{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5194,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":5194,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"4a214f6313a6","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research"}},"results":[{"id":"W1973107043","doi":"10.1139/x06-135","title":"Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":687,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bayesian network; Credibility; Computer science; Spurious relationship; Process (computing); Machine learning; Resource (disambiguation); Data mining; Bayesian probability; Artificial intelligence; Data science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1334906437607225,"gpt":0.348454606446239,"spread":0.2149639626855165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001128718,0.00006079331,0.000100214,0.00009438201,0.0003745233,0.0001117538,0.0001072797,0.00005674556,0.0003641749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003304916,0.00005330421,0.00001586147,0.0001964446,0.0001153416,0.00007740545,0.00004122766,0.0001253415,0.000004498951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004039372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001062782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005532881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2527685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990768,0.0000238949,0.0002599003,0.0001201609,0.0001683451,0.0003508544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999347,0.00008468411,0.00004486815,0.00004804037,0.000171805,0.0003036091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009458797,0.00002574306,0.7097015,0.00004053391,0.00001787584,0.00004613315,0.0002936669,0.0589281,0.0008468601,0.06255454,0.1546988,0.01275163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001106794,0.0002779305,0.7892557,0.00009883899,0.00001219787,0.0001078902,0.003532872,0.1362592,0.00009690043,0.01090213,0.05798623,0.0003632932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665604,0.0001142236,0.02258268,0.008496406,0.000036888,0.0002098892,0.000009206011,0.000002730373,0.001987603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995134,0.00002486026,0.004128574,0.0005450656,0.00009860364,0.00001044612,0.00001145824,0.000006100871,0.00004089021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2472356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8364098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1852719163","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2014-0347","title":"A survey on technologies for automatic forest fire monitoring, detection, and fighting using unmanned aerial vehicles and remote sensing techniques","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire Detection and Safety Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":622,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Firefighting; Fire detection; Wildfire suppression; Aerial survey; Remote sensing; Fire control; Field (mathematics); Systems engineering; Aeronautics; Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; Architectural engineering; Geography; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07671189151839218,"gpt":0.3136299731529901,"spread":0.2369180816345979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002007887,0.0001266306,0.0002245505,0.0006513054,0.0003220283,0.0001882876,0.0001170599,0.000168561,4.18065e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001565191,0.0001183081,0.00003365858,0.0003228843,0.000138177,0.0001402158,0.00001695763,0.0004051702,6.068654e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003732245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002633675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01183831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08671589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987991,0.0001149188,0.0003230444,0.0001234046,0.0002325164,0.0004069578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987218,0.000264461,0.00007101505,0.0001338446,0.0004735391,0.0003353292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001956427,0.000007320857,0.0699104,0.0005144248,0.0001528413,0.0002189565,0.001621255,0.003338328,0.004594143,0.00002967658,0.001487113,0.9179299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001608883,0.001609994,0.1429058,0.00233144,0.0000283125,0.001105369,0.003038049,0.8136019,0.02443457,0.002595338,0.006133629,0.0006066897],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962536,0.0007529915,0.002068025,0.00009290766,0.0004212765,0.0002709573,0.00001040055,0.00009247258,0.00003738897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971188,0.0000349779,0.002556768,0.000001912593,0.0002376815,0.000001295356,8.090739e-7,0.00003330465,0.00001441029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9173232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126544822","doi":"10.1139/x06-025","title":"On the formation of dense understory layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":607,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Directorate for Biological Sciences","keywords":"Understory; Ecological succession; Regeneration (biology); Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Forest dynamics; Biodiversity; Canopy; Competition (biology); Secondary succession; Biology; Environmental science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03725557480418266,"gpt":0.2916913217135285,"spread":0.2544357469093458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009000239,0.00005011634,0.00008827802,0.000263838,0.0004162115,0.00002393096,0.0001388046,0.00004424509,0.00001199011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002291001,0.00003738932,0.00002118392,0.000190056,0.001353726,0.0001644122,0.00003021575,0.0001645345,0.000001555775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003073356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001258446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01154571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9462974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993505,0.00007762846,0.0001852125,0.00007977265,0.0001079352,0.00019897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990774,0.0005880562,0.0001057834,0.00006388014,0.00006983986,0.00009505577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001874847,0.000008158419,0.9670247,0.00001124372,0.000003627896,0.000003535561,0.0001872011,0.00181945,0.00001417711,0.02917737,0.00153397,0.0001977499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002209922,0.0001081627,0.8802072,0.00003372832,0.000003855386,0.00001293829,0.0004486668,0.001597438,0.000007670827,0.11728,0.00004585091,0.00003349803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879386,0.0001738646,0.0002953303,0.0107616,0.00002471651,0.0002094626,0.00002192275,7.822093e-7,0.000573761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997625,0.00005160386,0.00007797094,0.00004244436,0.000005544095,0.00000640804,0.000003884731,0.000002168103,0.00004748011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968289388","doi":"10.1139/x10-060","title":"Resilience and vulnerability of permafrost to climate changeThis article is one of a selection of papers from The Dynamics of Change in Alaska’s Boreal Forests: Resilience and Vulnerability in Response to Climate Warming.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Climate change and permafrost","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":559,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Permafrost; Snow; Environmental science; Climate change; Taiga; Hydrology (agriculture); Vegetation (pathology); Tussock; Physical geography; Tundra; Boreal; Arctic vegetation; Arctic; Ecology; Geology; Geography; Forestry; Geomorphology; Oceanography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05485842521501346,"gpt":0.3188059967857027,"spread":0.2639475715706893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00869026,0.0001369116,0.0004260156,0.0006416309,0.0001509936,0.00003251564,0.0004110533,0.0001299797,0.0004582547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002112477,0.0001096924,0.00004967174,0.001131529,0.0008373728,0.000252093,0.00005881513,0.0006526932,0.00000109505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006826089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005209622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3383864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970343,0.0006498119,0.000744533,0.0002959088,0.0006357607,0.0006396979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996924,0.001450566,0.0002279531,0.0003277802,0.0005271472,0.0005424947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001434281,0.00003832055,0.9731557,0.0001101526,0.000006353362,0.00001278777,0.01189568,0.0001194357,0.008683305,0.00002126857,0.00003065321,0.004492011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004187677,0.0009126063,0.9900174,0.0002873797,0.000009065158,0.00001474861,0.002084346,0.003620876,0.002304041,0.0002033646,0.00003239144,0.00009505085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913805,0.000273694,0.000001088274,0.002812474,0.000073877,0.0004678626,0.004914014,0.000001558051,0.00007490839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994258,0.0002764616,0.0001284894,0.00007310207,0.0000482665,0.000005137931,0.00003382056,0.000006086844,0.000002858851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6519282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6660193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144819008","doi":"10.1139/x02-011","title":"Predictive mapping of forest composition and structure with direct gradient analysis and nearest- neighbor imputation in coastal Oregon, U.S.A.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing in Agriculture","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":544,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Oregon State University","keywords":"Thematic Mapper; Gradient analysis; Vegetation (pathology); k-nearest neighbors algorithm; Imputation (statistics); Geography; Vegetation classification; Environmental science; Remote sensing; Physical geography; Satellite imagery; Missing data; Statistics; Ordination; Mathematics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01267642147262731,"gpt":0.2288029260514897,"spread":0.2161265045788624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003683875,0.00009979005,0.0002139526,0.0005466152,0.0001489536,0.00007263089,0.0001139013,0.00006941725,0.00005676735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007184216,0.00007134149,0.00003063982,0.001257919,0.0005240178,0.0002249265,0.00002877877,0.0003542784,7.026717e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002567406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005588694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01750563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5930243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986779,0.0001434812,0.0002413543,0.0001764772,0.0004475369,0.0003132237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991719,0.00009676012,0.0001347091,0.0000952687,0.0001150448,0.000386392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003061499,0.00001126645,0.9699343,0.00001180457,0.0000614917,0.0001352132,0.001770673,0.02470848,0.0007101885,0.00001809924,0.0002077095,0.002400111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003412172,0.0003011815,0.9865674,0.0000857462,0.00003568993,0.0001657798,0.0003820671,0.01165351,0.0001293098,0.0002028255,0.00006119107,0.00007411467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985857,0.0001496172,0.0002016497,0.0002833841,0.00001847047,0.0001676316,0.00002872167,0.00000158506,0.0005632491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990342,0.00003655571,0.0008541787,0.000008653653,0.00002605882,3.913156e-7,0.000009221812,0.000007187742,0.00002361215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5755187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051974796","doi":"10.1139/x05-249","title":"Exotic bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera in the United States: recent establishments and interceptions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":541,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Buprestidae; Agrilus; Longhorn beetle; Curculionidae; Biology; Bark (sound); Botany; Slash (logging); Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03899368906844982,"gpt":0.2850128582239853,"spread":0.2460191691555355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001520631,0.00006423395,0.00007851849,0.0004056762,0.0002669714,0.0001283352,0.0002444607,0.00003624251,0.0004414922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000991991,0.00004815941,0.00001264084,0.0005410692,0.0004405346,0.000182129,0.00006002935,0.0003536272,0.00001483591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002977823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006658999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06242103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7213638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989247,0.0001926307,0.0001917547,0.000106215,0.000219612,0.000365119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994889,0.0001302586,0.00003998895,0.0001009858,0.00003444681,0.0002054069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000175103,0.00003895074,0.9786322,0.000008837156,0.000007565295,0.0004354258,0.0020049,0.002552541,0.00001344147,0.0008747319,0.01339481,0.002019151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003014614,0.0001604392,0.9593182,0.00002906879,0.00000407685,0.00011205,0.001476657,0.0003229732,0.000001394699,0.002533637,0.03569248,0.00004754888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946899,0.00007763089,0.00002137386,0.001361592,0.00005918274,0.0001731985,0.000002717656,0.00000120256,0.003613219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992542,0.0002744568,0.00006476184,0.000198855,0.00002899449,0.000007793837,0.000005290088,0.000004568873,0.00016105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6589428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9438224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090137677","doi":"10.1139/x05-112","title":"Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":540,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Natural Resources Limited","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Forest inventory; Environmental science; Diameter at breast height; Statistics; Seemingly unrelated regressions; Tree allometry; Tree (set theory); Mathematics; Forestry; Sampling (signal processing); National forest; Forest management; Ecology; Agroforestry; Geography; Biomass partitioning; Biology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04472177674749202,"gpt":0.3095348465168197,"spread":0.2648130697693277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001959641,0.00008334449,0.00009851919,0.0007826944,0.0006000036,0.00009388196,0.0005507963,0.00008867322,0.007364342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000476643,0.0000792315,0.00005905664,0.0005849286,0.0004063665,0.0003773956,0.00003514192,0.0003777482,0.001738535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003624498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002461552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5596713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981763,0.0001011998,0.0002595241,0.0001412748,0.0006067809,0.0007148788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981697,0.0001310737,0.00006132792,0.0001417692,0.0001495466,0.001346634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001460624,0.00005175281,0.4479484,0.000006405219,0.00006491812,0.0003885303,0.0005561747,0.006946969,0.00005542693,0.1357096,0.3995324,0.008724788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002579125,0.0001100596,0.5155475,0.000008685916,0.000004989409,0.0000446727,0.00008588758,0.00049475,0.00001940852,0.0186996,0.464632,0.00009452535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6434096,0.0002006036,0.0004786225,0.03111218,0.0003681281,0.0003148659,0.00003323243,0.00000582158,0.324077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933155,0.00000651117,0.0004530268,0.0003763654,0.0002046864,0.000007505185,0.000006551501,0.00001019605,0.005619714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4394714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900842202","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2018-0293","title":"Fire-regime changes in Canada over the last half century","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":527,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"National Fisheries Development Board","keywords":"Fire regime; Geography; Homogeneous; Lightning (connector); Physical geography; Environmental science; Fire ecology; Climatology; Ecology; Geology; Ecosystem; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01779435638380445,"gpt":0.2530683241730937,"spread":0.2352739677892892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001894634,0.00009712962,0.0001453844,0.0001595067,0.0002729666,0.00007427861,0.0008022537,0.00004848567,0.002177861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000349133,0.00006716474,0.00003032282,0.0006499923,0.0004537129,0.0001386542,0.00006542109,0.0005535954,0.0001796322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003186945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00260049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977557,0.0002964537,0.0002155399,0.0001469559,0.0007827875,0.0008025365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986408,0.0002441055,0.00008307552,0.0002839787,0.00006552682,0.0006825172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001013561,0.000005654967,0.916689,0.000006032259,0.000008026785,0.0004244244,0.00045511,0.00005825508,0.00008602184,0.00004349678,0.0754001,0.006813716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001685807,0.0001440964,0.7933176,0.00006433815,0.000001443584,0.00007757794,0.0002331272,0.0004426985,0.00009449482,0.00005431646,0.2053323,0.00006947313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911676,0.0002579581,5.746855e-7,0.003423701,0.0005207902,0.0001960197,0.000007193186,0.000001146827,0.004424997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999149,0.00001949,0.000008878637,0.0002025463,0.0003302162,0.000005349658,6.279887e-7,0.0000148875,0.0002689852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1299322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133860313","doi":"10.1139/x08-171","title":"Responses of insect pests, pathogens, and invasive plant species to climate change in the forests of northeastern North America: What can we predict?This article is one of a selection of papers from NE Forests 2100: A Synthesis of Climate Change Impacts on Forests of the Northeastern US and Eastern Canada.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":515,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Northeastern States Research Cooperative; U.S. Department of Energy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Beech; Armillaria; Range (aeronautics); Invasive species; PEST analysis; Climate change; Tsuga; Introduced species; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03566431043844433,"gpt":0.2452280171986807,"spread":0.2095637067602364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009750197,0.0002102027,0.0005844579,0.0005173942,0.0001243028,0.00002093274,0.0005386031,0.00008779806,0.00008825129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003948644,0.0001493905,0.00009457309,0.0008418012,0.0007368046,0.0002477517,0.0001280202,0.0002789282,5.391963e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002191888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004356032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5429934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969862,0.0004505081,0.0007998999,0.0002508706,0.0008833728,0.0006292246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977996,0.0005756845,0.0007368374,0.0003777658,0.0001611214,0.0003489872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001094958,0.0001320875,0.9785786,0.0002024797,0.00006419737,0.00005430379,0.01012514,0.0002895941,0.001009059,0.00002603955,0.00002828884,0.008395218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005066709,0.002113997,0.9906175,0.001266281,0.00006071907,0.00002817734,0.00157332,0.00020683,0.003396628,0.00009192331,0.00003012162,0.0001078378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966802,0.0003158257,5.371822e-7,0.001121255,0.00004853325,0.0008561007,0.0008952022,0.000001148139,0.0000812137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984598,0.001290271,0.00002081669,0.0001457548,0.00003114485,0.00002563666,0.000005207688,0.00001551594,0.000005822588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4554571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.609197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145912859","doi":"10.1139/x03-232","title":"A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition: effects of shading versus crowding","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":509,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tsuga; Shading; Crowding; Interspecific competition; Competition (biology); Canopy; Thuja; Western Hemlock; Biology; Ecology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02327539228879094,"gpt":0.2885648801529743,"spread":0.2652894878641833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009653793,0.0000814219,0.000278569,0.0009584753,0.0001491357,0.00001878698,0.000434459,0.00006496251,0.0008375046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003569012,0.00007626588,0.0001536664,0.001561326,0.0005506271,0.000159928,0.00005940814,0.0002709149,0.00001858136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006951285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003618434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01896707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5322425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985662,0.00009958338,0.0003309345,0.0001293558,0.000450068,0.000423888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988928,0.000247799,0.0001663429,0.0001921277,0.00008466575,0.0004162074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001600138,0.00009671248,0.859073,0.0000825056,0.0009146163,0.0006002132,0.001027424,0.04672565,0.0009442271,0.0885895,0.0009887123,0.0007973608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001685443,0.001064304,0.9870785,0.00009846557,0.0002879194,0.00001169669,0.0002367569,0.0001928877,0.001838529,0.006534484,0.0008642475,0.0001068054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866514,0.000129517,0.0005431493,0.000425262,0.0001895791,0.0001329124,0.000005236,0.000001590704,0.01192131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996036,0.00001986262,0.0002469374,0.00002234142,0.00002784556,0.000003110155,0.000002600031,0.000006842026,0.00006685721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5132755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114191733","doi":"10.1139/x03-225","title":"Assessing forest metrics with a ground-based scanning lidar","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":422,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lidar; Point cloud; Remote sensing; Diameter at breast height; Deciduous; Environmental science; Forest inventory; Canopy; Tree canopy; Sampling (signal processing); Laser scanning; Geography; Forestry; Forest management; Ecology; Computer science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05549543246517787,"gpt":0.3262188852113955,"spread":0.2707234527462176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001450573,0.0001048898,0.000144703,0.0005922185,0.0006607407,0.0004430957,0.0004100001,0.00006782338,0.0000943323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002877697,0.0000843137,0.00005990845,0.001707738,0.0005883105,0.0003805935,0.000021062,0.0006324498,0.00007709009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00125311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001918444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06801972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3144101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980907,0.00008590585,0.0002410504,0.0001786942,0.0007884434,0.000615178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984061,0.0001368835,0.0001121411,0.0002615007,0.0001644619,0.0009189358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002758914,0.00006144786,0.8415636,0.00001569053,0.00002759101,0.0008552496,0.000614593,0.1376898,0.0006356253,0.001227597,0.001579232,0.01570196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008993683,0.000439272,0.9725145,0.0002275716,0.00001760489,0.0004115828,0.000751342,0.0007181832,0.0005717918,0.0039724,0.01926177,0.0002145789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786533,0.0000902887,0.008335548,0.00161275,0.00004613561,0.0001270991,0.00000159855,0.000005898879,0.01112741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886705,0.000002320214,0.01101075,0.00007855011,0.00009282369,0.000001125223,0.000002224418,0.00002265653,0.0001190392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2463903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9381864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105669291","doi":"10.1139/x00-178","title":"Natural fire frequency for the eastern Canadian boreal forest: consequences for sustainable forestry","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":403,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Taiga; Boreal; Disturbance (geology); Forestry; Geography; Fire regime; Transect; Climate change; Physical geography; Environmental science; Fire ecology; Agroforestry; Ecology; Ecosystem; Geology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02456831197343453,"gpt":0.2868247160869921,"spread":0.2622564041135576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003516534,0.0002301613,0.0002961234,0.000390528,0.001520508,0.0004103118,0.001499149,0.0001594502,0.0001498347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002079309,0.0001664002,0.0002216217,0.0006861081,0.001057761,0.0006325284,0.00004587225,0.0006873335,0.00005048045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002334459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004128315,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9360509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996193,0.0001753577,0.0004962346,0.0003142646,0.0006644709,0.002156695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959696,0.001144881,0.0001836461,0.0004273571,0.0005193587,0.00175514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008061844,0.00001145643,0.9406734,0.00007053305,0.00005508656,0.001191337,0.0003118887,0.0004115161,0.00001648279,0.00252091,0.04704638,0.007610365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001280783,0.001202686,0.722275,0.0001629276,0.00004097889,0.001271525,0.00203623,0.01469172,0.00003781544,0.01920975,0.237369,0.0004216037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815049,0.001276959,0.0001812186,0.006895788,0.0005560782,0.002062635,0.00005754839,0.000007455986,0.007457434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944586,0.0000286736,0.0002630255,0.0001858084,0.0004657338,0.0001746536,0.00001521368,0.00004577514,0.0043625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2183985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081751416","doi":"10.1139/x08-001","title":"Impacts of a regional drought on the productivity, dieback, and biomass of western Canadian aspen forests","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":398,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Water content; Productivity; Climate change; Agronomy; Forestry; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07261089201418547,"gpt":0.3083079408695236,"spread":0.2356970488553381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00143874,0.0001177545,0.0001998801,0.0005908622,0.0003101446,0.00003357659,0.0006134599,0.00006219074,0.0005080318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003631944,0.00008200366,0.00006926749,0.0006551539,0.001539869,0.0002377706,0.00007462635,0.0003347339,0.00006111016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003307827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001027041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7558507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980872,0.0001702004,0.0002965211,0.000159241,0.0006693642,0.0006174825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983394,0.000176273,0.0001605686,0.000317798,0.00009641596,0.0009095247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003208739,0.0000186157,0.9538219,0.00001969061,0.00002696104,0.0001476993,0.0008843043,0.00005315161,0.00007870263,0.001424994,0.04311633,0.0003755735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002261434,0.000424502,0.9669971,0.00007460371,0.000006140388,0.0001415597,0.00004177922,0.00001924683,0.0002644463,0.001382915,0.03034,0.00008148827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982329,0.0001372494,6.490129e-7,0.00789684,0.00004884181,0.0002583492,0.00001644048,0.000001006514,0.009311595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984121,0.00004606481,0.0000239881,0.00008451484,0.0001024162,0.000003025203,0.000001839221,0.00001410949,0.001311948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2298052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5673712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168329827","doi":"10.1139/x03-241","title":"Decay and nutrient dynamics of coarse woody debris in northern coniferous forests: a synthesis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":394,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coarse woody debris; Nutrient; Environmental science; Forest floor; Litter; Plant litter; Agronomy; Snag; Ecology; Biology; Soil science; Soil water; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03161549762148954,"gpt":0.2468988923674256,"spread":0.215283394745936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007650948,0.00008400087,0.0002256774,0.0001500609,0.0002673893,0.00003063299,0.0002939229,0.0001091143,0.00003548068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003213604,0.00003806312,0.00006136703,0.0004251403,0.0006146361,0.00009138454,0.00004706698,0.0002956795,0.00000604991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002934479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002864492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04657814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988976,0.00009001352,0.0002497285,0.0001228986,0.0002232695,0.0004165407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988123,0.0003656874,0.00009286564,0.00004006098,0.0003569177,0.0003322276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000600872,0.00004577348,0.9942016,0.000009464337,0.00002523141,0.0002802236,0.0002147728,0.0000399469,0.00003417604,0.001575922,0.00008356591,0.00342925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003049403,0.0006432162,0.9922345,0.00008879786,0.000008745106,0.00007293942,0.001807646,0.000008470543,0.0001693755,0.004160887,0.000425729,0.00007471201],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956002,0.0005308581,0.000001154016,0.003415206,0.00004623263,0.0001273992,0.0000540798,0.000001603314,0.0002232231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997504,0.0001358787,0.00003187541,0.00001931699,0.00003516884,0.000002635769,0.000003535323,7.289059e-7,0.00002044962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9404995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9597708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025693723","doi":"10.1139/x02-068","title":"Fire growth using minimum travel time methods","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":387,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Computation; Travel time; Computer science; Meteorology; Environmental science; Simulation; Algorithm; Geography; Engineering; Transport engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06560543396521819,"gpt":0.3340704028900443,"spread":0.2684649689248261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003691107,0.0001227151,0.0002387199,0.0003123147,0.0003353575,0.0001122081,0.0006647036,0.0001082123,0.007568932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008665317,0.0001088856,0.0001037697,0.0007165692,0.0003802739,0.0003196473,0.00004562025,0.0005947645,0.001072643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009950841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002060126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03777467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03183043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973075,0.0006990071,0.0003501172,0.0001867637,0.0006461139,0.0008104745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979692,0.0003604965,0.0001101955,0.0002385439,0.00009572789,0.001225909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050466,0.0001689942,0.5611672,0.0001311109,0.0001553377,0.004306242,0.00445439,0.001325226,0.04465609,0.0002282199,0.2647745,0.1185823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002164292,0.002075472,0.5363583,0.0006010356,0.00006430966,0.004337956,0.0005382031,0.3804151,0.006430829,0.003012076,0.06287152,0.001130888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836215,0.0004396955,0.0002394834,0.0006750438,0.0002228393,0.000189963,0.000006956535,0.000003382546,0.01460111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929397,0.00001078122,0.004608122,0.00004544664,0.0001818877,0.000002062478,4.625623e-7,0.00002813345,0.002183402],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3790899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976452867","doi":"10.1139/x06-238","title":"Bayesian belief networks: applications in ecology and natural resource management","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":382,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Bayesian network; Adaptive management; Natural resource management; Ecosystem management; Resource management (computing); Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Ecology; Bayesian probability; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Artificial intelligence; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01952312044216336,"gpt":0.2832562241847414,"spread":0.2637331037425781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001185829,0.00008057459,0.0001310606,0.0007767806,0.0002312371,0.000211408,0.0007842573,0.00006742306,0.000004275244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000217616,0.00007372096,0.00002974485,0.0007130438,0.0001686812,0.000175634,0.00007296884,0.0005912668,0.000003233291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001710874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003960145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003771655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1395082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986032,0.0001402523,0.0002822098,0.0001918085,0.0002352944,0.0005472273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990318,0.0001309239,0.00005853789,0.000242746,0.0001772577,0.0003587351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001036922,0.0000519756,0.3505543,0.00003185698,0.00002224575,0.0007376518,0.000284808,0.01914725,0.000006204772,0.5843598,0.007210632,0.03758289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005530088,0.0001893577,0.8090686,0.0001118393,0.000005269502,0.0002215759,0.0001947029,0.07174239,0.0000088433,0.09322443,0.02446059,0.0002194425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3019022,0.005626024,0.6704124,0.006740504,0.0002527144,0.0005940269,0.000003093041,0.00002257581,0.01444645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947889,0.00003618465,0.004634545,0.00007155207,0.0001105783,0.00001059719,0.000001742385,0.000006157255,0.0003397485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6928867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8761935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558395093","doi":"10.1139/x10-098","title":"Alaska’s changing fire regime — implications for the vulnerability of its boreal forestsThis article is one of a selection of papers from The Dynamics of Change in Alaska’s Boreal Forests: Resilience and Vulnerability in Response to Climate Warming.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":381,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Black spruce; Taiga; Boreal; Fire regime; Environmental science; Climate change; Fire ecology; Fire protection; Physical geography; Vulnerability (computing); Human settlement; Geography; Forestry; Ecology; Ecosystem; Biology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03121133492007152,"gpt":0.3106808419516974,"spread":0.2794695070316259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009578729,0.0001307645,0.0003649101,0.0003331791,0.0002019629,0.00002038443,0.0006601512,0.0001251967,0.00006160946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003773404,0.00009677451,0.00008817671,0.001316423,0.0007904947,0.0002425021,0.0001166497,0.000577035,5.802116e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005244209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004335681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1360088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9074464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972569,0.0005661311,0.0007944205,0.0002809189,0.0004870312,0.0006145436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956881,0.002838416,0.0003772727,0.0005273137,0.0002721437,0.0002966847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006343747,0.00006661061,0.9761591,0.0000835254,0.00001292134,0.000001487631,0.005057582,0.0002866879,0.008258513,0.0001646476,0.00007717834,0.009197373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004786782,0.0005442298,0.9739183,0.0002005156,0.00001163501,0.000009483665,0.0006292709,0.01953732,0.004075688,0.000473089,0.00004619591,0.00007563025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915377,0.00009850274,0.0000263172,0.006557882,0.00005725279,0.001322138,0.0003486873,0.000002054047,0.00004945045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995549,0.00003332852,0.0002163424,0.00002586463,0.00004015356,0.000100963,0.000004040283,0.00001596974,0.000008380108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7714377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8697446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120964134","doi":"10.1139/x06-132","title":"Can forest management based on natural disturbances maintain ecological resilience?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":381,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Environmental resource management; Resilience (materials science); Ecosystem management; Ecosystem; Psychological resilience; Adaptive management; Ecology; Ecological resilience; Forest management; Natural (archaeology); Environmental science; Biodiversity; Forest ecology; Salvage logging; Geography; Agroforestry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00919981496726921,"gpt":0.2484680212842286,"spread":0.2392682063169594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001665588,0.0001464952,0.0001866143,0.0003606279,0.0005334835,0.0001533827,0.0009162045,0.00007945645,0.0004256107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001181274,0.0001055165,0.0001039722,0.0006189017,0.0006953671,0.0001115634,0.00006260904,0.0005802381,0.0000833942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001287045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002871393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02387373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7906211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972855,0.0002005427,0.0003746215,0.0002874126,0.0009489927,0.0009028663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987454,0.0001809378,0.0001187112,0.0002795246,0.00006525468,0.0006101602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003285234,0.00005643831,0.8863095,0.00001549867,0.000005517817,0.001467127,0.00002129679,0.09446003,0.00001934914,0.01028145,0.006485872,0.0008450756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003260601,0.0003709045,0.9733542,0.00008251313,0.000004204115,0.00004655115,0.0001520426,0.01086496,0.00001515421,0.008757127,0.005886066,0.0001402283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.964663,0.0001003722,0.00008526239,0.002318679,0.0002510695,0.0002739063,0.00001218589,0.000004426926,0.03229115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976199,0.000008984907,0.0003980486,0.0001054479,0.0001073741,0.00001054178,0.000004875124,0.00001198577,0.001732884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7667474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122477458","doi":"10.1139/x00-097","title":"Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, forest type, and litter mixtures","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":376,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Litter; Taiga; Agronomy; Environmental science; Plant litter; Forestry; Botany; Ecology; Biology; Nutrient; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02425881422573083,"gpt":0.2585935833959447,"spread":0.2343347691702139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005381114,0.0000708485,0.0002855378,0.00009568927,0.0001376853,0.00005149977,0.0002176902,0.0001409539,0.0003611067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001360696,0.00004790196,0.00004528376,0.0005246439,0.000849704,0.0001712195,0.00004157836,0.0002476287,0.000002268855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002190394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001020463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1369234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9057809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988717,0.0001192877,0.000349767,0.0001371148,0.0002113358,0.00031076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988642,0.000230851,0.0001166467,0.00004457363,0.0005533858,0.0001902888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009231939,0.00003308809,0.9896865,0.0000409423,0.00002897832,0.00005119228,0.000187814,0.00000811786,0.0004110868,0.000009658786,0.00406565,0.005384613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002622289,0.0009731214,0.9953001,0.0001826181,0.00001083831,0.00006582659,0.0002421384,0.000004077261,0.00008571901,0.00122362,0.001580535,0.0000692147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973282,0.001613661,3.380841e-8,0.0005326767,0.00004310494,0.000127381,0.00006421647,0.000001124149,0.0002896063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990694,0.000437209,0.00003579495,0.00006572987,0.00005438034,9.696672e-7,0.000007484243,0.000001011245,0.0003280387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7688575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8688239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168761168","doi":"10.1139/x10-061","title":"Fire, climate change, and forest resilience in interior AlaskaThis article is one of a selection of papers from The Dynamics of Change in Alaska's Boreal Forests: Resilience and Vulnerability in Response to Climate Warming.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":368,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Pacific Northwest Research Station; Division of Environmental Biology; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Ecological succession; Environmental science; Disturbance (geology); Taiga; Climate change; Dominance (genetics); Forest restoration; Deciduous; Ecology; Fire ecology; Fire regime; Forest dynamics; Plant community; Boreal; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Geography; Forestry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02340835831365185,"gpt":0.2871884178538661,"spread":0.2637800595402142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006951663,0.000137853,0.0003776859,0.0004879391,0.00009214838,0.00003045988,0.0004648902,0.0001278609,0.00007726696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001878465,0.0001166975,0.00003790477,0.001225154,0.0008707003,0.0003869091,0.0001751371,0.0006944273,0.000001605955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004825348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001873838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2724063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971443,0.0006147851,0.0007320417,0.0003133826,0.0005311462,0.0006643789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979713,0.000985043,0.000249244,0.0003223711,0.00009254413,0.0003794912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008631925,0.00005073507,0.9759182,0.00007013363,0.000003284044,0.00003285784,0.006496225,0.00005308024,0.007980692,0.00002362573,0.00001590229,0.008492086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005777724,0.0007395592,0.979499,0.0005978838,0.000003799086,0.00002098721,0.0007579038,0.01606964,0.001486047,0.0001384093,0.00001685395,0.00009214018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975218,0.0001055496,0.000001420603,0.001425856,0.00006392519,0.0007263271,0.0001009884,0.000001737597,0.00005242544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996005,0.0001118189,0.0001636264,0.00003640603,0.00002572512,0.0000427978,0.00000123123,0.00001436296,0.000003580751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7100326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7324389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164833045","doi":"10.1139/x00-197","title":"Direct carbon emissions from Canadian forest fires, 1959-1999","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":354,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Taiga; Boreal; Greenhouse gas; Sink (geography); Carbon sink; Carbon dioxide; Carbon fibers; Forestry; Atmospheric sciences; Climate change; Geography; Ecology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02316714620536451,"gpt":0.2695506130059778,"spread":0.2463834668006133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002027889,0.0002175937,0.0003398967,0.0007304467,0.0006441918,0.0002008601,0.001149213,0.0002102366,0.003321197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001157542,0.0001970339,0.0001315429,0.001047799,0.0004159381,0.0002848046,0.00006634641,0.0009446379,0.0004800285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003036122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002649112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962066,0.0004091377,0.0004846945,0.0003491102,0.0009863932,0.001564032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939387,0.0004300622,0.0001273045,0.0005515157,0.0001169011,0.004835546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001668751,0.00001429757,0.9498344,0.000005172813,0.00002573121,0.002676822,0.000315103,0.0005564854,0.000192597,0.00002245901,0.0432739,0.003066352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003209969,0.0001913942,0.6674064,0.0001514819,0.00001027227,0.0001960594,0.0001060963,0.00134028,0.0000834762,0.0004047956,0.3295841,0.0002046879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9076366,0.0008091444,0.000002376272,0.001818663,0.0005036017,0.0002962029,0.0000606682,0.000008364448,0.0888644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971387,0.00006355353,0.00007400684,0.0001040334,0.0004293631,0.0000119727,0.00001353346,0.00004769509,0.00211718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2863102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088769802","doi":"10.1139/x05-153","title":"Response of boreal ecosystems to varying modes of permafrost degradation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Climate change and permafrost","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":350,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Arctic Sciences; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of Energy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Thermokarst; Permafrost; Frost heaving; Geology; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Geomorphology; Geotechnical engineering; Oceanography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09716052039950009,"gpt":0.3191811198701117,"spread":0.2220205994706116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002720442,0.00007763559,0.0002124175,0.0009130161,0.0001414141,0.0000492417,0.0003580177,0.00006227217,0.001826163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003666821,0.0000653981,0.0000694777,0.0004794459,0.0001175745,0.0002509287,0.000007035444,0.0002231216,0.0000378775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004670568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001128953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1436361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8905134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982885,0.0002645038,0.0004309766,0.0000995341,0.0005012833,0.0004151717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980505,0.0004166263,0.0001326493,0.0001591255,0.0005371472,0.0007040262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004616712,0.00000808898,0.9834086,0.00003782754,0.0000134933,0.00005105717,0.001460678,0.004199712,0.002703733,0.00004337031,0.003841232,0.003770549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003507978,0.000672224,0.9790642,0.0002195787,0.000007070616,0.0001187351,0.000927177,0.003645858,0.003228244,0.00008012913,0.01158457,0.0001014731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933488,0.0006825372,0.00001174989,0.001207382,0.00009154987,0.0001232987,0.002662289,0.00000105969,0.001871334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992307,0.0000508169,0.0001908348,0.0000399331,0.0001577718,4.095641e-7,0.0001882576,0.000004610841,0.0001365972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118824892","doi":"10.1139/x01-117","title":"Rates of litter decomposition over 6 years in Canadian forests: influence of litter quality and climate","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":343,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Litter; Environmental science; Animal science; Precipitation; Nutrient; Atmospheric sciences; Plant litter; Mathematics; Chemistry; Ecology; Biology; Meteorology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05801193451397,"gpt":0.3387763805398776,"spread":0.2807644460259076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001220728,0.00006977694,0.000189558,0.0002193311,0.00007096932,0.00004142572,0.0002268423,0.00009218881,0.000175886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002017345,0.00003677958,0.00005764975,0.000452596,0.0002426868,0.0001471458,0.00001811034,0.0002704037,0.000002955885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001591226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001543646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7213265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985896,0.0001794132,0.0003807346,0.0001056144,0.0002638225,0.0004808194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987259,0.000208008,0.0001107126,0.00005474247,0.0002917569,0.0006089044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001712842,0.00001069294,0.9961618,0.00001454132,0.000006393457,0.00005397484,0.0001732706,0.0000333282,0.001531619,0.0002738397,0.0001229078,0.001600548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001566973,0.0001904883,0.9979999,0.00008643614,0.000002426206,0.00002069543,0.00009293138,0.0002166065,0.0001935441,0.0006654082,0.0003125969,0.00006228899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982629,0.0004207525,3.569739e-8,0.0009088567,0.00002359619,0.00008506362,0.00005984753,8.030558e-7,0.0002381376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997082,0.0001078482,0.00001659065,0.0001041426,0.00004329488,0.000001448449,0.00000463246,0.000001253453,0.00001256405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2728049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2805292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022074394","doi":"10.1139/x00-202","title":"Additivity of nonlinear biomass equations","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Additive function; Mathematics; Nonlinear system; Nonlinear regression; Seemingly unrelated regressions; Applied mathematics; Biomass (ecology); Tree (set theory); Statistics; Logarithm; Econometrics; Regression analysis; Ecology; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04730206124146605,"gpt":0.3113847815354063,"spread":0.2640827202939402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001488244,0.00005362122,0.00010827,0.0003149154,0.0002011521,0.00001778163,0.0003685793,0.00005497682,0.004962602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005288647,0.00004778032,0.00005582027,0.0005463726,0.000634286,0.0001742007,0.00005326874,0.0002546194,0.0002652582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000260602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003301028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0196789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5121553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988322,0.000114818,0.0002262647,0.00009097981,0.0003467352,0.0003889857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990693,0.0001695368,0.00008562014,0.0001625596,0.00008449725,0.0004284912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003404906,0.00009744382,0.9392809,0.00001343622,0.00004100105,0.0006584541,0.0002636642,0.001175027,0.0003468687,0.009838481,0.04444157,0.003809076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002930679,0.0003438595,0.8826715,0.00002045895,0.000007908074,0.00004884083,0.0001207457,0.0003416215,0.0002222742,0.009941556,0.1059175,0.00007062078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696384,0.00005449806,0.0008294425,0.001390538,0.0001271265,0.000119995,0.00001538649,0.000001731724,0.0278229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982045,0.00001753688,0.000418719,0.00003202142,0.00005811298,0.000002819914,0.000003276926,0.000005805835,0.001257184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4924764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153232735","doi":"10.1139/x01-120","title":"Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":326,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Colorado State University","keywords":"Beech; Monoculture; Picea abies; Fagus sylvatica; Nutrient; Litter; Agronomy; Botany; Indicator value; Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Biology; Chemistry; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05596654986709883,"gpt":0.3194153350896173,"spread":0.2634487852225185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008516798,0.00005645639,0.0001104388,0.0004715498,0.000287768,0.00003394822,0.0002338214,0.00003357825,0.003056785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000827783,0.00005224804,0.00004951352,0.0004870258,0.0004653273,0.0002301452,0.00002916194,0.0004054232,0.0001712352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006581541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002120831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00624918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9642473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998948,0.0001301017,0.0002292435,0.00009321574,0.0002386665,0.0003607946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990233,0.0005048526,0.00005124942,0.00007835896,0.00007769203,0.0002646077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001926665,0.00003272871,0.9890649,0.000002331142,0.00001032441,0.0003011787,0.0001867704,0.0009623144,0.00002231498,0.001849676,0.007120081,0.000428123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001648544,0.00004557664,0.9703516,0.00004035093,0.000002434746,0.000155265,0.0004462792,0.0001947735,0.00001263046,0.008725458,0.01981291,0.00004788748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9619193,0.00009425597,0.00005858259,0.003736676,0.000133191,0.00007052456,0.000006157489,0.000001381988,0.0339799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756,0.00009673544,0.0002130015,0.000032442,0.00006861097,0.00001368803,0.000001198675,0.000005139949,0.002009188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9579981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030675384","doi":"10.1139/x09-054","title":"Altitudinal differentiation in growth and phenology among populations of temperate-zone tree species growing in a common garden","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":325,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Phenology; Beech; Quercus petraea; Biology; Fagus sylvatica; Fraxinus; Altitude (triangle); Abies alba; Fagaceae; Ecology; Betula pendula; Temperate climate; Population; Picea abies; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0728531974404183,"gpt":0.3084266576489196,"spread":0.2355734602085013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004583294,0.00005879833,0.000158597,0.0004165437,0.00009410927,0.00003344284,0.0001515483,0.00005503775,0.001786778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001187261,0.00005517684,0.0000256018,0.0004469662,0.0002801975,0.000220997,0.00002129785,0.0002704923,0.000005053309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005724402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005739944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02206227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7813759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989665,0.0001093578,0.0002860519,0.00009218987,0.0002429707,0.0003029603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995907,0.0000345567,0.0000670807,0.00006850534,0.00003437075,0.0002047946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001498148,0.00002734035,0.9941508,0.000004067977,0.000001904781,0.00004167481,0.0004008992,0.00004807774,0.001711015,0.002960659,0.0002650866,0.0003735632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003828155,0.0001201554,0.9962841,0.00003714066,0.000002078097,0.00001344474,0.001447088,0.00004621678,0.000243393,0.001317791,0.00005965778,0.00004613843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941567,0.0001068343,0.000006543614,0.001173045,0.00003162907,0.00008235126,0.000008854438,9.529386e-7,0.004433109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998246,0.00005938341,0.00001644204,0.00001691268,0.0000174324,0.000001416184,0.000008747009,0.000003070014,0.00005200103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7593136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163422410","doi":"10.1139/x11-041","title":"Efficacy of tree defense physiology varies with bark beetle population density: a basis for positive feedback in eruptive species","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":325,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service; Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Mountain pine beetle; Biology; Bark beetle; Dendroctonus; Herbivore; Ecology; Population; Bark (sound); Woody plant; Host (biology); Picea engelmannii; Longhorn beetle; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03976660246383738,"gpt":0.2649837146765177,"spread":0.2252171122126803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007266262,0.00008865834,0.0002092917,0.0003586395,0.0001592842,0.00001172875,0.0002440708,0.00007244725,0.0005462511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003047019,0.00007252123,0.00005694364,0.0003781683,0.0008360642,0.0002058985,0.00004247219,0.0002268512,0.00001700966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004037291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001919958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03866472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7024707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988421,0.0001490157,0.0002356596,0.0001532089,0.000197186,0.0004227993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991861,0.0002394891,0.0001177217,0.0001341051,0.000104663,0.0002179105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002189498,0.0001607601,0.9739609,0.00002734793,0.0001062535,0.0002193664,0.005108716,0.001002286,0.0008789028,0.01334552,0.001387744,0.00161269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000685922,0.001079635,0.9908832,0.00004571857,0.00001575988,0.00002340683,0.0005201476,0.00002905149,0.0004545068,0.006011534,0.000178731,0.0000723427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995223,0.00002559636,0.00008773193,0.0001116566,0.00005175274,0.0003481036,0.000012003,0.000001296948,0.00413889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998605,0.000007213513,0.001046953,0.00004073945,0.00002634295,0.00000986472,0.000004828324,0.000009500726,0.0002495965],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.663806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9677369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150219928","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2013-0401","title":"Mapping attributes of Canada’s forests at moderate resolution through <i>k</i>NN and MODIS imagery","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":319,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Forest inventory; Scale (ratio); Sampling (signal processing); Remote sensing; Land cover; Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); Geospatial analysis; Pixel; Forestry; Physical geography; Data set; Cartography; Geography; Forest management; Land use; Statistics; Ecology; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03773142670803336,"gpt":0.2674499475745917,"spread":0.2297185208665583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001165055,0.0000819691,0.0001632303,0.0001196642,0.0005096929,0.00004396657,0.0002185395,0.00005287907,0.00006957078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003207006,0.00007385523,0.00003672649,0.0002922656,0.0004630602,0.0001530357,0.00005940821,0.0002690665,0.000008068638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006978694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008524676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7500111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984686,0.0001394377,0.0002827187,0.0001509454,0.0004753347,0.0004829275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988679,0.0001696713,0.0001160116,0.000214174,0.000123736,0.0005084767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009261753,0.00003250298,0.6479355,0.00007676266,0.00005718101,0.0001226995,0.002744561,0.039357,0.007078891,0.002355062,0.2863112,0.01383611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003987765,0.0001272959,0.8795278,0.0001131632,0.000007619815,0.0002082867,0.0002487347,0.01600533,0.002416378,0.01070066,0.09006406,0.0001819151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843026,0.0001891136,0.001981536,0.002821657,0.00004920816,0.000102844,0.00001509643,0.000001876841,0.01053604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980777,0.00002337178,0.001110811,0.00005158367,0.00005924928,6.794191e-7,0.00000360807,0.00001053855,0.0006624573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2380695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3920197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101464256","doi":"10.1139/x03-199","title":"Interregional nonlinear heightdiameter model with random coefficients for stone pine in Spain","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Covariate; Mathematics; Percentile; Sampling (signal processing); Mixed model; Random effects model; Pinus <genus>; Tree (set theory); Ecology; Forestry; Geography; Biology; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03233042697444787,"gpt":0.2912108290668542,"spread":0.2588804020924063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001698593,0.00009619849,0.0001729002,0.0004208986,0.0001625495,0.00003214884,0.0003940857,0.00006241495,0.0001931614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002569453,0.00007391706,0.00005735115,0.0003389066,0.0005701457,0.000163922,0.00004385188,0.0003651432,0.00004299728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007482347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005727626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00513668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5274479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985598,0.00006227096,0.0002542447,0.0001709211,0.0003623312,0.0005903777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991623,0.00008833222,0.00006342543,0.000144329,0.00009935357,0.0004422564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008988106,0.0002007228,0.1564796,0.00001924469,0.00004034295,0.0004338875,0.0006192737,0.8287523,0.00001941135,0.005548082,0.006064673,0.0009236967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05691066,0.009080834,0.6087428,0.000858002,0.00007495407,0.000411593,0.001543442,0.1313233,0.00042292,0.1130939,0.0763001,0.001237464],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560149,0.00004725463,0.0397254,0.002370868,0.0001048148,0.0005030887,0.00001063574,0.000002169763,0.001220876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934176,0.00000712213,0.005674545,0.0001888281,0.00005542563,0.00002212281,0.000005434213,0.0000142183,0.0006147019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.697429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7765158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096923627","doi":"10.1139/x01-200","title":"Microclimatic and soil moisture responses to gap formation in coastal Douglas-fir forests","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":309,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pacific Northwest Research Station; U.S. Forest Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Environmental science; Vegetation (pathology); Canopy; Water content; Range (aeronautics); Growing season; Moisture; Douglas fir; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Atmospheric sciences; Geography; Forestry; Biology; Geology; Meteorology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03392692335040013,"gpt":0.2782786198250234,"spread":0.2443516964746233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001877201,0.0001129554,0.0001896283,0.0006415066,0.0002063526,0.0001492053,0.000355094,0.00008292694,0.0003482863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000784386,0.0001004264,0.00003833274,0.0006190478,0.0001974719,0.0004822524,0.00006677549,0.0004647434,0.0002968342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006385779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009409709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03775943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.924289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979857,0.0003157695,0.0003714679,0.0001519359,0.0005304338,0.0006446802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998522,0.0002792854,0.00008528148,0.0001876941,0.00005821739,0.0008675404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006055236,0.00002261478,0.9677687,0.00005812501,0.000005420464,0.000617144,0.002368355,0.0004523912,0.001279451,0.00003340279,0.02354639,0.003787439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005777039,0.0004863242,0.9865824,0.0002369555,0.00000296296,0.0007277157,0.0003254787,0.002423422,0.0002753945,0.0003643289,0.007859168,0.0001381314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954097,0.0002523389,0.00002505054,0.001688624,0.0001157808,0.0003346342,0.00001296064,0.000002878948,0.002158034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991357,0.00001971519,0.0001594938,0.00007090138,0.00007173396,0.00001086991,0.000001201498,0.00001569547,0.0005147356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8865296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9686482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162666178","doi":"10.1139/x01-152","title":"Growth and dieback of aspen forests in northwestern Alberta, Canada, in relation to climate and insects","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":308,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Taiga; Deciduous; Climate change; Boreal; Biomass (ecology); Tree health; Ecology; Biology; Forestry; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03612016443086092,"gpt":0.2582512390306944,"spread":0.2221310745998334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000778478,0.00008218577,0.0001903588,0.0009161342,0.00007770978,0.00005407989,0.0001754496,0.00005343636,0.0001239117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005453023,0.0000736665,0.00001366616,0.0005007146,0.0001118389,0.0002231559,0.00001252499,0.000303832,0.000005673121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005587912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006682809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985273,0.0001728096,0.0003323203,0.0001338506,0.0003218647,0.0005118863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984328,0.000666906,0.00007019225,0.00009069146,0.00009026084,0.0006491222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006176237,0.000003483528,0.9948085,0.00004060271,0.000003710277,0.0003703231,0.0007632968,0.0005662765,0.000002903623,0.00003257659,0.00008283227,0.003263765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000335693,0.0002421413,0.9982318,0.0001726789,0.000001695908,0.00008643122,0.0001249811,0.0003902949,0.00001365211,0.0001471141,0.0001837038,0.00006986308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968677,0.0007647573,2.966241e-7,0.0007744786,0.00004432182,0.0001357753,0.00003390493,5.289276e-7,0.001378223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996789,0.0001746719,0.00004579069,0.00002482963,0.00002010593,4.485046e-7,0.000003444483,0.000004293161,0.00004756649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01560485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3004033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116793896","doi":"10.1139/x00-124","title":"Interspecific variation in susceptibility to windthrow as a function of tree size and storm severity for northern temperate tree species","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":304,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"New York State Department of Environmental Conservation","keywords":"Windthrow; Beech; Storm; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Marsh; Temperate climate; Interspecific competition; Biology; Forestry; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04326419520634425,"gpt":0.2791778144174547,"spread":0.2359136192111104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001110857,0.0000965056,0.0002352656,0.0004137665,0.00009974586,0.00004749517,0.0001314415,0.00006161309,0.00004673176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007729473,0.00009058628,0.00005747709,0.0003973756,0.0001293056,0.0001677134,0.00001342186,0.0002626115,0.000002278712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000676504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003169767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009475047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989136,0.00006236562,0.0003321154,0.0001269348,0.0002209251,0.000343988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987733,0.0002587734,0.00003401621,0.0001449645,0.0004986907,0.0002902386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002462392,0.00001999045,0.986335,0.00006176497,0.00004004088,0.00001329507,0.003701801,0.000789089,0.00125046,0.0001006039,0.0003718951,0.007069799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004912352,0.0005088621,0.9936977,0.00005012913,0.000006085735,0.000007944031,0.001728771,0.0001232579,0.00005990222,0.001133347,0.002116992,0.00007577823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977406,0.0002936212,0.0002890042,0.0006274239,0.0001612548,0.0002759949,0.00001840895,0.000004868761,0.0005888678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995838,0.00003130833,0.00008408674,0.000003462338,0.0001239334,0.000007718442,0.000001013371,0.00001236363,0.0001523237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069895703","doi":"10.1139/x05-028","title":"How resilient are southwestern ponderosa pine forests after crown fires?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":304,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Northern Arizona University","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Shrub; Ecosystem; Fire regime; Forestry; Fire ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Pinus <genus>; Natural (archaeology); Agroforestry; Regeneration (biology); Biology; Botany; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02009938306604737,"gpt":0.2625405820568255,"spread":0.2424411989907781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001945579,0.0002096516,0.0002935597,0.0004829903,0.0003212576,0.0004477256,0.0008544207,0.0001518734,0.001266413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000586408,0.0001767992,0.0001502229,0.000553548,0.000507226,0.0007102033,0.0001113928,0.0008140507,0.0007669756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001413309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004276831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01572513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8829551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965307,0.0003071064,0.0004063279,0.0003197984,0.001223802,0.001212307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997241,0.0001620173,0.0002089097,0.0005054321,0.0001509789,0.001731621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008138079,0.00003110041,0.9675373,0.00002589769,0.00001827146,0.001076613,0.0005453873,0.0004771314,0.0001734066,0.0000160558,0.02513183,0.004885598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005083277,0.0002947631,0.905655,0.0001708413,0.000006381813,0.0002662959,0.0001641004,0.0003668001,0.000231096,0.0001168351,0.09203956,0.0001800511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913451,0.0006131428,0.00005501987,0.006385497,0.0002434218,0.0003326333,0.000030832,0.000007706371,0.0009866185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950936,0.000008873781,0.0001801978,0.0001381602,0.0005200669,0.00001968239,0.000002272612,0.00004155669,0.003995609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8672299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097947367","doi":"10.1139/x07-077","title":"An overview of the Fuel Characteristic Classification System — Quantifying, classifying, and creating fuelbeds for resource planningThis article is one of a selection of papers published in the Special Forum on the Fuel Characteristic Classification System.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":303,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pacific Northwest Research Station; Joint Fire Science Program","keywords":"Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Operations research; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.100369771765069,"gpt":0.3270835207846152,"spread":0.2267137490195462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01000936,0.000160194,0.0003785279,0.0003656092,0.0004034395,0.0001480558,0.0007840504,0.0001497018,0.0001124496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001341449,0.0001003816,0.0001106878,0.0009990763,0.0004413626,0.0002991613,0.0000330206,0.0005609941,0.000003160552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000899131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002871925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005406532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04776777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961829,0.0009482371,0.00106909,0.0002722876,0.0009880504,0.0005395045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966554,0.001210347,0.00115874,0.00050946,0.0002373877,0.0002286774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004347834,0.0001556242,0.9223417,0.002170181,0.00005792698,0.000007086115,0.007825439,0.00002871558,0.05005774,0.01274733,0.0009660205,0.003207437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003988204,0.0005667669,0.9759767,0.001313435,0.00003217884,0.00005117852,0.01229791,0.006952895,0.00114889,0.00005235946,0.001114692,0.00009416143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944047,0.0001362353,0.00004799987,0.001053947,0.000175248,0.001107502,0.00004596465,0.000004343741,0.003024086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995642,0.00001365167,0.00003574378,0.00004109176,0.0002550087,0.0000351659,0.000006386079,0.00002338063,0.00002534393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05363499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.969608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151458409","doi":"10.1139/x99-188","title":"Spatial simulation of forest succession and timber harvesting using LANDIS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Ecological succession; Clearcutting; Environmental science; Forest management; Disturbance (geology); Forest inventory; Thinning; Forest dynamics; Stand development; Seed dispersal; Vegetation (pathology); Biological dispersal; Ecology; Agroforestry; Forestry; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04389674326056052,"gpt":0.3316536798943432,"spread":0.2877569366337827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000709436,0.000048431,0.0001003351,0.0001313704,0.0003237339,0.00002389123,0.0001003909,0.00005009864,0.0009792534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002140734,0.00004118532,0.00002215216,0.0001704968,0.0003719602,0.0002023026,0.0000206562,0.0001929452,0.00001294877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000125932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001237177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02919932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5640109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991987,0.000090436,0.0002024108,0.00007867302,0.0002022585,0.0002275158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994125,0.0001837688,0.00007518962,0.00005667906,0.00006267589,0.0002091536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001223738,0.000004526995,0.7581986,0.000005129461,0.000004766131,0.00001789142,0.0002493707,0.2386813,0.00002478088,0.00002224857,0.00003734018,0.00274186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000192243,0.00008760803,0.9003763,0.00004048217,0.000005087589,0.00001977738,0.00004822986,0.0976866,0.000009979178,0.001073058,0.0004220917,0.0000386148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961028,0.00007270098,0.000368801,0.0001366208,0.00003314202,0.00006205436,0.000002982871,8.706228e-7,0.003219998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991164,0.00001548929,0.0003593808,0.0000108984,0.00003833788,4.797772e-7,0.000001212777,0.000004988388,0.0004528606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5348116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084375685","doi":"10.1139/x06-072","title":"Anchorage of coniferous trees in relation to species, soil type, and rooting depth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Peat; Picea abies; Soil water; Soil type; Botany; Karst; Environmental science; Horticulture; Geology; Biology; Soil science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03948539575082922,"gpt":0.2732834372251887,"spread":0.2337980414743595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005611756,0.00005592031,0.0001485392,0.0004951601,0.00005912018,0.00002916965,0.00008656264,0.00003995223,0.00000860508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002390308,0.00005334878,0.00001749359,0.0004903721,0.00007652658,0.00007964284,0.000009408564,0.0002530184,0.000001665805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001921716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000214034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01619163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9789172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992119,0.00003524324,0.0002492593,0.00005846683,0.000171018,0.0002740764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993892,0.0001073062,0.00002124137,0.00007150736,0.0002362427,0.00017448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009449214,0.000003423044,0.9783713,0.00002185241,0.000007348921,0.0000497102,0.0003403654,0.01799296,0.0002832456,0.0003533943,0.001110989,0.001455915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001522105,0.00008894081,0.996748,0.00006795077,0.00000188324,0.000009862812,0.0002412921,0.0002584551,0.000186395,0.0004153752,0.001783691,0.00004599185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993091,0.001943349,0.00003701533,0.0001610831,0.00006962026,0.00006824408,0.000004802356,0.000002948361,0.004621948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996681,0.00001858556,0.00008248908,0.000001089657,0.00008522072,7.843587e-7,0.000001015672,0.00000876519,0.0001339792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146320958","doi":"10.1139/x02-178","title":"Cellular phenology of annual ring formation of<i>Abies balsamea</i>in the Quebec boreal forest (Canada)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Abies balsamea; Balsam; Phenology; Growing season; Taiga; Boreal; Black spruce; Dendrochronology; Annual growth %; Thickening; Dendroclimatology; Spruce budworm; Ecology; Environmental science; Botany; Biology; Climate change; Chemistry; Tortricidae","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01780753682627349,"gpt":0.244411329112993,"spread":0.2266037922867195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002561682,0.00008706615,0.0001918278,0.0002944031,0.0001566632,0.00001526796,0.0005968804,0.00007490851,0.0002611416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004238932,0.00006693375,0.00005263077,0.0004611986,0.000688314,0.0002605802,0.00003987841,0.000398152,0.000007245734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005068196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009978844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8228358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980021,0.0003719227,0.0004460936,0.0001041376,0.0005516923,0.0005241123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991105,0.0002011351,0.0001828225,0.0002158065,0.00009240935,0.0001972832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042583,0.00005619236,0.8763912,0.00005463893,0.00002491732,0.0003449487,0.002476323,0.008258532,0.0001049803,0.09059092,0.0204433,0.001211449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004345967,0.0002940113,0.9546154,0.00003484537,0.000009952145,0.00005301031,0.004117373,0.0001335208,0.0006789661,0.01062587,0.02891694,0.00008547709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762939,0.0001773979,0.0002527899,0.0009305128,0.0001217369,0.0002092237,0.00001010155,7.61969e-7,0.02200361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999554,0.00001846554,0.0001285894,0.00006111249,0.00002101955,0.000005628166,0.000002819161,0.000006492784,0.0002018655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1765373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2859318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011352468","doi":"10.1139/x04-071","title":"Charcoal production, dispersal, and deposition from the Fort Providence experimental fire: interpreting fire regimes from charcoal records in boreal forests","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":280,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Charcoal; Deposition (geology); Fire regime; Environmental science; Taiga; Boreal; Carbon fibers; Prescribed burn; Sediment; Geology; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Forestry; Chemistry; Geography; Ecosystem; Paleontology; Biology; Materials science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01708876428659222,"gpt":0.2738277796216891,"spread":0.2567390153350969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001424843,0.0001741313,0.0002202046,0.0001128248,0.0004270036,0.0002169525,0.0006014575,0.0001036575,0.0001233872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007090775,0.0001346286,0.0000626949,0.0003547691,0.000596865,0.0007955097,0.000114023,0.0007205853,0.00002868486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001489255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004634316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6167236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7876378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975622,0.0003020318,0.0004326736,0.0003927806,0.0006775993,0.0006327415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986855,0.0002608299,0.0001615347,0.0003104322,0.00005135586,0.000530335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001113899,0.00004045269,0.9831527,0.000008892292,0.00001787069,0.0003029534,0.005311081,0.0001803182,0.001268498,0.00001605718,0.003145004,0.006444748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000599396,0.0004885508,0.9889528,0.0008393772,0.000007331169,0.0001972506,0.001541723,0.002590881,0.00333136,0.0007701237,0.000494229,0.0001869323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929406,0.001303979,0.00002845331,0.004573549,0.0003838906,0.000574395,0.00002908228,0.000006563199,0.0001595022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990868,0.00004609818,0.0002691968,0.00006634703,0.0004084255,0.00003907004,0.00001494897,0.00002685702,0.00004224736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1709142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5489995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153914621","doi":"10.1139/x03-022","title":"Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":278,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cross-validation; Statistics; Model validation; Regression analysis; Regression; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05996579451484035,"gpt":0.3436855497145677,"spread":0.2837197551997273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007350178,0.00004751085,0.0000638567,0.000272789,0.0001844361,0.00005375926,0.0002622654,0.00005307096,0.003843671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009177602,0.00002568544,0.00002972153,0.0003346027,0.0002732096,0.0010277,0.00001529832,0.0002409803,0.00003492773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004379102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005495216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002448968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1111819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979739,0.0005162249,0.0002952272,0.00006119104,0.0009315296,0.0002219465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992765,0.000133465,0.0001455237,0.0001266192,0.0002165343,0.0001014096],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007505163,0.00009060141,0.4219186,0.00003713718,0.0000196169,0.00002717414,0.003659572,0.4292823,0.00001877978,0.07047901,0.06483047,0.009561647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006425511,0.0001500524,0.7578887,0.00006221571,0.000009136564,0.00001885825,0.0008322871,0.005501114,0.0001438959,0.2095343,0.02515265,0.00006421744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792791,0.00001832876,0.0002232946,0.0005715298,0.0001186141,0.000376772,0.00002298308,7.621992e-7,0.01938864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996364,0.000005520493,0.0001471064,0.00005342253,0.00001542068,0.00002696898,0.00002810989,0.000002262172,0.00008477208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4237812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148008501","doi":"10.1139/x05-250","title":"Interception frequency of exotic bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) and relationship with establishment in New Zealand and worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":273,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interception; Bark (sound); Curculionidae; Biology; Introduced species; Invasive species; Ecology; Geography; Forestry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02229409578120154,"gpt":0.2491901204902856,"spread":0.226896024709084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007713088,0.00007254273,0.0001223506,0.0003790336,0.0001165215,0.00005706063,0.00009753368,0.00006043274,0.0001202291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007937376,0.00006067016,0.00001044934,0.0002844715,0.0005446142,0.0002680277,0.00003708437,0.0003262163,0.000002615836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001971413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001730421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09871997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9116679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990981,0.00008767864,0.0002301641,0.0001319015,0.0001832985,0.0002688965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994295,0.0001112853,0.00007440989,0.00008002978,0.00002494644,0.0002798831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003150373,0.00001276628,0.9951609,0.00001571279,0.000004415991,0.0001158588,0.000352722,0.0001780383,0.000185349,0.001556342,0.001439411,0.0009469825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005417586,0.0003252911,0.9889931,0.000116429,0.000007023568,0.0001129133,0.0001509958,0.00002716605,0.000008541821,0.009312672,0.0003471753,0.00005690272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973574,0.0002481504,0.00001793008,0.0003100211,0.00002051343,0.0001904378,0.000001572534,0.000001005768,0.001852939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983793,0.00003728517,0.0006241229,0.00001976334,0.00001934913,0.000003058367,0.000001280389,0.000005480145,0.0009103929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.812948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9072818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015111511","doi":"10.1139/x01-033","title":"Introduction and evaluation of possible indices of stand structural diversity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":269,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity index; Hectare; Statistics; Mathematics; Basal area; Biodiversity; Index (typography); Diversity (politics); Variance (accounting); Forestry; Ecology; Geography; Species richness; Biology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0433979157806825,"gpt":0.3124557721786166,"spread":0.2690578563979341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002530719,0.00003552735,0.00008421375,0.000237299,0.0002076542,0.00001016734,0.0001628284,0.00003530666,0.00176064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001782255,0.00003073457,0.00001839219,0.0002512212,0.0005230967,0.0002241705,0.00008395547,0.000139034,0.000003945333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002409492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001861428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01297477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1985355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99896,0.0001332984,0.000151565,0.00007529482,0.0005058718,0.0001739599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994735,0.00002907953,0.0001085753,0.00008092666,0.0001410356,0.0001669353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003667473,0.000006134293,0.9907542,0.000009605315,0.0000163058,0.00001064973,0.0005339588,0.002147621,0.00005690338,0.0008151717,0.002556995,0.003055813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031157,0.0002428058,0.9870425,0.000009192156,0.0000174823,0.00002340177,0.0003576805,0.0002308119,0.0001305249,0.01069949,0.0009085485,0.00002596404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971173,0.000212504,0.00001154818,0.0005063408,0.00009085939,0.0001092827,0.000002738736,4.113656e-7,0.001949025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996895,0.00003469272,0.00006506674,0.000003578346,0.00004582497,4.627654e-7,8.473883e-7,0.00000181263,0.000158238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1855607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165365881","doi":"10.1139/x03-053","title":"An analysis of sucker regeneration of trembling aspen","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Bioenergy crop production and management","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sucker; Regeneration (biology); Biology; Disturbance (geology); Stand development; Thinning; Botany; Agronomy; Ecology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08241676230207941,"gpt":0.317260213075912,"spread":0.2348434507738326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001614822,0.00004321802,0.0001514762,0.0002966081,0.0001129244,0.0000366537,0.0002045529,0.0000419706,0.000629762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001215724,0.00001855948,0.00009397793,0.001325599,0.0001074276,0.0001144233,0.000005228346,0.0001095911,0.000001074532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005073745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001339946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02074294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4759111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998942,0.0002132127,0.0002656899,0.00009541382,0.0002940043,0.0001897219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988878,0.00003595591,0.0001236296,0.00006656985,0.0006215645,0.0002644939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007998716,0.000218647,0.7148355,0.00002466282,0.0007282891,0.00005024457,0.0006102624,0.03554866,0.1166611,0.0768415,0.003763295,0.05063793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002148341,0.001110102,0.8849294,0.00002911625,0.0001513622,0.00001171826,0.00210505,0.0008418623,0.03554926,0.00126867,0.07364755,0.0001410951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977081,0.0002109328,0.00004364326,0.0007446353,0.00006267697,0.00004564631,0.000006123122,9.12258e-7,0.00117731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994091,0.0000406518,0.0001659259,0.00001532309,0.00007350819,6.20298e-7,0.0000103714,5.004393e-7,0.0002840313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4551682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172494291","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2013-0372","title":"A refinement of models projecting future Canadian fire regimes using homogeneous fire regime zones","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Boreal; Fire regime; Homogeneous; Environmental science; Spatial heterogeneity; Taiga; Hfr cell; Physical geography; Ecosystem; Geography; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Forestry; Geology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0366189188367407,"gpt":0.2763421341036786,"spread":0.2397232152669379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003242332,0.0001979624,0.0003722993,0.0005034156,0.0005890458,0.0001023203,0.0008125987,0.0001771007,0.0003300019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004711539,0.000176735,0.0001292851,0.0008279884,0.0003288477,0.0003340261,0.00006446408,0.0006464447,0.00003359536],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00188604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002130565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.875842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9681219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996695,0.000443493,0.0005497718,0.0002947973,0.0009042084,0.001112694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972602,0.000161456,0.0002917358,0.0004916235,0.0002325318,0.001562463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001841774,0.0001516314,0.5906801,0.0007393879,0.0003294169,0.003285783,0.0108624,0.1213684,0.001750495,0.002480593,0.08283986,0.1853277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003150376,0.004559363,0.1293463,0.003690129,0.0001553744,0.00580641,0.006103213,0.617045,0.001841257,0.00623984,0.2199374,0.002125378],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991742,0.0007152878,0.00005113523,0.001363949,0.0003528326,0.0003915446,0.00002016043,0.000004897852,0.00535817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977454,0.00002460988,0.001074646,0.00004631666,0.0004437632,0.00000670304,0.00000270069,0.00004098731,0.0006149061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4956765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7207045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021897163","doi":"10.1139/x02-063","title":"Aboveground and belowground biomass and sapwood area allometric equations for six boreal tree species of northern Manitoba","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":258,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tree allometry; Biomass (ecology); Black spruce; Diameter at breast height; Allometry; Taiga; Botany; Willow; Boreal; Biology; Salicaceae; Environmental science; Woody plant; Horticulture; Forestry; Ecology; Biomass partitioning; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06624735703700359,"gpt":0.2698144481579535,"spread":0.20356709112095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008886923,0.00009259542,0.0001671892,0.0006339577,0.0003393064,0.00007213977,0.000258076,0.00006995973,0.0004885464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003861536,0.00008157999,0.00004617938,0.000561666,0.0008156277,0.0002251545,0.0000615589,0.0001791995,0.00001424908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003246586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008023194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02304175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9044393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987702,0.00005737354,0.0002696044,0.000154096,0.0003151731,0.0004335484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988638,0.0003685646,0.0001049263,0.000138229,0.00008856529,0.000435974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002121566,0.00005252704,0.9783251,0.00003251151,0.00005763072,0.00006807976,0.0004201697,0.00005409602,0.0000661415,0.006776211,0.006551138,0.007575195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005787745,0.0006357215,0.977281,0.00001676984,0.00002121043,0.00003299035,0.0005859769,0.0003673367,0.00002558395,0.006825395,0.01354198,0.00008729186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889615,0.0006069007,0.0004260975,0.001040007,0.00007117623,0.0002732124,0.00002883201,0.000001638525,0.008590643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998253,0.0001178251,0.0003001576,0.00002329151,0.00004977289,0.000009143298,0.000004242528,0.0000101582,0.001232403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8813976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9834639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094027924","doi":"10.1139/x03-183","title":"Decadal observations of tree regeneration following fire in boreal forests","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":254,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Boreal; Taiga; Forestry; Thinning; Ecology; Regeneration (biology); Environmental science; Population; Black spruce; Geography; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04149326456965259,"gpt":0.2931501371042204,"spread":0.2516568725345678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001844156,0.00008334046,0.0001745545,0.0003276493,0.0001548893,0.00004396063,0.0004015116,0.00008631621,0.00006310679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006032824,0.00007798859,0.00008108426,0.0007698266,0.0001542223,0.0004240928,0.00002685508,0.000359339,0.00002405358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001255858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008468038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2322462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9569227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981919,0.0001494593,0.0004244485,0.0001318514,0.000636969,0.0004653782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990471,0.0001239917,0.0001121179,0.000193459,0.0000714972,0.000451825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001067959,0.00002890424,0.9832729,0.00001032088,0.000008556661,0.0002878439,0.0003782682,0.00985142,0.0009024524,0.0003697722,0.001273489,0.003605385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000709178,0.0002519368,0.994848,0.0001370101,0.000003419826,0.000036938,0.00006151669,0.0009444419,0.0007305748,0.001540541,0.0006660713,0.00007042393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972759,0.0001459515,0.00004386979,0.0008919816,0.0001621404,0.0002105244,0.000006613348,0.000001897563,0.001261072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992913,0.000005625182,0.0004822623,0.00001482002,0.00007253114,0.00000694653,0.000007215045,0.0000137076,0.0001055706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7246765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7728664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117843969","doi":"10.1139/x06-108","title":"Using Bayesian belief networks in adaptive management","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptive management; Bayesian network; Computer science; Bayesian probability; Process (computing); Influence diagram; Management science; Operations research; Decision tree; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Environmental resource management; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04419425602060646,"gpt":0.3032468153849311,"spread":0.2590525593643246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001296589,0.000102329,0.0001326507,0.0007054802,0.0002059073,0.00008917994,0.0004851376,0.00006010708,0.00161172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001856718,0.00009659653,0.00005795268,0.0009896631,0.0003295125,0.0002433571,0.00008464743,0.0004245634,0.0001417699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008924658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001170913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.149032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5823898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981485,0.0001263866,0.0003106927,0.0001505949,0.0004672677,0.0007965792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999289,0.00003846476,0.00007469179,0.0001754904,0.00002851012,0.0003938864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002447659,0.00002764218,0.7280455,0.000006629564,0.00001289702,0.001173561,0.0001014408,0.2171125,0.000003973429,0.01091157,0.0393748,0.003204975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006960407,0.0001989616,0.896638,0.000119686,0.00001189029,0.00004851203,0.0001249627,0.03261235,0.000005334649,0.01016017,0.05916594,0.0002181087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7530114,0.0002560302,0.001076909,0.0005082196,0.0001639754,0.0003220982,0.00000235572,0.0000035899,0.2446554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949219,0.0000172438,0.001234789,0.00005114055,0.0001991715,0.000002817794,0.000001553365,0.00001538519,0.003555987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4333579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050079933","doi":"10.1139/x02-165","title":"Belowground biomass dynamics in the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector: recent improvements and implications for the estimation of NPP and NEP","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Primary production; Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Temperate climate; Taiga; Tree allometry; Carbon sequestration; Ecosystem; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Biomass partitioning; Biology; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03352682070981912,"gpt":0.2864103015843583,"spread":0.2528834808745392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002025064,0.00007164489,0.00009936932,0.0001731896,0.0004382371,0.00003898308,0.0004142241,0.00006154535,0.00001283947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003082471,0.00004233324,0.00002914738,0.0003521227,0.0006656996,0.00008383559,0.00003795931,0.0002175195,2.331741e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007393784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006638893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3628408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989699,0.0001168859,0.0002541012,0.0001083988,0.0002054239,0.0003453295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918,0.0001979485,0.000118205,0.0002411816,0.00007098982,0.0001917338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001324254,0.00002368525,0.8914022,0.00002868509,0.00002901103,0.000001907502,0.0006752377,0.01706763,0.00004847765,0.08743528,0.0007834058,0.002491225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003363664,0.0001375491,0.884719,0.00001564581,0.0000194326,0.00001280159,0.0004121429,0.05600831,0.00002542687,0.05718691,0.001074353,0.00005203185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897172,0.0001649385,0.0003080483,0.006718808,0.00006293448,0.0007569043,0.00004158194,4.45672e-7,0.002229068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995674,0.00005143338,0.0001789151,0.00008851329,0.000006358764,0.00003256953,0.000002928933,0.0000066956,0.00006519381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6332724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6414021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035679993","doi":"10.1139/x01-140","title":"Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Scots pine; Pulpwood; Carbon stock; Carbon fibers; Greenhouse gas; Picea abies; Felling; Forestry; Agroforestry; Carbon dioxide; Botany; Mathematics; Climate change; Ecology; Biology; Pinus <genus>; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0443507997482953,"gpt":0.3221459321450391,"spread":0.2777951323967438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001196205,0.00008451512,0.0001038001,0.0004526398,0.0002440605,0.0001522149,0.0004167769,0.00005289108,0.003930972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002325791,0.00007840272,0.00003493555,0.001180572,0.0001037335,0.0003018618,0.00003353305,0.0003183087,0.001003247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005460326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003950923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1066314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5748702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983622,0.00009522816,0.0002351601,0.0001408516,0.0005904151,0.0005761905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987223,0.0000411153,0.00005666781,0.0001945512,0.0001350328,0.0008503022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002022743,0.00001209926,0.894161,0.00000465696,0.00001126828,0.000103061,0.001095354,0.004084327,0.0001237704,0.0009510332,0.0969322,0.002500989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003771572,0.000574399,0.7064365,0.00004984583,0.000009546775,0.00006921136,0.0002095442,0.001633938,0.0001824535,0.004060844,0.2861949,0.0002016249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8351198,0.0000213445,0.00001305886,0.007310824,0.00008812229,0.0001694575,0.000002112617,0.00000310511,0.1572721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873948,0.0000254948,0.0001852653,0.0002345977,0.0001834492,0.000005401622,0.000002120785,0.00001248248,0.01195647],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4682387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028642342","doi":"10.1139/x06-100","title":"Silviculture that sustains: the nexus between silviculture, frequent prescribed fire, and conservation of biodiversity in longleaf pine forests of the southeastern United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hort Innovation; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Silviculture; Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Fire regime; Disturbance (geology); Ecosystem; Prescribed burn; Geography; Nexus (standard); Forest management; Environmental science; Ecology; Stand development; Forestry; Forest ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02366064041237965,"gpt":0.23766153327234,"spread":0.2140008928599603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001443183,0.000121679,0.0002225325,0.0001893583,0.0002184328,0.00005455497,0.0006181962,0.0001018768,0.00004133894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002631658,0.00006820689,0.00006640663,0.0008363375,0.0007829222,0.0002097299,0.00009968003,0.0004499225,0.000003851383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003213371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001890068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4562301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8175461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980073,0.0004078307,0.0003704746,0.0001419513,0.0006613383,0.000411092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987603,0.000291602,0.0002876036,0.000243292,0.0002036828,0.0002134936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002246233,0.00001885311,0.9920475,0.00005026332,0.0000166921,0.00002728708,0.001653645,0.001494506,0.0001137806,0.0000427875,0.004397597,0.0001146389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005252035,0.0001413988,0.9935567,0.0001475237,0.00001187937,0.00001639755,0.001761773,0.0006831463,0.0005015513,0.0008189031,0.001765229,0.00007033692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963688,0.0003385496,0.000004316985,0.002485828,0.0000456503,0.0005121322,0.0001314265,0.000001737812,0.0001115315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997571,0.00001089658,0.00001057636,0.00003822626,0.00003296164,0.000002814409,0.00002177357,0.000006532622,0.0001190842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3613161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5473909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135080304","doi":"10.1139/x06-257","title":"Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":244,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; US-UK Fulbright Commission; Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning","keywords":"Environmental science; Slash (logging); Forest management; Biomass (ecology); Forestry; Fossil fuel; Agroforestry; Greenhouse gas; Biofuel; Agronomy; Ecology; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04557017408388083,"gpt":0.3343178070093146,"spread":0.2887476329254338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003282505,0.0001028344,0.0002058702,0.001786974,0.0001565437,0.00007509354,0.0003865188,0.00006438234,0.0005618877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002843957,0.00008708923,0.00008005457,0.002482153,0.0005817792,0.0002721645,0.00007002392,0.0003217477,0.00002175441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003710848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001230494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09654292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.714852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982257,0.00009861404,0.0003845761,0.0001625205,0.0006026691,0.0005258456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986897,0.000130007,0.0003247295,0.0002138716,0.00009645496,0.0005453024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005548455,0.00002447224,0.9876989,0.00002105904,0.0003035169,0.0002494486,0.0003327564,0.002251584,0.00004692426,0.004204511,0.00122643,0.003584895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002690629,0.0001772888,0.9666387,0.00003405888,0.0002346347,0.00001263575,0.0003089445,0.001372729,0.00004850407,0.0004743817,0.03033704,0.00009196776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528964,0.0001715615,0.00005410293,0.0002842355,0.00006533675,0.0001586085,0.000004127744,0.000002400029,0.04636327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981658,0.0000963237,0.0003133715,0.00002271655,0.00004365724,0.000001650267,0.000006703025,0.00000800515,0.001341806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6183091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9094733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}