{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":25,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"ecd61003508b","filters":{"venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin"}},"results":[{"id":"W4239951440","doi":"10.1080/03050710601179150","title":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03010261658543287,"gpt":0.3454846624718732,"spread":0.3153820458864404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002443616,0.0002563951,0.0003411944,0.0000909547,0.003123919,0.0005071593,0.0006725933,0.0002434125,0.01083711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002993842,0.000276527,0.0001117701,0.0005863715,0.0008683394,0.000187603,0.00009722663,0.0009422291,0.005188651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003263257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005975331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3409579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07759669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962996,0.0009825652,0.0007524724,0.0004294375,0.0006679016,0.0008680621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972427,0.000980881,0.0004314808,0.0006166704,0.0003824134,0.000345881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001407539,0.0001943679,0.0002444558,0.00001383202,0.000004893947,0.000003303504,0.000792718,0.00000505744,0.000003651447,0.5926698,0.4056665,0.0003873601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004136768,0.00004518154,0.0005865855,0.00002887878,0.00001543794,0.000004425252,0.001289985,0.000002775671,0.00002869598,0.009392788,0.9878863,0.0003052741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001616142,0.0002828461,0.00006859159,0.3971652,0.000784004,0.0003718117,0.0000197813,0.0002703331,0.5994213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9213623,0.00009409189,0.00245158,0.05177623,0.001395211,0.00009857944,0.0001136271,0.00004896799,0.02265944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017253217","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2020.1751981","title":"An Introduction to English legal history (5th ed)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Magnum opus; Law; Kingdom; History; Classics; Legal history; Political science; Art; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04091266953165045,"gpt":0.3275700307829342,"spread":0.2866573612512837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003766329,0.0001037896,0.000179567,0.00002286058,0.0004756295,0.00005282803,0.0003313462,0.00003919786,0.002755597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002952331,0.0001097365,0.00004569087,0.00009219407,0.0002072648,0.0001212111,0.00006871261,0.0001716385,0.0005399064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003515796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001064707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006044722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004523093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986492,0.0002676822,0.0002043389,0.0003038251,0.0003239885,0.0002509656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991156,0.00006859799,0.00006747938,0.0001520749,0.0002840281,0.0003121507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003078148,0.00003031114,0.00007896383,0.000003063862,0.000005229717,0.00000100412,0.008234987,0.0000125203,0.00001821381,0.4764335,0.5148807,0.0002706929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001153319,0.0001881303,0.0002741907,0.00000382089,0.000004455968,1.404428e-7,0.001727914,0.00001176121,0.00003418739,0.00009397664,0.9974229,0.0001232413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03114895,0.0008910071,0.0003183711,0.5005198,0.003004444,0.0004884365,0.00001427087,0.0003757061,0.463239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683391,0.00004539703,0.0003811575,0.02188152,0.007322481,0.00003113036,0.0000126051,0.00001174738,0.001974875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953753403","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2019.1635034","title":"Judicial approaches to combating ‘revenge porn’: a multi-jurisdictional perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Commonwealth; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Phenomenon; Intervention (counseling); Scope (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Action (physics); Sociology; Relevance (law); Criminology; Politics; Psychology; Medicine; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1560345961806197,"gpt":0.3447530701291101,"spread":0.1887184739484905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001263457,0.0001792216,0.0002490832,0.00001198958,0.003017093,0.0001060286,0.0004491837,0.0002283964,0.001320848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001954627,0.0001743814,0.0001320682,0.0003367204,0.001041764,0.00006605612,0.0001392111,0.0003818468,0.0008496415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003755164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001906583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007609969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01261353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977627,0.0004465992,0.0002773953,0.0004177622,0.0005022911,0.0005932155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998852,0.0001643415,0.0001284012,0.0002308949,0.0002707908,0.0003535364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003331558,0.0001866171,0.0002982942,0.000008021648,0.00002631962,0.000002119438,0.08798652,0.000003328698,0.000009096241,0.8335614,0.07728411,0.0006008787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004093719,0.0001301661,0.0008651,0.00003889278,0.00001532506,0.000001712398,0.03440459,0.00002208159,0.00003600117,0.006675011,0.9571542,0.0002475912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02114382,0.0007351184,0.001009867,0.1702442,0.001472225,0.001293092,0.00006701353,0.0005129873,0.8035216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753917,0.00004029506,0.008197588,0.009513671,0.002975631,0.00008561562,0.00001082006,0.00002645181,0.003758169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.954248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016786051","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2020.1753087","title":"Proscription of terrorism in Nigeria: a comparative legal study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proscription; Terrorism; Political science; Legislature; Law; Politics; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07214030047705174,"gpt":0.3598253788940401,"spread":0.2876850784169884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007469112,0.0001874907,0.0005124569,0.00005099332,0.000251527,0.00005319968,0.0004709748,0.0001165519,0.0003039356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001048021,0.0001867745,0.00007309286,0.000300188,0.0004268676,0.0001233194,0.00009461171,0.0003924765,0.0001451286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001203125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000148523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01630701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01600769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971224,0.0008825603,0.0006214901,0.0003674292,0.0004774461,0.0005286615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990001,0.0001550516,0.0001897113,0.0002310292,0.0001010936,0.0003230072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003515345,0.001269319,0.02895758,0.0001035442,0.00002683326,0.00005449071,0.9406717,0.00001009085,0.0001277892,0.01855696,0.009221382,0.0006487928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001695697,0.001273893,0.01635677,0.0001362819,0.00002053466,0.000001048807,0.7088366,0.00007653748,0.0001112692,0.0003329529,0.270758,0.0004004482],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654229,0.0001536642,0.00009416156,0.01948262,0.0004107167,0.00110562,0.000020135,0.00009451323,0.01321567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971206,0.00001883224,0.00002890821,0.00233277,0.000269427,0.00007187457,0.000004808241,0.00001340126,0.000139354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2615366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063086196","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2010.481400","title":"Must terrorists act for a cause? The motivational requirement in definitions of terrorism in the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand and Australia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Commonwealth; Law; Ideology; Kingdom; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1224426672534655,"gpt":0.3591118586053519,"spread":0.2366691913518864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001329924,0.0001608431,0.0002183147,0.00008274834,0.0004011235,0.00005657079,0.0005211671,0.0001288187,0.0001344435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003044581,0.0001131072,0.00004224232,0.0002881996,0.0004672885,0.00005375401,0.00004682034,0.000490571,0.000002443164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000135192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005652942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9321994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979829,0.0003389696,0.0004911628,0.0002293086,0.0004167701,0.0005409038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981148,0.001171255,0.0001653403,0.0003023772,0.0000787825,0.0001674582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001904794,0.0004685804,0.1737592,0.0001414571,0.00004328671,0.00003966345,0.1408647,0.0000227895,0.00008632623,0.5119386,0.1718007,0.0006443263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001382426,0.0001197437,0.263216,0.000186388,0.0000296109,0.000008899829,0.02717804,0.00004456561,0.00001942336,0.007154557,0.7003692,0.0002911718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126415,0.00001665852,0.00001719214,0.08562729,0.000406931,0.0006620456,0.00008152895,0.00001120597,0.000535605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961275,0.00002077521,0.00004758916,0.00323321,0.0002325114,0.00008922027,0.00003517693,0.00001087786,0.0002031225],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5285686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4612377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237002303","doi":"10.1080/03050710600907114","title":"HJ Heinz Co of Canada Ltd v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008003946763719844,"gpt":0.2450202725649055,"spread":0.2370163258011857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003058792,0.0001141438,0.0002313809,0.0000138184,0.001303687,0.0000197146,0.0002208527,0.00004741037,0.0006264053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003924278,0.0001068231,0.00004203245,0.0001481188,0.0002761915,0.00001692062,0.00004364937,0.000118976,0.000004357316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006014601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003370449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983494,0.0001625352,0.0003282987,0.00016804,0.000525239,0.0004665259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991559,0.0001554719,0.0001461777,0.0002116651,0.0001542193,0.0001765438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000405044,0.00001626242,0.001359235,0.0000146022,0.00000807808,0.0000120483,0.0001600407,0.0001163638,0.000003842525,0.2270519,0.7711923,0.00006125852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001552106,0.00001094827,0.004574843,0.00001114126,0.000005885546,7.99072e-7,0.0004841443,0.000006481896,0.00006021479,0.0001923657,0.9943741,0.0001238799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06564301,0.001302447,0.000007234949,0.1098858,0.0008677519,0.0003088264,0.0001738327,0.00003653715,0.8217746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979184,0.00003392835,0.0001195747,0.003817547,0.0004918028,0.00001055042,0.00002515041,0.00001182322,0.01630567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.913541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549189372","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2016.1259077","title":"Aboriginal oral testimony, hearsay rule and the reception theory of admissibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Admissible evidence; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03379697311334558,"gpt":0.3644389456552977,"spread":0.3306419725419522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006109973,0.0001064178,0.0002479252,0.00002761704,0.000546352,0.0000481251,0.0003739918,0.00008874611,0.001420557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001437599,0.00005760242,0.00004900675,0.0001653085,0.002148699,0.00006983789,0.00005315377,0.000129107,0.0001083307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000564715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002112725,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001713619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001008402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974445,0.001299237,0.0003356392,0.0002489671,0.000391389,0.0002803435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966801,0.002478887,0.0001509909,0.0003493812,0.0001923566,0.0001483056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005751171,0.00007357607,0.003038686,0.00003514207,0.000008085561,0.00000115151,0.002358996,4.847695e-7,0.0000435041,0.8442604,0.009189972,0.1404149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000929623,0.00005455482,0.009486329,0.0001039318,0.00001317256,0.000001583825,0.0003685644,0.000001190706,0.0001045503,0.1486607,0.8401744,0.0001013587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.742053,0.002608411,0.002427622,0.1465081,0.0006938808,0.001149797,0.00004674636,0.0002737023,0.1042387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995414,0.0004741719,0.001315879,0.001013354,0.00009174741,0.00001621647,6.668045e-7,0.0000106165,0.001663307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8309844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073883360","doi":"10.1080/03050710701747328","title":"Change of Political Allegiance in Parliamentary Life","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Parliament; House of Commons; Politics; Law; Constitution; Political science; Conscience; Parliamentary sovereignty; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0683611379097948,"gpt":0.3400177201564915,"spread":0.2716565822466967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009539616,0.00007198324,0.0001882251,0.00003421052,0.0002816199,0.00000662228,0.0001710738,0.00006325935,0.0002759856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001214993,0.00007249958,0.00003909762,0.0001499357,0.0008918106,0.00003103079,0.00006198026,0.0001250431,0.00007022874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001133653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009792484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2551026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1077546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99872,0.00009902824,0.0002791061,0.0001286092,0.0002779101,0.0004952755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993504,0.0002453159,0.00006260841,0.00008501314,0.00005054427,0.0002060945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003058668,0.00008583815,0.02424627,0.000008629782,0.000004806015,0.000008938287,0.001193428,1.336081e-7,0.000001315042,0.9708027,0.002155272,0.00146208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002654572,0.00003885029,0.08399222,0.00006539031,0.00000405754,2.981771e-7,0.005808584,3.2089e-7,0.00001506393,0.01115332,0.8985489,0.0001075506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1588284,0.004772253,0.00006943652,0.1255596,0.0006179484,0.0005767157,0.0000218738,0.00006877493,0.709485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885663,0.0002284381,0.0001400596,0.01059718,0.0004096683,0.00001516702,0.000002107912,0.000003790392,0.00003722435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9085266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232701384","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2014.937068","title":"Report of the Commonwealth Working Group of Experts on Cybercrime","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Cybercrime; Political science; Law; Law enforcement; Public administration; The Internet","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02412560156671155,"gpt":0.2560168851966746,"spread":0.231891283629963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001382406,0.0002505789,0.0005501262,0.00006129502,0.0004292669,0.00003196019,0.001516901,0.00008551353,0.00004026478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001202269,0.0001795614,0.0002027796,0.0003054108,0.0002928583,0.00005061785,0.000871816,0.00024509,0.00002171086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005936843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004000814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004407251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008407173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971947,0.0003602199,0.000943086,0.0004308606,0.0006180234,0.0004531052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967452,0.0005480532,0.0005736941,0.001915561,0.0001037667,0.000113692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002713423,0.0002206438,0.003427488,0.00008057622,0.00003187873,0.000006822199,0.0007693704,0.00003473775,0.0001139448,0.957572,0.03056105,0.007154396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006675473,0.0003717497,0.01034904,0.0003982307,0.00001665586,0.00003111601,0.00008242703,0.0001296476,0.003203636,0.002417608,0.9820552,0.0002771741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1122717,0.001094274,0.02040944,0.02951362,0.002773833,0.001444549,0.000007284956,0.0003729188,0.8321124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933509,0.00003757681,0.001838524,0.004156081,0.00009515084,0.00002629882,0.000003603849,0.00001939132,0.0004724488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9551544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7322301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256726705","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2005.9986672","title":"Law reform commission of nova Scotia final report privity of contract (third party rights)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Privity of contract; Law; Commission; Political science; Business; Exclusion clause; Contract management; History; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04649608744291367,"gpt":0.3424570061971877,"spread":0.295960918754274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001659888,0.0001287018,0.0003610664,0.00002271808,0.0005488383,0.00002438196,0.0004337191,0.0001466359,0.0009899896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006612946,0.0001072151,0.0001165988,0.0001559084,0.0007393394,0.0001106088,0.0001123603,0.0002772658,0.00013018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001689996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2132852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1372879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980604,0.0001767647,0.0007374343,0.000238796,0.0004456546,0.0003409239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982261,0.0001855985,0.0005953534,0.0005645102,0.0002092883,0.0002191327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003737297,0.0003460806,0.0009627932,0.00003855589,0.000009566833,0.000004621096,0.0006859698,0.000008437037,0.0001424542,0.9907342,0.00628843,0.0007415856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003495861,0.00004611092,0.002879258,0.0000609883,0.00001459365,0.000005379216,0.00007556425,0.00001568432,0.001984127,0.001646262,0.9928033,0.0001191945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1241657,0.0001530728,0.0001077216,0.03830307,0.0001344819,0.0005933658,0.00004363027,0.00007728003,0.8364217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962315,0.00001767936,0.001532766,0.0006738353,0.0001867526,0.000008725019,0.00001839806,0.000009348237,0.001321025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095019064","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2002.9986631","title":"Improving legislative drafting capacity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Law; Principal (computer security); Political science; Legislative assembly; Public administration; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03878955039522614,"gpt":0.2790808590525016,"spread":0.2402913086572755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006032444,0.00009905933,0.0001402983,0.00002897119,0.000907574,0.0001209795,0.0002245093,0.00008884004,0.003576446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003356933,0.00009830301,0.00005999424,0.0001202284,0.0002482889,0.0001583862,0.00004245233,0.0002522405,0.0007666126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001342922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04871847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008636263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986138,0.0003243425,0.0002190301,0.0001971129,0.0002602863,0.0003854801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992682,0.0002055782,0.0001309992,0.0001705412,0.00008523349,0.0001394735],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001271158,0.0001015759,0.0005754634,0.00003965299,0.00001651519,0.00001635637,0.4231924,0.000005712121,0.0002132271,0.5208194,0.01316414,0.04184281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001539789,0.00003847714,0.0000435938,0.00002825197,0.000005950904,8.595622e-7,0.0009363848,0.0004002916,0.0001345478,0.0001714499,0.9979526,0.0001336398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008659726,0.0004353751,0.0004580241,0.009518951,0.0002766751,0.0002093568,0.000004830213,0.0001628365,0.9802742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899762,0.00002185835,0.001045894,0.003653579,0.0003295144,0.00001432971,0.000002587966,0.00001228712,0.004943694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089150328","doi":"10.1080/03050710902726931","title":"Provincial law reform agencies in Canada: are they really that different from the Scottish Law Commission?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Mandate; Political science; Law reform; Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Public administration; State (computer science); Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04327491989774831,"gpt":0.3108582560417497,"spread":0.2675833361440014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008939195,0.0001782896,0.0002553852,0.0000207176,0.00191995,0.000301198,0.0007255577,0.0001095406,0.0006880363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001836651,0.0001278347,0.00004678071,0.0002007106,0.0002593253,0.0001949485,0.00007050802,0.000769315,0.00003261611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002006272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002515746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975445,0.0006618446,0.0004227334,0.0002614651,0.0006349931,0.0004744654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982195,0.0006328364,0.0003281565,0.0004685519,0.00014151,0.000209389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003284594,0.0001130301,0.003128326,0.000005040738,0.000007357084,0.000007633761,0.008098878,0.000001676701,0.000003327455,0.9166219,0.07118442,0.0007955755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002184378,0.00002322943,0.05301728,0.00007162141,0.000009754601,6.847845e-7,0.01096676,0.000002603886,0.00002058365,0.007022994,0.928482,0.0001640267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0423354,0.0001541004,0.000001724102,0.4441271,0.0005776585,0.0004595479,0.0001061742,0.00005694377,0.5121813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482473,0.00007533473,0.00007693878,0.05032619,0.0003461825,0.00003127317,0.00005731128,0.00001154719,0.0008279509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9095989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016150660","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2012.748258","title":"Private international law and the Internet, 2nd edn","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01425567974650163,"gpt":0.2753441801334555,"spread":0.2610885003869539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008214035,0.00008905546,0.0001319977,0.00001687104,0.0005594366,0.0002804107,0.0003528589,0.0000669427,0.003170727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005228857,0.00006455928,0.00004648403,0.00004867927,0.0009719754,0.00008802264,0.0001519482,0.0001819672,0.0003607686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004769415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000182667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07069427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008850611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988881,0.000235122,0.0002162012,0.0001641267,0.0002585952,0.0002378115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992875,0.0002420449,0.00009995891,0.0001670482,0.00008115557,0.0001222875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002296455,0.0000197284,0.0003362016,0.000003629241,0.00001157133,6.474011e-7,0.003086427,2.63477e-7,0.000002879532,0.9759322,0.0171683,0.003415124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005939683,0.00001889515,0.001063274,0.00001821558,0.000005403198,0.000001592876,0.0003417053,0.00005709681,0.00000977536,0.01076952,0.9870439,0.00007664398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03572308,0.0003048775,0.00007483338,0.1714068,0.0007287717,0.000460576,0.000002123257,0.00008548937,0.7912135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790417,0.0002708945,0.0001364384,0.01290156,0.0004028162,0.00005381021,0.00000426642,0.000009264892,0.007179284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9698756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940882295","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2019.1602066","title":"Two steps forward and ten steps backwards: a retreat from shareholder value primacy, stakeholder theory, creditors and directors duties in the Commonwealth Caribbean","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Insolvency; Creditor; Shareholder; Stakeholder; Corporate law; Stakeholder theory; Law; Business; Accounting; Duty; Shareholder primacy; Companies Act; Corporate governance; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance; Debt","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0300432189276999,"gpt":0.2395178769353064,"spread":0.2094746580076065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001733779,0.000508463,0.0006211132,0.0001387247,0.0008166864,0.0006251753,0.0006945499,0.0001603977,0.0003879287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001976231,0.0003835353,0.00007732175,0.0004556748,0.0007348433,0.0004719139,0.0005514789,0.0005769452,0.00008958828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009042363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006383049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05223951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02298431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970143,0.0002688066,0.0006829544,0.0007462856,0.0005593984,0.0007281907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976995,0.0006886157,0.0005503794,0.0008051544,0.0001840442,0.00007230113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001267873,0.0005826185,0.3325885,0.000824558,0.0001723986,0.0001371721,0.004822106,0.00001361306,0.00003180688,0.3218424,0.3202844,0.01743253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002407973,0.0001202812,0.1876505,0.0004290822,0.0001113951,0.000007820388,0.00240798,0.0002496515,0.00002990713,0.01552717,0.7904084,0.000649944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9396563,0.003422848,0.0000506368,0.0137031,0.001396064,0.001320561,0.0002465561,0.0002110007,0.03999297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850594,0.0001693804,0.0001836813,0.01147702,0.002667916,0.0000733444,0.0001077621,0.00007159766,0.0001898331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4701239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062193801","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2005.9986684","title":"The introduction of the Caribbean court of justice and the likely impact on human rights standards in the Caribbean commonwealth","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science; Human rights; Economic Justice; Caribbean region; Latin Americans","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02048758146967592,"gpt":0.2896857658495351,"spread":0.2691981843798592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003619111,0.0002298141,0.0003526261,0.00006250222,0.001309821,0.0001917605,0.0009928645,0.00007464858,0.00007417579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002581643,0.00009786721,0.0001413307,0.0002233509,0.001396868,0.0001104926,0.0001887952,0.0005163901,0.000008864369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001381273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004588054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01642397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01524475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976786,0.0002907353,0.0006866498,0.0002400287,0.0007620939,0.0003419387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975504,0.0007559833,0.0006521402,0.000710672,0.000311425,0.00001942693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003165974,0.0001279796,0.001069668,0.0001193713,0.0000356964,7.045961e-7,0.0004413693,0.0003815485,0.000005166714,0.8838046,0.1133328,0.0003644962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00175648,0.00008803882,0.02241438,0.00008614241,0.000157009,0.000004910591,0.0006378821,0.000813025,0.00004981827,0.01325039,0.9605827,0.0001592085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4430211,0.001067175,0.00009583851,0.4528064,0.001634867,0.002281625,0.0002044208,0.0000726088,0.09881593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937561,0.00005849759,0.00001527732,0.004066333,0.0019287,0.00002064003,0.00002335722,0.0000192656,0.0001117995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8705543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038699022","doi":"10.1080/03050710903573472","title":"Keeping the statute book up to date: a personal view","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Principal (computer security); State (computer science); Statute of limitations; Computer science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04471371080242119,"gpt":0.3635062729352497,"spread":0.3187925621328285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009021928,0.0001117204,0.0001696624,0.0000205303,0.00171795,0.0001219858,0.0004835767,0.00003988567,0.002978304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001328062,0.00008360439,0.00006541141,0.0001141594,0.0004163731,0.00005768846,0.0001736918,0.0003411515,0.001162071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003977856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001086154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00740141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03163564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986371,0.0002050474,0.0002053901,0.0002082916,0.0003870527,0.0003571079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990336,0.0003832966,0.00007399232,0.0001844275,0.0001664225,0.0001582134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001555226,0.0000157466,0.0001274282,0.000004623024,0.00001367174,0.000001207313,0.01031833,4.455727e-7,0.00002371607,0.7144614,0.273495,0.001522933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001056024,0.0000296511,0.0008328161,0.00002302571,0.000005310327,8.95995e-7,0.001508844,0.000007632741,0.00002633585,0.0005413452,0.99681,0.000108517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05333295,0.001946701,0.0001242759,0.291763,0.002115151,0.0007254386,0.00003110808,0.0001132934,0.6498481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403096,0.0002891684,0.0002110043,0.04318311,0.0006961849,0.00008957423,0.000006354014,0.00001216323,0.01520286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8869767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243102261","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.621655","title":"Canada: constitutional law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03408508762595927,"gpt":0.2849289009522696,"spread":0.2508438133263103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005358274,0.0001005697,0.0001579185,0.000009909933,0.002507285,0.00002511834,0.0001868073,0.00005835059,0.001736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008475449,0.00009760523,0.00003986264,0.00009347023,0.002986639,0.00006342404,0.00006905442,0.0001458275,0.0003351113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003518316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001303775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9736956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985303,0.0001426289,0.0001888911,0.0001194711,0.0004564713,0.0005622032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992283,0.0002053271,0.00006002538,0.0000987479,0.0000979062,0.0003096854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005486696,0.00003567417,0.002252227,0.000002470242,0.00001047239,0.000002550366,0.0001860804,0.000001262033,6.388227e-7,0.9093978,0.0879663,0.0001389724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001125823,0.000005289275,0.001333173,0.00001009764,0.000007754777,0.000002278621,0.0003916605,1.295812e-7,0.000007076474,0.006012295,0.991994,0.0001236465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001086672,0.00158217,0.00005360445,0.0441848,0.001132223,0.0001500072,0.00004193062,0.00006026552,0.9517083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791387,0.00006817083,0.0001103381,0.01924935,0.0009475618,0.00002125506,0.000009022056,0.000003482193,0.0004520821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972015922","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2012.694998","title":"International practice of Public Legal Education: a missing element in the justice system of Bangladesh","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Empowerment; Transformative learning; Relevance (law); Economic Justice; Element (criminal law); Public relations; Subject (documents); Political science; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Sociology; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06442253769063168,"gpt":0.4049741958835994,"spread":0.3405516581929677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005526328,0.00006892579,0.0001173456,0.00009567488,0.0003324015,0.0001200438,0.0004423183,0.00005610789,0.0007047412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002731306,0.00006032852,0.00003231492,0.000504546,0.0001682185,0.0006080847,0.00003457325,0.0002893211,0.00004010567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002184129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00102603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01417973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006111886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974961,0.001166214,0.0005058285,0.00009504944,0.0004939376,0.0002428207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968795,0.001699037,0.0005626753,0.0002269179,0.000543391,0.00008844876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001168686,0.0006536138,0.0008401287,0.00009887745,0.000009959187,1.959455e-7,0.01519694,9.319519e-7,0.000006391983,0.9532322,0.02633823,0.003610819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001171156,0.00001239085,0.0006204228,0.00004871656,0.00003662846,0.000007148423,0.09066141,0.000005051475,0.00001181753,0.00003878762,0.9083897,0.00005081419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002467168,0.0003423982,0.0001167689,0.3368183,0.00135336,0.0002458738,0.00000478532,0.00001199741,0.6586394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99113,0.00004463221,0.002470586,0.005261004,0.0005745942,0.00004585435,0.00001577984,0.000006069443,0.0004515029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246580623","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2005.9986711","title":"British Columbia law institute report on leases of unsubdivided land and the<i>top line</i>case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Line (geometry); Common law; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02343644274972351,"gpt":0.2923396679265732,"spread":0.2689032251768497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001312183,0.00008086775,0.0002269186,0.00001142655,0.0006589022,0.0003181276,0.0002206174,0.0000567709,0.0009312191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000347275,0.00008988453,0.00006672616,0.00006753756,0.001375502,0.00009670837,0.00006068012,0.0001930077,0.00004441676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003619943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005998518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2560228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4936382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985064,0.0003296738,0.0004099985,0.0002112402,0.0003217735,0.0002209439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988514,0.0004042121,0.0002279252,0.0002298648,0.0001481848,0.0001384274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009110634,0.000148834,0.002938693,0.00001858956,0.00002441011,0.000765331,0.0002549135,0.00001693416,9.878223e-7,0.9677067,0.02565266,0.002380874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001134201,0.0000455331,0.001175326,0.00007967475,0.00001438921,0.0001695717,0.00003525176,0.00001084326,0.000006008597,0.0008006004,0.9964289,0.00009967278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5415933,0.0007023127,0.000009503898,0.01860007,0.0002526269,0.0004265684,0.00003152498,0.00007205336,0.4383121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818594,0.0002504842,0.0001150769,0.01075974,0.0003937321,0.000009286075,0.00001321798,0.00001226584,0.006586733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9707763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017292580","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2010.500831","title":"Supreme Court of Canada – structure, status and challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Mandate; Jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Judicial independence; Administrative law; Court of record; Certiorari","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02601968357368546,"gpt":0.262253881313707,"spread":0.2362341977400216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002436174,0.00007552047,0.0001636403,0.00001176098,0.0006728888,0.00001138843,0.0001260646,0.00005686131,0.0003296601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001214438,0.00006948282,0.00001513548,0.00004408051,0.0008142494,0.00001744875,0.00005922758,0.0001611913,0.000002122524],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003728315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006004717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9289426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990667,0.00006482829,0.0001480193,0.0001268768,0.0002892811,0.0003043514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993884,0.0001676881,0.00007096113,0.00009695094,0.0001073285,0.000168673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008740721,0.00001135707,0.003117612,0.00001607133,0.00001233581,0.000001543541,0.0006864592,4.079468e-7,0.00002193346,0.9893453,0.004941796,0.001836458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001140973,0.00001501217,0.01838234,0.000009339844,0.000005924903,5.837569e-7,0.00102124,3.252747e-7,0.00003332283,0.01352123,0.9668187,0.00007781271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.447686,0.01165072,0.000001631523,0.1110767,0.001313617,0.0003150574,0.0001333913,0.00004921139,0.4277737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997017,0.002009535,0.0000959608,0.0006343732,0.0001601907,0.000003417517,0.000002096775,0.000003757314,0.00007369254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5175385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043523640","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2020.1795698","title":"Review of defences to copyright infringement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Copyright infringement; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04831794833297958,"gpt":0.2487987510377498,"spread":0.2004808027047702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003771927,0.0001795454,0.0003838324,0.00004875254,0.0001494017,0.00007519808,0.000514353,0.00003506632,0.02087998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002969282,0.0001345333,0.00009681456,0.000430093,0.00006833078,0.0001371553,0.0003970407,0.0001439524,0.00494964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001817463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001841167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008471379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006798968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998637,0.00002119053,0.0005169925,0.0002855641,0.0002622614,0.0002770009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992011,0.00005219876,0.0001997981,0.0002655787,0.0002258242,0.00005553101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005040626,0.0000389765,0.00008272803,0.005780832,0.00001038754,0.000001840821,0.00005597884,0.000001336724,0.00004182971,0.01435786,0.9768922,0.002685609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001639805,0.00006205108,0.0000428168,0.002042419,0.00002578654,2.334058e-7,0.00002413538,0.0002883536,0.0002003721,0.0002036331,0.996767,0.00017926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001596335,0.01811802,0.0003096311,0.1641517,0.0004435095,0.001124084,0.000004923176,0.0002178624,0.8140339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5726779,0.002169759,0.000407672,0.4235353,0.0008461876,0.00004867099,0.00001984014,0.00003275715,0.0002619471],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.813772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232703879","doi":"10.1080/03050710701594746","title":"Book Reviews","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03146703545260693,"gpt":0.3140369445263443,"spread":0.2825699090737374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00475732,0.0003166342,0.0005569112,0.00009436,0.0003538573,0.00004533109,0.0005726328,0.000138011,0.01072209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001883812,0.0002955331,0.0001672749,0.0002951325,0.0002431372,0.00005755621,0.000171597,0.0004950575,0.1472999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002361185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003540249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004462538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000527135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968915,0.0003291403,0.000941214,0.0004478356,0.0003773159,0.00101297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976825,0.00028225,0.0003614134,0.001086656,0.00008579827,0.0005013422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007522654,0.0001048295,0.0001743315,0.00007352296,0.000006524578,0.00003288241,0.00008350684,6.825342e-7,0.0001943492,0.03358344,0.9622917,0.003379012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005502116,0.00007531005,0.0006434263,0.0001148229,0.00001569096,0.00002823136,0.00001531711,0.000002458971,0.0005682337,0.0001581551,0.9975186,0.0003095148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001120353,0.1757526,0.0006568296,0.01314222,0.0006660179,0.001836348,0.00003603093,0.001005622,0.805784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2003306,0.009750526,0.02121942,0.6572536,0.003363541,0.0004080199,0.0003249439,0.001317609,0.1060317],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6997523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195243318","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2021.1953742","title":"Anatomy of an election – Canada’s Federal General Election of 2019 through the lens of political law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federal election; Law; Politics; Political science; Election law; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02199072710997826,"gpt":0.3104443812873444,"spread":0.2884536541773661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000274909,0.00007849454,0.00023425,0.000009552105,0.0007972561,0.00001071665,0.0001369101,0.00006255679,0.0001409237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006946768,0.00006565542,0.00006112806,0.0001792892,0.0008672831,0.0000478538,0.00004173959,0.0001288751,0.000001506874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001311885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864191,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99852,0.0003395634,0.0003138473,0.0001353315,0.0003942051,0.0002970436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991786,0.000135129,0.0001434922,0.0001265971,0.000357255,0.00005887413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002226045,0.00007348448,0.0004893944,0.00001133249,0.00002335802,0.000001030606,0.0003248405,0.00001006009,0.0001380687,0.9942557,0.004536746,0.0001137185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003297499,0.0001484714,0.009287554,0.00003407199,0.00003479337,0.000005379296,0.002997073,0.000008119118,0.007966733,0.04031726,0.9387209,0.0001498553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3047908,0.001024563,0.00008147667,0.07890421,0.0007099965,0.0003061017,0.00008113146,0.00002940963,0.6140724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975252,0.00008721887,0.0001097363,0.001886762,0.0002099585,0.000004919318,0.00001184156,0.000004289877,0.0001600512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.613193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035219757","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.548139","title":"Residential real estate brokerage services under attack in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Real estate; Commission; Listing (finance); Commonwealth; Competition (biology); Business; Tribunal; Service (business); Estate; Finance; Law; Accounting; Political science; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04519890385538514,"gpt":0.235182911203393,"spread":0.1899840073480079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002507957,0.0001821119,0.0002255299,0.00007801036,0.0001554715,0.0001181226,0.0004842453,0.00005511254,0.00171486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001441621,0.0001845951,0.00004095513,0.0001214919,0.00009465168,0.0002149947,0.0001884391,0.0002019581,0.0003803567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002099102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001343374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985073,0.00002739164,0.0004448035,0.0002893797,0.0003158436,0.0004152886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993343,0.00005777775,0.0002158621,0.0002615212,0.00009692446,0.00003357659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003588703,0.0002901843,0.1463083,0.0009118605,0.00006462215,0.0003953956,0.0004057248,0.0005188811,0.0000136453,0.7329154,0.116512,0.001305134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001023601,0.00001503263,0.218074,0.0001184778,0.00002345076,0.000003493361,0.0006235765,0.001032981,0.00002860704,0.004591633,0.7740417,0.0004234436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3884594,0.00003794672,0.00004141235,0.004352215,0.001104455,0.0002231828,0.0000156133,0.00008265932,0.6056831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987735,0.0001249253,0.0001269631,0.01084402,0.0005626719,0.00001311622,0.00006098834,0.00003093878,0.0005014276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7283238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014237474","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.595151","title":"Custom as a source of law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04170517480488936,"gpt":0.2968302301115839,"spread":0.2551250553066945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007302913,0.0001122875,0.0002179389,0.000003573145,0.0008175312,0.00002320784,0.0004808264,0.0002095797,0.006376755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004843336,0.0001019823,0.0001309355,0.0001221318,0.001146664,0.00004673124,0.00008175327,0.0002403165,0.0006966665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004659277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008321998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06077877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005903507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985598,0.0002766424,0.0002536823,0.0001879117,0.0003406515,0.0003813085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991509,0.00009701084,0.0001553913,0.000281242,0.0001138454,0.0002015696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001908403,0.00009547461,0.000142823,0.00002121759,0.0000103409,0.000002234202,0.04738653,4.126848e-7,0.00001086768,0.9242067,0.02773246,0.0003718036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001977738,0.00005390614,0.00004844017,0.00002499037,0.0000126289,0.000001196889,0.005969266,3.308562e-7,0.0003222628,0.01259876,0.9806485,0.0001219807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01169264,0.0003844499,0.00001627512,0.005089952,0.0002164318,0.0002039951,0.000003403393,0.0001213717,0.9822715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802849,0.0002008297,0.0008459369,0.008027282,0.0001885211,0.00001760584,0.000003229555,0.00001642913,0.01041529],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}