{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":88,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":88,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"9ca5b0b50b3f","filters":{"venue":"British Journal of Sociology"}},"results":[{"id":"W2127985840","doi":"10.1080/00071310020015280","title":"The surveillant assemblage","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2091,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Assemblage (archaeology); Panopticon; Michel foucault; Brother; Sociology; Institution; Convergence (economics); Total institution; Computer science; Epistemology; Data science; Computer security; Law; Social science; Political science; Archaeology; History; Politics; Philosophy; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07499317858989725,"gpt":0.4140537723713571,"spread":0.3390605937814599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006083257,0.000185496,0.001283638,0.0000607768,0.001339924,0.0001951715,0.0009842218,0.001006326,0.0003010355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001545095,0.0001454702,0.0008767631,0.0001309264,0.001901884,0.00008628667,0.00004240835,0.001981626,0.00009956204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001870012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001976193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006992976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003079898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945168,0.003388676,0.0009537904,0.0001675938,0.0004333245,0.0005398241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955306,0.002909457,0.0009861671,0.0001349608,0.0002660843,0.0001727504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002802267,0.00001871125,0.000003062728,0.0001898666,0.0001280279,0.0003497371,0.002471768,9.340602e-8,7.077687e-9,0.002484887,0.02727894,0.9670721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008491243,0.00004533968,0.00001696089,0.001998738,0.0001213837,0.001406301,0.001519517,2.297446e-8,3.655305e-9,0.002629155,0.9920188,0.0001589114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003075659,0.9708938,0.000002288426,0.0007542454,0.002278796,0.0001557697,0.00002305934,0.00001466374,0.02584662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00005132582,0.9943576,0.00001676999,0.0001509677,0.002278173,0.000004239256,0.00000676368,0.000026144,0.003108051],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118027361","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00017.x","title":"The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: theory and policy<sup>1</sup>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":784,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; State (computer science); Liberalism; Assertiveness; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Political economy; Immigration; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00974306554686801,"gpt":0.2951973244703893,"spread":0.2854542589235213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002286126,0.00005262112,0.0001396637,0.00003492643,0.0003892099,0.00006239195,0.0001977822,0.00009648323,0.00001342906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001073146,0.00003148814,0.00006564012,0.00009381404,0.0009897891,0.0001939474,0.000009911889,0.0002547884,8.990374e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007775977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001840019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00288134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008303201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982876,0.001000234,0.0003179903,0.00006118551,0.000169373,0.0001636232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990681,0.0004650245,0.0002052225,0.00004475874,0.0001820813,0.00003474922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009441311,0.00008762735,0.003049147,0.00000661168,0.00005073598,0.00004134957,0.7308016,0.0001767412,0.0002249679,0.2391695,0.003644552,0.0226528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002017841,0.00042991,0.1733193,0.0001765726,0.00003442783,0.0007857667,0.2287464,0.00001467969,0.0001236512,0.5765526,0.01761407,0.0001848117],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914237,0.002885482,0.00002161294,0.004722646,0.00006529196,0.00009706899,0.000005486343,0.000003047082,0.0007756956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914834,0.007363097,0.00005840133,0.0004478786,0.0003138153,0.000002160581,0.000001673034,0.000003066571,0.0003264545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5020552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4633381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121673258","doi":"10.1080/00071310120044980","title":"Moral panic versus the risk society: the implications of the changing sites of social anxiety","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":330,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moral panic; Panic; Roulette; Politics; Risk society; Anxiety; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03624687120079611,"gpt":0.3169450232863846,"spread":0.2806981520855885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002424742,0.00008023778,0.0002941425,0.00001776064,0.002247776,0.00003422024,0.0007161428,0.0001922962,0.00008220047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005519182,0.00005381358,0.0006660406,0.0003176688,0.002314791,0.00009918358,0.00006886345,0.0005634257,0.000001473092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008944922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003364796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008038576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001862564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979932,0.0008447297,0.0004161077,0.00009507951,0.0003130673,0.0003377903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978508,0.0007067631,0.0008482445,0.0001171537,0.0004390495,0.00003802104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002035199,0.0002388564,0.2372163,0.00002132987,0.0011601,0.000006259244,0.5124798,0.00003595223,0.00148144,0.1384922,0.02666838,0.08199585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002088011,0.0001333998,0.6725692,0.00004180993,0.0004892763,0.00007742764,0.2385701,0.00002188977,0.00003508095,0.04693877,0.03882935,0.0002056479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775306,0.003607647,0.00005536225,0.01319213,0.0005791244,0.0002142049,0.00003977254,0.000008676027,0.004772471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930722,0.005078873,0.00002234667,0.0004186754,0.001248246,0.000006033889,8.577505e-7,0.000007335655,0.0001454639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4353529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761214214","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12315","title":"Trump's electoral speeches and his appeal to the American white working class","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":318,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Sociology; Working class; Politics; Gender studies; Appeal; Victory; Immigration; Rhetoric; Boundary-work; White (mutation); Refugee; Media studies; Political science; Political economy; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0334401312196251,"gpt":0.3193416786365592,"spread":0.2859015474169341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007788708,0.00006593927,0.0002444021,0.00001736794,0.001885354,0.0002576134,0.000470568,0.0000809767,0.00002215189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004710692,0.00005529663,0.00009680365,0.00005301274,0.001553609,0.0001306733,0.00006720002,0.0003358956,0.000005522928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007085178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008754779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002049415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01440411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989889,0.0002551371,0.0001872032,0.0001008616,0.0001755417,0.000292413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991634,0.00008574229,0.0004415364,0.00006737406,0.0001161843,0.0001256896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007045514,0.0000341236,0.4013574,0.000003457907,0.0001139645,0.0001747485,0.0265944,0.000004777539,0.0001954857,0.005732944,0.0147948,0.5509235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002226247,0.0001390089,0.9196383,0.00004665748,0.00002671815,0.0001847862,0.01414649,0.000004353105,0.00000217809,0.005406589,0.06005043,0.0001318841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711658,0.0005939063,0.00001941781,0.0247072,0.0005210977,0.00006756204,0.00000312965,0.000009343074,0.002912566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956157,0.000804066,0.0002352279,0.001177169,0.001604239,0.000001467895,4.398834e-7,0.00000612613,0.000555549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5507916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952231354","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12667","title":"From ‘having’ to ‘being’: self‐worth and the current crisis of American society","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Youth Education and Societal Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Universalism; Dream; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Competition (biology); Immigration; Narrative; Inequality; Middle class; Mythology; Gender studies; Political economy; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.011721593091922,"gpt":0.3147376859509822,"spread":0.3030160928590602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001129379,0.00006057882,0.0003207294,0.00001837918,0.0002140376,0.00003873823,0.0002454717,0.00006150972,0.00006886264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001869669,0.00005474923,0.0002148836,0.0001250709,0.0009063483,0.00007768731,0.00004621499,0.00033793,0.000006249171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000681231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002294624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002418882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002265063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998813,0.0003617361,0.0003171726,0.0001092285,0.00021669,0.0001821552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988251,0.0003783327,0.0003802281,0.00006924208,0.0002364283,0.0001107005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005168877,0.000193564,0.1240273,0.00002186275,0.000311179,0.000003738802,0.747068,0.00001437002,0.00003858969,0.01126663,0.0248201,0.09218294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002171882,0.0002275103,0.4986731,0.0001472771,0.000178128,0.00003196567,0.4186329,0.0000715811,0.000003509836,0.02810391,0.05144863,0.0003096082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905844,0.001240176,0.0001021222,0.006447206,0.000824327,0.000126018,0.00001407897,0.000008007747,0.0006537134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937273,0.003571536,0.0009300064,0.001288711,0.0003902847,0.000001921443,0.000001586278,0.000006230549,0.00008238932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3746458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3656643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989315198","doi":"10.1080/0007131022000021461","title":"Explaining gender segregation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupational segregation; Patriarchy; Preference; Empowerment; Inequality; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Human capital; Sociology; Gender studies; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Mathematics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05076224290548897,"gpt":0.2899035940690802,"spread":0.2391413511635913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000839687,0.00005677633,0.000172727,0.00005285643,0.0004274387,0.00004504852,0.0001858378,0.000183087,0.000457221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003075344,0.0000699372,0.00009597713,0.00008595482,0.0003679653,0.0002098828,0.00001444203,0.0002956628,0.00002388722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008792358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000698074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001121849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001336001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988291,0.0003125087,0.0002887961,0.00008870901,0.0002161588,0.0002647854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999252,0.000130715,0.0002333024,0.00004230676,0.0002381882,0.0001034618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002013238,0.0003609428,0.2632833,0.00003064323,0.0003147038,0.00125291,0.4336562,0.0002864458,0.0005065063,0.1205125,0.0697168,0.1100589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00272108,0.0003223304,0.535593,0.0001260589,0.0001135934,0.002319435,0.2891033,0.0005250009,0.000008440717,0.118211,0.05029004,0.000666693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.966194,0.003771354,0.000958766,0.0005891029,0.0009590386,0.00004707514,0.000003822571,0.00001876749,0.02745812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931977,0.004040148,0.0009967982,0.0005634634,0.0006197012,9.666605e-7,0.000001339405,0.000008093594,0.0005718103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2723098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.500625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482689357","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01365.x","title":"A tainted trade? Moral ambivalence and legitimation work in the private security industry1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Ambivalence; Sociology; Work (physics); Private security; Criminology; Law; Political science; Public administration; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04088454268927215,"gpt":0.2534960909687257,"spread":0.2126115482794535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001051314,0.00009158968,0.0002203596,0.00006946949,0.000139387,0.0001167935,0.0002368195,0.0001565216,0.00003189599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004520563,0.00008340316,0.00007455763,0.0002175721,0.0004072495,0.0006966786,0.00004184628,0.0005319153,0.000001655093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004659445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002748975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004903342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005520202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990559,0.0001129699,0.0003383402,0.0001046993,0.0001332582,0.0002547889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994897,0.00005025734,0.0002884799,0.00005884298,0.00009681185,0.0000159394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002486595,0.0005670339,0.9122792,0.000201954,0.00007694231,0.000986946,0.03151787,0.000007979679,0.00001219699,0.03190177,0.004369725,0.01782975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005061889,0.0000329133,0.8671805,0.00008105481,0.00002918767,0.000148123,0.01484097,0.0000130823,8.069697e-7,0.116778,0.0002985744,0.00009057167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960858,0.0004893146,0.00002076832,0.001449602,0.0001519607,0.0001567751,0.000001975838,0.00001065054,0.001633202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982494,0.00007112118,0.00003917375,0.001184398,0.0004421338,0.000002403964,0.000002256182,0.000006336547,0.000002834361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08487623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3401082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141496883","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01315.x","title":"Education and occupational status in 14 countries: the role of educational institutions and labour market coordination","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canada Auto Workers; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Moderation; Vocational education; Higher education; Educational attainment; Labour economics; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0192456754676946,"gpt":0.3469143673478999,"spread":0.3276686918802053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001005629,0.00004390645,0.0001071297,0.00007517217,0.0004095527,0.00003305323,0.00007510802,0.00007404434,0.0003057656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001517028,0.00004215699,0.00002317302,0.00007503894,0.0009084219,0.0002152457,0.00001687311,0.0001930176,8.491517e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005458735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001829406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002425971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01001747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991779,0.0001849776,0.0002972426,0.00006964803,0.0001632017,0.0001070086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983321,0.0005953041,0.0002137782,0.0000258787,0.0007864977,0.00004641379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001776173,0.0001089121,0.3386541,0.000006290803,0.00001764911,1.613123e-7,0.007514279,0.000002609504,0.0001003232,0.6481044,0.003572364,0.00190119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001356028,0.00001857874,0.8451718,0.00002237073,0.000007376499,0.00005326791,0.01021327,0.000004345263,0.000004861489,0.09053533,0.05379015,0.00004303879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.978785,0.002529832,0.000005734216,0.01451851,0.0007299195,0.00007489017,0.00004041603,0.000001196392,0.00331446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970628,0.001105112,0.0003632648,0.0003511602,0.0005813312,0.00001213566,0.00001163339,0.000002100975,0.0005104718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5575691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5589986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992210276","doi":"10.1080/0007131032000045879","title":"Risk and panic in late modernity: implications of the converging sites of social anxiety","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Moral panic; Modernity; Anxiety; Panic; Social anxiety; Late modernity; Psychology; Social psychology; Perception; Sociology; Positive economics; Criminology; Political science; Social science; Psychiatry; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0205123579012492,"gpt":0.2868494719343926,"spread":0.2663371140331434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001526564,0.0001195163,0.0007008496,0.0000717629,0.000504476,0.00002618473,0.0003729312,0.0008795991,0.00006182602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005617445,0.000124044,0.000334308,0.0001398785,0.001729123,0.00009360397,0.00004074867,0.001855,5.621436e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005049414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001747157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002332647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970618,0.001525139,0.0006693812,0.0001519528,0.0002770296,0.0003146192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976563,0.0004491615,0.001370537,0.0000830342,0.0004048666,0.00003610881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000581343,0.0002141957,0.3736822,0.0003016051,0.0008521244,0.000117102,0.1777914,0.0000190939,0.0007525307,0.006961534,0.4044388,0.03481127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003072661,0.000125318,0.4904356,0.0003579482,0.000692839,0.0001557171,0.01575528,0.00001229577,0.00001928023,0.1542831,0.3344271,0.000662956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8843334,0.006157511,0.00003770571,0.1051654,0.0004772725,0.0003054862,0.0002104471,0.000006744902,0.003306038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969115,0.007344156,0.00002948902,0.02224231,0.001027569,0.000004338736,0.000004993138,0.00001393423,0.0002181833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1620361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8059155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156897669","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12080","title":"Social media in the 2011 <scp>E</scp>gyptian uprising","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Narrative; Social media; Electronic media; Advertising; Internet privacy; Business; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Politics; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03638099425717358,"gpt":0.3188940100394037,"spread":0.2825130157822301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002699522,0.00008016738,0.0003023593,0.00006812956,0.0005978605,0.0000704367,0.0004994652,0.0003245489,0.00006120556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006052062,0.00007928426,0.0001546928,0.000103579,0.001222087,0.000130647,0.00002242364,0.0006976383,0.00003280532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008794778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002518397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007520221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002301203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968555,0.001783647,0.0003965196,0.00009507003,0.0003776187,0.0004916363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953369,0.004033898,0.0003030146,0.00004911954,0.0001638402,0.0001132255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004516254,0.0001139875,0.03135117,0.000009366235,0.00004066805,0.000209009,0.7684036,9.813054e-7,0.00005938425,0.07675458,0.0933001,0.02975263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001026222,0.00009970272,0.1485685,0.00005770822,0.00005398593,0.0002596532,0.366827,0.000001857325,0.00001507731,0.2154267,0.2675535,0.0001102109],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777676,0.001009278,0.00004203977,0.004554927,0.00154965,0.00006679449,0.000003417239,0.00001133975,0.01499499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916077,0.0005358691,0.0001067747,0.001549043,0.006118612,0.00000241419,0.000001656985,0.00001010314,0.00006781988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4015767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7245321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205152789","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12923","title":"“This is a political movement, friend”: Why “incels” support violence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Politics; Criminology; Masculinity; Sociology; Social psychology; Lament; Content analysis; Psychology; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02083453867895219,"gpt":0.3115383239378426,"spread":0.2907037852588904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001813411,0.000153313,0.0004335518,0.0001103044,0.001096931,0.00006968367,0.0008687141,0.0001777681,0.01408901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003370924,0.0001892285,0.0002997267,0.0001591544,0.001352209,0.0002804883,0.0001980029,0.001045673,0.00006779336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004973489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007146023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003209135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001314068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962034,0.0009202309,0.0007131545,0.0002827131,0.0007992801,0.00108123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984221,0.0002939404,0.0003503261,0.0001469657,0.0002760288,0.0005106641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002416937,0.001412094,0.04490505,0.00006634132,0.000370828,0.005295455,0.3049204,0.000004476215,0.0004229343,0.125649,0.4820695,0.03464223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001975409,0.001969554,0.01045365,0.0002489832,0.0001384561,0.002491323,0.4463629,0.0000169527,0.00009684413,0.154449,0.380972,0.0008248925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665641,0.001491578,0.0003325161,0.01529521,0.002775871,0.000189366,0.0002450583,0.00005052841,0.01305583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723991,0.0007356634,0.00004172983,0.02481228,0.00104177,0.00001704448,0.000004871361,0.00001819873,0.0009293349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1414424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9868122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1830824532","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01429.x","title":"Analysing responses to climate change through the lens of reflexivity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Climate change; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Adaptation (eye); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Social science; Psychology; Ecology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1848582251585011,"gpt":0.4653964492421381,"spread":0.280538224083637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005222687,0.00008423223,0.0004333136,0.00005242703,0.0005279599,0.00002090562,0.0003969717,0.0002442173,0.0001470039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004775376,0.00007573289,0.0002257,0.0001917392,0.002327391,0.0003917342,0.000101177,0.0004422501,0.00001308727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001266533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001043242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001386189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004586248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996231,0.002193111,0.0005226025,0.0001067654,0.0002957163,0.0006508643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968567,0.002167735,0.0003513009,0.0001204902,0.0003595559,0.0001441394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003706279,0.0003897691,0.07330137,0.00004217694,0.0002483087,0.000125338,0.3976506,0.000004095965,0.00195983,0.4860365,0.006028779,0.03384265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009603296,0.0007366131,0.607356,0.0003667975,0.0003891143,0.0009004386,0.148209,0.000001311541,0.000184293,0.08254963,0.1578204,0.0005261003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718951,0.004957124,0.0001706004,0.01574338,0.0008115633,0.0001386646,0.00003186752,0.00001309745,0.006238607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916412,0.003278745,0.0008337583,0.002501838,0.001696051,0.00000561774,8.507949e-7,0.00001025799,0.00003170539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5340546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8575371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019718443","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00152.x","title":"Generational affinities and discourses of difference: a case study of highly skilled information technology workers<sup>1</sup>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Identity (music); Affinities; Sociology; Gender studies; Sample (material); Political science; Aesthetics; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01912884884343408,"gpt":0.3131872235754699,"spread":0.2940583747320358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006865304,0.0000698655,0.0003335787,0.0002061003,0.0002626243,0.00001984655,0.0001303882,0.0002342963,0.00002483675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008549264,0.0000745742,0.00005437246,0.0001442522,0.001426067,0.000201926,0.00003065005,0.0002427294,3.850883e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004367456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000290678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001721824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001232457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986548,0.0002065704,0.0006153891,0.0000561194,0.0002494289,0.0002176328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982958,0.0006037313,0.000511764,0.00004243421,0.0004677767,0.00007849529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008008444,0.0005137249,0.4591838,0.00003588192,0.0002465638,0.0008623868,0.4828172,0.00003976555,0.00009098186,0.02326195,0.0005766691,0.03229097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001151962,0.0005218742,0.02706656,0.00005369334,0.00006320381,0.001367819,0.9635704,0.000004880662,0.00005793948,0.005797077,0.0002567054,0.00008794601],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980002,0.0007285328,0.0001037998,0.0004760614,0.0002457112,0.0001418296,0.00001508769,0.000007987004,0.0002807647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989477,0.0002729742,0.0003458813,0.00004754953,0.0003440372,0.000002791666,0.000002056919,0.000003743431,0.00003325717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4807532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5254402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031490690","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00195.x","title":"Ignorance as an under‐identified social problem<sup>1</sup>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Epistemology; Ideal (ethics); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04596120760859806,"gpt":0.3292409037224664,"spread":0.2832796961138684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001295327,0.00008669788,0.000280565,0.00008006927,0.001328499,0.00009963413,0.0003424673,0.0002518989,0.0008910811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003596703,0.0001025089,0.0001395544,0.0001322964,0.001027339,0.001004063,0.00002114075,0.0003986747,0.00009540018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001182504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006923032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006493584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002206045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981049,0.0004763383,0.000509768,0.0001029009,0.0004252916,0.0003808599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998822,0.00008456699,0.0004200598,0.00005414771,0.0003870066,0.0002322731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001539017,0.0005052384,0.001966559,0.0000319673,0.0001902006,0.0007466367,0.7010649,0.0004237789,0.0002683108,0.07698398,0.1686751,0.04898945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008065003,0.001304486,0.179303,0.0002764055,0.0001138311,0.01398273,0.4303585,0.0001079773,0.0001419034,0.2370669,0.1279326,0.001346616],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707692,0.0003514489,0.0001876009,0.002347251,0.0002294916,0.0001050726,0.000006589093,0.00003118556,0.02597211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942041,0.00106357,0.0002825875,0.001847928,0.0009592556,7.668685e-7,0.000004894144,0.000009718585,0.001627174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2707064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600447196","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01408.x","title":"Planning for the worst: risk, uncertainty and the Olympic Games","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Rhetorical question; Securitization; Dimension (graph theory); Visibility; Everyday life; Control (management); Order (exchange); Work (physics); Public relations; Computer security; Business; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Law; Engineering; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03152040997368686,"gpt":0.3397169377110212,"spread":0.3081965277373343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00785422,0.00004635644,0.0001752099,0.00001361114,0.001369223,0.0000660754,0.0002323024,0.0001181813,0.00004777301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002195121,0.00002970358,0.00009633182,0.00005246132,0.001429662,0.0001512328,0.00002418601,0.0003725262,0.000001316548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004648254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001688736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003944929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006747809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982491,0.0009755093,0.0002225342,0.00005139051,0.0001360214,0.0003654688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965591,0.002889671,0.0002772651,0.00004010007,0.0001088862,0.0001249362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002936166,0.00009291071,0.1007623,0.00002513818,0.0002796192,0.00001363111,0.2956516,0.00007440263,0.00000103707,0.3258301,0.07455599,0.2024196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001805289,0.00007991718,0.1371993,0.0000541773,0.00007302909,0.0003618724,0.06538127,0.00003210751,2.761719e-7,0.05880396,0.7361133,0.00009560049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8828443,0.08277941,0.0004667958,0.02951494,0.001203813,0.0002839246,0.00001989584,0.000009976798,0.002876999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891626,0.007345331,0.00007296065,0.001767415,0.001571195,0.000005847361,5.430592e-7,0.000003150093,0.0000709801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6615573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543333009","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01338.x","title":"But the kids are okay: motherhood, consumption and sex work in neo‐liberal Latin America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Consumption (sociology); Work (physics); Sex work; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Medicine; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01493156023081663,"gpt":0.2823639018969606,"spread":0.267432341666144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007291834,0.00006132808,0.000202782,0.00003894629,0.0003247849,0.00005970953,0.0001684116,0.0002549301,0.0002768743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002445213,0.00005203988,0.00005341538,0.00009420559,0.001401032,0.00007586754,0.00002234777,0.0008891384,0.00001053053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002210782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006153245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006074731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004290696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989234,0.0003913593,0.0002466841,0.00009158437,0.0001243445,0.0002226523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992742,0.0003060688,0.0002404042,0.00004732138,0.00005755743,0.00007447016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042479,0.00007901442,0.7712951,0.000005105167,0.0000739203,0.000287016,0.09517793,0.00001418624,0.0003099272,0.0003389453,0.00588786,0.1264885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009092087,0.00008304159,0.8941967,0.0001607028,0.0000289744,0.0004537158,0.05795005,0.000007704133,0.000013311,0.01105616,0.03495322,0.0001872107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98954,0.004297202,0.000009310915,0.004355109,0.0005232007,0.00007311881,9.760877e-7,0.00001071293,0.00119037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993114,0.004700634,0.0002657873,0.0005713838,0.0005373717,0.000001655545,5.59654e-7,0.000007419493,0.0008011761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1263013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5162162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497775948","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12014","title":"Generation and discourse in working life stories","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Youth Education and Societal Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; Agency (philosophy); Theme (computing); Politics; Pragmatism; Sociology; Epistemology; Perception; Population; Social psychology; Positive economics; Social science; Political science; Psychology; Law; Demography; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05935526681403098,"gpt":0.3483374253544385,"spread":0.2889821585404075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005801455,0.00003222978,0.0001143711,0.00003035091,0.0002084554,0.00007523385,0.00006983324,0.00009821117,0.0001150872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004199199,0.00003747116,0.00003104872,0.00005284099,0.0004653374,0.0002154384,0.000009744552,0.0001868595,0.000003230115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006048268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001907365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001165289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002158278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993168,0.0002123028,0.0001950866,0.00005372533,0.00009228008,0.0001297998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995888,0.00007614384,0.0001268542,0.00001908792,0.0001004802,0.00008863366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005568077,0.0001484448,0.4795802,0.00000882434,0.00004881145,0.00003337103,0.3623212,0.00004538071,0.0002546669,0.04554788,0.01234644,0.09965917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005838851,0.00005542857,0.7457138,0.00006740486,0.00001341246,0.00007350453,0.2364616,0.0001444657,0.000001206022,0.01260126,0.004116247,0.0001678522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917394,0.002007802,0.00006985913,0.004341975,0.000697873,0.0000568208,5.546519e-7,0.000003824133,0.001081921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965701,0.001678554,0.0003453029,0.0004544636,0.0006729806,0.00000265136,0.000001192809,0.000003356838,0.0002714262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2661335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1761577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256425898","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00066.x","title":"Publicizing sociology","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07112174433277363,"gpt":0.3439985350832004,"spread":0.2728767907504268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00744955,0.0002790324,0.001142461,0.0001609328,0.001084271,0.0001463632,0.001211114,0.004042561,0.003810621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005431327,0.0003142928,0.0007455237,0.0001061104,0.00472233,0.0006731196,0.0001100231,0.008861165,0.0001294782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003183946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001092132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000266332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006361657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893867,0.007790678,0.00110033,0.0003547049,0.0004745262,0.0008930447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991619,0.005423226,0.001975775,0.0001674404,0.0006360981,0.0001784583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002773932,0.00003891923,0.0001486243,0.00001480182,0.0002501045,0.003556837,0.008501791,7.622102e-7,0.000004684895,0.007135057,0.9650692,0.01525142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003464959,0.0001637427,0.0001873752,0.00007411431,0.00008178132,0.001111498,0.003131742,1.382096e-7,3.607866e-7,0.07406461,0.9205417,0.0002964443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.007297719,0.02118845,0.0000659021,0.8920395,0.002998669,0.0001922663,0.00003551261,0.00006447636,0.07611745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06604858,0.01036472,0.0004526987,0.8619432,0.05132249,0.000009120143,0.00005905168,0.00005077679,0.009749399],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06692956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036365113","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00185.x","title":"Our favourite melodies: musical consumption and teenage lifestyles<sup>1</sup>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Melody; Musical; Favourite; Cultural capital; Taste; Elite; Ethnic group; Active listening; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Social science; Visual arts; Anthropology; Politics; Art; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04165921079009663,"gpt":0.3027013303417536,"spread":0.2610421195516569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006264204,0.00009445042,0.0003205828,0.0000378855,0.00100152,0.00004384708,0.0001760728,0.000288512,0.00006087826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005150968,0.00009729777,0.0001400136,0.00006584299,0.001068962,0.0002463252,0.00003912824,0.0004534384,0.00002046199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000771264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001321453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003791247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003580162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985385,0.0004203562,0.0003409342,0.0001361084,0.0002516362,0.0003124807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991742,0.0001494662,0.0002248089,0.00003784885,0.0002245693,0.0001890408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001929826,0.0005567356,0.2967041,0.00009276481,0.0006055585,0.005838471,0.4726522,0.00008428768,0.0004334574,0.03171628,0.09372811,0.09739508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002856946,0.0004266428,0.7465519,0.0002597783,0.0001526339,0.009459605,0.166501,0.00009449392,0.000004156522,0.01811974,0.0548617,0.0007114271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931568,0.003018541,0.00003397426,0.002448993,0.0002825269,0.00008362987,0.00001151098,0.00002594699,0.0009380855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790306,0.0180175,0.0002916534,0.0006316142,0.001338258,0.00000192928,0.000003173206,0.000008290894,0.0006769858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4498478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7702979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552769204","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01377.x","title":"Tightening the focus: moral panic, moral regulation and liberal government<sup>1</sup>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Moral panic; Moral disengagement; Panic; Focus (optics); Government (linguistics); Moral psychology; Politics; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Criminology; Economics; Philosophy; Anxiety","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03606524532352133,"gpt":0.2637490538345208,"spread":0.2276838085109995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001345101,0.00009462945,0.0002949043,0.00001892279,0.0008396496,0.00008648212,0.0002571685,0.0001996847,0.0002418555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002429969,0.00008749084,0.0001509494,0.00006543343,0.000993256,0.0003598116,0.00003926555,0.0003935401,0.000005721276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001234868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009056269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005353793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982071,0.0005911865,0.0003746708,0.0001330277,0.0003566212,0.0003374108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991471,0.0001834201,0.0003351827,0.00006532648,0.0001511149,0.0001178619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004447055,0.0002206725,0.1545929,0.0000218695,0.0004723213,0.0004546083,0.4124931,0.00001748391,0.0002785626,0.1530343,0.01555201,0.2624175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003777618,0.0006847294,0.535757,0.0001990746,0.000294747,0.0007321432,0.1055686,0.0002512911,0.00004756526,0.3349533,0.01712393,0.0006099559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716934,0.00587598,0.0001372409,0.001813799,0.0003587264,0.0001708032,0.000008007871,0.0000210018,0.01992105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964141,0.001064622,0.0002992892,0.0004076902,0.001164032,0.000003614628,6.482786e-7,0.00001138418,0.0006346331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3811642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6457991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079016399","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00047.x","title":"Cultural capital in an understated nation: the case of Scotland","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; National identity; Cultural capital; Cultural identity; Capital (architecture); Devolution (biology); Political science; Position (finance); Identity (music); Nationality; Sociology; Gender studies; Political economy; Anthropology; Immigration; Law; History; Negotiation; Politics; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05316298477562337,"gpt":0.2778061712891616,"spread":0.2246431865135383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003797417,0.0000391205,0.0001201258,0.00005718123,0.0001817334,0.00003850803,0.00009817295,0.00003848863,0.0006099396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006040259,0.00003363903,0.00005394033,0.00001731958,0.0005562776,0.0004715229,0.000008435469,0.0001926085,0.000004202618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006102613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000459132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006967946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04653944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999374,0.0001407463,0.0002875119,0.00004946302,0.0000722266,0.00007602495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993761,0.00008048963,0.0001954281,0.00002900884,0.0002951481,0.0000238938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000249071,0.001066546,0.007875655,0.00005424359,0.0003072454,0.008620767,0.3811261,0.0008440248,0.0004084574,0.5233284,0.05517155,0.02094795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01298356,0.002297854,0.109803,0.0004849111,0.0002927877,0.1408901,0.4340108,0.0005050846,0.0002449073,0.1727618,0.1245726,0.001152577],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952871,0.002068258,0.000002988439,0.0005454951,0.0003231902,0.00003439491,0.00001408691,0.000002951814,0.001721566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987477,0.00009470374,0.00002345749,0.00016069,0.0006305173,6.400242e-7,0.000005704755,0.000003202524,0.0003333653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3505666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9708588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023155538","doi":"10.1080/00071310120109366","title":"‘Sites’ of resistance: alternative websites and state‐society relations <sup>1</sup>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"National University of Singapore","keywords":"Civil society; The Internet; State (computer science); Population; Politics; Resistance (ecology); Diversity (politics); Mainstream; Negotiation; Restructuring; Censorship; Sociology; Political science; Ethnic group; Law; Political economy; Media studies; Public relations","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02404222446214371,"gpt":0.2749500396233268,"spread":0.2509078151611831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001255304,0.00008545982,0.0003212559,0.00005278421,0.000392795,0.0000401329,0.0002341918,0.0001827707,0.001322397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005257941,0.0001073162,0.0001406452,0.00009306106,0.001420712,0.0003097395,0.00003986703,0.0003833859,0.00002950655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002008808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001346312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001160244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001510469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985062,0.0003266683,0.0005441102,0.0001434612,0.0002201505,0.0002593974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983162,0.0006369915,0.0005618166,0.00005754092,0.0003180529,0.0001093411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003007838,0.0002073348,0.2569333,0.00003715929,0.0007168824,0.0001299083,0.4218399,0.0002238805,0.00009763634,0.009431202,0.3005793,0.009773389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005855556,0.0003590935,0.3200444,0.0006912553,0.0002141486,0.0006183936,0.2423683,0.0005046541,0.00009741152,0.2024089,0.2257208,0.001117043],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9699745,0.006328596,0.0000916774,0.002168242,0.0001757268,0.0001074358,0.00002838603,0.00001397919,0.02111144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783791,0.009092134,0.004993114,0.0002657513,0.0002465984,0.00000289758,0.000002464796,0.00001043268,0.007007489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1929777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084383009","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00080_5.x","title":"Handbook of the Sociology of Religion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Sociology; Sociology of religion; Pluralism (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01551743584178597,"gpt":0.3164481481572153,"spread":0.3009307123154293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000848623,0.00005099522,0.0002760795,0.00003095618,0.0002706024,0.000006742001,0.0003272153,0.0002408449,0.0001674583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005159875,0.00004569028,0.0003886703,0.00006367471,0.002585201,0.0001039561,0.0000304577,0.0003873245,0.000006592765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008695759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002920951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006554806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003959092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985359,0.0005104473,0.0005238367,0.00006610828,0.0001922893,0.0001713794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984723,0.0003256182,0.0006884216,0.00007231469,0.000389249,0.00005210342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009961862,0.0005583577,0.02537145,0.00003839037,0.0005089053,0.0000273689,0.2199714,0.0002029685,0.0177588,0.1020006,0.6108149,0.02264719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003685018,0.0008254154,0.06744435,0.001180076,0.0002766306,0.001579993,0.07727432,0.00002466766,0.005432846,0.1353175,0.7064546,0.0005045588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728164,0.008020022,0.0001592764,0.01066998,0.0008277104,0.000084222,0.000006576785,0.000006642959,0.007409181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836995,0.01373629,0.0003876828,0.001027646,0.0004620196,0.000001090101,4.303784e-7,0.0000049759,0.0006803644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1426971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9525279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005695323","doi":"10.1080/0007131022000021524","title":"Positivism in sociological research: USA and UK (1966–1990) <sup>1</sup>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Sociology; Logical positivism; Sociological research; Sociological theory; Epistemology; Social science; Index (typography); Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2097684005617859,"gpt":0.3976743243448806,"spread":0.1879059237830947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01225183,0.0001214645,0.0004856629,0.0001261909,0.0009074046,0.00009596843,0.0004131683,0.0006318412,0.002288223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006161917,0.0001223856,0.0001498831,0.0002136266,0.004252234,0.0004202338,0.0001091773,0.002162381,0.00006461666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001341891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005226338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001131737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900724,0.008087551,0.0005696715,0.0002666742,0.0003667717,0.0006369064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930705,0.006068593,0.0002614051,0.00008333047,0.0002658573,0.0002503036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000638455,0.00129856,0.2353912,0.00003934028,0.000329399,0.01253855,0.2189131,0.00005579922,0.0004304918,0.3430203,0.05133385,0.136011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002800687,0.001763008,0.1533148,0.0002428353,0.00003846638,0.002195526,0.07216405,0.00006815347,0.000006144694,0.6142884,0.1525073,0.0006106728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318083,0.01059008,0.00001583411,0.009243468,0.0001442655,0.0001541153,0.000006807039,0.0000133145,0.04802383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850181,0.01174349,0.0001813644,0.001045369,0.0007424467,0.000005693797,0.000001232849,0.000008012823,0.001254268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2712681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484910209","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00216.x","title":"Micropolitics of race and ethnicity in women's prisons in two political contexts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Imprisonment; Prison; Race (biology); Coping (psychology); Gender studies; Politics; Criminology; White (mutation); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Clinical psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02422731226079685,"gpt":0.3495901536935003,"spread":0.3253628414327034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007771293,0.00004709879,0.0003326369,0.0001397382,0.0001262356,0.000007458138,0.0001010727,0.00008890986,0.00005262893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006940545,0.00005723773,0.00006369602,0.0001505345,0.001290732,0.0000828577,0.00002248924,0.0003502357,8.368817e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002108797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002737212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01849381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01921561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986754,0.0004041442,0.0003931657,0.00008059155,0.0001176639,0.0003290032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991655,0.0003738988,0.0001503421,0.00003396754,0.0001598505,0.0001164931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002371688,0.001187845,0.5994643,0.00006986725,0.0001441908,0.002713153,0.3046546,0.00004731768,0.001014511,0.04419647,0.0009077474,0.04536281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001537637,0.000203941,0.346981,0.0001462521,0.00006242187,0.001465514,0.6395726,0.00001265805,0.00004962565,0.008906012,0.0009054295,0.0001569234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970554,0.001553644,0.00005240901,0.0006659816,0.0001162574,0.00003352057,0.000003624847,0.000002047875,0.0005171669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966257,0.002812786,0.0001274712,0.000251669,0.0001104895,0.000001269533,2.089551e-7,0.000003228527,0.0000672114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.334918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404581726","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12192","title":"Public political thought: bridging the sociological–philosophical divide in the study of legitimacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Construct (python library); Social science; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1644291292003737,"gpt":0.3740680646269833,"spread":0.2096389354266096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007238133,0.0001141314,0.0004235402,0.00006426549,0.0006264818,0.00006027211,0.001109903,0.0003176462,0.00008372661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008281345,0.00006130062,0.0002200643,0.0001667671,0.005532237,0.0002524503,0.0001145899,0.001204304,0.000007839963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001297776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003475288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004546338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002786989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931609,0.004523529,0.0007558041,0.0001755516,0.000616674,0.0007675585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932412,0.005821884,0.0002885583,0.0001598149,0.0003033939,0.0001851669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001985589,0.0004875074,0.01271736,0.000003576864,0.00004244556,0.000197576,0.007643017,3.429555e-7,0.00001807032,0.9755263,0.0005126828,0.002831246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008121612,0.000358873,0.08086342,0.00005587869,0.000027835,0.0002381678,0.01093549,4.905172e-7,0.000001788099,0.9051008,0.001513632,0.00009150646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6634195,0.000363701,0.00008802213,0.3260362,0.0002092877,0.0001919604,0.000009341745,0.000009236112,0.00967269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929217,0.000200851,0.0000162589,0.004041769,0.002781974,0.000009403799,3.263641e-7,0.000007834491,0.00001988603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3295021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479645065","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12201","title":"Moral panic, moral regulation, and the civilizing process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Moral panic; Process (computing); Political science; Moral disengagement; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02559549738844808,"gpt":0.3028549966171757,"spread":0.2772594992287277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001973358,0.00006409559,0.000288941,0.00002541898,0.0007186893,0.00006541778,0.0002147704,0.000138508,0.0001187559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009893406,0.00004480931,0.0001124913,0.00006189592,0.00217874,0.0002792282,0.00001837206,0.0001841529,0.000004028097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000557998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002157549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002882642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009005949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984982,0.0005981201,0.0003226552,0.0001026599,0.0002202554,0.0002580998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987476,0.0004592145,0.0003081048,0.00004658619,0.0003526823,0.00008574058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004827023,0.00008977628,0.09651971,0.00002863034,0.0002611389,0.0001559678,0.1257114,0.000003973131,0.0004505259,0.543494,0.009747305,0.2230549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006867251,0.0001181434,0.1480473,0.0002389267,0.0001058324,0.0003752769,0.03237366,0.000009744993,0.00001694365,0.7990254,0.01255313,0.0002684468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609715,0.008769515,0.0003136055,0.01793487,0.0006602753,0.0002162155,0.000006142069,0.00002381018,0.01110402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958777,0.001957521,0.00003292419,0.0004461188,0.0011557,0.000003923082,2.332715e-7,0.000006985319,0.0005189134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2555314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8027658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792121363","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12349","title":"The collective roots and rewards of upward educational mobility","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social mobility; Disadvantaged; Sociology; Elite; Narrative; Empowerment; Gender studies; Immigration; Privilege (computing); Mentorship; Educational attainment; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01323497932666853,"gpt":0.3209684117251848,"spread":0.3077334323985162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001398681,0.00002864109,0.0001076721,0.00001807682,0.0005296685,0.00002358207,0.0001172381,0.00007608323,0.0001331708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001188865,0.0000256172,0.00004114108,0.00007673915,0.002037693,0.00006228165,0.00001384132,0.0001246533,0.000001107243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007747427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008016265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000302836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008984763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991377,0.000357676,0.000217097,0.00005472503,0.0001308257,0.0001019781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985446,0.0004082479,0.0002205019,0.00003311286,0.0007417322,0.00005175196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003573892,0.0005927586,0.1786756,0.00002786132,0.000410369,0.00001441318,0.3191741,0.00001262277,0.0009599801,0.2937336,0.1354485,0.07059284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004631942,0.000303288,0.7909739,0.00003557098,0.00002152379,0.0001442816,0.02302461,0.00002894421,0.00002174483,0.1471777,0.03772119,0.0000840667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895959,0.001182863,0.0000568656,0.004231088,0.0003886898,0.00005931198,0.000008649788,0.000002056893,0.004474586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967867,0.00123046,0.0001877468,0.0001346502,0.0004096204,0.000001367608,4.651853e-7,0.000002043887,0.001246918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6122984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7507965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750731186","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12298","title":"Small‐p politics: how pleasurable, convivial and pragmatic political ideals influence engagement in eat‐local initiatives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Politics; Action (physics); Sociology; Sustainability; Equity (law); Consumption (sociology); Ideal (ethics); Public relations; Political action; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02552719098563169,"gpt":0.2439322574672182,"spread":0.2184050664815865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006805205,0.0001301101,0.0003844891,0.00001363339,0.0004689465,0.0002061632,0.0003550461,0.0001965207,0.00006380627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001062365,0.00006205247,0.00008000318,0.00003386107,0.000748246,0.0003350562,0.0001221768,0.0005416812,0.000003046129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005000547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003398597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002876613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005407701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985064,0.0003694989,0.0003533076,0.0001748694,0.0001479193,0.0004479602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988188,0.000444637,0.0003511705,0.00004111814,0.0001493495,0.0001949767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001971048,0.001350096,0.5369342,0.0003055106,0.0005482184,0.005005048,0.005343178,0.00001481917,0.1905803,0.1364052,0.004187298,0.119129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005274164,0.0004249598,0.9836702,0.0001879667,0.00001647943,0.001036869,0.003563624,0.00000314383,0.0002982615,0.009297782,0.0008224198,0.0001508248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846127,0.0008906918,0.000003586276,0.0137149,0.0001185609,0.0001072685,0.00004020876,0.000008028786,0.0005040346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985262,0.0003128628,0.00007405237,0.0005672018,0.0004747895,0.000003128907,0.000004873457,0.000001216265,0.00003566955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4467361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3606805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520977150","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01394.x","title":"War‐making and sense‐making: some technical reflections on an instance of ‘friendly fire’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Inquest; Coroner; Praxeology; Ethnomethodology; Event (particle physics); History; Politics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Poison control; Suicide prevention","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07412227498786601,"gpt":0.4200752293442676,"spread":0.3459529543564016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001796278,0.0001002964,0.0003613178,0.00006940807,0.0008764339,0.00001317615,0.000192319,0.0005821232,0.0001012728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001243652,0.0001132943,0.0001034591,0.000105087,0.004924191,0.0004488546,0.00003529523,0.001061191,0.000003354055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000250595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002254682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001874553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001049201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979924,0.0007615359,0.0004325718,0.0001568669,0.0002597143,0.0003968904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986739,0.0002883352,0.0005404626,0.00009452506,0.0002660687,0.0001367666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003061373,0.001386115,0.020967,0.00008692582,0.000262045,0.0005965517,0.2798303,0.00002608715,0.009103014,0.6336273,0.03213815,0.02167037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00264146,0.00373526,0.1731679,0.001387876,0.0003229147,0.01214923,0.2669756,0.000006926668,0.0001843801,0.08392546,0.4541411,0.001361859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.963298,0.01429931,0.0002436629,0.00438107,0.002037716,0.0001371296,0.00001657655,0.00005263629,0.01553386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943464,0.001735782,0.001877637,0.0008297857,0.001102615,0.0000019332,8.379889e-7,0.00001354534,0.00009145607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5497019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106449396","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01375.x","title":"Rational choice and the political bases of changing Israeli counterinsurgency strategy<sup>1</sup>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Adversary; Rational choice theory (criminology); Politics; Aggression; Military doctrine; Political science; Action (physics); Law and economics; Political economy; Nuclear weapon; Diplomacy; Law; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04225976320967721,"gpt":0.317337093984185,"spread":0.2750773307745077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009498061,0.00004785408,0.0001606783,0.00007660223,0.0002865894,0.00002088838,0.0001490964,0.00008609992,0.0006257382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007049426,0.00004159716,0.00009337582,0.00006642293,0.001417454,0.0001674427,0.00002372486,0.0001756898,0.00000290062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003853508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002104331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001696301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007894565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989578,0.0002438595,0.0003313954,0.00006029651,0.0001956134,0.0002111036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988827,0.0004602409,0.0002035604,0.00003096335,0.00035272,0.000069883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001802855,0.00002876643,0.006573267,0.000002849724,0.0000421169,0.00000916048,0.005339397,0.000007313445,0.000003773622,0.9868598,0.0002444083,0.0008711125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002330003,0.0002436436,0.1553089,0.0001493439,0.00008628544,0.001053998,0.05652075,0.000435359,0.00002342646,0.7776695,0.00597333,0.0002055147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8880646,0.001302551,0.0003502587,0.001185761,0.0001106218,0.00008457108,0.00003419961,0.000004913107,0.1088626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982017,0.0004483358,0.0001286439,0.0004574179,0.0005116996,0.000002258204,0.000001755421,0.000004143997,0.0002440356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2091903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6851394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1665919307","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01402.x","title":"Commodifying migration: excluding migrants in Europe's emerging social model","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Inclusion (mineral); Political economy; Social transformation; Sociology; Citizenship; Social rights; Interpretation (philosophy); Hindsight bias; Political science; State (computer science); Unemployment; Social change; Development economics; Economics; Economic growth; Human rights; Social science; Law; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06676635168503807,"gpt":0.3348446582754717,"spread":0.2680783065904336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002306468,0.0002328798,0.0006914248,0.0003019545,0.0009298109,0.0001522492,0.0004973801,0.00122606,0.0001952703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005897703,0.0002787769,0.0002713238,0.0002711006,0.0005270233,0.0009260136,0.00003728377,0.002837928,0.00001524912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003698749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006045429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001703115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01041551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960251,0.001419689,0.001050871,0.0002333665,0.0005988725,0.0006721327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977555,0.0002153366,0.001089348,0.00008218826,0.0007745638,0.00008305762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001134751,0.00004279473,0.001386155,0.00003950938,0.00005409589,0.0002239435,0.05423747,0.0000508322,0.00006406334,0.00114975,0.9372886,0.005451391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005817207,0.00004603076,0.002121748,0.0004321401,0.00008452118,0.0002547763,0.004288115,0.0002949809,0.000004703399,0.003837695,0.9875995,0.0004540963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2855344,0.01643872,0.003408373,0.6767402,0.0045652,0.0006153844,0.0000944875,0.00008799678,0.01251528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6622044,0.0148146,0.001448725,0.2658108,0.04954872,0.00003177648,0.0003405946,0.0001557684,0.005644591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4109294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553162826","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12205","title":"The remaining core: a fresh look at religiosity trends in Great Britain","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Secularization; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Population; Sociology; Sociology of religion; Public opinion; Descriptive statistics; Social science; Religious studies; Positive economics; Political science; Social psychology; Demography; Psychology; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03091734324837047,"gpt":0.3341634292321784,"spread":0.3032460859838079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001892736,0.00006906716,0.0002196211,0.00005537286,0.0008528149,0.00005364898,0.0003115388,0.0002013614,0.0003344265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009879161,0.00005211071,0.0002494736,0.0001389236,0.001123334,0.0001540589,0.00004830856,0.0003523524,0.00002252455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004133668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001350733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001176476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01483368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998346,0.0005100374,0.000431504,0.0001191706,0.000234624,0.0003586109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983212,0.000989153,0.0003064816,0.00008190715,0.0001822114,0.0001189987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001016866,0.00007103404,0.1003369,0.00000223098,0.0001049232,0.0005764994,0.02098542,0.000002357372,0.0007804561,0.01979538,0.7636429,0.09360021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002904058,0.0003128985,0.2126467,0.0005186594,0.00004342609,0.002663144,0.03266368,0.00000425797,0.0000393209,0.06469862,0.6831219,0.000383357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9502351,0.002937596,0.00005066729,0.02558968,0.0008599614,0.00005368496,0.000006134308,0.00001845997,0.02024866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754617,0.01577736,0.00008174113,0.0008071943,0.0004322834,0.000003049292,6.639678e-7,0.000007858502,0.007428171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1123099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8277544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1894429431","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01302.x","title":"False security or greater social inclusion? Exploring perceptions of CCTV use in public and private spaces accessed by the homeless","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Inclusion (mineral); Internet privacy; Computer security; Social security; Private security; Psychology; Business; Public relations; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1054793209196543,"gpt":0.3928706417549704,"spread":0.287391320835316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001511401,0.0001176022,0.0006838516,0.0001040367,0.001489184,0.00005001204,0.0003292851,0.0003819725,0.0003446887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005489025,0.00008969458,0.0000841078,0.0001506684,0.0006436772,0.0005630915,0.0004831778,0.001581985,0.000002194399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005265002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001789581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001423703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02105356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975933,0.0009674369,0.000707523,0.0001447624,0.0001958247,0.0003911043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982823,0.0006601792,0.000530123,0.00008728649,0.0003368924,0.0001032218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007787134,0.000131674,0.800632,0.00009585041,0.00004750953,0.00005596974,0.190209,1.343228e-7,0.002182644,0.001568488,0.0002521181,0.004746716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001425412,0.00006896017,0.8553047,0.0001436678,0.00002226761,0.00002140179,0.1366195,0.000002429133,0.0000294163,0.005062141,0.001168506,0.0001315949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969785,0.0003280291,0.00001170677,0.001874258,0.0004877147,0.0002123118,0.00005444905,0.00001103035,0.00004196757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975665,0.001689053,0.00004442334,0.0001340991,0.000471394,0.00003471656,0.000005322772,0.00001885163,0.00003567832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05467271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206249019","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12914","title":"“How you keep going”: Voluntary sector practitioners' story‐lines as emotion work","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Nottingham; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Disappointment; Voluntary sector; Public relations; Sadness; Politics; Anger; Sociology; Narrative; Work (physics); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02738988965996956,"gpt":0.3189092891560041,"spread":0.2915193994960345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002724059,0.00008096813,0.0002197949,0.00009211773,0.002940848,0.0001333215,0.0002840688,0.0001376834,0.006006189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002868341,0.0001120147,0.0001637694,0.0004072069,0.0003958081,0.0005583461,0.0000442475,0.001106667,0.00005332753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004698131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007872595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004546786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001855342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962382,0.00262441,0.0002677061,0.0001478864,0.0004488043,0.0002729502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978316,0.0008740092,0.0007371752,0.00006555358,0.000345369,0.000146328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003445963,0.0007455233,0.03259726,0.00001593617,0.0003474804,0.0005293554,0.1159419,0.00007065888,0.0001504666,0.0235641,0.7534189,0.0722738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003779808,0.0001392038,0.01905831,0.00001320436,0.0000474921,0.0005406953,0.1210188,4.308847e-7,0.000001953363,0.009012604,0.8496572,0.000132101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7793137,0.003836372,0.0001335235,0.1996295,0.007782098,0.0001808855,0.00001386631,0.00004567483,0.009064334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741942,0.000725256,0.000462955,0.002919076,0.003119519,0.00001338643,0.000016082,0.00001670065,0.01853286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1967104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208726237","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12899","title":"Felt deficits in time with children: Individual and contextual factors across 27 European countries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Flexibility (engineering); Developmental psychology; Psychology; Perception; Multilevel model; Feeling; European Social Survey; Typically developing; Quality (philosophy); Social psychology; Political science; Geography; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0200822916953113,"gpt":0.2783604605163277,"spread":0.2582781688210165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001452293,0.0001062827,0.0003608461,0.0000352326,0.0002959351,0.0001591153,0.0002677858,0.0001496526,0.0001220559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003622993,0.0001111533,0.00004898699,0.00009778187,0.001424763,0.000220107,0.00008433707,0.0004834229,0.000009045049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006399402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002497745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001845442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003727912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980297,0.00076464,0.0003165095,0.0001762696,0.0003170646,0.000395811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999033,0.0003422474,0.0002441064,0.00005237142,0.0002166557,0.0001116246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002055874,0.00005005866,0.9545864,0.00000306467,0.00006814327,0.0005322118,0.04213967,0.000002372791,0.00001345265,0.0001548228,0.000961955,0.0014673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009545414,0.0001178265,0.9583077,0.0001376118,0.00001389106,0.0008693642,0.037898,2.355205e-8,0.000006906796,0.0002641826,0.001301062,0.0001288424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863557,0.01106122,0.000003327657,0.0004319504,0.0001537973,0.000064144,0.00005762734,0.00001523556,0.001856951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945614,0.004643491,0.00005485797,0.0002390613,0.0002845532,4.880463e-7,0.000009409177,0.00001467995,0.000192044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008205665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5249598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324018127","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.13012","title":"What cultural hierarchy? Cultural tastes, status and inequality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Velux Fonden","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Hierarchy; Cultural capital; Sociology; Social psychology; Perception; Disadvantaged; Psychology; Social science; Demography; Political science; Economics; Population; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04669343753310804,"gpt":0.3588510017877906,"spread":0.3121575642546826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00100173,0.00009674514,0.0003036213,0.00003628061,0.0007453908,0.0003048214,0.0001897578,0.000214041,0.0000824475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007431663,0.00008772029,0.0001361169,0.0002311672,0.001287399,0.001123729,0.00005148677,0.0004151904,0.00001906112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001181124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001319015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001369112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001424052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981444,0.0005651318,0.0003730184,0.0001384097,0.0002929582,0.0004860525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988618,0.0002004832,0.0002591513,0.00003691213,0.0004138678,0.0002277549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001079448,0.0001371825,0.08431744,0.0000681668,0.0003883912,0.001007929,0.4231732,0.00002075725,0.001319969,0.05509418,0.05213884,0.382226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001056231,0.0001810424,0.3805968,0.0001629336,0.00004909027,0.0003962423,0.5022658,0.00001036976,0.000006611324,0.05370386,0.06121865,0.0003523899],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885143,0.005352105,0.000001687279,0.003661549,0.001456831,0.00008308457,0.00001752631,0.00004809028,0.0008647955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516906,0.04570171,0.0000650505,0.0003999938,0.0008990879,0.000002742574,0.00002332691,0.000007109188,0.001210424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3818737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5733019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980415784","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00489.x","title":"On sources and narratives in historical social science: a realist critique of positivist and postmodernist epistemologies*","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nomothetic and idiographic; Epistemology; Positivism; Sociology; Reflexivity; Historiography; Narrative; Criticism; Warrant; Nomothetic; Postmodernism; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03081223998744415,"gpt":0.3353022383273859,"spread":0.3044899983399418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00392323,0.00008449562,0.0003949654,0.0000742413,0.0007972522,0.00005551383,0.0002043765,0.0002078453,0.000109928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001473065,0.0000869389,0.00006446843,0.0001236687,0.005757403,0.0003351625,0.00002982059,0.0005126499,5.154207e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001717408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002226848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000817986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001417196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972472,0.00171774,0.0004043804,0.0001836115,0.0002085732,0.0002384497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998071,0.00136666,0.0002835093,0.00003661833,0.0001442262,0.00009799733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001957916,0.0006767915,0.03057345,0.00005855532,0.00009480031,0.001314819,0.293703,0.000003047073,0.00162703,0.5585784,0.001665137,0.1097471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001498881,0.001765155,0.2310511,0.0001953416,0.00002747523,0.001027452,0.04870617,0.000001957273,0.00002923,0.7012335,0.01411696,0.0003467925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571949,0.003272765,0.000009049716,0.007050312,0.0000881547,0.00007715316,0.000008424581,0.000007266467,0.03229204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972546,0.00162023,0.00009628633,0.000511873,0.0001522116,0.000001699344,6.123421e-7,0.000003997406,0.0003585621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2449968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800577809","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12380","title":"Emotion, reflexivity and social change in the era of extreme fossil fuels","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Scholarship; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1323353101451342,"gpt":0.4131560929477773,"spread":0.280820782802643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004112489,0.00006995578,0.0003340784,0.00004061928,0.0004291951,0.00002508025,0.000319931,0.000317631,0.0001609882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00189846,0.00006651125,0.00009757241,0.000114423,0.005858697,0.0001743321,0.00004440352,0.0005769671,0.000002564988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007749967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001835866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002092953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003128002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972667,0.001570558,0.0004344349,0.000121753,0.000248167,0.0003584109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984648,0.0007528905,0.0002720359,0.00005671873,0.0003789271,0.00007460632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000857214,0.0002733985,0.02944748,0.00003888339,0.00005407598,0.0002153228,0.5828282,3.60515e-8,0.0005518887,0.1796355,0.006533422,0.200336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001073963,0.0006278797,0.6998174,0.0001027201,0.00004078718,0.0004797069,0.05712744,0.000001473713,0.00001598106,0.2239757,0.01656272,0.0001742839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752907,0.001937083,0.00004463456,0.01975284,0.0003867692,0.0001111265,0.00001158098,0.000005894589,0.00245934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952917,0.00102873,0.0001601648,0.001404822,0.002089524,0.000004156967,8.503308e-7,0.000005764025,0.00001432204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6703699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168084831","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01401.x","title":"The post‐nationalization of immigrant rights: a theory in search of evidence<sup>1</sup>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Sociology; Criminology; Demographic economics; Social science; Political science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04021931494011278,"gpt":0.3266354724388426,"spread":0.2864161574987298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006514089,0.0001273626,0.0004654184,0.0002264685,0.0003549532,0.00004315944,0.0005356552,0.0007643545,0.0003616898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002085819,0.00009350127,0.0002599572,0.0001995225,0.00143105,0.0004451347,0.00002337692,0.001156739,0.00000446212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002090523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004457137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004726199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943777,0.003283558,0.001088185,0.0001378404,0.0007853443,0.00032738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946401,0.002270229,0.001062774,0.0001109888,0.001871696,0.00004427212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003224197,0.0002837346,0.01003223,0.0002936165,0.0004999217,0.0001255483,0.2471332,0.0001879285,0.0002698916,0.123479,0.5964155,0.02095712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001261589,0.0007445354,0.03898641,0.003619339,0.000270622,0.0004664433,0.03072513,0.00009089451,0.0001625335,0.1700264,0.7530351,0.0006109512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6219566,0.07616831,0.001414601,0.2936141,0.001880637,0.001304125,0.0001819956,0.00002285388,0.003456687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593229,0.01744169,0.0001657137,0.01556556,0.005226285,0.00001571632,0.0001216509,0.00002723654,0.00211321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3373663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6737888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116315053","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01363.x","title":"Dissenting families and social movement abeyance: the transmission of neo-fascist frames in postwar Italy1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Italian Fascism and Post-war Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Social movement; Movement (music); Sociology; Action (physics); Gender studies; Political economy; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01918059912391649,"gpt":0.2662856176561822,"spread":0.2471050185322657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001461367,0.00007915954,0.0002754805,0.00003606088,0.0004866603,0.00002680701,0.0002537864,0.0001842824,0.00009607372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009577614,0.00007056103,0.0001547283,0.00009501413,0.001514203,0.0001743847,0.00003334224,0.0003391924,0.000001004861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003657694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001226422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001576223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000316285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986136,0.0003472945,0.0004329127,0.0001061641,0.0002320879,0.0002679543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993039,0.0001598299,0.0003108991,0.00004129848,0.0001321786,0.00005188195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006894815,0.0001907617,0.06641746,0.00005946162,0.00009599685,0.0001029017,0.8592672,8.907914e-7,0.001087552,0.008493205,0.002624455,0.06159119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001086889,0.0001958381,0.533832,0.0002143989,0.00005548912,0.00007181047,0.4338607,0.00000422364,0.000278203,0.02335372,0.006826117,0.0002205247],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900877,0.005178542,0.00005246177,0.001401862,0.0002391826,0.0001012869,0.000009261661,0.000005785418,0.002923867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955456,0.003388052,0.0003679149,0.000391501,0.000183815,0.000001574176,0.000001261634,0.000007157128,0.000113131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4674146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5579143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085007153","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00181.x","title":"Secular privilege, religious disadvantage","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Privilege (computing); Secularity; Sociology; Religious studies; Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02723748325884552,"gpt":0.3122302858475475,"spread":0.284992802588702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009675655,0.0002073774,0.0006787768,0.000115404,0.000587017,0.00006219357,0.0006505693,0.001556028,0.0004732592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005365179,0.0002493429,0.0006405818,0.00008273876,0.002186184,0.000169118,0.00005880839,0.003221727,0.00004485869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004617786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007670582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001360645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002214432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966999,0.00100809,0.0007521264,0.0002899889,0.0006669931,0.0005829289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980913,0.0003572511,0.0008463165,0.000142666,0.0004309051,0.0001315386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008677919,0.00003304535,0.0002766754,0.00002146931,0.0001481432,0.006815176,0.01547688,7.50974e-7,0.000005787709,0.00009381073,0.9766325,0.0004870348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003125056,0.0001239832,0.0008094734,0.000116049,0.00004929763,0.007862221,0.00453894,1.454859e-7,0.000002192781,0.004611915,0.9813225,0.0002508249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1003279,0.03898828,0.0003248352,0.7365655,0.01919103,0.0006248198,0.0003167453,0.0001477672,0.1035131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1063726,0.08429335,0.0003861993,0.7527072,0.04557208,0.0000116166,0.0001682837,0.00009999148,0.01038871],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09312435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963664020","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01295.x","title":"‘Mobile sociology’","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Mobilities; Technoscience; Epistemology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02309666608548107,"gpt":0.3267810954412657,"spread":0.3036844293557847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001490649,0.0002502174,0.0008508603,0.0003434322,0.001114257,0.0001375342,0.001232701,0.005042125,0.004714422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009294396,0.0003078848,0.0008738718,0.00009279282,0.006759342,0.0002869385,0.00009870745,0.01552371,0.0002003487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001576021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005711606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009478801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004029293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964373,0.001113196,0.0008623824,0.0003114749,0.0004666565,0.0008089766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964688,0.0009076167,0.001355194,0.0001863954,0.0009355957,0.0001463903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006920957,0.00004188688,0.0002043561,0.00001242477,0.0002106887,0.00185886,0.007657181,3.691786e-7,0.00004920641,0.0004026838,0.9887356,0.000819808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002442123,0.0003193332,0.000743731,0.0000777687,0.0001155585,0.001741709,0.006536447,5.514318e-8,0.000001549275,0.01916121,0.9707841,0.0002743214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1346959,0.01609012,0.000007413765,0.7854955,0.01723118,0.0005702514,0.0001605247,0.0001344461,0.04561468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2197963,0.01070546,0.001155589,0.7014358,0.05280594,0.00005995862,0.0001051611,0.0001249548,0.01381083],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08510035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408956742","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.13203","title":"Varieties of Economic Elites? Preliminary Results From the World Elite Database (WED)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Academy of Finland; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Leverhulme Trust; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Elite; Dual (grammatical number); Power (physics); Sociology; Economic power; Position (finance); Database; Dual purpose; Economic analysis; Economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Linguistics; Engineering; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0171457517785189,"gpt":0.3133536814401848,"spread":0.2962079296616659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002795662,0.0001042385,0.0003896682,0.00006696991,0.0005169229,0.00003721222,0.000673673,0.0002695279,0.0002215489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001618582,0.00009940909,0.0002221092,0.0001135473,0.002747545,0.0002294277,0.0001257626,0.0006147352,0.00001431452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001193743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005739493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003846556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003153251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973997,0.001187285,0.0007782436,0.0001914053,0.0001436846,0.0002996548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957364,0.003163638,0.0006101144,0.0001865501,0.0002324047,0.00007089687],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001622979,0.0002055031,0.01967959,0.00002757151,0.000813501,0.0002463103,0.04361565,0.00005199906,0.0001645196,0.5205868,0.3911394,0.02184616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002753776,0.0003045128,0.2055522,0.000659665,0.0002784386,0.00007682668,0.03256497,0.000006615241,0.00006462324,0.5060882,0.251342,0.0003082359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8782696,0.05761189,0.00004456187,0.018522,0.002410411,0.00019099,0.0008677467,0.00002197581,0.04206086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841456,0.01033668,0.0003627758,0.001983088,0.0008675173,0.000003100006,0.00005793379,0.000006648044,0.002236587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1858726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388769647","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.13067","title":"Stressful life events and depressive symptoms during COVID‐19: A gender comparison","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Renmin University of China; Princeton University","keywords":"Mental health; Checklist; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Mediation; Clinical psychology; Gerontology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05544823245343474,"gpt":0.3818619615084796,"spread":0.3264137290550449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008782487,0.00007513133,0.0003508367,0.00007982566,0.0009338285,0.00004710814,0.0001957537,0.0001855393,0.0002143628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001747681,0.00008600429,0.00008884453,0.00009963263,0.0004097972,0.0001508032,0.00006904575,0.0003412095,0.00001025011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001142438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005277024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001528749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007108832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982016,0.0004864349,0.0004405069,0.0001326152,0.0002571141,0.000481727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984226,0.000479939,0.0003107686,0.0000470852,0.0001039359,0.0006357149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000215767,0.00002807564,0.9735242,0.00009927134,0.00008316146,0.000309243,0.01460675,0.00005547866,0.000004304764,0.001390888,0.007915555,0.001961546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000885532,0.00002931205,0.9732574,0.00007022534,0.00002065625,0.0001674542,0.01564897,0.000008985333,0.000001470408,0.003980212,0.005830714,0.00009904805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886655,0.005708528,0.00002777084,0.00445794,0.0005497471,0.00009805752,0.00001743094,0.00003391166,0.0004411374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918621,0.005485092,0.000023884,0.00188175,0.0005268326,0.000004259906,0.000002599332,0.000009378847,0.0002041193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003196608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7182348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130365078","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12028","title":"Strangers in a strange land: coping with imprisonment as a racial or ethnic foreign national inmate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Criminology; Scholarship; Ethnic group; Foreign national; Immigration; Citizenship; Prison; Sociology; Coping (psychology); Gender studies; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03016547575537501,"gpt":0.3296804234749129,"spread":0.2995149477195379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008499537,0.00006899138,0.0001939125,0.00008241653,0.0001750838,0.00005974183,0.0001267659,0.0001548499,0.001157849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002199489,0.00005964137,0.00005559296,0.0001011703,0.0002624725,0.0004346254,0.000005759223,0.000276668,0.00001584867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002034826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004646611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003106517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03722258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987345,0.0002661675,0.0003495192,0.00009687256,0.0003348516,0.0002181025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992402,0.0001191935,0.0002464542,0.00002425814,0.0002948009,0.00007506392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012876,0.001046704,0.1117593,0.0001344974,0.0005648338,0.0006920372,0.5102716,0.0004799809,0.002790399,0.06816875,0.04925674,0.2535476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01151413,0.004071338,0.6877307,0.001012784,0.0001057695,0.001623096,0.1073559,0.0001960674,0.0002286203,0.1446722,0.0403367,0.00115272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942163,0.0008491641,0.000410966,0.0007513295,0.0001121906,0.0002829705,0.000006425164,0.000008483667,0.00336216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971104,0.00130333,0.0003896363,0.0005509357,0.0004381879,0.00002405349,0.000006417229,0.000006469378,0.0001705334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5759714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134218809","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12842","title":"Public support for social security in 66 countries: Prosperity, inequality, and household income as interactive causes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Calgary; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Economic inequality; Economic interventionism; Economics; Inequality; Income inequality metrics; Income distribution; Socioeconomic status; Social inequality; Government (linguistics); Recession; Demographic economics; Development economics; Social security; Economic growth; Political science; Population; Sociology; Macroeconomics; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.082573854296698,"gpt":0.3796772289609197,"spread":0.2971033746642217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002331722,0.0001031137,0.0005044761,0.00007429098,0.0008329187,0.0001314306,0.0001669373,0.0002931554,0.00005310016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002623147,0.0001131956,0.0001440525,0.0001493148,0.001484251,0.0004238482,0.0001313462,0.000456979,0.000001025564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002534723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001118999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00178462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0160961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980112,0.0006157071,0.000493989,0.0001677716,0.0002924373,0.0004189193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982537,0.0005036378,0.0003505974,0.00003710957,0.000751123,0.000103853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000234613,0.000680115,0.3751794,0.0002338744,0.0007227717,0.0009730794,0.4208178,5.342939e-7,0.00005457886,0.1859804,0.007753385,0.007369446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003089752,0.0003056286,0.2605466,0.0001300551,0.00006971197,0.0006529951,0.1305303,8.833403e-7,0.00005310717,0.5862743,0.01796902,0.0003776154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827178,0.001351676,0.000003412229,0.01172128,0.0005671851,0.0002304875,0.0001014647,0.00001384897,0.003292876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935731,0.003808449,0.00002581525,0.001133582,0.001322539,0.00002199315,0.000005087686,0.0000107764,0.00009868718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4002939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8981999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316041926","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12994","title":"Assimilated or the boundary of Whiteness expanded? A boundary model of group belonging","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Racial and Ethnic Identity Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Assimilation (phonology); Boundary (topology); Race (biology); Social psychology; Socioeconomic status; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Demography; Mathematics; Epistemology; Linguistics; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07211987039784357,"gpt":0.3740995746607577,"spread":0.3019797042629141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004367606,0.00006893102,0.0003893162,0.0001377874,0.0008080491,0.00006799449,0.0005630055,0.0001966981,0.0001509199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009798805,0.00005188915,0.0001993571,0.0004663046,0.00242155,0.0002724217,0.0001145127,0.0004807963,0.000004582363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006932129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001108072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001571708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002819384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997755,0.0005955207,0.0005757668,0.0001081313,0.0005785323,0.000387056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984823,0.0004511849,0.0004102155,0.00008580745,0.0004833771,0.0000871528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002012573,0.001152021,0.07055858,0.0007679936,0.001851092,0.002667758,0.3277743,0.004247314,0.02765697,0.01733408,0.09435805,0.4496193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005763887,0.001574601,0.3382273,0.001959516,0.0003340377,0.00143977,0.1847633,0.004545346,0.0005773381,0.4364161,0.02339229,0.001006563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931513,0.00145476,0.0002228005,0.003237051,0.0004165226,0.0001164348,0.00002258313,0.00001668751,0.00136185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930401,0.00495594,0.00008241172,0.00009441876,0.0002704466,0.000003569478,0.000003285827,0.00001044824,0.001539393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4486127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8922303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400796527","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.13134","title":"Renewal without replication: Expanding Durkheim's theory of disruptions via queer nightlife","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Night-time city culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Nightlife; Sociology; Club; Narrative; Queer; Human sexuality; Field (mathematics); Gender studies; Law; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02664679604232207,"gpt":0.3453717454721603,"spread":0.3187249494298382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002392732,0.00008739388,0.0003085263,0.00008461449,0.0003866153,0.00007829248,0.000325911,0.0002651854,0.0006513631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007337601,0.00008829747,0.0002191108,0.0001863816,0.0009854214,0.0003009347,0.00003556028,0.000464649,0.00002238543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001418792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003172412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002020834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002823403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980732,0.0006711698,0.0005102307,0.0002022831,0.0002978461,0.0002452933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987772,0.000340989,0.0002881561,0.0001418713,0.0003237163,0.0001280471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001306084,0.0003450243,0.02977215,0.0001720905,0.001090101,0.0009349348,0.1498033,0.00003770908,0.03661961,0.6820123,0.0545287,0.04455359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001521993,0.0003791088,0.06771453,0.001819,0.0005143968,0.005759025,0.04225058,0.00002839065,0.001754424,0.7290963,0.1482894,0.00087292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9447675,0.01553598,0.004440558,0.007660393,0.00189673,0.0002307544,0.00003714644,0.0001091525,0.02532178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936809,0.001141662,0.0007497382,0.0001644121,0.001314978,0.000005165412,0.000004380011,0.00001535672,0.002923441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1075527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7131969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117535281","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00068.x","title":"A guarded welcome","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02707324936651724,"gpt":0.3247845884104634,"spread":0.2977113390439461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008210986,0.00004717495,0.0002028814,0.00003777042,0.0003643761,0.00003581966,0.0001650341,0.00009023628,0.000615945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004367816,0.0000517942,0.000119985,0.00004881293,0.0005525459,0.0001983376,0.00002165163,0.0001986636,0.00005980633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000481323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001311657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002201898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001281583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990366,0.0002264603,0.000259871,0.00005733715,0.0001673586,0.0002524411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993978,0.0001417572,0.0001715136,0.00003393109,0.0001519016,0.0001030812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008350744,0.0003782909,0.06335562,0.00001341461,0.0003594859,0.0006282613,0.219818,0.00002513518,0.0002369476,0.01754855,0.1774291,0.5201237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001666721,0.0003014018,0.2930212,0.00009174983,0.00005130065,0.001064266,0.04646448,9.725353e-7,0.00002427333,0.01598326,0.6410754,0.0002550121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9363292,0.005937098,0.00003902604,0.008910459,0.0003846841,0.00003882525,0.000002655232,0.00001348058,0.04834455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376,0.001872356,0.0003898439,0.001309507,0.001772061,6.669764e-7,2.663674e-7,0.000004317017,0.0008909514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5198687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6744166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}