{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":15,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"ba4d420d680e","filters":{"venue":"Chicago-Kent law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W86687610","doi":"","title":"Human Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation at World Sporting Events","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human trafficking; Sex trafficking; Criminology; Medical emergency; Political science; Psychology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Victoria Hayes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04979314054031645,"gpt":0.3720240743836732,"spread":0.3222309338433567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001399898,0.0001453495,0.0003075608,0.00003070154,0.001210585,0.00004146483,0.0002544042,0.0001096033,0.0006929307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002097911,0.0001240429,0.0001405248,0.0002945126,0.0001408163,0.0001493783,0.00003742501,0.0002627883,0.00009274483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005763359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000342403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001657207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003977272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984388,0.0001025623,0.0004630757,0.0003034938,0.0003247219,0.0003672976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991648,0.000109331,0.0002783207,0.0002158607,0.00008992309,0.0001418175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003063272,0.0007023246,0.007663646,0.005728814,0.000282901,0.0000192971,0.04519959,0.0000214726,0.005327378,0.6710433,0.04186074,0.2221199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001951697,0.00002354509,0.0004396912,0.001399843,0.0000938346,9.644288e-7,0.0004876318,0.000005234177,0.00008604137,0.0009195064,0.9961405,0.0002080026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8977095,0.04089533,0.00002187521,0.004897996,0.002075582,0.002434521,0.000003369442,0.0003604311,0.05160137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97961,0.006240045,0.0005979607,0.001631783,0.0009771907,0.0001519022,0.00006409052,0.00003890731,0.01068813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9310961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511941400","doi":"","title":"Reforming the Regulation of Political Advocacy by Charities: From Charity under Siege to Charity under Rescue?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Siege; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Law; History","authors":[{"name":"Adam Parachin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07102927307355589,"gpt":0.350009569758529,"spread":0.2789802966849731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002449115,0.0002220307,0.0005157707,0.00002158925,0.0005554199,0.00006741012,0.0005703039,0.000183748,0.000191153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003841503,0.0001574576,0.0002070141,0.0004043421,0.0005433235,0.0002296121,0.0001733701,0.0002612184,0.00009148273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005442746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005302744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06912979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001841483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967951,0.0004618926,0.0006793081,0.0004206406,0.001066602,0.0005764237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982703,0.0002008314,0.0001746049,0.0005506769,0.0003155759,0.0004879799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001218318,0.0001405835,0.0001646986,0.0003593693,0.00005835143,5.101058e-7,0.02947406,0.000002204957,0.00009116968,0.9042516,0.06496663,0.0004786125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006847952,0.0001027661,0.02011447,0.00388942,0.0001934715,0.000002814585,0.04006023,0.00001867156,0.000403882,0.21065,0.7230885,0.0007909339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4621448,0.2983803,0.001398222,0.1638286,0.002202601,0.005000671,0.0001637997,0.0003603309,0.06652069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237604,0.06115248,0.0002734509,0.01408881,0.0003302855,0.00006393553,0.00007083748,0.00001968616,0.0002401032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6936016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9370689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125006201","doi":"","title":"The Role of Innocence Commissions: Error Discovery, Systemic Reform or Both?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04378339745405326,"gpt":0.3756166703946833,"spread":0.33183327294063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001943483,0.0001751221,0.0004774182,0.00002560526,0.0008418996,0.0001368198,0.001210325,0.00008612949,0.0001108485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001251567,0.00009044866,0.0001465189,0.0007494832,0.0003945657,0.0003780738,0.0001041353,0.0002128656,0.00006548942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001464794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003399723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002252118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004424521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974945,0.0003291701,0.0007358071,0.0002862421,0.000787753,0.0003664817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981244,0.0004099204,0.0004570122,0.0006871659,0.0001897539,0.0001317428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003142621,0.00009604719,0.00004614545,0.0007524751,0.00001481646,0.000003206394,0.0005088399,6.636568e-7,0.0000786992,0.8237155,0.003261292,0.1714909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008224013,0.00006399786,0.000143683,0.009628162,0.00004149308,0.000009779631,0.0006614178,0.000002309839,0.00008532346,0.009933022,0.9791993,0.0001492285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002621669,0.7483419,0.0000763703,0.02057028,0.0005198785,0.001982326,0.00002278011,0.0001918275,0.2256729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7484807,0.2460859,0.0001920703,0.002544373,0.0001156963,0.00003888633,0.000003154604,0.00001383705,0.0025254],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.975938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6475296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592768569","doi":"","title":"Jury Trials for Violent Hate Crimes in Russia: Is Russian Justice Only for Ethnic Russians","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Jury; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Hung jury; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Jury selection; Legislation; Criminology; Sociology; Advertising; Business","authors":[{"name":"Nikolai Kovalev","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3751959791712456,"gpt":0.4795894323707514,"spread":0.1043934531995058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087821,0.0004103229,0.001547179,0.000133183,0.0006230604,0.0001131093,0.001056158,0.0003007346,0.0009007914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004118957,0.0003201656,0.0007046456,0.0006972225,0.0003390942,0.000383135,0.0001061877,0.0002894128,0.0001662868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001566044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007148889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002984573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001473012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951722,0.0007984078,0.001697794,0.0008243122,0.0006184238,0.0008888816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963236,0.001720944,0.0007910425,0.0006713824,0.0001849834,0.0003080625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001249342,0.0002832848,0.00001756253,0.004903318,0.00006096153,0.000005287484,0.002890656,2.929744e-7,0.000006280468,0.7970122,0.01647613,0.1782191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008582442,0.0001482265,0.0006201275,0.006550826,0.0007801723,0.000002770918,0.0002796967,0.000004255158,0.0001445787,0.03832176,0.9518251,0.0004642101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001448273,0.6950601,0.008920206,0.04335879,0.005411298,0.02257713,0.0006414088,0.0006819915,0.2219008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1700848,0.7127632,0.0344107,0.06852058,0.002630256,0.005057345,0.0001122711,0.0003371674,0.006083694],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.935349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980400367","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Criminal Jury","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Publicity; Jury selection; Criminal trial; Hung jury; Verdict; Fair trial; Ethnic group","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1332651090369766,"gpt":0.3701335272309318,"spread":0.2368684181939553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001867599,0.0001250827,0.0002096218,0.00002595738,0.002050047,0.0001342203,0.0008868966,0.00007593254,0.001379878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007500842,0.00008218773,0.0001130401,0.0003365443,0.0005565183,0.0001373687,0.00005427594,0.0002074666,0.0009876308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001309838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007980331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09625094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7418996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982213,0.000255899,0.0003068069,0.0002394763,0.0004917276,0.0004847491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987352,0.0001736804,0.000114205,0.0004326605,0.000184333,0.00035991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001855247,0.00001311834,0.00004519384,0.0001665497,0.000007986895,0.000009681725,0.0008769176,1.127651e-8,1.799851e-7,0.8520054,0.02169994,0.1251732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002723217,0.00001208637,0.0009354834,0.0006441033,0.00005144765,0.000003038836,0.00009259261,1.189567e-7,0.000005359953,0.007486093,0.9906247,0.0001177449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003960573,0.135405,0.00001025883,0.009245677,0.0007559271,0.0005515818,0.000005182884,0.00008222061,0.853548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7155868,0.2488005,0.0007808103,0.02866089,0.000515911,0.0001312864,0.00000544191,0.00004375496,0.005474556],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1276931799","doi":"","title":"Juror Bias, Voir Dire, and the Judge-Jury Relationship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Impartiality; Jury selection; Law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Hung jury; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Nancy S. Marder","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1102873229208837,"gpt":0.3443402924129597,"spread":0.2340529694920759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003056853,0.0001317594,0.0003034408,0.000001952227,0.0009078791,0.00009855494,0.0003226525,0.0001284868,0.0001281052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001146035,0.0000750761,0.0001696208,0.0003203384,0.001208841,0.0001883602,0.00007684164,0.0003004925,0.0001848774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005034852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001175508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001805448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003586819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980211,0.0007918748,0.0002765964,0.0002268574,0.000443027,0.0002405499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988689,0.0003619145,0.0001370356,0.0003073999,0.000117707,0.000207035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003959483,0.00001830434,0.0002681962,0.0001547692,0.00001462699,8.603479e-7,0.003109741,1.052836e-7,1.275303e-7,0.8912187,0.1024526,0.002757959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003285001,0.000007981516,0.0003667252,0.0004977656,0.0001008276,0.000002343161,0.0003968168,8.888994e-7,7.380752e-7,0.02098687,0.9771941,0.0001164685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001303332,0.5185087,0.000008191668,0.08931511,0.0005085605,0.00105628,0.00001058669,0.0001301284,0.3891591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2666685,0.6535591,0.0004289821,0.0544836,0.001322967,0.0002710004,0.00004416621,0.00003873797,0.02318297],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8747414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6982764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595507030","doi":"","title":"Payment Finality and Discharge in Funds Transfers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Payment; Finance; Actuarial science","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin Geva","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05049957105444494,"gpt":0.2625866234651767,"spread":0.2120870524107318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001669735,0.0001842675,0.0006249555,0.00007304188,0.00006849971,0.00002804522,0.0001680913,0.00008336368,0.000300991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005042116,0.0001861346,0.0001384546,0.0001607364,0.0001017284,0.0001679286,0.00004348583,0.0002062689,0.000251954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009001054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006611712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003491517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002972372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981838,0.0000190903,0.0009312833,0.0004269868,0.0000273286,0.0004114525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993343,0.00006610498,0.0001397725,0.0002998048,0.000005354428,0.0001546216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009151803,0.00008904766,0.0220296,0.001133218,0.00001819453,0.000003239923,0.00009273069,2.679358e-7,0.000002730771,0.9730153,0.0005645837,0.00304191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008993733,0.00009940741,0.171873,0.0008781538,0.00001853768,0.000009939326,0.00001215466,0.00004546896,0.00004450136,0.09624242,0.7293463,0.0005307577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3355635,0.2236079,0.0005742375,0.01683282,0.0005552394,0.001423196,0.0003002136,0.00007337138,0.4210696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721208,0.02086067,0.00005871574,0.006669835,0.00008454567,0.00002812064,0.00002004384,0.00001772303,0.0001396025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8767729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.759035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905800883","doi":"","title":"Legal Analysis of Economics: Solving the Problem of Rational Commitment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Normative; Commit; Rational choice theory (criminology); Adjudication; Rational agent; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Preference; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Bruce Chapman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03694648439122424,"gpt":0.2342655574391061,"spread":0.1973190730478819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004622879,0.0001094215,0.0006465355,0.00005942663,0.0001262929,0.00001633762,0.0002153867,0.00002627835,0.0002292197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001766292,0.00008243007,0.0003710757,0.0003055713,0.0002256545,0.0001129232,0.00007757099,0.00007610568,0.00004592851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008344439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004383451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007886091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003952768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987997,0.00001317823,0.0008324897,0.0001993912,0.00003564406,0.0001195661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991493,0.00004523142,0.0004940167,0.0002326394,0.0000502707,0.00002850429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002140902,0.00007773979,0.001246975,0.0002292008,0.0007091568,2.091853e-7,0.00003552261,0.001125071,0.000001692147,0.9961612,0.0001127948,0.0002983516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003980129,0.00004911243,0.005866369,0.0005149152,0.0005131662,0.000001971292,0.0000113293,0.0001259131,0.00009006458,0.06141085,0.9308075,0.0002107954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0400176,0.6021196,0.001917918,0.02691048,0.000294349,0.001681146,0.0009004991,0.00003242508,0.3261259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537252,0.04387436,0.0006483215,0.001523729,0.00003908475,0.0000611078,0.00004147282,0.000005449494,0.00008123232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3361401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1884302434","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Two Countries' Engagement with the Fair Cross Section Right: Aboriginal Underrepresentation on Ontario Juries and the Boston Marathon Bomber's Jury Wheel Challenge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Advertising; Business","authors":[{"name":"Marie Comiskey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05628836377254533,"gpt":0.3833654385294841,"spread":0.3270770747569388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002978079,0.0001739543,0.0003249483,0.00001603822,0.0008528692,0.0001599859,0.0002600777,0.00004951339,0.0001101714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005477955,0.00008925348,0.00008089747,0.0001559556,0.001439135,0.0003363087,0.0000482364,0.0002986339,0.00001770162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002076692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003629152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04875364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.291345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977588,0.0006550422,0.000297154,0.0002941692,0.0007570098,0.0002378144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988086,0.0002864578,0.0002606179,0.0003403514,0.0002044167,0.00009957184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003246423,0.00009254074,0.0005906065,0.0005302153,0.0000476495,0.000006460692,0.02289475,0.00001620218,0.000001601367,0.9694479,0.004907587,0.001139862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007373713,0.0001938242,0.001206137,0.001033806,0.000183078,0.000006290231,0.00100981,0.000004018182,0.00002491274,0.002349122,0.9931148,0.0001368581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4430663,0.1298485,0.0003234111,0.1486929,0.001810504,0.00666104,0.00003031717,0.0001704168,0.2693966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681096,0.02846052,0.00003839067,0.001530126,0.0002546413,0.0001416172,0.000008005303,0.00001170248,0.001445409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9575808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1123112189","doi":"","title":"Rational Choice and Reasonable Interactions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic interaction; Simple (philosophy); Rational choice theory (criminology); Rational agent; Game theory; Economics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Management science; Microeconomics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Neoclassical economics","authors":[{"name":"Bruce Chapman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04293868435832065,"gpt":0.2588586688575243,"spread":0.2159199844992037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001669063,0.00009432243,0.0002557382,0.00002083896,0.0002102127,0.00003660015,0.00007653271,0.00002050675,0.001115413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008292779,0.00008858083,0.00007368449,0.0000912051,0.00009146752,0.0002694692,0.00005341306,0.0001036397,0.001095089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004998669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001141688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001613086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001760842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992842,0.000007890832,0.000333158,0.0002216364,0.00002981331,0.0001232804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996364,0.00004676433,0.0001116492,0.0001225048,0.0000273952,0.00005533923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.692121e-7,0.00003794258,0.001504484,0.0001255918,0.00002722446,2.635209e-7,0.000008304,0.000002053299,0.000001072698,0.9872268,0.008759305,0.002306304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001171573,0.000007005669,0.003997814,0.0002529823,0.00001066044,0.00001015617,9.362768e-7,0.00004169981,0.000003220144,0.005368181,0.9900801,0.000110068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001555285,0.5210249,0.0002270449,0.03387852,0.0002618887,0.0002794295,0.00008432802,0.00004030181,0.4426482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7375249,0.2245413,0.001318385,0.02595486,0.0009115684,0.0002127288,0.00007378613,0.00001888578,0.009443572],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575016584","doi":"","title":"Religious Law, Family Law and Arbitration: Shari'a and Halakha in America","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Family law; Public law; Private law; Legal pluralism; Comparative law; Legitimacy; Politics; Legal realism","authors":[{"name":"Mohammad Fadel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02110317125135264,"gpt":0.284498532587161,"spread":0.2633953613358083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003824449,0.0001701126,0.0003957915,0.00002032728,0.0003807136,0.0001616662,0.0001776457,0.0000840522,0.000181483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002298766,0.0001334931,0.00005693937,0.0002189539,0.0006524049,0.0002861728,0.00006117813,0.000182148,0.0001603046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003762016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004513853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01101249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005537956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984495,0.0002130929,0.0003467647,0.0003711365,0.0002793959,0.000340096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999319,0.00007553395,0.00009086887,0.0002379845,0.00005658951,0.0002200006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000152368,0.00005161699,0.000190556,0.0004497392,0.00001297291,0.000007464894,0.002188818,1.232721e-7,0.00003270127,0.9904705,0.004271569,0.002322444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001893635,0.00003720037,0.0006477379,0.0006347667,0.00002705718,0.000003770533,0.0002004919,0.000004025779,0.000007816485,0.03288285,0.9651536,0.0002113482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01704631,0.1781807,0.00001126167,0.01352453,0.0002081175,0.001651425,0.000006963393,0.0001032031,0.7892675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7509381,0.2073448,0.0002325068,0.04094728,0.0001197895,0.0001307532,0.00001023529,0.00001402511,0.0002626219],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907518675","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Lens on Third Party Litigation Funding in the American Bankruptcy Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Context (archaeology); Through-the-lens metering; Business; Lens (geology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; History; Optics","authors":[{"name":"Stephanie Ben‐Ishai","is_ca":false},{"name":"Emily Uza","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04734319766364592,"gpt":0.2641971575081298,"spread":0.2168539598444839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007725306,0.0001862065,0.0003122417,0.00006616912,0.0002812313,0.0001569697,0.0003678803,0.00003031376,0.0001981582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001550242,0.0001301026,0.00009821561,0.0007596886,0.0001697267,0.0004677519,0.00003936297,0.0002181486,0.0009430595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001065644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005751101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1336933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4568601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986786,0.00004768881,0.0003443755,0.0002960282,0.0002527217,0.0003805692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990457,0.00005894133,0.0003745967,0.0004061401,0.00009041373,0.00002424055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000196813,0.00008127341,0.0089797,0.0009766135,0.00001631602,0.00003227334,0.0001169605,0.000001085843,0.00001390512,0.8912082,0.06148721,0.03706672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001242941,0.00002801757,0.01784154,0.002511915,0.00003150371,0.000001925672,0.00003748696,0.0000517209,0.00000577586,0.0018761,0.9773074,0.0001823178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4242641,0.02518664,0.00002909644,0.1164478,0.001371172,0.00278934,0.00003844933,0.0001775381,0.4296958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795594,0.00298552,0.000006549631,0.1165164,0.0007626236,0.00005249861,0.00002618338,0.00001384683,0.00007695105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9158202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046159894","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Law Analysis of Private Securities Litigation in the Wake of <em>Morrison v. National Australia Bank</em>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Subpoena; Pretext; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Liquation; Gestational period","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05227895462544088,"gpt":0.3384576026950132,"spread":0.2861786480695724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001354905,0.0002053012,0.0007324464,0.0001236947,0.00008051991,0.00003573821,0.0003705293,0.0000409709,0.03350173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002109316,0.0001506452,0.0003114058,0.000939123,0.0001987654,0.00008322561,0.0001033911,0.0002128052,0.00003389602],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001803953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004731902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004622344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007638365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973042,0.0004282007,0.0008308557,0.0002263673,0.0008987601,0.0003116103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986113,0.0002424982,0.0003878722,0.0003858861,0.0002888947,0.00008351816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009794522,0.0005017741,0.004017074,0.0009425763,0.0003800969,2.786318e-7,0.001336864,0.00001365734,0.0008670914,0.9850905,0.003910676,0.002929617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009938665,0.0001651029,0.0922005,0.00277133,0.001416204,8.990773e-7,0.0006045672,0.0008697681,0.002773459,0.002586329,0.8950993,0.0005186883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8080695,0.02093926,0.0001588074,0.002249466,0.0001315512,0.003053366,0.0005785346,0.00002022771,0.1647993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979227,0.0006482478,0.000156827,0.0002288649,0.00008363555,0.0001843774,0.0003820585,0.000006940637,0.000386405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9673818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405047158","doi":"","title":"Material Contribution to Risk in the Canadian Law of Toxic Torts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Lynda Collins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01699792661767994,"gpt":0.2260568465869935,"spread":0.2090589199693136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007463812,0.0001464019,0.0003168312,0.00005536469,0.0002020578,0.0001097252,0.0003107811,0.00005001779,0.0009720661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003019891,0.00007548246,0.00008435504,0.0002041483,0.00007842777,0.0002893498,0.00005544049,0.00006869858,0.0004024927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006864412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003237453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09384614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6909512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988734,0.00004527413,0.0003883776,0.0002120441,0.0002045334,0.0002764399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992543,0.00002713512,0.0002074971,0.0003706623,0.0001102194,0.0000301404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008363927,0.00002336626,0.0003983775,0.0003359512,0.000006231386,0.000008574591,0.000006472234,1.213595e-7,0.00006664084,0.9950011,0.00292334,0.00122142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002350056,0.00001080019,0.003384016,0.001673166,0.00006203549,0.000001261234,9.630284e-7,6.939807e-7,0.00008455479,0.02627936,0.968127,0.000141144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8583341,0.007041987,0.00003505728,0.0236676,0.001872435,0.004619758,0.000187785,0.0001174268,0.1041238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879109,0.0006897142,0.000005622204,0.01071612,0.0005168703,0.00004837017,0.00003796355,0.00001127113,0.00006319832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125242676","doi":"","title":"COMMON KNOWLEDGE, COMMUNICATION, AND PUBLIC REASON","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Appeal; Silence; Metaphor; Law; Framing (construction); Set (abstract data type); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy; Linguistics; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Bruce Chapman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0377908360445267,"gpt":0.3394033077946957,"spread":0.301612471750169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009548822,0.0001238376,0.0002846413,0.000002480381,0.001162264,0.0001169848,0.000469885,0.0001305094,0.0002531843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001498897,0.0001000529,0.0001148638,0.0003357414,0.0007601226,0.0002571513,0.0001186395,0.0002563706,0.0001350043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001036119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001109767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006100166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00615872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986871,0.0003686254,0.0002492163,0.0002018498,0.0002292128,0.0002640062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990281,0.00007303354,0.0001101414,0.0004488115,0.0001401478,0.0001997435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.170358e-7,0.0000965713,0.0001054231,0.0003220426,0.00001433,3.93083e-7,0.002641748,6.047281e-8,0.000001433246,0.9787382,0.01126607,0.006813315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001644836,0.000009854348,0.0001197125,0.001610084,0.00004095711,0.00000269335,0.0004541966,1.249048e-7,0.000004769487,0.01782927,0.9796298,0.0001340566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001400999,0.6264759,0.000003971812,0.04724168,0.00009707405,0.0004630152,0.000003896917,0.0001125355,0.3242009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1935256,0.7997965,0.0003218873,0.005239283,0.0001243579,0.0000567575,0.00003072115,0.00001133789,0.0008935347],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8939312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}