{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"f86169ca1127","filters":{"venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2592538197","doi":"10.1515/bjals-2016-0016","title":"Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Future of the Precautionary Principle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Sovereignty; Investment (military); International trade; Scope (computer science); Business; Uncertainty; State (computer science); European union; International economics; Economics; Public economics; Economic policy; Political science; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Haydn Davies","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008697889591839276,"gpt":0.2186868702454752,"spread":0.2099889806536359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002323316,0.00007040922,0.0002047799,0.000003142129,0.0003610698,0.0000193243,0.0001765097,0.00001256644,0.00001177602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005553138,0.00001425662,0.0001254437,0.0001781114,0.001108187,0.0001275101,0.0001288438,0.00008471914,3.968887e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002379886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008842492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001409712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007703771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991848,0.0001421549,0.0002703505,0.00007665162,0.000215803,0.0001102631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991643,0.0002056411,0.0004071188,0.00002445954,0.0001604349,0.00003807581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001733136,0.00008115887,0.02008442,0.0000104087,0.0003873651,0.00001306596,0.0005709172,0.00001994116,0.005855239,0.003158526,0.01141749,0.9582282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002564985,0.0001194612,0.8931119,0.0001120268,0.00002675158,0.0002468435,0.001344054,5.731337e-7,0.0001057849,0.0006232156,0.1039964,0.00005639953],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9393823,0.009303455,0.000002713917,0.05091145,0.0001664525,0.000108311,0.00006445873,0.000004113861,0.00005675262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900233,0.008775021,0.00005146861,0.0002050707,0.0003595876,0.000003324037,6.779239e-7,4.523406e-7,0.0005811598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.408316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807483693","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2018-0006","title":"Acts of State, State Immunity, and Judicial Review in the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Political science; Sovereign immunity; Alien Tort Statute; Statute; State immunity; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; State (computer science); Constitution; Common law; Qualified immunity; Tort; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Zia Akthar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02830028373899911,"gpt":0.3533581357669763,"spread":0.3250578520279772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001386814,0.00006872774,0.0003267915,0.00008946384,0.0003725959,0.00006929888,0.0002675166,0.000008418974,0.00002270328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003584897,0.00005248078,0.00005072148,0.0002580332,0.002272639,0.00021035,0.00004737335,0.0001912252,0.000001318671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004825813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001035052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03310267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03133203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998463,0.0004396263,0.0004105295,0.00006533094,0.0004493484,0.0001722142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983048,0.0002723675,0.0004763464,0.00004389982,0.0008627981,0.00003974674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009488319,0.001565171,0.010709,0.0009791399,0.002912504,0.002624131,0.3859771,0.00004574385,0.0001030084,0.3116961,0.1126095,0.1698298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001232798,0.002332943,0.1193446,0.00743918,0.0001609403,0.0004326387,0.03567334,0.000004126638,0.00009160094,0.07173365,0.7610906,0.0004635634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826618,0.01147697,0.000004572808,0.002101424,0.0001223687,0.0001051712,0.00001751803,0.000003595636,0.003506574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9029301,0.09552337,0.00005792161,0.001075269,0.0001626119,0.000001367133,0.000001292152,0.000004205007,0.0002438533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6484811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822363874","doi":"","title":"Admissibility frameworks and scientific evidence: controversies in relation to shaken baby syndrome / abusive head trauma","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Child Abuse and Related Trauma","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shaken baby syndrome; Verdict; Scientific evidence; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Child abuse; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Epistemology; Medical emergency; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Marika Linnéa Henneberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04344622052293529,"gpt":0.3378366281791877,"spread":0.2943904076562524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008341629,0.0001371903,0.0007039137,0.0002104589,0.0001420261,0.0001175288,0.000087559,0.00008738623,0.00001019639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003520651,0.0001252994,0.00010145,0.0005897947,0.0006423914,0.0003386831,0.00005406549,0.0008561597,0.000004472434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002558197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001870954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005705844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004662754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998347,0.00009774779,0.0005519031,0.0002638888,0.0004892456,0.0002502313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998292,0.0003384062,0.0002730159,0.0001159407,0.0006215139,0.0003591757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005593056,0.001390587,0.4100792,0.000355838,0.002470687,0.02428135,0.04266079,0.0007709576,0.0005211907,0.0001227751,0.04541094,0.4663427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002763829,0.002258015,0.9579785,0.0062079,0.0002094537,0.0120267,0.01385058,0.00002530863,0.00002989269,0.0002125903,0.004236888,0.0002003104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9377896,0.05531457,0.00002278823,0.0061496,0.0003332405,0.0002459147,0.000004804538,0.00001066332,0.0001288328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958865,0.002407622,0.0008432929,0.0005295007,0.0001136053,0.000002738527,9.152328e-7,0.00001145571,0.0002043664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5478994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5109561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594795538","doi":"10.1515/bjals-2016-0019","title":"The Two Noble Kinsmen: Internal and Legal Transparency in the WTO and Their Connection to Preferential and Regional Trade Agreements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); International trade; Negotiation; International trade law; International economics; Declaration; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Maria Panezi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.023101931491536,"gpt":0.2989851440975537,"spread":0.2758832126060177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005538001,0.00009539154,0.000206483,0.00004636298,0.0006126988,0.0002551835,0.0001694027,0.00001334099,0.000007487803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001586724,0.00005347179,0.00003023426,0.0001992994,0.001068674,0.0003560686,0.00003415392,0.0001360429,2.499687e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005552689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004130939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002732933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03241352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988014,0.0002872153,0.0002897068,0.0001367445,0.0002884298,0.0001965556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993073,0.0003143306,0.0001823504,0.00004142652,0.00007307073,0.0000815591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005334942,0.0003038164,0.08587187,0.00002740335,0.0007320885,0.000227171,0.07119624,0.000006578864,0.001810807,0.04626448,0.01617365,0.7768524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002296666,0.000744889,0.5852461,0.0004924833,0.00006527134,0.001281881,0.07437529,0.000001889683,0.0001593711,0.0009381538,0.3341074,0.0002906407],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9231355,0.003049819,0.0001845951,0.07278696,0.0001812004,0.000156691,0.000008062961,0.000006631679,0.000490598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901043,0.009004731,0.00005206266,0.0004404222,0.0002608003,0.000004570654,1.355289e-7,0.000006552163,0.0001263979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7765617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883228411","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2019-0014","title":"“Felix Cohen Was the Blackstone of Federal Indian Law:” Taking the Comparison Seriously","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisprudence; Law; Scholarship; Politics; Legal history; Civil servant; Legal education; Common law; Political science; Servant; Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Adrien Habermacher","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02593563018017501,"gpt":0.3256007071614473,"spread":0.2996650769812723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009555947,0.0001185177,0.0005707726,0.00002936645,0.001793883,0.0001631328,0.0004613065,0.00002507024,0.00004484074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000413258,0.00007901813,0.0001950727,0.0003490733,0.00494963,0.0002325307,0.0001348899,0.000360909,0.00001115382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001103613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001970298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1128008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05023879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980273,0.0002949437,0.0005094904,0.0001182313,0.0007394037,0.0003106221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979018,0.0004064058,0.0009872006,0.00008011321,0.0005660513,0.00005840378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005205449,0.0006544802,0.2264183,0.00007509951,0.005711377,0.0005248779,0.2070238,0.0007190257,0.0003288626,0.25124,0.04373472,0.2630489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008635488,0.0007146117,0.2446216,0.0006283036,0.0001969826,0.0003660611,0.5000615,0.000003754871,0.00006873897,0.003521178,0.2485511,0.0004025584],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9316835,0.01754178,0.000009520678,0.01073123,0.0006876746,0.0002227947,0.00001065775,0.0000129581,0.03909983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950986,0.003164947,0.00006330213,0.0009205566,0.0005743175,0.000003907586,2.836852e-7,0.000006692841,0.0001673751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2930377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387976370","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2023-0011","title":"Magical Thinking and Appearance-based Recusal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Precept; Jurisprudence; Law; Obligation; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Moral obligation; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Zygmont Pines","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03865647748839743,"gpt":0.3557058915749545,"spread":0.3170494140865571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008034576,0.00006535816,0.0002491749,0.00005541913,0.0007645487,0.0001841762,0.0001776698,0.00001912075,0.000007898057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004120588,0.00006615953,0.00007650789,0.0005273328,0.00101986,0.0001776694,0.00005817832,0.0002183064,0.000009642723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005384456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001151357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002269293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000604098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988882,0.0001132797,0.0002477405,0.000114103,0.0003990101,0.0002376554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992782,0.0001467105,0.0002187248,0.00004474222,0.0002032527,0.0001083409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001220032,0.0002206057,0.048557,0.00007117385,0.0004670331,0.001545512,0.0191401,0.0002484269,0.0002197794,0.04019329,0.04732841,0.8418866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008828584,0.0003351624,0.2315341,0.0006715829,0.00007889504,0.0002260649,0.065295,0.00004100049,0.00004382513,0.004090954,0.696415,0.0003855636],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641607,0.007292273,0.0001936764,0.02190765,0.0002243071,0.0001171194,0.000009008535,0.0000807573,0.006014492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901872,0.007878878,0.0009060912,0.0003416692,0.0004315267,0.000004451887,2.633726e-7,0.000007744457,0.0002422045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5880368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}