{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":40,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":40,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"3908eaf38d71","filters":{"venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2040018884","doi":"10.5840/beq200818436","title":"Beyond Moral Reasoning: A Review of Moral Identity Research and Its Implications for Business Ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":410,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Situational ethics; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral disengagement; Moral agency; Extant taxon; Identity (music); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Moral psychology; Moral reasoning; Business ethics; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Foundation (evidence); Moral development; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Normative ethics; Psychology; Social group; Political science; Social science; Public relations; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.731941843112248,"gpt":0.5878128708414749,"spread":0.144128972270773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03851157,0.0009001003,0.003716206,0.001671708,0.002016109,0.0008656593,0.003291581,0.003076529,0.00006704208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1044583,0.0007271577,0.0005920594,0.01169511,0.00181135,0.001636866,0.0004270753,0.006071384,0.00009119142],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002307527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0129849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003726296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004230885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9852009,0.003004794,0.003879403,0.002091619,0.004813502,0.001009718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9002396,0.03907471,0.002947868,0.002949958,0.05442309,0.0003647275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002094091,0.0003419965,0.00005686856,0.2311198,0.00009614359,0.000005350898,0.002618423,0.000001418877,0.000001497048,0.4648282,0.009582831,0.2913265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003123335,0.0001513879,0.00233038,0.1320018,0.00043048,0.0002699616,0.0003276387,0.00001572825,4.257749e-7,0.3489511,0.5142398,0.0009688839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002235043,0.9661455,0.003520451,0.02428038,0.001808757,0.002927269,0.0005573084,0.00006506643,0.0006728839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001178529,0.9939114,0.002136441,0.0005386099,0.0007901422,0.00106006,0.0005563837,0.0001467656,0.0007423238],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.504657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155160774","doi":"10.1017/beq.2015.2","title":"Agonistic Pluralism and Stakeholder Engagement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Pluralism (philosophy); Agonism; Power (physics); Stakeholder engagement; Stakeholder analysis; Context (archaeology); Agonistic behaviour; Stakeholder theory; Public relations; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2236061578970691,"gpt":0.3159893962055023,"spread":0.09238323830843317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003646462,0.0002563707,0.0002923434,0.0002022635,0.0003812145,0.0008270046,0.0001998152,0.0002133328,0.00004299997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00323341,0.0002502996,0.00004475011,0.0007529317,0.0002143419,0.001020262,0.0001258923,0.0006030848,0.0001587984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007168568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003368211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002219838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006856199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978589,0.00008000268,0.0005165402,0.000456981,0.0007073019,0.0003803009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973311,0.000262,0.0004337289,0.0003877022,0.001537131,0.0000483806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008735782,0.000851377,0.07722076,0.00325659,0.0002721956,0.001182553,0.03730975,0.0002549644,0.003568384,0.517086,0.01593543,0.3421884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00462714,0.0001607691,0.2511406,0.0004627809,0.000433934,0.00005965189,0.02836066,0.003598621,0.00003118531,0.3314485,0.377055,0.002621186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740428,0.0001660945,0.002273715,0.01091298,0.001175964,0.0004916391,0.000003241109,0.000359045,0.01057454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958412,0.000004078111,0.0003182775,0.002158801,0.001012734,0.00002555143,0.0000325465,0.00004573072,0.0005610565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3611195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335442800","doi":"10.5840/beq20122213","title":"Ethics, Enlightened Self-Interest, and the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: A Critical Look at the Justificatory Foundations of the UN Framework","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Obligation; Foundation (evidence); Law and economics; Corporate social responsibility; Shareholder; Business; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.101547682734168,"gpt":0.3194393840836499,"spread":0.2178917013494819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006408297,0.0003609467,0.000412454,0.0001490013,0.004060185,0.0005953504,0.0008989166,0.000452543,0.0002580611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001082982,0.0001768178,0.0001622704,0.0008185518,0.002493083,0.0006895938,0.0003728679,0.001778723,0.0001638918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007322145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001573467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008374041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007219221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967924,0.0007405465,0.0007360031,0.0005042738,0.0007222472,0.0005044898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918154,0.004461665,0.0006079173,0.001614738,0.001442572,0.0000576439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002977255,0.0001607133,0.0009893859,0.0002447969,0.00004795955,0.000002727109,0.006376197,0.000001513991,0.0002052611,0.9907102,0.0008842953,0.00007921475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006693487,0.00002747195,0.07218196,0.0002488565,0.000342274,0.000008407334,0.0005871684,0.00005036277,0.0001148616,0.8910486,0.03436222,0.0003584407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150204,0.0002197069,0.001327962,0.07906638,0.00144477,0.001054492,0.00001792954,0.0001564828,0.001691839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937379,0.000003294452,0.000254477,0.004101665,0.001246151,0.00007038781,0.00001360672,0.00004062626,0.0005318339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09966158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125915223","doi":"10.5840/beq20122215","title":"The Case for Leverage-Based Corporate Human Rights Responsibility","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Leverage (statistics); Harm; Human rights; Nothing; Business; Law and economics; Social responsibility; Business ethics; Moral responsibility; Public relations; Political science; Law; Economics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1171624395704827,"gpt":0.2974885088872709,"spread":0.1803260693167882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003378864,0.000362399,0.0003072503,0.0001756549,0.004351737,0.0009467637,0.0004184675,0.0002841182,0.00009803968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007260547,0.0002441132,0.000154592,0.0005125095,0.0003836326,0.001390309,0.00004415636,0.0005213713,0.0002017485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005455527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001109209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001948908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01686364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978353,0.0001019405,0.0005603393,0.0004255695,0.0003602243,0.0007166303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961622,0.0008773918,0.000643855,0.0008381993,0.00143127,0.0000470562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002815487,0.0002185294,0.0007973273,0.0003555454,0.00002689839,0.0001358912,0.0003170786,0.000009786459,0.0001694514,0.9929948,0.003616583,0.001076574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00160252,0.00005655698,0.01522501,0.00006813915,0.0001434553,0.0000483209,0.000150511,0.0008071175,0.00005239895,0.7907893,0.1903637,0.0006929354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868326,0.00009453294,0.004731685,0.003666488,0.001673366,0.000963917,0.00001859099,0.0002961268,0.001722722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946946,2.83531e-7,0.0001905153,0.001021052,0.00261721,0.0001212968,0.0001015379,0.0000520952,0.001201442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2022055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605631482","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.80","title":"<i>Guest Editors’ Introduction:</i>Corporate Sustainability Management and Environmental Ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Corporate sustainability; Sustainability; Business; Environmental ethics; Corporate social responsibility; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Management; Public relations; Economics; Philosophy; Engineering; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04763707272516954,"gpt":0.2817546425493376,"spread":0.234117569824168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005147783,0.0004158272,0.000417647,0.0002207668,0.002952229,0.002012251,0.0005824562,0.000529794,0.000054278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003545992,0.0004364127,0.0001023958,0.0003119849,0.001174666,0.002588767,0.0004935091,0.001508889,0.00008309784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002084045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002271112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00118005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005000871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966506,0.0001144935,0.0007251864,0.0009806532,0.0009781223,0.0005509352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995468,0.0002502822,0.001779985,0.001501144,0.000950093,0.00005053869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00148752,0.001905271,0.5446654,0.01402073,0.0005452845,0.00148283,0.01034196,0.0001058921,0.002077153,0.2419413,0.03264099,0.1487857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001163905,0.00005213491,0.5375296,0.0001144245,0.0002525288,0.00002291492,0.008162429,0.0003482363,0.00002869206,0.1444013,0.3068086,0.001115278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8643509,0.0001029722,0.001735597,0.107423,0.02099708,0.001563478,0.00001626694,0.0004531222,0.003357617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621309,0.00003325909,0.0002264322,0.0007667168,0.03547778,0.00005600846,0.00008846651,0.00006494129,0.001155522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2741676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601841016","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.73","title":"Talk Ain’t Cheap: Political CSR and the Challenges of Corporate Deliberation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Corporate social responsibility; Normative; Politics; Positive economics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Democracy; Law and economics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1139052896668244,"gpt":0.3079195108891107,"spread":0.1940142212222863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003659898,0.0001979823,0.000368283,0.00009572299,0.0008987781,0.0006873573,0.0003487144,0.0002390999,0.00001338362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004204776,0.0001510129,0.00007686003,0.0001475247,0.001214932,0.001103963,0.000138551,0.0004298012,0.00001621536],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002289493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001799903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002299263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001739384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998234,0.0000874787,0.0005552893,0.0003352802,0.0004688027,0.0003191597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958861,0.0004503706,0.00151897,0.0007122481,0.001409787,0.00002246116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002019581,0.000043626,0.001832704,0.0004424598,0.00002301753,0.00002017339,0.000741937,0.000001911729,0.0003529913,0.9704911,0.0000173716,0.02583075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001881897,0.00002830831,0.3405326,0.0001961578,0.0001199982,0.00001646075,0.002791591,0.001749951,0.00004777416,0.6511224,0.00115266,0.0003602033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123155,0.0002998036,0.0006639798,0.07440621,0.0004986986,0.0004672128,0.000002750377,0.00008178751,0.01126407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982866,0.00002887332,0.00008328205,0.0007067809,0.0007517101,0.00002003344,0.000006265021,0.00002734188,0.00008913469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3386999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6912766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108177500","doi":"10.5840/beq200818324","title":"The Conditions of Our Freedom: Foucault, Organization, and Ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Normative; Normative ethics; Business ethics; Subjectivity; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Information ethics; Meta-ethics; Applied ethics; Power (physics); Critical management studies; Value (mathematics); Extant taxon; Michel foucault; Engineering ethics; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04804574641721316,"gpt":0.2639517791510207,"spread":0.2159060327338075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006310829,0.0001728464,0.0001844481,0.0001309754,0.002079083,0.0001825438,0.0002622827,0.0001672078,0.00005064785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001655161,0.0001339905,0.00002696723,0.001328261,0.0003267674,0.0005806414,0.0001102968,0.0003967574,0.00007490169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000105288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009007937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002981713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004579341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987187,0.00003095557,0.0003424795,0.0002174082,0.0004940637,0.0001963557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964184,0.0003967453,0.0002718613,0.0002283656,0.002673566,0.00001105412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001400124,0.00009495777,0.04436685,0.0005047967,0.0001055587,0.00001017634,0.003109084,0.00006105581,0.0001102299,0.9110064,0.04028541,0.0003314797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001822038,0.00005113182,0.7185048,0.0001956732,0.0003119964,0.00002883063,0.01162957,0.0006374834,0.00003928427,0.09063885,0.1751641,0.0009762039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.405527,0.003889823,0.06579475,0.4639054,0.008383608,0.003034389,0.00008260775,0.001544959,0.04783746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958071,0.0004973444,0.0002022333,0.001642267,0.0009455702,0.000009937301,0.000082043,0.00003639602,0.0007770702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8203676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115699352","doi":"10.1017/beq.2015.1","title":"There Is No Rawlsian Theory of Corporate Governance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Business ethics; Corporate governance; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Subject (documents); Primary goods; Epistemology; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1878543675589971,"gpt":0.3464473367484481,"spread":0.158592969189451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003693432,0.0001426662,0.0002375899,0.00002826348,0.0002685251,0.00006131132,0.0004486641,0.0005208715,0.0001569041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001898399,0.0001304949,0.00006743263,0.0004285074,0.001589613,0.00030616,0.00002117615,0.0007258673,0.0003607747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006758022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001429988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00370897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000584694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975122,0.0007082422,0.0002918371,0.0002284842,0.0008850652,0.0003741552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966889,0.0007976723,0.0002896665,0.0003311014,0.001644431,0.0002482457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005385567,0.00005690017,0.000109007,0.00006163216,0.00001195613,0.000006786192,0.04760944,0.000001336765,0.00002216011,0.9493504,0.0008848459,0.001831711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002875602,0.00009728945,0.002172832,0.00009541099,0.00001657809,7.52565e-7,0.004252507,0.00001086621,0.00003890733,0.9619784,0.03086149,0.0001873488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04363802,0.0008334506,0.003527083,0.1165643,0.002653963,0.0004102269,0.0001476286,0.0002087103,0.8320166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938116,0.00008113623,0.0002134573,0.002549012,0.000575836,0.000005448169,0.00000364723,0.00001759758,0.002742278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9501736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5856996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972845345","doi":"10.1017/beq.2019.19","title":"Big Data and Personalized Pricing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Reservation; Point (geometry); Economics; Microeconomics; Welfare; Public economics; Business; Market economy; Computer science; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3976186661665431,"gpt":0.4326414813813234,"spread":0.03502281521478035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005737944,0.0001869003,0.0004032553,0.0002597635,0.0002004346,0.0008952395,0.001449512,0.0002572832,0.0002363464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00194521,0.0001411343,0.0000464913,0.0006832846,0.0001897865,0.0006841674,0.0002703969,0.0004925057,0.001143169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002207963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002572432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000148989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001346904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969414,0.0001925609,0.0006300086,0.0009282549,0.001040679,0.0002670904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942123,0.00291278,0.000283069,0.001846153,0.0006358455,0.000109837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004031314,0.00004153494,0.006718262,0.00001481383,0.000006861708,0.00001116163,0.003342794,0.000008277908,0.0005381855,0.001304691,0.001153384,0.9868197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003635258,0.0005098404,0.1099375,0.0004447701,0.0001070588,0.0002428446,0.01908675,0.01829084,0.00003561344,0.3553339,0.4906619,0.00171371],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848973,0.0001806061,0.007078778,0.003932938,0.002028516,0.00016866,0.0000546735,0.00005279588,0.001605764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966084,0.00002377528,0.001368457,0.000667275,0.0001915565,0.000002424417,0.00002127888,0.00002113174,0.001095651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.985106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345668280","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.27","title":"Moral Salience and the Role of Goodwill in Firm-Stakeholder Trust Repair","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Goodwill; Misconduct; Stakeholder; Construct (python library); Business; Salience (neuroscience); Stakeholder theory; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Accounting; Law; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2175411971240494,"gpt":0.3720122844017429,"spread":0.1544710872776935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01005723,0.000172674,0.000365775,0.0002424406,0.0001962668,0.0001487938,0.0006890089,0.0003049604,0.00009101709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009433267,0.00008386384,0.00007382896,0.001283852,0.001520549,0.0006148382,0.0000685406,0.0004496458,0.00003138984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002769785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004301226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001136923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001276639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964794,0.0005640606,0.0008517742,0.0005136388,0.001310421,0.0002807417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883318,0.008829589,0.000384336,0.0009002042,0.00149281,0.0000612566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000258064,0.0001598887,0.1501634,0.00006820436,0.00001354151,0.000004421261,0.039007,0.00002972055,0.000906214,0.702257,0.0004468747,0.1066857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000986465,0.0000401368,0.3546122,0.0001891876,0.000009686994,0.000009954643,0.006758487,0.0003492806,0.00007798682,0.6337326,0.003068029,0.0001660424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9416172,0.0009924833,0.00185808,0.05090944,0.0009148802,0.0003196134,0.00001836366,0.00005133977,0.003318603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983805,0.0001590624,0.0004567292,0.000377175,0.00009937497,0.0000286978,0.000001070575,0.00001342294,0.0004839655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2044488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095411304","doi":"10.5840/beq20147212","title":"A Responsive Approach to Organizational Misconduct: Rehabilitation, Reintegration, and the Reduction of Reoffense","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Punitive damages; Rehabilitation; Work (physics); Criminology; Whistle blowing; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02562412744996447,"gpt":0.2417440432947973,"spread":0.2161199158448329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001490985,0.0001389835,0.0002205313,0.0001860578,0.0003724195,0.0001511281,0.0001358499,0.00008224696,0.00001368681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002983703,0.00009529776,0.00003482363,0.001013273,0.0004080821,0.000429229,0.00003278517,0.0001605025,0.00002191655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001240759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004667796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002035946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003737091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988302,0.000108236,0.0003533208,0.0002654548,0.0003288391,0.0001139398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963332,0.0004347256,0.0002365017,0.0002741053,0.002711678,0.000009760978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003290746,0.00004271954,0.0003857253,0.000205876,0.00001897888,5.433971e-8,0.006666703,0.0002315728,0.000538927,0.9865751,0.003330564,0.00167476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004682986,0.0001864975,0.3017829,0.0003892925,0.000191675,0.00002514403,0.03094613,0.01079487,0.00006336176,0.6028429,0.04727494,0.0008193463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5386963,0.0001973394,0.1497714,0.2760052,0.00139274,0.002062755,0.000005794139,0.0002575454,0.03161088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948924,0.000003593087,0.002876418,0.001331276,0.0005023318,0.00004843234,0.00002469637,0.00001752571,0.0003032939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4561961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.388613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018656756","doi":"10.5840/beq20122217","title":"The Limits of Corporate Human Rights Obligations and the Rights of For-Profit Corporations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Reservation of rights; Obligation; Business; Property rights; Law and economics; Right to property; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Complicity; Law; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1006067454360863,"gpt":0.2857559038107298,"spread":0.1851491583746435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001667655,0.0002288779,0.0003505745,0.0001518983,0.002390582,0.0002600722,0.0003805645,0.0001708179,0.00002018969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000371861,0.0001234471,0.0001070998,0.0005441033,0.001277459,0.0009974912,0.00004067108,0.0002860604,0.00001644158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009816452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005210259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001198933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007736318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983776,0.00006593003,0.0006618914,0.0002071338,0.0003770033,0.0003104949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956114,0.0008025272,0.001325158,0.0004927552,0.001745541,0.00002264689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007279086,0.00003463715,0.001719528,0.0001831923,0.00004443321,3.194654e-7,0.0008609118,0.000003914042,0.0002684809,0.9960294,0.000639914,0.0001425121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001268243,0.0000245442,0.03143695,0.00007995941,0.000184954,0.00000183627,0.0001452038,0.000236133,0.0001466442,0.9578613,0.008415001,0.0001992525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886197,0.0002252736,0.001900923,0.004181335,0.0007054009,0.001077529,0.00002598232,0.00006128987,0.003202522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980637,0.000004162231,0.0001286202,0.0001394872,0.0007552022,0.00009116167,0.00008146903,0.00002161115,0.0007145299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03816809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007619103","doi":"10.5840/beq20122216","title":"Shareholder Engagement in the Embedded Business Corporation: Investment Activism, Human Rights, and TWAIL Discourse","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Shareholder; Corporate social responsibility; Corporation; Corporate law; Argument (complex analysis); International law; Hard law; Law and economics; Shareholder resolution; Scholarship; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Business; Corporate governance; Soft law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1028244452027551,"gpt":0.301462898902239,"spread":0.1986384536994839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001985101,0.0004510361,0.0003706455,0.0003444996,0.001224826,0.001104078,0.0004706178,0.000235318,0.0002541806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002382406,0.0002801726,0.00005759558,0.0009904423,0.0003423685,0.003348137,0.0001056636,0.0007968752,0.0001356782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005151164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006323109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00242602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006843007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974976,0.0001536871,0.000541667,0.0004752362,0.0007345956,0.0005972712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982427,0.0001689032,0.0004231971,0.0006205344,0.0005042304,0.00004037144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005578022,0.0008045145,0.004949269,0.0005257064,0.00004163906,0.00005251971,0.01340572,0.00001489446,0.0001990219,0.9736604,0.00518932,0.001101182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002325135,0.00006202835,0.576636,0.000359485,0.0002280839,0.00002252733,0.003233576,0.0001726615,0.00001928828,0.259639,0.1560715,0.001230655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.983919,0.0001225093,0.0004529757,0.006747825,0.0008489864,0.0008949651,0.000006418685,0.0001470798,0.006860209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932288,0.000003054284,0.00008334688,0.003393517,0.002214384,0.0001475805,0.0002211824,0.00004641014,0.0006617031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7140214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080793351","doi":"10.5840/beq20122212","title":"Guest Editors’ Introduction: Human Rights and Business","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Human rights; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public relations; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03660183237091125,"gpt":0.2527088085721357,"spread":0.2161069762012245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008249047,0.0004106463,0.0003806597,0.0003475113,0.001445957,0.0007608793,0.0002978115,0.0003566135,0.0003991698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003000353,0.0003483517,0.00005534077,0.00087942,0.0003484843,0.003629288,0.0000901802,0.00060199,0.0006012615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003328361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003486651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001807387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001250289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978518,0.0000349535,0.0004587285,0.0005015938,0.0005413347,0.0006115856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976674,0.00007354778,0.0003187567,0.0005281057,0.00135659,0.00005557091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004121405,0.0003429668,0.003088151,0.0007414118,0.00004398961,0.00001888412,0.001031634,0.000001988474,0.0004379863,0.8801137,0.1134097,0.000728421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005590339,0.00001543519,0.05529285,0.00006831651,0.00009792611,0.0000208018,0.00007532812,0.00001133042,0.00001714083,0.08924786,0.8540133,0.0005806242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8980777,0.0004023908,0.0008791071,0.01860589,0.06389634,0.0007314197,0.000008366946,0.0009797232,0.01641903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7543415,0.000002278252,0.0001008287,0.0005164976,0.2435034,0.00002592616,0.00014822,0.00005336126,0.001307997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7908658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215000332","doi":"10.1017/beq.2021.36","title":"Tackling Grand Challenges beyond Dyads and Networks: Developing a Stakeholder Systems View Using the Metaphor of Ballet","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Stakeholder; Metaphor; Stakeholder theory; Ballet; Stakeholder analysis; Focus (optics); Grand Challenges; Complex adaptive system; Knowledge management; Generative grammar; Dance; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Public relations; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1107203653363771,"gpt":0.2666261969225079,"spread":0.1559058315861309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001178092,0.0002603573,0.0004232794,0.0001330785,0.0006153776,0.0004807848,0.0002199744,0.0001379758,0.00002371037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002034367,0.0001991656,0.00004940562,0.001010808,0.0001506483,0.0006012424,0.0001822444,0.0002597109,0.000004126358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001900874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007051427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002038739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000423279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983268,0.00007125609,0.0004800541,0.0003643791,0.0004702153,0.0002872551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977267,0.000287224,0.0003398256,0.0002621991,0.001373201,0.00001086419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004099565,0.0001216432,0.003706622,0.009226662,0.0007609256,0.00005972686,0.003546994,0.003667898,0.0002036215,0.9675346,0.0009186452,0.01021168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007631417,0.0001109798,0.1634047,0.009612247,0.004590426,0.0001444073,0.0881614,0.1147302,0.00009312317,0.08476769,0.5210446,0.005708879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2205741,0.3404843,0.3471626,0.06962097,0.006352485,0.00260267,0.00002032141,0.0004978345,0.01268471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913453,0.004900272,0.0009413096,0.001575946,0.00100041,0.00002161553,0.00003616015,0.00005729204,0.0001217319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8121736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166058840","doi":"10.5840/beq200919320","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue: Globalization as a Challenge for Business Responsibilities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Globalization; Corporate social responsibility; Politics; Corporate governance; Ambivalence; Political science; State (computer science); Positive economics; Political economy; Public relations; Sociology; Economic system; Social science; Law and economics; Economics; Management; Law; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.158283672599535,"gpt":0.42273911855003,"spread":0.264455445950495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111271,0.0003265079,0.0004056194,0.0004600649,0.001154216,0.001188983,0.001158927,0.0005076864,0.0005673087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03909041,0.0002293312,0.0001100619,0.003959473,0.0002416921,0.0008871431,0.00004263221,0.0005506146,0.000771298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001433141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001162251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001954947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001107572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947135,0.0005725924,0.001006958,0.001037456,0.0021765,0.0004929362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833469,0.003653147,0.0004004011,0.001544951,0.0109205,0.0001341083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008045191,0.0003063301,0.00004172946,0.00008516638,0.00001490124,0.000002256664,0.04649983,0.00128162,0.0001704583,0.392978,0.3329251,0.2248901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002579083,0.0002603064,0.02440208,0.00005223766,0.00002012188,0.00001344413,0.006131968,0.0001115033,0.00002342558,0.3667869,0.6016722,0.0002679215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01671013,0.0001772627,0.08510954,0.8808497,0.01183854,0.00114958,0.00003240162,0.0001210218,0.004011804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8011205,0.0002933709,0.005589235,0.01915042,0.1521276,0.0003807778,0.0002041995,0.0001020284,0.02103185],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8616993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157556330","doi":"10.1017/beq.2021.6","title":"The Promise of Pragmatism: Richard Rorty and Business Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Business ethics; Deliberation; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Politics; Relevance (law); Democracy; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2248817930129592,"gpt":0.4139686884901908,"spread":0.1890868954772315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01744111,0.0003274217,0.0005691063,0.0002078334,0.001417764,0.001106684,0.0009985905,0.0009134195,0.00009621041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056112,0.0002175117,0.00009807186,0.003573053,0.001209418,0.0007074869,0.0001902512,0.002182694,0.00005491386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004041962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004079747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004131847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002122422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926772,0.001439493,0.001427261,0.0008520022,0.003133274,0.0004708218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544798,0.02369953,0.0009289867,0.001703555,0.01902793,0.000160218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002363452,0.000750508,0.0107023,0.001962791,0.0001625016,0.00008042852,0.1147483,0.0002540495,0.003908246,0.6241086,0.009262246,0.2338237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008367046,0.00007656553,0.336039,0.0006341246,0.00009012237,0.0001475579,0.01639081,0.0005074212,0.0004756693,0.5942934,0.04985526,0.0006533712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.454308,0.009279478,0.06362681,0.4541409,0.01048987,0.00107689,0.00009669425,0.0001908704,0.00679045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886627,0.002865162,0.004161315,0.00143515,0.0004212913,0.00007111675,0.00003256511,0.00005461169,0.002296059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5343547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594006143","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.77","title":"The Problem of Unilateralism in Agency Theory: Towards a Bilateral Formulation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Agency (philosophy); Unilateralism; Argument (complex analysis); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Principal–agent problem; Sociology; Moral hazard; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Politics; Incentive","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06799479555579228,"gpt":0.2714001653646418,"spread":0.2034053698088495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003189184,0.0001469954,0.0004469898,0.0001398375,0.0005472421,0.000357286,0.0006180567,0.0002875293,0.00002928287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001363696,0.0001490472,0.0001000956,0.0001143542,0.0002726424,0.0006231473,0.00004513079,0.0002947326,0.00006250141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007938137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008521901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007627873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002357993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982129,0.0000636199,0.001024018,0.0003212858,0.00005742076,0.0003207469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979065,0.0001308993,0.001061973,0.0007097697,0.0001460996,0.00004477606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004125432,0.0000335507,0.02411929,0.00008548705,0.00002464988,0.000002163174,0.008112435,0.00002399283,0.00001796661,0.9602422,0.00002596479,0.007271078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004745672,0.00004980961,0.2667784,0.00006066734,0.000003133064,0.00000121828,0.00008855026,0.0004448958,0.00001229708,0.7290584,0.002858754,0.0001692277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9258747,0.0006307951,0.002676426,0.009665317,0.001708397,0.0007613143,0.0000997985,0.00004163414,0.05854167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988659,0.0001738248,0.0001429794,0.0001125026,0.0001854785,0.00003481937,0.00001096746,0.00002665466,0.0004468807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2426591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296616755","doi":"10.1017/beq.2022.20","title":"The Role of Deliberative Mini-Publics in Improving the Deliberative Capacity of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Victoria","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Conceptualization; Publics; Corporate governance; Political science; Stakeholder; Public relations; Deliberative democracy; Polity; Civil society; Sociology; Public administration; Management; Economics; Law; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1043048008649893,"gpt":0.2872697813252834,"spread":0.1829649804602941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005470565,0.0002480517,0.0003872349,0.0002256218,0.001149276,0.0002377703,0.0005816093,0.0001288911,0.00003000847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004023855,0.0001798605,0.0001174415,0.002030483,0.0006364745,0.001061393,0.0002934181,0.001175082,0.000002193996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001015063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006050055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004997086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008084787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968318,0.0004756169,0.001102511,0.0003773831,0.0008426334,0.0003700894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933895,0.001953782,0.001794719,0.0005030723,0.002346281,0.00001268461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001410523,0.002009873,0.0983354,0.001214936,0.000394806,0.00005486594,0.2847972,0.003347565,0.04991198,0.3542128,0.0001327515,0.2041773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00272755,0.0002230973,0.4246859,0.0001982594,0.0001746409,0.00001176647,0.426736,0.03712609,0.001798129,0.09919011,0.005955095,0.001173364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937678,0.0002214988,0.0007303163,0.002834274,0.0003112999,0.0007498237,0.00002540457,0.00004184311,0.001317763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989531,0.000004700881,0.0002284268,0.0004359825,0.0001383369,0.00013156,0.00001766457,0.00003432524,0.00005588507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3263505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8839415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189164128","doi":"10.1017/beq.2021.19","title":"Evidence of an Inverted U–Shaped Relationship between Stakeholder Management Performance Variation and Firm Performance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Regina; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Stakeholder theory; Assertion; Stakeholder management; Variation (astronomy); Business; Sample (material); Stakeholder analysis; Empirical evidence; Economics; Management; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2164919590363489,"gpt":0.3135242210079621,"spread":0.09703226197161322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002536186,0.00021954,0.0003143388,0.0002421836,0.0004426457,0.0002970236,0.0002018469,0.0002336633,0.00003697714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001455179,0.0002400033,0.00004150228,0.001625139,0.0001359453,0.003194693,0.0001087485,0.0004634229,0.0000220786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000539203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000218101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000278464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002133869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976819,0.0001009467,0.0007579689,0.0004967862,0.0006819452,0.0002805158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965645,0.0005895602,0.0007365012,0.0005069719,0.001575889,0.0000265644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001379313,0.0001048362,0.9210051,0.005030934,0.00004547507,0.00002534723,0.002679419,0.00008178113,0.0008952355,0.004811968,0.00001478119,0.06516714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003824131,0.00003725615,0.9865261,0.0006937275,0.0001249748,0.000003683824,0.0006663114,0.007736878,0.00003074412,0.003415265,0.0001172654,0.0002654296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958317,0.0000929565,0.001521899,0.001314331,0.0001995768,0.0003165033,0.000001908754,0.00010467,0.0006164777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982448,0.00003573141,0.0008233168,0.0002756751,0.0002960025,0.00002054957,0.00006219072,0.00003116889,0.0002105539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0655209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9787049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520850800","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.45","title":"Professionalism, Agency, and Market Failures","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Agency (philosophy); Business; Market failure; Shareholder; Ideal (ethics); Business ethics; Law and economics; State (computer science); Industrial organization; Economics; Microeconomics; Corporate governance; Finance; Law; Management; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2798185655756876,"gpt":0.4402573974422764,"spread":0.1604388318665888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008052818,0.0002246425,0.0002895121,0.0002993678,0.0005118313,0.0004066673,0.0006705898,0.0004831296,0.001401472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01081502,0.0001225868,0.0000571323,0.0009163745,0.0005659837,0.0008707413,0.00009038622,0.0004804769,0.0002590636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003550154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001787863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002785123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958599,0.0006080362,0.0006741358,0.0006953577,0.001815491,0.0003470689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986532,0.009581054,0.0003112953,0.0008115665,0.002644467,0.0001195859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001368652,0.0001977686,0.01457971,0.0001741954,0.00002880522,0.00002047623,0.02089337,0.000001193894,0.004443636,0.3041055,0.04969844,0.60572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003456965,0.00003730416,0.3779618,0.0002679729,0.000009905049,0.00002100641,0.001408188,0.00002088679,0.00004325432,0.5604521,0.05915818,0.0002737744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4540758,0.0009537527,0.0482276,0.4779746,0.006376862,0.0005053415,0.00005678047,0.0002054218,0.01162387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862558,0.0001610902,0.001159459,0.001124738,0.0002976585,0.00003972707,0.000003291259,0.00002423339,0.01093398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6054463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063877999","doi":"10.5840/beq200414321","title":"An Investigation of Social Influence: Explaining the Effect of Group Discussion on Consensus in Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conformity; Dilemma; Audit; Normalization (sociology); Ethical dilemma; Viewpoints; Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Accounting; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Economics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08761001831235642,"gpt":0.4075835983556798,"spread":0.3199735800433234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01923468,0.0002252105,0.0004652342,0.0003907258,0.0004651637,0.0001526064,0.0006964473,0.000958316,0.00001203216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01445337,0.0001205664,0.00008438605,0.002020715,0.001168329,0.0003227593,0.00003526712,0.002174185,0.000009648803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006723122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000647761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008096021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006683402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936858,0.002181592,0.001130469,0.0005010621,0.00223053,0.0002704922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869502,0.01012322,0.0008593166,0.00063232,0.001361142,0.00007384981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001134757,0.0002799556,0.1026344,0.000597267,0.00002977994,0.00001477335,0.4241872,0.02397335,0.03315571,0.388414,0.0002036548,0.02537522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001203437,0.0009248327,0.8686987,0.001054397,0.00002221554,0.000006040939,0.01156957,0.0003727452,0.00187569,0.1139712,0.00004474837,0.0002564388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693505,0.00001309463,0.001064788,0.02823731,0.0009699657,0.0002492256,0.000006177236,0.0000234701,0.00008550685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988452,0.000003746115,0.0004570884,0.0003437,0.0002814285,0.00003031763,0.00001447185,0.00001857531,0.000005539282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7660643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769567087","doi":"10.1017/beq.2017.32","title":"Ethical Responsibility - An Arendtian Turn","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Ethical leadership; Politics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political action; Ethical responsibility; Political science; Public relations; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1675753946142185,"gpt":0.4460619657680579,"spread":0.2784865711538393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006888904,0.0002588984,0.0003548913,0.0001150729,0.004255282,0.001100603,0.001633833,0.001599774,0.0002700276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01357096,0.0002574046,0.0001171678,0.0002214697,0.003442866,0.001050906,0.00008218566,0.002848334,0.0003326526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001432815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001544966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0141581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02479792,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994666,0.002028229,0.0004352528,0.0006974231,0.001304497,0.0008686035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947389,0.001168325,0.0002366461,0.001905902,0.001235103,0.0007151676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009660707,0.0001710286,0.0009326229,0.00005008525,0.00001372598,0.00005600292,0.04206979,8.418695e-7,0.0001498613,0.9490364,0.0002563838,0.007166629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004840248,0.0002177668,0.1229767,0.00008895915,0.00003085819,0.000003975888,0.002783092,0.0000327948,0.00003782636,0.8292026,0.0435706,0.0005708247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3098826,0.00004499178,0.001698861,0.5259672,0.00293521,0.0005968441,0.0001138314,0.0006128196,0.1581476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937582,0.00000752104,0.0005528789,0.003415741,0.001674928,0.00002007126,0.00001484774,0.00003460758,0.0005212161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6838756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132282013","doi":"10.5840/beq201222445","title":"The Political Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Research Agenda","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Perspective (graphical); Corporate social responsibility; Political science; Corporate governance; Public administration; Public relations; Management; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2856677451487856,"gpt":0.4339731349356768,"spread":0.1483053897868912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01958446,0.0002788752,0.0004410725,0.0003645028,0.002079096,0.0005465901,0.0005296057,0.0004474708,0.00005985192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04507535,0.0002277192,0.0002002903,0.002648222,0.003025314,0.00127172,0.000264712,0.00174931,0.0001656097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003242253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001094526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003382625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008745678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994286,0.0008611056,0.0009879968,0.0005209584,0.00181882,0.001525104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810247,0.006849076,0.0006882617,0.0007362244,0.01062434,0.00007741494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004988574,0.0002454725,0.00710016,0.0002462155,0.00002710762,0.00001458077,0.00326668,1.825943e-7,0.001179746,0.9847004,0.0004907037,0.002229831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003799209,0.00005475062,0.1342543,0.00007287473,0.00007886509,0.000009607589,0.06073971,0.00009913823,0.00008181548,0.7961722,0.007664197,0.000392615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.869914,0.0002965323,0.0006582794,0.1026361,0.001470569,0.0007971071,0.00001507695,0.0002079334,0.02400436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957905,0.00000203115,0.0001124983,0.000818321,0.002956632,0.00004154456,0.000007397682,0.0000558012,0.0002152668],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1885283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277504637","doi":"10.1017/beq.2015.30","title":"Inverting Donaldson’s Framework: A Managerial Approach To International Conflicts Of Cultural And Economic Norms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Host (biology); Value (mathematics); Political economy; Cultural conflict; Sociology; Economic system; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1369432204936601,"gpt":0.2941916947099414,"spread":0.1572484742162813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001070428,0.000155198,0.0003498865,0.0002010463,0.00009709328,0.0001372458,0.0003043652,0.0002423726,0.0000511974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003603319,0.0001710273,0.00005485209,0.0001173686,0.000185628,0.0005475806,0.00006441108,0.0003160124,0.0002136265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001179873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007229151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007787851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006542198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987276,0.00002281905,0.0006346458,0.0003729584,0.00003962994,0.0002023425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990823,0.00009318921,0.0003094986,0.0002450672,0.000123415,0.0001465212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005196869,0.00004769503,0.001849383,0.00003918529,0.000046169,7.134086e-7,0.01293813,0.0007519267,0.00001219011,0.9835707,0.0002741377,0.0004177942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003641516,0.0003513367,0.02966075,0.0002281109,0.00003476366,0.00007394259,0.01110124,0.0151116,0.0000896889,0.7489862,0.1892105,0.001510303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8607144,0.0002320544,0.04793689,0.004009311,0.002736981,0.0002817539,0.0002342485,0.00005243019,0.08380192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929817,0.00003558609,0.00572021,0.0006028909,0.0003605549,0.00002528581,0.00003747812,0.00001604548,0.0002202058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2345845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6974289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184573451","doi":"10.1017/beq.2021.16","title":"When Managers Become Robin Hoods: A Mixed Method Investigation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interpersonal communication; Distributive justice; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Identity (music); Psychology; Procedural justice; Organizational justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Organizational commitment","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2723174634214356,"gpt":0.4270731996528874,"spread":0.1547557362314518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01312367,0.0003280378,0.0005220729,0.0005054753,0.0006092068,0.001380347,0.0009824003,0.0007092669,0.0006208776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01644433,0.0002926847,0.0001609564,0.003146278,0.0003182261,0.001114166,0.0001134335,0.00129267,0.0005373697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001061604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001942075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000576083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001329954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929006,0.001858128,0.001163436,0.001113034,0.002488983,0.0004758165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828297,0.008467758,0.0005693744,0.001594799,0.006306733,0.0002315972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008467029,0.0005294005,0.007716723,0.0007140291,0.0001772822,0.0001880986,0.1247495,0.001777807,0.01265337,0.5320067,0.04941443,0.2699879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004735383,0.00003705132,0.0784428,0.000189147,0.00005253588,0.00005589699,0.01179773,0.001221738,0.0009055493,0.8881092,0.01819159,0.000523235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1258074,0.0006004678,0.5989283,0.2594647,0.0096164,0.0003965611,0.00003362713,0.0002727007,0.004879784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8094436,0.0001226401,0.1706039,0.008948564,0.0009926409,0.0001192082,0.0002231614,0.0001030792,0.009443144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6836362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391814583","doi":"10.1017/beq.2023.37","title":"The Virtue of External Goods in Action Sports Practice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Action (physics); Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05866104984532122,"gpt":0.3914090032715373,"spread":0.3327479534262161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001673443,0.0001100118,0.0001348838,0.0001187971,0.00009594193,0.00008145852,0.0001136652,0.0002264726,0.0001147518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001357749,0.00008054337,0.00004767138,0.0004412385,0.0000965327,0.0002599843,0.000007258018,0.0007542919,0.00002801135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002875204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001184884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007281944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002842289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998629,0.0001765584,0.0004119864,0.0002361497,0.0003791103,0.000167216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984058,0.0008995213,0.0001724756,0.0002851523,0.0002101522,0.00002691035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002752217,0.0001802272,0.001235095,0.0001551215,0.00005011085,0.0005509529,0.04807638,0.00005728712,0.00138594,0.6028833,0.0003905834,0.3447598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000972984,0.0003083879,0.5196908,0.001112622,0.0001437055,0.0006618081,0.04859555,0.0009564496,0.00008681174,0.03487637,0.3919799,0.0006145993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6242191,0.008327199,0.226328,0.05063043,0.03044069,0.001077905,0.00001917028,0.0004307239,0.05852671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980506,0.00006319098,0.0001827621,0.0002715483,0.0002994214,0.00001280842,0.000004492778,0.00002157474,0.00109363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5680069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3284464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387675067","doi":"10.1017/beq.2023.25","title":"<i>Business Ethics Quarterly</i> Special Issue on: Normativity in Business Ethics and Beyond","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2201226711688147,"gpt":0.4166890507853692,"spread":0.1965663796165545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04323641,0.001168305,0.001607228,0.002524135,0.002495256,0.002500435,0.002289302,0.003971168,0.0004738865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04385541,0.001048203,0.0001973668,0.01791842,0.001979202,0.002640209,0.0002946596,0.01179386,0.002231304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002430914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004581793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00217495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0131756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9819025,0.004118215,0.002831533,0.002449814,0.007060819,0.001637149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9393309,0.04399043,0.001229108,0.002606142,0.01236934,0.000474056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009590454,0.001918357,0.007624101,0.00371626,0.0001205092,0.000532274,0.5306258,0.002825176,0.0006589888,0.1634089,0.0580135,0.229597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002665374,0.0004083045,0.5188249,0.001498909,0.00008708526,0.0001152644,0.04535026,0.00130401,0.00005810554,0.2914202,0.1357506,0.002517044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.367609,0.0003393938,0.008982181,0.5731269,0.02738803,0.001790699,0.0003161768,0.0008487121,0.01959897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653031,0.002028794,0.001376674,0.01454409,0.01265842,0.000267727,0.0003749097,0.0002948723,0.003151454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.597694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894398541","doi":"10.1017/beq.2018.31","title":"The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism, by Arun Sundararajan. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016. 256 pp. ISBN: 978-0262034579","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Sharing Economy and Platforms","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Sharing economy; Sociology; Political economy; Economic history; Economics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02401943558047088,"gpt":0.2345859969927301,"spread":0.2105665614122592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002704781,0.0003526939,0.0004479816,0.00007653486,0.0009392922,0.0008569203,0.001039725,0.000234867,0.00005869766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001770257,0.0001934709,0.0001430336,0.000294424,0.002082866,0.000950882,0.0001856974,0.0005295996,0.00004032986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002791482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001666824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0105046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001252707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980116,0.00005017468,0.0007599687,0.00044965,0.0002870637,0.0004415651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965763,0.0009510933,0.0008330324,0.0009413414,0.000673473,0.00002474412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002454919,0.0005188265,0.01475701,0.002794497,0.001067845,0.00001250485,0.006379005,0.0002543816,0.0002689626,0.7861127,0.163689,0.0216903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00626418,0.0001672094,0.02679542,0.0006237455,0.0006050865,0.00001036983,0.00185134,0.0179564,0.0008021165,0.0548198,0.8889824,0.00112195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8810214,0.01603373,0.002279157,0.05697518,0.002705705,0.002808563,0.0001875473,0.0002268876,0.03776179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957823,0.0001814567,0.00003899934,0.002113545,0.000815213,0.00009639671,0.00003612748,0.00005273055,0.0008832201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7312929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115803351","doi":"10.1017/beq.2020.42","title":"Where MLM Intersects MFA: Morally Suspect Goods and the Grounds for Regulatory Action","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Normative; Economics; Action (physics); Business ethics; Law and economics; Market failure; Preference; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Positive economics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3277120812841504,"gpt":0.4238712010087494,"spread":0.09615911972459901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006897909,0.0002555554,0.0004160406,0.0001370092,0.0007392482,0.001071239,0.0007492406,0.0004349921,0.00007015804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007076351,0.0001662597,0.0001298255,0.001122049,0.0008174988,0.0008219487,0.00007207709,0.0009237425,0.00003962915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005289076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000561006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002350321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001260925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965055,0.0005150267,0.0007056147,0.0007024778,0.001259967,0.0003114439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893501,0.007274457,0.0004388057,0.0006736826,0.002121768,0.0001411212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001794389,0.0001470436,0.00156806,0.001067764,0.0001110108,0.000007293337,0.1319391,0.0001676864,0.001944721,0.7444662,0.03454416,0.08224253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004600111,0.0005231478,0.09643079,0.000345346,0.0001510565,0.00004767936,0.05490153,0.007418715,0.0001121692,0.7861975,0.04838029,0.0008915947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2755133,0.001451797,0.1195742,0.5954983,0.005226981,0.001143925,0.00002423477,0.000202445,0.001364859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924753,0.0001707954,0.001211788,0.004583376,0.001012876,0.00008114658,0.00001152173,0.00003488276,0.0004183209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.716962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410327501","doi":"10.1017/beq.2025.3","title":"The Normative Core of Relational Stakeholder Strategies: Explaining Open Buyer-Supplier Relations in the Context of the Amazon Rainforest","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Normative; Core (optical fiber); Context (archaeology); Stakeholder; Business; Rainforest; Environmental resource management; Economics; Political science; Geography; Public relations; Computer science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1014996442759298,"gpt":0.3016273224814843,"spread":0.2001276782055545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002548667,0.0001317404,0.0001819179,0.0001360651,0.0006694467,0.000351703,0.0007779054,0.0001347422,0.00006473639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003189366,0.00007656682,0.00004414041,0.0009982466,0.0003108089,0.0009632336,0.0001123238,0.0005086699,0.00001668079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004977586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005956368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000701985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00229944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986308,0.0000594456,0.0007191179,0.0001391147,0.0002935095,0.0001580179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973285,0.0009233166,0.0005841365,0.0003233804,0.0008375852,0.000003052127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002846609,0.00003163771,0.009822383,0.00006682319,0.00002797714,2.491321e-7,0.01908623,0.0002357659,0.000009484131,0.9659356,0.00307647,0.001678912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001369833,0.000009260971,0.6322317,0.000322178,0.00002850658,6.05789e-7,0.207045,0.001568805,0.000005390389,0.09295291,0.06427472,0.0001910259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6319413,0.00005683635,0.004766236,0.09081632,0.001581931,0.002326191,0.00002866263,0.00003562563,0.2684469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953773,0.000003145235,0.00009060431,0.00360565,0.00005383995,0.00007492389,0.00004550022,0.000008192022,0.0007408401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8729827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.514891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247286483","doi":"10.1017/s1052150x00010630","title":"BEQ volume 15 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Santa Clara University; University of Northern British Columbia; University of Notre Dame; Loyola University Chicago; Yeshiva University; DePaul University; Fairfield University; University of Minnesota; Franklin and Marshall College; University of St. Thomas; Carnegie Mellon University; Northwestern University; University of Northern Iowa; Harvard University; University of Cambridge; Boston College; Wake Forest University; City University of New York; University of Washington","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04036648851952197,"gpt":0.226726750709076,"spread":0.186360262189554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067876,0.000178143,0.0003663344,0.0001470139,0.0002219498,0.0002274992,0.0001878886,0.0001842146,0.04666395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000453622,0.0002019348,0.00005732572,0.000108427,0.0002155864,0.0004866,0.00005238758,0.0002505331,0.2870494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005924136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002195702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003876221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004272077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986569,0.00001270292,0.0004529241,0.0005144048,0.00004687827,0.0003162234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992687,0.00005598273,0.0001913004,0.0003205928,0.00008437163,0.00007910295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001819325,0.00008692434,0.01836069,0.00009093669,0.00008112047,0.000003732044,0.01224589,0.00006839626,0.000004592963,0.01445629,0.951345,0.003238215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004086747,0.00002310406,0.0367088,0.0000142914,0.00000762842,0.000004185802,0.0005425253,0.0007446362,0.000001792027,0.002137367,0.9591234,0.0002836159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.07760371,0.005091233,0.005560288,0.04998419,0.006547652,0.0004625129,0.0008570897,0.0001461274,0.8537472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3089406,0.0002148894,0.001176336,0.00485531,0.0006039714,0.00002198369,0.00001886997,0.00003470763,0.6841333],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2403854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9542075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385234012","doi":"10.1017/beq.2023.15","title":"Ethics for Capitalists: A Systematic Approach to Business Ethics, Competition, and Market Failure, by Joseph Heath. Altona, MB: FriesenPress, 2023. 276 pp.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Competition (biology); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Economics; Political science; Management; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06111834758970949,"gpt":0.2591054063567076,"spread":0.1979870587669982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01024911,0.0006386159,0.001947315,0.0005038949,0.001170324,0.0009896418,0.0008185916,0.001828816,0.0000766196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00369023,0.0008230818,0.000222543,0.001475048,0.0006496885,0.0007230219,0.0001423935,0.001728588,0.000428578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002814869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004156572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007431933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002690446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943159,0.000400134,0.002361924,0.001539773,0.0003317822,0.001050439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930691,0.00298114,0.001023695,0.001104893,0.001429826,0.0003913426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001006446,0.0002558654,0.0008708456,0.03826028,0.000323051,0.000008290111,0.02447347,0.0001637877,0.00003312412,0.8231047,0.1123661,0.00003981135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006989115,0.0007053009,0.01443748,0.009700391,0.0003359329,0.0001430285,0.02751911,0.01525058,0.00002504672,0.5945831,0.3239797,0.006331164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06342094,0.04082279,0.4580601,0.2721858,0.02454779,0.02784804,0.03007781,0.003091876,0.07994488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740602,0.003727756,0.003013948,0.007082833,0.002006661,0.002906023,0.00222103,0.000486252,0.004495251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234697074","doi":"10.1017/s1052150x00008526","title":"BEQ volume 19 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; Washington State University; Loyola University Chicago; University of Minnesota; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04150745447443899,"gpt":0.2314931823076309,"spread":0.1899857278331919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006504569,0.000177187,0.0003777079,0.000152783,0.0002368052,0.0002375671,0.0001858947,0.0001820808,0.02017973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006048716,0.0001993762,0.00005789888,0.0001266217,0.0001648945,0.000372224,0.00002816797,0.0002424984,0.1270327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004976236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002415443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003904292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009902509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998692,0.00001296512,0.0004238568,0.0005161759,0.00004578105,0.0003092345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992737,0.00004886637,0.0001880874,0.00032167,0.00007376605,0.00009387364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002431373,0.00009504998,0.01069957,0.00007083186,0.00005562875,0.000009344827,0.01095145,0.0000376781,0.000005327436,0.03081595,0.9447587,0.002476146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000455979,0.00005957466,0.09749208,0.00001613157,0.000008263167,0.000005659118,0.0005678061,0.0003767092,0.00000102528,0.01434508,0.8863502,0.0003215716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.05374711,0.004167159,0.005258273,0.0531548,0.006297961,0.0004694021,0.0006659383,0.000142991,0.8760964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4152814,0.000256591,0.0007191813,0.009731892,0.0003627136,0.00001195809,0.00002465078,0.00002458448,0.5735871],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3615343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9807159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402806900","doi":"10.1017/beq.2024.10","title":"Human-Centered AI, by Ben Shneiderman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 305 pp.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05914274948877702,"gpt":0.3498394482004286,"spread":0.2906966987116516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002005676,0.0002869449,0.0003239767,0.000103228,0.002013918,0.001160309,0.0007730058,0.0009965166,0.0002110355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003168293,0.000313032,0.0001715604,0.0007542316,0.0008703538,0.001646748,0.00007568595,0.001949341,0.00002578172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002533348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001073667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01499183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008415953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968017,0.0005590347,0.0003343005,0.0005466184,0.001044074,0.000714259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977334,0.0005101117,0.0001181253,0.0003535812,0.0009865789,0.0002982333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002865937,0.000184963,0.0001705401,0.0003859386,0.0001413489,0.0001375782,0.07894161,0.000005292938,0.0003827586,0.7362078,0.1770284,0.006385133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000332064,0.00009356454,0.0007241265,0.0002206716,0.00006695031,0.00000147681,0.009017822,0.00007266235,0.00001307154,0.02132165,0.9677072,0.0004288081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1054484,0.007578986,0.004911933,0.509208,0.008445432,0.002094693,0.001110871,0.002605761,0.3585959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637195,0.004496138,0.00009961976,0.002893969,0.001075604,0.000007225643,0.0001629708,0.00007773789,0.02746716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8582712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231946439","doi":"10.1017/s1052150x00013014","title":"Business Ethics Quarterly: Business Ethics and the Theory of the Firm","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Business; Philosophy of business; Information ethics; Public relations; Content (measure theory); Business administration; Marketing; Political science; Business model; Law; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2636769377529595,"gpt":0.3933365559904039,"spread":0.1296596182374444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05295513,0.0008871649,0.001387254,0.0005660572,0.00514378,0.0008871863,0.003928544,0.002777603,0.0001796304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07625015,0.0004990795,0.0003594889,0.008230697,0.01050435,0.001276157,0.0003662247,0.009707141,0.0001114153],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001009492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006670008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002572019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00223445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9790142,0.008734374,0.002732095,0.001625261,0.006864613,0.001029509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.882095,0.08610371,0.002273962,0.004343764,0.02491623,0.0002673468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009448529,0.0005973908,0.007112543,0.001232035,0.0001637384,0.00002912388,0.4002673,0.0005076725,0.0003971921,0.5662469,0.002926714,0.01957456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002307276,0.00009487582,0.4490262,0.0007859847,0.000179091,0.0003044654,0.02602324,0.0003036291,0.00005033804,0.5104877,0.009550539,0.0008866561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5045487,0.003290384,0.06066294,0.4125654,0.01317948,0.001885447,0.0001235754,0.0002615994,0.003482534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885871,0.001590089,0.0007305699,0.006080146,0.0008787405,0.0001153352,0.00002483813,0.000115965,0.001877209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4840385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196966265","doi":"10.1017/s1052150x00008423","title":"Business Ethics Quarterly: Business Ethics and the Theory of the Firm","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Business; Information ethics; Public relations; Philosophy of business; Content (measure theory); Marketing; Political science; Business model; Law; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2636769377529595,"gpt":0.3933365559904039,"spread":0.1296596182374444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05295513,0.0008871649,0.001387254,0.0005660572,0.00514378,0.0008871863,0.003928544,0.002777603,0.0001796304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07625015,0.0004990795,0.0003594889,0.008230697,0.01050435,0.001276157,0.0003662247,0.009707141,0.0001114153],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001009492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006670008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002572019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00223445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9790142,0.008734374,0.002732095,0.001625261,0.006864613,0.001029509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.882095,0.08610371,0.002273962,0.004343764,0.02491623,0.0002673468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009448529,0.0005973908,0.007112543,0.001232035,0.0001637384,0.00002912388,0.4002673,0.0005076725,0.0003971921,0.5662469,0.002926714,0.01957456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002307276,0.00009487582,0.4490262,0.0007859847,0.000179091,0.0003044654,0.02602324,0.0003036291,0.00005033804,0.5104877,0.009550539,0.0008866561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5045487,0.003290384,0.06066294,0.4125654,0.01317948,0.001885447,0.0001235754,0.0002615994,0.003482534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885871,0.001590089,0.0007305699,0.006080146,0.0008787405,0.0001153352,0.00002483813,0.000115965,0.001877209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4840385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416456021","doi":"10.1017/beq.2025.10096","title":"Zones of Slow Death? Social Descent, Epistemic Injustice and Temporality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Framing (construction); Ethnography; Injustice; Social injustice; Social justice; Erasure","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09202905428730836,"gpt":0.3881972112763369,"spread":0.2961681569890285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001784995,0.0001349139,0.000317756,0.00008659898,0.001218167,0.00004178232,0.0002049181,0.0004132521,0.00000802764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005874361,0.0001358155,0.0000501949,0.000462557,0.001356053,0.0001160779,0.00004015323,0.0003591891,0.000004106967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004175102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005281165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005088491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004309353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983282,0.0005522157,0.000333185,0.0002655981,0.0002593067,0.0002615136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983274,0.0007691812,0.0001579562,0.0001441309,0.0005622138,0.00003911489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008538219,0.0001231723,0.05650291,0.001068391,0.00009674378,0.000007536397,0.1497007,3.483829e-7,0.00007539528,0.7842845,0.001267278,0.006787666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007607184,0.00009700223,0.7253414,0.0002711949,0.0002102217,0.00000306028,0.08263715,0.00000724852,0.00003298227,0.1795927,0.01066725,0.0003790517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7085805,0.004077447,0.01017628,0.1774665,0.003080167,0.0008624196,0.00006631093,0.0002775866,0.09541275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997156,0.0001543108,0.0002992554,0.0004326037,0.0001124185,0.00001333322,0.000003950048,0.000005737957,0.001822441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6688386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9369277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415570594","doi":"10.1017/beq.2025.10085","title":"The Danger of Contextual Integrity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Adversarial system; Sociality; Data integrity; Contextual design; Context analysis; Personal Integrity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05751387134764081,"gpt":0.3485667971884821,"spread":0.2910529258408413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002228553,0.00008855925,0.0001654494,0.00004488178,0.0009923897,0.0001228494,0.0004894578,0.0003048519,0.00003487586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007837769,0.00005756787,0.00006446054,0.0005092339,0.01347757,0.000150522,0.00001774535,0.0005587986,0.00001796046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003900382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008270121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003495398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0125541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985395,0.0003870792,0.0002570732,0.0001576304,0.0004157389,0.0002429529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971111,0.001530026,0.00009820889,0.0002799599,0.000938878,0.00004177077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000164117,0.000032434,0.0001820402,0.00002321826,0.00001708561,9.924011e-7,0.02843179,1.793688e-7,0.0000399691,0.9464872,0.00214538,0.02262323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004793805,0.00005771733,0.003135728,0.000132539,0.00003749234,4.174525e-7,0.02992014,0.0000229937,0.00006035342,0.3289071,0.6370622,0.0001839447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05697375,0.003490313,0.3140504,0.2189129,0.01356667,0.001472459,0.00005828184,0.0004360298,0.3910392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886673,0.0001719978,0.00008169076,0.0005024851,0.000250236,0.0000133908,0.000002767558,0.000005857531,0.01030428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398033375","doi":"10.1017/beq.2014.2","title":"Corporate Governance in the Common-Law World: The Political Foundations of Shareholder Power, by Christopher Bruner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 318pp. ISBN: 978-1-1070-1329-2","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Power (physics); Politics; Shareholder; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economic history; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0649859530000985,"gpt":0.2565826675910659,"spread":0.1915967145909674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001179505,0.000381848,0.0004342324,0.00008158264,0.0004212018,0.0004996503,0.001219296,0.0002303036,0.00004690082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118909,0.0002872517,0.0001166976,0.001649153,0.0008208641,0.001873198,0.0001698307,0.0009901171,0.00009587671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000141189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003523456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1009815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02022089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972017,0.0001763537,0.0005568939,0.0004777926,0.0009740844,0.0006131115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966907,0.0003537266,0.0009635778,0.0009130123,0.001029828,0.00004917568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008889532,0.0002047972,0.002180676,0.00009637612,0.00001903048,0.00004054322,0.0002000648,0.00002890337,0.00002750258,0.7070403,0.289949,0.0001239723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001688553,0.00004773794,0.06725349,0.0001945561,0.0001101099,0.00001187283,0.002633151,0.0005628966,0.00001250037,0.002673722,0.924241,0.0005703836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4333765,0.003367721,0.001891213,0.2714513,0.003751169,0.003021208,0.001265851,0.0003968424,0.2814783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872285,0.00005000952,0.00002183132,0.007124518,0.0004372537,0.00001671002,0.0001952895,0.00004615036,0.004879754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7043665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}