{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":113,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":113,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"6d5a6e18291e","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence"}},"results":[{"id":"W4211254543","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004550","title":"Nonconstitutional Amendments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional economics; Liberal democracy; Law; Constitutional amendment; Democratic legitimacy; Sovereignty; Phenomenon; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Richard Albert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02980027920861484,"gpt":0.313601402395157,"spread":0.2838011231865422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01394083,0.0005289362,0.0007572317,0.001499085,0.006118856,0.006524437,0.002244183,0.003236085,0.01674069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02321925,0.0005135598,0.0008829117,0.001632945,0.02059455,0.00685955,0.005463641,0.006243158,0.003470755],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003388463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004219072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002196084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003795258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9766128,0.009113403,0.00180845,0.004710265,0.005788882,0.001966081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980848,0.009142908,0.001134274,0.006246203,0.0023269,0.0003017357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002109223,0.000003028378,0.00002561456,0.00000785479,0.000001560239,0.00001001904,0.0001848714,0.00002109017,0.00005468025,0.9976386,0.0005643948,0.001486319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000264781,0.00002407346,0.0003032039,0.00006326472,0.00001340732,0.0000958173,0.0002278885,0.0003851169,0.0007626396,0.8198817,0.1781993,0.00001723538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01603678,0.001516737,0.03909775,0.005624676,0.001134155,0.0001562143,0.0002936537,0.0001968187,0.9359432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8497191,0.00120404,0.01701773,0.003777382,0.001365349,0.0005894962,0.000341896,0.000160734,0.1258242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07372701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502850426","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002290","title":"Property as Ontology: On Aboriginal and English Understandings of Ownership","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Relation (database); Categorization; Determinative; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Ontology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Bradley Bryan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02213227731938066,"gpt":0.2966466945513993,"spread":0.2745144172320186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003729654,0.0003912411,0.0005135987,0.002187053,0.009308653,0.007188185,0.001490388,0.001698075,0.002619806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003407611,0.000291764,0.0004965341,0.001948724,0.03798212,0.01018383,0.005316606,0.003324859,0.0001878126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01742004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007055573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3993983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3111907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975204,0.00116464,0.0000804341,0.0002112349,0.0004628782,0.0005604433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975981,0.001302156,0.0002287262,0.0001928141,0.0004523047,0.000225907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001614723,0.000009553939,0.0006744189,0.00004826646,0.000003739975,0.0002277496,0.2755049,0.00008251526,0.0001873876,0.7202432,0.000554129,0.002447946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002570411,0.00005569929,0.006568591,0.0006348105,0.00005765336,0.0006470422,0.370986,0.001213788,0.0005685954,0.4490486,0.1701382,0.00005539622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3452185,0.01619542,0.01453262,0.0325742,0.0003245242,0.00006122663,0.0001219064,0.00004291994,0.5909288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856656,0.002021339,0.001229881,0.0007723827,0.00005240769,0.0000270053,0.00002256235,0.00002980077,0.01017893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6006017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7941471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924136381","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004860","title":"Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Cult; Scholarship; Vocabulary; Politics; Constitutional law; Law; German; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Grégoire Webber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01980394409261855,"gpt":0.2965100207359664,"spread":0.2767060766433479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02518945,0.0005433547,0.0008602517,0.002978126,0.0122723,0.01894559,0.002343316,0.005855107,0.00468152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03547918,0.0005202474,0.0005246804,0.002836275,0.1118339,0.02324098,0.01042211,0.01040194,0.0005749075],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01232084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008412114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006896748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005619847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.974101,0.01550481,0.0007024812,0.002088704,0.006228849,0.001374066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794235,0.01609546,0.001037849,0.001602927,0.001160595,0.0006797903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001320402,0.000002342911,0.0000204952,0.000005742303,7.081611e-7,0.000006281853,0.001235019,0.00002822757,0.000009719833,0.9967787,0.0005233054,0.001388185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006190319,0.000002969785,0.00006048048,0.00004889958,0.000001312742,0.00001271559,0.0009473669,0.0001356786,0.00003870688,0.9783952,0.02034685,0.000003639823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0439262,0.01864429,0.05031122,0.2797483,0.002022909,0.00004374782,0.00005894082,0.00009073314,0.6051537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956338,0.005087925,0.007176386,0.01170719,0.001993324,0.00009356394,0.00003376252,0.0001039431,0.0174659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1332162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123691632","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000370","title":"Constitutional Theory and The<i>Quebec Secession Reference</i>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Law; Constitution; Vesting; Politics; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Sujit Choudhry","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robert Howse","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01400066725398214,"gpt":0.2774123435652219,"spread":0.2634116763112397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004636284,0.000366675,0.0004068641,0.001824814,0.02478418,0.01196114,0.002701721,0.005303967,0.00763884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008271719,0.0003764139,0.0005011284,0.002306514,0.02625784,0.002063984,0.001910819,0.005434026,0.0003434607],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1559383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949522,0.001449677,0.0001340518,0.0005770891,0.001517689,0.00136928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955836,0.001652744,0.0001617393,0.0001968199,0.001983917,0.0004211555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000668767,0.000003333307,0.000432981,0.00003385323,0.000004652958,0.0001589,0.00372833,0.0002817216,0.0001164328,0.9704635,0.02041049,0.004359071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005152707,0.00002180583,0.008703167,0.000765385,0.00006618497,0.0002085201,0.01664381,0.002256248,0.0007708821,0.1660021,0.8043294,0.0001809377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05225118,0.02283295,0.006341314,0.233715,0.002080666,0.0001012103,0.0007551605,0.0001476403,0.6817749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784683,0.004155191,0.002822781,0.01865536,0.0003397525,0.00005983403,0.0001230479,0.00006544827,0.09531035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9591911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205734915","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006226","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Arbitrariness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Rule of law; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Timothy Endicott","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0164922905117531,"gpt":0.2696170006024874,"spread":0.2531247100907343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00455829,0.0005484189,0.0005559683,0.001372518,0.004433727,0.006417267,0.0008626246,0.004770728,0.01481732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00940499,0.0005055467,0.0006813672,0.001312376,0.01598961,0.009893597,0.001743836,0.009887601,0.002788713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008779362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003575114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01234725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01020567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972132,0.001190403,0.00009003949,0.0003897651,0.0008409413,0.0002757538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995014,0.003972742,0.0001449773,0.0003006295,0.0003991066,0.0001685154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005510644,0.000004975633,0.00002501914,0.00002250274,0.000002334001,0.00002435399,0.0002014857,0.00009292368,0.00002568463,0.9584892,0.03653057,0.004575389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008643965,0.000006988883,0.0001071807,0.0001939846,0.000003501495,0.00003758938,0.0001295865,0.0003245378,0.00006988213,0.689715,0.3093927,0.00001044421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002680622,0.2167632,0.01051478,0.2809134,0.01473058,0.00001927663,0.00008091328,0.00006210069,0.4742352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4401484,0.1523624,0.007699602,0.04349956,0.04827224,0.0001646997,0.0001038275,0.000305114,0.3074441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01481732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06369901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121667437","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002381","title":"Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract: Toward a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Duty; Law; Doctrine; Legislation; Freedom of contract; Service (business); Race (biology); Public law; Political science; Private law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Amnon Reichman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02535695490025911,"gpt":0.3312106010967158,"spread":0.3058536461964567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02167412,0.000399164,0.0008005477,0.002023539,0.01467397,0.01522103,0.00249056,0.01327173,0.003201823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03120521,0.0005962808,0.0008357188,0.001264128,0.1195717,0.01066184,0.0113881,0.01079335,0.0006295567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01401846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04402539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1155673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09554101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9765622,0.007687547,0.0008866524,0.00253973,0.008294177,0.0040297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828394,0.007712584,0.001513074,0.002484405,0.002697853,0.002752804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002285153,0.000005780872,0.0001502511,0.000002947589,7.047885e-7,0.0000183797,0.002418051,0.00004165293,0.00002973544,0.9959522,0.0003645683,0.001013369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002090603,0.00001486627,0.0005215404,0.00006719329,0.00000415853,0.00008528354,0.002662926,0.0003564587,0.00009425462,0.9641238,0.03202426,0.00002437556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08796355,0.001894318,0.0672906,0.192908,0.0007089978,0.0001907972,0.00006402962,0.00005369932,0.648926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633762,0.000427853,0.007168731,0.009927983,0.0002225355,0.0001007222,0.00002134946,0.00002284076,0.01873179],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8844327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2297893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125232704","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004987","title":"Responsibility in Negligence: Why the Duty of Care is <i>not</i> a Duty “To Try”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Res ipsa loquitur; Duty of care; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Moral responsibility; Business; Reasonable person; Tort; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Ori J. Herstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0216370570456765,"gpt":0.2793598450793113,"spread":0.2577227880336349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007279537,0.0004115167,0.0005132716,0.001002685,0.004379779,0.006260996,0.001584306,0.008588672,0.004363494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01366215,0.0003560915,0.0006371511,0.0004852564,0.05600563,0.01013027,0.003523425,0.005916092,0.001110699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005768664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006256598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01431095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01020304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938438,0.002414105,0.0002934253,0.0008445266,0.001757965,0.0008462349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942157,0.002913202,0.00056574,0.0006453363,0.001125087,0.0005350169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006327546,0.00000701164,0.0002586052,0.00002829375,0.000003203404,0.00009346839,0.003139841,0.00008585735,0.00008564194,0.9873493,0.006038737,0.002903549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009031195,0.000008997617,0.0005945576,0.00007808841,0.000003867233,0.0002330102,0.001458502,0.0002346911,0.0001161162,0.9590606,0.03818541,0.00001703255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03668509,0.01277795,0.06617247,0.4735399,0.003224156,0.00008559746,0.0001049653,0.0001519437,0.4072579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367943,0.00276734,0.007414175,0.03082601,0.001105719,0.00007885919,0.00004392244,0.00008494093,0.02088487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01431095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04185474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1697724127","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000412","title":"The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Nationalism; Normative; Autonomy; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Politics; Self-determination; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02527542351283672,"gpt":0.3257953934730234,"spread":0.3005199699601867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004427613,0.0001868638,0.000331405,0.0007021219,0.002828274,0.00477406,0.0006512931,0.00282675,0.002786076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004731734,0.0001821353,0.0003013119,0.0006260029,0.02408012,0.004505719,0.002353702,0.002839985,0.0004557427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002925711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003570508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002585542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002608352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958577,0.002341081,0.0001336087,0.0003062271,0.0009586933,0.0004026927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997763,0.001028097,0.000225434,0.0003042533,0.000432326,0.0002468347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001348051,0.000001844926,0.00005991814,0.000002667155,3.743771e-7,0.000007828407,0.0002885786,0.00003748341,0.00001211458,0.9983869,0.0003943788,0.0008065094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006065637,0.000005067034,0.0002216648,0.00003736277,0.000001175317,0.00003536505,0.0004387449,0.0003402855,0.00005204094,0.970541,0.02831749,0.000003738541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03968102,0.003499518,0.03356278,0.05303984,0.0004786891,0.00003520983,0.00005769168,0.00003562633,0.8696096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95986,0.001273657,0.007328802,0.003620749,0.0004949167,0.0001475794,0.00004580718,0.00002933303,0.02719923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00477406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02341574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271604228","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003994","title":"Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Idiot; Law; Sociology; Tree of life (biology); Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Art; Literature","authors":[{"name":"W. J. Waluchow","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03350669052369158,"gpt":0.3190390909449404,"spread":0.2855324004212488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007573165,0.0004278263,0.0005358005,0.0026639,0.007097087,0.01078593,0.001640931,0.005595748,0.004430201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01081988,0.0003996222,0.0006367982,0.002005758,0.04637128,0.01594675,0.004845278,0.007823066,0.0008295781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004260302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006131126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006689242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918142,0.00429665,0.0002173495,0.0009689528,0.001964081,0.000738728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941373,0.003690842,0.0005059972,0.0008889704,0.0005468933,0.000229946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.891926e-7,8.630837e-7,0.00001496878,0.000001855339,3.001456e-7,0.000004098893,0.0006340328,0.00003694281,0.00000863822,0.9984649,0.0003323953,0.0005004384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009490676,0.00000709687,0.00008924169,0.00003729721,0.000003354668,0.0000317542,0.001021795,0.0005179417,0.0001022953,0.9165305,0.08164103,0.000008103759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.03862114,0.004634645,0.1803724,0.05984524,0.001154386,0.0001393218,0.0001722523,0.0002615349,0.714799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92217,0.002307316,0.03187837,0.007101763,0.001045844,0.0003452958,0.0001137532,0.0002576002,0.03478004],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04005122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586340792","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006330","title":"‘Obligations’, Decolonization and Indigenous Rights to Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Obligation; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Gordon Christie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01290009913857267,"gpt":0.2809436500038997,"spread":0.2680435508653271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002859033,0.0002807466,0.000364938,0.0008981682,0.01300751,0.007734583,0.00152727,0.001517074,0.003407796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004161218,0.0001997743,0.000237328,0.001120315,0.06949294,0.003564046,0.00507775,0.00260688,0.0001869422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06568148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06913258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9428063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9575734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961005,0.0007453538,0.00006582001,0.0003414261,0.0008905935,0.001856293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973291,0.0006960157,0.0002802012,0.0002579041,0.0007989265,0.0006378496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005926073,0.000006557264,0.001510647,0.00002671184,0.000003368319,0.0001262262,0.04172574,0.0003630827,0.0001570569,0.9491835,0.001176855,0.005714308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002544993,0.00003061019,0.02821147,0.0005263719,0.00003276695,0.0002954309,0.1070905,0.001999508,0.0007035576,0.5082704,0.3526987,0.0001152855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2793067,0.004456699,0.008319615,0.02347128,0.000108056,0.00006886394,0.00007851207,0.00008429417,0.684106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846971,0.0005242057,0.0005693361,0.0005034984,0.00001475253,0.00001355561,0.00001203067,0.00001457108,0.01365083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9428063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4765547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279373688","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006305","title":"In Defence of Reconciliation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Colonialism; Neocolonialism; Political economy; Doctrine; State (computer science); Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Victoria Freeman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01660642093499716,"gpt":0.2968984406756334,"spread":0.2802920197406363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01584046,0.0008378844,0.0009105631,0.001971714,0.0107204,0.01516982,0.003701586,0.01170939,0.00828376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02031701,0.0004309398,0.001156526,0.001751636,0.06157388,0.01127857,0.01683966,0.01799001,0.002238658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01112068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01635546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01295507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01421332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9766209,0.01150563,0.0008833953,0.002817649,0.005381651,0.002790809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905255,0.003327047,0.0009590375,0.002539909,0.002002498,0.0006459624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005250854,0.00000400986,0.00005757342,0.00003211443,0.000006212032,0.00004555723,0.005565478,0.00005948371,0.00005439637,0.9824039,0.007536629,0.004229488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001459757,0.00002567824,0.0002003056,0.0002291186,0.00001241034,0.0002313327,0.005294048,0.0002949484,0.0003925573,0.39401,0.5992711,0.00002399127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008361232,0.009015537,0.02316793,0.1466607,0.00392731,0.0001007879,0.00005422089,0.000246614,0.8084655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6720489,0.0034697,0.01072549,0.06146169,0.002850825,0.0003453229,0.0001214191,0.000339047,0.2486376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08377331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493931398","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004331","title":"Gender, Multiculturalism and Dialogue: The Case of Jewish Divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Judaism; Negotiation; Law; Sociology; Political science; Power (physics); Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Ethnic group; Gender studies; Public law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05870838004157729,"gpt":0.305949515897247,"spread":0.2472411358556697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009391898,0.0004411066,0.0006686963,0.001193481,0.06746408,0.007885084,0.002032461,0.009181874,0.002764413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01042021,0.0004573617,0.0006666473,0.00127584,0.03927179,0.004595735,0.009190728,0.009146651,0.0001939175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03078319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02056362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4329762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5490668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904177,0.005524848,0.0001137465,0.000369148,0.0008898537,0.002684705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954391,0.002595345,0.0002908717,0.0001423394,0.000503429,0.001028954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000303859,0.00003464481,0.00186669,0.00002525524,0.000009553645,0.005756132,0.7738451,0.00006630001,0.0002097901,0.2109649,0.002453025,0.004738179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004891214,0.00004054542,0.002570352,0.0001544632,0.00003135032,0.002020679,0.8694408,0.0003890382,0.0003522545,0.02919009,0.09570713,0.00005439886],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7399123,0.005127926,0.002034328,0.09810627,0.0006692354,0.00006272802,0.00002094639,0.00002725185,0.1540391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882252,0.0005833631,0.0003075057,0.004767755,0.00007698691,0.00001522736,0.000003934309,0.00000785748,0.006012042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5670238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186849605","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2021.13","title":"Why Is Aboriginal Title Property if It Looks Like Sovereignty?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Alienation; Jurisdiction; Property (philosophy); Subject (documents); Assertion; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Sanderson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Amitpal C. Singh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01904212969223386,"gpt":0.2903120987473367,"spread":0.2712699690551029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003501981,0.0001795841,0.000520363,0.0007277993,0.009049631,0.008931448,0.001569255,0.004051153,0.00587849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009684136,0.0002917514,0.0005078258,0.001174138,0.03741607,0.01023046,0.002534613,0.005025134,0.000837167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009213644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009406416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2367458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2454837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964339,0.0008801924,0.0001169747,0.0006925188,0.00106232,0.0008141156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958946,0.001779719,0.0003745659,0.0006709909,0.0009665071,0.0003137131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006958449,0.000003720812,0.001337255,0.00004026921,0.000007214847,0.0002427296,0.01605922,0.00004304521,0.0001255298,0.9721227,0.005472081,0.004539239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001750615,0.00003541448,0.01150403,0.0006667534,0.00004895264,0.001072978,0.02955248,0.0004020302,0.000506118,0.5779424,0.3781841,0.00006726945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1010828,0.01377283,0.01447291,0.1982758,0.001255535,0.00004439495,0.0003275441,0.00009747306,0.6706706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563982,0.003783519,0.001652331,0.01237349,0.0006441656,0.00003103555,0.0001174327,0.00007166254,0.02492805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7632542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4707355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308589887","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.26","title":"Subsidiarity and the Allocation of Governmental Powers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Southampton; McGill University","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Allocative efficiency; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; European union","authors":[{"name":"Michael Da Silva","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02608091062197771,"gpt":0.2921953430107506,"spread":0.2661144323887729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01023787,0.0002998721,0.0006521776,0.001877451,0.004766669,0.005717714,0.001212089,0.002862013,0.006310195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01290672,0.0003606105,0.0005838108,0.001126595,0.03526118,0.006006194,0.007259818,0.004091878,0.000656834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008452106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005919248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004622367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004110686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910895,0.004621685,0.0003249219,0.001433681,0.001315418,0.001214872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914625,0.00374506,0.001073361,0.001620353,0.001489073,0.0006095705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002336387,0.000002064463,0.0001113012,0.000003309503,0.000001332611,0.000008612118,0.0002295902,0.0000986864,0.00002372507,0.998798,0.0002069909,0.0005140944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001786147,0.00001098807,0.0005549595,0.00004585248,0.000007002614,0.00004013216,0.0004251489,0.0008678614,0.0001291037,0.9851694,0.01272472,0.000006894923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1360721,0.001835426,0.07957531,0.02405032,0.0002410152,0.0001288953,0.00007008392,0.00006692819,0.75796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987659,0.0001977348,0.00324632,0.0007050988,0.00007924173,0.00006099454,0.00001476121,0.0000184237,0.008018337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01023787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0613246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315465013","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.25","title":"Discretion in the Automated Administrative State","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Administrative discretion; Agency (philosophy); State (computer science); Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial discretion; State agency; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Administration (probate law); Judicial review; Algorithm","authors":[{"name":"Sancho McCann","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0780024987535169,"gpt":0.4147552629283831,"spread":0.3367527641748662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01691001,0.0002262852,0.0005056277,0.002088225,0.006679005,0.01422951,0.001650602,0.003127474,0.005458032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03097129,0.000485212,0.0006133819,0.001495692,0.03698283,0.009162798,0.006743473,0.004251339,0.000631718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009450912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01482463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01004607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9811012,0.008958945,0.000862432,0.002179253,0.004421001,0.002477308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630907,0.01959228,0.003516483,0.007273391,0.004832631,0.001694394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000579106,0.00000572677,0.0002205626,0.000004860479,0.000001907487,0.00001565484,0.0007581643,0.0007416249,0.00003867346,0.9961751,0.0004357391,0.001596255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000189922,0.0000120104,0.0005393259,0.00005775111,0.000007233218,0.00001786901,0.0007715481,0.003472443,0.0002428036,0.9752405,0.01959801,0.00002158571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.168673,0.00122093,0.1564828,0.04266388,0.0003235178,0.0001494373,0.0002007753,0.0003224118,0.6299633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898281,0.0001089354,0.00470201,0.0006398695,0.00009793789,0.00005697411,0.0000207283,0.00003407846,0.004511345],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01691001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08942968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583254963","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005087","title":"In Defence of Two-Step Balancing and Proportionality in Rights Adjudication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Prima facie; Law and economics; Criticism; Defeasible estate; Political science; Presumption of innocence; Human rights; Argumentation theory; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Charles-Maxime Panaccio","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05868485154411934,"gpt":0.3331830744211103,"spread":0.2744982228769909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06962562,0.00127018,0.001630733,0.002699115,0.006534472,0.01077003,0.00452757,0.0124135,0.005745952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0845105,0.00127319,0.00199085,0.003191553,0.0433509,0.01883334,0.01152518,0.01889753,0.00201558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00784857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008147785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003580391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004100284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.918431,0.05062321,0.003391635,0.007537986,0.01800542,0.002010719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9484906,0.03323359,0.003978835,0.008646784,0.004848639,0.0008017043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009068839,0.000002691608,0.00003928036,0.00002894182,0.000006538266,0.00001938865,0.0005525479,0.000198133,0.00006242425,0.9944261,0.0007146373,0.00394016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001908818,0.00001353588,0.00005037615,0.00006844683,0.000008189033,0.00005842805,0.0001038099,0.001651588,0.0002355255,0.9805027,0.01727108,0.00001718116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009482069,0.00232853,0.7299438,0.05921076,0.001427273,0.0003547107,0.0000976821,0.0002074878,0.1969476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6179184,0.001495288,0.311206,0.02166436,0.00210088,0.001621965,0.000101199,0.0003019371,0.04358992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06962562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3682199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256615650","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006615","title":"Existence and Justification Conditions of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Morality; Legal positivism; Law; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal realism; Philosophy; Legal profession; Mathematics; History","authors":[{"name":"Michael Giudice","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04854953337624345,"gpt":0.2380898457190175,"spread":0.189540312342774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01166664,0.0004318517,0.001014323,0.003468104,0.005853728,0.009696056,0.001494977,0.006576837,0.01183691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02274012,0.0007694351,0.001286559,0.001193762,0.03250236,0.01359324,0.006039462,0.008131048,0.001774722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005692178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00796667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00265514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002244144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859569,0.003943065,0.001194773,0.003457016,0.003730541,0.001717727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812351,0.01033759,0.001497377,0.002321493,0.003646342,0.000962057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001809574,0.000003994041,0.00007338383,0.00001138524,0.000001569528,0.000009138023,0.0001480226,0.0000404398,0.00003966572,0.9985086,0.0003334792,0.0008284133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002002162,0.000008650776,0.0002824494,0.00006713107,0.000006593684,0.00005244382,0.0002402736,0.0004617172,0.0002464061,0.9789532,0.01964908,0.00001204006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03547703,0.003853027,0.1103479,0.02941115,0.0008364585,0.0002418561,0.0004787773,0.000224818,0.819129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9192842,0.001939061,0.04745775,0.002866974,0.001034719,0.0007040639,0.0004949982,0.0001251365,0.02609311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01183691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06169981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815499224","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004720","title":"Beguiled By Metaphors: The “Living Tree” and Originalist Constitutional Interpretation in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitutional law; Original intent; Political science; Supreme court; Original meaning; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Bradley W. Miller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01343163500397304,"gpt":0.275409109206593,"spread":0.26197747420262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003050766,0.0003806293,0.0004084876,0.002238291,0.02786827,0.01414487,0.002539301,0.003316123,0.004788243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006322358,0.0002701817,0.0004683665,0.004644585,0.0510034,0.004762426,0.004493447,0.006805553,0.0002984478],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.178109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1577003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9865543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947214,0.001286754,0.00008761573,0.0004812316,0.001889203,0.001533743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966471,0.001200846,0.000195325,0.0001775252,0.001280337,0.0004989152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007169135,0.000005026244,0.0003681574,0.00001848928,0.000002556622,0.0001294919,0.0172324,0.0001404386,0.00005287846,0.9687884,0.009855663,0.003399233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003882494,0.00001715139,0.004825786,0.0003678145,0.00004665875,0.0002769846,0.07654774,0.002380491,0.0003709914,0.4336612,0.4813106,0.000155805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09497096,0.01514836,0.008147671,0.1573835,0.001164424,0.00007014206,0.0003772964,0.0001292975,0.7226083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504499,0.004549379,0.002466393,0.01013849,0.0001625638,0.0000307001,0.00009515934,0.00008499998,0.03202242],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.178109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238538938","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003623","title":"Gender Performance, Sexual Subjects and International Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; International law; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Brenda Cossman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06056175362656408,"gpt":0.2891183128103834,"spread":0.2285565591838193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00238921,0.0003963624,0.0002963566,0.001355113,0.006304645,0.008739838,0.0004891092,0.002125788,0.004980835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004080515,0.000118476,0.000189556,0.001983159,0.03909907,0.003796484,0.003110951,0.002104683,0.0002767697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003001793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002771072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01348563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01922843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982146,0.001035025,0.00003501497,0.0001230538,0.0002701185,0.0003222912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988225,0.0007679837,0.0001416971,0.00005443901,0.00008592904,0.0001273876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008346014,0.00000905858,0.001188249,0.00001725712,0.000001598116,0.00007008555,0.02564154,0.0000333996,0.00006790437,0.9639993,0.002271405,0.006691828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001448605,0.00008512745,0.008108372,0.0004585555,0.00001107724,0.0003009805,0.115821,0.0001534556,0.0003245804,0.4953361,0.3793603,0.00002589386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09881865,0.02423045,0.001842752,0.03352771,0.0009286531,0.00001717603,0.00004083999,0.00001648918,0.8405772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659994,0.00772925,0.0002463648,0.002588808,0.0005494649,0.00002075936,0.0000155665,0.0000196246,0.02283083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01348563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02681428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208799210","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004446","title":"Neither Here nor There: The (Non-) Impact of International Law on Judicial Reasoning in Canada and South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Municipal law; Comparative law; International law; Political science; Public law; Tying; Sociology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Graham Hudson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01650639266797427,"gpt":0.2685920604617675,"spread":0.2520856677937932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002047647,0.0003328263,0.0004164219,0.002633942,0.0224574,0.008080725,0.001213296,0.002001644,0.004325998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01180298,0.0002967986,0.0004257184,0.003835215,0.01152283,0.00193295,0.002859163,0.004426245,0.0001413872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09501489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1162576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951482,0.0005998564,0.0001035204,0.0003701867,0.001365392,0.002412658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936248,0.002367465,0.000579241,0.0001697103,0.002103757,0.001154953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001799051,0.00006950843,0.04685389,0.0008238339,0.0001382758,0.004617217,0.3062035,0.0009329472,0.00191855,0.5339959,0.02768584,0.07658057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007407054,0.00006210145,0.2070826,0.0018783,0.0002442323,0.00126355,0.3542981,0.0009550215,0.001947275,0.02320696,0.4087406,0.0002472225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6210771,0.02188053,0.0007757186,0.06751151,0.0005164425,0.0001168159,0.0002608802,0.00002410724,0.287837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842992,0.003988385,0.0003946635,0.002694694,0.0000407154,0.00001782266,0.00003078752,0.00001599989,0.008517776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09501489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6893845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908817484","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006123","title":"Reconstructing Fuller’s Argument Against Legal Positivism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Argument (complex analysis); Positivism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Legal formalism; Sociology; Legal realism; Law and economics; Political science; Legal profession; Black letter law; Comparative law; Private law","authors":[{"name":"Dan Priel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02136673522458685,"gpt":0.2299388762014419,"spread":0.2085721409768551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007952897,0.0005351729,0.0008546665,0.003423153,0.006421251,0.008636332,0.001468534,0.007262389,0.004965719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01530602,0.0005299445,0.0006744125,0.002111465,0.03680233,0.01216117,0.004772569,0.008047434,0.0005068181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01089615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004604554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01372669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01136435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922137,0.003482878,0.0002148614,0.0007408963,0.002543234,0.0008043228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887291,0.008410591,0.0005855961,0.0004988323,0.001296258,0.0004796839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002948373,0.000004715442,0.00002572219,0.00001318587,0.000001232588,0.00002122344,0.0006320517,0.00006831537,0.00001307373,0.9944096,0.003600194,0.001207671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001409114,0.00001007215,0.0001146034,0.00009339108,0.000004331182,0.00005347034,0.0007370379,0.0003382576,0.00006271356,0.9396581,0.0589007,0.00001325904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0404629,0.01456051,0.04229448,0.4485714,0.002142544,0.00006572887,0.0001870644,0.0001263611,0.451589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.908185,0.008844917,0.01028788,0.04382235,0.003051837,0.0001619666,0.00007521782,0.0001300015,0.02544077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01372669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07905757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121889772","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2016.1","title":"On the Spontaneous Emergence of Private Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Section (typography); Scope (computer science); Transaction cost; Law and economics; Process (computing); Private law; Database transaction; Political science; Law; Economics; Public law; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Legislature","authors":[{"name":"Daniele Bertolini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02629637907060578,"gpt":0.2077836404431294,"spread":0.1814872613725237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01337859,0.0002496637,0.0004570148,0.001372944,0.003187842,0.00451103,0.001201616,0.002138127,0.003734829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0310587,0.0003037413,0.0006005911,0.0007559014,0.02075903,0.007522811,0.003663565,0.003372145,0.0004049095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003079584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003692434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002056525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001729695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913407,0.004486707,0.0002552884,0.001141138,0.001920812,0.0008553097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668259,0.02160247,0.002475864,0.005501893,0.00281846,0.0007754063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003457174,0.000009551226,0.0003441407,0.000008555648,0.000002045286,0.00004830524,0.000678614,0.000674095,0.0001228214,0.9954944,0.000219026,0.002395136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001255625,0.0000144719,0.0005131981,0.00002740738,0.000002738991,0.00007596038,0.0004855175,0.005175824,0.0002629376,0.9864189,0.007002031,0.000008435946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2906196,0.001147323,0.3788296,0.02486291,0.0001389173,0.0003514441,0.0002005683,0.000257097,0.3035925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839298,0.0002212092,0.01244278,0.0003613723,0.00006129387,0.00009866808,0.00003144954,0.00002635497,0.002827076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01337859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07075357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522403117","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006317","title":"Mandates of the State: Canadian Sovereignty, Democracy, and Indigenous Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Autonomy; Democracy; Deliberation; Inclusion (mineral); Negotiation; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Ethos; Politics; Inclusion–exclusion principle; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Social science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Toby Rollo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008731184738897587,"gpt":0.2576841170448328,"spread":0.2489529323059353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003435494,0.0002239286,0.0004282774,0.001464049,0.03557036,0.009666468,0.002303889,0.003591727,0.005311157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00632098,0.0002838471,0.0003022141,0.002525629,0.02555111,0.002970033,0.00563137,0.005774744,0.000136538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1225296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.130913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962297,0.000580693,0.0001016341,0.0003494367,0.001159938,0.00157853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964381,0.001541458,0.0002413093,0.0001799755,0.0009287065,0.0006705142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001867016,0.00001930165,0.002854108,0.00005108449,0.000006937198,0.0003197851,0.08376549,0.0001687311,0.0001660063,0.896584,0.00668018,0.009365763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006215336,0.0000502437,0.05712667,0.0007266572,0.0001028446,0.0004402513,0.2070667,0.002264878,0.0007572004,0.257407,0.4736937,0.0003018048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.280996,0.005761901,0.0008196988,0.05903034,0.0002250145,0.00005478892,0.0001693039,0.0000252208,0.6529177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814597,0.0009524537,0.0003112867,0.001642838,0.00002311548,0.00001211606,0.00002281012,0.000009682224,0.01556588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1225296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8890184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205513482","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005932","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Judging The Judges: “May They Boldly Go Where Ivan Rand Went Before”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Globalization; Constitutional law; Constitution; Common law; Rule of law; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ian Binnie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01384921906643603,"gpt":0.2602579865963203,"spread":0.2464087675298843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00745998,0.000944395,0.0007284637,0.001353452,0.01071139,0.01229576,0.001581443,0.01029498,0.01744893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02289272,0.0008998399,0.0005174458,0.0009948247,0.01233251,0.01283134,0.002116656,0.02173875,0.008271394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01234276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01184119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06518054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1263434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941996,0.002505369,0.0001940565,0.0008118727,0.001649996,0.0006391546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877714,0.006979848,0.0003679568,0.0003472077,0.00244165,0.002091923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000135415,0.000009728756,0.00008022803,0.0000323585,0.0000029354,0.00002522227,0.0004004544,0.00002437808,0.00003785857,0.03369815,0.9545032,0.01117192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001093957,0.000007834497,0.0003920932,0.0005311397,0.000004172028,0.00004320372,0.001101219,0.00008062785,0.0000827992,0.02831092,0.9694066,0.00002852538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002988507,0.09137189,0.000550021,0.8079563,0.04774861,0.00001039638,0.00003445212,0.00004211452,0.05198738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0681057,0.08837781,0.00260771,0.4011329,0.09189782,0.0001197393,0.0001336131,0.0004024415,0.3472223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9348195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1296023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1468194871","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005178","title":"Legal Perspectives on Corporate Responsibility: Contractarian or Communitarian Thought?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Corporation; Duty; Corporate social responsibility; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social responsibility; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeff Bone","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07770124567077645,"gpt":0.246520838045686,"spread":0.1688195923749096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100491,0.0003786696,0.0005107404,0.002078272,0.004373448,0.008396986,0.001929721,0.00480029,0.00248476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008019163,0.0002584033,0.0005255528,0.002118172,0.05579679,0.009612316,0.003503222,0.006961458,0.0003342346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009844007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009333923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01780583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01163462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903196,0.004536439,0.0003267012,0.0006056484,0.003041802,0.001169864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919958,0.004808735,0.0008635972,0.0006012889,0.001012944,0.0007176377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[6.543626e-7,0.000003607809,0.00002991779,0.000008533054,5.807569e-7,0.000008602744,0.0009284755,0.000037849,0.00000824568,0.9971364,0.0005962895,0.001240965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005982817,0.000008356629,0.000252304,0.0001535726,0.000002360619,0.00005297746,0.001830422,0.0003113946,0.00004630313,0.9408009,0.05652642,0.000008932599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02785358,0.03899991,0.07396173,0.357667,0.001811844,0.00004798532,0.00005443005,0.00007562286,0.4995279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388114,0.01668569,0.005881422,0.01988325,0.002611829,0.0000800312,0.00003823043,0.00005203932,0.01595612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01780583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07142359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202214160","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005476","title":"Private Property and Tax Policy in a Libertarian World: A Critical Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tax policy; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Public economics","authors":[{"name":"David G. Duff","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07894097353695297,"gpt":0.3136137131778003,"spread":0.2346727396408474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002347657,0.0005414196,0.00117968,0.006443824,0.001059145,0.002857584,0.000873198,0.002665051,0.00259441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006035384,0.0005678924,0.0004799574,0.009931026,0.003089432,0.004584225,0.0008799923,0.002482911,0.000871938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005097034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007610233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01741655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01954354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990562,0.000361758,0.0000700882,0.0001299074,0.0003252379,0.00005693464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960502,0.002682002,0.0002093566,0.00007224978,0.0009246516,0.00006166769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006691507,0.00009576443,0.001004459,0.01753642,0.0001612076,0.0003546225,0.001138827,0.001754416,0.0002588757,0.2370115,0.1497542,0.5908627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001062894,0.00002721038,0.001575276,0.01775218,0.00007848859,0.0002134225,0.0006970834,0.0002299749,0.0001470267,0.02711863,0.9521282,0.00002180307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001386735,0.9951408,0.00009849097,0.002406226,0.0001493994,0.000003299756,0.000007738918,0.000001622108,0.002053784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003083901,0.995639,0.0001214679,0.0005813888,0.0002397222,0.000006384481,0.00001295724,0.000001766837,0.0003134173],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01741655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0369817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399160098","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.7","title":"Democracy and the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Skepticism; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael Pal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02435384871030163,"gpt":0.300638898873226,"spread":0.2762850501629244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004154961,0.000159462,0.0002959467,0.001105254,0.006671026,0.005296232,0.0007420018,0.002139236,0.006513619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01223214,0.0001693739,0.0002638066,0.001219246,0.02454995,0.00241997,0.002400626,0.004446781,0.0003180669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01310484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01999959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2475828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2610343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946342,0.001413832,0.0001319421,0.0005179177,0.001851848,0.001450308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993842,0.002808912,0.0006287207,0.0005914779,0.001749502,0.0003793836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001925896,0.000001781166,0.0002020348,0.000004124388,6.1626e-7,0.00001891248,0.0003777727,0.00006183158,0.00002207442,0.9963665,0.001315269,0.001627256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001613149,0.00001874644,0.003938426,0.0001887856,0.00001361088,0.00008740968,0.001594367,0.0006569351,0.000304392,0.7828752,0.210278,0.00002803659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.05030139,0.003342002,0.008539055,0.03579649,0.0004184171,0.000055804,0.0001085054,0.00003776395,0.9014006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783756,0.0006856701,0.000686485,0.003230359,0.0001259852,0.00002045575,0.00003585524,0.00001525565,0.01682447],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7524172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4922835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935216946","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006081","title":"Democracy and the Freedom of Speech: Rethinking the Conflict between Liberty and Equality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Campaign finance; Law; Jurisdiction; Negative liberty; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Yasmin Dawood","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04206118180743813,"gpt":0.2864001683894715,"spread":0.2443389865820333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01690577,0.000478983,0.0007979692,0.001549856,0.008791183,0.01282548,0.001662979,0.005604509,0.003604187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01959094,0.0004003933,0.000720078,0.0008674077,0.06865049,0.01525023,0.01297664,0.01197808,0.0005639188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007262761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006211403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004780714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005822468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985375,0.009539302,0.000388641,0.001378634,0.001901584,0.001416773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821072,0.014444,0.0008286003,0.001389698,0.0006561097,0.0005744398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004493119,0.000003085635,0.00005192882,0.000006508306,0.000001292259,0.00001366618,0.002115921,0.00009383977,0.00002248352,0.995061,0.0004907715,0.002135109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001443981,0.000009680341,0.000155947,0.00009627005,0.000005415663,0.00002850578,0.001096364,0.0002919401,0.0001628852,0.9593464,0.03877952,0.00001264369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06307115,0.01504999,0.06358075,0.2849182,0.001794006,0.00004908065,0.00006318329,0.0001122005,0.5713614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748352,0.001883805,0.003676637,0.008471441,0.0009345569,0.00007527713,0.00001840423,0.0000869605,0.01001769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01690577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08940732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272219748","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002460","title":"Unconstitutionality, Invalidity, and Charter Challenges","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Morality; Positivism; Legal positivism; Law; Duty; Political science; Politics; Constitutionality; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitution; Legal realism; Legal profession","authors":[{"name":"Michael Giudice","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1190269410000815,"gpt":0.3161608745964075,"spread":0.197133933596326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02576202,0.0004077095,0.001247794,0.002224678,0.01813108,0.01446449,0.003519433,0.008394937,0.002213045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04739202,0.0005663554,0.0009696184,0.001691654,0.07792147,0.01026428,0.01059051,0.01405416,0.0002466835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02443951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04175575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1097652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1010444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9633275,0.01213416,0.001432645,0.004533481,0.01328475,0.005287415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671887,0.01632229,0.002459572,0.004209334,0.008015392,0.001804786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004086112,0.000006623907,0.0003199283,0.000007615524,0.000002851236,0.00006115514,0.003014975,0.00009529092,0.00002672473,0.9935895,0.001028213,0.001842979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001553881,0.000008491016,0.0005878505,0.00006952968,0.00001442145,0.00009653774,0.002379399,0.0005851653,0.0002068497,0.9652929,0.03071904,0.00002417408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1526362,0.004140674,0.03987685,0.1886705,0.0008940507,0.000125015,0.0001244512,0.0001270966,0.6134051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976008,0.0006222189,0.003865524,0.008967279,0.0002543106,0.0000832947,0.00003159075,0.00004245335,0.01012523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8902348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2182527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284029674","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004835","title":"Red Tape and Gridlock","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Veto; Object (grammar); Law and economics; Position (finance); Gridlock; Property (philosophy); Power (physics); State (computer science); Business; Original position; Block (permutation group theory); Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Politics; Finance; Computer science; Economic Justice; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Larissa Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01284720054436498,"gpt":0.2762681103212118,"spread":0.2634209097768468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00199082,0.0003558372,0.0003897963,0.001038487,0.007715945,0.007578902,0.001222894,0.002984293,0.06153859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008039201,0.0002320149,0.0003467267,0.001815859,0.01215757,0.01085791,0.006463202,0.004219817,0.006269404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004439378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002297146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01009747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01200887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981024,0.0007375666,0.00005636885,0.0003483194,0.0003279822,0.0004272875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973423,0.001078633,0.000207944,0.0006278839,0.0003796215,0.0003636694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003114581,0.000009903411,0.0003202076,0.00003208151,0.000002556065,0.0001137056,0.003017023,0.0001430159,0.00004232559,0.9611748,0.02133769,0.01377561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003288292,0.00002519545,0.0006050393,0.0001970825,0.000006787792,0.0002114139,0.006042038,0.0005112313,0.0002248042,0.3783375,0.6137881,0.00001794413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02370445,0.00457947,0.009201017,0.03376294,0.001502505,0.00003458886,0.0001515469,0.0002514024,0.9268121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7501157,0.003243866,0.002234913,0.009193729,0.0006495062,0.00009726584,0.0001599174,0.0003395894,0.2339656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06153859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2058671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008191152","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.33","title":"Reasonable Accommodation for Age","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; nobody; Reasonable accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Law; Scope (computer science); Opt-out; Conscience; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Refia Kaya","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07395497734515308,"gpt":0.3298034589447745,"spread":0.2558484815996215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008508072,0.0004786288,0.0005946598,0.0007935347,0.007791219,0.006347809,0.001671795,0.01050455,0.008755116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02170871,0.0003302365,0.001355517,0.0005406914,0.01932134,0.007439012,0.007720495,0.009318465,0.001957972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005231767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009066456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01801889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0171246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867887,0.004324151,0.001334516,0.002043078,0.002876599,0.002632899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917509,0.002407992,0.0008659823,0.001771196,0.002165894,0.001038061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007774572,0.00001207127,0.0002809248,0.00002301566,0.000003149087,0.00007955037,0.001311286,0.00007099628,0.00009015733,0.991191,0.004068359,0.00286177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002771737,0.0000818285,0.002077152,0.0003844638,0.00002235661,0.0005190497,0.002201972,0.0005331446,0.0003987731,0.669804,0.3238661,0.00008337903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03021065,0.00407016,0.034414,0.06185543,0.002165029,0.0002707065,0.0002946289,0.0001715018,0.8665479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8609038,0.001354992,0.01361729,0.0399641,0.001349757,0.0005201143,0.0002047584,0.0001189738,0.08196618],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04499555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893559805","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004422","title":"The Cultural Limits of Legal Tolerance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Multiculturalism; Constitutionalism; Dialogic; Law; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Legal culture; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin L. Berger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04607625829073096,"gpt":0.3158658241002884,"spread":0.2697895658095574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006172671,0.0002329419,0.0003882347,0.001822512,0.0162078,0.01022734,0.001951393,0.001981949,0.00287177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01607388,0.0002821419,0.0003200373,0.001273809,0.07010841,0.005773849,0.01039997,0.004059395,0.0001490889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01585408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01989748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2260289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1743506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9883056,0.004877687,0.0003345925,0.0009176218,0.003221034,0.002343445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925615,0.003331874,0.0007813304,0.0008399893,0.001367458,0.001117814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001183757,0.00001320438,0.002072252,0.00002757996,0.00000762778,0.0001890834,0.09756592,0.0001580615,0.0001771544,0.8901641,0.0006724987,0.008940796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002442024,0.00003921968,0.01156939,0.0005104099,0.00003524011,0.0005724562,0.2342899,0.00078294,0.0005593814,0.6222444,0.1292908,0.00008155264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3955657,0.004748112,0.008009436,0.04547114,0.0002291336,0.00003284781,0.00003840698,0.00003654492,0.5458686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975588,0.0003435198,0.0002322601,0.0007143604,0.00001797436,0.000006754794,0.000003814763,0.0000062233,0.001116298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7739711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4494265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476423704","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004471","title":"<i>Discussion</i>Foucault, Agamben, and Arbour J.’s Dissent in<i>Gosselin</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; State (computer science); Human rights; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02891021977678319,"gpt":0.2999339519642602,"spread":0.271023732187477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01094674,0.0007976111,0.000989765,0.001697164,0.02348893,0.01315282,0.008343377,0.02698282,0.007344971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01564089,0.0004520405,0.001719798,0.001811661,0.0321192,0.007333702,0.00411089,0.0288607,0.001813114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03749515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02875551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5500388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5817962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876815,0.003500109,0.000306244,0.001955858,0.003714428,0.002841954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912773,0.0047289,0.0002951261,0.0002587037,0.002280035,0.00115996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001645193,0.00001966836,0.0003161112,0.00009201693,0.00001045937,0.0002715996,0.008815783,0.00008394096,0.0001743045,0.1986952,0.7864099,0.005094594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001479603,0.000009105769,0.001407832,0.0006768609,0.00001026048,0.0001064477,0.01541553,0.0001128381,0.0002807527,0.03982824,0.9420565,0.00008079303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001250164,0.00579706,0.0002500038,0.9599767,0.00631199,0.00001621806,0.000105868,0.00001614065,0.0262759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03540098,0.003187024,0.0004708519,0.9324893,0.007688339,0.0000635444,0.00004919471,0.00004290028,0.02060776],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4499612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9052223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122642849","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005555","title":"Testing Theory and Debunking Stereotypes: Lawyers’ Views on the Practice of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Ethical code; Public relations; Professional responsibility; Law; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Ann Wilkinson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christa Walker","is_ca":true},{"name":"Peter Mercer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07706624245631,"gpt":0.3828445914818455,"spread":0.3057783490255355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05455632,0.0005291354,0.0007019105,0.005567364,0.01711828,0.01716391,0.003252117,0.006050076,0.002708226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1088043,0.0008308142,0.0005604246,0.002614957,0.07363991,0.01493761,0.01235416,0.01060944,0.0002669249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01036331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007579978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01458799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01073787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9072509,0.07450294,0.001551142,0.002510936,0.01027231,0.003911698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8573731,0.1132265,0.01379132,0.005097811,0.007079165,0.00343216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001851254,0.00002352943,0.003723847,0.00002546245,0.000005809181,0.0001662341,0.9792326,0.00003194803,0.0001531936,0.01253438,0.0002504476,0.003834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009942012,0.00004137514,0.001985049,0.0001142175,0.000006618502,0.0001459926,0.9808758,0.0002402473,0.000185354,0.01125779,0.005121125,0.00001644669],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9279687,0.0008790385,0.00525962,0.02675378,0.0001392706,0.00005730881,0.00001506856,0.00003713653,0.03889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979756,0.000141792,0.0002599478,0.0009264409,0.0000306637,0.0000133331,0.000004694091,0.00001145616,0.0006359922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05455632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2885249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283773878","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004070","title":"Introduction: Global Ethics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Charles W. Jones","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04597599781249134,"gpt":0.3455845112431948,"spread":0.2996085134307034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008510088,0.0006184402,0.0003981252,0.001114391,0.001773428,0.004069544,0.0005936606,0.003425237,0.03987821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001559159,0.0001800368,0.0004303335,0.001103567,0.004330883,0.003263273,0.001816508,0.004019553,0.008515514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002977383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001671064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004270419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004905547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993635,0.0002338858,0.00002069796,0.0001158775,0.000182602,0.00008337929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994887,0.0002273746,0.00002915014,0.00006007942,0.0001204154,0.00007415387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007783257,0.00001037571,0.0001197676,0.0001488849,0.00000280884,0.00004700002,0.0008364212,0.000134956,0.00008453971,0.6569446,0.3213236,0.02033929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003041178,0.000005678868,0.000372469,0.0003229768,0.00000184228,0.0000683921,0.0003012001,0.00006556931,0.00003449238,0.1066088,0.8922114,0.000004151243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001402518,0.04919259,0.004709944,0.1266727,0.01238521,0.00006064818,0.0005992729,0.0001401436,0.8048369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1093445,0.05466847,0.005087972,0.09776659,0.02302469,0.000265488,0.0008172609,0.0003670899,0.7086579],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03987821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1334059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255131847","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.17","title":"Humane Driving","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Animal welfare; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Focus (optics); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Vaughan Black","is_ca":true},{"name":"Andrew Fenton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04474193502420136,"gpt":0.3624172305370065,"spread":0.3176752955128052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001835347,0.0003128305,0.0001937369,0.0005092375,0.002886969,0.003342492,0.0008339956,0.001925929,0.02543078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005815296,0.0001832628,0.0002454785,0.000294009,0.003902765,0.003084913,0.003374832,0.001503992,0.004981634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001787719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002415724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01625084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02255026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974733,0.0007004756,0.00007264983,0.0004026743,0.0009824204,0.0003684129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974287,0.00051212,0.0001761228,0.0003800894,0.001053593,0.0004493617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005447611,0.0001160011,0.008605902,0.0003095501,0.0000344027,0.0006547924,0.01102193,0.001060317,0.001135662,0.6694993,0.1410373,0.1664705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003987349,0.00005066823,0.003039213,0.0001810651,0.000004982776,0.0005689548,0.003826294,0.0003604789,0.0003006877,0.0357823,0.9558614,0.00002003323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02133371,0.00341086,0.01204239,0.03303714,0.001311283,0.00009371249,0.000319086,0.0001433575,0.9283084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7294087,0.006048838,0.006877601,0.01612341,0.0006990022,0.0001466244,0.0005867492,0.00009425198,0.2400148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02543078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08507442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26166760","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005737","title":"On the Intrinsic Value of Arabic in Israel—Challenging Kymlicka on Language Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Minority Rights and Languages","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minority language; Political science; Linguistics; Minority rights; Identity (music); Immigration; Cultural rights; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Meital Pinto","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01485815974018881,"gpt":0.2940361181945036,"spread":0.2791779584543148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002658776,0.000302249,0.0003736955,0.0007638074,0.007103602,0.008291367,0.0007472771,0.002647795,0.003809827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003397801,0.0001474097,0.0002288023,0.0004884795,0.02050325,0.005590476,0.005608545,0.004887611,0.000494703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005033056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002250924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007781467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009209557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984514,0.0007727645,0.00004896003,0.0001548453,0.0002927693,0.0002793006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978053,0.001310664,0.0002008192,0.0001350478,0.0003767893,0.0001713362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001680154,0.00001715198,0.0005512255,0.00001405407,0.000002952207,0.0001590097,0.0124396,0.00006734634,0.0001713406,0.9807335,0.001527737,0.004299197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005076365,0.00006292312,0.003630442,0.000318603,0.00001789666,0.0003651147,0.0395073,0.0010886,0.001020359,0.8069034,0.1469864,0.00004817265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2462152,0.003714513,0.003195836,0.06321601,0.0003248809,0.00003715781,0.00004342262,0.00001288897,0.68324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792788,0.000770523,0.0005558103,0.003374032,0.000211572,0.00002263052,0.00001011762,0.00001114036,0.01576545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008291367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03651756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261418248","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003593","title":"Resituating the Judicialization of Politics: Bush v. Gore as a Global Trend","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Polity; Presidency; Supreme court; Law; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03707364720469677,"gpt":0.3043663065438004,"spread":0.2672926593391037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004931497,0.0002345141,0.0003514887,0.001089371,0.007783172,0.008673587,0.0007722158,0.007974656,0.003413076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008141334,0.0002110293,0.0003394136,0.001363492,0.01633008,0.00608493,0.004626998,0.009445712,0.0003024579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005762409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007445863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04832869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1555782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970298,0.001124825,0.00006955438,0.0003826535,0.0004191199,0.000974102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972879,0.001496903,0.0002181245,0.0002226664,0.0003291629,0.0004452216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003941888,0.00002093674,0.001898773,0.00004430589,0.00001054924,0.0005840065,0.01749986,0.0001144082,0.0005241904,0.9268215,0.03898436,0.01345763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001110944,0.00008402059,0.01321561,0.0004544134,0.00009199212,0.0004921324,0.03791659,0.0004547463,0.00171405,0.2887093,0.6566675,0.00008860272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1692411,0.0115117,0.001327036,0.4277789,0.001675489,0.0000425804,0.000094717,0.00004162204,0.3882869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9051148,0.002097125,0.0004453882,0.06819744,0.0005437311,0.00002954325,0.00002644716,0.00005267769,0.02349286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04832869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09609479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317884482","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.29","title":"Theorizing Access to Civil Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European University Institute","keywords":"Economic Justice; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Underpinning; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; State (computer science); Law; Frame (networking); Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Dylag","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1130655748367023,"gpt":0.4468874587633919,"spread":0.3338218839266895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007882779,0.000412593,0.0004879466,0.002882017,0.005880221,0.009130722,0.002339907,0.005108887,0.01272795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01444047,0.0002708797,0.0006177824,0.00231448,0.06886231,0.01267197,0.01237873,0.005303756,0.0006131232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01197847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008313644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02000661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01074886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920864,0.003881555,0.0001997124,0.0009470683,0.001707952,0.001177286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925073,0.004617104,0.0004703711,0.0008128904,0.000941827,0.0006504866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[6.772117e-7,0.000002550798,0.00005395322,0.000005312194,8.677825e-7,0.00001357112,0.0007202381,0.00008009651,0.000007346232,0.9985785,0.0002217946,0.0003149954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004649941,0.000003199081,0.0001051416,0.00006134601,0.000003208265,0.00002345117,0.001325381,0.000380299,0.00003042753,0.987142,0.01091795,0.000003060521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03959407,0.003011723,0.05050112,0.06770817,0.0002850462,0.00008864423,0.0001155911,0.000047171,0.8386484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819374,0.0009990422,0.002673996,0.002561223,0.0001906676,0.00008670228,0.00004166373,0.00003000199,0.01147924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02000661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08691025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148520867","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000518x","title":"The Limits of Judicial Fidelity to Law: The Coxford Lecture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Fidelity; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey Goldsworthy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06233093076396494,"gpt":0.3241036159821197,"spread":0.2617726852181548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005426457,0.0003568058,0.0004596664,0.0009325044,0.005078755,0.006977001,0.0008097443,0.004188566,0.00755191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015626,0.0004738039,0.0003086675,0.0007916593,0.01962253,0.01055778,0.001889598,0.009433893,0.001368638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01007445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004687516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02602033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01795621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970133,0.001242865,0.00008247985,0.0003642968,0.0007741115,0.0005229543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901018,0.008194653,0.0002532377,0.0005720885,0.0005143121,0.0003638508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007789281,0.000004981404,0.00004170954,0.00001688181,0.000001605938,0.00002156226,0.0003693619,0.0001174646,0.0000246471,0.9721642,0.02102154,0.006208394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001639149,0.00001207752,0.0002667716,0.0002865437,0.00000643344,0.00005314143,0.0003588574,0.0006171172,0.0001544876,0.7516712,0.2465375,0.00001948085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009040792,0.07886916,0.01273158,0.3127883,0.01005762,0.00002474851,0.00005887873,0.0000733894,0.5763556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7637749,0.04662853,0.004853327,0.02204752,0.01163923,0.0000934455,0.00005184129,0.0001478154,0.1507634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02602033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07309562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256181194","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000382","title":"From Québec Veto to Québec Secession: The Evolution of the Supreme Court of Canada on Québec-Canada Disputes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Supreme court; Secession; Political science; Law; Constitution; Framing (construction); Geography; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Nathalie Des Rosiers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00826898085500558,"gpt":0.230140134087557,"spread":0.2218711532325515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005386366,0.0002405965,0.0005013272,0.00252452,0.03100189,0.01834009,0.00218691,0.006476219,0.01011569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01847643,0.0004982416,0.0003940864,0.004235543,0.0198873,0.003792261,0.003744118,0.005834272,0.0002907044],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2214478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1647469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934462,0.00145184,0.0000996374,0.000708709,0.001772497,0.002521104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887843,0.004033025,0.0005608897,0.0003264661,0.004493818,0.00180155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007275516,0.0000341101,0.009258814,0.00005566093,0.00003303953,0.0008577774,0.04810461,0.001019271,0.0004277388,0.8682355,0.04408706,0.02781353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007964944,0.00005023102,0.0519199,0.0005811171,0.0000975435,0.0003082827,0.05228854,0.002781054,0.0007948994,0.05985916,0.8309275,0.0003120232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3303711,0.01232337,0.003019761,0.1249386,0.0008186687,0.0001011194,0.0004698239,0.00008363396,0.5278739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650322,0.001339814,0.0005068273,0.006703875,0.00007050037,0.00001779833,0.00005409499,0.00003795058,0.02623691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2214478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9030102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258189201","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004872","title":"What can Kant Teach Us about Legal Classification?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jacob Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02507928804582306,"gpt":0.3210244308936607,"spread":0.2959451428478377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006929556,0.0006965924,0.0009311674,0.0026859,0.007185129,0.01084116,0.001551073,0.005363456,0.003517365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00935574,0.0004713529,0.0007827693,0.002179633,0.05266787,0.02099683,0.003681098,0.009018417,0.001262845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009078184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004334168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007411442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005297287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926034,0.004708551,0.0002059913,0.0005749482,0.001286916,0.0006202468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940428,0.003880423,0.0004211137,0.0007459586,0.0005857139,0.0003238621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002817767,0.000002147027,0.00005840926,0.00001196883,0.000001537831,0.000004711939,0.0009724029,0.00006681178,0.000006952366,0.994342,0.002178211,0.002352011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002674325,0.000003134616,0.00005715549,0.00003974252,0.000001399163,0.00001006351,0.0005310361,0.0001415964,0.00002454367,0.9752492,0.02393442,0.000005014924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01955069,0.02754213,0.08155359,0.5031745,0.002855743,0.00003271481,0.0001557499,0.0002455306,0.3648894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9002366,0.01401648,0.02990033,0.03067204,0.003275012,0.0001456787,0.0001338305,0.0001716953,0.02144841],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01084116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06586719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256463645","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006603","title":"A Rights-Based View of the Idea/ Expression Dichotomy in Copyright Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Public domain; Opposition (politics); Expression (computer science); Law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Copyright law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Intellectual property; Linguistics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Abraham Drassinower","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01881354497989694,"gpt":0.2258702494924856,"spread":0.2070567045125886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008363854,0.0004795874,0.0004967701,0.002445563,0.004661199,0.01397712,0.002147979,0.007523405,0.005646624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00955544,0.0004617778,0.0008051064,0.00147287,0.06709836,0.02123334,0.005837835,0.007728064,0.0009537467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005514047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004174355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001632135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001209344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916774,0.003748214,0.0003526595,0.0009014331,0.002525852,0.0007944585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941763,0.003461627,0.0005002658,0.000975859,0.0005865239,0.000299416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001183764,0.000001998665,0.00001053977,0.000002625958,3.043602e-7,0.000007675489,0.0003010257,0.00003766934,0.00001789366,0.9991999,0.00008379144,0.0003354245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005897141,0.00000539371,0.00003824397,0.00002130484,0.000001612606,0.00002670552,0.0002002164,0.0002662828,0.0001034476,0.9917511,0.007575681,0.000004109521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03160191,0.003553122,0.194351,0.04682546,0.0005802508,0.00007775925,0.00009115894,0.0001339255,0.7227854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9432718,0.001489427,0.02214598,0.003093174,0.0007893842,0.0001981065,0.0000432987,0.00007683253,0.02889208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01397712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04423285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47564605","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003799","title":"The Left and the Question of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Faith; Authoritarianism; Law; Parliament; Realm; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Left-wing politics; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01494727644993122,"gpt":0.3079403150364865,"spread":0.2929930385865553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047964,0.0002333153,0.0005323883,0.001342033,0.01351215,0.01165064,0.001073272,0.004865267,0.006174499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00783274,0.0002692123,0.0003402275,0.001024731,0.07034431,0.01397287,0.007013479,0.009197604,0.0008144854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01126453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008107531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01974534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01677269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946162,0.002924814,0.0001231311,0.0006724644,0.0009029465,0.0007605109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952561,0.003166107,0.0002487572,0.000438852,0.0004388189,0.0004512842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002491374,0.000002131741,0.00005214774,0.000005281139,5.108062e-7,0.00001665722,0.001704584,0.00002022715,0.00001333798,0.9951315,0.001636029,0.001415174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004758413,0.000004970309,0.0001152971,0.00007230036,0.000001441793,0.00003109519,0.001963628,0.0001110797,0.00004573375,0.9288848,0.06875963,0.000005319157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03691998,0.0243652,0.01111008,0.2834235,0.00083715,0.0000120541,0.00005352352,0.00007066337,0.6432079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492562,0.003414371,0.001365199,0.01635403,0.000762928,0.00003156626,0.00002631282,0.00006724906,0.02872204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01974534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08173031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264591406","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000424","title":"Toward a Proceduralist Theory of Secession","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Legitimacy; Clearance; Political science; Politics; Miller; Law; Privilege (computing); Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02972553829760843,"gpt":0.301959104128883,"spread":0.2722335658312746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105844,0.0005248162,0.0006170577,0.002201225,0.003696206,0.01020853,0.002902615,0.005380866,0.004147922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007032037,0.0005570865,0.001200998,0.001531939,0.03284913,0.0104647,0.003172172,0.01272201,0.001304056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00613346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008180475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004572093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004251483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938524,0.003309516,0.0002015156,0.0005717807,0.001613073,0.000451757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948448,0.002348813,0.000441472,0.0009240251,0.001082683,0.0003581403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[6.753348e-7,0.000003351643,0.00001568727,0.000002653548,5.342102e-7,0.00000453774,0.0002308774,0.0001101504,0.00001211351,0.9989497,0.0002875774,0.0003822622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004893969,0.000004027973,0.00004088489,0.0000167133,0.00000152201,0.000009332873,0.0001335715,0.000751135,0.00003144268,0.9867578,0.01224559,0.000003091855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01389533,0.001874336,0.4326562,0.106997,0.0007285892,0.0001355001,0.000175564,0.0002005142,0.4433371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7493134,0.00299544,0.1596829,0.01832769,0.002472307,0.000851803,0.0002757854,0.0003501337,0.06573049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05597633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172127440","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003684","title":"Theoretical Underpinning of Intellectual Property: “I am a Pragmatist But Theory is my Rhetoric”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underpinning; Intellectual property; Scholarship; Pragmatism; Rhetoric; Sociology; Politics; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Brian Fitzgerald","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02244247931331175,"gpt":0.2293062636996957,"spread":0.2068637843863839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01523894,0.0005743314,0.0007558683,0.003351312,0.007909114,0.01411292,0.003600459,0.008899027,0.005435633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021441,0.0004162304,0.0007225606,0.002633676,0.1250439,0.0208705,0.005928851,0.01323458,0.001279848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008189552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008683096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005749107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003540412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897989,0.005699191,0.0003013812,0.00128114,0.002341875,0.0005775425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821374,0.01330627,0.001035872,0.001398289,0.00161809,0.0005039789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001258394,0.000002938017,0.00003131597,0.00001676191,0.000001089936,0.0000143688,0.001923122,0.00004037554,0.00001054793,0.9947119,0.002271449,0.0009748905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006601594,0.00000803058,0.00008855946,0.0002003141,0.000003102165,0.00005926828,0.002205657,0.000280697,0.00009056997,0.921915,0.07513264,0.000009541545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01213432,0.01656013,0.05956363,0.6452932,0.002865987,0.00006214186,0.00008274238,0.0001143837,0.2633235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8930951,0.008297197,0.01447783,0.0591314,0.005071227,0.0003004695,0.00008781141,0.0001310789,0.01940791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08059216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251397852","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.15","title":"CJL volume 33 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Geography; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02640632338403906,"gpt":0.1957048125840057,"spread":0.1692984891999666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001148109,0.0009483127,0.001017407,0.004396423,0.003400565,0.009456087,0.001407888,0.003854531,0.8702622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003896496,0.0004810943,0.0009367776,0.002806362,0.0009873789,0.00235436,0.002113611,0.002565496,0.7803103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004155802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005518507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01945064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04324948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983708,0.00007308047,0.0000474134,0.0001721897,0.001132455,0.0002040874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961038,0.0003469473,0.00009603785,0.0002878821,0.002015779,0.001149524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001188302,0.00002217369,0.00005789213,0.00006278812,0.000001654155,0.00002946408,0.000008452745,0.00002299132,0.0001604619,0.001112706,0.9776397,0.02086978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006351979,0.000006706551,0.0004704339,0.00006655016,0.000001473974,0.00002783574,0.00002425761,0.00006218725,0.0000708148,0.000436866,0.9988213,0.000005190904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003467675,0.001426827,0.0002154497,0.005468879,0.01739205,0.000119123,0.00169421,0.0007380016,0.9725987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001042383,0.0005218927,0.0001246556,0.001452306,0.002617765,0.00001878875,0.0005655267,0.0002251167,0.9934315],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8702622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1850552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271109635","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003908","title":"How the New ICTs Matter to the Theory of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Allegiance; Sociology; Legal profession; Law and economics; Legal realism","authors":[{"name":"Keith Culver","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01978484410626212,"gpt":0.2639272698939052,"spread":0.2441424257876431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01033075,0.000470683,0.0008532018,0.003370022,0.004827515,0.01494628,0.002009521,0.007205168,0.005131713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0176929,0.000572231,0.0008334474,0.002100926,0.08082809,0.02437863,0.003849535,0.01014351,0.0008188191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01110538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00622202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01708677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006927089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901795,0.005724478,0.0002439008,0.001229191,0.001775106,0.0008478985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828337,0.01244453,0.0007846436,0.001465252,0.001424989,0.001046904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003066631,0.000006666891,0.0001089168,0.00001768542,0.000002737031,0.00001605393,0.00059683,0.0001971558,0.000009750502,0.9967809,0.0008079415,0.001452285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005703407,0.000004306768,0.0001400127,0.00004724331,0.000003198925,0.00001562198,0.000407109,0.000319858,0.00001785487,0.9860796,0.0129534,0.000006038735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03810089,0.04668773,0.03530143,0.5258121,0.002097248,0.0000490127,0.0001698051,0.0001234328,0.3516585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9363652,0.0192248,0.007949837,0.02012009,0.002816281,0.0001211461,0.00009031225,0.00008509154,0.01322742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01708677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08057553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477902474","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004495","title":"Reality Check: On the Uses of Empiricism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Notice; Law; Principal (computer security); Empiricism; Politics; Majority opinion; Empirical research; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Judicial opinion; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Peter Carver","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1244880207670079,"gpt":0.3353811908439809,"spread":0.2108931700769729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05210793,0.001170313,0.002285152,0.01199506,0.006669285,0.01326083,0.004694122,0.003708815,0.006644763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1453516,0.0006745253,0.001465693,0.005889885,0.07586266,0.0204888,0.006772669,0.008840132,0.0009848024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01041407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007261629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03345953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02721036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9497638,0.03864751,0.001252024,0.00238469,0.006659115,0.001293031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7745595,0.2014313,0.003365317,0.008778339,0.01065666,0.001208918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002471347,0.00001325153,0.000750617,0.0001505753,0.00006757863,0.00007883626,0.00327123,0.0004092941,0.00002425258,0.9494374,0.02877693,0.01699534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002385047,0.00002129902,0.001127389,0.0007212914,0.00002295785,0.00005604826,0.003412407,0.001324257,0.00009392908,0.9097255,0.08343115,0.00003992462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01576603,0.1288955,0.1112449,0.5166369,0.008485454,0.0001856148,0.0006991582,0.0005229372,0.2175635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7824094,0.04083979,0.07266752,0.07013194,0.01351833,0.0005179556,0.0005942271,0.0007541695,0.0185668],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05210793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2755764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218074896","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003957","title":"Justice and Responsibility","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Economic Justice; Moral responsibility; Power (physics); Law and economics; Distributive justice; Collective responsibility; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Arthur Ripstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04853700383529322,"gpt":0.2920217010822336,"spread":0.2434846972469404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006849728,0.0004939671,0.000589313,0.001190916,0.008497665,0.008616346,0.001396458,0.008260915,0.007023532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01099621,0.0003080293,0.0007895247,0.0007455983,0.05332078,0.01065684,0.009136505,0.006939358,0.001076981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007080457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007498509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009782823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006618364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902914,0.004012321,0.0004516085,0.001552666,0.002097626,0.001594219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954845,0.002168732,0.0005495172,0.0006406024,0.0005757074,0.0005809674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001488145,0.000002988311,0.00007823075,0.000006699971,0.000001455046,0.00001639788,0.0008447266,0.00004073693,0.00001527872,0.9967295,0.001107091,0.001155416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005764349,0.000009263662,0.0002104404,0.00006444794,0.000003926344,0.00008681753,0.000776547,0.0001434647,0.00007808739,0.9374994,0.06111395,0.000007731345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01465507,0.006021851,0.04460196,0.1112035,0.0009696814,0.00007994342,0.0000545498,0.00006690788,0.8223465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9117882,0.003243849,0.006954922,0.02354338,0.001028629,0.0001876281,0.00003832177,0.00006736529,0.05314772],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009782823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05137253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}