{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"a418229c28ac","filters":{"venue":"Cogency"}},"results":[{"id":"W2800557704","doi":"","title":"Depicting Visual Arguments: An ART Approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Argument map; Key (lock); Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Leo Groarke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04506052591709581,"gpt":0.3590324067291912,"spread":0.3139718808120954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002239132,0.000110414,0.000120804,0.00004172907,0.0003769012,0.00008826111,0.0002776909,0.00009167818,0.001724029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006672658,0.0001012309,0.00005978991,0.00003228633,0.00004876664,0.0002127151,0.00004385307,0.0001170585,0.001509845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001162274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001121582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006149381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001087811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990847,0.0000779762,0.0001539644,0.0003076622,0.0001213634,0.0002543133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991924,0.00001285179,0.0001232563,0.0005429048,0.00004226323,0.00008628987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002278734,0.003314953,0.1456107,0.00007393365,0.0004649469,0.0002549428,0.01542614,8.839288e-7,0.00967562,0.02692128,0.01185197,0.7861767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008058434,0.001595708,0.8571945,0.0001062889,0.0007117862,0.0004169102,0.02917844,0.0008389896,0.007187954,0.02058993,0.07160069,0.002520378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6025732,0.0001587145,0.002279049,0.00002283318,0.0008130948,0.0001275481,0.000004765569,0.00006381867,0.393957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914007,0.000006748174,0.0004115574,0.0001862536,0.0005165571,0.00005164439,0.00006013952,0.00002017134,0.007346272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7836564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998568607","doi":"","title":"Collateral Beliefs and the Rashomon Effect","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Argumentation theory; Cognition; Psychology; Work (physics); Social psychology; Rash; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02039654483811671,"gpt":0.2296259905037943,"spread":0.2092294456656776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003663317,0.00008632265,0.0001484736,0.00001596009,0.000260338,0.00004170033,0.00008808559,0.00003559529,0.0002985212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005025192,0.0000369998,0.00005973015,0.000009800887,0.0008318203,0.00006641458,0.00003371072,0.00006531808,0.0001242975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006273245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001192948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005858201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000200931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994226,0.0001385365,0.0001099433,0.0001202753,0.00007139904,0.0001372573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993322,0.0004061096,0.00003994265,0.0001510644,0.00004095342,0.0000296586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009064481,0.00001930257,0.001601757,0.00004829139,0.00006568472,0.000004789164,0.02109526,2.972015e-8,0.0006824699,0.940271,0.004600529,0.0315203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004197934,0.0003578062,0.001584917,0.0001019599,0.0001279792,0.00001150544,0.0004106398,0.000006470303,0.002112604,0.1644721,0.826294,0.0003220919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7760521,0.002611601,0.00004546505,0.004453104,0.001943695,0.0004105615,0.00002604224,0.00007562255,0.2143818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782703,0.0001684408,0.00000407586,0.0003666747,0.0006926417,0.00001943449,0.00000125234,0.000009097465,0.02046811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8216934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3268597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900268178","doi":"","title":"Aproximación a la investigación sobre diálogos argumentativos","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Social Sciences and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Logos Bible Software; Property (philosophy); Flexibility (engineering); Modal; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Eva Hamamé","is_ca":false},{"name":"Claudio Durán","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03036376983544391,"gpt":0.3709520824811297,"spread":0.3405883126456857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009624564,0.0002811695,0.0003060909,0.0001006299,0.001701729,0.0004465553,0.0008171236,0.00028583,0.001540032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004103053,0.0002592167,0.0001803708,0.001324835,0.004739941,0.0003997007,0.0001819561,0.0002090837,0.001838933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001059076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005467294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005908453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009816616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969872,0.000534884,0.0003622112,0.0004928214,0.000761328,0.0008615774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986103,0.0002496697,0.0002235337,0.0002898926,0.0001942777,0.0004323659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002891901,0.0003114094,0.07583033,0.00006827077,0.00009921678,0.00001985509,0.1787215,4.280813e-7,0.002977167,0.5767831,0.03902417,0.1261356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004270124,0.0004015357,0.02006533,0.0001049764,0.00008867979,0.000004254214,0.01300367,0.00006871445,0.001665955,0.05953773,0.9039996,0.0006325782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4034122,0.0005463408,0.00007342578,0.007152193,0.002096999,0.0005163722,0.00005418624,0.0001519303,0.5859964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868348,0.001652971,0.0002159498,0.001370206,0.00319126,0.00003875333,0.000003807921,0.00002243006,0.006669867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8649754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982205312","doi":"","title":"Hans V. Hansen, Ed., Riel’s Defence: Perspectives on His Speeches, McGill-Queens University Press, 2014, 331 pp., $32.95 (pbk), ISBN 97807773543362","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Military History and Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Art","authors":[{"name":"Lisa J. M. Porier","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02224501807989796,"gpt":0.2500934187306469,"spread":0.227848400650749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005475552,0.0002665425,0.0002757087,0.00006812166,0.001424334,0.00001954844,0.0006379476,0.0002620487,0.003012291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002776728,0.000231987,0.0002154213,0.0002274038,0.0009011801,0.0004895189,0.0000665593,0.0002273057,0.0005821176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006499419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003612885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00601357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001718559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974284,0.0005098279,0.0002297393,0.0007119437,0.0005052671,0.0006148457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985791,0.0002456913,0.0001202707,0.0005086753,0.0002209866,0.0003253134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002545644,0.0004212391,0.001240967,0.00002811984,0.000094906,0.0001830673,0.01916077,0.000005742757,0.002241568,0.4657526,0.5026596,0.00795687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003858307,0.0001903868,0.0009614373,0.00004979785,0.00004493287,0.000002525373,0.01084975,0.000002878967,0.0004579384,0.001727678,0.984923,0.0004038259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08872598,0.01342733,0.0005272283,0.004971691,0.002049903,0.0009318455,0.0008852663,0.0005516013,0.8879291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.838117,0.03467679,0.0003574198,0.0001408589,0.0006749086,0.000008245848,0.00001033143,0.00003422442,0.1259802],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7619489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207571416","doi":"","title":"Studying Argumentation Behaviour / Estudiando el comportamiento argumentativo","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Panacea (medicine); Humanities; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Dialogical self; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Hans V. Hansen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08290131220310663,"gpt":0.4568799103540673,"spread":0.3739785981509606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001829535,0.0002281171,0.0002550597,0.0001073738,0.004915823,0.001014901,0.0006212701,0.0001192487,0.0008291685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003748865,0.0002485326,0.0001224893,0.0001319103,0.0002835895,0.0007670263,0.00009234134,0.0002122518,0.0008232006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002802909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003075289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003988376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003433324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974485,0.000324733,0.0004748736,0.0004749571,0.0008571296,0.0004197967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981272,0.00008848464,0.0007553371,0.0006021016,0.0002179028,0.0002089552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107141,0.000600511,0.9256315,0.0000240577,0.00006526362,0.000004089035,0.05232973,0.000006105251,0.000321957,0.004549498,0.002505092,0.01395151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00108874,0.0001153683,0.9716999,0.0001156077,0.0002542902,8.54448e-7,0.0165077,0.00003970934,0.00044566,0.001336809,0.00802948,0.0003659025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683232,0.000351204,0.0001820361,0.00371586,0.004070376,0.0006641854,0.00001884312,0.00007161863,0.02260263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929175,0.0005566783,0.0001604378,0.0001032942,0.0007399555,0.0000828634,0.00005414621,0.00002376667,0.005361382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04606841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412992671","doi":"10.32995/cogency.v16i2.435","title":"Revisting Kant and Husserl on the Copernican Turn","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Philosophy and Historical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Copernican principle; Philosophy; Epistemology; Turn (biochemistry); Physics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Blézy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04803846954802803,"gpt":0.2330420464181106,"spread":0.1850035768700825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009932329,0.0000643058,0.00008413451,0.00002286293,0.0004837661,0.00005857487,0.000103556,0.00001472523,0.0005204818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009244484,0.00003865116,0.00003324001,0.00002925656,0.0001197176,0.00002868389,0.00003205022,0.0001022146,0.00006389901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001735969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001370524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002378125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003766521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996097,0.00002863776,0.0001022097,0.0001116042,0.00005745394,0.00009039707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996678,0.0001168545,0.00002594532,0.0001392894,0.00002838685,0.00002167458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005647102,0.00001688808,0.00002515998,0.00001504869,0.00000918054,0.000001797332,0.002203055,5.079357e-8,0.00003742668,0.9795561,0.01337359,0.004756069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005127492,0.00002845547,0.0001111965,0.00005769322,0.00001442784,3.479338e-7,0.0001721358,0.000008786251,0.000048454,0.0442131,0.9552371,0.00005703512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02316587,0.002956487,0.000005888889,0.005057679,0.0004801553,0.00009397709,0.000009523824,0.00003711161,0.9681933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971349,0.0000980998,0.000005321392,0.001591802,0.0004160923,0.000009467667,0.000001232309,0.000004288646,0.02652469],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9481831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.569891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}