{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"18065f216103","filters":{"venue":"China Law and Society Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W3155937899","doi":"10.1163/25427466-00502002","title":"Cage for the Birds: On the Social Transformation of Chinese Law, 1999–2019","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"China Law and Society Review","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Law; Politics; Social transformation; Chinese society; Cage; Political science; Sociology; State (computer science); Social change; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Sida Liu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01666008234599511,"gpt":0.3025346350799562,"spread":0.2858745527339611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002099516,0.0001610469,0.0001577971,0.001447615,0.003980256,0.001739218,0.0005018607,0.001045914,0.001959761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001849785,0.0001238203,0.0001564889,0.002475008,0.005529399,0.001770916,0.00116732,0.001151331,0.00007274125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01214449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007972679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1466087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2056305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999255,0.0002540502,0.00004604968,0.00008838515,0.0001984399,0.0001579647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993562,0.0002299311,0.0001476443,0.00003421965,0.0001486947,0.00008338616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005021901,0.000086281,0.02571785,0.0007385216,0.00005548833,0.001302174,0.1330259,0.0004355306,0.001085847,0.6994231,0.03542768,0.1026514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002514739,0.0001518187,0.2251281,0.0007219521,0.00005649936,0.0002710291,0.04547096,0.0006591516,0.0008725913,0.01510924,0.7114739,0.00005952062],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6620871,0.08224277,0.0007010841,0.08593766,0.0008140605,0.0001239823,0.0002377844,0.00001976003,0.167836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706686,0.01607179,0.000121911,0.003670942,0.0001812764,0.00002868924,0.00006466365,0.00000238899,0.009189749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1466087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2915107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154607103","doi":"10.1163/25427466-00502001","title":"With or Without You: Qing, Li, Fa, and Legal Pluralism in China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"China Law and Society Review","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Legal realism; China; Pluralism (philosophy); Scholarship; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Legal profession; Law; Legal formalism; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Epistemology; Black letter law","authors":[{"name":"Qian Liu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.010898431202731,"gpt":0.2818300320550871,"spread":0.2709316008523561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002435206,0.0001276411,0.0001763808,0.001592605,0.002805178,0.002032288,0.0002991762,0.0004899264,0.001692103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001815127,0.00007809204,0.0001289086,0.00262966,0.004039898,0.001502455,0.001134866,0.0005429178,0.00004335235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003343964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006046507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02835957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05520586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992927,0.0003443999,0.00003765115,0.00005321555,0.0001530873,0.0001188925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988202,0.0003729534,0.0003352481,0.00003483178,0.000182235,0.000254344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007960442,0.0001483257,0.1621894,0.001834438,0.0001378026,0.001455513,0.1088514,0.001239147,0.0008399139,0.5376011,0.02366565,0.1619578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004435195,0.0002289133,0.4099633,0.002391979,0.000152282,0.0004493578,0.09076632,0.002532739,0.0005755898,0.1001393,0.3926558,0.00009996381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8193102,0.06624925,0.0006407768,0.05110618,0.0002948221,0.00003726344,0.00008262772,0.00001046461,0.06226832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875145,0.00978333,0.00009657551,0.0006419616,0.00008263212,0.000009630974,0.00001644923,9.848911e-7,0.001853904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02835957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05638897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389497519","doi":"10.1163/25427466-07020005","title":"The Changing Role of the Police in the People’s Republic of China, 1949–1966","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"China Law and Society Review","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Punishment (psychology); Communism; Public order; Political science; People's Republic; Public security; Criminology; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Wang Juan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01769251448555587,"gpt":0.2850461498416729,"spread":0.2673536353561171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010653,0.00021293,0.0001577968,0.002501354,0.002715613,0.001296698,0.0004545743,0.0004930649,0.001324441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009235773,0.0002398757,0.0001296378,0.003612788,0.002894277,0.001081593,0.001130152,0.0006304831,0.00008872927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009644809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008871615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2478492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2830973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994774,0.00009516037,0.00003188829,0.00007490553,0.0001056094,0.0002149823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962,0.00005208377,0.0001152585,0.00002087395,0.0001106696,0.00008111334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002617078,0.0001764761,0.3936599,0.001181518,0.0001155836,0.00453197,0.2958903,0.001783213,0.005179822,0.1321944,0.0132942,0.1517309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001250661,0.00009155095,0.8550776,0.0002922009,0.00003203386,0.0002864428,0.04323115,0.000488847,0.0006768159,0.001920026,0.09784465,0.00004606958],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747536,0.005965917,0.0001023974,0.003348173,0.00009579999,0.00002972731,0.0001665493,0.000005982813,0.01553181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946886,0.002409101,0.00004280852,0.0001323181,0.0000317159,0.000005627995,0.00004780676,0.000001376318,0.002640658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2478492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4928131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}