000410676,0.0002032721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001377282,0.00007543986,0.0002363982,0.00002652456,0.002331428,0.00008413703,0.00005933656,0.0003907378,0.00000250837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007420299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001179407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002301898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003675603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987525,0.0001722604,0.0005029937,0.0001330587,0.0002426403,0.0001965959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983466,0.0006147914,0.0004568793,0.0002285807,0.0002839577,0.0000692273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004478341,0.0004779577,0.00001081268,0.000116564,0.0003069055,0.00002217405,0.0197541,0.00000647106,0.00005551681,0.9250429,0.03135089,0.02240789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006552772,0.0002540428,0.0002031519,0.0001625762,0.0001614749,0.0002994748,0.0006084797,0.0000578488,0.00003160864,0.5556368,0.4418046,0.0001246405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2666633,0.1183929,0.000177469,0.03098692,0.01958309,0.003454931,0.000902226,0.00007757005,0.5597616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993926,0.0002685256,0.000050388,0.000191178,0.0009561984,0.00001827682,0.000001487532,0.00001879489,0.004569078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7272627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618733512","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2017.1322038","title":"Consciousness, ideas of ideas and animation in Spinoza’s<i>Ethics</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Consciousness; Epistemology; Philosophy; Meaning (existential); Illusion; Object (grammar); Psychology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Oberto Marrama","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09110031731990202,"gpt":0.2892774388847627,"spread":0.1981771215648607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007694252,0.0001190599,0.00031906,0.0000678271,0.0007528618,0.00009455125,0.0003831518,0.00007344905,0.000176338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005222391,0.0001055042,0.0001814911,0.000009895384,0.001729074,0.0003144284,0.00005970606,0.0004503064,0.00000259298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008754082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009064619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005224051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002685623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987959,0.00008813126,0.0005118297,0.0001416389,0.0002718532,0.0001906742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986439,0.0003117109,0.0004955044,0.0002104697,0.0002461582,0.00009223411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001176377,0.0001729893,0.0001053481,0.0002385977,0.00004925597,0.00001821051,0.002449271,0.000001393472,0.0000618819,0.9898426,0.004597259,0.002345553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001036508,0.0001205837,0.001023972,0.0004891008,0.00005328663,0.0001130291,0.00009188273,0.00003194041,0.00001352049,0.7544658,0.2424386,0.0001217968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3942257,0.2079343,0.0002434159,0.07654703,0.03147515,0.002599933,0.001447078,0.00009259416,0.2854348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957007,0.0009676401,0.00005152062,0.0004775551,0.001168274,0.000008446068,0.000003431743,0.00001751002,0.001604938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6014749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6370847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311237460","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2142197","title":"Cartesian intuition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Certainty; Philosophy; Perception; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Elliot Samuel Paul","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06712002824523436,"gpt":0.220494746916762,"spread":0.1533747186715276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006156732,0.00007925488,0.0001521002,0.00008287775,0.002385567,0.00004092743,0.0004795274,0.00001391562,0.002404322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005295892,0.00007727733,0.0002454383,0.00003655333,0.000518714,0.0001996346,0.00004641905,0.0003690715,0.000007141231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006640051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001140773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001115258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003110226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989283,0.00008732023,0.0002983563,0.00013037,0.0003913486,0.0001643111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993333,0.0001090953,0.000226759,0.000125436,0.0001344577,0.0000709439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006457262,0.0002098525,9.716867e-7,0.0000236728,0.00003099255,0.0000274054,0.01301781,0.00008338301,0.00007807532,0.5965239,0.3799383,0.01000106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002518056,0.0002105522,0.000003390352,0.00001277631,0.00002271389,0.0002531451,0.0002855959,0.0000520277,9.468372e-7,0.2279912,0.7708321,0.00008370029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005766426,0.08516206,0.001909145,0.01744783,0.1007783,0.001420096,0.0008742896,0.0001824681,0.7864594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776407,0.00005382334,0.00004313628,0.0008657852,0.002214067,0.00004917806,0.000005486751,0.00001743017,0.01911042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996729878","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2014.900605","title":"Leibniz on Infinite Numbers, Infinite Wholes, and Composite Substances","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Infinity; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Adam Harmer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04977420463295627,"gpt":0.2241849010707028,"spread":0.1744106964377465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006610733,0.0001633349,0.0002974035,0.0001089988,0.001178451,0.0001262645,0.0004036958,0.00004806133,0.0001424665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001129804,0.0001418315,0.0001854779,0.00004062291,0.001265503,0.0003207448,0.00002778971,0.0003819241,0.00001762066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001681863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004581627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001122116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001412017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986708,0.00009997002,0.0004155303,0.0002143144,0.0003667277,0.0002326145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987131,0.0004464376,0.0003199601,0.0001777493,0.0001972244,0.0001454817],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002277377,0.0002395482,0.00004450711,0.0001089502,0.00007459734,0.00001827647,0.01251216,0.00005037155,0.00014463,0.8638228,0.09553961,0.02721683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005889112,0.0002893712,0.00009644961,0.0001879181,0.00003618779,0.0001006599,0.00007288689,0.00006974979,0.000003973359,0.1488463,0.8495287,0.0001788609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06802386,0.07349943,0.0007558096,0.008445255,0.02622978,0.0008920418,0.0003275542,0.0001609172,0.8216653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874462,0.0004378611,0.0001223445,0.00161317,0.002356161,0.000009759743,0.000004247151,0.00002512121,0.007985075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9194224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9063815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401615859","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2389869","title":"Du Châtelet's causal idealism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Rationalism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Natural (archaeology); Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Fatema Amijee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05660890936950277,"gpt":0.2337514307783508,"spread":0.177142521408848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006596642,0.0001288763,0.0002118735,0.0001111179,0.0008804405,0.0001876707,0.0004791667,0.00004195422,0.001077813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001041339,0.0001074852,0.000361951,0.00004537413,0.000884137,0.0003091569,0.00002849766,0.0003827215,0.00005773524],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004248836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001718935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000197575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006331085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987719,0.00004964279,0.0003908874,0.0001961364,0.0003646979,0.0002267547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991817,0.0002516445,0.0001188269,0.0001406559,0.0001917835,0.0001153376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016415,0.00003722742,1.804178e-7,0.00005956059,0.00003902771,0.00009276006,0.005714546,0.000005853691,0.00005098645,0.5671533,0.4212971,0.005533051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001567688,0.0001013451,0.000003170677,0.0001363313,0.00004625237,0.0005124729,0.00006211125,0.000146373,0.000001972099,0.218375,0.7803411,0.0001171072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00396001,0.2645037,0.001669371,0.0233384,0.1177794,0.0007413245,0.0004114949,0.0003039422,0.5872924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560441,0.0004968169,0.00005886557,0.000764376,0.01016679,0.00001831142,0.000003612983,0.00003441243,0.03241266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9520841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158220885","doi":"10.1080/09608780802548440","title":"Malebranche's Method: Knowledge and Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Cartesianism; Psychologism; Epistemology; CLARITY; Doctrine; Platonism; Direct and indirect realism; Theology; Perception; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"David Scott","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1128503336910326,"gpt":0.2921261545991854,"spread":0.1792758209081528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001000384,0.0001168474,0.0002364392,0.00007818116,0.000858517,0.00007185077,0.0004002861,0.00003764485,0.0002192362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002366325,0.00009974482,0.0001926712,0.00003529715,0.0006108683,0.0004540065,0.00002012283,0.000284317,0.000008137937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002036733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009502104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003394032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002462873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998974,0.00009428441,0.0003368259,0.0001874434,0.0002162069,0.0001912326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988796,0.0004138354,0.0002072051,0.0001420065,0.0002335636,0.0001237516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001346375,0.0002691207,0.000002798351,0.0001228233,0.00004104773,0.00002726744,0.02149787,0.000007847309,0.0004815617,0.6285429,0.1865689,0.1623032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002886238,0.00028311,0.00006517024,0.000281637,0.00004794333,0.000324223,0.00005557958,0.00009518231,0.000005952173,0.271164,0.7272506,0.0001379818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002450403,0.7293336,0.004776887,0.01362792,0.01669399,0.0007429718,0.00004845306,0.00009149176,0.2322343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967629,0.001407109,0.001314155,0.001214757,0.003480864,0.00000972585,5.74998e-7,0.00001684891,0.024927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9651785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6603106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081716706","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.650975","title":"Malebranche, the Quietists, and Freedom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Period (music); Epistemology; History; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Julie Walsh","is_ca":true},{"name":"Thomas M. Lennon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.041311710720692,"gpt":0.2629524950018639,"spread":0.2216407842811719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001123407,0.00006868959,0.0001423597,0.00002223834,0.001597024,0.0000241828,0.0002738671,0.00004183613,0.0001114061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002209598,0.00004822421,0.0001396256,0.00005851671,0.001078893,0.0002431773,0.00003016029,0.0002035728,0.000004290147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002201965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006214773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005458646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001048015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990938,0.0001411061,0.0001965525,0.0000719177,0.0002605113,0.0002361226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992383,0.0003329518,0.0001396839,0.00007966506,0.00009389303,0.0001154649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005748589,0.0001789134,0.001229244,0.0000438574,0.0001254871,0.000007564987,0.06527154,0.000001111743,0.000031071,0.1430146,0.7477227,0.04231633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002038995,0.00002903796,0.001727636,0.00003338071,0.00003865154,0.00008638485,0.0004343029,0.000001366298,3.122277e-7,0.01028449,0.9870907,0.00006984753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01689073,0.8034929,0.0003788202,0.0157715,0.02212667,0.000598644,0.00006052025,0.00004193354,0.1406383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434007,0.006210252,0.0003247441,0.0007784465,0.006749344,0.00002431198,8.502491e-7,0.00001705018,0.04249432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135155537","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2021.1881881","title":"Is this me?A story about personal identity from the <i>Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa</i> / <i>Dà zhìdù lùn</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Indian and Buddhist Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Buddhism; Philosophy; Sanskrit; Personal identity; Literature; Identity (music); Framing (construction); Epistemology; Aesthetics; History; Self; Theology; Art","authors":[{"name":"Jing Huang","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonardon Ganeri","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05201970458598405,"gpt":0.2358091185025373,"spread":0.1837894139165533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007031211,0.00023468,0.0003947976,0.00004445274,0.003006755,0.0003135365,0.0006699375,0.0000753805,0.005599587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001690658,0.0001862195,0.0007611268,0.00004202699,0.001408098,0.0005447435,0.000114603,0.0007981177,0.00009985942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003790424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003163602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000561913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009525217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980356,0.0001943898,0.0004863638,0.0002947223,0.0006440508,0.0003448538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980444,0.0004946211,0.0004235052,0.0002788963,0.0006648406,0.0000937044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006047382,0.0001643407,0.0000807851,0.00005948028,0.0004280782,0.0001020931,0.04433082,5.594747e-7,0.00007568317,0.02183558,0.9299175,0.002944641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008305574,0.00005575379,0.0003101461,0.0002454084,0.0002372482,0.0002800348,0.001954249,0.00001241859,0.00002751364,0.01717238,0.9786239,0.0002503978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02546193,0.6713582,0.0001258598,0.03259439,0.05298496,0.0007432155,0.003580873,0.0001154349,0.2130352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5441634,0.01307734,0.0002096247,0.03959953,0.03282192,0.00009155612,0.00009674208,0.0001899174,0.36975],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6582808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979382472","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.533025","title":"Boyle: Between God and Science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Philosophy; Haven; Theology; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"J. J. MacIntosh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1423156055555705,"gpt":0.2390143466615591,"spread":0.09669874110598864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008972165,0.00009555888,0.0001861866,0.0001125463,0.001503915,0.00006632712,0.000598453,0.00002577756,0.0003519053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001311089,0.00008092104,0.0001158905,0.00005150818,0.003654772,0.0005212121,0.00005015194,0.0002334301,0.000007370601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002103045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001574163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001509558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001957185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989213,0.00002680295,0.0002994254,0.0001844832,0.0003414922,0.0002264929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991361,0.00009897828,0.0002036899,0.0001426484,0.0002604166,0.0001581694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006789026,0.0002021705,0.00007918166,0.00006981428,0.00005374121,0.0000268817,0.04591015,4.771649e-7,0.0002101245,0.876021,0.04408583,0.03327279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003629538,0.0002612273,0.0004938219,0.00007310197,0.00005637406,0.0001650456,0.0001998548,0.00001093628,0.00002112823,0.3316734,0.6665125,0.000169697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04013822,0.04967264,0.0007712746,0.002516315,0.02258211,0.0007784559,0.0001942472,0.0001010503,0.8832457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928071,0.0001142218,0.0002355942,0.0002082052,0.001247163,0.000005725925,4.103505e-7,0.00001181915,0.005369691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.952669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009023040","doi":"10.1080/09608780802548473","title":"The Real Significance of Bayle's Authorship of theAvis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Michael W. Hickson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Thomas M. Lennon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04814873432005233,"gpt":0.3043715165631857,"spread":0.2562227822431334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001320646,0.00006074581,0.0001816816,0.00002651642,0.0007198126,0.00001205016,0.0004762326,0.00004845401,0.00003091252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003211166,0.00004832417,0.0002223843,0.00007790389,0.002652032,0.00008023499,0.000008410085,0.000179911,5.336207e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002010003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00125456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001338703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001206258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987876,0.0001966838,0.0003660299,0.00007130675,0.0003910758,0.0001873171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983103,0.0006849011,0.0004755728,0.0001163491,0.0003281878,0.00008470298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005924632,0.00006428466,0.00002764869,0.000009644479,0.00002499503,0.000002762673,0.000952633,0.00001026948,0.0001668162,0.9762366,0.01225442,0.01019064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002299792,0.000180817,0.001010235,0.0001065552,0.00005347712,0.00003174885,0.0003969082,0.000004196803,0.00003611905,0.2263414,0.7715245,0.00008404972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02280559,0.0417646,0.001359482,0.02117438,0.006803681,0.0009500346,0.0003148641,0.00003483101,0.9047925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929223,0.001433572,0.0001930404,0.0001701724,0.0006338134,0.000003026139,6.765684e-7,0.000004846242,0.004638554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9771523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003469035","doi":"10.1080/09608780903135253","title":"The Invention of Altruism: Making Moral Meanings in Victorian Britain","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Leslie Armour","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04005347515820541,"gpt":0.2959822403658658,"spread":0.2559287652076604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001503067,0.0000540347,0.0001282808,0.00004387607,0.0007572076,0.00002734161,0.0003607847,0.00005348253,0.00004197624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005502828,0.00004867522,0.0001505923,0.00007911462,0.001772891,0.0001289466,0.00001788432,0.000336484,7.703311e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002372258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001590194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002980201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989923,0.0001202749,0.0003167372,0.00007027398,0.0003104776,0.000189906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989915,0.0003357137,0.0003290447,0.00008121933,0.0002068866,0.00005566901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002101694,0.00003513819,0.000225908,0.000008747727,0.00001420621,0.000005225903,0.001099036,0.000004401792,0.0001209796,0.991818,0.004309579,0.002337822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000219307,0.00002618612,0.0004777627,0.00008188339,0.00001648258,0.00006148575,0.0003130895,0.00001018947,0.000003221009,0.2060772,0.7926558,0.00005740337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1283047,0.02249215,0.0008871703,0.02165174,0.04439213,0.001314671,0.0001523954,0.00005300457,0.7807521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966152,0.0001715766,0.0002728502,0.000143422,0.001144304,0.000005484681,8.318523e-7,0.00000697117,0.001639339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8683105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6532292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288698319","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2098689","title":"The ontology of images in Plato’s<i>Timaeus</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Ontology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Receptacle; Simple (philosophy); Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Samuel Meister","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04421202312164213,"gpt":0.2289103170119781,"spread":0.184698293890336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007518225,0.0001004002,0.0002644458,0.00007631964,0.001154211,0.00002854274,0.0005825507,0.00002334657,0.000503797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009177387,0.00007935345,0.000300057,0.00003610713,0.001054488,0.0001134274,0.00009187189,0.0005398509,0.000001729261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002313493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001067494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001555558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003610471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987191,0.0001558256,0.0005152628,0.0001212784,0.0002858016,0.0002027224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986941,0.0005970048,0.0003854123,0.000169402,0.0001145115,0.00003955199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004339802,0.000420961,0.00001214588,0.00004899304,0.0001002119,0.00006354498,0.004973686,0.0000747879,0.0001283539,0.7997648,0.1819028,0.01207581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000604836,0.0001725645,0.00002838117,0.00002785632,0.00002693475,0.0002009418,0.000339711,0.00001836273,0.000009194514,0.3356204,0.6628805,0.00007032423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03437296,0.2962255,0.00009324258,0.04968877,0.04446459,0.001897822,0.001678436,0.00008134023,0.5714974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988098,0.0003487436,0.00002163654,0.0004843656,0.001138289,0.00005132314,0.000004265356,0.00002342387,0.009829914],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9537251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8877372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467690823","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1177483","title":"Ross’s place in the history of analytic philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Contemporary philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Kaspar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05476888635321583,"gpt":0.2834945838184412,"spread":0.2287256974652254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025096,0.0002123975,0.0004469203,0.0001922103,0.0001619707,0.00001122435,0.001576709,0.0001401858,0.0008443434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000418698,0.0001335395,0.0004813769,0.0001964645,0.002483379,0.0002285952,0.00005877131,0.0004743622,0.00003504397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001063369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002703509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009842643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001879602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973645,0.0004443637,0.0008114967,0.0003498031,0.0005878898,0.0004419906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971776,0.001311837,0.0006158805,0.0005784347,0.0001786514,0.000137601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008413824,0.0009141367,0.00006600067,0.00005943236,0.0001776005,0.0001778886,0.003602153,0.000009737075,0.00100852,0.851218,0.1222085,0.01971672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002361473,0.0004683379,0.001277533,0.0004145233,0.0001155417,0.0009357496,0.00006578228,0.00001747147,0.0000115922,0.7746876,0.2193927,0.0002516331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0273948,0.1619695,0.001871325,0.03110086,0.03326685,0.001681726,0.0003050185,0.00007193191,0.742338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912279,0.0003038793,0.00005974173,0.0009820835,0.0009497253,0.00004086285,0.000001110564,0.00002972282,0.006405002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9638331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9244968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000887925","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.666849","title":"Lucretius: His Continuing Influence and Contemporary Relevance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Graeme K. Hunter","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05438542552203628,"gpt":0.2347252685630113,"spread":0.180339843040975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005170441,0.0001359967,0.0002672847,0.0000528052,0.0004671352,0.00006728115,0.0002271296,0.00004518794,0.0001164896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002324801,0.000120964,0.0001830268,0.00001795055,0.001022934,0.0007208845,0.00004036886,0.0003417039,0.000006918927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001123962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003854387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001377576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989595,0.00006263101,0.0004037751,0.0001267372,0.0002078343,0.0002395206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998805,0.0003970298,0.0003333671,0.0001329542,0.0001883798,0.0001432338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002983502,0.0003189977,0.0001401422,0.0002375675,0.0001813912,0.00003469354,0.02336795,0.000003375585,0.000371836,0.8048593,0.1423428,0.02784357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006351392,0.00008838801,0.0001693888,0.0003299672,0.00004728928,0.0002512153,0.0001817047,0.000009750232,0.00001121103,0.09693278,0.9011839,0.0001592863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1629799,0.6048702,0.0001858255,0.007584673,0.01778986,0.0009783234,0.0002926604,0.0001256058,0.2051929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884766,0.0006367503,0.00007130102,0.0006012559,0.003452528,0.00001443362,0.000002448783,0.0000268108,0.006717891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8254966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.493277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372287184","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2201615","title":"Varieties of consciousness in classical Arabic thought: Avicenna, Averroes, and the <i>mutakallimūn</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Deborah L. Black","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04440190953154571,"gpt":0.2328049505372834,"spread":0.1884030410057377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001168622,0.0001605417,0.000483145,0.000162048,0.0004535303,0.00005733221,0.00041937,0.00006548858,0.000162694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001763516,0.0001056381,0.0002941428,0.0001032583,0.003575351,0.0001623186,0.00007500487,0.000490734,0.000009185707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006637716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009271636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001280587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002834941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983453,0.0001882165,0.0006227623,0.0001787923,0.0004084437,0.0002564819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982597,0.0009333247,0.0003446812,0.0001761129,0.0002026383,0.00008355049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006295963,0.0001830422,0.00002022218,0.0002478421,0.0001212156,0.00004559205,0.009795706,0.00001337145,0.00005188346,0.8965956,0.089121,0.003174927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002527008,0.0001285811,0.0001550383,0.000240163,0.00009967959,0.0001148579,0.0007768695,0.0002761137,0.000004876555,0.559632,0.4359034,0.0001414356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1959447,0.2230034,0.0002337604,0.1730305,0.05055728,0.005389159,0.001188364,0.0003747928,0.350278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832871,0.00255115,0.00001306057,0.0007731995,0.00177318,0.00004469086,0.000006364259,0.00003169091,0.01151959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7873424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405425026","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2423396","title":"Aristotle on logical consequence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Phil Corkum","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1038504428668205,"gpt":0.2610522252396165,"spread":0.1572017823727959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003331063,0.0001211343,0.0001977472,0.00007038395,0.0004815116,0.0001371746,0.0002882007,0.00004680252,0.001228203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009965475,0.00009304967,0.0003673046,0.00002357555,0.001028633,0.0001471258,0.0000208629,0.0004919958,0.00008422232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002386961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001069043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002787724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001903842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990389,0.00004928857,0.0003129298,0.0001748299,0.0002517295,0.0001723194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991025,0.0004872726,0.0000940851,0.000128292,0.0001053897,0.00008245058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000698753,0.0001154281,8.935187e-8,0.00006256401,0.00006415052,0.0002967883,0.0009351432,0.000006211218,0.00004670622,0.8487456,0.1401181,0.009539276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001415069,0.0001552797,0.000001744734,0.0002184083,0.00003362328,0.0004559027,0.00002564118,0.00004793808,0.000004947601,0.4444893,0.5543516,0.00007407682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002739271,0.1087649,0.0004536441,0.02252697,0.03990365,0.0005586785,0.0004379484,0.000210175,0.8244048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726961,0.0002903821,0.00003578575,0.001130407,0.005055108,0.00001646791,0.000004149509,0.00002862177,0.020743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9699568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971960450","doi":"10.1080/09608780801969266","title":"Modernity, The Human Animal and Philosophical Tradition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophical methodology","authors":[{"name":"Leslie Armour","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1283401177064191,"gpt":0.2577913704305848,"spread":0.1294512527241657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003938457,0.0001851403,0.000293529,0.00005669555,0.002211782,0.00006927942,0.0004078275,0.00007013971,0.000461914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007181917,0.0001304367,0.0003524447,0.00002292213,0.002552499,0.0002390144,0.00005143006,0.000620026,0.000007816541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001209876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005886718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007333056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001241647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984969,0.0001360778,0.0004844077,0.0002033151,0.0003996704,0.0002796451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989435,0.0003202203,0.0002099152,0.0001800908,0.0001780333,0.0001682367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001001308,0.0003035976,0.000009195078,0.00004605118,0.000098872,0.00004628184,0.00251736,0.000001996551,0.00007844548,0.9734485,0.02260954,0.0007400678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007951052,0.0002986489,0.0003024598,0.00007709184,0.00009701376,0.001756217,0.00006948363,0.0000743108,0.000006084279,0.7125745,0.2837819,0.0001671061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5590318,0.08190328,0.0002864995,0.1476791,0.01443107,0.002253997,0.001182853,0.0002349949,0.1929964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895507,0.0005270132,0.00002168151,0.00138395,0.006356847,0.00002353718,0.00001124908,0.00003231717,0.002092704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4305189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410596923","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2496270","title":"W.E.B. Du Bois’ misrecognition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Kwesi Thomas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04389203167010317,"gpt":0.2397508409744425,"spread":0.1958588093043394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004236664,0.00009340735,0.0001566762,0.0001141758,0.0008052202,0.00008138856,0.0002662347,0.00003805165,0.0006882538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001491684,0.00009012382,0.0002134713,0.00002610728,0.000381691,0.0002802918,0.00001742734,0.0002098658,0.00001448574],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002125934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001526846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008435425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004368434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992176,0.00005200663,0.00034844,0.0001081592,0.000137812,0.0001359762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991091,0.0002102892,0.0002240413,0.0001162487,0.0003016775,0.00003865993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005938026,0.0001975771,0.000004143752,0.0001048573,0.0001046006,0.000003992388,0.004358322,0.000003747882,0.0000283582,0.4846375,0.4786077,0.03188979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003598119,0.00003729024,0.00004251728,0.0002005384,0.00007329974,0.00007321122,0.0002250642,0.0000242262,0.00000861588,0.4404661,0.5584222,0.00006710472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01242125,0.06858794,0.001823534,0.03067874,0.07803772,0.0009501801,0.0002372168,0.0001116841,0.8071517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644354,0.0007729738,0.0001279491,0.001932594,0.004356827,0.00005503943,0.0000201273,0.00001999717,0.0282791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9520141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7535896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416307882","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2511060","title":"Blueprint for cosmopolitan philosophy: a post-Eurocentric proposal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint","authors":[{"name":"Jonardon Ganeri","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05497622349358694,"gpt":0.3251756918430477,"spread":0.2701994683494608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065013,0.0001948965,0.0003893184,0.0001994594,0.001883281,0.00008117994,0.0009427759,0.0002205373,0.00005760545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002593872,0.0001961851,0.0006374057,0.0002199351,0.001730351,0.0002611402,0.00007251951,0.0006604375,0.000007203391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001252237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002123318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003247983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000708632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976146,0.0002585702,0.0006429638,0.0003005587,0.0005340899,0.0006492057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969598,0.00116407,0.0003096609,0.0002463941,0.001037937,0.000282109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002605274,0.0002928649,0.00001013915,0.0002172913,0.0001226235,0.00001298726,0.00113067,0.000006102043,0.00004931209,0.9526219,0.04138609,0.003889537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009711873,0.000151475,0.00006081804,0.000244964,0.0001263547,0.00003822581,0.0001907288,0.00002524703,0.00001477616,0.7584783,0.2395373,0.0001605548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005049183,0.06167946,0.009907784,0.3075055,0.03530679,0.006518991,0.001106258,0.0003193356,0.5726067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727303,0.001046603,0.001205101,0.006676995,0.004611318,0.0001470426,0.00001301479,0.00005442473,0.01351516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366524411","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2178732","title":"The historical history of philosophy: a discussion with Michael Frede <b>The historiography of philosophy</b> , by Michael Frede, with a postface by Jonathan Barnes, edited by Katerina Ierodiakonou, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 256 pp., £55.00, (hb), ISBN: 9780198840725","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Philosophy; Michael reaction; Classics; Theology; History; Chemistry; Organic chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Menn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01912456122642019,"gpt":0.1888382246402737,"spread":0.1697136634138535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001229886,0.0008458939,0.001242889,0.0005016418,0.002499875,0.00007803714,0.002704128,0.0002541359,0.0001259305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008593442,0.0005566731,0.0009634695,0.0004642552,0.006135728,0.0009171894,0.0002530841,0.00129273,0.000004054812],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003898618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007997531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00285194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004999858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944309,0.00044565,0.00134147,0.0009619463,0.001837433,0.0009825785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949355,0.0004176979,0.002188286,0.001088827,0.0009115179,0.0004582033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022299,0.0008931134,0.0000531202,0.0003542095,0.0004988188,0.00006260753,0.009036369,0.0000163935,0.001978535,0.01446168,0.9695828,0.0008324399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002773629,0.001456051,0.00003387656,0.000511497,0.0004655161,0.0001575166,0.0008337234,0.00006014059,0.00003893645,0.006951759,0.9859257,0.0007916304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02706057,0.7509888,0.000394762,0.05470359,0.04302096,0.00608557,0.01319467,0.0007260657,0.1038251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6931006,0.03973873,0.0002544994,0.001548949,0.007372337,0.0002953667,0.000823175,0.0007224248,0.2561439],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155781237","doi":"10.1080/09608780902763634","title":"‘Hume’ and ‘The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Hume's philosophy and hair distribution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Fred Wilson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02821819583431794,"gpt":0.2970518607699641,"spread":0.2688336649356461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001878889,0.0001278502,0.0002762147,0.00006537409,0.00168108,0.00009996023,0.0005009178,0.00008708885,0.0001300068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004844867,0.00010613,0.0002672486,0.0001249277,0.0010439,0.0002253048,0.00002387944,0.0002645158,0.00001276381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004872096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002198658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000483208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002129953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984121,0.0002505499,0.000421797,0.0001840819,0.000434421,0.0002970156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988434,0.0002774118,0.0002519962,0.0001723942,0.000246467,0.0002082766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004179604,0.0001919882,0.00001288576,0.00001880924,0.00008412866,0.0000328565,0.00855634,0.00002437241,0.0001030095,0.5819401,0.308332,0.1002856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001396842,0.0001523555,0.0002938311,0.00008790703,0.00008571964,0.00009451259,0.0002258183,0.00001031537,0.000007507368,0.3235105,0.6740062,0.000128449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02070771,0.1408242,0.006789407,0.2342834,0.01245571,0.004406702,0.000414022,0.0002194688,0.5798994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832826,0.002322544,0.0003398486,0.002254954,0.002466963,0.00002122311,0.000005045594,0.0000159233,0.009290915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9625749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409347825","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2478974","title":"Monads, situation, and infinite explanation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Filippo Costantini","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard T. W. Arthur","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0454345708368941,"gpt":0.2369759942232868,"spread":0.1915414233863927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002597872,0.00007648962,0.0001402948,0.00009712888,0.000557904,0.00006807862,0.000137367,0.00003127404,0.0001407709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001046264,0.00007008981,0.000109027,0.00002373589,0.0003726911,0.0002039265,0.00002006785,0.0001708493,0.000002496086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009638421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006229727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004927326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001104442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993664,0.00003376585,0.00027755,0.00009712668,0.0001323083,0.00009281907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993011,0.0002241608,0.0001530634,0.0000796569,0.0002052178,0.00003680348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004902489,0.00006406662,0.000003866698,0.0000492091,0.00006317421,0.00000371706,0.001991743,0.000004904913,0.0000238183,0.8810079,0.09674476,0.01999381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000366855,0.00003060263,0.00006178606,0.00007212844,0.0000413833,0.00002193274,0.0000791249,0.00005669227,0.000003187723,0.4688375,0.5303805,0.00004830609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01352536,0.1272372,0.003767885,0.04120328,0.02672459,0.00122529,0.0003071552,0.0001245763,0.7858847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757862,0.0005425489,0.00005170732,0.001059491,0.001524972,0.00001697692,0.000009510582,0.00001136941,0.02099722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9622608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4291003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406898838","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2445605","title":"James Africanus Beale Horton’s philosophy of history: progress, race, and the fate of Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy; Race (biology); Epistemology; Ancient philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Zeyad el Nabolsy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04218595766613161,"gpt":0.2653350638105355,"spread":0.2231491061444038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001447346,0.000189704,0.0007129513,0.0001007687,0.0008877952,0.0000186439,0.0007411191,0.0001089224,0.0000601942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005568719,0.0001294376,0.0004642317,0.000250177,0.007960205,0.0001634801,0.0001274786,0.0003667224,6.361719e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004854836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003647243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006247499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007155219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978236,0.0003505663,0.0007028571,0.0002268595,0.0005925521,0.0003035633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974793,0.0007535901,0.0008703475,0.0001978112,0.0005917531,0.0001071601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001363324,0.0005110652,0.0003748803,0.0004759538,0.0009501335,0.00001693229,0.03718388,0.000007479512,0.0001128424,0.7059769,0.2307868,0.02223979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00131073,0.0001345661,0.0003400493,0.0003183649,0.0002545798,0.00001633184,0.0008701509,0.00000619533,0.000008057393,0.3533263,0.6432757,0.0001390585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007817878,0.7139609,0.00006508407,0.08234329,0.004061858,0.001618406,0.0001922252,0.00004701679,0.1898933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831729,0.008432182,0.00017594,0.0002255094,0.0006464024,0.00006210865,0.000001622468,0.00001565273,0.007267687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.975355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386602190","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2239022","title":"An inconsistency in Cassirer’s conception of the a priori","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Scott Edgar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07423693053374412,"gpt":0.2586299337892665,"spread":0.1843930032555224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000789873,0.0001006489,0.0002278426,0.0001788415,0.0006094748,0.00003262704,0.0006094055,0.00003515967,0.0001482925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007906547,0.00007919194,0.0002498976,0.00009319848,0.001519003,0.0003226576,0.00003243919,0.0002572309,0.000006691887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003374732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002834134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005085148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001709604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987491,0.0001105469,0.0004605907,0.0001499379,0.0003412146,0.0001886563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990245,0.0001024126,0.0003758322,0.0002358072,0.0002034972,0.00005794435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002718523,0.0009747782,0.0004615991,0.0003576231,0.0001268606,0.00009519736,0.174651,0.0002171809,0.00342025,0.6183209,0.1687448,0.0323579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001276043,0.0002974354,0.002871809,0.0004519279,0.00007211061,0.0001643863,0.002386482,0.0002805345,0.00001610232,0.2236065,0.7683217,0.0002550128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6845676,0.03301117,0.00003591404,0.006366143,0.05601298,0.001946352,0.0005511542,0.0001697095,0.2173389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939246,0.0001813387,0.00001542455,0.0002071834,0.001226684,0.0000164534,0.000002651866,0.00001686473,0.004408781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5995768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.559683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404481090","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2423398","title":"Scudéry’s portraits: patriarchy, agency, and genre","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Scientific Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Portrait; Agency (philosophy); Art; Philosophy; Literature; Sociology; Art history; Gender studies; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Allauren Samantha Forbes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06173355360424425,"gpt":0.2732408484551356,"spread":0.2115072948508913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005735265,0.00009363081,0.0002485051,0.00009665448,0.0002980901,0.00002453604,0.0001056045,0.00004392097,0.0001272907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001613936,0.0000716024,0.0002620578,0.00009695765,0.0003659415,0.00007392713,0.0000282405,0.0002866824,0.000007969931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002771964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000178278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004653752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990156,0.00002459993,0.0003153154,0.0001849345,0.0002960624,0.0001634481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994214,0.0001326329,0.00006962541,0.0001016946,0.0001393981,0.0001352186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001129747,0.000125165,0.00002957827,0.0006100917,0.0002891911,0.0007046263,0.002235743,6.163447e-7,0.001638329,0.002269098,0.7899207,0.2020639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006107498,0.0002235957,0.001135976,0.0005673312,0.0002663194,0.00480001,0.00005833616,0.0000749641,0.000009362473,0.0152536,0.9768955,0.00010424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01919166,0.933687,0.0008362372,0.006616412,0.01895482,0.0005457959,0.0001217618,0.00007254497,0.01997377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8366035,0.01368006,0.001058004,0.0006952034,0.004101113,0.00003667824,0.00000977977,0.00006477034,0.143751],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9200069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2919861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402485048","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2373128","title":"Against the extremes: Simmel’s social and economic pluralism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Oxford; McMaster University; Harvard University","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Johannes Steizinger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07819909330377232,"gpt":0.3105184939609326,"spread":0.2323194006571603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002369224,0.0001174091,0.000250652,0.00006577715,0.001594498,0.0001539194,0.0005342728,0.0001363994,0.0001995099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002112938,0.00008887174,0.0004528596,0.0000876788,0.002183578,0.0002151358,0.00005390672,0.0004665158,0.00001537685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007624897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002979901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003719802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985879,0.0003806936,0.0003277311,0.0001956113,0.0002273924,0.0002806633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984513,0.001130735,0.0001678763,0.00009757774,0.00006252137,0.00008998808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007548184,0.00006253782,0.00003257697,0.00004811538,0.0008107828,0.00006402284,0.03816761,0.00003580576,0.0001006886,0.6759053,0.2374046,0.0472925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002411824,0.00003141128,0.0003271514,0.00005257985,0.00017157,0.00003590697,0.001900543,0.00006410995,9.11819e-7,0.2574027,0.7396388,0.000133118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2747457,0.4106385,0.0005987333,0.09889029,0.04062099,0.002126865,0.0004183653,0.0004812467,0.1714793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987367,0.003284607,0.0000365805,0.001061733,0.003942161,0.00002046878,0.000001992512,0.00002786442,0.004257563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7126213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954972732","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2019.1629387","title":"Kant and the science of logic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue","authors":[{"name":"Charles Cooper-Simpson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04823795495855564,"gpt":0.228431065853464,"spread":0.1801931108949084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009130597,0.00007653372,0.0002251981,0.00005623966,0.0005162696,0.00005252041,0.0004068236,0.00001909421,0.0002595408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001059526,0.00004667078,0.0001846144,0.00003014743,0.004474192,0.0001918528,0.00005433227,0.0002060967,0.000005313374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006370882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008878411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004859859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001085655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991395,0.00004175672,0.0002893997,0.0001136868,0.0002801442,0.0001354741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989938,0.0003101699,0.0002744678,0.0001525414,0.000223402,0.00004561022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001431594,0.00005719454,0.000001108353,0.00004650559,0.00003021662,0.000002239424,0.002660063,0.000004306658,0.0001983129,0.9904884,0.004060733,0.002307828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001416585,0.0001435789,0.00002558421,0.0001239597,0.00005408946,0.0001512669,0.0002004,0.00009258409,0.00002807109,0.7882172,0.2094684,0.0000782716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1207781,0.1076596,0.00008245325,0.02173085,0.02253977,0.001689775,0.0001820975,0.00004081472,0.7252966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925455,0.0002586556,0.00002695804,0.0003347995,0.0008460017,0.000004753766,3.904089e-7,0.000008997637,0.005973973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8717674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028483080","doi":"10.1080/09608780210143254","title":"Religion and the reflective self: Coleridge’s platonism revisited","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Travel Writing and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Platonism; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Leslie Armour","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03095783194949931,"gpt":0.2141933604797396,"spread":0.1832355285302403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004499732,0.0001082197,0.0002128671,0.00004777109,0.0010238,0.0001654385,0.0001882658,0.00004511908,0.0001400063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006342922,0.00007508526,0.0001823756,0.00002126036,0.0006116297,0.0001357289,0.00001668385,0.0004025931,0.000003836913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009816713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001738779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004929149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001804874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991782,0.00009822542,0.0002849527,0.0001237524,0.0001709607,0.0001439313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991634,0.0002354666,0.000231872,0.0001195502,0.0002021867,0.0000474702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001654698,0.00008110118,0.000001278142,0.00007518911,0.000136307,0.00002291218,0.03219826,0.000001398193,0.00001545144,0.4409721,0.5216215,0.004709057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00164737,0.00009798176,0.0000164669,0.0002934778,0.00009710069,0.0008120284,0.0001981319,0.0001312001,0.000001721054,0.03466324,0.9619355,0.000105837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01062379,0.5350302,0.00006321107,0.01417231,0.008196377,0.001279487,0.0003137921,0.000169211,0.4301516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9133486,0.006667641,0.0001751657,0.002885619,0.004477564,0.00003418564,0.00000641418,0.00004864388,0.0723562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9027247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7874343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413875675","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2547655","title":"Richard FitzRalph on the will and instantaneous volition: a critical edition of book I, Question 10 from Richard FitzRalph’s <i>Lectura in Sententias</i> (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 137)","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval Philosophy and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Volition (linguistics); Critical edition; Humanities; Classics; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Szlachta","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03080547455585664,"gpt":0.2563694404760046,"spread":0.225563965920148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001015464,0.0004091527,0.0007726165,0.0002968245,0.001234333,0.000122275,0.0004715372,0.0002086518,0.0007458992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008997998,0.0003428232,0.0004353423,0.0001065803,0.003480677,0.0003959758,0.0001173478,0.0009933427,0.00001482716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005105929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001808967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004314844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002279181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967427,0.0006823105,0.001153916,0.0004616833,0.0004806197,0.0004787167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960414,0.002239414,0.0005938152,0.0003269945,0.0006591924,0.0001392351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003816073,0.001174551,0.00003903222,0.001336861,0.001791572,0.0004597386,0.01009982,0.00004323346,0.0002562937,0.7402623,0.2352574,0.005463074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002240432,0.001102036,0.0002941001,0.004889578,0.001212529,0.0002529462,0.0005359569,0.0002188098,0.00004477717,0.7068022,0.2820272,0.000379499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07008224,0.8319153,0.0004762583,0.04128874,0.02841807,0.002037553,0.002951487,0.00006146596,0.02276886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709942,0.01528101,0.0000548767,0.004500852,0.004548192,0.00006528336,0.00006537867,0.00005379532,0.004436355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.900912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402801162","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2383624","title":"Physical influx theory: the case of Émilie Du Châtelet","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Humanities","authors":[{"name":"Christian Henkel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02888761222780548,"gpt":0.2777691850215041,"spread":0.2488815727936986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001328159,0.00008889422,0.0002145974,0.00004439736,0.001053904,0.00003295226,0.0003621187,0.00004311468,0.0001391005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003413837,0.00005948323,0.0003712313,0.0001457683,0.001281044,0.0001767342,0.00003661756,0.0003176057,0.000006347404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002944845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000202853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006607426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001265793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989145,0.0002509519,0.000262367,0.0001191882,0.0002763908,0.0001765601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985397,0.0009824933,0.0001226806,0.0001092262,0.0001764206,0.00006949592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000734691,0.0001904507,0.000007211788,0.0001059759,0.0002398779,0.0008336388,0.08149406,0.000006634039,0.00007448356,0.5588325,0.2869997,0.07114203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001323923,0.00007573835,0.00001289647,0.00009466986,0.00008610786,0.0007075909,0.0007966441,0.00003131948,0.000003288337,0.1477335,0.850257,0.00006881446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.259726,0.4933445,0.0008292943,0.02433811,0.02862851,0.001319177,0.0003976198,0.0001659668,0.1912508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859771,0.001035722,0.00002643276,0.000219863,0.003220179,0.00001548801,6.609068e-7,0.00001410798,0.009490429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7262511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8105883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233462544","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2002.10383085","title":"Book reviews","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Metaphysics","authors":[{"name":"George W. Wright","is_ca":false},{"name":"Desmond M. Clarke","is_ca":false},{"name":"G. H. R. Parkinson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gary Banham","is_ca":false},{"name":"Don A. Habibi","is_ca":false},{"name":"T. L. S. Sprigge","is_ca":false},{"name":"Christopher Adair‐Toteff","is_ca":false},{"name":"Graham Stevens","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.144438550018094,"gpt":0.3220933520619197,"spread":0.1776548020438258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001723209,0.00008864403,0.0002412704,0.000043739,0.001071376,0.00003397158,0.0005092039,0.0001080192,0.001801188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001169061,0.0000835335,0.0003766535,0.00006903051,0.001160438,0.000277625,0.00001937612,0.0004782039,0.00007012788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004020324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001013743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001498435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002893953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998512,0.0002725541,0.0004086336,0.0001186884,0.0003749552,0.0003131436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988361,0.0004076383,0.0002365049,0.0001459506,0.0001663705,0.0002074624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007714068,0.0000864793,8.126946e-7,0.00003342464,0.00001810931,0.00001080361,0.002235223,8.187757e-7,0.000006555071,0.1464133,0.8401322,0.01105452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002048505,0.00003837994,0.000004206105,0.0001241202,0.00003374713,0.00006358547,0.0000302231,0.000009530717,8.297697e-7,0.2221845,0.7772241,0.00008188025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002246354,0.6415991,0.0002192706,0.03065613,0.005303217,0.0003864229,0.00002003359,0.00002735227,0.321766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.172992,0.3521586,0.001015455,0.06247164,0.02267494,0.0001147903,0.000003844285,0.0001064776,0.3884623],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2894405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067132141","doi":"10.1080/09608780902763675","title":"‘Historical Dictionary of Nietzscheanism’, ‘On the Genealogy of Morality’ and ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Zoroaster; Philosophy; History; Classics; Theology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Paul Bishop","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06658631615997454,"gpt":0.2474648681158885,"spread":0.1808785519559139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005586295,0.0001425741,0.0003906555,0.00007836785,0.0004343002,0.00002651851,0.0002132477,0.00006922406,0.0001044404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005285196,0.000110917,0.0002446183,0.00001540628,0.0005643197,0.0001603175,0.0000189674,0.0002548773,5.005342e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001400615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007616243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001023676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003873205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988548,0.00005996105,0.0005286917,0.0001642909,0.0002168862,0.0001754156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988495,0.0002794023,0.0004063466,0.000151426,0.0002326903,0.00008069054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001196908,0.0007400661,0.00002681847,0.0002996605,0.00029521,0.00001776735,0.01249075,0.000007020157,0.001905435,0.3311593,0.6419468,0.009914221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001428984,0.00155051,0.0006100079,0.0001595329,0.0002055157,0.0002925253,0.0003320299,0.0000405418,0.00006009093,0.05086675,0.9442861,0.0001674387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2242889,0.6842395,0.0005407364,0.03017525,0.009988145,0.003453843,0.001063263,0.00006444318,0.04618593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978706,0.005772551,0.0002967507,0.001590139,0.001873566,0.00003002354,0.000006927485,0.00003299854,0.01169107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7544171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4523062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412571404","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2527980","title":"Towards a “halfway plausible theory of ethics”: judgement in Arendt’s critique of Kant’s moral philosophy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Normative ethics","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Dunn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1059541675870607,"gpt":0.3569349345724565,"spread":0.2509807669853958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005675472,0.0002626004,0.0008211904,0.0005779115,0.0005084735,0.00003157411,0.001267452,0.0003417445,0.0002665354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003046571,0.0002782713,0.0006357213,0.0004836405,0.002689818,0.0003547314,0.0001585797,0.001198939,0.000002845555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00103642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002313597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002679951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008443285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954751,0.001128752,0.001390941,0.000351697,0.001055462,0.0005980137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963731,0.001441422,0.0006676967,0.0003469045,0.0009511571,0.0002197037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003170212,0.0006674638,0.0001573771,0.0005385393,0.0001699983,0.00002728978,0.005314421,0.00004753648,0.0001995167,0.9813142,0.008018458,0.003228124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00143721,0.0002297803,0.0006452022,0.001531233,0.0001320332,0.00002080835,0.000667397,0.00001694499,0.0002896291,0.9616346,0.03315949,0.0002356994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02448245,0.05888147,0.005663677,0.09641729,0.01675663,0.003782795,0.001324022,0.0001476557,0.792544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944975,0.000853474,0.0006837434,0.001421422,0.0007376404,0.00005466345,0.000005380848,0.00003566737,0.001710548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414779733","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2560453","title":"The infinite divisibility and multiplicity of creatures: Conway’s non-absolutist theory of space","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multiplicity (mathematics); Divisibility rule; Space (punctuation); Infinite divisibility","authors":[{"name":"Hugo Hogenbirk","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jessica Tizzard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03629113902323856,"gpt":0.2392259134707926,"spread":0.202934774447554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00153712,0.0001244075,0.0003418611,0.00007564964,0.001101747,0.00003823291,0.0005288176,0.00005312781,0.00004257166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006170645,0.0000885418,0.0002654303,0.00005537476,0.003653377,0.0001468382,0.0000777539,0.0003220796,4.734431e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001435747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001530919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002378784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000194637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986955,0.0001363569,0.0005553095,0.0001717617,0.0002664895,0.0001746106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972554,0.001534228,0.0004710499,0.0002746758,0.0004016371,0.00006299607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003954634,0.0002296914,0.00006905835,0.0002444442,0.0001318131,0.00000287017,0.008873708,0.00001126751,0.0003417391,0.9602821,0.02026236,0.009155485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008776482,0.0002316213,0.001357486,0.0003591962,0.0001179177,0.00002245007,0.0005189856,0.000115054,0.00005180634,0.6317796,0.3644293,0.000138997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1247835,0.2848962,0.004859629,0.009730042,0.02515898,0.002862583,0.001341284,0.0000761507,0.5462916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911767,0.0005588346,0.00006013834,0.0001473224,0.000276563,0.000008640097,8.769097e-7,0.000008437253,0.007762496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8663931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407869643","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2455427","title":"Attribution arguments and the metaphysics of immanent actions: cognitive acts from Peter John Olivi to Durand of St. Pourçain","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Univerzita Karlova v Praze","keywords":"Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Attribution; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"André Martin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04936366166412882,"gpt":0.2583190484719532,"spread":0.2089553868078244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004184441,0.0001264236,0.0003899392,0.00009111105,0.0004096768,0.00003908835,0.0002027135,0.00003747909,0.0001113703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001508074,0.00009331778,0.0003248877,0.00004566824,0.000891018,0.0001728508,0.0000550708,0.0002337214,0.000001409949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006915013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001632005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009768095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988707,0.0001382792,0.0004775219,0.0001392061,0.0002432364,0.0001310021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998329,0.000725347,0.0003950739,0.0001246581,0.0003728152,0.00005305017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003177138,0.0008437287,0.00001875814,0.0002503395,0.001955081,0.000008787501,0.01144911,0.00001409704,0.0007013906,0.9480166,0.01879741,0.0147675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005394227,0.0002459876,0.0009549333,0.001373691,0.001080959,0.00002261433,0.0007365604,0.00003639469,0.0005710638,0.688464,0.3009295,0.0001900843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6444805,0.117354,0.00666606,0.03554564,0.02295276,0.00618122,0.01221856,0.0000797467,0.1545215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963284,0.0003688354,0.00002970605,0.0004104848,0.0006568822,0.00002535159,0.00001721369,0.00001159085,0.002151578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3518479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3805389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}