{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":182,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":182,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"1325816d12ec","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2154905584","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0063","title":"From Thick to Thin: Two Moral Reduction Plans","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Elstein","is_ca":false},{"name":"Thomas Hurka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05836533605621926,"gpt":0.2532884893290386,"spread":0.1949231532728193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000306262,0.000150654,0.0002440884,0.000314836,0.0003192211,0.0001882642,0.0003409478,0.00007390408,0.001077807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007675174,0.000131158,0.0001463089,0.00005877556,0.000193928,0.0002746806,0.000007048699,0.0006050858,0.0001242696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009523037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004054256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004723917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008407574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989293,0.00006443246,0.0003639254,0.0001457874,0.0002306367,0.0002659707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985159,0.00003953352,0.0001506519,0.0001865051,0.0002562171,0.0008512048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003956847,0.00001848122,0.000008413176,0.000002441492,0.00003312533,0.0001136071,0.01316818,0.00006810419,0.00009038221,0.9830424,0.002520776,0.0008944876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002953503,0.0002937675,0.00007569155,0.00009519466,0.00002707587,0.00003375882,0.000319118,0.000009084529,0.00005788141,0.9547541,0.04388088,0.0001581094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.245987,0.0007140331,0.00004661713,0.289579,0.005125455,0.0002009107,0.0004570636,0.00003679131,0.4578531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814886,0.000004749594,0.00009086268,0.006715486,0.01153284,6.241609e-7,0.000008873257,0.00001505146,0.0001429356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7355016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762494388","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1386481","title":"Human rights without human supremacism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Declaration; Environmental ethics; Subjectivity; Embodied cognition; Hierarchy; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Will Kymlicka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1639704313768476,"gpt":0.4922745909166849,"spread":0.3283041595398373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004186452,0.0001779036,0.000413508,0.0003003025,0.01337115,0.00007947587,0.001356343,0.0004269349,0.00217755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003316294,0.0001511719,0.0001351535,0.00005048974,0.0007773282,0.0005819559,0.00006247528,0.006113154,0.0003561153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003305444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001453048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02013801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1192737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968497,0.001010442,0.0008509358,0.0001872965,0.0005022583,0.0005994219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994728,0.0004530259,0.001467897,0.000871251,0.0006897374,0.001790032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001709341,0.00003377797,0.05766548,0.0001553869,0.0001280248,0.001068068,0.003170161,9.944196e-7,0.0004176175,0.8923011,0.0449315,0.0001107447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001141993,0.0001445529,0.02080122,0.0007186993,0.00007032279,0.0000495909,0.0001214258,0.000001498486,0.00002703061,0.85386,0.1228724,0.000191293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2846406,0.000151039,0.00004104458,0.03563451,0.003615653,0.0002958134,0.00001976532,0.0000165485,0.675585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903772,0.000002117437,0.000316383,0.00247041,0.004625399,0.000004202968,0.000002305679,0.0000339737,0.002167964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7057366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016435477","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.923240","title":"Justification is potential knowledge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Aberdeen","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06459974620442645,"gpt":0.2509244275320971,"spread":0.1863246813276707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003650175,0.00009586167,0.0001823295,0.0002142518,0.000302871,0.00009140609,0.0002178691,0.00006291113,0.0006192601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006938788,0.00008699922,0.0001427311,0.00002931777,0.0003740076,0.0001640171,0.000004780374,0.000271595,0.0001829992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004601978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000386471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007628159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00881708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992619,0.00007970703,0.0002888187,0.00009225913,0.00009398969,0.0001833816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988019,0.0000382793,0.000204195,0.0001512762,0.0004635078,0.0003407692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005094595,0.00001905676,0.00005435824,0.00004030841,0.00004608998,0.00001052529,0.01751724,0.000004744519,0.00005569731,0.9551513,0.02332144,0.0037741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002151302,0.0001091232,0.0001317561,0.00004162144,0.00006732844,0.00002063735,0.0003108405,0.00003780501,0.00008168622,0.2942189,0.704649,0.0001160943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06464401,0.002775944,0.001011141,0.03668448,0.01345085,0.0001772562,0.0001026958,0.00002622984,0.8811274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900739,0.000008864192,0.00006738854,0.001272592,0.006308422,7.033846e-7,0.000004141747,0.00001474911,0.002249281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6780465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583668695","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.857136","title":"A Humean theory of moral intuition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Jenny ja Antti Wihurin Rahasto; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Perception; Moral psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Antti Kauppinen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1223359896620183,"gpt":0.2476395764641013,"spread":0.125303586802083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001684382,0.00007155341,0.0001321523,0.0002408388,0.00006698918,0.00001469955,0.0002442647,0.00004234529,0.0009724348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001330154,0.00005977242,0.00009041053,0.0001151887,0.0002466984,0.0002173643,0.0000068708,0.0001589962,0.0001110931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004486681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001565545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002290856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006526949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992502,0.00009080621,0.000259906,0.00008995552,0.0001444183,0.000164736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992324,0.00004668469,0.0001819148,0.00009475769,0.00009537065,0.000348863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007457221,0.0001374233,0.003538128,0.00003605376,0.0000367273,0.0002478773,0.0007597118,0.00007518748,0.1057608,0.8581502,0.01777132,0.013412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003402197,0.0002904444,0.01165316,0.00006067533,0.000009099806,0.0002106911,0.00003060177,0.000007929541,0.01085379,0.9757273,0.0007341903,0.00008191312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9608544,0.0001078001,0.0001286948,0.009681898,0.0007039511,0.00009240424,0.00001687445,0.000004037125,0.02840998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973392,0.000005787273,0.0001087068,0.00220396,0.0002564443,0.000001252911,5.686081e-7,0.000006390717,0.00007770399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1175771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112923268","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.45","title":"Understanding the Problem of “Hype”: Exaggeration, Values, and Trust in Science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; Montana State University","keywords":"Exaggeration; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Journalism; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Media studies; History; Computer science; Psychoanalysis","authors":[{"name":"Kristen Intemann","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.589016986892307,"gpt":0.390232543620996,"spread":0.198784443271311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009483283,0.00003250412,0.00007271036,0.0001407632,0.0004173593,0.00006693274,0.0002610378,0.00002290439,0.0001087784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001535221,0.00002640578,0.00001841221,0.0004698627,0.0007059361,0.0002227922,0.00001003816,0.0001143832,0.000001182001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002008161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008394005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002063202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0259622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994115,0.00009604749,0.0001766249,0.00004937851,0.0001615931,0.0001049182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994135,0.00004907333,0.0001183687,0.00005644548,0.0001155081,0.0002470448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001750993,0.00001480851,0.03769922,0.00003438284,0.000008896418,0.000007703681,0.4705913,0.0000966794,0.00104123,0.4861616,0.001026754,0.00329992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001316557,0.0003613739,0.03644808,0.0004627008,0.00004123599,0.00002414739,0.1775212,0.0007902391,0.00009291396,0.7479162,0.03465264,0.0003727409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4809003,0.001489942,0.0004840756,0.349232,0.0002619581,0.0004018279,0.00001726,0.00000825264,0.1672044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987744,0.0003094095,0.0001537198,0.000604342,0.0001469307,4.278425e-7,3.939009e-7,0.000002402842,0.000007938238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5178742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531119672","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1235856","title":"Kant’s deductions of morality and freedom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main; Simon Fraser University; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Owen Ware","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05596386193333154,"gpt":0.2243051721624456,"spread":0.1683413102291141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002939514,0.00008227784,0.0001911397,0.0002031574,0.0001610586,0.00003112798,0.0001474833,0.00004692767,0.0007937688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000142508,0.00005344236,0.00009203201,0.00002715283,0.001128996,0.0001950833,0.000009679838,0.0001593739,0.00000812646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003157975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003305789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001609601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007255998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993194,0.00004696526,0.0003013402,0.00007586246,0.000113248,0.0001431734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989052,0.00009153968,0.0001816521,0.0001204658,0.000296033,0.0004051278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009170923,0.00001128125,0.000156436,0.00001368602,0.00003935585,0.00001579428,0.001250787,5.007939e-7,0.0001327348,0.9974234,0.0003106214,0.0006362448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002690101,0.0001109677,0.00024109,0.000111592,0.00002554549,0.00003032833,0.00009090867,6.952487e-7,0.00006448468,0.9640465,0.03493251,0.0000763939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5555741,0.002625168,0.0000861873,0.1969678,0.003240915,0.0001565213,0.0006254409,0.00001459449,0.2407093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980612,0.00003231842,0.00003487435,0.0002822268,0.001463592,4.936695e-7,4.120633e-7,0.000009373714,0.0001155043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4424871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8691213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020100236","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.9","title":"Credence: A Belief-First Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Moon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Elizabeth Jackson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1280423749139143,"gpt":0.234776251972447,"spread":0.1067338770585327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002127671,0.0001342971,0.0002864404,0.0001316374,0.0003835897,0.0001242743,0.0003570339,0.00006916082,0.0005411153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001300735,0.0001190919,0.0001890468,0.00005669671,0.0005261403,0.0002211287,0.00001025638,0.0004981821,0.0000716728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004667157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006316517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001335555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007016766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999051,0.00005226085,0.000342758,0.0001284236,0.0001718437,0.0002537071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985137,0.00004534101,0.0002141281,0.0001201307,0.0002873769,0.0008193305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001588689,0.00002463752,0.0003152397,0.0001188978,0.0001092179,0.0001468995,0.06599514,0.00003583113,0.000009830614,0.9069757,0.02592531,0.0003273774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004438979,0.0003733549,0.00007498042,0.00006849459,0.00008056808,0.00005548564,0.002398859,0.00004268983,0.00002025406,0.1251947,0.8710027,0.0002440598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01781266,0.004311326,0.0003569571,0.1024723,0.002854274,0.0002399814,0.0001407806,0.00003322484,0.8717785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869626,0.00001981052,0.0002751397,0.006154018,0.006160698,0.000001453148,0.000004276756,0.00002139032,0.0004006795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5924833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806181184","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1472516","title":"What kind of evaluative states are emotions? The attitudinal theory vs. the perceptual theory of emotions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Perception; Dilemma; Psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Self-perception theory; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive dissonance","authors":[{"name":"Mauro Rossi","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christine Tappolet","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08401052726712095,"gpt":0.3444453290382729,"spread":0.2604348017711519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001742255,0.000169323,0.000306103,0.0003034191,0.0004468755,0.00004698681,0.000590124,0.00009523645,0.005384655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001734363,0.00009967724,0.0002661209,0.0003409694,0.002124797,0.0002493404,0.00002505462,0.0004144086,0.00006356286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008400306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004587825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004453315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002660912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977369,0.0009892031,0.0005670711,0.0001564298,0.0002615899,0.0002887527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972563,0.0003703692,0.0006288995,0.0004861491,0.001012251,0.0002459899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003827991,0.0003947113,0.01493204,0.00003115457,0.0009187865,0.00007547728,0.08835789,0.00007019471,0.0003122531,0.8630921,0.01567042,0.01576219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001068691,0.001690624,0.5698861,0.0005134465,0.0006516407,0.0003256613,0.07748137,0.000006060862,0.0001433583,0.3452104,0.002780279,0.0002424423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797967,0.001432995,0.0003321267,0.01125697,0.002194008,0.0002958491,0.0002047399,0.000004270387,0.004482342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980866,0.00004079943,0.00006525283,0.0005182708,0.0007152579,0.00000574539,0.000005045086,0.00002164366,0.0005414339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5549541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592944988","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716589","title":"Memory and Personal Identity in Spinoza","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Personal identity; Identity (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Human being; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Self; Theology; Humanity","authors":[{"name":"Martin Hsiu‐Chu Lin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0419506459430174,"gpt":0.2478387356892383,"spread":0.2058880897462209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002045693,0.0001187901,0.0002124393,0.0002851126,0.0001426907,0.0001140772,0.0001642796,0.00004695563,0.002250005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005511897,0.0001029279,0.000103569,0.0000511631,0.0003473199,0.0005474651,0.00001214517,0.000319437,0.00005694358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001002669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001695404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001296499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02450451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990474,0.00004563487,0.0003380213,0.0001079723,0.0001725679,0.0002884203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990699,0.00003740629,0.00008418153,0.00006759591,0.00008848524,0.0006524153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001772127,0.00004272473,0.0007895684,0.00002629722,0.00002844039,0.0001597667,0.006397568,0.000002505351,0.000005586464,0.9887044,0.001017529,0.002807881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001091935,0.0001964457,0.00358,0.0001861241,0.00003970779,0.0001604677,0.0006168886,0.00003876163,0.00002855167,0.6025532,0.3912007,0.0003072276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7853185,0.005561655,0.000003790698,0.05089615,0.001165612,0.0001166255,0.00008721931,0.000008600517,0.1568418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924088,0.00002882651,0.00003475832,0.002562433,0.004627508,7.905766e-7,0.000001657956,0.00001106607,0.0003241791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3901832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283049953","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717524","title":"Making Do: Troubling Stoic Tendencies in an Otherwise Compelling Theory of Autonomy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Nothing; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Worry; Moral responsibility; Free will; Philosophy; Moral agency; Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"David Zimmerman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1014258699191419,"gpt":0.2766823715385294,"spread":0.1752565016193874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004026312,0.0001246058,0.0002462747,0.0004990437,0.0001134816,0.00005547499,0.000476037,0.00005190411,0.0008340268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008788842,0.0001122955,0.00009877599,0.0003369308,0.0002009939,0.0004274435,0.00000561794,0.0002941841,0.0000125228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001214769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006603411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002197259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000812111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987223,0.0001690223,0.0004742944,0.0001607709,0.0001779376,0.0002956478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991836,0.00009605224,0.000209548,0.000172401,0.00004926476,0.000289135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005648159,0.0006522628,0.05474916,0.0003017313,0.00007498122,0.005440726,0.0475979,0.04009654,0.1262473,0.4942696,0.0001900467,0.2298149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002917078,0.001014281,0.01020567,0.001836662,0.00006100327,0.0005158451,0.001095695,0.002726561,0.01741768,0.9512089,0.01001003,0.0009905437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818686,0.0007230801,0.00008538038,0.0005816189,0.0002215394,0.00007430895,0.0000147707,0.000006476655,0.01642427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988323,0.000016398,0.0002519539,0.0005272649,0.0002640844,6.498576e-7,2.078542e-7,0.00001767223,0.00008948381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4569393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9132009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149704867","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0025","title":"Teleology Without Tears: Aristotle and the Role of Mechanistic Conceptions of Organisms","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Context (archaeology); Natural philosophy; Philosophy; Ancient Greek; Ancient philosophy; Field (mathematics); History","authors":[{"name":"Sylvia Berryman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01454067298200785,"gpt":0.2026890590708422,"spread":0.1881483860888344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000392228,0.00009557833,0.0003162514,0.0001796885,0.0001775314,0.00001906954,0.0001874013,0.00005138716,0.0005206139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001236971,0.00006478935,0.0001048771,0.00005387405,0.001660618,0.00007567057,0.00001296315,0.0002223792,0.000005305342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002073012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001251834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009737885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999147,0.00005196159,0.0004378888,0.00007327091,0.0001249881,0.0001648931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988819,0.0001820516,0.0003377481,0.0001244554,0.0002465594,0.0002273276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006166373,0.00001805575,0.0002111465,0.00001142846,0.00005809917,0.00001285485,0.005754236,0.000001207641,0.000371041,0.992928,0.00005691348,0.0005154056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007428702,0.0002136813,0.0001716889,0.00004754711,0.00008657193,0.00005071146,0.001395139,0.000007574446,0.0005801857,0.9711465,0.02548302,0.00007447792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4143763,0.006107595,0.000588014,0.01111464,0.001653296,0.0004527698,0.0002614519,0.00001524442,0.5654307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987387,0.000009521615,0.00009279491,0.0002312842,0.0008220547,5.145105e-7,9.758852e-7,0.00001160475,0.00009256929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5843624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6118616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475106116","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716551","title":"Kant on Sensibility and the Understanding in the 1770s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Nothing; Metaphysics; Sensibility; Critical philosophy; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Alison Laywine","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1159716171938444,"gpt":0.2357518051722436,"spread":0.1197801879783992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002214259,0.00009145075,0.0001613397,0.0001288754,0.0004056117,0.000146352,0.0001707439,0.00003810438,0.0001265592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003625808,0.0000453341,0.00008225963,0.00004630073,0.001069208,0.00007392665,0.000003963605,0.000583786,0.000004519662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008645178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002328076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006962793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01411033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989541,0.0003862333,0.0002445666,0.00008182076,0.0001626834,0.000170569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989702,0.000564662,0.0001009546,0.0001536077,0.00005864198,0.0001519203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002819834,0.000008594509,0.00003059595,0.00000566906,0.00001420205,0.00006429302,0.01222932,0.000005497915,4.609841e-7,0.9875023,0.00008186326,0.00002905438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006118332,0.00007205255,0.00005205799,0.00004854855,0.00001314558,0.00004407555,0.002468959,0.000007321614,0.000001685173,0.9847788,0.01184127,0.00006023474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1114521,0.001168307,0.00002118701,0.1377058,0.000866104,0.0002339267,0.00002182947,0.000003553346,0.7485272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993886,0.00001787206,0.000002901367,0.005614624,0.0004538927,7.897074e-7,2.277189e-7,0.00000686353,0.00001681243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.882434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7873894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091795196","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0010","title":"Theory, Observation, and the Role of Scientific Understanding in the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Epistemology; Cognitivism (psychology); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Scientific theory; Order (exchange); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Cognition","authors":[{"name":"Glenn Parsons","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0155886476266549,"gpt":0.1952961808118147,"spread":0.1797075331851598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001614212,0.00006876654,0.0001170699,0.00008603588,0.0001662558,0.00002737734,0.0002855678,0.00007747694,0.00004151744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005066328,0.00004237216,0.00005488769,0.0002763512,0.001303167,0.0001687809,0.0000154907,0.0003115505,0.000001282437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001401246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004570988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009182608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003362791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990484,0.000176344,0.0002919739,0.00008366317,0.0002869014,0.0001127166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999401,0.0001320874,0.000262246,0.0001420983,0.00001093313,0.00005157439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004193644,0.00002996129,0.072636,0.000009497707,0.00000652302,0.000004396979,0.00283182,0.001631411,0.0006821411,0.921577,0.0001120497,0.0004372676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003506602,0.00003178497,0.03584078,0.00003356272,0.00001550523,0.00001990488,0.0005992041,0.00007335903,0.0002584269,0.9621801,0.0005523762,0.00004431709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711528,0.001252268,0.00006877247,0.009513794,0.0001239933,0.0001710222,0.00001330759,8.898735e-7,0.01770315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996663,0.000009561149,0.00006049859,0.0001990276,0.0000466084,9.009933e-7,0.000002060169,0.000004800687,0.00001026411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04060313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4801573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905410130","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.816176","title":"On preferring God's non-existence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Monash University","keywords":"Theism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Existence of God; Natural (archaeology); History; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Klaas J. Kraay","is_ca":true},{"name":"Chris Dragos","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03404541818901036,"gpt":0.1999583536977588,"spread":0.1659129355087485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000134927,0.0001430702,0.0002122843,0.0002859109,0.0003406597,0.0001152153,0.0003614117,0.00004803669,0.009265853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005503755,0.0001187248,0.0001360802,0.00002984015,0.0003628701,0.000363949,0.000007841249,0.0003514737,0.000833055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005474266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002218681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001964877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003662522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991724,0.00003448053,0.0002918651,0.0001101901,0.0001181915,0.0002728794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988618,0.00007126421,0.0001804977,0.0001738367,0.0002202788,0.0004922695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001203758,0.00001596174,0.000182777,0.00001343659,0.00004697837,0.00007531916,0.003375267,0.00001490139,0.0000109082,0.9850716,0.01061188,0.0005689149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003125457,0.0004299087,0.0006929603,0.0001556528,0.0000212428,0.00005309833,0.0001594987,0.000008061689,0.00003836625,0.9415396,0.05640818,0.0001809058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2468961,0.0003306509,0.000005922252,0.011396,0.001763249,0.0001271917,0.00001885053,0.000009801406,0.7394522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941004,0.000003251323,0.00004908914,0.002265699,0.002266088,0.000003142155,0.000001389363,0.00001624415,0.001294678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7472042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312125916","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.42","title":"Mental Imagery and the Epistemology of Testimony","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Testimonial; Externalism; Appeal; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Mental image; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognition; Law","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Munro","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04555395362339027,"gpt":0.2292890714370044,"spread":0.1837351178136141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007084087,0.00008168277,0.0002705963,0.000156588,0.0005424813,0.00002778111,0.0002241747,0.00002096086,0.0005323373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008123108,0.00005985226,0.0001249404,0.00003192775,0.001873742,0.0000798094,0.00002827734,0.0003812764,0.000002224505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000456996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003898898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003207825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004675118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990962,0.0002301919,0.0003258198,0.00007210446,0.0001251603,0.0001504906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990805,0.0002163766,0.0003070416,0.0001150948,0.0001313569,0.0001496369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005713661,0.00001810924,0.0006954526,0.00002978365,0.0001042772,0.00009200205,0.02492964,0.000007996391,0.00002948814,0.9668562,0.006691291,0.0004886564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001567336,0.0004481419,0.000362009,0.00003018958,0.0001184111,0.0005457358,0.00458932,0.00001903653,0.00003221303,0.7538514,0.2382835,0.0001527332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5349836,0.01964496,0.00001971629,0.1285153,0.009367076,0.000549389,0.0006795049,0.00001402864,0.3062264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970023,0.00001678655,0.00003559828,0.001648786,0.0006527054,0.000002858197,0.000002799751,0.00001029676,0.0006278517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4620187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.690388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044690955","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.29","title":"How to Philosophically Tackle Kinds without Talking about “Natural Kinds”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Relevance (law); Natural (archaeology); Politics; Subject (documents); Subject matter; Race (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Ingo Brigandt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0443798572572404,"gpt":0.2844933370229579,"spread":0.2401134797657175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000483164,0.0002043481,0.0004348324,0.0002271757,0.0008958026,0.0001941566,0.0007064676,0.0001673898,0.00009488528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093409,0.0001935274,0.0002052386,0.0004952881,0.0005421133,0.0002872153,0.0000368759,0.0005962237,0.00005102675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001743015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001321678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008654211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01241049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981962,0.0001923257,0.0003639581,0.0002581344,0.000400754,0.0005886179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973779,0.0000829093,0.0002494853,0.0001430084,0.0003710729,0.001775592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004829368,0.00008970264,0.1272353,0.0001953048,0.001203348,0.004583206,0.2298165,0.00009635968,0.0007182733,0.5257398,0.09631922,0.01352013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001381166,0.0009969975,0.01781488,0.000288619,0.0001688548,0.0001374545,0.006386576,0.00001328495,0.0001356279,0.119184,0.8524628,0.001029778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04800211,0.003198915,0.0001790613,0.8351525,0.002482136,0.0002962624,0.00003629463,0.00003596749,0.1106167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826018,0.00002205464,0.0005405695,0.0118866,0.004533827,0.000002906313,0.000001596878,0.00002089575,0.0003897902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9345996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7891817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523006892","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716583","title":"How to Distinguish Autonomy from Integrity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Suspect; Value (mathematics); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Carolyn McLeod","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06079187571652715,"gpt":0.2361941257216291,"spread":0.175402250005102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003020285,0.0001514095,0.0002574039,0.000244497,0.0002848447,0.0004091584,0.0004229927,0.0000756955,0.001223067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004269533,0.0001299211,0.0001616843,0.00004441261,0.0002848791,0.0002768179,0.00001871542,0.0007354483,0.00009708147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002136714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008666736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003444033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04555918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990466,0.00005261531,0.0003055675,0.0001418772,0.0001806844,0.0002726868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981284,0.0001059752,0.0001624207,0.0001854639,0.000376053,0.001041665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103871,0.00001565297,0.00006706186,0.000004535891,0.00004407981,0.00006146834,0.007972781,0.0000042048,0.00001109946,0.9866998,0.001661563,0.003447389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001171453,0.00005625883,0.00006067903,0.00005182042,0.00001385912,0.000004532219,0.0001213002,0.000005931795,0.00001959693,0.5303224,0.4691234,0.0001031091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1001609,0.0009909469,0.0001815188,0.4405347,0.00270885,0.0001630583,0.0004845004,0.00002879661,0.4547468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800894,0.000001874491,0.0003710033,0.005898295,0.01318266,0.000001526649,0.000005426947,0.00002043772,0.0004293845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8799285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080890053","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0011","title":"Public Reason and Moral Compromise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Politics; Compromise; Epistemology; Criticism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Public reason; Law; Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Social psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Lister","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1459050818559063,"gpt":0.3165623061178905,"spread":0.1706572242619842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001744186,0.00008242515,0.0001607989,0.000259738,0.0005050917,0.0001009754,0.0002436281,0.0001451685,0.00009866068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008517093,0.00008049024,0.00007146847,0.0002065886,0.0008892026,0.0003238257,0.000008333223,0.0004096992,0.00001238942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000179435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001228482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007195072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03129918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987797,0.00009759652,0.0002648566,0.00008958446,0.000269826,0.0004984878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997125,0.0001595863,0.000111444,0.00008630454,0.0002457937,0.002271874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007936922,0.000009017472,0.003687554,0.000006168564,0.0000127997,0.0001584658,0.001914903,3.124528e-7,0.000005827628,0.9920187,0.0006064217,0.001571895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002624642,0.0000746305,0.004283906,0.00003626716,0.00001384806,0.0000368398,0.0004144013,0.000002054947,0.0000128275,0.9277796,0.06696767,0.0001155059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1748079,0.001707041,0.0001220994,0.1733826,0.001030976,0.0001229952,0.0000193821,0.00001627164,0.6487908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964529,0.00002531084,0.0002745035,0.001296626,0.001870394,1.917791e-7,6.489584e-7,0.000008153108,0.00007124897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.821645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318606975","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1165571","title":"Psychopathy and internalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Psychology; Counterexample; Moral disengagement; Moral psychology; Epistemology; Moral reasoning; Social psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Victor Kumar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09279190722121253,"gpt":0.2581394660802139,"spread":0.1653475588590013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001107871,0.00006802147,0.00009798534,0.0001800383,0.00006414135,0.00001659694,0.0001940497,0.00003313603,0.0001897102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001159497,0.00004238139,0.00004932893,0.00005453248,0.0002069394,0.0001516699,0.000007052959,0.00008953145,0.00005928106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003690652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008366236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005718541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001102377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994166,0.00003812559,0.0001726235,0.0001120974,0.0001036113,0.0001569574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992604,0.00004485615,0.00009695738,0.00007563981,0.00003450082,0.0004875996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003000972,0.0001277807,0.02738187,0.0000299185,0.00006392989,0.003856723,0.001022286,0.000002418268,0.410951,0.3616649,0.06440986,0.1301892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002356887,0.0007182831,0.0277969,0.0004341796,0.00001917231,0.004502743,0.00001560132,0.00000195947,0.01658263,0.8240911,0.1231659,0.000314635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9144842,0.0002644985,0.0001394838,0.07100114,0.001448836,0.00003470109,0.00002046887,0.000004222014,0.01260245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950107,0.00005159548,0.00006038746,0.004226997,0.0004308308,3.802649e-7,4.308367e-8,0.000005873676,0.0002131939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4624263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2077194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044703139","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0061","title":"Promises to the Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Negativity effect; Philosophy; General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Allen Habib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06033349264577125,"gpt":0.2468120205707006,"spread":0.1864785279249294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002937321,0.00008921128,0.0001572687,0.0001356525,0.0003476375,0.0001138615,0.0003072443,0.00003290393,0.000200354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006931672,0.00005875485,0.0001139111,0.00003839586,0.0001361771,0.0001238831,0.000003450926,0.000267839,0.00007613588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004599875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005385844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000553311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01795149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993412,0.00005163535,0.0002229037,0.00006953461,0.0001136884,0.0002009781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990594,0.00003801492,0.0001144527,0.0001477702,0.0002597529,0.0003805939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007355011,0.0000188416,0.00005120744,0.000008333297,0.00004552298,0.00005973335,0.03282678,0.00001002077,0.00001179937,0.9298258,0.03491554,0.002219002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001169563,0.0002699081,0.0003082773,0.00003277487,0.00003245004,0.00002699426,0.0003761541,9.748733e-7,0.00002735623,0.2254648,0.7732605,0.00008280954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0884015,0.002062083,0.00002838957,0.3408135,0.004390936,0.0003727448,0.00006114478,0.00002887167,0.5638408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835891,0.000007306199,0.0001089865,0.01083096,0.004498324,8.743532e-7,7.160774e-7,0.000008124312,0.0009555863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8951876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045315299","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.981932","title":"Representationalism, perceptual distortion and the limits of phenomenal concepts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Direct and indirect realism; Epistemology; Perception; Distortion (music); Counterexample; Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David Bourget","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07938908558787802,"gpt":0.3383263123570376,"spread":0.2589372267691596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007079482,0.00007339556,0.0001760891,0.00009759932,0.00007644695,0.00001748972,0.0002491966,0.00004481847,0.00030034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002925606,0.0000487501,0.00007052072,0.0001485798,0.001700642,0.0001216798,0.000009193489,0.000162516,0.00001438829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000504502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002688402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006076812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001713626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990043,0.0002017805,0.0003113043,0.0001046198,0.0002200829,0.0001578955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987041,0.0001545912,0.0002175496,0.000137565,0.0002142682,0.000571978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000155036,0.00001310721,0.001021998,0.000002067042,0.00003064824,0.00002873771,0.007732729,0.00000968507,0.00001866812,0.9897372,0.0006408923,0.0006092932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001787643,0.0002129751,0.007178802,0.00001901615,0.0000302801,0.0001750198,0.0009770881,0.000009663142,0.00002127123,0.9879055,0.001606192,0.00007654358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5985427,0.002417067,0.0003016094,0.02155548,0.001428043,0.0001650786,0.00004460833,0.000004240621,0.3755412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987528,0.000003426507,0.00004666379,0.0005526005,0.0005716665,0.000001762136,0.000001402492,0.000005212505,0.00006445515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4002101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6266088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049669090","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.905251","title":"Debunking enactivism: a critical notice of Hutto and Myin’s Radicalizing Enactivism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enactivism; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Notice; Action (physics); Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Autopoiesis; Law","authors":[{"name":"Mohan Matthen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03618419868820575,"gpt":0.2586043134393586,"spread":0.2224201147511528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003679002,0.0001304475,0.0002703221,0.0003593794,0.0001956626,0.00006160995,0.0001956378,0.00008196777,0.00003775774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002747409,0.000122917,0.00008803928,0.0001636183,0.0003434327,0.0003840856,0.00001534468,0.0003777216,0.000006413293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006513095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002631342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003079588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001976835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998711,0.0001828654,0.0003439493,0.0001907455,0.0002546276,0.0003168208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982455,0.0006282093,0.0001928931,0.0001264665,0.0001249097,0.0006819726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007432158,0.00006735052,0.0005025709,0.0001473005,0.00002275909,0.0003558402,0.001338818,0.00001737246,0.05609823,0.9254395,0.0002464532,0.01568945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000870293,0.0004998943,0.0004981433,0.0005022917,0.00009094848,0.0009856931,0.00008741174,0.0005415574,0.05639797,0.9357544,0.003471542,0.0002998873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5978287,0.001014938,0.006854923,0.02872521,0.002669946,0.000339096,0.00006073126,0.00005095241,0.3624555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973865,0.00001285303,0.0004465106,0.001633843,0.0004931542,9.227564e-7,2.777027e-7,0.00001914128,0.000006819149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3995578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.501241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175390287","doi":"10.1017/can.2021.15","title":"Sensational Science, Archaic Hominin Genetics, and Amplified Inductive Risk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Max-Planck-Institut für Menschheitsgeschichte; Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover; University of Alberta; Michigan State University; Florida Atlantic University; Eastern Michigan University; Universidad del Atlántico; University of Utah","keywords":"Entertainment; Phenomenon; Population; Ancient DNA; History of science; Genealogy; History; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Demography","authors":[{"name":"Joyce C. Havstad","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03965290888151631,"gpt":0.3016978452288648,"spread":0.2620449363473485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006267932,0.00007970456,0.0001340732,0.0006920073,0.001190209,0.0002129622,0.0002426836,0.00005197707,0.0002970704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000909913,0.00008609016,0.00007613136,0.000613695,0.001935328,0.000355437,0.00002114743,0.0003217993,0.00001080501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001776542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003940324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007349043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2427105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987944,0.0001207744,0.0002330307,0.0001611724,0.0003628483,0.000327753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976927,0.0001098114,0.000211963,0.0001037566,0.001003795,0.0008779454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004376656,0.0001181373,0.1850078,0.00001422663,0.0003299999,0.0006912299,0.06323946,0.0001211086,0.002839489,0.737951,0.00489718,0.004746564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006658134,0.0002399089,0.3945107,0.00008768252,0.0001100793,0.000229418,0.03370297,0.00001647153,0.0005921214,0.5274825,0.04195123,0.000411107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680622,0.0006556717,0.000006412055,0.006669357,0.0007677996,0.00005621625,0.00003487862,0.000004087399,0.02374339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976233,0.0001105484,0.001127062,0.0002280311,0.0007996034,7.954343e-7,0.000001011766,0.000006834743,0.0001028106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2353614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954895053","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079004","title":"Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: beyond inductive risk","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Underdetermination; Philosophy of science; Relevance (law); Empirical evidence; Positive economics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Ingo Brigandt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05882964602861137,"gpt":0.3322949212887322,"spread":0.2734652752601209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001956511,0.00008276718,0.0001959965,0.0001830832,0.002264022,0.00006775768,0.0004632824,0.00008648417,0.00003533098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001467209,0.00006232496,0.0001050098,0.0004425023,0.005358377,0.0002682789,0.00001766028,0.0002966257,0.00001191078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001363308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003351558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005896536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02032979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985697,0.0004737908,0.0002921287,0.0001038702,0.0003137353,0.0002467583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998005,0.0002253815,0.0004224388,0.0001134431,0.0009115855,0.0003222034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001392564,0.00001491137,0.0206473,0.000004521578,0.0001216742,0.00001949452,0.2204532,0.00001704531,0.00000669221,0.7491956,0.009326039,0.0001795335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001782614,0.00007854808,0.01099637,0.0000156371,0.00005724242,0.000006705474,0.03644233,2.809549e-7,0.00002454265,0.942164,0.009963288,0.00007277413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8842041,0.001162436,0.00001502883,0.02292542,0.001577134,0.0001464977,0.0001303841,0.000005840922,0.08983309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988721,0.000009813338,0.00003535921,0.0002024628,0.0006609469,0.000002238887,0.000001134843,0.000004657131,0.0002112866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1929684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596494602","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1301776","title":"Hobbes’s agnostic theology before <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Agnosticism; Philosophy; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Existence of God; Epistemology; Faith; Subject (documents); Atheism; Reflexive pronoun; Theism","authors":[{"name":"Arash Abizadeh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04813081646638626,"gpt":0.2460425757805446,"spread":0.1979117593141583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002172095,0.0002040828,0.0003708916,0.0001907156,0.001052771,0.0003193629,0.0008856417,0.00009317419,0.003307838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004618818,0.0001579709,0.0002922632,0.00001762694,0.001181316,0.0003846269,0.00003767806,0.0004344402,0.0002579488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006774392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003277317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001547237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009588632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986344,0.0000636921,0.000443065,0.0001591914,0.0002001277,0.000499533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977963,0.00009220065,0.0003733329,0.0004381423,0.0002648662,0.001035172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001588829,0.00002825727,0.001024115,0.00001961577,0.00006791405,0.0003545697,0.001282504,8.661323e-7,0.000002718088,0.9925002,0.003833156,0.0008701285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003605885,0.0002598448,0.0009357533,0.00009509411,0.00005401553,0.00008467534,0.00003190868,0.000002741679,0.00001322053,0.6881151,0.3099075,0.000139604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09089532,0.001663706,0.00001361389,0.1017759,0.007653501,0.0002052192,0.000320406,0.00002064556,0.7974517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866358,0.00002048883,0.0000263587,0.003390018,0.008694587,0.000002081316,0.000005543857,0.00002634051,0.001198789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962293539","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2019.1619354","title":"Is children’s wellbeing different from adults’ wellbeing?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; York University","funders":"European Research Council; York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Psychology; Well-being; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist","authors":[{"name":"Andrée‐Anne Cormier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mauro Rossi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01732302339000507,"gpt":0.2014930318476231,"spread":0.184170008457618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001944363,0.0002531302,0.0004157007,0.0003247861,0.0002849971,0.0002163367,0.0005371089,0.0001241877,0.007915581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003746619,0.0002068322,0.0003336243,0.00004064494,0.0002870694,0.0002629947,0.00002767649,0.000783193,0.0003595734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001107714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002935871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005774919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005115373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984772,0.00007123736,0.0005139922,0.0002332182,0.0003197555,0.0003846523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982641,0.0001126736,0.0003059014,0.000311703,0.0002326612,0.0007730083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005454119,0.00003834478,0.007964685,0.00002544344,0.0002654842,0.00006105402,0.01106398,0.000003330219,0.00004690583,0.9792905,0.0008165119,0.0003692444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008727178,0.0002205997,0.00488545,0.0004195763,0.00007102511,0.00001553342,0.0001930932,0.000024259,0.0001099107,0.9694811,0.02339069,0.0003160329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109712,0.0009009915,0.000004034706,0.01380669,0.002140808,0.0001375569,0.000312255,0.00001271852,0.07171372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905704,0.00003014387,0.00001583378,0.004717687,0.004361198,0.000001164387,0.00001794079,0.00004250925,0.0002431685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07959913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554450515","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.816177","title":"Completing Rawls's arguments for equal political liberty and its fair value: the argument from self-respect","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Politics; Civil liberties; Law; Primary goods; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Meena Krishnamurthy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06147231165065698,"gpt":0.3075968779402261,"spread":0.2461245662895691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009398723,0.0001665474,0.0002764001,0.0001152121,0.001079748,0.0002608526,0.0004967099,0.0001626165,0.0002036781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001092701,0.0001247731,0.0001604305,0.0001215393,0.0004697149,0.0003377462,0.00003064228,0.0004923103,0.00004284618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003573284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001158114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01968754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002538653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977519,0.0003371541,0.0004447807,0.0001842305,0.0004293128,0.0008526313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963307,0.001184403,0.0001703551,0.0001374525,0.0003394025,0.001837705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006663361,0.00002497282,0.0003084185,0.00001156501,0.00008264988,0.00001199789,0.002841972,0.000002022902,0.00002167163,0.9950646,0.001509082,0.0001144313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004582651,0.0001402766,0.0007949919,0.00006553596,0.00006754129,0.000006480866,0.0006763564,0.00009894735,0.00004471347,0.9661717,0.03131097,0.0001642272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2901356,0.001787902,0.0002987407,0.562442,0.002104692,0.001430437,0.0004153013,0.00005286968,0.1413325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902826,0.0000137516,0.0004115412,0.006004789,0.003198634,0.00001070328,0.000003550732,0.00001800401,0.00005645652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.700147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9868404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160608726","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0045","title":"Augustine on Testimony","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Augustinian Studies and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Aside; Epistemology; Section (typography); Doxastic logic","authors":[{"name":"Peter King","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nathan Ballantyne","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03572342930087379,"gpt":0.2172991381365509,"spread":0.1815757088356771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009731942,0.0001090618,0.0002005388,0.0002217543,0.0002625157,0.00004573934,0.0001770692,0.00002960684,0.001828488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000922762,0.00008613387,0.0000934602,0.00003300497,0.0002068516,0.00008053696,0.000003412371,0.0002042116,0.0001099867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004614579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001825824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003397413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002111883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993454,0.00001892978,0.0002413423,0.00007629587,0.00008612275,0.0002319489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992142,0.00004335725,0.0001497456,0.0001012144,0.0001569915,0.0003344345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001557383,0.00001734899,0.0001340678,0.000002724264,0.00002599242,0.0002955659,0.002113743,0.00001327354,0.000001978234,0.957828,0.03603687,0.003514806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004683391,0.001262315,0.001387404,0.0000824321,0.00003656431,0.00007842496,0.0003130542,0.000005470168,0.000007897323,0.2977166,0.6984673,0.0001742371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07766324,0.0008355069,0.00001177448,0.02444215,0.001790593,0.00007206947,0.00003501102,0.00001560377,0.895134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917168,0.000004791585,0.00004844642,0.003954303,0.002742018,2.846961e-7,0.000001067512,0.000009155859,0.00152311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9140536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510964088","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.774846","title":"The use of useless knowledge: Bergson against the pragmatists","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Antithesis; Intuition; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics","authors":[{"name":"Barry Allen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0503690986137984,"gpt":0.2117547010551275,"spread":0.1613856024413291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000273243,0.0001429603,0.000265383,0.00013217,0.0006467736,0.0003374171,0.000552082,0.0000449277,0.0008868226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002686642,0.00006789042,0.0002608261,0.0001063239,0.001436493,0.0003040767,0.00002411945,0.0003226245,0.0001126137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004398034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002343032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002224163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01566299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987413,0.0001575086,0.0005335166,0.00008995001,0.0002020714,0.0002757086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978239,0.0005025513,0.0003113135,0.0002635297,0.0006859251,0.000412778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006057262,0.00002327608,0.00006641572,0.00001266378,0.0001610009,0.000009051365,0.002223538,0.00001342102,0.00001170367,0.9853485,0.006820327,0.005304052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000151353,0.00008284662,0.0002057341,0.00008573726,0.00008606356,0.00000908985,0.0001770819,0.0002105058,0.00004036199,0.6656646,0.3331674,0.0001192027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.536954,0.006576791,0.00005800212,0.2028883,0.002525368,0.0006724026,0.0002065777,0.00002391273,0.2500947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972431,0.00004664645,0.00002289905,0.000766833,0.001317556,0.000004723689,0.000002071976,0.00001519147,0.0005809774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4602892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9710085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463359842","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716516","title":"Origins Are Not Essences in Evolutionary Systematics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Natural selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Psychology; History; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Mohan Matthen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08524593220961214,"gpt":0.2077423234575075,"spread":0.1224963912478953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002097303,0.0001112417,0.0002430356,0.0005663988,0.0003629712,0.00008610661,0.0003800124,0.00003700087,0.001452828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006354156,0.00009850751,0.00009361497,0.0000949199,0.0005430602,0.0005307419,0.000005399598,0.0002266755,0.0001340421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004457895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002128444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001627644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02287957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989465,0.00004269931,0.0004201497,0.0001061308,0.0002517159,0.0002327912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990045,0.00004084616,0.0002990629,0.0001225969,0.0001768998,0.0003560875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003819748,0.00003731059,0.0007693273,0.00008993684,0.00001362289,0.0003792861,0.01174097,0.00005365896,0.000007278654,0.979688,0.007142065,0.00007470654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007692295,0.0004174961,0.001736835,0.001790013,0.00005013063,0.0003266288,0.004000688,0.0005936068,0.00001214728,0.2879886,0.701696,0.0006186118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2755425,0.0117572,0.00001288101,0.04454371,0.008254295,0.0003484704,0.0002303077,0.0000319046,0.6592788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974184,0.00001692435,0.00005480253,0.0006225912,0.001453383,0.000001469608,4.291789e-7,0.000007717157,0.0004242589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046309195","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0009","title":"The Social Dimensions of Modesty","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Character traits; Psychology; Social psychology; Simple (philosophy); Trait; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Computer science; History","authors":[{"name":"Scott Woodcock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07944100043389908,"gpt":0.2450665267759915,"spread":0.1656255263420924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003005894,0.00008251331,0.0001751339,0.0001133471,0.00134031,0.00002919337,0.0002704096,0.00004857453,0.0001596313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001017301,0.00004791144,0.0001781263,0.0000379118,0.001431415,0.00009682924,0.00001079893,0.0003609814,0.00001136477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003321538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006820303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007467385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00429234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991872,0.00006168779,0.0003256129,0.00005545965,0.0001865454,0.0001835327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989032,0.0001365392,0.0002114357,0.000106026,0.0003804325,0.0002624347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001226387,0.00001100646,0.00002104689,0.000004219561,0.00004016744,0.00005118287,0.007666481,0.0000046265,0.00001473201,0.9909424,0.001076036,0.0001558472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001587535,0.0000746915,0.00007124503,0.00002134191,0.00001598678,0.00003626941,0.0002034811,0.000007658092,0.00001789936,0.9180713,0.08125698,0.00006436143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4425891,0.003154276,0.00002093122,0.08699867,0.002618007,0.000162937,0.000180808,0.00001328843,0.464262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974625,0.00005501991,0.000008764459,0.0005803566,0.001724289,5.844e-7,7.356572e-7,0.00001144221,0.0001563384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5548734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740630344","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1353880","title":"Justice in migration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legitimacy; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Immigration; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Balance (ability); Emigration; Global justice; Democratic legitimacy; Political economy; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Christine Straehle","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06078543472612517,"gpt":0.3328047356437615,"spread":0.2720193009176363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005732191,0.00005113784,0.00009560688,0.0002155944,0.0007739148,0.0002101418,0.0003038744,0.00006958173,0.0001594247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009340743,0.00004842574,0.00005016526,0.00006712105,0.0001525017,0.0007278576,0.000002188042,0.0001381133,0.00001859323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001943227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001314146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06107784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.900629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993289,0.000074403,0.0002200721,0.00005994963,0.0001633531,0.0001533542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990627,0.00002146341,0.0002637667,0.0001229571,0.0002360844,0.0002929919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002342412,0.00003158918,0.07986806,0.00002228407,0.00002079179,0.0001174021,0.05592239,0.00005362964,0.0002067275,0.829805,0.02517719,0.008751524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007150379,0.0001779209,0.1090165,0.000245241,0.00006421071,0.00001483567,0.003626858,0.0001236679,0.0001806223,0.2225577,0.6629821,0.000295246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7690015,0.0005497485,0.0002098129,0.03768048,0.002507646,0.0001515451,0.000009490765,0.000005250599,0.1898846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976124,0.00008925194,0.0001191882,0.0002360256,0.00153168,7.845843e-7,0.000001359408,0.000004076896,0.0004052532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8395512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515709034","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1218254","title":"Mental causation, compatibilism and counterfactuals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Causation; Counterfactual conditional; Free will; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Counterfactual thinking","authors":[{"name":"Dwayne Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04129434277311143,"gpt":0.2357986121983564,"spread":0.194504269425245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000979959,0.00007336571,0.0001076516,0.0001387016,0.0001156833,0.0000302832,0.0001438995,0.00002554363,0.0003064073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001895658,0.00004675032,0.00003219078,0.00006527642,0.0001821053,0.0002634923,0.000006886812,0.00006138931,0.00003146434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006717437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001947502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002203481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008141571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993724,0.00003984293,0.0002060642,0.0001021935,0.0001268633,0.0001526127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992717,0.00006668973,0.0001165805,0.00008319736,0.00004942599,0.0004124449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005970369,0.00006443764,0.03792064,0.00004072439,0.0000393622,0.0008308063,0.004822602,0.00000615103,0.8050857,0.08673306,0.03628027,0.02811657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00548859,0.001439187,0.05175005,0.0009298248,0.00006599312,0.003265418,0.0001698821,0.00005696222,0.2985695,0.4182332,0.2189083,0.001123131],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831345,0.0002277408,0.00004212854,0.01209304,0.000611021,0.00005952215,0.00007530949,0.000004051447,0.003752667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985917,0.00003593816,0.00002069624,0.0009689933,0.0002421562,3.345478e-7,1.69961e-7,0.000007049698,0.0001329167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5065162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3354945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541780161","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1250201","title":"John Locke, ‘Hobbist’: of sleeping souls and thinking matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Soul; Metaphysics; Materialism; Epistemology; Suspect; Relation (database); False accusation; Law","authors":[{"name":"Liam P. Dempsey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02844951043428131,"gpt":0.2024139259673864,"spread":0.173964415533105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002283925,0.0001385023,0.0003012328,0.0002644526,0.0001996049,0.0000587387,0.0002361942,0.00006830403,0.002311677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006479773,0.00008731121,0.0001289442,0.00003304588,0.0005449197,0.0002755694,0.00001842825,0.0002213245,0.00006631896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004753685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001641068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000394424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001234612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989259,0.0000429044,0.0004457025,0.0001181846,0.0002187829,0.000248529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987657,0.00009427691,0.000286444,0.0001320944,0.0002177945,0.0005036693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004507763,0.00002838409,0.005358418,0.0001310261,0.0001671735,0.0001342584,0.008610548,5.976968e-7,0.0006940261,0.9672786,0.01187241,0.005679457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007157595,0.0002540301,0.001157617,0.0007578636,0.00007149077,0.00005884865,0.0001837132,0.00000168559,0.0003555696,0.8382478,0.1579571,0.000238485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4248246,0.003330839,0.0001658784,0.1220002,0.002945118,0.0002353813,0.0001854253,0.000018775,0.4462937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951767,0.00001548659,0.00004671748,0.001943585,0.002315605,7.51183e-7,5.678623e-7,0.0000186227,0.0004820037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5703521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295037080","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717561","title":"Matter and Aristotle's Material Cause","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue; The Thing; Aesthetics; Living matter; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Byrne","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03581503502933266,"gpt":0.2081965437692752,"spread":0.1723815087399426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008845015,0.0001209685,0.0001955178,0.0002063872,0.0002439695,0.0001979388,0.0001387859,0.00004481483,0.005792684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001571914,0.0001003087,0.00007792548,0.00003008203,0.0003394283,0.0002516781,0.000009994743,0.0001825412,0.0001446477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004473755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001167186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001020863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007023359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992856,0.00002862696,0.0002718296,0.0000962261,0.0001034334,0.0002142603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991429,0.00002268201,0.0001201803,0.0001075996,0.00010037,0.0005062797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008410584,0.00003426386,0.002912901,0.0000292321,0.0001113452,0.001329115,0.004359278,0.000001358018,0.00005240614,0.9611056,0.02910502,0.0008753502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002924475,0.0001065416,0.0007401415,0.00004579468,0.00004137158,0.0002961355,0.00007846309,0.000001176032,0.00001819463,0.4183263,0.5799104,0.0001430401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4713521,0.0006017576,0.000005732959,0.03390243,0.003005405,0.00009442434,0.0001280925,0.00001190025,0.4908982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919701,0.00001286236,0.00001823885,0.001875064,0.005180566,7.595671e-7,0.000003020461,0.00001825783,0.0009211124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5508054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1710638876","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716524","title":"Contingent Natures and Virtuous Knowers: Could Epistemology be ‘Gendered’","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Fallacy; Rationality; Philosophy; Feminist epistemology; Reading (process); Social epistemology; Sociology; Feminist philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca Kukla","is_ca":true},{"name":"Laura Ruetsche","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06499314415635483,"gpt":0.2860263510570169,"spread":0.2210332069006621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005418767,0.0001271019,0.0002942329,0.0002139075,0.0008255227,0.00004721977,0.000253365,0.0002088991,0.000318016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003947299,0.000121789,0.00009379157,0.000137598,0.001079785,0.0001069908,0.00001489988,0.0003592819,0.00001376776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001203896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003247082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002636278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03498835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987545,0.0002131267,0.0003062591,0.0001522955,0.0001763239,0.0003975051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987491,0.0001488204,0.0002145706,0.0001053406,0.0001745718,0.0006075454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006016948,0.0001002888,0.05718434,0.0001037135,0.0007604249,0.003395787,0.1440484,0.00000753787,0.00002609369,0.5894704,0.1966544,0.008188397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001108974,0.0005746247,0.006913502,0.0000966686,0.000141457,0.00065688,0.01239276,0.000008099631,0.00002942635,0.09879303,0.8787953,0.0004892432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1369399,0.08091031,0.00002551747,0.209177,0.004485636,0.0002968166,0.00005373544,0.00002843603,0.5680827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947668,0.0005817533,0.00008912893,0.002597823,0.0007195542,0.0000014151,5.202862e-7,0.000009241186,0.001233776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8578269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083102510","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2008.0005","title":"On the Value of Happiness: Herder contra Kant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Destiny (ISS module); Tone (literature); Content (measure theory); Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Sonia Sikka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04026447914236973,"gpt":0.2289922633699203,"spread":0.1887277842275506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204553,0.000124662,0.0002361908,0.0002304614,0.0002611699,0.00005433959,0.0003531578,0.00006638874,0.001184385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000278495,0.00007733107,0.0001804043,0.0000545955,0.0007340383,0.00008458096,0.000007842632,0.0005052034,0.00002384624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004718325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003935993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001067872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005273727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989004,0.00006466031,0.0004510974,0.00008111373,0.0002516924,0.0002510603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983549,0.0004486185,0.000275365,0.0001824285,0.0003820811,0.0003565993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003632947,0.00002350591,0.00001076747,0.00001286247,0.00006915884,0.00008746298,0.00310875,0.00001143973,0.00003626143,0.9958651,0.0005179604,0.0002204125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002657469,0.0001916476,0.00008302457,0.0001402819,0.00002374171,0.00001662585,0.00029641,0.000006743421,0.000106341,0.9583352,0.04044139,0.00009282395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1669854,0.001159021,0.00009133482,0.06749029,0.001854369,0.000170406,0.00008429961,0.000007519148,0.7621573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930335,0.000007083946,0.000007806708,0.005024571,0.001814355,5.434798e-7,8.28825e-7,0.00001648032,0.00009484443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.826048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069466861","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0002","title":"Benefits, Intentions, and the Principle of Fairness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Law and economics; Set (abstract data type); Public good; Economics; Sociology; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Idil Boran","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03874641803884814,"gpt":0.2854926207513649,"spread":0.2467462027125168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001068176,0.00006011749,0.0001661529,0.0001224879,0.0003809366,0.00003966689,0.0002495558,0.0000791809,0.00004269041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005394291,0.00004355588,0.0001015552,0.0001638953,0.001618738,0.0001422907,0.00001042259,0.0002387795,0.000002182408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006233525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009139962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01692829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02707927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990037,0.0001517895,0.0003030904,0.00005803553,0.0002711254,0.000212275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989159,0.0001948346,0.0001634232,0.00008883581,0.0003112399,0.0003258097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009893349,0.00000708901,0.001230271,0.000008419888,0.00001140155,0.000004788601,0.0005984731,0.00001617027,0.000002169755,0.9978699,0.0001123494,0.0001290474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003966333,0.00002403396,0.004861835,0.00005738047,0.00002738835,0.000009650795,0.0001701346,0.000002400938,0.00002234068,0.9756964,0.01867763,0.00005412457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3950975,0.006876885,0.0001468233,0.1762705,0.001164286,0.000296744,0.00008711312,0.00001117989,0.420049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985805,0.00004928692,0.00005759604,0.0003930277,0.0008485444,7.571235e-7,5.436937e-7,0.000004808559,0.00006496548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.603483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467609113","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717572","title":"Rational Choice with Deontic Constraints","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Point (geometry); Advertising; Law and economics; Free riding; Free rider problem; Marketing; Internet privacy; Economics; Microeconomics; Public good; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Heath","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04614076893581058,"gpt":0.2989282900366215,"spread":0.2527875211008109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001787307,0.00006875483,0.0001268506,0.0001291347,0.0003923695,0.00005913645,0.0001729847,0.00003497742,0.0005610319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006652992,0.00006414215,0.00004691385,0.0001193529,0.0007048317,0.0002588767,0.000003772465,0.000111045,0.00002634397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003256673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001405939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01066954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1829905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993628,0.00003662817,0.0001793719,0.00007140492,0.0001332378,0.000216586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991316,0.00003974948,0.0001284491,0.0000517135,0.0001611733,0.0004873793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003375507,0.00005098981,0.7323222,0.000004056907,0.0001244347,0.0006516764,0.01074838,0.00004065615,0.0001776886,0.2496332,0.003156706,0.003056305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007021502,0.001899803,0.2088651,0.0005981426,0.0003318207,0.00131559,0.02630235,0.00001362785,0.0006042357,0.1637927,0.587149,0.002106004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7569652,0.0005940007,0.0000325176,0.01295633,0.000491099,0.0001169571,0.00001144943,0.000006356126,0.228826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984755,0.00002023553,0.0003343902,0.0004233782,0.0005756136,0.000001452814,7.57132e-7,0.00000664462,0.0001620544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5839924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735266767","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1341781","title":"Epistemic buck-passing and the interpersonal view of testimony","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Testimonial; Epistemology; Reductionism; Philosophy; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Judith Baker","is_ca":true},{"name":"P. Clark","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07887050824485706,"gpt":0.2642439181365279,"spread":0.1853734098916708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006219721,0.0001027247,0.0003264521,0.00009343332,0.0007433165,0.0002015391,0.0003830445,0.0000445522,0.0001024154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002907055,0.00006776371,0.0001463717,0.000009320373,0.003139807,0.0002216015,0.00001847388,0.0003384078,0.000004212984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002989794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003824354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004488973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01855421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992456,0.00008397884,0.0003304381,0.00007758366,0.0001077298,0.0001546227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985773,0.0001630775,0.0005628728,0.0002237441,0.0002691074,0.0002038877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002968573,0.000008307959,0.001130307,0.000104563,0.0001161233,0.00004531367,0.01815952,7.59897e-7,0.00002539916,0.9747281,0.000898945,0.004752942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001527374,0.000200019,0.001483939,0.0009553366,0.0001990159,0.0001868012,0.001439699,0.00003855912,0.00004869425,0.9063108,0.08740224,0.000207513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3714069,0.0244318,0.00008790256,0.1838315,0.006639337,0.0004077515,0.0001801648,0.00001190422,0.4130027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997432,0.00005699566,0.00006179639,0.0007709831,0.001277144,7.969378e-7,5.590217e-7,0.00001099484,0.0003887368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6260251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997847719","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0030","title":"Modality, Individuation, and the Ontology of Art","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Object (grammar); Product (mathematics); Individuation; Modality (human–computer interaction); Contrast (vision); Sound (geography); Musical; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Visual arts; Art; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Psychoanalysis; Acoustics","authors":[{"name":"Carl Matheson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ben Caplan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05976143593382885,"gpt":0.2479901571436354,"spread":0.1882287212098065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002211043,0.00004964271,0.0001620638,0.0001690354,0.0001435602,0.00000877918,0.0001708387,0.00002886835,0.0001618773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002573881,0.00003318191,0.00007845367,0.0001513087,0.0007973258,0.00007119338,0.000006856104,0.000112846,0.00001128975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001724025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002570473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003339509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008637852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993351,0.000129572,0.0002411072,0.0000654856,0.0001364632,0.00009230779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994234,0.00003598045,0.0001842372,0.00009434213,0.00007171337,0.0001902651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002142948,0.0001372082,0.0736162,0.00003953694,0.00008137317,0.0008045301,0.02241619,0.0004453051,0.01015527,0.8696236,0.01538134,0.007085148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006832863,0.0004914935,0.1265873,0.0001012341,0.000257695,0.008971804,0.0004031813,0.0009193308,0.002256228,0.8191969,0.03350003,0.0004819668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9380099,0.0001498655,0.0002398278,0.04983353,0.0001020189,0.00004971576,0.0000102586,0.000002047535,0.01160283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977728,0.00006643315,0.0000419168,0.001927834,0.00007083234,3.961139e-7,2.54657e-7,0.000003174382,0.0001163644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05976289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.293778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829168491","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716587","title":"Inferentialism and Singular Reference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Expression (computer science); Generality; Epistemology; Extensional definition; Relation (database); Object (grammar); sort; Philosophy; Linguistics; Proposition; Inference; Binary relation; Order (exchange); Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Arithmetic; Discrete mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Mark McCullagh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03508942666289962,"gpt":0.2845320885942227,"spread":0.2494426619313231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002816672,0.0000987301,0.0001587313,0.0002009651,0.0001193041,0.00004699643,0.0002751687,0.00008662802,0.001506841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008069597,0.0000847353,0.00004999841,0.0001418734,0.0004036047,0.0001709761,0.00001174673,0.000272553,0.0001102592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004523269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001871112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004027825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005531296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991355,0.00006839737,0.0002600399,0.0001326179,0.0001261421,0.0002772943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987502,0.00004563653,0.0001177159,0.000155694,0.0000977934,0.000832931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001169656,0.00001311182,0.0003648136,0.000002194103,0.00001902561,0.00009672783,0.0005832285,0.000001494291,0.0000791514,0.9895629,0.0003649477,0.008900668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004217779,0.0001754323,0.004639603,0.00004161496,0.00002549397,0.0003513536,0.00002899279,0.000007234687,0.00008324102,0.9317446,0.06232944,0.0001511657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2957231,0.002246146,0.0003237348,0.02011564,0.0009210871,0.00007363868,0.00001952538,0.000009868714,0.6805673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974986,0.000007387378,0.0003110907,0.00121202,0.0008825285,6.472256e-7,7.124661e-7,0.000007698749,0.00007931642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7017755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789692057","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1415105","title":"Integration and authority: rescuing the ‘one thought too many’ problem","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas P.D. Smyth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09115655659884588,"gpt":0.2551344071805182,"spread":0.1639778505816724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006215857,0.00008154727,0.0001175567,0.0001548348,0.0007591739,0.0002917108,0.0001584095,0.00005057092,0.0002090176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000970514,0.00005725715,0.00004696141,0.00004075537,0.0005754277,0.0003018628,0.000006794308,0.0003133951,0.00001888767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005357293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002354532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001994125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05026323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992976,0.00006781996,0.0002632572,0.00008893511,0.0001336861,0.0001486981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990274,0.00004544934,0.0001745974,0.00012436,0.0004436214,0.0001845867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008995282,0.000005708398,0.00004147656,0.00001656931,0.0000232608,0.000004716823,0.03933311,3.750784e-7,0.0001047333,0.9499074,0.005898484,0.004655226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002263924,0.0002392388,0.0006134595,0.0002209257,0.00008628336,0.00003874526,0.0041433,0.00006583841,0.0002526149,0.4951556,0.4987974,0.0001601722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1396135,0.004002539,0.001345551,0.2341848,0.005702675,0.000657918,0.00009955325,0.00004721709,0.6143463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914235,0.00002048778,0.0002985982,0.0008048332,0.00588844,0.000001612208,0.000002951129,0.0000115126,0.001548064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.967067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962810377","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716726","title":"Integrity and Moral Danger","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Greg Scherkoske","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05005797442260495,"gpt":0.2424055268507124,"spread":0.1923475524281074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000119103,0.00007125261,0.0001024615,0.0001534793,0.000108181,0.00004720005,0.0002116926,0.00005279,0.0002255042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003870229,0.00005680212,0.00004635542,0.0001060772,0.0002118769,0.0001935817,0.00000899864,0.0006713301,0.00001930543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001376201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002904438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000649255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994644,0.00002558402,0.0001486016,0.00009560937,0.00009817513,0.0001676128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991422,0.000032557,0.00007695833,0.0001023364,0.0000475412,0.000598376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002795355,0.00005362911,0.04063868,0.00003704085,0.00001473451,0.002623042,0.001140483,0.000002778203,0.4985742,0.4199614,0.01311162,0.02381445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012073,0.0004954302,0.0425835,0.0001081716,0.00004116889,0.003763046,0.00004686386,0.0001215273,0.06787482,0.7511084,0.1320315,0.0006182257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714099,0.0001064049,0.000006556422,0.008084347,0.001250469,0.00003409605,0.00001782021,0.000004085651,0.01908638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979388,0.000006364726,0.000174728,0.001123793,0.0006593764,3.052909e-7,1.323316e-7,0.000007108269,0.00008939854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4306994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2916633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777563286","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1414524","title":"Intention as action under development: why intention is not a mental state","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University at Buffalo; University of New England","keywords":"Action (physics); Tadpole (physics); Mental state; Psychology; Action theory (sociology); State (computer science); Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Devlin Russell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1149861664227835,"gpt":0.293840096776608,"spread":0.1788539303538245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001665825,0.000126567,0.0001348292,0.0002922849,0.0007687618,0.0002463701,0.000424524,0.0000489007,0.0003672091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001968733,0.0001161131,0.0001140247,0.00007276863,0.0001555841,0.0009053183,0.00002558406,0.0002355038,0.0001735798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002565692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004175228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00160161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004362067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989396,0.00004322827,0.0003275594,0.0001780208,0.0002597212,0.0002518235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987809,0.0000107326,0.0004549928,0.0001956374,0.0001214651,0.0004362951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005840916,0.0003109733,0.01183525,0.0001825028,0.0002536578,0.001774947,0.009498017,0.00003946614,0.7379996,0.03500291,0.02701694,0.1755016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002657178,0.0006235206,0.04956631,0.0007500028,0.00006587551,0.001216555,0.000342256,0.0001838051,0.621588,0.2049177,0.117266,0.0008228035],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723526,0.0000486913,0.0005828338,0.01552872,0.002890151,0.0001284267,0.00002625442,0.00001005138,0.008432308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958324,0.00003417695,0.00006419993,0.002994315,0.0001760613,0.000001508382,0.000001679588,0.00001480705,0.0008808357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1746788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5912772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513512365","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716730","title":"Obligation and Advantage in Hobbes' <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Covenant; Prudence; Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Peacock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01985077571624141,"gpt":0.2140152349323051,"spread":0.1941644592160637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001987831,0.0001186578,0.000198675,0.0002854039,0.0001239651,0.000100802,0.0001563355,0.00006301622,0.0008888841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009628371,0.00009965782,0.00007729787,0.00005254554,0.0003258704,0.0003004244,0.00000952575,0.0005090641,0.00002729981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002758981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001479626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006994609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01599282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991271,0.00003365878,0.0003414145,0.0001066634,0.0001302305,0.0002609278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990102,0.00006490419,0.0001044831,0.0001023468,0.0001012479,0.000616826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001071846,0.0000221754,0.001774663,0.00001769657,0.00001017919,0.00009892818,0.001472788,3.292093e-7,0.0001294625,0.9952555,0.0003862268,0.0008213867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005041906,0.0001181784,0.001164651,0.00007478705,0.00001682814,0.00007252421,0.0001490883,0.000007908689,0.00007617517,0.686462,0.3111967,0.0001569883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8194779,0.0008806367,0.000003506534,0.02442105,0.002520732,0.0001349558,0.0001012839,0.000008981523,0.1524509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954395,0.00002212215,0.00005263438,0.001679063,0.00264883,0.0000012609,0.000004018611,0.00001329756,0.0001393297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3108104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9732658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985419471","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2012.0014","title":"Why the Basic Structure?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Constitution; Scope (computer science); Duty; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Louis‐Philippe Hodgson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05762212956430192,"gpt":0.298501507878754,"spread":0.2408793783144521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009346254,0.0000864816,0.0001303657,0.0001212889,0.0007800707,0.00006882343,0.000483299,0.0001250275,0.0006296585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007316577,0.00006038972,0.0001193913,0.0002271453,0.0008053042,0.000391392,0.000008110626,0.0005422569,0.00003220725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001743938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001164442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009476532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02174307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985823,0.0002472033,0.0002182247,0.00005471371,0.0003271349,0.0005704038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978966,0.0002094633,0.0001142336,0.0001412,0.0001778089,0.001460676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000260316,0.000005382677,0.001640471,0.000003430497,0.00001875415,0.00001010577,0.005982068,0.0000020215,0.000006955244,0.9811159,0.01098022,0.0002320875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006368808,0.00001694788,0.0009486675,0.00001378783,0.00001905071,0.00001618312,0.0002819812,2.478673e-7,0.00001906552,0.5859481,0.4126076,0.00006472517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06092253,0.003393701,0.00005874559,0.4690407,0.005218839,0.0001708943,0.00006667885,0.00001420776,0.4611137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759096,0.00001124336,0.00004664683,0.01668173,0.007290114,3.728543e-7,4.966463e-7,0.000008961384,0.00005084615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.914987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959395712","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079003","title":"Whose social values? Evaluating Canada's ‘death of evidence’ controversy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Relativism; Negotiation; Social epistemology; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Maya J. Goldenberg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4039532988622369,"gpt":0.4129952576931509,"spread":0.009041958830914076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00219156,0.0001007061,0.0003354391,0.000121087,0.0005817558,0.00002339314,0.0003504803,0.0000906476,0.00005653101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002997174,0.00008810578,0.000102996,0.0001677718,0.0004607211,0.0001655506,0.0000135439,0.0002062093,0.000002905385],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006998139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01943883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7783297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9203765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981839,0.0004021695,0.0004030454,0.0001035327,0.0005726216,0.0003347071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997659,0.0002787846,0.0004263919,0.00008397664,0.0009106427,0.0006412555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003528597,0.00006080526,0.2044223,0.0001129451,0.0009180171,0.001054572,0.2022217,0.0001428179,0.00005693184,0.3496253,0.2346082,0.006423526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004584903,0.002170623,0.06503222,0.0009496025,0.0007378375,0.0001266006,0.08924054,0.00004202297,0.0001577443,0.68292,0.1528801,0.001157746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.422075,0.01904654,0.00005847654,0.205606,0.008341411,0.0005482368,0.00012358,0.00001721894,0.3441836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975647,0.00001726542,0.0001129529,0.0006318671,0.001282054,0.000001051694,4.684242e-7,0.000006656895,0.0003829301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5754898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103312344","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.39","title":"Failures of Intention and Failed-Art","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Aesthetics; Luck; Accidental; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Michel‐Antoine Xhignesse","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05893295163836881,"gpt":0.2086846860974425,"spread":0.1497517344590737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001285766,0.00007496993,0.0001726435,0.000121096,0.000112198,0.00007042782,0.000118411,0.00003368768,0.0005218848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008532497,0.00006616928,0.00008384487,0.0000186013,0.0004140359,0.0001827138,0.000007152216,0.0002099732,0.00002520157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000123363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001573009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005192095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01655312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994116,0.00002786084,0.0002765264,0.0000679674,0.0001042484,0.00011181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991432,0.00002089323,0.0001656417,0.0000561556,0.0002490476,0.0003650819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001927303,0.00001098147,0.001954158,0.00009420019,0.00005392141,0.00005414452,0.04252671,0.000004283301,0.00008067123,0.93556,0.01881266,0.0008289354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004839846,0.0006254273,0.0003327556,0.0001978827,0.00005468652,0.00002343871,0.003943096,0.00002281408,0.0001738478,0.1521622,0.8418068,0.0001729832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3911209,0.004515492,0.0001471591,0.3394849,0.002519826,0.0002741947,0.0001842507,0.00002724923,0.261726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971039,0.00003149703,0.00005306863,0.001657933,0.0008949096,2.521631e-7,0.000001799716,0.00001008957,0.0002465042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8229942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9237031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069587569","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.977835","title":"Kant on conic sections","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conic section; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Geometry","authors":[{"name":"Alison Laywine","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03580878565759277,"gpt":0.2024952082967897,"spread":0.1666864226391969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002467561,0.0001088903,0.0001757112,0.0004975943,0.0006267015,0.0001060916,0.0002809584,0.00002682825,0.001054817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005926767,0.00009355087,0.000137941,0.00005055724,0.0004752605,0.0002027126,0.000003924891,0.0002573352,0.0002404139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001674396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005249177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001430146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0305951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991851,0.00004379046,0.0002502671,0.0001089491,0.0001776579,0.0002341939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989118,0.00004177921,0.0001527418,0.0001618375,0.0001837792,0.0005480824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005652044,0.00001568366,0.0000329826,0.000005815861,0.00001669353,0.00002368544,0.004013157,0.00002717185,0.00001184163,0.9800699,0.01539824,0.0003792109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000207146,0.0003075062,0.0000938059,0.00004471818,0.00001688189,0.00002999211,0.0001220077,0.00001469165,0.00001299274,0.1694836,0.8295489,0.0001177998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03441412,0.0003298779,0.00001478287,0.00807023,0.004540093,0.00005499718,0.00003371226,0.00001307887,0.9525291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916022,0.000003955837,0.00001301938,0.002366646,0.004834236,0.000001040903,0.000001148799,0.00001277219,0.001164986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}