{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":52,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":52,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"dbaf8de7cf19","filters":{"venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2069475098","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2010.524770","title":"The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval Philosophy and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Medieval philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; History of philosophy; Classics; History","authors":[{"name":"Paul Helm","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04619760930760119,"gpt":0.2282949709015021,"spread":0.1820973615939009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00164649,0.000454136,0.00052915,0.003581153,0.003721691,0.005996898,0.000685924,0.002796034,0.02292595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004531974,0.0004463253,0.0001785706,0.002238979,0.02196603,0.005314155,0.002488578,0.003979175,0.001599355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01994774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003463147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02970679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03459208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987181,0.0006464971,0.00004752756,0.000175588,0.0002746075,0.0001376226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983197,0.0009445398,0.00008654975,0.0001955308,0.0002506711,0.0002030707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002982443,0.00001032188,0.0001466516,0.0001017379,0.000006336655,0.00005222967,0.00357192,0.00004396409,0.00010933,0.9705917,0.01818651,0.007149561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003965871,0.00001947645,0.002776845,0.0005142981,0.000008881258,0.0001245004,0.00183059,0.0000912558,0.0001579011,0.2708517,0.7235678,0.00001709594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01618899,0.219809,0.001218407,0.07793356,0.002852103,0.00002760734,0.0003183401,0.0000629492,0.681589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7617225,0.05527664,0.001082772,0.008863484,0.005461081,0.00006634287,0.0001644782,0.0001530283,0.1672096],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02970679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1447317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065711826","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.679779","title":"Hume and Ancient Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Literature; Ancient philosophy; Classics; History; Art","authors":[{"name":"Peter Loptson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0851335377081105,"gpt":0.2495663736007044,"spread":0.1644328358925939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001985589,0.0002714746,0.0002546459,0.001491129,0.005366026,0.003600682,0.0004598371,0.002339362,0.004608872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002697829,0.0001349426,0.0001883462,0.001097656,0.02922124,0.003127717,0.002146435,0.002867778,0.0008905699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004243265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00196446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003808941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004285257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983216,0.001078085,0.0000322706,0.0001245142,0.0002756414,0.0001679303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985544,0.001007959,0.00009536853,0.00008563704,0.0001534472,0.0001031915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001224294,0.000005063172,0.0001171022,0.00003960847,0.000003055405,0.00005400104,0.0107694,0.00007660579,0.00003871175,0.9742509,0.007348033,0.0072853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009530232,0.00001860371,0.0005577683,0.0002896134,0.000003260735,0.0002000175,0.004326542,0.0001328612,0.0001345337,0.4950538,0.4992624,0.00001116404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04239829,0.1158195,0.00581247,0.09011226,0.002244911,0.00001969217,0.00006459479,0.00006928496,0.743459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.864473,0.0265532,0.002032492,0.01785028,0.002300307,0.00002390628,0.00003068552,0.00005661155,0.08667955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005366026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03078723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001579879","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2019.1664980","title":"Kant’s lectures on metaphysics: a critical guide","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Relation (database); Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Damian Melamedoff-Vosters","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1114586155937869,"gpt":0.2807317843998352,"spread":0.1692731688060483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004324717,0.001662784,0.0008520716,0.004520432,0.002788018,0.005993511,0.001719069,0.004994968,0.009992675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006702399,0.0008735978,0.0006386793,0.003884606,0.01789616,0.009507475,0.0024065,0.01202191,0.004592924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007373136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004779629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005534012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006086123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965412,0.002035466,0.0001794402,0.000230047,0.0008291092,0.0001848164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950566,0.003905954,0.0001604157,0.0002054568,0.0005111555,0.0001604742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001208357,0.00001721229,0.00004425202,0.0001751163,0.000007794405,0.00005505773,0.001738446,0.0004071895,0.0001039012,0.8386964,0.1432649,0.01547768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005219389,0.000004999053,0.0001019558,0.000409279,0.000002232928,0.000060396,0.000399029,0.0001711603,0.0000779041,0.4584731,0.5402821,0.00001268639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001437832,0.3776259,0.05311589,0.2425455,0.01031152,0.0001524299,0.000840575,0.000287065,0.3136832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1923047,0.3793654,0.0925391,0.08414438,0.02783166,0.001096031,0.001360496,0.001085263,0.2202729],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009992675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05349612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007126587","doi":"10.1080/09608781003643618","title":"The Ontological Argument from Descartes to Hegel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Ontological argument; Epistemology; Humanity; Theology; Philosophy of religion","authors":[{"name":"Charles P. Rodger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0536098042117221,"gpt":0.2376220770187749,"spread":0.1840122728070528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002676349,0.0005749944,0.0008296813,0.00228411,0.003668265,0.005314647,0.0008748527,0.002561453,0.004813737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005119768,0.0004103587,0.0005043282,0.002115759,0.02286929,0.009205116,0.002466916,0.004010019,0.001607478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005290827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002635804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01005855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00776728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997443,0.001523246,0.00007456543,0.0001783788,0.00059687,0.000183905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976645,0.001500387,0.00009523457,0.0002329759,0.0003889409,0.0001180616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005444962,0.000004173292,0.00001813987,0.00002078317,0.000002790259,0.0000226378,0.0007925381,0.00005836021,0.00001388224,0.9859108,0.01044769,0.002702672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003508898,0.000002623781,0.00006207292,0.00004707075,0.00000241857,0.00002794742,0.0004739008,0.00006003756,0.00006930126,0.939439,0.05980652,0.000005526803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00986722,0.1861912,0.02061981,0.1131805,0.004938529,0.00002441357,0.0002099344,0.0001217409,0.6648467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7654486,0.06876283,0.01081506,0.02337749,0.005603317,0.0001239975,0.000191616,0.0002928865,0.1253842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01005855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03838778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059453367","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.664025","title":"Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Dialectic; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Critical philosophy; Reflexive pronoun","authors":[{"name":"Brian A. Chance","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06562803257129741,"gpt":0.23684473839375,"spread":0.1712167058224526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006959398,0.0002979528,0.0003346482,0.001943192,0.003151646,0.006829315,0.0009100349,0.002349535,0.00207844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006581352,0.000213806,0.000310279,0.001195966,0.05522422,0.005036814,0.005278063,0.005060234,0.0002875737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00853536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003972274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002531357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001740313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923739,0.005268954,0.0001680067,0.0005574593,0.001315047,0.0003166798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943198,0.003593026,0.0004614019,0.0005541201,0.0007943773,0.0002771484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004905824,0.000003842163,0.00007326388,0.00001242932,0.000001999412,0.00003752631,0.00586508,0.0001095756,0.00006557888,0.9918988,0.0003101701,0.001617009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001163596,0.000009458145,0.0002501543,0.00006009358,0.000002729589,0.00006338659,0.002087827,0.0003975765,0.0001953834,0.9769746,0.01993893,0.000008269485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1732552,0.01432801,0.03975746,0.05278949,0.0004352526,0.00004574279,0.00004503228,0.0001242451,0.7192195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890761,0.0006852563,0.001900365,0.0008440159,0.00005673808,0.00001752838,0.000006992977,0.00001200368,0.007400938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00853536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06192863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986418568","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2010.502359","title":"Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Monad (category theory); Philosophy; Epistemology; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Richard T. W. Arthur","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05040132283498604,"gpt":0.2228933352059956,"spread":0.1724920123710095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001311716,0.001400911,0.0009912045,0.003188442,0.002309816,0.007348278,0.0008938002,0.002829895,0.02331356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002223592,0.0006237253,0.0003257767,0.004129867,0.005913914,0.01224957,0.003619241,0.003541842,0.01244189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003966857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003038764,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01046848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0133155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988943,0.0002717291,0.00008821491,0.0001498037,0.0004563979,0.0001395574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995682,0.0001383129,0.00006431319,0.00005911207,0.00008827072,0.00008174435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004400087,0.00002035421,0.0002510679,0.000471641,0.00001652945,0.0001393971,0.002044659,0.000166573,0.0002505188,0.4105668,0.4237443,0.1622841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007705657,0.000008489903,0.0007888161,0.0004978174,0.000005381421,0.0001798157,0.0006977007,0.00006026788,0.0001435409,0.1111739,0.8864216,0.00001493384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.000864308,0.8357791,0.002021115,0.02577868,0.003197175,0.0000132515,0.0002701486,0.0002598363,0.1318164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1135914,0.6142024,0.004349411,0.01019936,0.009201742,0.0001405533,0.0007780236,0.0004400712,0.2470971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02331356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0779916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337735366","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1154007","title":"Materialism in the mainstream of early German philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft","keywords":"Materialism; Mainstream; German; Philosophy; German philosophy; Epistemology; Theology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Corey W. Dyck","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06148565831719774,"gpt":0.241086954209271,"spread":0.1796012958920732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002984755,0.0003054374,0.0002488891,0.001924973,0.003643119,0.006092224,0.0003825207,0.001408966,0.001976224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001901651,0.0002443528,0.0001952394,0.001337967,0.02482236,0.003774422,0.00177918,0.001864655,0.0002215089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01496633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003152468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01199199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01151011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981642,0.0009483675,0.00006090957,0.0001531829,0.0003170949,0.0003562002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992434,0.0004734901,0.00008396251,0.0000551896,0.00008139959,0.00006260336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001862959,0.00000686035,0.0001693242,0.00003169106,0.000003115251,0.00007604437,0.01701678,0.0001061187,0.0001560732,0.9772798,0.001074704,0.004060839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005260858,0.00007002222,0.004579042,0.0003776462,0.00002104424,0.0002234631,0.01678138,0.0006017837,0.001071987,0.5775632,0.3986242,0.0000335701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3197542,0.05487073,0.009039495,0.04257832,0.00070629,0.00003637245,0.0001643691,0.0001144783,0.5727357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865231,0.002905176,0.0003539872,0.0008916105,0.0001431768,0.000009224437,0.00001063903,0.00001760929,0.009145581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01496633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1085888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229017849","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2060181","title":"On the significance of A. A. Robb’s philosophy of time, especially in relation to Bertrand Russell’s","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Relation (database); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Theory of relativity; Minkowski space; Theoretical physics; Physics; Mathematical physics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Richard T. W. Arthur","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04790631278482065,"gpt":0.2185602732257187,"spread":0.170653960440898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004872901,0.0004223647,0.0006232576,0.0016423,0.005689655,0.005525511,0.0008637243,0.003220506,0.002087837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006343206,0.0003019532,0.0004054563,0.00209015,0.02799848,0.00723673,0.002250463,0.004902807,0.0005902442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004999381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002633561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01012487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00853626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969381,0.001950747,0.00005889484,0.0002912822,0.0005661914,0.000194728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961004,0.002904169,0.0002421998,0.000139042,0.0003876614,0.0002264435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008607438,0.000002482903,0.00004233329,0.0000260691,0.000001841422,0.0000469122,0.001916184,0.00008229517,0.00004940925,0.9903972,0.004374442,0.003052224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000534325,0.00001178455,0.0002852736,0.0001295003,0.000004423977,0.0001397742,0.001258556,0.000256079,0.00011567,0.8142689,0.1835037,0.0000209159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03011138,0.1726128,0.05215243,0.2896792,0.006492909,0.0000262229,0.00008628312,0.0001434448,0.4486953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8790661,0.04381706,0.01183525,0.01956548,0.004206091,0.00006092208,0.00004725821,0.0002398297,0.04116204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01012487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03627324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016777474","doi":"10.1080/0960878032000058473","title":"The World as Representation: Schopenhauer's Arguments for Transcendental Idealism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Transcendental idealism; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Politics; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Douglas McDermid","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05727256063038989,"gpt":0.2804476096165112,"spread":0.2231750489861213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004502886,0.0006389137,0.0006992656,0.001799962,0.003692523,0.007597495,0.001253794,0.005111777,0.0077657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006829839,0.0003826826,0.0008612424,0.002816108,0.02346038,0.02072804,0.00471961,0.007041772,0.001376082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005431429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002384751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003097339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003276288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976469,0.001189566,0.00008238992,0.0002016774,0.0006218661,0.0002575494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971541,0.002149323,0.0001320954,0.0002145568,0.0002553703,0.000094647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004308747,0.000002516904,0.000007432936,0.000005561164,9.488885e-7,0.00000776641,0.0004802975,0.00005852198,0.00001012402,0.996258,0.002151976,0.001012672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004664064,0.000002133321,0.00002304692,0.00002153064,0.00000102263,0.00001197341,0.0001847817,0.00007984907,0.00002827079,0.988246,0.01139403,0.000002628006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01585912,0.05628119,0.05047072,0.1869458,0.001804631,0.0000388456,0.0001319062,0.00009893469,0.6883688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8892016,0.02151945,0.01162968,0.01640275,0.001860778,0.0001263328,0.00009918132,0.0001804786,0.05897989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03940797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908726607","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2018.1537256","title":"Patriarchal power as unjust: tyranny in seventeenth-century Venice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Power (physics); Politics; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Moral philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Marguerite Deslauriers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05225700864332328,"gpt":0.2552111298935706,"spread":0.2029541212502474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003656148,0.0002499398,0.0003559116,0.0009838018,0.008158602,0.005572968,0.000562144,0.002097406,0.002168993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002918438,0.0002559293,0.0001982621,0.0005746059,0.05196305,0.002387729,0.005602899,0.00391386,0.0002384248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006446307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00290705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009604893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01750478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979582,0.001034561,0.00004543695,0.0001462594,0.0002001204,0.0006154967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991228,0.0004148466,0.0001171867,0.00007928373,0.00007429197,0.0001915846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003934313,0.00001829151,0.001492991,0.00002999835,0.000003782879,0.0003410009,0.1681869,0.0001013537,0.0001566448,0.820814,0.001117769,0.007698022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000857223,0.0002094607,0.01469709,0.0009831757,0.00001779306,0.001192939,0.1084468,0.0003082889,0.001267277,0.3085544,0.5641502,0.00008691013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3691545,0.01477169,0.001830344,0.02515807,0.0004142284,0.00002694275,0.00002043798,0.00002412815,0.5885996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832249,0.0007777039,0.0001125713,0.0007480917,0.00007447904,0.000009660449,0.000004258833,0.000009754834,0.01503867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009604893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04677141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332652228","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2014.946470","title":"The Philosophy of Praxis: Marx, Lukács, and the Frankfurt School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Columbia College; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Agnes Judit Vashegyi MacDonald","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02640576270109966,"gpt":0.2739537506377253,"spread":0.2475479879366256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003409349,0.0004863523,0.000558821,0.001835781,0.007628567,0.009169549,0.0007262093,0.004886999,0.004702224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006628039,0.0003510789,0.0002301376,0.002227685,0.04038691,0.01076369,0.003063555,0.005129128,0.0005247801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01366087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008061213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02424176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03176194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975453,0.001636013,0.00005974791,0.0001925325,0.0002615592,0.0003047962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996496,0.002750457,0.000246014,0.0001443425,0.0001729954,0.0001902449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001664472,0.000009720062,0.00007436148,0.00002325322,0.000001441483,0.00002536569,0.006253522,0.00005223758,0.00001607797,0.9853722,0.004772186,0.003382881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002249793,0.00001106599,0.0003668761,0.0003123603,0.000004782728,0.00006851023,0.007499448,0.0001502984,0.00006992761,0.8663134,0.1251663,0.00001452459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0631499,0.2406036,0.004750408,0.3348678,0.002099026,0.00002885979,0.00007482932,0.00006168503,0.3543639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374437,0.01706636,0.001039564,0.005942073,0.0008688463,0.00003832634,0.0000150152,0.00004243966,0.03754367],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02424176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09911704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584133136","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1266461","title":"Donald C. Williams’s defence of real metaphysics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; University of Manchester; Arts and Humanities Research Council; British Academy; Princeton University","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); History; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"A. R. J. Fisher","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06861166619446298,"gpt":0.3166726351151308,"spread":0.2480609689206678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00513209,0.0006739111,0.0006720966,0.00182708,0.003972974,0.00594379,0.00142413,0.007415365,0.003981822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01183785,0.0005025355,0.0005534421,0.001297119,0.03278351,0.006417342,0.003409994,0.01091276,0.00147915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007543731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003678699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007837191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007059162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952957,0.002181512,0.0001644457,0.0008065389,0.001220307,0.000331448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955364,0.002981856,0.0003016797,0.0003453283,0.0006250707,0.0002095879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005576489,0.000002152875,0.00002254547,0.00001381465,0.000002215354,0.00002255553,0.0005844454,0.00004659645,0.0000471059,0.9890639,0.008194221,0.00199495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000103933,0.00001034157,0.0001236067,0.0001327872,0.000004734571,0.00009632195,0.0002831565,0.0001948455,0.0002245281,0.7061051,0.2927955,0.00001864956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01235047,0.04322947,0.03119737,0.4472117,0.008598824,0.00005699729,0.000139366,0.0001297672,0.457086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6614706,0.02648151,0.01371402,0.1359036,0.009751727,0.0003370575,0.00009098915,0.0004210115,0.1518295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007837191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05473381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032427725","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2013.771609","title":"Embodying Justice in Ancient Egypt:<i>The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant</i>as a Classic of Political Philosophy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Peasant; Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Literature; Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Chike Jeffers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03853613673637077,"gpt":0.2756476520904255,"spread":0.2371115153540548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001332275,0.0003403971,0.0002612182,0.0009597944,0.006675704,0.0054728,0.0004798275,0.001994001,0.002113435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001636761,0.0001253851,0.0001629763,0.00101412,0.02281592,0.002813643,0.001950792,0.003354956,0.0003654421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007740617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003135114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01646328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01707544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991608,0.0003743896,0.00002759259,0.00006569976,0.000184649,0.0001868878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999541,0.0002080434,0.00005680095,0.000036013,0.0001173959,0.00004069509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002810787,0.00001448346,0.0003130408,0.0001167887,0.000008683645,0.0002483352,0.05479625,0.0002276415,0.0002731826,0.9180147,0.01319872,0.01276021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002109919,0.00003648476,0.002411031,0.0003833476,0.00001842039,0.0004227924,0.04292839,0.0004343367,0.0009493144,0.3273854,0.6249698,0.00003957084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1262998,0.05484559,0.006613512,0.1106472,0.002144547,0.00004159099,0.00008311954,0.0001044398,0.6992202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228662,0.006068064,0.0009917724,0.00798728,0.0006824001,0.00001612162,0.00002034624,0.00004572877,0.06132205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01646328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05616236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079914764","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.689750","title":"The Limits of Experience and Explanation: F. A. Lange and Ernst Mach on Things in Themselves","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy; Denial; Vision; Mach number; Inference; Philosophy of science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Theology; Computer science; Mechanics; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Scott Edgar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08236861792178442,"gpt":0.2544564984952087,"spread":0.1720878805734243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004289972,0.0005754292,0.0006949417,0.001279901,0.003619972,0.006937121,0.00092876,0.005273309,0.001697096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008434661,0.0004475827,0.0004365505,0.0008210799,0.037731,0.01457815,0.003585967,0.007228892,0.0004418129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003008019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002642982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002989926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002452587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967902,0.001926198,0.00006816928,0.0003585313,0.0006302716,0.0002265228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940053,0.004897636,0.000258045,0.0003307418,0.000304768,0.0002035113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000209699,0.00001882726,0.0001551645,0.0000441343,0.000006222774,0.00008743077,0.00633508,0.0002708803,0.00006464003,0.9756455,0.00890553,0.008445515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001097748,0.000006452678,0.0001056416,0.00008666205,0.000002975307,0.00005032879,0.0008023948,0.0002420002,0.00004367848,0.9652146,0.03342335,0.0000110402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04091365,0.178803,0.03274704,0.546066,0.00415183,0.00002868397,0.000088466,0.0001533526,0.1970479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911341,0.03269898,0.008497613,0.02453072,0.004596202,0.00008872724,0.00004058109,0.0001217164,0.01808441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006937121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02268779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966471514","doi":"10.1080/09608780600792067","title":"Alternative possibilities in descartes's fourth meditation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","authors":[{"name":"C. P. Ragland","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04967137649723556,"gpt":0.2354972113379695,"spread":0.1858258348407339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009671043,0.0005603501,0.0002452039,0.001043806,0.003243727,0.00422419,0.0005829286,0.001344219,0.006129984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001634095,0.000219304,0.0004058675,0.0005139307,0.01393669,0.002331129,0.001962835,0.003029138,0.00162447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005357805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009713341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005880249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00577045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990627,0.00048548,0.00002450191,0.0000933254,0.0002099869,0.0001240099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995272,0.0002002973,0.00002909247,0.0001006189,0.00007844299,0.00006445128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002085888,0.000004833972,0.00002739692,0.00001363962,0.000001314895,0.00005776347,0.003246348,0.0000862865,0.00005736267,0.9843485,0.009099493,0.003036354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002463434,0.00002406148,0.0002602564,0.00006286581,0.000005370753,0.0001848076,0.002086797,0.0004183584,0.0005365776,0.4881547,0.5082172,0.00002449605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01161103,0.004928409,0.004492165,0.009940607,0.001143744,0.00001583912,0.00008564629,0.0001319648,0.9676505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8341065,0.002551955,0.004232737,0.001628549,0.0006059316,0.00005514783,0.00007468543,0.0000989023,0.1566455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006129984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03887373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091317637","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.583413","title":"The Unity of Efficient and Final Causality: The Mind/Body Problem Reconsidered","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Causality (physics); Mind–body problem; Epistemology; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Henrik Lagerlund","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1518580751963127,"gpt":0.2409242923422125,"spread":0.08906621714589982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005114683,0.0003284433,0.0005673367,0.001664851,0.003477345,0.005482638,0.0009485838,0.003212493,0.00872686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006597233,0.0002788627,0.0006653802,0.001261906,0.03175946,0.01144687,0.004872785,0.004414919,0.0005444984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004149738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002934208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003762081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002175204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969097,0.00170146,0.000109558,0.0004376244,0.0005385029,0.0003031879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961408,0.002447443,0.0002847361,0.0004259128,0.0005169931,0.000184083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000298412,0.000002075241,0.00003859112,0.000006872315,8.434913e-7,0.00001212925,0.000349151,0.00005187894,0.00001291622,0.9982988,0.0002661132,0.0009577102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005047716,0.000003550066,0.00008490891,0.00001934201,0.000001712006,0.00001777445,0.0003180823,0.0001972791,0.00003695589,0.9918447,0.007467465,0.000003123891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09501474,0.01076986,0.1429188,0.08475608,0.001740833,0.00006117169,0.0001637559,0.0001478685,0.6644269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684397,0.001868041,0.008326256,0.00259693,0.000457091,0.00005514814,0.00005220604,0.00007174983,0.01813289],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00872686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03010857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618733512","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2017.1322038","title":"Consciousness, ideas of ideas and animation in Spinoza’s<i>Ethics</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Consciousness; Epistemology; Philosophy; Meaning (existential); Illusion; Object (grammar); Psychology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Oberto Marrama","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09110031731990202,"gpt":0.2892774388847627,"spread":0.1981771215648607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002597842,0.0003841767,0.0002256197,0.0009125911,0.004418464,0.006382421,0.0005880307,0.002738193,0.002304778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003128249,0.0002089403,0.0003529162,0.0006887318,0.03338973,0.005579581,0.002603475,0.004309623,0.0004078897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004872617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002661943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00562797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004448648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974048,0.001731619,0.00007845026,0.000196479,0.000330828,0.000257841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983922,0.0009574938,0.0001831238,0.0001379121,0.0001649458,0.0001642365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002272369,0.000001802711,0.00004082736,0.00000514792,4.394446e-7,0.00001010069,0.001439513,0.00003049391,0.00002037914,0.9969056,0.0007185122,0.0008249226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005934501,0.00000796406,0.0002381143,0.00004828257,0.000002770862,0.00006567031,0.001635731,0.0003573923,0.0001537326,0.9118404,0.08563543,0.000008544842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04904777,0.01331384,0.08537873,0.106552,0.001312421,0.00005816607,0.00005760487,0.0001303415,0.7441491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576655,0.001720689,0.008871763,0.005895148,0.0004216714,0.0001026334,0.00001816615,0.00007030284,0.02523404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006382421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03535348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311237460","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2142197","title":"Cartesian intuition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Certainty; Philosophy; Perception; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Elliot Samuel Paul","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06712002824523436,"gpt":0.220494746916762,"spread":0.1533747186715276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001491491,0.0004485392,0.0004519086,0.001089659,0.001903544,0.003382315,0.0005010603,0.00104264,0.01121719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002931029,0.0002680238,0.0006385856,0.0006684424,0.007960402,0.004709107,0.00282728,0.002094724,0.002836286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00185094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009511703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001833576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001348787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985939,0.0004683197,0.00008930309,0.0003276443,0.0003805056,0.0001404506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988956,0.0003702488,0.00007807783,0.0002415586,0.0003408297,0.00007364354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002549628,0.000001156914,0.00003247358,0.000008503908,8.259704e-7,0.000009520019,0.0002331322,0.00004058799,0.00002227547,0.9971786,0.001098167,0.001372254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005222704,0.00001046086,0.000151111,0.00002897469,0.000003002856,0.0001297695,0.0001900824,0.0003205818,0.00008476295,0.9066004,0.09246921,0.000006479015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01277297,0.002696316,0.08005129,0.005328107,0.0005921535,0.00003941199,0.0002918229,0.000284149,0.8979438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8639027,0.00302478,0.04597285,0.002862842,0.000756158,0.0001136064,0.0005689156,0.0002313368,0.08256672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01121719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03752518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996729878","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2014.900605","title":"Leibniz on Infinite Numbers, Infinite Wholes, and Composite Substances","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Infinity; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Adam Harmer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04977420463295627,"gpt":0.2241849010707028,"spread":0.1744106964377465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002869185,0.0006567836,0.000693345,0.001842405,0.00371467,0.006593428,0.0008982992,0.00235825,0.002444472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003884159,0.0002870604,0.0006397082,0.001384667,0.02516902,0.008752588,0.002698416,0.003584636,0.000667694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005708074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001966767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004634414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003486833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981304,0.0007985928,0.00007326611,0.000285316,0.0005555752,0.0001568856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984702,0.0009495838,0.0001094799,0.0001849394,0.0001861281,0.00009959099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002361323,0.000001217074,0.00002088077,0.000006877103,0.000001119516,0.00001407939,0.0001837302,0.0000671039,0.00001842243,0.9983885,0.000620383,0.0006752931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002434584,0.00000283151,0.0000515127,0.00002237205,0.000001593686,0.00001282009,0.00007258803,0.00009659727,0.00003389816,0.986454,0.01324595,0.000003486609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03690544,0.07146221,0.05349263,0.03501504,0.001546139,0.00004159831,0.0002027851,0.0001154803,0.8012187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887177,0.02144765,0.01432288,0.006411653,0.002234186,0.0001622835,0.0001609039,0.0001207606,0.06796265],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006593428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04141515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401615859","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2389869","title":"Du Châtelet's causal idealism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Rationalism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Natural (archaeology); Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Fatema Amijee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05660890936950277,"gpt":0.2337514307783508,"spread":0.177142521408848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003266095,0.000422747,0.0005204895,0.001637118,0.00299057,0.004252416,0.001038485,0.002838336,0.004763333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006602651,0.0003070438,0.0009054879,0.0009356074,0.01582145,0.005238377,0.002930646,0.003943526,0.0006471836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006548552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003582074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006322137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004666319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969363,0.00102032,0.00009650876,0.0006047537,0.001032472,0.0003095424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964006,0.002255016,0.0001899363,0.0004230344,0.00054685,0.0001845506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001641334,0.000001318758,0.00001602361,0.000004042475,7.652422e-7,0.000007866493,0.0001084602,0.00008220843,0.0000125093,0.9989079,0.0004502789,0.0004069537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006300103,0.000003373215,0.00005615724,0.00001824261,0.000003333029,0.00003554509,0.0000750911,0.0008133086,0.000112567,0.974043,0.02482798,0.000005198296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02487047,0.00468904,0.118709,0.04240959,0.0008051748,0.00006012607,0.0001915928,0.0002049423,0.80806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293817,0.002174703,0.02199643,0.003643911,0.000514113,0.0001566716,0.0000826226,0.00009915374,0.04195064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006548552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04751331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158220885","doi":"10.1080/09608780802548440","title":"Malebranche's Method: Knowledge and Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Cartesianism; Psychologism; Epistemology; CLARITY; Doctrine; Platonism; Direct and indirect realism; Theology; Perception; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"David Scott","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1128503336910326,"gpt":0.2921261545991854,"spread":0.1792758209081528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01788293,0.0007597972,0.000693501,0.005200191,0.003120054,0.005168957,0.003907638,0.006082262,0.05293753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102654,0.0005535845,0.0005162993,0.003464047,0.01670127,0.01682086,0.003792119,0.005438481,0.008729815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003810412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003355673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008158263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007653309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864165,0.00629558,0.0005649948,0.002027249,0.004236079,0.0004595982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9047509,0.07305193,0.002682968,0.009391792,0.009083924,0.001038393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002999511,0.00005803006,0.001322162,0.0006640676,0.00006191854,0.0003109174,0.003840836,0.0001072324,0.0001372793,0.7185391,0.1541722,0.1204863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007572591,0.00005581688,0.002523591,0.002706936,0.00003722165,0.0004586196,0.001833968,0.0005333182,0.001005544,0.3063515,0.6843604,0.00005728043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01076479,0.06988796,0.0382711,0.243046,0.007071734,0.0002385541,0.001334794,0.0003391166,0.629046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6615131,0.06687051,0.03720149,0.07472719,0.00672716,0.0008585145,0.001197872,0.0006744305,0.1502298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1770937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081716706","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.650975","title":"Malebranche, the Quietists, and Freedom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Period (music); Epistemology; History; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Julie Walsh","is_ca":true},{"name":"Thomas M. Lennon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.041311710720692,"gpt":0.2629524950018639,"spread":0.2216407842811719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002725382,0.0003167735,0.0003878396,0.0008722475,0.009268171,0.006640902,0.0003875783,0.002557834,0.005307043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003652728,0.0002365547,0.0001839846,0.0007632712,0.04154344,0.005327384,0.005616206,0.004100178,0.0006979147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005365833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003097879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008994511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01452221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997084,0.001814396,0.00004143609,0.0002546609,0.0004457515,0.0003597711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986015,0.0007882327,0.0001377708,0.0000979337,0.000108893,0.0002656433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001767147,0.000004702356,0.0001434659,0.00001837118,0.000002128364,0.0000530326,0.01625902,0.00003770586,0.00006442815,0.9722334,0.007190442,0.003975452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002052218,0.00002108074,0.001327592,0.0001736229,0.000003591141,0.000135388,0.009686418,0.00006489504,0.0001323813,0.4315903,0.556826,0.00001820045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05490574,0.04186331,0.00354291,0.1383747,0.001018468,0.00002100688,0.00005655708,0.00002658154,0.7601907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8836969,0.005944883,0.0005573271,0.005627595,0.0006135458,0.00003217915,0.00001757882,0.00004004982,0.10347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009268171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03893203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135155537","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2021.1881881","title":"Is this me?A story about personal identity from the <i>Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa</i> / <i>Dà zhìdù lùn</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Indian and Buddhist Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Buddhism; Philosophy; Sanskrit; Personal identity; Literature; Identity (music); Framing (construction); Epistemology; Aesthetics; History; Self; Theology; Art","authors":[{"name":"Jing Huang","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonardon Ganeri","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05201970458598405,"gpt":0.2358091185025373,"spread":0.1837894139165533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001205412,0.0006924351,0.0004088125,0.00056771,0.01520021,0.005223859,0.0008355989,0.002111221,0.002857607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002495483,0.0003112294,0.0002416783,0.0009298539,0.01504156,0.0056022,0.003415803,0.0075778,0.0004967296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003615943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001207558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01167665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01995346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987813,0.0008389936,0.00002046041,0.00008055444,0.0001443181,0.0001343685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991726,0.000510304,0.00006094819,0.00003424703,0.00005429257,0.0001674554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004208435,0.00001615958,0.0003816253,0.00006317807,0.000003644026,0.001476997,0.9466993,0.00003007942,0.0002954092,0.04011248,0.007827418,0.003051502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087281,0.00007576582,0.002256952,0.0001998748,0.00001199996,0.001711832,0.759272,0.0001171718,0.0007905467,0.006700046,0.2288236,0.0000315357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6499077,0.009029194,0.002921833,0.09180393,0.002653555,0.0001123985,0.0004222072,0.00008479797,0.2430644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674931,0.002202522,0.0005756263,0.003980666,0.0004151553,0.00004547245,0.00007596741,0.00004754395,0.02516386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01520021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02623564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979382472","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.533025","title":"Boyle: Between God and Science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Philosophy; Haven; Theology; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"J. J. MacIntosh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1423156055555705,"gpt":0.2390143466615591,"spread":0.09669874110598864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225101,0.0009116577,0.0004308211,0.001066186,0.006196451,0.004902248,0.000888099,0.003724466,0.02753611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002325097,0.0004402559,0.0002152484,0.001164663,0.007344828,0.01011009,0.003485343,0.004913326,0.006405208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003311777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003146118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02135382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04834161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988973,0.0005961414,0.0000252541,0.0001288853,0.0002443845,0.0001080108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935,0.0002822208,0.00006688783,0.00004473633,0.0001106015,0.0001455887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000357809,0.00001106206,0.00009934572,0.0001657164,0.000005518624,0.0001878282,0.008252438,0.00007034099,0.0001443048,0.2346221,0.7273968,0.0290087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003946046,0.000006411059,0.0002755507,0.0003235674,0.000001645683,0.0001360594,0.002480278,0.00003262711,0.000103549,0.03064748,0.9659806,0.0000081886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002154576,0.5160177,0.002862776,0.177953,0.007224298,0.00002202679,0.0001988349,0.0001683892,0.2933984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1553677,0.2349859,0.005339368,0.05050023,0.007368384,0.0001231115,0.000238463,0.0004641844,0.5456127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09211743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009023040","doi":"10.1080/09608780802548473","title":"The Real Significance of Bayle's Authorship of theAvis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Michael W. Hickson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Thomas M. Lennon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04814873432005233,"gpt":0.3043715165631857,"spread":0.2562227822431334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003226731,0.000221673,0.0002917097,0.0009243917,0.00682762,0.008008072,0.0007367419,0.004511726,0.01020074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01528927,0.0003070708,0.0001224554,0.0009570163,0.01167395,0.004835705,0.003208056,0.006490218,0.00156953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003329623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002355213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005896419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01244161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970372,0.001440192,0.0001043074,0.0004251323,0.0005884305,0.0004047372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884958,0.007358269,0.0007400621,0.001031509,0.001840005,0.0005342776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004644596,0.000006713892,0.0004517683,0.00003940021,0.000004713445,0.0001156244,0.01113871,0.00003912716,0.0001138632,0.9131482,0.06412471,0.01077067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002786763,0.00002804904,0.001830347,0.0002099527,0.00001357517,0.0003137121,0.005803483,0.0003726173,0.0007637736,0.2061578,0.784436,0.00004289124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05893914,0.006460931,0.005139675,0.280106,0.01025717,0.00001290711,0.0001691359,0.0001937033,0.6387213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.880347,0.0009660547,0.0007423794,0.01017456,0.001987609,0.00001331528,0.00002299002,0.0001099222,0.1056363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01020074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03412485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003469035","doi":"10.1080/09608780903135253","title":"The Invention of Altruism: Making Moral Meanings in Victorian Britain","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Leslie Armour","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04005347515820541,"gpt":0.2959822403658658,"spread":0.2559287652076604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007847779,0.0002310053,0.0005049466,0.0008247953,0.0130722,0.009104882,0.001382959,0.006130975,0.005758179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01419442,0.0005962143,0.0002272131,0.001267686,0.04697353,0.004654319,0.005505083,0.008600415,0.0006260596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02225888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01298943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1070962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1407295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910241,0.005700916,0.0001851028,0.0006125856,0.00110224,0.001374963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947733,0.002831751,0.0003455416,0.0005170049,0.0007362565,0.0007960921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004178924,0.00001537705,0.0004386319,0.00007127657,0.000006314956,0.0001541641,0.05635488,0.000170552,0.0003206527,0.9310611,0.003712009,0.007653226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005432361,0.00003772458,0.005149676,0.0002309684,0.00001600517,0.0001792812,0.02431879,0.0008221996,0.0004083891,0.7215706,0.2471429,0.00006917971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2718856,0.009184237,0.007089343,0.09989273,0.0005947207,0.00005175764,0.0000907085,0.00004385109,0.6111671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693783,0.00049152,0.000631341,0.002197633,0.00005799981,0.00001472772,0.000007791486,0.0000417268,0.02717903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1070962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2129457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288698319","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2098689","title":"The ontology of images in Plato’s<i>Timaeus</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Ontology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Receptacle; Simple (philosophy); Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Samuel Meister","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04421202312164213,"gpt":0.2289103170119781,"spread":0.184698293890336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008784918,0.0003517356,0.0002153457,0.0007534587,0.003611787,0.004932003,0.0005068323,0.00140461,0.004246766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001239925,0.0002291018,0.0003646497,0.0008350421,0.02323132,0.006933988,0.002016146,0.002565233,0.0006310163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004247359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001649622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005575149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005102473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999184,0.0003626098,0.00002830329,0.0001204173,0.0001656755,0.0001390318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996181,0.0001560259,0.00005273522,0.00006387458,0.00004277773,0.00006642108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003509489,0.000001207935,0.00002215637,0.000004777728,2.807488e-7,0.000009240535,0.001498707,0.00002663985,0.00003451703,0.9967529,0.0006251404,0.001020925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000662788,0.000009694593,0.0002761468,0.0000325424,0.000002325105,0.00005184747,0.001451692,0.0004128845,0.0001498329,0.9155006,0.0820975,0.000008217351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03938878,0.00363419,0.05369283,0.01615484,0.0006379705,0.00004161254,0.0001888621,0.0001235289,0.8861375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454304,0.001113937,0.009744656,0.001575292,0.0003637896,0.0001021893,0.00007357893,0.0001142185,0.04148194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005575149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03081685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467690823","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1177483","title":"Ross’s place in the history of analytic philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Contemporary philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Kaspar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05476888635321583,"gpt":0.2834945838184412,"spread":0.2287256974652254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007462441,0.0004558988,0.0005489183,0.002016891,0.003048764,0.006145701,0.0007309532,0.003765355,0.002289144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01290635,0.000395192,0.0003623048,0.001426592,0.02407843,0.009201529,0.002891832,0.006461647,0.0006812912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00621299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004105556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00366561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00359074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915776,0.00578098,0.0002821952,0.000846163,0.001263009,0.0002500306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867653,0.01026413,0.0005649192,0.0009203361,0.0009842805,0.0005011852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001137848,0.00000407979,0.00006960973,0.00003989208,0.000002678323,0.00002514278,0.002250748,0.00007001198,0.00007042965,0.9798252,0.008550841,0.009079997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000774365,0.00001163072,0.0001766635,0.000189218,0.000003536376,0.0000909201,0.0006027742,0.0003152133,0.0001507022,0.7541088,0.2443276,0.00001532693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01891908,0.1692678,0.04661313,0.4195576,0.005282176,0.00003870759,0.0001019829,0.0001356727,0.3400838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7656368,0.06468084,0.03355587,0.03454422,0.007470699,0.0002133769,0.00008952958,0.0003504857,0.09345816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04507864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000887925","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.666849","title":"Lucretius: His Continuing Influence and Contemporary Relevance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Graeme K. Hunter","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05438542552203628,"gpt":0.2347252685630113,"spread":0.180339843040975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005087714,0.0007041258,0.0007255055,0.001863055,0.00514759,0.009959158,0.0009457474,0.00375859,0.005027157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008557064,0.0003660602,0.0002967341,0.001678155,0.02859038,0.009122162,0.004153857,0.005088277,0.002325559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006749969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004361324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007961046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008055896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954624,0.002721812,0.0001059973,0.0004514617,0.0008124826,0.0004459182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997039,0.001891444,0.0002101889,0.000247454,0.0003549879,0.0002570057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006244896,0.00001827904,0.000301103,0.0001861858,0.00001037279,0.0002883022,0.02771621,0.0001019754,0.0001654617,0.700289,0.1824971,0.08836348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000791591,0.00001639261,0.0004387693,0.0004717644,0.000003771976,0.0001975277,0.003432709,0.00005872671,0.0001245327,0.07451269,0.9207177,0.00001754624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01033978,0.4403671,0.001714301,0.2290017,0.006624545,0.00001316057,0.00004452763,0.00009202393,0.3118029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5790697,0.1817348,0.001749097,0.03626628,0.01846872,0.00005365087,0.00006119403,0.0003948254,0.1822019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009959158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04897469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372287184","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2201615","title":"Varieties of consciousness in classical Arabic thought: Avicenna, Averroes, and the <i>mutakallimūn</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Deborah L. Black","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04440190953154571,"gpt":0.2328049505372834,"spread":0.1884030410057377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032545,0.0003331625,0.0002287489,0.001092326,0.004210675,0.004528866,0.0004165687,0.001341096,0.001307705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001401955,0.0001486705,0.000186455,0.001121527,0.01854501,0.004496262,0.001798607,0.002360571,0.0001735299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003825082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001483166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006925741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006430793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995278,0.0002695399,0.00001253999,0.00004892025,0.00007824445,0.00006289158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993839,0.0003491472,0.0000766189,0.00003048727,0.00009762125,0.0000622209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008231125,0.00003083803,0.0009506717,0.0000790399,0.000005425175,0.0002429108,0.1028769,0.0001005724,0.000287143,0.875909,0.004699504,0.01473569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004312216,0.00006991319,0.00788959,0.0006774593,0.00001840526,0.0006977468,0.09149419,0.0009540024,0.0005755772,0.7083831,0.189141,0.00005593156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3976604,0.1251773,0.005897093,0.0845919,0.001861744,0.00003594433,0.00005186403,0.00003707609,0.3846867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874817,0.005717024,0.0007670894,0.001874623,0.0003452867,0.00001594719,0.000007994227,0.00001007538,0.003780268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006925741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02775306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405425026","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2423396","title":"Aristotle on logical consequence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Phil Corkum","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1038504428668205,"gpt":0.2610522252396165,"spread":0.1572017823727959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002423368,0.0004678875,0.0007122997,0.001677778,0.003340699,0.00342739,0.0005926295,0.002697187,0.003590907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003335021,0.0003021063,0.0005797513,0.001056619,0.01461602,0.005432655,0.001838066,0.00386057,0.001009861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004820718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001957933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004237525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003225028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980651,0.0008629779,0.00006819608,0.0002730243,0.0005895964,0.0001412829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986991,0.0007761673,0.00005998926,0.0001527447,0.0002457025,0.00006630398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003934353,0.000002382654,0.00001883572,0.000009342381,0.000001518301,0.00001377348,0.0001596792,0.0001436615,0.00002119173,0.9962273,0.002100201,0.00129818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004146801,0.000003627669,0.00003998772,0.00001999832,0.000001302282,0.00001012281,0.00003962692,0.0001847202,0.0000251788,0.9864305,0.01323815,0.000002637139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02254541,0.03826932,0.07619062,0.07603464,0.002273246,0.00006493475,0.0003833619,0.0001715681,0.7840669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8779028,0.01317497,0.0216243,0.01598961,0.002924158,0.0002287691,0.0002186806,0.0001572948,0.06777934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004820718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03497696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971960450","doi":"10.1080/09608780801969266","title":"Modernity, The Human Animal and Philosophical Tradition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophical methodology","authors":[{"name":"Leslie Armour","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1283401177064191,"gpt":0.2577913704305848,"spread":0.1294512527241657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003028476,0.000217505,0.0004566444,0.001813663,0.004142801,0.005033706,0.0005921795,0.002304738,0.008611529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003611657,0.0002465439,0.0001924744,0.002046319,0.04302677,0.00526557,0.001966802,0.004091701,0.0004319033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005746685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003294767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008430821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01509469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985182,0.0008958783,0.00004752679,0.0001885779,0.0001797312,0.0001701612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968091,0.002312311,0.0002041363,0.0002988951,0.0001930747,0.0001824294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009171938,0.000007377095,0.0001680047,0.00003054512,0.000003951877,0.00001661915,0.004789382,0.0000415481,0.00002594332,0.9905847,0.001348145,0.002974617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002512554,0.0000154207,0.001167772,0.0002013686,0.00000750635,0.00005535915,0.002847164,0.0000960646,0.00003463597,0.8492717,0.1462677,0.00001016555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06433745,0.1314726,0.004801173,0.06989121,0.001270917,0.00001865544,0.0000860653,0.00003955439,0.7280825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528468,0.01563917,0.00136995,0.003382864,0.001323516,0.00002209905,0.00002573259,0.0000361864,0.02535371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008611529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04169524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410596923","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2496270","title":"W.E.B. Du Bois’ misrecognition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Kwesi Thomas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04389203167010317,"gpt":0.2397508409744425,"spread":0.1958588093043394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00237828,0.0004686581,0.0004074702,0.001414235,0.003988003,0.005249817,0.0008369456,0.003633345,0.004320317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008626825,0.0002573735,0.0002977236,0.0008016931,0.02088154,0.009811239,0.004137749,0.00480242,0.001117164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00432344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002432838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006463113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004748838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997013,0.00126904,0.00009537108,0.0005931874,0.0007082793,0.0003211893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969451,0.00182311,0.0002988535,0.0003107828,0.0004488317,0.0001731896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001271901,0.000005438325,0.0002193474,0.00002861259,0.000003097659,0.00008273533,0.01298022,0.00005982264,0.0001181792,0.9528994,0.01932247,0.01426797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007437262,0.00001638302,0.0003380698,0.0001728722,0.00000449164,0.000492824,0.00581643,0.0002862503,0.0006651871,0.483092,0.5090845,0.00002358921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06811416,0.03539461,0.03552594,0.2753085,0.006909511,0.00004312914,0.00007786535,0.0001626048,0.5784637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8864147,0.007294692,0.004200835,0.02161983,0.00139835,0.00005416916,0.0000384193,0.0001281579,0.07885081],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006463113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03136891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416307882","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2511060","title":"Blueprint for cosmopolitan philosophy: a post-Eurocentric proposal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint","authors":[{"name":"Jonardon Ganeri","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05497622349358694,"gpt":0.3251756918430477,"spread":0.2701994683494608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007660838,0.000329696,0.0004207633,0.001195442,0.004148296,0.007946571,0.001324398,0.005276439,0.00545058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005327546,0.0002402295,0.0004469855,0.001326007,0.03098707,0.01110163,0.006934841,0.009998738,0.0008394707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004477136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007385994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002191971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002610114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957836,0.002551147,0.0001157774,0.0004435069,0.0006153031,0.000490786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970871,0.0009126724,0.00025151,0.0004571355,0.0006485449,0.0006430746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001983214,0.000006730401,0.00005361588,0.000006020879,7.356789e-7,0.00001672449,0.0007252887,0.00002903478,0.00001212589,0.996947,0.001141725,0.001058871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001305851,0.00001324335,0.0003903017,0.00008247331,0.000001587854,0.00008233538,0.002096263,0.0003212093,0.00005494829,0.8856944,0.1112446,0.000005658901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0348624,0.005747665,0.03326864,0.3644743,0.003606903,0.00006909585,0.00005142368,0.00006669306,0.557853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774418,0.002914374,0.01405951,0.04392149,0.001909032,0.00026352,0.00004729851,0.0001024553,0.05934045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007946571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04051489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366524411","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2178732","title":"The historical history of philosophy: a discussion with Michael Frede <b>The historiography of philosophy</b> , by Michael Frede, with a postface by Jonathan Barnes, edited by Katerina Ierodiakonou, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 256 pp., £55.00, (hb), ISBN: 9780198840725","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Philosophy; Michael reaction; Classics; Theology; History; Chemistry; Organic chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Menn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01912456122642019,"gpt":0.1888382246402737,"spread":0.1697136634138535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002402148,0.000551851,0.0005719804,0.001331824,0.005892445,0.006775178,0.0009182142,0.004566907,0.008515735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002803215,0.0005125121,0.0003466716,0.003145616,0.007978063,0.009274399,0.00259315,0.005600346,0.002177726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00779754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003986261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02322284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03864236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998911,0.0005433536,0.00003139716,0.0001442269,0.000242514,0.0001273866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992112,0.0004617428,0.00007055583,0.00002234019,0.0001095017,0.0001247082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001768557,0.00001441986,0.0001952125,0.0002092144,0.000006319505,0.0001946011,0.009052555,0.00006352597,0.00008138084,0.1200753,0.8366292,0.03346061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001814632,0.00000408607,0.0001927278,0.0003523073,0.000001125934,0.0001519171,0.001945502,0.00001846429,0.00003031722,0.008694828,0.9886021,0.000004902751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001362724,0.4414968,0.0006111239,0.5012609,0.008363672,0.000008491105,0.00003495502,0.00001743675,0.04684387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07996838,0.5489396,0.00297412,0.1431391,0.02589745,0.00009153359,0.00007491701,0.0001395007,0.1987754],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02322284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05657536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155781237","doi":"10.1080/09608780902763634","title":"‘Hume’ and ‘The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Hume's philosophy and hair distribution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Fred Wilson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02821819583431794,"gpt":0.2970518607699641,"spread":0.2688336649356461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002008242,0.001133705,0.0008882454,0.00325285,0.002991133,0.00533154,0.001483739,0.004989814,0.03259143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005283684,0.0006221715,0.0004997713,0.003662415,0.008513151,0.006107954,0.002123563,0.006268646,0.01424192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00326833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002943847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01275506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03242822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975498,0.001306655,0.0001168423,0.0001932204,0.0006223061,0.0002110955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982358,0.001013985,0.000150131,0.0001597189,0.000318799,0.0001215005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001911295,0.00001949135,0.00007143639,0.0001556532,0.000007646182,0.00004481196,0.001427617,0.00006794824,0.000070805,0.2866239,0.6836327,0.02785893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004629275,0.000005775412,0.0001797677,0.000188307,0.000002005083,0.00004679715,0.0002683983,0.00003381381,0.00005777349,0.03897669,0.9602264,0.00000966438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001160776,0.2260472,0.01202088,0.1473516,0.02828033,0.00008136062,0.0007941375,0.0005679787,0.5836957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04771707,0.06375792,0.008897597,0.05937719,0.02291348,0.0002939967,0.0005718407,0.001278205,0.7951927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03259143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1090292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409347825","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2478974","title":"Monads, situation, and infinite explanation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Filippo Costantini","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard T. W. Arthur","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0454345708368941,"gpt":0.2369759942232868,"spread":0.1915414233863927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004220866,0.0004561167,0.0006445103,0.002117599,0.004695704,0.005746924,0.001358267,0.002809647,0.004858001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00419789,0.0004300888,0.0008847333,0.00117283,0.03610884,0.01525061,0.004853326,0.004039386,0.0005228409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00758475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002665861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005148933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005426133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972615,0.001509139,0.000114454,0.0003663812,0.0004475898,0.0003009172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973279,0.001647554,0.0001754041,0.0004834804,0.0002073798,0.0001583465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036008,0.000001745106,0.00005203979,0.00001053394,0.000001577041,0.00001776464,0.0008237209,0.00008139806,0.00001729022,0.9980742,0.0002180763,0.0006981338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003595637,0.000002266257,0.00006221577,0.00002033992,0.000002587386,0.00002762836,0.000331263,0.0002571839,0.00004212179,0.9924509,0.006796359,0.000003505096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1361857,0.02410128,0.17074,0.07041416,0.0007917412,0.00006811324,0.0003714864,0.0005955518,0.5967319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980333,0.001121942,0.007596496,0.0009257988,0.0001659223,0.00003214883,0.00008251578,0.00005603364,0.009686026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00758475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05503148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406898838","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2445605","title":"James Africanus Beale Horton’s philosophy of history: progress, race, and the fate of Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy; Race (biology); Epistemology; Ancient philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Zeyad el Nabolsy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04218595766613161,"gpt":0.2653350638105355,"spread":0.2231491061444038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001246515,0.0002420698,0.0002434526,0.0009449507,0.004670482,0.002792404,0.0003867102,0.001802459,0.001713476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002076578,0.0001512753,0.0001253411,0.000796793,0.01347796,0.006097972,0.001685195,0.00361597,0.0002554729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003174864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002201369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009329684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01081654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993041,0.0003943592,0.00001860787,0.00008433862,0.0001268414,0.00007177632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999116,0.0006002301,0.00006471332,0.00003174952,0.00009408291,0.00009320495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001327431,0.000009143877,0.0002054178,0.00004819755,0.000002157439,0.00009059996,0.01116554,0.0001103302,0.00009970853,0.9597285,0.0201064,0.008420614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007742118,0.00001368974,0.0004949031,0.0002399385,0.000003139773,0.0001828153,0.004785829,0.0002319924,0.0001262278,0.4406422,0.5532582,0.0000132827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03261906,0.1255327,0.008417067,0.4996909,0.005332454,0.00004915096,0.00005238923,0.00002789324,0.3282783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.826378,0.04144579,0.00597618,0.03628901,0.002305506,0.00006819845,0.00001949403,0.00004258107,0.08747526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009329684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02303541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386602190","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2239022","title":"An inconsistency in Cassirer’s conception of the a priori","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Scott Edgar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07423693053374412,"gpt":0.2586299337892665,"spread":0.1843930032555224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01387606,0.0008188136,0.001172796,0.002088853,0.00440141,0.007049208,0.002784574,0.00583052,0.006302456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02502134,0.0006863369,0.0009987578,0.001496941,0.02384807,0.009197664,0.003386858,0.01258607,0.002573507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005309119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002955228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005053072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005537628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905543,0.004797847,0.0006287473,0.001614908,0.002029687,0.0003744806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867556,0.008966215,0.0004237087,0.001334472,0.002223933,0.0002960166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009193954,0.000002249726,0.00002642976,0.00002922624,0.000004510616,0.00001492507,0.0007689226,0.00004958133,0.00003166823,0.9881513,0.009166391,0.001745639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001602926,0.00001336793,0.0001264047,0.0001581187,0.00001084122,0.0001132388,0.0004224879,0.0004301673,0.0001516443,0.8688965,0.129632,0.00002920904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007682899,0.01531715,0.1180492,0.3317449,0.009939856,0.00006360733,0.0004134158,0.000374642,0.5164144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6545159,0.01319748,0.09296396,0.1333651,0.01316656,0.0005396471,0.0003239879,0.0008902309,0.09103721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01387606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07338452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404481090","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2423398","title":"Scudéry’s portraits: patriarchy, agency, and genre","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Scientific Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Portrait; Agency (philosophy); Art; Philosophy; Literature; Sociology; Art history; Gender studies; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Allauren Samantha Forbes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06173355360424425,"gpt":0.2732408484551356,"spread":0.2115072948508913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00143311,0.0006182569,0.0004308096,0.001852395,0.008493632,0.006402304,0.000719058,0.002612618,0.003518841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004176524,0.0002221235,0.0002753859,0.001288997,0.02850313,0.0040414,0.003829035,0.004820238,0.0006004308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003499125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001828749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005579544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005572997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982803,0.0009243343,0.00003847479,0.0001898932,0.0003453129,0.0002216805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987495,0.0008005088,0.0001103827,0.00009698303,0.00009550695,0.000147155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004178795,0.00001181392,0.0004622434,0.00007293205,0.000005223452,0.0006598203,0.2839587,0.00008890541,0.0004239001,0.6732479,0.02903941,0.01198743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006696916,0.00002809841,0.0005429375,0.0002513505,0.000005688089,0.00102695,0.04844068,0.0001532665,0.0004647759,0.06052483,0.88854,0.00001462773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1231109,0.03287138,0.009173858,0.1143915,0.002891969,0.00006108243,0.000125921,0.0001608903,0.7172124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8767694,0.008274756,0.001922958,0.007786265,0.001624104,0.00007123754,0.00003705612,0.0001969021,0.1033173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008493632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402485048","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2373128","title":"Against the extremes: Simmel’s social and economic pluralism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Oxford; McMaster University; Harvard University","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Johannes Steizinger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07819909330377232,"gpt":0.3105184939609326,"spread":0.2323194006571603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005024217,0.0004012281,0.0004163857,0.001397735,0.007710171,0.006669478,0.0006065993,0.00291087,0.001934802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003910416,0.0002184794,0.0004291547,0.0007766012,0.05297974,0.008456499,0.004451128,0.004987994,0.0002824584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005145935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003014379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002922153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003640917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963627,0.002410547,0.00005995644,0.0003914128,0.0004995562,0.0002757525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998325,0.0009504585,0.0001463319,0.0001743906,0.000140918,0.0002627463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005286558,0.00000555687,0.00005870403,0.000005336534,0.000001306702,0.00002719631,0.003900059,0.00007187206,0.00002241536,0.9917013,0.002469728,0.00173116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005678433,0.000006063246,0.00006770994,0.0000242373,0.000001196517,0.000028526,0.001682436,0.0001905396,0.00003698212,0.9538785,0.04407403,0.00000414253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09414073,0.01532551,0.02406229,0.3258885,0.001906679,0.00004708868,0.00004909372,0.00008478105,0.5384954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632859,0.001950311,0.004117504,0.01006318,0.0009677391,0.00004925926,0.000009946928,0.00003461009,0.01952159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007710171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03733659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954972732","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2019.1629387","title":"Kant and the science of logic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue","authors":[{"name":"Charles Cooper-Simpson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04823795495855564,"gpt":0.228431065853464,"spread":0.1801931108949084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002384553,0.0004863548,0.0005335146,0.001785719,0.003146533,0.005741575,0.0004726019,0.002696025,0.005036486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005184976,0.0003471755,0.0005138774,0.001046198,0.0194042,0.006867547,0.002062553,0.004771204,0.001587858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005903324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003324538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003460426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00352298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970348,0.001870929,0.00008260057,0.0002901338,0.0005056526,0.0002159849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977894,0.00145762,0.0001185068,0.0001993118,0.0003119042,0.000123271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001317278,0.000005570875,0.00004051033,0.00001763014,0.00000384699,0.00001312702,0.0003253423,0.0002047639,0.00003655039,0.9917802,0.005116042,0.00244321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005503927,0.000005462919,0.0000646834,0.00003250944,0.000002035985,0.00001808029,0.0001309156,0.0002229079,0.00005793114,0.9663073,0.03314671,0.000006040093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02416756,0.09716392,0.03054335,0.1748554,0.002651409,0.00004786187,0.0002534635,0.000231329,0.6700858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8203251,0.01844111,0.01552887,0.02407699,0.003101088,0.000119442,0.0001208467,0.0001690769,0.1181174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005903324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04283178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028483080","doi":"10.1080/09608780210143254","title":"Religion and the reflective self: Coleridge’s platonism revisited","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Travel Writing and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Platonism; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Leslie Armour","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03095783194949931,"gpt":0.2141933604797396,"spread":0.1832355285302403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005697867,0.0003796711,0.0006854205,0.001670231,0.008321793,0.009358693,0.001653332,0.005855257,0.005312498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01110232,0.000379951,0.0003826379,0.001756952,0.0741969,0.01189054,0.004457108,0.01044802,0.0005752614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005167239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005204097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01484807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01820278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969372,0.00181147,0.000107228,0.000426477,0.0004000119,0.0003176767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931588,0.004846234,0.0003758749,0.0006117432,0.0005555625,0.0004518298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008635973,0.000007177699,0.00007520476,0.00001242346,0.000001395362,0.00002859573,0.01258269,0.00002671446,0.00001088846,0.9826434,0.002339132,0.002263729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002884336,0.000006852311,0.0002111237,0.00008042668,0.000003856385,0.00007701833,0.005709092,0.0001511897,0.00004366813,0.948974,0.0447032,0.00001065414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.05859075,0.01484833,0.0169515,0.2112013,0.001543155,0.00008617093,0.00004482622,0.0000759852,0.696658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625841,0.002055999,0.003419019,0.0108423,0.0008674491,0.00006966118,0.00001527872,0.00007299887,0.02007307],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01484807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03749114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413875675","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2547655","title":"Richard FitzRalph on the will and instantaneous volition: a critical edition of book I, Question 10 from Richard FitzRalph’s <i>Lectura in Sententias</i> (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 137)","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval Philosophy and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Volition (linguistics); Critical edition; Humanities; Classics; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Szlachta","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03080547455585664,"gpt":0.2563694404760046,"spread":0.225563965920148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001744813,0.0004960943,0.0003268294,0.001006289,0.003596004,0.005501084,0.001061424,0.005228854,0.0060291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009074921,0.0002468497,0.0002612635,0.0008917612,0.009735676,0.007628235,0.00166638,0.008927182,0.001904646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004506589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02907518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04218965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986266,0.000501354,0.00005416353,0.0001872042,0.0004973545,0.0001333009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977691,0.00137352,0.0001283347,0.00009423381,0.0004842968,0.0001504982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001977467,0.00001015614,0.00008422386,0.00008277391,0.00000225689,0.0001082936,0.006536011,0.00003394699,0.00009081802,0.2388578,0.745685,0.008488962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007039705,0.000007641221,0.0004067824,0.0002782448,0.00000202892,0.00008889287,0.003172547,0.00002615363,0.0001066343,0.03235946,0.9635328,0.00001188678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00311125,0.05510373,0.001712448,0.7069079,0.0326956,0.00004553727,0.0001473974,0.00004714921,0.200229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1639114,0.04575902,0.002464291,0.3779472,0.049209,0.0002533073,0.0002037022,0.0004069019,0.3598452],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02907518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05781186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402801162","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2383624","title":"Physical influx theory: the case of Émilie Du Châtelet","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Humanities","authors":[{"name":"Christian Henkel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02888761222780548,"gpt":0.2777691850215041,"spread":0.2488815727936986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002555973,0.0003439326,0.0005099475,0.001709209,0.01495044,0.005737709,0.001141991,0.004149533,0.009282245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003720185,0.0003491627,0.0004543328,0.001302036,0.02308743,0.008895369,0.005749034,0.004793556,0.0009379493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01056257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003354155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02088901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0260719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981391,0.0007981872,0.00003140118,0.0003235,0.0003476413,0.0003600935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986903,0.0007885351,0.00009122884,0.000128471,0.0001589682,0.0001425869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005340401,0.000004060284,0.000103363,0.000008471402,0.000001109916,0.0001662842,0.006174976,0.00003216647,0.00003003513,0.9919601,0.0007715625,0.0007424988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003291283,0.00002572481,0.001119258,0.0002283342,0.00001729367,0.0007225648,0.01328907,0.0008872184,0.000336649,0.6474957,0.3358134,0.00003184459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06537542,0.005214975,0.009236895,0.0211727,0.0003376172,0.00003700696,0.00003003521,0.00004487846,0.8985505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464546,0.001187437,0.001323813,0.00209451,0.0001433644,0.0000570874,0.00001504269,0.00003906121,0.04868495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02088901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07663715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233462544","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2002.10383085","title":"Book reviews","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Metaphysics","authors":[{"name":"George W. Wright","is_ca":false},{"name":"Desmond M. Clarke","is_ca":false},{"name":"G. H. R. Parkinson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gary Banham","is_ca":false},{"name":"Don A. Habibi","is_ca":false},{"name":"T. L. S. Sprigge","is_ca":false},{"name":"Christopher Adair‐Toteff","is_ca":false},{"name":"Graham Stevens","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.144438550018094,"gpt":0.3220933520619197,"spread":0.1776548020438258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007897741,0.001066545,0.001343497,0.003447306,0.00149235,0.007637911,0.002645921,0.00281752,0.4876518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004649859,0.0004885119,0.0008905546,0.004576927,0.0007995197,0.004552914,0.002741253,0.002700835,0.4518478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002268407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004202497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003712692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005933867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985258,0.0001681048,0.000103548,0.0002807788,0.0007915906,0.0001302279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979675,0.0003883429,0.0001187562,0.0001898815,0.001015982,0.0003194519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001212881,0.00001557614,0.00004066385,0.0005519604,0.000004803389,0.00006691222,0.00007661449,0.00003546906,0.0001040849,0.003996453,0.8875208,0.1075746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001681129,0.000002694259,0.00004488073,0.0002160383,0.000001508893,0.00006777809,0.00003114644,0.000005053803,0.00001346206,0.000558704,0.9990547,0.000002257788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004093971,0.1877465,0.001662217,0.02095393,0.03192903,0.000205921,0.004338118,0.0009167813,0.7518381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002503847,0.1022721,0.001572136,0.009824649,0.008706249,0.0001488367,0.004460155,0.0006413591,0.8698707],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4876518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7308025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067132141","doi":"10.1080/09608780902763675","title":"‘Historical Dictionary of Nietzscheanism’, ‘On the Genealogy of Morality’ and ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Zoroaster; Philosophy; History; Classics; Theology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Paul Bishop","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06658631615997454,"gpt":0.2474648681158885,"spread":0.1808785519559139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009438633,0.0007661069,0.0004226313,0.002418134,0.00289145,0.00373623,0.0009726717,0.001691715,0.03251325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002293543,0.000335212,0.0002343864,0.003827966,0.004515068,0.005784805,0.001482875,0.002605379,0.007841115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004677043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005720426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0168261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04935022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989968,0.0004083012,0.00007521286,0.0001000211,0.0003307653,0.00008885345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995009,0.0001902367,0.00005362037,0.00005793173,0.0001553867,0.00004198785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001350312,0.0000111821,0.0001097209,0.0002827458,0.000005256193,0.00008457475,0.004835896,0.00008885803,0.0002035768,0.4691815,0.468486,0.05669722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001242907,0.000001762152,0.0001718378,0.0001244968,7.720889e-7,0.00006096803,0.0003673456,0.00001142274,0.00003821356,0.01430195,0.9849165,0.000003347347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001928642,0.2096786,0.006145317,0.04623348,0.006439331,0.00005639439,0.00136834,0.0001802852,0.7279697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.100587,0.1897847,0.0120261,0.0167973,0.00516137,0.0002527024,0.002813101,0.0006447114,0.671933],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03251325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1087677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412571404","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2527980","title":"Towards a “halfway plausible theory of ethics”: judgement in Arendt’s critique of Kant’s moral philosophy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Normative ethics","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Dunn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1059541675870607,"gpt":0.3569349345724565,"spread":0.2509807669853958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01217116,0.0006363103,0.0007482494,0.002314734,0.00621332,0.009085252,0.002299672,0.009130619,0.002865845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01501249,0.0004278115,0.001057948,0.001765273,0.05092531,0.008918832,0.004253038,0.01263765,0.0007437635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009049314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004994549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005220374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004589067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850793,0.009495745,0.0003170829,0.0009639199,0.00345731,0.0006867716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939631,0.003740588,0.0003884495,0.0005980739,0.001014538,0.0002952946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004753604,0.000004130649,0.00002392136,0.00001275983,0.000002143991,0.00001798941,0.001762952,0.0001179833,0.00002598024,0.9947455,0.00221094,0.001070988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006076546,0.000003423792,0.00005216701,0.00005178672,0.000001867397,0.00002122109,0.0004616715,0.0003842389,0.00006048704,0.9822466,0.01670408,0.000006523293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03311835,0.01320906,0.1217352,0.3529999,0.002997359,0.00008140665,0.00009572857,0.000128987,0.475634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9288709,0.002280171,0.02068,0.01914504,0.001387895,0.0001643453,0.00004606587,0.0001378544,0.02728777],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01217116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06565768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414779733","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2560453","title":"The infinite divisibility and multiplicity of creatures: Conway’s non-absolutist theory of space","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multiplicity (mathematics); Divisibility rule; Space (punctuation); Infinite divisibility","authors":[{"name":"Hugo Hogenbirk","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jessica Tizzard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03629113902323856,"gpt":0.2392259134707926,"spread":0.202934774447554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002760402,0.0004086001,0.0005634143,0.001182861,0.005156422,0.006868031,0.001259542,0.002519088,0.002699785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004506223,0.000430265,0.0007695481,0.0007924119,0.05562262,0.01191231,0.007006641,0.005175405,0.000333377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004588163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001476101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002069415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001968851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972149,0.001511522,0.0000932534,0.0005454001,0.000390638,0.0002442879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972708,0.001401884,0.0003125756,0.0005843046,0.0002036668,0.0002267814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006454296,0.000002575947,0.00006617094,0.000007946774,0.000001445743,0.00001713267,0.002593436,0.00009922111,0.00005025994,0.9959826,0.0002571421,0.0009156133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000617804,0.000007033588,0.0001331494,0.00002272108,0.000002663104,0.00006283472,0.0006632863,0.0002572386,0.0001093876,0.977125,0.02160219,0.000008332869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2018037,0.01639935,0.1553413,0.05016353,0.0007409069,0.00005417503,0.0001264995,0.0001292605,0.5752413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761051,0.0007333295,0.007610073,0.001095902,0.0001358415,0.00005242506,0.00002192338,0.00005108055,0.01419437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03328955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407869643","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2455427","title":"Attribution arguments and the metaphysics of immanent actions: cognitive acts from Peter John Olivi to Durand of St. Pourçain","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Univerzita Karlova v Praze","keywords":"Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Attribution; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"André Martin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04936366166412882,"gpt":0.2583190484719532,"spread":0.2089553868078244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003959683,0.0005361213,0.0003071557,0.001313933,0.004377215,0.004330431,0.0009126872,0.002573366,0.002766712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008737555,0.0002424995,0.0003434367,0.0009263857,0.02773363,0.005492256,0.002408614,0.003849868,0.0003510724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009504961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00219813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01554732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009434119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972626,0.001418751,0.00007396662,0.0003883166,0.000609177,0.0002472034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953395,0.003479316,0.0003839222,0.0002619311,0.0003781146,0.000157104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001025759,0.000003687879,0.00006566501,0.00001485462,0.000001540284,0.00004549992,0.003395738,0.0001021988,0.00004609183,0.9930879,0.0009636505,0.002262989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001658887,0.000007342033,0.0004144192,0.00008259236,0.000005633542,0.00007540623,0.001386654,0.0005532128,0.0002306381,0.9358479,0.06136356,0.00001600077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09575413,0.02187116,0.07312453,0.1112199,0.001999962,0.00004480415,0.00009838952,0.0002258758,0.6956612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827032,0.001664766,0.003345099,0.001109014,0.0004876045,0.00002230049,0.00001346064,0.000046439,0.01060816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01554732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06896365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}