{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":25,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"ab90b920e540","filters":{"venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa"}},"results":[{"id":"W317289987","doi":"","title":"The cartoon controversy : a note on freedom of expression, hate speech and blasphemy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blasphemy; Dignity; Freedom of religion; Freedom of expression; Islam; Expression (computer science); Law; Denial; Human rights; Political science; Multiculturalism; Freedom of the press; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Theology; Psychoanalysis","authors":[{"name":"Nazeem Goolam","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01724577025161134,"gpt":0.2480359473883886,"spread":0.2307901771367773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003928012,0.0003700268,0.0003299919,0.001266297,0.006458198,0.0108907,0.0006796162,0.004515846,0.003211899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0138079,0.000250563,0.000248482,0.001356661,0.02024422,0.005790765,0.002814206,0.004275352,0.000325672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002221319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001964946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00907863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01319803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995414,0.002502629,0.0001037335,0.0003574699,0.001186276,0.0004358695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862031,0.01155645,0.0009355673,0.0004300616,0.0006208274,0.0002539826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005868938,0.00002352381,0.001732695,0.0001355512,0.0000079916,0.0007757723,0.09646309,0.0001389099,0.000541032,0.8344262,0.02061165,0.04508501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002486207,0.00009218951,0.009399686,0.0009319837,0.00003352926,0.001762459,0.09699054,0.001620028,0.002351334,0.1668666,0.7198328,0.00009400034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.2749856,0.04413407,0.02216618,0.1649678,0.00731408,0.00008344135,0.00007848119,0.0001308909,0.4861395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662308,0.004005066,0.001390737,0.008987233,0.001576922,0.00003060628,0.00001475737,0.00003031662,0.01773368],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02077353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195398862","doi":"","title":"HIV / AIDS and equal opportunities in the workplace : the implications of the Employment Equity Act","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Statutory law; Legislation; Equity (law); Affirmative action; Political science; Employment discrimination; Equal employment opportunity; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Charles Ngwena","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1645664492356941,"gpt":0.3841107808934568,"spread":0.2195443316577627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00694037,0.0003868802,0.0004071153,0.0008636852,0.01515321,0.01540697,0.001490396,0.01562009,0.00494715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009693277,0.0003315045,0.0005724868,0.001288485,0.03834914,0.008046616,0.009392085,0.01206656,0.000466123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007949952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01716905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01937968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02505415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884413,0.00597026,0.0003507658,0.0004796079,0.001775132,0.002982855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928433,0.00540298,0.000531056,0.0002035319,0.0002976682,0.0007213907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009130269,0.00003013025,0.0003693112,0.00005548035,0.000001808692,0.0002909248,0.007772195,0.00009933159,0.00006193698,0.9808227,0.00416683,0.006320184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003606086,0.0001332837,0.005780444,0.002658269,0.00002149234,0.0007154856,0.05309632,0.0005404821,0.0004120285,0.5904129,0.3461067,0.00008666653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04551544,0.04403462,0.001957457,0.5485229,0.002677244,0.00007232143,0.00003542934,0.00001130558,0.3571733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8162557,0.0302449,0.001740781,0.1086231,0.002715846,0.0001964642,0.00001766678,0.00002109334,0.04018443],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01937968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0576812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296719230","doi":"10.25159/2522-3062/9428","title":"Considering Mental Health Courts for South Africa: Lessons from Canada and the United States of America","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Criminal justice; Legislature; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Mental illness; Law; Political science; Mental health law; Health care; Criminology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Letitia Pienaar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07616041130119866,"gpt":0.3342949621756237,"spread":0.2581345508744251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006943246,0.00052716,0.0006000343,0.002749643,0.0410532,0.01492823,0.002819745,0.009774784,0.00759806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02004862,0.0004953934,0.0008870922,0.003250142,0.01160052,0.006249225,0.007260989,0.01465363,0.0003486254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1094164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2876379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9687649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992953,0.001353376,0.0001968664,0.0003032764,0.001204082,0.003989422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786041,0.006071395,0.0006654357,0.0002465528,0.005591589,0.008820923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001868854,0.0003979011,0.0324613,0.0008429451,0.0001230884,0.01477582,0.1650764,0.001106513,0.0008566427,0.4926772,0.1525691,0.1389261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001212368,0.0001044604,0.04204711,0.005047391,0.0001606678,0.001951984,0.3940466,0.0007460535,0.0004679355,0.04427551,0.5107208,0.0003103877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.129548,0.03021673,0.0006462649,0.6970317,0.002142849,0.0001932752,0.000177301,0.00002567852,0.1400182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8063272,0.0353336,0.002375088,0.1310483,0.0005401019,0.0001271848,0.0001284983,0.00006178604,0.0240582],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1094164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.793875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285295340","doi":"","title":"The rights of child witnesses versus the accused's right to confrontation : a comparative perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Balance (ability); Human rights; Absolute (philosophy); Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Fawzia Cassim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08490094580724163,"gpt":0.3681039643595466,"spread":0.283203018552305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00555385,0.0003563618,0.0004984014,0.00234827,0.004689902,0.007058867,0.0009534886,0.006316809,0.008532971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01101977,0.000256859,0.0003459103,0.001235397,0.0222699,0.007929992,0.003634251,0.004203483,0.0004845811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002921357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00177304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004213129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004696956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952291,0.003276186,0.00009256722,0.0001604065,0.0004927348,0.0007490323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925705,0.006037316,0.0004161924,0.0002385543,0.0004589242,0.0002785594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001704262,0.00001458136,0.0002897449,0.00008077548,0.000005304343,0.0004643348,0.0175759,0.00007997737,0.0001831374,0.9751844,0.001115566,0.004989397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000364154,0.0001906485,0.005732656,0.002718356,0.00005157722,0.002722194,0.1049871,0.0004097833,0.0008691421,0.6284031,0.2538319,0.00004724346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1008874,0.02964114,0.003972051,0.04831431,0.0005683919,0.00003933604,0.00006276464,0.0000103679,0.8165042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610595,0.01639019,0.0008966584,0.003719776,0.0005816805,0.00006651416,0.00003071285,0.00001447972,0.01724043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008532971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02937198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71173951","doi":"","title":"Parole boards in South Africa: on the road to extinction? A comparative perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Privilege (computing); Prison; Perspective (graphical); Law; Criminology; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"G.J. Lidovho","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08221764025382884,"gpt":0.3528631016499546,"spread":0.2706454613961258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002751755,0.0002854267,0.0003657652,0.004133246,0.01210731,0.005838477,0.0008937496,0.001715923,0.01133154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009422006,0.0002871792,0.0001955624,0.004716706,0.01084263,0.005575879,0.005599014,0.002406659,0.0003381965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01165086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01188851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1183682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1691975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967212,0.001403362,0.00007557775,0.0001210688,0.0003428865,0.001335879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996557,0.001582939,0.0006180028,0.0001606171,0.0005906237,0.0004907793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009538417,0.00004253068,0.005800754,0.0006499021,0.00001365228,0.002626621,0.2455871,0.0001899533,0.000731983,0.6660643,0.00566509,0.07253274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002704173,0.00009209866,0.0355197,0.002540593,0.00002817696,0.001802404,0.433625,0.0001396896,0.0005530486,0.02680854,0.4988282,0.00003537926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4470402,0.05097636,0.00155987,0.05538281,0.0005583047,0.0001113809,0.0001059022,0.00001597565,0.4442492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667977,0.01828989,0.0003642637,0.002605989,0.00008169523,0.00004990991,0.00002998343,0.00001613045,0.01176443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1183682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2353585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261008081","doi":"","title":"The need for clarity on whether 'suspects' may rely on section 35 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 : a comparative law analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; CLARITY; Law; Adversarial system; Duty; Political science; Section (typography); Interpretation (philosophy); The Republic; Constitutional law; Sociology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Dane Ally","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09916064664287683,"gpt":0.3490144440462874,"spread":0.2498537974034106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0246556,0.0004136441,0.000694154,0.005904886,0.01158214,0.01446384,0.002285483,0.00999811,0.006320812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05050731,0.0006123272,0.0006656716,0.004733333,0.04721799,0.01855958,0.005090928,0.009598562,0.0004671267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01767427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01802769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0673254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06941856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9835624,0.01014806,0.0006739676,0.001033224,0.002769477,0.00181296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.949374,0.04507013,0.001606744,0.001077783,0.002492762,0.0003785993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007028551,0.000004417718,0.0002979237,0.00006007526,0.000003406885,0.0001383467,0.01542338,0.00005431531,0.00008162019,0.9791949,0.001049557,0.003684979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003378248,0.00008793526,0.006189697,0.003059397,0.00008161664,0.000735165,0.08894624,0.0005169272,0.001303721,0.6188082,0.2801183,0.0001190897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1317294,0.04426281,0.01753386,0.2530218,0.00103475,0.0001289409,0.0002123762,0.00003480834,0.5520414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661288,0.008255209,0.003663002,0.01470475,0.0003172001,0.00009742912,0.00006292068,0.00002545073,0.006745388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0673254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1338671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1142058392","doi":"","title":"Certification : the procedure, its role in class action proceedings in Ontario and the proposed South African certification procedure","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Certification; Class action; Class (philosophy); Commission; Political science; Action (physics); Law; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Public administration; Business; Computer science; Sociology; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Estelle Hurter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05664111418784133,"gpt":0.2577674164474325,"spread":0.2011263022595911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007025943,0.0002740355,0.0002260144,0.001472457,0.01557554,0.00769391,0.001856712,0.006684186,0.005027519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01502148,0.000600139,0.0004862983,0.001472117,0.01431704,0.00288299,0.003142737,0.003447822,0.0006520185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04767355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1222826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8272104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9142614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921514,0.00104231,0.0004879484,0.0007316104,0.003319518,0.002267271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933428,0.002336378,0.0006170316,0.0005551106,0.002199163,0.0009493917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005077754,0.00006119809,0.006944188,0.0001348336,0.000007305633,0.00112516,0.01528483,0.0007584293,0.002035939,0.9348689,0.01127544,0.02745303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001387047,0.0002985506,0.06169723,0.0008062812,0.00008815508,0.001210227,0.01650355,0.005292514,0.005504331,0.08214039,0.8259171,0.0004029686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2263716,0.00318682,0.01510147,0.05610598,0.0005732352,0.002114183,0.0002273558,0.0001543285,0.6961651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7305962,0.00164831,0.01326747,0.004584906,0.0001392884,0.0006056729,0.00007325412,0.00003938922,0.2490457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1727896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3476144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567059005","doi":"","title":"The accused's right to be present: a key to meaningful participation in the criminal process","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Human rights; Fair trial; Right to a fair trial; Criminal court; Criminal trial; Criminal procedure; Key (lock); Process (computing); International law; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Fawzia Cassim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1366579796420962,"gpt":0.4158274777342433,"spread":0.2791694980921472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01925636,0.0003984867,0.00104092,0.00116061,0.01141758,0.01386096,0.001810614,0.01571927,0.006494673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03852164,0.0007028506,0.000638001,0.0005802717,0.05889783,0.01539795,0.01488879,0.0151356,0.001389402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001825978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007744847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001583484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002079066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.978459,0.01279745,0.00103672,0.001895789,0.003592114,0.002218919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715507,0.015962,0.003211409,0.002604855,0.002825672,0.003845257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000368219,0.0000641785,0.0009216588,0.00009448646,0.00001395907,0.0007627038,0.0265782,0.00008608113,0.0008306578,0.9532441,0.003057536,0.01430953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000828772,0.0002862293,0.003821881,0.001587124,0.00009287924,0.005969173,0.03222769,0.0003390963,0.002219151,0.7263078,0.2269178,0.0001483776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09892034,0.01147897,0.02949701,0.2404662,0.001768942,0.0001931386,0.00006658518,0.00008980573,0.6175191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676129,0.002085994,0.003877029,0.008599714,0.0006872853,0.0001680224,0.00001857956,0.00003167207,0.01691875],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01925636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1018385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596394876","doi":"","title":"Justiciability and standing to challenge legislation in the Commonwealth: a tale of the traditionalist and judicial activist approaches","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Adjudication; Constitutionality; Judicial review; Political science; Legislation; Constitution; Complaint; Judicial discretion; Common law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Chuks Okpaluba","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2168246257946995,"gpt":0.3520220948740729,"spread":0.1351974690793734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008605726,0.0003901919,0.0005427069,0.002273934,0.007902386,0.01007829,0.001746178,0.006010944,0.001985044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01201085,0.000300815,0.0006579326,0.001282486,0.1201846,0.01019212,0.008981299,0.01105209,0.000194927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008576139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01207203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01188787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0179521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911327,0.003945206,0.0003165532,0.0008081429,0.002497594,0.001299782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936878,0.003793341,0.0005149447,0.0007500182,0.0008610264,0.0003928125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001003804,0.000002990659,0.0000477172,0.000004622381,7.868939e-7,0.00001755271,0.002191395,0.00004017333,0.00002807248,0.9963766,0.0002924921,0.0009966402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009894979,0.00002141516,0.00057864,0.000136388,0.000004203068,0.0000816441,0.004408714,0.0002462463,0.000197179,0.93041,0.06388979,0.00001591446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1241414,0.01368471,0.0533588,0.1820699,0.001423121,0.0001819031,0.00003684364,0.00004659717,0.6250567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631593,0.002209072,0.004475259,0.007882265,0.0008060592,0.0001077217,0.00001181554,0.00003484335,0.02131364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01188787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06222457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803031062","doi":"","title":"The limits of police deception in obtaining a confession from a suspect who is neither arrested nor detained : the Canadian Supreme Court leads the way","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Confession (law); Deception; Law; Supreme court; Interrogation; Power (physics); Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Criminology; Self-incrimination; Criminal procedure; Political science; Sociology; Privilege (computing)","authors":[{"name":"Bobby Naudé","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.130407755230572,"gpt":0.3758176626911119,"spread":0.24540990746054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02543092,0.0005266131,0.0009074822,0.002635612,0.02612451,0.02101365,0.003646541,0.01036144,0.002398866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06582975,0.0007615257,0.0005913777,0.002026822,0.05418973,0.009191097,0.005469602,0.01462602,0.0003643036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05803546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1015844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9372079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9575199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9770308,0.00653982,0.0008014389,0.001660191,0.009547263,0.004420626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9435635,0.03514735,0.00156501,0.002473664,0.01452563,0.002724877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001283966,0.00003345104,0.004941496,0.0001426004,0.00005320966,0.0008937748,0.0309482,0.0008207767,0.0004726236,0.9031612,0.02278257,0.03562165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001509957,0.0001848369,0.02928654,0.005166367,0.0005169519,0.001079411,0.08055354,0.005287179,0.003033888,0.5569143,0.3169732,0.0008527486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1460996,0.03326647,0.007128856,0.3578531,0.001171414,0.0001302052,0.0002379785,0.0000613342,0.454051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545905,0.007733144,0.002517723,0.0208049,0.0004929635,0.00006145315,0.00003455224,0.00003516249,0.01372963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06279206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4210787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590395160","doi":"","title":"Constructive appropriation - the key to constructive expropriation? Guidelines from Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Appropriation; Constructive; Law; Doctrine; Law and economics; Constructive trust; Jurisprudence; Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Elmarie Van der Schyff","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07304676549471395,"gpt":0.3426512898278825,"spread":0.2696045243331685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01100035,0.001025574,0.001099468,0.003735237,0.010171,0.01044295,0.004808972,0.01293246,0.004757579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02289431,0.0009226803,0.000843844,0.003919395,0.01562548,0.006022163,0.005247048,0.01268041,0.001405451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06347021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1865712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9201989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9524294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849871,0.002782686,0.001561738,0.001012205,0.007213304,0.00244298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832687,0.005085077,0.0004318318,0.000942481,0.008733583,0.001538284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001740486,0.00004156939,0.0003861766,0.0003881875,0.000008642997,0.0005202415,0.004577805,0.0009081181,0.000376391,0.8391503,0.1030437,0.05058136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001857565,0.00001203638,0.000806269,0.001986275,0.00001937805,0.0002111311,0.001679071,0.0004041848,0.0004430687,0.09304572,0.9012876,0.00008675271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004144425,0.06756808,0.0199374,0.3214652,0.002076328,0.0005071096,0.0004977335,0.0003095285,0.5834941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2965335,0.1568876,0.1115272,0.1830951,0.001106685,0.001268771,0.0006707719,0.0007287452,0.2481816],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07980108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4605108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607346612","doi":"","title":"Environmental audits and self-incrimination","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self-incrimination; Privilege (computing); Statute; Audit; Legislation; Law; Subject (documents); Political science; State (computer science); Criminal procedure; Business; Accounting; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Michael Kidd","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04317527136752848,"gpt":0.2660108727422762,"spread":0.2228356013747478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005032772,0.0001746599,0.0003039516,0.002092474,0.003291476,0.004017924,0.0006935132,0.002558621,0.003905081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02206774,0.0002139014,0.0003109287,0.001507886,0.01208135,0.004532619,0.003221184,0.00200467,0.0002305597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00289807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004497323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01123548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01224929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936036,0.003123953,0.0002528916,0.000390225,0.001620713,0.001008618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612919,0.02641402,0.007220698,0.001166967,0.003198458,0.0007079261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002735255,0.00004594771,0.009576388,0.00005511894,0.00001015865,0.0002910858,0.003063879,0.0003943426,0.00007299038,0.9685291,0.001274492,0.01665916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003525466,0.0001506103,0.03251095,0.0005495482,0.00006671008,0.001073363,0.01059204,0.002054296,0.001671972,0.864522,0.08669943,0.00007381035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4748167,0.01090462,0.01121495,0.05479128,0.0003523897,0.00007392878,0.00009208661,0.00002913623,0.4477249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878088,0.00201743,0.0005940286,0.001306362,0.0001082779,0.00001358537,0.000007839696,0.000003835537,0.008139732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01123548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02661622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W34542512","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe10030058","title":"Negotiating a standard material transfer agreement under the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: issues and concerns for Africa","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Treaty; Indigenous; Agriculture; Latin Americans; Political science; Realm; Genetic resources; International trade; International law; Law; Business; Ecology; Biotechnology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Edgar Tabaro","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03136287175059797,"gpt":0.2588762413583042,"spread":0.2275133696077063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01396549,0.0002692762,0.0002383948,0.0007871508,0.01690954,0.007665008,0.001244196,0.003973742,0.00310149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01961916,0.0002692537,0.0001768356,0.001323967,0.01197519,0.003858284,0.003310935,0.003421894,0.0001883582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01822133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03255256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.165397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2560209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934984,0.002679166,0.0002091557,0.0003310783,0.001120979,0.002161235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911993,0.005926343,0.0008122721,0.0004359542,0.0007473421,0.0008788307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001127522,0.0001283698,0.01894234,0.000201182,0.000009572035,0.005049268,0.4874837,0.0008307657,0.005272554,0.3945311,0.005738431,0.08169997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002869305,0.0001246098,0.01408355,0.0005592135,0.00001792951,0.001142036,0.6456136,0.0008152346,0.003491863,0.04542874,0.2886219,0.00007270813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8107406,0.001155847,0.008445142,0.05200217,0.0001819595,0.0002477799,0.00003371997,0.00002545931,0.1271672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878109,0.0005029013,0.001626857,0.002119157,0.00001779336,0.0000417897,0.000008332376,0.00000845646,0.007863794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.165397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3288686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522412034","doi":"","title":"Face-coverings, demeanour evidence and the right to a fair trial : lessons from the USA and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Credibility; Law; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Value (mathematics); Identity (music); Empirical evidence; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Bobby Naudé","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1047916631528387,"gpt":0.3577531058595488,"spread":0.2529614427067101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01473488,0.0004087501,0.001060826,0.00193888,0.01879062,0.01410894,0.003026286,0.009050948,0.008716682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05190869,0.0005082854,0.0006422299,0.003057854,0.01295963,0.005489009,0.004918385,0.01069412,0.0004115806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08929322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2333988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886267,0.002391678,0.0004299147,0.000909892,0.003449591,0.004192244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675992,0.01594535,0.0008389623,0.0009299325,0.01030677,0.004379821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000272856,0.000184951,0.009919313,0.0003121828,0.00007566331,0.001700504,0.01578076,0.001977663,0.0003088292,0.813966,0.04878891,0.1067124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005345601,0.0002217414,0.03711,0.004160239,0.0003762908,0.0008247248,0.05179472,0.006141508,0.001525171,0.3048251,0.5918506,0.0006353224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1427796,0.02745379,0.003745202,0.322183,0.001158644,0.0002380123,0.0003833114,0.00005753645,0.5020009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.898674,0.01835945,0.004721636,0.03031753,0.0001944684,0.0001235779,0.0001415229,0.00006924329,0.04739854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08929322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6478707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486351790","doi":"","title":"Child pornography and the Internet - a comparative perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Child pornography; Pornography; The Internet; Internet privacy; Political science; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Law; Business; Computer science; History; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Sanette Nel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08609911759901616,"gpt":0.3507039849004003,"spread":0.2646048673013842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001065562,0.0002187268,0.0002822816,0.002840198,0.002943907,0.00426779,0.0004445878,0.001490993,0.009408207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003192688,0.0001597545,0.000150728,0.003575784,0.006129679,0.003387555,0.001960653,0.001362663,0.0002792802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00360406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001055162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01207519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02081619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989715,0.0006878016,0.00002167183,0.00003563967,0.0001119956,0.0001715118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980781,0.001372905,0.0002316426,0.00005900324,0.0001440753,0.0001142196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007977122,0.0002082032,0.0144514,0.0006015634,0.00002339705,0.004368033,0.2100952,0.0001219404,0.000446782,0.7197994,0.006833076,0.04297127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002569327,0.0002401606,0.04331205,0.0020338,0.00005612788,0.006195697,0.3967467,0.0001962337,0.0006775911,0.02895411,0.5215345,0.00002729266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4045399,0.046103,0.0006263788,0.01560791,0.0002316448,0.00003153461,0.0001113902,0.00001679048,0.5327314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533807,0.03384645,0.0002617319,0.001202994,0.0001213301,0.00003148734,0.0000433486,0.00001064601,0.01110125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01207519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03147358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157906344","doi":"10.25159/2522-3062/5307","title":"The Canadian Courts’ Approach to the ‘Duty to Consult’ Indigenous Peoples: A Comparative Overview","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Convention; State (computer science); Notice; Ceremony; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"G.N. Barrie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1097529498798574,"gpt":0.3569841707544495,"spread":0.2472312208745922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00510088,0.0006744032,0.0007082262,0.009090099,0.03967248,0.01398284,0.0031053,0.004966586,0.006833851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01074778,0.0006621756,0.0007046736,0.02119693,0.02162954,0.004113481,0.003549501,0.005804584,0.0004355836],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.258167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2546541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859638,0.001644704,0.0003085964,0.0008748915,0.00732714,0.003880771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896125,0.002421119,0.0004908839,0.0002529619,0.006149626,0.001072926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003031527,0.00003539661,0.004339518,0.0006437189,0.00003309313,0.0007475517,0.05655898,0.0003742246,0.0002540741,0.8394842,0.05530637,0.04219257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009809181,0.00003093968,0.03086631,0.001454199,0.00007610599,0.000580659,0.05163762,0.0003690302,0.0002267073,0.01366885,0.9009336,0.0001460978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04864955,0.143708,0.001252358,0.05534694,0.00113618,0.00007578441,0.0004556167,0.00004041219,0.7493352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7548833,0.1691741,0.001675447,0.01329616,0.0005289013,0.00006955397,0.0002884077,0.00008517998,0.05999909],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.258167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8604212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731186053","doi":"","title":"The litigant in person and the access to justice dilemma : quo vadis South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Status quo; Dilemma; Political science; Law; Adversary; Economic Justice; Common law; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Estelle Hurter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09857682815585109,"gpt":0.3544046010071707,"spread":0.2558277728513196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003288385,0.0002648172,0.0003384865,0.0009403994,0.01168072,0.008208082,0.0006129143,0.004384647,0.005310341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005700292,0.0001993783,0.0002625791,0.001078347,0.01868605,0.007161911,0.007511239,0.004371452,0.0002558868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003212568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006203573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007241075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01129313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976087,0.001214624,0.00009874935,0.0001773108,0.0002806108,0.0006200329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998052,0.001074206,0.0002807792,0.00008259618,0.0001186105,0.0003918255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002004832,0.00003501317,0.00226738,0.0001464345,0.000009960857,0.002972474,0.1299347,0.0001012827,0.000455102,0.8514439,0.002837291,0.009776404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000338143,0.00008593364,0.006399261,0.001158461,0.00003009871,0.003942737,0.2989058,0.0004087824,0.0004752104,0.3898504,0.2986594,0.00005010783],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.404461,0.02612663,0.003471058,0.2392249,0.0008661019,0.00009708048,0.00003700755,0.00001240757,0.3257039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768957,0.004857465,0.0004514554,0.006515187,0.0001573605,0.00003232717,0.000004565395,0.000006045426,0.0110799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01168072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02330893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526263999","doi":"","title":"Combating impermissible tax avoidance through efficient administrative approaches : what SARS can learn from its Canadian counterpart","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Tax avoidance; Audit; Business; Revenue; Public economics; Compliance (psychology); Administrative law; Law and economics; Tax credit; Accounting; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Lee‐Ann Steenkamp","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1556025370832703,"gpt":0.3024698905645749,"spread":0.1468673534813046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003088398,0.0005179817,0.0004793904,0.001584137,0.007648107,0.00720377,0.001221463,0.001858944,0.007891827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006247207,0.0001995685,0.0004557841,0.002414407,0.007851475,0.004511656,0.002079197,0.004429465,0.0008975609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04462407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1253517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9462873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9730733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968566,0.0004576421,0.00006870418,0.0002188729,0.001513522,0.0008847815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945291,0.0007543235,0.0002573488,0.0003079815,0.003232831,0.0009184289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008082153,0.0001345325,0.01198187,0.0005489123,0.00003442353,0.0004993601,0.007143578,0.001594417,0.000670508,0.6647382,0.08770654,0.2248669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002272854,0.00009368323,0.02346651,0.001006367,0.00005726347,0.0003752137,0.02102667,0.001695949,0.0009824368,0.05554171,0.8955907,0.0001408313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04298658,0.02291535,0.005533937,0.4434659,0.001176533,0.0000851374,0.0003350199,0.0001506602,0.483351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7368308,0.07679569,0.01627757,0.03559918,0.0009008853,0.00004303999,0.0004025958,0.0001265415,0.1330237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05371267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3237718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495708875","doi":"","title":"Vindicatory approach to the award of constitutional and public law damages : contemporary Commonwealth developments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Damages; Commonwealth; Plaintiff; Political science; Jurisdiction; High Court; Charter; Common law; Constitution","authors":[{"name":"Chuks Okpaluba","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1572053411510131,"gpt":0.3500815575681314,"spread":0.1928762164171183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01449858,0.0004580035,0.0006955516,0.004694917,0.0103815,0.02502722,0.004763783,0.01615437,0.006562151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02288669,0.001044135,0.0009992369,0.004098135,0.07374114,0.01067709,0.01139914,0.01646469,0.0006731225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04172811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02498636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1237643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1355575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9761303,0.005681957,0.001149238,0.003728563,0.009953855,0.003356136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889305,0.005514884,0.0007495759,0.001444084,0.002630487,0.0007305555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001887359,0.000006348884,0.0000639307,0.00001568178,0.000002159996,0.00003489077,0.0007368744,0.00009585921,0.0000361255,0.9944236,0.001035899,0.003546742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002026818,0.00008908803,0.002434111,0.0007400565,0.00002832796,0.0002490326,0.002200278,0.0008214213,0.0003597732,0.7092693,0.2836913,0.00009706134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04034885,0.02633016,0.01233528,0.078542,0.001245764,0.0000811836,0.00005686857,0.00007065533,0.8409892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8809319,0.01334968,0.004950362,0.01781311,0.001805727,0.0002088631,0.00004583308,0.00008738946,0.08080716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1237643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3027601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916008992","doi":"","title":"Seeking access to the confidential records of a third party: the accused's right to a fair trial v the third party's right to privacy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Right to privacy; Conviction; Constitutional right; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Law; Third party; Information privacy; Privacy laws of the United States; Right to a fair trial; Public disclosure; Internet privacy; Human rights; Supreme court; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Fawzia Cassim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1086978109670332,"gpt":0.3830246964879712,"spread":0.274326885520938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01585595,0.0003841441,0.0009612797,0.001159427,0.009409247,0.01066941,0.001875345,0.02348405,0.003677111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03691733,0.0005868968,0.001009558,0.001110512,0.02645468,0.006712458,0.006144078,0.01550486,0.0004609544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005154361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009236681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02750413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0254279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873466,0.005259784,0.000658262,0.001074901,0.002588814,0.00307158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750469,0.02022003,0.00133932,0.001267245,0.001450317,0.0006762429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003640103,0.00002040001,0.0006608614,0.00002992777,0.00001447296,0.000724416,0.004151344,0.0001362303,0.0002731673,0.9891411,0.00254142,0.00227023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001923333,0.000178754,0.003399203,0.0007692858,0.0002734847,0.002117271,0.009268695,0.001668522,0.003742078,0.8648171,0.1133974,0.0001757965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2085805,0.008858027,0.01366619,0.1876368,0.001052034,0.0001949356,0.0001617314,0.00006301249,0.5797869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545757,0.001694542,0.001353127,0.02264414,0.0004302509,0.0001090882,0.0000175448,0.00002028114,0.01915538],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02750413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08385527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W130846176","doi":"","title":"The legitimacy of judicial review in South Africa's new constitutional dispensation : insights from the Canadian experience","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Constitution; Justiciability; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Bill of rights; Separation of powers; Power (physics); Judicial independence; Human rights; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Max Du Plessis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08105821159474702,"gpt":0.3202210138852579,"spread":0.2391628022905108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02591947,0.0003935266,0.0007840456,0.004173487,0.06936559,0.01980463,0.002419216,0.007736054,0.006143182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05923288,0.0007642971,0.0004948734,0.005846384,0.04418238,0.005338666,0.005513798,0.01210598,0.0003216809],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1767227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2129211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9787247,0.006039605,0.0006860259,0.001525015,0.006395517,0.006629123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9425521,0.03296503,0.002304938,0.00183297,0.01426776,0.006077276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009908719,0.00005016459,0.003360009,0.0001573063,0.00002274101,0.001895612,0.2092784,0.000432272,0.0007031935,0.7324399,0.02724284,0.02431835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114808,0.0000666526,0.01519394,0.0007791761,0.00007480001,0.0009693184,0.1505917,0.001044483,0.0009115409,0.05456407,0.7753044,0.0003850431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2334134,0.01779542,0.001882185,0.3507134,0.0007714542,0.0001283169,0.0001660607,0.000073383,0.3950563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683887,0.004259618,0.0006689005,0.01023083,0.0001388328,0.0000256976,0.00001845687,0.00003935542,0.0162296],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1767227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.954885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214149329","doi":"","title":"Journal Note: The Canadian Courts’ Approach to the ‘Duty to Consult’ Indigenous Peoples: A Comparative Overview","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Convention; State (computer science); Notice; Ceremony; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"G.N. Barrie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1026418327350635,"gpt":0.2852095054719395,"spread":0.182567672736876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002582535,0.0004796146,0.0004354904,0.003861353,0.03108719,0.01242235,0.002146425,0.005563236,0.0128057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005931235,0.0004109749,0.000479627,0.009329842,0.01929385,0.003407653,0.002587156,0.005049267,0.0009416376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1064726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1686326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923693,0.0007199188,0.0001239722,0.0005464452,0.004349864,0.001890417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994114,0.001562085,0.0002242508,0.0001360223,0.003231656,0.0007320519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001983176,0.00002833425,0.002901139,0.0003912676,0.00001538238,0.0003743217,0.02958147,0.0001676222,0.0002318465,0.5900019,0.3505114,0.02577549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004157929,0.00000931932,0.009404044,0.0003507567,0.00001784067,0.0001653598,0.01472871,0.00007741259,0.0001002687,0.00766076,0.9674389,0.00004244138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02023125,0.07163327,0.001045112,0.2012567,0.003845441,0.00005985453,0.0007205427,0.00004188637,0.701166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5555147,0.08349306,0.001990174,0.08837667,0.003317329,0.00006687576,0.0005332139,0.0001804133,0.2665275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1064726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7725167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606686253","doi":"","title":"The constitutional phenomenon of parliamentary privilege and immunity in South Africa : a comparison with jurisdictions in Britain, Canada and France","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Legislation; Doctrine; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Mbuzeni Mathenjwa","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02747202688656342,"gpt":0.2822475937560583,"spread":0.2547755668694949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001898386,0.0002049319,0.0004240452,0.00382327,0.01151487,0.007855919,0.0007398669,0.001504987,0.003218734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007098075,0.000279702,0.0003494972,0.005457488,0.01852455,0.002612269,0.004602609,0.002734632,0.0001645979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02351206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01717808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5461369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5698931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955526,0.001013391,0.0001150657,0.0003175463,0.000679435,0.002321838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964744,0.001810611,0.0006380571,0.0001777183,0.0004978738,0.0004013842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007740658,0.00002150315,0.01351415,0.0001646596,0.0000311446,0.001538687,0.1581275,0.000177575,0.001380923,0.8093241,0.001303584,0.01433874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007595242,0.0001002375,0.3170817,0.001373185,0.0001928129,0.002013891,0.2490755,0.0005264606,0.002167409,0.04071466,0.3865094,0.0001686125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7021391,0.006426032,0.0007080737,0.00644201,0.00006358293,0.0000410395,0.0000794463,0.00001384952,0.2840867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956861,0.000742852,0.00009678491,0.0003375604,0.00001313433,0.00001275983,0.00001028451,0.000007813421,0.003092736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4538631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9130719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561384485","doi":"","title":"Problems arising in compensating unconcious plaintiffs for loss of amenities of life: a comparative survey","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; High Court; Appeal; Common law; Political science; Trial court; Position (finance); English law; Precedent; Sociology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Boyce P. Wanda","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1608908525880752,"gpt":0.3683810508009158,"spread":0.2074901982128406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02155786,0.0003150219,0.0006545328,0.007802603,0.007172235,0.008224355,0.002117782,0.006587471,0.005070569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05378891,0.0005845114,0.0007677824,0.01022554,0.007649934,0.008610767,0.004470173,0.003449623,0.0006124323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007259883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006731735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01544571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03176873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861075,0.00610511,0.001292287,0.000970503,0.003583959,0.001940751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9513829,0.03498962,0.005001172,0.0009516264,0.006272564,0.001401999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005285314,0.001268737,0.09752048,0.003758671,0.00015027,0.003904158,0.07198682,0.00153966,0.001131392,0.3221915,0.02235683,0.473663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007082678,0.0018295,0.2100022,0.007180437,0.0002119821,0.008913489,0.2474627,0.001304989,0.001999146,0.0323016,0.4885355,0.0001877447],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4284487,0.312409,0.004433735,0.048908,0.0007478218,0.0001855236,0.0002098361,0.00003637666,0.204621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8315558,0.1533296,0.001669204,0.005252247,0.0005977878,0.00008710699,0.0001598435,0.0000276496,0.007320748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02155786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1140102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7123342568","doi":"10.25159/2522-3062/19686","title":"Trade Union Recognition and the Concepts of ‘Workplace’ in South Africa and the ‘Appropriate Bargaining Unit’ in Canada: Some Comparative Insights into Bargaining Constituencies and Protection of Minority Interests","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hospital for Sick Children; Dalhousie University; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Trade union; Collective bargaining; Unit (ring theory); Labour law; Bargaining power","authors":[{"name":"Wilhelmina Germishuys","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07053977967398467,"gpt":0.2983700968472917,"spread":0.227830317173307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001992804,0.0003645871,0.0004706882,0.004087132,0.02880639,0.008634062,0.001625475,0.002490577,0.003856477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00475864,0.0003179535,0.0004930722,0.00624655,0.01554742,0.002589292,0.004253122,0.003361155,0.0001941556],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1534647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1381986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948258,0.0007104415,0.00009205442,0.0002734269,0.001330391,0.00276787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982722,0.000601876,0.0001791313,0.00006006635,0.0005588981,0.0003278744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004320244,0.00002076532,0.005113265,0.0001497943,0.00001139864,0.0006155546,0.09292381,0.000603901,0.0004343692,0.8738028,0.003467844,0.02281331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004654295,0.00005214264,0.08810066,0.001706667,0.00009358718,0.0007389481,0.3835413,0.002334403,0.001206759,0.0889767,0.4329614,0.0002409127],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.319617,0.02352148,0.002441269,0.02657348,0.0002074899,0.00008945948,0.0001368349,0.00001549751,0.6273975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723911,0.006751623,0.0009195615,0.001238513,0.00001897598,0.00003178655,0.00004308453,0.00001375951,0.01859148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1534647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.981861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}