{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":28,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"8a71e7925071","filters":{"venue":"Canadian journal of family law"}},"results":[{"id":"W3177306436","doi":"","title":"Revisiting The Handmaid’s Tale : Feminist Theory Meets Empirical Research on Surrogate Mothers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Empirical research; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Karen Busby","is_ca":false},{"name":"Delaney Vun","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1480329374763647,"gpt":0.4212688640803418,"spread":0.2732359266039771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0302864,0.0006832093,0.001208905,0.002668815,0.01383519,0.01015916,0.004362575,0.01105541,0.0108837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05375043,0.0006322474,0.0004585276,0.002652829,0.08690847,0.02641209,0.008440138,0.01336661,0.000684534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01100509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01218038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03526016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05419563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9844223,0.01201896,0.0002226698,0.0009379377,0.001509062,0.0008892042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8955912,0.09699278,0.001504514,0.001829739,0.002879591,0.001202161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008685389,0.00001484509,0.000358918,0.00004937484,0.000002983517,0.0001388404,0.0301045,0.00007744371,0.00002883587,0.9596919,0.004650509,0.004872997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002135757,0.00002044253,0.0006804958,0.0008214446,0.00001044534,0.0002139756,0.1050428,0.0006670938,0.0002317406,0.8130488,0.07921364,0.00002765283],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04207357,0.01026587,0.01665701,0.7802629,0.001576963,0.00004186722,0.0000649014,0.00001503551,0.1490417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315898,0.005982693,0.004416111,0.04599296,0.0007434959,0.0001381809,0.00002888229,0.00006904103,0.01103875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03526016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1601717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039067449","doi":"","title":"Book Review: A Parent-Partner Status for American Family Law by Merle H. Weiner","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Genealogy; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Frances E. Chapman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.039273711452434,"gpt":0.3395010143025037,"spread":0.3002273028500697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002970345,0.0007495218,0.001177343,0.002791389,0.002236742,0.00362574,0.001942634,0.007980834,0.02008709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02203233,0.0004660631,0.0005307351,0.002269226,0.002123749,0.003161063,0.001348934,0.007459238,0.00972155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004999196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008053701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02247034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06992979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976572,0.000592128,0.0001871738,0.0002382517,0.001174103,0.0001511033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818971,0.009525544,0.0006618201,0.000337514,0.006437816,0.001140273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002802077,0.000002622025,0.00002903487,0.00004659127,0.000001043413,0.0000118584,0.000007066523,0.000007965636,0.000004947259,0.0004590693,0.9946385,0.004788516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001083067,0.00001084847,0.0006119045,0.0008473152,0.000009457953,0.0001202541,0.00007789147,0.00003638343,0.00002297983,0.001082618,0.9971578,0.00001171684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004255925,0.1838018,0.0003298199,0.5409244,0.2348455,0.0001094126,0.0004027254,0.00006890798,0.03909177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01078822,0.2168669,0.0005951942,0.3452807,0.2130227,0.0002476231,0.0005688061,0.0001780228,0.2124518],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02247034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06719804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186949450","doi":"","title":"An Alternative Conception: the Legality of Home Insemination Under Canada’s Assisted Reproduction Act","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Reproduction; Insemination; Donor insemination; Intrauterine insemination; Political science; Artificial insemination; Law; Biology; Pregnancy; Infertility; Genetics","authors":[{"name":"Fiona Kelly","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04675249353029011,"gpt":0.3146477136723396,"spread":0.2678952201420495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007717435,0.0003364567,0.0006379578,0.001114994,0.01594635,0.007916975,0.004250125,0.01968235,0.006215847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02180444,0.0007132738,0.0009611639,0.0015376,0.01766145,0.003027744,0.003637109,0.01751527,0.0003208701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0585192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1584105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9783133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878958,0.002378148,0.0003493167,0.001080798,0.00485155,0.003444358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881425,0.006887956,0.0004975102,0.0006357239,0.002743452,0.001092861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000860155,0.00003660044,0.002606562,0.00003416595,0.00001960089,0.001166545,0.00681071,0.0003788405,0.000206084,0.9442706,0.03366078,0.01072356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003272761,0.0001358612,0.02278162,0.001383125,0.0003072854,0.003080819,0.02288664,0.007495685,0.001448357,0.2727101,0.6670194,0.0004238108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1066745,0.01048769,0.005488771,0.3390932,0.001861118,0.0001641096,0.0005405016,0.0000574295,0.5356328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8365384,0.004771495,0.003842201,0.08453601,0.0008007079,0.00009763497,0.0001292992,0.00005514266,0.06922924],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0585192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4245885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080640902","doi":"","title":"Share the Wealth? Kerr v Baranow and the \"Joint Family Venture\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Joint venture; Business; Joint (building); Business administration; Engineering; Structural engineering","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Flood","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0658104394636366,"gpt":0.2619687311972317,"spread":0.1961582917335951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006575475,0.0002947648,0.0007024345,0.0005243749,0.01459482,0.007472067,0.001944887,0.02776954,0.008779316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02132822,0.0005563083,0.0005801937,0.0006468894,0.01231875,0.008546342,0.007145461,0.01684853,0.0006008381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005014601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01811156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08534177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1742239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956742,0.001366694,0.0001086389,0.0004123299,0.0005661665,0.001871989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948134,0.002517363,0.0003761679,0.0003684193,0.0003730866,0.001551511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001011647,0.0001306209,0.00451823,0.00002618745,0.00003328036,0.001499281,0.008791175,0.0001739282,0.000225519,0.8559933,0.1156124,0.01289489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002872274,0.0001419313,0.00983596,0.0007124374,0.0001539278,0.002236841,0.03905184,0.001035219,0.0009483991,0.5005137,0.4448417,0.0002407759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.121741,0.004074922,0.001331532,0.6433665,0.001823926,0.00006100398,0.0001257497,0.00002625285,0.2274491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7932053,0.001185131,0.000267316,0.1551053,0.001025752,0.00007290837,0.00003056236,0.00002893693,0.04907883],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08534177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1696901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048599398","doi":"","title":"Consent, Coercion, and Shared Parenting: Ruffudeen-Coutts v Coutts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Susan Boyd","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05136468322551728,"gpt":0.3043930437155806,"spread":0.2530283604900633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02386649,0.0005776244,0.001219681,0.001011647,0.01508241,0.006252439,0.003328803,0.04146511,0.002925179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04119543,0.0008559854,0.0009545853,0.001237739,0.02720229,0.009864465,0.007037419,0.03286019,0.0002199441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006569133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02816441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1088356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1892494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879404,0.005560462,0.0006581738,0.001593885,0.001750259,0.002496801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849664,0.01216636,0.0004955597,0.0006799839,0.0008238013,0.0008679072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008547875,0.0000652456,0.00201588,0.0000979785,0.00003064662,0.002058382,0.04230525,0.0001562878,0.0001787793,0.907203,0.03075912,0.01504411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000333019,0.0001344853,0.005382918,0.00303394,0.0002808814,0.002933481,0.06297629,0.0009770091,0.001145042,0.5900785,0.3324407,0.0002837486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.136158,0.02876833,0.004946189,0.6544876,0.004522012,0.0002897961,0.0001432698,0.00004784772,0.170637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7879032,0.00673723,0.001479026,0.181099,0.001791602,0.0003526423,0.00004156288,0.00004083921,0.02055484],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1088356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2164041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163571463","doi":"","title":"Hong Kong's Children Proceedings (Parental Responsibility) Bill : Comparative Family Law Reform and Multidisciplinary Collaboration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Katherine A. Lynch","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02786398686844673,"gpt":0.2990662812755085,"spread":0.2712022944070618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008094067,0.0002197729,0.0002970709,0.001536815,0.0157927,0.008426788,0.001776747,0.00390804,0.009496086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0137402,0.000416823,0.000388662,0.00178112,0.004910886,0.002867797,0.005287217,0.0031828,0.000294067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03247571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5144365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.688033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943879,0.002106606,0.0002004424,0.0003278394,0.0007196818,0.00225746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990748,0.003121644,0.000524243,0.0005576308,0.001334374,0.003714047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003609883,0.001012759,0.09488168,0.0002705405,0.0001070288,0.003511594,0.129031,0.001298,0.0005330547,0.5608225,0.1025023,0.1056685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002428589,0.0003708733,0.4207557,0.0009694616,0.0002577868,0.000549157,0.2690593,0.001124631,0.001201758,0.01639847,0.2889303,0.0001397764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.746757,0.004127796,0.0004139151,0.07424363,0.0005318263,0.0002253366,0.0003054962,0.00002355943,0.1733715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961155,0.001060834,0.0002967508,0.00498778,0.00005169705,0.0001481732,0.00006863086,0.000006473132,0.0322247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5144365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9768462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783109536","doi":"","title":"Le Droit Myope","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Régine Tremblay","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03061582775573795,"gpt":0.2959359580597442,"spread":0.2653201303040062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001018508,0.001261982,0.001039543,0.001334318,0.004386065,0.005806316,0.001018001,0.003426712,0.3220407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003851388,0.0003585093,0.0005435544,0.0007973033,0.001523695,0.00271583,0.001987664,0.005757423,0.1441651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003669335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002674726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0294455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02611302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986571,0.0002556135,0.00005229303,0.0002947179,0.0005415829,0.0001987495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990649,0.0003134263,0.00006208725,0.00008883714,0.0002887974,0.0001820228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001396307,0.00004642368,0.0004894173,0.0001859925,0.00001634671,0.0006095784,0.0005315352,0.0003145391,0.0009478315,0.08962114,0.7881017,0.1189959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006194102,0.000003764402,0.0002089664,0.00003706501,8.866344e-7,0.0001183761,0.0000920946,0.00003912099,0.00008306006,0.0009428306,0.998462,0.00000565755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005043173,0.03708123,0.002412027,0.08297505,0.05178554,0.00009171264,0.001613608,0.0009903024,0.8180073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02085297,0.006063318,0.0004799985,0.006355564,0.004642738,0.00006207035,0.0002586556,0.0003005973,0.9609841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3220407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9670266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124959456","doi":"","title":"A v B and Attorney General of Quebec (Eric v Lola) —The Implications for Cohabiting Couples Outside Quebec","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Order (exchange); Sociology; Poverty; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Bakht","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05099248566382994,"gpt":0.3006428017872881,"spread":0.2496503161234582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003498209,0.0002299285,0.0002727633,0.000636469,0.0247683,0.006101774,0.001834775,0.006944519,0.00791475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006384223,0.000332499,0.0004739571,0.000809413,0.007178313,0.001565594,0.002162636,0.005777762,0.0003674452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04174574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08077352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957305,0.00064706,0.0000705168,0.0003587175,0.0007896132,0.002403678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953039,0.001369231,0.0002710237,0.0001627506,0.001475468,0.001417596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001416676,0.0001441961,0.07787361,0.0001286295,0.0000607272,0.004945918,0.0211589,0.000727163,0.001214282,0.6165071,0.2201343,0.05696351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000139358,0.0001950131,0.1824764,0.001036767,0.0001887101,0.002113878,0.08534758,0.001621074,0.001697309,0.02982074,0.6950372,0.0003259032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2844845,0.01015839,0.001270653,0.2472743,0.001499027,0.0001303885,0.0005185091,0.00004261749,0.4546216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.869013,0.001898197,0.0003792708,0.06722499,0.0001902745,0.00004344689,0.00008222737,0.00001617412,0.06115246],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04174574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3028879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081446521","doi":"","title":"Introducing the Next Class of Bastard: An Assessment of the Definitional Implications of the Succession Law Reform Act for After-Born Children","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Law; Class (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Courtney Retter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04932346918375177,"gpt":0.3100338691469843,"spread":0.2607103999632325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01504511,0.000366308,0.000719808,0.001603321,0.01629069,0.01137467,0.003384449,0.008342911,0.008525366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02197681,0.0005313354,0.0008485747,0.001565454,0.02241564,0.00838655,0.007789981,0.0142389,0.0005285447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01029032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02786268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06512701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.169476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9866737,0.005722526,0.0005250571,0.0009944277,0.002663234,0.003420963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908928,0.004329682,0.0008964181,0.0007631665,0.001815867,0.001302032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002362102,0.00002807656,0.001184395,0.00002510146,0.000001665843,0.00006660471,0.006002453,0.00004859659,0.0000782954,0.9838378,0.003577478,0.005126041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002033645,0.0005444986,0.02441557,0.00178259,0.0001032949,0.0006195307,0.1026129,0.002699126,0.002632414,0.3801925,0.4840021,0.0001920705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.241303,0.00433735,0.01119293,0.09342671,0.00175629,0.000265458,0.0001716448,0.00007480779,0.6474718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403257,0.00087795,0.006521932,0.01778238,0.000219106,0.0001918915,0.00006177871,0.0000579046,0.03396131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.934873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1294959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157619134","doi":"","title":"Married Couple, Single Recipient: Understanding the Exclusion of Gifts and Inheritances from Default Matrimonial Regimes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"L. M. Cardenas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0841584033312976,"gpt":0.2975646533194248,"spread":0.2134062499881272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003800201,0.0002296501,0.0005194254,0.001612591,0.01492528,0.007778096,0.001915403,0.002179567,0.004174246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004749401,0.0002652844,0.0003298095,0.001573396,0.02449402,0.006554859,0.003519522,0.002792813,0.0002394301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03249669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02266015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7643347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7676545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979975,0.000764602,0.00006282415,0.0001965766,0.0004084028,0.0005700493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984441,0.0005358199,0.000204189,0.0001357693,0.000394386,0.0002856319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009767817,0.00001250041,0.002738811,0.00001467192,0.000002808287,0.0002793692,0.05989785,0.000116345,0.00007586264,0.932367,0.0007159314,0.003769167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004403524,0.00005305548,0.02826637,0.0005594509,0.00007800919,0.0007964082,0.1628129,0.003619799,0.0003009571,0.590089,0.2133143,0.00006556752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4005448,0.003730326,0.02259284,0.01740772,0.0001003089,0.00007244672,0.000160725,0.00003846343,0.5553524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902325,0.0007422714,0.0010147,0.0005951525,0.00002697851,0.00002128342,0.00003274627,0.00001391513,0.007320494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7643347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4741064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005267199","doi":"","title":"Prestation Compensatoire Et Union De Fait En Droit Québécois : Étude Critique Du Discours Judiciaire","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","authors":[{"name":"Laurence Saint-Pierre Harvey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05178023628263907,"gpt":0.4094153229177707,"spread":0.3576350866351317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009307673,0.0006387919,0.001134359,0.001769615,0.02517075,0.01036264,0.003386597,0.01198599,0.008839526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01918367,0.0007009362,0.0008100851,0.003009448,0.02937095,0.003973536,0.004399946,0.01432736,0.0004826965],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06630978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1108553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9505992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9629912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900548,0.002673968,0.0003230686,0.001092865,0.00246101,0.003394275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899164,0.005511059,0.0007526057,0.0006255436,0.002396052,0.0007983783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002068354,0.0000218858,0.002717299,0.00003419829,0.00001593151,0.0003809629,0.02787207,0.0002934729,0.0001374373,0.9540419,0.008409046,0.00605507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001825517,0.00009655819,0.05520704,0.001615858,0.0001620588,0.001413909,0.1098033,0.003345215,0.001018664,0.2078133,0.6190673,0.00027436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3107504,0.01196678,0.009123204,0.1198153,0.0007504748,0.000121651,0.0003263455,0.00005901022,0.5470868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9176171,0.001889895,0.001289673,0.008184346,0.0001618434,0.00009126772,0.00004858957,0.00004448279,0.07067278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9336902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4811134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174196727","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: McCain v McCain and Barton v Sauvé : A New Approach to Autonomous Domestic Contractual Bargaining in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public administration; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Cornish","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04931912024446239,"gpt":0.2837559971035994,"spread":0.234436876859137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003025908,0.0004366256,0.0006614428,0.0008420713,0.03421084,0.00622315,0.004190044,0.04453902,0.01467479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01209926,0.001316837,0.001094532,0.002066752,0.01172162,0.002969203,0.003342343,0.03146287,0.001131707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0726572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1122698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9720943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995017,0.0004702496,0.0002235995,0.0006576581,0.001372761,0.002258742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923638,0.00330683,0.000530293,0.0002728559,0.001447117,0.002078969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002163576,0.00006813904,0.008183543,0.0001626356,0.00006846408,0.008509761,0.04865589,0.0004038855,0.0009426528,0.2501754,0.6757038,0.00690939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002161431,0.00005531139,0.01622448,0.0003581921,0.000176905,0.002674916,0.04646041,0.0008543743,0.0007882921,0.01906995,0.9128236,0.0002973708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0532746,0.001234255,0.0007979939,0.8256829,0.00230529,0.0001692681,0.0003802504,0.00006040882,0.1160951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2461818,0.001467901,0.000777918,0.5917702,0.001728738,0.0001974251,0.00008309479,0.00008102559,0.1577118],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0726572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5271673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066197535","doi":"","title":"The \"Family\"—and \"Families\" in Law: A Review of Archana Parashar and Franscesca Dominello, <i>The Family In Law</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Research methodology; Family health","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01340362078827113,"gpt":0.2195263242788712,"spread":0.2061227034906001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003896094,0.0007430026,0.001091295,0.005390079,0.002426098,0.005604501,0.001113093,0.003890801,0.00298673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005384412,0.0004766313,0.0003753618,0.008499299,0.01132094,0.01010833,0.002499125,0.004953405,0.0004579246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004823735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01094013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02475579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03705806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979035,0.00103125,0.0001573871,0.0002147606,0.0005633641,0.0001298039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993969,0.004941369,0.0002509416,0.00009902145,0.0005717152,0.0001679692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003862427,0.00009090474,0.001017167,0.006723828,0.00004807983,0.0001566207,0.006456713,0.0002586163,0.0001374874,0.3963969,0.1436067,0.4450684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006020911,0.00002472671,0.001975638,0.01048093,0.00002698421,0.000290529,0.00341777,0.00007652913,0.00005644217,0.0273383,0.9562868,0.0000193862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002410978,0.987343,0.0002150775,0.007296314,0.0005709927,0.000003018245,0.00001163502,0.000001959764,0.004316919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008750798,0.9836186,0.000288732,0.005020958,0.001287454,0.00001113798,0.00001788213,0.000007341862,0.0009971652],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02475579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04922342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004913135","doi":"","title":"(Some) Mothers Know Best: A Case Comment on MM v TB and the Plight of Indigenous Mothers in Child Welfare and Adoption Proceedings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Welfare; Economic growth; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Wang","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02118420762285752,"gpt":0.288364042225923,"spread":0.2671798346030655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01182268,0.0006045457,0.0008168615,0.0006522257,0.03413805,0.007423712,0.005577645,0.06035662,0.006870806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03473167,0.001454104,0.001303633,0.0009147562,0.01767723,0.007041706,0.009047856,0.07624748,0.0007928681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009301797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01822863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1370741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.225778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992632,0.00232599,0.0004662232,0.0008380633,0.000802287,0.002935488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817423,0.01303414,0.001370915,0.0004764251,0.001214482,0.002161721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001033085,0.00009513029,0.006858228,0.0002598547,0.00006540872,0.03540391,0.5367983,0.0001827923,0.001470574,0.2445988,0.1647467,0.009417024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005080732,0.0001004227,0.00514886,0.001305604,0.0001745235,0.01247947,0.5163396,0.0004180617,0.001481486,0.02333298,0.4389628,0.0002053886],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.05523123,0.001349321,0.0006696197,0.9106104,0.003397569,0.00004860684,0.00002670501,0.00003010341,0.02863641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2415064,0.001458027,0.0008483254,0.7241113,0.003133227,0.0001274515,0.00001109969,0.00005883025,0.02874527],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8629259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2725525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217801924","doi":"","title":"The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining The Inequity Of Funding In An Act Respecting First Nations, Inuit And Métis Children, Youth And Families","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Rachael Garrett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04340520861916614,"gpt":0.2902101541365199,"spread":0.2468049455173538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056146,0.0001476252,0.0004000554,0.001887356,0.01265224,0.006065204,0.001732159,0.002084873,0.003148567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02659376,0.0002976081,0.0002975985,0.003045026,0.006269177,0.003391667,0.006300548,0.004855136,0.0001762157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01592453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02275156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5299805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.734606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989282,0.004367304,0.0002983173,0.0003475192,0.001458762,0.004245936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830297,0.006174526,0.004258576,0.0002872396,0.002126573,0.004123487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001574502,0.0004278637,0.5556069,0.00006099197,0.00006357367,0.0009390052,0.3591976,0.0003230413,0.0001897253,0.06276502,0.004051148,0.01621763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009438615,0.0001207451,0.2844629,0.0001723767,0.00004588436,0.000234536,0.6997211,0.0004233298,0.0001645978,0.002631073,0.01198745,0.0000264407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846586,0.0002097878,0.00004766531,0.003620905,0.00001930335,0.00001194996,0.00005117317,9.0841e-7,0.01137978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980066,0.00009034889,0.00003549872,0.0004180667,0.000007211177,0.00001764552,0.00001807066,0.000001917577,0.001404616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4700195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.945575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044244435","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Autonomous Motherhood? A Socio-Legal Study of Choice and Constraint by Susan B. Boyd, Dorothy E. Chunn, Fiona Kelly, and Wanda Wiegers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Sociology; Gender studies; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","authors":[{"name":"Brenda Cossman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02168493255173345,"gpt":0.2985832967222767,"spread":0.2768983641705433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002850414,0.000440034,0.001241107,0.001827776,0.001484863,0.003672431,0.001844605,0.004662303,0.01030366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024983,0.0004448907,0.0003825929,0.002902288,0.002891119,0.003133514,0.0008911997,0.006627748,0.003545681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009406682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02685691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0633006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975095,0.000977804,0.0001419239,0.000189359,0.00102349,0.0001579184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733732,0.01897827,0.0008784623,0.0002964988,0.005488183,0.0009853189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001045749,0.000003618683,0.00008223888,0.0003039316,0.000007900523,0.00003574044,0.00006621067,0.00001911253,0.000008592638,0.002679735,0.9856477,0.01113479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001946443,0.00001458622,0.0006392311,0.002588186,0.0000235059,0.0003230543,0.0003662875,0.00003641671,0.00004482866,0.002652907,0.9932737,0.00001784571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003746439,0.6210107,0.0001016252,0.3325565,0.03593871,0.00001668433,0.0001323115,0.000008199602,0.009860645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01031611,0.8007781,0.000146928,0.1115662,0.04975054,0.00006607845,0.000186405,0.00004808772,0.02714157],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02685691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05340117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080503576","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Transforming Law’s Family: The Legal Recognition of Planned Lesbian Motherhood by Fiona Kelly","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Shelley A. M. Gavigan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08938747715330296,"gpt":0.2925308204617236,"spread":0.2031433433084207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002350716,0.0009176212,0.001615937,0.003382523,0.002463124,0.004215518,0.001924795,0.008344017,0.01526056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01013954,0.0006429603,0.0004762886,0.003827539,0.003598385,0.004226732,0.001597498,0.008348883,0.005255869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00595969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008779627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05490468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.164988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984545,0.0005174538,0.0001040109,0.0001599425,0.0006198184,0.0001443671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900329,0.006752937,0.0003200922,0.0001450875,0.002199344,0.0005497333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003136716,0.000003305023,0.00001621647,0.0001717579,0.000001658105,0.00001338232,0.00004609643,0.00001224745,0.000008380808,0.0008633512,0.9911951,0.007665331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006461863,0.000006403418,0.0002047036,0.001341092,0.000006363373,0.00009870341,0.0001909578,0.00001497437,0.00001761569,0.0007451761,0.9973577,0.000009795823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001745985,0.6406739,0.0001649362,0.2182121,0.1237668,0.00003608636,0.0001099311,0.00002760206,0.01683414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003469698,0.6314018,0.0002509037,0.1722833,0.1095618,0.0001177621,0.0001466318,0.00009899137,0.08266918],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05490468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1091703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7056622171","doi":"","title":"Family Violence and Child Support: Abuse, Shared Parenting, and Special Expenses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Child support; Domestic violence; Economic Justice; Family support; Inequality; Relation (database); Child protection; Diversity (politics)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01301271289290069,"gpt":0.2458741415366988,"spread":0.2328614286437982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00252335,0.0001698191,0.0003639294,0.001075607,0.01038167,0.004688784,0.001038221,0.00329896,0.003171805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01073583,0.0002422326,0.0003267023,0.001312278,0.01206586,0.002881193,0.006268875,0.004504363,0.0001157265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01298085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02764696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3692618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5940408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937976,0.001845516,0.0004230815,0.0002730584,0.002027323,0.001633364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948861,0.001725637,0.001205912,0.0002376178,0.0008453402,0.001099367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003230619,0.00008961994,0.06615182,0.0002396424,0.00004124249,0.002123764,0.08415776,0.0002892983,0.0002606961,0.7150866,0.02690114,0.1046261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002619098,0.0001162217,0.2127412,0.00534373,0.00008586808,0.004472725,0.2155066,0.0004525791,0.0005757468,0.122965,0.4375415,0.0001725142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3614839,0.03418463,0.004154674,0.3003668,0.001169126,0.0001359127,0.0002162306,0.00002841028,0.2982604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701238,0.009933061,0.0008683448,0.01223465,0.0002343365,0.00007233748,0.0000444088,0.000009949025,0.006479202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6307382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7342249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997461026","doi":"","title":"Worthless? Victims of Family Violence and the (Non)Payment of Child Support","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Child support; Face (sociological concept); Payment; Adversarial system; Power (physics); Child abuse; Order (exchange); Family support","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0143361357681371,"gpt":0.2848715516811477,"spread":0.2705354159130106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004487714,0.0001541486,0.0003316898,0.0005952223,0.007891059,0.005376366,0.001145173,0.005651373,0.004965486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01600461,0.0003087116,0.0002669794,0.0005882608,0.01656013,0.005605189,0.004855413,0.006685336,0.0002629975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004250847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004801793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02863897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03680163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960394,0.001864217,0.0001455825,0.0002245495,0.0005838558,0.001142432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969203,0.001416457,0.000763952,0.0002160331,0.0002486262,0.000434629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003499946,0.00004906505,0.01220861,0.00006586438,0.00002421241,0.004852698,0.120483,0.00007605971,0.0001961498,0.8155335,0.02212084,0.02435506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000625764,0.000105252,0.01984781,0.002152303,0.00008719273,0.0157936,0.4594463,0.0004564897,0.0006492186,0.2220306,0.2792605,0.0001081965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3713673,0.013545,0.002517572,0.3714282,0.001452522,0.00006108207,0.00006472696,0.00002717701,0.2395365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780546,0.002558282,0.0002236164,0.01342714,0.0002462726,0.00002119824,0.000009542554,0.00001210801,0.00544725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.971361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05694455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048850375","doi":"","title":"Book Review: D’un océan à l’autre . . . recension de Nicole Laviolette et Julie Audet, L’essentiel du droit de la famille dans les provinces et territoires de common law au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Régine Tremblay","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01649967422605888,"gpt":0.280056274338826,"spread":0.2635566001127672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006376966,0.001015545,0.002484662,0.004874981,0.003053025,0.009622899,0.002718753,0.008075108,0.02287957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04910179,0.0008305158,0.001053578,0.005175498,0.003760996,0.0102019,0.002571202,0.0109224,0.01356796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02273323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05522873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1643973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938917,0.00154909,0.0005752051,0.0005707477,0.003064163,0.000349063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9366987,0.02118206,0.002645396,0.001521135,0.03399945,0.003953284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003395898,0.000002247105,0.00002380784,0.0001565337,0.000003075804,0.00001100793,0.00002673755,0.00000615204,0.000008980631,0.0003948152,0.9948758,0.004487452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005123305,0.000002574136,0.0000950349,0.0008147793,0.000007125728,0.00006469442,0.00007284988,0.000007384063,0.00001132899,0.0003734795,0.9985367,0.000008996458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001025601,0.2480841,0.0002313968,0.5467034,0.196843,0.00003321006,0.0002924237,0.00004710495,0.007662825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002268243,0.2368958,0.0006542873,0.5143182,0.1786081,0.0001465345,0.0004352543,0.0001619706,0.06651156],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9447713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1098145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902752104","doi":"","title":"Moral Evils v. Health and Safety Evils: The Case of an Ovum ‘Obtained’ From a ‘Donor’ and Used By the ‘Donor’ in Her Own Surrogate Pregnancy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egg donation; Pregnancy; Gynecology; Andrology; Medicine; Obstetrics; Biology; Genetics","authors":[{"name":"Pamela White","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04741376017114965,"gpt":0.3062397410306981,"spread":0.2588259808595484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0124839,0.0002899725,0.0004940604,0.0005999571,0.01596959,0.007962631,0.001743638,0.01539333,0.002356697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01945567,0.0005063395,0.0008087368,0.0005208825,0.03418332,0.003099021,0.003888769,0.01456642,0.0004139896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01461104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02623253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2651977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2585974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9837146,0.006452252,0.0003449027,0.001347976,0.004637718,0.003502558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906101,0.006427964,0.0003758786,0.0005761874,0.001442915,0.0005669119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001233725,0.000007656023,0.0002733207,0.00001391776,0.000003199611,0.0004601271,0.00380117,0.0001463575,0.00008949598,0.9785805,0.01441055,0.002201376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008598232,0.00008396988,0.002203928,0.000595282,0.0000644848,0.001041755,0.008689233,0.001293642,0.00136851,0.3094644,0.6749771,0.0001317347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03856507,0.003241074,0.005815188,0.1805903,0.001433824,0.0001008665,0.00009527658,0.00004564494,0.7701127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7514851,0.001816242,0.001590934,0.1546269,0.0009670593,0.000159444,0.00003720521,0.00005752743,0.08925958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7348024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5273081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039642515","doi":"","title":"A Feminist Critique of Quebec v. A. : Evaluating the Supreme Court's Divided Opinion on Section 15 and Common Law Support Obligations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Majority opinion; Business","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Mukhtar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08359551058275173,"gpt":0.3771282442904529,"spread":0.2935327337077012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011505,0.0006580684,0.0008958465,0.002581069,0.02913944,0.01058379,0.004905173,0.01657267,0.009102972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02104011,0.0005606036,0.0008333204,0.002725942,0.03171537,0.004318295,0.003100537,0.0138718,0.0005902937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09814912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08953458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9671414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.982816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897572,0.00341593,0.000150968,0.0008013676,0.003014434,0.00285997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849635,0.008757994,0.0004840555,0.0003758101,0.004558267,0.0008604047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003581258,0.00001100369,0.0009426171,0.00004325131,0.00001576903,0.000342267,0.01429901,0.0003404756,0.0001446474,0.9023742,0.07674757,0.004703284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001706804,0.00005824702,0.01648137,0.001691823,0.0002049044,0.0003412241,0.05371594,0.002824063,0.001450574,0.306506,0.6162459,0.0003091438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05701542,0.00711275,0.003268835,0.4586484,0.001227786,0.00007485085,0.0007202192,0.00005452926,0.4718773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534957,0.001769104,0.001298574,0.0877362,0.0005508782,0.00008867927,0.00007545458,0.00006806191,0.05491738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09814912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7121251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048446512","doi":"","title":"Townshend v. Townshend & Buttar v. Buttar : Gifts, Exclusions, and Intentions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan R. Robinson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06655443817021048,"gpt":0.3334327273593861,"spread":0.2668782891891756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004321103,0.0002169572,0.0004276182,0.001573457,0.01004824,0.005399838,0.001230547,0.007355074,0.006420764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01878394,0.0003187863,0.000396132,0.001331304,0.01426515,0.004152174,0.004023273,0.006097825,0.0003164146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007917952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01340338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2613774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3923843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970701,0.0008648763,0.000138056,0.0002201221,0.0008991301,0.0008076178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915176,0.005218013,0.0006012363,0.0003389592,0.001198602,0.001125422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005730966,0.00005361702,0.008382183,0.00003510661,0.00001273337,0.0004300554,0.00986357,0.0001474698,0.0001251122,0.9321603,0.04101803,0.007714503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002042214,0.0001195801,0.08445156,0.001367259,0.0002474385,0.001127406,0.06719703,0.001317328,0.001785345,0.575949,0.2659625,0.00027136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2151532,0.01141305,0.002421371,0.2926322,0.0006122987,0.00009390214,0.000325115,0.00003855986,0.4773102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655511,0.00193235,0.0002680534,0.01269498,0.0001350124,0.00003039829,0.00002667763,0.000009552457,0.01935177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7386226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.519712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184642675","doi":"","title":"Access to Assisted Conception: A Call for Legislative Reform in Light of the Modern Family ( Susan Doe v. Attorney General of Canada )","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Telecommunications; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Feldstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05561309867744824,"gpt":0.3175857809138221,"spread":0.2619726822363738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02144946,0.0006619116,0.001217385,0.001446089,0.02054151,0.0114711,0.008257329,0.0548338,0.005775285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03876587,0.001352526,0.001413853,0.001858822,0.01969053,0.006199186,0.007234787,0.04214444,0.0005661738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05144588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2733082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9239817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9784293,0.002701683,0.0009983365,0.001590187,0.008872325,0.007408313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670882,0.01457327,0.001212184,0.001316377,0.006936175,0.008873767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001154109,0.0001523848,0.006017901,0.0002665999,0.000066408,0.001793732,0.01591014,0.0007814037,0.001047262,0.4320349,0.5076726,0.0341412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002640672,0.0001365757,0.01872415,0.001369606,0.0001668325,0.001022995,0.01209893,0.001431124,0.0007413475,0.04082188,0.9228371,0.0003852666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01286356,0.007493417,0.001229654,0.9337021,0.003017973,0.0001306309,0.0002187786,0.0001037822,0.04124022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1311107,0.006690767,0.003484404,0.8080884,0.003340273,0.0002469085,0.0001677785,0.00009455079,0.04677617],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07601833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3732677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186683474","doi":"","title":"The Best Interests of Children: An Evidence-Based Approach by Paul Millar","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Gene C. Coleman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05859298943512477,"gpt":0.3366294320028895,"spread":0.2780364425677647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05710474,0.0009615834,0.002489289,0.004442926,0.007388053,0.01678765,0.003792203,0.01888737,0.002449203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1440343,0.001218173,0.0009961857,0.002615482,0.02387282,0.013653,0.006146201,0.04038804,0.0004693788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01045566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02839842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02371914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03708263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9470706,0.03375499,0.004096787,0.002114071,0.01168181,0.001281735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7151456,0.2533693,0.004416217,0.001737171,0.0186248,0.006706833],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006486228,0.000111612,0.001357244,0.002021121,0.0001757224,0.001147915,0.01360796,0.0007114098,0.0001121771,0.3921654,0.5016383,0.08688629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009330066,0.00006242888,0.0009929531,0.01453692,0.0001535294,0.001506309,0.01250571,0.0006794992,0.0003408132,0.2655829,0.7034106,0.0001348926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005913115,0.05935465,0.001636131,0.9259061,0.004012889,0.0000316667,0.00001915086,0.00000623637,0.008441757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1222365,0.2496766,0.02103721,0.5781006,0.01626188,0.0004324703,0.00004831643,0.0001063591,0.01210015],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05710474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3020023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118739551","doi":"","title":"The \"Family\"—and \"Families\" in Law: A Review of Archana Parashar and Franscesca Dominello, The Family In Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Mary Jane Mossman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0634057558751246,"gpt":0.3427713802528224,"spread":0.2793656243776978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005083999,0.001012414,0.002192541,0.009139156,0.001578228,0.004578876,0.001240893,0.004678493,0.003502821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01098592,0.0006488622,0.0007554801,0.01386345,0.004797466,0.00676371,0.002865106,0.004015782,0.0004536006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005224508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01869737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03196209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978424,0.0008823239,0.0003085903,0.0002370681,0.0006136088,0.0001160674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885748,0.009260797,0.000527486,0.0001143994,0.001223004,0.0002994615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009074074,0.0001019806,0.001282721,0.07814125,0.0003213224,0.0002661732,0.003879527,0.0002590349,0.0001834533,0.06201448,0.1393402,0.7141191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000230106,0.00003512608,0.003158311,0.1034933,0.0002867706,0.0005976341,0.002738327,0.00005348053,0.00005741006,0.009672517,0.8798433,0.00004081214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003078004,0.9984079,0.00001717648,0.001222523,0.0001542947,0.000001283556,0.000005009756,4.29167e-7,0.0001606724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008489285,0.9975217,0.00006765602,0.001199245,0.0002601033,0.000004661916,0.000007016455,0.00000101815,0.00008967704],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03196209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06355214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3059442353","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Families and the Law: Cases and Commentary by Mary Jane Mossman","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Genealogy; History; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Susan Boyd","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0201641656564556,"gpt":0.2615367770005895,"spread":0.2413726113441339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006260847,0.0009529872,0.002063221,0.003822824,0.007045571,0.006404804,0.004049695,0.03510235,0.00848209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04576274,0.001038268,0.001124787,0.003626877,0.005289093,0.005485259,0.003019539,0.02450965,0.003043344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01122226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01886171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0736942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1938967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950587,0.001572643,0.0003610328,0.0004817286,0.00207571,0.0004501518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9549875,0.03430904,0.001544728,0.0003894576,0.007085627,0.00168373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002935087,0.000001975899,0.00001704073,0.00009721825,0.000002752289,0.00004744668,0.00009713947,0.000008708685,0.000007517371,0.0008944552,0.9972363,0.001586559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001317072,0.000007054109,0.000322289,0.002241611,0.00002754696,0.0002357845,0.0008020304,0.00003112811,0.00003532191,0.001792368,0.9944708,0.00002091611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001942955,0.0906052,0.00005721594,0.8342898,0.06920039,0.0000257137,0.00006281653,0.000009446111,0.005555109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004214824,0.08525759,0.0001725381,0.7836688,0.09811278,0.0001481324,0.0000666573,0.00005907402,0.0282997],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0736942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1465305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044670361","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Petra Nordqvist and Carol Smart, Relative Strangers: Family Life, Genes and Donor Conception","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","authors":[{"name":"M.J. Vonk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05997318476299163,"gpt":0.2417193032012214,"spread":0.1817461184382298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001931452,0.001031141,0.001853024,0.00264705,0.001879602,0.003906164,0.002648947,0.01107043,0.02091167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0141214,0.0007301394,0.0006317996,0.00340724,0.002943405,0.004602908,0.001830562,0.01088348,0.01175772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004423237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005091746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01620273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04680466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987638,0.0002958643,0.00008639556,0.0001710347,0.0006003553,0.0000825844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992494,0.004906151,0.0002819487,0.0001214981,0.001713349,0.0004831121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000347409,0.000002215928,0.00001170888,0.0001288202,0.000002779269,0.00001952308,0.00002030285,0.000009504415,0.000004835797,0.0007268878,0.992927,0.006142804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000132204,0.000004602957,0.0001272831,0.000783893,0.000008693865,0.0001777767,0.00008660537,0.00001175552,0.00001283145,0.0009653206,0.9977996,0.000008446802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000809499,0.6103926,0.0001215253,0.2698195,0.1090469,0.00002216306,0.0001390509,0.00002639057,0.01035083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002285164,0.5578776,0.0002417252,0.2293951,0.1307783,0.0001067628,0.0002452702,0.00006695462,0.07900309],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02091167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06995648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}