{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":15,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"ea9e19ec9e35","filters":{"venue":"Chicago journal of international law"}},"results":[{"id":"W213016018","doi":"","title":"Who Then Should Judge?: Developing the International Rule of Law under NAFTA Chapter 11","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment protection; Bilateral investment treaty; Arbitration; Investment (military); Treaty; International trade; Investor-state dispute settlement; International law; Surprise; State (computer science); Foreign direct investment; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; International economics; International investment; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Charles N. Brower","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lee A. Steven","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04689294605375161,"gpt":0.2695255701310695,"spread":0.2226326240773179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006159969,0.0001977357,0.0002321408,0.0002344191,0.0001733189,0.0003319922,0.00118866,0.00006577342,0.001656009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008914025,0.0001369548,0.0002416568,0.0001197909,0.0002409815,0.001622571,0.0002135095,0.0002776991,0.00009301985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009535061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004210801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002835739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002725022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977481,0.00001472076,0.0008225972,0.0001771171,0.0010585,0.0001789099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975974,0.00009569827,0.0008730207,0.0001619812,0.0012487,0.00002318743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009616266,0.00008189517,0.001345201,0.000007212288,0.0002168434,0.00001386522,0.00005837808,0.0001969348,0.001291561,0.9951615,0.001385606,0.0001447973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009134968,0.0000184282,0.004248578,0.0001703021,0.00004329915,0.0001150708,0.0001311436,0.00164889,0.002285192,0.1148489,0.8753694,0.000207221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0958014,0.0000713694,0.002312427,0.05332537,0.003016192,0.0001342305,0.0000100338,0.00002408196,0.8453049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299636,0.00007117625,0.0004522897,0.06574445,0.002281799,0.000004112664,0.00002666507,0.00002505894,0.001430884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8803126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489088844","doi":"","title":"Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Compliance (psychology); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Shai Dothan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05064117342327562,"gpt":0.3175733786407491,"spread":0.2669322052174735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001872221,0.00006963374,0.0001306363,0.00009435036,0.000221012,0.00002373892,0.0008624478,0.00001951676,0.0002235091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001475906,0.00004666136,0.000112285,0.00008202231,0.0004148896,0.0002270812,0.00004392867,0.0002324563,0.00001843303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004770546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002732997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000886052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00252058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982729,0.0004072021,0.0004811984,0.00006955146,0.0006620334,0.0001071432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988757,0.0001240473,0.0004256755,0.00007203172,0.0004641715,0.0000383158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000270806,0.0001730954,0.001783416,0.000001251098,0.00006319094,0.00006171023,0.008581893,0.000001133118,0.0001098074,0.9868525,0.002225246,0.0001197304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009837912,0.0003320934,0.1240589,0.0001974002,0.00004550141,0.0000526952,0.002539296,0.000003642414,0.0008252361,0.08038116,0.7903891,0.0001911095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1130821,0.00005653478,0.00002731302,0.001052323,0.0006464946,0.00003983683,0.000004898425,0.000003846351,0.8850867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980979,0.00007244855,0.0001988334,0.0003267481,0.0008697091,3.47358e-7,0.000001196905,0.000006094196,0.0004267315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9064713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2447267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W317880880","doi":"","title":"The Normative Cycle of Shaping Judicial Independence in Domestic and International Law: The Mutual Impact of National and International Jurisprudence and Contemporary Practical and Conceptual Challenges","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Judicial independence; International law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Judicial activism; Independence (probability theory); Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Shimon Shetreet","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0766466413985528,"gpt":0.3936113633000813,"spread":0.3169647219015285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00182904,0.0001486016,0.0002494658,0.0001107165,0.0002570615,0.0001357569,0.0004396742,0.00006642921,0.0000238506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001561475,0.00009861312,0.00007381949,0.00007036081,0.002286198,0.0009185645,0.0001771949,0.000406266,7.606266e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001072332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000251408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002490162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005003918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977814,0.000235341,0.0006830719,0.0001852898,0.0009692101,0.0001456703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965641,0.001610624,0.0006802407,0.00005765008,0.0009971138,0.00009022428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003225351,0.00009473575,0.004023518,0.000004027222,0.0002406774,0.00001340999,0.007504222,0.00002041921,0.0001251842,0.9854439,0.0001907806,0.002016603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004951857,0.001336991,0.7199855,0.0009810728,0.00006504195,0.0009716104,0.01956951,0.002319946,0.0001439045,0.2211175,0.02799116,0.0005659155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7912014,0.006750821,0.00008027091,0.03940394,0.000849927,0.000258319,0.0001151157,0.000009836331,0.1613304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914817,0.007530211,0.0001717868,0.0003592631,0.0003482537,0.000002124526,0.000003379592,0.000006079828,0.00009720182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7643264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8423592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994096560","doi":"","title":"The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, NAFTA Chapter 11, and the Doctrine of Indirect Expropriation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Investment (military); Political science; Doctrine; International trade law; International trade; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Maurizio Brunetti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01633902096357253,"gpt":0.2321531210724702,"spread":0.2158141001088976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009330706,0.0001170962,0.0001664718,0.0002037018,0.0002217036,0.0002800574,0.0004028082,0.00003165007,0.0002279774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001649781,0.00006216687,0.0001217798,0.0001657297,0.0002937074,0.0007518888,0.00007328472,0.0001750297,0.00001271394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002513077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001063685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001568115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001280224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985968,0.00002679267,0.0006088501,0.00009285695,0.0005638946,0.0001108216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980598,0.0002201438,0.0008257454,0.0000962144,0.0007837472,0.00001433978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005283778,0.00004933424,0.001390503,0.000005792362,0.0001291047,0.000004653372,0.00006814989,0.0000959199,0.0003351647,0.9964269,0.0006680397,0.0002980742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003387106,0.00003883251,0.005955997,0.00008433392,0.00006317724,0.00007271526,0.0001597231,0.009058853,0.001035859,0.08125447,0.8987576,0.0001313891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.804472,0.0002861915,0.000713873,0.05102234,0.00156774,0.0003042792,0.00001020374,0.00002058984,0.1416027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888125,0.0005254954,0.00005963991,0.009133127,0.0009173162,0.000004519939,0.00003580449,0.00001017319,0.0005013979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9151724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935025186","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Regulation of State and Provincial Governments in NAFTA and GATT/WTO","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Free trade; International trade law; Trade barrier; International economic law; General Agreement on Trade in Services; Economics; Political science; State (computer science); Comparative advantage; International economics; Liberalization; Position (finance); International free trade agreement; International law; Public international law; Law","authors":[{"name":"Edward T. Hayes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01422193230156317,"gpt":0.2993571102302111,"spread":0.2851351779286479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003134383,0.00003673421,0.0001485121,0.00007430357,0.00004225787,0.00001493615,0.0001323462,0.00001939519,0.00003781565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009251085,0.00002841677,0.0000503977,0.0001733943,0.0002560974,0.0001843049,0.00002296058,0.0000719927,1.478622e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001243645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009816125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007226272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1662666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991815,0.00006104005,0.0002730581,0.00004998397,0.000376922,0.00005750134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992773,0.00007821116,0.0004580297,0.00003661217,0.0001113647,0.00003850868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004853729,0.0002616363,0.2026302,0.00001850551,0.001188059,0.000003553836,0.05146561,0.002627708,0.005257638,0.7289619,0.002017575,0.005082323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000398433,0.000026499,0.9736834,0.00005733325,0.00005831571,0.000002477724,0.0002536252,0.0005928,0.001010673,0.002107079,0.02176648,0.00004290383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864896,0.00007437043,0.00001138917,0.004084103,0.00004725636,0.00004546901,0.0001083295,3.137762e-7,0.009139168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989482,0.00005958274,0.00007824591,0.0002135131,0.00006913129,3.492906e-7,4.204846e-7,0.000001083262,0.0006294399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7710533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211475630","doi":"","title":"State Action is Always Present","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Democracy; Law; Constitution; Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Liberal democracy; Tort; Sociology; Politics; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Cass R. Sunstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05852217317198346,"gpt":0.3253231613675265,"spread":0.266800988195543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002575189,0.00005843097,0.0001007088,0.00005537673,0.000336187,0.00006323063,0.0002491406,0.00002716089,0.001365673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009503026,0.00004876828,0.0001082383,0.00007824189,0.0003178036,0.0003303524,0.00003045211,0.0001461194,0.00009644026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001146862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004093966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007184881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004802188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998849,0.00004414804,0.0002503451,0.00007071056,0.0006642587,0.0001215844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991847,0.00007206974,0.0002005387,0.00003669894,0.0004253882,0.00008065895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000501162,0.0002004247,0.001778319,0.000002129113,0.0002775085,0.00003593591,0.005400186,0.00006399878,0.0002152903,0.9327242,0.04395166,0.01530023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002172665,0.00003446121,0.001714703,0.00002864869,0.00001234685,0.00001768955,0.0004165804,0.00003653748,0.0003173797,0.04521902,0.9519162,0.00006912477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06396481,0.001031107,0.0004587994,0.05257561,0.002985497,0.00007506266,0.00002027322,0.0000205789,0.8788683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992891,0.001903125,0.0001147313,0.000980345,0.001436133,0.000001190471,5.24523e-7,0.00000302341,0.002669941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992833385","doi":"","title":"Strengthening the Wassenaar Export Control Regime","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Defense, Military, and Policy Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Political science; Communism; Cold war; Economic history; Law; International trade; Politics; Business; Economics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Jamil N. Jaffer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03540545628211968,"gpt":0.2300198295884983,"spread":0.1946143733063787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005283534,0.0001058696,0.0002668228,0.0001071024,0.0001265723,0.00005244077,0.0004121684,0.00003652318,0.0006168658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002440395,0.0000793908,0.000216004,0.00006146374,0.0001207009,0.000192997,0.00003015309,0.0002440179,0.0002112321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005128895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000543031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004485534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001783209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988773,0.00001669355,0.0007406597,0.0001166152,0.00009463951,0.0001541154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989258,0.000176484,0.0005721289,0.0001503596,0.000119449,0.00005577935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003459088,0.00009121346,0.0111407,0.000004241168,0.0005024501,0.00002336696,0.001286201,0.0001046241,0.00001485188,0.9522299,0.03400085,0.0005670075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00116541,0.0001080498,0.01087846,0.00003373194,0.00001840936,0.0001813521,0.0001914377,0.001081583,0.00003935306,0.0416307,0.9445009,0.0001706326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1621303,0.01461347,0.0009800479,0.0454895,0.003597428,0.0001284297,0.0001768844,0.00002121172,0.7728627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928405,0.0008228105,0.0001748837,0.001986895,0.001000616,0.000002385569,0.000001292226,0.00001172134,0.003158863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9105992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6754248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993411955","doi":"","title":"NAFTA Chapter 11 Meets Chicken Little","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Free trade; Law; Political science; Appeal; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Globalization; Economics; Politics; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Ian A. Laird","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01766032840991081,"gpt":0.2362603805278336,"spread":0.2186000521179228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003242921,0.0001500128,0.0001692469,0.0002587803,0.0001098865,0.000284461,0.0005375312,0.00004797187,0.003376971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009287574,0.0001232232,0.0001866696,0.0001075979,0.00009246576,0.001746866,0.00008955417,0.0001893718,0.0004372128],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004693281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001705526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009178823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001100843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985121,0.000007023214,0.0005392819,0.0001423683,0.0006439075,0.0001552862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985809,0.00003075437,0.0005197781,0.0001102495,0.0007298912,0.00002841862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007188306,0.0001092953,0.001834667,0.000004935841,0.00007711313,0.0000509609,0.00001685034,0.00004988413,0.000999374,0.9938423,0.002728199,0.0002145135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007095696,0.00001981248,0.003004428,0.00006318605,0.00002268268,0.0001444956,0.00002065122,0.001158812,0.0005111911,0.02367131,0.9705281,0.0001457839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09893043,0.00007003315,0.0003220351,0.01961019,0.002444022,0.00007831516,0.000003835141,0.00002677162,0.8785143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624938,0.0000517965,0.0003361848,0.03095373,0.00379655,0.000002312356,0.00002236327,0.00002022792,0.002322977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123770762","doi":"","title":"Environmental Cooperation in the (Partially) Disaggregated State: Lessons from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Political science; Politics; General partnership; Government (linguistics); Foreign policy; Sociology; Public administration; Political economy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Neil Craik","is_ca":false},{"name":"Joseph F.C. DiMento","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02206280684032421,"gpt":0.2779808652757152,"spread":0.255918058435391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003629014,0.0000511738,0.00009093554,0.00001457415,0.0001901599,0.00003335048,0.0002957224,0.00001906897,0.00006254068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000173267,0.00003250216,0.00003942066,0.00007708304,0.0007048009,0.0001938528,0.00001766974,0.0001851245,0.000001289037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007593071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001437435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01705573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1671719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989671,0.0002042802,0.0002275169,0.00006734286,0.0004412443,0.00009247735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994107,0.0001856321,0.0002416382,0.00006430178,0.00004845031,0.00004919947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005087978,0.0007665548,0.5767973,0.000006000703,0.0002494102,0.0001379254,0.2687228,0.0005959759,0.0003203824,0.1257646,0.01589646,0.01023378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004745168,0.00004574302,0.8107538,0.00002853878,0.00001336403,0.00002162138,0.0008233796,0.0001350615,0.0001432271,0.002175834,0.1853086,0.00007629992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769309,0.0001971643,0.000007530765,0.02104891,0.00006957501,0.00008812879,0.0002139676,0.000001037179,0.00144275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975159,0.0007957869,0.00001229667,0.001417503,0.0001969579,0.000002422702,0.000008048335,0.000002352652,0.00004876399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2678995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263206028","doi":"","title":"Preemption and Law in the Twenty-First Century[dagger]","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; United Nations Charter; Doctrine; National security; Charter; Preemption; Political science; Customary international law; International law; Presumption; Supremacy Clause; Federalism; Public international law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Β. Rivkin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lee A. Casey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mark Wendell DeLaquil","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01319519795436183,"gpt":0.2881807861697503,"spread":0.2749855882153885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001083371,0.00007019727,0.00009072925,0.00007725754,0.0002350767,0.0001603713,0.0003988665,0.00005109511,0.0001579698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001080206,0.00005124735,0.00006989051,0.00006991487,0.0001878841,0.000667019,0.00002395505,0.0002219276,0.00001657291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001504729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004029175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007000586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01077889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998633,0.0001144467,0.0003402234,0.00008753104,0.0007002021,0.0001246372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992156,0.0001826405,0.000247504,0.00005424325,0.0002506814,0.00004931563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003241501,0.00008725801,0.001597157,0.000001693623,0.00001818724,0.0000057988,0.00311443,0.00006598548,0.00004144757,0.9937165,0.0003535423,0.0009655798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005220221,0.00004097058,0.0133036,0.00007432632,0.00001014937,0.00004493041,0.0006150029,0.00008990592,0.00009827071,0.01740169,0.9677172,0.00008188499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3926362,0.0004058195,0.0001796441,0.0637787,0.001309307,0.0001807367,0.0000135542,0.00001292189,0.541483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951843,0.0005243975,0.0003244623,0.002105717,0.001485784,0.000002473458,0.000005317516,0.000004712073,0.0003628307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6014873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W122955574","doi":"","title":"Private Enforcement of International Human Rights Laws: Could a Small Church Group Successfully Combat Slavery in the Sudan?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Enforcement; Charter; Political science; International human rights law; International law; Government (linguistics)","authors":[{"name":"Amanda Bixler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0300434829229774,"gpt":0.2975461276090341,"spread":0.2675026446860567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00156182,0.0001945454,0.0003032614,0.0003362946,0.0004444513,0.0002233436,0.002172309,0.0001156997,0.003967144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007207914,0.0001374095,0.0002794898,0.0001201964,0.0005447795,0.0005898673,0.00009675503,0.0005374941,0.00002696295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003114686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004201926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001939178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007938836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963537,0.0002530003,0.001072209,0.0002052318,0.001830205,0.0002856569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978316,0.000313071,0.0008323838,0.0001806908,0.0007433923,0.0000988254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006860098,0.0004931393,0.00147001,0.000006641947,0.0001748669,0.00007388871,0.003354541,0.00005046504,0.0002476719,0.993086,0.0009051872,0.0000689321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002839562,0.0003915224,0.01222291,0.0003953885,0.00005715944,0.0001017549,0.0003515674,0.0002737931,0.0007752014,0.3549576,0.6272423,0.0003912217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6103133,0.00007546723,0.0001149758,0.003058641,0.001591154,0.0002036197,0.00003238552,0.00001197587,0.3845985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932737,0.00006801898,0.0002574807,0.0006666699,0.001149914,0.000009161317,0.00002984286,0.00001269514,0.004532455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6381284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579027523","doi":"","title":"Classical Liberalism Meets the New Constitutional Order: A Comment on Mark Tushnet","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Political science; Judicial review; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Richard A. Epstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03250333867555594,"gpt":0.2893396937529695,"spread":0.2568363550774136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004430473,0.0001110102,0.0001659679,0.00005587101,0.0007479338,0.0001156884,0.0005309017,0.00005568593,0.001405956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003637404,0.00007250249,0.0001568049,0.000136055,0.00185841,0.0001893824,0.00006070458,0.0003371644,0.0001259913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001825762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002133093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004111608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003711436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981477,0.0001237304,0.000369405,0.0001130956,0.001058142,0.0001879478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987599,0.0003864761,0.0002275306,0.00007193738,0.0003983262,0.0001557807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003881859,0.0001103645,0.0001218707,3.309665e-7,0.0001118743,0.00001918906,0.0005242565,0.00004535136,0.000006438154,0.8003565,0.1974924,0.001172594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004450308,0.00005966266,0.0004465749,0.00005716354,0.00001996035,0.00004200536,0.0001525271,0.00002577274,0.00001583478,0.0522867,0.9463654,0.00008341445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009532314,0.0004951981,0.0002935843,0.5243368,0.001807843,0.00007561643,0.00001466765,0.00001214515,0.4720109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969577,0.0006211603,0.0003274018,0.02425389,0.002868388,0.000003062498,0.00000269124,0.00000402147,0.002342403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W257037218","doi":"","title":"The Market for Treaties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Context (archaeology); Political science; International law; Law; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; Convention; Business; Public international law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Affolder","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01284244303559838,"gpt":0.2665454784718698,"spread":0.2537030354362714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064045,0.00007910168,0.00010606,0.00004956681,0.0002678082,0.0004194792,0.0004153841,0.00003818438,0.0000961562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008371735,0.00004906578,0.0001824088,0.00005693249,0.00014994,0.000604782,0.0000374025,0.0001864091,0.000004711537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000298973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003054763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000796403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002486123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992757,0.000006307415,0.0002695367,0.00006088176,0.0002499482,0.0001375938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987074,0.0001819038,0.0002842426,0.0000790697,0.0007329918,0.00001439886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002306327,0.00008690134,0.004965776,0.00001959646,0.0001111901,0.000004201256,0.000112773,0.00000512888,0.0001428461,0.9709644,0.01999017,0.003366359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005325616,0.00002108736,0.01524217,0.00001367849,0.00004029214,0.00001009185,0.0009198877,0.0001523666,0.0000473464,0.1526091,0.8303286,0.00008280453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5725644,0.0001021064,0.000245116,0.02476744,0.006516531,0.0002243449,0.00001625603,0.00002445388,0.3955393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939047,0.00001522436,0.0001436408,0.001090251,0.003818135,0.000002552334,0.000003029579,0.000008472743,0.001013989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8183553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4045048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604224115","doi":"","title":"Legal Aspects of the Security-Development Nexus: International Administrative Law as a Check on the Use of Development Assistance in the \"War on Terror\"","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Political science; Legitimacy; Terrorism; Law; Administrative law; Public administration; Public international law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Graham Mayeda","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06353154786136958,"gpt":0.3278952125751955,"spread":0.2643636647138259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00157484,0.0001666832,0.0002033556,0.0001044269,0.0003644756,0.0001207077,0.001479965,0.00007055474,0.0003360127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003307025,0.00008596838,0.0001755866,0.00009778693,0.0005481096,0.0005192662,0.00007780395,0.0005146531,0.00001722458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003825139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006060309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002220405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003470012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965119,0.000311467,0.0008151844,0.0001371984,0.002002519,0.0002217493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977153,0.0005995735,0.0008736901,0.0001659519,0.0005771969,0.00006830291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000184377,0.0005138232,0.0004113566,0.000003435263,0.0001624446,0.000008765765,0.0212945,0.00002874614,0.00005147359,0.9769088,0.0003797913,0.00005246123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007116517,0.0001602359,0.02387139,0.0006239745,0.00002013794,0.0000419979,0.002403048,0.00001570392,0.01145406,0.06550548,0.8949744,0.0002179233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6556326,0.0000248314,0.00001476336,0.009440885,0.001505229,0.0002127744,0.00001857442,0.000004201481,0.3331462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954354,0.000006838999,0.0002246634,0.002291824,0.0004987821,0.00001113291,0.000005179983,0.000009277127,0.001516956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9114034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3679103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125163359","doi":"","title":"A New Approach to an Old Problem: Managing Fish Resources in the Beaufort Sea","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Maritime boundary; Arctic; Exclusive economic zone; Fishery; Tragedy of the commons; Natural resource; Geography; Political science; Environmental resource management; Convention; International law; Oceanography; Commons; Law; Environmental science; Geology","authors":[{"name":"A. L. Epstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05036104315188384,"gpt":0.3114068456213792,"spread":0.2610458024694953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001078178,0.00007079678,0.0001162277,0.0001057067,0.0002331921,0.00007325127,0.0007964469,0.0000320064,0.0000812906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007967202,0.00004530786,0.00006767736,0.0001461541,0.0001355487,0.0002808866,0.00005666136,0.0002111091,0.000007804449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005933114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006213106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007636437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005064304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988464,0.0001156684,0.000268802,0.0001013363,0.0004958885,0.0001718979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995047,0.00005721385,0.0001518457,0.00008297843,0.00008408203,0.0001192199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005803702,0.0001275782,0.006763545,0.000003648854,0.00006629966,0.00001515897,0.160056,0.00001677779,0.000001926997,0.813509,0.01753081,0.001851242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005645244,0.0001571591,0.07926955,0.0001334525,0.00003610128,0.00007749915,0.02938491,0.00002824186,0.0000177637,0.1015502,0.788561,0.000219571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02669483,0.00002702974,0.0006510923,0.03764109,0.0001976727,0.0001216042,0.000002943256,0.00000827634,0.9346555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838872,0.00004984652,0.008007385,0.004544108,0.0009086681,0.000003683441,7.195208e-7,0.000006301287,0.002592109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}