{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"a418229c28ac","filters":{"venue":"Cogency"}},"results":[{"id":"W2800557704","doi":"","title":"Depicting Visual Arguments: An ART Approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Argument map; Key (lock); Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Leo Groarke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04506052591709581,"gpt":0.3590324067291912,"spread":0.3139718808120954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005215634,0.001008286,0.0006055009,0.005242906,0.003272362,0.01429546,0.002448193,0.003587899,0.00985413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01192063,0.0005389757,0.001813182,0.002255682,0.02239462,0.01623656,0.003664664,0.003999239,0.001304608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003036519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009484491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009798398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001133093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950265,0.003493128,0.0001238,0.0003214371,0.0008458748,0.0001892409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921492,0.006203978,0.0004054507,0.0006816564,0.0004451366,0.0001144455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001114671,0.000007598555,0.00006382903,0.00006651204,0.000008830851,0.00005702009,0.003087695,0.0007184051,0.0002768548,0.9873825,0.001229196,0.007090326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009522596,0.00001351646,0.000130195,0.0001204992,0.00001131262,0.0001254629,0.002104251,0.00369626,0.0004956927,0.9353411,0.05793636,0.00001589649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01882035,0.003998545,0.6810941,0.01252558,0.001034447,0.0001210481,0.0001486516,0.0004210991,0.2818362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6468627,0.002820594,0.3118698,0.00201578,0.001138463,0.0005120572,0.0001901284,0.0005232568,0.03406729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01429546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03296536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998568607","doi":"","title":"Collateral Beliefs and the Rashomon Effect","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Argumentation theory; Cognition; Psychology; Work (physics); Social psychology; Rash; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02039654483811671,"gpt":0.2296259905037943,"spread":0.2092294456656776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004704419,0.000331722,0.0003343618,0.001100381,0.002206341,0.00306484,0.0008055726,0.00203378,0.01468735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03629243,0.0003922709,0.0002918672,0.0007818554,0.01280525,0.008013139,0.006717212,0.002953704,0.0006652504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001491548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008235022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001697415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00241389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961473,0.002296779,0.0001562381,0.0005376797,0.0006145627,0.0002475069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785526,0.01463415,0.002294814,0.002929055,0.001068431,0.0005209813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002484133,0.0000412002,0.006845907,0.000189919,0.00003458463,0.0006520239,0.03401606,0.0003376166,0.001713726,0.9308078,0.002256745,0.02285619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223134,0.0001168483,0.015705,0.000368668,0.00007467371,0.001054244,0.02167433,0.001491873,0.00166703,0.9054464,0.05219835,0.00008025121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4373557,0.001728503,0.03741233,0.02146307,0.0002635467,0.0001087611,0.0002575694,0.0001852874,0.5012252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995194,0.0001820755,0.001711561,0.0003526671,0.00003526635,0.00002571914,0.00002471754,0.00001860965,0.002455396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01468735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04913414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900268178","doi":"","title":"Aproximación a la investigación sobre diálogos argumentativos","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Social Sciences and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Logos Bible Software; Property (philosophy); Flexibility (engineering); Modal; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Eva Hamamé","is_ca":false},{"name":"Claudio Durán","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03036376983544391,"gpt":0.3709520824811297,"spread":0.3405883126456857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01132701,0.001068809,0.001167426,0.004095214,0.00279736,0.0131769,0.001865999,0.006225978,0.006414574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01609358,0.0004245352,0.001204238,0.003778307,0.00895526,0.01302946,0.004248164,0.007913058,0.001439757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005621942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003971296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003023862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002507585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898957,0.007393474,0.0002709288,0.0007853446,0.001303412,0.0003511641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985307,0.01101796,0.0005172224,0.001048085,0.001710662,0.0003991756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005650572,0.00006759375,0.0003253006,0.0008075062,0.00002930358,0.0002214674,0.005841782,0.0007559618,0.0006014467,0.9234426,0.009403563,0.05844691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000272679,0.00004977424,0.0006051779,0.002038119,0.00004469417,0.0004097788,0.005889846,0.00308282,0.0006761744,0.5403923,0.4467496,0.00003443725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02703247,0.3285384,0.2229115,0.132911,0.01492698,0.0002625044,0.0002914054,0.0004793403,0.2726465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5037805,0.2433296,0.1447462,0.01607616,0.02408507,0.000806687,0.0005857707,0.0003275557,0.06626242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0131769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05990368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982205312","doi":"","title":"Hans V. Hansen, Ed., Riel’s Defence: Perspectives on His Speeches, McGill-Queens University Press, 2014, 331 pp., $32.95 (pbk), ISBN 97807773543362","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Military History and Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Art","authors":[{"name":"Lisa J. M. Porier","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02224501807989796,"gpt":0.2500934187306469,"spread":0.227848400650749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001950362,0.001446603,0.0009134214,0.002516664,0.001498776,0.004698901,0.001162321,0.002555939,0.0287037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002824985,0.0007534835,0.0003100188,0.004328826,0.002127381,0.005405649,0.001282231,0.002524792,0.0191496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003047132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004160517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02135873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04264781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991185,0.0003027666,0.0000604117,0.0001119961,0.0003088082,0.00009755429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989672,0.0006257459,0.00009844657,0.0000324647,0.0001365422,0.0001395508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004093615,0.00001149642,0.0001513486,0.0009138163,0.00001049934,0.0001305991,0.002140928,0.0001317237,0.0001157031,0.01159415,0.8556566,0.1291021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002899854,0.000005533141,0.0004186818,0.0009131212,0.000003093692,0.0001625393,0.00107568,0.00002511675,0.00004798081,0.002488182,0.9948488,0.000008420217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001948364,0.9647331,0.0002238985,0.01376766,0.002915986,0.000003180543,0.00008626534,0.00003281778,0.01804224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008194955,0.9255202,0.0006698007,0.002524733,0.002590024,0.00001570777,0.0001658845,0.00008275882,0.06023606],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0287037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09602338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207571416","doi":"","title":"Studying Argumentation Behaviour / Estudiando el comportamiento argumentativo","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Panacea (medicine); Humanities; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Dialogical self; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Hans V. Hansen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08290131220310663,"gpt":0.4568799103540673,"spread":0.3739785981509606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007308532,0.0003283319,0.0003714033,0.002473527,0.001312773,0.006161591,0.0007217777,0.001441344,0.002677886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03482246,0.0002379059,0.0004330282,0.001854343,0.001474446,0.003535411,0.00176183,0.001132392,0.001010019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001434153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001105073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004956451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004509638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923162,0.005043532,0.0004148205,0.0006230283,0.001354295,0.0002479569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696941,0.02097319,0.003972885,0.001348755,0.002918268,0.001092659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001567635,0.001802455,0.3507582,0.001697393,0.0003295786,0.0014706,0.2285784,0.004093194,0.02915795,0.1109955,0.003056006,0.2664931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002130535,0.001882135,0.4748847,0.001782469,0.0003541218,0.002855879,0.1823588,0.04359393,0.03524936,0.1753044,0.08124566,0.0002756234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9504093,0.0005272611,0.01643192,0.0006163184,0.00003927757,0.0001606146,0.0001008926,0.00005597903,0.03165836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920295,0.0001491111,0.005259017,0.00004683656,0.00001295027,0.00008537958,0.00007340594,0.00001808747,0.002325587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007308532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03865165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412992671","doi":"10.32995/cogency.v16i2.435","title":"Revisting Kant and Husserl on the Copernican Turn","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Philosophy and Historical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Copernican principle; Philosophy; Epistemology; Turn (biochemistry); Physics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Blézy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04803846954802803,"gpt":0.2330420464181106,"spread":0.1850035768700825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00768408,0.0005516636,0.000549546,0.002497786,0.004717189,0.00775778,0.001203332,0.003944464,0.004116747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005923163,0.0004756521,0.0004107671,0.001656542,0.07498632,0.01006161,0.006428297,0.007980985,0.0006167546],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01215047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004452726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005587503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005933167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942715,0.003835428,0.000116157,0.0005530975,0.000866879,0.000356951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946126,0.00379842,0.0003615444,0.0005826232,0.0004450492,0.000199841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008991421,0.000004487531,0.0000490141,0.00001603368,0.000001924074,0.00003229374,0.004256462,0.0001160996,0.0000226754,0.992504,0.001872706,0.001115245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001252284,0.000007502485,0.0002349923,0.0002280863,0.000005972644,0.00005662754,0.00391462,0.0003508569,0.0001670536,0.8931835,0.1018216,0.00001671477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05989071,0.01910488,0.02859373,0.1254123,0.002504549,0.00004197609,0.0001059294,0.0001475,0.7641985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486001,0.004690548,0.004798591,0.01061291,0.001006826,0.0000669462,0.00004062754,0.0001312126,0.0300522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01215047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08815819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}