{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":182,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":182,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"1325816d12ec","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2154905584","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0063","title":"From Thick to Thin: Two Moral Reduction Plans","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Elstein","is_ca":false},{"name":"Thomas Hurka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05836533605621926,"gpt":0.2532884893290386,"spread":0.1949231532728193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005555989,0.001014434,0.0005868157,0.001978183,0.005329786,0.007098858,0.001859891,0.003931126,0.01373662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01163263,0.000752295,0.001160474,0.001029275,0.0301456,0.01301862,0.009320856,0.0110275,0.002143201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005430836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003530388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002437912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003208956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942267,0.002507756,0.0001872864,0.0006446905,0.00187999,0.000553567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956541,0.001662853,0.0003254148,0.0008607283,0.0009913075,0.0005055824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007890822,0.00001111074,0.00003545728,0.0000113999,0.00000138854,0.00001663354,0.000463535,0.0000756047,0.00005007231,0.9958916,0.001462248,0.001973028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000129023,0.000008433885,0.00008787748,0.00002588817,0.000004108411,0.0000308399,0.0005503551,0.0004465299,0.0001436593,0.9848968,0.01378455,0.000007989254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0308849,0.001605103,0.1460153,0.05182721,0.001005416,0.0003460852,0.0003068149,0.0002488015,0.7677605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7772809,0.001251667,0.1022222,0.009900704,0.0006406949,0.001127744,0.000333859,0.0004208128,0.1068212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01373662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04595363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762494388","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1386481","title":"Human rights without human supremacism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Declaration; Environmental ethics; Subjectivity; Embodied cognition; Hierarchy; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Will Kymlicka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1639704313768476,"gpt":0.4922745909166849,"spread":0.3283041595398373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01547293,0.000415613,0.0007659449,0.0005818392,0.004238153,0.006571573,0.001498262,0.01065308,0.0061287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01751537,0.0002681873,0.0004018731,0.0003873745,0.05895977,0.006263185,0.005715082,0.01084553,0.001424212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003761166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007326047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004607339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002790238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985989,0.00711691,0.000617532,0.002069962,0.003012673,0.001194001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857495,0.00808008,0.001233752,0.001840231,0.001996382,0.001100014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005140743,0.000005061231,0.00005914282,0.00001761385,0.000003098135,0.00003920193,0.001354939,0.00003984191,0.00008370675,0.9933876,0.003196942,0.001807683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002401266,0.0000430996,0.0002509097,0.0002764427,0.000009964079,0.0001870864,0.001309115,0.0002598425,0.0003657053,0.8464801,0.150768,0.00002570425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02136046,0.007392958,0.02316659,0.3969389,0.003593647,0.00009136339,0.00008394032,0.00007370002,0.5472984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8800358,0.00262744,0.005547434,0.07234783,0.002172152,0.0001395593,0.00003936145,0.00003705457,0.0370535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01547293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08182967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016435477","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.923240","title":"Justification is potential knowledge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Aberdeen","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06459974620442645,"gpt":0.2509244275320971,"spread":0.1863246813276707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009245339,0.0004889547,0.0009270258,0.00243747,0.004608268,0.009166037,0.001437988,0.006180407,0.008465248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01528978,0.0004219102,0.001025505,0.001472894,0.04257462,0.01592414,0.004720231,0.005427072,0.001607618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005875498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005005545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002926806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001856562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914704,0.004417916,0.0003174787,0.001253228,0.00182439,0.0007165165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876166,0.007984473,0.0006644174,0.001557808,0.001755886,0.0004208334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001538093,0.000001406754,0.00001583755,0.00001277226,0.000001398958,0.000008927001,0.0001692457,0.00005032798,0.00001024946,0.9984549,0.0004443003,0.0008289959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003449853,0.000002336474,0.00002469865,0.0000403235,0.000001769979,0.00002462088,0.0001111987,0.0001955503,0.00003758944,0.986839,0.0127158,0.0000036417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01617979,0.00729167,0.2350316,0.08087227,0.001325592,0.0001026179,0.0002099116,0.0001977675,0.6587888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416375,0.002705268,0.02570304,0.00580528,0.001122312,0.0002039079,0.0001343303,0.0001251647,0.02256325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009245339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04889458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583668695","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.857136","title":"A Humean theory of moral intuition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Jenny ja Antti Wihurin Rahasto; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Perception; Moral psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Antti Kauppinen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1223359896620183,"gpt":0.2476395764641013,"spread":0.125303586802083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347243,0.0002686147,0.0002529527,0.0008919393,0.001065945,0.002217777,0.0006745582,0.001061332,0.005721917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003198224,0.0001943274,0.0005751133,0.0003229881,0.008601106,0.003791153,0.001740071,0.001455775,0.0007121922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001477781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001033163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007976518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007670355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989136,0.0004592338,0.00003072007,0.0002009175,0.0002960315,0.00009944764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990708,0.0004304798,0.00008474442,0.0001566082,0.0001886792,0.00006869334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007496516,0.000005774386,0.00008366202,0.00002210618,0.000003039648,0.00002463418,0.0003598299,0.0002203186,0.0001462138,0.9950304,0.0007520286,0.003344423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007503203,0.00001269043,0.0003934758,0.00001781301,0.000002419744,0.00007647204,0.0001080546,0.001265304,0.0001386654,0.9903631,0.007608297,0.000006260295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05923194,0.001651327,0.2922464,0.01156449,0.0004778553,0.0001033475,0.0002256329,0.0002622822,0.6342366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944083,0.0004804861,0.03545788,0.001843984,0.0002224032,0.0001053472,0.00007274061,0.00003467295,0.01769953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005721917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01914173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112923268","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.45","title":"Understanding the Problem of “Hype”: Exaggeration, Values, and Trust in Science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; Montana State University","keywords":"Exaggeration; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Journalism; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Media studies; History; Computer science; Psychoanalysis","authors":[{"name":"Kristen Intemann","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.589016986892307,"gpt":0.390232543620996,"spread":0.198784443271311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02325938,0.0004023254,0.0006888073,0.002863946,0.005678655,0.01358778,0.001721979,0.005792025,0.003422265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08219709,0.0006101825,0.0004426024,0.002153529,0.0662039,0.02050707,0.009487999,0.007841126,0.0002138943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008029742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00361557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01051531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005830711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9780965,0.01508243,0.0006827682,0.001154342,0.003834644,0.001149198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8873932,0.0796706,0.01534359,0.007340446,0.007887728,0.002364497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001138866,0.00006146634,0.008931721,0.0002150669,0.00005305748,0.0004921611,0.2443512,0.0007239919,0.001045042,0.7270152,0.002060542,0.01493671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004003148,0.00006148907,0.01079857,0.0004992731,0.00004747223,0.0003985638,0.1118412,0.004572571,0.000678795,0.8541671,0.01678144,0.0001133327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6236124,0.004826643,0.05167114,0.1232002,0.0003926378,0.0000858182,0.00008848698,0.0001017669,0.1960209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984629,0.000170468,0.0006657227,0.0004519245,0.00003067331,0.000007641019,0.000004470947,0.000006594229,0.0001994525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1230088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531119672","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1235856","title":"Kant’s deductions of morality and freedom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main; Simon Fraser University; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Owen Ware","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05596386193333154,"gpt":0.2243051721624456,"spread":0.1683413102291141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009321243,0.0006317789,0.001042947,0.002828526,0.003973196,0.007086752,0.00136406,0.004608629,0.005256303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01439962,0.0005261079,0.001338169,0.0009454402,0.05882138,0.006521322,0.00674169,0.008610189,0.0008379171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007438505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003996047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002939035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00188481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9890693,0.005938533,0.000342477,0.0008808098,0.002842458,0.0009263773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99173,0.004880039,0.0004285057,0.001301075,0.001203471,0.0004567214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003557282,0.000002914688,0.00001755631,0.000006831183,0.000002111418,0.00000983847,0.0002552831,0.0001557914,0.00001971365,0.9986437,0.0004223983,0.0004603305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005571864,0.000001699627,0.00003075074,0.00001716843,0.000001243455,0.000006373107,0.00007903293,0.0001482834,0.00004309849,0.995832,0.003831859,0.000002923606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04290538,0.002799134,0.1039627,0.04235449,0.001084017,0.00008266664,0.0001974622,0.0001348133,0.8064795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764473,0.0004753609,0.008421334,0.002197427,0.0003578858,0.00007305959,0.00006303172,0.00006171856,0.01190278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009321243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0539704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020100236","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.9","title":"Credence: A Belief-First Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Moon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Elizabeth Jackson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1280423749139143,"gpt":0.234776251972447,"spread":0.1067338770585327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01929554,0.0008033495,0.001452013,0.004607967,0.003655929,0.009922777,0.003562935,0.005962976,0.00884518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03722573,0.0007725114,0.001410453,0.001803835,0.03035697,0.0148982,0.004228456,0.009333041,0.0009583384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008287322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002875067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003824945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002232519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864693,0.008162836,0.0003917053,0.001491618,0.00276776,0.0007167868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599577,0.02970074,0.001885853,0.003376615,0.003720185,0.001358782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006206188,0.000006018864,0.00006601103,0.00002017135,0.000007820176,0.00002463215,0.0002165325,0.0005079214,0.00001779366,0.9972742,0.0003001083,0.001552494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005250128,0.00000489616,0.00005273168,0.00002892027,0.000004123982,0.00002519357,0.00004964816,0.001664752,0.00003449325,0.9961261,0.001998139,0.000005827362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02445392,0.007042795,0.6355941,0.07251842,0.001186068,0.0001375743,0.0002452031,0.0001699697,0.258652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424463,0.001268671,0.0455158,0.002682615,0.001045784,0.0001302074,0.00005709022,0.00004766156,0.006805917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01929554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1020458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806181184","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1472516","title":"What kind of evaluative states are emotions? The attitudinal theory vs. the perceptual theory of emotions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Perception; Dilemma; Psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Self-perception theory; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive dissonance","authors":[{"name":"Mauro Rossi","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christine Tappolet","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08401052726712095,"gpt":0.3444453290382729,"spread":0.2604348017711519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002752103,0.0001950589,0.0003200281,0.00101052,0.0007936773,0.004669216,0.0004384951,0.001261596,0.004341209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006867729,0.0001926403,0.0003737547,0.0006646668,0.008986299,0.005807518,0.001097176,0.001505379,0.0003811987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001141169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004541089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001106686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007755255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983044,0.0009361012,0.00006778818,0.0002147533,0.000291558,0.0001853863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960944,0.001809294,0.0005226128,0.0004010582,0.0008191167,0.0003535708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003995735,0.00003505121,0.001836491,0.00007689869,0.00001807788,0.00004419342,0.002686624,0.0002262568,0.0006675455,0.981097,0.001263513,0.01200827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002171718,0.00002878198,0.01007536,0.0001159955,0.00002761521,0.0001012099,0.004952533,0.001694578,0.0004373797,0.9705662,0.01195142,0.00002715992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2438373,0.00513576,0.08286619,0.05119558,0.0007580135,0.00007726996,0.0002348689,0.0001263538,0.6157687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941947,0.0006156541,0.002106343,0.0009121471,0.0001466419,0.00002957818,0.00002415529,0.00001422935,0.001956569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004669216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01455474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592944988","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716589","title":"Memory and Personal Identity in Spinoza","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Personal identity; Identity (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Human being; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Self; Theology; Humanity","authors":[{"name":"Martin Hsiu‐Chu Lin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0419506459430174,"gpt":0.2478387356892383,"spread":0.2058880897462209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001315668,0.0002958279,0.0004086286,0.001302714,0.01074302,0.01126784,0.0005450664,0.001589021,0.005520127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001488494,0.0001920529,0.0002852456,0.0009710976,0.02449714,0.00784973,0.005062948,0.00270776,0.0005850053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006137559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002520027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01944622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02040017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989058,0.0004281165,0.00004907461,0.0001811108,0.0001713571,0.0002645495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994532,0.000168049,0.00006602996,0.00008996335,0.00009203301,0.0001307804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001086239,0.000007917458,0.0002202022,0.00001130816,0.000001858746,0.00008951696,0.008668429,0.00001979681,0.00003171139,0.9876644,0.0007244515,0.0025496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002252572,0.00002029804,0.001154897,0.0001025586,0.00001579947,0.0003905874,0.01950499,0.0002551132,0.0001672724,0.8478336,0.1305092,0.00002320584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1148212,0.01309645,0.006677938,0.01930599,0.000679419,0.00003223252,0.00005611863,0.00007576049,0.8452549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739693,0.00149798,0.001023225,0.0008849507,0.00009138047,0.00001601991,0.00001625382,0.00001964662,0.02248121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01944622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04453135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283049953","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717524","title":"Making Do: Troubling Stoic Tendencies in an Otherwise Compelling Theory of Autonomy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Nothing; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Worry; Moral responsibility; Free will; Philosophy; Moral agency; Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"David Zimmerman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1014258699191419,"gpt":0.2766823715385294,"spread":0.1752565016193874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00410714,0.0002659089,0.0003489677,0.0008631471,0.003981899,0.0041028,0.0006847496,0.002899294,0.002072539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00686741,0.0002245221,0.0003948857,0.0004683901,0.03316746,0.006921433,0.003959063,0.003741121,0.0003062364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002454988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002151563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001780909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002735341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972139,0.001449814,0.00008223722,0.0004330268,0.0005600168,0.0002609459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972789,0.001392169,0.0004405919,0.0004241764,0.0002274935,0.0002366546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006045026,0.000004721658,0.0002101422,0.000008322342,0.000001806663,0.00004322627,0.00451154,0.00009530195,0.00009404624,0.9924762,0.000635277,0.00191352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008556651,0.00000675195,0.0002151787,0.00001890697,0.000002145467,0.00007172859,0.001631843,0.0004183627,0.0001018742,0.9884747,0.009044346,0.000005696654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3100669,0.002142235,0.06742556,0.1049937,0.0004987522,0.00005310807,0.00004478007,0.0001298743,0.514645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868826,0.000368375,0.005629689,0.00222271,0.00006048949,0.00003916289,0.00001087488,0.00002191915,0.004764157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00410714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02172083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149704867","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0025","title":"Teleology Without Tears: Aristotle and the Role of Mechanistic Conceptions of Organisms","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Context (archaeology); Natural philosophy; Philosophy; Ancient Greek; Ancient philosophy; Field (mathematics); History","authors":[{"name":"Sylvia Berryman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01454067298200785,"gpt":0.2026890590708422,"spread":0.1881483860888344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003199786,0.0003625899,0.0004054093,0.001211417,0.004454235,0.0038518,0.0008716509,0.002942526,0.004622799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003967155,0.0002814574,0.0003744776,0.0007474889,0.03771881,0.01445538,0.002865516,0.004526081,0.0005937857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004320095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001898924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003628506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003322535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983114,0.0009424274,0.00005237962,0.0002198761,0.0003255802,0.0001483411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980831,0.001265524,0.000129008,0.0002253672,0.0001944581,0.0001026264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004372423,0.000001613379,0.00002436236,0.000008839017,0.000001015254,0.00001551087,0.0009828822,0.00004747082,0.00001354,0.9971008,0.0007141516,0.001085436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007131228,0.000004695691,0.00009226167,0.00002847718,0.000001555811,0.00003374089,0.0007088224,0.0001077436,0.00003071428,0.9727303,0.02624887,0.000005675841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04357401,0.03481961,0.04784928,0.1094267,0.002321023,0.00003089652,0.00008907304,0.0001102325,0.7617791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448788,0.006712821,0.006580329,0.007901889,0.001308006,0.00005119013,0.000031418,0.0000853656,0.03245034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004622799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03134465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475106116","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716551","title":"Kant on Sensibility and the Understanding in the 1770s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Nothing; Metaphysics; Sensibility; Critical philosophy; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Alison Laywine","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1159716171938444,"gpt":0.2357518051722436,"spread":0.1197801879783992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006036597,0.0009847948,0.0007404023,0.002863622,0.007364682,0.01055323,0.0009762704,0.004883503,0.003584595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005624574,0.000594597,0.0006549922,0.002276792,0.05818391,0.01095829,0.004731996,0.007423708,0.001154609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02005194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005813485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01139294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008908499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940177,0.00388059,0.0001603996,0.000456326,0.0009319591,0.000552959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983041,0.001052852,0.0001224737,0.0001955544,0.0002106287,0.0001142995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003964557,0.000001502678,0.00001940128,0.000008656137,9.62336e-7,0.000008950275,0.00244807,0.00007094603,0.00001459244,0.995388,0.001077241,0.0009578445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000518361,0.000003851648,0.0000823986,0.00009866938,0.000002057706,0.0000180005,0.0009198503,0.00005670138,0.00006383771,0.9448715,0.05387089,0.000007108363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02600761,0.0652597,0.01412595,0.05328316,0.001258808,0.0000327903,0.0001411586,0.00006823177,0.8398226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9076831,0.01476659,0.004556534,0.007064702,0.0008756583,0.0001141046,0.00008162896,0.0001210165,0.0647367],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02005194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1454877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091795196","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0010","title":"Theory, Observation, and the Role of Scientific Understanding in the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Epistemology; Cognitivism (psychology); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Scientific theory; Order (exchange); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Cognition","authors":[{"name":"Glenn Parsons","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0155886476266549,"gpt":0.1952961808118147,"spread":0.1797075331851598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01214212,0.0005864775,0.0005833416,0.00208895,0.005369733,0.01040792,0.001582188,0.004600717,0.002745454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105368,0.0004145789,0.0009493577,0.001510775,0.1332892,0.0137028,0.006421296,0.007242597,0.0002935421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006434943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003722167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003495971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003254526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901752,0.006703481,0.0002439454,0.0007201345,0.001675007,0.0004822252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881883,0.008735167,0.0008335584,0.001164464,0.0007073455,0.000371081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003838074,0.000004865914,0.00008332627,0.00002561523,0.000001963485,0.00002298542,0.005004772,0.0001322641,0.00007540763,0.9928743,0.0003313879,0.001439363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006800434,0.000006647376,0.00012851,0.00004412575,0.000003082097,0.00005702139,0.002190791,0.000289554,0.00008392079,0.9836727,0.01350987,0.000006930587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05816664,0.01141058,0.1087727,0.09239125,0.001302377,0.00007232372,0.00005615543,0.00009958549,0.7277283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733866,0.002195414,0.01114432,0.00266845,0.0004775015,0.00009502885,0.00002097177,0.00006695259,0.009944684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06421447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905410130","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.816176","title":"On preferring God's non-existence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Monash University","keywords":"Theism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Existence of God; Natural (archaeology); History; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Klaas J. Kraay","is_ca":true},{"name":"Chris Dragos","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03404541818901036,"gpt":0.1999583536977588,"spread":0.1659129355087485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01494454,0.0005256522,0.00101934,0.001488661,0.007542068,0.007028239,0.001934638,0.005782231,0.00470993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01780947,0.0004014818,0.0007345781,0.001279963,0.0687142,0.01295447,0.006147656,0.01143682,0.0006858465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004732295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002083501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002582337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003051128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888044,0.006034127,0.0004406199,0.001418237,0.002515022,0.0007877231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986133,0.009350606,0.0008053423,0.001237343,0.00191146,0.0005621468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001880021,0.000003028528,0.00009839379,0.00003156895,0.000005894372,0.00003873723,0.001783118,0.00003946201,0.00004852647,0.9956788,0.0007681845,0.001485399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002085459,0.00002927975,0.0003667504,0.0001208266,0.00001263215,0.0001308935,0.002237182,0.0001550324,0.0001636136,0.9636338,0.0331146,0.00001455571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07801995,0.01737042,0.02571641,0.1575177,0.002855218,0.00004471884,0.00008401792,0.00007832669,0.7183133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735978,0.002879758,0.002831353,0.01075512,0.001136014,0.0000314305,0.00003769574,0.00006820844,0.008662599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01494454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07903522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312125916","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.42","title":"Mental Imagery and the Epistemology of Testimony","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Testimonial; Externalism; Appeal; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Mental image; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognition; Law","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Munro","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04555395362339027,"gpt":0.2292890714370044,"spread":0.1837351178136141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008911725,0.0003541167,0.0003978727,0.003114714,0.004387358,0.007057517,0.001588621,0.002985551,0.004555329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0343417,0.0004346216,0.0003889275,0.001339551,0.06263731,0.009539798,0.006925833,0.004194583,0.000305755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003929581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002402389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003645846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002222878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886645,0.008423598,0.0004324082,0.0006556105,0.001276253,0.0005475156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662817,0.02593095,0.002574522,0.002336687,0.002101983,0.0007741856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000244935,0.00002310248,0.0007147667,0.0001337416,0.000009681931,0.0002494787,0.04193219,0.0002962896,0.0003029037,0.9497607,0.0007267799,0.005825859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002872709,0.00002146919,0.001200289,0.0003567778,0.00001173799,0.0005192943,0.02289064,0.001818776,0.0006563156,0.9580456,0.01442166,0.00002871117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2947412,0.00584238,0.1339328,0.06173182,0.0006540538,0.00013068,0.0001620766,0.0001318321,0.502673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946094,0.0003584604,0.003548723,0.0003856879,0.00007742405,0.00002018398,0.00001880834,0.00001229306,0.000969095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008911725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04713029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044690955","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.29","title":"How to Philosophically Tackle Kinds without Talking about “Natural Kinds”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Relevance (law); Natural (archaeology); Politics; Subject (documents); Subject matter; Race (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Ingo Brigandt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0443798572572404,"gpt":0.2844933370229579,"spread":0.2401134797657175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03302611,0.0009341411,0.001346656,0.003019776,0.007024809,0.009164521,0.003124372,0.005149441,0.005145676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01623918,0.0006092396,0.001858418,0.001652892,0.07800379,0.01984493,0.00758279,0.01071429,0.00105666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008590317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008345524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007218684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007926223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834879,0.01140804,0.0006358239,0.001383481,0.002367509,0.0007172334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826299,0.01023073,0.001252731,0.002317516,0.002540444,0.001028749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002835889,0.000004679329,0.00006290751,0.00004014302,0.000006352518,0.00001373811,0.002139094,0.00008239147,0.0000609374,0.9950269,0.001078916,0.001481113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004905833,0.00000428058,0.00004661081,0.00007412749,0.000004397119,0.00002241025,0.001199195,0.0002343061,0.00006650489,0.9807608,0.01757506,0.000007391483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02006907,0.00959195,0.4728085,0.3317246,0.003936476,0.0002722709,0.0002041232,0.0002689782,0.1611239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6978666,0.005766619,0.2417047,0.03410664,0.00178539,0.0009326963,0.0001942287,0.0003214986,0.01732168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03302611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1746609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523006892","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716583","title":"How to Distinguish Autonomy from Integrity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Suspect; Value (mathematics); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Carolyn McLeod","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06079187571652715,"gpt":0.2361941257216291,"spread":0.175402250005102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01530847,0.0009416945,0.001297681,0.001501826,0.007580605,0.0111608,0.002193606,0.01037053,0.008554686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03722116,0.0006582011,0.0009149723,0.00105305,0.07933734,0.03575824,0.01008334,0.01727069,0.004001068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006559164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00770083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01057987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008683215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9768138,0.01336206,0.001330504,0.002001763,0.004308283,0.002183696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783751,0.01308824,0.001039293,0.001943912,0.003702283,0.001851169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000988036,0.000005166125,0.000129649,0.00004201851,0.000004738854,0.00007188153,0.007866759,0.00004417559,0.00006572145,0.9733088,0.01417563,0.004275497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001387278,0.000008936777,0.0002163581,0.0001569091,0.000004935673,0.0001403937,0.00543553,0.0001438804,0.0001491407,0.8442799,0.149425,0.00002507997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01102832,0.009785675,0.04920044,0.5551423,0.008042361,0.0001490907,0.0001539737,0.0002719129,0.3662258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7805796,0.005493435,0.03270774,0.1069693,0.003771833,0.0005273247,0.0001528133,0.0005941936,0.0692037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01530847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08095992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080890053","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0011","title":"Public Reason and Moral Compromise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Politics; Compromise; Epistemology; Criticism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Public reason; Law; Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Social psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Lister","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1459050818559063,"gpt":0.3165623061178905,"spread":0.1706572242619842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0246063,0.0006730442,0.0011837,0.002386427,0.01135817,0.01890358,0.00231752,0.01753644,0.01180534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03605183,0.0005110891,0.001346042,0.001653796,0.05193893,0.01656241,0.01106932,0.01239325,0.001700236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01540937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007950106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003563545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003135241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9753497,0.01396847,0.0006947781,0.003354768,0.003739911,0.002892282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797673,0.01229424,0.001445618,0.00313636,0.002383047,0.0009734993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002874424,0.000003861646,0.00002500678,0.000007507903,0.000003163742,0.00001463258,0.0003908806,0.00009305671,0.000008780952,0.9970039,0.001597787,0.0008487597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008273811,0.000002912577,0.00002753921,0.00002955287,0.000002953609,0.00001830809,0.0002326638,0.000183112,0.00003695162,0.979293,0.0201599,0.00000477913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01588332,0.006403396,0.03066162,0.1502333,0.001256687,0.00006355473,0.00005518587,0.0001111719,0.7953318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393884,0.001599793,0.005503173,0.01134759,0.001132917,0.0001205644,0.00004161488,0.0001397372,0.04072613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0246063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1301321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318606975","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1165571","title":"Psychopathy and internalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Psychology; Counterexample; Moral disengagement; Moral psychology; Epistemology; Moral reasoning; Social psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Victor Kumar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09279190722121253,"gpt":0.2581394660802139,"spread":0.1653475588590013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002037815,0.0003931176,0.0003746624,0.001908439,0.001207584,0.001786573,0.0004548038,0.0008899007,0.007071843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107676,0.0002767156,0.0002846229,0.0005386929,0.009924459,0.001220108,0.003071064,0.002379561,0.0003335216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001751709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001189283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001473051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00148352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983865,0.0004678457,0.0000620989,0.0003355407,0.00050623,0.0002418752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920242,0.001838127,0.003267623,0.0009500493,0.0009119147,0.001008108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004463563,0.001325601,0.7246541,0.0004379268,0.0002886016,0.004496957,0.02445798,0.0008687605,0.01195768,0.1258854,0.007557246,0.09762341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008376981,0.0003360909,0.7415539,0.0006396914,0.0001443941,0.006706041,0.01109116,0.001752068,0.002572116,0.225511,0.009521789,0.00008810956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9491816,0.0005408198,0.001903639,0.00608824,0.00009591472,0.00003551151,0.00006972351,0.00005497916,0.04202946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984932,0.0001708425,0.0003402942,0.0003662381,0.00001571252,0.000009921725,0.00001646096,0.00000798289,0.0005793053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007071843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02365768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044703139","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0061","title":"Promises to the Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Negativity effect; Philosophy; General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Allen Habib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06033349264577125,"gpt":0.2468120205707006,"spread":0.1864785279249294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00791893,0.0004094755,0.0004459932,0.000823516,0.007760037,0.00922163,0.0009704913,0.004120731,0.009370375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01600464,0.0003343678,0.0005579306,0.0008101441,0.02894861,0.01449798,0.005454557,0.007022225,0.003015494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005237825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005764719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00387088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003279298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993533,0.003930089,0.000108646,0.0005966455,0.001315369,0.0005162106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930024,0.003092526,0.0005289674,0.001270817,0.001351537,0.0007538173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006490415,0.000003358629,0.00005237217,0.00002023744,0.00000251826,0.00002702952,0.002673154,0.00004229026,0.00004901229,0.9840024,0.01066043,0.002460697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005854602,0.00001330222,0.0001276133,0.0001721091,0.000007242179,0.0000933452,0.003682549,0.0001840796,0.0002021574,0.6909072,0.30459,0.00001461592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01001523,0.008279656,0.01984826,0.1547189,0.001770681,0.00003101024,0.0001020349,0.0001629715,0.8050713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8388207,0.008377792,0.007392999,0.02168377,0.002209008,0.0001354279,0.0001094401,0.0002429398,0.1210279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009370375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04187977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045315299","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.981932","title":"Representationalism, perceptual distortion and the limits of phenomenal concepts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Direct and indirect realism; Epistemology; Perception; Distortion (music); Counterexample; Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David Bourget","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07938908558787802,"gpt":0.3383263123570376,"spread":0.2589372267691596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01008595,0.0004496499,0.0008765119,0.002123833,0.003177264,0.007261255,0.001986389,0.002210013,0.002587098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02088329,0.0005449099,0.0009846597,0.001188201,0.05692661,0.02262016,0.009494902,0.005804843,0.0002411682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005459308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001607203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002056034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006825335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923379,0.003149573,0.0005081033,0.001285181,0.002058885,0.0006603466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816196,0.008158744,0.002233001,0.005739463,0.001475444,0.0007736233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001656748,0.000005374906,0.0001943125,0.00003053432,0.000005659059,0.00004448912,0.003074046,0.0002335367,0.0002317139,0.9937612,0.0001704655,0.002231961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009039707,0.000008295538,0.0003291851,0.00001974011,0.000004050135,0.0001162588,0.0006670085,0.0005122469,0.0002507212,0.9943913,0.003683322,0.000008840059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3631775,0.01119223,0.2582327,0.04335622,0.0005539559,0.0001150957,0.0002421552,0.0005226412,0.3226076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904851,0.0004620246,0.007250994,0.0004271611,0.0000737799,0.00005027256,0.00002950854,0.00004688899,0.00117415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01008595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05334026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049669090","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.905251","title":"Debunking enactivism: a critical notice of Hutto and Myin’s Radicalizing Enactivism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enactivism; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Notice; Action (physics); Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Autopoiesis; Law","authors":[{"name":"Mohan Matthen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03618419868820575,"gpt":0.2586043134393586,"spread":0.2224201147511528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006568415,0.0005183166,0.0005661608,0.001027257,0.002796934,0.004016219,0.002076771,0.004315206,0.002593746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007907179,0.0002650362,0.0003993486,0.0007819717,0.03214538,0.01180634,0.003685213,0.009913309,0.000621628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003865974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002229919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003058592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003187546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962577,0.002002548,0.000115396,0.0005471396,0.0007940438,0.0002831912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936585,0.004935457,0.0002196764,0.0004521587,0.0005798865,0.0001543738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001101965,0.000004359511,0.00004807965,0.00007077139,0.000002972032,0.00003954683,0.003176603,0.0001178189,0.0000835216,0.9845945,0.005674225,0.006176645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001065528,0.00001553748,0.0001468014,0.0002306862,0.000006299724,0.0001288464,0.001373814,0.0003988071,0.0003711383,0.7536891,0.2436098,0.0000185033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02344938,0.1714944,0.08892233,0.4099665,0.01120544,0.00004762451,0.00006292693,0.0002345684,0.2946169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7903278,0.05826664,0.01541469,0.06778863,0.01361074,0.0002447304,0.00006574248,0.0005916612,0.05368926],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006568415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03473753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175390287","doi":"10.1017/can.2021.15","title":"Sensational Science, Archaic Hominin Genetics, and Amplified Inductive Risk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Max-Planck-Institut für Menschheitsgeschichte; Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover; University of Alberta; Michigan State University; Florida Atlantic University; Eastern Michigan University; Universidad del Atlántico; University of Utah","keywords":"Entertainment; Phenomenon; Population; Ancient DNA; History of science; Genealogy; History; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Demography","authors":[{"name":"Joyce C. Havstad","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03965290888151631,"gpt":0.3016978452288648,"spread":0.2620449363473485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003531638,0.0001546135,0.0002151015,0.001432459,0.001871593,0.002697871,0.0007180003,0.001338454,0.004158129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008825121,0.0001297913,0.000134342,0.0008637655,0.03626891,0.002228558,0.003171469,0.002148541,0.0001192437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002990522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008884239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003764591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00407669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983134,0.0008577791,0.0000426903,0.0001938302,0.0004420031,0.0001502474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942888,0.003572211,0.000848827,0.0004593612,0.0004635976,0.0003672686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000220624,0.00001439387,0.004265438,0.00002463784,0.000007605347,0.0002596713,0.01251216,0.0002890943,0.0004496669,0.9767756,0.000687135,0.004692371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008173207,0.00001852395,0.007511478,0.00003894113,0.00000821383,0.0005260875,0.009152149,0.0007211159,0.0003839424,0.9694459,0.01216117,0.0000242968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5677701,0.002781952,0.04473512,0.06224602,0.0002521779,0.00004333296,0.0001271848,0.00008286767,0.3219611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981731,0.0001376926,0.0007059163,0.0002415225,0.00002461167,0.000003734838,0.000003483085,0.000002234687,0.0007076365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02169788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954895053","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079004","title":"Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: beyond inductive risk","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Underdetermination; Philosophy of science; Relevance (law); Empirical evidence; Positive economics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Ingo Brigandt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05882964602861137,"gpt":0.3322949212887322,"spread":0.2734652752601209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2374507,0.001061731,0.003570115,0.008433225,0.007954271,0.01514791,0.005533514,0.01148335,0.00673547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5084341,0.001691546,0.002845907,0.004431225,0.1038118,0.03241247,0.01947192,0.01248591,0.0007241129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01192817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01355437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00368807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003189148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7677269,0.1677696,0.01315488,0.01359676,0.03146664,0.006285275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2178929,0.69336,0.02848477,0.03145968,0.02494703,0.003855643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074041,0.00002741229,0.002192265,0.0001964075,0.00009086958,0.0001482832,0.004962364,0.0006928078,0.0001062231,0.9853366,0.000535657,0.005637187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028343,0.00001095697,0.0003247297,0.0000960432,0.00001792103,0.00003036793,0.0005253028,0.0007544224,0.0001793582,0.9964767,0.001542206,0.00001363641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1611312,0.009439931,0.3583767,0.2713347,0.001174734,0.0007357781,0.0004390258,0.0002214345,0.1971467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448618,0.0009257901,0.04854284,0.003523245,0.0005711351,0.0004408527,0.00006746237,0.00007404057,0.0009927828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9920457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.940359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596494602","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1301776","title":"Hobbes’s agnostic theology before <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Agnosticism; Philosophy; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Existence of God; Epistemology; Faith; Subject (documents); Atheism; Reflexive pronoun; Theism","authors":[{"name":"Arash Abizadeh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04813081646638626,"gpt":0.2460425757805446,"spread":0.1979117593141583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002870118,0.0003072213,0.0003760486,0.001264666,0.004852289,0.00553696,0.0005822476,0.00221731,0.002611178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003389754,0.0003014952,0.0003477802,0.0005727327,0.03325387,0.003666078,0.002107742,0.005400185,0.0004852241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00712267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001926957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00682465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972621,0.001832432,0.00006404903,0.0002793031,0.0003760764,0.0001859832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984447,0.0008427615,0.0001073904,0.0001721479,0.0003096949,0.0001233537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004447722,0.000003189807,0.00002235765,0.000005534852,9.925383e-7,0.00001462671,0.001691074,0.00002359264,0.00004545979,0.9965135,0.001158438,0.0005166994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001156568,0.00001121179,0.0002181735,0.00008472314,0.000005207309,0.00005009016,0.001072094,0.0002794767,0.0002180298,0.8992625,0.09877048,0.00001644082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04943385,0.008857804,0.0315973,0.06160073,0.002585929,0.00003523957,0.0000892482,0.00009481495,0.8457051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622568,0.001063753,0.002867161,0.004737082,0.0007798246,0.00004318286,0.00002341845,0.0000695917,0.02815908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05167878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962293539","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2019.1619354","title":"Is children’s wellbeing different from adults’ wellbeing?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; York University","funders":"European Research Council; York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Psychology; Well-being; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist","authors":[{"name":"Andrée‐Anne Cormier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mauro Rossi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01732302339000507,"gpt":0.2014930318476231,"spread":0.184170008457618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00429637,0.0003198479,0.0004736882,0.001072622,0.001560133,0.003574208,0.0006163207,0.001640128,0.003100308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006598067,0.0001500582,0.0003536326,0.001049774,0.02138857,0.005885271,0.003202815,0.003904176,0.0002512218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003351258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001943259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009956638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008314265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977505,0.001086258,0.0000939089,0.0004713472,0.0003042045,0.0002936948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961401,0.001778954,0.0006992565,0.0002957774,0.0006156863,0.0004702011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004362297,0.00002001134,0.01269614,0.0001679619,0.00004587615,0.0002197579,0.02910004,0.0002735374,0.0003209299,0.9340414,0.003769066,0.0193016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001469484,0.00006225324,0.03732389,0.0006091283,0.00005201066,0.0004256002,0.04132264,0.0003379313,0.0004417606,0.8247011,0.09465725,0.00005183596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4147607,0.02726502,0.02313574,0.2936096,0.001115366,0.00006483596,0.0006802627,0.00006949266,0.239299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890146,0.00360126,0.001251793,0.003798856,0.0001459323,0.0000249272,0.00009324643,0.00001493388,0.002054475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009956638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02431518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554450515","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.816177","title":"Completing Rawls's arguments for equal political liberty and its fair value: the argument from self-respect","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Politics; Civil liberties; Law; Primary goods; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Meena Krishnamurthy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06147231165065698,"gpt":0.3075968779402261,"spread":0.2461245662895691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007726755,0.0004555447,0.0006876165,0.001769224,0.004564261,0.004985474,0.0009777434,0.003631139,0.006701898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009831086,0.0002801602,0.001133491,0.001208216,0.02765367,0.008922834,0.004298422,0.006435163,0.0008226921],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004363728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00777512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006363709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941497,0.002940772,0.0001575436,0.0005095688,0.001640772,0.0006016908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947414,0.003320663,0.00029913,0.0004271739,0.000940746,0.0002707519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003103924,0.000003826776,0.00001820319,0.00001032778,0.00000159705,0.00001608636,0.0003466583,0.00006077157,0.00001603849,0.9964643,0.001798717,0.001260475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007117203,0.000004511311,0.00006547374,0.00003144324,0.000002385588,0.00001583523,0.0001880044,0.000143061,0.00005133592,0.9745025,0.02498305,0.000005371153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03115721,0.01078085,0.04770183,0.1736676,0.001648938,0.00006180881,0.0001157165,0.00005778746,0.7348083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092707,0.004560875,0.01146963,0.01592112,0.001252437,0.0001276518,0.00004896761,0.0001088224,0.05723975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06918961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160608726","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0045","title":"Augustine on Testimony","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Augustinian Studies and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Aside; Epistemology; Section (typography); Doxastic logic","authors":[{"name":"Peter King","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nathan Ballantyne","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03572342930087379,"gpt":0.2172991381365509,"spread":0.1815757088356771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032995,0.0004981905,0.0004049937,0.001277026,0.007493327,0.004832415,0.0007815255,0.005069593,0.005005257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009013011,0.0002391395,0.0002813503,0.0008445044,0.01847655,0.00619626,0.003099798,0.008156511,0.001557279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005664083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003109436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007933219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008554596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959568,0.002389362,0.0001381437,0.0004867696,0.0007393318,0.0002894677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960665,0.002927285,0.0001870569,0.0001796474,0.0004347748,0.0002046783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008971918,0.000004874641,0.00005532151,0.00004604282,0.000001480048,0.00007127552,0.004261849,0.0000500505,0.00004908127,0.9269109,0.0623137,0.006226399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003804167,0.000007706381,0.0001277489,0.0002165295,0.000002111232,0.0001103097,0.001119348,0.0001034247,0.0001002326,0.171113,0.8270869,0.00000874133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006302499,0.0595823,0.008705718,0.2877962,0.008166107,0.00005251533,0.0001346799,0.0001051219,0.6291549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5064424,0.04306242,0.008998581,0.1207239,0.01205303,0.0002663744,0.00008143512,0.000213335,0.3081585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007933219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04109597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510964088","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.774846","title":"The use of useless knowledge: Bergson against the pragmatists","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Antithesis; Intuition; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics","authors":[{"name":"Barry Allen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0503690986137984,"gpt":0.2117547010551275,"spread":0.1613856024413291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028187,0.0007045399,0.0009438588,0.002437989,0.01007222,0.01508185,0.002082315,0.00980971,0.00206424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03774036,0.0006952202,0.0006392,0.001355093,0.09559897,0.02242778,0.007941138,0.01503934,0.0006031478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01344198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008173877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01290679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009001361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9720467,0.01900128,0.000948164,0.002489266,0.004071054,0.001443477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621637,0.02791833,0.002145898,0.0030719,0.003703705,0.0009964177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001014316,0.00000547621,0.00007239115,0.00002324819,0.000003971187,0.00004589883,0.01361624,0.0000681845,0.000036067,0.9795346,0.003749781,0.002834036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001615871,0.0000154614,0.0001061647,0.0001756594,0.000007865386,0.00009965141,0.005072315,0.0003339405,0.0001881573,0.9120917,0.08186356,0.00002923232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0465597,0.01824122,0.0383403,0.4834588,0.001663756,0.00006819733,0.00005854293,0.0001987663,0.4114107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386589,0.002476839,0.007288979,0.02779784,0.0005806259,0.0001042071,0.00001924202,0.00019234,0.02288096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1490688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463359842","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716516","title":"Origins Are Not Essences in Evolutionary Systematics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Natural selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Psychology; History; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Mohan Matthen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08524593220961214,"gpt":0.2077423234575075,"spread":0.1224963912478953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003501716,0.0004360583,0.0006783502,0.00136163,0.002250552,0.004618832,0.0007792239,0.001446108,0.004738273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009728595,0.0004832117,0.0005140241,0.001008204,0.024064,0.0154904,0.00310516,0.002933355,0.0006467476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002144985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001063458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001472021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00205126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972078,0.001345485,0.0001751293,0.0005776772,0.0004588538,0.00023509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948056,0.0025974,0.0004721843,0.001371608,0.000523111,0.0002300602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088095,0.000003397723,0.0009515908,0.00006842828,0.00001707447,0.00003526258,0.00159144,0.0002098337,0.0001635125,0.988314,0.0006307194,0.008005873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001141729,0.00001193197,0.001163918,0.00006198941,0.00001868947,0.0001117459,0.0006904015,0.0002381354,0.0001289978,0.9556422,0.04190941,0.00001106565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1868197,0.04629729,0.269911,0.08410503,0.002240745,0.00009338271,0.0005794801,0.0006833084,0.4092702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544177,0.005983738,0.02014953,0.002420152,0.0006303717,0.0000609897,0.0001209867,0.0001586828,0.01605792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01851904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046309195","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0009","title":"The Social Dimensions of Modesty","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Character traits; Psychology; Social psychology; Simple (philosophy); Trait; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Computer science; History","authors":[{"name":"Scott Woodcock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07944100043389908,"gpt":0.2450665267759915,"spread":0.1656255263420924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003107182,0.0003134538,0.0002429248,0.001368085,0.005007109,0.004502086,0.000452464,0.001255766,0.003586566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005217804,0.0001624646,0.0002923119,0.0008508133,0.03923471,0.00390207,0.004973335,0.002157557,0.0003529399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00297658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00148909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002760032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002527749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959422,0.002352074,0.0001354382,0.0003940022,0.0007862892,0.0003899044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965287,0.001378308,0.0006695096,0.0004258394,0.0004205348,0.0005770625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001170765,0.00001097084,0.001661781,0.00001902472,0.00001003786,0.00008533042,0.0101937,0.000141258,0.0001995546,0.9816772,0.001139447,0.004849982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001575457,0.00004756084,0.007059273,0.00007472386,0.0000122591,0.0002312925,0.009413289,0.0005690922,0.0002202381,0.8961257,0.08620854,0.00002219412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1782145,0.002436221,0.02009124,0.02694853,0.0002035556,0.00004649241,0.00009100567,0.00006387898,0.7719046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935819,0.0003931798,0.001037839,0.0004265306,0.00006646056,0.00002458166,0.00001530435,0.00001158572,0.004442736],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005007109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02159673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740630344","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1353880","title":"Justice in migration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legitimacy; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Immigration; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Balance (ability); Emigration; Global justice; Democratic legitimacy; Political economy; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Christine Straehle","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06078543472612517,"gpt":0.3328047356437615,"spread":0.2720193009176363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007249639,0.0003837638,0.0005451496,0.001209247,0.01173725,0.007887495,0.001004705,0.004859909,0.00374903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008844458,0.0001328682,0.0003994291,0.001156399,0.05281269,0.005129464,0.005716251,0.005519392,0.0002536988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009825494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01204199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02944469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02132963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921177,0.004701376,0.0002596577,0.0006849933,0.001027892,0.001208433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967637,0.001416895,0.0003153601,0.0002602129,0.0006934665,0.0005503945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002660015,0.000005640297,0.0001604806,0.00001735143,0.000001847006,0.00003694793,0.004291834,0.0001036923,0.00002136193,0.9911753,0.002103673,0.002079161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007140538,0.0000153211,0.0005204318,0.0002073741,0.000004916637,0.00007165714,0.00881933,0.0002027918,0.00005157491,0.9150155,0.07507225,0.00001174898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05855861,0.01729137,0.01229491,0.2710775,0.002808851,0.0001064596,0.00007337097,0.00003831167,0.6377506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662306,0.003456042,0.001515223,0.01299781,0.0007001469,0.00005188181,0.00001740354,0.00002307944,0.01500775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02944469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0712893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515709034","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1218254","title":"Mental causation, compatibilism and counterfactuals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Causation; Counterfactual conditional; Free will; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Counterfactual thinking","authors":[{"name":"Dwayne Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04129434277311143,"gpt":0.2357986121983564,"spread":0.194504269425245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01155776,0.0007208164,0.001112141,0.003462336,0.002884172,0.005693674,0.002099322,0.004811378,0.01286195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01954842,0.0007308536,0.001438937,0.001583838,0.02405825,0.01153764,0.007500185,0.005632105,0.0007184001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003123197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001615795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00191142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00104728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900149,0.005902775,0.0004250454,0.001439032,0.001741295,0.0004769175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836442,0.01116514,0.001390723,0.002027999,0.001180082,0.0005918852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007454702,0.000005158297,0.00005564499,0.00001331921,0.000008970365,0.00003208076,0.0001253044,0.0002429317,0.00003857516,0.9984257,0.0003187897,0.0007259781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006015618,0.000002451516,0.0000473397,0.000008445385,0.000003365647,0.00002485895,0.00003190135,0.0005740708,0.0000408565,0.9976798,0.001576366,0.000004588043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1019338,0.00673933,0.4601034,0.07941952,0.001907831,0.000133122,0.0002205996,0.0004364402,0.3491059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733385,0.0007699971,0.01933557,0.001839529,0.0005758801,0.00009599017,0.00006106012,0.00006249716,0.003920861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01286195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06112397,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541780161","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1250201","title":"John Locke, ‘Hobbist’: of sleeping souls and thinking matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Soul; Metaphysics; Materialism; Epistemology; Suspect; Relation (database); False accusation; Law","authors":[{"name":"Liam P. Dempsey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02844951043428131,"gpt":0.2024139259673864,"spread":0.173964415533105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001678123,0.0002670402,0.0003014803,0.0008589857,0.005966394,0.004445323,0.0004875958,0.00230286,0.004756918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003868399,0.0002287988,0.0001488599,0.0005924061,0.02911259,0.006975775,0.001829133,0.005097743,0.0006929447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002654353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001880452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0130251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02231823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989088,0.0007011209,0.00002069112,0.0001115595,0.0001764331,0.00008139492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983553,0.0009922039,0.00009100492,0.000097415,0.0002579723,0.0002060131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000304806,0.00001106046,0.000174133,0.00004964243,0.000004491499,0.0001279908,0.02555187,0.00004934672,0.0001160314,0.9275358,0.03989926,0.006449801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001776893,0.00001821053,0.0005609002,0.0002188446,0.000006153465,0.000332933,0.01624658,0.0002354473,0.0002756733,0.4306013,0.5514588,0.00002738521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04049644,0.08750062,0.01270016,0.3705774,0.007630738,0.0000334096,0.00009308544,0.0001343197,0.4808337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8758695,0.01147305,0.0039186,0.03465658,0.002342398,0.00004008928,0.00003246526,0.000166298,0.0715011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0130251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02589858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295037080","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717561","title":"Matter and Aristotle's Material Cause","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue; The Thing; Aesthetics; Living matter; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Byrne","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03581503502933266,"gpt":0.2081965437692752,"spread":0.1723815087399426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001768326,0.0006021839,0.0005509783,0.002530673,0.005226552,0.003573116,0.0007107405,0.003002106,0.004843249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001758414,0.0004782624,0.0007113771,0.001026182,0.02826811,0.005425389,0.002356541,0.002587972,0.0009570258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005990257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003077361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01079206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01336036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983755,0.0005349233,0.00005674104,0.0002699259,0.0005500678,0.0002127522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993962,0.0002638195,0.00005123646,0.00009496226,0.0001421526,0.00005161758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002926758,0.000001758558,0.00002429036,0.00001048597,0.000001308447,0.00001749406,0.0004203574,0.00008232525,0.00001836828,0.9979729,0.0005780002,0.0008697635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001065593,0.000009508515,0.0001760723,0.00002570967,0.000003294653,0.00003715758,0.0001657809,0.0001874219,0.00006597147,0.9577379,0.04157292,0.000007659567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02061704,0.01104314,0.04848456,0.01374566,0.0007840017,0.00006090263,0.0001536384,0.0001843494,0.9049267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8793367,0.005629629,0.02744641,0.00342527,0.0009681944,0.00012848,0.0001513922,0.0001150022,0.08279894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01079206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04346251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1710638876","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716524","title":"Contingent Natures and Virtuous Knowers: Could Epistemology be ‘Gendered’","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Fallacy; Rationality; Philosophy; Feminist epistemology; Reading (process); Social epistemology; Sociology; Feminist philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca Kukla","is_ca":true},{"name":"Laura Ruetsche","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06499314415635483,"gpt":0.2860263510570169,"spread":0.2210332069006621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01706925,0.0005539968,0.0006675855,0.001878338,0.009130908,0.01135225,0.002059028,0.00631548,0.005073813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01970806,0.0003891605,0.0008044845,0.001088002,0.1164194,0.02277704,0.007895136,0.008358122,0.0005712974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009042629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00576144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01317959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01354919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913242,0.005529512,0.0001705044,0.0008380717,0.001212469,0.0009251834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877412,0.008528411,0.0006674214,0.001435451,0.0009971046,0.0006304747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007650102,0.000003355819,0.000105945,0.00001069733,0.000001823029,0.00002763623,0.01416721,0.00002426488,0.0000373653,0.9830918,0.0009717304,0.001550551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009352619,0.000005962407,0.0001276978,0.00007179267,0.000002641373,0.00003160506,0.01515644,0.0001130245,0.0001030501,0.953276,0.03109251,0.000009952754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07755823,0.009298188,0.0420662,0.426894,0.001891131,0.00005005332,0.00009276633,0.00009146288,0.4420579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740616,0.001053155,0.003117379,0.0108198,0.000331528,0.00005350677,0.00001500499,0.00005661275,0.01049145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09027189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083102510","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2008.0005","title":"On the Value of Happiness: Herder contra Kant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Destiny (ISS module); Tone (literature); Content (measure theory); Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Sonia Sikka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04026447914236973,"gpt":0.2289922633699203,"spread":0.1887277842275506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002666601,0.0004804172,0.0006153719,0.001348005,0.00213551,0.004845453,0.0009059889,0.004531201,0.003567604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004905359,0.0002965664,0.0003257997,0.001558644,0.02000555,0.007118705,0.002756102,0.007338667,0.001233168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004002234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001586242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004779834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002334143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972868,0.00131838,0.00007609477,0.000479216,0.0006084196,0.0002311228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983411,0.001232101,0.0001121193,0.00007618263,0.0001847126,0.00005382574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002262201,0.000004879808,0.000096182,0.0001058186,0.000006120779,0.00004579404,0.002222718,0.0001181902,0.00003640144,0.9313857,0.05827735,0.007678291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008069351,0.00001725026,0.0003814557,0.000584648,0.000007863983,0.0001118583,0.0009968316,0.0001550453,0.00008717152,0.6819528,0.3156777,0.00001924666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008097215,0.2652294,0.005304832,0.5140659,0.006172867,0.00002522722,0.0003265051,0.00008486729,0.2006932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5244498,0.1374481,0.004946482,0.2199844,0.02172551,0.0002006358,0.0002310806,0.000170961,0.09084316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004845453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02903831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069466861","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0002","title":"Benefits, Intentions, and the Principle of Fairness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Law and economics; Set (abstract data type); Public good; Economics; Sociology; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Idil Boran","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03874641803884814,"gpt":0.2854926207513649,"spread":0.2467462027125168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01371491,0.0007319755,0.0008712743,0.001692253,0.004617718,0.008302887,0.001660368,0.006010566,0.006091849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01442853,0.0005408319,0.001034818,0.001313713,0.03632954,0.01038448,0.006444025,0.005757841,0.001177195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004772662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004715255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004758877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002989173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874784,0.006029262,0.0004588984,0.001579498,0.003311242,0.001142777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939055,0.003251945,0.0004539215,0.001073085,0.0009370528,0.0003784505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003587155,0.000002900155,0.00004749084,0.000008554618,0.000001951446,0.000007148578,0.0002244525,0.0001032951,0.00001642588,0.9974946,0.0004782875,0.00161142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006453642,0.00000470499,0.00007851401,0.00002230354,0.000002659445,0.00001772555,0.00008111028,0.0001616521,0.00002985139,0.985649,0.01394126,0.000004765402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02138296,0.007580053,0.1413457,0.04353412,0.00120703,0.0002010367,0.0001697233,0.0001371626,0.784442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802543,0.003893898,0.05472806,0.007954504,0.001525027,0.000590667,0.0001330505,0.0001668991,0.05075355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01371491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07253224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467609113","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717572","title":"Rational Choice with Deontic Constraints","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Point (geometry); Advertising; Law and economics; Free riding; Free rider problem; Marketing; Internet privacy; Economics; Microeconomics; Public good; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Heath","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04614076893581058,"gpt":0.2989282900366215,"spread":0.2527875211008109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008447032,0.001229076,0.001268481,0.001018658,0.002247614,0.00570416,0.002025453,0.00303061,0.01125734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01361905,0.001190059,0.001434772,0.00150062,0.00662123,0.009899778,0.002898345,0.004843809,0.001406926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00553543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003671691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009251084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008947472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934861,0.003504773,0.0003946474,0.0008697395,0.001256453,0.0004883538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897068,0.007249703,0.0004937544,0.001365494,0.0008194923,0.0003647445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001099885,0.000005822463,0.00003991587,0.00002208217,0.000007656236,0.00003137294,0.00009148658,0.001103942,0.00003123865,0.9959752,0.001135887,0.001544422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001887289,0.00000339224,0.00003213974,0.00001410441,0.000005463278,0.00001550549,0.00003036181,0.002676637,0.00002470098,0.9906642,0.006509983,0.000004604685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02692352,0.007419813,0.5231431,0.02797008,0.0006990521,0.0002452758,0.001556068,0.0003696173,0.4116735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7965463,0.004921279,0.1405933,0.003458201,0.001159662,0.0007178397,0.001318076,0.0002144522,0.05107089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04467273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735266767","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1341781","title":"Epistemic buck-passing and the interpersonal view of testimony","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Testimonial; Epistemology; Reductionism; Philosophy; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Judith Baker","is_ca":true},{"name":"P. Clark","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07887050824485706,"gpt":0.2642439181365279,"spread":0.1853734098916708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01300989,0.0005556472,0.0006959328,0.003147616,0.007514493,0.009613855,0.002099619,0.005412039,0.006010794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03162753,0.0005667093,0.0008123005,0.001055703,0.04293801,0.01285792,0.00851786,0.007933977,0.0006315422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006194898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002656289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00329111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002281292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9822676,0.01075954,0.0006755092,0.001492476,0.003679843,0.001125038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969249,0.02050692,0.00215129,0.003458139,0.003427153,0.001207523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007841289,0.000006537723,0.00009704131,0.00003380538,0.000005520888,0.0001190687,0.003929475,0.0002187673,0.00006901877,0.9933351,0.0004517308,0.001725975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007504918,0.00001204091,0.0001368682,0.00009182437,0.00001463824,0.0001367283,0.001671611,0.0009126485,0.0003002378,0.9853527,0.0113496,0.00001363058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07593516,0.002769299,0.1300836,0.05803276,0.0007296931,0.000111721,0.00008285805,0.0001537801,0.7321012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854928,0.0003306984,0.006048327,0.001289144,0.0002064756,0.00003253174,0.00001309488,0.00002510114,0.006561814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01300989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06880373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997847719","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0030","title":"Modality, Individuation, and the Ontology of Art","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Object (grammar); Product (mathematics); Individuation; Modality (human–computer interaction); Contrast (vision); Sound (geography); Musical; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Visual arts; Art; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Psychoanalysis; Acoustics","authors":[{"name":"Carl Matheson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ben Caplan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05976143593382885,"gpt":0.2479901571436354,"spread":0.1882287212098065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001919964,0.0004819588,0.0004482506,0.00188594,0.003864178,0.007583261,0.0009671108,0.001815315,0.004359113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001700752,0.0003158007,0.0007541329,0.001156806,0.03205361,0.009474765,0.004182365,0.002214485,0.0005826256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002988005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001167836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003136031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002840829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981824,0.0008543782,0.00007176936,0.0003695679,0.0002993272,0.0002225839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992684,0.0003317696,0.00007876485,0.0001692428,0.00007672132,0.00007524034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007228364,0.000002641776,0.0001022084,0.00001306279,0.000002285756,0.00002866113,0.002634851,0.00006263893,0.000129837,0.9945029,0.0002564525,0.002257243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105186,0.00001172211,0.0004098603,0.00004730656,0.000005695917,0.0001476539,0.001870511,0.0002904712,0.0001828615,0.9593354,0.03767632,0.00001158468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06368985,0.01275192,0.072763,0.006698217,0.0005522428,0.00004111635,0.0001328294,0.0001401106,0.8432307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626803,0.002561079,0.01206732,0.0007918357,0.0003497451,0.00008522953,0.00007911959,0.00009136202,0.02129401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007583261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02167964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829168491","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716587","title":"Inferentialism and Singular Reference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Expression (computer science); Generality; Epistemology; Extensional definition; Relation (database); Object (grammar); sort; Philosophy; Linguistics; Proposition; Inference; Binary relation; Order (exchange); Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Arithmetic; Discrete mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Mark McCullagh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03508942666289962,"gpt":0.2845320885942227,"spread":0.2494426619313231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006520188,0.0005532409,0.0008430579,0.002893118,0.005626201,0.006930784,0.001713211,0.003065609,0.005775729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007824143,0.0005479215,0.001392095,0.002494846,0.04220887,0.01500097,0.005753838,0.006682683,0.00092992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008094462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002448052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00544361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004344122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993291,0.002606217,0.0003227154,0.001367553,0.001921446,0.000491129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955143,0.002626529,0.0002455551,0.0008610755,0.0005714628,0.0001811168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002812003,0.00000173739,0.00002917632,0.000007958035,0.000001874327,0.00001442967,0.0005889528,0.00003215338,0.00002547626,0.9977013,0.0003409228,0.001253212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002573063,0.00000199441,0.00004350404,0.00001094735,0.000001822615,0.00002485439,0.00009557603,0.0001245213,0.00004575051,0.9905692,0.009076737,0.000002470658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03386188,0.02242753,0.2677867,0.04954921,0.001014158,0.0000685364,0.0002298678,0.0004074579,0.6246546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9027883,0.005222215,0.04388789,0.007042756,0.001785068,0.0001306236,0.0002378798,0.0002854699,0.03861969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008094462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05872971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789692057","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1415105","title":"Integration and authority: rescuing the ‘one thought too many’ problem","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas P.D. Smyth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09115655659884588,"gpt":0.2551344071805182,"spread":0.1639778505816724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02011263,0.0005473468,0.001104455,0.00177266,0.007429016,0.00871632,0.00234375,0.009131788,0.00594748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03264153,0.000567528,0.0008800149,0.001060964,0.08276848,0.01999992,0.01442653,0.01512254,0.0008174665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00652012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007087527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004093198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002654805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9838869,0.01032614,0.0004119913,0.001281879,0.002908913,0.001184125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837443,0.009211206,0.001138426,0.00271611,0.002088485,0.001101473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006514272,0.000004453997,0.00003573088,0.000006689379,0.000001846281,0.00003190764,0.001500176,0.00009418555,0.00002614324,0.9962211,0.0008359595,0.001235129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000115323,0.000006236097,0.00005116393,0.00003992064,0.000003860607,0.0000352384,0.0006967114,0.0004848824,0.00008628649,0.9860498,0.01252554,0.000008740594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07866848,0.004167119,0.1518953,0.1997473,0.002582522,0.00009120767,0.0000415033,0.0002080033,0.5625985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774716,0.0004228522,0.007487533,0.004536639,0.0006200118,0.00004718222,0.00001109197,0.00009724376,0.009305663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02011263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1063671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962810377","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716726","title":"Integrity and Moral Danger","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Greg Scherkoske","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05005797442260495,"gpt":0.2424055268507124,"spread":0.1923475524281074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009479295,0.0006134099,0.0006436871,0.001305683,0.009881712,0.01326724,0.001361174,0.008358628,0.0118169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01487848,0.0003677776,0.0005324117,0.0007284602,0.06845222,0.01594162,0.009644195,0.01029088,0.002367789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007358424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004821096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003744174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908804,0.004812808,0.0003022629,0.000920227,0.002019323,0.001064996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922346,0.003414228,0.0007498651,0.001105072,0.001456805,0.001039494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004203118,0.000004363076,0.00007618049,0.00001499695,0.000001964913,0.00002586254,0.002365012,0.00003666495,0.00002640381,0.9893385,0.005296855,0.002809018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006259905,0.000007923282,0.0001151929,0.00009066004,0.000002726388,0.00009887102,0.001567087,0.0001022908,0.00006316121,0.9062358,0.0916996,0.00001049881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01395524,0.01934406,0.02135398,0.2062202,0.001745821,0.00005043163,0.0000700304,0.00009782293,0.7371624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8681014,0.006590862,0.005967682,0.02942697,0.001679511,0.00009362613,0.00005869746,0.0001548856,0.08792637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01326724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05338931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777563286","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1414524","title":"Intention as action under development: why intention is not a mental state","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University at Buffalo; University of New England","keywords":"Action (physics); Tadpole (physics); Mental state; Psychology; Action theory (sociology); State (computer science); Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Devlin Russell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1149861664227835,"gpt":0.293840096776608,"spread":0.1788539303538245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047189,0.0003238975,0.0004243303,0.001059065,0.00124763,0.004264592,0.00120064,0.002613893,0.004083273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009420177,0.0003743359,0.0008027304,0.0004965804,0.01993327,0.007729754,0.002282494,0.003267587,0.0006617208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002539514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002075103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004016324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001816506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970351,0.001553847,0.0001246429,0.0004546997,0.000532456,0.0002992133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936141,0.00329523,0.0006026797,0.0007317103,0.001192743,0.0005635012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089165,0.000006524197,0.0004542235,0.00002687268,0.000004821213,0.00005544626,0.001267783,0.0003413553,0.0001618566,0.9950022,0.0004168984,0.002253121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001585161,0.00002679756,0.00093736,0.00005848823,0.00001119753,0.0001210944,0.0007858279,0.003196318,0.0003258912,0.9861531,0.008345042,0.00002292326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1612388,0.003088612,0.2967902,0.04884706,0.0008338043,0.0001372691,0.000211301,0.0003862514,0.4884667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790462,0.0003666501,0.01447255,0.0008497638,0.00005039197,0.00007238439,0.00005602117,0.00005186866,0.005034058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02495623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513512365","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716730","title":"Obligation and Advantage in Hobbes' <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Covenant; Prudence; Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Peacock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01985077571624141,"gpt":0.2140152349323051,"spread":0.1941644592160637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003324153,0.0002853699,0.0003338439,0.0008059001,0.005344072,0.005137337,0.0005598822,0.002044183,0.004253225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003563559,0.0002163713,0.0003818929,0.0005853031,0.02657908,0.007229666,0.004256828,0.003287074,0.0004267648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004204438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001780905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003758091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004193302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973253,0.001271329,0.00008245501,0.0003621691,0.0005367674,0.000421936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998652,0.0007573117,0.0001300417,0.0001309357,0.0001550239,0.0001747675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005473153,0.000003707268,0.00006529322,0.000006938225,8.716284e-7,0.00001465086,0.001971678,0.00002610446,0.00003444329,0.996133,0.0005351808,0.001202784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000896185,0.00001742823,0.0006148595,0.00005936476,0.000004891782,0.00006768978,0.001928552,0.0002190918,0.0001439341,0.9280747,0.06884812,0.00001239832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07581974,0.008351134,0.0264814,0.03809892,0.0007334949,0.00002216653,0.00002538518,0.00003710762,0.8504307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759942,0.001073756,0.002383539,0.002556719,0.0003743313,0.00003354138,0.000009521244,0.00004067815,0.01753364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005344072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03050548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985419471","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2012.0014","title":"Why the Basic Structure?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Constitution; Scope (computer science); Duty; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Louis‐Philippe Hodgson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05762212956430192,"gpt":0.298501507878754,"spread":0.2408793783144521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004222949,0.0004483592,0.0004469796,0.001049971,0.005394818,0.005805314,0.001572543,0.003154024,0.01505284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008093528,0.0004159473,0.0004234203,0.0009634165,0.02710641,0.01722384,0.004993807,0.007144659,0.003356173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007286648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00492163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01014801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01280113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962453,0.001458804,0.00008977317,0.0005803998,0.001013634,0.0006120735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974139,0.0007821968,0.0001905088,0.000449406,0.0007057081,0.0004583714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008551001,0.000005468185,0.0001267743,0.00001814397,0.000001978586,0.0000154563,0.001238897,0.00002655104,0.00005167518,0.9820266,0.01229165,0.004188177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001778976,0.00001553899,0.0003559297,0.00009203346,0.000003394129,0.00007495286,0.001587269,0.0001204385,0.0001141896,0.7811085,0.216501,0.000008858172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02016257,0.01428114,0.04168685,0.3090685,0.003994429,0.0000748446,0.0003189982,0.0002450246,0.6101676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8097216,0.008302305,0.01502353,0.05641661,0.002384701,0.000240957,0.0004811131,0.0004575773,0.1069715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01505284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0528686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959395712","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079003","title":"Whose social values? Evaluating Canada's ‘death of evidence’ controversy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Relativism; Negotiation; Social epistemology; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Maya J. Goldenberg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4039532988622369,"gpt":0.4129952576931509,"spread":0.009041958830914076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05639877,0.0006004285,0.001489086,0.00518253,0.03858487,0.03954477,0.00670193,0.02139442,0.004491509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1412057,0.0006568099,0.0009689216,0.007227072,0.04405546,0.01186302,0.01085566,0.01878719,0.0003164219],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2726985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3384797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9573929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9694501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9498425,0.01482882,0.001593386,0.002826656,0.02103834,0.009870348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8238211,0.09703233,0.00454147,0.002672342,0.05984718,0.01208546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010232,0.00003274206,0.003757281,0.0003083905,0.00007725896,0.0006042831,0.02531524,0.000553443,0.0001776418,0.8669122,0.08558414,0.01657504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002286779,0.00006496473,0.008881471,0.002374646,0.0003507642,0.0001795104,0.08847155,0.001954634,0.0008759029,0.4084733,0.4877723,0.0003722314],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03888494,0.01089521,0.001181323,0.8450755,0.001534767,0.00007353816,0.0002277043,0.00003189562,0.102095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8084871,0.005355736,0.002355478,0.1715328,0.001107163,0.00008989508,0.0001229304,0.00009377673,0.01085504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8435667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103312344","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.39","title":"Failures of Intention and Failed-Art","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Aesthetics; Luck; Accidental; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Michel‐Antoine Xhignesse","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05893295163836881,"gpt":0.2086846860974425,"spread":0.1497517344590737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01474344,0.0006814344,0.0007746805,0.002141192,0.00491066,0.008710614,0.002283025,0.003814297,0.006358061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03158867,0.0005395166,0.0007817783,0.001180904,0.04880445,0.0119725,0.01006899,0.005868915,0.0009522294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003719948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002169673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002960534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001747431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860986,0.007229638,0.0006467787,0.00113527,0.002978352,0.001911438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966153,0.01670517,0.003911908,0.007383467,0.003736236,0.002110194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007994966,0.00005293031,0.006006422,0.00008049216,0.00002452696,0.0005053871,0.02779089,0.001379813,0.0004082333,0.9536229,0.001089063,0.008959346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003731193,0.00009170023,0.006424567,0.0002708923,0.00002812471,0.0005571639,0.02453944,0.006629345,0.0010586,0.9402915,0.01998576,0.00008568237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5181729,0.001268068,0.06526393,0.01258041,0.0002112276,0.00009073805,0.000085581,0.0003720457,0.4019551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967536,0.00005963995,0.0009448598,0.0001206844,0.00001234892,0.0000175178,0.0000113442,0.00003536658,0.002044528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01474344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07797164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069587569","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.977835","title":"Kant on conic sections","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conic section; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Geometry","authors":[{"name":"Alison Laywine","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03580878565759277,"gpt":0.2024952082967897,"spread":0.1666864226391969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002572175,0.0004482143,0.0003140757,0.001303699,0.003911082,0.004056882,0.0005602653,0.001745846,0.006989964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005355652,0.0002351127,0.0003599922,0.001181003,0.01623913,0.006185317,0.0023419,0.003683547,0.001610225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004023594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00181627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003466486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002597799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972184,0.001536379,0.00007160916,0.0003676171,0.0005498584,0.0002562914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974681,0.001219316,0.0001516195,0.0003772631,0.0006628603,0.0001207504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003607667,9.92982e-7,0.00002017258,0.000005546343,7.032519e-7,0.000008406143,0.0003411097,0.000077896,0.00001677576,0.9968317,0.001586574,0.001106517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004167958,0.000004727165,0.00007083451,0.00003509523,0.000001637572,0.00002312976,0.0002845251,0.0001617997,0.0001072493,0.9253272,0.07397528,0.00000426688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01928081,0.007712051,0.03903297,0.01763265,0.001042321,0.00002933899,0.0001309387,0.0001057223,0.9150331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.853188,0.004636924,0.01052617,0.006670844,0.001042771,0.00009082526,0.0001334942,0.0002186161,0.1234924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006989964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0291934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}