{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":19,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"4e6b8dc88670","filters":{"venue":"Communications in Information Literacy"}},"results":[{"id":"W1532305657","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2011.4.2.92","title":"Why Information Literacy Is Invisible","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Critical literacy; Literacy; Subject (documents); Higher education; Perception; Position (finance); Sociology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Library science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05233205478923168,"gpt":0.339579396082155,"spread":0.2872473412929233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001270449,0.0001972314,0.0001947939,0.001171786,0.0009953071,0.001299405,0.002188258,0.0001636692,0.002095432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004903415,0.0002049846,0.00009946215,0.002223951,0.000400958,0.197228,0.0003888995,0.0003864691,0.002212299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001685117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003157083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001763299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002329647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971626,0.0002633464,0.001431333,0.000113803,0.0005655885,0.0004632748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967281,0.0002128024,0.0005752001,0.001542507,0.0007410327,0.0002003798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002016266,0.0000779119,0.006816987,0.00003091706,0.000007198317,1.564041e-7,0.5919299,0.000005723697,7.09153e-7,0.2616942,0.02961281,0.1098034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003977254,0.00002513222,0.007243567,0.00008020011,0.000003908314,0.000002086095,0.007792203,0.002375045,0.00004061716,0.005637381,0.9761478,0.000254275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01806981,0.0002685928,0.006277096,0.02048232,0.0008319873,0.001311187,0.0001274137,0.0005029689,0.9521286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7899705,0.001897563,0.0586447,0.146566,0.0001221092,0.0003593303,0.00128761,0.00001671665,0.001135439],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583367090","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.1.178","title":"\"Mind-Blowing\": Fostering Self-Regulated Learning in Information Literacy Instruction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Information literacy; Praxis; Conversation; Pedagogy; Psychology; Higher education; Mathematics education; Literacy; Epistemology; Cognition; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07061583107805365,"gpt":0.4110357897957603,"spread":0.3404199587177066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003952744,0.0002332533,0.0002709641,0.001749675,0.0002737126,0.0004217504,0.0007204906,0.0002264567,0.00009135211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001229784,0.0002609422,0.00005535389,0.001871552,0.00007823306,0.009680173,0.0004177248,0.001503032,0.0005907691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004594736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002657806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006997977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961134,0.001604361,0.001499186,0.0001495448,0.0002704778,0.0003629988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971244,0.000387261,0.0006405865,0.00116883,0.0005970359,0.00008190213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008102967,0.00009807872,0.03282133,0.000031201,0.00002141373,6.655806e-7,0.3252967,0.00204076,0.000009963387,0.005969944,0.0001732054,0.6334558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004469024,0.0001412256,0.1793994,0.0003768369,0.00001471983,0.00006975744,0.01154387,0.06551202,0.00002716218,0.00112277,0.736769,0.0005542763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8870562,0.0001888711,0.01712348,0.0008535217,0.001000288,0.0005854612,0.000007651623,0.0004543205,0.09273019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471906,0.00001492329,0.05129737,0.0003301944,0.00004328751,0.0001408121,0.0007765927,0.00001563537,0.0001906102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7365957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594493455","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.31","title":"Changing Our Aim: Infiltrating Faculty with Information Literacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Popularity; Library instruction; Perspective (graphical); Literacy; Mathematics education; Computer science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03261731458380641,"gpt":0.3535823699164558,"spread":0.3209650553326494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001437601,0.0002107007,0.0001979373,0.001203662,0.001227115,0.001443443,0.001474522,0.0001219774,0.0001145167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006709309,0.0001536779,0.00006542962,0.002275764,0.0002141755,0.1799921,0.0002895572,0.0002642856,0.0007201846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002477832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003161184,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001543258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001564299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972426,0.0002326789,0.001193458,0.0001182258,0.0006433834,0.0005696534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969683,0.0002933709,0.0006837561,0.001106673,0.0007717118,0.0001761472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003563209,0.00004968314,0.01245426,0.00003958966,0.00001177963,3.07983e-7,0.3510724,0.00007817082,0.00000684409,0.1486431,0.002752277,0.484856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008475187,0.00003781167,0.004310887,0.0003643226,0.000004153926,0.000005546803,0.02456952,0.002028341,0.00005061931,0.0005542199,0.9669139,0.000313196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2096241,0.0002188772,0.09930575,0.2207342,0.001578294,0.004565643,0.0007066198,0.001937724,0.4613288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730805,0.0001658382,0.01714031,0.007919769,0.00009296818,0.0001932074,0.0006491851,0.000008323829,0.0007499683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9641616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226017320","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.2.166","title":"Pedagogies of Possibility Within the Disciplines: Critical Information Literacy and Literatures in English","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Critical literacy; Sociology; Creativity; Openness to experience; Pedagogy; Literacy; Discipline; Critical thinking; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02207476573091018,"gpt":0.3730299423546859,"spread":0.3509551766237757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00319242,0.0001508515,0.0002132147,0.0005871491,0.0005993104,0.001346121,0.001243537,0.0001226672,0.0000364753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00671403,0.0001174423,0.00005294739,0.001375174,0.000976555,0.0757619,0.0003956246,0.0004282556,0.00002106236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006917273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002076854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003956067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007747951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970573,0.0005966467,0.001548375,0.0001036013,0.0004273306,0.0002667834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958375,0.001855601,0.0004609967,0.001096431,0.0006609476,0.00008853763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001672638,0.00003622043,0.01860566,0.00006532294,0.000001617444,2.100346e-8,0.4835928,0.00006238649,5.1948e-7,0.4687501,0.0001226027,0.02874601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009839041,0.00007600078,0.1840959,0.0005152769,0.000008763317,0.000002753384,0.0657982,0.05489046,0.00002648937,0.04404984,0.6491272,0.0004251924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8302283,0.0009756,0.003058724,0.0391687,0.001312376,0.002045493,0.0001765246,0.000323675,0.1227106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99103,0.0001976031,0.006290334,0.002112123,0.00005396829,0.00007761118,0.0001864164,0.000003234048,0.00004865169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6490046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153453210","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2009.3.1.66","title":"Advancing the Promotion of Information Literacy Through Peer-led Learning","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Session (web analytics); Mentorship; Curriculum; Promotion (chess); Pedagogy; Library instruction; Literacy; Mathematics education; Critical literacy; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; World Wide Web; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02723010664731468,"gpt":0.4319115379034096,"spread":0.404681431256095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003118128,0.0001220863,0.0001501022,0.0003418382,0.001010545,0.0005341877,0.001074892,0.0001020449,0.00006629891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006944408,0.0001112327,0.00006133897,0.001428393,0.0002112717,0.03144839,0.0001176027,0.0005849288,0.00009242358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003874043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002751319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004339831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004696702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972189,0.0008998948,0.0009893316,0.00007762576,0.0005601943,0.0002540338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954729,0.0009192185,0.001044157,0.000923586,0.001598722,0.0000413973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000206512,0.0001286985,0.003501022,0.00002140431,0.00000666065,2.15872e-8,0.4784167,0.0007706467,0.00002314535,0.1231893,0.0003169765,0.3936048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003694528,0.00007346381,0.02398504,0.0001429152,0.00001344842,0.000002404263,0.0204972,0.00634713,0.00008006271,0.02015528,0.9281685,0.000165109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1148653,0.0005244833,0.0460854,0.08966833,0.0009584631,0.002542285,0.00001440993,0.0003215646,0.7450197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96391,0.0007507216,0.03406341,0.0006950201,0.00005563848,0.00009099399,0.0002535047,0.000004007945,0.0001767328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9278515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505647283","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.1.18","title":"Empowering Students to Make Sense of an Information Saturated World: The Evolution of Information Searching and Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Psychology; Public relations; Higher education; Trustworthiness; Sociology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01562761309434638,"gpt":0.3959224055773447,"spread":0.3802947924829984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001974329,0.00007430793,0.0001403122,0.001401481,0.0003367456,0.0002132335,0.0005442636,0.00004762364,0.00001564604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007899898,0.00005435748,0.00003948266,0.002462418,0.000144063,0.01046014,0.0002473041,0.0001459083,0.00001466355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001829052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001536805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009721409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001031256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982197,0.0003704701,0.0008078032,0.00004190569,0.0004154018,0.0001447213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979275,0.000371433,0.0004822618,0.0006023776,0.0005590015,0.00005736931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005825812,0.00004743843,0.05805475,0.00003885323,0.00006233892,2.738433e-8,0.1780516,0.001309305,0.00005221232,0.03477812,0.00002358367,0.7275235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001244424,0.00009283666,0.5912679,0.0004053716,0.0001087513,0.000001530967,0.0740765,0.02131054,0.0001097869,0.00108069,0.309976,0.0003255747],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755407,0.00003651012,0.01628632,0.002124224,0.00005256302,0.0004810716,0.00005316596,0.00004162021,0.005383816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908485,0.00009792648,0.008756867,0.0001004124,0.000008394381,0.00002074282,0.0001366869,0.000001733636,0.00002870624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7271979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7583346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506621672","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2007.1.1.3","title":"Information Literacy at Augustana: A Programmatic Approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Historical and Architectural Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Institution; Literacy; Critical literacy; Medical education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02995745623175952,"gpt":0.2788121173324437,"spread":0.2488546611006842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005149983,0.000175507,0.0001905676,0.0004773149,0.0009278543,0.0005021071,0.0006254283,0.00004846989,0.0002028551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001672614,0.0001473776,0.00008024505,0.0002986263,0.000274236,0.006589504,0.0003899687,0.0002904421,0.0005616023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003350862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000218099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001712012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001332021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982745,0.0000590935,0.001038263,0.00006633297,0.000252676,0.0003091293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982536,0.0002472659,0.0003161425,0.0007535557,0.0003527594,0.0000766876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003755048,0.0001069329,0.0004733961,0.0001455551,0.00001661615,1.826163e-7,0.4496885,0.00002309866,7.618974e-7,0.1822063,0.002460926,0.3648402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003705141,0.00002846989,0.001215369,0.00005171519,0.000007637315,0.000004962186,0.004443165,0.002402602,0.000002829907,0.001148272,0.9901288,0.0001957265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05527958,0.001230249,0.008865993,0.002396811,0.000559854,0.001507305,0.00009409626,0.0004998408,0.9295663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844648,0.0001029481,0.01124667,0.0009229826,0.00009740111,0.0002033289,0.001053306,0.000008415621,0.001900095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7218449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782768125","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.2.8","title":"SoTL in the LIS Classroom: Helping Future Academic Librarians Become More Engaged Teachers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship of Teaching and Learning; Library instruction; Curriculum; Sociology; Scholarship; Pedagogy; Higher education; Information literacy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Library science; Computer science; Teaching method; Political science; Teaching and learning center","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03660421365792755,"gpt":0.3184851412067212,"spread":0.2818809275487937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00148637,0.0001422511,0.0001414555,0.0003378266,0.001354296,0.00185895,0.01009902,0.000144044,0.00001199183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002325028,0.0001165911,0.00005197868,0.0004808052,0.00009889372,0.03088851,0.001328853,0.001870213,0.00007336558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004384361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009631924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009301115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003357266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981998,0.0006145706,0.0006062278,0.0001293511,0.0002135329,0.0002365577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948282,0.0005562009,0.0004052028,0.004115348,0.00004912606,0.00004596737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006613549,0.00008176379,0.04681444,0.00004999077,0.00001106565,0.000001620071,0.5822332,0.0001475917,0.00001158365,0.1928051,0.002372018,0.175465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006285074,0.00001460743,0.3778297,0.000163621,0.000003175792,0.00001026372,0.01095727,0.07338641,0.00001791639,0.003758306,0.5329781,0.0002520839],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3766311,0.003543158,0.01597359,0.5071772,0.001490415,0.001967167,0.0000517575,0.0006941188,0.09247145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737383,0.0005373876,0.01993076,0.005405043,0.00009161863,0.0001033333,0.000110757,0.000006107759,0.0000766884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5971072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117683421","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.2.2","title":"Teaching and User Satisfaction in an Academic Chat Reference Consortium","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; Ontario Council of University Libraries; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Library instruction; Information literacy; Psychology; Academic library; Higher education; Academic advising; User satisfaction; World Wide Web; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Medicine; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04521409590193554,"gpt":0.3206750159784906,"spread":0.275460920076555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003049952,0.00008024309,0.00009291793,0.0002008505,0.000139211,0.0003163377,0.001089153,0.0000665082,0.000007032344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006339556,0.00008389642,0.000008796277,0.0003620981,0.0000314172,0.02220215,0.0005124258,0.0006513286,0.00002880723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002253766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003462279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001902218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000478231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990013,0.0002356108,0.0004439562,0.0001097194,0.00009675076,0.0001126616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988645,0.000159635,0.0001390441,0.0007297608,0.00003774198,0.0000693757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001297952,0.00002847904,0.1798772,0.00007122087,0.000002889594,4.806498e-7,0.1079403,0.0001816821,0.0001188068,0.3344863,0.0001105038,0.3771692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000497803,0.00004303207,0.4557246,0.00009339023,0.000001481,0.000006005308,0.001205892,0.4075041,0.00003114593,0.001988642,0.1326914,0.0002124572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.948217,0.0004840879,0.01678622,0.02583843,0.00008049879,0.0003817745,0.00001000583,0.0002498614,0.007952073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611,0.0001972469,0.0344011,0.004181599,0.00001055673,0.00002592124,0.00007316186,0.000002502057,0.000007890792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4073225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497429993","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.1.15","title":"Reporting or Reconstructing? The Zine as a Medium for Reflecting on Research Experiences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Scale (ratio); Psychology; Critical reflection; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3903557567890661,"gpt":0.6226552990640538,"spread":0.2322995422749877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01399875,0.00008504058,0.0001179664,0.000388151,0.002567504,0.0004534015,0.001262912,0.00008236801,0.0001518835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1069399,0.00005076866,0.00004116624,0.001109167,0.0006892477,0.004560466,0.0001890117,0.0003699405,0.00008743738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005263758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007917308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004746332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003813639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996702,0.001098259,0.001247504,0.0001438315,0.0004733164,0.0003351276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830211,0.01312683,0.001492474,0.001197181,0.001105906,0.00005644782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009033698,0.00005222253,0.003247237,0.0000103171,0.000007104897,1.070827e-7,0.5176731,0.000002104814,0.00004043915,0.07071804,0.001032175,0.4071268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002484298,0.00007168594,0.0006975181,0.0002227178,0.000002872519,0.000007817493,0.2197104,0.0001429251,0.0002727686,0.01534752,0.7631709,0.0001045188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3612932,0.0001326736,0.001615744,0.09734445,0.001949999,0.002244625,0.000004547159,0.000160505,0.5352542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774447,0.0003368169,0.01874105,0.0004900739,0.0001965861,0.001639869,0.000008943057,0.000007380013,0.001134595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7621387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215546696","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2012.5.2.104","title":"Re-conceptualizing Access: The New Role of Information Literacy in Post-Secondary Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Access to information; Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Information access; Literacy; Simple (philosophy); Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02537196822212765,"gpt":0.3656003872914645,"spread":0.3402284190693369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001916147,0.0001562866,0.0001847403,0.0009934445,0.0005049399,0.001012049,0.002289118,0.0001256921,0.0005740402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001077868,0.0001382769,0.00007476756,0.00219218,0.0003034999,0.1978438,0.0004293966,0.000431949,0.0002355027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001992353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00160147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003100426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001135069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970922,0.0004024885,0.001554555,0.000072902,0.0004675489,0.0004102898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967762,0.0005833071,0.0008249585,0.001128887,0.0005305028,0.0001561221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001239353,0.00006840062,0.01574337,0.00002263874,0.000003257878,5.473731e-9,0.4622163,0.00003205961,0.000002868148,0.1571038,0.002038086,0.3627569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003030722,0.00001227995,0.0592338,0.0001201336,0.000003674663,9.203408e-7,0.06993866,0.0008636381,0.00004182702,0.003150476,0.8661701,0.0001613861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1832493,0.007251053,0.001271807,0.03735865,0.00186677,0.003234745,0.0001224344,0.000253054,0.7653922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837393,0.0007824246,0.004949477,0.009357608,0.0001208597,0.0001250593,0.0007166737,0.000005506129,0.0002030644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.864132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9759209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389729010","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2023.17.2.1","title":"Exploring the Role of Information Literacy Instruction in Student Co-Creation of Community-Based Research Products","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University; Community Based Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Community engagement; Experiential learning; Literacy; Sociology; Equity (law); Pedagogy; Higher education; Public relations; Psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2283215220232699,"gpt":0.4643339364831112,"spread":0.2360124144598413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01078715,0.00009330681,0.0001566925,0.001637293,0.001309065,0.0002286419,0.001696693,0.00005906171,0.0000126577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001316078,0.0000915741,0.0000368313,0.004392122,0.0003618512,0.006501714,0.0004219527,0.001099843,0.00004905421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002863488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000228554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007731233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004800888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939536,0.004046437,0.0009998361,0.00004805721,0.0007081499,0.0002439124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948826,0.001904772,0.0004130795,0.001564517,0.001203033,0.00003194089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003152033,0.0001526574,0.01453016,0.0001116916,0.00000712288,1.946616e-8,0.6937724,0.002676456,0.00002824199,0.02502007,0.00005271569,0.263617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007835609,0.00006438748,0.1845755,0.0004195868,0.000005722894,2.558839e-7,0.3979857,0.005234295,0.0005769514,0.001702582,0.4085196,0.0001319229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9629701,0.00005539365,0.00005175015,0.002471003,0.0001012503,0.00076369,0.00001365512,0.0000809627,0.03349224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972938,0.0006336678,0.0008341174,0.00009613505,0.00001448109,0.000364628,0.0007397749,0.000005051873,0.00001836579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4084668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128091093","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2013.7.2.143","title":"Minding the Gaps: Exploring the Space Between Vision and Assessment in Information Literacy Work","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Set (abstract data type); Space (punctuation); Work (physics); Task (project management); Process (computing); Literacy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05180351715787408,"gpt":0.3695345391201766,"spread":0.3177310219623025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002497718,0.0001641816,0.0001637945,0.0005868602,0.001465539,0.003421156,0.001560823,0.00007635541,0.0001179454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004288975,0.0001104907,0.0000489152,0.002169674,0.000400164,0.1326454,0.0004183056,0.0006591752,0.00028864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001829315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001701232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008698216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001993537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973715,0.0004995186,0.001152419,0.00009392324,0.0005117864,0.0003708457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966587,0.001449239,0.0004580306,0.00104858,0.000289261,0.00009616398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000413219,0.00002238506,0.07540628,0.00002291115,0.000005079036,4.264375e-8,0.3856809,0.00009389552,5.048665e-7,0.0920812,0.001732705,0.44495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002467475,0.00001236218,0.3267557,0.0001812067,0.000002870943,6.4312e-7,0.02027203,0.003807766,0.00000262555,0.002226467,0.6463516,0.0001399438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8048086,0.0004257283,0.001509272,0.1077511,0.0006528679,0.00269596,0.00002204766,0.0001544053,0.0819801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989527,0.001280884,0.00537454,0.002896254,0.00006947793,0.0005248198,0.0001899944,0.000004740702,0.0001323195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6446189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389726504","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2023.17.2.8","title":"Impact of Library Instruction Tutorial Format on Student Preference and Performance in First-Year Chemistry","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Task (project management); Library instruction; Mathematics education; Computer-Assisted Instruction; Computer science; Multimedia; Chemistry; Psychology; Information literacy; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03152456967531245,"gpt":0.3364316827083692,"spread":0.3049071130330567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005245206,0.00009904995,0.0001310972,0.0005056591,0.0002922117,0.0002819415,0.0007521173,0.00008537847,0.000116349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001598063,0.00009402545,0.00003951778,0.001659625,0.0002009876,0.03616186,0.0002671133,0.0002216958,0.00007446677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001069336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002016502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009358673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005050894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986448,0.00007833677,0.0006862549,0.00007769115,0.0003022317,0.00021074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988521,0.0002113144,0.0002546083,0.0005361447,0.00007954953,0.00006627158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000848706,0.00009444495,0.7810731,0.00009339959,0.00000641732,1.099309e-7,0.1522712,0.001016728,0.000002588008,0.02907649,0.0006816911,0.03559899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008449354,0.00007141351,0.912114,0.0002036715,0.000001321382,7.639558e-7,0.004382716,0.008625285,0.00002573476,0.0005570703,0.07302884,0.0001442484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570097,0.00001888802,0.000004262086,0.0006070798,0.0001382477,0.0002945277,0.00002733029,0.00008340652,0.04181658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970808,0.001906707,0.0004686093,0.00009200379,0.00003723578,0.00005524641,0.0002354129,0.000003615043,0.0001203948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1478885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9773188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281766867","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2022.16.1.3","title":"Flexibility Is Key: Co-creating a Rubric for Programmatic Instructional Assessment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Flexibility (engineering); Key (lock); Process (computing); Engineering management; Computer science; Instructional design; Process management; Library instruction; Creativity; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Information literacy; Engineering; Sociology; Psychology; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06994744401423979,"gpt":0.4988872160320599,"spread":0.4289397720178201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003204562,0.00009458003,0.0001235416,0.00035358,0.002772236,0.0003927244,0.0009346491,0.00004369865,0.0004105513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001286775,0.0001159875,0.00006523763,0.001009994,0.0002148853,0.004589114,0.000253768,0.0004220924,0.00002017894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001565789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007952919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005373886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005379588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976585,0.0008225979,0.0006908276,0.0001293483,0.0004712132,0.0002275124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996841,0.001236035,0.0005541046,0.000871843,0.0004433988,0.00005364998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003227435,0.0004283507,0.02936903,0.00006126428,0.00002379546,3.105577e-8,0.2430187,0.0003740626,0.000005403349,0.3614639,0.000991516,0.3642316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003968627,0.00004058872,0.01074705,0.00001595331,0.000009939888,0.000002474125,0.02332432,0.0134673,0.000005238308,0.02512807,0.926721,0.0001411626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2364777,0.0002904906,0.02256738,0.0292768,0.001380228,0.006335557,0.0002617626,0.0003780354,0.7030321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7950154,0.00006065809,0.2003454,0.0006120939,0.00005039474,0.003172678,0.0005329608,0.000006655582,0.0002037928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9257295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884589685","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2018.12.1.3","title":"SAILS, Take 2: An Exploration of the “Build Your Own Test” Standardized IL Testing Option for Canadian Institutions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Standardized test; Psychology; Mathematics education; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1494307377113385,"gpt":0.3521045573604027,"spread":0.2026738196490643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009913695,0.0001117048,0.0001283477,0.000514583,0.001009436,0.0007098996,0.002611373,0.000069826,0.000006232111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001053295,0.00009178771,0.00004911549,0.001889032,0.0002148655,0.05710083,0.000274159,0.0001343855,0.00003771867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001758838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001047278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001703035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001559495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983706,0.0001061624,0.000921656,0.0001098244,0.0002701647,0.0002215622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961028,0.0002380292,0.0004933619,0.001955628,0.001107596,0.0001025652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001207579,0.0001223445,0.01062235,0.00007122137,0.00001110222,5.755111e-8,0.1224449,0.002470887,0.0002655097,0.6472666,0.001897171,0.2148158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006876633,0.0001397473,0.0125147,0.0001778849,0.00000294487,0.000007449899,0.00223099,0.478566,0.0005901182,0.00566214,0.4991947,0.0002256988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0340259,0.00005334335,0.9234707,0.006974721,0.001018763,0.002143396,0.0003981484,0.0002182498,0.03169678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9046203,0.00001277677,0.09409395,0.0008720487,0.00004249016,0.0001589793,0.0001578924,0.000003344004,0.0000382096],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8705944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.956087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411366062","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2025.19.1.4","title":"What Language Are We Speaking?: Marketing Information Literacy on University Library Websites","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Literacy; Academic library; Higher education; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009151639524250672,"gpt":0.256595792150882,"spread":0.2474441526266313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003600398,0.0001647429,0.0001553373,0.001142722,0.0003428764,0.00286587,0.00287526,0.00008769702,0.00006892632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009519634,0.0001745374,0.00006352201,0.001815048,0.00004543688,0.1036789,0.00140258,0.0003479577,0.0003038973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007313272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001042623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002358615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985982,0.0003177499,0.0005714794,0.0001269971,0.0001803414,0.0002052834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968002,0.0007387023,0.0003782093,0.001906451,0.0001230326,0.00005340221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009778313,0.0001566334,0.01157407,0.0004186154,0.00002951525,0.000003199144,0.08489856,0.0004970975,0.000004903883,0.1645763,0.008774337,0.728969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004785064,0.000013004,0.02685062,0.001267827,0.000003691809,0.000002056998,0.006003164,0.07893659,0.00007022739,0.0008106464,0.8853624,0.000201278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.176953,0.00634002,0.04966987,0.1652065,0.002775227,0.002228049,0.0001790277,0.002848291,0.5938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9213448,0.004283627,0.05944775,0.01193628,0.00003827877,0.00002456562,0.0009315393,0.000009226308,0.001983996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.876588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2429218545","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.2.194","title":"Book Review: Not Just Where to Click: Teaching Students How to Think About Information","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Mathematics education; Library instruction; Higher education; Computer science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04437858349306887,"gpt":0.4231835259844917,"spread":0.3788049424914228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003225398,0.0001321765,0.0001928189,0.0004348636,0.0006699198,0.0009281029,0.001735321,0.00008754674,0.00007590917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003395406,0.0001371346,0.00004914758,0.000736017,0.00004994243,0.01360487,0.0005792143,0.0005257194,0.001238466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002935122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003476785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003061227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001971588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976825,0.0005141977,0.0007349301,0.00008505022,0.0007005241,0.0002828726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975213,0.0001960542,0.0003101507,0.001070217,0.0006457437,0.0002565436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001283576,0.00005601899,0.001555116,0.0001046075,0.000007299987,1.06133e-7,0.2187727,0.0001604501,4.902166e-7,0.006896855,0.540242,0.2321916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002611273,0.00002804878,0.001260305,0.0008211141,0.000007901697,6.880522e-7,0.01316245,0.0003010615,0.000001246637,0.00002599532,0.9839652,0.0001648631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01464781,0.03528707,0.01131181,0.6872988,0.001273654,0.006491574,0.0001150573,0.0008765144,0.2426977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2023,0.06198043,0.2233595,0.4898424,0.0007621662,0.001299634,0.002398737,0.00005897741,0.01799814],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4437233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216340390","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.1.181","title":"Book Review: The Embedded Librarian's Cookbook","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05492835904020717,"gpt":0.3724330036032845,"spread":0.3175046445630774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001285374,0.00006394168,0.00008145873,0.00009202061,0.0005002241,0.0004321259,0.001384537,0.00004277987,0.0002978906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006903593,0.00004982263,0.00003199832,0.0006850565,0.0003246684,0.01599762,0.0001569285,0.0001733087,0.0004440819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006067899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005430633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009005287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002409751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986913,0.0003674464,0.0004310556,0.00005717335,0.0002996751,0.0001532998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983761,0.0002297722,0.0001798696,0.0009434634,0.0001767397,0.0000941006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000269165,0.0000203129,0.0002051359,0.00001256091,0.000001398471,9.585567e-8,0.04353681,0.000006914601,1.571833e-7,0.07129198,0.8761073,0.008814607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001182592,0.000008949803,0.0002449005,0.00012962,0.000002503593,8.790673e-7,0.002706398,0.0005924574,0.000002374215,0.001464302,0.9946621,0.00006725638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001465099,0.07917301,0.0004026054,0.2628127,0.000302277,0.001087387,0.00001196412,0.0001576653,0.6559059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1033984,0.1540928,0.008658631,0.6925328,0.0003692542,0.0007198772,0.001230695,0.00001917234,0.03897832],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6169276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}