{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":28,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"8a71e7925071","filters":{"venue":"Canadian journal of family law"}},"results":[{"id":"W3177306436","doi":"","title":"Revisiting The Handmaid’s Tale : Feminist Theory Meets Empirical Research on Surrogate Mothers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Empirical research; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Karen Busby","is_ca":false},{"name":"Delaney Vun","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1480329374763647,"gpt":0.4212688640803418,"spread":0.2732359266039771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004142188,0.0001074201,0.0002454034,0.0002690547,0.0005237575,0.00005952627,0.0003106908,0.0001377335,0.00007091683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002082218,0.00006518705,0.0001008848,0.0003039851,0.001084582,0.00005200998,0.00001613521,0.001781967,0.00003550438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001325422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001515076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001402024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002529465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984121,0.0002038533,0.0003310115,0.0001856938,0.0003564343,0.0005109148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978864,0.0004850717,0.0001318739,0.000485849,0.0003952544,0.0006155853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001565491,0.00009946448,0.07062056,0.0002669612,0.0003051041,0.004247323,0.00370783,0.00001170276,0.01752431,0.6821085,0.06041346,0.1591293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001359616,0.0007672688,0.05905307,0.000400826,0.00004058319,0.0010027,0.005351172,0.000005607973,0.003276832,0.0123228,0.9162687,0.0001508241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8737437,0.001090783,0.00000380749,0.04304806,0.0004977943,0.0002320657,0.000006948869,0.00001462796,0.08136221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947983,0.00003951653,0.0001963866,0.00364776,0.0008606472,0.000004156812,6.926227e-7,0.00002064905,0.000431889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7741861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039067449","doi":"","title":"Book Review: A Parent-Partner Status for American Family Law by Merle H. Weiner","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Genealogy; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Frances E. Chapman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.039273711452434,"gpt":0.3395010143025037,"spread":0.3002273028500697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007603595,0.000168048,0.0005329464,0.00005147899,0.002005352,0.0004479944,0.000710034,0.00007657654,0.000102003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003290051,0.000145966,0.0002057141,0.0001039972,0.001226368,0.0007725757,0.0000146332,0.0002032454,0.00002242605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002490811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002139127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.663627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5474086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980336,0.0001150429,0.0005101728,0.0001890499,0.0003986718,0.0007534335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969669,0.00006482146,0.0008055117,0.000283647,0.0005579814,0.001321128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001039332,0.00001029136,0.0003419348,0.00006912588,0.00004629078,0.00002680994,0.000592725,5.605897e-7,0.00007454852,0.02949832,0.9675267,0.001802301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003059951,0.0001292869,0.0004024285,0.0004601343,0.00006137388,0.000002354223,0.0007844738,8.745037e-7,0.00001889622,0.0005531322,0.9970812,0.0001999013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004804295,0.5467082,0.00011849,0.02159228,0.003202416,0.0009634959,0.0004360544,0.00002510955,0.4221496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8574647,0.02850346,0.0001742767,0.1028586,0.002399401,0.00003716768,0.00001242534,0.00005811362,0.008491811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8526604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186949450","doi":"","title":"An Alternative Conception: the Legality of Home Insemination Under Canada’s Assisted Reproduction Act","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Reproduction; Insemination; Donor insemination; Intrauterine insemination; Political science; Artificial insemination; Law; Biology; Pregnancy; Infertility; Genetics","authors":[{"name":"Fiona Kelly","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04675249353029011,"gpt":0.3146477136723396,"spread":0.2678952201420495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006911927,0.00008705878,0.0002180608,0.0001193915,0.0001512208,0.00001686247,0.0001685852,0.00008431976,0.00002902597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003817689,0.00006081822,0.00004742193,0.0001843038,0.0004279136,0.0001970654,0.000004445631,0.0005531812,5.554006e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003206733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004858709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7376173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9245564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989656,0.00006807053,0.0003642013,0.0001671026,0.0002557512,0.0001792511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980075,0.00003494088,0.0003681176,0.0004570568,0.0008374145,0.0002949741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008777342,0.0003659579,0.1623247,0.0003374896,0.0007057529,0.0006707066,0.003171834,0.0003009416,0.2998336,0.2645856,0.03941158,0.2274141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005613613,0.000387759,0.922471,0.00005332859,0.00005351755,0.000468577,0.00153083,0.00001079986,0.01425551,0.002066479,0.05804855,0.00009230514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816923,0.0003194751,0.00005261881,0.01309276,0.001437023,0.0001705316,0.00001511441,0.000007804418,0.003212387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983389,0.00001928,0.0002229651,0.0007543112,0.0005369796,0.000001930266,0.000006196236,0.000008439726,0.0001110031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7601463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8619141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080640902","doi":"","title":"Share the Wealth? Kerr v Baranow and the \"Joint Family Venture\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Joint venture; Business; Joint (building); Business administration; Engineering; Structural engineering","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Flood","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0658104394636366,"gpt":0.2619687311972317,"spread":0.1961582917335951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001358215,0.00008594239,0.0001638484,0.00005689625,0.001134937,0.0001342673,0.0003429779,0.00007445338,0.0001635529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007623341,0.00004925056,0.0001129819,0.0001322964,0.001051272,0.0001701105,0.00001175886,0.0002948324,0.00001077057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000882866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008852362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1753274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2700825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988825,0.0002225918,0.0002647272,0.00008454173,0.0002459281,0.0002997329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897,0.0000733935,0.0001782722,0.0001427059,0.0001738062,0.0004618446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009264009,0.00001499907,0.001599667,0.00001078434,0.0001017125,0.0001177276,0.1031464,0.00000256713,0.00007395996,0.8568748,0.0229098,0.01505488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005691899,0.00006363993,0.05133817,0.00005495611,0.00004315307,0.00002202544,0.01099569,0.00000685348,0.00001060676,0.006172083,0.9306337,0.00008995969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3900491,0.01747238,0.00004846375,0.02866642,0.003090352,0.0005216409,0.00004372334,0.00001809371,0.5600898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934664,0.0004881911,0.00002437711,0.005200594,0.0004746102,0.000002500804,4.377948e-7,0.000008024951,0.0003348701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9077239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8729131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048599398","doi":"","title":"Consent, Coercion, and Shared Parenting: Ruffudeen-Coutts v Coutts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Susan Boyd","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05136468322551728,"gpt":0.3043930437155806,"spread":0.2530283604900633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001113443,0.0001296797,0.0002768747,0.0001336575,0.0006593689,0.0003228533,0.0004088209,0.0001275717,0.0001147661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008923439,0.0001274712,0.00007745343,0.0001952793,0.0008928737,0.0003092402,0.00001778864,0.0002657229,0.00006152752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001722545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001353235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04722714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2033461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983366,0.0002406469,0.0003846929,0.0001563595,0.00036836,0.0005133985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976,0.0002511773,0.0002602722,0.000160341,0.0003840459,0.001344133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004458633,0.00004520247,0.1157974,0.00006159971,0.0001628953,0.0005163787,0.1637415,0.00002302739,0.0003556724,0.5384042,0.1782839,0.00256366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003946435,0.00005271847,0.006415377,0.00009066953,0.00003380924,0.00001187811,0.003145872,0.00000924807,0.00001267334,0.002863399,0.9868019,0.0001678025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4659804,0.006693127,0.0002506315,0.009736799,0.004337776,0.0003746816,0.0001097885,0.00005561708,0.5124612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967422,0.00003889672,0.0003204594,0.001319979,0.0005599413,0.000001115651,0.000003197201,0.00001614738,0.0009980673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.808518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9591175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163571463","doi":"","title":"Hong Kong's Children Proceedings (Parental Responsibility) Bill : Comparative Family Law Reform and Multidisciplinary Collaboration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Katherine A. Lynch","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02786398686844673,"gpt":0.2990662812755085,"spread":0.2712022944070618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008208148,0.0001466178,0.0002933058,0.0001951605,0.0007851854,0.0002874765,0.0002109888,0.0001339899,0.00002982869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002541976,0.0001211909,0.00007365202,0.0003991711,0.0005611366,0.00103205,0.00002186284,0.000254444,0.00001286758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007290708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001252642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.142426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3913971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986152,0.00008214219,0.0004013125,0.0002153521,0.0003402799,0.0003456839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983889,0.00004562153,0.0002753312,0.00009900868,0.0005624075,0.000628731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000548874,0.0001138362,0.3273649,0.00003563453,0.0002038659,0.00005775759,0.125783,0.0000288221,0.00743349,0.5347298,0.002332111,0.00136783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001326571,0.0006561796,0.8093874,0.0001898158,0.00005543976,0.00003107381,0.05783926,0.00004689448,0.0002428625,0.001761724,0.1280795,0.0003833167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8732107,0.0003862904,0.000001322913,0.001232384,0.0004740118,0.0003550124,0.00004353838,0.00001227008,0.1242844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998726,0.00004907314,0.0001305004,0.0003337768,0.0002651716,0.000002185666,0.00000626752,0.00001131286,0.0004756897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5329681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8632846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783109536","doi":"","title":"Le Droit Myope","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Régine Tremblay","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03061582775573795,"gpt":0.2959359580597442,"spread":0.2653201303040062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005628233,0.00004273001,0.0001137703,0.0001048043,0.0007910065,0.0001274811,0.0002191758,0.00005544199,0.00009903836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005576203,0.00004696101,0.00006010445,0.000150409,0.000138004,0.0002997058,0.000001143022,0.0001256252,0.00002323651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001776284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005064987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.431279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9585956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992288,0.00005598285,0.0002057026,0.00005489037,0.000192277,0.0002623675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988651,0.00001326212,0.0001047235,0.00006709849,0.0001969506,0.0007528986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002204618,0.000008025242,0.002834243,0.000002069211,0.000004456228,0.00003811662,0.004480426,0.000004234111,0.00002326362,0.9569471,0.03445924,0.001196558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002488418,0.0001148801,0.124906,0.00003159381,0.00001218007,0.00001005939,0.003719314,0.00000153103,0.00001275197,0.1327209,0.7381079,0.0001140409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3811219,0.001619283,0.0001313296,0.01331924,0.001058383,0.00009435621,0.000007401913,0.00000956144,0.6026385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931669,0.0002063275,0.0001123661,0.004897812,0.0006331424,1.325884e-7,7.087659e-7,0.000003215526,0.0009793912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8242263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8985068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124959456","doi":"","title":"A v B and Attorney General of Quebec (Eric v Lola) —The Implications for Cohabiting Couples Outside Quebec","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Order (exchange); Sociology; Poverty; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Bakht","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05099248566382994,"gpt":0.3006428017872881,"spread":0.2496503161234582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006691625,0.00009180714,0.000227792,0.0000373557,0.00109224,0.0001094379,0.0002538557,0.00006312258,0.000005759985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005305829,0.00006613757,0.0001040121,0.000118086,0.000878941,0.000164635,0.00001209289,0.0001150288,9.439383e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003049294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007263768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8675888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990392,0.0001082635,0.0003163802,0.00009503619,0.0001353791,0.0003057332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984609,0.0003767431,0.0002869391,0.0000858775,0.0004363362,0.000353177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001355646,0.00001222147,0.0466833,0.0000479787,0.0001671713,0.000001959409,0.02448577,0.0001201145,0.002330193,0.8893806,0.01954015,0.01721698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004087334,0.00005642787,0.3772981,0.00007431454,0.00007593007,0.000003795783,0.00985771,0.00004117835,0.00004546332,0.002224538,0.6097415,0.0001723584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655862,0.001922418,0.0004310326,0.02273377,0.0003751001,0.000359135,0.00005916204,0.000009112166,0.008524071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970377,0.00005493317,0.0008084188,0.0008390215,0.0005291059,0.00000868846,0.000001501403,0.000008254693,0.00071238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8400734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081446521","doi":"","title":"Introducing the Next Class of Bastard: An Assessment of the Definitional Implications of the Succession Law Reform Act for After-Born Children","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Law; Class (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Courtney Retter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04932346918375177,"gpt":0.3100338691469843,"spread":0.2607103999632325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007351425,0.00006644664,0.0001348064,0.00004108316,0.0005600145,0.00002624874,0.0005565148,0.00005397004,0.00004961937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003873311,0.00003529882,0.0001692772,0.0001820104,0.0005356996,0.0002652716,0.00002025163,0.0001575483,1.372485e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001823925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001210035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07856006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3587767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990165,0.0001448279,0.0003567885,0.00008026879,0.0002371674,0.0001644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987528,0.00006237812,0.0004661292,0.0002650933,0.0003261734,0.000127451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000246251,0.00006324951,0.06811915,0.0000123612,0.00005259728,2.627508e-7,0.004658991,0.00004312635,0.0009914141,0.9231306,0.0003168317,0.002586749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000183857,0.00007370817,0.9831898,0.0001003474,0.00005503197,0.000004150889,0.00172434,0.000004272752,0.0004548727,0.009196477,0.00496154,0.00005166818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639103,0.0001163042,0.00009770423,0.006342669,0.0003090935,0.0002886354,0.0002187576,0.000001754874,0.02871482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986994,0.00001877188,0.0004073467,0.0006647438,0.0001845163,0.000004370166,0.00000407378,0.000006351044,0.00001045817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9150706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9275759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157619134","doi":"","title":"Married Couple, Single Recipient: Understanding the Exclusion of Gifts and Inheritances from Default Matrimonial Regimes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"L. M. Cardenas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0841584033312976,"gpt":0.2975646533194248,"spread":0.2134062499881272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004259832,0.00006081933,0.0001255125,0.000045793,0.0009118229,0.0001111199,0.0002572669,0.0000602089,0.0000494451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007329496,0.00004581475,0.00004267492,0.0001808076,0.00103522,0.0001721648,0.00001702088,0.0001050384,0.00000232522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002001908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005717577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1250036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5011927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992505,0.00006752078,0.0002301553,0.00008427441,0.0001800991,0.0001874766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991199,0.0001287014,0.0002241164,0.0001039261,0.0001505611,0.0002727425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000711387,0.00002445796,0.004712183,0.000008037068,0.00006629091,0.00002112638,0.03257896,0.00001117539,0.005398427,0.9463788,0.008012443,0.002716911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007775957,0.0003157592,0.0149317,0.0002799321,0.0000873228,0.000009608927,0.05471291,0.00006487707,0.0006591631,0.1382301,0.7896542,0.000276885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9335802,0.001388001,0.000565632,0.004354081,0.0004726901,0.0001175041,0.00004697559,0.000004903802,0.05947002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986851,0.00008524652,0.0003219723,0.0003512163,0.000436932,6.451764e-7,7.632433e-7,0.000006143395,0.000112036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8081487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8808231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005267199","doi":"","title":"Prestation Compensatoire Et Union De Fait En Droit Québécois : Étude Critique Du Discours Judiciaire","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","authors":[{"name":"Laurence Saint-Pierre Harvey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05178023628263907,"gpt":0.4094153229177707,"spread":0.3576350866351317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007579762,0.0002766972,0.0005603371,0.0002793828,0.001353232,0.0001208647,0.0004043909,0.0006693907,0.0006291592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001157668,0.0002892728,0.000149615,0.000281237,0.0004872104,0.001162416,0.00002537287,0.001959379,0.0001808472],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001704682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02064647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8818672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9882677,0.008838329,0.00124509,0.0002442815,0.0003545099,0.001050092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939632,0.001167866,0.001027779,0.0003101643,0.001273637,0.00225729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007415322,0.00007576525,0.01943947,0.001030266,0.0001931261,0.001301848,0.1062895,0.0000372123,0.0001333735,0.7193708,0.1201021,0.03195225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006403009,0.0006209265,0.1175419,0.00389501,0.0001012347,0.0003719947,0.03984555,0.0001117959,0.00001078806,0.006427686,0.8301543,0.0002785091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4508933,0.01186726,0.003008117,0.4697619,0.01153528,0.0008359274,0.0004131479,0.00002144896,0.05166359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747686,0.0009782851,0.0007820672,0.01787145,0.003623518,0.000008502504,0.00001301538,0.00006746473,0.001887138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7129432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174196727","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: McCain v McCain and Barton v Sauvé : A New Approach to Autonomous Domestic Contractual Bargaining in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public administration; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Cornish","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04931912024446239,"gpt":0.2837559971035994,"spread":0.234436876859137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008481989,0.0001023979,0.0002308523,0.000148212,0.0002965244,0.0001902467,0.0002177996,0.00008181696,0.0001144032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008557026,0.0001033464,0.00004599078,0.0001757867,0.0001069203,0.0002187377,0.00001619259,0.0003627422,0.00002664697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008125906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003947252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9166377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988904,0.00009249248,0.0003209203,0.0001562825,0.0001448253,0.0003950631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998319,0.0001558396,0.0001060543,0.0001292717,0.00006062659,0.001229228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003044395,0.00006584609,0.01789813,0.000009861412,0.00004716441,0.001690049,0.09875472,0.001165108,0.00009458438,0.8688517,0.005852907,0.005539461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001162023,0.000108215,0.01463495,0.00006726357,0.00002531438,0.0005442396,0.01148147,0.000124163,0.000002632522,0.002732491,0.9688569,0.0002603479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8150367,0.0001328838,0.000261903,0.004201518,0.0001551997,0.0003842289,0.00001267428,0.000005802172,0.179809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99321,0.000003198493,0.001169577,0.004283686,0.00009860293,0.00000344101,0.000001632896,0.000009536102,0.001220304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.963004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7002256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066197535","doi":"","title":"The \"Family\"—and \"Families\" in Law: A Review of Archana Parashar and Franscesca Dominello, <i>The Family In Law</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Research methodology; Family health","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01340362078827113,"gpt":0.2195263242788712,"spread":0.2061227034906001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00101491,0.0002392593,0.0005024213,0.0002333547,0.0001913886,0.00008121447,0.0003960307,0.0001381126,0.00001511198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001157914,0.0001738899,0.00009640992,0.000576075,0.001325488,0.0002059539,0.00002430005,0.000467332,0.00001398109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001107826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001888045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004111021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09955992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998091,0.000126388,0.0008359931,0.0001695285,0.0002630612,0.0005140173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986569,0.0002670974,0.0001234329,0.0002985563,0.0001555222,0.0004985204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001192579,0.00007930512,0.002683304,0.003116173,0.0003492511,0.0003223657,0.003000766,0.0006449521,0.03630276,0.9129694,0.02703666,0.01337581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001930867,0.0002805586,0.02910111,0.005145994,0.0001053593,0.00007845921,0.000461946,0.001871679,0.0003344939,0.003918246,0.9561837,0.000587634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4926335,0.4213214,0.0004396373,0.001930222,0.00123399,0.0007165293,0.0001129408,0.00002835451,0.08158346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684736,0.02651678,0.0001920813,0.004564059,0.0001502876,0.000005500608,0.000002610281,0.00003860211,0.0000564528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.929147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9168708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004913135","doi":"","title":"(Some) Mothers Know Best: A Case Comment on MM v TB and the Plight of Indigenous Mothers in Child Welfare and Adoption Proceedings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Welfare; Economic growth; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Wang","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02118420762285752,"gpt":0.288364042225923,"spread":0.2671798346030655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000703629,0.000113501,0.0002931521,0.0002245689,0.0002607487,0.00002879493,0.00007666108,0.0001345232,0.00001021034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007117257,0.00007754605,0.00004022428,0.0001442848,0.0005008766,0.00007688898,0.000007812583,0.000558572,7.850826e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001618795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000266806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05416864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0292895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990882,0.0000408079,0.0003510249,0.0001123607,0.0001745484,0.0002330014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989708,0.00005445582,0.000186242,0.00009544835,0.0002313191,0.0004616996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002847062,0.0004331337,0.1028097,0.002457765,0.000604288,0.01068259,0.3941234,0.00002257004,0.0001073861,0.4307013,0.005391159,0.0498197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02310145,0.01281584,0.05346061,0.006284296,0.0006684612,0.01896711,0.1081861,0.00025292,0.0003462715,0.003775711,0.7712656,0.0008756117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9524937,0.006735085,8.829549e-7,0.03408407,0.0001504257,0.0003403828,0.00001732098,0.000002085646,0.006176103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903532,0.0009494931,0.00007861058,0.008195207,0.0003776711,0.000002333371,6.748708e-7,0.00001691105,0.0000258925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7658744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217801924","doi":"","title":"The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining The Inequity Of Funding In An Act Respecting First Nations, Inuit And Métis Children, Youth And Families","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Rachael Garrett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04340520861916614,"gpt":0.2902101541365199,"spread":0.2468049455173538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001097078,0.00007559755,0.0001444959,0.00009000087,0.001821502,0.0001942882,0.0001901548,0.00004227328,0.0000079227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005205804,0.00005591349,0.00002726527,0.0001211673,0.001180278,0.0002142022,0.00002828135,0.0002134055,1.276696e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001894193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003150831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.154942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9196863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989001,0.0002195453,0.0002835814,0.00009738942,0.0002104813,0.0002889627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988195,0.0005053292,0.0001859377,0.00009317959,0.0001331393,0.000262952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003457979,0.00000597815,0.6672938,0.000002537282,0.00003346046,0.00001094731,0.03502098,0.00003480877,0.00001030154,0.2957685,0.00002297101,0.001792156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002043756,0.00005523143,0.930707,0.000124978,0.00003298457,0.00005110616,0.0627251,0.000002396075,0.00001416599,0.0005081688,0.005470942,0.0001035852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891797,0.001935081,0.000006029274,0.0009995911,0.000119223,0.00007714409,0.00007325754,0.000002196371,0.007607833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989153,0.0005169006,0.00007601951,0.0002819604,0.0001655592,4.94828e-7,0.000002440819,0.000004661579,0.00003670084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7647443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044244435","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Autonomous Motherhood? A Socio-Legal Study of Choice and Constraint by Susan B. Boyd, Dorothy E. Chunn, Fiona Kelly, and Wanda Wiegers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Sociology; Gender studies; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","authors":[{"name":"Brenda Cossman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02168493255173345,"gpt":0.2985832967222767,"spread":0.2768983641705433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004693006,0.0001607582,0.0005938691,0.0001320907,0.0003288945,0.0000469296,0.0001856642,0.00009473359,0.00005163538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003598319,0.0001304535,0.00006006741,0.00004727154,0.000913696,0.0001972806,0.00002238412,0.0003757625,9.207504e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001166767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009663578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01474421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003631398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987809,0.00004657886,0.0004732787,0.000224989,0.0001771345,0.0002970877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982014,0.00004747774,0.0004889395,0.0004275546,0.0002257284,0.0006089333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000186681,0.00029789,0.1941293,0.002090588,0.0006243757,0.00100661,0.001262676,7.390203e-7,0.001601824,0.001859576,0.741169,0.05577074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003445809,0.002278414,0.12127,0.001288118,0.0002156251,0.0005777279,0.001698117,0.000002048576,0.0001924447,0.0001497496,0.868688,0.0001939284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6799446,0.2945461,0.000003662643,0.01846155,0.0001928696,0.0008276877,0.00004493093,0.0000115287,0.005967095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797562,0.01292967,0.00008974207,0.006653561,0.00009775107,0.000005885269,0.00000142735,0.00001768059,0.0004480708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2998117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080503576","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Transforming Law’s Family: The Legal Recognition of Planned Lesbian Motherhood by Fiona Kelly","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Shelley A. M. Gavigan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08938747715330296,"gpt":0.2925308204617236,"spread":0.2031433433084207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00115291,0.0001473839,0.0003536849,0.0000523284,0.0007894324,0.00004296403,0.0004186338,0.000102594,0.0001902091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006357017,0.0001156546,0.0001633561,0.0001547429,0.0008840045,0.0003608169,0.000006014029,0.0002549039,0.00001072452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001200573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008376347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1662549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3441779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982719,0.0002656734,0.0005617373,0.0001320565,0.0003600032,0.0004085655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998804,0.00009880798,0.0002793862,0.0001407396,0.0002869587,0.0003901234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007440346,0.00007579987,0.0001367506,0.0002067927,0.0002876146,0.00009105361,0.1318547,6.546823e-7,0.0003008573,0.07156107,0.7850981,0.01031223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002578647,0.000187644,0.0001508693,0.0003843903,0.00007924863,0.000009992222,0.04670943,3.032479e-7,0.0001818593,0.001319895,0.9505659,0.0001525434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0098013,0.2433413,0.00005118548,0.006863688,0.0009846514,0.0004888077,0.0003062061,0.00001530756,0.7381475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8519319,0.02796158,0.0001436335,0.1159942,0.0004826934,0.00001039018,0.00001570158,0.00003947284,0.003420395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8421307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8392971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7056622171","doi":"","title":"Family Violence and Child Support: Abuse, Shared Parenting, and Special Expenses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Child support; Domestic violence; Economic Justice; Family support; Inequality; Relation (database); Child protection; Diversity (politics)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01301271289290069,"gpt":0.2458741415366988,"spread":0.2328614286437982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001521408,0.0001132901,0.0001880962,0.0001808601,0.0002168185,0.0001896197,0.0001772229,0.00002912263,0.008756723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001001353,0.0001086767,0.0000471162,0.0001130617,0.0001671486,0.00004926249,0.00003022252,0.0002097163,0.00000490559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001049932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005364832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01402235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01401989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991133,0.00003162581,0.0002889698,0.0001427663,0.0001408322,0.0002825634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992048,0.00003690744,0.00009799351,0.0001172734,0.0001262667,0.0004167159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004747868,0.00005966556,0.2030004,0.00008298443,0.0001828679,0.0002166812,0.001147422,0.000003323272,0.001153316,0.06808373,0.1585444,0.5674777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001284387,0.0001423952,0.3164569,0.0007742441,0.00004330703,0.00001020896,0.002571131,0.00002682421,0.0001727338,0.001411429,0.6768841,0.0002224054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7116761,0.0009434024,0.00003820509,0.0006109129,0.0003059767,0.0001330079,0.00005789993,0.000002263795,0.2862322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975093,0.00009905796,0.00008497054,0.0006388986,0.0004273764,0.000003231439,0.000004654044,0.000006418173,0.001226092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5672553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997461026","doi":"","title":"Worthless? Victims of Family Violence and the (Non)Payment of Child Support","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Child support; Face (sociological concept); Payment; Adversarial system; Power (physics); Child abuse; Order (exchange); Family support","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0143361357681371,"gpt":0.2848715516811477,"spread":0.2705354159130106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001434869,0.0001255882,0.0003999856,0.0001845013,0.0004165703,0.00005062787,0.0005612819,0.00009290881,0.00003432078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007944657,0.00009377214,0.0001457217,0.0003671557,0.001901863,0.0001633935,0.00002825313,0.0002509573,0.000002844767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008972836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001795641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05113342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01392336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984237,0.000157554,0.0006033778,0.0001310084,0.000331273,0.000353069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986673,0.0001176525,0.0003453627,0.0002016948,0.0003653995,0.0003025734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002003671,0.00007246133,0.02569539,0.0001424828,0.000279491,0.000088219,0.01342552,0.0001723155,0.0005859481,0.9276866,0.009358454,0.02229274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006276958,0.0005684028,0.6806973,0.007411779,0.0005627114,0.00004150099,0.05526831,0.000149386,0.00194823,0.03035741,0.2158975,0.0008205013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3523258,0.006334286,0.0002769458,0.001383958,0.001256353,0.0003876972,0.00005061729,0.000006148777,0.6379783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954709,0.001609503,0.00009508421,0.002578612,0.00007449486,0.00000295366,6.638904e-7,0.000006511822,0.0001612708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8973292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9551852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048850375","doi":"","title":"Book Review: D’un océan à l’autre . . . recension de Nicole Laviolette et Julie Audet, L’essentiel du droit de la famille dans les provinces et territoires de common law au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Régine Tremblay","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01649967422605888,"gpt":0.280056274338826,"spread":0.2635566001127672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002342367,0.0004221449,0.0007915199,0.0000429595,0.004898704,0.0005186359,0.001339929,0.0003561793,0.0001044071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005418133,0.0003935042,0.0003109647,0.0001180072,0.002906604,0.0008492814,0.0001131196,0.001083961,0.000005115082],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006743591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0114607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954504,0.00156039,0.0007448872,0.0003241202,0.0006264065,0.001293803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963235,0.0004473921,0.0009823403,0.0003875524,0.0003266137,0.001532626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001667647,0.00006326645,0.03311982,0.0003751499,0.0002294441,0.001624298,0.01050491,0.00009415208,0.0002731999,0.04506098,0.9044901,0.004147999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000443692,0.00007566758,0.06746161,0.003742311,0.0002329492,0.0001305758,0.003561579,0.00002426445,0.000130692,0.0006631374,0.9231029,0.0004306175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2082367,0.2727087,0.00002318874,0.3318172,0.002251925,0.0006690233,0.0003872771,0.00002790232,0.1838781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8197124,0.08440149,0.0004659462,0.08297344,0.00114722,0.00001875604,0.00001240377,0.00006243835,0.01120592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6114757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902752104","doi":"","title":"Moral Evils v. Health and Safety Evils: The Case of an Ovum ‘Obtained’ From a ‘Donor’ and Used By the ‘Donor’ in Her Own Surrogate Pregnancy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egg donation; Pregnancy; Gynecology; Andrology; Medicine; Obstetrics; Biology; Genetics","authors":[{"name":"Pamela White","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04741376017114965,"gpt":0.3062397410306981,"spread":0.2588259808595484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008333056,0.0001574475,0.0004520665,0.0001329261,0.0002771745,0.00003198236,0.0001665511,0.00009717274,0.00001392005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002741708,0.00008931343,0.00004402448,0.0002263766,0.001104113,0.0001746851,0.00002056041,0.0004351242,6.599662e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001419132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001257945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1297867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2303373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984824,0.0002073613,0.000554296,0.000229612,0.0001201795,0.0004061533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982562,0.0001367619,0.0003186095,0.0004460632,0.0001904623,0.0006519064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002069441,0.0003291916,0.6141027,0.0007723406,0.0005440383,0.005948915,0.03028709,0.000009538694,0.001543702,0.0198781,0.01128372,0.3132312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02286237,0.01912815,0.7020451,0.009172494,0.000481683,0.01664418,0.07627599,0.0005499524,0.002646131,0.03308554,0.1157973,0.001311079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535946,0.03078281,0.000007019872,0.01437872,0.0001507811,0.0004664574,0.00006124348,0.000007499394,0.0005508134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968482,0.0007748625,0.0001763991,0.002013703,0.0001252294,0.000004226087,0.000003986423,0.0000159864,0.00003741934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3119201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8760082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039642515","doi":"","title":"A Feminist Critique of Quebec v. A. : Evaluating the Supreme Court's Divided Opinion on Section 15 and Common Law Support Obligations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Majority opinion; Business","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Mukhtar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08359551058275173,"gpt":0.3771282442904529,"spread":0.2935327337077012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001815266,0.00008028287,0.0002012322,0.00005330184,0.002594034,0.0004510093,0.0003358301,0.00009081484,0.00002278715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003873951,0.00006409844,0.00006209016,0.00006842061,0.0008560957,0.0003821783,0.00001281337,0.0002198,0.000001561087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001464236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001752711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9015269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9789939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987978,0.0002083644,0.0003510041,0.00009179957,0.0003403758,0.0002106762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998524,0.0001730508,0.000483548,0.0001666012,0.0003513119,0.0003015058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003094778,0.00002254892,0.01414449,0.00004894924,0.00005162754,0.00002003422,0.01552287,0.00002235597,0.0005797857,0.9581141,0.007446354,0.003995947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001585564,0.001763609,0.1787227,0.002100629,0.0001376963,0.00006994297,0.03091446,0.00006547297,0.0007185031,0.06226353,0.7210741,0.000583794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.750957,0.0005789443,0.00001664433,0.01314276,0.002066157,0.0003096978,0.00005307275,0.000007996337,0.2328677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980707,0.00003848715,0.0000166785,0.0009640756,0.0007260259,0.000002872831,0.000001492417,0.000007660266,0.000172045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8958505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048446512","doi":"","title":"Townshend v. Townshend & Buttar v. Buttar : Gifts, Exclusions, and Intentions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan R. Robinson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06655443817021048,"gpt":0.3334327273593861,"spread":0.2668782891891756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000651948,0.000100417,0.0001802395,0.00009737343,0.003903464,0.0005420647,0.0006548535,0.00009068627,0.0001308201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002955494,0.00009383429,0.0001014494,0.00007048118,0.0008750455,0.0005223642,0.00005166553,0.0002679537,0.00001773623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002240859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001446603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2086525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5599402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988878,0.00005784629,0.0002905917,0.0001373374,0.0002634788,0.0003629332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980633,0.00004953234,0.000258867,0.0003141518,0.0002767085,0.001037412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004609201,0.00002030091,0.006735888,0.000006018589,0.00004182441,0.0000807449,0.002744592,0.000004063633,0.0003372919,0.9692,0.01527281,0.005551931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002186203,0.00002946329,0.04247838,0.00005131313,0.00003288284,0.00001668531,0.003085448,0.000003153522,0.00002376582,0.01015423,0.9437786,0.0001275118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4100004,0.00181872,0.0002319985,0.03476248,0.001085572,0.0002505793,0.0001320314,0.00001594883,0.5517022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996146,0.0002648547,0.0005764054,0.0008308277,0.0004276275,0.000002948833,0.000001535603,0.00001009219,0.001739694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184642675","doi":"","title":"Access to Assisted Conception: A Call for Legislative Reform in Light of the Modern Family ( Susan Doe v. Attorney General of Canada )","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Telecommunications; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Feldstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05561309867744824,"gpt":0.3175857809138221,"spread":0.2619726822363738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005150644,0.0001281498,0.0003691571,0.00006420627,0.000436239,0.0000528684,0.0006715943,0.0001128353,0.00001763198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002491548,0.00008654877,0.0001380286,0.000312062,0.0004604505,0.0002779598,0.00003321661,0.0002859751,1.861755e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001355761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004129961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9830436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984145,0.0001064031,0.0005159514,0.0001263155,0.0004225878,0.0004142104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998082,0.00008586023,0.0003996077,0.0001371727,0.0008169531,0.0004783715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000423464,0.0001691235,0.1301923,0.0002027894,0.0008824846,0.000147033,0.2458766,0.001375574,0.08773087,0.3304339,0.1911621,0.01140367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009527185,0.000102852,0.4436089,0.0001671282,0.00004349065,0.000002901393,0.009244077,0.00003233452,0.001036143,0.000766359,0.5437589,0.0002841697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9066088,0.0001902567,0.00001314953,0.009267187,0.001309121,0.0004566252,0.0001326972,0.000002286223,0.08201984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969134,0.000008794682,0.0002840232,0.001008034,0.0003180004,0.000009220746,0.000001010434,0.000008937351,0.001448582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3525968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7326373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186683474","doi":"","title":"The Best Interests of Children: An Evidence-Based Approach by Paul Millar","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Gene C. Coleman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05859298943512477,"gpt":0.3366294320028895,"spread":0.2780364425677647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001230285,0.0001258042,0.0002886699,0.0001103087,0.0002096825,0.00005224397,0.0003870932,0.0002190105,0.000019022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005574244,0.00008448149,0.0001184044,0.0001690651,0.0004558019,0.0001276061,0.000007912614,0.001354474,0.000003084588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006866467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002699427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03230372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04604024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985824,0.0001127358,0.000513424,0.0001305198,0.000341445,0.0003194344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973218,0.0002325903,0.0002532663,0.0003956104,0.0006244234,0.001172348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001114443,0.0009523259,0.6319606,0.00153696,0.0009052252,0.001751647,0.008292401,0.0001180551,0.02183719,0.07112123,0.1575785,0.1028314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006590839,0.01110229,0.1123776,0.003507082,0.001046507,0.002409701,0.006313052,0.0006344295,0.006899217,0.002100818,0.8456514,0.001367079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731564,0.01640237,0.0000536088,0.006497433,0.0007931151,0.0002095953,0.00005558295,0.000003995991,0.002827912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952085,0.0003779578,0.0007726209,0.002864756,0.0006719671,0.000001448843,0.00001035841,0.00002062478,0.00007178939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6880729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9741402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118739551","doi":"","title":"The \"Family\"—and \"Families\" in Law: A Review of Archana Parashar and Franscesca Dominello, The Family In Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Mary Jane Mossman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0634057558751246,"gpt":0.3427713802528224,"spread":0.2793656243776978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004805603,0.0003822727,0.00158285,0.0002485187,0.0007489689,0.0001962315,0.000917975,0.0003282765,0.00001771192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001804764,0.0002407009,0.0003829836,0.0006699103,0.003980736,0.0002340003,0.00004624828,0.0009026559,0.000005491912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002891887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002316016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3191874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7872288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959296,0.001018786,0.001538554,0.0003141298,0.0005329597,0.0006659931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971048,0.0008090425,0.0008635574,0.0003947065,0.0002665515,0.0005613659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003597654,0.00004377243,0.0001493868,0.01412854,0.0003057615,0.0002627831,0.007503949,5.677549e-7,0.000003202896,0.5754876,0.01228916,0.3897893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002853102,0.00008595935,0.0002405782,0.03945344,0.0002169532,0.0000250663,0.001037758,8.131216e-7,1.273391e-7,0.001088578,0.9573307,0.0002346841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004302319,0.9544379,0.000001921107,0.0009736226,0.0005939067,0.0008242904,0.00007288799,0.000003873581,0.04266136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003365019,0.9929659,0.00001899124,0.003054839,0.000416654,0.0000247701,0.0000043545,0.00003295649,0.0001165474],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9450416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3059442353","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Families and the Law: Cases and Commentary by Mary Jane Mossman","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Genealogy; History; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Susan Boyd","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0201641656564556,"gpt":0.2615367770005895,"spread":0.2413726113441339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001155518,0.00009652468,0.0002129531,0.0000441039,0.001023235,0.0000874984,0.000159989,0.00006613194,0.00004128898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008558,0.00006704279,0.0000565367,0.00008617944,0.001523793,0.0003790719,0.00001562522,0.0002500251,0.000002427571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008513199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001671701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1240736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1263029,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998905,0.000288577,0.0002612714,0.00006875739,0.0001728607,0.0003035077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986884,0.0004147813,0.0001319648,0.00009556675,0.00006748956,0.0006018242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007984702,0.000008366599,0.005375724,0.00003621493,0.00004280392,0.00002818597,0.003009691,5.171789e-7,0.000004825095,0.08830547,0.9024466,0.0007336836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003351172,0.00002299838,0.003106904,0.0001958633,0.00006998174,0.00005961016,0.003588344,0.000004062921,5.366372e-7,0.0004823679,0.9920396,0.00009456552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03553534,0.8905409,0.000004352368,0.04471714,0.0005102638,0.0002269318,0.00006309327,0.000004406152,0.02839755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6632603,0.1467623,0.0000778586,0.1884835,0.0003096124,0.000003472775,0.000008181338,0.00001343121,0.001081344],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7437786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8896399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044670361","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Petra Nordqvist and Carol Smart, Relative Strangers: Family Life, Genes and Donor Conception","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","authors":[{"name":"M.J. Vonk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05997318476299163,"gpt":0.2417193032012214,"spread":0.1817461184382298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003978216,0.0001136,0.0002661749,0.0001122337,0.000273205,0.00007249555,0.0000982542,0.00003320775,0.0002219335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004774103,0.00009134789,0.00004186105,0.00002931644,0.001183383,0.0006360749,0.000004339591,0.000171512,0.00001532927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009184713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007055879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00890468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02876241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991722,0.00004431358,0.0002839087,0.0001160121,0.0001788486,0.0002046839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984192,0.00002334608,0.0001517965,0.00007719996,0.0002655271,0.001062975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001332502,0.000005776071,0.0002773671,0.0000861961,0.00003321553,0.00011287,0.01729482,8.324477e-7,0.00008067523,0.006839258,0.9712946,0.003961082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004642669,0.0002533016,0.0006412985,0.0004443234,0.00007264323,0.00003510437,0.006526859,0.000003018944,0.000001740483,0.00007159852,0.9913754,0.0001103896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05854935,0.8520267,0.00001643244,0.004163641,0.001313594,0.0002480911,0.00004893986,0.000007667511,0.08362558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7294192,0.05439537,0.0001951872,0.1755124,0.003454719,0.00001291069,0.00001703145,0.00004995901,0.03694325],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7976313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}