{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":113,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":113,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"6d5a6e18291e","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence"}},"results":[{"id":"W4211254543","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004550","title":"Nonconstitutional Amendments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional economics; Liberal democracy; Law; Constitutional amendment; Democratic legitimacy; Sovereignty; Phenomenon; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Richard Albert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02980027920861484,"gpt":0.313601402395157,"spread":0.2838011231865422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004157409,0.00007568069,0.0001439742,0.00008012642,0.001135578,0.00008177513,0.0003157467,0.00005263244,0.000242855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001446846,0.00007167378,0.00008482316,0.000171269,0.001113542,0.0003494499,0.000004927334,0.0001557288,0.00005152053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002971263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003715339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05301742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1794064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998916,0.00005102969,0.0002426294,0.00008551738,0.0003857865,0.0003190851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988968,0.00004168036,0.0001257773,0.00005475694,0.0003030391,0.0005779457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004697079,0.00001109644,0.001415663,4.431812e-7,0.00001325587,0.0001543794,0.0009010402,0.0000199449,0.00002795727,0.9936681,0.002244805,0.001538641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002020197,0.00009278779,0.01042025,0.0001045951,0.0000240373,0.00005496512,0.00050344,6.847218e-7,0.00003798953,0.1214943,0.8669136,0.0001512815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06547384,0.004031122,0.0005459233,0.02012533,0.001922168,0.0001368885,0.00002387979,0.00001613201,0.9077247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967264,0.0001220698,0.0002687534,0.00209566,0.0006221942,5.569795e-7,4.236044e-7,0.000001582906,0.000162356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9312525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502850426","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002290","title":"Property as Ontology: On Aboriginal and English Understandings of Ownership","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Relation (database); Categorization; Determinative; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Ontology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Bradley Bryan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02213227731938066,"gpt":0.2966466945513993,"spread":0.2745144172320186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006257691,0.00009484583,0.0001970634,0.00001706372,0.0004921859,0.00008465115,0.0003318794,0.0001614868,0.0009679471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001051611,0.00006425011,0.00008128193,0.0001660752,0.00141732,0.0003098857,0.000002329485,0.0003200892,0.00000870959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002273102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001949998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04033899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1674656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988894,0.0001204247,0.0002257254,0.0001217179,0.0003204807,0.000322264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988623,0.00007098987,0.0001423792,0.0000894603,0.0002437741,0.0005910837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006864761,0.00002634776,0.004500592,0.00002231573,0.00004813634,0.0001638576,0.1023301,0.000009906437,0.00003071344,0.8794677,0.01051144,0.002820214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002591067,0.0002289437,0.0006125636,0.0001802893,0.00002886251,0.00003063605,0.007119285,5.055581e-7,0.0001159434,0.009127141,0.9821723,0.000124411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4375405,0.001411831,0.000002758502,0.007599243,0.000483428,0.0001315711,0.00001054836,0.00001074261,0.5528094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993367,0.0007201484,0.0001037905,0.001142074,0.0003218575,7.404692e-7,2.834467e-7,0.000005992079,0.004338176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9716609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924136381","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004860","title":"Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Cult; Scholarship; Vocabulary; Politics; Constitutional law; Law; German; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Grégoire Webber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01980394409261855,"gpt":0.2965100207359664,"spread":0.2767060766433479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001639983,0.00006950554,0.0001758688,0.00004727719,0.001344723,0.00006976238,0.0002971394,0.00006639138,0.0001634392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006338868,0.00004579992,0.00007619955,0.0001253884,0.01220771,0.000285515,0.0000157283,0.000344544,0.000005000878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005024065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002971302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5227198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988614,0.0001037147,0.0003133258,0.00008288855,0.0004416779,0.0001969764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985614,0.0001751928,0.000242025,0.00006822471,0.0006303749,0.0003227403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001210651,0.000006287857,0.0237813,0.000002447963,0.00002354783,0.00002108448,0.0008168054,0.00000197543,0.00004350658,0.9749591,0.0002312969,0.0001005483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006004231,0.00002679832,0.04280975,0.0001170762,0.00005474118,0.000144685,0.0002959504,0.000001234782,0.0001430157,0.5870442,0.3686324,0.0001296762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.787623,0.002664565,0.0001574856,0.01533346,0.00178714,0.000265815,0.00004292517,0.00000754745,0.192118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989716,0.00004727614,0.0001898168,0.0003313962,0.0003922432,0.000001817038,4.114692e-7,0.000001339504,0.00006406091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4338108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123691632","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000370","title":"Constitutional Theory and The<i>Quebec Secession Reference</i>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Law; Constitution; Vesting; Politics; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Sujit Choudhry","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robert Howse","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01400066725398214,"gpt":0.2774123435652219,"spread":0.2634116763112397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001790879,0.00007096132,0.0001605778,0.00001350622,0.000743018,0.000143722,0.0003088713,0.00007155388,0.001052258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002582614,0.00004629146,0.00004958133,0.00008359393,0.004498589,0.0003199486,0.000005474765,0.0002154505,0.00003075268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001433344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001856336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.547123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6967567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986662,0.0003987685,0.0002500449,0.00008745996,0.0002963731,0.0003011298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987198,0.0003637482,0.0001197089,0.00008709867,0.0001081039,0.0006015526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002839005,0.000002365049,0.0006274162,0.000002956637,0.000006314342,0.00003459032,0.00122827,0.000002166817,0.000002308546,0.9930111,0.0007242694,0.004329917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003187263,0.00001244157,0.003544701,0.0001797022,0.00001124969,0.0000458799,0.0001799166,9.209122e-7,0.000008212728,0.04867865,0.9469476,0.00007200614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2514856,0.007140619,0.000153684,0.008900021,0.0005162779,0.0001699509,0.00004007239,0.000008381689,0.7315853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930936,0.0002955998,0.00002681846,0.001538817,0.0003154696,0.000001362978,2.196602e-7,0.000002145158,0.004725951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9462233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205734915","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006226","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Arbitrariness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Rule of law; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Timothy Endicott","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0164922905117531,"gpt":0.2696170006024874,"spread":0.2531247100907343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000912543,0.00006938119,0.0001227237,0.00003089276,0.002422578,0.0001587421,0.0004854232,0.00004666075,0.00004613301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004975637,0.00004751954,0.00007603978,0.0001651979,0.001436469,0.0001509574,0.00001044443,0.0001988467,0.00001774588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001140875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001679003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.127276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7818279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989835,0.0001103435,0.0002038596,0.00007027509,0.0003014608,0.0003305477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988531,0.000238974,0.0001260998,0.00008121606,0.0003012402,0.000399389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004204983,0.000002253932,0.00188015,8.502606e-7,0.00001517416,0.00001755831,0.000822933,0.000018176,0.000003825178,0.9902007,0.001378175,0.005655977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006192214,0.00002628152,0.003131803,0.00002794265,0.00001210687,0.0000140345,0.0002176867,0.000002003473,0.00001943135,0.1101389,0.8862811,0.00006669999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06569853,0.009986345,0.002683311,0.04951144,0.004818048,0.0002059442,0.000007687863,0.00002195204,0.8670667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974838,0.0002303282,0.00005320043,0.001235474,0.0008411187,0.000001340909,1.088572e-7,0.000003255712,0.0001513741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9317853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121667437","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002381","title":"Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract: Toward a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Duty; Law; Doctrine; Legislation; Freedom of contract; Service (business); Race (biology); Public law; Political science; Private law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Amnon Reichman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02535695490025911,"gpt":0.3312106010967158,"spread":0.3058536461964567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009767548,0.00006904757,0.0001809941,0.00004677262,0.0005839756,0.00009729547,0.0003426299,0.00004815502,0.00006996054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000951052,0.00004903967,0.00005043134,0.0001723685,0.0006885521,0.00026081,0.00002110997,0.0002008672,0.000003635815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001097143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009041607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3878343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7852054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988915,0.0001325357,0.000316527,0.00009057415,0.0003113179,0.0002575367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986493,0.0001846371,0.0002162772,0.0001213819,0.0002778106,0.000550591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005568044,0.00005275988,0.01216716,0.000006442951,0.00001488628,0.0000244262,0.03754174,0.00003126772,0.00006796289,0.9482064,0.0004669858,0.001364284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003065162,0.000469843,0.2628416,0.0003902975,0.000154503,0.00005455001,0.0239936,0.0001565037,0.0002040352,0.03132006,0.6769542,0.0003957271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506264,0.0002948662,0.0001599088,0.02035015,0.0003006558,0.0004910333,0.0000263547,0.000003415569,0.02774718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986871,0.00004896266,0.0001668565,0.0007379862,0.0001594348,0.000008766531,6.027964e-7,0.00000492569,0.0001853311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9168863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6162421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125232704","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004987","title":"Responsibility in Negligence: Why the Duty of Care is <i>not</i> a Duty “To Try”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Res ipsa loquitur; Duty of care; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Moral responsibility; Business; Reasonable person; Tort; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Ori J. Herstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0216370570456765,"gpt":0.2793598450793113,"spread":0.2577227880336349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008352854,0.0001836353,0.0003172373,0.0001941669,0.0002627767,0.00008135733,0.001429506,0.000121531,0.0002715895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001542844,0.0001334484,0.0001643599,0.0007198047,0.0006121751,0.0003278746,0.00005232593,0.0008714668,0.00002382231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001089329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001780449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01835391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.300481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977254,0.0002348223,0.0006892629,0.0003358565,0.0005028929,0.0005118179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976748,0.0003381155,0.0002873205,0.0006764944,0.0002820201,0.0007412749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004746523,0.0001142475,0.04433324,0.0001486315,0.00001348465,0.001800473,0.03127981,0.0001788829,0.8668228,0.03439864,0.01063933,0.009795782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006042842,0.0005612198,0.06235791,0.000399835,0.0000261651,0.0004561016,0.0007406865,0.00003267004,0.7197189,0.0046929,0.209924,0.0004853247],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886208,0.0003635267,0.00002159747,0.006134513,0.001093075,0.0002408099,0.0001071254,0.000005545612,0.003412966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923388,0.00003269829,0.0001911302,0.007173802,0.0001399464,0.000004203437,1.501475e-7,0.00001434194,0.000104961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2821271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.988183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1697724127","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000412","title":"The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Nationalism; Normative; Autonomy; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Politics; Self-determination; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02527542351283672,"gpt":0.3257953934730234,"spread":0.3005199699601867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001587435,0.00004524937,0.0001090886,0.00003443427,0.0006206675,0.00002427938,0.000240729,0.00006056317,0.0002123653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004499124,0.00003282648,0.0000413656,0.0001090089,0.00327598,0.0001744334,0.000004690433,0.0002279853,0.000001335427],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005649096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005820359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02335799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05120721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988886,0.0003399049,0.0002599939,0.00004004204,0.0003271814,0.0001442664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978975,0.001123968,0.0002302135,0.00005760415,0.0004444154,0.0002462753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008567649,0.000002922419,0.0003289415,0.00000507971,0.00001112341,0.000004614277,0.007891335,0.00001347163,0.000008532381,0.9898041,0.0001589282,0.001762366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001350445,0.00006834797,0.002475334,0.0002198554,0.00002634437,0.00003270363,0.003881786,0.000003364192,0.0001704079,0.08938804,0.9035121,0.00008663058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3422391,0.006330773,0.0003902475,0.01863549,0.0004623996,0.0001578245,0.0001416004,0.000004165728,0.6316385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980636,0.0004750967,0.0001752727,0.0005236832,0.00008313092,3.633994e-7,3.059062e-7,0.000002022031,0.0006764941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9033532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271604228","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003994","title":"Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Idiot; Law; Sociology; Tree of life (biology); Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Art; Literature","authors":[{"name":"W. J. Waluchow","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03350669052369158,"gpt":0.3190390909449404,"spread":0.2855324004212488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007559397,0.0001066158,0.0001904166,0.0001200963,0.00204147,0.0001561296,0.000447084,0.00008039993,0.0005889043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004942342,0.000103937,0.0001069377,0.000241747,0.001962612,0.0007958107,0.00001359964,0.0002263632,0.0001081353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003860978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005254177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2022746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8837481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986249,0.0001319637,0.0003162722,0.0001293613,0.0003712913,0.0004262338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998293,0.0001385155,0.0001504338,0.0001027105,0.0003585654,0.0009567894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002906878,0.00002070157,0.00398423,9.360681e-7,0.0000252336,0.00009340249,0.005511139,0.0001461245,0.00002111182,0.9864019,0.000955385,0.002836979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001219259,0.0001041942,0.005194677,0.0002128652,0.00005145581,0.0001343722,0.003701894,0.000005415349,0.00002931851,0.01385987,0.9763597,0.0002242777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2373207,0.006919397,0.0004601812,0.0108905,0.001334441,0.0001402658,0.00002843987,0.00003373326,0.7428724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965391,0.0002308146,0.0003805092,0.001259768,0.001284186,0.000001956252,3.742251e-7,0.000004707713,0.0002986267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9754043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586340792","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006330","title":"‘Obligations’, Decolonization and Indigenous Rights to Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Obligation; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Gordon Christie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01290009913857267,"gpt":0.2809436500038997,"spread":0.2680435508653271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005491314,0.00008453623,0.0001565836,0.00004046219,0.001450399,0.0001719141,0.000280124,0.00006838269,0.00005184651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005655931,0.00007313228,0.00003497741,0.000225833,0.0003200804,0.0003839047,0.00001318335,0.0001290506,0.00002526186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003997764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004134418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1928777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.772002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989312,0.0001152117,0.0002309926,0.0001133817,0.000295934,0.0003132414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985287,0.0001224426,0.0001869204,0.0000718625,0.0003875037,0.000702604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001341853,0.00002491619,0.06281273,0.00002283835,0.00006710448,0.00007689094,0.2292716,0.0002090734,0.000130727,0.6890883,0.007268767,0.01101361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002233993,0.0001390949,0.1610791,0.000137031,0.00002930104,0.00001702013,0.0009594936,0.000007932498,0.0002041339,0.00816615,0.8287886,0.0002486309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829615,0.0008767335,0.0002999857,0.006499191,0.0005174071,0.0001992771,0.000007364924,0.0000097575,0.008628817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974589,0.00007375295,0.001071617,0.0006860487,0.000310764,0.0000027292,3.239129e-7,0.000005021997,0.0003908797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8215199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279373688","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006305","title":"In Defence of Reconciliation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Colonialism; Neocolonialism; Political economy; Doctrine; State (computer science); Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Victoria Freeman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01660642093499716,"gpt":0.2968984406756334,"spread":0.2802920197406363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001916053,0.00005267844,0.0001477445,0.0001537033,0.0008510859,0.00002618761,0.0003056849,0.0000828242,0.0001367627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005604342,0.00004844365,0.00004053612,0.0002212065,0.0002783071,0.0003844911,2.58958e-7,0.0001498899,0.00001313516],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003460439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02447341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7359155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987842,0.0002348533,0.0003799066,0.00007756806,0.0002270486,0.0002964144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987065,0.0001331818,0.0002994679,0.00009884884,0.0003595515,0.0004024991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004175306,0.00001418985,0.007587257,0.00002005147,0.000003090584,0.000008977659,0.182203,0.00002214377,0.000008715739,0.8095175,0.0001892576,0.0004216755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001329982,0.00008341816,0.006424563,0.0001449171,0.000006408623,0.00001064325,0.001184783,0.0000054764,0.0003283526,0.01247262,0.9791143,0.00009154772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8629183,0.0004250629,0.000116423,0.001118921,0.001305212,0.0001188408,0.000002626883,0.000002294221,0.1339923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977884,0.0005589954,0.0003602529,0.0001631896,0.0003612515,2.200759e-7,2.709123e-7,0.000003986582,0.0007633941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.978925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9810569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493931398","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004331","title":"Gender, Multiculturalism and Dialogue: The Case of Jewish Divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Judaism; Negotiation; Law; Sociology; Political science; Power (physics); Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Ethnic group; Gender studies; Public law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05870838004157729,"gpt":0.305949515897247,"spread":0.2472411358556697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005888923,0.000133674,0.0002690656,0.00003597203,0.002036165,0.0000742138,0.0003998012,0.00009406878,0.00004808359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000611278,0.00008405451,0.0001158867,0.0001867038,0.002515299,0.000382101,0.00003251808,0.0002845243,0.000004130711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001795191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004649381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3310994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5589011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985709,0.0002412345,0.0003777983,0.0001302944,0.0002892296,0.0003905106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981762,0.0003070186,0.0003051231,0.0001220105,0.0005049118,0.0005847077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002463885,0.0000500035,0.02604137,0.00006830515,0.0003175926,0.01318717,0.8189502,0.00006816631,0.000510768,0.1200435,0.01608827,0.004650005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002718718,0.0004469412,0.1929324,0.0005063308,0.0005668572,0.01903405,0.1291214,0.00005593793,0.001165583,0.006109766,0.6456688,0.001673185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982981,0.008595162,0.000006868825,0.003818697,0.0004763344,0.0001781799,0.00002015843,0.000006904985,0.003916691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979088,0.0009242076,0.0002651651,0.0003376552,0.0003242122,0.000002369206,3.590853e-7,0.000006704781,0.0002305642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6898288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186849605","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2021.13","title":"Why Is Aboriginal Title Property if It Looks Like Sovereignty?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Alienation; Jurisdiction; Property (philosophy); Subject (documents); Assertion; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Sanderson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Amitpal C. Singh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01904212969223386,"gpt":0.2903120987473367,"spread":0.2712699690551029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002928964,0.00008256853,0.0001443466,0.00004595495,0.0006439965,0.000193535,0.0003246329,0.00008850082,0.02030167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002068409,0.00005877906,0.0000882334,0.0001446519,0.0002662209,0.0002088409,0.000005626502,0.0002181402,0.0004032471],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002046717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007033721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08091444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6041279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989318,0.00006778988,0.0001934407,0.0001177606,0.0003150898,0.0003741774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988572,0.00002568991,0.00009975322,0.0001367766,0.0003591339,0.0005214281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004711966,0.0000215329,0.0004244338,0.00001448015,0.00003601329,0.001338222,0.01972432,0.00000242056,0.0000238014,0.4249897,0.5520355,0.001384846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006809179,0.00002697644,0.00004636014,0.00006101738,0.0000158512,0.00006294226,0.0005045735,0.000001287612,0.0001785577,0.002893016,0.9960367,0.0001046422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003244889,0.0009872237,0.00004901944,0.007256572,0.001157175,0.00006885474,0.00002244618,0.000007490974,0.9872063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8699527,0.0005002708,0.0006718815,0.02066854,0.0015403,0.000001584886,0.000002302149,0.00002690739,0.1066355],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8805708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308589887","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.26","title":"Subsidiarity and the Allocation of Governmental Powers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Southampton; McGill University","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Allocative efficiency; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; European union","authors":[{"name":"Michael Da Silva","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02608091062197771,"gpt":0.2921953430107506,"spread":0.2661144323887729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001851752,0.00004003053,0.0001032398,0.000024661,0.0007746027,0.00003119138,0.0003149428,0.00003178421,0.0001378873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003101181,0.00003339495,0.00005228817,0.0001008061,0.001648534,0.0001459934,0.00002082246,0.0003293187,8.669198e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000386399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001148923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1293245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1185343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988415,0.0003150578,0.0001857322,0.00005337121,0.0004263084,0.0001780543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991225,0.000273811,0.0001390901,0.00007075888,0.00007438519,0.0003194758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001884627,0.000005488193,0.0005926864,0.000002968837,0.000008731582,0.00001301761,0.00841648,0.000006922971,0.00001547701,0.990607,0.0002446863,0.000067685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001287203,0.0002527929,0.006292202,0.00005784801,0.00009395116,0.00009692089,0.03081031,0.00002905632,0.0003267093,0.7038511,0.2566666,0.0002352662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6464996,0.003335654,0.00005107586,0.09853941,0.001232585,0.0002351891,0.00009103976,0.000005231583,0.2500102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983646,0.00006414582,0.000023318,0.001388876,0.00009966161,0.000001106823,2.332801e-7,0.000002576524,0.00005551866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3518649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8975501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315465013","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.25","title":"Discretion in the Automated Administrative State","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Administrative discretion; Agency (philosophy); State (computer science); Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial discretion; State agency; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Administration (probate law); Judicial review; Algorithm","authors":[{"name":"Sancho McCann","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0780024987535169,"gpt":0.4147552629283831,"spread":0.3367527641748662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001216613,0.00006001408,0.0001013204,0.0001095008,0.0003490064,0.0001703004,0.0004316055,0.00004113314,0.00008356324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001628537,0.00004221642,0.00004404017,0.0005730141,0.0003621489,0.0003119369,0.000003483257,0.0001957413,0.00006824341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001070735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001553843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2108854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7839282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988234,0.0002961905,0.000212652,0.00006425286,0.0002779648,0.0003255224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992841,0.0001570392,0.0001087135,0.00007466055,0.00008855113,0.0002868867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002524178,0.0000225508,0.008422755,0.00001799226,0.00002993714,0.002600945,0.5840267,0.0002112233,0.00007568861,0.3684948,0.03319154,0.002880597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000228963,0.0001717918,0.04575561,0.0001748925,0.00001345605,0.0000361807,0.01491513,0.00009793037,0.0001565885,0.01764964,0.9206073,0.0001925051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8936548,0.0003143194,0.00001309602,0.03918887,0.0005769941,0.0001860653,0.00004121826,0.00005235118,0.06597233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982899,0.00007069526,0.00001971201,0.0006009575,0.0001645009,0.000002005968,9.613888e-7,0.000003903925,0.0008473861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8874158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7943694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583254963","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005087","title":"In Defence of Two-Step Balancing and Proportionality in Rights Adjudication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Prima facie; Law and economics; Criticism; Defeasible estate; Political science; Presumption of innocence; Human rights; Argumentation theory; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Charles-Maxime Panaccio","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05868485154411934,"gpt":0.3331830744211103,"spread":0.2744982228769909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001554982,0.00005068517,0.0001404438,0.0001087153,0.0001182876,0.00001247803,0.0002029721,0.00008301523,0.00006388391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003249245,0.00004877119,0.00002578516,0.000185248,0.0007732329,0.0004126243,0.000006841548,0.0002843015,0.0000019119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001590512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001182834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3476202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7026491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989102,0.000170182,0.0003700381,0.0000868858,0.0002251173,0.0002375163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991164,0.0001072691,0.000173963,0.00007027731,0.0001522865,0.0003798086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005674685,0.00001351258,0.04362655,0.00001129498,0.000002007255,0.00005607643,0.007024765,0.000001851881,0.00002751083,0.9491563,0.00001211902,0.00006238124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002383772,0.00004661177,0.1348851,0.0002809005,0.00000803157,0.00001664775,0.0003061268,0.000009274965,0.0003508773,0.8612266,0.002530622,0.0001008202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9480234,0.0004342813,0.00009080594,0.00204782,0.0001733501,0.0000913151,0.000005802922,0.000001856885,0.04913132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989986,0.00002190909,0.0006159993,0.0002721352,0.00007365992,9.431188e-7,1.393536e-7,0.000002039772,0.00001454328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.355029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6567241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256615650","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006615","title":"Existence and Justification Conditions of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Morality; Legal positivism; Law; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal realism; Philosophy; Legal profession; Mathematics; History","authors":[{"name":"Michael Giudice","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04854953337624345,"gpt":0.2380898457190175,"spread":0.189540312342774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002544901,0.00006511605,0.0001955158,0.00007857591,0.0002125704,0.00003658774,0.0001208999,0.00003710991,0.0001206377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009884814,0.00006908323,0.00005086275,0.00008804885,0.0005265739,0.000257521,0.000005017724,0.00009882342,0.00002497115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006274243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001775507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007682657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009851957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993083,0.00001063261,0.0004080451,0.0001033725,0.00003302417,0.0001365851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992689,0.00003715535,0.0002913888,0.0000917099,0.0001198987,0.0001909733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001276315,0.000007324697,0.005622116,0.00001144555,0.00001832434,0.00001085788,0.0001922154,0.00000879747,0.00002227492,0.9939178,0.000158119,0.00002949988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003472627,0.00009327324,0.02542792,0.0001065474,0.00002388377,0.0001987341,0.000130924,0.00001046837,0.000696416,0.4085456,0.5642062,0.0002126714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4059886,0.03067852,0.001215682,0.002494349,0.001049968,0.0001624887,0.0004165001,0.000006365781,0.5579875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987229,0.000167088,0.0005938482,0.0003026426,0.00003216042,0.00000186883,9.685227e-7,0.000003436119,0.0001751497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5927342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815499224","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004720","title":"Beguiled By Metaphors: The “Living Tree” and Originalist Constitutional Interpretation in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitutional law; Original intent; Political science; Supreme court; Original meaning; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Bradley W. Miller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01343163500397304,"gpt":0.275409109206593,"spread":0.26197747420262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006162219,0.00009271844,0.0001751646,0.00003448897,0.0006926458,0.0001297916,0.0002915393,0.0000368162,0.00006017594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004105454,0.00006660179,0.00003757594,0.0001686538,0.0008991442,0.0003542358,0.000006953924,0.0002293171,9.797567e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001388437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00361176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988095,0.0001793808,0.0002832596,0.0000999499,0.00033848,0.0002894779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989902,0.0002820155,0.0001652082,0.00005345028,0.0001768301,0.0003322308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004878667,0.00003876772,0.1688521,0.00002192955,0.0001792354,0.000547202,0.1169946,0.000282995,0.0003521914,0.6489944,0.04240579,0.02128199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006787094,0.0001493879,0.2755376,0.0008809444,0.0001307727,0.0001103902,0.03773537,0.0001623236,0.0001278113,0.003924782,0.6798829,0.0006790219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446676,0.009249165,0.00009830814,0.02658322,0.0006878873,0.0002497298,0.00003370658,0.000005735082,0.01842466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985305,0.0001415343,0.00009015844,0.001061907,0.00009497716,0.000001548719,5.360433e-7,0.000001875124,0.00007695049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6450696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6407107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238538938","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003623","title":"Gender Performance, Sexual Subjects and International Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; International law; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Brenda Cossman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06056175362656408,"gpt":0.2891183128103834,"spread":0.2285565591838193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004770668,0.0000988209,0.0001345623,0.0001019425,0.0005886633,0.0002184404,0.0004456192,0.00008732009,0.0008365944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004997736,0.00009968795,0.00004238988,0.0001121405,0.0005688345,0.0005549097,0.00001545348,0.0002438225,0.00003290845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001261276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004153384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02347709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2322257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988427,0.00007393595,0.0002333913,0.0001329966,0.0003477844,0.0003692226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987814,0.00004428034,0.0001248556,0.00009687335,0.0002254541,0.000727097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001658822,0.00005258474,0.06199003,0.00003877047,0.0001260648,0.0004191626,0.1135571,0.00002302277,0.00009226119,0.800618,0.009017824,0.01404859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004421414,0.0001287922,0.01360942,0.00004600934,0.00003160263,0.0002175551,0.004504034,0.00009505396,0.00006305821,0.003050111,0.9775296,0.0002825966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6620362,0.002518947,0.00001704323,0.001982047,0.001238552,0.00006881922,0.000008102286,0.000009223726,0.3321211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953362,0.0004095926,0.00008675727,0.001228271,0.0006215021,9.516625e-7,4.567484e-7,0.000007978588,0.002308245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9830257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208799210","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004446","title":"Neither Here nor There: The (Non-) Impact of International Law on Judicial Reasoning in Canada and South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Municipal law; Comparative law; International law; Political science; Public law; Tying; Sociology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Graham Hudson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01650639266797427,"gpt":0.2685920604617675,"spread":0.2520856677937932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003768591,0.00007646168,0.00012792,0.00005593014,0.0002975102,0.00004025327,0.0003543486,0.00004042269,0.000125556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001071585,0.00005621949,0.00005906884,0.0001087047,0.0002737782,0.0001929234,0.000008123242,0.0002035994,0.00000180652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000818294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005363481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998951,0.00008414071,0.000249734,0.00008210177,0.0004235634,0.0002094336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991676,0.000111828,0.0002430805,0.0000656463,0.0002100092,0.0002018335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008636827,0.00002049,0.5293041,0.000003360367,0.00008720055,0.0003636279,0.02776477,0.0008267809,0.00004796381,0.4397492,0.001241795,0.0005042235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000838911,0.0002416656,0.9379661,0.0004663397,0.00002337411,0.00008875689,0.003997129,0.0001646261,0.0001521956,0.003853921,0.05190134,0.0003056554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9282784,0.0001603011,0.000007926035,0.0009389814,0.0003298802,0.00006325044,0.00003373832,0.000001016264,0.07018648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991452,0.00003331307,0.00003103528,0.0002804179,0.0002698151,9.64117e-7,6.390697e-7,0.000006142441,0.0002325441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4358953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908817484","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006123","title":"Reconstructing Fuller’s Argument Against Legal Positivism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Argument (complex analysis); Positivism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Legal formalism; Sociology; Legal realism; Law and economics; Political science; Legal profession; Black letter law; Comparative law; Private law","authors":[{"name":"Dan Priel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02136673522458685,"gpt":0.2299388762014419,"spread":0.2085721409768551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002371429,0.0001788181,0.0002346735,0.0001610096,0.000387695,0.0003240126,0.0006159989,0.00007017934,0.0005966714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000251527,0.0001577151,0.0001321005,0.00020146,0.0003235818,0.001001436,0.00002532949,0.0004350231,0.0002385494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001715167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007139018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007697725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00427142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982525,0.0001076735,0.0005114765,0.0002457094,0.0003100119,0.0005726679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982408,0.0001117586,0.0003160633,0.0002243135,0.0001408896,0.000966178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002741807,0.0001091147,0.01017668,0.00008728458,0.0000649166,0.008310937,0.002758302,0.0003588943,0.6882389,0.1677294,0.02142576,0.1007123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002247565,0.00106439,0.009135169,0.001873842,0.00009261424,0.01360972,0.0009269438,0.001151191,0.5505439,0.01777647,0.3993738,0.002204396],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9434928,0.0003278479,0.00008696544,0.002911208,0.001531432,0.0001565419,0.00001186888,0.00001477176,0.05146654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956316,0.00004338678,0.000577414,0.002852629,0.0003131669,0.000003780585,2.9124e-7,0.00001865145,0.0005591086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.377948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121889772","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2016.1","title":"On the Spontaneous Emergence of Private Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Section (typography); Scope (computer science); Transaction cost; Law and economics; Process (computing); Private law; Database transaction; Political science; Law; Economics; Public law; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Legislature","authors":[{"name":"Daniele Bertolini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02629637907060578,"gpt":0.2077836404431294,"spread":0.1814872613725237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009923419,0.000128387,0.0004614365,0.000120272,0.0001842649,0.0000524328,0.000765906,0.00009161461,0.001232243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001961723,0.0001055787,0.0001890897,0.0001046269,0.0005207437,0.0002541649,0.00001816237,0.0001483396,0.0003182916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001654891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001750527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01835518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04744174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982639,0.00003444383,0.001063944,0.0002060905,0.00005937948,0.0003722431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979566,0.0002013571,0.0009797855,0.0003980954,0.00008918429,0.0003749468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001562415,0.00001016834,0.003407001,0.000008314214,0.00004048754,0.0001247557,0.0002349354,0.00001724128,0.00007678301,0.994294,0.001620113,0.0001505034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000690915,0.000526228,0.003152607,0.0005169829,0.00001879121,0.0005276412,0.00008087336,0.00002035025,0.002413819,0.7374031,0.2541289,0.0005198337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.788045,0.00243746,0.0006668943,0.004910579,0.003023108,0.0002583606,0.0002714919,0.00000812874,0.2003789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982848,0.0001646808,0.00005551906,0.0009435031,0.0002682677,0.000002521112,2.763734e-7,0.00002047468,0.0002600214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.256891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522403117","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006317","title":"Mandates of the State: Canadian Sovereignty, Democracy, and Indigenous Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Autonomy; Democracy; Deliberation; Inclusion (mineral); Negotiation; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Ethos; Politics; Inclusion–exclusion principle; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Social science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Toby Rollo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008731184738897587,"gpt":0.2576841170448328,"spread":0.2489529323059353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001431497,0.000113328,0.0002150183,0.0001678179,0.005963258,0.0001148031,0.0006419924,0.0001198999,0.0001628594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002632786,0.00008235208,0.00006589758,0.0002290061,0.0008309023,0.0002793708,0.000001612517,0.0002858937,0.000007950036],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004636572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06084218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9881647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981791,0.0003021281,0.0003975124,0.0001279032,0.0003315148,0.0006617741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975266,0.0001351479,0.000346338,0.0002005165,0.0004088678,0.00138251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006607198,0.00001718381,0.03161757,0.00004726536,0.00003102146,0.00002777983,0.3821349,0.00001951302,0.000004830418,0.5842921,0.0004702393,0.001330983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002131205,0.0001298604,0.02406185,0.0001835634,0.00003734819,0.00008580115,0.002736095,0.000003589777,0.0003298309,0.08444152,0.8875499,0.0002275106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9347954,0.0007942892,0.00001186193,0.001378656,0.001006796,0.0002463793,0.00003298289,0.000003395288,0.06173018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969044,0.001080236,0.0001081817,0.0003645037,0.0003149341,3.017497e-7,8.896931e-7,0.00001137997,0.001215155],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8870797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205513482","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005932","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Judging The Judges: “May They Boldly Go Where Ivan Rand Went Before”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Globalization; Constitutional law; Constitution; Common law; Rule of law; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ian Binnie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01384921906643603,"gpt":0.2602579865963203,"spread":0.2464087675298843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001149356,0.0001498044,0.0002082488,0.00004034169,0.004786196,0.0005243692,0.0009582614,0.00007692991,0.000222904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003308903,0.00008079167,0.0001615077,0.0001958,0.001858077,0.0003666661,0.00003255079,0.0004063003,0.00007477019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002883342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001941878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2558123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9128585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99814,0.0002107607,0.0003632575,0.0001347979,0.0005440079,0.0006071749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982937,0.0003281569,0.0002513079,0.0001750679,0.0004487856,0.000502956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001823951,0.00001381849,0.0242087,0.000006291456,0.0001685926,0.00007096858,0.02161595,0.0001103684,0.00001987818,0.8993403,0.03217256,0.0222543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001774997,0.00005806839,0.01170534,0.0001020473,0.00004184632,0.00002982401,0.00394212,0.000004680786,0.00001033824,0.07804232,0.9057463,0.0001396352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3466443,0.04616211,0.0003412064,0.3476518,0.0051779,0.001259942,0.00002894108,0.0000438212,0.25269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957482,0.001020344,0.00002946395,0.001827247,0.000897566,0.00001102604,2.539268e-7,0.000008302875,0.0004576077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1468194871","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005178","title":"Legal Perspectives on Corporate Responsibility: Contractarian or Communitarian Thought?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Corporation; Duty; Corporate social responsibility; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social responsibility; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeff Bone","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07770124567077645,"gpt":0.246520838045686,"spread":0.1688195923749096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009370597,0.0002731019,0.0004088322,0.0004335322,0.0007119327,0.0005545462,0.0008992482,0.000111739,0.001884549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001133024,0.0002079096,0.0001547963,0.0003284394,0.0005032129,0.001974664,0.00004147424,0.0006283949,0.0001984547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001686216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001045143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05236537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4949346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983114,0.00007424402,0.0005757979,0.0002568771,0.0002993442,0.0004823556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975693,0.00009833281,0.0008695468,0.0005290695,0.0007294305,0.0002043487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006619773,0.00008401534,0.001580079,0.0000217266,0.00005056989,0.002314674,0.00119083,0.000003187404,0.00004028076,0.9914948,0.002254239,0.0003036469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001953056,0.0005771377,0.03864332,0.0005872747,0.0002404712,0.0003419445,0.003360073,0.00005425291,0.0002692867,0.2350784,0.71794,0.0009547801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8600596,0.0003479444,0.00006444953,0.001231399,0.001053152,0.0002625861,0.00001467082,0.00003747465,0.1369287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952078,0.00001120096,0.0003737255,0.002048233,0.001009945,0.000002393227,0.000003409233,0.00003467208,0.001308546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7564164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202214160","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005476","title":"Private Property and Tax Policy in a Libertarian World: A Critical Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tax policy; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Public economics","authors":[{"name":"David G. Duff","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07894097353695297,"gpt":0.3136137131778003,"spread":0.2346727396408474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006535264,0.0003064376,0.001872189,0.0006738087,0.0001641812,0.0001304242,0.0004828506,0.0001318564,0.0001921497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006432474,0.000230843,0.0003082461,0.0006221538,0.0004582107,0.0003547794,0.00005116874,0.0006867076,0.0001275717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005873741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001768355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0245199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09405098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976228,0.00005075357,0.001480821,0.0003198356,0.00006389714,0.0004619277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984721,0.0001073901,0.0005752653,0.0002051794,0.00006659555,0.000573469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001380185,0.00001615161,0.0001472145,0.005968933,0.00006495058,0.000272294,0.00005059967,2.229142e-7,2.504889e-9,0.8455943,0.00196801,0.1459159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008992777,0.00002836706,0.00006280923,0.03456197,0.00006531194,0.000371322,9.025483e-7,5.235762e-7,1.122228e-8,0.00471998,0.9598202,0.0002786704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001217727,0.967424,0.000008098892,0.006349237,0.0002306639,0.0002699296,0.0001623485,0.000002640762,0.02555186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003857143,0.9957266,0.0002637347,0.001832757,0.0004823507,0.00002345525,0.000002421281,0.00002133864,0.001261667],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9819759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399160098","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.7","title":"Democracy and the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Skepticism; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael Pal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02435384871030163,"gpt":0.300638898873226,"spread":0.2762850501629244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009322353,0.00005746142,0.0001173722,0.00005472203,0.001506164,0.0002845336,0.0001969032,0.00003403777,0.00006480922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002326942,0.00003691747,0.00005898051,0.0001784455,0.002029991,0.0002791722,0.00001134188,0.0001949156,0.0000127517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001277565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001501296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09756878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3161153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992412,0.00008274456,0.0001677996,0.00007317535,0.0002246212,0.0002104594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992197,0.0002972133,0.00004821178,0.00004165505,0.0001102306,0.0002829528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006904815,7.953605e-7,0.0009238013,0.000003030884,0.00002680972,0.0001652841,0.005754046,0.000002626281,0.000003308024,0.9903041,0.001570066,0.001239218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001807362,0.00001970041,0.001162495,0.0002717238,0.00005827066,0.00008538012,0.002001921,0.00001151123,0.000006902512,0.2726583,0.7234496,0.00009338606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.213007,0.1389912,0.001287705,0.2085124,0.008184535,0.0004222958,0.00003241495,0.00005024523,0.4295122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975538,0.0009666065,0.00004873608,0.0006584953,0.0005278959,7.567002e-7,5.159312e-8,0.000003126388,0.0002405652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7845467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935216946","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006081","title":"Democracy and the Freedom of Speech: Rethinking the Conflict between Liberty and Equality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Campaign finance; Law; Jurisdiction; Negative liberty; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Yasmin Dawood","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04206118180743813,"gpt":0.2864001683894715,"spread":0.2443389865820333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003564783,0.0001097285,0.0003159994,0.00004496164,0.001309622,0.0003121982,0.000682078,0.00009857246,0.0001177311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003846518,0.00005810434,0.00007778689,0.0001511938,0.01809154,0.0004909225,0.00003565248,0.0003815393,0.000003403207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005273874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006359076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2596692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2363071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980294,0.0006300185,0.000463736,0.0001304839,0.0004177224,0.0003286958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974957,0.001058434,0.0004026891,0.0002301514,0.000311542,0.0005014462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001252381,0.00000731334,0.05904613,0.00001247579,0.00008125718,0.00002593037,0.08914073,0.000001042397,0.00002001369,0.8459834,0.00106038,0.004608755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002669591,0.0003111714,0.08013261,0.0003290577,0.0003771786,0.0001139928,0.01378639,0.00005414055,0.0001374006,0.7157857,0.185793,0.0005098087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517428,0.003074247,0.000696823,0.03098252,0.0006600062,0.0006514374,0.00001561744,0.000008817778,0.01216768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981757,0.0002115517,0.0001785931,0.0004669867,0.0005709001,0.000001671571,1.780298e-7,0.000007310065,0.0003870477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1847326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272219748","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002460","title":"Unconstitutionality, Invalidity, and Charter Challenges","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Morality; Positivism; Legal positivism; Law; Duty; Political science; Politics; Constitutionality; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitution; Legal realism; Legal profession","authors":[{"name":"Michael Giudice","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1190269410000815,"gpt":0.3161608745964075,"spread":0.197133933596326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006450185,0.00010667,0.0002027024,0.00004927373,0.001018021,0.0001424515,0.0002992542,0.00008964889,0.0004955576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002995362,0.00009070475,0.00006966922,0.00008992768,0.001521022,0.0005134839,0.00002273256,0.0002181637,0.00004264395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002490607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002647016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0531669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4554277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998747,0.0001550662,0.0002492541,0.0001301128,0.0003672784,0.0003512715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986452,0.0001259101,0.0001467479,0.00007984362,0.0002888476,0.0007133918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003010507,0.00002642163,0.0117992,0.00003194334,0.00008140945,0.0002797768,0.05754121,0.000004329834,0.00002569798,0.9099665,0.01381777,0.006422782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002249458,0.00005132211,0.01265712,0.0001278539,0.00003025137,0.000069592,0.003022873,0.000002945488,0.0000245452,0.005021102,0.9785642,0.000203233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3946418,0.08669379,0.00002673117,0.1736014,0.002681766,0.0004526014,0.00006023078,0.00004330534,0.3417984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942785,0.004032124,0.0001515044,0.0005869686,0.0005000618,0.000001798823,2.156066e-7,0.000004403778,0.0004444552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9531382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284029674","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004835","title":"Red Tape and Gridlock","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Veto; Object (grammar); Law and economics; Position (finance); Gridlock; Property (philosophy); Power (physics); State (computer science); Business; Original position; Block (permutation group theory); Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Politics; Finance; Computer science; Economic Justice; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Larissa Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01284720054436498,"gpt":0.2762681103212118,"spread":0.2634209097768468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006398005,0.00006162115,0.0001285976,0.00005974129,0.0004196568,0.0001218168,0.0002896796,0.0001003447,0.0005810703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003579404,0.0000601844,0.00004456722,0.00006086299,0.0007693334,0.0003505714,0.000009067356,0.0003528425,0.00001488392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005310337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001378876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06449129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5860011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991823,0.00004876812,0.0001983523,0.00008551667,0.0001170831,0.0003679458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982088,0.0001056499,0.00009080052,0.00009223264,0.000109511,0.001393017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002416591,0.000003727834,0.002359492,0.000003001752,0.00000678066,0.00009918049,0.001253601,3.117351e-7,0.0001288613,0.9913075,0.002201139,0.00263398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001067252,0.00002903245,0.00437816,0.00001953891,0.000009543481,0.000056669,0.0001834409,0.000001856855,0.0001173739,0.0312976,0.9637129,0.00008716654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.627433,0.0003962624,0.00004292243,0.01998601,0.001992025,0.00009161331,0.00001074222,0.000009863373,0.3500376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970682,0.00004191039,0.0004242223,0.001295869,0.0005627173,6.351631e-7,1.225404e-7,0.000004573214,0.0006017949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9417383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008191152","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.33","title":"Reasonable Accommodation for Age","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; nobody; Reasonable accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Law; Scope (computer science); Opt-out; Conscience; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Refia Kaya","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07395497734515308,"gpt":0.3298034589447745,"spread":0.2558484815996215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004690151,0.00005746245,0.0001189007,0.00004592528,0.0004249392,0.0001615623,0.0003393311,0.00006337072,0.00007295635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005432626,0.00005779777,0.00007843105,0.000141367,0.0001816893,0.0004197871,0.00000449496,0.00009122548,0.00001319103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001280484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001266649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06716219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2902209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991966,0.00005715508,0.0002097718,0.00008547815,0.0002131741,0.0002377598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987288,0.00007694343,0.0001576082,0.00006110899,0.00028238,0.0006931917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002008152,0.000006591732,0.0007613005,0.00001870141,0.00001065542,0.00007350466,0.01343048,0.00006857212,0.0001959269,0.9224501,0.05878151,0.004182609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004261913,0.0001757187,0.0008919695,0.00006708849,0.00004122878,0.000008331099,0.002048323,0.00007082274,0.0003422681,0.05200083,0.9437633,0.0001639878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09026112,0.004383723,0.02349762,0.1095589,0.002775812,0.001155743,0.00007756461,0.00006296868,0.7682265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960952,0.00006768297,0.001288826,0.001679208,0.0006091619,0.000002715993,0.000002678049,0.000007075652,0.0002474795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.905834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9390497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893559805","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004422","title":"The Cultural Limits of Legal Tolerance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Multiculturalism; Constitutionalism; Dialogic; Law; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Legal culture; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin L. Berger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04607625829073096,"gpt":0.3158658241002884,"spread":0.2697895658095574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005582655,0.0001185142,0.0002498463,0.00002695793,0.002546123,0.0001022897,0.000742177,0.00007535453,0.0000435058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005814743,0.00007550052,0.0001659767,0.0002268771,0.002304679,0.0005801992,0.00001370554,0.0003005695,0.00001308463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002798653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001123193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1507212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4524729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982906,0.0001645288,0.0004244816,0.0001057471,0.0005393021,0.0004753124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980021,0.000222949,0.0003490057,0.0001197719,0.0007891093,0.0005170237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001002045,0.00006476587,0.05246099,0.00004293015,0.0003166555,0.001203032,0.2223633,0.0002629446,0.001434465,0.633433,0.08086981,0.007447979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002263128,0.00008022103,0.03042421,0.0001063825,0.00002228454,0.00009260758,0.005282813,0.000002709732,0.0006736491,0.0002969824,0.9626186,0.0001732455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9415516,0.009114946,0.000006735119,0.01028909,0.001185517,0.0001553401,0.000009310085,0.000009054365,0.03767844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959779,0.001350591,0.0002048437,0.000268193,0.0004795989,0.00000196323,1.659682e-7,0.000006063181,0.001710637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8817488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476423704","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004471","title":"<i>Discussion</i>Foucault, Agamben, and Arbour J.’s Dissent in<i>Gosselin</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; State (computer science); Human rights; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02891021977678319,"gpt":0.2999339519642602,"spread":0.271023732187477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008582336,0.0001144008,0.0002560534,0.0001045227,0.0006317947,0.00004044483,0.0003485136,0.0001492135,0.0002018755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000476946,0.00008549142,0.00007553297,0.0001707577,0.001753232,0.0003391424,0.00001652492,0.0004135824,0.00001759984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001634265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001515839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03035651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1304087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983678,0.0002570955,0.0003706455,0.0001487343,0.0002628134,0.0005928464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981556,0.0001918301,0.0001268718,0.0001250133,0.0001196282,0.001281043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001369566,0.00001918191,0.02275179,0.000004936241,0.000009751052,0.001234072,0.004919918,0.00000617923,0.00001172261,0.9701967,0.000448236,0.0003837762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001047407,0.0001966076,0.1431961,0.0003833692,0.00004115475,0.0009810008,0.003137264,0.00001573893,0.0002659282,0.5957291,0.2544122,0.0005940765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8462965,0.001837465,0.00004931672,0.006235796,0.0006164428,0.0001200837,0.00001254727,0.000009478453,0.1448224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996815,0.0005052523,0.0001512511,0.001484257,0.0002848072,0.000001388754,3.191894e-7,0.000007597079,0.000750155],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3744676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9761004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122642849","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005555","title":"Testing Theory and Debunking Stereotypes: Lawyers’ Views on the Practice of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Ethical code; Public relations; Professional responsibility; Law; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Ann Wilkinson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christa Walker","is_ca":true},{"name":"Peter Mercer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07706624245631,"gpt":0.3828445914818455,"spread":0.3057783490255355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004490953,0.00007253978,0.0001155395,0.0000708912,0.0008206822,0.0002425456,0.0003191634,0.00005116767,0.0002284122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006386708,0.00005517774,0.00003284627,0.0002992551,0.0005337217,0.001212667,0.000008213264,0.000450301,0.00001577889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001249394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001945579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04422194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1666807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984686,0.0006245072,0.0003428091,0.0000850605,0.0002736564,0.000205335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946832,0.003796939,0.0005315876,0.0001376448,0.0006026414,0.0002479517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001059959,0.00001491295,0.0002198411,0.000003612107,0.00001435522,0.000006999668,0.02342004,0.000009886328,0.00005238975,0.9704474,0.001051235,0.004748737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006999731,0.00005096581,0.0003432817,0.0001462678,0.00003119198,0.00003925758,0.006638297,0.0000025766,0.0001219479,0.006180984,0.9863045,0.00007068233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07184727,0.001446786,0.0001088619,0.1460067,0.0006003511,0.0002044167,0.000006302188,0.000008732431,0.7797706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845996,0.00004277156,0.001840192,0.01289407,0.0003393779,0.000001548772,1.505186e-7,0.000006664088,0.000275625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9621426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283773878","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004070","title":"Introduction: Global Ethics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Charles W. Jones","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04597599781249134,"gpt":0.3455845112431948,"spread":0.2996085134307034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001633183,0.00008314873,0.0001451945,0.00004390029,0.0008992385,0.0001475981,0.0004266728,0.0002479377,0.0003055337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008907455,0.000084021,0.00009380765,0.0002568208,0.001426902,0.0003780123,0.000007739141,0.0007867943,0.00006292653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004965774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004523755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1960867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.515096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983636,0.0002481818,0.0003088243,0.0001139285,0.0004957459,0.0004696813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982536,0.0001726539,0.0001275195,0.0001283068,0.0005029013,0.0008150275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003098204,0.000007064363,0.0005825569,0.000005042681,0.0000052331,0.00009610737,0.000886573,0.00002825209,0.000003596812,0.9870405,0.01123137,0.0001106397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005459387,0.00002448714,0.0008747383,0.0000220712,0.00001155195,0.000038939,0.0001417727,5.254628e-7,0.00002294665,0.4043162,0.5944201,0.00007204875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01773067,0.001652979,0.0005223171,0.369417,0.003836476,0.00008633095,0.00003427658,0.00002272801,0.6066973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887903,0.00003064948,0.0003628082,0.00256584,0.007764634,3.97045e-7,6.614302e-7,0.000004756554,0.0004799002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8092666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255131847","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.17","title":"Humane Driving","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Animal welfare; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Focus (optics); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Vaughan Black","is_ca":true},{"name":"Andrew Fenton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04474193502420136,"gpt":0.3624172305370065,"spread":0.3176752955128052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001307346,0.00007508406,0.0001791161,0.00006413946,0.001110304,0.0004629664,0.0004091312,0.0001382297,0.0006584699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001563307,0.00008087784,0.0001176751,0.0002207091,0.0005486809,0.0006176599,0.00001327577,0.0004505859,0.00002254029],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002481309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006897131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06342841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.788116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985923,0.0001930311,0.0002677907,0.00009924401,0.0004177107,0.0004299898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973683,0.0001826765,0.0001677171,0.0001150218,0.001053701,0.001112573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001279367,0.00001265431,0.003770691,0.000007123396,0.00003058781,0.001494025,0.02560479,0.000008971567,0.0003519861,0.9617649,0.005420352,0.001532607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001759375,0.0000579051,0.00441492,0.0002523765,0.00003178213,0.00006579762,0.005271212,0.000001137858,0.0007441334,0.0624683,0.9262908,0.0002257025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.41403,0.004076445,0.0001366044,0.05677696,0.002718308,0.00008695794,0.00000854758,0.00001743055,0.5221488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945589,0.000288437,0.0004293,0.002215735,0.0007414643,2.65351e-7,3.772702e-7,0.000009190783,0.001756371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9208704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26166760","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005737","title":"On the Intrinsic Value of Arabic in Israel—Challenging Kymlicka on Language Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Minority Rights and Languages","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minority language; Political science; Linguistics; Minority rights; Identity (music); Immigration; Cultural rights; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Meital Pinto","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01485815974018881,"gpt":0.2940361181945036,"spread":0.2791779584543148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020264,0.0001102037,0.0002098171,0.0002562155,0.0003756037,0.00005280735,0.0005559067,0.00009574489,0.0002782498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002357681,0.00007022585,0.00009148952,0.0002821698,0.0003913312,0.0001431001,0.000007468722,0.000426023,0.00001700892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002594877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004771227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2439046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7849576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984714,0.0001774822,0.0003657226,0.0001217862,0.000433947,0.0004296669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856,0.0005442307,0.0002186976,0.000193957,0.0001075178,0.000375654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001492235,0.00002226432,0.0005607792,0.000006018479,0.00001048918,0.0005775537,0.02554899,0.00003369075,0.00004576294,0.9712142,0.0002575265,0.00170785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003456431,0.002449248,0.0941728,0.006043163,0.0001795295,0.0002449903,0.127597,0.00006732569,0.02174361,0.1638423,0.5779614,0.002242182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9419519,0.0009390951,0.00001994039,0.002546262,0.0003322829,0.0001128716,0.000004334162,0.000004218783,0.05408911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986182,0.00003254413,0.00004701755,0.0006727875,0.0003157987,5.748846e-7,2.214454e-7,0.000006889871,0.0003059219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7611303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261418248","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003593","title":"Resituating the Judicialization of Politics: Bush v. Gore as a Global Trend","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Polity; Presidency; Supreme court; Law; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03707364720469677,"gpt":0.3043663065438004,"spread":0.2672926593391037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004459075,0.00007440985,0.0001608268,0.00004272931,0.001187978,0.00006334123,0.0003602034,0.00005577861,0.0002587677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000566013,0.00005899713,0.00008536254,0.0003517887,0.001327986,0.0001887814,0.00001252662,0.0001122681,0.00001454954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002536291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001011763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3037651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6226443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987505,0.0001204624,0.0003284973,0.00007928154,0.000424931,0.0002962984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998951,0.0001022338,0.0002622037,0.00007710658,0.0003147647,0.0002927618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002188705,0.000007900737,0.005168566,0.000002302916,0.00002500127,0.00003862348,0.005663719,0.00003968556,0.000004087497,0.9849153,0.002982271,0.001150413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005042274,0.0002546679,0.02315907,0.0006170776,0.0001996725,0.0001287825,0.01322992,0.00004765493,0.0000814852,0.4193416,0.5420514,0.0003844119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2064974,0.01201745,0.0002461998,0.02218806,0.001240005,0.0001985535,0.00007079553,0.00001328512,0.7575282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982697,0.0002226721,0.00005838005,0.0007187726,0.0005953177,8.81732e-7,3.399119e-7,0.000002791028,0.0001310804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7917724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9137086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317884482","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.29","title":"Theorizing Access to Civil Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European University Institute","keywords":"Economic Justice; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Underpinning; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; State (computer science); Law; Frame (networking); Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Dylag","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1130655748367023,"gpt":0.4468874587633919,"spread":0.3338218839266895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001778232,0.00006371345,0.0001013798,0.0003112555,0.0009940959,0.0007631297,0.000733344,0.00005403471,0.0008282847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002635057,0.00006491564,0.00004311618,0.001625249,0.0001610022,0.001575339,0.00001723093,0.0003375865,0.0003418791],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002070391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005880302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07154269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4790519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988166,0.0001441066,0.0002679374,0.00009719409,0.000319849,0.0003542852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979085,0.0003943363,0.0001728636,0.0001285711,0.0005831463,0.0008126135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004674277,0.000007099415,0.001300515,0.000009137466,0.00001264127,0.00008886424,0.02684384,0.0000956855,0.00005324405,0.8298209,0.1394576,0.002305854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004849235,0.00001793838,0.002905949,0.00005356,0.00002322608,0.00001000423,0.004129824,0.000002328569,0.00004425235,0.006129304,0.9865469,0.0000881844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08511806,0.0001989728,0.0006046243,0.3450174,0.007406373,0.0002412672,0.00001798982,0.00005414583,0.5613411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890905,0.00004530236,0.0002433479,0.007709204,0.000841866,0.000003242924,7.703485e-7,0.000008530346,0.002057257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9039724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148520867","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000518x","title":"The Limits of Judicial Fidelity to Law: The Coxford Lecture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Fidelity; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey Goldsworthy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06233093076396494,"gpt":0.3241036159821197,"spread":0.2617726852181548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001085958,0.0000688282,0.0001196117,0.00002230519,0.001416933,0.00009932895,0.001011721,0.00005849131,0.00009169715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000234353,0.00004152659,0.00009186203,0.0002250656,0.0007776904,0.0001467717,0.0000182413,0.0002533907,0.00001304266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009827692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001401733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2711248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8825195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989003,0.0001148519,0.0003095282,0.00008352027,0.0002847288,0.0003070996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985486,0.0001700838,0.0002111083,0.0002250427,0.0003661605,0.0004790549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009275633,0.000006586131,0.000443815,0.000001501411,0.00001276815,0.000006919309,0.0100856,0.00001227355,0.00005708351,0.9842252,0.002864785,0.002274251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000521895,0.00005635642,0.00500065,0.00002885103,0.00001996619,0.000006498214,0.0007634612,0.000001555827,0.0006279239,0.0288409,0.9645329,0.00006877634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3447887,0.002880701,0.001191465,0.08236033,0.001728266,0.0008973164,0.00008781908,0.00001890164,0.5660465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973229,0.00006718182,0.0001701207,0.001958687,0.0003220124,0.000003736971,1.222061e-7,0.00000530212,0.0001499987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256181194","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000382","title":"From Québec Veto to Québec Secession: The Evolution of the Supreme Court of Canada on Québec-Canada Disputes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Supreme court; Secession; Political science; Law; Constitution; Framing (construction); Geography; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Nathalie Des Rosiers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00826898085500558,"gpt":0.230140134087557,"spread":0.2218711532325515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004375036,0.0001298376,0.0002845347,0.00002008176,0.0006049738,0.00003304831,0.001139818,0.00006052073,0.0006497643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004821444,0.00008123938,0.00009664165,0.0002440146,0.0004638741,0.0001259775,0.00001684578,0.0002494343,0.000002633049],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004629285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1031557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976584,0.0002275115,0.0005260964,0.0001434524,0.0009902385,0.0004543539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978291,0.000461627,0.0003559715,0.0003203316,0.0002503517,0.0007825647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001701418,0.00008506421,0.1614261,0.00007250203,0.0002386393,0.0002077843,0.02799573,0.002345411,0.0004029622,0.2016246,0.5974715,0.00795964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101339,0.00004529493,0.102597,0.0003881595,0.00002018011,0.00000428177,0.001036219,0.000008294965,0.0001991309,0.0003160206,0.8951733,0.0001108647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9041226,0.002085836,0.000008594146,0.07735395,0.0007959962,0.0001704776,0.0002738329,0.000002183535,0.01518652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949139,0.00001101774,0.000007669747,0.002058701,0.0004013637,0.000002233876,1.645529e-7,0.000008445354,0.002596451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2977018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258189201","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004872","title":"What can Kant Teach Us about Legal Classification?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jacob Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02507928804582306,"gpt":0.3210244308936607,"spread":0.2959451428478377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008498313,0.0001038519,0.0001566484,0.00009186369,0.00107414,0.0008371584,0.000851644,0.0001257354,0.0003454036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001593119,0.00009850249,0.0000997809,0.0002340331,0.0006857033,0.0009795401,0.00001311778,0.0006545319,0.00004872585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002001784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004002444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1618227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8746646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985998,0.00007560681,0.0003616083,0.0001626146,0.0003682256,0.0004320913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978225,0.00007265952,0.000261341,0.0002773402,0.0003895364,0.001176625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001912568,0.0000163031,0.005044144,0.000003023524,0.00001096994,0.00004680723,0.004409056,0.00000583054,0.00107588,0.984397,0.002690458,0.002298625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009398726,0.00001885521,0.02278687,0.00004081491,0.00001698613,0.00004124411,0.001385546,0.00001130173,0.000157357,0.001758349,0.9735562,0.0001325086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8694924,0.0006997039,0.0001119045,0.04314483,0.003113736,0.0002546727,0.00003480826,0.00002253019,0.08312546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955074,0.0001593073,0.0004351139,0.00109028,0.0008896405,0.000006097344,0.000001596936,0.00001157881,0.00189894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8437588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256463645","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006603","title":"A Rights-Based View of the Idea/ Expression Dichotomy in Copyright Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Public domain; Opposition (politics); Expression (computer science); Law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Copyright law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Intellectual property; Linguistics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Abraham Drassinower","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01881354497989694,"gpt":0.2258702494924856,"spread":0.2070567045125886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004975578,0.0001779654,0.0003111184,0.0002001563,0.0002899634,0.0001728464,0.0006776481,0.00008290929,0.002851592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001639166,0.0001034319,0.0001701668,0.000511253,0.0003196266,0.0009090703,0.0000236966,0.0003494717,0.00004607565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009755545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000418003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03202106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1346776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985182,0.00006119779,0.0005843628,0.0001630453,0.0003318099,0.0003413788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998794,0.00007410647,0.000400728,0.0002964683,0.0003502072,0.0000845423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002177968,0.0002738114,0.01326112,0.0005722258,0.00007243503,0.0005857034,0.0008094108,0.0002090891,0.009050502,0.8317541,0.1417742,0.001419522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006220978,0.00002883586,0.0007571223,0.001158343,0.00002709901,0.00002008287,0.00002183042,0.0003465414,0.01574059,0.01877037,0.9622967,0.0002104086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3163028,0.006019906,0.0003703033,0.001946257,0.002201764,0.0007038809,0.00000723213,0.00002008827,0.6724277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968683,0.00001121004,0.00009431762,0.002676446,0.0001648995,0.000003346174,5.657613e-7,0.00001542657,0.0001654868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8205224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47564605","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003799","title":"The Left and the Question of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Faith; Authoritarianism; Law; Parliament; Realm; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Left-wing politics; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01494727644993122,"gpt":0.3079403150364865,"spread":0.2929930385865553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001969205,0.00004911078,0.0001208149,0.0000159795,0.0009462656,0.0000560302,0.0003461513,0.00006975156,0.00003870666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004851722,0.00002813399,0.00005617248,0.00004364079,0.005089929,0.0001589305,0.000008879645,0.000215506,0.000003708995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008543994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009318872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0765461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2402086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990143,0.0003040531,0.0002036955,0.00005155607,0.0001701247,0.0002563353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988616,0.0004659299,0.0001218861,0.00009695535,0.0001346508,0.0003190386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001399387,0.000002076781,0.0001551058,0.000001385397,0.000009564773,0.00001358793,0.001896852,0.000008111665,0.000001881024,0.9977351,0.00001615093,0.0001461425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002910646,0.0000330912,0.001364933,0.00004737678,0.0000169407,0.00003812118,0.0004443062,8.244819e-7,0.0001287447,0.9645907,0.03300526,0.0000386072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3061283,0.006172151,0.0002608405,0.02788227,0.0009544105,0.0002091013,0.00001223366,0.000007281385,0.6583734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983732,0.0002235404,0.00004899628,0.001065051,0.0001439807,3.909058e-7,5.268331e-8,0.000002480905,0.0001422866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6922449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264591406","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000424","title":"Toward a Proceduralist Theory of Secession","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Legitimacy; Clearance; Political science; Politics; Miller; Law; Privilege (computing); Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02972553829760843,"gpt":0.301959104128883,"spread":0.2722335658312746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005810882,0.00007174109,0.0001672808,0.00005748569,0.00034159,0.00003962321,0.0003863754,0.00006109366,0.002298279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001532314,0.00006352852,0.00008461953,0.0001652952,0.001754267,0.0002681561,0.000003895571,0.0001531654,0.00001734374],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001367638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008568307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05320962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04725989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989019,0.0001491222,0.0002917968,0.00007386643,0.0002967427,0.000286586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987411,0.000119351,0.0001740655,0.00008234652,0.0002605387,0.0006226077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001306401,0.000007354886,0.0007455633,0.00000959571,0.000009765452,0.00006235539,0.002959407,0.00001587005,0.00001818234,0.9927424,0.001002197,0.002414206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118749,0.0000682943,0.0008568984,0.000196308,0.00002513065,0.00007563974,0.001229346,7.065429e-7,0.0001628437,0.01385654,0.983292,0.0001175295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2238543,0.001715575,0.0001620277,0.003915825,0.0003944515,0.000103107,0.00005106644,0.00000831287,0.7697954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959486,0.000101366,0.000283365,0.0009438028,0.0002640754,6.41991e-7,5.81938e-7,0.00000462681,0.002452977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172127440","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003684","title":"Theoretical Underpinning of Intellectual Property: “I am a Pragmatist But Theory is my Rhetoric”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underpinning; Intellectual property; Scholarship; Pragmatism; Rhetoric; Sociology; Politics; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Brian Fitzgerald","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02244247931331175,"gpt":0.2293062636996957,"spread":0.2068637843863839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001220799,0.0002546987,0.0004284534,0.0003483608,0.000323939,0.0003418075,0.0006326044,0.0001192763,0.01685774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002212147,0.0001633713,0.0001881778,0.0004985288,0.0008559542,0.0009999708,0.00004572542,0.0004685248,0.0001961379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001300069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007896083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003214293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002152763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980708,0.00008488291,0.0007122406,0.0002380702,0.0003949635,0.0004990289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981301,0.0002723807,0.000408916,0.0002806726,0.0007529315,0.0001549712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008280549,0.00004020732,0.0002392121,0.000105096,0.00007546395,0.0001088301,0.001352631,0.000004591752,0.000355771,0.9545351,0.04034467,0.002755646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008432879,0.0002806799,0.0001208838,0.000943048,0.0002232121,0.0004094757,0.001228613,0.001900183,0.007840335,0.173851,0.8116129,0.0007464008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09732726,0.003149813,0.008188754,0.001867823,0.001789527,0.0004657726,0.000009341363,0.00003884597,0.8871629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954718,0.00003225377,0.0002993352,0.002694465,0.0004239644,0.000002693704,9.926853e-7,0.00003713572,0.001037313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8981446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251397852","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.15","title":"CJL volume 33 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Geography; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02640632338403906,"gpt":0.1957048125840057,"spread":0.1692984891999666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000265767,0.0001087065,0.0003418959,0.00008887093,0.0001474371,0.0001765646,0.0002779365,0.00004942494,0.04132002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004990395,0.0001207889,0.00008122571,0.00006016903,0.0002144496,0.0003891755,0.00003375792,0.0001446435,0.04625938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008762973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008923614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004151269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006993535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990051,0.000007150533,0.0004558835,0.0002276873,0.00002981665,0.0002744052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989516,0.00001542377,0.0002826308,0.0001207519,0.00004291721,0.0005866804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008253818,0.000004971198,0.06164278,0.00002024698,0.00006250232,0.00007548578,0.002508488,0.00004996228,0.000002886392,0.01220919,0.9232835,0.0001317074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002235638,0.00004269389,0.00785736,0.00001722221,0.000008346108,0.00002053457,0.000172573,0.0001339233,0.000009629161,0.0006846042,0.9906859,0.0001436847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09351503,0.01398982,0.0006058324,0.02013974,0.004785564,0.0001933652,0.001059989,0.00001159343,0.8656991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9199156,0.0001695207,0.0003428187,0.007245776,0.0003659455,0.000001151461,0.000001041774,0.00001490906,0.07194331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8264005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9595563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271109635","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003908","title":"How the New ICTs Matter to the Theory of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Allegiance; Sociology; Legal profession; Law and economics; Legal realism","authors":[{"name":"Keith Culver","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01978484410626212,"gpt":0.2639272698939052,"spread":0.2441424257876431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001108263,0.0000973054,0.0001495362,0.000008147094,0.0009788112,0.0002673299,0.001173906,0.000100235,0.0002741409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001096165,0.00005337921,0.0001660592,0.0002278525,0.0009817062,0.0003138308,0.00001900396,0.0003352767,0.00004328115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001640444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001620734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04335639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4426163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987328,0.0001859572,0.0001995432,0.00009695258,0.0004232349,0.0003615115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986691,0.0001143752,0.0001794564,0.0002320514,0.0002125632,0.0005923808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004726576,0.000004505423,0.0001095336,0.000003203518,0.00002427529,0.00001994196,0.05763131,0.00006833217,0.00004590843,0.9068454,0.03491993,0.0003229554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001182302,0.00003614568,0.0005046528,0.00009369156,0.00002927827,0.00002396949,0.007971582,3.737927e-8,0.0004113046,0.07719335,0.9135341,0.00008365825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04641515,0.006598742,0.0007824665,0.7378098,0.002160393,0.0005119214,0.00003159799,0.00001311079,0.2056768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761338,0.00007397764,0.0002280686,0.01779675,0.0007916602,0.000001496807,1.625907e-7,0.00000830738,0.004965736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9297187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.963014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477902474","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004495","title":"Reality Check: On the Uses of Empiricism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Notice; Law; Principal (computer security); Empiricism; Politics; Majority opinion; Empirical research; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Judicial opinion; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Peter Carver","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1244880207670079,"gpt":0.3353811908439809,"spread":0.2108931700769729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006852915,0.0000673567,0.0001642129,0.00004527274,0.001204439,0.00001869195,0.0003969235,0.00004587944,0.0001290066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000472643,0.00004638701,0.00009845405,0.0002032479,0.002194062,0.0001237646,0.000009648386,0.000171044,0.00001360803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001242467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002475096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2478205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3762953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989003,0.0001312295,0.0002610335,0.00007142169,0.0004087218,0.000227326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988857,0.0002277811,0.0001983454,0.00009666227,0.0003278825,0.0002636267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001002666,0.00001593824,0.01237185,0.000001851329,0.00003080481,0.0001212519,0.006606306,0.00002188445,0.00001931705,0.9689876,0.01154406,0.0002690498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001881736,0.0001738558,0.1386017,0.0002375812,0.00003938875,0.00007266694,0.003120707,9.123643e-7,0.0005196355,0.05601505,0.8008204,0.0002099456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7124881,0.001768308,0.00003232234,0.02514553,0.0006431834,0.0001083871,0.00002288483,0.000005589954,0.2597857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979624,0.0003386995,0.00002200259,0.001225265,0.0003016009,9.615081e-7,1.075174e-7,0.000002522333,0.0001464898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9263695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218074896","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003957","title":"Justice and Responsibility","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Economic Justice; Moral responsibility; Power (physics); Law and economics; Distributive justice; Collective responsibility; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Arthur Ripstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04853700383529322,"gpt":0.2920217010822336,"spread":0.2434846972469404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003674834,0.0001019413,0.0001475648,0.00009640291,0.0002873662,0.00008686507,0.0003483328,0.00005194489,0.00006511209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001006994,0.0000882436,0.0000508806,0.000184927,0.0004428989,0.000390481,0.00001660014,0.0002669893,0.00002579259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001121434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001026025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003654085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02408511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998938,0.00007793943,0.0002846605,0.0001915985,0.0002035081,0.0003043301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987018,0.0001346291,0.0001298629,0.0001930043,0.00008538461,0.0007553843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001381688,0.00007920394,0.00260062,0.0001574212,0.00001170627,0.008046963,0.003214276,0.0004434846,0.1808694,0.7981821,0.001120129,0.005136535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00405314,0.001917208,0.08318162,0.001204349,0.0003818596,0.01364678,0.00049658,0.00005740242,0.3858112,0.2596075,0.2480837,0.001558629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874963,0.0008851229,0.0001917554,0.002960944,0.0006705094,0.00007099731,0.0000155475,0.000008288009,0.007700591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972677,0.00007170664,0.0004814684,0.001907259,0.0001324406,5.114286e-7,5.693481e-8,0.000008109938,0.000130709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5385745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}